Enhancing Machine Learning via Quantum Computing: An Integrated Approach for Enhanced Data Processin

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 12 Issue: 07 | Jul 2025

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

Enhancing Machine Learning via Quantum Computing: An Integrated Approach for Enhanced Data Processing and Optimization Thamizh Selvam D1, Keerthana R2 and Santhakumar R3 1Department of Computer Science, Rajiv Gandhi Arts & Science College, Thavalakuppam, Puducherry, India 2Tata Consultancy Services, Chennai, India

3Department of Computer Science, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India

---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------

Abstract - Machine learning (ML) and quantum

computing utilizes qubits that can be in a superposition of both states at the same time [9]. This distinctive feature allows quantum computers to carry out numerous calculations simultaneously, greatly enhancing computational efficiency [10]. Quantum phenomena like superposition, entanglement, and quantum interference enable quantum computing to exceed the capabilities of classical computing, particularly in data handling and optimization activities, offering substantial advantages for improving machine learning methods [11, 12, 13].

computing (QC) together form a new area in computational science that improves data processing and optimization beyond traditional computing. Quantum Machine Learning (QML) uses quantum mechanics, like superposition and entanglement, to create faster algorithms. Key aspects of QML include quantum-augmented support vector machines, quantum neural networks, and vibrational quantum algorithms that blend classical and quantum techniques.

Quantum computing enhances ML with better solutions for gradient descent and generative model training. Libraries like PennyLane, TensorFlow Quantum, Qiskit Machine Learning, and Cirq aid in QML development. QML shows promise in sectors like finance, healthcare, and materials science, suggesting a Combined Strategy for Superior Data Processing and Optimization.

Key Words: Quantum Neural Networks, Quantum Machine Learning, Quantum Computing, Machine Learning, PennyLane, TensorFlow, Noisy IntermediateScale Quantum.

1. INTRODUCTION The swift advancement of Machine Learning (ML) has resulted in transformative innovations across multiple domains, such as healthcare, finance, autonomous systems, and natural language processing [1, 2, 3].

Notwithstanding its significant advancements, traditional ML faces limitations due to computational constraints as models increase in complexity and the data volume rises exponentially [4, 5]. Training deep learning models and addressing high-dimensional optimization issues demand substantial computational resources, resulting in slow convergence speeds and processing inefficiencies [6]. This requires the investigation of different computational paradigms that can surpass these restrictions, one of which is Quantum Computing (QC) [7].

Fig.1. Quantum Architecture The integration of Quantum Computing and Machine Learning, referred to as Quantum Machine Learning (QML), is a burgeoning interdisciplinary field aimed at harnessing quantum concepts to refine ML models [14].

QML utilizes quantum algorithms for various applications such as classification, clustering, regression, and generative modeling, possibly offering greater speed and efficiency than standard methods [15].

Various quantum computing frameworks and libraries have been created to aid the incorporation of quantum computing into machine learning workflows. PennyLane, TensorFlow Quantum, Qiskit Machine Learning, and Cirq offer reliable resources for creating and implementing QML algorithms on quantum simulators and real quantum hardware [16, 17]. These platforms allow researchers and developers to test quantum circuits, create quantumboosted ML models, and connect theoretical progress with practical application [18, 19].

Quantum Computing signifies a revolutionary advancement in computer science, employing principles from quantum mechanics to handle and alter data in fundamentally different ways than conventional computing [8]. In contrast to conventional binary computing that uses bits as either 0 or 1, quantum

© 2025, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.315

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 777

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 12 Issue: 07 | Jul 2025

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

In spite of persistent obstacles, the collaboration between quantum technology and ML offers significant chances to transform data-driven areas, resulting in remarkable scientific discoveries and innovative advancements. This study investigates the collaboration between Quantum Computing and Machine Learning, offering a cohesive approach to improve data handling and efficiency.

applications of machine learning, particularly in dataintensive domains [17, 18]

3. CHALLENGES IN CONVENTIONAL LEARNING

Conventional machine learning (ML) has made substantial progress in recent years, facilitating innovations across various domains, such as healthcare, finance, natural language processing, and autonomous systems.

