saeed saman

‫‪ 3‬ﺁﻭﺭﻳــﻞ ‪2013‬‬

‫ﺩﺭ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻌﻠﻰ‪ ،‬ﺑﻪ ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻰ ﻫﺮ ﭼﻨﺪ ﻣﺤﺪﻭﺩ ﺍﺯ ﻋﻤﻠﻜﺮﺩ‬ ‫ﻭ ﺍﻫــﺪﺍﻑ ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴــﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺭﻭﺷــﻦ ﺷــﺪﻥ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ‬ ‫ﺁﺷــﻮﺏﺯﺩﺓ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻣﺎﻥ ﻛﻤﻚ ﻛﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ‪ ،‬ﻫﻤﺴﻔﺮﻩﺍﻯ‬ ‫»ﺍﺳــﻄﻮﺭﻩﺍﻯﺍﺵ«‪ ،‬ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ ﻧﺎﻣﺴــﺎﻋﺪﻯ ﺩﺳﺖ‬ ‫ﻭ ﭘــﺎ ﻣﻰﺯﻧﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﺍﺯ ﻳﻚﺳــﻮ‪ ،‬ﺳــﺨﻦﭘﺮﺍﻧﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﺮﻃﻤﻄﺮﺍﻕ ﻭ ﮔﻮﺷــﺨﺮﺍﺵ‬ ‫ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ »ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳــﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﻫﺎﻯ ﺟﻬﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺷﻮﺧﻰ ﻭ‬

‫ﺑﺬﻟﻪﮔﻮﺋﻰ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷﺪﻩ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎ ﻋﻠﻨﻰ ﺷﺪﻥ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ‬ ‫ﺍﺯ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﺵ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﮕﺮﺍ‪ ،‬ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﻣﺔ ﺷﻬﺮﻫﺎﻯ ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺩﺭ »ﻛﺎﺥﻫﺎﻯ«‬ ‫ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﻣﺼﺮ‪ ،‬ﺗﻮﻧﺲ ﻭ ﻟﻴﺒﻰ ﺩﺭ ﭘﺸــﺘﻴﺒﺎﻧﻰ ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴــﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﺍﺯ‬ ‫ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ ﺟﺎﻯ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺑﺎﻗﻰ ﻧﮕﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﭘﻨﺎﻩ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ »ﺧﺮﺭﻧﮓﻛﻦ« ﻳﺎﻧﻜﻰﻫﺎ‬ ‫ﻭ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻛﺎﺥﺳﻔﻴﺪ‪ ،‬ﺷﻴﺦ ﻗﻄﺮ ﺑﺎ ﺣﺮﻣﺴﺮﺍ ﻭ ﻛﻨﻴﺰ ﻭ ﻏﻼﻡ ﻭ ﻏﻠﻤﺎﻥ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ‬ ‫ﺷــﺪﻩ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﺨﻨﮕﻮﻯ »ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳــﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﻭ ﭘﺎﺩﻭﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴﻮﻥﻫﺎ‬ ‫ﺍﺯ ﻗﻤﺎﺵ ﺍﺳــﺪ ﻭ ﺣﺴــﻨﻰﻣﺒﺎﺭﻙ ﻭ ‪ ...‬ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺦ ﻣﺼﺮﻑﺷــﺎﻥ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ‬ ‫ﺷﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺳﺮﺩﻣﺪﺍﺭﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺘﺒﺪﺍﺩ!‬ ‫ﺁﻥﻫﺎ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﭘﻨﺪﺍﺭﻧﺪ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻓﻮﻕ ﭘﺸﺖ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻣﺘﻮﻗﻒ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻣﺎﻧﺪ‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﺍﺷﺘﺒﺎﻩﺍﻧﺪ؛ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺁﻣﺪ ﻭ ﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎً ﺩﺭ‬

‫ﻣﻴﻌﺎﺩ ﻫﻴﺎﻫﻮﺳﺎﻻﺭﻯ »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ« ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻧﻘﺶﺳﺮﻧﻮﺷﺖﺳﺎﺯﻯ‬ ‫ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ‪ .‬ﺗﺠﺪﻳﺪ ُﻓﺮﺍﺵ ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴــﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺣﺘﻤﺎﻝ‬ ‫ﻗﺮﻳــﺐ ﺑﻪ ﻳﻘﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ« ﺁﻳﻨﺪﺓ ﺭﻳﺎﺳــﺖ ﺟﻤﻬﻮﺭﻯ ﭼﺎﻩﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ‬ ‫ﺍﺑﻌــﺎﺩ ﻭﺍﻗﻌــﻰ ﺧــﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ ﻋﻠﻨﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﻨــﺪ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻢ ﺍﻛﻨﻮﻥ‬ ‫ﻓﺮﻧﮓﻧﺸــﻴﻨﺎﻧﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﺧﻮﺩ ﺭﺍ »ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺘﻤﺪﺍﺭ« ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻨﺪ‪ ،‬ﺑــﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﺻﺎﺑﺖ‬ ‫ﺗﺮﻛﺶﻫﺎ ﺑﻪ ﺳﻨﮕﺮﺷﺎﻥ ﺁﻣﺎﺩﻩ ﺑﺎﺷﻨﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺟﻬﺖ ﺑﺮﺭﺳــﻰ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻰ »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ« ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ‬ ‫ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ‪ ،‬ﻧﺨﺴﺖ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺷــﻴﻮﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺿﻴﺔ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺷﻨﮕﺘﻦ ﺭﺍ‬

