Revisiting Targeting in Social Assistance by World Bank Publications

Revisiting Targeting in Social Assistance

398 | Revisiting Targeting in Social Assistance

BOX 6.6 (continued)

Technical work

6/2015: Reassessment of TSA households begun

8/2015: Adoption of compensation measures

5/2015: Decree No. 215 of the government, which amends Decree No. 145 2–5/2015: Pretesting of the PMT with social workers

12/2014–5/2015: Analysis of winners and losers

12/2014: Discussion of PMT models, introduction of new beneﬁt structure for the TSA and CBP

9–11/2014: Estimation of PMT based on new data

7–11/2014: Revision of needs index

2–3/2014: Collection of additional module in IHS

12/2014: Resolution No. 758: Methodology for assessment of the socioeconomic condition of socially vulnerable families

Figure B6.6.1 Timeline of Key Developments in Georgia’s Targeted Social Assistance Program

Policy actions

Source: Baum, Mshvidobadze, and Posadas 2016. Note: The large hollow circles represent legislation (or equivalent), and the small solid circles represent technical work or other agreements. CBP = Child Beneﬁt Program; IHS = Integrated Household Survey; PMT = proxy means test; TSA = targeted social assistance.

review recommended pretesting the new parameters before the national rollout. The pretestingb was done between March and April 2015, once the law with the new eligibility formula was passed in December 2014. The pretesting confirmed all the predictions of the microsimulations and provided more precise estimates on winners and losers among small, vulnerable groups, which were oversampled for this purpose. For single continued next page

Revisiting Targeting in Social Assistance

Articles inside

7.5 Performance Triangle for Two Programs

7.9 Relative Efficiency of Programs

Concluding Remarks

7.13 Exclusion and Inclusion Errors

the Poverty Line

7.12 Impacts on Poverty and Inequality

7.3 Inclusion and Exclusion Errors in a 10-Person Economy

7.4 Targeting Differential

What to Look for When Conducting Method Assessments

7.1 Social Program Coverage in Brazil

Illustrative Case Study on How to Avoid Spurious Interpretations

Introduction

References

Notes

B6.11.2 Household Consumption, Assets, and Land Access in PSNP Woredas, by PSNP Beneficiary Status, 2008

Conclusion

B6.11.1 Criteria for Selecting Beneficiary Households

Community-Based Targeting

Key Elements for Community-Based Targeting

6.10 Machine Learning, Big Data, and Human Rights

PMT, Machine Learning, and Big Data: What Do We Know?

Poor Households in Togo

Formulae

Its Drivers

B6.6.1 Distribution of Winners and Losers, by Demographic Group

6.8 Machine Learning Models That Are Commonly Used

B6.6.1 Timeline of Key Developments in Georgia’s Targeted Social Assistance Program

Causal Effect One

Updating the PMT Formula: The 2013–15 Reform of the Georgia Targeted Social Assistance Program

6.3 Illustration of PMT Weights for Selected Variables

Key Elements for PMT Methods: Traditional Models, Processes, and Machine Learning

B6.4.1 Summary of the Availability and Quality of Administrative Data in Tunisia, 2019

Hybrid Means Testing Targeting System: The Case of Tunisia

6.2 Romania: Asset-to-Income Conversion Coefficients

and Proxy Means Testing Models in Algeria

6.1 Albania: Imputation of Farm Income

Key Elements for Hybrid Means Testing

6.2 Income Test under the Hybrid Means Testing Approach

6.2 Treatment of Assets in Means-Tested Programs

Key Elements for Means Tests

Geographic Targeting: Big Data Are Revolutionizing Poverty Mapping

6.1 Example of Classification of Developed Area

6.1 Examples of Big Data

Some Starting Considerations about Data—Traditional and Big

Summary

Notes

References

Targeting Methods

Different Eligibility Approaches

Addition of Quantitative Information to the Decision-Making Process

5.8 Illustrative Lessons from the Simulations Literature

Country

5.6 Profiling Job Seekers to Differentiate Support

Methods That Rank People According to Welfare

a Fragile State

from Mongolia, Bolivia, and Nepal

Considerations in Choosing among Welfare Targeting Methods

Category in Determining Eligibility or Benefits

B5.3.2 Woreda Selection Does Not Add Much to the PSNP’s Targeting Performance

5.1 Humanitarian–Social Protection Alignment

Reflections on Patterns of Use of Targeting Methods

Patterns in Using and Combining Targeting Methods

5.1 Common Targeting Methods

Notes

Introduction

Conclusion

References

4.7 Examples of How Countries Are Providing Data Security

Data Protection?

from Chile and Moldova

Planning and Adapting Delivery Systems for Crisis Response

Program Access That Lead to Errors of Exclusion

Data Systems and Their Role in Supporting Eligibility Determination and Recertification

Client Interface: The Interaction between People and Institutions

Jigisemejiri Program

4.2 How Big Should a Social Registry Be?

Support Program

Fortifying Weak Links in the Delivery Chain to Reduce Errors of Exclusion and Inclusion