THE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY • DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGICAL STUDIES
Evaluation Form - Student Teaching Presentations / Demonstrations Name
Stefanie Migiani
(4) Exemplary
Rating [4]
Date 10/14/09 Time
10:00
Evaluator
(3) Proficient
M. Anderson
Visit # 3
(2) Developing
(1-0) Inadequate
W RITTEN TEACHING PLAN
Comments
1. Rationale for Lesson & Analysis of Students’ Prior Knowledge
[3]
2. Content Standards & Lesson Objectives
[3]
3. Introduction (Use of Prior Knowledge & “Hook” to Generate Interest/Curiosity)
[3]
4. Body (Formatting with Key Words, Questions to Ask Class & Time Allocation Listed on Plan)
[3]
5. Review (Review Questions Tied to each Objective)
[3]
6. Media & References (Media/Instructional Aids Listed; Two/Three References Cited)
[4]
7. Preparation: (Optimum Physical Facilities, Needed Supplies & Equipment Listed),
Rating
PRESENTATION
Comments
[3]
8. Introduction (Sets the Stage, Motivating, Gets Students’ Attention)
[3]
9. Student Involvement & Teacher Interaction (E.g. Effective Questioning Techniques) Students all on task doing their assigned work
[3]
10. Continuous & Ongoing Assessment of Instruction (E.g. Formative Assessment) Asked question and got immediate feedback. Moved around and worked with all students.
[4]
11. Technical Accuracy & Safety (If Applicable) .
[3]
12. Instructional Media (Effective Use of/Models/Teaching Aids) Good use of board
[3]
13. Summary/Review (Evidence of Student Understanding; Objectives Accomplished)
Continuous emphasis on accuracy
Student warned 5 mins. To clean-up . Work will continue next period
[3]
14. Teaching Plan Followed Lesson plan well done and followed
[3]
15. Class Management & Control W ell behaved.
Page 1 of 2
THE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY • DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGICAL STUDIES
Evaluation Form - Student Teaching Presentations / Demonstrations W ritten Summary & Recommendations Name
Stefanie Migiani
Date10/14/09
Time
10:00 Evaluator M. Anderson Visit # 3
[n/a] 16. Evidence of Creativity (In Planning and/or Presentation) Not in this learning how to letter assignments [
]
17. Other (Please List_______________________________________________________________________
Was able to explain in detail the grading system. Had a strong knowledge of the computer attendance system and how the school responds to the input.
The Assessment Scale Exemplary Performance in this category is outstanding and well above the expectations of the College and field experience site.
Proficient Competency is evident. Performance in this category meets expectations of The College and field experience site.
1
Dev eloping Performance is slightly below standard. Improvement will be needed to meet minimum performance standards.
Inadequate Performance in this category is generally characterized as unacceptable. Substantial improvement is needed to meet minimum performance standards.
Source: TCNJ School of Education: Creating Agents of Change: The Culminating Clinical Experience Handbook (2007). Ewing, NJ: Support for Teacher Education Programs. 1
Page 2 of 2