Southington Master Plan Community Risk Assessment: Standards of Cover

Page 150

Master Plan, CRA/SOC

Town of Southington, CT

Response Performance Summary Citizens and elected officials often look are response performance as one of the most visible components of service delivery to the community. More specifically, they wish to know how quickly the department arrives on scene to provide service. This section will illustrate various standard time performance measures as it relates to service delivery. In analyzing response performance, ESCI generates percentile measurements of response time performance. The use of percentile measurement using the components of response time follows the recommendations of industry best practices. The best practices are derived by the Center for Public Safety Excellence (CPSE), Standard of Cover document, and the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 1710: Standard for the Organization and Deployment of Fire Suppression Operations, Emergency Medical Operations, and Special Operations to the Public by Career Fire Departments. The “average” measure is a commonly used descriptive statistic also called the mean of a data set. The most important reason for not using the average for performance standards is that it may not accurately reflect the performance for the entire data set and may be skewed by outliers, especially in small data sets. One extremely good or bad value can skew the average for the entire data set. The “median” measure is another acceptable method of analyzing performance. This method identifies the value at the middle of a data set and thus tends to not be as strongly influenced by data outliers. Percentile measurements are a better measure of performance because they show that most of the data set has achieved a particular level of performance. The 90th percentile means that 10% of the values are greater than the value stated, and all other data are at or below this level. This can be compared to the desired performance objective to determine the degree of success in achieving the goal. As this report progresses through the performance analysis, it is important to keep in mind that each component of response performance is not cumulative. Each is analyzed as an individual component, and the point at which the fractile percentile is calculated exists in a set of data unto itself. The response time continuum—the time between when the caller dials 911 and when assistance arrives— is comprised of several components: ▪

Call Processing Time—The time between a dispatcher getting the call and the resources being dispatched.

Turnout Time—The time between unit notification of the incident and when they are responding.

Travel Time—The time the responding unit spends on the road to the incident

Response Time—A combination of turnout time and travel time, the most commonly used measure of fire department response performance.

Total Response Time—The time from when the 911 call is answered until the dispatched unit arrives on the scene. Page 150


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Opportunity #5: Prevention Programs

3min
pages 189-191

Opportunity #4: Training and Professional Development Programs

7min
pages 184-188

Opportunity #6: Facilities and Apparatus

26min
pages 192-222

Opportunity #3: Service Delivery Deployment and Documentation

11min
pages 178-183

Opportunity #2: Staffing, Recruitment and Retention

5min
pages 174-177

People, Tools, and Time

1min
page 165

Dynamics of Fire in Buildings

4min
pages 162-163

Mutual Aid Alarm Assignments

1min
pages 157-158

Opportunity #1: Agency Management & Organization

8min
pages 170-173

Service Demand Projections

1min
page 161

Response Performance Summary

9min
pages 150-156

Response Reliability Review

5min
pages 147-149

Resource Concentration Study

2min
pages 143-146

Operational Staffing

17min
pages 122-131

Resource Distribution Analysis

5min
pages 137-142

Apparatus Replacement

4min
pages 106-107

Information Technology

2min
page 97

Health and Safety Programs

3min
pages 95-96

Capital Assets and Capital Improvement Programs

2min
page 102

Counseling Services

1min
page 94

Human-Caused Hazards

7min
pages 41-45

Union Contract

1min
page 78

Natural Hazards

13min
pages 31-40

Risk Prioritization

8min
pages 57-65

Compensation

4min
pages 90-93

Volunteer Costs

4min
pages 79-81

Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan

10min
pages 46-56

At-Risk Populations

5min
pages 26-30

External Stakeholder Input

3min
pages 13-15

Population

1min
page 21

Community Politics

2min
page 3

Organization Overview

1min
page 16

Community Risk Assessment

1min
page 20

Population Density

1min
page 22

Demographics

3min
pages 23-25

Organizational Design

1min
page 19
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Southington Master Plan Community Risk Assessment: Standards of Cover by Record Journal - Issuu