‫ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﺳــﺎﺯﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﺑﺸﻨﺎﺳــﻴﻢ‪ .‬ﺑﺎ ﻧﻴﻢﻧﮕﺎﻫﻰ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺤﻮﻻﺕ‬ ‫ﻣﺼــﺮ‪ ،‬ﻟﻴﺒــﻰ‪ ،‬ﺗﻮﻧﺲ ﻭ ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﺩﺭﻣﻰﻳﺎﺑﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺤﻮﻝ ﻣــﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﻧﻪ‬ ‫ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ »ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳــﻰ«‪ ،‬ﻛﻪ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ »ﺍﺳــﻼﻡ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﺍﺩﺍﺭﺓ‬ ‫ﺍﻳﻦ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ‪ ،‬ﺍﮔﺮ ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴﻮﻥ ﺟﻤﺎﻋﺖ ﺧﻮﺍﺳﺘﺎﺭ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳﻰ‬ ‫ﻣﻰﺑﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺴــﺖ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻓﺸﺎﺭ ﺑﺮ ﻧﻮﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩﺍﺵ‬ ‫ﺍﺯ ﻗﻤﺎﺵ ﻣﺒﺎﺭﻙ‪ ،‬ﺑﻦﻋﻠﻰ‪ ،‬ﺍﺳﺪ ﻭ ‪ ...‬ﺩﺭ ﻣﺼﺮ‪ ،‬ﺗﻮﻧﺲ ﻭ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﻧﻮﻋﻰ »ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ‬ ‫ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ« ﻭ ﺍﺣﺘﺮﺍﻡ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺷﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻛﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﺍﮔﺮ ﺑﺎ ﻫﻴﺎﻫﻮ ﻭ‬ ‫ﺻﺤﻨﻪﺳﺎﺯﻯ ﻣﺸﺘﻰ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﺵ ﺭﻳﺸﻮ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻧﺔ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﺸﻮﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﺸﺎﻧﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﻓﻘﻂ‬ ‫ﻭ ﻓﻘﻂ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﺯ »ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻳﺴﻢ« ﺍﺳﺖ؛ ﻗﻀﻴﻪ ﺍﺭﺗﺒﺎﻃﻰ ﺑﺎ »ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳﻰ«‬ ‫ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ‪ .‬ﺍﻳﻦ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺳــﻨﺎﺭﻳﻮﺋﻰ ﺍﺳــﺖ ﻛﻪ ‪ 34‬ﺳــﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺑﺎ ﻛﻤﻚ ﺳﺎﻭﺍﻙ ﻭ‬ ‫ﺍﺭﺗــﺶ ﺷﺎﻫﻨﺸــﺎﻫﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﻴﺎﺩﻩ ﻛﺮﺩﻧﺪ ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﻗــﻮﻝ ﺭﺿﺎﭘﻬﻠﻮﻯ‪» ،‬ﺭژﻳﻤﻰ‬ ‫ﺭﺍ ﻛــﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺑﺎ ﺭژﻳﻤﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻼﺡﭘﺬﻳﺮ ﻧﻴﺴــﺖ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﻮﺩﻧﺪ!«‬ ‫ﻭﻟﻴﻌﻬﺪ ﭘﻬﻠﻮﻯﻫﺎ ﻧﻤﻰﮔﻮﻳﺪ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﻳﺎ ﺷﺎﻳﺪ ﻧﻤﻰﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﮕﻮﻳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺍﺻﻮﻻً »ﺍﺻﻼﺡ«‬ ‫ﻣﺪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ‪ ،‬ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺍﺣﺪﻯ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺎﻥ »ﺍﺻﻼﺡ« ﻧﻴﺴﺖ؛ ﻫﺪﻑ ﺍﻳﻦ‬ ‫ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺳﻞ ﺑﻪ ﭼﻪ ﺗﺮﻓﻨﺪﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻬﺘﺮ ﻭ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﻠﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﭼﺎﭘﻴﺪ!‬ ‫‪ 16‬ﺳﺎﻝ ﭘﻴﺶ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺗﻞ ﺯﺑﺎﻟﺔ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻓﺮﺩﻯ ﺑﻪ‬ ‫ﻧﺎﻡ ﻣﻼﻣﻤﺪ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ‪ ،‬ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻝ ﺗﺒﻠﻴﻐﺎﺕ ﺟﻨﮓ ‪ 8‬ﺳــﺎﻟﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﻣﺄﻣﻮﺭ ﺳﺎﻧﺴﻮﺭ ﻭ‬ ‫ﻣﻤﻴﺰﻯ ﻭﺯﺍﺭﺕ ﺍﺭﺷﺎﺩ ﺭﺍ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ﺧﻮﺏ« ﻭ »ﺍﺻﻼﺡﻃﻠﺐ« ﺑﻴﺮﻭﻥ‬ ‫ﻛﺸــﻴﺪ‪ .‬ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﺁﻧﺎً ﺑﻪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎﺏ ﻭ ﻛﻨﻴﻪ ﻭ ﻓﻀﺎﺋﻞ ﻭ»ﻣﻘﺎﻣﺎﺕ« ﻭ ‪ ...