Project Honey - May Dashboard Report 240603 combined

prepared for Globe Kingston Limited

May 2024

summarised progress report

Surrey House Island Site – Project Honey (10372)

contents

1.0 executive summary

2.0 programme

3.0 planning update

4.0 legals

5.0 design and project update

6.0 procurement update

7.0 construction works update

8.0 health and safety matters

9.0 tenant variations and approvals update

10.0 sustainability / Net Zero Carbon

11.0 environmental status update

12.0 key risks

13.0 areas of concern

14.0 key activities in the reporting period

15.0 lookahead – key activities in the next reporting period

appendices

appendix a – LoR & warranties tracker

appendix b – planning / S106 conditions

appendix c – EAI tracker

appendix d – outline programme

appendix e – G&T update report

https://francishunter.sharepoint.com/sites/FH/Shared

appendix f – MCLH update report

appendix g – BREEAM tracker

appendix h – Aecom CMT report

appendix i – MNP CMT report

appendix j – ORSA monthly CDM report

appendix k – DAA CMT report

appendix l – package review schedule

appendix m – McLH procurement schedule

appendix n – McLH programme

appendix o – Lautus progress report

appendix p – Clarke’s manufacturing update

appendix q – LFB response

appendix r – latest Buildzone tracker/report

https://francishunter.sharepoint.com/sites/FH/Shared

project: Surrey House Island Site, Project Honey

client: Globe Kingston Ltd/Cube Advisers Ltd r eport: summarised progress report – May 2024

distribution: Cube

1.0 executive summary

The purpose of this summary statement, is to provide a periodic update of activities undertaken by the developer’s project team, currently engaged to implement the redevelopment of Surrey House Island Site and to discharge Hathaway Opportunity Fund/Globe Kingston’s obligations under the Agreement for Development and Lease dated 9 December 2020 (and it’s Deed of Variations dated 8 April 2021 and 25 May 2022) with Unilever; and the Development Funding Agreement with LCN exchanged on 25 May 2022 and completed on the 14 June 2022.

The Main Contractor, Mclaughlin & Harvey Construction are appointed under a JCT Design & Build Contract dated 25 May 2022. The Contract has been signed based on a fixed price for Buildings A and B, and a guaranteed maximum price (Provisional Sum) for Building C.

MCLH are reporting that works on site are currently 3 weeks behind on Building A, 4 weeks behind on Building B and 1 week behind programme on Building C The MCLH construction programme has now been issued, and progress is being tracked against this updated programme Following instruction of SMART buildings (EAI 115), it is anticipated that there will be a 5-week delay to Building B (Sectional Completion). The previous Sectional completion date was 05 August 2024 and following the 5-week delay this will now be 09 September 2024. McLH have confirmed that this does not have an impact on early access dates and will also have no impact on Building A and C ( Practical Completion). This is under review currently.

On Building A – MEP install is progressing up to level 8 Façade works have commenced on the 5th floor . The stick system continues on the ground and first floor. All major roof plant has been delivered Otis have installed 3no. lifts. Feature stair install is ongoing on all floors. The main structure to the link buildings is now in place closing off the Brook Street entrance to site.

On Building B - MEP install is progressing up to level 10 Façade works are ongoing on the 8th and 9th floor and complete on the 7th floor The stick system glazing is ongoing on the ground and first floor All major plant has now been delivered to site and in place. Otis have installed the first 3no. lifts. Power is now in Building B.

On Building C – Façade now complete above ground floor. The green brick at ground floor will commence in June The changing area fit out is ongoing with 1st fix MEPH complete. Landscape works on roof have commenced and 50% of PVs have been installed.

LFB responded on 13th May 2024 to the scheme fire strategy. This has been reviewed by the team and no critical issues have been raised. MCLH are to respond to LFB in the next reporting period with an updated Fire Strategy picking up the queries raised.

The key risk previously reported relating to the UKPN leases has now been resolved with all three signed. Building B now has power-on, with Building A and C planned for the 5th June. The impact on programme is currently being reviewed, and initial indication is that this will not impact the Practical Completion Date.

A further risk is the SMART buildings integration incurring a potential 5-week delay to Sectional Completion. This is due to the late instruction of the network infrastructure. MCLH continue to review the impact and are to provide a detailed report justifying 5-week delay impact.

The façade continues to be a risk on the project due to programme challenges and issues with alignment. The programme is being reported to us on a weekly basis and the latest manufacturing/ installation tracker is appended to this report. Clarkes continue to have supply issues; however, their manufacturing numbers are getting back to the target numbers.

Thames Water have installed the first phase of their works in the public highway. The second phase is currently being programmed between MCLH and RBKT as it was not installed under the previous road closure. This is to install the three branches from the trunk main to the to the site boundary. The water on date is currently scheduled for 10th June 2024.

Another key risk is the S278 works, which due to significantly elongated technical approval period is being carried out far later than envisaged. The S278 agreement has now been agreed with Highways/ Council, and tenders received from two Highway Contractors. FHPM are engaging with Statutory providers to ascertain whether any services in the pavement/ road need to be relocated as a result of the S278 works. The planned commencement date for the S278 works is beginning of September 2024.

some key activities that have been undertaken in the current reporting period include.

• S278 negotiations – Agreed S278 agreement ready for engrossment

• Receive tenders to carry out S278 works

• Continue to review design packages received from MCLH and progress the approval process with UL and LCN in line with the programme.

• Continue to close out planning conditions as required.

• Completed Building B 8th floor façade.

• Completed Building A 3rd floor façade.

• Agreed UKPN leases to allow ‘Power-On’

• Completed installation of reception link structure.

• Commenced Building C roof landscaping works.

• Power-on for Building B

• Commenced snagging of Building B level 2 and 3

• Received LFB response

some key activities that will be undertaken within the next reporting period include.

• S278 negotiations – Receive technical approval

• S278 – Put in place Bond for the S278 works

• Procure S278 works

• Continue to review design packages received from MCLH and progress the approval process with UL and LCN in line with the programme

• Submit pre-occupation conditions

• Complete Building B 9th floor façade

• Com plete Building A 4th floor façade.

• Complete second phase of Thames Water works on St James’s Road

• Power-on for Building A and C

• Review CAT A benchmark area

• Formally respond to LFB

high level financials

• Contract Sum - £122,974,925.66

• Contract variations to date - -£959,230.75 (net)

• Projected Final Account - £122,015,694.91

2.0 programme

Following the Unconditional date being confirmed on the 14 June 2022, which has commenced the 27-month construction

Longstop period, the below schedule reflects the latest programme attached to this report in Appendix D and follows the issue of the Possession Notice on 4 July 2022 and Deferment of Possession commencing works on the 20th September 2022

MCLH are now reporting against their Construction programme May 2024 which we are reporting against.

Following a review of MCLH programme and MCLH progress on site, FHPM’s current view on programme is as follows;

- Building A – 2 weeks and 2 days behind

- Building B – 4 weeks behind

- Building C – 1 week behind

The key risks to MCLH programme is as follows;

- Thames Water – Due to for install on 10th June, however a delay to this will impact commissioning

- Access to site – Due to works required in service yard, brickwork to Building C and the works in Woodland Walk, site logistics will be significantly impacted

- Blind boxes – Due to late instruction by tenant, there is now a significant complication to the perimeter margin detail.

- S278 works – Works will need to commence prior to PC, and this is likely to impact on the site logistics. This will need to be managed closely and co-ordinated with MCLH to minimise any impact.

3.0 planning update

3.1 general update

Over the next reporting period a number of the pre-occupation conditions outlined in the condition tracker will be submitted to the Council for approval. A breakdown of outstanding condition is set out below.

3.2 planning conditions & S278 agreements

Highways have now agreed the scope of the S278 works, with the S278 agreement itself agreed and ready for engrossment. Tenders have been returned for the works and are currently under review.

The scope of the Secure by Design requirements for Building C have now been agreed with the DOCO. The updated pack is being prepared to be issued to the RBKT.

Outstanding conditions set out below;

5 Detailed landscape and planting plan

To be submitted by 21/06/24

18 S278 scope Pre-Occupation Submitted to Council

21 Pedestrian Environment Review Study Pre-Occupation To be submitted by 14/06/24

24 Delivery and Servicing Plan

37 Sustainable Drainage Scheme

Pre-Occupation To be submitted by 21/06/24, awaiting information for UL

Pre-Occupation To be submitted once drainage system complete. End of July

43 Flood Void Maintenance Plan Pre-Occupation To be submitted by 21/06/24

44 Flood Resistance measures Pre-Occupation To be submitted by 21/06/24

46 Car Park Management Plan

49 Park Mark/ SBD

50 Retail Management Plan

Pre-Occupation To be submitted in July. Await input from Car Park Operator

Pre-Occupation To be submitted in July. Await input from Car Park Operator

Pre-Use To be submitted by 21/06/24, awaiting information for UL

51 Woodland Walk Management Plan Pre-Occupation To be submitted by 21/06/24, awaiting information for UL

58 Thames Water No timing Awaiting report from MCLH. To be submitted in July

64 GLA Whole Life Carbon Assessment Pre-Occupation Awaiting report from MCLH. To be submitted in July

66 Circular Economy Statement Pre-Occupation Awaiting report from MCLH. To be submitted in July

3.3 progress against S106 employment and procurement requirement

MCLH have now issued to the Council confirmation of their procurement of 15% of works in the local area as well as their current status of local employment. We await feedback from the Council.

There are now monthly meetings in place with representatives of the Council to demonstrate the team’s willingness to meet the set targets.

4.1 AfDL Conditions Update

The AfDL is now Unconditional, and therefore conditionality will not be reported on going forward.

4.2 appointments and warranties

Terms have been agreed with all of the principal consultants together with all relevant fees and cash flows based upon the current programme A schedule of appointments and warranties has been agreed with both the Fund and the Occupier.

A full schedule of appointments and contracts is being managed and monitored by Francis Hunter, a copy of which is included within the appendix.

It has been 12 months since Unconditional and therefore additional pressure is being put on MCLH and Gowlings to resolve the outstanding Warranties. Regarding Lender Warranties, the majority of current significant designers/ subcontractors have now been signed

The additional warranties requested by the Lender have been provided and are currently being executed

4.3 construction documents

The JCT D&B Contract was signed and dated on the 25th May 2022, with all terms agreed with the Contractor, Funder and Occupier. A Possession Notice was signed and issued on the 4th July 2022 to enact the Contract confirming a possession date of 12th September 2022 Following a number of obstructions and issues found on site during demolition, the Date of Possession was deferred to the 20th September 2022.

Buildings B and C were deferred until 26th September 2022, although MCLH have since confirmed the second deferment had no impact on the overall programme

A breakdown of extensions of time and expected relevant events is shown in the programme section of this report.

The Employer’s Requirements are back-to-back with drawings and specifications within the DOV and DFA. FHPM prepared and issued a Contract Report on the 5th May 2022 giving an outline of the JCT Contract and its key terms.

5.0 design and project updat e

MEPH, Architectural and Structural Stage 5 design is progressing

Throughout the process, information will be shared with the Occupier and Funder so that this review process can happen alongside the Developers in order to achieve the timescales noted above.

It should be noted that variations going forward are likely to have a significant impact on the design, procurement and construction programme due to the stage the project is at. These will need to be considered when contemplating any further variations.

5 1 k ey design changes/ issues under consideration

Fire Curtains/ Shutters – A proposal is under review whereby MCLH will only be issued a Final Certificate from SWECO on the shell & core and not the CAT A for Building A. This may remove the requirement for this to be required at PC. With Unilever fit-out then certifying the CAT A/ B. Currently reviewing whether SWECO are able to provide a letter of comfort for the CAT A works carried out by MCLH.

Public Art design – Detailed design and damper design is now underway. Due to the Public Art interface with the façade and the structure of three separate buildings it continues to cause complications.

Reception link pipework routes – A route has now been agreed, which require a notch in the slab of Building A and B in the reception link to allow services to pass at high level.

6.0 procurement update

Following lengthy negotiations with MCLH, the JCT D&B Contract was signed with a Contract Sum of £122,962,469.66 dated 25th May 2022.

MCLH have issued a revised procurement schedule, which is appended to this report This will be tracked by FHPM going forward.

The G&T Report is appended in Appendix E

7.0 construction works update

Below is an update on progress in the last reporting period:

• Continuing MEPH works throughout A and B

• Continued roofing works to the roof of all buildings

• Continued Building A and B façade works

• Continued lift installation to Building A and B

• Continued ceiling works in Building A and B

• Continued raised access floor installation in Building B

• Continuing steelwork to the feature stair, reception steel, balustrades

8.0 health and safety matters

ORSA, as Principal Designer, are progressing key design risk assessments with the team as the design develops and continue to keep the professional team informed at all stages. ORSA are carrying out monthly site inspections of works being undertaken by MCLH and providing reports. No issued were raised in the report. ORSA carried out a site inspection on the 24th May 2024, and their findings are appended to this report.

9.0 variations and approvals update

Variations instructed in the last reporting period are set out below (and set out in more detail in the variation tracker within the appendix)

10.0 variations and approvals update

Variations instructed in the last reporting period are set out below (and set out in more detail in the variation tracker within the appendix).

• EAI 123 - RAF

• EAI 124 – Terrazzo benches

• EAI 125 – Public Art Cable and Damper Design

• EAI 126 – MSCP Prov Sum

•

•

• EAI 129 – External Lighting to Car Park Roof Terrace

• EAI 130 – S278 Setting Out

There are a number of expected upcoming tenant/ developer variations requests, which are as follows;

• Construction cost of louvres in façade

• Terrace power/ lighting/ water

• Building A 7th Floor East Riser Ductwork

As noted earlier in the report, given the stage the project is at, variations are becoming more impactful and will potentially result in abortive design costs, cancellation charges and programme delays.

The below table sets out in more detail the variations in the last reporting period. This is the capital cost of the variation and does not include any finance costs;

External Lighting to Car Park

11.0 sustainability/ Net Zero Carbon

In line with undertakings within the AfDL the developer team continue to follow the sustainability commitments. All members of the design team are specifically charged with supporting the objectives and developing the design accordingly. Design is progressing on the basis of achieving BREEAM Excellent and EPC A. Currently achieving 79.54% which is the same projected figure as the previous month.

12.0 environmental status update

As it stands, there are no environmental issues identified on site. This will continue to be monitored as the project progresses.

Principal risks during the immediate next phases that could impact on the deliverability of the scheme are as follows;

R1 Health & Safety The Principal Designer (ORSA) are fully integrated into the team and providing regular updates, as well as carrying out monthly site inspections during the construction contract

R2 Programme delays due to COVID 19

R3 Construction (Contractor) delays

R4 Planning Condition Delays

R5 Contractor/ sub-contractor insolvency

No programme impact as yet and risk mitigated within AfDL.

Tight town centre site with complex logistics will increase risks of delay significantly. This is now primarily a contractor risk item

The planning conditions are being tracked on a weekly basis, with Chartplan in discussions with RBKT. The key conditions currently with the council for review is the District Heat Network Condition

The financial status of the Main Contractor and its key supply chain is checked on a quarterly basis. The financial stability of all sub-contractors is the Contractor’s risk. The latest checks were carried out in December 2023, which raised no significant concerns.

R6 Impact of the Ukraine War There is a ‘carve out’ in the JCT for the impact of the Ukraine War on programme. This will be monitored going forward to ensure packages are procured early enough to mitigate.

R7 Brexit import delay

There is a ‘carve out’ in the JCT for Brexit import delay on programme. This will be monitored going forward to ensure packages are procured early enough to mitigate. It is worth noting that the façade is now being procured from Northern Ireland, this further reduces the potential of this risk.

R8 Achieving areas To ensure the targeted areas are achieved, these will be checked at each design stage and as Construction progresses to ensure the development is falling within the min/max area brackets.

The first measure of Building B 2nd, 3rd and 4th floors has been carried out. We are awaiting results

R9 Cost Overrun

The Contract has been signed on a fixed price, however there are Provisional Sums which could lead to an overspend and require expenditure of the contingency. These are reported on each month by G&T and the Provisional Sums are to be closed out as early as possible.

R10 Twin Wall An alternative LDI policy with Build-Zone has been agreed, and the Deed of Variation to replace the Aviva policy has been agreed and signed. The cost and programme impact of the twin-wall has been closed with the signing of the DOV. It should be noted that delays during resolving the issue have impacted the programme and resulted in delays beyond the current reported delay.

R11 Utilities –UKPN Leases

The UKPN works are complete with substations in place and highway works complete. Legal agreements have now been signed, and power-on in Building B. Building A and C are due to have power-on 5th June 2024. Programme impact is currently under review.

R12 S278 Agreement Highways have now agreed to the scope of the S278 works and the S278 agreement itself has been agreed with the Council. A bond is ready to be put in place and the tender returns for the S278 works are currently being reviewed.

R12 Clarkes façade programme Clarkes façade manufacturing and installation programme is behind. MCLH have put forward a recovery programme which will be updated weekly. The last 4 weeks, Clarkes have met or exceeded their planned manufacturing This is still being tracked on a weekly basis, but it is likely their programme can be improved on this basis.

R13 MEPH weather damage MEPH works are progressing on floors prior to the façade being installed. This is not necessarily an issue; however, a concern has been raised by Aecom and the tenant team. MCLH have provided an uplifted testing regime to deal with these out of sequence works. This is under review

R14 Building A –Feature Stair Finish

and

and

Unilever have raised some concerns regarding the timber finish of the tread on the feature stair not matching the timber finish of the handrail An alternative is being reviewed currently.

R15 LFB Sign off LFB response was received in the previous reporting period with no critical issues raised. MCLH have summarised the response which has been circulated.

R16 Network Infrastructure McLH to issue a detailed narrative this week confirming the main issues in relation to the 5-week delay of Sectional Completion due to the late instruction of the network infrastructure This is under review

Risk Register Key

14.0 areas of concern

Façade - The façade manufacturing and installation programme is currently behind Meetings are being held on a weekly basis to discuss progress and a tracker will be circulated to all parties Progress has been improved in the last reporting period however there are still significant concerns regarding the façade that has been installed, particularly regarding alignment.

UKPN leases and works – Power-on for B and power-on for A and C is due on the 5th June. The programme impact of this delay is being reviewed.

S278 Agreement - Highways have now agreed to the scope of the S278 works and the S278 agreement itself has been agreed with the Council. A bond is ready to be put in place and the tender returns for the S278 works are currently being reviewed.

Fire Curtains/ Shutters – Still awaiting instruction to proceed with the 6th and 7th floor fire curtain. An alternative proposal is under review which will negate the requirement for these works to form part of the basebuild development works.

15.0 k ey activities in the reporting period

I UKPN Lease agreements signed

II. Progress tenant variations.

III. Concluded S278 legal discussions.

IV. Review design release packages issued by MCLH.

V. Continue to look at options of reducing the carbon impact of the development.

VI. Issued S106 Procurement Targets to RBKT.

VII. Received LFB response to scheme

VIII. Received tenders for S278 works

IX. Achieve power on for Building B

X. Completed Thames Water works outside of site

XI. Submitted Condition 11

XII. Progress ed design for connection details and cables for the public art to Buildings A, B and C.

XIII. G99 application signed by LCN for Building A and B.

lookahead

– k ey activities in the next reporting period

I. Complete Building B facade

II. Progress tenant variations

III. Engross S278 Agreement

IV. Review design release packages issued by MCLH

V. Continue to look at options of reducing the carbon impact of the development

VI. Appoint Highways Contractor to carry out S278 works

VII. Issue updated SBD document to RBKT

VIII. Agree early access protocol with Unilever and their fit-out Contractor

IX. Achieve power on for Buildings A and C

X. Complete Thames Water works inside site

XI. Submit further conditions as per 3.2

XII. Progress design for connection details and cables for the public art to Buildings A, B and C

XIII. Close out Park Mark with Car Park Operator

appendices

A. LoR & warranties tracker

B Planning/ S106 Conditions

C EAI Tracker

D Outline Programme

E G&T Update Report

F MCLH Update Report

G BREEAM Tracker

H Aecom Update Report

I MNP Update Report

J ORSA Update Report

K DAA Update Report

L Package Review Schedule

M. McLH Procurement Schedule

N. McLH Construction Programme

O. Lautus Progress Report

P. Clarkes Manufacturing Update

Q. LFB Response

R. Buildzone tracker/ report

project: Surrey House

£10m aggregate expires 28/02/25 Fully executed order dated 30/5/23 received and filed on Centrodoc. redacted . 6/3/24 Certified copy required.

2.16 Acoustic consultantContractor Appointment Hann Tucker £1m expires 24/7/24

2.17 Lift subcontractor Otis £5m aggregate expires 30/11/24 Redacted subcontract order dated 4/5/23 received and filed on Centrodoc.. 6/3/24 Certified copy required.

2.18 Car Park Contractor (if separate) FP McCann £10m aggregate expires 31/01/25

2024- Issued to the sub-contactor

Gwlng May TrackerDraft received. 30/4/24 email…Client Warranty sent to Consultant by Docusign

29/1/24 Signed by subcontractor, to be sent to the contactor with Funder and Lemder warranties

Fully executed subcontract order dated 26/7/23 received and saved on Centrodoc.. 6/3/24 Certified copy

June 2024- Issued to the sub-contactor

Not required Gwlng May Trackerissued to Consultant for signature. Gwlng May Tracker- with Consultant for signature

Completed- Gwlng May Tracker .June 2024 Signed by the sub-contractor. Sent to the Tenant. 12/4/24 Issued to Otis again by GWLNGS

June 2024 Still with subcontractor. Issued to Otis by Docusign by GWLNGS ….12/4/24

June 2024- Issued to the sub-contactor

June 2024- Issued to the sub-contactor

June 2024- Issued to the sub-contactor

project: Surrey House

project: Surrey House

sub-sub contractor)

6.02 Design of PT slabs (Mitchelson sub-sub contractor)

6.03 Design, manufacture, installation (Mitchelson sub-sub contractor)

contractor)

6.05 Design and manufacture(Mitchelson sub-sub contractor)

6.06 Sub-sub-contractor (Halsion)

23/2/24 TA confirmed that she has sent a draft form of warranty to BCLP for all 5 of these sub-subbies…....and will arrange for these to be issued once approved.

planning/S106 conditions

Detail Planning Application No: 22/02905/FUL – Consented 11/01/2023

Updated 31/05/2024

Surrey House, 34 Eden Street NCP Car Park, St James Road Former Hippodrome, Eden Street And Bo Concept, The Roundhouse 20 Eden Street

PROPOSAL: Application under S73 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990 to carry out development without compliance with condition 1 (Approved plans) of planning permission ref: 21/04022/FUL (Application under Section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 to carry out development without compliance with Condition 1 (Approved Plans) of Planning Permission ref: 20/02495/FUL (Full Planning application for the demolition of Surrey House, Multi Storey Car Park, Hippodrome and Bo Concept and the erection of 2 (two) Office buildings [Use Class - E(g)(i)] Building A and Building B: Building A 9 storeys (22,144 (GEA) sqms) Building B 11 storeys (11,587 (GEA) sqms). The erection of a replacement multi storey car park of 354 spaces plus cycle parking (for use as a public car park at weekends) landscaping, public realm upgrades, servicing, pedestrian and vehicular access) dated 02/12/2021. Variations to include alterations to bridge link, elevations, floorplates, ground floor level access, rooftop plant and screen, service yard, reduction to height of Buildings A and B, alterations to landscaping/public realm, removal of basements and stairs on sides of Building A. This application is accompanied by an Environmental Statement.)

