5 0 Billion Euros: Europe's Child Labour Footprint in 2019

Page 114

114 by Shift highlighted that “the requirements of the Duty of Vigilance Law have pushed companies to improve their reporting” (Shift, 2019, p.5). The report notes that, “overall, 55% of companies slightly improved the maturity of their disclosure, with an average overall score of 2.58/5, up from 2.45/5 before the entry into force of the Law” (Shift, 2019, p. 5), which is slightly higher than the average non-French company (Shift, 2018, p. 6). One study found generally high levels of compliance with the legislation, and observed that the French Duty of Vigilance has had some positive impacts on business practices (Duthilleul & de Jouvenel, 2020). However, a majority of companies seem to have adopted a compliance-orientated approach, and to have focused on the risks to the business itself, rather than on the risks to people and the planet (ActionAid et al., 2019). Furthermore, consultation with external stakeholders (which is encouraged but not made compulsory under the FDVL) has remained limited in practice (Barraud de Lagerie et al., 2020). To address some of these issues, a recent report for the French Government recommended to nominate a public authority which would be in charge of: (i) monitoring the promoting and implementation of the law; (ii) contributing to the harmonisation of corporate practices; and (iii) promoting sectorial and multi-party approaches (Duthilleul & de Jouvenel, 2020). Finally, despite its objective to improve access to remedy for victims, the FDVL failed to address a number of obstacles to accessing remedy faced by claimants in concrete cases. In particular, the burden of proof remains on the claimant, who will need to prove that they suffered damage as a result of a fault on the part of the parent company or lead company (Bright, 2021).

2. The Netherlands The Dutch Child Labour Due Diligence Act (DCLDDA) was adopted on 14 May 2019,40 although it has yet to enter into force.41 It is framed around a double objective of preventing the use of child labour in supply chains thereby ensuring consumer protection (Enneking, 2020): we have taken into consideration the desirability of enshrining in law that companies that sell goods and services on the Dutch market should do everything within their power to prevent their products and services from being produced using child labor, so that consumers can buy them with peace of mind. (The Dutch Child Labour Due Diligence Act, 2019, Preamble)42 Child labour is defined in Article 2 of the DCLDDA (2019) as meaning: in any case, any form of work, whether or not under an employment contract, 40 The Netherlands Child Labour Due Diligence Act of 2019: “Wet van 24 oktober 2019 n. 401 houdende de

invoering van een zorgplicht ter voorkoming van de levering van goederen en diensten die met behulp van kinderarbeid tot stand zijn gekomen (Wet zorgplicht kinderarbeid).” 41 Its exact date of its entry into force is to be determined by Royal Decree. It may, in fact, never enter into force if the legislative proposal published in March 2021 is adopted as the latter would effectively replace it. 42 For an unofficial translation please see Ropes & Gray LLP publication (Littenberg & Blinder, 2019).


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Annex III – Examples of TSD Chapters

4min
pages 150-152

Bibliography

38min
pages 153-181

XI. About Development International e.V

1min
page 143

X. About the Authors

1min
page 142

3. Child Labour Monitoring Systems

1min
page 110

2. IPEC

3min
pages 108-109

6. Suggested carrots and sticks

14min
pages 127-132

2. Switzerland

2min
page 119

2. The Netherlands

8min
pages 114-116

C. EU Investment Protection Agreements

2min
page 121

B. Mandatory corporate due diligence legislation

7min
pages 133-135

5. Use of other measures to justify exceptions

2min
page 126

D. U.S. support for trade partners

2min
page 104

Instrument

7min
pages 101-103

3. List of Goods, coordination of enforcement

10min
pages 89-92

4. U.S. Trade Policy

5min
pages 93-95

2. Support through dialogue and cooperation platforms

6min
pages 98-100

1. DHS mechanism

18min
pages 80-86

2. EO mechanisms

5min
pages 87-88

B. U.S. trade policy enforcement vis-à-vis child labour

2min
page 79

6. EU trade sanction instruments

3min
page 78

5. EU “essential elements” human rights clause

2min
page 77

4. EU-UK Free Trade Agreement

2min
page 76

1. Morbidity and mortality of hazardous labour

2min
page 59

2. Stringency of child labour provisions

5min
pages 73-74

Dimension 2: Quality of the education system

5min
pages 63-65

3. Local impact dimension of TSD chapters

2min
page 75

Dimension 3: Government capacity

5min
pages 66-67

2. How could unconditional trade bans and sanctions lower child welfare?

2min
page 57

G. Laissez-faire vs. intervention

2min
page 58

4. Forced/indentured child labour findings

5min
pages 45-50

E. Factors of child labour

8min
pages 51-53

3. Child labour footprint findings

9min
pages 36-44

2. USDOL’s “List of Products Produced by Forced or Indentured Child Labor”

2min
page 27

C. Sectors and geographies with child labour practices

2min
pages 28-29

I. Introduction

5min
pages 20-22

2. Example child labour commodities

6min
pages 33-35

Executive Summary

17min
pages 4-13

Acronyms

3min
pages 14-16

II. Research Objectives

4min
pages 23-24

Foreword by Saskia Bricmont

6min
pages 17-19
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
5 0 Billion Euros: Europe's Child Labour Footprint in 2019 by SaskiaBricmont - Issuu