Fall 2021

SPRING2013 FALL2021

ONSITE PD TESTING OF CAST-RESIN TRANSFORMERS IN WIND FARMS

PROTECTING WIND TURBINES THROUGH EFFECTIVE GROUNDING PAGE 60

APPLYING NFPA 70E AND CSA Z462 TO RENEWABLE ENERGY POWER GENERATION PAGE 72 JIM WHITE REMEMBRANCE PAGE 83

The sun works hard, so you don’t have to.

Make sure your solar panels can keep up.

Megger Solar Testing Kit Whether you’re installing, commissioning, or simply maintaining photovoltaic solar arrays, you need an electrical testing toolkit that you can count on! Made for you, Megger’s Solar Testing Kit is completely customizable. To assemble your kit, just choose from the following testers: n n n

MIT2500 Insulation Resistance Tester NEW DCM1500S Digital Clamp Meter PVM210 Irradiance Meter

n n

TC3231 Thermal Camera PV Test Lead

We recommend including all of these tools, your solar testing kit should be built to fit your specific needs.

The DCM1500S—Megger’s newest solar clamp meter—is the perfect multifunction tester for solar applications.

With the DCM1500S, you can finally test higher voltages and current values—giving you more flexibility than ever before with a single tool.

The MIT2500 is the only handheld insulation resistance tester with test voltages up to 2,500V, so you can easily test both the ac and dc sides of inverters and quickly identify conductor insulation issues.

During installation, use the PVM210 irradiance meter to ensure optimal solar PV system performance. For routine maintenance and troubleshooting, the TC3231 thermal makes it easy to identify hot spots or bad cell connections.

Keep your solar PV system running with a custom Solar Testing Kit from Megger.

Want some FREE megger stickers?

Visit us.megger.com/stickers and we’ll send some your way!* Reference Code: NETA_FALL_SOLAR *Offer valid in US only

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FA L L 2 0 2 1 · V O L U M E 4 3 , N O . 3 FEAT URES

COV ER STO RY

60

Protecting Wind Turbines through Effective Grounding

Sameer Kulkarni and Dr. Ahmed El-Rasheed, Megger

48

72

Applying NFPA 70E and CSA Z462 to Renewable Energy Power Generation

Terry Becker, P.Eng., CESCP, TW Becker Electrical Safety Consulting Inc.

Onsite PD Testing of Cast-Resin Transformers in Wind Farms Wind power generation has established itself as a major renewable technology used by utilities around the world. But like anything new, the fast-paced implementation of windpower installations has brought its share of challenges. The failure rate of mediumvoltage transformers installed in wind farms is well above what the industry has been used to with traditional energy-generation sources. The lack of onsite testing capability, among other factors, has contributed to those failures. While challenges are great, so are opportunities. This article shares a modern method to test the insulation of mediumvoltage transformers installed in challenging environments such as remote locations, constricted space conditions, and areas with high electromagnetic interferences.

60

Mathieu Lachance, OMICRON electronics Canada, and Dr. Alexander Kraetge, OMICRON electronics Germany

TABLE OF CONTENTS

NETAWORLD

•

3

TABLE OF CONTENTS INSIGHT AND INSPIRATION 10

Virginia Balitski, Magna IV Engineering

108 Electrical Safety through the Lens of the Fire & Life Safety Ecosystem™

Derek Vigstol, National Fire Protection Association

IN EVERY ISSUE

ADVANCEMENTS IN THE INDUSTRY

7

114 Determining Cellulose Degradation in Transformers Using Indirect Tests

President’s Desk

Always Remember: Your Work Is Essential Eric Beckman, National Field Services NETA President

17

21

26

32

38

40

NFPA 70E and NETA

Proposed Changes to the NFPA 70E Standard, 2002 Edition In Memory of James R. White, Shermco Industries

Relay Column

Programming Numerical Relays to Alarm Steve Turner, Arizona Public Service Company

In the Field

Lance R. Lewand and David Koehler, Doble Engineering Company

SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS 126 ANSI/NETA Standards Update 128 CSA Z462 Workplace Electrical Safety — 2021 Edition Changes & Updates

Terry Becker, P.Eng., CESCP, TW Becker Electrical Safety Consulting Inc.

The Trouble with Ground Fault Testing Mose Ramieh, CBS Field Services

134 Committee Report: NFPA 70B

Safety Corner

135 Committee Report: CSA Z462 and CSA Z463

Distracted Driving Paul Chamberlain, American Electrical Testing Co., LLC

Tech Quiz

Tech Quiz #1 In Memory of James R. White, Shermco Industries

Tech Tips

The Importance of Grounding Renewables Jeff Jowett, Megger

David Huffman, Power Systems Testing Company

Kerry Heid, Shermco Industries

NETA NEWS 83

In Remembrance: James R. “Jim” White

136 Outgoing NETA President Scott Blizard: Up to the Challenge

INDUSTRY TOPICS

IMPORTANT LISTS

90

139 NETA Accredited Companies

MV/HV Circuit Breaker Testing Beyond Conventional Practices

Volney Naranjo, Megger

146 Advertiser List

101 How Grounds Affect Peak Voltage Due to Lightning Al Martin, retired

4

•

FALL 2021

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introducing the Jobsite Cleaning Kit Protec is now standardizing and packaging cleaning convenience into an easy carry case!

We all know what a pain it can be to remember to keep cleaning supplies on the truck. So we have put together a Cleaning Kit to help you get the job done at substations, pipelines, hospitals, data centers, refineries or any other location you need to service.

Everything you need to do the job right.

You no longer need to go to a specialty shop to purchase a dozen different items, store them and remember to take them with you to the next job. We make it easy for you, so you can focus on getting the job done!

To order, call

•

(866) 352-5550

•

or visit

•

protecequip.com/products/cleaning-kit

Convenient carrying case so you can easily carry in and out of the job site or store in your truck.

All SDS sheets are included so you have the paperwork ready to go.

Protec can ship the cleaning kit directly to the job site, or stock up at your office and have kits ready to go when you need them!

• Full Member of the InterNational Electrical Testing Association (NETA) • Licensed Electricians (IBEW-JIW) • Member of the National Electrical Contractors Association (NECA) • ISO/IEC 17025 Accredited

Electrical Testing & Commissioning •Acceptance Testing •Preventative and Predictive Maintenance •Technical Support•Protective Relays • Transformers• Switchgear • Breakers • Infrared & Ultrasonic Survey • Cable Locating • VLF & Tan Delta Testing• Partial Discharge• Meters• Grounding• Generator Controls• ATS• UPS• Battery Systems • Motor Control Centers • Switches• Capacitor Banks

Electrical Studies

• Short Circuit/Device Coordination Studies • Arc Flash/Shock Hazard Studies • Harmonic/Power Factor/Transient Studies & Corrections

Training

• Electrical Safety & Troubleshooting • NFPA 70E

When downtime is not an option. TM

866-967-9464

Ann Arbor, MI • Dayton, OH • Chicago, IL www.teamuis.com

3050 Old Centre Road, Suite 101 Portage, MI 49024 Toll free: 888.300.NETA (6382) Phone: 269.488.NETA (6382) Fax: 269.488.6383 neta@netaworld.org www.netaworld.org executive director: Missy Richard NETA Officers president: Eric Beckman, National Field Services first vice president: Ken Bassett, Potomac Testing second vice president: Bob Sheppard, Premier Power Maintenance secretary: Dan Hook, Western Electrical Services, Inc. treasurer: John White, Sigma Six Solutions, Inc. NETA Board of Directors Virginia Balitski (Magna IV Engineering) Ken Bassett (Potomac Testing, Inc.) Eric Beckman (National Field Services) Scott Blizard (American Electrical Testing Co., Inc.) Jim Cialdea (CE Power Engineered Services, LLC) Scott Dude (Dude Electrical Testing LLC) Dan Hook (Western Electrical Services, Inc.) David Huffman (Power Systems Testing) Chasen Tedder, Hampton Tedder Technical Services Ron Widup (Shermco Industries) non-voting board member

Lorne Gara (Shermco Industries) Alan Peterson (Utility Service Corporation) John White (Sigma Six Solutions) NETA World Staff technical editors: Roderic L. Hageman, Tim Cotter assistant technical editors: Jim Cialdea, Dan Hook, Dave Huffman, Bob Sheppard associate editor: Resa Pickel managing editor: Carla Kalogeridis copy editor: Beverly Sturtevant advertising manager: Laura McDonald design and production: Moon Design NETA Committee Chairs conference: Ron Widup; membership: Ken Bassett; promotions/marketing: Scott Blizard; safety: Scott Blizard and Jim White; technical: Alan Peterson; technical exam: Dan Hook; continuing technical development: David Huffman; training: Eric Beckman; finance: John White; nominations: Dave Huffman; alliance program: Jim Cialdea; association development: Ken Bassett and John White © Copyright 2021, NETA

NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER

NETA World is published quarterly by the InterNational Electrical Testing Association.

Opinions, views and conclusions expressed in articles herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of NETA. Publication herein does not constitute or imply endorsement of any opinion, product, or service by NETA, its directors, officers, members, employees or agents (herein “NETA”).

All technical data in this publication reflects the experience of individuals using specific tools, products, equipment and components under specific conditions and circumstances which may or may not be fully reported and over which NETA has neither exercised nor reserved control.

Such data has not been independently tested or otherwise verified by NETA. NETA MAKES NO ENDORSEMENT, REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY AS TO ANY OPINION, PRODUCT OR SERVICE REFERENCED OR ADVERTISED IN THIS PUBLICATION. NETA EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL LIABILITY TO ANY CONSUMER, PURCHASER OR ANY OTHER PERSON USING ANY PRODUCT OR SERVICE REFERENCED OR ADVERTISED HEREIN FOR ANY INJURIES OR DAMAGES OF ANY KIND WHATSOEVER, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, DIRECT OR INDIRECT DAMAGES. NETA FURTHER DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OF IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. ELECTRICAL TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED ONLY BY TRAINED ELECTRICAL PERSONNEL AND SHALL BE SUPERVISED BY NETA CERTIFIED TECHNICIANS/ LEVEL III OR IV OR BY NICET CERTIFIED TECHNICIANS IN ELECTRICAL TESTING TECHNOLOGY/LEVEL III OR IV. FAILURE TO ADHERE TO ADEQUATE TRAINING, SAFETY REQUIREMENTS, AND APPLICABLE PROCEDURES MAY RESULT IN LOSS OF PRODUCTION, CATASTROPHIC EQUIPMENT FAILURE, SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATH.

PRESIDENT’S DESK

ALWAYS REMEMBER: YOUR WORK IS ESSENTIAL I want to start by thanking all NETA members and Board members for their support and trust to help lead the organization as I step into my term as President. It truly is an honor to be part of such a first-class organization that’s so well-respected all across the world and to be able to represent and lead it is even more important.

In this NETA World, we take a renewable energy tack and look into the hazards and regulations associated with this type of power generation from construction to maintenance. We also take a look at the importance of effective grounding in the protection of wind turbines. You’ll certainly want to read the cover story, “Onsite PD Testing of Cast-Resin Transformers in Wind Farms.”

As the world begins to open, I want to take a moment to recognize electrical workers and their families across the world. As we all have learned, the electrical infrastructure is quite possibly the most essential part of our life these days. We tend to forget that we can’t accomplish many of the things we’ve become accustomed to doing without it.

Although very fortunate to have the opportunity to continue to work and provide for their families, these technicians, electricians, and engineers put themselves in potential harm’s way. Adhering to various state, agency, and government regulations while maintaining safe work practices has and continues to be a huge challenge for everyone.

I want to commend the perseverance and dedication to all of those involved. It is truly a testament to how hard-working the people in this critical industry really are.

Remember to mark your calendar for February 28–March 4 for PowerTest 2022 at the Hyatt Regency in Denver, Colorado. This will be our first in-person event — but with a virtual element.

Plan ahead and always put safety first!

Eric Beckman, PE, President International Electrical Testing Association

PRESIDENT’S DESK

NETAWORLD

•

7

Superior Service for Optimal Performance Whether you need startup services, ongoing maintenance, or emergency response you need a partner you can trust.

Rely on your High Voltage Maintenance team for expertise, responsiveness, and safety.

• • •

Consistent quality, service-delivery process Proactive customer communication and project management National, regional, and local service center availability

To learn more, visit HVMCorp.com or call 1-866-HVM-TEAM Experts Available Across Six Centers of Excellence: Commissioning | Electrical Engineering | DC Power Testing and Maintenance | Protection and Controls | Compliance

© 2019 HVM CORP. All rights reserved. HVM and the HVM logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of HVM Corp. All other names and logos referred to are trade names, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. While every precaution has been taken to ensure accuracy and completeness herein, HVM Corp. assumes no responsibility, and disclaims all liability, for damages resulting from use of this information or for any errors or omissions. Specifications are subject to change without notice.

HVM-COE-AD-2-EN-NA-8x5.25.indd 1

12/07/2019 8:54:28 PM

HPC Switches?

We’ve got you covered.

•

In Stock

•

New and Obsolete

•

800A—4000A

•

Retrofit kits

•

24/7 Emergency Service

HPC

New Generation HPC

We stock new General Electric HPCII drop in replacements for the THPC 3000 & 4000 amp GFI models for same day shipping. Call anytime for immediate service.

800-421-5082 www.qualityswitchgear.com

Modernize in a Flash

AC-PRO-II

with

®

Minimize downtime while catching up on maintenance and upgrade projects.

AC-PRO-II® retrofit kits ship faster than anyone and are easy to install.

We have thousands of kits available for all major circuit breaker brands.

Find Out More UtilityRelay.com/Modernize

UTILITYRELAY.COM | 888.289.2864 | URCSALES@UTILITYRELAY.COM

INSIGHTS & INSPIRATION

VIRGINIA BALITSKI: SAFETY FIRST — SUCCESSION PLANNING NEXT With over 15 years’ experience at Magna IV Engineering in Edmonton, AB, Canada, this technician-turned-trainer explains why preserving our legacy knowledge is the best way to keep people safe.

NW: What attracted you to the electrical testing profession?

Balitski: In high school, I excelled in math and physics, so one of my instructors encouraged me to explore engineering. My father was an electronics technician, and I was often in the shop with him when he was fixing things. I’ve always enjoyed working with my hands.

I graduated from the NAIT Electrical Engineering Technology program in 2006.

I have always had an interest in the electrical discipline, so I thought the field might be a great place to start my career. I worked full time in the field as a technician for approximately 6

10

• FALL 2021

Virginia Balitski is Manager — Training and Development for Magna IV Engineering, a NETA Level 4 Certified Technician, and a member of the NETA Board of Directors.

years, then moved to a role that was 50% in the field and 50% in the office for a few more years. Now, I am mostly in the office or onsite delivering technical or safety training — although I do dust off the coveralls every now and again and head back out to the field.

NW: What about this work keeps you committed to the profession?

Balitski: Once I started working on projects, I knew I loved the work. I especially enjoy the experiences and the knowledge that come with the job. I started getting involved in a few of the electrical industry groups and started participating more on committees and boards through my

VIRGINIA BALITSKI: SAFETY FIRST — SUCCESSION PLANNING NEXT

INSIGHTS & INSPIRATION

employer as well. Now I am part of several groups that contribute to the electrical industry.

NW: What about this work is specifically challenging for you, and how are you overcoming that challenge?

Balitski: Staying on top of all the technological advancements and staying up to date is always challenging. I have to keep up with new technologies, safety regulations, and new legislation. I stay involved with the emerging technologies by reading technical papers, articles, attending seminars, and conferences. NETA World is a great resource for some of that information. Fortunately,

Canada and the United States are technically harmonized in a majority of their regulations and standards.

NW: If you were talking to a young person interested in knowing more about being a technician or having a career in electrical testing, what advice would you give?

Balitski: I would make sure they understood that the job is ever-changing and fast-moving.

To be successful in the electrical power testing industry, you need to be flexible and quickthinking, ready to work hard, and be willing to devote your time. You pay your dues by working long hours in the field, and there’s lots

VIRGINIA BALITSKI: SAFETY FIRST — SUCCESSION PLANNING NEXT

NETAWORLD

•

11

INSIGHTS & INSPIRATION of travel. You must stay on the job until the problem is solved, so it’s important to develop your troubleshooting skills. You must do whatever needs to be done to keep the client happy. The reward is a successful career in a field that we all enjoy.

NW: Describe one of your best workdays…

What happened?

Balitski: I am not sure I could pick a particular day, but it is always rewarding to leave a site with a successful energization and a happy client. I’ve had loads of good days. It’s always a good day when no one gets hurt.

NW: What’s it like when a day doesn’t go as planned? How did you respond to those situations?

Balitski: Most days during a maintenance shutdown rarely go exactly as planned, which is why I emphasize the need for quick thinking and flexibility. It is very important to be able to troubleshoot issues as they come up and to be flexible with the demands, schedule, and plan.

NW: How important is ongoing training and professional development in this field?

Balitski: Training and development is where I am currently involved in my career, so I certainly believe it is essential for workers to be properly trained and competent to perform the tasks they are asked to handle. It is an ongoing challenge for any organization to stay up to date with all the new technologies and standards. Since I am involved in developing and delivering training, it is essential that I understand the latest standards and requirements in the industry. Being involved with all aspects of the industry —such as standards, technical information, and safety — helps to keep me updated on all new topics.

You have to take responsibility for your professional development by joining and participating in industry organizations and keeping up with your continuing education credits and standards.

12

• FALL 2021

NW: Speaking of training, I saw a photo of you providing training to an all-male audience. What advice do you have for women who are interested in advancing in the electrical power testing profession?

Balitski: I don’t want to be thought of as a female technician or a woman doing her best in a predominantly male industry. I don’t expect any favors or special attention. I want to be thought of in the same way as any other team member.

My advice to women is to be comfortable in your technical competence. Work hard and do your job. It’s the same for both men and women who want to advance in their career. In the electrical testing profession, we are all doing the same tasks. There is nothing in the field that a woman cannot do. There are generally fewer women in the field, but this is a great career for women, with plenty of opportunity to excel.

NW: What are some of the energy trends you believe will affect your work in the future (e.g. EVs, wind, solar, etc.)? How are you preparing for future changes that may be coming your way?

Balitski: Renewable energy and electric vehicles are trends that will continue to evolve in the electrical industry and become much more prominent. Dealing with the unique stresses and operational challenges of an aging electrical infrastructure will highlight the importance of ensuring the reliability of electrical systems. We have to make sure the electrical systems can handle it. Some of our clients are shifting to renewable energy, particularly wind and solar. Therefore, it is critical to stay on top of all the new standards.

NW: As an industry, what do you think should be the No. 1 priority over the next year?

Balitski: The industry focus should always be on improving safety. Safety is always essential and should be given top priority. Complying with the latest electrical safety standards and

VIRGINIA BALITSKI: SAFETY FIRST — SUCCESSION PLANNING NEXT

INSIGHTS & INSPIRATION

Balitski says safety is about making sure technicians return to who and what they love at the end of the day. best practices throughout the industry needs to be top of mind for all organizations. There are lots of tools and resources out there to help with this and keep all workers safe so they can go home and keep doing what they love to do. In my spare time, you will find me out exploring mountains, running races, and spending time with my loved ones. Everyone should be able to return safely to their loved ones at the end of each day.

After safety, the industry needs to look at recruitment and succession planning. We must make sure we are not losing our collective industry knowledge. We need mentorship for passing along that information to the next generation. When I started out in the field, I

was working with a smaller group of people and had easy access to the most experienced people.

But as a company grows larger, you need a plan on how to pass on that knowledge to the newer people on the team. It’s critical that our industry keeps its legacy knowledge intact.

WANT TO TELL YOUR STORY? NETA World is looking for technicians, emerging leaders, and industry thought leaders to be featured in our new Insight & Inspiration department. If you know someone who would make a great interview — or if you would like to be interviewed yourself — please contact Carla Kalogeridis at ckalogeridis@netaworld.org.

VIRGINIA BALITSKI: SAFETY FIRST — SUCCESSION PLANNING NEXT

NETAWORLD

•

13

JET Electrical Testing, LLC is a 24/7 full service testing company founded upon the premise of providing exceptional customer service and the most highly skilled technicians in the industry. The team of project managers, engineers, support staff, and field technicians form the cohesive team in which customers have relied on year after year. JET specializes in commissioning, preventative maintenance, equipment repair, apparatus testing, and emergency response/troubleshooting.

Electrical system reliability is JET’s goal.

24/7/365 Emergency Services:

609.285.2800

100 Lenox Drive, Lawrenceville NJ 08648 www.JETElectricalTesting.com

THE

PREMIER

ELECTRICAL

MAINTENANCE

AND

SAFET Y

CONFERENCE

CALL FOR EXHIBITORS FEBRUARY 28 – MARCH 4, 2022 HYATT REGENCY DENVER, COLORADO P OW E R TE S T. ORG 888. 300. 6382

HOS TED BY

Exhibit to an audience of 500+ electrical testing professionals including leading decision-makers looking for new products and services.

For attendee profile and additional information, visit powertest.org

One Line. One Company.

The largest NETA Accredited technical group in the industry, that never compromises safety.

As North America’s largest independent electrical testing company, our most important Company core value should come as no surprise: assuring the safety of our people and our customer’s people. First and foremost.

Our service technicians are NETA-certified and trained to comply and understand electrical safety standards and regulations such as OSHA, NFPA 70E, CSA Z462, and other international guidelines. Our entire staff including technicians, engineers, administrators and management is involved and responsible for the safety of our co-workers, our customers, our contractors as well as our friends and families.

Our expertise goes well beyond that of most service companies. From new construction to maintenance services, acceptance testing and commissioning to power studies and rotating machinery service and repair, if it’s in the electrical power system, up and down the line, Shermco does it.

www.shermco.com l 888-SHERMCO

NFPA 70E and NETA

Proposed Changes to the NFPA 70E Standard, 2002 Edition

A LOOK BACK AT HISTORY

T

he National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) is best known for the 70 standard, which is a consensus standard reviewed and updated every three years. The NFPA produces many additional standards covering topics such as Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting, Finishing Processes, and Wastewater Treatment Plants. There are three standards that pertain directly to electrical workers and equipment: • NFPA 70

National Electrical Code

• NFPA 70B Recommended Practice for Electrical Equipment Maintenance • NFPA 70E Electrical Safety Requirements for Employee Workplaces The NFPA 70 standard, first published in 1979, was the first nationallyrecognized standard for electrical safety in the US and was the reference document used for the Electrical Safety-Related Work Practices (ESRWP) regulation (29CFR1910.331–.335). Although the CRF is a Federal law, the 70E is a standard, which means it is not legally binding.

In July of this year, another revision of the 70E is due to be published. Because of this, a lot of interest is being generated about the standard, what it will contain, and the impact any changes may have on companies and their employees.

So why should we be concerned about the 70E standard? Much of it (speaking from a monetary standpoint) has to do with the fact that if there is a nationally recognized standard and we do not follow it, we are left open for PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE NFPA 70E STANDARD: A LOOK BACK AT HISTORY

Jim White Shermco Industries, Inc.

litigation if something should occur.

The court would literally “throw the book at us” at trial. Another reason to use the 70E standard is that OSHA accepts the 70E and uses it as their reference, as they have members on the 70E Committee.

The 70E Committee is composed of a wide range of individuals from companies and organizations, such as the IBEW, OSHA, Underwriters Laboratories, protective clothing manufacturers, contractors, and NETA. The OSHA representatives are nonvoting and are there to advise the 70E Committee so that the standard stays compliant with the regulations.

At last count, there were 24 members and ten alternates.

One observation I had at the December 70E Committee meeting was that each person on the Committee as well as the people who attended to have their NETAWORLD

•

17

NFPA 70E AND NETA views and opinions heard were committed to providing a safe work environment for all employees who have to work on or near electrical equipment. This provided an environment where people can voice their concerns without worrying that they would be ridiculed or harassed. This is extremely important in developing the best recommendations for the standard.

The real reason we should apply the 70E is because it contains the latest, and best, research and methods for working on electrical systems. No one wants to see another person injured or killed. However, we often make decisions based on our ignorance, which can have a negative consequence on our employees’ and on our future.

S O ME IM P ORTANT C H A NGES One of the major changes is that the current Part II, which covers electrical safety-related work practices, will become Part I. This will give more emphasis on the employee safety requirements. The current Part I, Installation Safety Requirements (basically a paraphrasing of the NEC) will become Part IV. Some other major changes are with job sites where more than one employer is working, such as when a contractor is working at a company’s job site. Both the contractor and the site representative are to coordinate safe work procedures, including identifying existing hazards, what PPE is required, what safe work procedures are needed, and emergency/evacuation procedures. A physical meeting and documentation of the meeting is also required.

In the 2000 edition of the 70E, equipment and lines that had less than 50 volts to ground received very little mention. In the 2003 edition, it is recognized that low-voltage systems could present a hazard and, if they do, the hazards they present must be accounted for. Conductors and live parts below 50 volts must be placed in an electrically safe condition if they create any hazard. Other changes to the 70E standard include: • 2-1.1.2, Part II. This section states that unqualified works will be allowed to work on equipment that has been placed into an electrically safe condition by a qualified worker. This was not the case in the 2000 version.

18

• FALL 2021

• 2-1.3, Part II. This section has been reorganized.

• 2-1.3.1 through 201.3.3, Part II, Electrical Hazard Analysis. This section requires that both a shock hazard analysis and a flash hazard analysis be performed before any person approaches the Flash Protection boundary. It also requires that the employer document the incident energy exposure at the working distance and what PPE is being used.

The Hazard/Risk tables can be used as an alternative.

Annex B, the new IEEE 1585 Guide (parts of which are contained in Annex B) or the new Table 2-1.3.3.2 may be used as well as any of the available computer programs.

• 2-1.3.6, Part II (new), Energized Electrical Work Permit. This section states that any work performed within the flash protection boundary requires an energized electrical work permit. An exception was added that allows troubleshooting and diagnostic work to be done without a permit if the worker is protected by performing a hazard analysis. 2-1.3.6, Part II refers the reader to Appendix G for an example form.

• 2-3.2.1, Alertness. This section prohibits allowing employees to work in areas containing live parts if their alertness is impaired due to illness, fatigue, or other reasons.

• 2-3.4.2, Part II, Conductive Articles Being Worn.

This section states that unrestrained conductive eyeglass frames are prohibited if they post an electrical hazard. Plastic frame glasses, although not specified, are implied when someone works on or near energized equipment. The wording “unless such articles are rendered nonconductive by covering, wrapping or other means” will be deleted.

• 3-3.3, Part II, Head, Neck and Face Protection. This section now includes face, neck, and chin.

• Table 3-3.9.1, Part II. Many revisions are being made to this Table. When the incident energy exceeds 40 cal/cm2, a new Note 7 is applicable, which reads, “The degree of hazard and risk is too great for this task to be performed while the circuit is energized.

This task must be performed only with the equipment in an electrically safe work condition.”

At one point, the Committee considered adding a Hazard/Risk Category 5, which would be used when arc energies exceed 100 cal/cm2. It was decided that the hazard from the acoustic wave (blast) of an arc

PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE NFPA 70E STANDARD: A LOOK BACK AT HISTORY

NFPA 70E AND NETA would, at that point, be primary hazard, so the HRC 5 category would not be appropriate.

• Table 3-3.9.1, Part II also adds notes for diagnostic testing and other types of equipment, such as watthour meters.

• Table 3-3.9.2, Part II. This Table changes wording to allow wearing of other types of clothing besides cotton.

• Table 3-3.9.3, Part II. This Table deletes a column calling out fabric weights to allow for newer clothing systems that may weigh less that previous ones did.

• 3-3.9.4.1, Part II, Layering. This section allow nonmelting, flammable clothing to be worn as underlayers.

• 3-3.9.4.3, Part II, Underlayers. This section allows a small quantity of meltable fibers to be used in undergarment waistbands. There is still a hazard when any meltable fiber is work, as the heat from an arc can be sufficient to melt such clothing, even through flash protective clothing and equipment.

• 3-3.9.4.4, Part II, Coverage. This section requires coverage for the wrists and neck.

• 3-3.9.5.2, Part II, Flash Suits. This section requires that flash suits and their face shields have adequate thermal rating. Face shields were not specifically called out in the previous edition.

• 3-3.9.5.3, Part II, Hand Protection. Leather gloves are required for flash protection. Rubber insulating gloves are required as needed for shock protection.

CONCLUSI ON This is by no means a complete, or even thorough, look at the new 70E. There are too many changes recommended that would take too long to detail, but the changes included here are some of the more important ones that I believe managers should look for.

As this article is being written, the full 70E Committee is sending their ballots in for a final vote, It is possible that some of the proposed changes to the standard will not pass, so do not make any changes yet. As always, everyone should strive to provide a safe work environment, regardless of the status of the OSHA regulations or standards.

Jim White wrote this first 70E & NETA column for the Spring 2003 issue of NETA World. He went on to write 72 consecutive 70E & NETA articles, most co-authored with Shermco Industries’ Ron Widup. Jim also authored numerous feature articles for NETA World and provided an article for every Training Talk issue from Summer 2017 through Fall 2020.

James (Jim) R. White was nationally recognized for technical skills and safety training in the electrical power systems industry. At time of this article, he was the Training Director for Shermco Industries, a NETA Full Member company, and spent his nearly 40-year career directly involved in technical skills and safety training for electrical power system technicians.

• 3-3.9.7.2, Part II, Flammability. This section allows the use of cotton or other nonmelting, flammable clothing where work is performed on Class–1 and Class–0 systems and the incident energy is expected to be less than 2 cal/cm2. The 2 cal/cm2 value is not intended to be an arc-thermal rating for cotton, by the way. Cotton, wool, or other flammable material does not provide protection from an arc, it only does not increase the extent of the injury by igniting and melting onto your skin.

• Annex B, Part II. This section now includes the text portion of IEEE 1584-2002. The new portions are added after B–6. In my opinion, this annex is of limited benefit. If the 1584 Guide is going to be used, the calculators that are included are much handier.

PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE NFPA 70E STANDARD: A LOOK BACK AT HISTORY

NETAWORLD

•

19

RELAY COLUMN

PROGRAMMING NUMERICAL RELAYS TO ALARM

BY STE V E N TU R N E R , Arizona Public Service Company

Numerical protection relays offer the ability to alarm for many abnormal operating conditions, including the health of the relay. Below is a list of typical conditions to alarm for due to an abnormal condition: • Overexcitation • Phase undervoltage • Loss of potential or blown fuse(s) • Relay firmware or hardware failure • Relay access • Over or under station battery DC voltage • Trip coil monitoring The purpose of this article is to demonstrate how to set a numerical protection relay to alarm for some of the conditions listed above.

A B N OR MAL P OW E R SY ST E M O PE R AT ING CON D IT IONS

condition by measuring the volts per hertz. A typical alarm threshold is when the measured volts per hertz reaches 105% of the nominal value.

Assume the nominal voltage measured by the relay is 120 volts secondary line-to-line and the power system operates at 60 Hz. V/Hznominal = 120 volts/60 Hz V/Hznominal = 2 V/Hz (1 per unit) 105% V/Hznominal = 1.05l(2 V/Hz) 105% V/Hznominal = 2.1 V/Hz

Overexcitation (24)

Use the Level 1 volts/hertz element as an overexcitation alarm (Figure 1). Set the pickup equal to or greater than 105% but less than the minimum pickup of the Level 2 element if the relay is also programmed to trip for this abnormal condition. Use a time delay of 1 second to allow time to ride through transient conditions.

Overexcitation occurs in a transformer when the magnetic core saturates. Stray flux is induced in nonlaminated components and causes overheating. Numerical transformer relays with phase voltage inputs can detect this

Assign the time-delayed Level 1 volts/hertz element to an output contact, which closes on operation to signal the control center this condition exists.

Overexcitation and phase undervoltage are two such conditions taken from the list above.

PROGRAMMING NUMERICAL RELAYS TO ALARM

NETAWORLD

•

21

RELAY COLUMN LVL1 V/HZ PICKUP

100–200%

24D1P := 105

LVL1 TIME DLY

0.04–400.00 sec

24D1D := 1.00

Figure 1: Overexcitation Alarm Settings

Phase Undervoltage (27) Generators are usually designed to operate continuously at a minimum voltage of 95% of its rated voltage, while delivering rated power at rated frequency. Operating a generator with terminal voltage lower than 95% of its rated voltage can cause undesirable effects such as reduced stability and import of excessive reactive power from the grid to which it is connected. Use the methodology demonstrated in the previous example to set this function to alarm with a fixed time delay.

E QUIP M E NT FAI LURE CONDIT IONS Loss of potential, relay failure, relay access, and trip circuit monitoring are the conditions covered here.

Loss of Potential (LOP) or Blown Fuse(s) Loss of potential occurs due to blown potential fuses or by the operation of molded case circuit breakers. The basic principle used to detect this condition is voltage unbalance in the presence of no current unbalance. For example, there is more than a 25% drop in the measured positive-sequence voltage with no corresponding magnitude or angle change in positive-sequence, negative-sequence, or zero-sequence currents. Loss of potential to a relay can cause voltage-dependent protection functions such as phase undervoltage and distance elements to misoperate. It is very important to alarm for this condition so the fuses can be replaced to restore proper operation of any affected voltage-dependent protection functions. Use the methodology

22

• FALL 2021

demonstrated in the first example to set this function to alarm with a fixed time delay.

Note: It is a good practice to use this function to block the voltage-dependent protection functions while the condition exists. For example, to supervise phase undervoltage protection elements by using LOP, use the following trip equation: TR2 := . . . OR 27P2T AND NOT LOP Where: TR2 ≡ 2nd Trip Equation 27P2T ≡ Level 2 Phase Undervoltage Element LOP ≡ Loss of Potential

Relay Failure One relay manufacturer uses the relay word bit HALARM to signal self-test problems.

HALARM is pulsed for hardware self-test warnings and is continuously asserted for hardware self-test failures.

Program a normally closed output contact to open if the relay detects a relay hardware failure as follows: OUT301 := HALARM The control center senses a relay failure when this output contact is open.

Relay Access The same manufacturer mentioned above uses the relay word bit SALARM, which is pulsed, for software programmed conditions such as setting changes, unsuccessful password entry attempts, and password change. It is very PROGRAMMING NUMERICAL RELAYS TO ALARM

RELAY COLUMN important to monitor these conditions due to the need for cybersecurity.

Program a normally open output contact to close if the relay detects any of these conditions has occurred as follows: OUT302 := SALARM The control center senses the alarm when this output contact pulses.

Trip Circuit Monitor (TCM) If the trip coil fails for a circuit breaker or lockout relay (86), then personnel should know this condition exists immediately so that it can be quickly corrected. Figure 2 illustrates the external connections for a trip circuit monitor function.

This function should be programmed to block when the breaker is open, as indicated by the 52b contact input. If the TCM is monitoring a lockout relay, use a lockout relay (86) contact input to block this function when the lockout relay is tripped.

When the output contact is open, and continuity exists in the trip circuit, a small DC current flows, which activates the trip circuit monitor input. If the trip circuit is open, and the output contact is open, no current flows and the trip circuit monitor input is deactivated.

An output contact that is welded closed will also cause the trip circuit monitor input to deactivate, indicating failure of the output contact. When the output contact is closed, no current flows in the trip circuit monitor input.

If the relay has issued a trip command to close the output contact and trip circuit monitor input remains activated, this is an indication that the output contact failed to close.

The output of the trip circuit monitor function should be programmed as an alarm to alert maintenance personnel.

PROGRAMMING NUMERICAL RELAYS TO ALARM

Figure 2: Trip Circuit Monitor Connections Diagram

CONCLUSI ON This article demonstrates how to program numerical protection relays to alarm for specific abnormal operating conditions, including the health of the relay. By using these alarms, it is possible to quickly address such issues and restore the integrity of the power system.

Steve Turner is in charge of system protection for the Fossil Generation Department at Arizona Public Service Company in Phoenix. After working with Beckwith Electric Company, Inc. for 10 years, Steve spent two years as a consultant in San Diego. His previous experience includes positions as an Application Engineer at GEC Alstom and in the international market for SEL focusing on transmission line protection applications. Steve also worked for Duke Energy (formerly Progress Energy), where he developed the first patent for double-ended fault location on overhead high-voltage transmission lines and was in charge of all maintenance standards in the transmission department for protective relaying. Steve has BSEE and MSEE degrees from Virginia Tech University. He has presented at numerous conferences including Georgia Tech Protective Relay Conference, Western Protective Relay Conference, ECNE, and Doble User Groups, as well as various international conferences. Steve is a senior member of IEEE and a member of the IEEE PSRC.

NETAWORLD

•

23

CBS stocks every low- and mediumvoltage circuit breaker

made in America since 1945.

With more than 5 million breakers and parts in our 200,000-square-foot warehouse — including switchgear, transformers, substations, protective relays, loadbreak switches, electrical contacts, motor controls and centers, vacuum interrupters, and more — Circuit Breaker Sales has you covered.

