Project Honey - August Dashboard Report 240902

summarised progress report

prepared for Globe Kingston Limited

August 2024

summarised progress report

Surrey House Island Site – Project Honey (10372)

contents

1.0 executive summary

2.0 programme

3.0 planning update

4.0 legals

5.0 design and project update

6.0 procurement update

7.0 construction works update

8.0 health and safety matters

9.0 tenant variations and approvals update

10.0 sustainability / Net Zero Carbon

11.0 environmental status update

12.0 key risks

13.0 areas of concern

14.0 key activities in the reporting period

15.0 lookahead – key activities in the next reporting period

appendices

appendix a - AfL completion deliverables tracker

appendix b – LoR & warranties tracker

appendix c – planning / S106 conditions

appendix d – EAI tracker

appendix e – outline programme

https://francishunter.sharepoint.com/sites/FH/Shared

appendix f– G&T update report

appendix g – MCLH update report

appendix h – BREEAM tracker

appendix i– Aecom CMT report

appendix j – MNP CMT report

appendix k – ORSA monthly CDM report

appendix l – DAA CMT report

appendix m – McLH procurement schedule

appendix n – McLH programme

appendix o – Lautus progress report

appendix p – latest Buildzone tracker/report

appendix q – commissioning meeting notes

appendix r – Plowman Craven latest measure

appendix s – guarantee schedule

appendix t - Notice of Relevant Event 06

appendix u – Notice of Relevant Event 07

appendix

https://francishunter.sharepoint.com/sites/FH/Shared

project: Surrey House Island Site, Project Honey

client: Globe Kingston Ltd/Cube Advisers Ltd r eport: summarised progress report – August 2024

distribution: Cube

1.0 executive summary

The purpose of this summary statement, is to provide a periodic update of activities undertaken by the developer’s project team, currently engaged to implement the redevelopment of Surrey House Island Site and to discharge Hathaway Opportunity Fund/Globe Kingston’s obligations under the Agreement for Development and Lease dated 9 December 2020 (and it’s Deed of Variations dated 8 April 2021 and 25 May 2022) with Unilever; and the Development Funding Agreement with LCN exchanged on 25 May 2022 and completed on the 14 June 2022.

The Main Contractor, Mclaughlin & Harvey Construction are appointed under a JCT Design & Build Contract dated 25 May 2022. The Contract has been signed based on a fixed price for Buildings A and B, and a guaranteed maximum price (Provisional Sum) for Building C.

MCLH are reporting that works on site are currently 4 weeks behind on Building A, 1 week behind on Building B (taking into account the EoT) and 2 weeks behind programme on Building C The MCLH construction programme has now been issued, and progress is being tracked against this updated programme (R16)

On Building A – MEP install is progressing throughout Unitised façade works are now almost complete The stick system continues on the ground and first floor. Otis have completed their installation of lifts Feature stair install is ongoing on all floors. Raised access floor is now complete on all floors.

On Building B - MEP install is progressing up to level 10 The stick system glazing is ongoing on the ground and first floor, with air tests complete Otis have installed all lifts Raised access floor has been installed on all floors

On Building C – Façade is complete with green brick ongoing at ground floor The changing area fit out is ongoing Landscape works on the roof are ongoing with all PVs now installed.

The key risk previously reported relating to UKPN and Thames Water has now been fully resolved. All three buildings have power and water on The impact on programme has been realised with Notice of Relevant Event 06 and 07 being raised due to late Utility (both water and power) connections. MCLH are currently reporting a 4-week delay to PC, which is under review.

The façade continues to be a risk on the project due to programme challenges and issues with alignment The majority of remaining works relate to the Equitone core cladding on Building A and B and resolving alignment issues.

A further key risk is the S278 works, which due to a significantly elongated technical approval period is being carried out far later than envisaged. The S278 agreement has now been agreed with Highways/ Council, with a Highways Contractor selected (Rineys) Two road closures are due to commence on the 9th September until mid-November. This is subject to the S278 being completed and LOI being issued a week prior to commencement of works on site. The remaining Eden Street and line painting works will commence in January 2025 due to the Christmas moratorium.

some key activities that have been undertaken in the current reporting period include.

• Agree LOI and Contract terms with S278 Contractor (Rineys)

• Continue to review design packages received from MCLH and progress the approval process with UL and LCN in line with the programme.

• Condition 49 – Booked meeting with Park Mark on site mid-September

• Complete Building A façade (unitised)

• Snagged 2nd 3rd and 4th floors of Building B

• Completed measurement of Building B

• Commenced measurement of Building A (levels 2,3,4 and 5)

some key activities that will be undertaken within the next reporting period include.

• S278 – Put in place Bond for the S278 works

• Execute Contracts with S278 Contractor

• Continue to review design packages received from MCLH and progress the approval process with UL and LCN in line with the programme

• Complete Building B façade (ground and first)

• Com plete Building A façade (unitised)

• Snag all floors of Building B

• Commence snagging of Building A

• Remove remaining tower crane TC3

• Place contract for FLOW artwork to commence fabrication

high level financials

• Contract Sum - £122,962,469.66

• Contract variations to date - -£927,401.05 (net)

• Projected Final Account - £122,035,068.61

2.0 programme

Following the Unconditional date being confirmed on the 14 June 2022, which has commenced the 27-month construction Longstop period the below schedule reflects the latest programme attached to this report in Appendix E and follows the issue of the Possession Notice on 4 July 2022 and Deferment of Possession commencing works on the 20th September 2022

MCLH are now reporting against their Construction programme July 2024 Rev 16, which we are reporting against.

Following a review of MCLH programme and MCLH progress on site, FHPM’s current view on programme is as follows;

- Building A – 4 weeks behind

- Building B – 3 days behind (taking into account EoT 04)

- Building C – 2 weeks and 1 day behind

The key risks to MCLH programme are as follows;

- Thames Water – Works now completed however this has impacted commissioning as MCLH had to work off temporary water for an extended period of time. This has resulted in Notice of Relevant Event 06. MCLH have highlighted a critical delay to the scheme leading to a completion date of Section 1 and 2 of 18th November 2024.

- UKPN – Live testing of the main LV panel is 4 weeks in delay and now a critical path activity affecting the end date. This is directly related to the lateness of the power-on date and has led to Notice of Relevant Event 07 being issued by MCLH with a critical delay leading to completion of Section 1 and 2 of 18th November 2024.

- Access to site – External works being carried out within site and the S278 works are likely to impact access to site. This is being closely co-ordinated and monitored.

- S278 works – Works will need to commence prior to PC, and this is likely to impact on the site logistics. This will need to be managed closely and co-ordinated with MCLH to minimise any impact.

- Fit-out of the changing village in Building C – Now on critical path and likely to overrun.

- Equitone Cladding – Delay to Equitone cladding has led to a delay in being able to remove the two mast climbers on site as well as TC3. This has had a knock-on impact on the ability of MCLH to progress the External Works. Both mast climbers and TC3 are due to be removed before the end of September.

*Following instruction of SMART infrastructure.

3.0 planning update

3.1 general update

All pre-occupation conditions that can be submitted, have been. Please see Condition Tracker for further detail. In the last reporting period, a rejection to Conditions 43 and 44 was received due to insufficient information. These will be resubmitted by 6 September 2024.

3.2 planning conditions & S278 agreements

Highways have now agreed the scope of the S278 works, with the S278 agreement itself agreed and ready for engrossment. Riney have been selected as the S278 Contractor and are under a letter of instruction to progress long lead items and traffic management. Works are to start on site on the 9 th September 2024, where both Brook Street and St James’s Road will be closed for 8 weeks.

The scope of the Secure by Design requirements for Building C have now been agreed with the DOCO. The updated pack has been issued to the DOCO. Once external doors are in place, the DOCO and Park Mark will inspect and sign off works. Outstanding conditions set out below;

3.3 progress against S106 employment and procurement requirement

MCLH have now issued to the Council confirmation of their procurement of 15% of works in the local area as well as their current status of local employment. We have had several queries from the Council which have been responded to.

There are now monthly meetings in place with representatives of the Council to demonstrate the team’s willingness to meet the set targets.

4.1 AfDL conditions update

The AfDL is now Unconditional, and therefore conditionality will not be reported on going forward.

4.2 appointments and warranties

Terms have been agreed with all principal consultants together with all relevant fees and cash flows based upon the current programme A schedule of appointments and warranties has been agreed with both the Fund and the Occupier.

A full schedule of appointments and contracts is being managed and monitored by Francis Hunter, a copy of which is included within the appendix.

It has been 12 months since Unconditional and therefore additional pressure is being put on MCLH and Gowlings to resolve the outstanding Warranties. Regarding Lender Warranties, the majority of current significant designers/ subcontractors have now been signed

The additional warranties requested by the Lender have been provided and are currently being executed

4.3 construction documents

The JCT D&B Contract was signed and dated on the 25th May 2022, with all terms agreed with the Contractor, Funder and Occupier. A Possession Notice was signed and issued on the 4th July 2022 to enact the Contract confirming a possession date of 12th September 2022 Following a number of obstructions and issues found on site during demolition, the Date of Possession was deferred to the 20th September 2022.

Buildings B and C were deferred until 26th September 2022, although MCLH have since confirmed the second deferment had no impact on the overall programme

A breakdown of extensions of time and expected relevant events is shown in the programme section of this report.

