Primer on Large-Scale Assessments of Educational Achievement

Page 74

52

PRIMER ON LARGE-SCALE ASSESSMENTS OF EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT

BOX 4.4. Item Writing Guidelines • Well-written items should: • Address a key learning area • Be a constructive, meaningful task • Be clearly mapped to a learning outcome, intended grade level, and cognitive process as defined in the assessment framework or test blueprint • Be fair and unbiased • Provide the student with clear direction on what they are required to do • Stand alone and not depend on understanding based on a previous item • Use simple, clear wording, avoiding vague, unfamiliar terms • Use short, direct, correctly punctuated sentences, avoiding difficult logic and double negatives • Be consistent in use of terms and measurements • Be culturally relevant and contextualized. • Well-written multiple-choice items should also • Include response options of similar length and style. The correct answer should not stand out from the others because of its length, wording, or some other surface feature. • Include unambiguous response options. Avoid distractors that overlap in meaning. • Include only one correct response option. Avoid partially correct distractors. • Include plausible but incorrect response options. • Well-written open-ended and constructed-response items should also have clear, objective scoring criteria. Source: Adapted from Anderson and Morgan 2008.

Subject matter experts should be recruited to develop items. These experts are usually subject teachers who are experienced in the school grades assessed and curriculum specialists familiar with student learning trajectories. Teachers and other subject matter experts can also review and provide feedback on items that their peers develop. Training should be provided to teachers or other experts participating in the item development process who are not familiar with item writing and review procedures. Most national and international large-scale assessments primarily rely on multiple-choice items to assess student achievement. However, it is often necessary to include short-answer, open-ended items as well, which require that students write a word, phrase, or sentence(s) to demonstrate understanding. Open-ended items are appropriate when the task can be accurately defined and reliably scored and a range of possible answers provide evidence of the targeted knowledge or ability (Anderson and Morgan 2008).


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Glossary of Technical Terms

7min
pages 159-163

Asia Primary Learning Metrics 2019 Assessment

1min
page 155

Primary Learning Metrics 2019 Reading Literacy Assessment

1min
page 154

Benchmarks for Grades 4 and 6

2min
page 149

Metrics 2019 Mathematical Literacy Assessment

4min
pages 152-153

CONFEMEN 2014

1min
page 142

Programme d’Analyse des Systèmes Éducatifs de la CONFEMEN

2min
page 141

Assessment, 2000–18

1min
page 131

Eastern Africa Consortium for Monitoring Educational Quality

2min
page 138

8.9 Translation and Adaptation of International Large-Scale Assessments

2min
page 130

Study, 2001–16

1min
page 125

Mathematics and Science Study

2min
page 124

International Mathematics and Science Study

4min
pages 119-120

References

1min
pages 115-116

Chapter 8. What Are the Main International Large-Scale Student Assessments?

1min
page 117

Achievement Survey

1min
page 109

What Are Other Ways to Communicate Large-Scale Assessment Results?

2min
page 112

Chapter 7. How Can Effective Communication of Large-Scale Assessment Results Be Ensured?

1min
page 105

7.1 Features That a National Large-Scale Assessment Can Highlight

3min
pages 107-108

References

1min
page 104

Assessment According to Sex

2min
page 97

Key Ideas

1min
page 103

Student Achievement?

2min
page 99

6.2 Scoring Rubrics

2min
page 95

6.1 Example of an Item and Its Codebook Information

1min
page 94

References

1min
page 92

Key Ideas

1min
page 91

Administration?

2min
page 89

Structure and Main Changes over Time

1min
page 81

5.1 National Large-Scale Assessment: Student Tracking Form

1min
page 88

References

1min
page 84

What Should Be Included in the Test Administration Manual?

2min
page 79

How Will the Assessment Be Administered?

1min
page 78

4.5 The Importance of Item Piloting

2min
page 75

4.4 Item Writing Guidelines

1min
page 74

Chapter 4. What Are the Key Decisions in Designing Large-Scale Assessments?

1min
page 67

References

1min
page 66

Key Ideas

1min
page 65

3.2 National Large-Scale Assessment Funding Checklist

2min
pages 63-64

Team Personnel

2min
page 60

Católica de Chile in Supporting National and International Large-Scale Assessment Initiatives

9min
pages 56-59

3.1 Saudi Arabia’s Education and Training Evaluation Commission

2min
page 54

Syndicate

1min
page 55

References

4min
pages 49-52

Key Ideas

1min
page 48

Goals in Brazil

2min
page 43

2.6 Communicating National Large-Scale Assessment Results in Peru

2min
page 41

National Assessment

1min
page 39

Practice in Argentina

2min
page 47

What Are Some Common Policy Implications of Large-Scale Assessment Findings?

2min
page 42

9.3 Proportion of Students in Each Reading Proficiency Level in Grade

2min
page 27

2.5 Investing in Technical Expertise in Indonesia

2min
page 40

What Will You Learn from This Primer?

2min
page 32
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Primer on Large-Scale Assessments of Educational Achievement by World Bank Publications - Issuu