√ Replacement parts and equipment √ Remanufacturing, retrofits, and upgrades √ Reverse engineering, 3-D printing of obsolete parts

1315 Columbine, Gainesville, Texas 76241 | 800-232-5809 INFO @ CBSALES.COM | CircuitBreaker.com

CBStore.com Your TRUSTED online resource for authentic circuit breaker and electrical distribution equipment

new service lo catio ns CBS Florida | Lakeland, Florida | 863-646-5099 | CBS-Florida.com CBS Midwest | Crown Point, Indiana | 219-575-5420 | CBSMidwest.com For more information about Group CBS and its affiliate companies, visit GroupCBS.com.

(800) 232-5809 CircuitBreaker.com

TOLLFREE

IN THE FIELD

THE TROUBLE WITH GROUND FAULT TESTING

BY M OSE RAM IEH , CBS Field Services

“What are you doing here?” asked the manufacturer’s testing representative. “We are doing start-up of the gear, and your work seems redundant.”

Redundant? That depends on what each of us is responsible for checking. That depends on who is going to ensure that all the known potential failures get checked and as needed, corrected.

As an industrial or commercial buyer, getting a warranty on your new switchgear is great.

An extended warranty because you purchased manufacturer acceptance testing and start-up is even better. In addition to a warranty, wouldn’t you like to have a piece of electrical equipment that works reliably for years because it was properly started up?

In this “in the field” situation, the manufacturer didn’t include primary current testing for

breakers or the ground fault protection system.

Admittedly, it is rare for a new breaker to fail a primary injection test. In contrast, it is common for a ground fault protection system to fail. This significant increase of failure is directly related to the human elements of installing and wiring the ground fault protection system (Figure 1).

GROUND FAULT PROTECTI ON FAI LURE Ground fault protection systems come from the factory with several potential error points: • Incorrect input wiring at the breaker • Incorrect output wiring of the neutral current transformer (CT) • Incorrect neutral CT orientation Ground fault systems have additional potential error points during field installation: • Incorrect neutral conductor connection to CT orientation

Figure 1: Overview of Ground Fault System

26

• FALL 2021

• Neutrals and ground landed together on the same bus in the switchboard or at downstream panels THE TROUBLE WITH GROUND FAULT TESTING

IN THE FIELD Assuming that the factory or the contractor installed wiring correctly can lead to issues.

These issues typically result in nuisance trips of the breaker that create power outages and production losses. After a system has been energized, a nuisance trip is even more difficult to troubleshoot and correct.

Note on direction of current flow: What is the appropriate direction to return the test current through the neutral CT? Reference Figure 1 again: Neutral current is the normal current that flows on the neutral of an unbalanced three-phase, four-wire system. This current returns from the load(s) through the neutral CT on its way back to the source (transformer).

G R O U N D FAU LT PROT E CT ION T E ST ING PROC E D U RE

I had to question my technique when the first of the ground fault protection systems we tested that day failed. After spending some time checking and double-checking, our team moved on to another breaker. To our pleasure, this system worked as we expected it to work.

Pro-Tip: Trust your testing plan and use good procedures.

1. Trip Test: The breaker should operate during this test because it is simulating an unbalanced phase current without neutral CT input to cancel it out. a. Inject primary current through the breaker to verify ground fault pick-up per manufacturer’s tolerances.

Given this new piece of validation and information, we: • Rolled the polarity of the wiring at the CT, even though it matched the wiring of all the other neutral CTs of this type (Figure 2).

b. Inject approximately 1.5 times the pick-up value to verify that the breaker trips in the published time band for the coordination setting.

2. No-Trip Test: The breaker should NOT operate because the unbalanced phase current is canceled out by returning the unbalanced current through the neutral CT input. a. Inject primary current (used in step 1b) through the breaker and return the current through the neutral CT. For this, you will need additional conductors to route the current through the neutral CT. b. Note that the direction of the current through both the breaker (source to load) and the neutral CT (load to source) should be as shown in Figure 1. c. If everything is properly installed and wired, the breaker should not trip, as this is a normal current flow situation.

THE TROUBLE WITH GROUND FAULT TESTING

Figure 2: CT Lead with Incorrect Wiring Polarity • Retested and obtained the no-trip result we expected the first time. While this fixed the operation, the wiring problem was actually at the input to the breaker’s trip unit. As noted earlier, the wiring matched all the other CTs and caused us to question our test procedures.

NETAWORLD

•

27

IN THE FIELD • This information was passed to the manufacturer to correct the wiring at the breaker to avoid a warranty challenge with our team making a modification.

We continued our testing and found one additional CT wiring issue that was legitimately at the CT (Figure 3). Unlike the first CT issue we identified, this CT had three wires. Following the failed test, we noted that two wires were landed into one connection point of the CT leaving one connection open. After a quick comparison to other similar CTs, we relocated the wire to the proper output, and the issue was corrected, rechecked, and operated as expected.

The complication: • Usually starts with the assumption that the system was properly started up and is working to do its job to protect the equipment from a ground fault event.

• Assumes that the setting is appropriate per the coordination study.

• These assumptions lead to a well-intended facility manager insisting on installing temporary metering in the hopes that you can capture the event. In my experience, the event never seems to occur while the metering equipment is installed. I’m still trying to figure out why that is.

• Many months later, this plan typically leads to another nuisance ground fault protection trip and an outage.

Take the steps necessary to troubleshoot a suspected ground fault trip: 1. De-energize the source of power. This typically creates more frustration for the client, who says, “Can’t you do this with the equipment energized?”

2. Do a trip test and a no-trip test as described earlier.

3. Inspect the installation of the neutral wires. This is particularly important if the CT is mounted on the neutral bus bar.

Figure 3: CT wiring is landed incorrectly on the secondary of the CT. On the left, note the empty middle connection. The photo on the right shows the connection corrected with the black wire in the middle connection.

These two big finds helped our customer avoid unnecessary outages in their process. What would have happened if we had not been there to test things that the factory team assumed had been verified at the factory?

IN-S E RVIC E G ROUND FAULT T R IP Additional complications are possible if a breaker trips on a ground fault event after the system has been in service for many months or even years.

28

• FALL 2021

CASE STUDI ES Following are two case studies related to busbar mounted CTs. Case 1: A customer experienced repeated ground fault trips that couldn’t be explained.

• The metering didn’t capture anything.

• Our trip and no-trip tests passed.

• Confused and frustrated, I crawled underneath the eight sets of parallel conductors to inspect the neutral CT at the rear of the gear, which was installed against a wall, of course.

THE TROUBLE WITH GROUND FAULT TESTING

IN THE FIELD • To my surprise, half the neutral wires were landed on one side of the neutral CT and half were landed on the other side (Figure 4). This effectively meant that half of the neutral current flowed through the CT and half did not, which in turn meant that when the conditions were right, enough of the needed neutral current to avoid an operation didn’t flow through the CT. • It was no easy fix to move all those neutral wires to the correct side of the CT, but after that the unplanned outage calls stopped.

Case 2: A customer experienced a significant ground fault event that the ground fault protection system failed to operate and clear.

• Starting with the basics, we conducted a successful trip and no-trip test — both passed.

• During the inspection of the entire switchboard and neutral wires, it was noted that the installing contractor had landed all the neutrals and all the grounds to the neutral bus.

• By landing the ground conductors on the neutral bus, the contractor effectively defeated the ground fault protection because the ground current from the fault was now passing through the neutral CT. • When asked why they landed the grounds on the neutral bus, the reply was, “Well, it’s electrically the same point, right?”

No. No, it is not. The neutral is a normal current-carrying conductor. The ground conductor only carries current in the event of a fault. Hint: you might see a question like this on the certification exam.

CON C LU S ION When setting up new equipment, we are often the ones charged with ensuring that all known potential failures are checked and corrected if needed. To increase the probability of success,

THE TROUBLE WITH GROUND FAULT TESTING

Figure 4: Improperly Landed Neutral Wires avoid these mistakes or misconceptions technicians make in the field: • Assuming the neutral CT is a ground CT and the source of current necessary to operate the ground fault protection.

• Passing current only through the neutral CT, which will trip the breaker at the designated pick-up level. However, this is not the intended operational design of the system and therefore provides no value.

• Failing to include the no-trip test in the acceptance testing plan.

Ensuring you understand the purpose of the neutral CT in a ground fault protection system is another step towards meeting the requirements of NETA technician certification.

Mose Ramieh III is Vice President, Business Development at CBS Field Services. A former Navy man, Texas Longhorn, Vlogger, CrossFit enthusiast, and slow-cigar-smoking champion, Mose has been in the electrical testing industry for 24 years. He is a Level IV NETA Technician with an eye for simplicity and utilizing the KISS principle in the execution of acceptance and maintenance testing. Over the years, he has held positions at four companies ranging include field service technician, operations, sales, business development, and company owner. To this day, he claims he is on call 24/7/365 to assist anyone with an electrical challenge. That includes you, so be sure to connect with him on the socials.

NETAWORLD

•

29

An extensive inventory of over 200,000 sq. ft. across the southeast means the Southland Group has the products you need most in stock and ready to ship! Our team of experienced technicians provide on-site field service support and engineering services to ensure that your products are safe, reliable and service ready.

Contact us today and let us create the solutions you need most!

NETA WINTER AD 2019 - option 1.indd 1

10/11/2019 3:19:48 PM

Independent Electrical Testing and Preventive Maintenance

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES • Acceptance Testing • Planned Electrical Testing and Preventive Maintenance Programs

• Transformer Oil Analysis, Vacuum Degassing and Repair • Circuit Breaker Retrofit and Repair

• Power Factor Testing

• Power Generation Systems Testing

• Cable Testing

• Load and Power Quality Recording/Analysis

• Relay & Meter Calibration

• Chiller Systems Testing

• Ground Resistance Testing

• Infrared Inspections

609-890-8300 www.easternhighvoltage.com 11-A S. Gold Drive • Robbinsville, NJ 08691

EasternHighVoltage_1-2_NETA_F14.indd 1

7/31/14 2:26 PM

The Power of Positive Results

AET Brings Precision and Value to Electrical Testing, Commissioning and Engineering… and Positive Results to Our Customers.

AET delivers the best value in the marketplace by offering the highest quality service at competitive prices. With a workforce and offices located throughout the country, AET is an industry leader and one of the largest independent electrical testing companies in the U.S.

To learn more about AET’s full range of testing and engineering services, visit www.aetco.us A Subsidiary of

WWW.AETCO.US • 800.992.3826

AET-IBEW Full Page Ad-FINAL-8.75 X 11.25.indd 1

An

Company

10/5/17 11:44 AM

SAFETY CORNER

DISTRACTED DRIVING

BY PAU L CH AM BERL AIN, American Electrical Testing Co. LLC

People are easily distracted in a world filled with more distractions every day. In this day of modern technology, it is easy to get overwhelmed with the number of distracting devices out there, and these devices have encroached upon the driving environment. Cell phones are convenient means to communicate over long distances, but couple them with texting, email, internet, and mobile video, and they are an absolute attention grabber.

They can be coupled with hands-free Bluetooth devices that allow a driver to talk with limited interaction with the phone, and they can be useful in displaying directions when used as a GPS. However, even when using these safer methods of interaction, they divert the attention of the driver from their primary task — driving a vehicle. And cell phones are not the only distractions in a vehicle. People still eat or drink while driving, fiddle with the radio, read the paper or magazines, talk on CB radios, play with smart watches, and perform personal grooming like shaving or brushing their hair. Some vehicles even have video players in them. Drive on the road long enough and look at what the other drivers are doing. It is astounding what people will do while driving and the absurd risks they are willing to accept.

W H E RE CA N I F I ND MORE INF ORM AT ION? The National Highway Transportation and Safety Administration (NHTSA), which is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation, has created a website for distracted driving information: www.distraction.gov. It is loaded

32

• FALL 2021

with statistics and information that can be disseminated to co-workers and teen drivers and used by employers for employee distracteddriving awareness training.

Here are some key facts and statistics from that website: • In 2019, 3,142 people were killed, and 424,000 people were injured in motor vehicle crashes involving distracted drivers. More than 26,000 have been killed between 2012 and 2019 • In 2019, an estimated 2.1 trillion text messages were sent in the USA. (https://www.ctia.org/news/report-2020annual-survey-highlights) • Nine percent of all drivers 15 to 19 years old involved in fatal crashes were reported as distracted at the time of the crashes.

This age group has the largest proportion of drivers who were distracted at the time of the crashes. (http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot. gov/Pubs/812132.pdf ) • In 2019, 566 nonoccupants (pedestrians, bicyclists, and others) were killed in DISTRACTED DRIVING

SAFETY CORNER

PHOTO: © ISTOCKPHOTO.COM/PORTFOLIO/LOVRO77

distraction-affected crashes. (http://wwwnrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/812132.pdf )

used in the USA. (https://www.ctia.org/news/ report-2020-annual-survey-highlights)

• The USA had over 442.5 million wireless subscribers in 2019. (https://www.ctia.org/ news/report-2020-annual-survey-highlights)

• More than half (53%) of all adult cellphone owners have been on the giving or receiving end of a distracted-walking encounter. (http://www.pewresearch.org/

• In 2019, there were an estimated 287,000 distraction-affected injury crashes (15 percent of all injury crashes). In these crashes, an estimated 294,000 drivers (8% of all drivers in injury crashes) were distracted at the time of the crash. (http:// www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/812132.pdf ) • Five seconds is the average time your eyes are off the road while texting. When traveling at 55mph, that’s enough time to cover the length of a football field blindfolded. (http://mcsac.fmcsa.dot.gov/ documents/DriverDistractionStudy.pdf ) • Smartphone ownership is growing. In 2019, 37.1 trillion megabytes of data were DISTRACTED DRIVING

fact-tank/2014/01/02/more-than-half-of-cellowners-affected-by-distracted-walking/)

WHAT CAN EMPLOYERS DO TO REDUCE DI STRACTED DRI VI NG? Employers are certainly not powerless to prevent distracted driving by employees while on company time or in a company vehicle. The U.S.DOT encourages employers to create a distracted driving policy. It will provide videos, posters, and sample policies to encourage better driving habits. There is a lot of hands-free technology available for use that can either be provided for employees, or you can encourage NETAWORLD

•

33

SAFETY CORNER ME AK

VT WA

MT ID

OR HI

ND WY

NV CA

MN SD

CO UT

IA NE

NM AZ

WI IL MO KS

OK

Primary enforcement hand-held phone use ban for all drivers

MI IN KY AR

LA

OH WV

TN MS

Secondary enforecement texting ban for all drivers

PA VA

NC AL

TX

Primary enforcement texting ban for all drivers

NY

NH MA

NJ DC

RI CT

DE

SC

MD

PR

VI

GA FL

AS

GU

MP

Primary enforcement texting ban for novice/beginner drivers No bans on cell phone use

SOURCE: NCSL, 2020

Figure 1: State Laws Addressing Cellphone Use while Driving your employees to purchase it. Before purchase, however, be aware of which states allow the use of such devices. The map provides more information regarding hand-free device and texting bans or allowances.

H OW CAN PAR ENTS P R E VE NT DIST R ACTED DR IVING ?

Parents can use videos and talk with the children regarding distracted driving. Many states ban the use of cell phones for young drivers. Additionally, apps are available that parents can put on their children(s) smart phones that will disable the phone while it is in motion. A list of these apps for Android devices can be found here https://bit.ly/2T5DcV2 as an example of what’s available. A similar number are available for use on Apple devices.

Teens and young adults are prone to distractions while driving. With the many social apps available out there, they have a tendency to need to feel “connected” and may

34

• FALL 2021

be inclined to pick up the phone when it beeps.

Couple that distraction with their inexperience driving, and it can lead to tragedy, as the statistics from the U.S. DOT show.

Teenagers can also make pacts with each other to not use the phone while driving. A friend riding as a passenger can be affected just as adversely by a distracted driving accident as the driver, so they can make it their responsibility to prevent drivers from using the phone while driving.

Adults, for the most part, have less connection on social networking and don’t tend to reach for the phone each time it beeps, and their accumulated windshield time has given them the experience necessary to react better in emergency situations. However, they do have reduced reaction time, which slows as you age, and can be distracted due to other outside forces. These can include lack of sleep (i.e. new parents, stressful work, etc.) or time pressure (i.e. in a rush to get to work). So teens AND parents should take a pledge together to DISTRACTED DRIVING

SAFETY CORNER concentrate on driving and to avoid or mitigate those distractions that affect them the most.

H O W CA N T E AC H E RS PRE V E N T DIST R ACT E D D R IVIN G ?

Schools can get involved in reducing distracted driving, too. They can run a pledge drive, encouraging students and other educators to not drive distractedly. They can use the various posters or videos available to spread the word on distracted driving. They can also encourage parents to use some of the methods mentioned above to mitigate a teen or young adults distracted driving.

downloadable campaign kit available for these groups. Additionally, voters can support local driving laws and ensure their local police departments enforce those laws.

CONCLUSI ON Many things can divert a person’s attention from driving, and in this digital age, the cell phone is probably the most prevalent.

Communicate with others about distracted driving and follow your state laws. Make it a point to be a better, more attentive driver, and it will be hard not to see the improvements in driving ability.

HOW ELSE CAN DISTRACTED DRIVING BE PREVENTED? Local community groups, such as churches or other youth groups (i.e. the Boy Scouts of America) can get involved in reducing distracted driving. Distraction.gov has a free

Paul Chamberlain has been the Safety Manager for American Electrical Testing Company Inc. since 2009. He has been in the safety field since 1998, working for various companies and in various industries. He received a Bachelor of Science from Massachusetts Maritime Academy.

POWERFUL RELIABILITY MEETS FULL-SERVICE SOLUTIONS AT AN UNMATCHED SCALE

NOW A SHERMCO COMPANY • Power System Acceptance Testing • Commissioning and Start-up • Maintenance • Coordination and Arc Flash Studies RGB Build R:106 G:115 B:123

sigmasix.com | 253-333-9730

• Troubleshooting and Repairing • Training and Engineering Services • Planning and Operations Support • Project Management

RGB Build R:245 G:132 B:38

RGB Build R:35 G:31 B:32





B B BULLOCK BREAKERS 1-763-269-2832

• Thousands of Air Circuit Breakers in Stock!

• Switchgear Line-ups you can’t find anywhere else!

• Now Available as Reconditioned with AC-Pro Trip Units!

475 Annandale Blvd • Annandale • Minnesota 55302 www.bullockbreakers.com • Email: jason@bullockbreakers.com R

A Wide Range of Test Systems Available Unmatched Reliability and Performance!

PHENIX

TECHNOLOGIES

1-301-746-8118 • www.PhenixTech.com info@phenixtech.com • 75 Speicher Drive, Accident, MD 21520 USA

DC Hipots with Automated Features

Micro-Ohm Meters

➤ Accurately measure very

low contact resistances

➤ Double ground

High Current Circuit Breaker Test Sets ➤ 9 models available ➤ 1,000 to 75,000 Amp Outputs ➤ Updated control system, automated

testing, data acquisition

measurements (substation) ➤ 5 models available, 10 to 200 Amp

➤ 7” Full-color, touch screen display ➤ Auto-ranging meters ➤ Automatic voltage control or

Manual control via infinity dial

➤ Data acquisition

40+ Years Experience

High Voltage - High Current - High Power Test Systems and Components

Absolute confidence. Every time.

You can count on us for specialized experience in healthcare, data center, office complex, and commercial acceptance and maintenance testing. Absolutely. Power generation, petrochemical, oil & gas, and heavy industries also look to us for high demand services such as start-up commissioning, maintenance testing, shut-down and turnarounds, and breaker shop repair. Get started today.

Toll Free 1+ (855)767-4446 8100 West Little York | Houston, Texas 77040 Email: Alan Postiglione | apost@absolutetesting.com | www.absolutetesting.com

Like us on:

TECH QUIZ

TECH

Quiz

No. 61

A LOOK BACK AT HISTORY 1. Describe the function of polarity marks on current transformers.

2. Transformer differential relays protecting a 50 MVA, 138 kV – 13.09 Y/7.56 kV transformer have been operating normally during the construction phase of a project. When the transformer is being brought up to full load it trips. There is no indication of a fault, as all tests on the transformer and cable are acceptable. What are the most likely causes?

3. What is the definition of a CT accuracy class (i.e. Class C200)?

4. Relay CTs are available in either Class C or Class T. What is the difference?

ANSWERS 1. At the instant that current flows into H₁,it also flows out of X₁. This is on the positive half cycle. On the negative half cycle, current flow reverses, and at the instant current flows into H₂, it also flows out of X₂. Since we are dealing with alternating current, the polarity marks indicate relative instantaneous polarity.

• FALL 2021

2. One cause could be incorrect tap setting.

Others are incorrect CT connection or miscalculation of the mismatch ratio. During startup, there often is not enough load (operating current) to cause a minimum trip operation. As load increases, operating current increases until a trip occurs.

38

3. The accuracy class of a CT (C100, C200, etc.) indicates the maximum output voltage the CT can sustain at 20X full secondary current (100 amperes) without exceeding a 10 percent error.

James (Jim) R. White, Vice President of Training Services, had worked for Shermco Industries Inc. since 2001. He was a NFPA Certified Electrical Safety Compliance Professional and a NETA Level 4 Senior Technician. Jim was NETA’s principal member on NFPA Technical Committee NFPA 70E®, Electrical Safety in the Workplace®; NETA’s principal representative on National Electrical Code® Code-Making Panel (CMP) 13; and represented NETA on ASTM International Technical Committee F18, Electrical Protective Equipment for Workers. Jim was Shermco Industries’ principal member on NFPA Technical Committee for NFPA 70B, Recommended Practice for Electrical Equipment Maintenance and represented AWEA on the ANSI/ISEA Standard 203 Secondary Single-Use Flame Resistant Protective Clothing for Use Over Primary Flame Resistant Protective Clothing. An IEEE Senior Member, Jim received the IEEE/IAS/PCIC Electrical Safety Excellence Award in 2011 and NETA’s Outstanding Achievement Award in 2013. Jim was Chairman of the IEEE Electrical Safety Workshop in 2008 and was Vice-Chair of the IEEE IAS/PCIC Safety Subcommittee.

4. Class C means the CT accuracy can be calculated, while Class T means it must be measured.

Jim White wrote his first Tech Quiz in the Fall 2002 issue of NETA World. He would go on to write 75 consecutive Tech Quiz columns over the next 19 years of his service to NETA and the industry. Nationally recognized for technical skills and safety training in the electrical power systems industry, Jim never turned down a request from NETA World staff for support or guidance. He will be missed.

TECH QUIZ

BEFORE

AFTER

Upgrade High-Current Circuit Breaker Test Sets with ETI’s Retrofit Services Extend the life of your critical equipment IMPROVE THE LEGACY CONTROLLER With the reliable & easy-to-operate MAC-21, the most intuitive digital controller in the industry.

INCREASE TIMING & MEASUREMENT ACCURACY 1

RETROFIT INCLUDES 2

MAC-21 provides accurate true-RMS current

Replacement of control wiring; SCR’s; SCR

readings and trip times even for pulses < one cycle.

firing board; current transformers; poor

WHY UPGRADE?

connections & wiring.

GENERAL MAINTENANCE & CALIBRATION

Improve equipment reliability by replacing obsolete parts.

Minimize technician training by standardizing user interface across all circuit breaker test sets.

Thorough inspection and cleaning.

Returned to you ready for service with a

Improve technician productivity. 1

NIST-traceable certificate of calibration.

1 Compared to analog controls.

2 Model dependent.

Trusted by

Supported Models:

professionals nationwide.

CB-9110 CB-9116 CB-8160 CB-8130 CB-8115

Contact ETI Precision for a retrofit quote today.

CB-7745 CB-7725 CB-7140 CB-7130 CB-225

CB-225-66 BTS-1000 BTS-500 BT-120DC BT-360DC

HC-100 HC-20 PS-1000 PS-9160 PS-9116

etiprecision.com/NETA | 410-857-1880 | info@etiprecision.com ETI Precision | 8430 Spires Way, Suite A | Frederick, MD 21701

PS-600 DDA-6000 DDA-3000 DDA-1600 BTS-300

TECH TIPS

Nacelle Destroyed by Lightning Strike

THE IMPORTANCE OF GROUNDING RENEWABLES

BY J EFF J OW ET T, Megger

The rapidly developing industry of renewable power generation can be compared to an hourglass. Inexhaustible supplies of free resources — sun and wind — are converted into a corresponding outflow of electrical energy at notable return on investment. But the process includes the neck of the hourglass through which the resources must pass. This is the solar array or wind tower. These two assets must be diligently kept functioning at maximum efficiency and safety in order for the process to yield its anticipated return.

40

• FALL 2021

THE IMPORTANCE OF GROUNDING RENEWABLES

TECH TIPS

Open solar fields are prime lightning targets.

WIND

SOLAR

Wind towers are particularly at risk because of their great height: 280 feet and getting taller.

It is estimated that a tower extending more than 50 feet above surrounding structures becomes a prime lightning target. Lightning interruptions cause up to 50% of typical downtime, depending on locale. And damage isn’t limited to structure. It can extend all the way down to sensitive control systems, further limiting profitability.

Solar panels are at similar lightning risk as wind towers, as they are installed on roofs or vast open fields where they may be the highest structure.

The National Lightning Safety Institute recommends that protection begin as early as site selection and proceed through system design. Yet the Institute estimates that maximum lightning protection can be achieved at only 1% of the total cost of a new project.

Useful sources of standardization are available in IEC 61024 and IEC 61400-24.

THE IMPORTANCE OF GROUNDING RENEWABLES

The National Electrical Code (NEC) specifies: Exposed non-current-carrying metal parts of module frames, equipment, and conductor enclosures shall be grounded.

Components like inverters, combiner boxes, and disconnects are connected by an equipment-grounding conductor. Every module must be connected to an equipmentgrounding conductor. These converge commonly at the ground busbar inside the main distribution panel. From here, the grounding electrode conductor completes the connection to the ground electrode. When removing panels, care must be taken not to NETAWORLD

•

41

TECH TIPS

Blade tips are particularly vulnerable to lightning. disrupt the bonding. For roof mounts, this is often rebar in the foundation, but it should be supplemented by a ground rod to prevent damage to the concrete during fault clearance.

Full requirements are described in NFPA 70, NFPA 780, NEC Article 250, NEC Article 690, and UL 96A.

G ROUNDING SYSTEM The tower and array should be designed, constructed, installed, and maintained according to the highest industry standards. An indispensable part of this is the grounding. It is easy to become focused on the dynamics of this process, such as the turning of blades or the humming of transformers, and overlook the indispensable contribution made by the grounding system. Buried out of sight and not visibly operating, these critical components can be largely out of mind until an event occurs, such as a wind tower crashing to ground after a lightning strike.

Don’t wait for such an event to happen!

Ensure the system is designed and installed in accordance with industry standards and local conditions first, and then periodically checked and maintained on a regular basis.

42

• FALL 2021

It is commonly thought that burying a rod and connecting the electrical system means it is grounded, but that is not necessarily the case.

The grounding system must be treated with the same attention and care as any other electrical component.

GROUNDI NG CONDUCTO R The other main element of this protection is the grounding conductor. No matter how good the grounding electrode (rod, grid, or other structure) is , it will be rendered useless without a continuous, low-impedance path to conduct lightning and fault current around equipment and personnel and safely into the soil. This is the job of the grounding conductor. In general applications, it connects the dead frame of equipment to the ground bus at the entrance panel.

But in wind generation, its structure is unique: It spans from the tips of the blades to connect with the ground grid at the base of the tower.

Frequency of lightning strikes increases with height, and studies have suggested that rotating blade tips are additionally attractive.

THE IMPORTANCE OF GROUNDING RENEWABLES

TECH TIPS For adequate protection, the grounding conductor must be regularly tested. Turbine manufacturers typically specify 15–30 mΩ for a safe path to ground. A low-resistance ohmmeter is the designated tester for this purpose. Traditionally, these testers utilize a 10 Amp test current to reliably assure a sufficiently low-impedance path. These can be bulky, given the physical demands of this testing environment.

Recent improvements in meter technology, however, have made the job easier by introducing handheld 1 Amp testers with sufficient accuracy and resolution. The most sensitive part of the ground path is through the blade because the stress of motion can cause the grounding conductor to crack. If the two fragments remain in contact, a simple continuity test will still pass. A more robust test current and measurement resolution will unerringly reveal such a break.

But there’s still a unique problem: the distance of the blade tips from the ground. As with handheld testers, technological advances were in order and have been realized. Test leads with lengths of 100 meters have become available.

The long leads create an additional problem: resistance. A compensation factor allows for power loss in some instruments when using leads of a normal length. Compensation for extra-long leads is accomplished via the formula: P = I2R Where: P = output power of the instrument I = output current of the instrument R = (resistance of load) + (resistance of test leads) Standard compensation in the average meter can fall short of delivering enough power against such a daunting lead resistance as would exist in 100-meter leads. Adequate compensation is achieved by reducing test current. Some instruments have a selector THE IMPORTANCE OF GROUNDING RENEWABLES

switch to reduce current; others do so automatically. Either way, a 1 amp test current has proven sufficient to yield accurate, reliable test results. The ohmmeter is thereby enabled to test with milli-ohm resolution without lead resistance entering the measurement.

REMOTE EARTH The termination of the protection system is the electrode buried in earth. This must not be taken for granted. The mere fact of its existence is not enough, although it is often thought of in that manner. No, it must be tested, like any other electrical component.

Surge arresters alone are inadequate without a good ground. The goal is low resistance to what is referred to as “remote earth” — that is, the maximum resistance a fault current or lightning stroke will encounter before being safely dissipated. There is no universal standard, but electrode resistance should be held to values like 1–5 Ω.

TESTI NG AND MAI NTENANCE Testing is particularly difficult with renewables because a single electrode is not grounding a single network, as in a building. Rather, potentially enormous numbers of wind towers and solar panels are daisy-chained together, and the chain is often growing. The biggest problem is that ground testing requires long leads strung to test probes far out in the soil, with the distances based on multiples of the maximum dimension of the grid or array. This can quickly become prohibitive. Unfortunately, there’s no simple answer. But one of the worst things to do is to wait until the job is done before testing. By that time, the composite electrode can be virtually too big to test.

Plan ahead, and test the sections as they are installed. This applies to both solar and wind, as the issue is the same. Every time a new section is paralleled in, resistance will drop significantly. So collectively, by the time the job is done, an adequate ground will be provided. Periodic maintenance also needs to NETAWORLD

•

43

TECH TIPS may be shallow-buried, and this may not afford sufficient protection from lightning.

A Well-Maintained Solar Field

The grounding system must be tested upon installation for initial conformance to specs and standards, and then periodically thereafter.

The familiar “out of sight, out of mind” can be deadly here. Clearance of lightning strikes and electrical faults will often work as intended, leaving the tower structure and function unharmed. But in the process of clearance, the grounding electrode can be seriously compromised, and it is dangerously out of sight. Regular testing, as well as after known strikes, is necessary. Changes in soil composition, especially moisture and subsurface corrosion, can have the same effect on a longer time scale.

Copper theft, a problem throughout the electrical industry, can be particularly acute on wind farms because of their size and remote location. In addition, grounding is often buried at much shallower depths than cabling, making theft that much easier. The clamp-on ground tester can be a useful tool here as a quick means of determining whether continuity exists or has been corrupted by theft.

Wind Generator Blade Destroyed by Lightning be performed, as we’ve seen, and this can be a bigger challenge.

The most widely respected ground electrode test, fall of potential, is likely to require too much space. Be familiar with methods that have been specifically designed to deal with this problem. The most prevalent is the slope method. Another is intersecting curves.

Instructions for these methods are commonly available in the literature. Additionally, lightning protection and power grounding have different criteria, so be certain requisite conditions are met for both. Power grounds

44

• FALL 2021

Studious and thorough record-keeping is particularly in order, as comparing results can be especially informative in recognizing problems and issues. It’s also a good idea to note exactly where test probes are placed.

Subsequent testing can then be done for comparison to stored records. The data is useful for maintenance to note changes, even if the size of the grid precludes objective accuracy to remote earth. Provided testing is precisely repeated, changes in results can be indicative of issues that need to be addressed.

CONCLUSI ON Effective grounding is indispensable to the safe and efficient operation of renewable energy sources, wind towers, and solar arrays. The two are identical in requiring a continuous, low-impedance path to ground and a lowTHE IMPORTANCE OF GROUNDING RENEWABLES

TECH TIPS impedance connection to the surrounding earth. The test equipment is the same for both, and procedures are only slightly — but critically — adjusted to the site.

REFERENCES Richard Kithil. “Lightning Hazard Reduction At Wind Farms,” National Lightning Safety Institute, 26 April 2010.

Paul Swinerd. Megger Application Note: “Earth Testing On Wind Farms” Megger Application Note: “Testing Wind Turbine Lightning Protection.”

Bruce Thatcher. “Grounding: The Key To Lightning Protection,” Sankosha, USA. 2016.

Megger. “Getting Down To Earth: A Practical Guide to Earth Resistance Testing.”

Jeffrey R. Jowett is a Senior Applications Engineer for Megger in Valley Forge, Pennsylvania, serving the manufacturing lines of Biddle, Megger, and MultiAmp for electrical test and measurement instrumentation. He holds a BS in biology and chemistry from Ursinus College. He was employed for 22 years with James G. Biddle Co., which became Biddle Instruments and is now Megger.

AIR-CELL BLADDERS BLADDER: Constructed From A Heavy Duty Rubberized-Nylon FLANGES: Variety Of Precision Steel Flanges Stocked MOUNTING: Optional Flexible Hangers & Loops Per Application EXPERIENCE THE ATL DIFFERENCE...

EXPEDITED DELIVERY

ATL’s Lightning-Quick Turnaround, 2-3 Day Average, Significantly Limits Downtime During Outages

STANDARD TEMPLATES

Digital Library of Popular Sizes/Styles

REVERSE ENGINEERING

ATL Can Precisely Duplicate Any OEM Conservator Bladder Every Bladder Undergoes Stringent Quality AS9100D Control Tests ISO 9001:2015 Prior To Shipping IFIED

CERT

BUILT TO FIT ANY TRANSFORMER

FOR OVER 50 YEARS | MADE IN THE U.S.A.

AIRCELLBLADDERS.COM

aircells@atlinc.com

800-526-5330

THE

PREMIER

ELECTRICAL

MAINTENANCE

AND

SAFET Y

CONFERENCE

CALL FOR SPONSORS Promote your products and services to a valuable audience of key industry decision makers while increasing brand visibility.

FEBRUARY 28 – MARCH 4, 2022 HYATT REGENCY DENVER, COLORADO P OW E R TE S T. ORG 8 88. 300. 6382

HOS TE D BY

Learn more about sponsorship items at powertest.org

COVER STORY

PHOTO: © ISTOCKPHOTO.COM/PORTFOLIO/SIMONSKAFAR

ONSITE PD TESTING OF CAST-RESIN TRANSFORMERS

48

• FALL 2021

IN WIND FARMS

BY M ATH IEU L ACH ANCE, OMICRON electronics Canada, an d D R . A L E XANDER K RAETG E, OMICRON electronics Germany

Installed wind power capacity in the United States has been growing at an incredible pace during the last two decades. In the middle of 2020, the total American wind power capacity was nearly 110,000 MW with over 60,000 turbines installed (Figure 1).

It is known that power equipment used to connect renewables faces very specific and increased stress when sources of fluctuating nature are involved. Large-scale wind and solar

power often utilize transformers of different types within one installation. A typical wind farm electrical installation includes several small transformers (referred to as generation

ONSITE PD TESTING OF CAST-RESIN TRANSFORMERS IN WIND FARMS

90,000

Cumulative capacity

80,000

Annual additions

COVER STORY

20,000

110,000

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 U.S. Installed Wind Capacity (MW) 2018 2019

transformers in this article) connecting single 70,000 wind turbines to a main bus feeder. Several 60,000 feeders then connect the substation to the 50,000 power grid 40,000 using one or more larger power transformers.