The Employer’s Requirements are back-to-back with drawings and specifications within the DOV and DFA.

5.0 design and project updat e

MEPH, Architectural and Structural Stage 5 design is progressing

Throughout the process, information will be shared with the Occupier and Funder so that this review process can happen alongside the Developers in order to achieve the timescales noted above.

It should be noted that variations going forward are likely to have a significant impact on the design, procurement and construction programme due to the stage the project is at. These will need to be considered when contemplating any further variations.

5 1 k ey design changes/ issues under consideration

Fire Curtains/ Shutters – The revised proposal is for UL to provide a formal letter confirming that they will not occupy until the works set out in the base build fire strategy and in particular the fire curtain around the feature stair of level 6 and 7 are completed. On this basis SWECO are willing to give a full Final Certificate for the works of Building A. We await formal confirmation of this.

Public Art design – Detailed design and damper design is now underway. Due to the Public Art interface with the façade and the structure of three separate buildings it continues to cause complications. Detailed design of the connections to and through the façade of the buildings is being completed by CMF (MCLH sub-contractor)

Fire escape doors GF – Due to lack of tested systems on the market, the Contractor has proposed a double door for the fire escape doors that sit beside the lift lobby on the Ground Floor. This has been presented to UL for review and acceptance and now needs formally closing.

6.0 procurement update

Following lengthy negotiations with MCLH, the JCT D&B Contract was signed with a Contract Sum of £122,962,469.66 dated 25th May 2022.

MCLH have issued a revised procurement schedule, which is appended to this report This will be tracked by FHPM going forward.

The G&T Report is appended in Appendix F.

7.0 construction works update

Below is an update on progress in the last reporting period:

• Continuing MEPH works throughout A and B

• Continued roofing works to the roof of all buildings

• Completion of Building A unitised façade

• Completed lift installation to Buildings A and B

• Continued ceiling works in Building A and B

• Completed raised access floor installation in Building A and B

• Continuing steelwork to the feature stair, reception steel, balustrades

• Continuing green brick at ground floor of Building C

• Commenced external works in Woodland Walk

8.0 health and safety matters

ORSA, as Principal Designer, are progressing key design risk assessments with the team as the design develops and continue to keep the professional team informed at all stages. ORSA are carrying out monthly site inspections of works being undertaken by MCLH and providing reports.

ORSA carried out a site inspection on the 30th August 2024, and their findings are appended to this report.

A RIDDOR event occurred in the last reporting period on the 6th August 2024. The details, conclusions and actions/ recommendations from this event are appended to this report. ORSA are currently reviewing.

9.0 tenant variations and approvals update

Variations instructed in the last reporting period are set out below (and set out in more detail in the variation tracker within the appendix)

- EAI 142 – 9-Aug-24 - MSCP Provisional Sum Expenditure - Fire Stopping/ Roller Shutter

- EAI 143 - 16-Aug-24 - MSCP Provisional Sum Expenditure - Wayfinding

- EAI 144 - 19-Aug-24 - Bollard revised layouts

- EAI 145 – 19-Aug-24 - Cancellation of EAI 136

There are a number of expected upcoming tenant/ developer variations requests, which are as follows;

• Terrace power/ lighting/ water

• Building A 7th Floor East Riser Ductwork

• FLOW artwork connections

As noted earlier in the report, given the stage the project is at, variations are becoming more impactful and will potentially result in abortive design costs, cancellation charges and programme delays.

The below table sets out in more detail the variations in the last reporting period. This is the capital cost of the variation and does not include any finance costs;

variation reference variation description

MSCP Provisional Sum

Expenditure - Fire Stopping/ Roller Shutter EAI 142 Prov Sum Expenditure of Provisional Sum

MSCP Provisional Sum

Expenditure - Wayfinding EAI 143 Prov Sum Expenditure of Provisional Sum

Bollard revised layouts EAI 144 TBC Occupier

Cancellation of EAI 136 EAI 145 TBC Occupier TOTAL for the reporting period £0

10.0

sustainability/

Net Zero Carbon

In line with undertakings within the AfDL the developer team continue to follow the sustainability commitments. All members of the design team are specifically charged with supporting the objectives and developing the design accordingly.

Design is progressing based on achieving BREEAM Excellent and EPC A. Currently ac hieving 79.54% which is the same projected figure as the previous month.

11.0 environmental status update

As it stands, there are no environmental issues identified on site. This will continue to be monitored as the project progresses.

12.0 measured surveys update

Below table sets out the NIA of each floor as set out in DFA and DOV compared to actual measures currently being carried out by Plowman Craven (see appendix R). These numbers are inclusive of tenant variation changes.

B - 9 Office 8,957 9,333 15 August 2024

B - 8 Office 8,957 9.321 15 August 2024

B - 7 Office 8,963 9,310 15 August 2024

B - 6 Office 8,963 9,299 10 July 2024

B - 5 Office 8,963 9,306 10 July 2024

B - 4 Office 8,961 9,293 06 June 2024

B - 3 Office 8,961 9,290 06 June 2024

B - 2 Office 8,961 9,296 06 June 2024

B - 1 Office 7,557 7,822 15 August 2024

B - G (Office) Office 2,707 2,865 15 August 2024

B - G (Reception) Reception 3,422 3,515 15 August 2024

Ground FloorShared Reception 852

6th Floor - Link Reception 469

NPC Parking 1

Car Parking 354

13.0 key risks

Principal risks during the immediate next phases that could impact on the deliverability of the scheme are as follows;

of

of

R1 Health & Safety The Principal Designer (ORSA) are fully integrated into the team and providing regular updates, as well as carrying out monthly site inspections during the construction contract RIDDOR event occurred on site in the last reporting period. Its findings are appended to this report.

R2 Programme delays due to COVID 19

R3 Construction (Contractor) delays

R4 Planning Condition Delays

R5 Contractor/ sub-contractor insolvency

No programme impact as yet and risk mitigated within AfDL.

Tight town centre site with complex logistics will increase risks of delay significantly. This is now primarily a contractor risk item S278 works will impact logistics on site and these works/ road closures will need to be co-ordinated with MCLH and the Highways Contractor L M

The planning conditions are being tracked on a weekly basis, with Chartplan in discussions with RBKT. The pre-occupation conditions are currently being submitted

The financial status of the Main Contractor and its key supply chain is checked on a quarterly basis. The financial stability of all sub-contractors is the Contractor’s risk. The latest checks were carried out in March 2024, which raised no significant concerns.

R6 Impact of the Ukraine War There is a ‘carve out’ in the JCT for the impact of the Ukraine War on programme. This will be monitored going forward to ensure packages are procured early enough to mitigate.

R7 Brexit import delay

There is a ‘carve out’ in the JCT for Brexit import delay on programme. This will be monitored going forward to ensure packages are procured early enough to mitigate. It is worth noting that the façade is now being procured from Northern Ireland, this further reduces the potential of this risk.

R8 Achieving areas To ensure the targeted areas are achieved, these will be checked at each design stage and as Construction progresses to ensure the development is falling within the min/max area brackets.

and Developer

R9 Cost Overrun

R10 Twin Wall

R11 Utilities –UKPN/ Thames Water

R12 S278 Agreement

Section 12 outlines the measures to date. Further measures were carried out on the 15th August 2024 The final measure is taking place on the 4th September

The Contract has been signed on a fixed price, however there are Provisional Sums which could lead to an overspend and require expenditure of the contingency. These are reported on each month by G&T and the Provisional Sums are to be closed out as early as possible.

An alternative LDI policy with Build-Zone has been agreed, and the Deed of Variation to replace the Aviva policy has been agreed and signed. The cost and programme impact of the twin-wall has been closed with the signing of the DOV. It should be noted that delays during resolving the issue have impacted the programme and resulted in delays beyond the current reported delay.

The UKPN works are complete with substations in place and highway works complete. Power-on is now on in all three buildings, however this is later than planned and has impacted the Commissioning programme. Notice of Relevant Event 06 and 07 have now been issued by MCLH for delay to Power and Water on. These are currently being reviewed.

Highways have now agreed to the scope of the S278 works and the S278 agreement itself has been agreed with the Council although not completed A bond is ready to be put in place and a contractor has been selected to carry out these works (Riney). Works are due to commence on the 9th September 2024. This is at risk, due to S278 not being completed and Contractor not formally instructed.

R13 Clarkes façade programme

Clarkes façade manufacturing and installation programme is behind. MCLH have put forward a recovery programme which will be updated weekly. Majority of unitised works complete. Work now focused on stick at Ground and First, as well as the Equitone cladding on core walls of Building A and B

R14 MEPH weather damage

MEPH works are progressing on floors prior to the façade being installed. This is not necessarily an issue; however, a concern has been raised by Aecom and the tenant team. MCLH have provided an uplifted testing regime to deal with these out of sequence works. This is under review

R15 LFB Sign off LFB have been formally responded to however MCLH confirmed at the reporting meeting that all points have been responded back to SWECO who have raised no significant concerns.

Risk Register Key High risk -

14.0 areas of concern

Façade - The façade manufacturing and installation programme is currently behind Meetings are being held on a weekly basis to discuss progress and a tracker will be circulated to all parties Progress has been improved in the last reporting period however there are still significant concerns regarding the façade that has been installed, particularly regarding alignment. These are now being closed out, with Building B alignment repairs complete A solution for Building A vertical gaps has been agreed and are waiting on a final report from MCLH/ Clarkes to close this.

