THE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY • DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGICAL STUDIES
Evaluation Form - Student Teaching Presentations / Demonstrations Name Stefani Migiani
Date
11/19/09 Time 11/19/09
(4) Exemplary
Rating
(3) Proficient
Evaluator Mr. Anderson Visit #
6 Observation 7
(2) Developing
(1-0) Inadequate
W RITTEN TEACHING PLAN
Comments
Class- Drafting [4]
1. Rationale for Lesson & Analysis of Students’ Prior Knowledge
[3]
2. Content Standards & Lesson Objectives
[4]
3. Introduction (Use of Prior Knowledge & “Hook” to Generate Interest/Curiosity)
[4]
4. Body (Formatting with Key Words, Questions to Ask Class & Time Allocation Listed on Plan)
Well thought out. [3] 5. Review (Review Questions Tied to each Objective) [3]
6. Media & References (Media/Instructional Aids Listed; Two/Three References Cited)
[4]
7. Preparation: (Optimum Physical Facilities, Needed Supplies & Equipment Listed),
PRESENTATION
Rating
Comments
[4] 8. Introduction (Sets the Stage, Motivating, Gets Students’ Attention) Students are into it! Little confusion between class challenge and the Toys Are Us Challenge [4]
9. Student Involvement & Teacher Interaction (E.g. Effective Questioning Techniques)
Good having student demonstrating at the board. They like looking to see if the one at the board gets it right. That can be powerful to reinforce comprehension
[4]
10. Continuous & Ongoing Assessment of Instruction (E.g. Formative Assessment)
Good questions and answers
[4]
11. Technical Accuracy & Safety (If Applicable)
[3]
12. Instructional Media (Effective Use of/Models/Teaching Aids)
Handouts, overhead, whiteboard all used well [3] 13. Summary/Review (Evidence of Student Understanding; Objectives Accomplished) [3]
14. Teaching Plan Followed
[4]
15. Class Management & Control
[4]
16. Evidence of Creativity (In Planning and/or Presentation)
Required to creat a board game within parameters should be great activity
[
]
17. Other (Please List_______________________________________________________________________ Page 1 of 2
THE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY • DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGICAL STUDIES
Evaluation Form - Student Teaching Presentations / Demonstrations W ritten Summary & Recommendations Name
Stefani Migiani
Date 11/19/09 Time
10:10 Evaluator Mr. Anderson Visit # 6 Observation #7
1. Great handouts – different fonts. Made ita little busy but interesting to follow. 2. Could use examples of Parker Brothers. Look up their history online http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parker_Brothers http://www.bkfk.com/inventor/parker-george.asp Good one - http://www.spotlightongames.com/list/parker.html Note to students that the majority of Millionaires in this country are not Hollywood stars nor pro ball players. They are inventors 3. May not want to define good samples. You may want to state these are examples of board games. Some are not so good and some are really good. Some look good but don’t follow the design requirements. ID the best can lead to more of the same sample. 4. Good scanning of class while gathered to see samples. Caught student on chair. 5. Great idea for inventing with real –world connection for toy manufacturers challenge.
The Assessment Scale Exemplary Performance in this category is outstanding and well above the expectations of the College and field experience site.
Proficient Competency is evident. Performance in this category meets expectations of The College and field experience site.
1
Dev eloping Performance is slightly below standard. Improvement will be needed to meet minimum performance standards.
Inadequate Performance in this category is generally characterized as unacceptable. Substantial improvement is needed to meet minimum performance standards.
Source: TCNJ School of Education: Creating Agents of Change: The Culminating Clinical Experience Handbook (2007). Ewing, NJ: Support for Teacher Education Programs. 1
Page 2 of 2