30,000 For10,000 a better understanding of typical topology, please refer 0 to Figure 2. While these power transformers typically do not show reduced life expectancy compared to other grid transformers, a higher rate of failures has been reported for generation transformers installed in wind farms, including liquid-filled as well

100,000 90,000

Cumulative capacity

80,000

Annual additions

70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

U.S. Installed Wind Capacity (MW)

110,000 100,000

Figure 1: U.S. Wind Capacity in 2019

Pwp, Qwp Pwp, Qwp

Ug1 Uwp

WT1 2.5MVA 20/0.66kV

Ugrid

Ug1 Uwp

WT1

8MVA 66/20kV

2.5MVA 20/0.66kV

Feeder

8MVA 66/20kV

Ugrid

Feeder

Ug2

Ug2 WT2

WT2

2.5MVA 20/0.66kV

2.5MVA 20/0.66kV Ug3

Ug3

WT3 2.5MVA 20/0.66kV

WT3 2.5MVA 20/0.66kV

• Pad-mounted next to tower • In the base of the tower • In the nacelle

Figure 2: Typical Topology of a Wind Farm

• Pad-mounted next to tower • In the base of the tower • In the nacelle

Ur 30 s

Ur

180 s

30 s 180 s

1.3 x Ur

t

1.3 x Ur

t

CD

CD

PD

1.8 x Ur

1.8 x Ur

CD

CD

ONSITE PD TESTING OF CAST-RESIN TRANSFORMERS IN WIND FARMS 40

CD

PD

CD

NETAWORLD

•

49 40

COVER STORY as cast-resin transformers. The latter are widely applied when special measures for fire or ground water protection are required.

Generation transformers used in wind power plants typically have rated power ranging from 1 MVA to 4MVA, with primary voltages usually below 1,000 V and secondary voltages of up to 36 kV. Larger units with rated power up to 14 MVA are also available, but their failure rates seem lower.

In most cases, problems occur in the insulation system. Identified reasons include overheating due to very narrow design restrictions, vibrations, frequent thermal cycling, impact of frequency converter signals, high humidity, and salty air. Consequently, periodic diagnostic condition assessment is requested more frequently, as failures cause increasing outage costs for repairs and, often even worse, undelivered energy.

For cast-resin transformers, the application of typical diagnostic tools is very limited due to the specifics of molded, air-cooled windings.

The most common reason for failure of this type of transformer is electric breakdown of the epoxy-resin insulation. Therefore, including off-line partial discharge measurements during commissioning and in a periodic maintenance plan can reduce the risk of in-service failures.

PD measurements on transformers can be quite challenging when performed onsite. If done online, the level of interference is usually above the permissible limit of a factory test.

Therefore, PD occurring below the noise floor can go undetected. On the other hand, the logistics to perform offline PD measurements on transformers installed in remote and constricted space locations, such as wind farms, can be very complicated.

This article shares a modern method to perform offline PD measurements using induced voltage on medium-voltage transformers installed in the field in challenging environments such as remote locations, constricted space conditions, and areas with high electromagnetic interferences.

50

• FALL 2021

MEASURI NG PARTI AL DI SCHARGE I N TRANSFORMERS Partial discharges are localized dielectric breakdowns of a small portion of an insulation system under electrical stress. It can occur in solid, liquid, and gaseous electrical insulation.

Most insulation systems used in transformers are not resistant to PD, and sustained PD activity will therefore result in erosion of the insulation. Over time, this can lead to inservice failures.

Accurate PD measurement can help identify weak points within the insulation system before complete insulation breakdown. For this reason, many international standards require or recommend PD measurements during the production of various MV and HV equipment.

Commissioning and preventive maintenance of equipment during its service life is also increasingly recommended.

PD measurement may be performed on the windings of all types of dry-type transformers.

For transformers with solid-cast windings with rated voltage above 1.2 kV, partial discharge measurements are an integral part of the routine tests performed at the end of the manufacturing process. The measurement is done during the induced voltage test by applying voltage to the low side of the transformer and measuring PD on the high side. Unlike the conventional applied voltage test, commonly called hipot, the induced voltage test stresses both the turnto-turn insulation and the insulation to ground above the rated voltage.

In order to increase the test voltage above the rated voltage of the transformer, the frequency must be higher than 60 Hz to avoid core saturation without introducing significant interference pulses that may be detected as PD signals. In addition, the voltage source must be powerful enough to supply the needed reactive power at higher frequencies. Traditional voltage sources used in factories include large motor-generator sets (MG sets) or frequency converters. On many occasions, a capacitor

ONSITE PD TESTING OF CAST-RESIN TRANSFORMERS IN WIND FARMS

WT3

2.5MVA Ug3 20/0.66kV

WT3 WT3

For onsite PD measurements on transformers, the expectations for a voltage source are raised. In addition to the previously stated requirements to perform induced voltage tests at the factory, the voltage source must be able to function on the limited power available from a regular power outlet, as mobile diesel generators are not always available and must be portable for confined space conditions. A great example of such a space requirement is when testing a transformer installed inside the tower or the nacelle of a wind turbine or installed deep inside a facility with difficult access.

To reduce the power requirement, the onsite test is performed using a single-phase voltage source. The required power is therefore significantly reduced compared to the conventional three-phase test. In addition, energizing one phase at a time is usually the next step when PD is detected during a threephase measurement. To further reduce the required power, a modern voltage source that can freely control the frequency and that can measure the impedance of the complete test circuit is used. The test frequency can therefore

30 s

Ur Ur

30 s 30 s

180 s 180 s 180 s

1.8 x Ur

1.3 x Ur

1.8 x Ur 1.8 x Ur

1.3 x Ur 1.3 x Ur t t t

Figure 3: PD Test Procedure According to IEEE C57.12-91

CD CD CD

PD

CD

CD CD CD CD CD

Figure 4: PD Test Arrangement According to IEC 60076-11 40

40

30 40 40 20 30 30 10 20

40 20 40

20 00 10 0 10 -10 00 000 -20 -100 -10 -30 -20

20 0 20 50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

0 450 -20 0

50 50

100 100

150 150

200 200

250 250

300 300

350 350

400 400

450 -20 -40 450 -20 -40 -60 -40

-20 -40 -30

-30 -50 -40 -40 -50 -50

Phase Phase [º] Phase [º] [º]

F ROM T H E FACTORY TO T H E FIELD

COVER STORY

PD PD

PD test procedures are described in IEEE C57.12.91, IEEE C57.124, IEC 60076-11, and in IEEE C57.113 in the case of liquidfilled transformers. In dry-type transformers, a phase-to-phase pre-stress voltage of 1.8 x Ur is induced for 30 seconds, followed by a phaseto-phase voltage of 1.3 x Ur for 3 minutes, during which PD is recorded. For in-service or aged transformers, the voltage level is usually reduced to 80% of the factory acceptance test (FAT) level. The maximum level of PD must be less than 10 pC for solid cast windings and 50 pC for resin-encapsulated windings. As an example, the test sequence according to IEEE C57.12.91 and a three-phase connection diagram according to IEC 60076-11 are respectively illustrated in Figure 3 and Figure 4.

2.5MVA 20/0.66kV 2.5MVA 20/0.66kV

Ur

Impedance Impedance Impedance [Ohms] [Ohms][Ohms]

bank is also used to compensate completely or partly for the needed reactive power.

• Pad-mounted next to tower • In the base of the tower • Pad-mounted next to tower • In the nacelle to tower • Pad-mounted In the base ofnext the tower • In the base of the tower • In the nacelle • In the nacelle

Ug3

-60 -80 -60

Frequency [Hz]

-80 -80

Z [Ohm] phi [º] Frequency [Hz] Frequency [Hz] Z [Ohm] phi [º] Z [Ohm] phi [º]

Figure 5: Test Circuit Impedance vs. Frequency be tuned to the resonance frequency of the given test circuit, including the inductance of the transformer, the winding capacitance, and the coupling capacitor used for PD measurement. Figure 5 illustrates an example Compensation of the frequencyCapacitors response of such a system. If Compensation the test frequency is set to the maximum value Capacitors Compensation Capacitors in the blue curve (highest impedance), the required test power is minimized.

ONSITE PD TESTING OF CAST-RESIN TRANSFORMERS IN WIND FARMS

NETAWORLD

•

51

-60 -40 -50

COVER STORY

-80

Frequency [Hz] Z [Ohm]

phi [º]

not intended to be used on-site, even though it is recommended practice to apply its rules if possible.

Compensation Capacitors

Figure 6: Voltage Source with Capacitive Compensation, Test Object, and Coupling Capacitor In rare cases, the required power can still be too high for a conventional power outlet. In these cases, additional low-voltage capacitors can be used to compensate for part of the reactive power needed to energize the winding.

Practical experience has shown that 10–100 uF are enough. Since these capacitors are installed on the low-voltage side of the transformer (typically 600–690 V), commercial availability is usually not an issue. Figure 6 shows an example of the test setup used for onsite testing with low-voltage capacitors for reactive power compensation.

ONSIT E INT E RF ERENCE Partial discharge measurements outside of Faraday cages are most often troublesome due to electromagnetic interference from the surroundings. For example, PD in cast-resin insulation will sooner or later lead to severe problems, as these types of insulation are not self-healing. PD will erode the insulation over time, and the dielectric strength will decrease more and more. Thus, very small levels of PD must be found and clearly identified.

External interferences are often far higher than the PD signals to be detected. To overcome these challenges, modern fully digital PD instruments employ several denoising methods that can reduce or even eliminate such noise problems. A great advantage of digital compared to analog filters is their flexibility to adapt bandwidth and mid-band frequency to the actual measuring conditions. While the strict boundary conditions of IEC 60270 apply for measurement in the factory, this standard is

52

• FALL 2021

As the aim of on-site PD testing typically is risk assessment, the steps to achieving the goal include reliable detection of harmful PD, identification of PD type, and location of the PD spot(s) if necessary. Evaluation of the pC-value describing the intensity is of less importance, especially if assets with nonself-healing insulation are to be investigated.

Therefore, it is common for practical reasons to set the digital measuring filters of the PD instrument to frequency ranges with a lower background-noise floor. Variation of the filter bandwidth can also help to achieve a better signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).

Another powerful method is to utilize multiband measurement filters, often referred to as the 3-center frequency relation diagram (3FREQ or 3CFRD) method. This requires three PD bandpass filters measuring every PD event simultaneously at their predefined mid-band frequencies. The synchronous consideration of three different frequency parts of the spectrum of each single PD pulse provides information on its discharge nature, signal propagation, and path attenuation. A comprehensive investigation of the spectral behavior of different types of pulses is given in reference. Selection of these three bandpass positions in the frequency domain is the key to gaining optimum benefit. By applying 3CFRD, it is possible to discriminate between pulses of different type or same type but different origin.

Figure 7 shows a simplified theoretical schematic of the principles behind 3CFRD. The red arrows indicate the response of PD pulse #1 at the discrete filter frequencies. These response values are represented by the starshaped 3CFRD diagram as shown on the right side of Figure 7. The lengths of the phasors represent the measured response magnitudes, and the axes indicate the respective filter frequency. By adding the phasors of the PD responses, one single dot is the final

ONSITE PD TESTING OF CAST-RESIN TRANSFORMERS IN WIND FARMS

COVER STORY

Figure 7: Simplified Theoretical Schematic of 3CFRD representation of the initial triplet. Figure 7 shows an example of a measurement where 3CFRD was applied to separate different types of PD.

PROOF O F CONC E P T Like any innovative solution, the concept had to be proven first. Therefore, measurements took place in collaboration with manufacturers of cast-resin transformers and with wind turbine manufacturers. Figure 8 shows an initial test that was performed on a 6 MVA wind farm transformer in the factory, along with its corresponding installed location in the wind turbine.

Figure 8: Test Setup in the Factory and Installed Position in the Nacelle

A pre-stress voltage of 52 kV was induced for 30 seconds, followed by three minutes at 42 kV where PD was measured. No PD activity was detected during the test.

To test the applicability of onsite induced voltage testing with PD measurements once the transformer is installed in the nacelle, a test was successfully conducted on a preparation site of a large, offshore windfarm. Figure 9 shows the test setup.

CAS E ST U DIE S In recent years, several measurements have been performed using this innovative testing solution. It has also been applied outside wind farms at other applications including transformers used for the excitation of hydrogenerators and transformers installed in constricted space conditions inside industrial facilities or on ships.

Figure 9: On-Site PD Measurements during Induced Testing of an Installed Transformer

Case Study #1: 34.5 kV Transformer with Known PD Activity in a Wind Turbine A 34.5 kV wind turbine transformer known to have PD activity was tested at 40 kV, and several PD sources were able to be identified.

Figure 10 shows the transformer during the test and its regular position in the wind turbine. In

ONSITE PD TESTING OF CAST-RESIN TRANSFORMERS IN WIND FARMS

NETAWORLD

•

53

COVER STORY were requested after two of eight 10 MVA transformers, installed to excite the 400 MVA asynchronous generators, had failed. The goal of the measurements was to assess the insulation of the remaining six transformers.

The transformers’ rated voltage was 19 kV on the high side and 3.9 kV on the low side. For this reason, an additional step-up transformer was needed. Figure 13 is an aerial photo of the remote generating station and a photo of the test setup.

Figure 10: PD Measurement on a Transformer (left) and Position in a Wind Turbine (right) this case, it is obvious that a small, portable test set was a necessity.

Figure 11 shows the initial phase-resolved partial discharge (PRPD) diagram on the left and its corresponding 3CFRD diagram on the right.

Figure 12 shows the individual PRPD diagrams from each selected cluster of the 3CFRD diagram. The top PRPD diagram shows contact-related PD activity; the other two PRPD diagrams show signs of internal and surface discharges. The transformers had visible signs of carbonized tracks, which indicates PD activity sustained over some time.

Case Study #2: Commissioning a Hydro-Generating Station Following the commissioning of a remote hydroelectric power plant, PD measurements

For these measurements, an equivalent of the factory test was required and therefore had to be done according to IEC 60270. This led to higher background noise due to external signals from nearby power electronics that could not be switched off. Using an advanced, fully digital PD instrument and the 3CFRQ cluster separation method, it was possible to confirm that no internal PD was present with a sensitivity of less than 30 pC, which was considered acceptable under the given circumstances. All transformers passed the test successfully.

Case Study #3: Diagnostic Measurement in a Data Center Partial discharges were detected by an online PD monitoring system for a length of mediumvoltage cable in an important data center.

An offline PD measurement showed clearly that the cables were PD-free. A connected 2 MVA/20 kV transformer was identified as the possible source of the detected PD signals.

A subsequent induced voltage test provided clear indication of the presence of void-type

Figure 11: PRPD Pattern of the Three Filters (left); 3CFRD Measurement (right)

54

• FALL 2021

ONSITE PD TESTING OF CAST-RESIN TRANSFORMERS IN WIND FARMS

COVER STORY

Figure 12: 3CFRD with Cluster Selected (left); Corresponding PRPD Diagram (right) discharges within the solid insulation. The inception and extinction voltages were both below the transformer’s rated voltage; therefore, the risk of failure was considered high. As all phases were affected, replacing the windings was not economically justifiable; thus, the transformer had to be replaced. Figure 14 shows the test setup and the measured PRPD diagram depicting void-type discharges.

CONCLUSI ON Modern test equipment opens all kinds of new testing possibilities. Historically, onsite PD measurements for medium-voltage transformers have been difficult to perform.

With the latest advancements in technology, use of a flexible and portable voltage source for PD testing combined with fully digital PD measurement technology opens new onsite

Figure 13: Aerial Photo of the GS (left); MVA Transformer under Test (right) ONSITE PD TESTING OF CAST-RESIN TRANSFORMERS IN WIND FARMS

NETAWORLD

•

55

COVER STORY

Figure 14: Test Setup (left); PRPD Diagram for all Three Phases (right) testing possibilities. This results in increased reliability for modern power generation and industrial facility operators in addition to creating new business opportunities for service providers.

A. Kraetge, C. Engelen, W. Guo, M. Kruger.

“Field-Testing of Cast-Resin Transformers in Wind Farms, industrial and Marine Applications under Constructed Space Conditions,” Proceedings of TechCon Aus-NZ, Sydney, Australia, 2018.

R E F E R E NC E S IEEE Std. C57.12.91-2020, IEEE Standard Test Code for Dry-Type Distribution and Power Transformers, (Revision of IEEE Std C57.12.91-2011).

IEC 60076-11, Power transformers – Part 11: Dry-type transformers, International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva 2004.

IEEE Std. C57.124, IEEE Recommended Practice for the Detection of Partial Discharge and the Measurement of Apparent Charge in Dry-Type Transformers, 1991.

IEC 60270, High-Voltage Test Techniques – Partial Discharge Measurements” International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva 2015.

A. Kraetge, K. Rethmeier, M. Krueger, P. Winter. “Advanced noise suppression during PD measurements by real-time pulse waveform analysis of PD pulses and pulse-shaped disturbances,” IEEE ISEI, San Diego, 2010

56

• FALL 2021

Mathieu Lachance joined OMICRON electronics Canada Corp. in 2019 and presently holds the position of Regional Application Specialist for rotating machines and partial discharges. Matthieu previously worked as a test engineer in the fields of partial discharges and high voltage. He received a BS in electrical engineering from Université Laval in 2014.

Dr. Alexander Kraetge is a transformer expert and key account manager for the transformer industry with OMICRON electronics in Germany. After working as a professional electrician, he studied high-voltage engineering at the Berlin University of Technology and earned a PhD in transformer condition assessment. Alexander has held several technical and senior management positions within OMICRON, Austria, and Highvolt, Germany. He is an IEEE Senior Member, a member of the IEEE Transformers Committee, and is actively involved in Cigré D1 and A2.

He has authored more than 100 technical and scientific publications, mainly about condition assessment of transformers and partial discharge diagnostics.

ONSITE PD TESTING OF CAST-RESIN TRANSFORMERS IN WIND FARMS

N TE O ST W EQ RE UI NT PM IN EN G T

“SOLID STATE”

INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS

We Buy, Sell, Trade, Calibrate, Repair Featuring quality, reliable, on-time service and support for all brands and types of solid state power electronics.

Power electronics are our business Let us suppoort you with our quality repair, calibration and servicing of your solid state equipment. We also buy, sell and trade: • Communications devices for power equipment • Protective relays • Circuit breaker trip devices • Motor overload relays • Rating plugs

Toll Free 877-TRIP-FIX

4701 Spartan Drive • Denton, TX 76207 (877-874-7349) • Phone: 940-243-3731 • Fax: 940-387-8277 Email: info@solidstaterepair.com • Web: www.solidstaterepair.com

Huge Selection of In-Stock Electrical Equipment

SPECIAL TEST EQUIPMENT FOR • Protective Relays • Transformers & Motor Analysis • Partial Discharge/Corona • Current Injection • Cable Fault Location

ADVANTAGES OF RENTING

• Switchgear/Circuit Breakers • Insulation Resistance • Tan Delta/Power Factor • Current Transformers • Ground Grid

• Cost-Savings Versus Buying • Available for Immediate Delivery • Choose From a Variety of Manufacturer’s Top-of-the-Line Products • Short-term Solutions for One-Off Tests • Always Calibrated Equipment ISO 17025 / NIST Cal / ANSI Z540

Start Saving Today! www.atecorp.com

800-404-ATEC (2832)

RETROFITTED BREAKER

Acceptance and Maintenance Testing Commissioning Circuit Breaker Repair and Retrofit Infrared Scanning MV Cable Terminations and Testing Commissioning and Load Bank Testing of UPS, Generators, and ATS

6605 W. WT Harris Blvd. Suite F • Charlotte NC 28269 | 13 Jenkins Court • Mauldin, SC 29662 | 9481 Industrial Center Drive, Suite 5 • Ladson, SC 29456 704.573.0420 • 844-383-8617 • 704.573.3693 (fax) • www.powerproducts.biz

Try Before You Buy Megger Rentals and Leasing When You Need It, Where You Need It. We are positive you will love working with your Megger rental equipment. To prove it, you can now take our world class test solutions for a “test run”.

Rent any piece of Megger electrical testing equipment from our inventory for 30 days, and if you decide to buy it, we will discount the cost of your rental from the purchase price.

LAST CHANCE! OFFER EXPIRES JULY 30, 2021

Available in the U.S. and Canada

1.800.728.6269 rentals@megger.com us.megger.com/rentals

FEATURE

60

• FALL 2021

PROTECTING WIND TURBINES THROUGH EFFECTIVE GROUNDING

FEATURE

PROTECTING WIND TURBINES THROUGH EFFECTIVE GROUNDING

The share of wind power in total electric power generation is expected to increase, and with that comes a requirement for this carbon-free source to be more reliable. The wind turbine, which is the most important component of a wind power system, is exposed to harsh environmental conditions and electrical transients such as lightning strikes. Naturally, understanding the lightning protection scheme of the wind turbine and checking its integrity is vital to protect it during lightning strikes such that continued, reliable operation is achieved.

Recent international studies have shown that in one European country, 80% of insurance claims on wind turbines resulted from lightning-related damage. Similarly, a major US utility reported that over 85% of their wind turbine downtime was due to lightning-related damage.

This article provides a general overview of the lightning protection system of a wind

turbine, the best practices for lightning protection on wind turbines, and how to verify effectiveness. It discusses the need and advantages of various tests performed to verify the continued integrity of such lightning protection systems, and shares reference quantities for testing parameters and expected results while reviewing some practical and safety considerations.

PROTECTING WIND TURBINES THROUGH EFFECTIVE GROUNDING

NETAWORLD

PHOTO: © ISTOCKPHOTO.COM/PORTFOLIO/JOTILY

BY S A M E E R KUL KARNI an d DR. AH M ED EL-RASH EED, Megger

•

61

FEATURE 53% with both the United States and China leading the world in new installations of wind power generation. Wind power answers the pressing needs and circumstances of the day.

It is a relatively inexpensive and green energy source that addresses constrained infrastructure budgets as well as climate-change policies.

Most market analysts indicate that wind power development will continue to grow at a fast rate because all the driving factors for its adoption persist.

This is great news for the electrical power industry, as there will be growth and opportunity for many years to come. However, this growth will require improved maintenance programs that will protect the investments and maximize the profits from wind power.

LI GHTNI NG STRI KES The biggest maintenance problem for wind power is lightning strikes (Figure 1a and Figure 1b). According to Vestas CEO Henrik Andersen, intense lightning strikes were the biggest driving force behind the record warranty claims of €175M (US$212M) in just the second quarter of 2020. Wind turbine manufacturers and installers like Vestas recognize the immense danger of lightning strikes and take great care in the design of turbines. Still, operators and owners of wind turbines must ensure a robust and effective maintenance program for their assets.

LI GHTNI NG PROTECTI O N SYSTEMS

Figure 1a and Figure 1b: Lightning Damage to Wind Turbines

W IND P OW E R Renewable energy — and wind power, in particular — is growing at a rapid pace. In 2020, new installations of wind power provided 93 GW globally. The year-over-year growth is

62

• FALL 2021

A growing number of studies speculate that rotating wind turbines may be more susceptible to lightning strikes than stationary structures. Wind turbines are at an increased risk of being struck by lightning due to their height and the locations used for wind farms.

Lightning faults cause more loss in wind turbine availability and production than the average fault. Wind turbines are equipped with lightning protection to minimize damage from direct lightning strikes and to shield sensitive

PROTECTING WIND TURBINES THROUGH EFFECTIVE GROUNDING

FEATURE equipment integral to wind turbine operation.

A lightning strike would not only have a large magnitude of current but would also impress an unwanted electromagnetic field across components housed in the nacelle and base of the tower. The lightning protection system (LPS) performs the function of directing the current strikes to ground.

Lightning Protection Zones To facilitate the coordination of protections functions, it is prudent to divide the wind turbine into lightning protection zones (LPZ).

The lightning protection zone concept is a structuring measure for creating a defined, electromagnetically compatible environment in an object while being cognizant of the object’s stress withstand capability.

IEC 62305, Standard for Lightning Protection defines the LPZ for structures and can be applied to a wind turbine. The zones are classified into external and internal zones based on their exposure to direct lightning.

Figure 2: Simplified Wind Turbine External LPZ

External Zones • LPZ 0A is the zone where the threat is due to the direct lightning flash and the full lightning electromagnetic field. The internal systems may be subjected to full lightning surge current.

• LPZ 0B is the zone protected against direct lightning flashes but where the threat is the full lightning electromagnetic field.

The internal systems may be subjected to partial lightning surge currents.

The rolling sphere method is used to determine LPZ 0A — the parts of a wind turbine that could be subjected to direct lightning strikes, and LPZ 0B — the parts of a wind turbine that are protected from direct lightning strikes by external air-termination systems or airtermination systems integrated in parts of a wind turbine (for example in the rotor blade), as seen in Figure 2 and Figure 3.

Figure 3: Air Termination Systems Installed for Wind Turbine Nacelle

PROTECTING WIND TURBINES THROUGH EFFECTIVE GROUNDING

NETAWORLD

•

63

FEATURE Internal Zones • LPZ 1 is the zone where the surge current is limited by current sharing and isolating interfaces and/or by surge protection devices (SPD) at the boundary. Spatial shielding may attenuate the lightning electromagnetic field.

• LPZ 2 to LPZ n are the zones where the surge current may be further limited by current sharing and isolating interfaces and/or by additional SPDs at the boundary. Additional spatial shielding may be used to further attenuate the lightning electromagnetic field.

The LPS essentially works by taking the form of a low-resistance path to ground. The path goes from the blade’s tip to the base of the turbine.

This path is shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5.

Figure 4: Current Path for Lightning Discharges

In the event of a lightning strike, current will flow to ground through the lightning protection system, not the sensitive equipment in the wind turbine. As the lightning current is dissipated through the grounding system, it is important to not cause thermal or mechanical

damage or arcing that may lead to fires or personnel injuries. To ensure that protection in the above zones will work when needed, the resistance of the path to ground should be measured at regular intervals, making sure it meets the limits specified by the turbine

Figure 5: Foundation Earth Electrode at Wind Turbine Base

64

• FALL 2021

PROTECTING WIND TURBINES THROUGH EFFECTIVE GROUNDING

FEATURE manufacturer (typically limited to 15–30 mΩ, depending on turbine size). For these tests, use of a low-resistance ohmmeter is recommended.

M E T H O D S TO VE R IF Y L I G H T N IN G P R OT E CT ION SY ST E MS Measurement of low resistance is affected by key factors such as measurement type, test current magnitude, length of measurement leads, and placement of leads/probes.

Four-Wire Method The four-wire method (Figure 6) is most appropriate because it uses separate current probes to inject direct current (DC) and separate potential probes to measure the voltage drop across the test specimen.

Figure 6: Four-Wire Method

As introduced in the preceding sections, the most important part of the LPS is to test the conductor from the blade tip to the down conductor inside the hub that ultimately connects to the ground grid as was shown in Figure 5 and is depicted in Figure 7 and Figure 8.

This conductor is placed under significant strain as the blade flexes with the wind during normal operation. Under strain, the conductor may fracture. Unfortunately, it is not enough to simply check continuity because, if the fractured conductor is touching at the break point during a continuity test, the result will not be satisfactory. Consequently, a test current magnitude of 1 A or more is recommended for this test.

Figure 7: Lightning Conductor Resistance Measurement at Blade Tip

SOURCE: VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS A/S

Testing Wind Turbine Lightning Protection

SOURCE: VESTAS WIND SYSTEMS A/S

In some practical cases, a Kelvin measurement — where current and potential probes are 180° apart — is also employed to measure lowresistance values. The use of any other methods such as a two-wire method may not be suitable, as the measurement contains contact resistance values of the probes, thereby clouding the measurement.

Figure 8: Lightning Conductor Resistance Measurement at Wind Turbine Hub

PROTECTING WIND TURBINES THROUGH EFFECTIVE GROUNDING

NETAWORLD

•

65

FEATURE

Figure 9: Wind Turbine Blade before Installation

The length of a turbine blade can be seen in Figure 9. The size of the turbines poses a problem because low-resistance ohmmeter test leads are typically very short. Due to the size of the wind turbines, some extra-long leads are required, often up to 100 m. This is a huge increase in length over standard test leads for low-resistance ohmmeters. The long leads must be designed with a low enough resistance to ensure that a measurement is still possible. To achieve this, it is important to understand the test instrument design.

Some instruments have a compensation factor to allow for power loss in standard test leads. When using long test leads, the compensation for power loss will no longer

be sufficient. As a result, the test range of the instrument will be reduced. When the resistance of the test leads is increased, the total value of R in the following equation will also increase.

P = I 2R where R = (resistance of load) + (resistance of test leads) P = output power of the test instrument I = output current of the test instrument Since the maximum power output (P) of the test equipment cannot change,

Table 1: Resistance Range for Varying Test Current Magnitudes for a Popular Low-Resistance Tester Test Current

Range of leads Standard

30 m

60 m

100 m

Resolution

Comments

0.1 mA

0 to 2500.0 Ω

0 to 2499.9 Ω

0 to 2499.6 Ω

0 to 2499.2 Ω

0.1 Ω

0.1 mA

0 to 250.00 Ω

0 to 249.85 Ω

0 to 249.60 Ω

0 to 249.20 Ω

0.01 Ω

1 mA

0 to 25.000 Ω

0 to 24.850 Ω

0 to 24.600 Ω

0 to 24.200 Ω

1 mΩ

10 mA

0 to 2500.0 mΩ

0 to 2350.0 mΩ

0 to 2100.0 mΩ

0 to 1700.0 mΩ

0.1 mΩ

100 mA

0 to 250.00 mΩ

0 to 100.00 mΩ

Out of range

Out of range

0.01 mΩ

1A

0 to 25.000 mΩ

Out of range

Out of range

Out of range

1 μΩ

10 A

0 to 2500.0 µΩ

Out of range

Out of range

Out of range

0.1 μΩ

1 A (2.5W)

0 to 2500.0 mΩ

0 to 2350.0 mΩ

0 to 2100.0 mΩ

0 to 1700.0 mΩ

0.1 mΩ

Optimum conditions (Figure 10)

10 A (25W) 0 to 250.00 mΩ

0 to 100.00 mΩ

Out of range

Out of range

0.01 mΩ

Insufficient range

66

• FALL 2021

Test current insufficient Resolution inaccurate

Insufficient range

PROTECTING WIND TURBINES THROUGH EFFECTIVE GROUNDING

FEATURE the rise in test lead resistance will cause the maximum current (I) to be reduced.

Table 1 shows how lead length impacts the ability of an instrument to measure low resistances. It is clear that accurate and repeatable measurements will be a combination of test current, lead length, and resolution.

As seen in Figure 10, the performance of the low-resistance tester at 1 A (2.5 W) was most desirable for lead lengths that are typically employed to measure wind turbine LPS. For wind turbine applications, it is important to utilize the proper range and test current magnitude because it will be imperative for the length of measurement leads to accommodate the length of the wind turbines blades.

R E S U LT S Testing the lightning protection system was performed on a wind turbine with 32-m-long (105-ft) blades using a low-resistance ohmmeter. The instrument was used in its long-test-lead mode, which applies a 1 A test current and can measure accurately down to 0.01 mΩ when using 100-m-long (330-ft) test leads. The lightning system testing consisted of measuring the system’s resistance from the tip of each blade to the hub and from the hub to the base. The lightning system terminates with interconnected ground rods at the base of the turbine tower.

Each measurement was taken three times to evaluate repeatability. The variance meter on the instrument automatically recorded three measurements in a row and calculated their variance. The raw measurements of this test can be seen in Table 2; total results are shown in Table 3.

The low variance provides confidence in the measurement. In the field, test engineers must take every care to remain safe and follow best practices. This will provide the best possible measurements.

Range with 100 m

Range with 60 m

Range with 30 m

Range with Std.

1700.0 mΩ 2100.0 mΩ

1A

2350.0 mΩ 2500.0 mΩ 0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

Resistance in Ω

Figure 10: Optimum Testing Parameters with 1 A Test Current and Long Leads Table 2: Raw Measurements, Variance, and Averages Section Tested

Test 1 (mΩ) Test 2 (mΩ) Test 3 (mΩ)

Variance

Average (mΩ)

Blade A

7.81

7.81

7.79

0.9%

7.80

Blade B

7.85

7.86

7.86

0.4%

7.86

Blade C

7.51

7.52

7.52

0.4%

7.52

Tower

3.17

3.20

3.20

1.3%

3.19

Table 3: Total Resistance Values and Results Manufacturer’s Pass Level: ≤ 20 mΩ Lightning Path

Total Resistance (mΩ)

Pass/Fail

Blade A to Ground

10.99

PASS

Blade B to Ground

11.05

PASS

Blade C to Ground

10.71

PASS

The manufacturer of this wind turbine provided a pass level for the lightning system of 20 mΩ or less. This test proves that the lightning system has been installed correctly and is in good working order. Therefore, this turbine has good lightning protection as per the manufacturer’s design.

CONCLUSI ON Lightning is a hugely damaging threat to wind turbines, and as wind power installations continue spreading across the world, the

PROTECTING WIND TURBINES THROUGH EFFECTIVE GROUNDING

NETAWORLD

•

67

FEATURE requirement to protect these assets becomes more important.

Manufacturers of wind turbines take great care in designing the lightning protection system because of the known damage that can be caused. Owners and operators of turbines must ensure that the lightning protection system has been installed correctly. Additionally, owners and operators must regularly check the lightning protection system as part of the maintenance program.

Testing and verifying the lightning protection system is based primarily on low-resistance measurements. There are some challenges to measuring resistances at milliohm level when dealing with large structures like a wind turbine, so a balance between test energy, accuracy, resolution, and test lead length must be established. However, the right tools for the task will make it a simple job.

It is highly recommended to make lightning protection maintenance a key regular task for owners and operators. This will avoid lightning damage to wind turbines and ensure these assets are protected.

R E F E R E NC E S Dehn International. “Lightning and Surge Protection for Wind Turbines,” 2015.

[Online]. Available: https://www.dehn-usa. com/sites/default/files/uploads/dehn/pdf/whitepapers/ab-juli15/wp016-e-wind_turbines.pdf.

Vestas Wind Systems A/S. Installation of Copper Tip - Work Instruction, Vestas.

A. Z. Kattamis and M. Pooley. “Lightning Protection for Wind Turbines,” Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, 2017.

Megger Limited. “Testing Wind Turbine Lightning Protection,” Application Note, June 2019.

Furse. Guide to BS EN/IEC 62305.

American Clean Power. “Wind Power Facts,” [Online]. Available: https://cleanpower.org/ facts/wind-power/.

Global Wind Energy Council. “Global Wind Report,” Global Wind Energy Council, Brussels, 2021.

Sameer Kulkarni, PE, is an Applications Engineer at Megger. He previously worked for Entergy at River Bend Nuclear Generating Station as Systems Engineer responsible for power distribution, large power transformers, and NERC. Sameer obtained his BS in Mumbai, India, and graduated with an MS in electrical engineering from Arizona State University. He obtained his Professional Engineer license in June 2019 and is an IEEE Member.

Dr. Ahmed El-Rasheed is a Business Development Director at Megger and has over 14 years’ experience in electrical engineering. He is a member of several international standards organizations and has published papers on ground testing, insulation testing, and multi-sensor integration using AI.

Megger Instruments Ltd. Wind Farm Testing Growth Applications, 2021.

68

• FALL 2021

PROTECTING WIND TURBINES THROUGH EFFECTIVE GROUNDING

We rent transformer test equipment Transformer Turns Ratio Raytech AEMC Doble/Vanguard Winding Resistance Raytech Megger Power Factor Test Sets Doble Omicron Raytech Sweep Frequency Response Analyzers Doble Omicron Dielectric Frequency Response Analyzers Omicron Megger Transformer Dry Out System Trojan TDOS 1000 HV Also available: Dew Point Analyzers, Sudden Pressure Relay Test Sets, Combustible Gas Meters, CT testers 888.902.6111 | info@intellirentco.com | intellirentco.com

Call Today: 610.515.8775

Looking for Obscure, Obsolete, New or Used Parts?

Belyea’s Vast Inventory Has it All!

No one has a wider range of Electrical Power Equipment and Parts. Our vast inventory has new, used and obsolete parts.

Visit www.belyeapower.com to nd the parts you need.  Electro Mechanical Relay  Substation Equipment  Grounding Resistors  Motor Controls  CT’s and PT’s

CONTACT US TODAY: 610.515.8775 • Fax (610) 258-1230

 Bushings  Arresters  Gauges  Fuses  And More....

2200 NORTHWOOD AVE, EASTON, PA 18045 USA For our complete inventory visit our website: www.belyeapower.com • sales@belyeapower.com

POWER THROUGH WITH

CONFIDENCE

MAKE A REAL POWER MOVE...

PARTNER WITH MID-ATLANTIC’S PREMIER PROVIDER OF ELECTRICAL TESTING, ENGINEERING AND FIELD SERVICES. Since 1985

800.331.2002 | PotomacTesting.com

FEATURE

APPLYING NFPA 70E AND CSA Z462 TO RENEWABLE ENERGY POWER GENERATION

BY TE R RY B E CK E R, P.ENG ., CESCP, TW Becker Electrical Safety Consulting Inc.

The growth in renewable energy power generation will continue into the future. What has been lacking is focus on the electrical hazards in construction and fabrication, commissioning, operation, and maintenance. However, requirements in NFPA 70E, Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace and CSA Z462, Workplace electrical safety Standard do apply to renewable power generation.

AR C F LA S H A ND SHOCK H AZA RDS IN RENEWABLE P OW E R GE NE R ATI ON Renewable power generation is not new technology. It has been adopted in Canada, the United States, and globally for decades.