S278 Agreement -

Highways have now agreed to the scope of the S278 works and the S278 agreement itself has been agreed with the Council (although not engrossed) A bond is awaiting surety prior to being put in place and Riney have been selected to carry out the works. These works are due to commence on the 9th September.

Fire Curtains/ Shutters – Still awaiting instruction to proceed with the 6th and 7th floor fire curtain. An alternative proposal is under review which will negate the requirement for these works to form part of the base build development works.

15.0 k ey activities in the reporting period

I. Completed Building A unitised facade.

II. Progress tenant variations.

III. Review design release packages issued by MCLH.

IV. Continue to look at options of reducing the carbon impact of the development.

V. Agreed form of appointment with Highways Contractor

VI. Closed out Early Access Protocol with UL

VII. Arranged Park Mark inspection for mid-September

VIII. Submit further conditions as per 3.2

IX. Snagged levels 1 – 4 of Building B

X. Continued to progress Commissioning of systems to Building A and B

XI. Completed measure for all of Building B

XII. Progress ed measures on Building A

lookahead

– k ey activities in the next reporting period

I. Complete façade works

II. Progress tenant variations

III. Review design release packages issued by MCLH.

IV. Continue to look at options of reducing the carbon impact of the development.

V. Formally appoint Highways Contractor to carry out S278 works

VI. Remove mast climber and crane from site.

VII. Close out Park Mark with Car Park Operator

VIII. Close out conditions as per 3.2

IX. Formally agree proposal to resolve Building A façade issue

X. Instruct connection details and cables for the public art to Buildings A, B and C.

XI. Complete measure for all of Building A

XII. Commence highway works

appendices

A. AfDL completion deliverables tracker

B LoR & warranties tracker

C Planning/ S106 Conditions

D EAI Tracker

E Outline Programme

F G&T Update Report

G MCLH Update Report

H BREEAM Tracker I Aecom Update Report

J MNP Update Report

K ORSA Update Report

L DAA Update Report

M McLH Procurement Schedule

N McLH Construction Programme

O. Lautus Progress Report

P Buildzone tracker/ report

Q Commissioning Meeting Notes

R. Plowman Craven latest measure

S. Guarantee Schedule

T. Notice of Relevant Event 06

U. Notice of Relevant Event 07

V. RIDDOR Report – 6th August 2024

AfL completion deliverables tracker

project Honey completion deliverables -AFL

project Honey completion deliverables -AFL

-

Access

IR:Note this is tenant wayleaves for Unilever so NOT satisfied unless all your wayleaves are in place.LN : Confiirmed all our wayleaves are in place. No further wayleaves required for Developer. What else is required from us to satisfy? DG this is for LCN/Unilever and is not a deliverable for PC but there is an obligation for us to help them do it so keep on this list and ask Unilever what they are doing re this.UL t fi tiitd

In progress….agreed with Nick. Formalised and will be saitisfied. UL have confirmed no Early Access being taken….so clause satisfied. Contract Protocol being used as agreed.

Anticipated 9th September 2024. Not an issue atm but leave on list. Early access not happening so satisfied. Confirmation email inc in folder dated 16.08.24

project Honey completion deliverables -AFL

Snagging /defects lists (13.8 & 17) Ongoing. Need list by sectional completion.

4 Licence for Alterations (tenant works) and Tenants Drawings

4 Variations to the building contract - Signed RFCs

9.3 DRAFT H&S files

9.6 O&M manuals (9.6 (b)) SEE 9.3

Also clause 12. No LTA required at point of lease signature, updated LTA programme to be agreed between Unilever and KF.

48 of 68 variations have been signed by Unilever. In progress. FHPM/ Mace to close out outstanding RFCs

Draft H & S File to be provided 2 weeks before PCD . FHPM have requested them from MCLH. …drafts received. Ongoing. Awaiting confirmation of date of draft issue

One set of maintenance & operation manuals to be provided 2 weeks before PCD. They have been requested from MCLH. Drafts received. Targetready for review end of August. LN: Access given to Unilever's Team plus Colliers, in draft format.

(Client Monitoring Team)

project Honey completion deliverables -AFL

4.6 Tenant CAT A Works payments and Tenant Invoice

4.7 Final Lease Plans (Buildings A/B) (4.7 & 22)

4.7 Final licence plan (car park) (4.7 & 22)

To be closed out by the end of the month so that invoicing can de done at the end of the month with payment 10 days before PC. Total view inc contributions, finance charges and rent

Sent to GWL 27.08.24 for issue FHPM/Mace then GWlngs to MB

Car Park Meeting to be arranged with all parties to close out and agree. DAA to produce plans

15 Measured surveys. The following floors have been confirmed by P & C: All of Building B and 2, 3, 4 and 5 of A. These have been submitted to LCN and UL

In progress. See P & C schedule to be attached to monthly report. Issued on 02/09/24 to UL and LCN for review and comment P & C/FHPM 2.1-PCD(-5days)

18 Agreed rents Building A/B/Ground Floor Link rent Await Plowman Craven (P&C) measure . Ongoing. FHPM

project Honey completion deliverables -AFL

Engrossment leases/Licences to Alter/Estate Deed (and Defects Deed) plus Current lease surrender Unilever House/new lease Unilever House

6.2 A certified copy of each Professional Appointment (covered in clause 5) plus copy of current PII certificate

Needs review and update following change in Unilever strategy re Lever House - KF/ LCN to provide sign off on acceptance of a delay to the Lease Surrender. GWL to advise on next steps and Cube to issue with summary

TA to send over to FHPM for filing on Centrodoc. Full certified copies received but awaiting redacted ones. TA to send over.

6.2 Professional Team/Subcontractors and Contractor Warranties/ Third Party Rights….the following have warranties that are not completed: (6.2 & 6.3)

TA- some warranties still circulating. ….TA will chase BCLP. Need to keep pressure on. Again redacted copies to be uploaded.

TA:no response from BCLP re sub-sub-contractors. TA: we must include all sub-subcontractors providing any element of material design. She assumes not necessary for the Lender but will check when everyone back from holidays.

FHPM/Gwlngs

-PCD

project Honey completion deliverables -AFL

Copy of each sub-contract and current PII certificate of each Principal Sub-Contractor

In progress…will be moved across before PC. Check that none run out before PC. Sub-Contractor insurances not expiring before PC moved across. Those renewing between September and December to be noted.

6.4 Product guarantees (separate schedule to be attached) to include those identified at RIBA stage 4/ plus for Tenant Variations.

9.8 Site meeting minutes and monthly project and costs reports provided N/A

LN -KF happy with list…Mace have provided list of guarantees required. MCLH confirming these are being provided. UL and LCN to provide any required wording for Guarantees

Minutes, variations, progress reports, costs etc all provided before PCD. Circulated to all parties on an ongoing basis and therefore not included as a hyperlink. Ongoing. FHPM to upload minutes/ reports from Start on Site

project Honey completion deliverables -AFL

Commissioning Certificates/Validation Reports

17.3 Schedule of Defects delivered to Unilever

In progress… list of Certificates to be be provided are in PC Checklist

Can't be done yet. Ongoing. FHPM

Notices of Completion of Making Good Defects

18.5 Actual Construction Costs figure (as per assumptions and exclusions in AFL definition) IR: Cost Savings to be paid to Unilever by way of rent free adjustment.

18.5 Car Park Works updated Construction Costs figure

4.3 Tenants building contracts/warranties

DL sent over to Unilever to review. UL to confirm acceptance. G&T and Mace QS to meet next week

G&T issued to UL for review and acceptance. Await comment from UL. G&T and Mace QS to meet next week

In progress. LN: Mace have full access to PI certs. Copies of all required consents have been shared to date. Cube have approved all appointments to date. DG- Mace to provide to LCN/KF.

and Mace to agree.

20 working days before the expiry of the rectification period in the building contract

KF/Unilever Not relevant until fit-out. Not relevant to Developer works and only required for fit-out

project Honey completion deliverables -AFL

5 Appointments and novations (5 & 6)

9.6 DRAFT As built drawings (CAD) Buildings A/B and Estate including installations and services (9.6 (a)) including O&Ms

Environmental

All main appointments completed ..BRE (L of R) and P&C (Appointment) plus various Contractor Appts outstanding. FHPM to check with Gowlings to ensure all are complete/being completed. . LN: Mace have full access to Centrodoc folder containing all PI certs and kept up to date. Mecserve drafted. Not yet signed. TA to issue redacted appointments

Ongoing..to be reviewed with MCLH at the start of August. Starting to be issued. Ongoing.

8 - Environmental Consultant DEmail sent 18/6/24. IR: We have reliance letters from GEA dated 22 December 2022. TA to provide FHPM with copy for filing.