Nonetheless, in spite of these accomplishments, traditional ML encounters various ongoing obstacles that affect its effectiveness, precision, scalability, and interpretability.

2. RELATED WORKS Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has emerged as an interdisciplinary area dedicated to combining the strengths of quantum computing with the versatility of machine learning approaches [1, 5]. Foundational theoretical work, such as Shor’s algorithm for integer factorization [6] and Grover’s algorithm for database searching [7], illustrated that quantum computing could exceed traditional methods in particular computational challenges. These innovations fueled excitement for the application of quantum principles in machine learning [8].

Early QML studies, particularly by Lloyd, Mohseni, and Rebentrost, concentrated on quantum-augmented versions of conventional algorithms such as Quantum Support Vector Machines (QSVM), suggesting possible quantum speedup in the inversion of kernel matrices, an essential phase in SVM training [9]. As a result, the idea of Quantum Neural Networks (QNN) was developed, utilizing quantum circuits to create neural network structures capable of managing intricate data transformations [10].

Fig.2. Challenges in Classical Machine Learning 3.1. Data Quality and Accessibility

Research by Farhi et al. highlighted quantum circuits as essential instruments for enhancing neural network calculations and explored the capability of quantum parallelism to boost learning efficiency [11]. Additionally, quantum clustering techniques, such as quantum k-means, have been developed to enhance conventional clustering methods using quantum speedup, as demonstrated in research by Kerenidis et al. [12]. These studies emphasize the diverse applications of quantum computing in machine learning, focusing on optimization, classification, regression, and clustering tasks [13].

The effectiveness of machine learning models is largely contingent upon the availability of substantial high-quality data for both training and evaluation; nevertheless, the acquisition of such data is frequently problematic in various real-world applications. Data collection is often hindered by privacy issues, ethical dilemmas, and technical constraints, especially in sensitive sectors like healthcare, where it is essential to anonymize patient information, or in finance, where access to private datasets is restricted [1], [2].

Moreover, even when data is available, it may suffer from class imbalance, leading to the underrepresentation of certain categories or labels. In fraud detection systems, fraudulent transactions are significantly less common than legitimate ones, which impedes machine learning models from recognizing important patterns within the minority class. Class imbalance can lead to biased models that perform well on the majority class but have difficulty with the minority class, thus reducing the overall robustness of the model. This issue necessitates targeted strategies such as oversampling, undersampling, and synthetic data generation techniques like SMOTE (Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique) to ensure that the model is

Despite these advancements, challenges persist, such as the limitations of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) systems and the necessity for efficient quantum data representation [1, 14]. Instruments and frameworks such as PennyLane, TensorFlow Quantum, and Qiskit Machine Learning have played a crucial role in facilitating the practical application of quantum algorithms [15, 16].

With advancements in quantum technology, QML's ability to address intricate issues in fields like healthcare, finance, and materials science enhances significantly. These advancements offer exciting possibilities for innovative

© 2025, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.315

MACHINE

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 778

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 12 Issue: 07 | Jul 2025

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

trained on a balanced representation of diverse data classes [3], [4].

performance GPUs, TPUs, or distributed computing frameworks. This challenge is particularly evident in deep learning, where training state-of-the-art models can take days or weeks and require large amounts of memory and processing power [13].

3.2. Data Pre-processing and Feature Engineering Datasets from the real world frequently have absent values, redundant entries, and noisy or unimportant attributes that can interfere with the model's training process. Dealing with missing data necessitates approaches like imputation or elimination, yet incorrect treatment can result in biased or deceptive outcomes [5].

3.6. Bias, Fairness, and Security ML models are prone to reflecting and amplifying biases present in training data. Biases can lead to discriminatory or unfair outcomes, raising serious ethical concerns.

Additionally, adversarial attacks—where small, carefully crafted input perturbations mislead ML models—pose security risks in areas like cybersecurity, autonomous driving, and facial recognition [14].

Choosing the most important variables for model training, known as feature selection, is an essential but challenging task, as adding too many irrelevant features can raise computational complexity and diminish model performance, whereas having too few could result in underfitting [6], [7].