‬ﻣﺰﻳﻦ ﺷﺪﻩ‪،‬‬ ‫ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﻓﻴﻠﺴﻮﻑ« ﺭﺍﻫﻰ ﭘﺎﺭﻳﺲ ﻭ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﺷﺪ‪ ،‬ﺗﺎ »ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻟﻴﺖﺍﺵ« ﺑﻰﺧﺪﺷﻪ‬ ‫ﺑﺎﺷﺪ! ﻭﻟﻰ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻞ‪ ،‬ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻰ ﻛﻪ »ﺯﻳﺮﺑﻨﺎﻯ« ﺁﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻣﻼﻣﻤﺪ ﺍﺭﺩﻛﺎﻧﻰ‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﭘﺎﻳﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺷﺪ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ‬ ‫ﻣﺎﻟﻰ ﻭ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎ ﻧﻮﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﺓ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﻣﻰﺟﻨﮕﺪ؛ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺘﻰ‬ ‫ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻭﺑﻼگﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺷــﺘﻪ ﺁﻥ ﺭﺍ »ﺟﺒﻬﺔ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ـ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ« ﺧﻮﺍﻧﺪﻳﻢ‪ .‬ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ‬ ‫ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ »ﺟﺒﻬﻪ« ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﻣﺮﺩﻡﺳﺎﻻﺭ ﺩﻳﻦﺑﺎﻭﺭ« ﺑﻪ ﺗﺤﻜﻴﻢ‬ ‫ﻫﺮ ﭼﻪ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﻣﻮﺍﺿﻊ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺧﺪﻣﺖ ﻛﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﺩﺭ ﻭﺍﻗﻊ ﮔﺸﻮﺩﻥ »ﺟﺒﻬﺔ«‬ ‫ﻛﺬﺍ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻥ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﺁﻭﺭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﺎ ﺑﺎﻧﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﺁﺩﻣﻜﺸﻰ ﻛﻪ‬ ‫ﭘﺲ ﺍﺯ ﻛﻮﺩﺗﺎﻯ ‪ 22‬ﺑﻬﻤﻦ ‪ 57‬ﺑﺮ ﻛﺸــﻮﺭ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩﻧﺪ‪ ،‬ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺎﺭﺕ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ‬ ‫ﻭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﻧﺸﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﺍﻳﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﺧﺎﺗﻤﻰ ﺩﺭ‬ ‫ﺭﺃﺱ ﺟﺮﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﻡ »ﺍﺻﻼﺣﺎﺕ!«‬ ‫ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺴــﺌﻠﻪ ﺭﺍ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷــﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺍﮔﺮ »ﺳﺎﻧﺴﻮﺭ« ﻭ ﻣﻤﻴﺰﻯ‬ ‫ﻗﺎﻃﻌﺎﻧﺔ »ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ـ ﺍﻣﻨﻴﺘﻰ« ﻣﺴــﻜﻮ ﺑﺮ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺩﺍﺧﻠﻰ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﻋﻤﺎﻝ ﻧﻤﻰﺷﺪ‪،‬‬ ‫ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﺗﺮﺟﻴﺢ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﺩ ﻫﻤﭽﻮﻥ ﻧﻤﻮﻧﺔ ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ‪ ،‬ﺑﺠﺎﻯ ﺑﺮﭘﺎﺋﻰ ﺧﻴﻤﻪﺷﺐﺑﺎﺯﻯ‬

‫»ﺍﺻﻼﺣــﺎﺕ«‪ ،‬ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺭﻭﺯﻫﺎ ﻣﺸــﺘﻰ ﻻﺕﻭﻟﻮﺕ ﻣﺴــﻠﺢ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺣﻮﺍﻟﻰ‬ ‫ﺗﻬــﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺟﺎﻥ ﻧﻮﻛــﺮﺍﻥ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻧﻰﺍﺵ ﺑﻴﺎﻧﺪﺍﺯﺩ‪ .‬ﻭﻟــﻰ ﺧﻮﺏ‪ ،‬ﺍﮔﺮ ﻣﺎ‬ ‫ﻣﻠﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺍﺯ ﻫﻤﺴــﺎﻳﮕﻰ ﺑﺎ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﻣﻨﻔﻌﺘﻰ ﻧﺒﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ‪ ،‬ﺍﻳﻨﺒﺎﺭ ﺣﺪﺍﻗﻞ‬ ‫ﻫﻤﺴﺎﻳﮕﻰ ﻛﺬﺍ ﻣﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺍﺯ »ﺟﻨﮓﺳــﺎﺯﻯ« ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻣﺎﻥ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ‬ ‫ﺩﺍﺷﺖ ﻭ ﺧﻠﻖﺍﷲ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﮔﻮﺷﺖ ﺩﻡ ﺗﻮپ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ »ﺟﻤﺒﻮﻝ« ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﻧﻜﺮﺩ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺭﺍﺳﺘﺎ ﺷــﺎﻫﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ‬ ‫ﻏﺮﺏ ﺑﻪ ﺑﻦﺑﺴــﺖ ﺍﺳــﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺭﻭﺳــﻴﻪ‪ ،‬ﺟﻨﺎﻳﺎﺕ ﻭ ﻧﻜﺒــﺖ ﻭ ﺍﺩﺑﺎﺭ‬ ‫ﺍﺳــﻼﻡﮔﺮﺍﻳﺎﻧﻰ ﻛــﻪ ﺑــﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴــﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺗﺶ‬ ‫ﻛﺸــﻴﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ ﺑﺮگ ﺑﻪ ﺑﺮگ ﺭﻭ ﻣﻰﺷــﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺷﺒﻜﺔ ﺭﺳــﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ‬ ‫ﻛﺎﺥﺳــﻔﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺗﺪﺭﻳﺞ ﻋﺮﺑﺪﺓ »ﺍﺳــﺪ ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﺮﻭﺩ« ﺭﺍ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ‬ ‫ﻛﺮﺩﻩ‪ ،‬ﺗﻠﻮﻳﺤﺎً ﺑﻪ »ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻥ« ﻭﻯ ﺭﺿﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ! ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ‬ ‫ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺒﻜﺔ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﻴﺴــﻰ ﺣﺰﺏ ﺑﻌﺚ ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺗﺎ ﺣﺎﻝ ﺑﺎ ﺯﺩﻥ ﻧﻌﻞﻭﺍﺭﻭﻧﻪ‬ ‫ﺳﻌﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻐﺬﻳﺔ ﺷﻮﺭﺷﻴﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﮕﺮﺍ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ‪ ،‬ﺍﻳﻨﺒﺎﺭ ﺩﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎﻻ ﺯﺩﻩ‬ ‫ﺑﻪ »ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ« ﺭﺳﺎﻧﻪﺍﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ‪ ،‬ﻳﺎ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ‬ ‫ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﭼﺎﻩﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ »ﻧﺎﻥ ﻗﺮﺽ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ!«‬ ‫ﺍﻇﻬﺎﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺑﺸــﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺪ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ ﻣﺴــﺎﺋﻞ »ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ـ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ« ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ‬ ‫ﺑﺮﺍﺑﺮ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﭘﺮﺷﻤﺎﺭﻯ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﺳﻮﺭﻯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﺩ ﺷﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺻﺮﺍﺣﺖ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﺩﺍﺩ‬ ‫ﻛــﻪ »ﺟﺒﻬﺔ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ـ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ« ﺍﺯ ﻧﻔﺲ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩﻩ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺳــﺖﺍﻧﺪﺭﻛﺎﺭ‬ ‫ﭘﺎﻳﻪﺭﻳﺰﻯ ﺟﺒﻬﺔ ﺟﺪﻳﺪﻯ ﺷــﺪﻩ‪ .‬ﺳــﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺍﺳﺪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻓﺎﺭﺱ‪ ،‬ﻣﻮﺭﺥ‬ ‫‪ 14‬ﻓﺮﻭﺭﺩﻳﻦﻣﺎﻩ ﺳﺎﻟﺠﺎﺭﻯ ﻣﻨﻌﻜﺲ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺷﺎﻫﺪﻯ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺑﺮﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺪﻋﺎ‪:‬‬ ‫»]ﺍﺳــﺪ[ ﺍﻓﺰﻭﺩ‪ :‬ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺁﻣﺮﻳــﻜﺎ ﻣﺨﻔﻰ ﻣﻰﻛﺮﺩ‪ ،‬ﺍﻛﻨــﻮﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻫﻤﻪ‬ ‫ﺭﻭﺷﻦ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺿﺢ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ ﺁﻥ‪ ،‬ﻫﺪﻑ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﺩﺍﺩﻥ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ‪،‬‬ ‫ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‪ ،‬ﻛﺮﻩ ﺩﻣﻮﻛﺮﺍﺕ ﻭ ﺩﻭﺳﺘﺎﻧﺸــﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻮﺭ ﺟﺪﺍﮔﺎﻧﻪ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺗﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍﻩ‬ ‫ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺧﻮﺩ ﻣﺤﻘﻖ ﻛﻨﺪ]‪«[...‬‬ ‫ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ ﻣﻰ ﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ‪ ،‬ﺍﺳــﺪ‪ ،‬ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺧﺎﻟﺖ ﻣﺴــﺘﻘﻴﻢ ﻣﺴــﻜﻮ‪،‬‬ ‫ﭼﻤﺪﺍﻥﻫﺎﻯﺍﺵ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﺑﺴــﺘﻪ ﺑﻮﺩ‪» ،‬ﻓﺮﺍﻣﻮﺵ« ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ‬ ‫ﻛﻪ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻬﻢﺗﺮﻳﻦ ﻣﻨﺎﺑﻊ ﺗﺴــﻠﻴﺢ ﻭ ﺳــﺎﺯﻣﺎﻧﺪﻫﻰ ﺍﻭﺑﺎﺵ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﮕﺮﺍ‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ‪ ،‬ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﺟﻤﻜــﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻮﺩﻩ! ﺍﻳﻦ‬ ‫ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺍﺭﺳﺎﻝ »ﻣﻬﻨﺪﺳﻴﻦ ﺳﭙﺎﻩ« ﻭ ﻳﺎ »ﺑﺎﺯﻧﺸﺴﺘﮕﺎﻥ ﺳﭙﺎﻩ«‬ ‫ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺩﻣﻴــﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻨﻮﺭ ﺁﺗﺶ »ﺟﺒﻬﺔ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ـ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ«‪ ،‬ﺳــﻌﻰ‬ ‫ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﻭﻟﻴﻨﻌﻤﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳــﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﻗﺎﻟﺐ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻧﻮﻳﻦ ﻭ »ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ« ﺑﺮ‬

