The Role of Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers in Improving Education Outcomes

Page 301

10

China Case Study XIAOXIA WANG AND BINZHEN WU

INTRODUCTION China has the largest education system in the world, with 270 million students and 16 million teachers working in 514,000 educational institutions as of 2018. It achieved universal coverage of nine-year compulsory education in 2011, a remarkable increase over the gross enrollment rate of only 66 percent in junior high schools in 1978. In the 40 years from 1978 to 2018, the gross enrollment rate for senior high schools more than doubled (from 34 percent to 88 percent), the rate for higher education increased 17 times (from 2.7 percent to 46 percent), and the rate for kindergartens increased sevenfold (from 11 percent to 80 percent). The number of undergraduates in regular higher education institutions was 9 million in 2019, more than 20 times the number in 1978. China now sends more students abroad than any other country.1 Government funds are the main revenue source for schools, accounting for more than 70 percent of total education expenditure since 2008. Education in China is managed mostly by the state-run public education system, although the number of nonpublic schools has increased steadily in recent years. In 2017, about 95 percent of primary schools were public schools. The proportion of public schools declines with the level of education, dropping to about 70 percent for higher education. Financing such a large public education system has been a challenge for the Chinese government, and it became even more difficult after China exempted students from tuition fees for compulsory education and abolished rural agricultural taxes and fees in the 2000s. Nevertheless, there has been a tremendous increase in government expenditure on education in China, and the educational system has become increasingly reliant on the government. Figure 10.1 shows that government expenditure per student for all education levels (kindergarten to university) increased by almost 15 times in nominal terms from ¥ 826 in 1998 to ¥ 13,091 in 2018. Government educational expenditure as a share of total educational expenditure increased from 69 percent in 1998 to 80 percent in 2018. Government educational expenditure as a share of gross domestic product (GDP) increased from 2.4 percent in 1998 to 4 percent in 2018. In addition, the government spent a larger share of its budget on education after 2000, increasing from 13.8 percent in 2000 to a peak of 16.3 percent in 2011 before dropping to 14.5 percent in 2018. These figures  265


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Notes

2min
page 333

References

9min
pages 334-339

Key policy directions

2min
page 332

Fiscal transfer mechanisms

2min
page 312

education?

2min
page 311

10.2 Education expenditure in Shandong, 2018

7min
pages 307-309

9.1 Evolution of the allocation mechanism in school finance

2min
page 288

9.2 Improving education outcomes in Ceará, Brazil

5min
pages 296-297

Key policy directions to strengthen decentralized education financing

5min
pages 294-295

Introduction

2min
page 301

9.4 Pillars for central government education transfers to municipalities

4min
pages 284-285

governments

7min
pages 274-276

Conclusion

2min
page 265

References

3min
pages 268-270

Notes

7min
pages 266-267

8.2 Change in IDEB scores, 2005–17

1min
page 263

Impact of Brazil’s decentralized financing system on subnational spending and education outcomes

2min
page 258

in Ceará

4min
pages 253-254

8.10 Federal contributions to FUNDEB, 2007–17

2min
page 252

8.7 Brazil’s results on PISA, 2000–18

1min
page 245

8.1 Learning poverty in Brazilian municipalities, 2017

1min
page 244

8.1 Preuniversity education responsibilities of governments in Brazil

4min
pages 240-241

Introduction

4min
pages 237-238

References

1min
pages 235-236

7.9 Impact of total local expenditure on reading

2min
page 230

7.1 Distribution of education transfers as a zero-sum game

5min
pages 217-218

7.9 Subnational education spending by financing source, 2018

4min
pages 211-212

How is the system financed? Effects of decentralized financing system on subnational spending

2min
page 207

and 2018

2min
page 201

6.13 Transfers and education spending

1min
page 191

Context

1min
page 199

7.12 Allocation of education transfers, 2005–19

2min
page 215

6.15 Predicted education outcomes and district spending

1min
page 194

6.14 District spending and education outcomes

4min
pages 192-193

Introduction

1min
page 173

Fiscal transfer mechanisms

2min
page 183

References

12min
pages 168-172

Notes

9min
pages 165-167

Key policy directions to strengthen the decentralized education finance system

5min
pages 163-164

5.24 GERs in government primary schools, by LG, 2019/20

1min
page 155

and high primary GER and falling secondary GER, 1996/97–2019/20

1min
page 152

Effects of the decentralized finance system on subnational spending and education outcomes

4min
pages 150-151

Introduction

4min
pages 121-122

5.2 Government responsibilities under the Education Act

12min
pages 127-132

4.18 Fund flows in education

1min
page 109

for education

5min
pages 103-104

governments

2min
page 93

4.1 Population pyramid of Sudan, 2000–30

1min
page 90

4.9 Gender parity index, by state

2min
page 98

Notes

2min
page 82

Introduction

1min
page 89

References

10min
pages 83-88

Political economy constraints

2min
page 81

transfers for education

13min
pages 75-80

Education (FUNDEB

2min
page 66

Intergovernmental transfers

2min
page 48

3.3 Marginal effects of fiscal transfers on subnational education spending

5min
pages 61-62

3.3 The No Child Left Behind Act in the United States

5min
pages 72-73

outcomes?

5min
pages 70-71

Tax assignment

2min
page 47

Impact of fiscal transfers in education: A literature review

7min
pages 51-53
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
The Role of Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers in Improving Education Outcomes by World Bank Publications - Issuu