Pledge Report FAO/OIE Global Conference on Foot-and-Mouth Disease Control (2012)

Page 127

Session 5

The FMD virus pools and the regional programmes

Three topotypes under type O were identified in the last ten years: ME-SA, SEA and Cathay, with concurrent co-circulation of all these three previously observed. ME-SA topotypes were mostly further identified to be of the PanAsia lineage, whereas reported SEA were Mya-98. Only topotype Asia, most often of the SEA-97 lineage, is identified for serotype A in the region. No distinct topotype is established for serotype Asia 1. Observations on these lineages, however, should be viewed with caution, as more supporting phylogenetic data may be needed for these to be conclusive. Nevertheless, it is worth exploring further as this can provide guidance for strategic vaccination campaigns designed to target the disease at source (Fig. 1). Count of serotype

Year/month

Fig. 1 Monthly FMD outbreaks in SEACFMD Member Countries O/ME-SA/PanAsia

First identified in Northern India in 1990, the PanAsia strain is an emergent sublineage of FMD virus that has spread through southern Asia, the Middle East and Europe. From 1998 to 2001, this virus caused an explosive pandemic in Asia, extending to parts of Africa and Europe, including countries that have been historically free from FMD for decades. It is generally believed that this strain was first introduced in South-East Asia in 1999 and appears to have continued to persist (13). In the last ten years, PanAsia has been frequently identified in outbreaks from the region, particularly from Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam, where, respectively, 71.4%, 64% and 55% of the isolates so far characterised were of PanAsia lineage (Table IV). It has also been recognised in outbreaks from China and Malaysia, but not in Myanmar or Thailand, except for one sample from Thailand in 2011. As shown in Table V, PanAsia was recovered in several outbreaks observed in Laos (March 2003 to January 2004), Cambodia (April 2004 to July 2004), Vietnam (July 2004 to August 2005), Malaysia (November 2005 to April 2006) and again in Cambodia (June to August 2006). It should be noted, however, that on most occasions, it is co-circulating with other FMD virus types. Interestingly, after its last recorded recovery in Cambodia in July 2006, PanAsia was not recovered until May 2010, from a pig in Vietnam. A major epizootic followed, extending until the early part of 2011. During this period, PanAsia was recovered from Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam. The only other strain found in these three countries was Mya-98, recovered from outbreaks north of Vietnam and Laos around the first quarter of 2010 and before the wave of the PanAsia outbreaks. Interestingly, Mya98 outbreaks were also being reported in Malaysia and Thailand during this period. This indicates that the observed 2010/11 epizootic

130

The FAO/OIE Global Conference on Foot and Mouth Disease Control


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

The initial cost estimate of the FAO/OIE global foot and mouth disease control strategy

4min
pages 221-228

FMD in the SADC region: historical perspectives, control strategies and trade implications

26min
pages 173-180

The Global Foot and Mouth Disease Control Strategy

27min
pages 211-220

Global foot and mouth disease portfolio review

15min
pages 199-204

The Hemispheric Program for the Eradication of Foot-and-Mouth Disease

35min
pages 181-198

Foot and mouth disease in West and Central Africa

20min
pages 163-172

Virus Pool 2 – South Asia

17min
pages 141-146

Foot and mouth disease in South-East Asia: current situation and control strategies

36min
pages 127-140

Experience of FMD control in Thailand: the continual attempts and foresight

10min
pages 121-126

Vaccine use for foot and mouth disease control

31min
pages 103-114

Foot and mouth disease: ongoing research and its application in the foot and mouth disease control policy

18min
pages 115-120

Vaccines: types, quality control, matching and supply

24min
pages 95-102

International and regional reference laboratory network

9min
pages 91-94

Diagnostic tools and their role in the global control of foot and mouth disease

15min
pages 85-90

situations

23min
pages 75-84

including vaccination and wildlife issues

13min
pages 69-74

Maintaining foot and mouth disease-free status and providing evidence: the South American experience

22min
pages 61-68

OIE endorsement of foot and mouth disease control programmes and recognition of disease-free status

16min
pages 47-54

Maintaining foot and mouth disease-free status – the European experience

15min
pages 55-60

national and regional FMD control

28min
pages 27-36

veterinary legislation, PVS Evaluation follow-up

24min
pages 37-46

SESSION Key elements in the prevention and control of FMD and in implementing the strategy

1min
page 4

SESSION Global FMD Control Strategy, socio-economic rationale and implementation costs

11min
pages 7-12
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Pledge Report FAO/OIE Global Conference on Foot-and-Mouth Disease Control (2012) by EuFMD - Issuu