The Role of Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers in Improving Education Outcomes

Page 168

132 |  The Role of Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers in Improving Education Outcomes

60. Budget 2019–20, Online Transfer Information Management System (database), Republic of Uganda (accessed August 2020), otims.go.ug. 61. Household consumption figures for 2019 are from World Bank (2019a). Household spending shares on different levels of education are from the National Education Accounts of 2014 (Government of Uganda et al. 2016). Shares of household education spending for 2012–13 and 2016–17 are from the national household surveys of those years (Uganda Bureau of Statistics 2016a, 2016b). 62. The number of government-supported secondary students in both partnership and government schools has declined by an estimated 30 percent over the past four years according to capitation grant records. 63. Also as reported in the 2018 Uwezo survey as an average of 933 classes (Twaweza 2018b). However, the survey methods differed as the Service Delivery Indicators study recorded “in-use books” and made classroom visits unannounced (Wane and Martin 2016). 64. For a discussion of the likely resource capacity of a district in the first few years after it has been created, see Green (2015). 65. Urban areas are expected to more than triple in total population before 2050, and rural areas are expected to increase their total population by 46 percent (United Nations 2018). 66. Wage grant values per teacher are similar across LGs, making this a good proxy for the student-teacher ratio. 67. P1 was not used because of the disguised preprimary enrollment and chronic repetition issues described in Weatherholt et al. (2019) and Brunette et al. (2017). LGs are not disaggregated in the enrollment data in the 2013 and 2014 Statistical Abstracts or in the PLE 2019 outcomes. We used 2013, rather than 2014, data for enrollment, because of recording issues in the Statistical Abstract. 68. Similar sample-based SACMEQ assessments were carried out in 2000 and 2007. 69. See Twaweza (2019a) for a full explanation.

REFERENCES ACODE-U. 2020. “An Analysis of the Proposed National Budget FY 2019/20 and Proposals for Reallocation.” Advocates Coalition for Development and Environment, Kampala, Uganda. Allen, R., P. Elks, R. Outhred, and P. Varley. 2016. “Uganda’s Assessment System: A Road Map for Enhancing Assessment in Education.” Health & Education Advice & Resource Team, Oxford, UK. Altinyelkin, H.K. 2010. “A Converging Pedagogy in the Developing World? Insights from Uganda and Turkey.” In Global Education Policy and International Development: New Agendas, Issues and Policies, edited by A. Verger, M. Novelli, and H.K. Altinyelken, 201–22. London: Bloomsbury. Atuhurra, J., and V. Alina. 2018. “Basic Education Curriculum Effectiveness in East Africa: A Descriptive Analysis of Primary Mathematics in Uganda Using the ‘Surveys of Enacted Curriculum’.” Working Paper 87583, University Library of Munich, Munich, Germany. Atuhurra, J., and M. Kaffenburger. 2019. “System (In)Coherence Seen Through a Curriculum Lens: Ugandan Teachers Face Conflicting Demands from Curriculum and Examination Bodies.” Research on Improving Systems of Education (RISE) (blog), May 23, https://riseprogramme.org/blog/system_incoherence_curriculum. Bashir, S., M. Lockheed, E. Ninan, and J.P. Tan. 2018. Facing Forward: Schooling for Learning in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank. Bold, T., M. Kimenyi, G. Mwabu, A. Ng’ang’a, and J. Sandefur. 2018. “Experimental Evidence on Scaling Up Education Reforms in Kenya.” Journal of Political Economy 168 (December): 1–20. Brunette, T., L. Crouch, C. Cummiskey, A. Dick, C. Henny, R. Jordan, K. Merseth, R. Nabacwa, J. Pressley, and T. Weatherholt. 2017. “Repetition of Primary 1 and Pre-primary Education in Uganda.” Working Paper, 2017-02, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC. Brunette, T., B. Piper, R. Jordan, S. King, and R. Nabacwa. 2019. “The Impact of Mother Tongue Reading Instruction in Twelve Ugandan Languages and the Role of Language Complexity,


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Notes

2min
page 333

References

9min
pages 334-339

Key policy directions

2min
page 332

Fiscal transfer mechanisms

2min
page 312

education?

2min
page 311

10.2 Education expenditure in Shandong, 2018

7min
pages 307-309

9.1 Evolution of the allocation mechanism in school finance

2min
page 288

9.2 Improving education outcomes in Ceará, Brazil

5min
pages 296-297

Key policy directions to strengthen decentralized education financing

5min
pages 294-295

Introduction

2min
page 301

9.4 Pillars for central government education transfers to municipalities

4min
pages 284-285

governments

7min
pages 274-276

Conclusion

2min
page 265

References

3min
pages 268-270

Notes

7min
pages 266-267

8.2 Change in IDEB scores, 2005–17

1min
page 263

Impact of Brazil’s decentralized financing system on subnational spending and education outcomes

2min
page 258

in Ceará

4min
pages 253-254

8.10 Federal contributions to FUNDEB, 2007–17

2min
page 252

8.7 Brazil’s results on PISA, 2000–18

1min
page 245

8.1 Learning poverty in Brazilian municipalities, 2017

1min
page 244

8.1 Preuniversity education responsibilities of governments in Brazil

4min
pages 240-241

Introduction

4min
pages 237-238

References

1min
pages 235-236

7.9 Impact of total local expenditure on reading

2min
page 230

7.1 Distribution of education transfers as a zero-sum game

5min
pages 217-218

7.9 Subnational education spending by financing source, 2018

4min
pages 211-212

How is the system financed? Effects of decentralized financing system on subnational spending

2min
page 207

and 2018

2min
page 201

6.13 Transfers and education spending

1min
page 191

Context

1min
page 199

7.12 Allocation of education transfers, 2005–19

2min
page 215

6.15 Predicted education outcomes and district spending

1min
page 194

6.14 District spending and education outcomes

4min
pages 192-193

Introduction

1min
page 173

Fiscal transfer mechanisms

2min
page 183

References

12min
pages 168-172

Notes

9min
pages 165-167

Key policy directions to strengthen the decentralized education finance system

5min
pages 163-164

5.24 GERs in government primary schools, by LG, 2019/20

1min
page 155

and high primary GER and falling secondary GER, 1996/97–2019/20

1min
page 152

Effects of the decentralized finance system on subnational spending and education outcomes

4min
pages 150-151

Introduction

4min
pages 121-122

5.2 Government responsibilities under the Education Act

12min
pages 127-132

4.18 Fund flows in education

1min
page 109

for education

5min
pages 103-104

governments

2min
page 93

4.1 Population pyramid of Sudan, 2000–30

1min
page 90

4.9 Gender parity index, by state

2min
page 98

Notes

2min
page 82

Introduction

1min
page 89

References

10min
pages 83-88

Political economy constraints

2min
page 81

transfers for education

13min
pages 75-80

Education (FUNDEB

2min
page 66

Intergovernmental transfers

2min
page 48

3.3 Marginal effects of fiscal transfers on subnational education spending

5min
pages 61-62

3.3 The No Child Left Behind Act in the United States

5min
pages 72-73

outcomes?

5min
pages 70-71

Tax assignment

2min
page 47

Impact of fiscal transfers in education: A literature review

7min
pages 51-53
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
The Role of Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers in Improving Education Outcomes by World Bank Publications - Issuu