• A strong installed base exists in wind

turbine power generation and large commercial solar power farms, and with new battery technology, largescale battery storage will begin to be installed.

• Large-scale solar power generation

development (e.g. 100 MW, 500 MW, 1,000MW, or larger) has lagged wind turbine power generation, but has accelerated in the last three to five years.

72

• FALL 2021

• Installation of large-scale battery

storage systems is relatively new and will experience significant growth.

In Canada, according to Natural Resources Canada — in addition to wind and solar power growth — development of other renewable power generation including hydro, solid biomass, ethanol, renewable municipal waste/landfill gas, biodiesel, and tidal has also accelerated in the last 15 to 20 years.

Additionally, technological development and competition in battery technology has resulted in lower prices and greater capacity. This is expected to result in accelerated growth in adoption.

The development growth has come with the additional exposure of construction and fabrication, commissioning, operation, and

APPLYING NFPA 70E AND CSA Z462 TO RENEWABLE ENERGY POWER GENERATION

FEATURE

PHOTO: © ISTOCKPHOTO.COM/PORTFOLIO/ROSSHELEN

maintenance workers to the electrical hazards of arc flash and shock from working on both low- and high-voltage electrical equipment.

N FPA A N D C SA STA N DA R D S NFPA 70E and CSA Z462 have been adopted across the USA and Canada by industrial, commercial, and institutional business sectors as the industry’s best practices for the development and implementation of policies, practices, and procedural requirements for electrical safety and the effective management of arc flash and shock hazards. The adoption

and application of NFPA 70E and CSA Z462 to renewable energy power generation would be considered good due diligence to applicable OSHA and provincial or territorial occupational health and safety regulations.

The 12th Edition of NFPA 70E published in September 2020 included a new Battery Risk Assessment method (Figure 1) for work on batteries in Annex F Risk Assessment and Risk Control, F.7, and Figure F.7: Assessing Hazards Associated with Work on Batteries. CSA Z462 published its 5th Edition in January 2021; it does not include this flow chart related to batteries.

APPLYING NFPA 70E AND CSA Z462 TO RENEWABLE ENERGY POWER GENERATION

NETAWORLD

•

73

FEATURE Perform an arc flash risk assessment before proceeding

End (shock) End (thermal)

No thermal PPE required

No

Work involves possibility of an arc (3 kW min.)

Yes

Shock PPE based on maximum reachable voltage

Thermal hand protection required

An arc flash risk assessment must be completed by a qualified engineer prior to work

No (shock)

No

Thermal

Start

Safety glasses, insulated tools, no jewelry (minimum requirement)

Arc flash/shock

System voltage ≤100 volts

No

Can battery be segmented in sections all ≤100 volts?

Ungrounded, open rack AND single cell/unit readings (and visual)

No

Arc flash risk assessment completed

No (arc flash)

Chemical

Yes

Yes Yes (see Note 1) Handling electrolyte

No arc flash PPE required

Yes No arc flash or shock PPE required

Maximum energy ≥1.2 cal/cm2

No

Yes (see Note 2)

No

Yes

No chemical PPE required

Chemical PPE required

Arc flash PPE required for maximum battery energy (see Note 4)

End (arc flash)

End (chemical) Notes: 1. Arc flash and shock PPE may be required to put the battery in a segmented state. The battery must also be isolated from the system.

2. This only applies if the technician cannot reasonably reach across more than 100 volts or if the exposed parts are protected so the technician cannot touch across more than 100 volts.

3. If the battery terminals are more than 6 ft apart, or if at least one of the terminals is protected, arc flash hazard PPE is not required with respect to the battery terminal risk.

4. There may be additional procedures that can be implemented that would further reduce the arc hazard risk and required PPE.

Any work on main terminals (battery not segmented) Yes (see Note 3)

Yes For other conditions/ situations not shown, follow guidance provided by the arc flash risk assessment (see Note 4)

No

Battery cabinet (see Note 1)

No

Figure 1: Annex F, Figure F.7: Assessing Hazards Associated with Work on Batteries REPRODUCED WITH PERMISSION OF NFPA FROM NFPA 70E®, STANDARD FOR ELECTRICAL SAFETY IN THE WORKPLACE®, 2021 EDITION. COPYRIGHT© 2020, NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION. FOR A FULL COPY OF NFPA 70E®, PLEASE GO TO WWW.NFPA.ORG.

As defined by the Canadian Electrical Code and the National Electrical Code, low-voltage (≤1,000 V) and high-voltage (≥1,001 V) power generation is installed. Solar power generation occurs at DC voltages that are considered highvoltage: 1,500 VDC. In its 2021 Edition, CSA Z462 will apply to electrical equipment with a voltage greater than 30 V AC or 60 V DC (CSA Z462, 2021 Edition, Clause 4.1.6.2.3), while NFPA 70E still retains a 50 V AC or DC low-voltage threshold.

The NFPA 70E and CSA Z462 standards are based on work tasks and are 100% focused on risk assessment. Specific, defined worktask descriptions can be found in NFPA 70E

74

• FALL 2021

Table 130.5(C) or CSA Z462 Table 2 for both AC and DC low- and high-voltage electrical equipment. Table 1 highlights some of the work tasks that would normally be performed related to construction and fabrication, commissioning, operation, and maintenance of renewable power generation.

Significant electric shock and arc flash hazard exposure is related to isolation and any diagnostics or troubleshooting work tasks related to renewable energy power generation.

During the construction of renewable energy power generation facilities, tasks related to commissioning the power distribution system

APPLYING NFPA 70E AND CSA Z462 TO RENEWABLE ENERGY POWER GENERATION

FEATURE Table 1: Energized Work Tasks Applicable to Renewable Power Generation Task

Description

1

For AC systems, work on energized electrical conductors and circuit parts, including electrical testing

2

Operation of a circuit breaker or disconnect switch the first time after installation or completion of maintenance in the equipment

3

Operation of a circuit breaker or switch that is not in a normal equipment condition

4

For DC systems, working on energized electrical conductors and circuit parts of series-connected battery cells, including electrical testing

5

Opening hinged door(s) or cover(s) or removal of bolted covers (to expose bare, energized electrical conductors and circuit parts) including bolted covers, such as battery terminal covers for DC systems

6

Working on control circuits with exposed energized electrical conductors and circuit parts, greater than 120 V

7

Insertion or removal (racking) of circuit breakers or starters from cubicles, doors open or closed

8

Insertion or removal of connector covers or battery intercell connector(s)

9

For DC systems, working on exposed energized electrical conductors and circuit parts of utilization equipment directly supplied by a DC source

10

Opening voltage transformer or control power transformer compartments

11

Operation of outdoor disconnect switch (hook-stick operated)

12

Operation of outdoor disconnect switch (gang operated, from grade)

13

Operation of a circuit breaker, switch, contactor, or starter

14

Voltage testing on individual battery cells or individual multi-cell units

15

Removal or installation of equipment covers such as wireways, junction boxes, and cable trays that does not expose bare, energized electrical conductors, and circuit parts

16

Opening a panel-board hinged door or cover to access dead front overcurrent devices

17

Removal of battery nonconductive intercell connector covers.

18

Maintenance and testing of individual battery cells or individual multi-cell units in an open rack

19

Insertion or removal of individual cells or multi-cell units of a battery system in an open rack

SOURCE: WORK TASKS LISTED ARE EXCERPTED FROM NFPA 70E TABLE 130.5(C) OR CSA Z462 TABLE 2, ESTIMATE OF THE LIKELIHOOD OF OCCURRENCE OF AN ARC FLASH INCIDENT FOR AC AND DC SYSTEMS.

will expose qualified persons to the electrical hazards of arc flash and shock. Following commissioning, ongoing operation and electrical equipment maintenance will expose operations and maintenance employees or contractors to the electrical hazards of arc flash and shock.

Renewable power generation also includes construction of additional overhead power lines for distribution and transmission with related outdoor high-voltage substations, and this energized electrical equipment poses a significant shock and electrocution hazard and arc flash.

S E QU E L A E F F E CT S OF EL E CT R I CA L S H OC K The electrical shock hazard has been neglected.

Electrical workers have accepted being shocked

as part of the job — a right-of-passage, a badge of honor — and they may not even be aware of the long-term sequela health effects of receiving multiple low-voltage electrical shocks and how it may have impacted them. Currently, two facilities are formally recognized for formal research and treatment: the St. Johns Rehab Centre, Electrical Injury Program in Canada and the University of Chicago, Chicago Electrical Trauma Rehabilitation Institute (CETRI) in the United States.

When a worker is exposed to electric shock hazard, there are two possible outcomes: 1. A shock is received, and the worker survives.

2. Or they die.

APPLYING NFPA 70E AND CSA Z462 TO RENEWABLE ENERGY POWER GENERATION

NETAWORLD

•

75

FEATURE Electrical incident statistics confirm that fatal electrical injuries from shock occur at an alarming rate — on average still once a day or more in North America. What is not published in electrical incident statistic reports is the number of electrical workers who suffer from the long-term effects of receiving multiple lowvoltage (<1,000V) shocks. The medical term for this is “sequela.”

A sequela is a pathological condition resulting from a disease, injury, therapy, or other trauma.

Typically, a sequela is a chronic condition that is a complication which follows a more acute condition. It is different from, but is a consequence of, the first condition. SOURCE: WIKIPEDIA

electric shock is received impacts the long-term effects and possibly sequelae.

Long-Term Effects If you are an electrical worker reading this article, you may have long-term sequelae effects from been shocked multiple times throughout your career at 120 VAC, 208 VAC, 240 VAC, 277 VAC, 347 VAC, 480 VAC, or 600 VAC. If you have some of the symptoms listed in this article, you may want to follow up with your family physician. The potential long-term sequela effects from receiving multiple, lowvoltage electric shocks include psychological, neurologic, or physical symptoms.

Short-Term Effects We know the short-term effects of receiving an electric shock. As noted above, you survive the electric shock or you die. Table 2 lists the short-term immediate effects of receiving — but surviving — an electric shock.

The amount of current, the current flow path through the human body, and the frequency and length of time the current flows through the human body determines the probability of heart fibrillation. Male and female body resistance will be different, and added muscle mass increases conductivity. Wet or dry skin at the point of current entry will also impact current flow, and the number of times an

• Psychological Symptoms. Behaviour changes and attention span issues. You may be irritable, get frustrated, experience anger, and may be physically aggressive.

You may experience depression and posttraumatic stress disorder depending on whether you experienced “no-letgo” or became unconscious due to the shock exposure. Other sequelae include insomnia, anxiety, fear of electricity, panic attacks, guilt, and moodiness.

• Neurological Symptoms. You may experience memory loss, numbness, headaches, chronic pain, poor concentration, carpal tunnel, seizure disorders, dizziness, tinnitus, and tremors.

Table 2: Immediate Effects of Electrical Current Flow through the Human Body Current mA (milli-amps)

Physiological Effect On Human Body

Human Perception of Effect On Human Body

< 1 ma

None

Imperceptible

1 mA

Perception threshold

Mild sensation

1–10 mA 10 mA

Paralysis threshold of arms and hands

Cannot release hand grip; “no let go” threshold

30 mA

Respiratory paralysis

Breathing may stop

75 mA

Heart fibrillation possible

Heart action uncoordinated

250 mA

Heart fibrillation

Heart may stop

4 amps

Heart paralysis threshold

Heart stop for duration of current flow

Tissue burns

Most likely fatal; vital organs are burned or damaged; can lead to amputation of limbs

5 amps or greater

76

Painful sensation

• FALL 2021

APPLYING NFPA 70E AND CSA Z462 TO RENEWABLE ENERGY POWER GENERATION

FEATURE • Physical Symptoms. Generalized pain, fatigue, exhaustion, reduced range of motion, contracture, night sweats, fever, chills, or joint stiffness may be experienced.

The effects listed can change or may be more severe depending on whether the shock was a momentary contact or resulted in no-let-go, the path the current flowed through the body, and the duration and amount of current.

John Knoll’s Story John Knoll is a Master Electrician, and a Professional Electrical Contractor (PEC) with the Electrical Contractors Association of Alberta (ECAA) and resides in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. John is currently not working in the trade and is suffering from sequalae related to receiving multiple low-voltage shocks while at work starting when he was an apprentice and continuing while he was a journeyman electrician. John worked in the non-unionized side of the trade for most of his apprenticeship and career. He told me, “As an apprentice trimming out lighting circuits in apartments, we played games about being shocked at 120 VAC. We were not taught to fear electricity or respect it. I was never concerned about 120 VAC, 240 VAC. I didn’t consider it an issue to receive those shocks. I always said I would rather receive one knowing it was coming than not knowing. So after tick testing, we would touch the wires, because sometimes the tick tester lied, and it was better to know it was coming. It was the most we were able to do most times not being supplied the proper PPE or training to do our duties.”

The story of John’s career is very common.

John started in the electrical trade in 2005 and worked on energized 120/240 VAC singlephase and three-phase 208 VAC panelboards as an apprentice. He received shocks as early as the first week in the trade. John states, “I was probably shocked up to 500 times,” and I have talked to other electricians who say they were shocked hundreds of times during their career.

John explains, “The electricians I worked with

when I was an apprentice never identified the hazards and long-term effects of electric shock. There was no formal training, and no personal protective equipment was provided.

If we wanted a tick tester, we had to buy it ourselves. ‘Live’ work was not questioned. We had to work energized because we couldn’t deenergize parts of the job. We cut in panels while energized and rarely could turn off the power, as it impacted the other trades. I didn’t receive any training on lockout until I worked the last few months of my fourth period in the Union.”

John’s perception of shock and his sequela changed when he was shocked at 347 VAC. “That shock was different,” he says. “I was held and could not let go. I knew I was going to die, and I had no control of my body. I was saved by gravity when I fell off my ladder. I thought I was dying; the pain was unbelievable as I lost the ability to breathe. At that point,” John says, “I had a new-found respect and fear of electricity.”

In John’s case, he experienced psychological, neurological, and physical symptoms he did not know could be attributed to receiving multiple, low-voltage shocks throughout his career. When John described his injuries, I found it unbelievable, but based on information published more than 10 years ago

by Dr. Joel Fish, who at the time was practicing at St. Johns Rehab Centre in Ontario, the longterm sequela effects of electric shock are real.

John moved on in his career and had his own company from 2010 until he could no longer work due to escalation of his symptoms. He believes he began experiencing symptoms as early as two years into the trade and began seeking chiropractic and massage care — known relief for the nerve pain caused by the long-term sequelae effects of electric shock.

In 2016, his life began to change rapidly, and looking back now, he knows the multiple electrical shocks he received led to deterioration in his mental and physical health and directly impacted his personal life, as he was divorced from his wife and had issues with his friend and business partner.

APPLYING NFPA 70E AND CSA Z462 TO RENEWABLE ENERGY POWER GENERATION

NETAWORLD

•

77

FEATURE ELECTRICAL SHOCK RISK FACTORS Those working in the electrical industry identified many sociocultural, environmental, and behavioral factors that lead to electric shock.

Societal

Sectoral

Organizational

Interpersonal

Individual

These may include environmental factors, federal, provincial or municipal laws and policies

These may include cultural values and/or safety norms

These may include environment, equipment and/or culture

These may include coworkers, family, supervisor and/or friends

These may include knowledge, attitudes and/or skills

Bad weather (i.e. rain) Working at heights

Time pressure (trying to work quickly)

Poor training in electrical safety and risk

Rely on others to ensure equipment is de-energized

Competitive pricing strategies (trying to cut costs)

Faulty equipment

Miscommunication

Poor work practice/ complacency

Other trades working on site Interruptions and distractions

63%

HAVE DECLINED OR REFUSED WORK BECAUSE OF CONCERNS ABOUT ELECTRIC SHOCK

There are consequences of refusing or declining to work on energized equipment.

Direct

Indirect

3%

4%

5%

Were told not to bring things up again in the future if they felt unsafe

Directly punished or faced overt negative consequences from their superior

Were made fun of or teased

8%

19%

22%

Felt indirectly like they had done something wrong

Felt like they added costs or time to the project

Felt like they had inconvenienced someone

95%

95%

HAVE WORKED ON ENERGIZED EQUIPMENT

EXPERIENCED ELECTRIC SHOCK

97% Minor shock

Approximately 40% worked on energized equipment when they didn’t want to. Individuals are:

3x

2x

2x

More likely spent 75% of their time working in the single family residential sector

More likely were born outside of Canada

More likely worked alone

68% Moderate shock 22% Severe shock had one or more occurances

Figure 2: TSBC Risks and Consequences of Electrical Shock Infographic SOURCE: TECHNICAL SAFETY BRITISH COLUMBIA John’s comments about working on energized conductors and circuit parts were and perhaps still are the norm in the industry. In fact, his comments align with the results of a shock research project completed by the British Columbia, Canada, Technical Safety British

78

• FALL 2021

Columbia (TSBC). In February 2019, the TSBC published a report related to shock hazard in “Negotiating Safety – Understanding the Behavioral and Sociocultural Factors Related to Electric Shock.” Based on interviews and surveys, the report categorized the reasons

APPLYING NFPA 70E AND CSA Z462 TO RENEWABLE ENERGY POWER GENERATION

FEATURE electricians have worked and continue to work energized: societal, sectoral, organizational, interpersonal, and individual (Figure 2). The report concluded that poor training, poor work practices, complacency, not refusing to work energized, “I thought someone else had turned off the power,” and peer pressure (e.g. loss of job, keep the boss happy, rebuked by other workers) influenced why working energized was never questioned.

I believe John’s story is not an isolated case.

There are hundreds, potentially thousands, of electricians in Canada, the United States, and internationally who have long-term sequelae and have not correlated them to receiving multiple, low-voltage shocks throughout their careers. The psychological, neurological and physical health issues, the impacts on families, and the potential impact of not continuing in the trade with its resulting financial impacts are significant. If you are an electrician and are experiencing symptoms listed in this article, they can most likely be attributed to receiving multiple, low-voltage electric shocks while working. A big shout out and “thank you” to John Knoll for sharing his story, emotions, drive, and entrepreneurial spirit.

The bottom line is that electrical workers have been shocked as a normal condition of doing their jobs with a complete lack of awareness of the potential long-term effects of receiving multiple, low-voltage shocks throughout their careers. From 1942–1960, the American Electricians’ Handbook taught electricians that the human body could be used to detect voltages up to 250 VAC by touching with the hands. The chapter on Measuring, Testing, and Instruments said, “Electricians often test circuits for the presence of voltage by touching the conductors with the fingers. The presence of low voltages can be determined with tasting.”

Yes, there have been changes in the last decade in Canada with the publication of CSA Z462, Workplace electrical safety Standard in 2009.

NFPA 70E, Standard for Electrical Safety in

the Workplace, first published in 1979, has also made a difference, but the focus has been on arc flash and not shock. For the future, shock needs to be a priority!

APPLYI NG NFPA 70E AND CSA Z 4 6 2 As noted previously, the NFPA 70E or CSA Z462 standards are work-task-based. The next consideration is the voltage of the electrical equipment the work task will be completed on and the condition of maintenance of the electrical equipment. NFPA 70E and CSA Z462 require a risk assessment procedure to be implemented for defined “jobs” that would include the execution of a single or multiple work tasks. Two separate risk assessments are completed underneath the job’s risk assessment procedure for each work task: a shock risk assessment and an arc flash risk assessment.

Based on the work tasks listed in Table 1, construction/fabrication, commissioning, operation, and maintenance of renewable energy power generation require effective hazard identification and risk assessments to be completed for “jobs” that may include the work tasks listed.

CONCLUSI ON The requirements of NFPA 70E, Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace and CSA Z462, Workplace electrical safety Standard do apply to energized electrical equipment related to renewable power generation.

REFERENCES Marni L. Wesner, MD, MA, FCFP, DipSportMed, and Dr. John Hickie, MD, MSc, CCFP, CCBOM. “Long-Term Sequelae of Electrical Injury.” Canadian Family Physician, CFP-MFC, Official Publication of The College of Family Physicians of Canada, September 2013.

Online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ articles/PMC3771718/.

APPLYING NFPA 70E AND CSA Z462 TO RENEWABLE ENERGY POWER GENERATION

NETAWORLD

•

79

FEATURE Clifford C. Carr, EE, PE. American Electricians’ Handbook, Fifth Edition, Tyrell Croft Consulting Engineers. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1942.

Technical Safety British Columbia (TSBC).

“Safety Stories: Electric Shock.” Online: https://www.technicalsafetybc.ca/State-ofSafety-2018/safety-stories/electric-shock.

St John’s Rehab Centre. Electrical Injury Program. Online: https://sunnybrook.ca/ content/?page=sjr-patvis-prog-electrical.

University of Chicago, Chicago Electrical Trauma Injury Institute. Online: https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_Electrical_ Trauma_Rehabilitation_Institute.

Reliable Power System Solutions We deliver optimum system reliability and performance while reducing the chances of costly unplanned power outages. Whether you need acceptance testing or preventive maintenance, depend on EnerGTest to keep the power on.

ener

es

™

Accredited Company

Serving clients in Pennsylvania, Delaware, New Jersey, Maryland, Washington, DC and New England.

204 Gale Lane

Kennett Square, PA 19348

484.731.0200

enerGtest.com

Government of Canada. Online: https:// nrcan.gc.ca/science-data/data-analysis/energydata-analysis/energy-acts/renewable-energyfacts/20069.

Terry Becker, P.Eng., CESCP, IEEE Senior Member, is an Electrical Safety Specialist and Management Consultant.

He is the first past Vice-Chair of CSA Z462, Workplace electrical safety Standard Technical Committee and currently a Voting Member and Clause 4.1 and Annexes Working Group Leader. Terry is also a Voting Member on CSA Z463, Maintenance of electrical systems Standard and a Voting Member of IEEE Std. 1584, Guide for Performing for Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations. He has presented at conferences and workshops on electrical safety in Canada, the United States, India, and Australia, and is a Professional Engineer in the Provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and Ontario.

DOBLE F8000 POWER SYSTEM SIMULATORS DIGITAL NEXT-GENERATION HARDWARE DESIGNED FOR SUPERIOR FLEXIBILITY AND VALUE

COMMAND MODULE

LOW DENSITY LOGIC I/O MODULE

HVA CURRENT MODULE

WWW.DOBLE.COM/F8000

BATTERY SIMULATOR

HVA VOLTAGE MODULE

PROTECTION TESTING PLATFORM THAT EXPANDS AND ADAPTS TO FUTURE TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS

NETA NEWS

In Remembrance: JAMES R.

JIM WHITE

“

”

Fo re w o rd b y R O N WIDUP, Shermco Industries

On June 9, 2021, I received this text message from Vickie White, wife of Jim White: Jim is free and home with God. June 9, 2021 @ 4:55 AM was his appointed time.

And that was that.

Jim the fighter, the guy who would never give up, the person you could always count on to help you out and volunteer to get things done, had gone home.

And though it wasn’t a surprise to any of us, it’s the finality of that statement that hits you. I saw Jim just two days earlier and was able to say goodbye to him, and more importantly, to say goodbye from all his electrical buddies. It is in that spirit that we honor our memories of Jim, in his favorite electrical industry journal, NETA World.

Jim’s career in the electrical field expanded across many decades with a specialty in training and education. His direct impact on the electrical worker in the field is immeasurable. With a passion for the practical and a common-sense approach to understanding the hazards of electricity,

IN REMEMBRANCE: JAMES R. “JIM” WHITE

Jim shared his knowledge with a unique style and dry-wit humor that was his trademark.

Who knows what the impact of Jim’s contributions are to the industry? Did he prevent significant injury or save lives because of it? My guess is he did. And did he make all of us better at what we do?

Most definitely.

We could spend many hours on Jim stories, and we should continue to do that when we come together again in future conferences and meetings. One thing for sure: We are better people for having known and spent time with him. We will miss him dearly.

NETAWORLD

•

83

NETA NEWS

J

ames Roy White was born December 12, 1951, in Washington, DC, to parents Benjamin and Katherine White. He was the middle son, born between brothers Ben Jr. and David.

Jim grew up in Cottage City, Maryland, and attended Bladensburg High School. In 1968, he began work as a journeyman electrician.

This was the beginning of Jim’s auspicious career in the electrical industry.

In 1970 at the age of 19, Jim enlisted in the Air Force where he served as a jet mechanic in Korea during the Vietnam War. After a fouryear stint, Jim returned home and worked as a high-voltage electrician for the U.S. government.

It was during that time he met the love of his life, Vickie Ford. They were married two years later and raised a family comprised of a

Vickie and Jim White daughter and two sons. Everyone knew that with Jim, family always came first.

Jim enjoyed golf, restoring old cars (mostly Corvettes), and very early morning workouts at a local gym. He was a member of the National Corvette Restorers Society for 20 years, earning Master Judge recognition for judging restored vintage Corvettes.

Jim’s Air Force Days

84

• FALL 2021

Jim leaves behind his beloved wife Vickie, daughter Jodie, son Jason and his wife Christina, son Justin and his wife Allison, granddaughter Kristen, and three grandsons Caden, Connor, and Anthony.

IN REMEMBRANCE: JAMES R. “JIM” WHITE

NETA NEWS

A N O U T P OU RING OF LOVE AND RESPECT FOR

Jim White

Generosity of spirit is the phrase that comes to mind when I think of Jim. He gave freely to all around him, educating us through his knowledge and expertise and passion for the industry. He genuinely cared about making the electrical power industry a safer place for everyone in it. — Kristen Schmidt

While others may remember Jim for his hard work, technical expertise, and industry knowledge, I will always remember Jim as a leader who faced great adversity, and despite these tremendous challenges, set an example for us all. Jim’s courage and faith are an inspiration. — Bill Mohl

Jim was one of the most well-respected technical and safety professionals in the industry. He will be greatly missed. — NETA President Eric Beckman

Jim always impressed me as a straightshooter and a gentleman — a person of integrity and empathy, as well of deep expertise and knowledge of his field. He could offer you a dissenting opinion and bring you to his side of seeing things without even the hint of disagreement. — Marcelo Valdes

I remember a few times when conversations were tense while debating this or that in a meeting. Jim would always retort with something from a different perspective, or he would say something completely off the wall and make us all laugh. We are safer at work because of his efforts, but more than that, we are better human beings because we knew Jim. — Kiley Taylor Jim was a wealth of knowledge. I thought I had a lot of knowledge myself and was enjoying some good conversation with other members during a task group breakout. Jim put me back in my place with a good comment about something I said: “That sounds great, but how does it help us address this issue?” He always made you think about solving the real problems at hand. — Karl Cunningham

IN REMEMBRANCE: JAMES R. “JIM” WHITE

Jim is in a new oversight role now. — Martin Nagel Jim was the consummate professional, guru on electrical safety, and a downright great person. His loss creates an unfillable void and emptiness in the hearts of all who had the privilege of knowing him. — Tom Bishop I will remember Jim for his dedication to his craft, his dedication to the NFPA community and codes and standards, and his dedication to safety — always looking out for the small guy. — Larry Ayer

NETAWORLD

•

85

NETA NEWS

New Corvette 2012

A P ROLIF IC CA REER During his career, Jim became an industry leader in electrical safe work practices and technical training. An NFPA Certified Electrical Safety Compliance Professional and a NETA Level 4 Senior Technician, Jim was NETA’s principal member and current secretary of NFPA Technical Committee NFPA 70E®, Electrical Safety in the Workplace for nearly 20 years. Louis Barrios served with Jim on the 70E Committee.

“Jim White continued his commitment to our safety community until the very end. I’ll never forget one of his last presentations at the IEEE ESW, where he drove himself up to the podium in a small scooter and stood and delivered his presentation. What a fighter!”

“Jim had a special way of cutting through what can sometimes be very complex messages and getting to the practical point with a unique wit,” Barrios continues. “He was a real champion of electrical safety.”

Jim was also NETA’s principal representative on National Electrical Code® Code-Making Panel (CMP) 13 and represented NETA on ASTM International Technical Committee F18, Electrical Protective Equipment for Workers.

Jim was Shermco Industries’ principal member on NFPA Technical Committee for NFPA 70B,

86

• FALL 2021

Recommended Practice for Electrical Equipment Maintenance. “He was a straight-shooting, tellit-like-it-is guy, a true champion of electrical safety, and a friend,” says Rod West, who worked alongside Jim on the 70B Committee.

Jim also represented AWEA on ANSI/ISEA Standard 203, Secondary Single-Use Flame Resistant Protective Clothing for Use Over Primary Flame Resistant Protective Clothing.

Jim was Chairman of the IEEE Electrical Safety Workshop in 2008, was Vice-Chair of the IEEE IAS/PCIC Safety Subcommittee, and was an active member on many advisory boards.

Additionally, Jim authored two technical books and many articles for industry publications.

He was a regular contributor to NETA World for well over two decades and was an active presenter/lecturer at NETA’s PowerTest and many other venues.

“Jim will be sorely missed within the electrical and NETA communities,” says Scott Blizard, a recent past-President of the NETA Board of Directors. “The industry lost a man who made a huge impact on the world,” adds Missy Richard, NETA Executive Director.

Daryld Ray Crow co-presented technical classes and papers with Jim over the course of many years. “I enjoyed helping Jim with the questionIN REMEMBRANCE: JAMES R. “JIM” WHITE

NETA NEWS and-answer sessions on NFPA 70E that he led at NETA’s safety conferences,” recalls Crow. “I could always count on his help when needed.

Jim was a true mentor to many people.”

Jim was well-respected in the industry, and he received much recognition and many industry awards for his technical expertise, vast industrial experience, and leadership. An IEEE Senior Member, he received the IEEE/ IAS/PCIC Electrical Safety Excellence Award in 2011 and NETA’s Outstanding Achievement Award in 2013.

“I had the opportunity to meet many players in the codes and standards industry over the years, but there is only one Jim White,” says colleague Jim Dollard. “He was respectful, compassionate, humble, kind, and funny as hell. In many cases, his dry sense of humor made tense meetings seem jovial. We are all better people for having known and spent time with him.”

Jim’s contributions to electrical codes and standards will live on, making workplaces safer and saving the lives of men and women who never knew him.

Jim presented at many industry events.

“While we all recognize his passion for everything he was involved in, his ongoing dedication to NFPA 70E and PowerTest — and more recently, the conversion of NFPA 70B from a recommended practice to a standard — was determined and energetic,” says Palmer Hickman.

“He continued to participate at the highest level when most would have retreated and given up.

Overcoming adversity and giving it his all is what we all will fondly remember of Jim.”

Tony Demaria and Jim Cutting Up To watch Jim’s June 28th service, go to https://www.dropbox.com/s/pwv8mthr4itmh4b/Jim%20 White%20Memorial%20%286-26-21%29.mp4.

IN REMEMBRANCE: JAMES R. “JIM” WHITE

NETAWORLD

•

87

Find FAME with Phoenix Contact Ideal solutions for relay protection and electric revenue metering FAME (Fast and Modular Energy) test systems from Phoenix Contact are a safe, reliable, simple way to test meters, relays, and instrument transducers, as well as calibrate control systems, disconnection, troubleshooting, checkout, and testing. Normally-closed contacts provide touch-safe make-before-break short-circuiting for current transformer circuits. Fully functional handles along with modular disconnect and interrupt plugs are also available.

Select your perfect FAME configuration, from 4 to 20 poles.

For innovation and rugged touch-safe design, choose FAME from Phoenix Contact for your next test system. For more information, visit www.phoenixcontact.com/FAME or contact Technical Service at 1-800-322-3554.

© PHOENIX CONTACT 2021

We Help You See What Others Can’t

Detecting defects that you can’t see, touch or feel is the challenge that comes with maintaining the health of your cable assets.

Megger’s cable fault, test and diagnostic equipment provide clear insights and analytics that give you the data you can confidently rely on to make informed decisions. We help you find the defects that others can’t so you can maximize uptime.

Smart Thump ST25-30 Portable/Vehicle Mount Cable Fault Location System

TDS-NT Combined Cable Test & Diagnosis System

Cable Test and Diagnostics Resources Visit our educational webinars library at us.megger.com/webinars to see all of our upcoming and previous presentations related to cable fault location, testing and diagnostics.

1-800-723-2861

us.megger.com

VLF Sine Wave 62 kV Test And Diagnostic System For The Testing And Condition Analysis Of Medium Voltage Cables

INDUSTRY TOPICS

MV/HV CIRCUIT BREAKER TESTING

BEYOND CONVENTIONAL PRACTICES

BY VOL NEY NARANJ O, Megger

Conventional testing of medium- and high-voltage circuit breakers (MV/ HV CBs) involves measuring the timing and travel of the main contacts and their corresponding resistors (pre- or post-insertion) if any, along with the current profile of the operating coils, and occasionally the timing of auxiliary contacts.

This article explains several techniques available to improve or extend the scope of testing.

Aspects reviewed include improving the safety and efficiency of conventional practices, testing circuit breakers that are normally not tested due to the difficulty they present, and using additional or alternative testing techniques to assess specific circuit breaker components.

Circuit breaker analyzers (CBAs) are versatile instruments that can be used to extend testing capabilities beyond conventional testing to achieve better or focused assessment of circuit breakers depending on their application or criticality — all by simply adding accessories.

This article provides insight into techniques that can be implemented and the advantages of adding them to a maintenance plan.

CONVE NT IONA L CB T E ST ING MV/HV CBs are installed in systems above 1 kV with various insulating media: air magnetic blast, vacuum, oil (low and bulk volume),

90

• FALL 2021

SF6, or new insulating gases developed by CB manufacturers. Vacuum is the most common for MV CBs and SF6 for HV CBs. The mechanism that drives operation of the breaker is commonly spring-based, but pneumatics and hydraulics are also used. Magnetic mechanisms are currently common on MV vacuum CBs. Depending on size and application, the breaker may have one or three mechanisms: (1) One single mechanism for the three phases, commonly known as three-pole operated (2) One mechanism per phase, known as single pole or independent pole operated (IPO) A circuit breaker isolates the source from the load when it is in open position as well as any side from ground under any circumstance.

Insulation tests, such as insulation resistance, power factor, vacuum bottle integrity, or gas analysis, are required to assess the condition of the insulation.

MV/HV CIRCUIT BREAKER TESTING BEYOND CONVENTIONAL PRACTICES

INDUSTRY TOPICS

When the breaker is closed, it should provide continuity to the circuit with extremely low impedance to avoid losses and consequent heat that deteriorates the contacts and can cause catastrophic failure of the breaker. A contact resistance test is used to determine whether the contacts are within specs. High values from the reference or elevated differences between the contacts are indication of wear, contamination, or looseness of the contacts.

The third main function of a circuit breaker is to act as a switch for operational maneuvers or protection against faults in the system. MV and HV circuit breakers rely on external commands to operate under protection conditions.

External commands are applied to a control

circuit, which in turn uses coils and contacts to actuate the mechanical or electrical restrain to release the energy stored in the mechanism to close or open the breaker. The breaker should also be capable of opening correctly immediately after closing in cases where the breaker is closed under an existing fault; this function is called close-open or trip-free. In other instances depending on the system and the type of breaker, the breaker should be able to open and close after a certain delay to act as a recloser. If the fault persists, the breaker should open again immediately. These operations are called open-close and open-close-open.

All of these operating characteristics are included in manufacturer specifications and

MV/HV CIRCUIT BREAKER TESTING BEYOND CONVENTIONAL PRACTICES

NETAWORLD

•

91

INDUSTRY TOPICS should be within certain timing and travel parameters. They can therefore be verified with a test that simulates the external commands to the control coils, measures the operating times of main and resistive contacts, calculates synchronism of the poles, and characterizes mechanical behavior by plotting the travel curve and calculating the speed, acceleration, rebounds, stroke, and penetration, among others. This comprehensive test, called timing and travel analysis, is performed with a circuit breaker analyzer (CBA) and the appropriate transducers.

In a very simplified description, a CBA is a test instrument that simulates the operating pulses from relay and control systems by closing a contact in a control module to initiate a timer and operation of the breaker. Simultaneously, another set of modules or channels are activated to measure different parameters. These modules operate with analog or digital signals.

One module is dedicated to simulating the operating signals. Other modules are dedicated to measure: • Timing of the main contacts by applying voltage to each pole and detecting the make- or-break by measuring current circulation or interruption, in essence a continuity measurement. Resistor contacts (pre- and post-insertion) timing is measured the same way and includes measurement of the resistance.

• Timing of auxiliary contacts using a similar concept of continuity measurement.

• Travel of the breaker mechanisms through analog or digital channels and the usage of the corresponding transducers mechanically attached to a specific point of the circuit breaker drive. The module measures the analog or digital signals for the entire operating period and converts the information to

• FALL 2021

The analog channels of a CBA can be used to measure signals from various accessories.

This allows the instrument to be used for the following tests, thus expanding the usage of a CBA as a comprehensive and efficient tool.

