The Role of Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers in Improving Education Outcomes

Page 163

Uganda Case Study | 127

Regressions carried out for this study (World Bank 2021) suggest that lower poverty rates, lower repetition rates, and lower student-classroom ratios are correlated with higher NAPE, Uwezo, and PLE scores at the LG level. The positive correlation between the share of students who are out of school and higher scores suggests selection effects. Analysis using student scores on the most recent Uwezo assessment in government schools also suggests that household wealth quintile and textbook availability have a small effect and that grade progression has a very large effect.69

KEY POLICY DIRECTIONS TO STRENGTHEN THE DECENTRALIZED EDUCATION FINANCE SYSTEM Although LGs have overseen an expansion in basic education, the analysis in this chapter has shown that the fiscal decentralization framework and systems for primary and secondary education currently in place are not delivering the results that were expected. Specifically: • Despite extensive political and nominal fiscal decentralization, education trends reveal a sustained learning crisis, inequitable access to secondary education by both gender and socioeconomic status, inefficient distribution of both primary school teachers and classrooms, and inadequate levels of funding for nonwage expenditures. • Fiscal decentralization is largely nominal; conditional grants from the central government to LGs provide virtually all funds for basic education service delivery and their use is centrally conditioned. LGs have few discretionary fiscal resources and little ability to raise them. • After more than 20 years of fiscal decentralization, access to services across and within LGs is inequitable. Grants to cover wages are allocated on the basis of a bargaining process with little transparency between the central government and LGs. As a result, student-teacher ratios diverge sharply among LGs. The distribution of schools and classrooms is inequitable, and enrollment is linked to the limited availability of classrooms and teachers. • Conditional grants for education are based on the number of students enrolled rather than on the number of school-age children. This is not unusual. Because enrollment is not independently verified, however, this incentivizes primary repetition and overenrollment and does nothing to improve learning, increase primary school completion, or improve the transition from primary to lower secondary. • Although recent increases have started to reverse the impact of a decade of decline, the level of financing for education services is inadequate. In particular, the central government’s allocation to capitation grants to primary schools remains very small and is inadequate for procuring enough of the instructional materials and other school operational inputs needed to improve learning. • The capacity to implement education decentralization policies is weak because of inadequate funding for routine LG management and oversight of service delivery; insufficient capacity development and technical support to LGs for in-service or preservice teacher training and inspection officers or LG officers responsible for education service delivery; an absence of clarity about delegated responsibilities; and a lack of effective data and accountability mechanisms.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Notes

2min
page 333

References

9min
pages 334-339

Key policy directions

2min
page 332

Fiscal transfer mechanisms

2min
page 312

education?

2min
page 311

10.2 Education expenditure in Shandong, 2018

7min
pages 307-309

9.1 Evolution of the allocation mechanism in school finance

2min
page 288

9.2 Improving education outcomes in Ceará, Brazil

5min
pages 296-297

Key policy directions to strengthen decentralized education financing

5min
pages 294-295

Introduction

2min
page 301

9.4 Pillars for central government education transfers to municipalities

4min
pages 284-285

governments

7min
pages 274-276

Conclusion

2min
page 265

References

3min
pages 268-270

Notes

7min
pages 266-267

8.2 Change in IDEB scores, 2005–17

1min
page 263

Impact of Brazil’s decentralized financing system on subnational spending and education outcomes

2min
page 258

in Ceará

4min
pages 253-254

8.10 Federal contributions to FUNDEB, 2007–17

2min
page 252

8.7 Brazil’s results on PISA, 2000–18

1min
page 245

8.1 Learning poverty in Brazilian municipalities, 2017

1min
page 244

8.1 Preuniversity education responsibilities of governments in Brazil

4min
pages 240-241

Introduction

4min
pages 237-238

References

1min
pages 235-236

7.9 Impact of total local expenditure on reading

2min
page 230

7.1 Distribution of education transfers as a zero-sum game

5min
pages 217-218

7.9 Subnational education spending by financing source, 2018

4min
pages 211-212

How is the system financed? Effects of decentralized financing system on subnational spending

2min
page 207

and 2018

2min
page 201

6.13 Transfers and education spending

1min
page 191

Context

1min
page 199

7.12 Allocation of education transfers, 2005–19

2min
page 215

6.15 Predicted education outcomes and district spending

1min
page 194

6.14 District spending and education outcomes

4min
pages 192-193

Introduction

1min
page 173

Fiscal transfer mechanisms

2min
page 183

References

12min
pages 168-172

Notes

9min
pages 165-167

Key policy directions to strengthen the decentralized education finance system

5min
pages 163-164

5.24 GERs in government primary schools, by LG, 2019/20

1min
page 155

and high primary GER and falling secondary GER, 1996/97–2019/20

1min
page 152

Effects of the decentralized finance system on subnational spending and education outcomes

4min
pages 150-151

Introduction

4min
pages 121-122

5.2 Government responsibilities under the Education Act

12min
pages 127-132

4.18 Fund flows in education

1min
page 109

for education

5min
pages 103-104

governments

2min
page 93

4.1 Population pyramid of Sudan, 2000–30

1min
page 90

4.9 Gender parity index, by state

2min
page 98

Notes

2min
page 82

Introduction

1min
page 89

References

10min
pages 83-88

Political economy constraints

2min
page 81

transfers for education

13min
pages 75-80

Education (FUNDEB

2min
page 66

Intergovernmental transfers

2min
page 48

3.3 Marginal effects of fiscal transfers on subnational education spending

5min
pages 61-62

3.3 The No Child Left Behind Act in the United States

5min
pages 72-73

outcomes?

5min
pages 70-71

Tax assignment

2min
page 47

Impact of fiscal transfers in education: A literature review

7min
pages 51-53
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
The Role of Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers in Improving Education Outcomes by World Bank Publications - Issuu