Variation to consist of revisions to the Car Park (Building C). This application is accompanied by an Environmental Statement.

Taking into account the Environmental Information contained within the Environmental Statement and addenda thereto, which was submitted under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 and subject to a ‘Legal Agreement’, PERMIT subject to the following conditions:

This application is accompanied by an Environmental Statement.

BRIEF OUTLINE OF CONDITIONS

(See Notice of Decision of Planning Application 22/02905/FUL for Full Specification)

1 The approved development shall be carried out in accordance with the following drawings/details: (See consent for full list of drawings)

App deposited re cladding deposited and validated 27/04/23

Suite 21, High Cedars, 20 Wray Park Road, Reigate RH2 0DD – Registered in England: 5204488 T: 01883 730 877 M: 07843 661 054 E: barry@chartplan.co.uk

2 The development hereby permitted shall begin before the expiration of three years from 2nd December 2021 (2nd December 2024)

3 . The development shall be completed in accordance with samples for all facing materials including fenestration and boundary treatments (gates, fences / walls, other) including details of manufacturing specification which shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority before above ground works on site are commenced. The development shall then be built in accordance with these approved samples and completed prior to occupation.

Pre above ground works condition

Ref: 23/01117/NMA

MCLH 11th November 2022

Validation details 22/03576/CLC Consented 30/01/23

22/03576/CLC

4 Notwithstanding the details shown on the approved plans additional architectural detailing plans at scale 1:10/ 1:5 showing all openings and key elements of the building / landscape (windows, doors, facade glazing, fins and parapets, spandrel panels, entrance and associated publicly visible features, signage, lighting in publicly accessible areas, vents / intakes / exhausts, grilles / louvres, rooftop plant, other elevational features shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority before the relevant element is commenced on site. The development shall be constructed in accordance with the approved details.

5 Prior to any occupation an updated full and detailed landscape and planting plan, including details of additional tree planting on Brook Street shall have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The Strategy shall include the details of the 6 trees to be planted in Brook Street along with the proposed locations and details of the tree pits and tree grilles. The Trees planted on Brook Street shall comprise of 3no. Fastigiate Hornbeam (Carpinus betulus ‘Fastigiata’) planted at a minimum of 550cm tall with a minimum single clear stem of 200cm and a girth of 30-35cm, and 3no. Fastigiate Hornbeam (Pyrus calleryana ‘Chanticleer’)

Pre development condition, relevant to each section

Pre above ground development

Pre-occupation condition

MCLH Application deposited 15/08/23

Ref: 23/02245/CLC

Validated 22/08/23

Consented 10/10/23

MCLH

planted at a minimum of 450cm tall with a minimum single clear stem of 200cm and a girth of 25-30cm. The Strategy shall be implemented within the first planting season following completion of the development and the landscape and planting shall thereafter be maintained for five years to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority. Any trees or planting that die during this period shall be replaced during the following planting season, and the areas shown to be landscaped shall be permanently retained for that purpose.

6 No above ground development shall take place until details of all external lighting have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The external lighting shall be installed in accordance with the approved details and thereby retained as such unless a variation is subsequently submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

7 Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (or any Order revoking or re-enacting this Order) No fans, louvres, ducts, external lighting or other external plant other than those shown on the drawings hereby approved shall be installed without the prior written approval of the Local Planning Authority.

Application

8 All works on site shall take place in accordance with the details approved pursuant to 22/00273/CLC (Details of Demolition and Construction Environmental Management Plan)

9 The development shall be carried out in accordance with details approved by 22/00759/CLC (Levels).

10 The development shall be carried out in accordance with details approved under 22/00371/CLC pursuant to Condition 10 (Site Waste Management Plan).

11 Within 6 months of above ground works a Public Realm Management Plan, including measures to minimise any adverse

Within 6 months of MCLH Application deposited 10/05/24

microclimatic impacts of the development have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Prior to the beneficial occupation of the development hereby approved the hard and soft landscaping shall be fully implemented and made available for all residents and thereafter maintained for the lifetime of the development. commencement of above ground works Ref 24/01192/CLC

Decision due by 05/07/24 12

The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved Transport Statement. Informative

13 Prior to the commencement of any development above ground level, details of secure cycle parking facilities to serve the development to which this permission relates shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The cycle parking facilities as shown in the approved details shall be provided prior to beneficial occupation of the development to which this permission relates and shall be permanently retained for that purpose and kept free from obstruction thereafter. Pre development condition (above ground)

14 The hard surfaces hereby approved shall be made of porous materials and retained thereafter or provision shall be made and retained thereafter to direct run-off water from the hard surface to a permeable or porous area or surface within the /curtilage of the property.

Informative

15 The revised energy strategy as approved by 22/00683/CLC on 3rd January 2023 shall be implemented throughout the development of the site. Informative 16

Any flat roofed area that is not identified as communal or private amenity space or roof terrace shall not be converted or used as a balcony or sitting out area, and no access shall be gained except for maintenance purposes. Informative

17

A public art and way-finding strategy should be submitted to the local planning authority for approval prior to commencement of above ground works. The public art and wayfinding strategy shall identify proposed public art and way-finding works to be installed Pre above groundworks condition

Consented 21/03/23

Ref: 22/03873/CLC

as part of the detailed landscaping strategy. The Strategy shall detail the mechanism for selecting the public art and way-finding works and the maintenance and management of the art works. The works of art shall be installed prior to the beneficial use of the car park or in accordance with the timeframe set out in the public art and wayfinding strategy and thereafter retained in accordance with the agreed maintenance and management plan.

18 Prior to the occupation of the development hereby approved, details of the works relating to highway works required in connection with the proposed bus stop and bus stand, including any relocation of services and pedestrian crossings, shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority or by the Council as Highway Authority pursuant to Section 278 of the Highways Act 1980, and carried out in accordance with the approved details. Such details shall include the agreement of levels and construction details. All works are to be to the Council's adoptable highway standards and shall include any associated drainage works, lighting improvements, landscaping, street furniture, road markings, signage, traffic orders, and any necessary alterations to statutory undertakers equipment. Any widening to the public footways shall be retained permanently available for pedestrian circulation and the widened areas dedicated as highway pursuant to the Highways Act 1980.

19 The development shall be carried out in accordance with the details approved on 25.02.2022 Reference 22/02595/CLC (Written Scheme of Investigation WSI - Archaeology). No development shall take place other than in accordance with the agreed WSI, and the programme and methodology of site evaluation and the nomination of a competent person(s) or organisation to undertake the agreed works. If heritage assets of archaeological interest are identified by stage 1 then for those parts of the site which have archaeological interest a stage 2 WSI shall be submitted to and approved by the local planning authority in writing. For land that is included within the stage 2 WSI, no demolition/ development shall take place other than in accordance with the agreed stage 2 WSI which shall include: A. The statement of significance and research objectives, the programme and methodology of site

Pre occupation condition

MCLH Application deposited

Ref: 24/01313/CLC

Decision due: 18/07/24

Pre demolition condition

FHPM/Ch art Plan DOC app deposited

31.12.21

App validated 05/01/22

Ref: 21/04117/CLC

Additional Archaeology report submitted to LPA, validated 10/08/22

Ref: 22/02595/CLC

Consented 25/02/22

Consented 23/09/22

investigation and recording and the nomination of a competent person(s) or organisation to undertake the agreed works; B. The programme for post-investigation assessment and subsequent analysis, publication & dissemination and deposition of resulting material. This part of the condition shall not be discharged until these elements have been fulfilled in accordance with the programme set out in the stage 2 WSI.

20 The servicing of commercial unit(s) hereby permitted shall only take place between 0700 and 2000 on any day, including Sundays and Bank Holidays.

21 Prior to occupation a Pedestrian Environment Review Study (PERS), considering the ten Healthy Streets indicators, as set out in the Mayor’s Transport Strategy, 2018 shall be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority, the findings of which shall be implemented in accordance with timeframes agreed with the Local Planning Authority and thereafter permanently retained.

22 Prior to the occupation of the office, details as to how the approved development has been designed to connect to a future District Heating Network in the surrounding area and provision for the development’s connection shall be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority and thereafter permanently retained.

Pre occupation condition Milestone

Pre occupation condition MCLH Application deposited and validated 23/11/23 Ref: 23/03103/CLC Decision due by 16.01.24

23 The development shall be carried out in accordance with details approved pursuant to 22/00463/CLC in relation to Condition 23 (Ecological Management Plan) Informative

24 Prior to the occupation of development a Delivery and Servicing Management Plan shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

25 The rating level of the noise determined by the cumulative sound emissions of the plant hereby permitted shall be at least 5dBA lower than the existing background noise level at any

Pre occupation condition Chart Plan/Unilv er/MIlest one

Informative

given time of operation. The noise levels shall be measured or predicted 1m externally to any window at the nearest residential facade. Measurements and assessment shall be made according to British Standard 4142:2014.

26 The site and building works required to implement the development shall be only carried out between the hours of 08.00 and 18.00 Mondays to Fridays and between 08.00 and 13.00 on Saturdays and not at all on Bank Holidays and Sundays.

27 The demolition secured through demolition PD Consent 20/02696/PRA and construction works shall be implemented in accordance with details approved pursuant to Condition 27 (Section 61 of Control of Pollution Act 1974).

28 The Development shall be carried out in accordance with the details approved on 08.03.2022 Reference 22/00411/CLC (Air Quality Technical Note Technical Note J13011 F1)

29 All Non-Road Mobile Machinery (NRMM) of net power of 37kW and up to and including 560kW used during the course of the demolition, site preparation and construction phases shall comply with the emission standards set out in chapter 7 of the GLA’s supplementary planning guidance “Control of Dust and Emissions During Construction and Demolition” dated July 2014 (SPG), or subsequent guidance. Unless it complies with the standards set out in the SPG, no NRMM shall be on site, at any time, whether in use or not, without the prior written consent of the local planning authority. The developer shall keep an up to date list of all NRMM used during the demolition, site preparation and construction phases of the development on the online register.

30 Prior to commencement of above ground works on the development hereby permitted, a Damage Cost Assessment in line with the requirements of the GLA Sustainable Design and Construction Practice must be submitted to and approved in writing by the local authority.

31 The development shall be implemented in accordance with the Fire Statement approved under 22/00557/CLC and retained as such for the lifetime of the development.

Informative

Informative

Informative

Informative

Pre above ground works condition AQ Consultan ts / Chart Plan App deposited 25/10/22 PP-11645457

Validated Ref: . 22/03432/CLC

Informative

Suite 21, High Cedars, 20 Wray Park Road, Reigate RH2 0DD – Registered in England: 5204488 T: 01883 730 877 M: 07843 661 054 E: barry@chartplan.co.uk

Consented 23/01/23

22/03432/CLC

32 The development shall be carried out in accordance with details approved by 22/03872/CLC on 5th January 2023 regarding the exhaust point to ensure the health and safety of residents nearby.

33 The Development shall be carried out in accordance with the details approved 11.03.2022 Reference 22/00359/CLC (Contamination Ground Investigation Report).

34 Should remedial works be required in relation to contaminated land, the remedial strategy shall be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority, prior to the commencement of the development works and remedial works. On completion of the agreed remedial works, a closure report and certificate of compliance endorsed by the interested party/parties, shall be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority, prior to the occupation of the site by end users.

35 If during implementation of this development, contamination is encountered which has not previously been identified, the additional contamination shall be fully assessed and a specific contaminated land assessment and associated remedial strategy shall be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority before the additional remediation works are carried out. The agreed strategy shall be implemented in full prior to completion of the development hereby approved.

Informative

InformativeRemedial works condition

InformativeContamination condition

36 Prior to commencement of groundworks (excluding site investigations and demolition), a final detailed drainage design, including drawings, supporting calculations, SuDS Statement and Drainage Assessment Form shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. A detailed management plan confirming routine maintenance tasks for all drainage components must also be submitted to demonstrate how the drainage system is to be maintained for the lifetime of the development. The system shall be implemented and thereafter managed and maintained in accordance with the approved details Pre above groundworks condition MCLH Application deposited and validated 22/09/22 Ref: 22/03000/CLC

Consented 09/05/23

37 No building hereby permitted shall be occupied until evidence (photographs and installation contracts) is submitted to demonstrate that the sustainable drainage scheme for the site has been completed in accordance with the submitted details. The sustainable drainage scheme shall be managed and maintained thereafter in accordance with the agreed management and maintenance plan for all of the proposed drainage components

38 Within 6 months of the commencement of any development above ground level, details of waste and recycling facilities to serve the development to which this permission relates shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority.

Within 6 months of commencement of above groundworks condition

39 The development (including any works of demolition) shall be carried out in accordance with details approved under 22/00306/CLC (Arboricultural Report and Drawings). Informative

40 The approved protection scheme (Condition 39) shall be implemented prior to commencement of any work on site including demolition, and be maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority until the completion of the development or until such stage as detailed within the approved AMS.

Informative

41 The development shall be carried out in accordance with the submitted Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) by Cole Easdon Consultants Limited (dated November 2022; issue no. 2; job no. 8922) and the Design Note by Robert Bird Group titled ‘Flood Volume Attenuation Strategy Clarifications – Updated MSCP’ (dated 02/09/2022; project no. 4881; document no. 4881-RBGZZ-XX-DN-CV-87002, issue 02) and the following mitigation measures it details:

Finished floor levels shall be set no lower than 8.8mAOD for more vulnerable residential uses

Informative

MCLH Application deposited with LPA 07/08/23

Ref: 23/02158/CLC

Validated 09/08/23

Consented 11/10/23

• Finished floor levels shall be set no lower than 8.4mAOD for less vulnerable commercial uses

• Finished floor levels shall be set no lower than 7.9mAOD for the commercial reception area

• Flood storage mitigation shall be provided

• Flood voids shall be installed

These mitigation measures shall be fully implemented prior to occupation and subsequently in accordance with the scheme’s timing/phasing arrangements. The measures detailed above shall be retained and maintained thereafter throughout the lifetime of the development.

42 The development shall be carried out in accordance with the submitted Interim Flood Storage Scheme detailed within the letter from MNP to the Environment Agency (SV/ib/220051-04; dated 15 February 2021), with the location of the temporary storage amended in the Design Note by Robert Bird Group titled ‘Flood Volume Attenuation Strategy Clarifications – Updated MSCP’ (dated 02/09/2022; project no. 4881; document no. 4881-RBG-ZZ-XX-DN-CV-87002, issue 02). The car park ramp tank will be implemented at the trigger points specified and remain in perpetuity until the demolition of Lever House is complete.

43 Prior to occupation, a maintenance plan to manage the flood voids and grilles over the lifetime of the development will be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the local planning authority in consultation with the Environment Agency. The Plan should cover general maintenance and inspection as well as maintenance after a flood event. The approved management plan will then be implemented in full throughout the lifetime of the development.

44 Prior to occupation, a scheme detailing the flood resistance measures must be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the local planning authority with guidance from the Environment

Agency. The scheme should include details on the passive flood barriers up to 8.31 metres above Ordnance Datum (mAOD) to protect: The shared reception of the Hive and Honey Buildings The car park basement access ramp, stairwell and lift lobbies The scheme shall be fully implemented and subsequently maintained, in accordance with the scheme’s timing/phasing arrangements, or within any other period as may subsequently be agreed, in writing, by the local planning authority.

45 Surface water draining from areas of car park hardstanding shall be passed through an oil separator or series of oil separators, prior to being discharged into any watercourse, soakaway or surface water sewer. The separator(s) shall be designed and constructed to have a capacity compatible with the area being drained, shall be installed prior to the occupation of the development and shall thereafter be retained and maintained throughout the lifetime of the development. Clean roof water or vehicle washdowns and detergents shall not pass through the separator(s) and should be drained instead to foul sewer or sealed system.

46 A Car Park Management Plan demonstrating how the use of the car park will be controlled, including any restrictions and detailing the signage necessary within the site to direct pedestrians and vehicles shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority before the first occupation of the development. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details. Pre occupation condition

47 By the time the development hereby permitted is substantially complete, pedestrian/vehicular intervisibility splays of 2.8 m x 3.3 m shall have been provided in each direction where the access meets the back edge of footway, and shall be permanently retained free from any obstruction to visibility higher than 1.0m above ground level.

Informative

MCLH / Occupier

48 Within 6 months of MCLH Application deposited 03/04/23 Consented 31/05/23

'Within six months of the commencement of the above ground development' details regarding the relocated bus driver welfare facilities on Brook Street, have been submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The relocated bus driver welfare facilities shall be delivered in accordance with time frames agreed with the Local Planning Authority prior to development, other than demolition and thereafter permanently retained.

Bus driver welfare facilities will be retained throughout development.

49 A. The development hereby permitted shall incorporate security measures to minimise the risk of crime and disorder and meet the specific security needs of this development in accordance with Secured by Design Commercial 2015 or its equivalent required security standards. Details of these measures shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority prior to commencement of the development and shall be implemented in accordance with the approved details prior to occupation.

B. As the proposed development is in close proximity to Kingston Town Centre, a crowded place, I would seek that that a blast assessment be completed by a member of the Register of Security Engineers & Specialists (RSES); this is order to determine the appropriate glazing specification for the building(s).

C. Prior to occupation of the offices a Secured by Design accreditation certificate or its equivalent from the Metropolitan Police Design Out Crime Office shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority.

commencement of above groundworks condition

Ref: 23/00892/CLC

D) Prior to the functioning of the multi-story carpark Park Mark Certification is achieved. Pre development condition MCLH / FHPM / Kabsec App deposited 21/02/22

49 REVISED

. A. The development hereby permitted shall incorporate security measures to minimise the risk of crime and disorder and meet the specific security needs of this development in accordance with Secured by Design details approved under

Within 3 months post commencement of ground works.

Validated 22/02/22

Ref: 22/00558/CLC

(Originally submitted under Planning Consent 20/02499 /FUL – App form sent to LPA to request transfer to this app 19/04/2022)

(TRANSIT APPLICATION )*

Consented 28/04/22

TO BE REVISED AS BELOW

22/00558/CLC (other than the car park/ cycle parking proposed in Building C which is superseded by this permission.) Details of the car park/ cycle parking measures shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority within 3 months of commencement of above ground works of the car park. The development shall be implemented in accordance with the approved details prior to occupation. B. As the proposed development is in close proximity to Kingston Town Centre, a crowded place, I would seek that a blast assessment be completed by a member of the Register of Security Engineers & Specialists (RSES); this is in order to determine the appropriate glazing specification for the building(s). C. Prior to occupation of the offices a Secured by Design accreditation certificate or its equivalent from the Metropolitan Police Design Out Crime Office shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. D. Prior to the functioning of the multi-storey car park, Park Mark Certification is achieved. The development shall be implemented in accordance with the approved details.

50 A retail management plan to include opening hours and the link to the wider occupation of the site shall be submitted to the local planning authority for approval prior to commencement of the use of the Eden St retail units. The retail units shall operate in accordance with the approved management plan.

51 Prior to occupation of the new office building, the woodland walk shall be made available to members of the public in accordance with hours of access and a management plan to be submitted to the local planning authority for approval. The woodland walk shall operate in accordance with the approved details.

52 The car park shall be implemented in accordance with the details approved under 22/03504/CLC dated 29th December 2022.

53 The development shall be implemented in accordance with the details approved on 07.03.2022 under reference 22/00292/CLC (Water re-use/harvesting).

54 Details shall be submitted to the local planning authority prior to commencement of development to demonstrate how the comprehensive landscaping strategy would achieve the proposed Urban Greening Factor of at least 0.3 within the site. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details prior to occupation of the development.

55 The minimum water consumption targets as per The London Plan 2021, i.e. 105 l/person/day for residential units and a BREEAM rating of ‘Excellent’ for the Wat 01 credits for non-residential uses. It should be stressed that these are the minimum requirements and need to be improved upon where possible

56 . Air Quality Neutral Assessment: A Damage Cost Assessment using the most up to date damage cost toolkit from Defra and the most recent version of the EFT must be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority within 3 months of commencement of development.

57 The development must be carried out in accordance with the Dust Management Plan Reference 22/00618/CLC approved on 07.03.2022. The applicant must install PM10 monitoring equipment at the site boundary, with exact locations to be determined through discussion with the local authority Environmental Health department.

58 No construction shall take place within 5m of the water main. Information detailing how the developer intends to divert the asset / align the development, so as to prevent the potential for damage to subsurface potable water infrastructure, must be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority in consultation with Thames Water. Any construction must be undertaken in accordance with the terms of the approved information. Unrestricted access must be available at all times for the maintenance and repair of the asset during and after the construction works.

condition

Within 3 months of commencement of development condition

Report to be submitted – No time constraint specified.

Application deposited 03/04/23 Ref: 23/00893/CLC Consented 22/05/23

Consultan ts App deposited 25/10/22 PP-11645457

Consented 23/01/23

22/03432/CLC

MCLH

59 Any piling must be undertaken in accordance with the terms of the approved piling method statement approved under 22/00390/CLC.

60 In order to demonstrate compliance with the ‘be seen’ postconstruction monitoring requirement of Policy SI 2 of the London Plan, the legal Owner shall at all times and all in all respects comply with the energy monitoring requirements set out in points a, b and c below. In the case of non-compliance the legal Owner shall upon written notice from the Local Planning Authority immediately take all steps reasonably required to remedy noncompliance. a. Within eight weeks of planning permission being issued by the Local Planning Authority, the Owner is required to submit to the GLA accurate and verified estimates of the ‘be seen’ energy performance indicators, as outlined in Chapter 3 ‘Planning stage’ of the GLA ‘Be seen’ energy monitoring guidance document, for the consented development. This should be submitted to the GLA's monitoring portal in accordance with the ‘Be seen’ energy monitoring guidance. b. Once the as-built design has been completed (upon commencement of RIBA Stage 6) and prior to the building(s) being occupied (or handed over to a new legal owner, if applicable), the legal Owner is required to provide updated accurate and verified estimates of the ‘be seen’ energy performance indicators for each reportable unit of the development, as per the methodology outlined in Chapter 4 ‘Asbuilt stage’ of the GLA ‘Be seen’ energy monitoring guidance. All data and supporting evidence should be uploaded to the GLA’s monitoring portal. The owner should also confirm that suitable monitoring devices have been installed and maintained for the monitoring of the in-use energy performance indicators, as outlined in Chapter 5 ‘In-use stage’ of the GLA ‘Be seen’ energy monitoring guidance document. c. Upon completion of the first year of occupation following the end of the defects liability period (DLP) and for the following four years, the legal Owner is required to provide accurate and verified annual in-use energy performance data for all relevant indicators under each reportable unit of the development as per the methodology outlined in Chapter 5 ‘In-use stage’ of the GLA ‘Be seen’ energy

Various submissions

monitoring guidance document. All data and supporting evidence should be uploaded to the GLA’s monitoring portal. This condition will be satisfied after the legal Owner has reported on all relevant indicators included in Chapter 5 ‘In-use stage’ of the GLA ‘Be Seen’ energy monitoring guidance document for at least five years. .

61 The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details ref. 22/00622/CLC and maintained as such in perpetuity.

62 The development shall be carried out in accordance with the plans and details approved under 22/03626/CLC (Drinking Water Infrastructure) approved 30/12/22, and drinking water made available to the public for free in accordance with the plans and details prior to occupation of the development, and in perpetuity.

63 The measures set out in the Air Quality Positive Statement AQPS approved on 08.03.2022 under reference 22/00412/CLC shall be implemented in accordance with the details so approved, and thereafter retained, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the local planning authority.

