The Role of Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers in Improving Education Outcomes

Page 252

216 |  The Role of Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers in Improving Education Outcomes

Since FUNDEB’s creation, its resources have constantly increased, which makes it a significant financing source for small municipalities and poor states. Between 2007 and 2017, the resources allocated to FUNDEB increased from approximately R$81 billion to more than R$132 billion. In the same period, the federal contribution increased from R$3.6 billion to approximately R$12.8 billion (see figure 8.10). These represent substantial increases for small municipalities and poor states. Currently one-third of the states, mostly those in the North and Northeast regions, receive the federal top-up. In municipalities with fewer than 50,000 inhabitants, FUNDEB’s resources represent 89 percent of their education budgets. In contrast, in municipalities with more than 1 million citizens, FUNDEB accounts for 44 percent of their education budgets. A recent amendment to the Brazilian constitution increases the federal contribution to FUNDEB, makes it more equitable, and mandates a results-based component for all Brazilian states. The amendment addresses equity more directly by allocating additional resources to municipal school networks with low spending and setting higher weights for enrollment of disadvantaged students, acknowledging that it is more costly to achieve high education outcomes in poor and marginalized contexts. The amendment (1) increases the federal top-up every year to 23 percent by 2026, starting with 12 percent in 2021; (2) improves the regional equity generated by the federal top-up by transferring 10.5 percentage points of the additional funds to the municipal school networks with the lowest spending per student, rather than assigning the 10 percent federal contribution to the states with the lowest spending per student, which gave rich municipalities in poor states additional federal support but left poor municipalities in rich states without additional funds; (3) allocates 2.5 percentage points out of the 13 percent additional federal top-up to transfers to school networks according to improvements in education results; (4) changes the constitutional article related to the ICMS transfers to municipalities, linking them to improvements in education results (as in Ceará’s results-based model), and obligating all states to have at least 10 percent (and up to 35 percent) of the transfers linked to education outcomes; and (5) establishes an exogenous minimum spending level per student, to be defined by state law.13

FIGURE 8.10

2017 R$, billions

Federal contributions to FUNDEB, 2007–17 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total

State and municipal

Federal

Source: FUNDEB Financial Statements 2007–17. Note: FUNDEB = Fund for the Development of Basic Education; R$ = Brazilian real.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Notes

2min
page 333

References

9min
pages 334-339

Key policy directions

2min
page 332

Fiscal transfer mechanisms

2min
page 312

education?

2min
page 311

10.2 Education expenditure in Shandong, 2018

7min
pages 307-309

9.1 Evolution of the allocation mechanism in school finance

2min
page 288

9.2 Improving education outcomes in Ceará, Brazil

5min
pages 296-297

Key policy directions to strengthen decentralized education financing

5min
pages 294-295

Introduction

2min
page 301

9.4 Pillars for central government education transfers to municipalities

4min
pages 284-285

governments

7min
pages 274-276

Conclusion

2min
page 265

References

3min
pages 268-270

Notes

7min
pages 266-267

8.2 Change in IDEB scores, 2005–17

1min
page 263

Impact of Brazil’s decentralized financing system on subnational spending and education outcomes

2min
page 258

in Ceará

4min
pages 253-254

8.10 Federal contributions to FUNDEB, 2007–17

2min
page 252

8.7 Brazil’s results on PISA, 2000–18

1min
page 245

8.1 Learning poverty in Brazilian municipalities, 2017

1min
page 244

8.1 Preuniversity education responsibilities of governments in Brazil

4min
pages 240-241

Introduction

4min
pages 237-238

References

1min
pages 235-236

7.9 Impact of total local expenditure on reading

2min
page 230

7.1 Distribution of education transfers as a zero-sum game

5min
pages 217-218

7.9 Subnational education spending by financing source, 2018

4min
pages 211-212

How is the system financed? Effects of decentralized financing system on subnational spending

2min
page 207

and 2018

2min
page 201

6.13 Transfers and education spending

1min
page 191

Context

1min
page 199

7.12 Allocation of education transfers, 2005–19

2min
page 215

6.15 Predicted education outcomes and district spending

1min
page 194

6.14 District spending and education outcomes

4min
pages 192-193

Introduction

1min
page 173

Fiscal transfer mechanisms

2min
page 183

References

12min
pages 168-172

Notes

9min
pages 165-167

Key policy directions to strengthen the decentralized education finance system

5min
pages 163-164

5.24 GERs in government primary schools, by LG, 2019/20

1min
page 155

and high primary GER and falling secondary GER, 1996/97–2019/20

1min
page 152

Effects of the decentralized finance system on subnational spending and education outcomes

4min
pages 150-151

Introduction

4min
pages 121-122

5.2 Government responsibilities under the Education Act

12min
pages 127-132

4.18 Fund flows in education

1min
page 109

for education

5min
pages 103-104

governments

2min
page 93

4.1 Population pyramid of Sudan, 2000–30

1min
page 90

4.9 Gender parity index, by state

2min
page 98

Notes

2min
page 82

Introduction

1min
page 89

References

10min
pages 83-88

Political economy constraints

2min
page 81

transfers for education

13min
pages 75-80

Education (FUNDEB

2min
page 66

Intergovernmental transfers

2min
page 48

3.3 Marginal effects of fiscal transfers on subnational education spending

5min
pages 61-62

3.3 The No Child Left Behind Act in the United States

5min
pages 72-73

outcomes?

5min
pages 70-71

Tax assignment

2min
page 47

Impact of fiscal transfers in education: A literature review

7min
pages 51-53
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.