Gwlngs to confirm….Appointment and Lender and Funder warranty with Client for signature. Tracker notes "Reliance letters (for Tenant) to be issued once reports are prepared" FHPM checking with Gowlings. Cannot be done until all measurements are completed

8

Consultant Duty of Care letters

8 Measurement Surveyor Duty of Care letters

project Honey completion deliverables -AFL

Latent Defects Policy

9.2 s 278 Agreement and any highways licences

9.2/9.6 Copies of Building Regulations and certificates confirming compliance

9.2/9.6 Evidence of ALL planning permissions (including pre-commencement and pre-demolition) 9.2/9.6 - Evidence of all Planning Permissions

Policy on cover from PCD…wording to be agreed.Revised proposal expected from Towergate…to be chased w/c 8/7/24. IR16/07/2024 ey outstanding. LN: Chasing Buildzone for response. Meeting with Buildzone 2/8/24. Progress being made…not in place until PC. Is due this week - FHPM to check process of putting in place at PC

Signed by all parties. Awaiting surety to complete.

To be done at

uploading decision notices as and when…to be copied over to appropriate folder when completed. In progress No decision notice/ council confirmation to be provided for informative conditions. UL/ LCN to comment.

project Honey completion deliverables -AFL

9.2/9.6 Evidence of discharge of planning conditions (discharge notices). The following have not yet been discharged:

5 Detailed landscape and planting plan

18 S278 scope

24 Delivery and Servicing Plan

37 Sustainable Drainage Scheme

43 Flood Void Maintenance Plan

44 Flood Resistance measures

46 Car Park Management Plan

49 Park Mark/ SBD

50 Retail Management Plan

51 Woodland Walk Management Plan

H58 Thames Water

64 GLA Whole Life Carbon Assessment

66 Circular Economy Statement

9.6 As built drawings (CAD) Buildings A/B and Estate including installations and services (9.6 (a))IR: Should include testing and commissioning certificates for machinery.

List of planning conditions that have not been discharged….list circulated by Chartplan. Progressing.

Chartplan

D to provide to T no later than 2 months following PCD. Ongoing

9.6 Copies of consents etc (9.6 (d)) - SEE 9.2 All conditions and approvals contained in

9.6 EPCs (9.6 (e)) Ongoing …not completed yet.

9.6 BREEAM within 6 months of PC/drafts?

23.7 Copies of any consents needed to grant/register the Leases

100 Note - Warranties - See Warranty Tracker

Currently at 79.54%. Not completed until PC.

LN- includes anything not picked up above. DS- need consent of bank as soon as have engrossments. Will follow... Gwlng/Cube

Warranty tracker provided on a monthly basis to Mace and UL

project

project: Surrey House

awaiting confirmation to send to funder. Gwlng August Tracker…signed by consultant and contractor, awaiting confirmation to send to lender.

project: Surrey House

date: 27/08/24

Halsion £10m AOC expires 11/12/24

2.15 Façade, cladding and curtain walling Clarkes £10m aggregate expires 28/02/25

Redacted order dated 21/11/22 received and saved on Centrodoc. Certified copy required.

Fully executed order dated 30/5/23 received and filed on Centrodoc. redacted 6/3/24 Certified copy required.

Gwlng August Trackersigned by the subcontractor, with contractor for signature.

Signed by the sub=contractor, sent to tenanat.

Gwlng August Trackersigned by the subcontractor, with contractor for signature

Signed by the subcontractor and contractor, awaiting confirmation to send to lender for signature

2.16 Acoustic consultantContractor Appointment Hann Tucker £1m expires 24/7/25

2.17 Lift subcontractor Otis £5m aggregate expires 30/11/24

2.18 Car Park Contractor (if separate)

Redacted subcontract order dated 4/5/23 received and filed on Centrodoc.. 6/3/24 Certified copy required.

McCann £10m aggregate expires 31/01/25 Fully executed subcontract order dated 26/7/23 received and saved on Centrodoc.. 6/3/24 Certified copy

Gwlng May TrackerDraft received. 30/4/24 email…Client Warranty sent to Consultant by Docusign

Gwlng August TrackerSigned by the subcontractor and contractor, arrangin signature by employer.

Not required Gwlng May Trackerissued to Consultant for signature.

Gwlng May Tracker- with Consultant for signature

Completed- Gwlng May Tracker

Gwlng August Tracker…signed by the subcontractor and contractor, awaiting confirmation to send to funder for signature.

Gwlng August tracker….signed by subcontractor and contractor, awaiting confirmation to send to lender for signature.

Signed by subcontractor and contractor, arranging signature by employer. Signed by the subcontractor….sen to the tenanat. Signed by sub-contrator and contractor…with funder for signature. Signed by sub-contractor and contrator,

project: Surrey House

project: Surrey House

6.04

planning / S106 conditions

Detail Planning Application No: 22/02905/FUL – Consented 11/01/2023

Updated 27/08/2024

Surrey House, 34 Eden Street NCP Car Park, St James Road Former Hippodrome, Eden Street And Bo Concept, The Roundhouse 20 Eden Street

PROPOSAL: Application under S73 of the Town & Country Planning Act 1990 to carry out development without compliance with condition 1 (Approved plans) of planning permission ref: 21/04022/FUL (Application under Section 73 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 to carry out development without compliance with Condition 1 (Approved Plans) of Planning Permission ref: 20/02495/FUL (Full Planning application for the demolition of Surrey House, Multi Storey Car Park, Hippodrome and Bo Concept and the erection of 2 (two) Office buildings [Use Class - E(g)(i)] Building A and Building B: Building A 9 storeys (22,144 (GEA) sqms) Building B 11 storeys (11,587 (GEA) sqms). The erection of a replacement multi storey car park of 354 spaces plus cycle parking (for use as a public car park at weekends) landscaping, public realm upgrades, servicing, pedestrian and vehicular access) dated 02/12/2021. Variations to include alterations to bridge link, elevations, floorplates, ground floor level access, rooftop plant and screen, service yard, reduction to height of Buildings A and B, alterations to landscaping/public realm, removal of basements and stairs on sides of Building A. T

This application is accompanied by an Environmental Statement.

Taking into account the Environmental Information contained within the Environmental Statement and addenda thereto, which was submitted under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 and subject to a ‘Legal Agreement’, PERMIT subject to the following conditions:

This application is accompanied by an Environmental Statement.

(See Notice of Decision of Planning Application 22/02905/FUL for Full Specification)

1 The approved development shall be carried out in accordance with the following drawings/details: (See consent for full list of drawings) Informative

NMA App deposited re cladding deposited and validated 27/04/23

Ref: 23/01117/NMA

Suite 21, High Cedars, 20 Wray Park Road, Reigate RH2 0DD – Registered in England: 5204488 T: 01883 730 877 M: 07843 661 054 E: barry@chartplan.co.uk

Consented 25/05/23

2 The development hereby permitted shall begin before the expiration of three years from 2nd December 2021 (2nd December 2024)

3 . The development shall be completed in accordance with samples for all facing materials including fenestration and boundary treatments (gates, fences / walls, other) including details of manufacturing specification which shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority before above ground works on site are commenced. The development shall then be built in accordance with these approved samples and completed prior to occupation.

Pre above ground works condition

MCLH 11th November 2022

Validation details 22/03576/CLC

Consented 30/01/23

22/03576/CLC

4 Notwithstanding the details shown on the approved plans additional architectural detailing plans at scale 1:10/ 1:5 showing all openings and key elements of the building / landscape (windows, doors, facade glazing, fins and parapets, spandrel panels, entrance and associated publicly visible features, signage, lighting in publicly accessible areas, vents / intakes / exhausts, grilles / louvres, rooftop plant, other elevational features shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority before the relevant element is commenced on site. The development shall be constructed in accordance with the approved details.

5 Prior to any occupation an updated full and detailed landscape and planting plan, including details of additional tree planting on Brook Street shall have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The Strategy shall include the details of the 6 trees to be planted in Brook Street along with the proposed locations and details of the tree pits and tree grilles. The Trees planted on Brook Street shall comprise of 3no. Fastigiate Hornbeam (Carpinus betulus ‘Fastigiata’) planted at a minimum of 550cm tall with a minimum single clear stem of 200cm and a girth of 30-35cm, and 3no. Fastigiate Hornbeam (Pyrus calleryana ‘Chanticleer’) planted at a minimum of 450cm tall with a minimum single clear stem of 200cm and a girth of 25-30cm. The Strategy shall be implemented within the first planting season following

Pre development condition, relevant to each section

Pre above ground development

Pre-occupation condition

MCLH Application deposited 15/08/23

Ref: 23/02245/CLC

Validated 22/08/23

Consented 10/10/23

MCLH Application deposited 11/06/24

Ref: 24/01446/CLC

Consented 06/08/24

completion of the development and the landscape and planting shall thereafter be maintained for five years to the satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority. Any trees or planting that die during this period shall be replaced during the following planting season, and the areas shown to be landscaped shall be permanently retained for that purpose.

6 No above ground development shall take place until details of all external lighting have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The external lighting shall be installed in accordance with the approved details and thereby retained as such unless a variation is subsequently submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

Pre above groundworks condition

7 Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (or any Order revoking or re-enacting this Order) No fans, louvres, ducts, external lighting or other external plant other than those shown on the drawings hereby approved shall be installed without the prior written approval of the Local Planning Authority. Informative

8 All works on site shall take place in accordance with the details approved pursuant to 22/00273/CLC (Details of Demolition and Construction Environmental Management Plan)

9 The development shall be carried out in accordance with details approved by 22/00759/CLC (Levels).

10 The development shall be carried out in accordance with details approved under 22/00371/CLC pursuant to Condition 10 (Site Waste Management Plan).