‫ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﺣﺎﻛﻢ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ‪ .‬ﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﭘﺮﺳــﻴﺪ ﺩﻻﻳﻞ ﭼﺮﺧــﺶ ﻭ ﺗﻌﺪﻳﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﺔ‬ ‫ﺧﺎﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺳﺪ ﭼﻴﺴﺖ؟‬ ‫ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎً ﻧﺨﺴﺘﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﻣﺰﻭﺭﺍﻧﺔ ﻓﺮﻭﺵ »ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳﻰ«‬ ‫ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﺭﻫﺎ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ‪ .‬ﺷــﺎﻳﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺑﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺍﺯ‬ ‫ﺍﺳﻼﻣﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﻧﻴﺴﺖ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﻫﻢ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷﺎﻧﻰ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻰ‪،‬‬ ‫ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻗﺘﺼﺎﺩﻯ ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺟﻬﺖ ﺗﻌﻠﻴﻖ ﺩﺭﺍﺯﻣﺪﺕ ﺍﻟﻬﺎﻣﺎﺕ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺗﻴﻚ‬ ‫ﻣﻠﺖ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﻛﺎﻓﻰ ﺗﺸﺨﻴﺺ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ! ﺑﻠﻪ‪ ،‬ﺩﺭ ﻳﻚ ﻓﻀﺎﻯ ﻧﺎﺍﻣﻦ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻮﻯ ﺑﺎﺭﻭﺕ‬ ‫ﻭ ﺧﻮﻥ ﻣﺸــﺎﻡ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺁﺯﺍﺭﺩ‪ ،‬ﻣﺸﻜﻞ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺭﻣﺎﻥﻫﺎﻯ ﺩﻣﻜﺮﺍﺳﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ‬ ‫ﻭ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﺑﻴــﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻣﻄﺎﻟﺒﺎﺕ ﻭ ﺣﻘﻮﻕ ﺷــﻬﺮﻭﻧﺪﻯ ﺩﻓﺎﻉ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻤﻞ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ‪ .‬ﭼﻨﻴﻦ‬ ‫ﻓﻀﺎﺋﻰ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺻﻮﺭﺗﺒﻨﺪﻯ »ﻣﻘﺒﻮﻝ« ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴــﻮﻧﻰ ﺑﺴــﻴﺎﺭ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﺍﺳﺖ!‬ ‫ﭘﻴﺸــﺘﺮ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻋﻤﻠﻴﺎﺕ ﻣﺤﻴﺮﺍﻟﻌﻘــﻮﻝ ﻣﺠﺎﻫﺪﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﻭ ﻓﺪﺍﺋﻰﮔﺮﻯ ﻭ »ﺟﻨﮓ ﺑﺎ‬ ‫ﺻﺪﺍﻡ« ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ »ﺳﺮﺯﻣﻴﻦﺳﻮﺧﺘﻪ« ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺟﺮﺍ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻣﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺩﻭﻣﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﻋﻘﺐﻧﺸﻴﻨﻰ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺟﺒﻬﺔ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ‪ ،‬ﺑﻦﺑﺴﺘﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ‬ ‫ﺁﻧﮕﻠﻮﺳﺎﻛﺴــﻮﻥﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷﺪﻩ‪ .‬ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ »ﻣﺎﻟﻰ« ﺩﺭ ﻳﻮﻧﺎﻥ ﻭ ﻗﺒﺮﺱ ﻭ‬ ‫ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺘﺎﻟﻴﺎ ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎً ﻓﻘﻂ ﻗﺴﻤﺖ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﻛﻮﻩﻳﺦ« ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﻭ‬ ‫ﻣﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎ ﺍﺯ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺳــﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻗﻠﺐ ﺑﻨﻴﺎﺩﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻓﺮﺍﻧﺴﻪ ﺳﺨﻨﻰ‬ ‫ﺑــﻪ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻧﻤﻰﺁﻭﺭﻳﻢ ﭼﺮﺍ ﻛﻪ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﻪ ﺩﺭﺍﺯﺍ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﻛﺸــﻴﺪ‪ .‬ﻭﻟﻰ ﺍﮔﺮ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ‬ ‫ﺑﻪ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻨﻮﺍﻝ ﺍﺩﺍﻣﻪ ﻳﺎﺑﺪ ﺩﻳﺮﻯ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﭘﺎﺋﻴﺪ ﻛﻪ ﻓﺮﻭﭘﺎﺷــﻰ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ‬ ‫ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﻯ ﻏﺮﺑﻰ ﺁﻏﺎﺯ ﺷــﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺩﺭ ﭼﻨﻴﻦ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﻧﻤﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ »ﻧﮕﺮﺍﻥ«‬ ‫ﺣﺎﻝ ﻭ ﺍﻭﺿﺎﻉ ﭘﺎﺩﻭﻫﺎﻯﺍﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ!‬ ‫ﺳــﻮﻣﻴﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﭘﺲﺭﻭﻯ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﻣﺮگ ﭼﺎﻭﺯ‪ ،‬ﭘﻮﭘﻮﻟﻴﺴﺖ ﻭﻧﺰﻭﺋﻼﺋﻰ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺑﺮ‬ ‫ﺍﺳــﺎﺱ ﭘﻴﺶﻓﺮﺽﻫﺎ ﻇﺎﻫﺮﺍ ً ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻣﺸﻜﻠﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ‬ ‫ﭼﻨﺪ »ﺳــﻮءﻗﺼﺪ ﻫﺪﻓﻤﻨﺪ«‪ ،‬ﺑﺎ ﻳﻜﻰ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﭼﻪﻫﺎﻯﺍﺵ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ ﺷﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﭼﺎﻭﺯ‬ ‫ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻔﺘﻰ ﻏﺮﺏ ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺼﺪﻕﺍﻟﺴﻠﻄﻨﻪ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ »ﺷﺮﻛﺖ‬ ‫ﻧﻔــﺖ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ!« ﻧﻘﺶ ﺍﺻﻠﻰ ﭼﺎﻭﺯ ﻓﺮﺍﻫﻢ ﺁﻭﺭﺩﻥ ﺯﻣﻴﻨﺔ ﻣﻨﺎﺳــﺐ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﭼﭙﺎﻭﻝ‬ ‫ﺩﺭﺍﺯﻣــﺪﺕ ﻧﻔــﺖ ﻭﻧﺰﻭﺋﻼ ﺑﻮﺩ ﻭ ﺩﻳﺪﻳــﻢ ﻛﻪ ﻃﻰ ﺩﻭﺭﺍﻥ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺍﻳﺸــﺎﻥ ﺑﺮ‬ ‫ﻭﻧﺰﻭﺋــﻼ ﻧﻪ ﺗﻨﻬﺎ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﻣﺜﺒﺘﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻄﺢ ﺯﻧﺪﮔﻰ ﺗﻮﺩﻩﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﺩﺍﺩﻩ ﻧﺸــﺪ‬ ‫ﻛــﻪ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻣﺮﺩﻡ ﻭﻧﺰﻭﺋﻼ ﺑﺮ ﺳــﺮ ﭼﺎﻩﻫﺎﺋﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻫﺮ ﺑﺸــﻜﻪ ﻧﻔﺖﺷــﺎﻥ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ‬ ‫ﻳﻜﺼﺪﺩﻻﺭ ﻗﻴﻤﺖ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﮔﺮﺳــﻨﻪﺗﺮ ﺍﺯ ﮔﺬﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺑﻴﮕﺎﺭﻯ ﻭ ﻓﻘﺮ ﺩﺳﺖ ﻭ ﭘﻨﺠﻪ‬ ‫ﻧــﺮﻡ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﺑــﺎ »ﻟﻮ« ﺭﻓﺘﻦ ﻃﺮﺡﻫــﺎﻯ ﺗﺮﻭﺭ ﺩﺭ ﻭﻧﺰﻭﺋــﻼ‪ ،‬ﺧﻼء ﺣﻀﻮﺭ‬ ‫ﻳﻚ ﺟﺎﻳﮕﺰﻳﻦ »ﭼﺎﻭﺯﻯ« ﺷــﻜﺎﻑ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﺩﺍﺭﺗﺮ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺷﻜﺎﻑ‪،‬‬ ‫ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺎﻥ ﭼﺎﻭﺯ ﺭﺍ ﻫﺮ ﺭﻭﺯ ﺑﻪ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚ ﻭ ﻧﺰﺩﻳﻚﺗﺮ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ!‬

‫ﺩﺭ ﻧﺘﻴﺠــﻪ‪ ،‬ﺭﻭﻳﺎﻯ ﺷــﻴﺮﻳﻦ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺷــﺒﻜﺔ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﻭ ﺍﻧﻘﻼﺑﻰ‬ ‫»ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ـ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ـ ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ« ﺑﻪ ﻛﺎﺑﻮﺱ ﺗﺒﺪﻳﻞ ﺷــﺪﻩ‪ .‬ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻄﻰ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺁﻣﺪ‬ ‫ﻛﻪ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﺣﺘﻰ ﺗﺼﻮﺭﺵ ﺭﺍ ﻫﻢ ﻧﻤﻰﻛﺮﺩ‪ .‬ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﺎﻳﺔ‬ ‫ﺍﻭﺑﺎﺵﭘﺮﻭﺭﻯ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳــﻮﺭﻳﻪ‪ ،‬ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺴﺖ ﻧﻘﺶ ﻛﻠﻴﺪﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ‬ ‫ﻧﻈﺎﻣﻰ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﻳﻔﺎ ﻛﻨﺪ‪ ،‬ﺯﻳﺮ ﺿﺮﺑﺔ ﺧﺮﺩﻛﻨﻨﺪﺓ ﺭﻭﺳﻴﻪ ﺩﻣﺎﺭ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﺯﮔﺎﺭﺵ‬ ‫ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻩ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺍﻣﺮﻭﺯ ﻧﻪ ﻗﺎﺩﺭ ﺍﺳﺖ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻓﺮﺍﻣﺮﺯﻯ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ‪،‬‬ ‫ﻗﺒﺮﺱ ﻭ ﻟﺒﻨﺎﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺩﻧﺒﺎﻝ ﻛﻨﺪ‪ ،‬ﻧﻪ ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻯ ﺑﻪ ﺣﻔﻆ ﺣﺎﻛﻤﻴﺖ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﺔ‬ ‫ﺁﺗﺎﺗﺮﻛﻰ ﺩﺭ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﻣﺮﺯﻫﺎﻯﺍﺵ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﺑﺎﺷﺪ‪ .‬ﭘﻴﺎﻡ ﻧﻮﺭﻭﺯﻯ ﺍﻭﺟﺎﻻﻥ ﻭ ﺟﺸﻦ‬ ‫ﺳﺮﺍﺳﺮﻯ ﻧﻮﺭﻭﺯ ﺩﺭ ﺗﺮﻛﻴﻪ‪ ،‬ﻓﻘﻂ ﮔﻮﺷﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻓﻼﺱ ﺁﺗﺎﺗﺮﻛﻴﺴﻢ ﺍﺳﺖ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﺮﺍﻥ ﺟﻤﻜــﺮﺍﻥﺯﺩﻩ ﻧﻴﺰ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﺑﻴﺪﺍﺩ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ‪ .‬ﻣﻼﻳﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺴــﺖ‬ ‫ﻗﻠﺐ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﺳﺎﺯﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻗﻢ ﺯﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﺍﻣﻴﺪﻫﺎﻯﺷﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ‬ ‫ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺍﺳﺘﺮﺍﺗﮋﻳﻚ ﺑﺮ »ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ« ﺍﺳﻼﻣﮕﺮﺍﻳﺎﻥ ﺳﻮﺭﻯ ﻣﺘﻤﺮﻛﺰ ﺷﺪﻩ ﺑﻮﺩ‪ ،‬ﺑﻪ‬ ‫ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﭼﺮﺧﺶ ﺍﺧﻴﺮ ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺍﻫﺮﻡ« ﻣﺤﺮﻭﻡ ﻣﺎﻧﺪﻧﺪ‪ .‬ﺍﺯ ﺳﻮﻯ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ‪،‬‬ ‫ﻭ ﺍﺯ ﻣﻨﻈﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺘﮕﺰﺍﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﻔﺘﻰ ﻧﻴــﺰ »ﺣﺒﻞﺍﻟﻤﺘﻴﻦ« ﭼﺎﻭﺯ ﺁﻣﺮﻳﻜﺎﺋﻰ ﺍﺯ‬ ‫ﺩﺳــﺖ ﺭﻓﺘﻪ؛ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪﻳﺴﻢ ﺷﻴﻌﻰﻣﺴــﻠﻚ ﻭ ﻭﺍﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﺍﻫﺮﻣﻰ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﻰ ﻭ‬ ‫ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺭﺩ ﺗﺎ ﺑﺮ ﺁﻥ ﺗﻜﻴﻪ ﻛﻨﺪ‪.