Southington Master Plan Community Risk Assessment: Standards of Cover

Page 13

Master Plan, CRA/SOC

Town of Southington, CT

The members who responded to the survey saw opportunities for improvement in the areas of communication, accountability, training, staffing, and the coordination between career and volunteer firefighters. Additionally, calls for keeping town politics out of the fire service in Southington were many and repeated. ESCI factored this input as well as the rest of that which was submitted in the survey when designing recommendations for the Recommendations and Strategies Section of this report. The Internal Survey has been included in this report as Appendix A: Southington Fire Department Internal Survey.

External Stakeholder Input Due to Covid-19 Restrictions, instead of holding community forums, ESCI team members conducted an electronic survey for the residents and business owners within the Town of Southington to determine internal, external, and policy-maker expectations of the Southington Fire Department. To solicit input from the Southington Community, ESCI created a nine-question online survey. The resident and business surveys were both open for participation from March 15, 2021 through April 15, 2021. The Southington Fire Department posted the link to this survey on the department website and shared information about the survey through its other normal communication channels. A total of 220 residents participated in the online surveys. The people who participated in the Southington Fire Department Community Feedback Surveys were, in general, very pleased with the services offered by the fire department. This is a credit to the men and women of the Southington Fire Department who provide a consistently high levels of service to the community every day. When asked to rank the following priorities, Resource Deployment – arriving in less than five minutes was the community’s highest priority. Cost containment was the lowest priority. The following table illustrates the weighted average of the survey responses on a scale of 1 to 6 with 6 being the highest priority.

Page 13


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Opportunity #5: Prevention Programs

3min
pages 189-191

Opportunity #4: Training and Professional Development Programs

7min
pages 184-188

Opportunity #6: Facilities and Apparatus

26min
pages 192-222

Opportunity #3: Service Delivery Deployment and Documentation

11min
pages 178-183

Opportunity #2: Staffing, Recruitment and Retention

5min
pages 174-177

People, Tools, and Time

1min
page 165

Dynamics of Fire in Buildings

4min
pages 162-163

Mutual Aid Alarm Assignments

1min
pages 157-158

Opportunity #1: Agency Management & Organization

8min
pages 170-173

Service Demand Projections

1min
page 161

Response Performance Summary

9min
pages 150-156

Response Reliability Review

5min
pages 147-149

Resource Concentration Study

2min
pages 143-146

Operational Staffing

17min
pages 122-131

Resource Distribution Analysis

5min
pages 137-142

Apparatus Replacement

4min
pages 106-107

Information Technology

2min
page 97

Health and Safety Programs

3min
pages 95-96

Capital Assets and Capital Improvement Programs

2min
page 102

Counseling Services

1min
page 94

Human-Caused Hazards

7min
pages 41-45

Union Contract

1min
page 78

Natural Hazards

13min
pages 31-40

Risk Prioritization

8min
pages 57-65

Compensation

4min
pages 90-93

Volunteer Costs

4min
pages 79-81

Capitol Region Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan

10min
pages 46-56

At-Risk Populations

5min
pages 26-30

External Stakeholder Input

3min
pages 13-15

Population

1min
page 21

Community Politics

2min
page 3

Organization Overview

1min
page 16

Community Risk Assessment

1min
page 20

Population Density

1min
page 22

Demographics

3min
pages 23-25

Organizational Design

1min
page 19
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Southington Master Plan Community Risk Assessment: Standards of Cover by Record Journal - Issuu