11 Within 6 months of above ground works a Public Realm Management Plan, including measures to minimise any adverse microclimatic impacts of the development have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Prior to the beneficial occupation of the development hereby approved the hard and soft landscaping shall be fully

Informative

Informative

Informative

Within 6 months of commenceme nt of above ground works

MCLH Application deposited 31/10/22

Validated Ref: 22/03480/CLC

MCLH Application deposited 10/05/24

Ref 24/01192/CLC

Decision due by 05/07/24

Consented 23/01/23

22/03480/CLC

implemented and made available for all residents and thereafter maintained for the lifetime of the development.

12 The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the approved Transport Statement.

13 Prior to the commencement of any development above ground level, details of secure cycle parking facilities to serve the development to which this permission relates shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The cycle parking facilities as shown in the approved details shall be provided prior to beneficial occupation of the development to which this permission relates and shall be permanently retained for that purpose and kept free from obstruction thereafter.

14 The hard surfaces hereby approved shall be made of porous materials and retained thereafter or provision shall be made and retained thereafter to direct run-off water from the hard surface to a permeable or porous area or surface within the /curtilage of the property.

15 The revised energy strategy as approved by 22/00683/CLC on 3rd January 2023 shall be implemented throughout the development of the site.

16 Any flat roofed area that is not identified as communal or private amenity space or roof terrace shall not be converted or used as a balcony or sitting out area, and no access shall be gained except for maintenance purposes.

17

Informative

development condition (above ground)

Informative

Informative

Informative

A public art and way-finding strategy should be submitted to the local planning authority for approval prior to commencement of above ground works. The public art and wayfinding strategy shall identify proposed public art and way-finding works to be installed as part of the detailed landscaping strategy. The Strategy shall detail the mechanism for selecting the public art and way-finding works and the maintenance and management of the art works. The works of art shall be installed prior to the beneficial use of the car park or in accordance with the timeframe set out in the public art and wayfinding strategy and thereafter retained in accordance with the Pre above groundworks condition

Consented 30/01/23

Ref: 22/03841/CLC

Consented 21/03/23

Ref: 22/03873/CLC

agreed maintenance and management plan.

18 Prior to the occupation of the development hereby approved, details of the works relating to highway works required in connection with the proposed bus stop and bus stand, including any relocation of services and pedestrian crossings, shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority or by the Council as Highway Authority pursuant to Section 278 of the Highways Act 1980, and carried out in accordance with the approved details. Such details shall include the agreement of levels and construction details. All works are to be to the Council's adoptable highway standards and shall include any associated drainage works, lighting improvements, landscaping, street furniture, road markings, signage, traffic orders, and any necessary alterations to statutory undertakers equipment. Any widening to the public footways shall be retained permanently available for pedestrian circulation and the widened areas dedicated as highway pursuant to the Highways Act 1980.

19 The development shall be carried out in accordance with the details approved on 25.02.2022 Reference 22/02595/CLC (Written Scheme of Investigation WSI - Archaeology). No development shall take place other than in accordance with the agreed WSI, and the programme and methodology of site evaluation and the nomination of a competent person(s) or organisation to undertake the agreed works. If heritage assets of archaeological interest are identified by stage 1 then for those parts of the site which have archaeological interest a stage 2 WSI shall be submitted to and approved by the local planning authority in writing. For land that is included within the stage 2 WSI, no demolition/ development shall take place other than in accordance with the agreed stage 2 WSI which shall include: A. The statement of significance and research objectives, the programme and methodology of site investigation and recording and the nomination of a competent person(s) or organisation to undertake the agreed works; B. The programme for post-investigation assessment and subsequent analysis, publication & dissemination and deposition of resulting material. This part of the condition shall not be discharged until these elements have been fulfilled in accordance with the programme set out in the stage 2 WSI.

Pre occupation condition MCLH Application deposited 23/05/24

Ref: 24/01313/CLC

Decision due: 18/07/24

NMA application deposited 28/06/24

Ref: 24/01621/NMA

Pre demolition condition

FHPM/Ch art Plan

DOC app deposited 31.12.21

App validated 05/01/22

Ref: 21/04117/CLC

Additional Archaeology report submitted to LPA, validated 10/08/22

Ref: 22/02595/CLC

Consented 25/02/22

Consented 23/09/22

20 The servicing of commercial unit(s) hereby permitted shall only take place between 0700 and 2000 on any day, including Sundays and Bank Holidays. Informative

21 Prior to occupation a Pedestrian Environment Review Study (PERS), considering the ten Healthy Streets indicators, as set out in the Mayor’s Transport Strategy, 2018 shall be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority, the findings of which shall be implemented in accordance with timeframes agreed with the Local Planning Authority and thereafter permanently retained.

22 Prior to the occupation of the office, details as to how the approved development has been designed to connect to a future District Heating Network in the surrounding area and provision for the development’s connection shall be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority and thereafter permanently retained.

23 The development shall be carried out in accordance with details approved pursuant to 22/00463/CLC in relation to Condition 23 (Ecological Management Plan)

Pre occupation condition Milestone Application deposited 17/06/24

Ref: 24/01511/CLC

Decision due 12/08/24

Consented 21/08/24

Pre occupation condition MCLH Application deposited and validated 23/11/23

Ref: 23/03103/CLC

Decision due by 16.01.24

Informative

24 Prior to the occupation of development a Delivery and Servicing Management Plan shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

25 The rating level of the noise determined by the cumulative sound emissions of the plant hereby permitted shall be at least 5dBA lower than the existing background noise level at any given time of operation. The noise levels shall be measured or predicted 1m externally to any window at the nearest residential facade. Measurements and assessment shall be made according to British Standard 4142:2014.

26 The site and building works required to implement the development shall be only carried out between the hours of 08.00

Pre occupation condition Chart Plan/Unilv er/MIlest one Application deposited 17/06/24

Ref: 24/01510/CLC

Decision due: 12/08/24

Informative

Informative

and 18.00 Mondays to Fridays and between 08.00 and 13.00 on Saturdays and not at all on Bank Holidays and Sundays.

27 The demolition secured through demolition PD Consent 20/02696/PRA and construction works shall be implemented in accordance with details approved pursuant to Condition 27 (Section 61 of Control of Pollution Act 1974).

28 The Development shall be carried out in accordance with the details approved on 08.03.2022 Reference 22/00411/CLC (Air Quality Technical Note Technical Note J13011 F1)

29 All Non-Road Mobile Machinery (NRMM) of net power of 37kW and up to and including 560kW used during the course of the demolition, site preparation and construction phases shall comply with the emission standards set out in chapter 7 of the GLA’s supplementary planning guidance “Control of Dust and Emissions During Construction and Demolition” dated July 2014 (SPG), or subsequent guidance. Unless it complies with the standards set out in the SPG, no NRMM shall be on site, at any time, whether in use or not, without the prior written consent of the local planning authority. The developer shall keep an up to date list of all NRMM used during the demolition, site preparation and construction phases of the development on the online register.

30 Prior to commencement of above ground works on the development hereby permitted, a Damage Cost Assessment in line with the requirements of the GLA Sustainable Design and Construction Practice must be submitted to and approved in writing by the local authority.

31 The development shall be implemented in accordance with the Fire Statement approved under 22/00557/CLC and retained as such for the lifetime of the development.

32 The development shall be carried out in accordance with details approved by 22/03872/CLC on 5th January 2023 regarding the exhaust point to ensure the health and safety of residents nearby.

33 The Development shall be carried out in accordance with the details approved 11.03.2022 Reference 22/00359/CLC (Contamination Ground Investigation Report).

Informative

Informative

Informative

Pre above ground works condition AQ Consultan ts / Chart Plan

Informative

Informative

Informative

App deposited 25/10/22 PP-11645457

Validated Ref: . 22/03432/CLC

Consented 23/01/23

22/03432/CLC

34 Should remedial works be required in relation to contaminated land, the remedial strategy shall be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority, prior to the commencement of the development works and remedial works. On completion of the agreed remedial works, a closure report and certificate of compliance endorsed by the interested party/parties, shall be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority, prior to the occupation of the site by end users.

35 If during implementation of this development, contamination is encountered which has not previously been identified, the additional contamination shall be fully assessed and a specific contaminated land assessment and associated remedial strategy shall be submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority before the additional remediation works are carried out. The agreed strategy shall be implemented in full prior to completion of the development hereby approved.

36 Prior to commencement of groundworks (excluding site investigations and demolition), a final detailed drainage design, including drawings, supporting calculations, SuDS Statement and Drainage Assessment Form shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. A detailed management plan confirming routine maintenance tasks for all drainage components must also be submitted to demonstrate how the drainage system is to be maintained for the lifetime of the development. The system shall be implemented and thereafter managed and maintained in accordance with the approved details

37 No building hereby permitted shall be occupied until evidence (photographs and installation contracts) is submitted to demonstrate that the sustainable drainage scheme for the site has been completed in accordance with the submitted details. The sustainable drainage scheme shall be managed and maintained thereafter in accordance with the agreed management and maintenance plan for all of the proposed drainage components

38 Within 6 months of the commencement of any development above ground level, details of waste and recycling facilities to serve the development to which this permission relates shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority.