‬‬ ‫ﻭﺍﻛﻨــﺶ ﻟﻨــﺪﻥ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ »ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ« ﺭﻭﺷــﻦ ﺑﻮﺩ؛ ﭼﺮﺧﺶ ﺑﻪ ﺳــﻮﻯ ﭘﻜﻦ ﻭ‬ ‫ﺩﻣﻴﺪﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺗﻨﻮﺭ »ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥ ﻫﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻯ« ﻛﺮﺓ ﺷﻤﺎﻟﻰ! ﺍﻳﻨﺠﺎﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺑﻴﻨﻴﻢ‬ ‫ﺑﺎ ﺣﻤﺎﻳﺖ ﻣﺎﺋﻮﺋﻴﺴــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﭘﻜﻦ‪ ،‬ﺁﺗﺶ »ﺟﻨﮓ ﻫﺴــﺘﻪﺍﻯ« ﺩﺭ ﺷﺒﻪﺟﺰﻳﺮﺓ‬ ‫ﻛﺮﻩ ﺑــﺎﻻ ﻣﻰﮔﻴﺮﺩ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﻳــﻚ ﺟﻮﺍﻧﻚ ﻧﺎﻗﺺﺍﻟﻌﻘﻞ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺴــﺖ ﺩﻟﺶ ﺑﻪ‬ ‫ﻧﺎﻣﺰﺩﺑــﺎﺯﻯ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺧﺘﺮ ﻫﻤﺴــﺎﻳﻪ ﺧﻮﺵ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ‪ ،‬ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨــﻮﺍﻥ »ﺭﻫﺒﺮ« ﻛﺮﻩ‪ ،‬ﺑﺎ‬ ‫ﻣﻮﺷﻚﻫﺎﻯ ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ‪ ،‬ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﺭﺍ ﺑﻪ »ﺟﻨﮓﻫﺴﺘﻪﺍﻯ« ﺗﻬﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻰﻛﻨﺪ!‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﮔﻴﺮﻭﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﻪ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺟﺎﻳﺰﺓ ﺷــﻴﺮﻳﻨﻜﺎﺭﻯ‪ ،‬ﭼﻨﺪﻳﻦ ﺷــﺮﻛﺖ ﭼﻴﻨﻰ ﺍﺯ‬ ‫ﺍﻣــﻜﺎﻥ ﻋﻘﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭﺩﺍﺩﻫﺎﻯ »ﺁﺑــﺪﺍﺭ« ﺑﺎ ﻃﺮﻑﻫﺎﻯ ژﺍﭘﻨــﻰ ﻭ ﺍﺭﻭﭘﺎﺋﻰ ﭘﻴﺮﺍﻣﻮﻥ‬ ‫ﻫﻤﻜﺎﺭﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺻﻨﻌﺘﻰ ﻭ ‪ ...‬ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻧﺪ!‬ ‫ﺍﺑﺮﺍﺯ ﺗﺮﺩﻳﺪ ﺁﻣﺎﻧﻮ‪ ،‬ﺳﻮﻻﻧﺎ ﻭ ﺩﻳﮕﺮ ﻣﻮﺵﻫﺎﻯ ﮔﻨﺪﺍﺑﺔ ﻏﺮﺏ‪ ،‬ﺩﺭ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﻧﺸﺴﺖ‬ ‫»ﺍﻟﻤﺂﺗــﻰ ‪ «2‬ﻧﻴﺰ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﺴــﻴﺮ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ‪ .‬ﺍﺯ ﺯﺑــﺎﻥ ﺍﻳﻨﺎﻥ ﻣﺮﺍﺗﺐ‬ ‫ﻧﺎﺧﺸﻨﻮﺩﻯ ﺍﻳﺎﻻﺕ ﻣﺘﺤﺪ ﻭ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺭﻭﻧﺪ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﺩﺭ ﺧﺎﻭﺭﻣﻴﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻪ ﻣﺴﻜﻮ‬ ‫ﮔﻮﺷﺰﺩ ﻣﻰﺷﻮﺩ‪.‬‬

‫ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻟﻴﻞ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﺳﺨﻨﺮﺍﻧﻰ ﺑﺸﺎﺭ ﺍﺳﺪ »ﻧﻮﻳﻦ«‪ ،‬ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﻨﻚ ﺍﺯ ﻭﺿﻌﻴﺖ‬ ‫ﻣﻬﺮﺓ ﺣﺬﻑ ﺷــﺪﺓ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻘﺎﻡ »ﻣﻬﺮﻩﺍﻯ ﻣﻌﺘﺒﺮ« ﺍﺭﺗﻘﺎء ﺩﺭﺟﻪ ﻳﺎﻓﺘﻪ‪،‬‬ ‫ﺷــﺎﻫﺪ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻳﻚ »ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ« ﻣﻰﺷﻮﻳﻢ‪ .‬ﻣﺤﻮﺭﻯ ﻣﺘﺸﻜﻞ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ‪،‬‬ ‫ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﻭ ﻛﺮﻩ ﺷﻤﺎﻟﻰ! ﺩﻭﻟﺖ »ﻧﻮﻳﻦ« ﺳﻮﺭﻳﻪ ﻗﺼﺪ ﺍﻟﻘﺎء ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻮﻫﻢ ﺭﺍ ﺩﺍﺭﺩ ﻛﻪ‬ ‫ﺍﻳــﻦ »ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﻣﻘﺎﻭﻣﺖ« ﻣﻰﺗﻮﺍﻧﺪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎ ﻭ ﻣﻔﻬﻮﻡ ﺑﻴﺎﺑﺪ‪ ،‬ﺍﻟﺒﺘﻪ ﺑﺎ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺮ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻦ‬ ‫ﻭﺍﺑﺴــﺘﮕﻰ ﺳﺎﺧﺘﺎﺭﻯ ﺧﺎﻧﺪﺍﻥ ﺍﺳــﺪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺑﻘﺎء ﺍﻳﻦ »ﻣﺤﻮﺭ«‬ ‫ﻧﻴــﺰ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨــﺎﻯ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﻭ ﺑﻘﺎء ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴــﺘﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ‬ ‫ﺷــﻮﺩ! ﻭﻟﻰ ﭼﻪ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴﻢ ﻛﻪ ﺷــﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﺟﺰ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﺸﺎﻥ ﻣﻰﺩﻫﺪ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺳﺘﻨﺒﺎﻁ‬ ‫ﻣــﺎ ﭘﺎﻳﺪﺍﺭﻯ ﭼﻴﻦ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﺤﻨﻪ ﺁﻧﻘﺪﺭﻫﺎ ﺩﻭﺍﻡ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺁﻭﺭﺩ؛ ﺩﺭ ﻣﻴﻌﺎﺩﻯ ﻧﻪ‬ ‫ﭼﻨــﺪﺍﻥ ﺩﻭﺭ‪ ،‬ﭘﻜﻦ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺪﺍﻥ ﺧﺎﺭﺝ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺷــﺪ‪ .‬ﺑﻪ ﻋﻮﺍﻣﻞ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻰﻧﻤﺎ ﻭ‬ ‫ﺍﺟﻨﺒﻰﻫﺎﻯ ﻭﺍﺑﺴــﺘﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺑﮕﻮﺋﻴــﻢ‪ ،‬ﭼﺮﺧﺶ ﻧﺎﮔﺰﻳﺮ ﺑﺮﻳﺘﺎﻧﻴﺎ ﻭ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ‬ ‫ﻣﺤﻮﺭ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﺳــﺎﺯﻯﻫﺎﻯﺍﺵ ﺑﻪ ﻫﻴﭻ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ ﺑﻪ ﻣﻌﻨﺎﻯ ﭘﻴﺮﻭﺯﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎﻯ‬ ‫ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ‪ .