Dual Ground Testing

C IRC UIT B R E AKER ANALYZE R

92

travel parameters (length, angle, speed) using manufacturer conversion factors or tables. Results are displayed numerically and graphically to show the behavior of the mechanism throughout the entire operating time.

The conventional timing method requires the breaker to be isolated from ground at least from one side. Even though the circuit breaker under test is isolated from high voltages and grounded on one side, three main possibilities still exist for the breaker to become energized to a dangerous high potential: 1. Accidental energization of the line from some unwanted source of potential 2. A lightning strike on the lines or bus connected to the circuit breaker 3. Most common, capacitive coupling from another conductor that is energized. The voltage from capacitive coupling can sometimes generate 20 mA or more of current that can be pushed through a human body.

To minimize the safety hazard, the common practice is to ground both ends and only remove one of the grounds for the testing operations. When the timing equipment is connected to the circuit breaker under test, it provides a direct path to the technician for this capacitive-coupled current. Timing equipment should always be grounded while testing in a substation, but the induced current will still flow through the equipment to ground as seen in Figure 1.

If the ground fails or the technician inadvertently removes one of the timing leads

MV/HV CIRCUIT BREAKER TESTING BEYOND CONVENTIONAL PRACTICES

INDUSTRY TOPICS One side grounded One side grounded High voltage High voltage Up to several kV if not earthedkV Up to several if(grounded) not earthed (grounded)

capacitive coupled current capacitive

capacitive coupled current capacitive

coupled current

CBA analyzer manufacturers have implemented techniques to be able to time breakers with both ends grounded, and utilities are gradually implementing them in their procedures due to the benefits of increased safety and reduced outage time.

DCM Testing One leading technique uses dynamic capacitance measurement (DCM), which relies on the natural capacitance of the circuit breaker to distinguish between closed and open states.

A simple representation of a circuit breaker (Figure 3) consists of a moving contact and a stationary contact separated by some type of insulating medium, commonly vacuum, oil, or SF6 gas, i.e. the circuit breaker is a capacitor.

By placing a variable frequency generator in parallel with the circuit breaker, an LRC circuit is formed. The inductance and resistance is composed mainly of the leads connecting the frequency generator to the circuit breaker and the ground leads; the capacitance is from the circuit breaker itself.

coupled current

Test equipment Test equipment Grounding Grounding

Protective earth cable Protective earth cable Station earth (ground) Station earth (ground)

Figure 1: CB with One Side Grounded for Testing

Both sides grounded Both sides grounded High voltage High voltage Up to several kV if not earthedkV Up to several if(grounded) not earthed (grounded)

capacitive capacitive coupled coupled current current

The added step of disconnecting the ground to test and reconnecting it to complete the setup and return the CB to service adds extra time to the procedure, which can represent one or two extra hours to complete the testing depending on the size of the breaker and internal company practices. Additionally, safety is compromised as was shown in Figure 1 while the tests are conducted. Some international standards, including IEC EN 50110-1, require working on components in high-voltage environments only when both sides are grounded.

Test equipment Test equipment Protective earth cable Protective

Grounding

earth cable

Grounding

capacitive capacitive coupled coupled current current

from equipment, the technician is now the easiest path to ground, and the induced current will flow through the technician. When the circuit breaker is grounded on both sides as in Figure 2, the induced current flows directly to ground and not through the test equipment or test technician.

Grounding Grounding

Station earth (ground) Station earth (ground)

Figure 2: CB with Both Sides Grounded for Testing

Measuring the dynamic capacitance allows the maximum capacitance value for each contact to be determined. This happens when the contacts have the minimal separation before the make of the contacts. The moment of this maximum Moving capacitance is used to start and/orFixed stop the timer Moving Fixed to measure the breaker operatingcontact times. contact

contact

MV/HV CIRCUIT BREAKER TESTING BEYOND CONVENTIONAL PRACTICES

d d

contact

NETAWORLD

•

93

Test Grounding equipment Protective earth cable

INDUSTRYGrounding TOPICS

Grounding Station earth (ground)

Grounding

Figure 4 includes two graphs of current vs. frequency — each with its own resonance point. When the circuit breaker is in the closed position, frequency varies between 150 kHz to 2 MHz to establish a minimum current response, at which point the frequency is locked into this position. When the circuit breaker is operated, the test current is continuously monitored at a high frequency (typically 40 kHz). When the contacts first separate upon opening, or right before they first touch on closing, the capacitance in the circuit is at maximum, and the resonance point shifts from the established minimum recorded while the circuit breaker was closed.

As stated previously, if a timer records from close or trip coil energization to this shift in current response, accurate contact times per IEEE Std. C37.09 and IEC Std 62271-100 are recorded.

Station earth (ground)

Moving contact

Moving contact

d

d

Fixed contact

Fixed contact CB

CB Variable frequency 150 kHz - 2 MHz

A CBA with the ability to operate with a DCM accessory allows a breaker to be tested more safely and efficiently, totally immune to 50/60 Hz interference, and with the added advantage of displaying the results in the Resonance frequency conventional timing format.

i 3: RLC Model of a Circuit Breaker Figure and DCM Test Setup Variable frequency 150 kHz - 2 MHz

is determined and locked while CB is in closed position

i IMin i

IMin

IOpen fLock

i

Resonance frequency is determined and fLock locked while CB is in closed position

f This testing technique monitors contact resistance

Resonance changes at contact separation withfaddition of serial Lock capacitance

f

f

Figure 4: Current vs. Frequency for Contacts Closed and Contact Separation

+ Control voltage – measurement

94

• FALL 2021

by circulating a DC current and measuring the voltage drop across the contacts of the breaker while it is opened or closed. The purpose is to Resonance changes at plot the resistance rather than obtaining a specific contact separation contact resistance magnitude. This plot depicts with addition of serial capacitance the condition of the surfaces of the contacts and the various sections along the travel of the moving contact over the fixed contact.

f

IOpen

fLock

Dynamic Resistance Measurement (DRM)

The typical DRM response of the open operation of a breaker with arcing contacts (Figure 5) shows a flat line during the first milliseconds, then a slight increase in resistance as the moving contact begins + Control to travel towards the open position. Then, when voltage measurement the – main contact opens and the swipe continues over the arcing contact, the plot reflects this Trigger in from control house trip transition with a resistance spike followed by a command second horizontal response with higher magnitude

MV/HV CIRCUIT BREAKER TESTING BEYOND CONVENTIONAL PRACTICES Trigger in from control house trip Measure auxiliary command contacts if desired

INDUSTRY TOPICS for some milliseconds, trailed by a last spike in resistance to infinite when the moving contact parts from the fix side.

Arcing contacts are used to endure the deterioration caused by the arc from opening the breaker. The wear and tear caused by the arc reduces the length of the moving arcing contact to the point that it becomes ineffective and needs replacement. To determine when to replace the arcing contact, it is necessary to know the length of the moving contact. This can be estimated from manufacturer graphs that show the estimated number of operations under fault current, but since it is an estimate, it may trigger major maintenance activity only to find it is not due for replacement, or it is too late, and the main contacts are already affected.

As an optimal alternative, DRM can be used to reliably determine the length of the arcing contact. When travel measurement is added to the test, the separation between the two spikes in resistance, measured from the travel curve, represents the remaining length of the moving arcing contact. Furthermore, significant deterioration of the arcing contact such as erosion or contamination will be reflected in the graph with multiple and high variations in the resistance instead of a smooth and flat curve.

DRM works well with both sides of the breaker grounded and when the breaker opens. Instead of a spike to infinite, it will show a spike to a resistance of higher magnitude equivalent to the ground loop resistance. In this sense, the technique also offers increased safety, and in addition to assessing the arcing contacts, it may be used to estimate breaker timing. However, it is not as accurate because it relies on a resistance threshold that needs to be adjusted below the ground loop resistance and above the arcing contact resistance. Both limits are usually not higher than 10 milliohms, and the transition occurs in less than 10 ms. A threshold setting within such a small range is difficult, especially if the measurement is affected by induced AC currents from surrounding live conductors.

Figure 5: Typical Response of a DRM Test

First Trip Circuit breakers can be used for multiple applications, and in most of them, the common status or position is closed. Because they are used mainly for protection and temporary isolation, they will be in open position only for hours or days, while they remain in closed position for months or even years. Since their operation depends mainly on mechanical drives, latches, and their corresponding lubrication, the lack of exertion can degrade their ability to respond in a matter of milliseconds upon a protection or control command.

Think about two identical breakers for a period of two years with the same initial mechanical conditions but with different operating regimes. Breaker A operates occasionally in steady, mild environmental conditions.

Breaker B, which is permanently closed, does not operate over the two-year period and is exposed to harsh environmental conditions, i.e. the four seasons, high humidity, and extreme temperatures. After the two-year period, the operating performance of these two breakers will be different. The lack of exertion and the effect of the environment on lubrication and components could have greater impact on the performance of Breaker B compared to the effect of wear and tear on Breaker A. Specifically, the very first open operation of

MV/HV CIRCUIT BREAKER TESTING BEYOND CONVENTIONAL PRACTICES

NETAWORLD

•

95

IMin fLock

i INDUSTRY TOPICS

f

changes at Breaker B could be slowerResonance and is likely to be out contact separation of tolerance; however, subsequent operations with addition of serial during the testing process may not show this capacitance reduced performance. When called upon to open, a breaker only has one opportunity: that very first operation after being closed for a fLock f long time. It doesn’t matter if the performance improves with additional operations.

IOpen

+ Control voltage – measurement Trigger in from control house trip command

Measure auxiliary contacts if desired

Coil current measurement via external CTs

Figure 6: Setup to Measure First Trip

Any detriment in performance will be reflected in the current signature of the trip coil. Any problem in the control circuit or the latching system driven by the coil armature will change the magnitude of the current or the timing of the sequence of events prior to releasing the latch. Opening a breaker that has been closed for a long time in preparation for testing usually goes unmeasured, the reduced performance is unnoticed, and the maintenance test may not prescribe any maintenance activity, masking an underlying and developing issue in the breaker.

It is easy to conclude that measuring this first operation provides revealing information about the condition of the breaker.

This test is called first trip and can be done using a CBA with added current clamps. The test consists of measuring the current signature of the trip coil — or coils if the breaker is an independent pole operated (IPO) breaker — at the first operation after being in the closed position for a long time. The setup needs to be done at the control cabinet while the breaker is in service, however the setup is simple: one current transformer per trip coil, connections to the DC voltage supply to

Figure 7: Setup to Measure First Trip and CB Opening Time

96

• FALL 2021

MV/HV CIRCUIT BREAKER TESTING BEYOND CONVENTIONAL PRACTICES

INDUSTRY TOPICS monitor the voltage while the breaker operates, and connection to the trip circuit to use it as a trig-in that starts the timer of the CBA (Figure 6). The measured signature is compared to a previous measurement, and the differences can determine whether there is a problem with the coil winding or armature, wiring or low-voltage issues, or problems in the trip latch or linkage system due to corrosion or lubrication issues.

The opening time of the CB can also be measured by monitoring the secondary side of the protection current transformers (Figure 7).

In any case, extra caution must be taken since there are live DC circuits in the control cabinet, and the mechanism may be inside the same cabinet. In this test, there are no connections to the main terminals, and travel is not measured unless the transducer is permanently mounted.

The greatest benefit of using first trip testing is to test real-world operating conditions. It is a quick test that does not require an outage and can be used to determine and prioritize offline maintenance actions using a condition based approach.

Motor Current A spring-charge motor is employed to compress or expand springs to store potential energy for close and open operations.

Malfunctions of the charging drive can cause deviations in motor operation, which in turn will be reflected in the electrical current that circulates during its operation. If this current is monitored and trended, issues such as lack of lubrication or a broken or fatigued spring can be determined.

Normally, operation of the motor occurs after a close operation and takes between 10 and 30 seconds. Due to the duration of the operation, a separate close test is added to the breaker test plan to measure the current separately from the rest of the timing operations. For the measurement, the current is monitored by one of the CBA’s analog modules using a current sensor clamped around the motor power

Figure 8: Motor Current Measurement Result supply. The power supply voltage is monitored by the control module.

The result will display the current graph along with parameters that characterize the motor voltage and current behavior such as motor running time and peak current (Figure 8). Analyzing the results evaluates the current shape and ensures that maximum current and time for charging springs are not exceeded compared to manufacturer specs, commissioning, or historic results.

If the motor peak current is too high and/or motor charge time is too long, it could indicate that the charging mechanism requires more force than normal, e.g. due to lack of lubrication.

Lower peak current and/or shorter motor charge time could indicate a broken or fatigued spring.

MV GIS Breaker Timing Medium-voltage gas insulated switchgear poses a challenge when performing timing tests because the breaker is enclosed without any access to its terminals. Electrical access may be possible via cable terminal components, spare bays, or similar routes, but such access is limited to installation and commissioning phases. In the end, these options do not provide a practical option for routine or

MV/HV CIRCUIT BREAKER TESTING BEYOND CONVENTIONAL PRACTICES

NETAWORLD

•

97

INDUSTRY TOPICS troubleshooting testing activities, and the entire switchgear needs to be isolated to be able to test using the conventional timing technique.

An alternative is to connect a CBA to the voltage detection system (VDS) through an adapter to determine the operating time of the breaker by detecting the instant in which voltage appears or disappears when closing or opening the breaker, respectively, for each phase.

Other parameters, such as coil current and auxiliary contacts, can be recorded, and other testing techniques like first trip and motor current are fully applicable to this type of circuit breaker while using the VDS to perform the test. Figure 9 shows the basic test setup where the control module is used to measure control voltage and trigger signals. The adapter is connected to the VDS on one end and to the timing module on the other end.

Figure 10 compares the results of close and open operations under conventional and VDS methods.

Figure 9: Basic Setup for VDS Testing

This technique offers the ability to safely, efficiently, and accurately test breakers that are difficult to test with conventional techniques.

Figure 10: Close and Open Timing with Conventional and VDS Methods

98

• FALL 2021

MV/HV CIRCUIT BREAKER TESTING BEYOND CONVENTIONAL PRACTICES

INDUSTRY TOPICS CON C LU S ION

REFERENCES

A circuit breaker analyzer is a multifunction instrument that, with the appropriate accessories and adapters, allows conventional testing, complementary testing, advanced testing such as DRM and motor current, and alternative techniques such as DCM to improve safety and efficiency. First trip testing can be used to prioritize maintenance activities.

Other uses of a CBA not covered in this article include vibration analysis and testing synchronized switching of shunt capacitor or harmonic filter circuit breakers.

R. Foster, V. Naranjo, and D. Carreño. “Testing High Voltage Circuit Breakers with Both Sides Grounded Using Dynamic Capacitance (DCM) Technology,” IEEE Electrical Insulation Conference (EIC), 2018, pp. 439-442.

Not all circuit breaker analyzers are capable of performing all of these measurements. It depends on the module’s configuration and software capabilities. Selecting the right base instrument is critical to be able to add any additional feature in the future.

Megger. Circuit Breaker Testing Guide, 2017.

[ONLINE] https://embed.widencdn.net/pdf/ plus/megger/eqalkjxt4v/CB_Testing_Guide_ AG_2017_en_V0a.pdf.

Volney Naranjo joined the Technical Support Group at Megger in 2011 as an Applications Engineer focusing on the products for transformer, low-voltage and high-voltage circuit breakers, batteries, and power quality testing. He participates in the IEEE Energy Storage and Stationary Battery committee and has published articles in conferences such as TechCon, PowerTest, TSDOS, BattCon, and EIC as well as technical magazines. Volney received his BSEE from Universidad del Valle in Cali, Colombia. After graduation, he worked in the areas of electrical design and testing and commissioning of power systems as a field engineer and project manager.

1945

Largest inventory of protective relays in the country Dedicated group of 8 relay specialists Upgrade support

PROTECTIVE RELAYS THROUGH THE YEARS

We are Your Protective Relay Solution

All relays are supplied in like-new condition, tested, and with a 1-year warranty

79 Main Street, Seymour CT 06483

PRESENT

sertecrelays.net

1-800-521-0197

CAN’T AFFORD TO WAIT FOR

ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT?

When equipment fails, every minute spent searching for what you need is bad for the bottom line. Our massive inventory of millions of new, surplus and repurposed circuit breakers, switchgear and related products is here for you.

We have the expertise to see the big picture, understand your problem and recommend the best solution. Already know exactly what you need? Our website is constantly being updated with products and the online buying process is easy.

Tap into the power of National Switchgear at nationalswitchgear.com or call us today at (800) 322-0149. performance by design sm

INDUSTRY TOPICS

HOW GROUNDS AFFECT PEAK VOLTAGE DUE TO

LIGHTNING

PHOTO: © ISTOCKPHOTO.COM/PORTFOLIO/SLAVICA

BY A L M ART IN, retired

Did you know that the most common characterization of a ground rod may not work for lightning? In 1997, an experiment at the International Center for Lightning Research and Testing (ICLRT) at Camp Blanding, Florida, challenged the predominant view that ground rods are essentially resistive. That experiment found that the waveshapes of lightning currents in a building grounding system and those entering the electrical circuits of the building were considerably different. That was at odds with IEC 61312-1:1995 assertions that they should be the same. The conclusion was that, for lightning, the ground rod had an impedance with a reactive component in addition to the resistive one.

HOW GROUNDS AFFECT PEAK VOLTAGE DUE TO LIGHTNING

NETAWORLD

•

101

INDUSTRY TOPICS So how do we take into account the impedance effects for lightning? Well, it turns out not to be so simple. Professor Leonid Grcev, who with his students has conducted extensive studies of grounds, found that a simple modeling of a ground rod as an R-L-C circuit doesn’t yield correct results due to surge propagation effects that cause deviation from the low-frequency behavior during the fast-transient period.

So the challenge is to determine what this deviation is.

impulse coefficient is equal to one (1). leff will be used later in the discussion of the IC, which is what we really want.

Grcev has shown that normal grounds (those not chemically treated or otherwise enhanced), can be characterized in terms of effective length and impulse coefficient (IC). The IC is the ratio of peak voltage across an actual ground rod to the peak voltage across a purely resistive ground rod in response to a surge. It shows how the impedance of the ground rod affects the expected peak voltage due to a surge relative to what it would have been if the ground rod were purely resistive.

(3)

E F F E CT IVE LE NGTH The first thing to consider is the ground rod effective length leff, which is the maximum length of the ground electrode for which the

To calculate leff, Grcev developed the relation:

(1)

where: (2)

ρ = soil resistivity in ohm-m and T₁ is the zeroto-peak rise time of the lightning current pulse.

Military Handbook 419 Table 2.3 shows a range for average soil resistivity of 1 to 500 ohm-m.

CIGRE TB549 Table 3.5 shows a range of front durations of 1.1 µsec for the average subsequent stroke to 18 µsec for the maximum first stroke. Considering those values, the ρT₁ product could reasonably range from 1 to over 1,000 ohm-m-µsec. We can use those values in equations (2) and (3) to make a plot of leff vs. ρT₁, as shown in Figure 1. Both slower rise time and higher soil resistivity lead to a longer effective ground-rod length.

I MPULSE COEFFI CI ENT If the length s of the ground rod is less than leff (Figure 1), the ground rod is primarily resistive, with some capacitive effect. If the length of the ground rod is greater than leff, the ground rod will have inductive effects. So which effect do we have, and what is the consequence of that effect?

Well, that’s what the IC determines. Grcev has proposed the relation: (4)

Figure 1: Variation in Effective Length of a Ground Rod with Soil Resistivity and Zero-to-Peak

102

• FALL 2021

where A = Z/R is the impulse coefficient, Z is the effective impedance, R is the ground rod resistance, α is calculated from equation (2), and β is calculated from equation (3).

HOW GROUNDS AFFECT PEAK VOLTAGE DUE TO LIGHTNING

INDUSTRY TOPICS I M P U L S E COE F F IC IE NT S For A >1, the ground rod has an effective series inductance in addition to its resistance. In this case, the peak voltage will be A times bigger than it would have been if the ground rod were purely resistive.

For A <1, the ground rod has an effective parallel capacitance in addition to its resistance.

In this case, the peak voltage will be A times lower than it would have been if the ground rod were purely resistive.

From equation (4), the effect of the ground rod reactance can be calculated. As an illustration, take the four cases of ρT₁ = 100, 300, 1,000, and 10,000, and use equation (4) to plot the impulse coefficient A vs. the length of the rod.

Ground rods with a low ρT₁ product have a high impulse coefficient, whereas ground rods with a high ρT₁ product have a low impulse coefficient, as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Impulse Coefficient (Ratio of Peak Voltage to Peak Voltage across a Purely Resistive Ground Rod) Versus Length of Ground Rod

Figure 3 is a replot of Figure 2 for ground rods of a length normally used in the field (≤ 10 m).

For ground rods ≤ 10 m, the low value of the impulse coefficient means that the peak voltage across the ground rod will be less than would be calculated for a purely resistive ground rod. For example, for a common 2-m rod, the ratio of peak voltage to the peak voltage across a purely resistive ground rod is in the range of 0.2 to 0.4, depending on the ρT1 product. The voltage across the ground rod as a surge decays is determined primarily by the resistance of the ground rod. So as the surge decays, the effect of the ground rod reactance dies away (remember that the impulse coefficient is relevant only during the rise-time period).

C U R R E N T F LOW ING IN T H E G R O U N D ROD The peak voltage developed across the ground rod is given by: (5) where Irod is the peak current captured by the ground rod, and Z is the ground rod impedance.

Figure 3: Impulse Coefficient for Ground Rods ≤ 10 M Long To calculate Irod we need to calculate the fraction of the lightning current Imax captured by the ground rod. IEEE Std. 142 shows that 99% of the current flowing in the ground rod is captured in a volume having a radius of twice a ground rod length, s. Figure 4 illustrates this situation, where d is the distance from the

HOW GROUNDS AFFECT PEAK VOLTAGE DUE TO LIGHTNING

NETAWORLD

•

103

INDUSTRY TOPICS Remember that in calculating Irod, the first term in equation (9) is only valid for d greater than 2s, and the second term is only valid for d less than 2s.

PEAK VOLTAGE The peak voltage is calculated from equation (5). The effective impedance Z of the ground rod to be used in equation (5) can be calculated from Dwight’s equation multiplied by A: (10) where a is the radius of the ground rod.

Figure 4: Effective Capture Area of the Ground Rod

Substituting equations (9) and (10) in equation (5):

lightning strike point to the edge of a cylinder representing the ground rod outer effective extent.

The angle θ subtended by the ground rod is given by: (6) Note that the arcsin is not defined for arguments greater than 1, so there are two cases for equation (6): Case 1 where d ranges from 2s to infinity, and case 2 where d ranges from 2s to 0.

For case 1, if the arcsin is in degrees, then the fraction f₁ of the lightning current Imax captured by the ground rod is: (7) For case 2, if the fraction f₂ of the lightning current Imax captured by the ground rod is: (8) Combining equations (7) and (8), Irod = Imax (f₁ + f₂), which is: (9)

104

• FALL 2021

(11)

As an example of the calculation of Vpeak, consider a 12 kA 4.5/77 subsequent surge from TB549 impinging on a 10-m rod 5/8 inches in diameter in the soil of 50 ohm-cm, 200 ohmcm, 600 ohm-cm, and 3,000 ohm-cm.

For these cases, Figure 5 demonstrates how Vpeak changes due to a decrease in ground-rod current capture with increasing distance.

Applicability of the Peak Voltage Calculation Now a word about the applicability of the foregoing analysis. In the region near the lightning strike point, the ground resistivity ρ is highly variable. In particular, soil breakdown can happen when the electric field overcomes the soil ionization gradient. Soil ionization occurs when the electric fields at the ground electrode surface become greater than the ionization threshold of approximately 300 kV/m. In this case, in the region surrounding the current striking point, local transverse discharges start from the lightning strike point and stop at the points where the electric field drops below the critical

HOW GROUNDS AFFECT PEAK VOLTAGE DUE TO LIGHTNING

INDUSTRY TOPICS breakdown strength. An illustration of this point is shown in Photo 1.

The literature on lightning shows that the streaks in Figure 6 are places where the ground is ionized. A circle of radius r₀ can be put around this area. The size of r₀ is determined by both the magnitude of the lightning current and ρ. In Figure 6, r₀ appears to be about 6 m, but that may or may not be typical. In any case, to avoid the area where ρ is highly variable, d should generally exceed 2r₀.

With the foregoing discussions in mind, different lightning waveforms, different ρ, and different ground rod lengths will result in different peak voltages from those shown in Figure 5.

S U MM A RY The usual assumption that ground rods are purely resistive is not what is actually observed in the case of lightning. Particularly for the relatively short ground rods commonly used, during the rise-time period, the ground rods look like an impedance with a significant capacitive component. The result is that for these commonly used ground rods, the peak voltage due to a lightning strike is generally significantly lower than would be the case for a purely resistive ground rod. Whether the peak voltage is higher or lower than for a purely resistive ground rod depends on a number of variables, including the surge waveform, the ground resistivity, the length of the ground rod, and the distance the observer is from the lightning strike point.

The peak voltage across the ground rod can be calculated based on estimates of these variables.

Figure 5: Example of Peak Voltage across 2 M Ground Rod Due to 12 kA 4.5/77 Strike

Extent of Ionization from a Lightning Strike to the Flag Marking the Hole

REFERENCES 1. V. A. Rakov et al. “Direct Lightning Strikes to the Lightning Protective System of a Residential Building: Triggered-lightning Experiments,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 17, No. 2 (April 2002).

2. IEC Standard 61312-1:1995, Protection Against Lightning Electromagnetic ImpulsePart 1: General Principles.

3. L. Grcev. “Impulse Efficiency of Ground Rods,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 24, No. 1 (January 2009), 441-451.

4. H. B. Dwight. “Calculation of Resistances to Ground,” Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, (1936) Vol. 55, pp. 1319-1328..

HOW GROUNDS AFFECT PEAK VOLTAGE DUE TO LIGHTNING

NETAWORLD

•

105

INDUSTRY TOPICS 5. IEEE. IEEE Std 142-1991, IEEE Recommended Practice for Grounding of Industrial and Commercial Power Systems.

6. MILHDBK419, Military Handbook Grounding, Bonding, and Shielding for Electronic Equipments and Facilities, Volume 1 of 2 Volumes on Basic Theory, January 1982.

7. Cigre TB549, Lightning Parameters for Engineering Applications, August 2013.

8. A. Geri. “Behaviour of Grounding Systems Excited by High Impulse Currents: The Model and Its Validation,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 14, No. 3, July 1999.

9. L. Grcev and V. Arnautovski. Proceedings of 24th International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP’98), Birmingham, UK, 1418 September 1998, Vol. 1, pp. 524-529.

Al Martin holds a BEE degree from Cornell University and a PhD from UCLA. He joined Raychem in 1975 and held a number of positions with Raychem, which became TE Connectivity) until retiring in 2013. Al has been a contributing member of TIA TR41, ATIS NIPP- NEP, ITU-T, the IEEE EMC Society, the IEEE Power and Energy Society, and the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society. He has been an editor for TIA TR41, ATIS NIPPNEP, and IEEE standards, and is presently chairman of IEEE PES SPDC WG3.6.7 Surge Protectors and Protective Circuits Used in Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Networks, including Smart Grid Data Networks, and vicechairman of WG3.6.2 Solid State Surge Protective Device Components. He serves as a member on the Telecom Advisory Committee of the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society and is the author or co-author of over 30 papers on EMC and telecommunications, including nine PEG presentations. Al is a Life Senior Member of the IEEE and the IEEE SA.

Precisely Measure Power Quality & Energy Performance with AEMC Instruments ®

Portable instruments for a wide range of indoor and outdoor applications - Voltage current and power monitoring - Harmonic detection and analysis - Inrush current analysis - Energy cost and time of use analysis - Power factor analysis and recording - Power demand and consumption monitoring - Transient detection and analysis - Data logging

Call Today! (800) 343 -1391 www.aemc.com • sales@aemc.com

M

Y

HVI - The World’s Source for High Voltage Test Equipment

HIGH VOLTAGE, INC.

Cable Fault Locating & VLF Testing HVI Makes it Easy and Efficient

VLF/Thumper Combination

VLF hipot: 0 - 33 kVac @ 1 μF @ 0.1 Hz Fault locate: 0 - 13 kV @ 760 J VLF Fault Burner Radar/TDR ready Other Thumper models: 5/10/20 kV @ 1000 J 9/18/36 kV @ 3200 J

You Can Rely on HVI!

All That You Need

• Very Low Frequency AC Technology • Cable Diagnostic TD & PD Testing • Cable Fault Locating with Controlled Energy • AC & DC Hipots, Aerial Lift Testers, Oil Testers • Ω-CHECK® Concentric Neutral Testing • Custom Engineered & Fabricated Van Pkgs.

Y

Y

All HVI Products are

Made in the USA

ISO 9001 2015

50 kVac @ 3 kVA Hipot 1 piece & w/cable output

VLF 0.1 Hz @ 34 kVac Comp. control - wireless

80 kVdc Hipot/Megohmmeter 1 instrument - 2 tests

HIGH VOLTAGE, INC. 31 County Rt. 7A • Copake, NY 12516 • Tel: (518) 329-3275 • Fax: (518) 329-3271 • sales@hvinc.com • www.hvinc.com

ELECTRICAL TESTING on the LEADING EDGE ELEMCO SERVICES

offers a comprehensive array of state-of-the-art electrical testing services and expertise.

HIGH, MEDIUM AND LOW VOLTAGE REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF: Switchgear / Circuit Breakers / Transformers / ATS Switches / Cables TESTING, CALIBRATION AND REPAIR OF METERS AND RELAYS FIELD SERVICES: Acceptance Testing and Commissioning / Infrared Surveys Motor and Cable Testing Load and Power Quality Recording and Analysis Nu Heat Certified Repair Specialists

CONTACT US TODAY • 24 HOUR SERVICE 228 Merrick Road, Lynbrook, NY 11563 (631) 589-6343 601 Union Street, Brooklyn, NY 11215 (718) 786-4900 WWW.ELEMCO.COM

Licenced in New York and New Jersey

INDUSTRY TOPICS

ELECTRICAL SAFETY THROUGH THE LENS OF THE

FIRE & LIFE SAFETY ECOSYSTEM

BY D E REK V IG STOL , National Fire Protection Association

PHOTO: © ISTOCKPHOTO.COM/PORTFOLIO/DOUCEFLEUR

Electrical safety is often described as a three-legged stool encompassing proper installation, routine maintenance, and applicable safe work practices. It is this relationship that sets the stage for what can best be described as the electrical safety ecosystem as it lives within the larger overall NFPA Fire & Life Safety Ecosystem™.

108

This Ecosystem is made up of eight key elements (Figure 1) that must all work together and are interdependent on each other. A breakdown in one element often leads to tragedy, and when it comes to electrical safety, the stakes are even higher.

On top of keeping the world working safely within this well-oiled system, industry professionals are tasked with keeping up with an ever-changing technological landscape.

Equipment and building systems are evolving at a faster pace than ever before as manufacturers strive to solve issues with energy efficiency, equipment resiliency, building manageability, and cybersecurity. Keeping up with this

• FALL 2021

changing industry is paramount to the success of the Ecosystem and that three-legged stool of electrical safety.

CODES AND STANDARD S One of the key components of this ecosystem is that we develop and use codes and standards based on the most up-to-date information available. Imagine trying to stay on top of the dangers of today’s lithium-ion energy storage system (ESS) hazards if all we had were the installation requirements for storage batteries from the 1981 edition of NFPA 70, National Electrical Code® (NEC®)! This would be extremely problematic.

ELECTRICAL SAFETY THROUGH THE LENS OF THE FIRE & LIFE SAFETY ECOSYSTEM

INDUSTRY TOPICS

Figure 1: NFPA Fire & Life Safety Ecosystem Fortunately, that is not the case. Today, we have specific requirements in a number of codes and standards that address the hazards with these ever-evolving battery technologies.

However, requirements across multiple codes and standards means that those who design, install, and maintain electrical equipment have more places to look when they need to find the necessary information.

Energy Storage Systems Take an energy storage system, for example.

As an electrician, I immediately think of Article 706 in the NEC and Article 480 for storage batteries, if the ESS happens to employ batteries as the energy storage medium. But there is also the new standard, NFPA 855, Standard for the Installation of Stationary Energy

SOURCE: NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION

Storage Systems. This standard addresses the

minimum requirements for mitigating the hazards associated with ESS. Additionally, NFPA 1, Fire Code contains an entire chapter on energy storage systems from a fire danger standpoint. And a number of other codes and standards contain information like how these systems can serve an installation, how and when these systems must be maintained, how to work safely around ESS equipment, and how to address an ESS when there is a problem. All in all, at least half a dozen documents contain requirements for safety around energy storage equipment throughout its lifecycle.

Microgrid As technology like ESS and solar/wind power generation becomes more prevalent in the built

ELECTRICAL SAFETY THROUGH THE LENS OF THE FIRE & LIFE SAFETY ECOSYSTEM

NETAWORLD

•

109

INDUSTRY TOPICS environment, this has become more of an issue.

Today’s electrical systems seek to resolve issues with resiliency and efficiency. This has led to an increase in the number of systems utilizing this technology and has put terms like “microgrid” and “island mode” on the tip of everyone’s tongue in the NEC universe. With facilities aiming their sights squarely on establishing a system that can weather just about anything that comes their way and keeping energy costs to a minimum, microgrids seem to be popping up everywhere. This usually means an entire system that depends on solar/wind generation and ESS to stay operational, and it presents challenges from both maintenance and upkeep standpoints due to the hazards this type of system presents.

NEC Section 706.3

Let’s take a look at some requirements that will help keep us safe.

ESS must also be maintained in safe and proper operating condition. This required maintenance must be in accordance with both manufacturer’s requirements and industry standards, and a written record must be kept of all maintenance and repairs performed.

First, we must fully grasp and understand just what is meant by the term “microgrid.”

There has been a lot of discussion around this term ever since it was added into the NEC, but it often seems as though folks are overcomplicating the issue. In its basic form, a microgrid is defined in the NEC as: “A premises wiring system that has generation, energy storage, and load(s), or any combination thereof, that includes the ability to disconnect from and parallel with the primary source.”

In other words, a microgrid is simply a premises wiring system that can stand on its own if need be and can operate in parallel with a primary source such as a utility-fed service. Not overly complicated when it comes to answering the question of “what is a microgrid.” However, let’s break down the individual components of a microgrid and explore the requirements there.

We’ll start by diving right into energy storage systems, in particular, battery-type energy storage systems. We will need to look in both the NEC and NFPA 855 for requirements related to the design and installation of these systems.

110

• FALL 2021

First and foremost, section 706.3 requires that only qualified persons as defined in the NEC install and maintain these systems. This means that only those individuals who possess skills and knowledge related to the construction and operation of the electrical equipment and installations and have received safety training to recognize and avoid the hazards involved are able to work on these systems.

Article 706 goes on to require other safety measures like how systems must be listed, disconnecting means configuration, circuit sizing, and capacity along with overcurrent protection, ventilation, and how to make the connection to an energy source.

NFPA 70B One such document that provides industry knowledge for maintenance is NFPA 70B,

Recommended Practice for Electrical Equipment Maintenance. However, in NFPA 70B, you

are not going to find specific requirements for maintaining an ESS. You will find recommendations on how and why to establish an electrical preventive maintenance program.

You will also find recommendations on what information to collect, how to collect it, and some basic fundamentals that make up maintaining these systems such as cleaning and personnel safety. However, the requirement for what needs to be checked, when it needs to be checked, and how it gets checked often comes from elsewhere like the manufacturer’s information.

NFPA 855 Lastly, we also need to be thinking about other hazards associated with an ESS that

ELECTRICAL SAFETY THROUGH THE LENS OF THE FIRE & LIFE SAFETY ECOSYSTEM

INDUSTRY TOPICS are now incorporated into the installation when we install a microgrid. NFPA 855 addresses many of these other hazards. There are requirements within 855 for emergency planning for when something goes wrong, protection of thermal runaway incidents, and even explosion control to be implemented in accordance with NFPA 69, Standard on Explosion Prevention Systems. There are also requirements for fire protection systems depending on the type of ESS employed.

PH OTOVOLTA IC EQ U I P M E NT However, all of this only addresses the ESS portion of the microgrid. Don’t forget we must also address the other components. One of the more popular energy sources for microgrids is solar photovoltaic (PV) equipment, which has its own set of requirements to follow.

NEC Article 690 addresses the installation of PV systems for safeguarding persons and property from the electrical hazards this type of equipment presents. Here we can find requirements for sizing conductors based on how much current the PV system will supply and how to protect those conductors from overcurrent. We’ll also find requirements for how to shut off the system intentionally as when adverse conditions exist. This requires isolation disconnects, rapid shutdown for emergency response, and arc-fault detection in order to shut the system down when it presents a hazard.