InformativeRemedial works condition

InformativeContamination condition

Pre above groundworks condition

MCLH Application deposited and validated 22/09/22

Ref: 22/03000/CLC

Consented 09/05/23

Pre occupation condition

MCLH Application deposited 25/07/24

Validated 30/07/24

24/01842/CLC

Decision due by 19/09/24

Within 6 months of commencemen t of above

MCLH Application deposited with LPA 07/08/23

Ref: 23/02158/CLC

Validated 09/08/23

Consented 11/10/23

39 The development (including any works of demolition) shall be carried out in accordance with details approved under 22/00306/CLC (Arboricultural Report and Drawings). Informative

40 The approved protection scheme (Condition 39) shall be implemented prior to commencement of any work on site including demolition, and be maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Local Planning Authority until the completion of the development or until such stage as detailed within the approved AMS. Informative

41 The development shall be carried out in accordance with the submitted Flood Risk Assessment (FRA) by Cole Easdon Consultants Limited (dated November 2022; issue no. 2; job no. 8922) and the Design Note by Robert Bird Group titled ‘Flood Volume Attenuation Strategy Clarifications – Updated MSCP’ (dated 02/09/2022; project no. 4881; document no. 4881-RBG-ZZ-XX-DN-CV-87002, issue 02) and the following mitigation measures it details:

Finished floor levels shall be set no lower than 8.8mAOD for more vulnerable residential uses

• Finished floor levels shall be set no lower than 8.4mAOD for less vulnerable commercial uses

• Finished floor levels shall be set no lower than 7.9mAOD for the commercial reception area

• Flood storage mitigation shall be provided

• Flood voids shall be installed

These mitigation measures shall be fully implemented prior to occupation and subsequently in accordance with the scheme’s timing/phasing arrangements. The measures detailed above shall be retained and maintained thereafter throughout the lifetime of the development.

Informative

42 The development shall be carried out in accordance with the submitted Interim Flood Storage Scheme detailed within the letter from MNP to the Environment Agency (SV/ib/220051-04; dated 15 February 2021), with the location of the temporary storage amended in the Design Note by Robert Bird Group titled ‘Flood Volume Attenuation Strategy Clarifications – Updated MSCP’ (dated 02/09/2022; project no. 4881; document no. 4881-RBG-ZZXX-DN-CV-87002, issue 02). The car park ramp tank will be implemented at the trigger points specified and remain in perpetuity until the demolition of Lever House is complete

43 Prior to occupation, a maintenance plan to manage the flood voids and grilles over the lifetime of the development will be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the local planning authority in consultation with the Environment Agency. The Plan should cover general maintenance and inspection as well as maintenance after a flood event. The approved management plan will then be implemented in full throughout the lifetime of the development.

44 Prior to occupation, a scheme detailing the flood resistance measures must be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the local planning authority with guidance from the Environment Agency. The scheme should include details on the passive flood barriers up to 8.31 metres above Ordnance Datum (mAOD) to protect: The shared reception of the Hive and Honey Buildings The car park basement access ramp, stairwell and lift lobbies The scheme shall be fully implemented and subsequently maintained, in accordance with the scheme’s timing/phasing arrangements, or within any other period as may subsequently be agreed, in writing, by the local planning authority.

Pre occupation condition MCLH Application deposited 11/07/24

Ref: 24/01739/CLC

Decision due 06/09/24

Pre occupation condition MCLH Application deposited 11/07/24

Ref: 24/01735/CLC

Decision due 05/09/24

Refused!

45 Surface water draining from areas of car park hardstanding shall be passed through an oil separator or series of oil separators, prior to being discharged into any watercourse, soakaway or surface water sewer. The separator(s) shall be designed and constructed to have a capacity compatible with the area being

Informative

Refused!

drained, shall be installed prior to the occupation of the development and shall thereafter be retained and maintained throughout the lifetime of the development. Clean roof water or vehicle washdowns and detergents shall not pass through the separator(s) and should be drained instead to foul sewer or sealed system.

46 A Car Park Management Plan demonstrating how the use of the car park will be controlled, including any restrictions and detailing the signage necessary within the site to direct pedestrians and vehicles shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority before the first occupation of the development. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.

47 By the time the development hereby permitted is substantially complete, pedestrian/vehicular intervisibility splays of 2.8 m x 3.3 m shall have been provided in each direction where the access meets the back edge of footway, and shall be permanently retained free from any obstruction to visibility higher than 1.0m above ground level.

48 'Within six months of the commencement of the above ground development' details regarding the relocated bus driver welfare facilities on Brook Street, have been submitted to and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The relocated bus driver welfare facilities shall be delivered in accordance with time frames agreed with the Local Planning Authority prior to development, other than demolition and thereafter permanently retained.

Bus driver welfare facilities will be retained throughout development.

Pre occupation condition

MCLH / Occupier NMA application deposited 06/08/24 (See NMA table below)

24/01931/NMA

Within 6 months of commencemen t of above groundworks condition

49 A. The development hereby permitted shall incorporate security measures to minimise the risk of crime and disorder and meet the specific security needs of this development in accordance with Secured by Design Commercial 2015 or its equivalent required security standards. Details of these measures shall be Pre development condition

MCLH Application deposited 03/04/23

Ref: 23/00892/CLC

Consented 31/05/23

MCLH / FHPM / Kabsec App deposited 21/02/22

Validated 22/02/22

Ref: 22/00558/CLC (TRANSIT APPLICATION )*

Consented 28/04/22

Suite 21, High Cedars, 20 Wray Park Road, Reigate RH2 0DD – Registered in England: 5204488 T: 01883 730 877 M: 07843 661 054 E: barry@chartplan.co.uk

submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority prior to commencement of the development and shall be implemented in accordance with the approved details prior to occupation.

B. As the proposed development is in close proximity to Kingston Town Centre, a crowded place, I would seek that that a blast assessment be completed by a member of the Register of Security Engineers & Specialists (RSES); this is order to determine the appropriate glazing specification for the building(s).

C. Prior to occupation of the offices a Secured by Design accreditation certificate or its equivalent from the Metropolitan Police Design Out Crime Office shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority.

D) Prior to the functioning of the multi-story carpark Park Mark Certification is achieved.

49 REVISED

. A. The development hereby permitted shall incorporate security measures to minimise the risk of crime and disorder and meet the specific security needs of this development in accordance with Secured by Design details approved under 22/00558/CLC (other than the car park/ cycle parking proposed in Building C which is superseded by this permission.) Details of the car park/ cycle parking measures shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority within 3 months of commencement of above ground works of the car park. The development shall be implemented in accordance with the approved details prior to occupation. B. As the proposed development is in close proximity to Kingston Town Centre, a crowded place, I would seek that a blast assessment be completed by a member of the Register of Security Engineers & Specialists (RSES); this is in order to determine the appropriate glazing specification for the building(s). C. Prior to occupation of the offices a Secured by Design accreditation certificate or its equivalent from the Metropolitan Police Design Out Crime Office shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. D. Prior to the functioning of the multi-storey

Within 3 months post commencemen t of ground works.

(Originally submitted under Planning Consent 20/02499 /FUL – App form sent to LPA to request transfer to this app 19/04/2022) TO BE REVISED AS BELOW

car park, Park Mark Certification is achieved. The development shall be implemented in accordance with the approved details.

50 A retail management plan to include opening hours and the link to the wider occupation of the site shall be submitted to the local planning authority for approval prior to commencement of the use of the Eden St retail units. The retail units shall operate in accordance with the approved management plan.

51 Prior to occupation of the new office building, the woodland walk shall be made available to members of the public in accordance with hours of access and a management plan to be submitted to the local planning authority for approval. The woodland walk shall operate in accordance with the approved details.

52 The car park shall be implemented in accordance with the details approved under 22/03504/CLC dated 29th December 2022.

53 The development shall be implemented in accordance with the details approved on 07.03.2022 under reference 22/00292/CLC (Water re-use/harvesting).

Pre use condition

Occupier Application deposited 26/06/24

Ref: 24/01603/CLC

Decision due: 21/08/24

Pre occupation condition

Occupier Application deposited 17/06/24

Ref: 24/01509/CLC

Decision Due: 12/08/24

Informative

Informative

54 Details shall be submitted to the local planning authority prior to commencement of development to demonstrate how the comprehensive landscaping strategy would achieve the proposed Urban Greening Factor of at least 0.3 within the site. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details prior to occupation of the development.

55 The minimum water consumption targets as per The London Plan 2021, i.e. 105 l/person/day for residential units and a BREEAM rating of ‘Excellent’ for the Wat 01 credits for non-residential uses. It should

Pre development condition

Informative

MCLH Application deposited 03/04/23

Ref: 23/00893/CLC

Consented 22/05/23

be stressed that these are the minimum requirements and need to be improved upon where possible

56 . Air Quality Neutral Assessment: A Damage Cost Assessment using the most up to date damage cost toolkit from Defra and the most recent version of the EFT must be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority within 3 months of commencement of development.

Within 3 months of commencemen t of development condition

57 The development must be carried out in accordance with the Dust Management Plan Reference 22/00618/CLC approved on 07.03.2022. The applicant must install PM10 monitoring equipment at the site boundary, with exact locations to be determined through discussion with the local authority Environmental Health department. Informative

58 No construction shall take place within 5m of the water main. Information detailing how the developer intends to divert the asset / align the development, so as to prevent the potential for damage to subsurface potable water infrastructure, must be submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority in consultation with Thames Water. Any construction must be undertaken in accordance with the terms of the approved information. Unrestricted access must be available at all times for the maintenance and repair of the asset during and after the construction works.