3.7. Adaptability Many ML models rely on static datasets and struggle to adapt to dynamic environments. Real-time adaptability is essential in applications such as fraud detection and recommendation systems, yet remains challenging [15], [16].

3.3. Generalization and Model Performance An important concern in conventional machine learning is model generalization, which pertains to an ML model's capacity to maintain strong performance on unfamiliar data. Generalization is influenced by two primary conflicting factors: overfitting and underfitting.





4. QUANTUM COMPUTING’S ROLE IN MACHINE LEARNING Quantum computing (QC) is a swiftly progressing area that has the capacity to transform machine learning (ML) by providing computational advantages that outstrip classical computing abilities. By harnessing the principles of quantum mechanics—such as superposition, entanglement, and quantum interference—quantum computing can carry out complicated computations more effectively than traditional systems. Machine learning, which is fundamentally reliant on optimization, data processing, and pattern recognition, stands to gain considerably from the parallelism and speed enhancements offered by quantum computing. Quantum Machine Learning (QML), the integration of quantum computing and ML, aims to create quantum-enhanced algorithms capable of processing large datasets more efficiently, addressing complex problems more rapidly, and improving generalization in predictive modeling. This section investigates how quantum computing aids ML, focusing on significant algorithms, applications, and challenges in this developing field.

In classical ML, training involves optimization tasks such as gradient descent, where model parameters are iteratively updated using Equation (1): 𝜃𝑡+1 = 𝜃𝑡 − 𝜂𝛻𝐽(𝜃𝑡 ) (1) Quantum computing offers an alternative approach by leveraging quantum parallelism and interference effects to accelerate optimization tasks. A quantum equivalent of gradient-based optimization can be represented using unitary transformations, as shown in Equation (2):

Overfitting arises when a model captures both the critical patterns in the training data and the noise or random variations, which results in excellent performance on the training data but inadequate performance on the test data [8].

Underfitting occurs when a model is excessively simplistic, failing to discern the fundamental pattern in the data, leading to insufficient performance on both training and testing datasets.

3.4. Interpretability and Explainability Another significant challenge in classical ML is model interpretability and explainability, particularly as models grow increasingly complex. Simple models such as decision trees, logistic regression, and linear regression are relatively easy to interpret, as their decision-making processes can be visualized or mathematically explained [11]. However, more sophisticated models, such as deep neural networks, support vector machines, and ensemble models, operate as “black boxes,” making it difficult to understand why a particular decision was made [12].

3.5. Computational Complexity and Scalability Training large-scale ML models requires significant computational resources, often necessitating high-

© 2025, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.315

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 779

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 12 Issue: 07 | Jul 2025

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

|θ𝑡+1 ⟩ = 𝑈(η, ∇𝐽̂)|θ𝑡 ⟩ (2) Quantum optimization algorithms such as the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) provide solutions for complex optimization problems using the following cost function representation (Equation 3): 𝐶(𝛾, 𝛽) = ⟨𝛾, 𝛽| 𝐻_𝐶 | 𝛾, 𝛽⟩ (3) where HC is the problem Hamiltonian encoding the cost function, and parameters 𝛾 and 𝛽 are iteratively optimized.

Another widely used approach in quantum machine learning is the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE), which aims to minimize an expectation value with respect to parameterized quantum states, as given by Equation (4): 𝑚𝑖𝑛 *𝜃+ ⟨ 𝜓(𝜃) | 𝐻 | 𝜓(𝜃) ⟩ (4) 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 ( 𝐻 ) is the Hamiltonian representing the problem, and (|𝜓(𝜃)⟩) is the variational quantum state. In addition, quantum kernel methods transform classical data into highdimensional quantum feature spaces using kernel functions of the form presented in Equation (5): 𝐾(𝑥𝑖 , 𝑥𝑗 ) = ⟨𝜙(𝑥𝑖 )|𝜙(𝑥𝑗 )⟩ (5) where (ϕ(𝑥)) represents a quantum feature mapping that leverages entanglement and superposition to capture complex relationships within the data.