64 Prior to the occupation of each building the post-construction tab of the GLA’s whole life carbon assessment template should be completed accurately and in its entirety in line with the GLA’s Whole Life Carbon Assessment Guidance. The post-construction assessment should provide an update of the information submitted at planning submission stage, including the whole life carbon emission figures for all life-cycle modules based on the actual materials, products and systems used. This should be submitted to the GLA at: ZeroCarbonPlanning@london.gov.uk. along with any supporting evidence as per the guidance. Confirmation of submission to the GLA shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the local planning authority, prior to occupation of the relevant

65 The development shall be carried out in accordance with the Ducting Space for Full Fibre Connectivity Infrastructure Plans approved on 07.03.2022 under reference 22/00681/CLC these

Informative

Informative

Informative

Informative

Pre occupation condition MCLH

plans shall be implemented prior to occupation and maintained as such in perpetuity.

66 Prior to the occupation any building, a Post Completion Report setting out the predicted and actual performance against all numerical targets in the relevant Circular Economy Statement shall be submitted to the GLA at: circulareconomystatements@london.gov.uk along with any supporting evidence as per the GLA’s Circular Economy Statement Guidance. The Post Completion Report shall provide updated versions of Tables 1 and 2 of the Circular Economy Statement, the Recycling and Waste Reporting form and Bill of Materials. Confirmation of submission to the GLA shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the local planning authority, prior to occupation. Pre occupation condition

67 Notwithstanding the submitted details, prior to commencement of any above ground development (excluding demolition), details of a plant screen on top of Block A and Block B shall have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The approved plant screen shall be installed in accordance with the approved details prior to the occupation of the development hereby approved.

NMA APPLICATIONS

NMA Application deposited re amendments to Building A and B Spandrel Panels

Prior to commencement of above ground works MCLH/ DAA App deposited 25/10/22 PP-11631141

Consented 26/01/23

22/03431/CLC

NMA Condition 3 (Facing Materials)

Foot Bridge Link

Deposited with LPA 09/08/23

Ref: 23/02182/NMA

Validated 09/08/23

Deposited 25/09/23

Validated 27/09/23 23/02623/NMA

Deposited and validated 03/10/23

Ref: 23/02702/NMA

Consented 07/09/23

01883

Registered in England: 5204488

Consented 23/04/24

Consented 23/04/24

Section 106 Obligations

1 Affordable Workspace contribution The Owner covenants to pay the Affordable Workspace Contribution to the Council prior to Occupation of the Development.

2 Kingston Employment Support Services Contribution Kingston Employment Support Services Contribution" means the sum of £232,000 Index Linked to be paid by the Owner to the Council towards the Council's work match brokerage initiative;

3 Skills Employment and Apprenticeship Plan Contribution.

4 The Owner covenants to submit to the Council for approval a Skills Employment and Apprenticeship Plan –Construction Phase within 3 months of Commencement of the Development to include the following provisions:

Skills Employment and Apprenticeship Plan Contribution" means the sum of £50,000 Index Linked to be paid by the Owner to the Council towards implementation of the Skills Employment and Apprenticeship Plan.

• 70 employment opportunities for residents of the South London Partnership Boroughs or students and graduates of the Mayor's Construction Academy.

• 20 apprenticeships for Local Residents.

• Two Local Businesses to be invited to quote for

£250,000 Prior to Occupation of the development

£232,000, Prior to Commencement of the development. Paid - 6th February 2023

£50,000 Prior to Commencement of the development Paid - 6th February 2023

Pre-Construction SEP & Stakeholder Allocation sent to LPA 03.07.23

Within 3 month of commencement of the development

Submitted to the Council for approval

5 Skills Employment and Apprenticeship Plan –Operational phase

6 Carbon Dioxide Emissions Target

7 Carbon Dioxide Offsetting Contribution

contracts less than £150,000 in value; and

• Not less than 15% of the total value of goods and services procured throughout the construction phase to be procured from Local Businesses or businesses based in Neighbouring Boroughs The Owner covenants to use its best endeavours to comply with the Skills Employment and Apprenticeship Plan –Construction Phase during the construction of the Development PROVIDED THAT the Owner and the Council may agree amendments to the Skills Employment and Apprenticeship Plan – Construction Phase in writing from time to time.

Skills Employment and Apprenticeship Plan – Operational Phase" means a plan setting out targets for local employment, skills and training and detailing mechanisms for delivering such opportunities during the operational phase of the Development

Carbon Dioxide Emissions Target” means a 35% carbon reduction against Part L2a of the Building Regulations 2013. 35% carbon reduction against part L2a of the Building Regulations 2013

Carbon Dioxide Offsetting Contribution" means a sum of money (Index Linked) calculated on the basis of £60 per tonne for 30 years to be agreed between the Council and Owner (both parties acting reasonably) and paid by the Owner to the Council in the event that the Development cannot achieve the Carbon Dioxide Emissions Target and the shortfall in

£60 per tonne for 30 years to be agreed

Suite 21, High Cedars, 20 Wray Park Road, Reigate RH2

Within 18 months of commencement of the development.

Following practical completion

Following practical completion

Action for Unilever.

emissions reduction has not been offset through an accredited scheme or alternative off site off setting has not been agreed with the Council, to be used if payable towards the Council's Carbon Offset Fund which seeks the delivery of carbon dioxide emissions reductions projects within the Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames inter alia through retrofit of social housing, schools and civic buildings, investment in renewable energy projects and low-carbon lighting projects;

8 Energy Monitoring Portal “Energy Monitoring Portal” means the ‘Be seen’ webpage of the GLA’s website and the email address ZeroCarbonPlanning@london.gov.uk, or any other such method of submission that may replace this N/A

9 Construction Environmental Management Plan Construction Environmental Management Plan” means the plan to be submitted by the Owner to the Council for approval in accordance with paragraph 15 of Schedule 1; N/A

10 Construction Phase Flood Management Plan Construction Phase Flood Management Strategy" means the measures set out in the flood risk assessment prepared by Cole Easdon Consultants Limited dated November 2020 (issue 5) submitted with the Planning Application and the supplementary letter issued by Mason Navarro Pledge Limited dated February 2021 attached to this deed at Appendix 2 as the same relate to the Land;

N/A

To be submitted within 8 weeks of the grant of the Planning Permission Completed

Prior to Commencement of the Development the Owner shall submit the Construction Environmental Management Plan Submitted and approved

The Development shall be constructed and completed in accordance with the approved Construction Phase Flood Management Strategy. Ongoing

11 Rooftop Garden Management Plan Rooftop Garden Management Plan" means the plan for the provision of managed public access to the Rooftop Garden as may be varied from time to time in writing; N/A

Prior to Occupation of the Development Action for Unilever.

Suite 21, High Cedars, 20 Wray Park Road, Reigate RH2 0DD – Registered in England: 5204488 T: 01883 730 877 M: 07843 661 054 E: barry@chartplan.co.uk

12 Car Park Management Plan

13 Delivery and Service Management Plan

14 District Heating Network

"Car Park Management Plan" means a management plan detailing measures for the management of the use of the car park within the Development including restrictions on use of the car park by users other than the occupier(s) of the offices within the Development. N/A

Delivery and Servicing Management Plan” means the plan to be submitted by the Owner to the Council for approval in accordance with paragraph 16 of Schedule 1; N/A

Prior to Occupation of the Development

Prior to Occupation of the Development Action for Unilever

15 Highway and Public Realm Enhancement Works

“District Heating Network" means a third party district heating network to be developed within the Council's area and which is capable of providing electricity to the Development; N/A DHN rooms provided within Building A and B.

“Highway and Public Realm Enhancement Works" means the highway and public realm enhancements identified for indicative purposes only on the Highway and Public Realm Enhancements Plan N/A

16 TFL Works TfL Works" means the relocation of Transport for London's welfare facility from Brook Street near the corner of Eden Street as shown for indicative purposes only on the Highway and Public Realm Enhancements Plan; N/A

17 Travel Plan

18 Woodland Walk Management Plan

Travel Plan” means a full travel plan to be submitted to the Council for approval in consultation with Transport for London pursuant to paragraph 14 of the First Schedule; N/A

Woodland Walk Management Plan” means a management plan to be submitted to and agreed by the Council in accordance with paragraph 8 of the First Schedule which shall contain arrangements for management of the Woodland Walk N/A

Following an agreement pursuant to section 278 of the Highways Act 1980 Discussions ongoing

Within 12 months following first Occupation of the Development Will form part of S278 works

Prior to Occupation of the Development Action for Unilever

Prior to Occupation of the Development Action for Unilever

Suite 21, High Cedars, 20 Wray Park Road, Reigate RH2 0DD – Registered in England: 5204488 T: 01883 730 877 M: 07843 661 054 E: barry@chartplan.co.uk

employer's agent instruction register

outline programme

Project Honey

Gardiner & Theobald Progress Report at 30 May 2024

General Update

Building facades and fit out are progressing.

Activities & Progress in Period

Contractor

Valuation and recommendation no 28 of MCLH works for April 2024.

Ongoing review of general & tenant variations.

Interface with tenant team

Ongoing dialogue with MACE cost team in relation tenant changes

Interface with funder team

None in the period

Cost Status

Gardiner & Theobald Cost Report 23 issued 26 April 2024 and Report 24 to be issued 5 May 2024

Procurement

S278 works to be reviewed when issued by MCLH

Design Development

None in the period

Project Honey

Gardiner & Theobald Progress Report at 30 May 2024

Future Works

Continuing valuation of the works. Valuation 29 due date 3 June 2024.

Agreement of remaining provisional sums.

Agreement of further tenant changes.

Agreement of costs with MACE against AFL position.

Information Required

MCLH final costs for deck car park.

MCLH response to outstanding TVO’S

Team

No changes

MCLH update report

1. CDM / Health and Safety

• Construction Phase and Environmental plans are in place and updated as required.

• All risk assessments / method statements and COSHH assessments currently up to date for the work activities on site.

2. List of sub-contractors on site:

• O’Neill & Brennan – Logistics/Waste Management

• Trident – Temporary Electrics & Water

• LTC – Tower Cranes

• ATJ – Partitions/Ceilings

• Halsion – MEP

• RECO – Hoists

• CMF – Metalwork

• Clarkes – Façade

• AYM – Roofing & Cladding

• Swiftcrafted – Core fit out/Joinery.

• Kingspan – Raised Access Flooring

• Original Joinery – Building C Fitout

• OWS – Glazed Doors

• Frost – Car Park Landscaping

• Coopers - Concertina Fire Curtains

• A1S – Lift Lobby Fire Curtains

3. Construction Update

• Partitions are complete up to level 8 building A, and level 10 building B.

• CAT A - Ceilings ongoing to all floors.

• MEP is progressing up to level 8 building A, and level 10 building B

• Building B Power on – Live commissioning has commenced.

• UKPN have completed their installations.

• Clarke Façades currently progressing:

Block A: Unitised progressing to level 5. Stick CW from GF – Level 2 ongoing. Block B: Unitised complete to level 7, level 8 & 9 ongoing Stick CW from GF- Level 2 ongoing

• AYM Roofing complete on Buildings A, B & C.

• Swift crafted progressing with joinery/tiling/vanity units/doors to Building A & B cores

• Car park fit out ongoing.

• All Key plant positioned on to the roof.

• Otis have completed 6No. lifts (Tested). Currently working on the next batch of lifts.

• Raised Access Flooring complete in Building B to levels 2,3,4, 5 and progressing with 6 Building A Level 2 has commenced

• Link bridge steelwork and metal decking installed.

• Feature stair steelwork complete

• Feature Stair Fire Curtains

4. Progress/Programme Dropline

• Block A – 3 weeks behind programme due to Twin wall delay

• Block B – 4 weeks behind programme due to Twin wall delay

• Block C – 1 week behind programme

Report

- 30.05.24

5. Lookahead Activities

• CAT A ceilings ongoing

• MEP works ongoing.

• Commissioning ongoing

• CMF steelwork ongoing (Reception steel, balustrades etc)

• Frost Landscaping to Block C roof

• Clarkes Façade progressing to buildings A & B

• Lift installations ongoing

• Power on to A & C

• Building C Fitout ongoing

• Kingspan progressing in Blocks A&B

6. Key Risk Schedule

• Future client variations/TVR’s

• Twin Wall Core impact

• MSCP Provisional Sum

• Planning

o Building A & B Spandrel Panel – NMA Granted 7th September 23

o Building A & B Equitone – NMA Granted 24th April 24

o Building C Façade – NMA Granted 24th April 24

• LFB ‘sign off’

o CAT A Omissions / Temporary Measures – discussions ongoing regarding Building Control Final Certification

o Building C Façade – LFB submission agreed on current Maple proposal

o Building C Sprinkler Requirements – Insurance Acceptance issued via email from client

• Building Control Certification

o Discussions ongoing with SWECO regarding Final Cert and Letter of Comfort

o MCLH responded to Shore Comments (12st May 24)

• Building C Parkmark Accreditation – instruction issued in part

• Tenant Fit-Out design potentially not aligned with MCLH ER’s / Instructed works (e.g. Modified CAT A / Omissions)

• Access Control – Omitted from MCLH Contract – EAI 118 Issued

• S278 Works

o Tender Pack issued for pricing. Quotations received.

o Works will not be completed for Practical Completion

• SMART Buildings – EAI 115 issued and programme impact being discussed

7. Outstanding Instructions/Tenant Variations

• Integration of Smart Building Technology – EAI 115 issued

• External Entrance Lighting – cost submitted – EAI to be issued

• EAI 29 Rev 1 to be reviewed and comments updated: Anti Drumming, Reverberation etc

• EOT 3 to be updated – Removal of Early Access Dates Schedule, draft dates and protocol submitted to Francis Hunter

• EOT 4 to be issued – SMART Buildings to Building B – awaiting response

• EAI 115 - SMART Buildings; to be updated to reflect agreed Scope and Programme

• Terrace Façade Penetrations (RFC 54) – cost submitted, EAI to be issued

• General Instructions – future RFC’s instructed will more than likely impact Programme, for example -

- RFC 005 – External Building Signage; MCLH awaiting revised brief

- 30.05.24

- RFC 061 & 070 – Woodland Walk and Building C Roof Terrace – costs submitted, awaiting urgent EAI

- EAI 089 – Louvres to Façade; design instruction received, design completed and submitted Client reviewing current design, MCLH awaiting direction. Impact on construction to be reviewed. Advised works to be completed following Sectional Completion

- EAI 096 / EAI 125 Public Artwork – RBG & Clarke’s design instructed and completed. FH have further instruction (EAI 125) for RBG detailed design

- EAI 104 Rev 3 – Blind Boxes have been instructed including recommencement of Curved Grill procurement. Potential Programme impact as already advised

- EAI 117 – Building B GF Changing Layout; reduced Scope instructed, potential risk to Programme.

8. Site Wide Issues / Matters Affecting Progress

• Twin Wall impact

• Wayleaves

9. Quality and Environmental

• Environmental plan in place

• Section 61 approved

• CPDs carried out: Pudlo Waterproofing, quelfire (fire collars), CCL (post tensioning), Imperial Ductwork, British Gypsum and Wicona.

Progress Report 25 - 30.05.24

BREEAM (Tracker attached)

Progress Report 25 - 30.05.24

11. Utility Tracker

Report 25 - 30.05.24

Progress Report 25 - 30.05.24

Progress Report 25 - 30.05.24

15.1 Valuation

- Valuation Nr 29 to be submitted on the 28th May 2024

- Next payment Cert. due on the 7th June 2024

15.2 Projected Final Account

£121,511,301

15.3 Provisional Sums

• Statutory Authorities £735,000

o £735,000 Omitted (under EAI 063)

o £461,993.51 Addition (under EAI 063)

• Bird Deterrent to Facades £50,000 – to be omitted

• Fibre Backbone Cabling for Wired Score £180,000 – awaiting instruction

• Public Art Works £50,000 (design instructed under EAI 096 & EAI 125)

• Asbestos £5,000 (Omitted under EAI 063)

• Newts, bats & bat roosts, Japanese knotweed and hogweed. £5,000 (Omitted under EAI 063)

• UXO £5,000 (Omitted under EAI 063)

• Cycle Path Works including Green Wall to Carpark £295,000 – to be omitted

15.4 Employer Instructions

• EAI 001 – BIM Level 2

• EAI 002 – Townhall design feasibility

• EAI 003 – Gym design feasibility

• EAI 004 – Drop kerb

• EAI 005 – S106

• EAI 006 – Townhall & Gym additional piles (only)

• EAI 007 – ASHRAE

• EAI 008 – Below ground drainage

• EAI 009 – CAT A Omission

• EAI 010 – Bridge Link Widening

• EAI 011 – Townhall & Gym

• EAI 012 – MER and SER Loading Design

• EAI 013 – S73 Façade and Plant Screen Amendment Rev1

• EAI 014 – MER and SER Loading Changes - 6th Floor Building B

• EAI 015 – Building B Column Sizes

• EAI 016 – Above Ground Drainage

• EAI 017 – Greywater and Rainwater Design

• EAI 018 – Additional Pile Mat

• EAI 019 – Change in RAL Colours

• EAI 020 – Gym Structural Changes

• EAI 021 – Building C Fees

• EAI 022 – Building A Ground Floor Amendments

• EAI 023 – Signage Design Costs

• EAI 024 – Rainwater Harvesting Tank (Supply Only)

• EAI 025 – CHW and LTHW Design

• EAI 026 – Ventilation Uplift Design

• EAI 027 – Splice Details

• EAI 028 – Green and White Brick Confirmation

• EAI 029 – GRC Alternative

• EAI 030 – Expenditure of FP McCann MSCP Structure

• EAI 031 – Green Wall Design

• EAI 032 – Town Hall Design Amendments

• EAI 033 – Building C Below Ground Obstruction

30.05.24

• EAI 034 – LV Design

• EAI 035 – Domestic Water

• EAI 036 – Structural Penetrations

• EAI 037 - Wicona

• EAI 038 – Rainwater Harvesting Tank

• EAI 039 – New Sewer Connection & Manhole

• EAI 040 – Internal Ramps

• EAI 041 – Townhall Amendments

• EAI 042 – Spandrel Panels

• EAI 043 – Terrace Doors

• EAI 044 – SMART Buildings Design

• EAI 045 – Building A – Slab Penetrations for Future MEP

• EAI 046 – Building B Slab Penetrations

• EAI 047 – MSCP Cast In Channels

• EAI 048 – WC Corridor RCPs

• EAI 049 – Secondary CAT A Omissions

• EAI 050 – CCTV and Access Control Omissions

• EAI 051 – Terrace Finishes

• EAI 052 – Building A and B Spandrels

• EAI 053 – Building C Ramp Ducts

• EAI 054 – Building A Column Sizes

• EAI 055 – Building A Soffit to Retail Entrance

• EAI 056 – Expenditure of Building C Lifts

• EAI 057 – Circleslide Doors

• EAI 058 – Generator Uplift TVR Construction Works

• EAI 059 – Domestic Water TVR Construction Works

• EAI 060 – Gym Floor Design

• EAI 061 – Building B Stair Glazed Screen/Fire Curtain Omission (Levels 1-10)

• EAI 062 – Expenditure of Utilities Prov Sum

• EAI 063 – Omission of Undefined Provisional Sums

• EAI 064 – Service Yard Door

• EAI 065 – Mullion Cover Strips

• EAI 066 – Ventilation TVR Construction Works

Progress Report 25 - 30.05.24

• EAI 067 – LV Panel Enhancement Construction Works

• EAI 068 – Modified CAT A

• EAI 069 – Maple & Halsion MSCP Construction Works

• EAI 070 – Gym Floor Dead Load Increase

• EAI 071 – Omission of Soap Dispensers

• EAI 072 – MSCP Additional Fire Alarm Protection

• EAI 073 – CHW & LTHW Uplift

• EAI 074 – RAL 9010

• EAI 075 – BOH Corridor Ceilings

• EAI 076 – Building A & B Shell and Core Sockets

• EAI 077 – Rainwater Above Ground

• EAI 078 – WC Hand Driers

• EAI 079 – Building B Opening

• EAI 080 – Corian Alternative

• EAI 081 – Building C Packages (Brick, Block, Roof)

• EAI 082 – Bridge Link Design

• EAI 083 – Building A Feature Stair Nosing

• EAI 084 – Omission of Toilet Roll Holders

• EAI 085 – CAT A Temporary Measures

• EAI 086 – Façade Lighting

• EAI 087 – Internal & External Doors (Design)

• EAI 088 – Building B Changing Places (Design)

• EAI 089 – External Louvres (Design)

• EAI 090 – Door Vision Panel Beads

• EAI 091 – Building A & B GF Screed and RAF Omission

• EAI 092 – Building C Planning Approval

• EAI 093 – BREEAM MAN02 Credit omission

• EAI 094 – Building C Fitout and Metalwork Packages

• EAI 095 – Town Hall Intumescent paint

• EAI 096 – Public Art Design

• EAI 097 – Feature Stair Curtains

• EAI 098 – MSCP Access Control/Park Mark/CCTV

• EAI 099 – Blind Box Design

Progress Report 25 - 30.05.24

• EAI 100 – Woodland Walk Widening Design

• EAI 101 – WC Frameless Grilles

• EAI 102 – Omission of Tea Point Fans & Ducts

• EAI 103 – Wiring Accessories

• EAI 104 – Blind Box Construction Rev3

• EAI 105 – Disabled Refuge Phone Recess

• EAI 106 – Public Art Schematic & Connection

• EAI 107 – RAF Omissions

• EAI 108 – Galv Brackets

• EAI 109 – Building A Baby Changing

• EAI 110 – Building C roof Landscaping

• EAI 111 – Building A Level 9 AHU Clash

• EAI 112 – Service Yard Door

• EAI 113 – Building A & B Manifestation

• EAI 114 – Building C Shower Shelf

• EAI 115 – SMART Network Infrastructure

• EAI 116 – BOH Door

• EAI 117 – Building B Changing Places Instruction

• EAI 118 – Access Control Hardware & CCTV Mounts

• EAI 119 – Brook Street Trees

• EAI 120 – Water Reduction

• EAI 121 – Floor Screed

• EAI 122 – Irrigation to Building C

• EAI 123 – RAF Levels

• EAI 124 – Terrazzo Benching (Building C)

• EAI 125 – Public Art Detailed Design

• EAI 126 – MSCP Expenditure (Ext. Doors, Louvres, Vinyl, Cycle Storage)

15.5 Project Cash Flow

• Cashflow issued on 1st December 22 in line with Townhall Instruction

• Cashflow Rev 1 issued on 8th August 23

• Cashflow Rev 2 issued on 6th February 24

• Cashflow Rev 3 issued on 6th March 24

Progress Report 25 - 30.05.24

16 Warranty / Sub-Contract / Appointment Tracker

• See attached

• Key Changes in the period

o Warranties – Francis Hunter have issued client version as a REV E Tracker

o Certified Sub-Contracts

▪ Sub-Sub-Contracts – clarity needed around certifying of these

▪ MCLH to issue any further redacted Sub-Contracts upon signing

17 Procurement schedule

Key Changes in the Period

• Building A & B - see attached

• Building C - see attached

18 Commercial and Contractual (in the Period)

• Early Access Protocol

o DRAFT issued to Francis Hunter

▪ Overbury/Mace have returned comments

o Early Access Protocol meetings ongoing with Overbury & Mace

o Point cloud Survey Parameters issued by MCLH

• Early Warnings

o EWN 001 – Brooke Street Closure; issued on 24/03/23

o EWN 002 – Thames Water; issued on 18/10/23

o EWN 003 – UKPN Wayleaves; issued on 19/03/24

• Relevant Events

o RE 001 – Deferment – EOT 01 issued

o RE 002 – Deferment – EOT 01 issued

o RE 003 – Townhall Design – EOT 02 issued

o RE 004 – Townhall Construction – EOT 3 issued

o RE 005 – Smart Buildings – EOT to be issued

Progress Photos

Block A Unitised Progressing

Progress Report 25 - 30.05.24

Block B Pump Room Progressing

Progress Report 25 - 30.05.24

Building C Roof Progressing

Progress Report 25 - 30.05.24

Car Park Metalwork Ongoing

Progress Report 25 - 30.05.24

Report 25 - 30.05.24

Report 25 - 30.05.24

Report 25 - 30.05.24

Project Honey BREEAM Tracker - Design Stage

Please

Training,

Monitoring

principal contractor. The principal contractor analyses these items.

Draft letter template under review with McL&H - please sign and send back

Early stage site activity: CLOCS and CCS accreditation being sought by McL&H certificate of compliance and 1st CCS repor issued, performance on track.

Draft letter template under review with

McL&H has registered the site with SMARTWaste - this is the confirmed method for monitoring and reporting energy and water consumption

PLEASE CONTINUE TO PROVIDE MONTHLY UPDATES AND AN UPDATED REPORT ON COMPLETION OF PROJECT

Draft

Transport impacts must be monitored. This information must be recorded in SMARTWaste (or similar) for credit to be targeted.

PLEASE ENSURE THIS IS MONITORED AND PROVIDE MONTHLY UPDATES AND AN UPDATED REPORT ON COMPLETION OF PROJECT

A copy of the architectural acoustic and BS reports confirm that the requirements are being targeted.

SQA has provided confirmation proposed design is expected to achieve indoor ambient noise levels that comply with the design ranges given in Section 7 of BS 8233:2014.

McLH - confirmation has been provided SQA is appointed to provide this post-completion review. McLH to provide written confirmation as per letter template.

Marked-up

McL&H

Proposed plan to be discussed:

Dedicated and safe cycle paths are provided from the site entrance to any cycle storage, and connect to offsite cycle paths where applicable.

Adequate external lighting in accordance with BS 5489-1:2013 Lighting of roads and public amenity areas.

2. Appropriate sized, designed and constructed. The following publications offer guidance on how to demonstrate this:

a. Local transport Note 2/08 Cycle infrastructure design, Department of Transport, 2008. b. Sustrans design guidance (www.sustrans.org.uk), specifically the Sustrans design manual handbookfor cyclefriendly design

Dedicated and safe footpaths are provided on and around the site providing suitable links for the following:

a The site entrance to the building entrance

b Car parks (where present) to the building entrance

c The building to outdoor space

d Connecting to off-site paths where applicable.

Pedestrian drop-off areas are designed off, or adjoining to, the access road and should provide direct access to other footpaths.

Where vehicle delivery access and drop-off areas form part of the assessed development, the following apply: Delivery areas are not accessed through general parking areas and do not cross or share the following: a pedestrian and cyclist paths b outside amenity areas accessible to building users and general public.

There is a dedicated parking or waiting area for goods vehicles with appropriate separation from the manoeuvring area and staff and visitor car parking.

Parking and turning areas are designed for simple manoeuvring according to the type of delivery vehicle likely to access the site, avoiding the need for repeated shunting.

Specifications

Watt AND All external light fittings are automatically controlled for prevention of operation during daylight hours and presence detection in areas of intermittent pedestrian traffic.

The above requirements include decorative & floodlighting.'

Emergency light fittings, including security lighting, that are also used for normal operation are assessed for this issue - please confirm if this will be the case.

External lighting drawings still to be provided confirming compliance with requirements.

Please obtain appropriate confrimation and spec and drawings from external lighting designer.

LZCT feasibility study has been

Specified local LZC technologies for the building have been shown in line with the feasibility study recommendation.

The reduced regulated carbon dioxide (CO ₂ -eq) emissions have been reported.

Copies of Part L received. energy specialist - Patel Jayesh, CIBSE reg.

3

2

1

Schenatics

Water

1.a

supply and the buildings under assessment.

2 The leak detection system is:

2.a A permanent automated water leak detection system that alerts the building occupants to the leak OR an inbuilt automated diagnostic procedure for detecting leaks

2.b Activated when the flow of water passing through the water meter or data logger is at

2.c

high or low level, over set time periods. Although high and low level leakage rates are not specified, the leak detection equipment installed must have the flexibility to distinguish between different flow rates to enable it to be programmed to suit the building type and owner's or occupier's usage patterns.

2.d Programmable to suit the owner's or occupier's water consumption criteria

2.e Where applicable, designed to avoid false alarms caused by normal operation of large water consuming plant such as chillers.

Where there is physically no space for a leak detection system between the utilities water meter and the building, alternative solutions can be used, provided that a major leak can still be detected.

Schematics have been provided confirming presence.

Leak detection - Page 334 clause M1-7 - Please provide additional specifications details: 1.a On the utilities water supply within the buildings, to detect any major leaks within the buildings AND

1.b Between the buildings and the utilities water supply, to detect any major leaks between the utilities

2 The leak detection system is:

2.a A permanent automated water leak detection system that alerts the building occupants to the leak OR an inbuilt automated diagnostic procedure for detecting leaks - PLEASE CONFIRM

2.b Activated when the flow of water passing through the water meter or data logger is at a flow rate above a pre ‐set maximum for a pre ‐set period of time. It does not necessarily require a system that directly detects water leakage along part or the whole length of the water supply system

2.c Able to identify different flow and therefore leakage rates, e.g. continuous, high or low level, over set time periods. Although high and low level leakage rates are not specified, the leak detection equipment installed must have the flexibility to distinguish between different flow rates to enable it to be programmed to suit the building type and owner's or occupier's usage patterns.

2.d Programmable to suit the owner's or occupier's water consumption criteria

2.e Where applicable, designed to avoid false alarms caused by normal operation of large water consuming plant such as chillers.

Template

Certs being

Calculation is underway.

DAA has

review and assessment additional narrative has been provided in addition to the drawings issued.

Confirmation design provides adequate protection for exposed parts of the building from material degradation.

Drawings and strategy confirm and demonstrate i) there is convenient access to the roof and façade for costeffective cleaning, replacement and repair in the building's design and ii) the roof and façade has been designed to prevent water damage, ingress and detrimental ponding

Progess is on-going. - report has been updated to include Technical Design Stage. consider methods that have been adopted that aim to optimise the use of materials to cover all of the following stages:

a. Preparation and Brief (e.g. re-use, adaption and expansion of existing building / services, need for flexibility and adaptability etc.)

b.

Please

This

of overheating

- Ene 01 approach, Maximise energy efficiency to tackle energy demand

- Ene 04 approach, passive design - Maximise opportunities to avoid unnecessary carbon emissions

- Mat 05 approach - durability and resilience - Avoid increased risks of deterioration and higher maintenance demands

- Pol 03 - Minimise the risks of increased flood risk and surface water run-off affecting the site or others Conduct

Ecological value of site

Site survey:

A Suitably Qualified Ecologist (SQE) carries out a survey and evaluation for the site early enough to influence site preparation works, layout and, where necessary, strategic planning decisions (typically Preparation and brief stage) .

The SQE’s survey and evaluation determines the site’s ecological baseline, including:

a Current and potential ecological value and condition of the site and related areas within the Zone of Influence.

b Direct and indirect risks to current ecological value from the project.

c Capacity and feasibility for enhancement of the site's ecological value and, where relevant, areas within the Zone of Influence.

Recommendations and data collected from the survey and evaluation are shared with appropriate project team members to influence decisions made for activities during site preparation, design and construction works, which can support ecological features.

Determining ecological outcomes:

The project team liaise and collaborate with representative stakeholders early enough to influence key planning decisions (typically Concept Design stage), to:

a Identify the optimal ecological outcomes for the site.

b Identify, appraise and select measures to meet the optimal ecological outcomes for the site, in line with the mitigation hierarchy of action, according to the route being used:

1. Avoidance

2. Protection

3. Reduction or limitation of negative impacts

4. On site compensation and 5. Enhancement, considering the capacity and feasibility within the site, or where viable, offsite. 2

LE 02's 'Survey and evaluation and Determining ecological outcomes’ criteria have been achieved.

1 credit: Further planning to avoid and manage negative ecological impacts on-site is carried out early enough to influence the concept design and design brief as well as site preparation planning (typically Concept Design stage). On-site measures for managing negative ecological impacts during site preparation and construction are implemented inpractice.

The above is based on input from the project team in collaboration with representative stakeholders and data collated as part of the ‘Determining ecological outcomes’ in LE 02 Ecological risks and opportunities

1 or 2 credits: Achieve 1st credit.

Negative impacts from site preparation and construction works are managed according to the mitigation hierarchy: No overall loss of ecological value has occurred (two credits).

OR The loss of ecological value has been minimised (Minimising Loss) (one credit)

where this is not feasible, b Off site within the Zone of Influence.

Data collated are analysed and where potentially valuable, provided to the local environmental records centres nearest to, or relevant for, the site 1 1 Feb-23

A copy of the ecology report has been provided and confirms site is of low ecological value.

Written confirmation required from Landscpae architect: - that the ecologist report was received at an early enough stage to help inform the landscaping and ecological enhancement strategy

- that the project team liaised and collaborated with representative stakeholders early enough to influence key planning decisions (typically Concept Design stage), to:

a Identify the optimal ecological outcomes for the site.

b Identify, appraise and select measures to meet the optimal ecological outcomes for the site, in line with the mitigation hierarchy of action:

1. Avoidance

2. Protection

3. Reduction or limitation of negative impacts

4. On site compensation and 5. Enhancement, considering the capacity and feasibility within the site, or where viable, offsite.

Ecologist has visited site and confirms compliance is being met.

McL&H to sign and return letter template, confirming below

One credit – Planning and measures on-site

Further planning is required to be carried out for activities during site clearance and construction. McLH to confirm mitigation strategy - requirement for On-site measures for managing negative ecological impacts during site preparation and construction are implemented in-practice (e.g. mitigation measures to protect existing ecological features), as per ecologist recommendations.

Two credits Managing negative impacts the following hierarchy must be followed when managing negative impacts of the site preparation and construction works:

– Avoidance of negative impacts on habitats and features of ecological value on the site.

– If it is not possible to avoid negative impacts completely; protect habitats and features of ecological value from damage during development works in accordance with best practice guidelines to minimise negative impacts.

- If it is not possible to achieve the above, fully reduce, limit or control negative impacts as far as possible

- Where it is not possible for avoidance, protection, limitation or control of the negative impacts on features of ecological value on site; compensation has taken place to ensure the existing ecological value is maintained during and after the project.

This builds on the measures agreed for delivering optimal ecological outcomes in LE 02 Ecological risks and opportunities.

Commit to ensuring measures are implemented that enhance ecological value, which are based on input from the project team and SQE in collaboration with representative stakeholders and data collated as part of the ‘Determining ecological outcomes’ in LE 02.

This issue intends to recognise enhancement measures that have been carried out in line with good practice recommended by an SQE, which build on mitigation measures taken in LE 03. enhancement measures must meaningfully enhance the site's ecological value - it would be benefical to discuss and agree this with input from the SQE.

McLH - please complete letter template - written confirmation compliance will be monitored against all relevant UK, EU or international legislation relating to the ecology of the site, as per SQE recommendation and that measures will be implemented as per SQE recommendations.

Landscape architect - please confirm final design. ecologist has deemed current proposals appropriate.

Three credits are to be targeted and will be awarded based on the change in ecological value occurring as a result of the project. This must be calculated in accordance with the process set out in GN36 - BREEAM, CEEQUAL and HQM Ecology Calculation Methodology – Route 2. Credits are awarded in line with the Reward Scale table in GN36 where there are no residual impacts on protected sites or irreplaceable habitats.

Biodiversity metric confirms significant net gain.

Pre-requisite

The client or contractor has confirmed that compliance is being monitored against all relevant UK, EU and international standards relating to the ecology of the site.

Comprehensive route (Route 2) - Criterion 8 in LE 03 has been achieved (Negative impacts from site preparation and construction works have been managed according to the mitigation hierarchy, in line with the SQE's recommendations) and at least one credit under LE04 for 'Change and Enhancement of Ecology' has been awarded.

Measures have been implemented to manage and maintain ecology throughout the project. These measures are based on input from the project team in collaboration with representative stakeholders and data collated as part of the ‘Determining ecological outcomes’ in LE 02 To ensure the optimal ecological outcomes agreed in LE 02 are met in-practice, these measures must monitor and review the effectiveness of the mitigation and enhancement measures in place for LE 03 & LE 04 to ensure they are implemented.

Management and maintenance throughout the project

- Contractor nominates biodiversity champion - Contractor trains the site workforce on how to protect site ecology during the project - Contractor records actions taken to protect biodiversity and monitor their effectiveness A new ecologically valuable habitat appropriate to the local area is created

- Where flora and/or fauna habitats exist on-site, the contractor programmes site works to minimise disturbance to wildlife

A section on Ecology and Biodiversity has been included as part of the tenant or building owner information supplied, to inform the owner or occupant of local ecological features, value and biodiversity on or near the site. This should include detailed management and maintenance plans as required by landscape and asset managers as well as relevant parts of the handover information for occupiers written in a format that encourages understanding and supportive behaviours 1 1

Contractor to confirm compliance will be monitored against all relevant UK, EU and international standards relating to the ecology of the site.

McLH to please confirm measures will be implemented to manage and maintain ecology throughout the project - as per letter template.

For brownfield sites, drainage measures are specified so that the peak rate of run-off from the site to the watercourses (natural or municipal) shows a 30% improvement for the developed site compared with the predeveloped site. This should comply at the 1-year and 100-year return period events.

For Greenfield sites, drainage measures are specified so that the peak rate of run-off from the site to the watercourses (natural or municipal) is no greater for the developed site than it was for the pre-development site. This should comply at the 1-year and 100-year return period events.

Relevant

Surface water run-off rate calcs have been provided for 1-year and 100-year.

Calculations appear to demonstrate that a 40% allowance for climate change has been provided.

Written summary confirmation has been provided demonstrating compliance can be met: Confirmation that surface water run-off design solutions are bespoke, i.e. they take account of the specific site requirements and natural or man-made environment of and surrounding the site. Please confirm the priority levels detailed in BREEAM have been followed, with justification given where water is allowed to leave the site. For brownfield sites, drainage measures are specified so that the peak rate of run-off from the site to the watercourses (natural or municipal) shows a 30% improvement for the developed site compared with the predeveloped site. This should comply at the 1-year and 100-year return period events. OR For Greenfield sites, drainage measures are specified so that the peak rate of run-off from the site to the watercourses (natural or municipal) is no greater for the developed site than it was for the pre-development site. This should comply at the 1-year and 100-year return period events.

Please confirm calculations and reports are for both buildings, noted Building A and Building B on the submitted drawings.

Please confirm maintenance agreements for the ownership, long term operation and maintenance of all specified Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) are in place.

Calculations have been provided.

Calculations and reports are for both buildings, noted Building A and Building B on the submitted drawings.

Flooding of property will not occur in the event of local drainage system failure (caused either by extreme rainfall or a lack of maintenance); AND EITHER

Drainage design measures are specified so that the post-development run-off volume, over the development lifetime, is no greater than it would have been prior to the assessed site’s development. This must be for the 100year 6-hour event, including an allowance for climate change.

Any additional predicted volume of run-off for this event is prevented from leaving the site by using infiltration or other SuDS techniques.

OR (only where criteria above cannot be achieved):

Justification from the appropriate consultant indicating why the above criteria cannot be achieved, i.e. where infiltration or other SuDS techniques are not technically viable options.

Drainage design measures are specified so that the post-development peak rate of run-off is reduced to the limiting discharge. The limiting discharge is defined as the highest flow rate from the following options:

a.The pre-development one-year peak flow rate

b. The mean annual flow rate (Qbar)

c. 2L/s/ha.

For the one-year peak flow rate, the one-year return period event criterion applies.

For either option, above calculations must include an allowance for climate change; this should be made in accordance with current best practice planning guidance.

Please also confirm relevant maintenance agreements for the ownership, long term operation and maintenance of all specified SuDS are in place.

Aecom CMT report

To: FrancisHunter – Luke Nurser

CC: meeting distribution

Monthly Report : TA/CMT No 23: 29/05/24

Report up to 28/05/2024

1. Key Actions in Month

1.1 Review meeting to clear comments on Stage 5 drgs & tech subs

1.2 Review of packages on Viewpoint – Stage 5 tech subs are ongoing .

1.3 Site visit No7 for MEP – SVR issued.

1.4 Review of power on & HV/LV switchrooms

1.5 Meeting re proposed commissioning/demo process.

2. Status of Document Submittals

AECOM Sunley House 4 Bedford Park Croydon CR0 2AP, UK T +44(0)203 043 9200 aecom.com

Project name: Project Honey - Kingston Project ref: 60627560

By : D Emerson

Date: 29/05/24

2.1 Workshop held to agree remaining comments - Comments issued on submittals as per MCLH notes of review.

3. Any key issues / comments / quality issues related to site/Test activities

3.1 see SVR007. Installation benchmarks reviewed on visit & comments noted.

3.2 Comments raided on power on & HV/LV rooms – response awaited.

4. Key actions for next month

4.1 Review of o/s package comments to be submitted as per MCLH list

4.2 Continue schedule of visits.

4.3 Agreement on close out process

4.4 Comments on HV/LV switchrooms

5. Key decisions required / variations

5.1 Commissioning / demo and completion programme.

6. Any CDM issues

6.1 n/a

MNP CMT report

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

1 General Progress of the Works: Site Works

No. of CMR site visits to date: 19

MNP last attended site on 14th May 2024.

• The focus of MNP work this month has been on the review of low concrete cube results, which have been reported on by RBG and issued for review on 28th March 2024. The final MNP CMR report will be issued before the end of the Month.

• We also met with McL&H on site and reviewed line-by-line our ongoing site observations tracker, and closed items where evidence has been provided by McL&H. A number of items remain open and McL&H are collating evidence to demonstrate which have been closed.

• MNP attended site at the invitation of McL&H for the final snagging walk over Block C – The Car Park. Observations are reported within this document. Our general observation is that the car park is yet to be completed, and as such, is not in a position to be snagged. We have made recommendations in this report to show the matters to be addressed, many of which have been reported in earlier site observation reports. The design architect and engineer are to review and provide input in the close out process. MNP will next attend when McL&H snagging is completed.

• The majority of defects in the car park can be addressed by making good, but we draw attention to the water ingress which appears to be ongoing after waterproofing installation. An architectural rview of the waterproofing is required. We have raised some concerns in this report.

• The water entry continues to affect concrete and steel beams which must be made good. Steel delta beams are corroding and we highlight concerns about how these can be effectively remediated given that the concrete now obscures the steel

• We are informed that the planning condition tracker is currently being updated. We will report on final condition status on receipt of this document.

General view on Level 7 mezzanine deck roof

Waterproofing has been completed and insulation is in place ready for the creation of the landscaped area. The inspection followed a night of heavy rain and the photographs at lower levels will show how there is still substantial water ingress to the building. The source of the water is unknown as there are some open aspects to the car park, but we have to question whether the waterproofing is effective.

It is important that this is determined before the landscaping is installed to avoid having to remove finishes at a later date to access waterproofing.

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024 2

General view on south side high level roof

Waterproofing is complete on the deck but there is no waterproofing or finish to the top of the parapet walls at the opening Normal cracks in the top of the wall will be subject to wet and dry / freeze and thaw and we expect that cracks will degrade over time. The waterproofing partly laps over the parapet, and around temporary posts. Is there to be a capping applied later?

We noted area of local damage in the top of the wall and grout holes that were not fully infilled, leading to pooling. Looking down the shaft we see that the joints between PCC are rough and partly filled. Will the shaft be covered to prevent water entry?

The outlet to the roof is not to a hopper so water will run down the wall. There is some pooling of rainwater on the waterproofing so we can conclude that a positive fall has not been made to the gully point.

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23 17th May 2024

Visible water ingress through PCC joists indicates that waterproofing is not as required above. Damage to PCC staircase nosing to be made good. External waterproofing at deck level is installed. Architect to comment on system which appears to be a bitumen single layer bonded system

Level 7 Mezzanine South Staircase

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

4

Steel angle supports to underside of high-level roof are pointed but surface rust is visible and appears to be developing. The steels must be protected to prevent corrosion. Details of the paint and confirmation of design life requested. Environment is external but sheltered from rain.

Visible water ingress through PCC joists to soffit of slab. Concrete fillet is de-bonded in placed and came loose when pressed. Joints to be made good.

Level 7 Mezzanine North Staircase

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23 17th May 2024 5.

Level 7 Mezzanine North

15mm deep pooled water against the access to the north staircases shaft. Incomplete waterproofing at junction to be made good after removal of temporary edge barrier.

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

6. Steel beams within body of main car park

Steel Delta Beams are protected by a paint system which has failed under constant wetting during the construction period. Water is still trapped within the beams, which are wet, and water is seeping out from the elastomeric bearing strip, indicating that there is water trapped in the system.

The paint has failed and must be repaired to give a full design life. Access is easily achieved from the soffit but there is no access to the steel below the bearing strip. The designer must provide a solution. The steel requires protection and cannot be accepted as unprotected. We are concerned that an effective repair may not be achievable without some sort of intrusive works / investigations. The designer is to make a proposal for investigation and repair.

Furthermore, concrete repairs close to the ends of the Delta Beams are rough and poorly designed. In places the concrete traps water against the steel beams and obscures repair to the paint system. The concrete has been moulded to form a detail, but does not appear to be aesthetically acceptable in our view. The architect must provide comment before this can be accepted.

A sample repair to the paint system has been completed at level 2. This appears to provide a good level of coverage to the soffit but the paint protects only the visible face of the steelwork. The paint appears patchy and we would recommend that a full repaint may be required to achieve an acceptable product.

We must receive an acceptable plan of action to protect the steel before snagging is completed to avoid potentially abortive works No works can be effectively undertaken until water is excluded from the system and the steels dry out in our opinion

Bear in mind, the final in-use structure will be subjected to de-icing salts so we expect corrosion so accelerate in-use. Solutions must be fit for the final use.

Sample of photographs follows to demonstrate the issue of concern, which are widespread;

Water trapped within hollow core and joint has compromised the paint protection.

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

Water ingress at bearing. Hand trowelled concrete repair. Rust stains on concrete,

Water ingress at joint in slabs has caused corrosion

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

Examples of concrete repair mortar up against painted steelwork The concrete repair prevents paint repair and must be removed locally. Paint has been scuffed and damaged – visible in rust pattern.

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

Untidy detail. Concrete infill to be improved and please remove protecting film from bearing to improve aesthetic Steel has water damage and was wet to touch (u/s L07 mezz).

Water ingress affecting paint system and causing rust. Underside of beam wet after overnight rain.

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23 17th May 2024

Active water ingress at a lower level leading to wetting of the hidden steel.

Repaired beam at Level L02 – paint to soffit only

Repaired beam at Level L02 – paint to soffit only

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23 17th May 2024

Staircases within body of main car park Concrete formed to a basic level of finish

7. Concrete structures within body of main car park

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23 17th May 2024

Water trapped in hollow pot flooring is seeping out Wet to touch. Stalactites forming.

Water seeping out of bearing of PCC to edge beams.