However, there are also requirements for grounding and bonding, safety marking and labeling of PV systems, and the same requirement as ESS systems that require only qualified persons to install PV system equipment and wiring components.

An entire chapter in NFPA 70B deals with the maintenance of PV systems. Here we can find recommendations on how to plan out a maintenance schedule to maximize the longevity of these systems and keep them performing as intended for years. The

environment where we install these systems plays a crucial part in planning out how we take care of them as well.

For instance, PV systems are on nearly every building in California. If the building location is within close proximity to the ocean, the maintenance plan might need to include a procedure for cleaning the salt off of the modules and other associated equipment like the inverter and possibly the charge controller if the ESS is also installed where exposed to this environment. Another thing to maintain is labelling or marking. When the NEC requires us to mark something with the hazard present or leave a placard showing the location of other key components of the system, it is important that these labels are suitable for the environment where they will be installed. We must make sure we maintain them in legible condition and that the environment hasn’t damaged them beyond recognition.

These are just a few examples of where we need to begin when it comes to building out the electrical safety ecosystem. We find a number of requirements for qualified persons to install and service the equipment that makes up a microgrid. Having a skilled workforce is one of the key components to protecting the world from electrical hazards. We also want to make sure we are using the most recent editions of the various codes and standards since these are based upon the most recent information available to the industry.

ENFORCEMENT We also need effective enforcement, which means that people in job roles like the AHJ must be aware of and stay current with industry trends and the latest requirements. However, enforcement isn’t always coming from the AHJ role. Many times, as is the case with safe electrical work practices, it is the employer who must enforce the rules. No matter who does the job, effective enforcement is critical to ensuring the highest level of safety.

ELECTRICAL SAFETY THROUGH THE LENS OF THE FIRE & LIFE SAFETY ECOSYSTEM

NETAWORLD

•

111

INDUSTRY TOPICS INVE ST M E NT

CONCLUSI ON

All of this requires a significant investment in safety. There will need to be training, development of electrical safety plans and electrical preventive maintenance plans, and investments in new technology that provides new ways of approaching the electrical system within a building. We also need to keep pace with the changing trends in the industry. To do this the right way, electrical safety must be a place where no corners are cut. Replace equipment if we know it to be unsafe; make the investment now before the investment turns into fines and restitution. Be prepared to respond when the unthinkable happens. We can follow all aspects of the ecosystem, but if there is no emergency plan, we can still fail to provide that needed level of electrical safety when we have no idea how to respond to an event. Remember, people’s lives are often on the line when it comes to electrical safety.

When we bring all these pieces together to form our electrical safety ecosystem, it becomes more and more apparent just how much work we really have in front of us. With technology evolving on a daily basis, keeping up with what a person needs to know often seems an impossible task or at a minimum, a full-time job all by itself.

However, staying connected and getting involved will help keep us on that leading edge of knowledge and expertise that the world depends on us for. Keep in mind that, without those of us in the electrical industry with safety as a core principle for doing what we do day in and day out, the whole thing can come crashing down. The electrical world is a complex and often confusing world to navigate, but with a little help, we can achieve the level of safety we all strive for. Remember, it’s a big world. Let’s protect it together!

RESOURCES The NEC, NFPA 1, and NFPA 70B are now available in NFPA LiNK™, the association’s information delivery platform with NFPA codes and standards, supplementary content, and visual aids for building, electrical, and life safety professionals and practitioners. Learn more at nfpa.org/LiNK. Derek Vigstol is Senior Electrical Content Specialist with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) in Quincy, Mass. He can be reached at dvigstol@nfpa.org.

ELECTRICAL SAFETY THROUGH THE LENS OF THE FIRE & LIFE SAFETY ECOSYSTEM

DOBLE LABORATORY SERVICES: ANALYSIS AND ENGINEERING GUIDANCE TO HELP MANAGE CRITICAL ASSET RISK

Since 1933, our experienced team of engineers and chemists has helped customers determine the health of transformers and other oil-filled assets. Whether it’s routine oil testing or development of cost-effective testing programs, customers rely on our expertise for independent interpretation of results and high quality data. Doble also offers in-depth reporting and consulting services to help clients analyze test results and make informed decisions about asset health and maintenance.

At five ISO 17025-accredited laboratories located throughout North America, Doble offers over 200 tests and testing packages on both solid and liquid insulation, including: • Dissolved gas-in-oil analysis (DGA) • Furanic compounds-in-oil • A multitude of oil quality test packages • Water content • Corrosive sulfur • Degree of polymerization of paper • Wear metals in oil (Doble Test Method) • Dissolved metals in oil

• Load tap changer analysis program • Breaker analysis program • Material compatibility programs • New insulating liquid and solid insulation development programs • Forensic analysis of oils and apparatus components • Methanol, ethanol and furanic compound analysis

For comprehensive data analysis and fleet asset management, automatically load your test results into Doble’s INSIDEVIEW® software.

E S T. 1920

Reliable Safe Secure

For a full menu of Doble’s laboratory services, visit: doble.com/lab-services. To request information on consulting services or proposals, please contact us via email at Labservices@doble.com.

ADVANCEMENTS IN INDUSTRY

DETERMINING

CELLULOSE DEGRADATION IN TRANSFORMERS USING INDIRECT TESTS L A N CE R . L E WAND an d DAV ID KOEH L ER, Doble Engineering Company

The design life of a transformer is usually about 20 to 25 years. In the United States, estimates show the average age of a transformer is currently around 42 years, which means a number of even older units are still in service. As with all things, transformers age and degrade over time.

Transformer failures can come from a variety of sources including through faults, faulty crimps and brazes, corrosive sulfur, poor design, water intrusion, collateral damage from a bushing or load tap changer (LTC) failure, incorrectly sized leads, and a host of other issues. Overall, however, the demise of a transformer from normal aging is linked directly to the condition of the solid insulation (i.e. paper, cellulose).

PA P E R INSULAT ION Paper is used as an insulating medium because it is inexpensive, a very effective dielectric, has high mechanical strength, and allows insulating liquids to fill voids in the insulating structure.

Much of the mechanical strength of paper and pressboard comes from the long-chain cellulose polymer. As the cellulose ages, the polymers are cleaved and become shorter, resulting in reduced mechanical strength.

114

• FALL 2021

Although the two main insulation components in a transformer are the insulating liquid and the cellulose (paper), it is the paper that is the main driver of transformer life, as it is intimately wrapped around the conductor and cannot be easily replaced, nor can it be remediated in situ.

In contrast, the insulating liquid can easily be replaced, reclaimed, or reconditioned.

However, the same stressors that negatively impact the insulating liquid will also impact the

DETERMINING CELLULOSE DEGRADATION IN TRANSFORMERS USING INDIRECT TESTS

ADVANCEMENTS IN INDUSTRY

PHOTO: © ISTOCKPHOTO.COM/PORTFOLIO/FERTNIG

paper. The main stressors to insulating liquids are heat and oxygen. Minor stressors are organic acids and possibly the catalytic effects of copper.

Water has little to no effect on the life of the insulating liquid. Paper degradation is accelerated by heat and oxygen, as are insulating liquids, but the added stressor of water is significant and is directly proportional to the water concentration in the paper. Also like insulating liquids, the minor stressors of organic acids and metal catalytic effects play a role. Insulating liquids and paper degradation has been discussed in numerous papers over the years and thus will not be discussed in detail in this article.

A S S E S S I N G PAP E R I N S U L AT ION CONDIT ION Since paper degrades, it becomes vitally important to monitor the degradation process and take effective measures to reduce or delay the aging process. Several analytical tools can

be used to assess the condition of the paper insulation. These tools are broken down into two large categories: direct and indirect tests.

Direct Tests These tests are conducted directly on the paper insulation from the transformer. The two most common tests are tensile strength and degree of polymerization (DPv). Both tests require paper samples from the transformer.

The DPv test measures the average length of the cellulose molecule in the paper. DPv values of 1,000 to 1,300 are considered consistent with new paper; as values of 200 would be considered end-of-life, and values of 400 would be considered midlife as it is a logarithmic relationship as opposed to linear. McNutt proposed a life curve based on the DPv value.

Taking a paper sample for DPv or tensile strength is an expensive proposition. Some or

DETERMINING CELLULOSE DEGRADATION IN TRANSFORMERS USING INDIRECT TESTS

NETAWORLD

•

115

ADVANCEMENTS IN INDUSTRY all of the insulating liquid must be drained from the transformer and samples dissected from various locations in order to adequately assess the aging of the insulation. Then those sections where samples were retrieved must be repaired followed by preparing the transformer to receive and install the insulating liquid back into the unit.

The biggest obstacle is deciding where in the transformer to retrieve the paper sample.

An attempt needs to be made to find the hottest spot insulation as this will dictate the survivability of the transformer over time.

Most often, the hottest spot insulation is in the upper third of the winding and cannot be retrieved unless the transformer is scrapped.

Paper aging in transformers is not uniform; it follows thermal and water gradients. In addition, external layers are more exposed to higher concentrations of oxygen and the byproducts of aging in the insulating liquid.

Actual DP measurements from various areas of the transformer can be drastically different depending on the local conditions.

Because of the sheer intrusiveness and exorbitant cost, this is seldom done on in-service transformers. Additionally, if it is a generating unit, revenue is lost as a result of the transformer

being out of service while the process in ongoing.

Although direct tests can provide information on the paper in the general vicinity from which they were taken, it cannot provide a global determination of the transformer insulation as a whole. This is why there has been a focus on indirect tests to gather valuable information.

Indirect Tests Most indirect tests are the analysis of chemical markers in the insulating liquid. Electrical tests such as power factor, dielectric frequency response (DFR), gas-in-oil monitors, and water-in-oil monitors can help one understand the condition of the cellulose, but the results of these tests are unable to define the aging process relative to how much of the cellulose life has been consumed.

Indicators of cellulosic aging are: • Water content/relative saturation • Acidity of the oil • Carbon oxide concentrations • Furanic compounds • Methanol and ethanol concentrations

Water Content Analyzing the water content of the oil using on-line monitors or water-in-oil measurements can provide some indication of the condition of the paper. Along with DFR, they can provide information on the water content of the paper through mathematical interpretation. As the water content of the cellulose doubles, the life of the paper decreases by half, so it is directly proportional. However, determining the end of life of the paper or how much life has been consumed through these means is not effective.

Acid Neutralization Number Figure 1: Example of the Amount of Paper around a Lead

116

• FALL 2021

The acid content (neutralization number) is another marker that paper has decayed as the broken bonds in the cellulose structure

DETERMINING CELLULOSE DEGRADATION IN TRANSFORMERS USING INDIRECT TESTS

COOH

OH

H COOH O H

O

CHO

OH

O

CHO

OH

O

O O

ADVANCEMENTS IN INDUSTRY

OH

H

OH

COOHO

H

OH

COOH

O

OH

O

O

O

O O

OH

O

OH OH

Figure 2: Three Units of a Cellulose Molecule O

CH2OH CH2OH

O

C C

C

C C

CHO

C

C

C

CHO

C

C C 2-furfural

O

C C

C

C

CH2OH

C

furfuryl alcohol

COCH3

CHO

C

C

C

C alcohol C furfuryl

5-hydroxymethyl-2-furfural O

O

C

CH2OH

O

C C

C

C C 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furfural O

O

CHO

C C

C

C C 2-acetyl furan

2-acetyl furan Figure2-furfural 3: Commonly Found Furanic Compounds

will eventually form measurable acids. But other materials in the transformer also form acids. Natural esters in the insulating liquid, for example, forms large amounts of acids.

Therefore, it becomes difficult to distinguish between paper degradation and other materials being degraded. So, although useful in a general sense, this test has not been used to determine the remaining life of paper insulation.

Carbon Oxide Gases Carbon oxides — carbon monoxide (CO) and carbon dioxide (CO2) — can be detected from dissolved gas-in-oil (DGA) or online DGA sensors that alert the user that paper degradation has occurred. Carbon oxides can be produced from outgassing of transformer components, especially in older transformers, but generally most of the production is from cellulose decay.

There have been attempts to use carbon oxide concentrations to estimate paper life, especially

COCH3

O

CH3

CH3

C

CHO

O

C C

C C

CHO

C

C C 5-methyl-2-furfural 5-methyl-2-furfural

in Japan (Yoshida, et al), but it is not common practice. It is probably more suitable to sealed transformers that are not leaking as opposed to free-breathing transformers that can lose much of the CO to the atmosphere because of the partitioning coefficient.

Furanic Compounds Furanic compounds are probably the most notable of the cellulose degradation indicators that began to develop as a method of analysis in the 1980s in Europe.

Through the hydrolytic, oxidative, and thermal stressors already discussed, the polysaccharide of cellulose (Figure 2) is broken down into smaller and smaller molecules forming a variety of products including alcohols, carbon oxides, waters, acids, and free glucose that is not soluble in the insulating liquid. To form furanic compounds, the glucose undergoes

DETERMINING CELLULOSE DEGRADATION IN TRANSFORMERS USING INDIRECT TESTS

NETAWORLD

•

117

ADVANCEMENTS IN INDUSTRY additional reactions that break the sixmembered carbon rings into five-membered ring structures (Figure 3). Unsworth and Mitchell demonstrated a mechanism by which the open-chain glucose molecule goes through a series of dehydration reactions (elimination of water molecules) and then recycles into a fivemembered ring structure. Furanic compounds, unlike sugars such as glucose, are oil soluble and therefore are detectable.

ANALYZING F URANI C COM P OU NDS ASTM Method D5837 and IEC 61198 are the methods employed to perform furanic compound analysis; they can be utilized for all insulating liquids including natural and synthetic esters. The method involves extracting semi-polar compounds, in which furanic compounds might be present, from the insulating liquid into a more polar solvent that is then injected into a high-performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC). In the HPLC, the extracted eluent is passed through an analytical column that separates the compounds by polarity and molecular weight. The compounds are detected by the use of a tunable ultraviolet (UV) detector optimized at specific wavelengths for the desired compounds.

Furanic compounds are measured in ug/L or mg/kg. Although there are many furanic compounds, many of them are unstable in the insulating liquid or the eluent and are of little use for routine diagnostic information.

Table1: Furanic Compounds Commonly Used for Diagnostic Purposes Common Name

Abbreviation

5-hydroxymethyl-2-furfural

HMF

furfuryl alcohol

FOL

2-furfural

FAL or 2-FAL

2-acetyl furan

AF

5-methyl-2-furfural

MF

One compound, 2-furfural (FAL or 2-FAL), is the one most commonly present and used for diagnostic purposes. The 2-furfrual content

118

• FALL 2021

is being used to provide an overall DPv value through the use of the Chendong or other similar equations.

Although a powerful tool for transformer diagnostics, it can be misapplied, as it was originally designed for free-breathing Chinesemade Kraft paper transformers, even though it is now used universally for all transformers. The equation is given as: Equation 1: Estimated DP = ((log of 2-furfural in mg/kg) – 1.5)/-0.0035 SOURCE: XUE CHENDONG

The furanic compounds produced from locations of paper degradation inside a transformer are comingled from other locations in a transformer to provide a pseudo-average 2-furfural concentration in the oil, much like water and gas-in-oil measurements. The extent to which paper is aged in one or more locations will increase the value of the 2-furfural concentration.

The DPv value calculated by the Chendong equation does not apply to any one location within the transformer. It must be remembered that if the 2-furfural concentration is high, which corresponds to a low DPv value, the actual location in the transformer where the highest rate of paper degradation is taking place is probably much worse.

As stated, the specific population of transformers the Chendong equation is derived from were Kraft paper-wound, freebreathing, conservator-type transformers.

Varied practices were used worldwide to manufacture transformers. Many transformers in Latin America, Europe, and parts of Asia, for example, have historically been manufactured with breathing conservator systems and Kraft paper insulation. Most open conservator systems seal out water, but not oxygen. In contrast, the most common practice in the United States is to seal the oil and paper from air by using either a sealed tank with nitrogen or a conservator tank with a polymer

DETERMINING CELLULOSE DEGRADATION IN TRANSFORMERS USING INDIRECT TESTS

ADVANCEMENTS IN INDUSTRY Table 2: Categories of Transformer Types Paper Type

Transformer Type

Preservation Type

Normal Aging Rate of 2-Furfural

Kraft Paper

All 55°C rise transformers

Free Breathing

< 50 ug/L/year

Kraft Paper

All 55°C rise transformers

Sealed

< 35 ug/L/year

TU* Paper

Most 65°C rise transformers

Free Breathing

< 25 ug/L/year

TU* Paper

Most 65°C rise transformers

Sealed

< 20 ug/L/year

SOURCE: DOBLE

Table 3: 2-Furfural Concentrations 2-Furfural Concentration, ug/L < 100

Information and Recommendations Normal Aging

100 to 999

Some paper degradation has occurred. Resample in 36 months or sooner if rate does not exceed those listed in Table 2.

1000 to 1259

Paper degradation has occurred. Resample in 24 months or sooner if rate does not exceed those listed in Table 2.

1260 to 3325

The cellulose insulation has 50% to 25% remaining mechanical life. Resample in 18 months or sooner if rate does not exceed those listed in Table 2.

3326 to 4974

The cellulose insulation has 25% to 10% remaining mechanical life. Resample in 6–12 months or sooner if rate does not exceed those listed in Table 2.

4975 to 6284

The cellulose insulation is below 10% remaining mechanical life. Serious consideration should be given to planned replacement of this transformer in the near future. Resample in 3 months or sooner if rate does not exceed those listed in Table 2.

>6284

The cellulose insulation is near or past its mechanical life. Mechanical disruption of the windings, for example through faults, may cause unit to fail. Immediate mitigation is necessary.

SOURCE: DOBLE

membrane. For older U.S. designs with a 55°C average winding-temperature rise, Kraft paper insulation was typically used before the 1960s.

Most modern U.S. designs are of the 65°C average winding-temperature-rise type, and thermally-upgraded (TU) paper is used to wrap conductors. In some cases, especially in mobile transformers, Nomex© insulation is employed; Nomex is a synthetic aramide fiber that does not produce furanic compounds.

aging profiles. The results of the calculation to estimate DP from the 2-furfural content needs to consider the kind of paper and the type of preservation system. For example, when used for nitrogen-blanketed and sealedconservator transformers, this calculation can seriously underestimate the degree of long-term aging, especially in transformers with thermally upgraded insulation. Under these conditions, the result could provide a false sense of security.

The Chendong equation has come to be used by some to evaluate the paper DP for all transformers, regardless of paper type or preservation system. As transformers with different insulation and preservation systems accumulate different amounts and ratios of furanic compounds, they will have differing

The Chendong equation is best used to estimate an average DP in transformers with Kraft paper insulation and free-breathing conservators. For other insulation and preservation systems, the equation can be used to estimate paper degradation from thermal events.

DETERMINING CELLULOSE DEGRADATION IN TRANSFORMERS USING INDIRECT TESTS

NETAWORLD

•

119

ADVANCEMENTS IN INDUSTRY

Figure 4: Example of Degraded Insulation Because of the differences in paper types and preservations systems, there are four categories for evaluating the results (Table 2). In addition, normal rates of accumulation concentrations of 2-furfural are provided for each category.

These rates can be calculated over the age of the transformer or from sample to sample. It is actually good to perform both calculations, as the current aging may be more severe than previous aging rates and is dependent on load increases over time, overheating events, environmental conditions, and leaks in sealed systems (Figure 4). To get a sense of severity and the degree of remaining life, the information in Table 3 may be useful.

The fate of furanic compounds in the oil can be changed by a number of processes very similar to the fate of acids, water, and gases-in-oil. Vacuum dehydration usually removes about 10% of the furanic compounds. Straight filtration using cellulose filters can remove as much as 15% of the furanic compounds, especially HMF, whereas oil replacement or reconditioning by Fuller’s earth or activated alumina will remove all of the furanic compounds. Removal of furanic compounds does not improve the paper condition, just as degassing does not repair the incipient fault condition of a transformer; it only

120

• FALL 2021

removes the evidence that the paper degradation has occurred. It is highly recommended to test the insulating liquid for furanic compounds before processing or changeout to serve as a baseline. It usually takes 6–12 months for furanic compounds to migrate from the paper back into the insulating liquid after a processing activity to establish a steady-state condition.

Any furanic compounds produced after that point should be added to the baseline value determined before the processing activity to get a more reliable indicator of the true aged condition.

Several other factors can affect the amount of 2-furfural in the insulating liquid. 2-furfural can be decomposed at really high temperatures that produce carbon monoxide and acetylene gases and thus does not adequately indicate that paper degradation has occurred.

Additionally, the dicyandiamide used as the thermal upgrading agent in thermally upgraded paper can cause decomposition of 2-furfural through an oxidation reaction and thus yield lower levels than expected. Lastly, because furanic compounds are semi-polar, wet paper tends to bind more strongly to furanic compounds and yields less concentration in the insulating liquid. As a result, another method to determine paper degradation was needed.

DETERMINING CELLULOSE DEGRADATION IN TRANSFORMERS USING INDIRECT TESTS

ADVANCEMENTS IN INDUSTRY M E T H A N OL A ND E T H ANOL Because most U.S. and Canadian transformers are built with thermally upgraded paper, the fate of 2-furfural is suspect and may not be the best indicator of paper degradation. In addition, wet paper reduces the concentration of furanic compounds in the insulating liquid.

In 2007, research group IREQ (Jalbert et al), which is based in Canada and headed by Dr. Jalbert, was able to determine that the rupture of the glycosidic bond between the cellulose molecules in paper caused the formation of methanol. Additional research by that group developed a method for methanol as an indicator of cellulose aging in 2012. They also found that ethanol was produced but at higher temperatures. That method was developed into ASTM Method D8086, released in 2020.

Research has shown that methanol and ethanol concentrations are not impacted by the wetness of the paper insulation nor the dicyandiamide content of thermally upgraded paper.

Additionally, it is an even earlier indicator of paper degradation than furanic compounds.

Since the break in the glycosidic bond between two glucose molecule occurs before the glucose molecule is opened up to form the furanic compounds, methanol and ethanol is produced much sooner than furanic compounds. This provides the transformer owner with an earlier alert of a possible issue.

It was also determined that methanol appears to be more thermally stable than furanic compounds; it survives in temperatures about 110°C. Ethanol survives up to 130°C, whereas the temperature range for furanic compounds was 110°C and lower.

The methanol and ethanol concentrations need to be corrected to 20°C to establish a steady-state condition for comparing samples and from which to draw diagnostic value.

It should also be noted that transformer design, insulating liquid to paper ratios, and other factors such as the presence of acids may influence the amount of methanol and ethanol produced and dissolved in the insulating liquid.

Table 4 provides information on the methanol concentration and the global calculated DPv value.

Based on the work by Jalbert et. al, the following interpretation model was presented to calculate the mean DPv value: DP = DP0 /(1.5542(1-e-0.0054 [CH3OH]) + 0.00101[CH3OH] + 1) where: DP0 = Starting DPv value after initial factory dry out, usually around 1,000 CH3OH = methanol concentration in ug/kg (ppb) Methanol and ethanol concentrations suffer the same fate as furanic compounds and other chemical markers from oil processing — most or all is removed even from vacuum treatment alone. However, the migration rate from the paper into the insulating liquid is much quicker than furanic compounds — usually 6 months or less and higher than 89% of the methanol value before treatment. As a comparison, most

Table 4: DPv Values from Methanol Concentrations Methanol Concentration ug/kg

Mean Calculated DPv

Paper Condition

0-50

1000-700

Healthy

51-200

700-450

Moderate deterioration

201-1440

450-250

Extensive deterioration

>1440

<250

End-of-life criteria

SOURCE: CIGRE BROCHURE 779

DETERMINING CELLULOSE DEGRADATION IN TRANSFORMERS USING INDIRECT TESTS

NETAWORLD

•

121

ADVANCEMENTS IN INDUSTRY furanic compounds only return 18% to 26% of the methanol value before treatment.

Currently, analysis and modeling for methanol is for mineral-oil-filled transformers. Hydrolysis reactions that can be found when dealing with natural and synthetic esters may impact the concentrations of methanol and ethanol.

Several researchers are currently looking into the degradation mechanism and chemical marker formation.

NOM E X Since Nomex is a synthetic aramid fiber, no cellulose is present that can degrade. So DPv, furanic compounds, and methanol/ethanol analysis cannot yield any results that would indicate the remaining life of this type of insulation. The only type of analysis that can be performed is tensile strength testing, but this requires going into the transformer to gather Nomex insulation samples for testing; this is not a common practice and is an expensive endeavor. Researchers are actively trying to determine whether some chemical marker can be found in the insulating liquid to aid in determining the condition of the Nomex.

CONC LUSION Direct tests on paper such as tensile strength and DPv are useful in determining the aging of the paper in the specific locations where the samples were taken. Because water and temperature gradients within the transformer dictate paper aging, degradation is not uniform within the transformer. Therefore, multiple samples are needed to get an adequate assessment. Retrieving the samples is intrusive and costly and thus not often performed.

A more useful and cost-effective approach is to determine the condition of the paper insulation through chemical markers in the insulating liquid. Water/relative saturation, acid content, and dissolved gases-in-oil can be indicators of paper degradation, but cannot be used to determine the remaining life of solid insulation.

122

• FALL 2021

Furanic compounds, developed in the late 1980s, are an excellent tool in determining the life of cellulose insulation, especially in free-breathing transformers with Kraft paper insulation.

For transformers with thermally upgraded insulation, 2-furfural concentration, which is used to determine an average DPv value, can be compromised by very high temperatures and the dicyandiamide used to thermally upgrade the paper. Because of these factors, methanol and ethanol analysis were developed.

The presence of methanol and ethanol stems from the breakdown of the glycosidic bond between glucose groups in the cellulose molecule. As such, it is an early indicator of paper degradation, and the concentration is not compromised by the presence of dicyandiamide from thermally upgraded paper. In sealed systems with thermally upgraded paper, methanol/ethanol analysis would be the best choice for determining paper degradation.

Because methanol/ethanol are light alcohols and volatile, samples must be taken in syringes like DGA in order to make sure the alcohols are not lost to the atmosphere.

For natural- and synthetic-filled transformers, methanol and ethanol production and/or stability may be negatively impacted. All chemical markers in the insulating liquid are negatively impacted by any insulating liquid replacement or processing; thus, baseline values must be established before any processing activity commences.

From the use of indirect tests such as furanic compounds and methanol/ethanol, the amount of paper degradation and an estimate of remaining life can be reasonably ascertained.

REFERENCES Lewand L.R. and Griffin P.J. “How to Reduce the Rate of Aging in Transformer Insulation,” NETA World, Spring, 1995.

McNutt, W. J. “Insulation Thermal Life Considerations For Transformer Loading Guides,” IEEE Trans. on Power Deliv, Vol. 7, No. 1, Jan. 1992, Pg. 392-401

DETERMINING CELLULOSE DEGRADATION IN TRANSFORMERS USING INDIRECT TESTS

ADVANCEMENTS IN INDUSTRY Lewand, L.R. and Griffin, P.J. “Practical Experience Gained from Furanic Compound Analysis,” Proceedings of the Seventy-Third International Conference of Doble Clients, Boston, MA, 2006 Yoshida, H., Ishioka, Y., Suzuki, T., Yanari, T., Teranishi, T. “Degradation of Insulating Materials of Transformers,” IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul, 1987, EI-22, pg.

795–800 Unsworth, J. and Mitchell, F. “Degradation of Electrical Insulating Paper Monitored with High Performance Liquid Chromatography,” IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul, Vol. 25, No. 4, August 1990, pg. 737-46.

Chendong, X. “Monitoring Paper Insulation Aging by Measuring Furfural Contents in Oil,” 7th International Symposium on High Voltage Engineering, Aug. 26-30, 1991, pp.

139-142.

Jalbert, J., Gilbert. R., Tétreault, P., Morin, B., Lessard-Déziel, D. “Identification of a Chemical indicator of the rupture of 1,4-β-glycosidic bonds of cellulose in an oil-impregnated insulating paper system,” Cellulose, 2007, Vol. 14, pp. 295-309.

Jalbert, J., Gilbert. R., Tétreault, P., Morin, B., and Denos Y. “Kinetics of 1,4-β-glycosidic bonds rupture in cellulose and correlation with methanol formation during ageing of paper/oil systems. Part 1: Standard wood kraft insulation,” Cellulose, 2009, Vol. 16, pp. 327-338.

Jalbert, J., Duchesne, S., Rodriguez-Celis, E., Tetreault, P., and Collin, P. “Robust and Sensitive Analysis of Methanol and Ethanol from Cellulose Degradation in Mineral Oils,” Journal of Chromatography A, Vol. 1256, pp. 240-245, September 21, 2012.

Griffin, P.J., Lewand, L.R., and Pahlavanpour, B. “Paper Degradation By-Products Generated Under Incipient-Fault Conditions,” Minutes of the Sixty-First Annual International Conference of Doble Clients, 1994, Sec. 10-5.

Lance R. Lewand is the Technical Director for the Doble Insulating Materials Laboratory. The Insulating Materials Laboratory is responsible for routine and investigative analyses of liquid and solid dielectrics for electric apparatus.

Since joining Doble in 1992, Lance has published over 75 technical papers pertaining to testing and sampling of electrical insulating materials and laboratory diagnostics. He is actively involved in professional organizations including the American Chemical Society; has served on the ASTM D-27 since 1989 and chairs ASTM Committee D-27 as well as Subcommittee 06 on Chemical Tests; is secretary of the Doble Committee on Insulating Materials, and represents the U.S. on the National Committee for TC10 of the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and ISO TC28. Lance is a recipient of the ASTM Award of Merit for Committee D-27.

He received his BS from St. Mary’s College of Maryland.

David Koehler is the Business Development Manager, Professional Services for Doble Engineering Company.

He has 23 years of experience in the testing of insulating liquids and management of analytical laboratories. He has provided numerous technical presentations and published technical articles within the power industry and is an active contributor at NETA’s PowerTest Conference. David is Vice President-elect for IEEE Member and Geographic Activities (MGA) and a member of IEEE’s Honor Society, HKN. He served on the IEEE Board of Directors from 2019–2020 and will serve on the IEEE Board of Directors again in 2022. David is a member of the ASTM D-27 Technical Committee on Electrical Insulating Liquids and Gases and serves as an Advisory Board Member for Engineering and Technology at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Worldwide Campus. David is a past Executive Committee member of the Indiana American Chemical Society. He received a BS in chemistry from Indiana University and obtained his MBA.

CIGRE. “Field Experience with Transformer Solid Insulation Ageing Markers,” CIGRE Brochure 779, October 2019. Committees A1/D2.

DETERMINING CELLULOSE DEGRADATION IN TRANSFORMERS USING INDIRECT TESTS

NETAWORLD

•

123

Know who you are hiring.

ERS has a new look, but still delivers the Next Level Reliability you’ve come to trust.

We are the experts that deliver technical knowledge, experience, and a proactive ‘go the extra mile’ approach to ensuring your electrical system’s health and performance.

Always have, always will!

To learn more visit ERS.Vertiv.com or call 877-468-6384 Expertise Available Across Seven Centers of Excellence: Commissioning | Acceptance Testing and Maintenance Electrical Engineering | DC Power Testing and Maintenance Protection and Controls | Transformer Services | Compliance

Industrial Electric Testing, Inc. EC13004105 • 24 Hour Emergency Service ACCEPTANCE AND MAINTENANCE TESTING AND REPAIR • Cables • LV/MV Circuit Breakers • Rotating Machinery • Meters • Automatic Transfer Switches • Switchgear and Switchboard Assemblies

• LV/MV Switches • Relays - All Types • Motor Control Centers • Grounding Systems • Transformers • Insulating Fluids • Thermographic Surveys

• Reclosers • Surge Arresters • Capacitors • Batteries • Ground Fault Systems • Equipotential Ground Testing

CoNSulTING AND ENGINEERING SERvICES • Load Studies • Transient Voltage Recording and Analysis • Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Testing

• Harmonic Investigation • Replacement of Insulating Fluids • Power Factor Studies

11321 West Distribution Avenue • Jacksonville, Florida 32256 • (904) 260-8378 201 NW 1st Avenue • Hallandale, Florida 33009 • (954) 456-7020

NEW EDITION

FEATURING NEW CONTENT Arc Energy Reduction System Test Partial Discharge Survey for Switchgear Updates

ORDER NOW

Visit NETAWORLD.ORG or call 888.300.6382

SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS ACTIVITY

ANSI/NETA STANDARDS UPDATE 2020

SETA EC

ANSI/N

2020

S STANDARD

2020

L A C I R LECT ECIFICATIONS

ANSI/

ARD F STAND

OR

NETA

E MISSIONING SP

RD FO

STANDA TRICAL

R ELEC

COM

TEMS

NING

ISSIO

COMM

IC

LECTR

FOR E

& SYS

MENT

QUIP WER E AL PO

NS

ICATIO

SPECIF

ANSI/NE

TA ATS-2

2021

REVISION SCHEDULED

ANSI / NETA ETT–2018 REVI SI ON SCHEDULED FOR 20 2 1

STANDA

RD FOR

ACCEPT A

TESTING SPE

FOR ELE CTR

021

NCE

CIFICATIONS

ICAL PO WER EQ U

IPMENT

& SYSTE

MS

ANSI/NETA ETT, Standard for Certification of Electrical Testing Technicians, 2018 Edition is in the process of revision. The initial ballot was completed July 2021.

Suggested comments and revisions will be reviewed by the Standards Review Council in fall 2021. A second ballot is scheduled for late 2021. The revised edition of ANSI/NETA ATS is scheduled to debut at PowerTest 2022.

ANSI/NETA ETT establishes minimum requirements for qualifications, certification, training, and experience for the electrical testing technician. It provides criteria for documenting qualifications for certification and details the minimum qualifications for an independent and impartial certifying body to certify electrical testing technicians.

126

• FALL 2021

ANSI/NETA STANDARDS UPDATE

SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS ACTIVITY A N S I/ N E TA AT S–2021 L AT E ST E D IT ION ANSI/NETA ATS, Standard for Acceptance Testing Specifications for Electrical Power Equipment & Systems, 2021 Edition, has completed an American National Standard revision process. ANSI administrative approval was granted September 18, 2020. The new edition was released in March 2021 and supersedes the 2017 edition.

ANSI/NETA ATS covers suggested field tests and inspections for assessing the suitability for initial energization of electrical power equipment and systems.

The purpose of these specifications is to assure that tested electrical equipment and systems are operational, are within applicable standards and manufacturers’ tolerances, and are installed in accordance with design specifications. ANSI/ NETA ATS-2021 new content includes arc energy reduction system testing and an update to partial discharge survey for switchgear. ANSI/NETA ATS-2021 is available for purchase at the NETA Bookstore at www.netaworld.org.

A N S I/ N E TA E C S –2020 L AT E ST E D IT ION ANSI/NETA ECS, Standard for Electrical Commissioning of Electrical Power Equipment & Systems, 2020 Edition, completed the American National Standard revision process.

ANSI administrative approval was received on September 9, 2019. ANSI/NETA ECS–2020 supersedes the 2015 Edition.

ANSI/NETA ECS describes the systematic process of documenting and placing into service newly installed or retrofitted electrical power equipment and systems. This document shall be used in conjunction with the most recent edition of ANSI/NETA ATS, Standard for Acceptance Testing Specifications for Electrical Power Equipment & Systems.

PA RT I C IPAT ION Comments and suggestions on any of the standards are always welcome and should be directed to NETA. To learn more about the NETA standards review and revision process, to purchase these standards, or to get involved, please visit www.netaworld.org or contact the NETA office at 888-300-6382.

ANSI/NETA STANDARDS UPDATE

The individual electrical components shall be subjected to factory and field tests, as required, to validate the individual components. It is not the intent of these specifications to provide comprehensive details on the commissioning of mechanical equipment, mechanical instrumentation systems, and related components.

The ANSI/NETA ECS–2020 Edition includes updates to the commissioning process, as well as inspection and commissioning procedures as it relates to low- and mediumvoltage systems.

Voltage classes addressed include: • Low-voltage systems (less than 1,000 volts) • Medium-voltage systems (greater than 1,000 volts and less than 100,000 volts) • High-voltage and extra-high-voltage systems (greater than 100 kV and less than 1,000 kV) References: • ASHRAE, ANSI/NETA ATS, NECA, NFPA 70E, OSHA, GSA Building Commissioning Guide

ANSI / NETA MTS–2 0 1 9 LATEST EDI TI ON ANSI/NETA MTS, Standard for Maintenance Testing Specifications for Electrical Power Equipment & Systems, 2019 Edition, completed an American National Standard revision process and received ANSI approval on February 4, 2019.

The revised edition of ANSI/NETA MTS was released in March 2019 and supersedes the 2015 Edition.