59 Any piling must be undertaken in accordance with the terms of the approved piling method statement approved under 22/00390/CLC.

60 In order to demonstrate compliance with the ‘be seen’ postconstruction monitoring requirement of Policy SI 2 of the London Plan, the legal Owner shall at all times and all in all respects comply with the energy monitoring requirements set out in points a, b and c below. In the case of non-compliance the legal Owner shall upon written notice from the Local Planning Authority immediately take all steps reasonably required to remedy noncompliance. a. Within eight weeks of planning permission being issued by the Local Planning Authority, the Owner is required to submit to the GLA accurate and verified estimates of the ‘be seen’ energy performance

Report to be submitted – No time constraint specified.

Consultan ts App deposited 25/10/22 PP-11645457 Consented 23/01/23

22/03432/CLC

Informative

Various submissions

MCLH Application deposited 05/08/24

Ref: 24/01921/CLC Decision due 02/10/24

indicators, as outlined in Chapter 3 ‘Planning stage’ of the GLA ‘Be seen’ energy monitoring guidance document, for the consented development. This should be submitted to the GLA's monitoring portal in accordance with the ‘Be seen’ energy monitoring guidance. b. Once the as-built design has been completed (upon commencement of RIBA Stage 6) and prior to the building(s) being occupied (or handed over to a new legal owner, if applicable), the legal Owner is required to provide updated accurate and verified estimates of the ‘be seen’ energy performance indicators for each reportable unit of the development, as per the methodology outlined in Chapter 4 ‘As-built stage’ of the GLA ‘Be seen’ energy monitoring guidance. All data and supporting evidence should be uploaded to the GLA’s monitoring portal. The owner should also confirm that suitable monitoring devices have been installed and maintained for the monitoring of the in-use energy performance indicators, as outlined in Chapter 5 ‘In-use stage’ of the GLA ‘Be seen’ energy monitoring guidance document. c. Upon completion of the first year of occupation following the end of the defects liability period (DLP) and for the following four years, the legal Owner is required to provide accurate and verified annual in-use energy performance data for all relevant indicators under each reportable unit of the development as per the methodology outlined in Chapter 5 ‘In-use stage’ of the GLA ‘Be seen’ energy monitoring guidance document. All data and supporting evidence should be uploaded to the GLA’s monitoring portal. This condition will be satisfied after the legal Owner has reported on all relevant indicators included in Chapter 5 ‘In-use stage’ of the GLA ‘Be Seen’ energy monitoring guidance document for at least five years. .

61 The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details ref. 22/00622/CLC and maintained as such in perpetuity.

62 The development shall be carried out in accordance with the plans and details approved under 22/03626/CLC (Drinking Water Infrastructure) approved 30/12/22, and drinking water made available to the public for free in accordance with the plans and details prior to occupation of the development, and in perpetuity.

Informative

Informative

63 The measures set out in the Air Quality Positive Statement AQPS approved on 08.03.2022 under reference 22/00412/CLC shall be implemented in accordance with the details so approved, and thereafter retained, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the local planning authority.

64 Prior to the occupation of each building the post-construction tab of the GLA’s whole life carbon assessment template should be completed accurately and in its entirety in line with the GLA’s Whole Life Carbon Assessment Guidance. The post-construction assessment should provide an update of the information submitted at planning submission stage, including the whole life carbon emission figures for all life-cycle modules based on the actual materials, products and systems used. This should be submitted to the GLA at: ZeroCarbonPlanning@london.gov.uk. along with any supporting evidence as per the guidance. Confirmation of submission to the GLA shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the local planning authority, prior to occupation of the relevant building

65 The development shall be carried out in accordance with the Ducting Space for Full Fibre Connectivity Infrastructure Plans approved on 07.03.2022 under reference 22/00681/CLC these plans shall be implemented prior to occupation and maintained as such in perpetuity.

66 Prior to the occupation any building, a Post Completion Report setting out the predicted and actual performance against all numerical targets in the relevant Circular Economy Statement shall be submitted to the GLA at: circulareconomystatements@london.gov.uk along with any supporting evidence as per the GLA’s Circular Economy Statement Guidance. The Post Completion Report shall provide updated versions of Tables 1 and 2 of the Circular Economy Statement, the Recycling and Waste Reporting form and Bill of Materials. Confirmation of submission to the GLA shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the local planning authority, prior to occupation.

67 Notwithstanding the submitted details, prior to commencement of any above ground development (excluding demolition), details of a

Informative

Pre occupation condition MCLH Timeline NMA deposited 05/08/24 (see NMA table below)

Ref: 24/01919/NMA

Informative

Pre occupation condition MCLH Timeline NMA deposited 05/08/24 (See NMA table below)

plant screen on top of Block A and Block B shall have been submitted to and approved in writing by the local planning authority. The approved plant screen shall be installed in accordance with the approved details prior to the occupation of the development hereby approved. t of above ground works

NMA APPLICATIONS

NMA Application deposited re amendments to Building A and B Spandrel Panels

NMA Condition 3 (Facing Materials)

Foot Bridge Link

NMA Condition 1 – Louvre NMA

Deposited with LPA 09/08/23 Ref: 23/02182/NMA Validated 09/08/23

Deposited 25/09/23 Validated 27/09/23 23/02623/NMA

Deposited and validated 03/10/23 Ref: 23/02702/NMA

Application validated 03/01/24 Ref: 24/00017/NMA

NMA Condition 18 (Highways) Application deposited 28/06/24 Decision due by 26/07/24

Ref: 24/01621/NMA

NMA Condition 64 (Carbon Assessment – Timeline change) Application deposited 05/08/24 Decision due by 02/09/24 Ref: 24/01919/NMA

NMA Condition 66 (Economy Statement – Timeline change)

Application deposited 05/08/24 Decision due by 03/09/24

NMA Condition 46 (Car Park Management Plan – Timeline Change) Application deposited 06/08/24 Decistion due by 03/09/24

Ref: 24/01920/NMA

Ref: 24/01931/NMA

Consented 07/09/23

Consented 23/04/24

Consented 23/04/24

Suite 21, High Cedars, 20 Wray Park Road, Reigate RH2 0DD – Registered in England: 5204488 T: 01883 730 877 M: 07843 661 054 E: barry@chartplan.co.uk

Consented 23/04/24

Section 106 Obligations

1 Affordable Workspace contribution

2 Kingston Employment Support Services Contribution

The Owner covenants to pay the Affordable Workspace Contribution to the Council prior to Occupation of the Development.

Kingston Employment Support Services Contribution" means the sum of £232,000 Index Linked to be paid by the Owner to the Council towards the Council's work match brokerage initiative;

3 Skills Employment and Apprenticeship Plan Contribution.

4 The Owner covenants to submit to the Council for approval a Skills Employment and Apprenticeship Plan –Construction Phase within 3 months of Commencement of the Development to include the following provisions:

Skills Employment and Apprenticeship Plan Contribution" means the sum of £50,000 Index Linked to be paid by the Owner to the Council towards implementation of the Skills Employment and Apprenticeship Plan.

• 70 employment opportunities for residents of the South London Partnership Boroughs or students and graduates of the Mayor's Construction Academy.

• 20 apprenticeships for Local Residents.

• Two Local Businesses to be invited to quote for contracts less than £150,000 in value; and

• Not less than 15% of the total value of goods and services procured throughout the construction

£250,000 Prior to Occupation of the development

£232,000, Prior to Commencement of the development. Paid - 6th February 2023

£50,000 Prior to Commencement of the development Paid - 6th February 2023

Pre-Construction SEP & Stakeholder

Allocation sent to LPA 03.07.23

Within 3 month of commencement of the development

Submitted to the Council for approval

5 Skills Employment and Apprenticeship Plan –Operational phase

phase to be procured from Local Businesses or businesses based in Neighbouring Boroughs The Owner covenants to use its best endeavours to comply with the Skills Employment and Apprenticeship Plan –Construction Phase during the construction of the Development PROVIDED THAT the Owner and the Council may agree amendments to the Skills Employment and Apprenticeship Plan – Construction Phase in writing from time to time.

Skills Employment and Apprenticeship Plan – Operational Phase" means a plan setting out targets for local employment, skills and training and detailing mechanisms for delivering such opportunities during the operational phase of the Development

6 Carbon Dioxide Emissions Target

7 Carbon Dioxide Offsetting Contribution

Carbon Dioxide Emissions Target” means a 35% carbon reduction against Part L2a of the Building Regulations 2013.

35% carbon reduction against part L2a of the Building Regulations 2013

Carbon Dioxide Offsetting Contribution" means a sum of money (Index Linked) calculated on the basis of £60 per tonne for 30 years to be agreed between the Council and Owner (both parties acting reasonably) and paid by the Owner to the Council in the event that the Development cannot achieve the Carbon Dioxide Emissions Target and the shortfall in emissions reduction has not been offset through an accredited scheme or alternative off site off setting has not been agreed with the Council, to be used if payable towards the Council's Carbon Offset Fund which seeks the delivery of £60 per tonne for 30 years to be agreed

Within 18 months of commencement of the development. Action for Unilever.