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23 17th May 2024

Damaged concrete bearing and exposes PT strand rusting. Water ingress appears to be live.

Water staining at joints between PCC units. Appears to be historic. Laitance to be removed.

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

Water staining at joints between PCC units and edge beam. Appears to be historic. Laitance to be removed.

Water staining at joints between PCC units at depth change. Appears to be historic Light laitance but it should be removed.

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

Saw cut movement joint has been stopped each side of longitudinal joint Joint must continue to avoid cracking. Joints to be sealed to prevent debris ‘locking off’ movement joints.

Active water ingress running down ramp walls at hollow-core joints, suggesting hollow cores may be water filled and that waterproofing maybe ineffective above. To be resolved and laitance and staining to be addressed.

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

Long term water run off onto ramp slab has revealed aggregate in top surface. Water ingress to be dealt with and concrete to be cleaned of debris.

Heavy laitance and staining and local repair to spine beam. Concrete must be prepared to remove laitance and staining prior to final inspection. The level of staining is not as expected in a new concrete car park and requires significant improvement.

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

Heavy laitance and staining and local repair to spine beam. Concrete must be prepared to remove laitance and staining prior to final inspection. The level of staining is not as expected in a new concrete car park and requires significant improvement.

Open gap at central spine to be protected to prevent falls. Bearing of PCC spine beam appears to have a difference of circa 25mm Responsible structural engineer to comment as to whether this is acceptable within design criteria

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

Uneven bearing and heavy laitance and staining. Active water ingress – dripping off stalactites. Ensure waterproofing above is effective. RE: stepped bearing; responsible structural engineer to comment as to whether this is acceptable within design criteria Concrete to be cleaned and prepared in final snagging. Rough joint between PCC hollow-core planks to be made good.

Rough finished concrete at floor gully requires repair to avoid degradation over time. Not acceptable in current form.

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

Stepped corbel cracking has been repaired over part of the column head only. Complete repair work as part of final snagging.

Untidy detail at PCC interfaces and some debris in joint. To be revisited as part of snagging.

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

Active water ingress reaching Level 5 mezzanine slab. Water is moving through the building.

Active water ingress through ramp corbels at Level 5

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23 17th May 2024

Active water ingress at level 5 spine

Voiding within open cores to be made good to protect the rebar in the PCC planks

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23 17th May 2024

Water ingress in stair core to Level 5 mezzanine

Active water ingress to Level 5 ramp soffit

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

Staircase landing slab step to be made good to prevent trips. Step is approx. 5mm

Unacceptable staining and laitance at Level L04

Active water ingress in Level 4 staircores

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

Untidy joint in PCC and visible twist in bearing. Damaged concrete at corner of PCC. To be revisited in snagging.

Staircase landing slab step to be made good to prevent trips. Step is approx. 5mm

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

Water ingress through joint in staircase at L04 – appears historic but laitance must be removed.

Severe trip hazard at level L02 – circa 25mm. Architect to review and comment but this does not appear to be acceptable and the floor must be made good to avoid trips and ankle twists.

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23 17th May 2024

8. Lower Level Car Park Uses

Water-staining at level L01 is not damp to touch. Clean off laitance.

Blockwork and insulation installations are still in progress

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23 17th May 2024

Rough finished concrete to be revisited as part of snagging.

Trip hazard at entry to staircase cores to be made good.

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

Water entry from roof down M&E shafts. Are the openings to be covered? Water ingress to dry staircases is not acceptable.

Rough finish surface to staircase fire escape to be improved to avoid trips.

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

Water penetration through external blockwork to be resolved.

Statement required from Superstructure and Substructure Engineers to confirm misalignment of systems can be accommodated by the designed systems.

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

Vehicle damage to two perimeter blockwork panels. Wall panels to be reconstructed. End panel has slipped its bearing, and a second panel has an impact strike crack pattern.

Temporary bund to prevent water ingress to lift pit to be made good. Concrete repair required to damaged corner PCC panel.

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23 17th May 2024

Exposed rebar in top of L00 corridor ramp to be repaired to ensure required cover is maintained.

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

Finishing works to be completed at front elevation – PCC holes to be infilled. External skin to be added to wall.

Cut rebar in face of wall to be protected by render repair product to prevent corrosion

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23 17th May 2024

Blockwork point to be completed

Rear elevation progress

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

Front elevation progress

2 General Progress of the Works: Design Submissions

The following packages have been reviewed, blue items within this period. Refer to Appendix B: Technical Submission Tracker.

• Attenuation product data sheet (ahead of final design information)

• Piling Specification – RBG

• Piling Package – Van Elle

• RBG Loading Plans

• RBG Building A Superstructure GAs (design still in progress)

• RBG Building B Superstructure GAs (design still in progress)

• RBG Building C Substructure (in progress)

• RBG Drainage

• RBG Building A and B Pile-caps

• RBG Building C Piling

• RBG Block B revised loading plans

• RBG Block B Foundation Revision

• RBG Block B L10 Revision

• McL&H Benchmark Columns

• RBG Block A Core Plans

• RBG Block B Core Plans

• RBG Block C Drainage

• RBG Block A Townhall Steelwork

• RBG Block C Drainage

• RBG Blocks B and C Cores

• RBG Block A L06 amendment

• RBG Block A,B,C concrete cube report

3 Contractor’s Quality Control

Implementation of the Contractor’s Quality Control Systems in relation to ERs and Building Contract We can confirm that the design development and/or construction work carried out to date has been regularly inspected/reviewed by the Contractor in this period of reporting

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

We list any suspected defective work and recommend procedures for remedial action including, where necessary, a regime of testing or exposure. Refer to Appendix A: Site observations tracker.

4 Statutory Approval Status

Report on current status of local authority and other statutory approvals relating to Civil and Structural Engineering. Discharge of reserved planning matters or conditions. We report in reference to Eden Campus Conditions Matrix (Chartplan) tracker dated 23/08/2023 Refer to Appendix C: Planning conditions tracker. There has been no change to status of conditions since this date.

Approval of Building Regulations submissions and discharge of any conditions hereto.

• All building control approvals are recorded in the McL&H monthly contractor’s report.

Comment on satisfaction of Building Inspector’s routine inspections.

• No Building Regulation Inspection Reports are known to have been submitted.

5 Prohibited Materials

MNP has not become aware in carrying out its duties under the Appointment and/or this deed that any of the materials or substances referred to in clause 6 of this agreement (Prohibited Materials) are being or has been used in the Development.

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

Appendix A – Site Observation Tracker

1 22.07.22

Demolition of the NCP car park is approaching the shared foundation with Lever House. Discussions with the demolition contractor on site indicated that the presence of the shared foundation may not be well understood

2 24.08.22 Demolition of the NCP car park is approaching the shared foundation with Lever House. McL&H and RGB attending site to monitor demo works in vicinity of shared foundation.

The demolition contractor is to demonstrate by RAMS how the works in the vicinity of the shared foundations are to be controlled and the main contractor team is to put in place controls to ensure that the Lever House foundation is protected.

3 20.10.22 No additional comments to make No additional comments to make

4 28.11.22

Rebar cage in Block B central core pile has displaced

5 28.11.22 Rebar to top of Block A pile cap appears to be set lower than the cover zone.

6 11.01.23

Check the cover on the pile is as required to ensure durability meets the ERs (Reviewed May 2024) - McL&H and Van Elle to comment.

Check the cover over the rebar cage is as expected and that it complies with the design intent, and controls cracking.

Excavation close to Brook St bus stops. MNP discuss temporary stability of berm on site with McL&H who confirm temporary stability has been discussed with RBG and earth is stable No additional comments to make

7 11.01.23 MNP / McL&H review Field View Quality system in site office.

8 21.02.23 Column rebar arrangement in a Block A column. Lower start bars set inboard of cranked bar..

9 24.02.23

Block A L01 slab soffit – rebar marking and grout leakage at day joints.

10 24.02.23 Block A L01,L02 slab soffit – Most of the soffit is very good but some areas of poorer finish are emerging.

Good QA/QC systems in place. No additional comments to make.

McL&H asked to check rebar arrangement is as required and log via field view.

McL&H to check rebar pattern is not associated with low cover (it looks like staining only from rebar stored on the shutter). McL&H to comment as to whether the staining will be removed and to review shutter cleaning near rebar stock pile locations. (Reviewed May 2024) - McL&H to comment.

McL&H to comment on how marking can be avoided by the subcontractor in the future. Check ply liners are not damaged and are cleaned. 11 24.02.23 Block A L02 Column – Grout leakage from slab at head and blow holes require repair.

To be addressed prior to offering for inspection. Agree repair with client by establishing benchmark for repaired column. We recommend grout at head of column is removed by slab follow up team after shutters are removed to limit staining potential.

24.02.23 Block A L02 lift lobby. Grout

To be addressed prior to offering for inspection. Recommend establishing a benchmark area at an earlier stage to set expectations for exposed concrete finish.

To be reviewed and discussed with concrete contractor to ensure quality of finishes can be achieved by the follow up team

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

19 30.08.23

20 30.08.23

21 03.10.23

22 03.10.23

23 03.10.23

24 03.10.23

Plywood closures have been fitted to the flood void entry points to prevent vermin entering the voids. The flood void is therefore closed.

Block C Ramp Tie pars have been cold worked and do not align with topping / tie slots in PCC

Block C – Overspill concrete in flood void to be removed

Block C – Use of PT tendon as tie bar through Delta Beams

Block C – Damage to PCC elements to be repairs prior to handover to McL&H for snagging

Block B – L09 slab construction joint – remove laitance form shutter prior to pour

25 03.10.23 Block B – Core door enlargement – cover protection to be added

26 23.10.23 Block A – Steel beams in Town Hall are propped with two floors of RC cast above

27 23.10.23 Block A – L6 slab soffit appears to be very wet so looks highly variable

A Town Hall steel

Does this affect the flood performance of the site during the works? Could there be adverse comment from the EA?

Post 3/10/23 visit – suggest McL&H simply have a policy to remove covers in the case that the site is shut down through a flood event.

McL&H to review and advise how the tie bars will be resolved. (Reviewed on site May 2024) - McL&H to comment

McL&H confirmed this has been completed (May 2024) –SV meeting on site.

McL&H to review and confirm this is as the required tie detail (Reviewed on site May 2024) - McL&H to comment

McL&H confirmed on site that this will happen. Snagging will on be when the PCC formally offers the system. (Reviewed on site May 2024) - McL&H to comment

McL&H confirmed on site that this in on their snagging schedule

McL&H confirmed on site that this in on their snagging schedule (Reviewed on site May 2024) - McL&H to comment

McL&H to confirm TW release strategy to avoid ‘shocking’ the concrete structure above when steel deflects.

Assumed to be storm related – MNP to inspect when dry

to confirm they have primed site welding prior to over coating and site welds have test certifications. 29 06.12.23

A Roof – Poorly formed column

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

43 15.05.24 Block C – Widespread construction defects to be made good as part of final follow up snagging / clearing operations including;

• Water staining to concrete (laitance / stains)

• Damaged PCC with exposed rebar

• Misaligned PCC units

• Untidy concrete repairs

• Making good to joints required

• Steel delta beams corroded and wet

• Steel ledger angled to L08 roof paint required update – rust appearing

• Permanent edge protection to be installed

• Debris in PCC joints

• Voiding in cored concrete to be made good

• Exposed rebar in top of L00 ramp slab

• Block work pointing incomplete

• Temporary bunds to lifts to be removed

• Uneven surface in fire escapes

44 15.05.24

Appendix B – Technical Submission Tracker

McL&H to resolve all to final snagged state prior to final inspection. There is work to do.

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering Monthly Progress Report – Report 23 17th May 2024

220051 Eden Campus Kingston

Client Monitoring Report Civil & Structural Engineering

Monthly Progress Report – Report 23

17th May 2024

Appendix C - Planning Condition Tracker

Pending release of final tracker by FHPM/DAA

8. All works on site shall take place in accordance with…details which shall have…been submitted…in the form of a Demolition and Construction Environmental Management Plan.

9. The levels of buildings, roads, parking areas and pathways within the site shall… have previously been submitted to and approved in writing by the LPA before development is commenced.

10. Prior to the commencement… a Site Waste Management Plan/Circular Economy Statement shall be submitted…and approved in writing by the LPA.

14. Hard surfaces … shall be made of porous materials and … retained thereafter to direct run-off water … to a permeable or porous area or surface within the curtilage of the property.

19. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the details approved on 25.02.2022 Reference 21/04117/CLC (Written Scheme of Investigation WSI - Archaeology).

23. The development … shall not be commenced until a detailed Ecological Management Plan has been submitted …and agreed in writing by the LPA.

34. Should remedial works be required in relation to contaminated land, the remedial strategy shall be submitted to and agreed in writing by the LPA, prior to the commencement of the development works and remedial works. On completion of the agreed remedial works, a closure report and certificate of compliance endorsed by the interested party/parties, shall be submitted to and agreed in writing by the LPA, prior to occupation.

35. If during implementation, contamination is encountered, it shall be fully assessed and a contaminated land assessment and remedial strategy shall be agreed by the LPA before the additional remediation works are carried out. The strategy shall be implemented prior to completion of the development.

36. Prior to commencement of groundworks (excluding SI and demo), a final detailed drainage design, including drawings, calculations, SuDS Statement and Drainage Assessment Form shall be submitted to and approved by the LPA. A detailed management plan must also be submitted for the lifetime of the development.

37. No building shall be occupied until evidence is submitted to demonstrate that the SuDS scheme has been completed in accordance with the submitted details. The SuDS scheme shall be managed and maintained in accordance with the agreed management and maintenance plan

41 The development shall be carried out in accordance with the submitted FRA by Cole Easdon (ref: 7378, issue no.5; dated November 2020) and the following mitigation measures:

FFL no lower than 8.8mAOD for more vulnerable residential uses

FFL no lower than 8.4mAOD for less vulnerable commercial uses

FFL no lower than 7.9mAOD for the commercial reception area

Flood storage mitigation shall be provided Flood voids shall be installed

42 The development shall be carried out in accordance with the submitted Interim Flood Storage Scheme detailed within the letter from MNP to the Environment Agency (SV/ib/220051-04; dated 15 February 2021). The car park ramp tank will be implemented at the trigger points specified and remain in perpetuity until the demolition of Lever House is complete.

43 Prior to occupation, a maintenance plan to manage the flood voids and grilles over the lifetime of the development will be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the LPA in consultation with the EA.

44 Prior to occupation, a scheme detailing the flood resistance measures must be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the LPA with guidance from the EA. The scheme should include passive flood barriers up to 8.31 mAOD to protect the shared reception of the Hive and Honey Buildings and the car park basement access ramp, stairwell and lift lobbies.

45 Surface water draining from areas of car park hardstanding shall be passed through an oil separator or series of oil separators, prior to being discharged into any watercourse, soakaway or surface water sewer.

53 The development shall be implemented in accordance with the details approved on 07.03.2022 under reference 22/00292/CLC (Water re-use/harvesting).

59 No piling shall take place until a piling method statement (detailing the depth and type of piling to be undertaken and the methodology by which such piling will be carried out, including measures to prevent and minimise the potential for damage to subsurface water infrastructure, and the programme for the works) has been submitted to and approved in writing by the LPA in consultation with TW.

64 Prior to the occupation of each building the post-construction tab of the GLA’s whole life carbon assessment template should be completed accurately and in its entirety in line with the GLA’s Whole Life Carbon Assessment Guidance.

No

No No

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

No No

ORSA monthly CDM report

Site Inspection

0.0 Document Verification

Job Number 2800 Job Eden Campus

Document Title Site Inspection File Reference SI1 ORSA_H&S Site Inspection February 2024.docx

Document Information

Revision Issue Date Filename 2800_Eden Campus_ORSA Site Inspection_FJMK240524

A 26/05/24 Description Site Inspection

Prepared By Checked By Approved By Name Francis J M Kenny James Bucknall James Bucknall

Signature Date 24/05/24 dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy

Revision Issue Date Filename Description

Name

Prepared By Checked By Approved By

Signature Date dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy

Revision Issue Date Filename

dd/mm/yy Description

Name

Prepared By Checked By Approved By

Signature Date dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy

1.0 Key Project Details

Client Globe Kingston Ltd

Site Eden Campus, Eden Street, Kingston Upon Thames KT1 1ER.

Principal Contractor McLaughlin & Harvey Ltd

Inspected by Francis J M Kenny

Date 24 May 2024

Programme Completion due Sept 2024

2.0 Site Inspection

A site inspection of the Eden Campus Project was undertaken on the 24th May 2024 in the company of Jack Monaghan, Assistant Site Manager for Principal Contractor McLaughlin & Harvey Ltd.

The Project comprises the erection of 3 blocks. An 11-storey office block, a 9-storey office and retail block and a multi storey car park with 354 spaces.

The car park will contain ground floor changing area with showers and lockers. The office block will be occupied by Unilever when completed.

The purpose of the site inspection was to highlight any Health, Safety and Environmental observations and undertake a review of the on-site documentation in relation to the work activities that were being carried out.

3.0 Work activities ongoing at time of inspection

§ Roofing.

§ Glazing.

§ Metsec Partitioning.

§ Plaster Boarding.

§ Cladding.

§ M&E

§ Cable containment.

§ Rebar Installation.

§ Containment.

§ Waste removal.

§ Lifting operations.

§ Traffic management

§ Deliveries.

4.0 Site Attendance

The current average daily site attendance is approximately 240 including operatives and site management.

5.0 Accidents, Incidents & Near Misses

It was confirmed by Jack Monaghan that there have been no recorded accidents, incidents or near misses or Enforcing Authority visits since our last inspection.

6.0 Compliance Actions that the contractor needs to implement

Concluding this visit there were no issue or action raised, and all issues or actions raised last month have been addressed by McLaughlin & Harvey Ltd.

7.0 Comments

I conducted a thorough safety inspection of the project site, aiming to assess overall safety performance and ensure compliance with health and safety regulations and best practices.

Operatives continue to diligently following safety protocols with evident supervision, reflecting the management team's active engagement in promoting and enforcing safety measures, setting a commendable example for the project.

Biometric turnstiles effectively control site access, enhancing security and safety by permitting only authorized personnel entry.

The high-quality hoarding and fencing are regularly maintained, while up-to-date health and safety noticeboards ensure operatives are well-informed about safety requirements and legal obligations.

Daily hazard and briefing boards provide essential safety updates, enhancing operatives' awareness of potential hazards and safety precautions.

Adequate PPE usage was observed among all operatives, ensuring their safety during tasks.

While work areas, walkways, and routes were well-organised and maintained, dust management standards have been improved

Certified portable fire extinguishers and visible fire exit signage are crucial for emergency protection, while exclusion zones with effective barriers and signage minimize risks.

Method statements and risk assessments were deemed suitable, considering project-related health and safety risks.

Access to suitable first aid equipment and competent first aiders on-site ensure prompt medical attention.

The site offers adequate toilet and washing facilities, drinking water, and a well-maintained canteen area, with designated spaces for changing and storing clothing and PPE, prioritising workforce well-being and comfort.

Daily coordination briefings, while held, could be utilised more effectively to address safety improvement areas, thereby enhancing project standards and contributing to a wellcoordinated and safe work environment.

Documents observed while on site included:

§ Safety posters

§ Safety notice and hazard boards.

§ Permits.

8.0 Temporary Works Design & Coordination

McLaughlin & Harvey Ltd. has established a robust system to ensure that any temporary works installed on-site are appropriately designed and approved by competent engineers.

This measure is crucial to mitigate potential risks associated with temporary structures and ensure their stability throughout their intended use.

A comprehensive temporary works register is in place on the project. The register provides detailed information about all temporary works on-site, including their design specifications, installation dates, responsible personnel, and approval status, and the register is updated regularly to reflect any changes or new installations.

Andy Finnigan has been formally appointed as the responsible person for overseeing temporary works at the project site.

This appointment demonstrates a clear commitment to ensuring that temporary works are managed by a competent individual with the necessary expertise to assess and oversee their design, installation, and maintenance.

In line with best practices, McLaughlin & Harvey Ltd. has ensured that engineers responsible for designing and approving temporary works possess the required competencies and qualifications. This approach guarantees that temporary structures are designed and executed by individuals with the appropriate expertise.

9.0 Site Inspection Assessment Criteria below

The scoring criteria adopted for our site inspection is given as

10.0 Site Inspection Checklist & Actions

Observation

Project H&S Organisation

Project Arrangements

Project Risk Register

Project Methodology Statements

Inductions

Register/Notices/Forms

Permits to Work

Construction Phase Health & Safety Plan

Information

Communications/Consultation/Training

Site Establishment

Welfare-General

Canteen

Rest/Drying/Changing Room

First Aid

Sanitary/Washing Facilities

Walkways/safe routes

Fire escape routes

Access and Egress on site

Offices

Storage

Segregation of substances

Access / Egress

Site Boundary

Hoarding/Fence/Other

Security

Signage

Traffic Management

Status Comments

Acceptable Contained within the CPP.

Acceptable Project risk register available.

Acceptable In place for live works.

Acceptable Inductions carried out and recorded.

Acceptable Displayed.

Acceptable Issued and controlled.

Acceptable In place.

Acceptable Displayed on notice boards.

Acceptable Briefings undertaken daily.

Acceptable Good standard, clean and tidy. -

Acceptable Good standard, clean and tidy.

Acceptable Good standard, clean and tidy.

Acceptable First aid equipment available on site.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable Access and egress sufficient and not obstructed.

Acceptable Weil controlled

Acceptable Clean and tidy.

Acceptable Stored in line with COSHH assessment.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable Good standard and well maintained

Acceptable No issues identified.

Acceptable Good signage in place.

Acceptable Managed well.

Observation Status

One Way System?

Site internal turning

Banks man supervision

Vehicle/Pedestrian Segregation

Wheel wash

Site Access-General

Operations - Safety Management – Planning

Risk Assessment-General

Method Statement-General

Roles and Responsibilities-General

Scaffold/Register

Plant/Register

False work

Temporary Works Design Brief

Temporary Works Appointments

Temporary Works Register

Operations - Safe Methods of Work

Compliance with method statement

Method Statement-General

Signature/Documentation

Risk Assessments

Permit system responsible person

Internal site safety tours

Documentation Acceptable

Considerate Constructors Registered

Water Management Plan

Emergency Fire evacuation Plan

Use of Scaff-inspection tags

Slips/`Trips /Falls

RPE - Face Fit testing

Acceptable Site has two gates, and a one-way system is used as required.

Acceptable Traffic marshals in place.

Acceptable In place.

Acceptable Good segregation is in place.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable RAMS are in place.

Acceptable Suitable and sufficient.

Acceptable In place and listed within CPP.

Acceptable Suitable and sufficient.

Acceptable Completed.

Acceptable. No issues raised.

Acceptable In place.

Acceptable In place for Andy Finnigan

Acceptable In place and up to date.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable Suitable and sufficient.

Acceptable In place within the site files.

Acceptable In place.

Acceptable In place and up to date.

Acceptable Regular tours undertaken.

Acceptable In place and relevant.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable In place.

Acceptable In place.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Observation Status

Asbestos Register and Awareness Training

Good Practice - Safe Working

Work areas tidy

Walkways/safe routes clear of obstruction

Tools & Equipment suitable for the task

Safe manual handling

Signage

Storage of materials

Compliance with method statement

Personnel Protective Equipment PPE

Operations - Activity Set Up

Resources

Operatives Certification

Plant Certification

PUWER Register

Hoist Register

Crane Register

Lifting Equipment Register

Induction Register

Tool box talks

Contractor's team briefings

Operations - Activities -Safe Working

Site tidiness-Housekeeping

Fire Precautions

Fire safety route

Fire Fighting Equipment [Site]

Fire Signage

Fire Escape route

Fire Assembly

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable In place and sufficient.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable Clear and un-obstructed.

Acceptable Suitable for current activities.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable Plant registers maintained

Acceptable Records in place and up to date.

Acceptable Records in place and up to date.

Acceptable Four cranes in place, and rescue team trained.

Acceptable In place.

Acceptable In place and signed by site operatives.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable In place and completed.

Acceptable Good standard

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable Clear and unobstructed.

Acceptable Suitable and sufficient.

Acceptable Displayed.

Acceptable Clear and unobstructed.

Acceptable In place.

Observation

Fire register [Site]

COSHH

Safe Storage

Hazardous Substance Register

MSDS Sheets Documented

Hand Tools/Plant/Transport

Hand Tools [PAT]

Plant

Transport Equipment

Excavation

Electricity

Acceptable In place.

Acceptable Assessments in place.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable In place and sufficient.

Acceptable Attached to assessments.

Acceptable No defects noted.

Acceptable PAT tested and in date.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable Good practice

Acceptable No issues raised.

Overhead Power Lines Not Applicable Not Applicable.

Underground Services

Acceptable No issues raised.

HV Electrical installation Not Applicable Not Applicable.

Working at Height

Ladders

Step Ladders

Mobile Scaffold Towers

Roof work

Mobile Elevated Working Platforms [MEWP]

Hoists

Mechanical Lifting

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable Clear and unobstructed.

Confined Space Not Applicable. Not Applicable.

Permit

Floor openings

Edge Protection

Signage

Safe working practices

Protective clothing /equipment

PPE-General

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable in place where required.

Acceptable Relevant safety signage is in place.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable 5 points of PPE as per site rules.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Observation Status

Manual handling

Environmental

Air Pollution

Water Pollution

Land Pollution

Noise Pollution

Dust Pollution

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No activities causing concern. - -

Acceptable No activities causing concern.

Acceptable No activities causing concern.

Acceptable No activities causing concern.

Acceptable No activities causing concern. - -

Acceptable Dust management throughout the project has improved, but will need to be monitored McLaughlin & Harvey Ltd Ongoing

Working over /adjacent to water Not Applicable. Not Applicable. - -

Roadwork's Not Applicable. Not Applicable.

Working over/adjacent to railways Not applicable Not Applicable.

Appendix 1 Photographs

DAA CMT report

Architectural Progress Report _ 28th May 2024

Project UL Campus, Kingston Created By Alexander Cook

Job No 19064

Date 28/05/2023

Revision 01

1.0 Project Overview

Date 28/05/2023

Approved By Alastair Roberts

Date 28/05/2023

 DAA continue to develop & coordinate the Stage 5 detailed design of buildings A + B + C with McLH in line with the construction programme.

 DAA have started Snagging process to ensure De-snag condition in line with Program - Refer to the McLH Snagging Tracker for further details.

 R emaining planning conditions such as Bridge Link, Condition 03 & External Louvre ( NMA ) have been consented by RBKT.

2.0 Key Design Development/Deliverables

 DAA are attending project DTM’s with McLH & the design team as well as organising specific design workshops with Structures, M+E, Facades, Building Control, Fire & BREEAM when required

 A s lead design DAA continue the coordination of BIM models & have begun circulat ing our Revit models on a bi-weekly basis following all BIM protocol to ensure the design team is fully informed & coordinated

 DAA issued architectural information that targets all pre-above ground planning conditions & continue to work with both McLH + FH to unlock the conditions. The CMT team continue to chase the progress of Condition 3 & associated comments

 DAA are attending detailed design workshops on the proposed External Works, landscaping, Internal walls , waterproofing, roofing , external f acades to ensure further coordination between consultants, the occupier team & funders.

 DAA continue to manage & present E xternal + Internal finishes samples to both the Unilever design team & RBKT for formal sign off. The design team are continuing to develop the façade detailed proposals with Clarkes & McLH through dedicated façade workshops & a re actively responding to RFI’s to ensure the façades retains the original design intent + quality.

 DAA have attended site meetings + visits + snagging when required to review benchmark works on site, samples & detailed coordination issues.

3.0 Next Period / Key Decisions and Instructions Required

 Instruction required on all occupier variations + associated DAA fees on the following:

- Signage planning application.

Any Additional Occupier Variations

 Full understanding of any other new UL variations which could potentially affect the S tage 5 design programme is critical for avoiding redundant work.

4.0 Issued Documentation + Information.

 DAA have issued design sketches + Updated Stage 5 Design Packs for the following :

 MSCP Wayfinding

 MSCP Roller Shutter Proposals

 Entrance Link + BL Coordination

 External Lighting + CCTV TVR

 Blind Box design updates + coordination

 External Works + Site coordination – Ramps / Stairs / Flood Voids / Railings – A + B + C

 Fire Curtains + interface detailing – Bridge Link

 RCP’s + MEP coordination/Set out

 Service Yard elevations – External Lourves

 Drylining Workshops + BWH coordination

 RAF construction detailing

 Area Drawings

 Roller Shutter Construction Issue

 Reception Screed Drawings + associated details

 Roof Package Updates

 Firestopping details – A + B + C

 MSCP External Wall / Flood void / Blockwork

 BC Tracker Development

 Façade Coordination + Comments – A + B

 Access + Security Strategy

 DAA have fully updated their Architectural folder on Viewpoint + associated TIDP which now contains all issued drawings / specifications / reports / design options / sketches through to end of February

 DAA have continued to attend BIM clash detection workshops when required & have always ensured that design development of Revit models are frequently issued following coordination workshops & key design changes/variations.

 DAA have responded to all required RFI’s & provided comments via Viewpoint on all consultant drawings & design information.

Latest Stage 5 Car Park Architectural Information Issued within this period [Buildings C] :

 13000 – Floorbeds - A5

 21000 – External Walls + Façade Packages - A5

 22000 – Internal Walls – A5

 24000 – Stairs - A5

 25000 – Cores - A5

 2 7 000 – Roof Package - A5

 30000 – GA Drawings - A5

 34000 – Metalwork - A5

 35000 – RCPs - A5

 42000 – Wall Finishes - A5

 43000 – Floor Finishes - A5

 68000 – Fire Strategy - A5

 44000 – Skirtings - A5

 74000 – Sanitaryware Package - A5

 Outline Finishes Specification

 External Door Schedule - A5

 Internal Door Schedule - A5

 NBS Specifications - A5

 External Roller Shutter Proposal - A5

 Floor beds + Gullies Changing village - A5

Latest Stage 5 Architectural Information Issued within this period [Buildings A + B] :

 03000 – GA’s - A5 – CAT A Omissions

 04000 – Ground Floor Setting Out + Slab Edge Set Out + Builders Works Penetrations - A5

 13000 – Floorbeds - A5

 23000 - Thermal Zones - A5

 21000 – External Walls + Façade Packages - A5

 22000 – Internal Walls - A5

 23000 – Building Links – Reception + Bridge - A5

 24000 – Stairs + Feature Stair Building B - A5

 25000 – Core Package - A5

 27000 – Roof Package - A5

 31000 - External Door Schedule - A5

 32000 – Internal Door Schedule - A5

 33000 – RAF - A5

 34000 – Metalwork - A5

 35000 – RCP’s - A5 – CAT A Omissions

 42000 – Wall Finishes - A5 – CAT A Omissions

 43000 – Floor Finishes – A5 – CAT A Omissions

 44000 – Skirtings – A5 – CAT A Omissions

 68000 – Fire Strategy - A5

 74000 – Sanitaryware Package - A5

 80000 – Areas - A5

 90000 – External Works - A5

 External Door Schedule – A5

 Internal Door Schedule – A5

 NBS Specifications – A5

 External Shutter – A5

 Lift Finishes + Lobby - A5

 Fire Stop Details + Fire Curtains - A5

Latest Contractors Instruction Issued within this period:

 CI 014 - CIRCLESLIDE DOORS

 CI 015 - BUILDING B FEATURE STAIR GLAZING INFILL

 CI 028 - CAT A Temp Measures

 CI 029 - Internal + External Doors

 CI 030 - Changing Places

 CI 031 - External Louvres

 CI 032 - Facade Lighting – In progress

 CI 033 - GF Screed and Omission of RAF

 CI 034 - Blind Boxes

 CI 035 - Car Park Additional Work

 CI 036 - WC Grilles

 CI 037 - RAF Omission

 CI 038 - Building A Baby Change

 CI 039 - Car Park - Shower shelf

 CI 040 - Blind box

 CI 041 – Doors ( CI 029 amendment s + CCTV ) In progress

 CI 042 - Lift Floor

 EAI 71 - Omission of Soap Dispenser

Architectural

Architectural Lifts (Internal finish) Lifts (Internal finish) RIBA 4

Architectural M10 Cement Base Levelling Wearing Screeds Technical Submittal RIBA 4 N/A

Architectural M60 Painting / Clear Finishing Technical Submittal RIBA 4 N/A

Architectural NIA Plans - Areas Building A & B RIBA 4 22/12/2022 24/01/2023 17 days 24/01/2023

Architectural Circleslide Curved Sliding Door Technical Submittal RIBA 5 N/A 13/10/2023 N/A 13/10/2023 02/11/2023

02/10/2023 B 02/10/2023 B 02/10/2023 B

MEP

MEP

MEP

MEP

MEP

MEP

MEP Below ground drainage Below ground drainage RIBA 3 N/A 13/09/2022 N/A 13/09/2022 03/10/2022 29/09/2022 05/10/2022

MEP Below ground drainage Construction details RIBA 3 N/A 13/09/2022 N/A 13/09/2022 03/10/2022 29/09/2022

MEP BMS description of operations BMS description of operations RIBA 3 14/10/2022

MEP

N/A 11/04/2024 N/A 11/04/2024 01/05/2024 29/04/2024 18/04/2024 A 18/04/2024 A 18/04/2024 A All plans received 03/10/2022

MEP Containment Specification RIBA 3 N/A 10/10/2022 N/A 10/10/2022 28/10/2022 26/10/2022 20/10/2022 B 20/10/2022 B 20/10/2022 B All plans received 10/10/2022

MEP Containment Layouts (Building A) RIBA 3 21/11/2022 11/11/2022 -6 days 11/11/2022 01/12/2022 29/11/2022 12/12/2022 B 12/12/2022 B 12/12/2022 B All plans received 11/11/2022.

MEP Containment Layouts (Building C) RIBA 4 N/A 09/03/2023 N/A 31/07/2023 18/08/2023 16/08/2023 29/08/2023 B 29/08/2023 B 29/08/2023 B

MEP Containment Layouts Building A & B RIBA 5 N/A 23/04/2024 N/A 23/04/2024 13/05/2024 09/05/2024 07/05/2024 A/B 07/05/2024 A/B 07/05/2024 A/B Status C given on theM5 Floor.

MEP Containment Layouts Building C RIBA 3 05/12/2022 05/12/2022 0 days 05/12/2022 23/12/2022 21/12/2022

MEP Controls (BMS) Description of operations RIBA 3 18/07/2022 14/10/2022 88 days 14/10/2022 03/11/2022 01/11/2022 04/11/2022 B 02/11/2022 B 04/11/2022 B All plans received 14/10/2022

MEP Cooling (CHW) system Building A schematic RIBA 5

MEP Disabled Refuge Alarm System Alarm System RIBA 4 N/A 30/05/2023 N/A 30/05/2023 19/06/2023 15/06/2023 08/06/2023 A

MEP Disabled refuge schematic Building

05/04/2023 C

MEP Domestic Services Building B RIBA 5 N/A 28/08/2023 N/A 28/08/2023 15/09/2023 13/09/2023 22/09/2023

MEP Drainage Layout Building B & C RIBA 4 N/A 14/04/2023 N/A 14/04/2023 04/05/2023 02/05/2023 12/05/2023 B 02/05/2023 B 12/05/2023 B

MEP Drainage Layout Building C RIBA 5 N/A 13/03/2024 N/A 13/03/2024 02/04/2024 29/03/2024 15/03/02024 A/B 18/03/2024 A/B 18/03/2024 A/B Status B given on the following floors - 7th floor

MEP Dry Riser Building A RIBA 4 N/A 23/05/2023 N/A 23/05/2023 12/06/2023 08/06/2023 20/06/2023 A/B 07/06/2023 A/B 20/06/2023 A/B

MEP Dry Riser Building A + B RIBA 3 N/A 05/12/2022 N/A 05/12/2022 23/12/2022 21/12/2022 10/01/2023 B 10/01/2023 B 10/01/2023 B

MEP Dry Riser Building A & B RIBA 5 N/A 14/11/2023 N/A 14/11/2023 04/12/2023 30/11/2023 01/12/2023 A/B 14/12/2023 A/B 14/12/2023 A/B

MEP Dry Riser Building C RIBA 4 N/A 12/06/2023 N/A 12/06/2023 30/06/2023 28/06/2023 20/06/2023 B 20/06/2023 B 20/06/2023 B

MEP Dry Riser Building C RIBA 3 N/A 14/02/2022 N/A 14/02/2022 04/03/2022 02/03/2022 17/03/2023 B 13/03/2023 B 13/03/2023 B

MEP Electrical riser Drawings Building A + B RIBA 3 N/A 11/11/2022 N/A 11/11/2022 01/12/2022 29/11/2022 11/11/2022 C C C All plans received 11/11/2022. Reason rejected: Provide LV schematics.

MEP Electrical riser Drawings Building A + B+C RIBA 4 N/A 15/03/2023 N/A 15/03/2023 04/04/2023 31/03/2023 30/05/2023 C 30/05/2023 C 30/05/2023 C

MEP Electrical Vehicle charging Electrical Vehicle charging RIBA 3 N/A 27/03/2023 N/A 27/03/2023 14/04/2023 12/04/2023 31/05/2023 C 31/05/2023 C 31/05/2023 C

MEP Emergency Exit Light Fitting Light Fitting RIBA 4 N/A 30/05/2023 N/A 30/05/2023 19/06/2023 15/06/2023 02/06/2023 A 02/06/2023 A 02/06/2023 A

MEP Energy statement Energy statement RIBA 3 N/A 12/09/2022 N/A 12/09/2022 30/09/2022 28/09/2022 20/10/2022 B 20/10/2022 B 20/10/2022 B All plans received on 12/09/2023

MEP Exterior Lighting Design Site Wide RIBA 4 N/A 15/05/2023 N/A 15/05/2023 02/06/2023 31/05/2023 01/06/2023 B 01/06/2023 B 01/06/2023 B

MEP Fire Alarm Building A Layout RIBA 5 N/A 04/12/2023 N/A 04/12/2023 22/12/2023 20/12/2023 21/12/2023

MEP Fire Alarm and Security Building A Layouts RIBA 4 N/A 09/03/2023 N/A 09/03/2023 29/03/2023 27/03/2023 22/05/2023 B 09/06/2023 B 22/05/2023 B

MEP Fire Alarm and Security Building B RIBA 4 N/A 09/03/2023 N/A 09/03/2023 29/03/2023 27/03/2023 22/05/2023 B 09/06/2023 B 22/05/2023 B

MEP Fire Alarm and Security Building A, B & C Layouts RIBA 5 N/A 04/12/2023 N/A 04/12/2023 22/12/2023 20/12/2023 06/12/2023 A/B 21/12/2023 A/B 21/12/2023 A/B

MEP Fire alarm schematic Building B RIBA 5 N/A 17/10/2023 N/A 17/10/2023 06/11/2023 02/11/2023 08/11/2023 B 08/11/2023 B 08/11/2023 B

MEP Fire alarm schematic Building C RIBA 5 N/A 17/10/2023 N/A 17/10/2023 06/11/2023 02/11/2023 08/11/2023 B 16/11/2023 B 16/11/2023 Awaiting Occupier and Fund comments.

MEP Light Fittings Site wide RIBA 5 N/A 14/05/2024 N/A 14/05/2024 03/06/2024 30/05/2024 05/06/2024 A/B 05/06/2024 A/B 05/06/2024 A/B

MEP Flow Meter Technical Submittal RIBA 4 N/A 17/04/2023 N/A 17/04/2023 05/05/2023 03/05/2023 24/04/2023 B 24/04/2023 B 24/04/2023

MEP

MEP

MEP

0 days 20/12/2022 09/01/2023 05/01/2023 All plans received 03/11/2022 MEP Lighting and emergency lighting Building B RIBA 3 N/A 20/12/2022 N/A 20/12/2022 09/01/2023 05/01/2023 18/01/2023 B 18/01/2023 B 18/01/2023 B All plans received.

MEP Lighting Layout Building A RIBA 4 N/A 09/03/2023 N/A 09/03/2023 29/03/2023 27/03/2023 02/06/2023 A/B 02/06/2023 A/B 02/06/2023 A/B

MEP Lighting Layout Building B RIBA 3 N/A 20/12/2022 N/A 20/12/2022 17/01/2023 13/01/2023 18/01/2023 B 18/01/2023 B 18/01/2023 B All packages received.

MEP Lighting Layout Building A, B, & C RIBA 5 N/A 15/01/2024 N/A 15/01/2024 02/02/2024 31/01/2024 02/02/2024 B

MEP Lightning protection Layouts Building C RIBA 4 N/A 02/05/2023 N/A 02/05/2023 22/05/2023 18/05/2023 31/05/2023 B 31/05/2023 B 31/05/2023 B Status C received on 13/12/2022. Revision plans uploaded on 16/02/2023.

MEP Lightning protection Layouts Building C RIBA 5 N/A 12/03/2024 N/A 12/03/2024 01/04/2024 28/03/2024 20/03/2024 B 20/03/2024 B 20/03/2024 B

MEP Lightning protection Drawings (Building A + B GF and roof) RIBA 3 N/A 16/02/2023 N/A 16/02/2023 08/03/2023 06/03/2023 All plans received 11/11/2022. Previous Plans were given status C on 21/11/2022. Revisions received 16/02/2022.

MEP

MEP Potable Cold Water Storage Building A,B & C RIBA 4 N/A 17/07/2023 N/A 17/07/2023 04/08/2023 02/08/2023

MEP Pump House Building B - Level 00 RIBA 4 N/A 31/08/2023 N/A 31/08/2023 20/09/2023 18/09/2023 27/11/2023 A 27/11/2023 A 27/11/2023 A

MEP Pump House Building B - Level 00 RIBA 3 N/A 19/01/2023 N/A 19/01/2023 08/02/2023 06/02/2023 06/02/2023 B

MEP PV PV RIBA 3 N/A 25/09/2022 N/A 25/09/2022 13/10/2022 11/10/2022 25/09/2022 C 25/09/2022 C 25/09/2022 C All plans received 25/09/2022. Status C was received

MEP QAHV Sanitary Hot Water Pump Building C RIBA 5 N/A 17/07/2023 N/A 17/07/2023 04/08/2023 02/08/2023 14/08/2023 C 16/08/2023

MEP Rainwater diagrammatic Building C RIBA 4 N/A 02/05/2023 N/A 02/05/2023 22/05/2023 18/05/2023 12/05/2023 A 19/05/2023 B 19/05/2023 B

MEP Rainwater drainage schematic Building A & B RIBA 4 N/A 03/04/2023 N/A 03/04/2023 21/04/2023 19/04/2023 11/04/2023 B 02/05/2023 B 02/05/2023 B

MEP RD102 Sprinkler Specification RIBA 4 N/A 31/03/2023 N/A 31/03/2023 20/04/2023 18/04/2023 11/04/2023 A 20/06/2023 A 20/06/2023 A

MEP Sanitaryware Technical submittal RIBA 5 N/A 12/01/2024 N/A 12/01/2024 01/02/2024 30/01/2024 13/02/2024 B 22/02/2024 B 22/02/2024 B

MEP Shower Channel Gullies Technical Submittal RIBA 4 N/A 14/06/2023 N/A 14/06/2023 04/07/2023 30/06/2023 30/06/2023 B

MEP Site Utilities Incoming Services Plans RIBA 4 N/A 11/09/2023 N/A 11/09/2023 29/09/2023 27/09/2023 02/10/2023 C 02/10/2023 C 02/10/2023 C Status B given by MCLH and closed out on 22/02/2023.

MEP Site Wide Generator Controls Schematic RIBA 5 N/A 14/11/2023 N/A 14/11/2023 04/12/2023 30/11/2023 19/12/2023 B 19/12/2023 B 19/12/2023 B

MEP Small Power and Data Layouts (Building C) RIBA 4 N/A 12/06/2023 N/A 12/06/2023 30/06/2023 28/06/2023 29/08/2023 B 29/08/2023 B 29/08/2023 B All plans received 12/06/2023.

MEP Small power and data Layouts (building C) RIBA 3 N/A 18/11/2022 N/A 18/11/2022 08/12/2022 06/12/2022 08/12/2022 B 13/02/2023 B 08/12/2022 B All plans received 18/11/2022.

MEP Small power and data Layouts (building A + B) RIBA 3 N/A 25/11/2022 N/A 25/11/2022 15/12/2022 13/12/2022 15/12/2022 B 15/12/2022 B 15/12/2022 B All plans received 25/11/2022

MEP Small power layout Building A & B RIBA 4 N/A 23/03/2023 N/A 23/03/2023 12/04/2023 10/04/2023 08/06/2023 B 07/06/2023 B 08/06/2023 B

MEP Small power layout Building B RIBA 5 N/A 23/04/2024 N/A 04/12/2023 22/12/2023 20/12/2023 06/12/2023 B 20/12/2023 B 20/12/2023 B Statuc C given on reuploaded ground floor drawing on 07/05/2024.

MEP Small power layout Building A RIBA 5 N/A 04/03/2024 N/A 04/03/2024 22/03/2024 20/03/2024

MEP Smoke Ventilation System Design RIBA 4 N/A 24/08/2023 N/A 24/08/2023 13/09/2023 11/09/2023 28/11/2023 C 28/11/2023 C 28/11/2023 C Status C given to allow Halsion to reupload updated drawings.

MEP Smoke Ventilation System Wiring Schematic Building A, B & C RIBA 5 N/A 14/11/2023 N/A 14/11/2023 04/12/2023 30/11/2023 22/11/2023 C 22/11/2023 C 22/11/2023 C Status C given to allow Halsion to reupload updated drawings.

MEP Sprinkler and Dry Riser Mains Layout Building A +B RIBA 4 N/A 19/07/2023 NA 19/07/2023 08/08/2023 04/08/2023 24/07/2023 A 16/08/2023 A 16/08/2023 A

MEP Sprinkler Block Plan Building A & B RIBA 4 N/A 06/04/2023 N/A 06/04/2023 26/04/2023 24/04/2023 24/04/2023 B 02/05/2023 B 02/05/2023 B awaiting UL response.

MEP Sprinkler Protection Building A & B RIBA 5 N/A 14/11/2023 N/A 14/11/2023 04/12/2023 30/11/2023 21/12/2023 A/B 21/12/2023 A/B 21/12/2023 A/B

MEP Sprinkler protection Building B RIBA 3 N/A 25/11/2022 N/A 25/11/2022 15/12/2022 13/12/2022 03/01/2023 A/B 03/01/2023 A/B 03/01/2023 A/B

MEP Sprinkler protection Layouts Building A RIBA 3 N/A 05/12/2022 N/A 05/12/2022 23/12/2022 21/12/2022 14/12/2022 C 14/12/2022 C 14/12/2022 C Status C received

MEP Sprinkler protection RCP Layouts Building A RIBA 3 N/A 03/11/2022 N/A 03/11/2022 23/11/2022 21/11/2022 10/01/2023 B 10/01/2023 B 10/01/2023 B Awaiting comment from occupier for Level 01 Sprinkler Protection Layout.

MEP Sprinkler Protection Pipework Layout Building B RIBA 4 N/A 07/08/2023 NA 07/08/2023 25/08/2023 23/08/2023 14/08/2023 B 29/08/2023 B 29/08/2023 B Status C given to Level 1 on 28/11/2023.

MEP Sprinkler protection RCP layout Building B RIBA 5 N/A 23/04/2024 N/A 23/04/2024 13/05/2024 09/05/2024 30/04/2024 A 30/04/2024 A 30/04/2024 A

MEP Sprinkler protection RCP layout Building A RIBA 3 N/A 05/12/2022 N/A 05/12/2022 23/12/2022 21/12/2022 06/12/2022 A Revisions uploaded on 27/01/2023, awaiting comments.

MEP Sprinkler protection RCP layout Building A & B RIBA 4 N/A 15/05/2023 N/A 15/05/2023 02/06/2023 31/05/2023 30/05/2023 B 02/06/2023 B 02/06/2023 B

MEP Sprinkler protection RCP layout Building B RIBA 3 N/A 06/12/2022 N/A 06/12/2022 26/12/2022 22/12/2022 16/01/2023 A/B 16/01/2023 A/B 16/01/2023 A/B All plans received 06/12/2022

MEP Sprinkler riser Building A + B RIBA 3 N/A 05/12/2022 N/A 05/12/2022 23/12/2022 21/12/2022 06/01/2023 B 04/01/2023 B 04/01/2023 B

MEP Sprinkler riser Building A +B RIBA 4 N/A 12/06/2023 N/A 12/06/2023 30/06/2023 28/06/2023 20/06/2023 A 16/08/2023 A 16/08/2023 A

MEP Sprinkler Riser Building A & B RIBA 5 N/A 14/11/2023 N/A 14/11/2023 04/12/2023 30/11/2023 21/12/2023 A 21/12/2023 A 21/12/2023 A

MEP Sprinkler Schematic Layout RIBA 3 N/A 20/02/2023 N/A 21/02/2023 13/03/2023 09/03/2023 29/06/2023 B 29/06/2023 B 29/06/2023 B

MEP Sprinkler Schematic Layout Site Wide RIBA 4 N/A 06/04/2023 N/A 06/04/2023 26/04/2023 24/04/2023 24/04/2023 B 02/05/2023 B 02/05/2023 B

MEP Sprinkler system System Design RIBA 3 02/11/2022 03/11/2022 0 days 03/11/2022 23/11/2022 21/11/2022 All plans received 03/11/2022

MEP Sprinkler Tanks Technical Submittal RIBA 4 N/A 14/06/2023 N/A 14/06/2023 04/07/2023 30/06/2023 30/06/2023 A/B 30/06/2023 A/B 30/06/2023 A/B

MEP Stage 4 Design Report MEP Stage 4 Report RIBA 4 N/A 15/03/2023 N/A 15/03/2023 04/04/2023 31/03/2023 29/08/2023 C 29/08/2023 C 29/08/2023 C

MEP Substation Earthing RAMS RIBA 3 N/A 03/11/2022 N/A 03/11/2022 23/11/2022 21/11/2022 30/01/2023 B Removed from CMT Workflow.

MEP Tech subs MEP Tech Subs RIBA 4 N/A 01/08/2023 N/A 01/08/2023 21/08/2023 17/08/2023 20/09/2023 B 20/09/2023 B 20/09/2023 B

MEP Underground GRP Storage Tank With Granula Infill/TF4 Filter RIBA 3 N/A 15/12/2022 N/A 15/12/2022 12/01/2023 10/01/2023 Given status A by MCLH on 22/02/2023.

MEP Valves Site wide RIBA 4 N/A 28/03/2023 N/A 28/03/2023 17/04/2023 13/04/2023 20/06/2023 A/B 06/06/2023 A/B 20/06/2023 A/B

MEP Ventilation Building A & B RIBA 5 N/A 14/11/2023 N/A 23/04/2024 13/05/2024 09/05/2024

29/04/2024

MEP

MEP Site Utilities Incoming Services Plans RIBA 4 N/A 14/04/2023 N/A 14/04/2023 04/05/2023 02/05/2023 23/05/2023 C 23/05/2023 C 23/05/2023 C

Structural Basement waterproofing system Basement waterproofing system RIBA 4 N/A 30/11/2022 N/A 05/12/2022 23/12/2022 21/12/2022 Not issued for review.

Structural Car park GA's and sections Car park GA's and sections RIBA 4 N/A 10/11/2022 N/A 10/11/2022 30/11/2022 28/11/2022 All plans received 10/11/2022

Structural Cast - In Channel Technical Submittal RIBA 3 N/A Not issued for review.

Structural Civils (tbc) Attenuation (CPD) RIBA 4 21/12/2022

Structural Core Plans Building A & B RIBA 4 N/A 27/02/2023 N/A 27/02/2023 17/03/2023 15/03/2023 12/05/2023 A 12/05/2023 A 12/05/2023 A

Structural First Floor GA Building B RIBA 4 N/A 16/12/2022 N/A 16/12/2022 13/01/2023 11/01/2023 MCLH closed out as status A ON 03/02/2023.

Structural GA's Building A & B RIBA 4 N/A 30/11/2022 N/A 30/11/2022 20/12/2022 16/12/2022

Structural GA's Building C RIBA 3 N/A 07/12/2022 N/A 07/12/2022 04/01/2023 23/12/2022 15/12/2022 A/B 15/12/2022 A/B 15/12/2022 A/B

Structural General Arrangement Plan Foundations RIBA 4 N/A 13/02/2023 N/A 13/02/2023 03/03/2023 01/03/2023

Structural General arrangements Building A+ B RIBA 4 N/A 26/09/2022 N/A 26/09/2022 14/10/2022 12/10/2022 13/01/2023 A 13/01/2023 A 13/01/2023 A All plans received. Awaiting comments for building B - first floor GA.

Structural Glass Balustrade Technical Submittal RIBA 4 N/A 11/04/2023 N/A 11/04/2023 01/05/2023 27/04/2023 11/05/2023 B 11/05/2023 B 11/05/2023 B

Structural Glass Technical Report Technical Submittal RIBA 4 N/A 06/04/2023 N/A 06/04/2023 26/04/2023 24/04/2023 25/04/2023 C 25/04/2023 C 25/04/2023 C MCLH delivery team and review - status C given.

Structural Grd Floor and L06 Link Bridge Grd Floor and L06 Link Bridge RIBA 4 29/11/2022 14/01/2023 N/A 14/01/2023

Structural Ground Floor Building B RIBA 4 04/11/2022 Not issued for review.

Structural Loading plans Loading plans RIBA 4 02/11/2022 02/11/2022 0 days 02/11/2022 22/11/2022 18/11/2022 31/10/2022 B 31/10/2022 B 31/10/2022 B All plans received 02/11/2022

Structural Pile caps Pile Caps C RIBA 4 23/09/2022 Not issued for review.

Structural Piling Piling A + B RIBA 4 11/08/2022 09/08/2022 -2 days 09/08/2022 30/08/2022 25/08/2022 25/08/2022 A/B 25/08/2022 A/B 25/08/2022 A/B All plans received on 09/08/2022

Structural Piling Concrete mix design RIBA 4 N/A 09/09/2022 N/A 09/09/2022 29/09/2022

Structural Piling Piling C RIBA 4 27/09/2022 07/12/2022 51 days 07/12/2022 05/01/2023 03/01/2023 16/12/2022 A 16/12/2022 A 16/12/2022 A

Structural Plant Steel frame Building A RIBA 4 15/03/2023

Structural Siderise CW-FS120 Technical Submittal RIBA 4 N/A 27/02/2023 N/A

Structural Specialist CDP Design (FP McCann) Specialist CDP Design (FP McCann) RIBA 4 13/10/2022

Structural Superstructure PT Floors (CPD) Building A RIBA 4 09/11/2022

Structural Superstructure PT Floors (CPD) Building B RIBA 4 09/11/2022

Structural Test piling Results and proposal RIBA 4 N/A 25/09/2022 N/A 25/09/2022 13/10/2022 11/10/2022 13/10/2022 A 13/10/2022 A 13/10/2022 A All plans received 25/09/2022

Structural Town Hall Building A RIBA 4 N/A 03/04/2023 N/A 03/04/2023 21/04/2023 19/04/2023 05/04/2023 A 05/04/2023 A 05/04/2023 A

Structural Walls and Columns inc Stairs Building A RIBA 4 20/10/2022

Structural Walls and Columns inc Stairs Building B RIBA 4 21/10/2022

Structural Wicona EL Evo Technical Submittal RIBA 4 N/A 23/01/2023 N/A 23/01/2023 10/02/2023 08/02/2023 01/02/2023 B Received EOC comments on 01/02/2023.

Structural Wind calculations Wind calculations RIBA 4 TBC 01/02/2023 N/A 01/02/2023 21/02/2023 17/02/2023

Structural Ash and Lacy Mechslip Brickslip Technical Submittal RIBA 4 N/A 09/03/2023 N/A 09/03/2023 29/03/2023 27/03/2023 24/05/2023 B 24/05/2023 B 24/05/2023 B

Structural Benchmark Approval Form Rectangular Columns RIBA 5 N/A 08/02/2023 N/A 08/02/2023 28/02/2023 24/02/2023 17/03/2023 B 20/03/2023 B 20/03/2023 B

Structural Kilsaran Inspection and Test Plan Test Plan RIBA 4 N/A 20/02/2023 N/A 20/02/2023 10/03/2023 08/03/2023 Not issued for review.

Structural Loading Plan Building C level 00 RIBA 4 N/A 22/03/2023 N/A 22/03/2023 11/04/2023 07/04/2023 24/04/2023 A 24/04/2023 A 24/04/2023 A

Structural Performance mark ups Building A & B RIBA 5 N/A 14/05/2024 N/A 14/05/2024 03/06/2024 30/05/2024 04/06/2024 B 04/06/2024 B 04/06/2024 B Received comments from EOC on 04/06/2024

Structural Façade Tech subs Technical Submittals RIBA 5 N/A 14/05/2024 N/A 14/05/2024 03/06/2024 30/05/2024 04/06/2024 B 04/06/2024 B 04/06/2024 B

McLH procurement schedule

Lautus progress report

Planning Report

Project Honey

Project Honey

This report is based on the construction programme rather than the contract programme.

Summary

Progress

The approach to the installation of Utilised cladding had been to complete two floors of cladding before finishes commence on the floor. Due to the poor performance this has been relaxed to complete a floor of cladding and then start finishes on that floor. This again was changed to carry out finishes to a floor independent to cladding installation leaving just the perimeter fit out works until the cladding is finished. This approach results in a higher risk of water damage but reduces the projection delays in completion.

A key link between the completion of utilised cladding on a floor and commencing the perimeter floor plate fit out is missing.

Building A - on site

Envelope

The weekly reports detailing cladding panels manufactured and cladding panels installed has stopped. Reports now only detail units manufactured and not cladding panels fixed split between straight and curve panels.

Due to reported production issues, cladding progress has been poor. There is not one floor that is completed. The lack of curved panels on the lower floors may have an affect on early commissioning.

From the revised construction programme cladding completion is show as 12 August 24

The Contract programme shown completion 22 April 24.

Utilised Cladding now 15 weeks 3 days in delay.

The instruction to install perimeter blind boxes will be carried out once the utilised panels have been fixed. The sequencing of this work may well increase pressure in achieving pc.

There are no links between the end of cladding on each floor and the remaining fit out works that can only be undertaken once the cladding is complete to a floor in particular level 5.

Membranes installed with finishes still to be carried out. Installation dates for the PV panels still to be confirmed. Mechanical works are a principle delay on level 9 and the terrace level 8. Level 6 the delay is now insulation, gutters, roof finishes handrails etc.

Roof

Roof delays Building A.

Finishes

Power On is due w/c 28/5/24.

Lift installation – Work complete lift 07 and 97% complete on L01 & L05. Work progressing on lifts L02 and L06 running approximately -2½ weeks. L03 due to commence 24 June 24.

Lift L07 is planned to be used as the only means of vertical transportation of movement of materials and labour shared with the fit-out contractor once the external hoist has been de commissioned 10 June 24. This could cause delays in moving materials and labour up the building.

Work to risers running -5 weeks in delay.

Cores

The construction programme has split the cores down into

1). WC fit out

2). Lobby and corridors.

This will give a clearer picture of progress in the cores.

Work activities to cores are running in parallel on level 1 to 5 which requires high levels of labour with a higher risk in achieving programme dates.

The critical floor is the fifth floor CAT fit out, showing at present completion 30 September 24 with beneficial access of the 23 September 24. Key to achieving this date is the installation of utilised cladding panels and resolving issues around the blind box installation which are still to be confirmed.

Plenums have been ordered with a delivery date of the 14 June 24. This will affect the planned timing of the air balancing.

Building B- on site

Envelope

Original completion of the utilised cladding was the 10 April 24, now projected completion 8 July 24 an improvement from last month.

The weekly reports detailing cladding panels manufactured and cladding panels installed has stopped. Reports now only detail units manufactured and not cladding panels fixed, split between straight and curve panels.

Cladding installation is running approximately 12W2d. Last month 14 weeks late. A betterment of 1W 3d from previous month.

Roof

Level 11 roof is complete except for installation of plant screen cladding.

The terrace at level 10 roof finishes still to be carried out beyond the laying of the completed membrane. Projected completion is the 1 August 24.

Finishes

Power On due 24 May 24.

Lift installation.

Lift 03 is complete L02 is 90% complete. Lift L04, L05 are underway and L01 installation is still to commence.

It is reported that beneficial access will be provided via a shared lift L03. This will be the only means of vertical transportation or movement of materials and labour, shared with the fit-out contractor once the external hoist has been decommissioned. This could cause delays in moving materials and labour up the building.

Finishes to Stairs 01 and 02 now running together rather than one at a time. This may cause access restrictions for labour and materials.

Building C- on site

Roof landscaping 34% complete.

The final cladding panels to be installed on the South elevation, the projected completion now 4 June 24.

Work progressing with fit out on the ground floor a critical area which is now projected to complete 28 October 24.

External Works Access

Gate 2 will be closed 3 June 24.

The haulage road is then due to be broken up. This will effect site logistics at a time when there is a high demand for materials for fit out works. This may have an effect on site progress. The water connection at the site boundary will also increase congested on the movement of materials.

Tower Cranes

TC2 is removed 27/28 July 24. Building B.

TC3 is removed 22/23 June Building A.

Hoist

Hoist is to be removed building A on the 10 June 24.

Critical issues

◌ྕ Date required from Thames Water when final connections will be made.

◌ྕ Poor performance of installation of unitised cladding panels will affect the final fitting out of upper floors.

◌ྕ No weekly reports now being given of unitised straight and curved panels installed per week.

◌ྕ Access for materials and labour will be via one lift in each building. Concern that the proposed use of only one lift for both the main works and for client contractors will restrict movement of labour and materials.

◌ྕ With the possible introduction of Smart building functionality, it is necessary to know

what elements of the build have to be complete for the smart system to commence installation. This will enable the dovetailing of the final stages of the build process with the installation of the smart system.

◌ྕ The updated beneficial access dates are to be incorporated onto the construction programme.

◌ྕ The effect of the introduction of blind boxes is to be determined on the completion of a floor. Manufacture periods, installation and sequencing details to be confirmed.

◌ྕ With the break out of the haulage road this will effect the logistic of movement of materials at a time when the pressure for materials for internal works is increasing. This is likely to effect on site progress.

Block B Straight Panels

Project Honey - Block B

Straight Panels (including linkbridge)

06/05/202413/05/202420/05/202427/05/202403/06/202410/06/202417/06/202424/06/202401/07/2024

Panels Fabrication (Planned) 3320258252524

Panels Fabrication (Actual) 332-26 258131619

Cumulative Fabricated (Planned) 258283308332

Cumulative Fabricated (Actual)258271287306 TotalCheck

Project Honey - Block B Curved Panels

Block B Curved Panels

06/05/202413/05/202420/05/202427/05/202403/06/202410/06/202417/06/202424/06/202401/07/2024

Panels Fabrication (Planned) 82049111111

Panels

Cumulative Fabricated (Planned) 49607182

Cumulative Fabricated (Actual)49596871

Block A Straight Panels

Project Honey - Block A

Straight Panels (including linkbridge)

06/05/202413/05/202420/05/202427/05/202403/06/202410/06/202417/06/202424/06/202401/07/2024

Panels Fabricated (Planned) 478026300058585742

Panels Fabrication (Actual) 478-161 263122418

Cumulative Fabricated (Planned) 263263263263321379436478478

Cumulative Fabricated (Actual)263275299317

Block A Curved Panels

Project Honey - Block A Curved Panels

06/05/202413/05/202420/05/202427/05/202403/06/202410/06/202417/06/202424/06/2024

Note: From WC 13/05/24 we will be fabricating Block A 'Z' Panels for 4 weeks

01/07/2024

LFB response

Private and Confidential

Gregory Kypri

Principal Building Control Surveyor Sweco

T 020 8555 1200

Minicom 020 7960 3629 london-fire.gov.uk

The London Fire Commissioner is the fire and rescue authority for London Date 13 May 2024 Our Ref 23/161090/LR Your Ref 66101102

Dear Sir/Madam,

RECORD

OF CONSULTATION/ADVICE GIVEN

THE BUILDING (APPROVED INSPECTORS ETC.) REGULATIONS 2010 & REGULATORY REFORM (FIRE SAFETY) ORDER 2005 ARTICLE 46

FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICES ACT 2004

SCOPE OF WORKS: new mixed use development PREMISES ADDRESS: Project Honey, Surrey House, Kingston Upon Thames, London KT1 PLAN NUMBER(S) INCLUDING REVISIONS: As per attached PDF. DOCUMENTS REVIEWED:

• Fire Strategy Report – Buildings A & B. EDC-MAR-ZZ-XX-RP-Y-0009-P07-S4. Marshall Fire. Rev 14. 07/08/23

• Fire Strategy Report – Building C. EDC-MAR-CXX001-XX-RP-Y-0002-P05-S4. Marshall Fire. Rev 04. 26/06/23

• External Fire Spread Analysis. EDC-MAR-ZZ-XX-RP-Y-0001-P03-S4. Marshall Fire. Rev 01. 06/07/23

• CFD Report: Venting of a FF shaft - Building B. EDC-MAR-BXX001-XX-RP-Y-0003-P05-S4. Marshall Fire. Rev 02. 08/02/23

• CFD Report: Venting of a FF shaft at reduce height - Building B. EDC-MAR-BXX001-XX-RPY-0002-P02-S4. Marshall Fire. Rev 01. 08/02/23

• CFD Report: Venting of Level 8. EDC-MAR-AXX001-XX-RP-Y-0005-P01-S4. Marshall Fire. Rev 00. 27/03/23

• CFD Report: Venting of a FF shaft. EDC-MAR-AXX001-XX-RP-Y-0002-P04-S4. Marshall Fire. Rev 02. 08/02/23

• 3rd Party Review of Fire Strategy. Brigly Fire. BF/FSR/SWE/HONEY. Issue 2. 01/06/23

• 3rd Party Review of CFD Modelling. Brigly Fire. CFD/REV/SWE/HONEY. Issue 2. 21/05/23

• LFB Pro forma. Sweco. 16/08/23

The London Fire Commissioner (the Commissioner) is the fire and rescue authority for London. The Commissioner is responsible for enforcing the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 (The Order) in London.

The Commissioner has been consulted with regard to the above-mentioned premises and makes the following comments/observations:

(1) Comments on proposed scheme primarily relating to the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 (‘The Order’)

Note to the building control body (BCB): it is expected that a copy of these comments will be passed to the future responsible person for this scheme.

Project Honey Building A and Building B Fire Strategy Report, EDC-MAR-ZZ-XX-RP-Y-0009P07-S4_Rev 14, dated 07/08/2023

3.1. Means of Warning and Evacuation Regime

1. We note the commentary indicating that an investigation period is not proposed. We assume consideration has been given towards the impact false alarms and unwanted fire alarms signals will have on the buildings occupants and the London Fire Brigade (LFB) given this proposal.

3.2 Horizontal Means of Escape

2. It is unclear from the plans provided how the occupants of the bridge will escape to a storey exit. We assume occupants within the bridge have unrestricted access to a storey exit within the maximum allowable travel distances specified table 11 of BS 9999:2017 and summarised in section 3.2.1 of the fire strategy report. We assume the BCB, as approving authority, are satisfied with the proposed arrangements

3.2.1 Travel Distance

3. We note the travel distance within the mezzanine level exceeds the minimum allowable travel distance for a retail space. As the layout is unknown this distance should not exceed 13.2m. We question how a 32.65m travel distance is considered acceptable and are of the opinion further justification is required for this significant deviation from guidance.

3.2.2 Horizontal Means of Escape – Door Widths

4. We note a single firefighting core serves the 8th storey of building A which is a clear deviation from guidance. As a single stair office design over 11m (31.7 m in this case) is such a significant departure from fire safety guidance such as ADB and BS 9999, in our opinion a fully fire engineered approach following a framework such as that outlined in BS 7974 and the supporting PD 7974 series should be followed. Included within the BS 7974 framework is the expectation to undertake a qualitative design review (QDR). We would expect the QDR to consider and agree the key considerations relating to a tall single stair, such as:

a) How a potential fire will be controlled and suppressed (such as by compartmentation and a suitable automatic fire suppression system);

b) How the single stair will be fundamentally protected for means of escape, and how provisions for safe working for attending fire crews will be provided. This will require demonstration that the stair and lobby will be protected from the ingress of smoke throughout both the means of escape and firefighting phases, and that the smoke control system proposed will direct the air path direction from the stair to the lobby and from the lobby to the fire compartment. Air paths in the reverse direction are potentially unsafe for attending fire crews.

c) Consider the number of both evacuation lifts (see BS 9999:2017 Annex G) and firefighters lifts to ensure there is sufficient numbers of lifts provided so that if a lift is out of service (e.g. as a result of breakdown or maintenance), there is at least one of each lift type (evacuation and firefighters) that is still available for use from all areas of the building.

d) How it will be demonstrated that all occupants, including any that require assistance from the building’s fire safety management personnel, can evacuate prior to the arrival of the fire and rescue service.

We are also of the opinion that particular aspects in this scheme are not compatible with a single stair approach, for example the dual entry firefighter’s lift, fire curtain. These aspects should be addressed as part of the overall fire safety engineering approach.

5. We also highlight the stair arrangements on the seventh and eighth floors of building A are not standard and could cause confusion in both the means of escape and firefighting phases Clear signage may be necessary to reduce any confusion. We assume you the BCB and approving authority will satisfy yourselves regarding the non-standard approach.

3.2.3 Building A – Eighth Floor Level Shared Lift Lobby

6. All occupants from the Eighth floor of building A must pass through the lift lobby (08-002 Lift Lobby) to reach a place of relative safety This is highlighted in the CFD report which shows the whole lift lobby (08-002) and corridor (08-001) filled with smoke We do not feel it appropriate to consider the storey exit at the lobby door as this is not a place of relative safety. We therefore are of the opinion the travel distances for the 8th storey should be reconsidered and measured to a place of relative safety.

3.3 Vertical means of Escape

7. We note that an L2 fire alarm has been proposed instead of a type M (Manual) alarm system in order to apply a BS 9999 15% reduction/increase where necessary. We disagree that a manual alarm system would be appropriate and would expect that a suitable and sufficient fire risk assessment would include an automatic fire detection and alarm system for this type of building. Therefore, in our opinion the system provided is not enhancement and should not be used to justify the extended travel distances within the premises.

8. We note the total anticipated occupancy on upper floor levels is within the maximum numbers according to the total achievable occupancy load. However, as noted in the comment 7, above we do not feel a 15% reduction in the stair width per person is appropriate. We refer this to you the BCB and approving authority for review. If you do not agree with the 15% reduction in stair width then the maximum allowable occupancy will be reduced and the total anticipated occupancy will exceed this. Therefore, considerations will need to be made as to how the occupancy numbers will not exceed the maximum allowable occupancy

3.5 Open Spatial Void

9. We note that active fire curtain barrier assemblies (hereafter referred to as the “fire curtain(s)”) are proposed to be used to enclose the open spatial voids created by the feature stair. In our opinion, the use of fire curtains for the proposed application does not provide equivalence to traditional passive fire protection, composed of fire resisting walls and protected openings. This is in part due to the increased maintenance and testing expectations placed upon the responsible person by fire curtains. We recommend that the proposed use of fire curtains for this application be reconsidered. Where it is proposed to continue to use fire curtains, we request that further suitable justification be provided.

10. We note the proposed Townhall (open spatial void) at level six and seven of Building A. It is unclear who will manage this space to ensure the proposed floor capacities and the 2m sterile zone around the feature stair are managed. We assume this space will be occupied by those unfamiliar with the building and expect an appropriate risk profile is applied to this space

3.6 Provision of Refuges

11. Refuge spaces have not been clearly identified on the plans or within the fire strategy. We note the comment ‘a disabled refuge positioned in a place of safety’ however we question where this may be in each building. The mechanical smoke extraction from the lobbies will cause smoke to enter them eliminating them as an option as a place of safety. This is further demonstrated in the CFD reports. We therefore assume the only place of safety is considered to be within the staircase however we question how the minimum area (900mm x 1400mm) for the refuge

space is satisfied as it appears there is not the space to have the refuge space without impeding on the stair width

12. A sufficient number of lifts should be available at all times for both firefighters use and occupant evacuation. This number should also include a redundancy to ensure that there is at least one lift still available for use from all areas of the building, in the event of the lift being out of service (e.g., as a result of breakdown or maintenance). We assume that you as the approving authority will ensure that an acceptable number of lifts are provided, for both firefighters use and occupant evacuation.

5.2.2 Compartmentation

13. We feel there are significant increased risks with the proposed arrangements for the glazing on the stair core 2 in building B We refer you to our commentary in comment 9 above.

Building B Ground Floor Escape Stair Glazed Screen

14. Glass poses two problems in the event of a fire - excessive thermal radiation passing through the glass and cracking and falling out of the glass once a critical temperature difference has been reached. Compartmentation requires that areas are independent from each other and so the effects of fire on glass leads to situations where compartmentation breaks down.

A study investigating the effect of water film, or drencher systems, on glass, exposed to fire, suggests that crazing and falling out of the glass has a tendency to occur during cooling of the glass. The implication being that the thermal shock from water spray causes crack formation which subsequently propagates through the glass. This occurs due to a temperature difference across the thickness of the glass. In the case of impact of water, this may be characterised by a certain temperature on the exposed side.

Failure of the window leads to loss of integrity leading to potential increased smoke exposure nevertheless the use of water film does decrease the transmission of heat radiation decreasing the thermal exposure. Assessment of these scenarios and the hazards they present is needed to ensure that the building operates as intended, in the event of a fire. Avoidance of these glass failures requires assurances of certain temperatures on the exposed side of the glass. Principally because it is not possible to restrict water impact on glass as this would incur restrictions of fire fighter tactics.

General

Fire curtain assemblies

15. We note that active fire curtain barrier assemblies (hereafter referred to as “fire curtains”) are proposed to be provided. It is our expectation that that the fire curtain(s) will be specified to conform to the requirements of BS 8524 parts 1 and 2 and that consideration should be given to performance requirements such as:

• Suitable insulation and radiation performance in accordance with Clauses 5.6.3 and 5.6.4 of BS 8524-1:2013, where the fire curtain is proposed to be in proximity to an escape route or combustible materials;

• A reliability and durability Class suitable for the proposed frequency of testing of the assembly, in accordance with Clause 5.3 of BS 8524-1:2013: in our opinion, this is especially important where the fire curtain is proposed to compensate for the omission of passive fire protection in critical areas and it would be appropriate to test the fire curtain more frequently and in excess of the manufacturer’s recommended maintenance schedule;

• An emergency egress control, in accordance with Clause 5.4.3 of BS 8524-1:2013, for example where a fire curtain(s) is proposed to be located on means of escape routes;

• An emergency access control, in accordance with Clause 5.4.4 of BS 8524-1:2013, for example where a fire curtain(s) is proposed be located on fire and rescue service access routes;

• Sensory equipment for obstruction warning in accordance with Clause 5.8.5 of BS 8524-1:2013: in our opinion, this equipment should be considered whenever fire curtains are proposed to be provided in areas where it is reasonably foreseeable that obstructions such as furniture or luggage could be located.

For additional guidance, we refer to the ASFP published Black Book: Active Fire Curtains: Compartmentation and Protected Routes, 1st Edition: Guidance on specification, use and application of product.

CFD

16. We note that the modelling on this project has been demonstrated to meet the design objectives to the satisfaction of the Approving Authority (or in conjunction with their third-party reviewer). As such for this project LFB have only reviewed the accompanying report and not the modelling data itself.

(2) Observations on proposed scheme primarily relating to the Building Regulations

Project Honey Building A and Building B Fire Strategy Report, EDC-MAR-ZZ-XX-RP-Y-0009P07-S4_Rev 14, dated 07/08/2023

7.1 Access to the Building for Firefighting

17. Table 13 of the fire strategy indicates a minimum carrying capacity of 12.5(t). Please note LFB pumping appliances require a minimum carrying capacity of 14 tonnes. (See Fire Safety Guidance Note .29 attached).

18. We note the commentary proposing the omission of the dry riser outlet between levels seven and eight of stair 1A. It should be noted that hose distances are not the sole criteria for the recommendation of a second Firefighting shaft. We refer you to comment number 21 below. The omission of the dry riser outlet limits, firefighting tactical options, as attending fire crews will run two jets, one from the floor of origin (which is typically the back-up jet) and one (the primary jet) from the floor below, therefore, we do not concur with the justification as detailed and are of the opinion that the dry riser should be provided in accordance with clause 22.1 of BS 9999:2017.

19. We note the dry riser inlet for stair 2 of building A is located in a position that is not intuitive for firefighter access. It is our expectation the dry riser inlet is located on the external wall next to the access point for a firefighting shaft. With the current arrangements there may be confusion with the dry riser inlet for stair 1. Clear signage should be considered to ensure this confusion is restricted.

7.2 Temporary Firefighting Vehicle Access for Building B

20. We note the temporary firefighting arrangements which do not meet the recommendations of guidance. It is essential the time period for temporary arrangements is minimised Considerations should be made as to how the temporary arrangements will affect the firefighting operations and captured within the fire risk assessment. It should be ensured the continued safe operation for firefighters as well any additional provisions that can be implemented to reduce the additional demand on firefighting operations are provided.

7.3 Firefighting Shaft

21. We disagree with the inappropriate method undertaken to measure the floor plate of building B. The firefighting facilities clearly form part of the floor plate and are intended to be low risk in order to provide protection to firefighters and in our opinion must part of the calculated floor size. Further, it is our expectation and that of guidance such as Approved Document B and BS 9999 that building B should be served by two firefighting shafts. as the stated floor area is >900m2. It should be noted that hose coverage is not the sole determinant of the number of

firefighting shafts but just one factor. Consideration also needs to be given to aspects such as the impact of tenancy splits, the ability for firefighters to approach the fire from a different direction, carrying out firefighting and search and rescue activities simultaneously, and the ability to switch to another firefighting shaft if one is compromised. It is our view that the benefits of two firefighting shafts and the options these give attending fire crews are not met in this instance.

22. We note commentary in section 5.2.2 of the fire strategy proposing the dual-entry firefighter lift will meet the recommendations given in clause 20.4.3 of BS 9999:2017. However, we refer to clause 20.4.3 (d) where it states that “any storey served by a single firefighters lift should not be served by a dual-entry firefighters lift”. Therefore, we do not consider that the proposed design is suitable. It is our opinion that the dual-entry provision for the firefighters lift should be removed and the lift should open into the firefighting lobby only. The firefighting lift should also not be used as a goods lift.

23. We note commentary stating ‘the mezzanine floor is served solely by stair 1 and is not provided with a firefighting lift due to building constraints’ however we do not feel justification has been made for the deviation from clause 20.1.3 of BS 9999:2017

7.5 Fire Control Centre

24. The fire control centre for building B is located through a back of house corridor which has an unventilated bin store connected to it. It is our expectations that 0.2m2 of permanent ventilation or a suitable mechanical alternative is provided as per clause 15.10 of BS 9999:2017. We question how the proposed arrangements can be considered acceptable and assume you, the BCB and approving authority will ensure the proposed arrangements do not negatively impact the access to the fire control centre.

7.7 Smoke ventilation

25. It is unclear from the documents provided whether ventilation is provided to the lobby of the firefighting shaft at the mezzanine level of building A. It is our expectation all levels accessed from the firefighting shaft should have the necessary provisions outlined in clause 20 and 27 of BS 9999:2017. Please provide further justification as to the ventilation provisions for the mezzanine level.

(3) Additional observations and recommendations relating to proposed scheme

Project Honey MSCP Building C Fire Strategy Report, EDC-MAR-CXX001-XX-RP-Y-0002-P05S4_Rev 04, dated 26/06/2023

7.6 Car Park Electric Charging Points

26. We note that the proposals include enclosed car parking areas and recommend that consideration is given in relation to electric vehicle (EV) charging units, together with the potential fire risk posed by their battery systems. The following should be considered, preferably as part of a Qualitative Design Review (QDR) and, following the recommendations given in BS 7974. This is not intended to be an exhaustive list of considerations:

• Whether the smoke ventilation provisions for car parks are sufficient to manage the products of combustion from a fire involving one or more EVs

• Whether AWFSS require enhancements beyond the minimum recommendations of the relevant standards

• Whether the fire resistance of elements of structure should be increased beyond the minimum recommendations of this code of practice

• Whether car parking spaces served by EVCUs should be located closer to the access points to the car park for the fire and rescue services and to any fire main outlets in order to assist firefighters in applying extinguishing media to the fire

• Whether there should be provision for the safe removal of any EV car that has been involved in a fire and may still pose a risk of reignition. If access to the space is only via a car lift, for example, this may not provide such suitable provision

• Whether the water supplies provided for the fire and rescue services should be enhanced beyond the minimum requirements of BS 9990 and other relevant standards, in particular with regard to the duration of water supply available

• Suitable protection to car park internal surfaces and drainage systems to facilitate post-fire clean-up and environmental protection

This list is not intended to be exhaustive. However, it covers some of the areas of consideration that we would expect to be addressed by the project design team. We would also recommend liaising with the relevant insurance provider as they may have their own requirements.

A means of isolating the power supply to EVCUs should be provided for the fire and rescue services in a suitable location associated with, but outside of, the fire resisting enclosure to any car park containing EVCUs. This should be at the main designated access point to the building or car park for the fire and rescue services. Signage should be provided to identify the power supply isolation controls and this should state:

“FIREFIGHTERS ELECTRICAL ISOLATION SWITCH FOR CAR PARK ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING UNITS”

The signage should be conform to BS 5499-1.

The location(s) of power supply isolation controls serving EVCUs should be indicated on premises information provided for firefighters.

The power supply to all EVCUs should also be automatically isolated upon actuation of the fire warning and detection system or sprinkler system serving the car park in which they are located.

EVCUs should be provided with a suitable level of water resistance to ensure that they do not pose a hazard to firefighters should they become immersed in water, either as a result of the activation of the sprinkler system or firefighting operations.

It is our strong recommendation that car parks containing EVCUs should be provided with sprinkler coverage in accordance with BS 9251:2021 or BS EN 12845:2015+A1, irrespective of whether a building is otherwise provided with a sprinkler system.

General

Cycle storage areas

27. The proposals include a cycle storage area. It is our opinion that consideration is given to the storage (and potential charging) of electric bikes and electric scooters and the potential fire risk posed by these electric powered personal vehicles (EPPV)s which may be located within these areas. There is increasing evidence showing that EPPVs can spontaneously ignite and burn for long periods so there is an increased potential for toxic gases/smoke/fire spread. It is therefore our recommendation that adequate automatic fire suppression and smoke control systems for the area are necessary. As such storage would be deemed an ancillary area, we are of the view that it should be provided with a ventilated lobby in accordance with the recommendations given in clause 32 of BS 9991:2015. If EPPVs are to be stored in this location, then a fire risk assessment may identify this room as a place of special fire hazard and appropriate fire safety measures should be provided, taking into account the guidance provided in RC59 Recommendations for fire safety when charging electric vehicles.

28. We note that a significant number of photovoltaic cells are to be installed. Care should be taken to ensure that these are installed correctly to the manufacturer’s recommendations due to concerns that have become known in regards to the fire hazards associated with poorly fitted installations. We recommend that ‘arc-fault’ protection is fitted if possible, and also request that it is clarified whether there is any access (e.g. for maintenance) to the areas where the cells are situated.

It is our expectation that suitable isolation controls will be provided for use by firefighters. These controls should be accessible to firefighters and provided with suitable local signage to identify their location. The location of isolation controls should also be shown on premises information plans provided in a Secure Information Box or equivalent operational/emergency information pack provided for fire and rescue service use, as appropriate.

29. We note that the design includes proposals for green/living building envelope elements. We presume that you, as the approving authority, are satisfied that the proposed green/living building elements do not conflict with functional requirement B4 of the Building Regulations or Greater London Authority Town and Country Planning policy with regard to combustible elements external wall and roof construction.

It is our expectation that the fire performance and fire safety of green/living building envelope elements will be considered as part of the fire safety strategy for the proposed development. We refer you to guidance such as that given in the Green Roof Organisation (GRO) Green Roof Code (2014) and the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) guidance on Fire Performance of Green Roofs and Walls (August 2013), referenced in Approved Document B.

Regulation 38 (Building Regulations)

30. Where applicable, we presume that you, as the BCB and approving authority, will check to ensure that adequate fire safety information (as detailed in Section 17 of Approved Document B, Volume 1/Section 19 of Approved Document B, Volume 2) will be issued to the responsible person for the premises at the completion of the project, or when the building or extension is first occupied.

(4) Expected outcome of consultation

Based on the nature of the items raised above in sections 1 to 3:

☒ We would expect to be consulted further to this letter due to the significant issues raised in relation to matters under The Order and/or Building Regulations. In our view further information should be provided in regard to the following:

Comments numbered 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 13, 19, 21, 23, 24, 25

Notwithstanding the above, we presume that all comments/observations raised in this consultation letter will be forwarded to the client/project design team for consideration.

The above observations are in relation to the current proposal and may not be relevant to any future proposal.

Any queries regarding this letter should be addressed to FSR-AdminSupport@london-fire.gov.uk. If you are dissatisfied in any way with the response given, please ask to speak to the Team Leader quoting our reference.

Yours faithfully,

Assistant Commissioner (Prevention & Protection)

Reply To: Building Design Consultation Hub (via FSR-AdminSupport@london-fire.gov.uk)

There is clear evidence that Automatic Water Fire Suppression Systems (AWFSS) can reduce the number of deaths and injuries from fire, as well as reducing the risk to firefighters.

The London Fire Brigade strongly encourages those who design, construct and approve residential and commercial buildings, to go beyond the minimum expectation of compliance and include AWFSS in a wider variety of buildings. There are also additional benefits to the inclusion of AWFSS in terms of property protection, environmental protection and business continuity.

Further guidance can be found on the Brigade’s website.

TECHNICAL AUDIT

SITE INSPECTION REPORT

Approved Consultant Services Limited

Tel: 020 7079 1028

Buildzone Ref Number: BZ9084931

Address: Project Honey Eden Street Kingston KT1 1ER

Description: NewDevelopmentof2xOfficeBlocksand1 x Car Parking Block

Surveyor: Ahmet Ozcagli

Developer / Contractor Details:

Summary of Visit:

Developer Name: Globe Kingston Ltd

Contractor Name: McLaughlin & Harvey Ltd

Project ManagementName: Francis Hunter

Inspections Required: 27 (Twenty Seven)

Inspection No: 14 of 27

Date: Updated: 03.05.2024

Time on site: 11:00hrs

Surveyor Email: technical@approvedconsultant.co.uk aozcagli@approvedconsultant.co.uk

Photographs: Yes

Inspection Madewith Contractor / Developer: Yes

David Lunt– 07885959943 – David.lunt@francishunter.co.uk

Luke Nurser– 07568188829 – luke.nurser@francishunter.co.uk

Farid Safavi – 07843368758 – farid.safavi@francishunter.co.uk

Joe Gooden - joe.gooden@build-zone.com

Nick Sullivan – nick.sullivan@towergate.co.uk

General Site Layout:

Site visit carried out in company of contractor site manager.

Block A:

Drylining fire stopping progressed up to 9th floor.

MEP works ongoing at all floors.

Prefabricated façade panel installations commenced at 2nd floor progressed partially up to 6th floor.

East elevation CP panel installations over SFS and steel has progressed up to roof level.

Roof heat insulation works 90% completed. Roof floor cladding works 80% completed.

Façade heat insulation installations at roof levelongoing with render.

Ground and 1st floor curtain wall installations ongoing.

Block B:

Drylining works mostly complete.

Drylining fire stopping progressed up to 8th floor.

MEP works ongoing at all floors.

Prefabricated panel installation progressed partially up to 8th floor.

Ground and 1st floor curtain wall profile and glazing installations ongoing.

Roof level heat insulation and raised floor installations ongoing.

Raised access floor installations progressed up to 6th floor.

Suspended ceiling panel installations commenced and ongoing at several levels.

Block C:

Façade panel installations ongoing at several elevations.

Concrete floor works completed from ground to top floor.

Roof waterproofing works completed.

.11 For Block B, provide structuralengineer’s written approval of fire door opening core wall cutting works.

.13 ProviderepairmethodstatementandimagesofrepairsatBlockCprecastelements.

.17 Clientis advisedto provide repair methodology and images ofrepair applications to floor concrete at Block C roof level.

.18 Clientis advisedto provide repair methodology and images ofrepair applications to floor concrete at Block C 1st level.

.26 Notable images from visit on 03.05.2024

Information required

Information required

Information required

Information required

Observations

2.00 Technical Submissions

.01

Provide pre-pour QA inspection records for slab and columns.

.02 Provide Building Control Site inspection reports periodically, throughout the course of construction. (Provided up to 06.2023)

.03

.04

.05

.06

.07

Provide Full Architectural Package (RIBA Stage 5)

Provide Full Structural Package and Calculations (RIBA Stage 5)

Provide pile integrity tests certificates.

Provide Cube test results.

ProvideHeatsoakandimpacttestcertificationforallexternallyglazedunitsthatare not serviceable from eitherground floor or from within

.08 Provide Flat roof and terracewaterproofing IBG

.09 Confirm full list of external cladding materials proposed.

.10 Provide window & external door manufacture guarantee.

.11

Provide QA records for precast elements from manufacturer

3.00 Other matters arising (at time of inspection)

.01 Where applicable, minimum statutory documentation and certification required:

Pre-pour inspection records from site engineer

Building Controlsite inspection reports

Fire consultant QA records

Basement waterproofing QA records

Pile integrity test certs

Bolt checking QA records

Weld test certs

Cube test certs

Static load test certs

Basement waterproofing IBG

Terrace and flat roof IBG

BBA certification for any rainscreen cladding or brick slips

Glazing / curtain walling heat soak and impact testing certs

Building ControlCompletion Cert(s)

EPC

As built SAPS

Mechanical Ventilation certification

Chlorination certs

Gas/water/elec certs

Fire doorcompliance commissioning

Fire suppression, alarm commissioning

Sound tests

Air tests

Lift Commissioning

Drainage pressure testing (written confirmation from AI) & orCCTV

NEXT VISIT: 30.05.2024

Provided

Information required (ongoing)

Provided

Provided

Provided

Information required

Information required

Information required

Provided

Provided

Information required

Information required. (At completion of project)

Note

TECHNICAL AUDIT REMEDIATION TRACKER

BuildzoneRef Number: BZ9084931

Address: ProjectHoney

InspectionsRequired: 27 (Twentyseven)

InspectionNo: 14 of 27 Eden Street

DateofInspection: 03.05.2024 Kingston KT1 1ER

Surveyor: Ahmet Ozcagli

Key: UrgentRemediation

Client is advised to provide belowinformation for works before site visit:

•Provide images of works before visitincluding pile caps,foundations before concrete pour, floor slab before concrete pour,Core twin wall installations.

•Provide pile integritytests certificates.

•Provide pre-pour QAinspection records for foundations,slabs,columns and core wall installations.

1.02 Provide images of drainage works before backfilling.

Provide structural engineer’s solution or approval for the low concrete coverage for steel over precastslab at Block A ground floor.

Provide structural engineer’s solution or approval for the low concrete coverage for steel over precastslab at Block B ground floor.

Provide structural engineer’s solution or approval for the low concrete coverage for steel over precastslab at Block C ground floor.

For Block B,provide structural engineer’s written approval of fire door opening core wall cutting works.

Provide repair method statementand images of repairs at Block C precast elements.

1.14 Provide images of Block C car park floors before concrete pours.

Client is advised to provide repair methodologyand images of repair applications to floor concrete at Block C roof level.

Client is advised to provide repair methodologyand images of repair applications to floor concrete at Block C 1st level.

1.20 Provide waterproofing leak tests for Block A.

1.21 Provide waterproofing leak tests for Block B.

1.23 Provide waterproofing leak tests for Block C. 2.00TechnicalSubmissions

2.01 Pre-pour QA inspection reports

2.02 Ongoing - Building control inspection records Provided & Ongoing

2.03 Full RIBA Stage 5 Architectural Drawings

2.04 Full RIBA Stage 5 Structural Drawings and Calcs

2.05 Pile integritytest results

2.06 Cube testresults

2.07 Heat soak and impacttestglass specifications

2.08 Terrace and flat roof IBG

2.09 List of full cladding materials proposed

2.10 Windows & external door manufacture guarantees

2.11 Provide QA records for precast elements from manufacturer

3.00Othermattersarising(attimeofinspection)

3.01 Provide all statutoryand certification documentation at projectcompletion

inline with technical reporting

Pre-pour inspection records from site engineer

Building Control site inspection reports

Fire consultant QA records

Basementwaterproofing QA records

Pile integritytest certs

Bolt checking QA records

Weld testcerts

Cube testcerts

Static load testcerts

Basementwaterproofing IBG

Terrace and Flat roof IBG

BBA certification for anyrainscreen cladding or brick slips

Glazing / curtain walling heat soak and impacttesting certs

Building Control Completion Cert(s)

EPC

As built SAPS

Mechanical Ventilation certification

Chlorination certs

Gas/water/elec certs

Fire door compliance commissioning

Fire suppression,alarm commissioning

Sound tests

Air tests

Lift Commissioning

Drainage pressure testing (written confirmation from AI) & or CCTV