9ﻓﻮﺭﻳــﻪ 2013
ﺗﻼﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﺎﺯ ﭘﺲ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎﻯ ﺷﻤﺎﻟﻰ ،ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺍﻳﻨﺪﻭ ﭘﺎﻳﺘﺨﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ .ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ ،ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ،ﺍﻟﺠﺰﺍﻳﺮ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑــﺮ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺻﻒﺁﺭﺍﺋﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧــﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻚ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻧﺲ ،ﺍﺭﺩﻭﮔﺎﻩ ﺩﻳﺮﻳﻦ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻮﻳﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎﻯ ﺷــﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺑﺮﺗﺮﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺷﺎﺥ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺎﺥ ﻳﻜﺪﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻧﺪﺍﺧﺘﻪﺍﻧﺪ.
ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﻭﻡ ،ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﺓ ژﺋﻮﭘﻮﻟﻴﺘﻴﻚ، ﺑﺎ ﻣﻴﻞ ﻭ ﺭﻏﺒﺖ ﺿﺪﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺷﻰ ﺳﭙﺮﺩﻩ، ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺷــﻤﺎﻝ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﺨﻠﺼﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﺷــﺘﻐﺎﻝ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ،ﺍﻳﻨﻚ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻳﻨﺔ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺍﻭﺩﺍﺕ ﺟﻬﺎﻧــﻰ ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎً ﺩﺭ ﺁﻥ ﻧﻘــﺶ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﻔﺎ ﻣﻰﻛﻨــﺪ ،ﺑﺎﺭ ﺩﻳﮕــﺮ ﺭﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ .ﺗﺮﻭﺭ »ﺷــﻜﺮﻯ ﺑﻞﻋﻴﺪ« ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳــﺘﻨﺒﺎﻁ ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ »ﺣﺎﺷﻴﺔ ﺍﻣﻦ« ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻡﮔﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻮﻧﺲ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ،ﺷﺎﻫﺪﻯ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻋﺎ .ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻯ ﻧﺎﻛﺎﻡ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻧﺲ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻮﺷــﺶ »ﺍﻋﺘﺮﺍﺽ« ﺑﻪ ﺗﺮﻭﺭ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻫﺒﺮﺍﻥ ﭼﭗﮔﺮﺍ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻥ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ ،ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺒﻜﺔ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﻋﺖ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻮﺷﺶ »ﺧﻮﺍﺳــﺖ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ« ﺑﺮﺍﻯ »ﺍﻧﺤﻼﻝ ﻛﺎﺑﻴﻨﻪ« ﻭ ﺗﺸﻜﻴﻞ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ »ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕ« ﻣﻄﺮﺡ ﺷﺪ!
ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺮﻭﺭ »ﺷــﻜﺮﻯ ﺑﻞﻋﻴﺪ« ﻋﻠﻴﺮﻏﻢ ﭘﺎﻓﺸــﺎﺭﻯ ﺷﺒﻜﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺧﺒﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ﺭﺳﻴﺪﻥ »ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕﻫﺎ«، ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﻣﺤﻔﻞ »ﺍﻟﻨﻬﻀﻪ« ﻛﻪ ﻭﻳﺮﺍﺳــﺖ ﺗﻮﻧﺴﻰ ﺣﺰﺏﺍﷲ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻗــﺪﺭﺕ ﻛﻨﺎﺭﻩﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﻧﻜــﺮﺩ ،ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ »ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ« ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰﺍﺵ ﻧﻴﺰ ﭘﺎﻯ ﻓﺸــﺮﺩ! ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺳﻨﺘﻰ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺑﻼﺷــﺮﻁ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﺍﺳﺖ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻧﻤﺎﺋﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻛﺠﺎ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ؟ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺳــﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ! ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ،ﻧﻘﺶ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭ ﻛﻬﻨﺴﺎﻝ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺳــﻔﺮ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻨﺘﻈﺮﺓ ﺩﻳﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﺠﺰﺍﻳﺮ ﻭ ﺑﺮﻛﻨﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺑﻴﺮﻛﻞ »ﺟﺒﻬﺔ ﻧﺠﺎﺕ ﻣﻠﻰ« ﺍﻳﻨﻜﺸــﻮﺭ ـ ﺟﺒﻬﺔ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺣﺰﺏ ﻣﺠﺎﺯ ﺍﻟﺠﺰﺍﻳﺮ ﺍﺳﺖ ـ »ﺗﻘﻮﻳﺖ« ﺷﺪ .ﻃﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻔﺮ ،ﻧﺎﺧﺸﻨﻮﺩﻯ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ »ﻧﺠﺎﺕ« ﮔﺮﻭﮔﺎﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﻛﺰ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﺑﺮﺩﺍﺭﻯ ﮔﺎﺯ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﻮﺏ ،ﺑﻪ »ﺑﻮﺗﻔﻠﻴﻘﺎ«، ﺭﺋﻴﺲ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ »ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻞ« ﺍﻟﺠﺰﺍﻳﺮ ﺍﺑﻼﻍ ﺷﺪ ،ﻭ ﺭﻧﮓ ﭘﺮﻳﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺳﺖﻭﭘﺎﻯ ﻟﺮﺯﺍﻥ ﺍﻳﺸﺎﻥ ﻃﻰ ﻣﻼﻗﺎﺕ ﺑﺎ ﺩﻳﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﺎﻣﺮﻭﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺏ »ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺏ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺍﻟﺠﺰﺍﻳﺮ« ﻛﻴﺴﺖ!
ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ،ﺗﻼﺵ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻧﺲ ،ﺗﻼﺷــﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ً ﻧﺎﻓﺮﺟﺎﻡ ﻫﻢ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻩ ،ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺣﺎﺋﺰ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ! ﻫﺪﻑ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﭼﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻨﺎﺭ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﻗﺪﺭﺕ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺳﻨﺎﺭﻳﻮﺋﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻧﺲ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺑﻠﻮﺍﻯ ﺭﺿﺎ ﻣﻴﺮﭘﻨﺞ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﻯ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺑﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺩﺭ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﺮﻧﺎﻣﺔ »ﻣﺸﻌﺸﻌﺎﻧﻪ« ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻳﻚ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻛﻤﺮﻧﮓ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ »ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕ« ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ .ﺩﻭﻟﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺳﺮ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ »ﺭﺗﻖﻭﻓﺘﻖ« ﻇﺎﻫﺮﻯ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﮔﺮﻡ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ ،ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺸــﺖ ﭘﺮﺩﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺸــﻜﻞﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﮕﺮﺍ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﺔ ﺍﻣﻦ ﻭ ﻣﻨﺎﺳﺐ ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﻣﻰﻧﻤﻮﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻭﻟﻴﻦ ﻓﺮﺻﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻮﺟﻮﺩﺍﺕ ﻗﺮﻭﻥ ﻭﺳــﻄﺎﺋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺎﺷــﻴﺔ ﺍﻣﻦ ﺭﺍﻧﺪﻩ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ،ﻫﻢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺮﺍﻭﺩﺍﺕ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺗﻮﻧﺲ ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻓﺸﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﺮﻭﻥﻣﺮﺯﻯ ﺍﺳﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﺑﻬﻴﻨﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﻫﺪ. ﻭ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﺤﻘــﻖ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﻣﻬﻢ« ،ﺟﺎﻥ ﻳﻚ ﻧﻔﺮ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻴــﭻ ،ﻗﺘﻞﻋﺎﻡ ﺻﺪﻫﺎ ﺗﻦ ﻧﻴﺰ »ﻭﺍﺟﺐ ﺷــﺮﻋﻰ« ﻣﻰﺷﺪ! ﻭﻟﻰ ﺁﺭﺍﻳﺶ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻰ ﺷــﻜﻞ ﮔﺮﻓﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻃﺮﺡ »ﺯﻳﺮﻛﺎﻧﺔ« ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎ ﺍﺳﺘﺨﻮﺍﻥ ﺷﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ﺩﺭ ﮔﻠﻮﻯ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﭼﻴﺎﻥ! ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﺔ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﺴﺖ ،ﮔﺮﺩ ﻭ ﺧﺎﻛﻰ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺗﺮﻭﺭ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﮕﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻮﻧﺲ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻮﺍ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﺎﺭﺳــﺎﺯ ﻧﻴﻔﺘﺎﺩ ،ﻭ »ﺗﻮﺻﻴﻪﻫﺎﻯ« ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻤﻌﻰ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﻣﺮﺗﺒﺎً ﺗﻜﺮﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺷــﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻜﻮﺕ ﻓﺮﺍﮔﻴﺮ ﺳــﭙﺮﺩ! ﺧﻼﺻــﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ،ﻋﻠﻴﺮﻏﻢ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺴــﺘﺮﺩﻩﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﺸﻴﻴﻊ ﺟﻨﺎﺯﺓ »ﻗﺮﺑﺎﻧﻰ« ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻧﺲ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺷــﻬﺮﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺭﺍﻩ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺣﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺒﻜﺔ ﺧﺒﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺳﺨﻦ ﺍﺯ »ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕﻫﺎ« ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻧﺲ ﺑﺮ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺎﻭﺭﺩ! ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ،ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻓﻌﺎﻻﻧــﺔ ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻧﺲ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﮔﻤﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺍﻣﻦ ﺯﺩ ﻛــﻪ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺑﺨﺶ ﻗﺎﺑﻞ ﺗﻮﺟﻬﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ »ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻬﺎﺭﻯ« ﺧﻮﺩ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻤﺎﻝ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎ ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸــﻴﻨﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﭼــﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ً ﭘﻴﺸــﺮﻭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ »ﻧﻮﻳــﻦ« ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭﻫﺎ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﭘﺎﺭﻳــﺲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﺯﺗﺎﺏ ﻧﻤﻰﺩﻫﺪ! ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ »ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻬﺎﺭﻯ« ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺷــﻤﺎﻝ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎ ﭼﻴﺰﻯ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﺟﺰ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ »ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫــﺎﻯ ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕ« ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﻣﻨﺎﻓــﻊ ﻣﻠﻰ« ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺳﻮﺍﺣﻞ ﺷﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﻣﺪﻳﺘﺮﺍﻧﻪ ،ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻛﻤﺮﻧﮓﺗﺮ ﻭ ﻏﻴﺮﺍﻳﺪﺋﻮﻟﻮژﻳﻚﺗﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ ،ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺑﻬﺮﻩﻭﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳــﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﻧﮕﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﻧﺪ .ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺍﻟﺠﺰﺍﻳﺮ ﻭ ﻣﺮﺍﻛﺶ ،ﻭ ﺩﻭﻟﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺳــﺎﺑﻖ ﺗﻮﻧﺲ ﻭ ﻣﺼﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺍﻧﻮﺍﻉ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺻﻄﻼﺡ »ﺗﻜﻨﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕ« ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻓﺘﻨﺪ ﻭ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﻧﺪ.
ﺣﺎﻝ ﻛﻪ ﻧﻘﺶﭘﺬﻳﺮﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎﻯ ﺷــﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﺳﺮﺍﻧﺠﺎﻣﻰ ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺷــﺎﻳﻨﺪ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ ،ﺟﻬﺖ ﺭﻳﺸــﻪﻳﺎﺑﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﻧﺎﺧﻮﺷــﻰﻫﺎ« ،ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻰ ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﻭ ﺷﻤﺎﻝ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎ ﺳﺎﻳﻪ ﺍﻓﻜﻨﺪﻩ ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﻰ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ .ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎ ،ﺩﺭ ﮔﺎﻡ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﻣﻰﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻳﻢ ﺑﻪ »ﺑﻠﺒﺸﻮﺋﻰ« ﻛــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ« ﺍﻧﻌﻜﺎﺱ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ. ﺑﻪ ﻳﺎﺩ ﺩﺍﺭﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ» ،ﺧﺒﺮ ﻓﻮﺭﻯ« ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﺷﺪﻥ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺩﺭﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ،ﺟﻬﺖ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﮕﺮﺍﺋﻰ ﺍﻧﺘﺸﺎﺭ ﻳﺎﻓﺖ! ﺟﺎﻟﺐ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻠﺐ ﻫﻴﺎﻫﻮﺋﻰ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ،ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﻭ ﭼــﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻫﻤﻪﺟﺎﻧﺒﺔ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﮕﺮﺍﺋﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺼﺮ، ﺗﻮﻧﺲ ﻭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ! ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ،ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻮﻉ »ﺧﺒﺮﺳﺎﺯﻯ« ﻣﺘﻨﺎﻗﺾ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﻳﻚ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ ،ﺁﻧﻬﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺍﺳﺘﻌﻤﺎﺭﻯﺍﺵ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ،ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﻋﻠﻴﺮﻏﻢ ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻞ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺑﺮ ﺧﻼﻑ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﻫﺎﻯ »ﺍﺑﺮ ﻫﻴﺎﻫﻮﻯ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺗﻰ« ﭘﺎﻯ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺼﺎﻑ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩﻩ؛ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺮ ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ! ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺟﻨﮕﻰ ﭘﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺗﻮﺟﻴﻪ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺗﻰ ﺁﻥ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﺮ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ »ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳــﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﻩ ﻣﺘﻜﻰ ﻣﻰﺷﺪ! ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ »ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﻩ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺷﻮﺧﻰ ﺧﻨﻚ ﻣﻰﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﺗﺎ ﻳﻚ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻯ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺗﻰ .ﻫﻤﻪ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﺎﺭﻩ ﺟﺰ ﻏﺎﺭﺕ ﻭ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻭ ﻭﺣﺸﻴﮕﺮﻯ ﭘﺎﻳﺘﺨﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻫﻴﭻ »ﺭﻣﺰ ﻭ ﺭﺍﺯﻯ« ﺩﺭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ. ﺩﺭ ﺁﻏــﺎﺯ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ،ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﺳــﺮﻳﻌﺎً ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﮔﻴﺮﻯ »ﺳــﺎﺣﻞ« ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ؛ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺳــﺎﻝ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﻟﻮژﻳﺴﺘﻴﻚ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺑﺴﻨﺪﻩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ! ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺑﻌﺪﻫﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ ﻛﻤﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﻟﻮژﻳﺴﺘﻴﻚ ﺍﺫﻋﺎﻥ ﻛﺮﺩ ﻭ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﻧﻴــﺰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺗــﻰ ﻋﺠﻮﻻﻧﻪ ﺍﻋﺰﺍﻡ »ﺗﻜﻨﻴﺴــﻴﻦﻫﺎﻯ« ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺳﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻴﺮﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺄﺋﻴﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩ! ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺶ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﻄﻤﺌﻦ ﻧﻴﺴﺘﻴﻢ ،ﻭﻟﻰ ﮔﺮﺩﺍﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻰ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺩﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ. ﺩﻻﺋــﻞ ﻭﺍﻗﻌﻰ ﺟﻨﮓ ﻣﺎﻟــﻰ ،ﻭ ﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺘﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻭﺍﺷــﻨﮕﺘﻦ، ﻟﻨــﺪﻥ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺁﻥ ﻫﻨﻮﺯ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺎﻟﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻡ ﻓﺮﻭﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ،ﻭﻟﻰ
ﺗﺄﺛﻴﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻮﻧﺲ ﻭ ﺑﻦﺑﺴﺖﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ »ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ« ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻩ ،ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻴﭻ ﺍﺑﻬﺎﻣﻰ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺩﺍﺭ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ .ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻫﺮ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﻣﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ،ﺗﻮﻧﺲ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺒﻊﺍﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸﻴﻨﻰ ﻛﻨﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﺑﺮ ﺳﺮﻧﮕﻮﻧﻰ ﺑﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺪ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﺟﻴﺮﻩﺧﻮﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﻋﺮﺏ ﻭ ﺁﻓﺮﻳﻘﺎﺋﻰﺷﺎﻥ »ﺁپﺩﻳﺖ« ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﺩﺭ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ »ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻫﺮﻩ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺵ ﺭﺳﻴﺪ؛ ﻫﻤﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻃﺒﻞ »ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ« ﻣﻰﻛﻮﺑﻴﺪﻧﺪ! ﻭﻟﻰ ﺑﻪ ﮔﺰﺍﺭﺵ ﺳــﺎﻳﺖ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ »ﻧﻮﻭﺳــﺘﻰ« ،ﻣﻮﺭﺥ 8ﻓﻮﺭﻳﻪ ،2013 ﻣﻌــﺎﻭﻥ ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﺔ ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻜﻦ ﺍﻋﻼﻡ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻛــﻪ» ،ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻓﺮﺍﺩ ﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴــﻠﺢ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﭙﺬﻳﺮ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ!« ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ،ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﻗﺒﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺳﻼﺡ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺯﻣﻴﻦ ﺑﮕﺬﺍﺭﻧﺪ! ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ،ﻣﺴﺌﻠﻪ ﺻﺮﻓﺎً ﺑﻪ ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸــﻴﻨﻰ ﻣﻨﺘﻬﻰ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ؛ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﻃﻖ ﻳﻜﻰ ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺭﻓﺖ .ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺧﻂ ﭘﺎﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸﻴﻨﻰ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺣﺎﺿﺮ ﺗﺮﺳﻴﻢ ﻛﺮﺩ. ﻃﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸﻴﻨﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺳﻨﮕﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻚ ﺑﻪ ﻃﺮﻑ ﻣﻘﺎﺑﻞ »ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭ« ﺷﺪﻩ ،ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺭﻭﺷﻦﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﺗﻼﺵ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺑﺎﺯﮔﺸﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ! ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻏﻴﺮﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺻﺮﻳﺤﺎً ﺗﺎﻛﺘﻴﻚ ﺩﻳﮕﺮﻯ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ. ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺳﻌﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸﻴﻨﻰ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻓﺸﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ،ﭘﻜﻦ ﻭ ﺩﻫﻠﻰﻧﻮ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮓ ﻛﻨﻨﺪ ،ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﻭﺍﮔﺬﺍﺭﻯ ﺳﻨﮕﺮﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺑﺮﺳﺎﻧﻨﺪ .ﻭ ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎً ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﻣﺘﺰﻟﺰﻝ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎ ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﻣﻮﺿﻊﮔﻴﺮﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻮﻳﻦﺷﺎﻥ ﻫﺴﺘﻴﻢ. ﺷﺎﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻰ ﭼﻨﺪ ﺭﻭﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺣﻤﺪﻯﻧﮋﺍﺩ، ﻭﺯﻳﺮ ﺍﻣﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﺭﺟﻪ ﻭ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺍﻋﻀﺎﻯ ﻛﻤﻴﺴــﻴﻮﻥ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺖ ﻣﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺷﻮﺭﺍﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ،ﻧﺪﺍﻯ »ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ« ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻮﺍ ﺑﺮﺧﺎﺳﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ .ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺒﻴﻨﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﻧﺪﺍ« ﭼﻪ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺘﻰ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ. ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻯ ﺭﺍﺑﻄﺔ ﻣﺴﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺩﻳﻨﻰ ﻭ ﻣﻨﻬﻴﺎﺕ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺤﻤﻴﻞ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ، ﻣﻮﺍﺿــﻊ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻣﺘﺰﻟــﺰﻝ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻧﺪﺍﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﺌﺖ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﻣﺠﻠﺲ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺄﺋﻴﺪ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕ« ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺵ ﻣﻰﺭﺳﺪ ،ﻓﻘﻂ ﻭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻛﻞ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺪﺩ
»ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻦ« ﺍﺯ »ﺧﻂ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ« ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺑﺮﺁﻣــﺪﻩ .ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺧﻂ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ« ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﺷــﻴﻌﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻛﺸــﻴﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺁﻏــﺎﺯ ﺑﻠﻮﺍﻯ 22ﺑﻬﻤﻦ 57ﺩﺭ ﺯﺑﺎﻥ ﻋﻮﺍﻡﺍﻟﻨﺎﺱ ﺑﻪ ﻋﺎﻣﻞ »ﺿﺪﺍﺳــﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ« ﻭ ﺟﻔﻨﮕﻴﺎﺗــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻗﻤﺎﺵ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷــﺪ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻣــﺮﻭﺯ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ »ﺧﻂ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ« ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ »ﺳــﺪﻯ« ﺷــﺪﻩ ﻛﻪ ﺑــﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﻰ ﻋﻠﻨﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺑﺮﺍﺑــﺮ ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭﻯ ﺭﻭﺍﺑﻂ ﺟﻬﺎﻧﻰ ﻭ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺻﺤﻨﺔ ﺑﻴﻦﺍﻟﻤﻠﻠﻰ ﻗﺪ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ. ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺳــﺪ« ﻳﺎ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺩﺍﺷــﺘﻪ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻳﺎ ﻛﻞ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻖ ﮔﻨﺪﺍﺑﻰ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺸــﺖ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻧﺒﺎﺭ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺧﻔﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ .ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻗﻀﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭ، ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖ ﺳﺪ ﻣﺬﻛﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﻓﺮﺍﻭﺍﻥ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ .ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻼﻑ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ،ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴــﻪ ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﺔ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻭ ﻋﻠﻴﺮﻏﻢ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ،ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﻭ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚﺍﺵ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﺴــﺒﺖ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺑﺮ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﻣﻴــﺰﺍﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻏــﺮﺏ »ﺑﻰﺗﻔﺎﻭﺗﻰ« ﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ ،ﺑﻰﺗﻔــﺎﻭﺕ ﺑﻤﺎﻧﺪ .ﻧﻮﻉ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴــﺖ ﺑﺮ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺗﺒﻌﺎﺕ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻣﺴــﻜﻮ ﺑﻪ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ ،ﻭ ﺑــﻪ ﻫﻤﻴــﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺳــﻌﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﺍﺕﺷــﺎﻥ ﺑﺎ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ »ﻧﻴﺎﺯ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ« ﺑﻪ ﻧﻮﻉ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﺑﻬﺎﻯ ﻣﻤﻜﻦ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺑﻔﺮﻭﺷﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ »ﻧﺎﺯ ﻭ ﻛﺮﺷﻤﺔ« ﺍﺧﻴــﺮ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣــﻮﻥ »ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ «.ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ »ﻭﻻﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ« ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﺩﺍﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﻨﻬﺎﺩ ﻣﺬﺍﻛﺮﻩ ﺑﺎ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻛﻨﻔﺮﺍﻧﺲ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻰ ﻣﻮﻧﻴﺦ ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﺷﺪ ،ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺳﻢ ﻭﺍﻟﻨﺘﺎﻳﻦ »ﭘﺎﺳﺦ« ﺩﻫﻨﺪ. ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻭﺟﻮﺩ ﻳﻚ ﻣﻄﻠﺐ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﭘﺮﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻘﻄﻊ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺑﮕﻴﺮﻳــﻢ .ﻭ ﺁﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﻜــﻪ ،ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻫــﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺗﺎ ﺁﻧﺠــﺎ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻗﺪﺭﺕﻃﻠﺒﺎﻧﻪﺷــﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺒﺎﻝ ﻣﺴــﻜﻮ ،ﭘﻜﻦ ﻭ ﺩﻫﻠﻰﻧﻮ ﻣﺮﺑﻮﻁ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ ﺳــﻴﺮ ﻗﻬﻘﺮﺍﺋﻰ ﻣﻰﭘﻴﻤﺎﻳﻨﺪ .ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺗﻜﻴﺔ ﺑﻰﺣﺪ ﻭ ﻣــﺮﺯ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﺑﻪ »ﺍﻟﺰﺍﻣﺎﺕ« ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ،ﻭ ﺍﻃﻤﻴﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻮﺭﻛﻮﺭﺍﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻜﻪ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻫﻨﮕﻰ »ﺑﻴﺖﺭﻫﺒﺮﻯ« ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴﻮﻥ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ ،ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺸﻴﺮﻯ ﺩﻭﻟﺒﻪ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ. ﻳﻚ ﻟﺒﺔ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺸــﻴﺮ ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪﻳﻢ ﺑﻰﻗﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺷــﺮﻁ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴﻮﻥﻫﺎﺳــﺖ .ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺗﻌﻠﻞ ﻭ ﺳﻮءﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﻧﺎﺑﺠﺎ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺷﻤﺸﻴﺮ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻼﺣﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ .ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺗﻮﺿﻴﺢ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻛﺎﺭﺑﺮﺩ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺷﻤﺸﻴﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺒﻪ« ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﻳﻚ ﺑﺮﺭﺳﻰ ﺍﺟﻤﺎﻟﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺭﺍﺋﻪ ﺩﻫﻴﻢ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺳﺮﺑﺴــﺘﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ،ﺳﻮﺍﻯ