Fig. 3. Layers of Classical Computer vs Quantum Computer 4.2. Optimization and Quantum Neural Networks Another area where quantum computing enhances ML is optimization, which is a core component of many learning algorithms. Traditional optimization techniques, such as gradient descent, often struggle with high-dimensional and non-convex optimization problems. In classical machine learning, gradient descent updates model parameters iteratively using the following equation: θ𝑡+1 = θ𝑡 − η∇𝐽(θ𝑡 ) (8) Quantum computing offers improved optimization methods, including Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) and Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE), which provide more efficient solutions to combinatorial optimization problems [8]. The QAOA approach aims to minimize the expectation value of a cost function encoded in a Hamiltonian HCH_CHC using the formula: 𝐶(γ, β) = ⟨γ, β| 𝐻_𝐶 | γ, β⟩ (9) where γ and β are variational parameters optimized to find the minimum energy state.

Another widely used quantum optimization approach is VQE, which seeks to minimize the expectation value of the system Hamiltonian H: min _*θ+ ⟨ψ(θ) | 𝐻 | ψ(θ) ⟩ (10) These quantum optimization methods are particularly useful in training deep learning models, where optimizing large numbers of parameters is a time-consuming process.

By leveraging quantum-enhanced optimization (Equations 2 and 3), ML models can potentially converge faster and avoid local minima more effectively than classical approaches (Equation 1) [9].

4.1. Quantum Algorithms and Techniques One of the most promising contributions of quantum computing to machine learning (ML) is its ability to speed up classical algorithms. Classical ML models, such as support vector machines (SVMs), neural networks, and clustering techniques, require substantial computational resources when handling high-dimensional data. Quantum computing offers acceleration in various ML tasks via quantum kernels, which facilitate quantum-enhanced feature mapping. Quantum kernel methods transform classical data into quantum states, allowing quantum computers to detect patterns in complex datasets more efficiently than classical approaches. For instance, quantum SVMs take advantage of quantum kernels to enhance classification tasks, providing exponential speedup in some instances.

In classical machine learning, optimization tasks often utilize stochastic gradient descent (SGD), where parameter updates are based on mini-batches of data, as described in Equation (6): 𝜃𝑡+1 = 𝜃𝑡 − 𝜂

1

∑𝑖 1 𝛻𝐽𝑖 (𝜃𝑡 )

(6)

In addition to optimization, quantum neural networks (QNNs) are a promising avenue in QML. Unlike classical neural networks that rely on classical logic gates and matrix multiplications, QNNs utilize quantum circuits to represent and process information. These networks exploit quantum entanglement and superposition to represent complex relationships within data, potentially leading to more efficient learning processes [10]. The evolution of a

The classical approach to solving machine learning problems often involves calculating cost functions such as mean squared error (MSE) for regression tasks, shown in Equation (7): 1 ∑𝑖 1(ℎ𝜃 (𝑥𝑖 ) − 𝑦𝑖 )2 𝐽(𝜃) = (7) 2

© 2025, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.315

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 780

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 12 Issue: 07 | Jul 2025

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

quantum state in a QNN is governed by unitary transformations, commonly represented as: |ψ𝑡+1 ⟩ = 𝑈(θ𝑡 )|ψ𝑡 ⟩ (11) where U(θt) represents a parameterized quantum gate acting on the quantum state ∣ψt⟩.

Early research suggests that QNNs could outperform classical deep learning models in specific applications, such as reinforcement learning and generative modeling (Equation 4).

This encoding procedure is frequently computationally intensive and adds further complexity to ML workflows [17].

Notwithstanding these challenges, research in QML is advancing, with the emergence of frameworks such as Qiskit Machine Learning, PennyLane, TensorFlow Quantum, and Cirq, which offer tools for simulating and implementing quantum ML algorithms. These frameworks allow researchers to explore hybrid quantum-classical models, merging quantum speed advantages with classical reliability.

As quantum hardware continues to improve, these tools will aid in the integration of QML into practical applications, potentially leading to significant breakthroughs in areas such as drug discovery, financial modeling, materials science, and artificial intelligence [18], [19].

EarlyresearchsuggeststhatQNNs could outperform classical deep learning models in specific applications, such as reinforcement learning and generative modeling [11].

4.3. Clustering, Dimensionality Reduction, and PCA Quantum computing also contributes to clustering and principal component analysis (PCA), which are essential techniques in ML for dimensionality reduction and data segmentation. Classical k-means clustering aims to minimize the within-cluster variance using the cost function: 𝐽 = ∑𝑘𝑖 1 ∑𝑥∈𝐶𝑖 ||𝑥 − 𝜇𝑖 ||2 (12) Quantum k-means clustering algorithms have been proposed to enhance classical clustering methods by reducing the computational complexity of distance calculations between data points [12]. 𝐷𝑖𝑗 = |ϕ(𝑥𝑖 ) − ϕ(𝑥𝑗 )|2 (13)

Fig. 4. Computation Time Ultimately, quantum computing has the capability to markedly boost machine learning by expediting computations, enhancing optimization, and introducing ground breaking algorithms that excel beyond conventional methods.

Similarly, Quantum PCA (QPCA) provides a quantumenhanced approach to extracting the most significant features from high-dimensional datasets. The quantum analog of PCA is based on estimating the eigenvalues of the covariance matrix Σ [13]. Σ𝑣 = λ𝑣 (14) These quantum techniques enable faster and more efficient analysis of large datasets, making them valuable tools in big data applications [14].

5. CHALLENGES & ADVANCEMENTS In spite of these advancements, QML encounters numerous challenges and limitations that need to be resolved prior to achieving widespread adoption. One of the primary challenges is hardware constraints, as existing quantum computers—especially Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices—experience issues with noise, limited qubit coherence, and elevated error rates [15]. These constraints hinder the scalability of quantum ML models and complicate the reliable execution of complex computations. Another significant challenge is the encoding of quantum data, as classical data must be transformed into quantum states before it can be processed by a quantum computer [16].

© 2025, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.315

Fig.5. Energy Consumption

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 781

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 12 Issue: 07 | Jul 2025

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

Fig.6. Accuracy Although the practical application remains difficult due to hardware restrictions and algorithmic challenges, persistent research and advancements in quantum hardware and software are consistently broadening the scope of what can be achieved. As quantum technology develops, its integration with machine learning is projected to unveil new avenues for tackling complex issues that were previously unattainable with classical computing methods. Quantum Machine Learning exists at the junction of two ground breaking fields, promising a future where computational intelligence attains extraordinary levels of efficiency and capability.

Classical Computing

Computational Model

Deterministic and sequential

Probabilistic processing

Processing Unit

CPU/GPU/TPU

Qubits

Optimization Speed

Slower for highdimensional data

Potential exponential speedup

Parallelism

Limited to a fixed number of processors

Exploits superposition massive parallelism

© 2025, IRJET

|

Exponential scaling specific problems)

Memory Handling

Requires large memory for highdimensional data

Can encode large states compactly using entanglement

Energy Consumption

High energy usage for complex computations

Potentially parallelism

Noise Sensitivity

Robust against minor errors

Highly sensitive decoherence and noise

Scalability

Scales well with available hardware

Limited by current qubit count and coherence time

Maturity

Well-established with extensive libraries

Emerging with ongoing hardware improvements

lower

(for

due

to

to

6. CONCLUSION Quantum Machine Learning (QML) merges quantum computing with standard machine learning to enhance data processing and modeling. By employing quantum properties such as superposition and entanglement, QML aims to surpass the limitations of traditional machine learning, resulting in faster and more efficient algorithms.

Traditional machine learning struggles with issues like data quality, high computational requirements, and difficulties in scaling and interpreting models. These challenges complicate the handling of large data sets and the resolution of complex problems. Quantum computing may provide solutions to these challenges by managing multiple states simultaneously, leading to improvements in areas like neural networks and clustering.

Nevertheless, QML is still in its developmental phase, encountering challenges such as hardware constraints from existing quantum devices, especially Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum systems, which suffer from errors and limited complexity. The process of converting classical data into quantum formats is also intricate. In spite of these hurdles, platforms like Qiskit and TensorFlow Quantum are being created to facilitate the application of QML. Hybrid approaches that combine quantum and classical techniques exhibit potential across various domains, yet further research and collaboration are essential to fully realize QML's capabilities.

Quantum Computing and

Polynomial scaling

Table 1. Feature comparison of Classical Computing vs Quantum Computing.

Fig.7. Training Time Feature

Algorithm Efficiency

parallel

REFERENCES [1] S. Sharma, A. Gupta, and R. Singh, "Quantum Machine Learning: A comprehensive review on optimization of machine learning algorithms," in Proceedings of the

for

Impact Factor value: 8.315

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 782

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET)

e-ISSN: 2395-0056

Volume: 12 Issue: 07 | Jul 2025

p-ISSN: 2395-0072

www.irjet.net

IEEE International Conference on Computing, Communication, and Automation (ICCCA), (2021) [2] M. A. Khan and S. A. Khan, "An Introduction to Quantum Machine Learning Techniques," in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies (ICET), (2021) [3] Sharma and P. K. Mishra, "Machine Learning: Quantum vs Classical," IEEE Access, vol. 8, (2020) [4] S. Das, A. Ghosh, and S. Chakrabarti, "Quantum Machine Learning and Recent Advancements," in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (ICSEC), (2022) [5] M. Schuld and F. Petruccione, "Quantum Machine Learning: Recent Advances and Outlook," IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 70, no. 10, (2021) [6] Y. Li, X. Liu, and J. Du, "Quantum Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Overview and Analysis," in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Applications (ICAICA), (2022) [7] Kumar and S. Sharma, "Implementation of Quantum Machine Learning Algorithms: A Review," in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Computing and Communication Technologies (CONECCT), (2022) [8] P. Rebentrost, M. Mohseni, and S. Lloyd, "Quantum Support Vector Machine for Big Data Classification," in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), (2014) [9] N. Wiebe, D. Braun, and S. Lloyd, "Quantum Algorithm for Data Fitting," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 56, no. 1, (2015) [10] M. Schuld, I. Sinayskiy, and F. Petruccione, "Prediction by Linear Regression on a Quantum Computer," IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 26, no. 1, (2015) [11] W. Harrow, A. Hassidim, and S. Lloyd, "Quantum Algorithm for Solving Linear Systems of Equations," in Proceedings of the IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), (2009) [12] D. W. Berry, A. M. Childs, and R. Kothari, "Hamiltonian Simulation with Nearly Optimal Dependence on All Parameters," in Proceedings of the IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), (2015) [13] S. Lloyd, M. Mohseni, and P. Rebentrost, "Quantum Principal Component Analysis," IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, vol. 1 (2014) [14] Z. Zhao, J. K. Fitzsimons, and J. F. Fitzsimons, "Quantum Assisted Gaussian Process Regression," IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 29, no. 5, (2018) [15] N. Soklakov and R. Schack, "Efficient State Preparation for a Register of Quantum Bits," IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, vol. 2, (2005)

© 2025, IRJET

|

Impact Factor value: 8.315

[16]

V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, "Quantum Random Access Memory," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 51, no. 6. (2005) [17] S. Aaronson, "Read the Fine Print," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 52, no. 10, (2006) [18] J. Bang, A. Dutta, S.-W. Lee, and J. Kim, "Optimal Usage of Quantum Random Access Memory in Quantum Machine Learning," IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 30, no. 1, (2019) [19] D. Peddireddy, V. Bansal, Z. Jacob, and V. Aggarwal, "Tensor Ring Parametrized Variational Quantum Circuits for Large Scale Quantum Machine Learning," in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), (2022) [20] Griol-Barres, S. Milla, A. Cebrian, Y. Mansoori, and J. Millet, "Variational Quantum Circuits for Machine Learning: An Application for the Detection of Weak Signals," IEEE Access, vol. 9, (2021)

|

ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal

|

Page 783