‬ﻛﺎﻣ ً‬ ‫ﻼ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻜﺲ! ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻐﻴﻴﺮ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖ‬ ‫ﻧﺎﺷﻰ ﺍﺯ ﺿﻌﻒ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﺎﻯ ﺩﺭ ﺳﻴﺮ ﻗﻬﻘﺮﺍﺋﻰ ﮔﺬﺍﺷﺘﻪ‪.‬‬ ‫ﺣﺎﻝ ﺗﺎﺭﻳﺨﭽﺔ ﺑﺤﺮﺍﻥﺳــﺎﺯﻯﻫﺎﻯ ﺍﻧﮕﻠﺴﺘﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻥ ﻭ ﻣﺴﺎﺋﻞ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪ ﺭﺍ ﺭﻫﺎ‬ ‫ﻣﻰﻛﻨﻴﻢ ﻭ ﻣﻰﭘﺮﺩﺍﺯﻳﻢ ﺑﻪ »ﺍﻣﻜﺎﻧﺎﺕ« ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖﻫﺎ ﺩﺭ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ«‬ ‫ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﻧﺎﻡ ﮔﺮﻓﺘــﻪ‪ .‬ﺍﺻﻞ ﻛﻠﻰ ﺩﺭ »ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑــﺎﺕ« ﺁﻳﻨﺪﻩ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ‬ ‫ﺑﺮﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﻧﮕﺎﻩ ﺩﺍﺷﺘﻦ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻭ ﻛﺘﻞ »ﺟﺒﻬﺔ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ـ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ« ﺍﺯ ﻃﺮﻳﻖ ﺍﻳﺠﺎﺩ ﺗﻘﺎﺑﻞ‬ ‫ﻛﺎﺫﺏ ﺍﺳﺖ‪ .‬ﺑﻪ ﻋﺒﺎﺭﺕ ﺳﺎﺩﻩﺗﺮ‪ ،‬ﻳﻚ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ ﺍﺯ ﻧﻮﻛﺮﺍﻥ ﻟﻨﺪﻥ ﺍﺯ ﺩﺭﻭﻥ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ‬ ‫ﺍﺳــﻼﻣﻰ ﻋﻠﻢ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻔﺖ ﺑﺎ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺳﻤﺎﻥ ﺑﻠﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩﻩ‪ ،‬ﻭ ﻣﻠﺖ ﺭﺍ ﺑﺎ ﻭﻋﺪﻩ‬ ‫ﻭ ﻭﻋﻴﺪﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻀﺤﻚ ﺳــﺮﮔﺮﻡ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﻛﺮﺩ‪ .‬ﻭ ﮔــﺮﻭﻩ ﻣﺨﺎﻟﻒ ﻫﻢ ﺑﻪ ﻧﺎﭼﺎﺭ‬ ‫ﭘــﺎﻯ ﺩﺭ ﻫﻤﻴﻦ ﻣﻌﺮﻛﻪ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩ؛ ﻭ ﻧﻬﺎﻳﺖ ﺍﻣﺮ ﻃﺒﻖ ﻣﻌﻤﻮﻝ ﻛﺎﺭ ﺑﺠﺎﺋﻰ‬ ‫ﻣﻰﺭﺳــﺪ ﻛﻪ »ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ« ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻧﻪ ﺑﺮ ﻋﻬﺪﺓ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺩﻭﻟﺖ ﻭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﻛﻪ‬ ‫ﺑﻪ ﮔﺮﺩﻥ »ﺩﻳﮕﺮﺍﻥ« ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺍﻓﺘﺎﺩ‪ .‬ﻧﻮﻋﻰ ﻣﺴــﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖﮔﺮﻳﺰﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺩﺭ ﻧﻈﺎﻡﻫﺎﻯ‬

‫ﻓﺎﺷﻴﺴﺖ ﺭﻭﺍﻝ ﺷــﻨﺎﺧﺘﻪ ﺷﺪﻩ ﻭ »ﻃﺒﻴﻌﻰ« ﺑﻪ ﺷﻤﺎﺭ ﻣﻰﺭﻭﺩ‪ .‬ﺍﻳﻦ ﺳﻴﺎﺳﺖ‬ ‫»ﺳــﻠﺐ ﻣﺴﺌﻮﻟﻴﺖ« ﻫﻤﺎﻥ ﺍﺳﺖ ﻛﻪ ﭘﻴﺸﺘﺮ ﺗﺤﺖ ﻋﻨﻮﺍﻥ »ﺷﻴﺦﻭﺷﺎﻩ« ﺍﺯ ﺁﻥ‬ ‫ﻧﺎﻡ ﺑﺮﺩﻩﺍﻳﻢ؛ ﻧﺒﺮﺩ ﺷــﻴﺦ »ﺣﻖﻃﻠﺐ« ﺑﺎ »ﺷــﺎﻩ ﻣﺴﺘﺒﺪ!« ﺑﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺗﻔﺎﻭﺕ ﻛﻪ‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﻧﻤﺎﻳﺸــﻨﺎﻣﺔ ﺧﺮﺩﺭﭼﻤﻦ‪ ،‬ﺍﻳﻨﺒﺎﺭ »ﺷﻴﺦﻭﺷــﺎﻩ« ﻫــﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺁﺧﻮﻧﺪ ﺍﺯ ﺁﺏ‬ ‫ﺩﺭﺁﻣﺪﻩﺍﻧﺪ!‬ ‫ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳــﻦ ﻣﻴﺎﻥ ﻋﻠــﻰ ﺧﺎﻣﻨﻪﺍﻯ ﻛﻪ ﺣﻀــﻮﺭﺵ ﺩﺭ ﺭﺃﺱ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺍﺯ‬ ‫ﻃﺮﻑ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﺖﻫﺎﻯ ﻣﻨﻄﻘﻪﺍﻯ ﻣﻮﺭﺩ ﺗﺄﺋﻴﺪ ﻗﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﺮﻓﺘﻪ‪ ،‬ﺳﻌﻰ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ‬ ‫ﺗﻮﺍﺯﻥ ﺑﻴﻦ ﺩﻭ ﮔﺮﻭﻩ »ﺣﻖﻃﻠﺐ« ﻭ »ﻣﺴــﺘﺒﺪ« ﺭﺍ ﺩﺭ ﭼﺎﺭﭼﻮﺏ ﻣﻨﺎﻓﻊ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺑﺎﻥ‬ ‫ﻓﺮﺍﻣﺮﺯﻯﺍﺵ ﺣﻔﻆ ﻛﻨﺪ! ﻫﻤﭽﻨﺎﻧﻜﻪ ﺑﺎﺭﻫﺎ ﮔﻔﺘﻪﺍﻳﻢ‪ ،‬ﻣﺴﻠﻤﺎً ﺑﻬﺘﺮﻳﻦ ﮔﺰﻳﻨﻪﺍﻯ‬ ‫ﻛﻪ ﺍﻳﺮﺍﻧﻴﺎﻥ ﺩﺭ ﭘﻴﺶ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﻨﺪ ﺩﺍﺷــﺖ ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻢ ﺑﺪﻭﻥ ﻗﻴﺪ ﻭ ﺷﺮﻁ ﻣﺴﺨﺮﻩﺑﺎﺯﻯ‬ ‫»ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ« ﺍﺳــﺖ‪ .‬ﺗﺤﺮﻳﻤﻰ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻪ ﺍﺭﺑﺎﺑﺎﻥ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺍﺳﻼﻣﻰ ﺗﻔﻬﻴﻢ ﺧﻮﺍﻫﺪ‬ ‫ﻛﺮﺩ ﻛﻪ ﺑﻴﺶ ﺍﺯ ﺁﻧﭽﻪ ﺍﻧﺘﺨﺎﺑﺎﺕ ﺍﺯ ﺍﻫﻤﻴﺖ ﺑﺮﺧﻮﺭﺩﺍﺭ ﺑﺎﺷــﺪ‪ ،‬ﭘﻴﺶﻓﺮﺽﻫﺎﻯ‬ ‫ﺁﻥ ﻳﻌﻨﻰ ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯ ﻣﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎﺕ‪ ،‬ﺁﺯﺍﺩﻯﺑﻴﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺗﺸــﻜﻞﻫﺎﻯ ﺳﻴﺎﺳــﻰ ﻭ ﺣﺮﻓﻪﺍﻯ‬ ‫ﻭ ﻛﺎﺭﮔــﺮﻯ ﻣﻰﺑﺎﻳﺪ ﻣﺪ ﻧﻈﺮ ﻗــﺮﺍﺭ ﮔﻴﺮﺩ‪ .‬ﺑﺎﺯ ﻫﻢ ﻣﻰﮔﻮﺋﻴﻢ‪ ،‬ﭘﺎﻯ ﮔﺬﺍﺭﺩﻥ ﺑﻪ‬ ‫ﺧﻴﻤﻪﺷﺐﺑﺎﺯﻯ ﺣﻜﻮﻣﺖ ﺟﻤﻜﺮﺍﻥ ﺟﺰ ﮔﺴﺘﺮﺵ ﺳﺮﻛﻮﺏ ﻭ ﭼﭙﺎﻭﻝ ﻧﺘﻴﺠﻪﺍﻯ‬ ‫ﻧﺪﺍﺷﺘﻪ ﻭ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺩﺍﺷﺖ؛ ﺁﻧﺎﻥ ﻛﻪ ﻣﺒﻠﻐﺎﻥ ﺣﻀﻮﺭ ﻓﻌﺎﻝ ﺩﺭ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺻﺤﻨﻪﮔﺮﺩﺍﻧﻰ‬ ‫ﻫﺴــﺘﻨﺪ ﻳﺎ ﺍﻳﻦ ﺭﺍ ﻣﻰﺩﺍﻧﻨﺪ ﻭ ﺁﮔﺎﻫﺎﻧﻪ ﺁﺏ ﺑﻪ ﺁﺳــﻴﺎﺏ ﺍﺟﻨﺒﻰ ﻣﻰﺭﻳﺰﻧﺪ‪ ،‬ﻳﺎ ﺍﺯ‬ ‫ﺷﺮﺍﻳﻂ ﻛﺸﻮﺭ ﺑﻰﺍﻃﻼﻉﺍﻧﺪ ﺩﺭ ﻫﺮ ﺩﻭ ﺻﻮﺭﺕ ﻭﺟﻮﺩﺷﺎﻥ ﺟﺰ ﺿﺮﺭ ﻭ ﺯﻳﺎﻥ ﺑﺮﺍﻯ‬ ‫ﻣﻠﺖ ﻧﺒﻮﺩﻩ ﻭ ﻧﺨﻮﺍﻫﺪ ﺑﻮﺩ‪.‬‬