ﺗﻤﺎﻳﻼﺕ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﺑﺎﺯﺍﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻫﺎ ﻭ ﺗﺸــﻜﻴﻼﺕ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ،ﺟﺎﻣﻌﺔ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺮﺣﻠﺔ »ﮔﺬﺍﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ« ﭘﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩﻩ. ﺧﻼﺻﻪ» ،ﻣﻴﻮﺓ« ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﺷﻴﻌﻰﻣﺴــﻠﻚ ﮔﻨﺪﻳﺪﻩﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺧﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻏــﺮﺏ ﺗﺼــﻮﺭ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ؛ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴــﻮﺓ ﮔﻨﺪﻳﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺻــﻮﺭﺕ ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺣﺎﻝ ﻓﺮﻭﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺷﺎﺧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ .ﺩﻗﻴﻘﺎً ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﮔﻨﺪﻳﺪﮔﻰ ﻣﻔﺮﻁ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻏﺮﺏ ﺳــﻌﻰ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﻣﻴﻮﻩ« ﺗﺎ ﺣﺪ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﺍﺳــﺘﻔﺎﺩﺓ ﺑﻬﻴﻨﻪ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﺩﻫﺪ، ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺟﻬﺖ ﭘﻴﺸــﺒﺮﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯﺍﺵ ﺑﺴﺎﺯﺩ .ﻫﻢ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭ ﭼﺎﻧﻪﺯﻧــﻰ ﻭ ﺑﺎﺝﮔﻴﺮﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺪ ،ﻭ ﻫــﻢ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺯﺵ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩﻥ »ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻏﻴﺮﺳﺎﺯﺷﻜﺎﺭﺍﻧﺔ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ« ،ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﺟﻤﺎﻋﺖ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺟﺎﻳــﮕﺎﻩ ﺑﺮﺗــﺮ ﻭ »ﻧﺎﻇﺮ« ﺑــﺮ ﺗﺪﻭﻳﻦ ﻭ ﺍﺟﺮﺍﻯ ﻗﻮﺍﻧﻴﻦ ﺳــﺮ ﻫﻢ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺧﻼﺻﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ،ﻫﺪﻑ ﺗﺄﻣﻴﻦ ﻋﻤﺮ ﺩﻭﺑﺎﺭﻩ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﺷﻴﻌﻰﻣﺴﻠﻚ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺑﺰﺍﺭﻯ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ ﺍﺳﺖ. ﻭﻟﻰ ﻫﻤﺎﻧﻄﻮﺭ ﻛﻪ ﮔﻔﺘﻴﻢ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻤﺸﻴﺮ ﺩﻭﻟﺒﻪ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ؛ ﺩﻭﻟﺒﺔ ﺗﻴﺰ ﻭ ﺑﺮﺍ .ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ ﻟﺒﺔ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻰ 34ﺳــﺎﻝ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﻻﺗﺮ ﺗﺸــﺮﻳﺢ ﻛﺮﺩﻳﻢ ،ﻣﻰﻣﺎﻧﺪ ﻟﺒﺔ ﺍﻳﺴﺘﺎﻯ ﺁﻥ .ﻟﺒﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺓ ﻭﺳﻴﻊ ﻧﺎﻣﺸﺮﻭﻋﻴﺖ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﻧﻔﻊ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺷــﻮﺩ ،ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺠﺎﺋﻰ ﺑﻜﺸﺎﻧﺪ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﻓﺸﺎﺭﻯ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴــﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﺑﺨﺸــﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺟﻬﺖ ﻋﺒــﻮﺭ ﺍﺯ »ﺧﻂ ﻗﺮﻣﺰ« ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﺑﺴﻴﺞ ﻛﻨﺪ .ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ »ﻭﻻﻳﺖ ﻓﻘﻴﻪ« ﺭﺳﻤﺎً ﺑﻪ ﭼﺎﻟﺶ ﻛﺸﻴﺪﻩ
ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ .ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺼﻮﺭﺕ ﺳــﻼﺡ »ﻧﺎﺯ ﻭﻛﺮﺷــﻤﻪ« ﺍﺯ ﭼﻨﮓ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ ﻣﻌﻈﻢ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺷــﺪﻩ ،ﻫﻤﺰﻣﺎﻥ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﺓ »ﺩﺭﺧﺸﺎﻧﻰ« ﻛﻪ ﻳﺎﻧﻜﻰﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯﺷﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺭﻭﺣﺎﻧﻴﺖ ﺷﻴﻌﻰﻣﺴﻠﻚ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﺶﺑﻴﻨﻰ ﻛﺮﺩﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﻭﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻮﺍ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ. ﻣﺴــﻠﻤﺎً ﻃﻰ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻁ ﺑﺎ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﺍﺗﺨﺎﺫ ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ، ﺗﻮﻧﺲ ،ﻣﺼﺮ ﻭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎً ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ« ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ،ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻴﻢ ﺩﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺪﺍﻣﻴﻦ ﻟﺒﻪ ﺩﺳﺖ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺭﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ.