The Role of Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers in Improving Education Outcomes

Page 127

Uganda Case Study | 91

TABLE 5.2  Government

responsibilities under the Education Act

FUNCTION

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

LOCAL GOVERNMENT

Policy

• Setting policy on all matters concerning education and training • Setting and maintaining the national goals and broad aims of education • Encouraging the development of a national language

n.a.

Teachers

• Registering and licensing of teachers (primary, secondary, postprimary) • Recruiting, deployment, and promotion of teaching and nonteaching staff (postprimary)

• Recruiting, deployment, and promotion of teaching and nonteaching staff (primary) • Management, monitoring, supervising, and disciplining of staff and students (primary) • Ensuring teachers’ welfare

Curriculum and instruction

• Providing learning and instructional materials • Developing and controlling the national curriculum • Determining the language of instruction

n.a.

Evaluation and supervision

• Evaluating academic standards through continuous assessment and national examinations • Developing management policies for all government and government-aided schools and private schools

• Ensuring the supervision of student performance in both public and private schools

Institutions

• Ensuring the equitable geographic distribution of education institutions • Regulating, establishing, and registering educational institutions • Providing buildings (de facto)

• Ensuring the equitable geographic distribution of education institutions • Providing and maintaining buildings (de jure and de facto)

Financing

• Restricting collection of fees by government schools and government-aided schools

• Passing on capitation grants to schools

Source: World Bank based on the Education Act, 2008. Note: n.a. = not applicable.

primary teachers and primary school inspectors within approved personnel budget limits, with the input of the District Education Officer (DEO).24 Two recent surveys have found serious shortcomings in some districts with teacher job vacancies and redeployment, noting that key stakeholders such as headmasters and DEOs are not fully involved in the process (Ernst & Young 2019; Lwanga, Munyambonera, and Guloba 2018). In addition, LGs are authorized to procure and supervise improvements in school infrastructure and to procure and supervise the construction of new schools. Schools themselves have only limited responsibilities, which include hiring contract teachers and nonteaching school staff, procuring instructional materials in addition to those provided by MoES (typically, the textbook budget is minimal and donor-dependent), and procuring small school improvements and administrative necessities (Najjumba, Habyarimana, and Bunjo 2013). Head teachers and school management committees (SMCs), which usually meet only once or twice a year, appear to have, relative to many countries, few mandated responsibilities with respect to teachers, curriculum, or finance (Najjumba, Habyarimana, and Bunjo 2013; Twaweza 2018a, 2018b). Headmasters perceive the DEO as the major decision-maker for teacher transfers or suspensions, as well as the person to whom they submit requests related to school improvements. Teachers are often paid allowances from the capitation grant resources, although this is officially discouraged (National Planning Authority 2018c).

Alignment of funding with responsibilities Virtually all funding for education originates from the central government. Local governments’ own revenues for supporting education are minimal,25 and LGs


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Notes

2min
page 333

References

9min
pages 334-339

Key policy directions

2min
page 332

Fiscal transfer mechanisms

2min
page 312

education?

2min
page 311

10.2 Education expenditure in Shandong, 2018

7min
pages 307-309

9.1 Evolution of the allocation mechanism in school finance

2min
page 288

9.2 Improving education outcomes in Ceará, Brazil

5min
pages 296-297

Key policy directions to strengthen decentralized education financing

5min
pages 294-295

Introduction

2min
page 301

9.4 Pillars for central government education transfers to municipalities

4min
pages 284-285

governments

7min
pages 274-276

Conclusion

2min
page 265

References

3min
pages 268-270

Notes

7min
pages 266-267

8.2 Change in IDEB scores, 2005–17

1min
page 263

Impact of Brazil’s decentralized financing system on subnational spending and education outcomes

2min
page 258

in Ceará

4min
pages 253-254

8.10 Federal contributions to FUNDEB, 2007–17

2min
page 252

8.7 Brazil’s results on PISA, 2000–18

1min
page 245

8.1 Learning poverty in Brazilian municipalities, 2017

1min
page 244

8.1 Preuniversity education responsibilities of governments in Brazil

4min
pages 240-241

Introduction

4min
pages 237-238

References

1min
pages 235-236

7.9 Impact of total local expenditure on reading

2min
page 230

7.1 Distribution of education transfers as a zero-sum game

5min
pages 217-218

7.9 Subnational education spending by financing source, 2018

4min
pages 211-212

How is the system financed? Effects of decentralized financing system on subnational spending

2min
page 207

and 2018

2min
page 201

6.13 Transfers and education spending

1min
page 191

Context

1min
page 199

7.12 Allocation of education transfers, 2005–19

2min
page 215

6.15 Predicted education outcomes and district spending

1min
page 194

6.14 District spending and education outcomes

4min
pages 192-193

Introduction

1min
page 173

Fiscal transfer mechanisms

2min
page 183

References

12min
pages 168-172

Notes

9min
pages 165-167

Key policy directions to strengthen the decentralized education finance system

5min
pages 163-164

5.24 GERs in government primary schools, by LG, 2019/20

1min
page 155

and high primary GER and falling secondary GER, 1996/97–2019/20

1min
page 152

Effects of the decentralized finance system on subnational spending and education outcomes

4min
pages 150-151

Introduction

4min
pages 121-122

5.2 Government responsibilities under the Education Act

12min
pages 127-132

4.18 Fund flows in education

1min
page 109

for education

5min
pages 103-104

governments

2min
page 93

4.1 Population pyramid of Sudan, 2000–30

1min
page 90

4.9 Gender parity index, by state

2min
page 98

Notes

2min
page 82

Introduction

1min
page 89

References

10min
pages 83-88

Political economy constraints

2min
page 81

transfers for education

13min
pages 75-80

Education (FUNDEB

2min
page 66

Intergovernmental transfers

2min
page 48

3.3 Marginal effects of fiscal transfers on subnational education spending

5min
pages 61-62

3.3 The No Child Left Behind Act in the United States

5min
pages 72-73

outcomes?

5min
pages 70-71

Tax assignment

2min
page 47

Impact of fiscal transfers in education: A literature review

7min
pages 51-53
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
The Role of Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers in Improving Education Outcomes by World Bank Publications - Issuu