ANSI/NETA MTS contains specifications for suggested field tests and inspections to assess the suitability for continued service and reliability of electrical power equipment and systems. The purpose of these specifications is to assure that tested electrical equipment and systems are operational and within applicable standards and manufacturers’ tolerances, and that the equipment and systems are suitable for continued service. ANSI/NETA MTS–2019 revisions include online partial discharge survey for switchgear, frequency of power systems studies, frequency of maintenance matrix, and more. ANSI/NETA MTS–2019 is available for purchase at the NETA Bookstore at www.netaworld.org.

NETAWORLD

•

127

SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS ACTIVITY

CSA Z462 WORKPLACE ELECTRICAL SAFETY, 2021 EDITION CHANGES & UPDATES

BY TE R RY B E CK E R, P.ENG ., CESCP, TW Becker Electrical Safety Consulting Inc.

Changes in the CSA Z462, Workplace electrical safety Standard are slowing down. Good news! That said, the 2021 Edition includes significant reorganization of content in Clause 4.1 and Clause 4.3, changes to existing annexes and some new annexes, and a significant change to the Arc Flash PPE Category Method of determining “additional protective measures” for a work task’s arc flash risk assessment. CSA Z462, 2021 Edition IS NOT 100% technically harmonized with the 2021 Edition of NFPA 70E. The following information is provided for the benefit of the reader in understanding the CSA Z462, Workplace electrical safety Standard and the updates/changes to the 2021 Edition, as well as for the employer in order to update an established electrical safety program. A compliant electrical safety program’s internal electrical safety audit would identify the need to update the electrical safety program whenever a new edition of CSA Z462 publishes.

Note: The information provided in this article is the technical interpretation of the author and is not an official interpretation from the CSA Group. The author takes no liability for the information presented. The information presented

128

• FALL 2021

is based on the published CSA Z462, 2021 Edition. This article does not include all changes or updates.

CSA Z 4 6 2 , 5 T H EDI TI O N CSA Z462, Workplace electrical safety Standard published its fifth edition on January 5, 2021. Since its inception in 2006 following CSA and NFPA executing a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to harmonize standards for North America, CSA Z462 has had a positive impact on electrical safety and the identification and effective management of arc flash and shock hazards. Lives have been saved!

CSA Z462 WORKPLACE ELECTRICAL SAFETY - 2021 EDITION CHANGES & UPDATES

SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS ACTIVITY The first edition published in January 2009.

Over the first four editions, significant evolution of the standard has occurred. CSA Z462 moved from focusing on hazard identification and PPE selection to a more mature standard aligned with occupational health and safety management system standards (e.g. CSA Z45001, ISO 45001) to include a mandatory risk assessment procedure. In the 2018 and 2021 Editions, CSA Z462 is 100% job and discrete work-task and risk-assessment based, including two unique risk assessments completed under the overall job’s risk assessment specific to the work task(s) that will be performed: the shock risk assessment and arc flash risk assessment.

Clause 3 Definitions

Technical harmonization of the core clauses and articles between CSA Z462 and NFPA 70E has been maintained for the most part in the first four editions. CSA Z462 includes additional annexes that were not adopted into NFPA 70E. This has occurred again in CSA Z462, 2021 Edition.

The following new definitions are added: Normal Operation, Policy, Procedure, Process, and Program.

The 2021 Edition of CSA Z462 includes additional changes of a technical nature related to the Arc Flash PPE Category Method that are not published in NFPA 70E. NFPA 70E, 2021 Edition includes a significant new Article 360 Safety-Related Requirements for Capacitors and an associated Annex R Working With Capacitors that are NOT included in the CSA Z462, 2021 Edition.

The CSA Z462, 2021 Edition public review draft closed July 29, 2020. You are encouraged in future revision cycles to submit public comments and influence the direction of the CSA Z462 standard. The CSA Z462 Technical Committee met on October 27, 2020, to review and approve final amendments to the draft, and a final vote occurred to the draft.

The 2021 Edition of CSA Z462 as noted above published on January 5, 2021.

C L AU S E S The following changes and updates are noted.

Not all changes are included in this article.

The following definitions have been altered, or updated: Accessible, Balaclava (sock hood), Barrier, Equipment, Arc-Resistant, Fault Current, Available (Note), Receptacle, Shock Hazard, Voltage Nominal (note on float voltage for DC to change the threshold for applicability of CSA Z462 to 60 VDC from 30 VDC), and Work On (Notes). To clarify, if the voltage is 30 VAC or less or 60 VDC or less, CSA Z462’s requirements do not apply.

The following definitions are deleted: BranchCircuit Overcurrent Device, Switchgear, ArcResistant.

Clause 4 Safety-Related Work Practices A substantial reorganization of content from Clause 4.1 and Clause 4.3 has occurred. This is a positive change to further clarify the framework/contents of an employer’s electrical safety program and the elements that need to be considered when completing a work task’s risk assessment procedure. Content is deleted altogether, updated, or relocated between clauses. Significant clause number changes will occur with this realignment of content.

Clause 4.1 now identifies that an employer shall create and document an “Electrical Safety Policy” that affirms the organization’s commitment to identify electrical hazards, eliminate exposure, or assessment and control risks, and as a priority, establish an electrically safe work condition. This policy shall be documented in the employer’s electrical safety program. Clause 4.1 will now include a new clause with a general requirement that an electrically safe work condition shall be established as identified in Clause 4.2. Practices as identified in CSA Z462 Clause 4.1, and Clause 4.3 shall be used if an electrically safe work condition cannot be established.

CSA Z462 WORKPLACE ELECTRICAL SAFETY - 2021 EDITION CHANGES & UPDATES

NETAWORLD

•

129

SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS ACTIVITY Justification statements for energized electrical work are relocated from Clause 4.3 to Clause 4.1. With respect to the applicable voltage level that CSA Z462 applies to in the 2021 Edition, 30 VAC will be retained, but the threshold voltage for DC will be increased to 60 VDC. Reference is now made to CSA Z45001 instead of CSA Z1000 as the CSA Group adopted ISO 45001 with respect to occupational health and safety management systems. Annex A in turn has been completely updated with respect to the comparison table of how CSA Z462 aligns with the requirements of CSA Z45001.

Some updated content will be added to the risk assessment procedure clause, specifically Clause 4.3.2.2.4 Normal Operating Condition will be relocated to Clause 4.1 under Risk Assessment Procedure and is renamed Normal Equipment Conditions. A new definition of Normal Operation is added. This is an appropriate update as the requirements of a normal equipment condition relate directly to risk assessment (e.g. likelihood of occurrence) and are not related to justification for energized electrical work. This aligns with the arc flash risk assessment CSA Z462 Table 2.

Additionally, in Clause 4.1.6.9 from the 2018 Edition (this clause will be renumbered), new Annex I content will be added providing an example of a job safety planning checklist.

Updated Clause 4.1 content will be included for Lockout Program and Procedures.

A significant change in the 2021 Edition related to type of training includes the addition of language in the Notes for the existing Clause 4.1.7.1.5, which now recognizes that classroom training can include “interactive electronic or interactive web-based training.”

Some additional content is included in existing Clause 4.1.10 Portable (cord-and-plugconnected) Electrical Equipment related to maintenance, handling, and storage.

Clause 4.2 includes two changes to the existing Clause 4.2.5 Process for Establishing and

130

• FALL 2021

Verifying an Electrically Safe Work Condition and Clause 4.2.6 Temporary Protective Grounding Equipment.

A note is added to Clause 4.2.5 with respect to where a shared neutral conductor may still carry current. Some wording changes are included for a “permanently mounted absence of voltage tester.” A specific reference to UL 1436, Outlet Circuit Testers and Other Similar Indicating Devices is added.

In Clause 4.2.6 Temporary Protective Grounding Equipment, expanded content is added with respect to testing and inspection, and a new Annex T is added with extensive additional information.

In Clause 4.3 as noted above, significant content is relocated to Clause 4.1, which does enhance the flow of content in CSA Z462 and what an employer’s electrical safety program shall include for content.

In Clause 4.3 some additional content modifications are included with respect to describing the “estimate of likelihood and severity” for a work task’s shock risk assessment.

CSA Z462 Table 2 Estimate of the Likelihood of Occurrence of an Arc Flash Incident for AC and DC Systems includes the deletion of the work task: “For DC systems, maintenance on a single cell of a battery system or multicell units in an open rack”; this duplicated “Maintenance and testing on individual battery cells or individual multi-cell units in an open rack.” A new work task was added: “Operation of a circuit breaker or switch the first time after installation or completion of work or maintenance in the equipment” for any equipment condition. The wording of “Removal or battery conductive intercell connector covers” changed to “Insertion or removal of connector covers or battery intercell connector(s).” The arc resistant switchgear work task description is updated and renamed “Arc-resistant equipment.”

CSA Z462 WORKPLACE ELECTRICAL SAFETY - 2021 EDITION CHANGES & UPDATES

SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS ACTIVITY Some minor updates are included to Table 3 with respect to addition of “high-visibility apparel” and clarifying in notes that outerwear arc-rated clothing worn over selected arc-rated PPE is not considered as part of the required ATPV for the anticipated incident energy exposure.

In Clause 4.3.7.3 Personal Protective Equipment, new content is added to the note providing risk control method options to consider when the incident energy exceeds the ATPV of commercially available arc flash PPE to manage risk (e.g. Oberon Company 140 cal/cm2 ATPV).

In Clause 4.3.7.3.7 Hand and Arc Protection, a new Table 4A Maximum Use Voltage for Rubber Insulating Gloves is added to identify Class number and maximum AC and DC use voltages. This table is taken from ASTM F496, Standard Specification for In-Service Care of Insulating Gloves and Sleeves, Table 1 Voltage Requirements.

The most significant change in CSA Z462, 2021 Edition relates to Clause 4.3.7.3.15 Arc Flash PPE Category Method. The existing Table 6A Electrical Equipment Parameters were used (with other selected IEEE 1584 parameters) with the new IEEE 1584, 2018 Edition formulas. A new arc flash PPE category 5, minimum 75 cal/cm2, will be added for 600-V-class switchgear. Also, the arc resistant electrical equipment rows will clarify that the arc flash PPE category is N/A when doors are closed and secured and the available fault current does not exceed the arc-resistant rating of the electrical equipment. Table 6C Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) will add the new arc flash PPE category 5 and quote minimum 75 cal/cm2 ATPV arc flash PPE (e.g. Arc Flash Suit).

The most significant change is a new alternate table to Table 6A. Table V.1 is added in a newnormative Annex V Arc Flash PPE Categories. The existing Table 6A Arc-Flash PPE Categories for Alternating Current (AC) Systems has not been deleted and either Table 6A or Table V.1 can be used.

Included in the new Annex V is Figure V.1, Table V.1 Arc-Flash PPE Categories Selection flow chart, which is provided as a guide to the use of the alternate Table V.1. Table V.1 was added in an effort to simplify the information gathering required to use the arc flash PPE category method.

Of significance, this new Table V.1 includes electrical equipment that is “240 VAC singlephase” indicating abnormal arcing fault probability is sustainable for 240 VAC singlephase electrical equipment. Official clarification from the CSA Group with respect to the addition of 240 VAC single-phase electrical equipment in the new Table V.1 can be requested to get specific technical clarification on why 240 VAC single-phase electrical equipment is capable of sustaining an abnormal arcing fault condition and causing an arc flash to occur on 120/240 VAC panelboards.

Clause 5 Safety-Related Maintenance Requirements A general rewrite of Clause 5 is included in CSA Z462, 2021 Edition. A lot of the existing content is retained but will be removed and the clause numbering is completely updated.

A new clause is added with respect to the owner of the electrical equipment establishing, implementing, and maintaining a documented maintenance program for electrical equipment and references CSA Z463, Maintenance of electrical equipment Standard.

The updates, revisions, and additions to Clause 5 improve its readability and the interpretation of the information presented.

It is recommended that the CSA Z463, Maintenance of Systems Standard be purchased from the CSA Group and referenced with respect to reviewing electrical equipment maintenance requirements.

ANNEXES In CSA Z462, 2021 Edition, several existing annexes are updated and several new annexes are included to provide additional explanatory

CSA Z462 WORKPLACE ELECTRICAL SAFETY - 2021 EDITION CHANGES & UPDATES

NETAWORLD

•

131

SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS ACTIVITY and supplemental information to reference with respect to the core clause content of CSA Z462.

Annex O Updated. Safety-related design has been significantly updated with changes and additions.

Annex A Updated. References CSA Z45001 and provides a new cross-reference table specific to CSA Z462 and the CSA Z45001 occupational health and safety management system intent or objective.

Annex P New. Electrical switching and isolation is added to provide general information for low- or high-voltage complex switching and isolation including a new Figure P.2 Example Switching Order form.

Annex D Updated. The existing IEEE 1584, 2002 Edition content is deleted (no detailed formula content from IEEE 1584 is included).

References added to only the new updated IEEE 1584, 2018 Edition.

Annex Q Updated. Arc flash and shock warning equipment labels includes minor wording updates and updated example equipment labels to correct the orange color used to properly align with ANSI Z535.

A specific note is now included that states electrical hazard information for supervised industrial installations can be provided through alternative methods other than the application of equipment labels.

Annex I Updated. Added a sample job briefing and planning checklist and a new Figure I.2 Sample Job Planning Checklist.

Annex J Updated. Sample energized electrical work permit and Figure J.2 Energized Electrical Work Permit Flow Chart amended to update the applicability of the permit for 30 VAC or now 60 VDC. Annex K Updated. Includes a complete rewrite of the general categories of electrical hazards as related to arc blast indicating that arc blast pressure is not as significant as it has been presented in the past.

Note I have quoted that 40 cal/cm2 of incident energy is not a stop point for energized work, which has been a true statement for over 10 years.

This updated published information in Annex K will now provide additional substantiation for this.

Energized work tasks can be performed up to 140 cal/cm2 of incident energy, as an arc flash suit is available from Oberon Company with an ATPV of 140 cal/cm2.

Annex T New. Temporary Protective Grounding is added to provide application information further in addition to the content of CSA Z462, Clause 4.2.6.

Annex V New. Arc flash PPE categories added.

This is a normative annex providing an alternate table to Table 6A. An instructional flow chart is included: Arc-Flash PPE Categories Selection and then Table V.1.

SUMMARY Since 2009, CSA Z462, Workplace electrical safety Standard has made a significantly positive impact in Canada to worker safety related to energized electrical work. Many employers are referencing CSA Z462 when developing their

DO C U M E N T RE VIS ION H ISTORY

132

Revision

Revision Description

By

Date

Approved

Rev 1.0

Issued

TWB

11/11/2020

TWB

Rev 2.0

Updated

TWB

12/07/2020

TWB

Rev 3.0

Updated

TWB

01/28/2021

TWB

Rev 4.0

Revised

TWB

03/08/ 2021

TWB

• FALL 2021

Date

CSA Z462 WORKPLACE ELECTRICAL SAFETY - 2021 EDITION CHANGES & UPDATES

SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS ACTIVITY electrical safety programs and determining the hierarchy or risk-control methods to apply to work tasks to eliminate exposure to arc flash and shock for qualified electrical workers and task qualified workers to reduce risk as low as reasonably practicable.

This article is not an official interpretation from the CSA Group and is based on the interpretation of the author of this article.

You are advised to contact the CSA Group for any official interpretation. If you would like to discuss this article and the information presented, please contact me at terry.becker@ twbesc.ca (www.twbesc.ca) or 1-587-433-3777.

PowerSystemsTesting.1-2_NETA.WI15.indd 1

Terry Becker, P.Eng., CESCP, IEEE Senior Member, is an Electrical Safety Specialist and Management Consultant.

He is the first past Vice-Chair of CSA Z462, Workplace electrical safety Standard Technical Committee and currently a Voting Member and Clause 4.1 and Annexes Working Group Leader. Terry is also a Voting Member on CSA Z463, Maintenance of electrical systems Standard and a Voting Member of IEEE Std. 1584, Guide for Performing for Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations. He has presented at conferences and workshops on electrical safety in Canada, the United States, India, and Australia, and is a Professional Engineer in the Provinces of British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and Ontario.

10/21/15 9:16 AM

SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS ACTIVITY

COMMITTEE REPORT:

NFPA 70B

BY DAV ID H UFFM AN, Power Systems Testing Company

The new NFPA 70B, Recommended Practice for Electrical Equipment Maintenance closed its First Draft balloting on June 11, 2021, at 11:59 PM EDT. Much work has been done — and will continue to be done — by the committee members.

This has been a huge re-write with chapters added, moved, renamed, and completely revamped.

Material that was anything but a “what to do” has been removed from the chapters but retained in annex material for its value.

The final two weeks of work included multiday Teams meetings between six and eight hours in length. We’re pretty happy with the outcome and very pleased to have a break from the work. The First Draft report will be issued

by October 29, 2021. The public comment closing date for the Second Draft is February 9, 2022. The next publication is due to release in 2023.

David Huffman has been with Power Systems Testing, a NETA Accredited Company, since January 1988 and is currently CEO. He graduated from California State University, Fresno, and is a licensed Professional Electrical Engineer in the state of California as well as a NETA Level IV Certified Technician. David is a NETA board member, NETA’s Principal Representative to the NFPA 70B Committee, and serves as a member of various NETA committees.

134

• FALL 2021

NFPA 70B COMMITTEE REPORT

SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS ACTIVITY

COMMITTEE REPORT: CSA Z462 AND CSA Z463

BY K E R RY H E I D, Shermco Industries

NETA supports two main CSA standards in Canada: CSA Z462, Workplace Electrical Safety and CSA Z463, Maintenance of Electrical Systems. Both of these standards are entering a new revision phase.

T W O N E W T E C H NICAL COM MIT T E E C H A IR S CSA Z462 is now chaired by Daniel Roberts. Daniel is well-known in electrical safety circles as an expert in electrical shock and arc flash exposure mitigation as well as standards development and training. This standard, which strives to remain harmonized with NFPA 70E, will release a new publication in 2024.

After 11 years as chair of CSA Z463, my tenure has expired. I’m pleased to announce that Lorne Gara (Shermco Industries and NETA Board Member) has been elected as the new technical committee chair. Lorne has numerous years of field experience and is highly regarded as one of the top technical experts within

COMMITTEE REPORT: CSA Z462 AND CSA Z463

NETA’s Standards Review Council. The next edition of Z463 will be published in 2023.

MEETI NGS In May 2021, virtual meetings were held for both standards to establish the technical committees, working groups, and timeline to the next edition. Face-to-face meetings are expected to take place during the fall of 2021.

Kerry Heid is an Executive Consultant at Shermco Industries. After beginning his career with Westinghouse Service, Kerry founded the Magna Electric Corporation (MEC) office in Regina, Saskatchewan in 1996 and became President of the company in 2001. MEC was acquired

by Shermco Industries in December 2013, and Kerry served as CEO of Shermco Industries Canada until 2019. Kerry is a NETA Certified Level IV test technician and is active in Canadian standards development. He has served as Chair of the CSA Z463, Maintenance of Electrical Systems Technical Committee since 2010, and as a member of the CSA Z462, Workplace Electrical Safety Technical Committee since its inception in 2006. He received the prestigious Award of Merit from the Canadian Standards Association in 2019. Kerry served on NETA’s Board of Directors from 2003–2014, is a past-President, and received NETA’s Outstanding Achievement Award in 2010.

NETAWORLD

•

135

OUTGOING NETA PRESIDENT SCOTT BLIZARD: UP TO THE CHALLENGE A change in NETA leadership occurs every two years, with the transition to a new president recognized as an important part of the association’s history and a key to its longevity and progress. NETA World’s custom is to share the outgoing president’s perspective in a thoughtful and reflective interview.

Outgoing President Scott Blizard has been Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of American Electrical Testing Co. LLC since 2000. During his tenure, Scott acted as the Corporate Safety Officer for nine years. He has over 25 years of experience in the field as a Master Electrician, Journeyman, Wireman, and NETA Level IV Senior Technician.

Scott went to work early with his father, Charles – a former NETA President – and spent most of his life being around and working within the family company. “I grew up in the industry and in NETA,” he says. One of the lessons his father imparted to him over the years was the importance of giving back to the industry. “I was never good at sitting still,” Scott admins, “so I decided to just go for it and follow my father’s example of giving back to the industry.”

Scott credits his success to the love and support of his wife, Laurie, and their five children — Daniel, Cortneigh, Christopher, Cameron, and Riley — as well as his granddaughter, Sadie.

Scott has made many contributions to NETA over the years. He currently chairs the Promotions & Marketing and Safety Committees and is a member of the Membership

136

• FALL 2021

Application Review Committee, the Technical Representation Steering Committee, the Finance Committee, and the Conference Committee.

He represents NETA on NFPA 70, National Electrical Code Code-Making Panel 10; is an alternate to Dave Huffman on NFPA 70B, Recommended Practice for Electrical Equipment Maintenance; and is a frequent NETA World author. Scott received NETA’s Outstanding Achievement Award in 2019.

Q: Looking back over your service as NETA President, what accomplishment are you most proud of?

Blizard: I am proud of the NETA TEAM and having had the privilege of guiding our organization through the COVID-19 Crisis.

Q: With two years of focused industry leadership behind you, what has emerged as the biggest challenge facing the electrical power testing field?

Blizard: To keep NETA in the forefront of the electrical industry, it’s critical to be able to show the value of hiring a NETA-Accredited Company. It can be challenging to educate the

OUTGOING NETA PRESIDENT SCOTT BLIZARD: UP TO THE CHALLENGE

Left: Scott Blizard received NETA’s Outstanding Achievement Award in 2019.

Below: Jim White and Scott Blizard attend PowerTest 2020

end user about the importance and positive results of acceptance testing and commissioning new installations to assure they operated as designed; encourage them to develop a maintenance program to properly assure the equipment is functioning as designed, and promote the need for continuing education of our technicians to insure they are up to date with the latest technology.

Q: What impact will the growth of alternative power like wind and solar have on the industry?

Blizard: New technology along with the growth of alternative power is creating new opportunities for NETA Member Companies. Following the government spend on alternative sources of power and with the majority of the 50 states setting OUTGOING NETA PRESIDENT SCOTT BLIZARD: UP TO THE CHALLENGE

NETAWORLD

•

137

Scott Blizard Speaks at PowerTest 2020 Member Meeting standards to be carbon-free, this trend is not going away. We must embrace the opportunity as it is the future of our industry.

Q: Did PowerTest’s performance as a virtual event surprise you?

POWERTEST TV OFFERED A MORE CUSTOMIZABLE CONFERENCE EXPERIENCE THAN EVER BEFORE AND WAS A GREAT SUCCESS.

Blizard: It didn’t surprise me as much as you might have thought. We started planning a virtual event in the background in June of 2020 when NETA Executive Director Missy Richard and I began looking at platforms. We had a pretty good idea of who we wanted to use if we had to cancel the live event. Most of the credit for the success for PowerTest 2021 should go to Conference Chair Ron Widup and NETA staff led by Events and Editorial Services Manager Laura McDonald, with a shout-out to the promotion and marketing team and liaison Marketing Project Manager Katie Polzin.

PowerTest 2021 was able to fill the void of CEU and CTD training during the COVID-19 crisis.

The program was designed around the needs of the technician, so the all-new virtual platform featured high-powered, on-demand content; the flexibility to participate from anywhere in the world; and the ability to earn 75+ NETA CTD credits (7.5+ CEUs). PowerTest TV offered a more customizable conference experience than ever before and was a great success.

138

• FALL 2021

Realistically, I was thinking of 350 to 450 attendees at best, so I was pleasantly surprised to see nearly 400 new attendees — mostly technicians who would not normally have had the experience of attending a NETA conference. We actually set a new attendance record for PowerTest with over 600 attendees.

Q: What advice do you have for incoming NETA President Eric Beckman?

Blizard: I don’t have any advice for Eric other than to enjoy his time as President. I wish him the best.

“I have had the pleasure of working closely with Scott over the past two years as he served as President,” says NETA Executive Director Missy Richard. “Scott has an extraordinary passion for the association and the electrical testing profession. I am honored and blessed to have shared this time with him. He is not only a mentor who has deeply impacted me professionally and personally, but also a friend. His leadership and support — especially during the unprecedented challenges of the pandemic — were invaluable to me and this organization. Quite frankly, I don’t know that we could have navigated so successfully through the last 18 months without him. I look forward to continuing our work with Scott as he passes the torch to the next President.”

OUTGOING NETA PRESIDENT SCOTT BLIZARD: UP TO THE CHALLENGE

NETA ACCREDITED COMPANIES Setting the Standard 249th Engineer Battalion 249th EN BN S3 NCOIC 9450 Jackson Loop. Bldg. 1418 Fort Belvoir, VA 22060 (703) 805-9981 james.e.phillips180.mil@mail.mil www.usace.army.mil/Home.aspx 249th Engineer Battalion, Alpha Company 1251 Pirowski Rd, Bldg 1407 Schofield Barracks, HI 96857 (808) 787-4604 ali.n.abubekr.mil@mail.mil SFC Aldher Maldonado Serrano 249th Engineer Battalion, Bravo Company Bldg 3-2631 Butner Rd Fort Bragg, NC 28310-0001 (703) 853-3958 john.w.crosby.mil@mail.mil SFC John Crosby 249th Engineer Battalion, Charlie Company 9410 Jackson Loop Bldg 1416 Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-5116 (703) 806-1078 william.s.maddox13.mil@mail.mil SSG William Maddox 249th Engineer Battalion, HHC 9450 Jackson Loop Bldg 1416 Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-5147 SSG Michael Hamilton A&F Electrical Testing, Inc. 80 Lake Ave S Ste 10 Nesconset, NY 11767-1017 (631) 584-5625 kchilton@afelectricaltesting.com www.afelectricaltesting.com A&F Electrical Testing, Inc. 80 Broad St Fl 5 New York, NY 10004-2257 (631) 584-5625 afelectricaltesting @afelectricaltesting.com Florence Chilton ABM Electrical Power Services, LLC 720 S Rochester Ste A Ontario, CA 91761-8177 (301) 397-3500 abm.com/Electrical abm.com/Electrical ABM Electrical Power Services, LLC 6541 Meridien Dr Suite 113 Raleigh, NC 27616 (919) 877-1008 brandon.davis@abm.com Brandon Davis ABM Electrical Power Services, LLC 2631 S. Roosevelt St Tempe, AZ 85282 (602) 722-2423

NETA ACCREDITED COMPANIES

ABM Electrical Power Services, LLC 3600 Woodpark Blvd Ste G Charlotte, NC 28206-4210 (704) 273-6257 ABM Electrical Power Services, LLC 6940 Koll Center Pkwy Suite# 100 Pleasanton, CA 94566 (408) 466-6920 ABM Electrical Power Services, LLC 9800 E Geddes Ave Unit A-150 Englewood, CO 80112-9306 (303) 524-6560 ABM Electrical Power Services, LLC 3585 Corporate Court San Diego, CA 92123-1844 (858) 754-7963 ABM Electrical Power Services, LLC 1005 Windward Ridge Pkwy Alpharetta, GA 30005 (770) 521-7550 ABM Electrical Power Services, LLC 4221 Freidrich Lane Suite 170 Austin, TX 78744 (210) 347-9481 ABM Electrical Power Services, LLC 11719 NE 95th St. Ste H Vancouver, WA 98682 (360) 713-9513 Paul.McKinley@abm.com Paul McKinley ABM Electrical Power Solutions 4390 Parliament Place Suite S Lanham, MD 20706 (240) 487-1900 ABM Electrcal Power Solutions 3700 Commerce Dr # 901-903 Baltimore, MD 21227-1642 (410) 247-3300 ABM Electrical Power Solutions 317 Commerce Park Drive Cranberry Township, PA 16066-6407 (724) 772-4638 christopher.smith@abm.com Chris Smith - General Manager ABM Electrical Power Solutions 814 Greenbrier Cir Ste E Chesapeake, VA 23320-2643 (757) 364-6145 keone.castleberry@abm.com Keone Castleberry ABM Electrical Power Solutions 1817 O’Brien Road Columbus, OH 43228 (724) 772-4638 www.abm.com Absolute Testing Services, Inc. 8100 West Little York Houston, TX 77040 (832) 467-4446 ap@absolutetesting.com www.absolutetesting.com

Accessible Consulting Engineers, Inc. 1269 Pomona Rd Ste 111 Corona, CA 92882-7158 (951) 808-1040 info@acetesting.com www.acetesting.com Advanced Electrical Services 4999 - 43rd St. NE Unit 143 Calgary, AB T2B 3N4 (403) 697-3747 accounting@aes-ab.com Advanced Electrical Services Ltd. 9958 - 67 Ave Edmonton, AB T6E 0P5 (403) 697-3747 www.aes-ab.com Advanced Testing Systems 15 Trowbridge Dr Bethel, CT 06801-2858 (203) 743-2001 pmaccarthy@advtest.com www.advtest.com Pat McCarthy American Electrical Testing Co., LLC 25 Forbes Boulevard Suite 1 Foxboro, MA 02035 (781) 821-0121 sblizard@aetco.us www.aetco.us Scott Blizard American Electrical Testing Co., LLC Green Hills Commerce Center 5925 Tilghman St Ste 200 Allentown, PA 18104-9158 (484) 538-2272 jmunley@aetco.us Jonathan Munley American Electrical Testing Co., LLC 34 Clover Dr South Windsor, CT 06074-2931 (860) 648-1013 jpoulin@aetco.us Gerald Poulin American Electrical Testing Co., LLC 76 Cain Dr Brentwood, NY 11717-1265 (631) 617-5330 bfernandez@aetco.us Billy Fernandez American Electrical Testing Co., LLC 91 Fulton St., Unit 4 Boonton, NJ 07005-1060 (973) 316-1180 jsomol@aetco.us Jeff Somol AMP Quality Energy Services, LLC 352 Turney Ridge Rd Somerville, AL 35670 (256) 513-8255 brian@ampqes.com Brian Rodgers

AMP Quality Energy Services, LLC 41 Peabody Street Nashville, TN 37210 (629) 213-4855 Nick Tunstill Apparatus Testing and Engineering 11300 Sanders Dr Ste 29 Rancho Cordova, CA 95742-6822 (916) 853-6280 jcarr@apparatustesting.com www.apparatustesting.com Jerry Carr Apparatus Testing and Engineering 7083 Commerce Cir Ste H Pleasanton, CA 94588-8017 (916) 853-6280 jcarr@apparatustesting.com Jerry Carr Applied Engineering Concepts 894 N Fair Oaks Ave. Pasadena, CA 91103 (626) 389-2108 michel.c@aec-us.com www.aec-us.com Michel Castonguay Applied Engineering Concepts 8160 Miramar Road San Diego, CA 92126 (619) 822-1106 michel.c@aec-us.com Michel Castonguay BEC Testing 50 Gazza Blvd Farmingdale, NY 11735-1402 (631) 393-6800 ddevlin@banaelectric.com www.bectesting.com Burlington Electrical Testing Co., LLC 300 Cedar Ave Croydon, PA 19021-6051 (215) 826-9400 waltc@betest.com www.betest.com Walter P. Cleary Burlington Electrical Testing Co., LLC 846 Waterford Drive Delran, NJ 08075 (609) 267-4126 C.E. Testing, Inc. 6148 Tim Crews Rd Macclenny, FL 32063-4036 (904) 653-1900 cetesting@hotmail.com www.cetestinginc.com/ Mark Chapman Capitol Area Testing, Inc. P.O. Box 259 Suite 614 Crownsville, MD 21032 (757) 650-0740 carl@capitolareatesting.com www.capitolareatesting.com Carl VanHooijdonk

NETAWORLD

•

139

NETA ACCREDITED COMPANIES Setting the Standard CBS Field Services 14311 29th St E Sumner, WA 98390-9690 (253) 891-1995 dhook@westernelectricalservices.com www.westernelectricalservices.com Dan Hook CBS Field Services 12794 Currie Court Livonia, MI 48150 (810) 720-2280 mramieh@powertechservices.com CBS Field Services 5680 S 32nd St Phoenix, AZ 85040-3832 (602) 426-1667 www.westernelectricalservices.com CBS Field Services 3676 W California Ave Ste C106 Salt Lake City, UT 84104-6533 (888) 395-2021 www.westernelectricalservices.com CBS Field Services 4510 NE 68th Dr Unit 122 Vancouver, WA 98661-1261 (888) 395-2021 Jason Carlson CBS Field Services 5505 Daniels St. Chino, CA 91710 (602) 426-1667 Matt Wallace CBS Field Services 620 Meadow Ln. Los Alamos, NM 87547 (505) 469-1661 CBS Field Services 5385 Gateway Boulevard #19-21 Lakeland, FL 33811 (810) 720-2280 CE Power Engineered Services, LLC 4040 Rev Drive Cincinnati, OH 45232 (800) 434-0415 info@cepower.net Jim Cialdea CE Power Engineered Services, LLC 480 Cave Rd Nashville, TN 37210-2302 (615) 882-9455 dave.mitchell@cepower.net Dave Mitchell CE Power Engineered Services, LLC 40 Washington St Westborough, MA 01581-1088 (508) 881-3911 jim.cialdea@cepower.net Jim Cialdea CE Power Engineered Services, LLC 9200 75th Avenue N Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 (877) 968-0281 jason.thompson@cepower.net Cameron Dooley

140

•

FALL 2021

CE Power Engineered Services, LLC 72 Sanford Drive Gorham, ME 04038 (800) 649-6314 mike.roach@cepower.net Michael Roach CE Power Engineered Services, LLC 8490 Seward Rd. Fairfield, OH 45011 (800) 434-0415 info@cepower.net Jerry Daugherty CE Power Engineered Services, LLC 1803 Taylor Ave. Louisville, KY 40213 (800) 434-0415 Eric.croner@cepower.net Eric Croner CE Power Engineered Services, LLC 1200 W. West Maple Rd. Walled Lake, MI 48390 (810) 229-6628 www.cepower.net Ryan Wiegand CE Power Engineered Services, LLC 10840 Murdock Drive Knoxville, TN 37932 (800) 434-0415 don.williams@cepower.net Don Williams CE Power Engineered Services, LLC 3496 E. 83rd Place Merrillville, IN 46410 (219) 942-2346 lucas.gallagher@cepower.net Lucas Gallagher CE Power Engineered Services, LLC 1260 Industrial Park Eveleth, MN 55734 (218) 744-4200 Joseph Peterson CE Power Solutions of Florida, LLC 3502 Riga Blvd., Suite C Tampa, FL 33619 (866) 439-2992 robert.bordas@cepowersol.com www.cepowersol.com Robert Bordas CE Power Solutions of Florida, LLC 3801 SW 47th Avenue Suite 505 Davie, FL 33314 (866) 439-2992 robert.bordas@cepowersol.com Robert Bordas Control Power Concepts 141 Quail Run Rd Henderson, NV 89014 (702) 448-7833 jtravis@ctrlpwr.com www.controlpowerconcepts.com

Dude Electrical Testing, LLC 145 Tower Drive, Unit 9 Burr Ridge, IL 60527-7840 (815) 293-3388 scott.dude@dudetesting.com www.dudetesting.com Scott Dude

Electric Power Systems, Inc. 1230 N Hobson St. Suite 101 Gilbert, AZ 85233 (480) 633-1490 PHX@epsii.com Mike Benitez

Eastern High Voltage, Inc. 11A S Gold Dr Robbinsville, NJ 08691-1685 (609) 890-8300 bobwilson@easternhighvoltage.com www.easternhighvoltage.com Robert Wilson

Electric Power Systems, Inc. 915 Holt Ave Unit 9 Manchester, NH 03109-5606 (603) 657-7371 MAN@epsii.com Sam Bossee

ELECT, P.C. 375 E. Third Street Wendell, NC 27591 (919) 365-9775 btyndall@elect-pc.com www.elect-pc.com Barry W. Tyndall Electek Power Services, Inc. 870 Confederation Street Sarnia, ON N7T2E5 (519) 383-0333 tvanderheide@electek.ca Tim Vanderheide Electric Power Systems, Inc. 21 Millpark Ct Maryland Heights, MO 63043-3536 (314) 890-9999 STL@epsii.com www.epsii.com James Vaughn Electric Power Systems, Inc. 11211 E. Arapahoe Rd Ste 108 Centennial, CO 80112 (720) 857-7273 den@epsii.com Mike Benitez Electric Power Systems, Inc. 120 Turner Road Salem, VA 24153-5120 (540) 375-0084 rnk@epsii.com Richard Kessler Electric Power Systems, Inc. 1090 Montour West Ind Park Coraopolis, PA 15108-9307 (412) 276-4559 PIT@epsii.com Jon Rapuk Electric Power Systems, Inc. 4300 NE 34th Street Kansas City, MO 64117 (816) 241-9990 KAN@epsii.com Rodrigo Lallana

Electric Power Systems, Inc. 3806 Caboose Place Sanford, FL 32771 (407) 578-6424 ORL@epsii.com Justin McGinn Electric Power Systems, Inc. 1129 E Highway 30 Gonzales, LA 70737-4759 (225) 644-0150 BAT@epsii.com Josh Galaz Electric Power Systems, Inc. 684 Melrose Avenue Nashville, TN 37211-3121 (615) 834-0999 NSH@epsii.com James Vaughn Electric Power Systems, Inc. 2888 Nationwide Parkway 2nd Floor Brunswick, OH 44212 (330) 460-3706 CLE@epsii.com Jon Rapuk Electric Power Systems, Inc. 54 Eisenhower Lane North Lombard, IL 60148 (815) 577-9515 CHI@epsii.com George Bratkiv Electric Power Systems, Inc. 1330 Industrial Blvd.

Suite 300 Sugar Land, TX 77478 (713) 644-5400 HOU@epsii.com Electric Power Systems, Inc. 56 Bibber Pkwy # 1 Brunswick, ME 04011-7357 (207) 837-6527 BRU@epsii.com Sam Bosse Electric Power Systems, Inc. 11861 Longsdorf St Riverview, MI 48193-4250 (734) 282-3311 DET@epsii.com Greg Eakins

NETA ACCREDITED COMPANIES

NETA ACCREDITED COMPANIES Setting the Standard Electric Power Systems, Inc. 4416 Anaheim Ave. NE Albuquerque, NM 87113 (505) 792-7761 ABQ@epsii.com Mike Benitez Electric Power Systems, Inc. 3209 Gresham Lake Rd. Suite 155 Raleigh, NC 27615 (919) 322-2670 RAL@epsii.com Yigitcan Unludag Electric Power Systems, Inc. 5850 Polaris Ave., Suite 1600 Las Vegas, NV 89118 (702) 815-1342 LAS@epsii.com Devin Hopkins Electric Power Systems, Inc. 7925 Dunbrook Rd. Suite G San Diego, CA 92126 (858) 566-6317 SAN@epsii.com Devin Hopkins Electric Power Systems, Inc. 6679 Peachtree Industrial Dr. Suite H Norcross, GA 30092 (770) 416-0684 ATL@epsii.com Justin McGinn Electric Power Systems, Inc. 306 Ashcake Road suite A Ashland, VA 23005 (804) 526-6794 RIC@epsii.com Chris Price Electric Power Systems, Inc. 7169 East 87th St. Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 941-7502 IND@epsii.com Ben Hocking Electric Power Systems, Inc. 7308 Aspen Lane North Suite 160 Brooklyn Park, MN 55428 (763) 315-3520 MIN@epsii.com Paul Cervantez Electric Power Systems, Inc. 140 Lakefront Drive Cockeysville, MD 21030 (443) 689-2220 WDC@epsii.com Jon Rapuk

NETA ACCREDITED COMPANIES

Electric Power Systems, Inc. 783 N. Grove Rd Suite 101 Richardson, TX 75081 (214) 821-3311 Thomas Coon Electric Power Systems, Inc. 11912 NE 95th St. Suite 306 Vancouver, WA 98682 (855) 459-4377 VAN@epsii.com Anthony Asciutto Electric Power Systems, Inc. Padre Mariano 272, Of. 602 Providencia, Santiago, Electrical & Electronic Controls 6149 Hunter Rd Ooltewah, TN 37363-8762 (423) 344-7666 eecontrols@comcast.net Michael Hughes Electrical Energy Experts, LLC W129N10818 Washington Dr Germantown, WI 53022-4446 (262) 255-5222 tim@electricalenergyexperts.com www.electricalenergyexperts.com Tim Casey Electrical Energy Experts, LLC 815 Commerce Dr. Oak Brook, IL 60523 (847) 875-5611 Michael Hanek Electrical Engineering & Service Co., Inc. 289 Centre St. Holbrook, MA 02343 (781) 767-9988 jcipolla@eescousa.com www.eescousa.com Joe Cipolla Electrical Equipment Upgrading, Inc. 21 Telfair Pl Savannah, GA 31415-9518 (912) 232-7402 kmiller@eeu-inc.com www.eeu-inc.com Kevin Miller Electrical Reliability Services 610 Executive Campus Dr Westerville, OH 43082-8870 (877) 468-6384 info@electricalreliability.com www.electricalreliability.com Electrical Reliability Services 5909 Sea Lion Pl Ste C Carlsbad, CA 92010-6634 (858) 695-9551 Electrical Reliability Services 1057 Doniphan Park Cir Ste A El Paso, TX 79922-1329 (915) 587-9440

Electrical Reliability Services 6900 Koll Center Pkwy Ste 415 Pleasanton, CA 94566-3119 (925) 485-3400

Electrical Reliability Services 9636 Saint Vincent Ave Unit A Shreveport, LA 71106-7127 (318) 869-4244

Electrical Reliability Services 8500 Washington St NE Ste A6 Albuquerque, NM 87113-1861 (505) 822-0237

Electrical Reliability Services 1426 Sens Rd. Ste. #5 La Porte, TX 77571-9656 (281) 241-2800

Electrical Reliability Services 2275 Northwest Pkwy SE Ste 180 Marietta, GA 30067-9319 (770) 541-6600

Electrical Reliability Services 9753 S. 140th Street, Suite 109 Omaha, NE 68138 (402) 861-9168

Electrical Reliability Services 12130 Mora Drive Unit 1 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 (562) 236-9555

Electrical Reliability Services 190 E. Stacy Road 306 #374 Allen, TX 75002 (972) 788-0979

Electrical Reliability Services 400 NW Capital Dr Lees Summit, MO 64086-4723 (816) 525-7156

Electrical Reliability Services 4833 Berewick Town Ctr Drive Ste E-207 Charlotte, NC 28278 (704) 583-4794

Electrical Reliability Services 7100 Broadway Ste 7E Denver, CO 80221-2900 (303) 427-8809 Electrical Reliability Services 2222 W Valley Hwy N Ste 160 Auburn, WA 98001-1655 (253) 736-6010 Electrical Reliability Services 221 E. Willis Road, Suite 3 Chandler, AZ 85286 (480) 966-4568 Electrical Reliability Services 1380 Greg St. Ste. 216 Sparks, NV 89431-6070 (775) 746-4466 Electrical Reliability Services 11000 Metro Pkwy Ste 30 Fort Myers, FL 33966-1244 (239) 693-7100 Electrical Reliability Services 245 Hood Road Sulphur, LA 70665-8747 (337) 583-2411 wayne.beaver@vertivco.com Electrical Reliability Services 9736 South Sandy Pkwy 500 West Sandy, UT 84070 (801) 561-0987 Electrical Reliability Services 6351 Hinson Street, Suite A Las Vegas, NV 89118-6851 (702) 597-0020

Electrical Reliability Services 324 S. Wilmington St. Ste 299 Raleigh, NC 27601 (919) 807-0995 Electrical Reliability Services 8983 University Blvd Ste. 104. #158 North Charleston, SC 29406 (843) 797-0514 Electrical Reliability Services 13720 Old St. Augustine Rd. Ste. 8 #310 Jacksonville, FL 32258 (904) 292-9779 Electrical Reliability Services 4099 SE International Way Ste 201 Milwaukie, OR 97222-8853 (503) 653-6781 Electrical Testing and Maintenance Corp.

3673 Cherry Rd Ste 101 Memphis, TN 38118-6313 (901) 566-5557 r.gregory@etmcorp.net www.etmcorp.net Ron Gregory Electrical Testing Solutions 2909 Greenhill Ct Oshkosh, WI 54904-9769 (920) 420-2986 tmachado@electricaltestingsolutions.com www.electricaltestingsolutions.com/ Tito Machado

Electrical Reliability Services 36572 Luke Drive Geismar, LA 70734 (225) 647-0732 www.electricalreliability.com

NETAWORLD

•

141

NETA ACCREDITED COMPANIES Setting the Standard Electrical Testing, Inc. 2671 Cedartown Hwy SE Rome, GA 30161-3894 (706) 234-7623 scott@electricaltestinginc.com www.electricaltestinginc.com Jamie Dempsey Elemco Services, Inc. 228 Merrick Rd Lynbrook, NY 11563-2622 (631) 589-6343 courtney@elemco.com www.elemco.com Courtney Gallo EnerG Test, LLC 206 Gale Lane Kennett Square, PA 19348 (484) 731-0200 KMatthews@energtest.com www.energtest.com Energis High Voltage Resources 1361 Glory Rd Green Bay, WI 54304-5640 (920) 632-7929 info@energisinc.com www.energisinc.com EPS Technology 37 Ozick Dr. Durham, CT 06422 (203) 679-0145 www.eps-technology.com Sean Miller Giga Electrical & Technical Services, Inc. 5926 E. Washington Boulevard Commerce, CA 90040 (323) 255-5894 gigaelectrical@gmail.com www.gigaelectrical-ca.com/ Hermin Machacon Grubb Engineering, Inc. 2727 North Saint Mary’s St. San Antonio, TX 78212 (210) 658-7250 rgrubb@grubbengineering.com www.grubbengineering.com Robert Grubb Halco Testing Services 5773 Venice Boulevard Los Angeles, CA 90019 (323) 933-9431 www.halcotestingservices.com Don Genutis Hampton Tedder Technical Services 4563 State St Montclair, CA 91763-6129 (909) 628-1256 chasen.tedder@hamptontedder.com www.httstesting.com Chasen Tedder Hampton Tedder Technical Services 3747 W Roanoke Ave Phoenix, AZ 85009-1359 (480) 967-7765 Linc McNitt

142

•

FALL 2021

Hampton Tedder Technical Services 4113 Wagon Trail Ave. Las Vegas, NV 89118 (702) 452-9200 Roger Cates Harford Electrical Testing Co., Inc. 1108 Clayton Rd Joppa, MD 21085-3409 (410) 679-4477 testing@harfordtesting.com www.harfordtesting.com High Energy Electrical Testing, Inc. 5042 Industrial Road, Unit D Farmingdale, NJ 07727 (732) 938-2275 judylee@highenergyelectric.com www.highenergyelectric.com High Voltage Maintenance Corp.

5100 Energy Dr Dayton, OH 45414-3525 (937) 278-0811 www.hvmcorp.com

High Voltage Maintenance Corp.

941 Busse Rd Elk Grove Village, IL 60007-2400 (847) 640-0005 High Voltage Maintenance Corp.

14300 Cherry Lane Court Suite 115 Laurel, MD 20707 (410) 279-0798 www.hvmcorp.com High Voltage Maintenance Corp.

10704 Electron Drive Louisville, KY 40299 (859) 371-5355 Hood Patterson & Dewar, Inc. 850 Center Way Norcross, GA 30071 (770) 453-1415 info@hoodpd.com https://hoodpd.com/ Brandon Sedgwick

High Voltage Maintenance Corp.

24 Walpole Park S Walpole, MA 02081-2541 (508) 668-9205

Hood Patterson & Dewar, Inc. 15924 Midway Road Addison, TX 75001 (214) 461-0760 info@hoodpd.com

High Voltage Maintenance Corp.

1052 Greenwood Springs Rd. Suite E Greenwood, IN 46143 (317) 322-2055 www.hvmcorp.com

Hood Patterson & Dewar, Inc. 4511 Daly Dr. Suite 1 Chantilly, VA 20151 (571) 299-6773 info@hoodpd.com

High Voltage Maintenance Corp.

355 Vista Park Dr Pittsburgh, PA 15205-1206 (412) 747-0550

Hood Patterson & Dewar, Inc. 1531 Hunt Club Blvd Ste 200 Gallatin, TN 37066 (615) 527-7084 info@hoodpd.com

High Voltage Maintenance Corp.

8787 Tyler Blvd.

Mentor, OH 44061 (440) 951-2706 www.hvmcorp.com Greg Barlett High Voltage Maintenance Corp.

24371 Catherine Industrial Dr Ste 207 Novi, MI 48375-2422 (248) 305-5596 High Voltage Maintenance Corp.

3000 S Calhoun Rd New Berlin, WI 53151-3549 (262) 784-3660 High Voltage Maintenance Corp.

1 Penn Plaza Suite 500 New York, NY 10119 (718) 239-0359 www.hvmcorp.com High Voltage Maintenance Corp.

29 Diana Court Cheshire, CT 06410 (203) 949-2650 www.hvmcorp.com Peter Dobrowolski

Industrial Electric Testing, Inc. 11321 Distribution Ave W Jacksonville, FL 32256-2746 (904) 260-8378 gbenzenberg@bellsouth.net www.industrialelectrictesting.com Gary Benzenberg Industrial Electric Testing, Inc. 201 NW 1st Ave Hallandale Beach, FL 33009-4029 (954) 456-7020 Industrial Tests, Inc. 4021 Alvis Ct Ste 1 Rocklin, CA 95677-4031 (916) 296-1200 greg@indtest.com www.industrialtests.com Greg Poole Infra-Red Building and Power Service, Inc. 152 Centre St Holbrook, MA 02343-1011 (781) 767-0888 Tom.McDonald@infraredbps.com www.infraredbps.com Thomas McDonald Sr.

J.G. Electrical Testing Corporation 3092 Shafto Road Suite 13 Tinton Falls, NJ 07753 (732) 217-1908 h.trinkowsky@jgelectricaltesting.com www.jgelectricaltesting.com JET Electrical Testing 100 Lenox Drive Suite 100 Lawrenceville, NJ 08648 (609) 285-2800 jvasta@jetelectricaltesting.com jetelectricaltesting.com Joe Vasta KT Industries, Inc. 3203 Fletcher Drive Los Angeles, CA 90065 (323) 255-7143 eric@kti.la ktiengineering.com Eric Vaca M&L Power Systems, Inc. 109 White Oak Ln Ste 82 Old Bridge, NJ 08857-1980 (732) 679-1800 milind@mlpower.com www.mlpower.com Milind Bagle Magna IV Engineering 1103 Parsons Rd. SW Edmonton, AB T6X 0X2 (780) 462-3111 info@magnaiv.com www.magnaiv.com Virginia Balitski Magna IV Engineering 141 Fox Cresent Fort McMurray, AB T9K 0C1 (780) 791-3122 Ryan Morgan Magna IV Engineering 3124 Millar Ave. Saskatoon, SK S7K 5Y2 (306) 713-2167 info.saskatoon@magnaiv.com Adam Jaques Magna IV Engineering 96 Inverness Dr E Ste R Englewood, CO 80112-5311 (303) 799-1273 info.denver@magnaiv.com Kevin Halma Magna IV Engineering Avenida del Condor sur #590 Oficina 601 Huechuraba, 8580676 +(56) -2-26552600 info.chile@magnaiv.com Harvey Mendoza

NETA ACCREDITED COMPANIES

NETA ACCREDITED COMPANIES Setting the Standard Magna IV Engineering Unit 110, 19188 94th Avenue Surrey, BC V4N 4X8 (604) 421-8020 info.vancouver@magnaiv.com Rob Caya Magna IV Engineering Suite 200, 688 Heritage Dr. SE Calgary, AB T2H 1M6 (403) 723-0575 info.calgary@magnaiv.com Morgan MacDonnell Magna IV Engineering 4407 Halik Street Building E Suite 300 Pearland, TX 77581 (346) 221-2165 info.houston@magnaiv.com Aric Proskurniak

National Field Services 1405 United Drive Suite 113-115 San Marcos, TX 78666 (800) 420-0157 matt.lacoss@natlfield.com Matthew LaCoss

Pacific Power Testing, Inc. 14280 Doolittle Dr San Leandro, CA 94577-5542 (510) 351-8811 steve@pacificpowertesting.com www.pacificpowertesting.com Steve Emmert

National Field Services 3711 Regulus Ave. Las Vegas, NV 89102 (888) 296-0625 tylor.pereza@natlfield.com Tylor Pereza

Pacific Powertech Inc. #110, 2071 Kingsway Ave. Port Coquitlam, BC V3C 6N2 (604) 944-6697 www.pacificpowertech.ca Josh Konkin

National Field Services 2900 Vassar St. #114 Reno, NV 89502 (775) 410-0430 tylor.pereza@natlfield.com Tylor Pereza

Phasor Engineering Sabaneta Industrial Park #216 Mercedita, PR 00715 (787) 844-9366 rcastro@phasorinc.com www.phasorinc.com Rafael Castro

Magna IV Engineering 10947 92 Ave Grande Prairie, AB T8V 3J3 1.800.462.3157 info.grandeprairie@magnaiv.com Matthew Britton

Nationwide Electrical Testing, Inc. 6515 Bentley Ridge Drive Cumming, GA 30040 (770) 667-1875 Shashi@N-E-T-Inc.com www.n-e-t-inc.com

Magna IV Engineering 531 Coster St. Bronx, NY 10474 (800) 462-3157 Info.newyork@magnaiv.com

North Central Electric, Inc. 69 Midway Ave Hulmeville, PA 19047-5827 (215) 945-7632 bjmessina@ncetest.com www.ncetest.com Robert Messina

Midwest Engineering Consultants, Ltd. 2500 36th Ave Moline, IL 61265-6954 (309) 764-1561 m-moorehead@midwestengr.com www.Midwestengr.com Monte Moorehead MTA Electrical Engineers 350 Pauma Place Escondido, CA 92029 (760) 658-6098 tim@mtaee.com Timothy G. Shaw MUSE 1000 23rd Ave BLDG 1360 Port Hueneme, CA 93043 (805) 982-1178 waverly.r.holland@navy.mil Waverly Holland National Field Services 651 Franklin Lewisville, TX 75057-2301 (972) 420-0157 eric.beckman@natlfield.com www.natlfield.com Eric Beckman National Field Services 1760 W. Walker Street Suite 100 League City, TX 77573 (800) 420-0157 Jonathan.wakeland@natlfield.com Jonathan Wakeland

NETA ACCREDITED COMPANIES

Orbis Engineering Field Services Ltd. #300, 9404 - 41st Ave. Edmonton, AB T6E 6G8 (780) 988-1455 accountspayable@orbisengineering.net www.orbisengineering.net Orbis Engineering Field Services Ltd. #228 - 18 Royal Vista Link NW Calgary, AB T3R 0K4 (403) 374-0051 Amin Kassam Orbis Engineering Field Services Ltd. Badajoz #45, Piso 17 Las Condes Santiago, +56 2 29402343 framos@orbisengineering.net Felipe Ramos Pace Technologies, Inc. 9604 - 41 Avenue NW Edmonton, AB T6E 6G9 (780) 450-0404 www.pacetechnologies.com www.pacetechnologies.com Pace Technologies, Inc. #10, 883 McCurdy Place Kelowna, BC V1X 8C8 (250) 712-0091

Potomac Testing 1610 Professional Blvd Ste A Crofton, MD 21114-2051 (301) 352-1930 kbassett@potomactesting.com www.potomactesting.com Ken Bassett Potomac Testing 1991 Woodslee Dr Troy, MI 48083-2236 (248) 689-8980 ldetterman@northerntesting.com Lyle Detterman Potomac Testing 12342 Hancock St Carmel, IN 46032-5807 (317) 853-6795 Potomac Testing 1130 MacArthur Rd. Jeffersonville, OH 43128 Power Engineering Services, Inc. 9179 Shadow Creek Ln Converse, TX 78109-2041 (210) 590-4936 dstaudt@pe-svcs.com www.pe-svcs.com Daniel Staudt Power Engineering Services, Inc. 1 Ellis Road, Suite 100 Friendswood, TX 77546 (210) 590-4936 Adam Straub Power Products & Solutions, LLC 6605 W WT Harris Blvd Suite F Charlotte, NC 28269 (704) 573-0420 x12 adis.talovic@powerproducts.biz www.powerproducts.biz Adis Talovic

Power Products & Solutions, LLC 13 Jenkins Ct Mauldin, SC 29662-2414 (800) 328-7382 raymond.pesaturo@powerproducts.biz Raymond Pesaturo Power Products & Solutions, LLC 9481 Industrial Center Dr. Unit 5 Ladson, SC 29456 (844) 383-8617 www.powerproducts.biz Power Solutions Group, Ltd. 425 W Kerr Rd Tipp City, OH 45371-2843 (937) 506-8444 bwilloughby@powersolutionsgroup.com www.powersolutionsgroup.com Barry Willoughby Power Solutions Group, Ltd. 251 Outerbelt St. Columbus, OH 43213 (614) 310-8018 sspohn@powersolutionsgroup.com Power Solutions Group, Ltd. 5115 Old Greenville Highway Liberty, SC 29657 (864) 540-8434 fcrawford@powersolutionsgroup.com Anthony Crawford Power Solutions Group, Ltd. 172 B-Industrial Dr. Clarksville, TN 37040 (931) 572-8591 Chris Brown Power System Professionals, Inc. 429 Clinton Ave Roseville, CA 95678 (866) 642-3129 jburmeister@powerpros.net James Burmeister Power Systems Testing Co. 4688 W Jennifer Ave Ste 108 Fresno, CA 93722-6418 (559) 275-2171 ext 15 dave@pstcpower.com www.powersystemstesting.com David Huffman Power Systems Testing Co. 600 S Grand Ave Ste 113 Santa Ana, CA 92705-4152 (714) 542-6089 Power Systems Testing Co. 6736 Preston Ave Ste E Livermore, CA 94551-8521 (510) 783-5096 Power Test, Inc. 2200 Highway 49 S Harrisburg, NC 28075-7506 (704) 200-8311 rich@powertestinc.com www.powertestinc.com Rick Walker

NETAWORLD

•

143

NETA ACCREDITED COMPANIES Setting the Standard PowerSouth Testing, LLC 130 W. Porter St. Suite 120 Cartersville, GA 30120 (678) 901-0205 samuel.townsend@ powersouthtesting.com www.powersouthtesting.com Precision Testing Group 5475 Highway 86 Unit 1 Elizabeth, CO 80107-7451 (303) 621-2776 office@precisiontestinggroup.com www.precisiontestinggroup.com Premier Power Maintenance Corporation 4035 Championship Drive Indianapolis, IN 46268 (317) 879-0660 kevin.templeman@premierpower.us Premier Power Maintenance Corporation 2725 Jason Rd Ashland, KY 41102-7756 (606) 929-5969 jay.milstead@premierpower.us Jason Milstead Premier Power Maintenance Corporation 3066 Finley Island Cir NW Decatur, AL 35601-8800 (256) 355-1444 johnnie.mcclung@premierpower.us Johnnie McClung Premier Power Maintenance Corporation 7262 Kensington Rd. Brighton, MI 48116 (517) 715-9997 steve.monte@premierpower.us Steve Monte Premier Power Maintenance Corporation 1901 Oakcrest Ave., Suite 6 Saint Paul, MN 55113 (612) 430-0209 Zac.mrdgenovich@premierpower.us Josh Vareberg Premier Power Maintenance Corporation 119 Rochester Dr. Louisville, KY 40214 (256) 200-6833 Jeremiah.evans@premierpower.us Jeremiah Evans QP Testing, LLC 3535 165th Street Hammond, IN 46323 (219) 844-9214 spioppo@qp-testing.com Steve Pioppo RESA Power Service 50613 Varsity Ct. Wixom, MI 48393 (248) 313-6868 www.resapower.com www.resapower.com

144

•

FALL 2021

RESA Power Service 3890 Pheasant Ridge Dr. NE Suite 170 Blaine, MN 55449 (763) 784-4040 Michael.mavetz@resapower.com Mike Mavetz RESA Power Service 4540 Boyce Parkway Cleveland, OH 44224 (800) 264-1549 www.resapower.com RESA Power Service 19621 Solar Circle, 101 Parker, CO 80134 (303) 781-2560 jody.medina@resapower.com Jody Medina RESA Power Service 40 Oliver Terrace Shelton, CT 06484-5336 (800) 272-7711 RESA Power Service 13837 Bettencourt Street Cerritos, CA 90703 (800) 996-9975 www.resapower.com RESA Power Service 2390 Zanker Road San Jose, CA 95131 (800) 576-7372 RESA Power Service 1401 Mercantile Court Plant City, FL 33563 (813) 752-6550 RESA Power Service 6268 Route 31 Cicero, NY 13039 (315) 699-5563 RESA Power Service #181-1999 Savage Road, Vancouver, BC V6V OA5 (604) 303-9770 Gilda Pereira RESA Power Service 3190 Holmgren Way Green Bay, WI 54304 (920) 639-0742 kevin.carr@resapower.com Kevin Carr Reuter & Hanney, Inc., a CE Power Company 4089 Landisville Rd. Doylestown, PA 18902 (215) 364-5333 www.reuterhanney.com Reuter & Hanney, Inc., a CE Power Company 11620 Crossroads Cir Middle River, MD 21220-2874 (410) 344-0300 Peter Earlston

REV Engineering Ltd. 3236 - 50 Avenue SE Calgary, AB T2B 3A3 (403) 287-0156 www.reveng.ca Roland Nicholas Davidson, IV

Shermco Industries 2425 E Pioneer Dr Irving, TX 75061-8919 (972) 793-5523 info@shermco.com www.shermco.com

Rondar Inc. 333 Centennial Parkway North Hamilton, ON L8E2X6 (905) 561-2808 rshaikh@rondar.com www.rondar.com Rajeel Shaikh

Shermco Industries 112 Industrial Drive Minooka, IL 60447-9557 (815) 467-5577 info@shermco.com

Rondar Inc. 9-160 Konrad Crescent Markham, ON L3R9T9 (905) 943-7640 Saber Power Field Services, LLC 9841 Saber Power Ln Rosharon, TX 77583-5188 (713) 222-9102 bbodine@saberpower.com www.saberpowerfieldservices.com Saber Power Field Services, LLC 9006 Western View Helotes, TX 78023 (210) 444-9514 www.saberpowerfieldservices.com Saber Power Field Services, LLC 1908 Lone Star Rd. Suite A-D Mansfield, TX 76063 (682) 518-3676 www.saberpowerfieldservices.com Saber Power Field Services, LLC 433 Sun Belt Dr. Suite C Corpus Christi, TX 78408 (361) 452-1695 www.saberpowerfieldservices.com Saber Power Field Services, LLC 6097 Old Jefferson Hwy Geismar, LA 70734 (877) 912-9102 www.saberpowerfieldservices.com Saber Power Field Services, LLC 9672 IH-10 Orange, TX 77632 (346) 335-7011 www.saberpowerfieldservices.com Scott Testing, Inc. 245 Whitehead Rd Hamilton, NJ 08619 (609) 689-3400 rsorbello@scotttesting.com www.scotttesting.com Russ Sorbello Sentinel Field Services, LLC 7517 E Pine St Tulsa, OK 74115-5729 (918) 359-0350 info@sentfs.com www.sentfs.com

Shermco Industries 233 Faithfull Cr. Saskatoon, SK S7K 8H7 (306) 955-8131 Shermco Industries 2231 E Jones Ave Ste A Phoenix, AZ 85040-1475 (602) 438-7500 info@shermco.com Shermco Industries 1711 Hawkeye Dr. Hiawatha, IA 52233 (319) 377-3377 info@shermco.com Shermco Industries 1705 Hur Industrial Blvd Cedar Park, TX 78613-7229 (512) 267-4800 info@shermco.com Shermco Industries 3434 25th Street NE Calgary, AB T1Y 6C1 (403) 769-9300 Shermco Industries 5145 Beaver Dr Johnston, IA 50131 (515) 265-3377 info@shermco.com Shermco Industries 4510 South 86th East Ave. Tulsa, OK 74145 (918) 234-2300 info@shermco.com Shermco Industries 1375 Church Avenue Winnipeg, MB R2X 2T7 (204) 925-4022 Shermco Industries 1033 Kearns Crescent RM of Sherwood, SK S4K 0A2 (306) 949-8131 Shermco Industries 33002 FM 2004 Angleton, TX 77515-8157 (979) 848-1406 info@shermco.com Shermco Industries 12000 Network Blvd Buidling D, Suite 410 San Antonio, TX 78249-3354 (210) 877-9090 info@shermco.com

NETA ACCREDITED COMPANIES

NETA ACCREDITED COMPANIES Setting the Standard Shermco Industries 3731 - 98 Street Edmonton, AB T6E 5N2 (780) 436-8831

Shermco Industries 9475 Old Hwy 43 Creola, AL 36525 (251) 679-3224

Shermco Industries 417 Commerce Street Tallmadge, OH 44278 (614) 836-8556 info@shermco.com

Shermco Industries 5211 Linbar Dr. Suite 507 Nashville, TN 37211 (615) 928-1182 info@shermco.com

Shermco Industries 3807 S Sam Houston Pkwy W Houston, TX 77056 (281) 835-3633 info@shermco.com

Shermco Industries #307-2999 Underhill Ave Burnaby, BC V5A 3C2 (972) 793-5523 Brad Wager

Shermco Industries 7050 S.109th Ave La Vista, NE 68128 (402) 933-8988 info@shermco.com

Shermco Industries 1411 Twin Oaks Street Wichita Falls, TX 76302 (972) 793-5523 Trey Ingram

Shermco Industries 1301 Hailey St. Sweetwater, TX 79556 (325) 236-9900 info@shermco.com

Shermco Industries 11800 Jordy Rd. Midland, TX 79707 (972) 793-5523 Trey Ingram

Shermco Industries 2901 Turtle Creek Dr. Port Arthur, TX 77642 (409) 853-4316 info@shermco.com

Shermco Industries 6551 S Revere Parkway Suite 275 Centennial, CO 80111 (877) 456-1342 www.shermco.com

Shermco Industries 5145 NW Beaver Dr. Johnston, IA 50131 (515) 265-3377 info@shermco.com Shermco Industries 998 E. Berwood Ave. Saint Paul, MN 55110 (651) 484-5533 info@shermco.com Shermco Industries 37666 Amrhein Rd Livonia, MI 48150 (734) 469-4050 Shermco Industries 1720 S. Sonny Ave. Gonzales, LA 70737 (225) 647-9301 info@shermco.com Shermco Industries 7136 Weddington Rd #128 Concord, NC 28027 (910) 568-1053 info@shermco.com

NETA ACCREDITED COMPANIES

Sigma Six Solutions, Inc. 2200 W Valley Hwy N Ste 100 Auburn, WA 98001-1654 (253) 333-9730 jwhite@sigmasix.com www.sigmasix.com John White Sigma Six Solutions, Inc. www.sigmasix.com Quincy, WA 98848 (253) 333-9730 Chris Morgan Southern New England Electrical Testing, LLC 3 Buel St Ste 4 Wallingford, CT 06492-2395 (203) 269-8778 www.sneet.org www.sneet.org John Stratton

Star Electrical Services & General Supplies, Inc. PO Box 814 Las Piedras, PR 00771 (787) 716-0925 ahernandez@starelectricalpr.com www.starelectricalpr.com Aberlardo Hernandez Taifa Engineering Ltd. 9734-27 Ave NW Edmonton, AB T6N 1B2 (780) 405-4608 fsteyn@taifaengineering.com Taurus Power & Controls, Inc. 9999 SW Avery St Tualatin, OR 97062-9517 (503) 692-9004 powertest@tauruspower.com www.tauruspower.com Rob Taurus Taurus Power & Controls, Inc. 19226 66th Ave S. #L102 Kent, WA 98032-2197 (425) 656-4170 powertest@tauruspower.com TAW Technical Field Services, Inc. 5070 Swindell Rd Lakeland, FL 33810-7804 (863) 686-5667 www.tawinc.com Tidal Power Services, LLC 4211 Chance Ln Rosharon, TX 77583-4384 (281) 710-9150 monty.janak@tidalpowerservices.com www.tidalpowerservices.com Monty Janak Tidal Power Services, LLC 8184 Highway 44 Ste 105 Gonzales, LA 70737-8183 (225) 644-8170 Darryn Kimbrough Tidal Power Services, LLC 1056 Mosswood Dr Sulphur, LA 70665-9508 (337) 558-5457 Monty Janak Tidal Power Services, LLC 1806 Delmar Drive Victoria, TX 77901 (281) 710-9150 monty@tps03.com Monty Janak

Titan Quality Power Services, LLC 1501 S Dobson Street Burleson, TX 76028 (866) 918-4826 www.titanqps.com www.titanqps.com Titan Quality Power Services, LLC 7630 Ikes Tree Drive Spring, TX 77389 (281) 826-3781 Titan Quality Power Services, LLC 7000 Meany Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 (661) 589-0400 Tony Demaria Electric, Inc. 131 W F St Wilmington, CA 90744-5533 (310) 816-3130 neno@tdeinc.com www.tdeinc.com Neno Pasic US Army Prime Power School Bldg 12630, Flw 28 Fort Leonard Wood, MO 65473 (253) 380-0194 brandon.s.sheppard.mil@mail.mil SSG Brandon Sheppard Utilities Instrumentation Service - Ohio, LLC 998 Dimco Way Centerville, OH 45458 (937) 439-9660 www.uiscorp.com www.uiscorp.com Utilities Instrumentation Service, Inc. 2290 Bishop Cir E Dexter, MI 48130-1564 (734) 424-1200 gary.walls@UIScorp.com www.uiscorp.com Gary Walls Utility Service Corporation PO Box 1471 Huntsville, AL 35807 (256) 837-8400 apeterson@utilserv.com www.utilserv.com Alan D. Peterson

NETAWORLD

•

145

ADVERTISERS This issue’s advertisers are identified below.

Please thank these advertisers by telling them you saw their advertisement in NETA World.

INDEPENDENT NETA ACCREDITED COMPANIES Absolute Testing Services Inc.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 American Electrical Testing Co., LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Apparatus Testing and Engineering. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 Eastern High Voltage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Electrical Reliability Services (Vertiv). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 Electrical Energy Experts, Inc.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Elemco Services Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 EnerG Test. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 Hampton Tedder Technical Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Harford Electrical Testing Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 High Voltage Maintenance Corp. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Industrial Electrical Testing, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 Infra-Red Building and Power Service, Inc.. . . . . . . . . . . . 80 JET Electrical Testing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 North Central Electric, Inc.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 Potomac Testing, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 Power Products & Solutions, Inc.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 Power Systems Testing Co.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 Scott Testing Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 Shermco Industries. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Sigma Six Solutions, Inc.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Taurus Power & Controls Inc.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 Utilities Instrumentation Service. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

146

•

FALL 2021

MANUFACTURERS AND OTHER SERVICE PROVIDERS Advanced Test Equipment Rentals (ATE Corp). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 AEMC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 Aero Tech Laboratories. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 AVO Training Institute. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 BCS Switchgear. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 Belyea Company. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 Bullock Breakers. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 Circuit Breaker Sales Co., Inc.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Doble Engineering, Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81, 113 ECP Solutions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 ETI Precision. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 High Voltage Inc.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 High Voltage Electric Service, Inc.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 HV Diagnostics, Inc.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Intellirent. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 Megger . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inside Front Cover, 59, 89 National Switchgear. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 NETA ANSI/NETA ATS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 NETA PowerTest 2022 Call for Exhibitors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 NETA PowerTest 2022 Call for Sponsors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 OMICRON electronics Corp. USA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Back Cover Phoenix Contact. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 Phenix Technologies, Inc.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 Protec Equipment Resources. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Quality Switchgear. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Raytech. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inside Back Cover Sertec. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 Solid State Exchange. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 Southland Electrical. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Technitrol, Inc.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 Thyritronics, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Utility Relay Company. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9

ADVERTISERS

Why Raytech?

99% of All Raytech Equipment Sold is Still in Operation Today Over 20 years of innovative design and manufacturing means Raytech's equipment is built for the harsh environments of the testing industry. Your test equipment is assured to be in service for a long time.

5-Year Standard Warranty The 5-Year Standard Warranty means years of trouble-free operation, without instrument replacement costs.

You can be confident in our instruments’ performance for years to come.

Reliable Support for 100% of the Equipment We’ve Ever Built Raytech supports every product we’ve ever introduced. Your equipment will remain functional, even after it is no longer being sold. We fully support all of our products for the entire time you own them.

#1 in Customer Support

• No-charge service evaluations • Hardware, firmware, and software updates • Lifetime product support • Professional, expert service and advice • Certification services provided • Short repair turnaround times Five Product Lines: Straight-Forward, Easy to Set Up, and Easy to Use

Single and 3-Phase Ratiometers

Winding Resistance with Core Demagnetization

Current Transformer Test Sets

10A and 200A Contact Resistance

Power Factor Test Sets

Toll Free: 888 484 3779 | Phone 267 404 2676 118 South 2nd Street, Perkasie, PA 18944

www.RaytechUSA.com

RaytechUSA.com

Toll Free: 888 484 3779 | Phone: 267 404 2676 118 South 2nd Street, Perkasie, PA 18944

Brandon Dupuis Regional Application Engineer

TESTRANO 600: Power transformer testing made faster and easier than ever before …

Due to its one-time test connection and 3-phase concept, TESTRANO 600 minimizes the number of test connections and lead changes required to perform conventional transformer diagnostic tests.

TESTRANO 600 significantly reduces test time, improves ease-of-use, and improves user safety – you can now make fewer trips up and down the transformer.

TESTRANO 600 can be controlled using either the Primary Test Manager (PTM) software or the touch display. www.omicronenergy.com/TESTRANO600