Following practical completion

Following practical completion

carbon dioxide emissions reductions projects within the Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames inter alia through retrofit of social housing, schools and civic buildings, investment in renewable energy projects and low-carbon lighting projects;

8 Energy Monitoring Portal “Energy Monitoring Portal” means the ‘Be seen’ webpage of the GLA’s website and the email address

ZeroCarbonPlanning@london.gov.uk, or any other such method of submission that may replace this N/A

9 Construction Environmental Management Plan Construction Environmental Management Plan” means the plan to be submitted by the Owner to the Council for approval in accordance with paragraph 15 of Schedule 1; N/A

10 Construction Phase Flood Management Plan Construction Phase Flood Management Strategy" means the measures set out in the flood risk assessment prepared by Cole Easdon Consultants Limited dated November 2020 (issue 5) submitted with the Planning Application and the supplementary letter issued by Mason Navarro Pledge Limited dated February 2021 attached to this deed at Appendix 2 as the same relate to the Land;

N/A

To be submitted within 8 weeks of the grant of the Planning Permission Completed

Prior to Commencement of the Development the Owner shall submit the Construction Environmental Management Plan

Submitted and approved

The Development shall be constructed and completed in accordance with the approved Construction Phase Flood Management Strategy. Ongoing

11 Rooftop Garden Management Plan Rooftop Garden Management Plan" means the plan for the provision of managed public access to the Rooftop Garden as may be varied from time to time in writing; N/A

12 Car Park Management Plan "Car Park Management Plan" means a management plan detailing measures for the management of the use of the car park within the Development including restrictions on use of the car park by users other than the occupier(s) of the offices within the Development.

N/A

Prior to Occupation of the Development Rooftop Management Plan submitted to LPA 19/06/24

Prior to Occupation of the Development

Suite 21, High Cedars, 20 Wray Park Road, Reigate RH2 0DD – Registered in England: 5204488 T: 01883 730 877 M: 07843 661 054 E: barry@chartplan.co.uk

13 Delivery and Service Management Plan

Delivery and Servicing Management Plan” means the plan to be submitted by the Owner to the Council for approval in accordance with paragraph 16 of Schedule 1;

Prior to Occupation of the Development Action for Unilever

14 District Heating Network “District Heating Network" means a third party district heating network to be developed within the Council's area and which is capable of providing electricity to the Development; N/A DHN rooms provided within Building A and B.

15 Highway and Public Realm Enhancement Works

16 TFL Works

“Highway and Public Realm Enhancement Works" means the highway and public realm enhancements identified for indicative purposes only on the Highway and Public Realm Enhancements Plan N/A

TfL Works" means the relocation of Transport for London's welfare facility from Brook Street near the corner of Eden Street as shown for indicative purposes only on the Highway and Public Realm Enhancements Plan;

17 Travel Plan Travel Plan” means a full travel plan to be submitted to the Council for approval in consultation with Transport for London pursuant to paragraph 14 of the First Schedule; N/A

18 Woodland Walk Management Plan

Woodland Walk Management Plan” means a management plan to be submitted to and agreed by the Council in accordance with paragraph 8 of the First Schedule which shall contain arrangements for management of the Woodland Walk including the management of public access to the Woodland Walk; N/A

Following an agreement pursuant to section 278 of the Highways Act 1980 Discussions ongoing

Within 12 months following first Occupation of the Development Will form part of S278 works

Prior to Occupation of the Development Action for Unilever

Prior to Occupation of the Development Action for Unilever

employer's agent instruction register

e outline programme

15/06/2022

15/07/2022

15/07/2022

15/07/2022

07/06/2024

23/08/2024

12/09/2022

09/09/2024

12/09/2022

09/09/2024

20/10/2024

20/09/2022

20/09/2022 07/10/2022

31/07/2023

18/08/2023

29/08/2023

18/09/2023

08/11/2023

21/11/2023

30/05/2024

09/07/2024

08/01/2024

25/06/2024

02/06/2024

02/06/2024

23/08/2024

18/06/2024

03/09/2024

01/07/2024

16/09/2024

04/08/2024

16/09/2024

09/11/2024

15/09/2022

15/07/2022

15/09/2022

07/06/2024

23/08/2024

09/09/2024

21/10/2024

21/10/2024

21/10/2024

09/11/2024

15/08/2024

20/09/2022

07/10/2022

30/05/2024

14/08/2024

08/01/2024

15/08/2024

21/10/2024

12/06/2024

02/09/2024

01/07/2024

16/09/2024

04/08/2024

21/10/2024

09/09/2024

21/10/2024

Project Honey

Gardiner & Theobald Progress Report at 28 August 2024

General Update

Building fit out continues to progress and valuations have been broadly in line with anticipated cashflow. Small number of variation costs remain to be agreed to finalise the account.

Activities & Progress in Period

Contractor

Valuation and recommendation no 31 of MCLH works for July 2024.

Finalisation of general & tenant variations

Interface with tenant team

Ongoing dialogue with MACE cost team in relation tenant changes

Reconciliation of viability costs.

Interface with funder team

None in the period

Cost Status

Gardiner & Theobald Cost Report 26 issued 31 July 2024 and Report 27 to be issued 29 August 2024

Procurement

None in the period.

Design Development

None in the period.

Project Honey

Gardiner & Theobald Progress Report at 28 August 2024

Future Works

Continuing valuation of the works. Valuation 32 due date 2 September 2024.

Agreement of final tenant changes and developer changes.

Agreement of costs with MACE against AFL position.

Prepare & agree CAT A reconciliation.

Information Required

MCLH response to outstanding variations by 28 August

Team

No changes

MCLH update report

1. CDM / Health and Safety

• Construction Phase and Environmental plans are in place and updated as required.

• All risk assessments / method statements and COSHH assessments currently up to date for the work activities on site.

2. List of sub-contractors on site:

• O’Neill & Brennan – Logistics/Waste Management

• Trident – Temporary Electrics & Water

• LTC – Tower Cranes

• ATJ – Partitions/Ceilings

• Halsion – MEP

• RECO – Hoists

• CMF – Metalwork

• Clarkes – Façade

• AYM – Roofing & Cladding

• Swiftcrafted – Core fit out/Joinery.

• Kingspan – Raised Access Flooring

• Original Joinery – Building C Fitout

• OWS – Glazed Doors

• Riney – External Works

• Serna – Cleaning

• Coopers - Concertina Fire Curtains

• A1S – Lift Lobby Fire Curtains

• Contrasol – Louvres

• Charter Global – Service Yard Gate

• Koyda – External Metalwork

3. Construction Update

• Partitions and ceilings are complete in both blocks

• CAT A - Ceilings ongoing to all floors (Snagging)

• MEP is progressing up to level 8 building A and complete in Building B

• MEP commissioning ongoing to A and C

• Clarke Façades currently progressing: Block A: Unitised complete. Equitone ongoing. Revolving doors being installed. Block B: Unitised complete. Equitone ongoing. Cleaning ongoing.

• AYM Roofing complete on Buildings A, B & C. Paving ongoing.

• Swift crafted progressing with joinery/tiling/vanity units/doors to Building A & B cores.

• Car park fit out ongoing.

• Otis have completed Block A & B lifts (excluding final commissioning), Block A

• Raised Access Flooring complete in Building B & Building A (Level 7 outstanding)

• Link bridge unitised installed

• Feature Stair Fire Curtains complete

• Riney external works ongoing

4. Progress/Programme Dropline

• Block A – 4 weeks behind programme

• Block B – 1 week behind programme

• Block C – 2 weeks behind programme

- 28.08.24

5. Lookahead Activities

• Commissioning ongoing to A,B & C

• Building B PC

• Clarkes Façade completion to buildings A & B

• Completion of Lift installations

• Building C Fitout complete

• Kingspan complete in Blocks A&B

• Riney external works ongoing

• Koyda external metalwork ongoing

6. Key Risk Schedule

• Any Future client variations; MCLH using best endeavours to incorporate recent EAI’s into current programme

• Twin Wall Core impact

• MSCP Provisional Sum

• LFB ‘sign off’

o CAT A Omissions / Temporary Measures – discussions ongoing regarding Building Control Final Certification

o Building C Façade – LFB submission agreed on current Maple proposal

o Building C Sprinkler Requirements – Insurance Acceptance issued via email from client

• Building Control Certification

o Discussions ongoing with SWECO / Shore regarding Final Cert and Letter of Comfort

o MCLH responded to Shore Comments (12th May 24)

o Final signoff procedure agreed in principle between MCLH, Sweco, Francis Hunter and Mace

o Francis Hunter to instruct Sweco to change inspections to from CAT A to Shell & Core

• Tenant Fit-Out design potentially not aligned with MCLH ER’s / Instructed works (e.g. Modified CAT A / Omissions)

7. Outstanding Instructions/Tenant Variations

• Inspection Procedure for Building Control; change from CAT A to Shell & Core

• EAI 29 Rev 1 to be reviewed and comments updated: Anti Drumming, Reverberation etc

• EOT 3 to be updated – Removal of Early Access Dates Schedule

• EAI 036 Rev1 Structural Penetrations – Instruction to be revised to remove the Building B Roof Penetrations as now confirmed not required.

• EAI 116 Building A Post Room Ventilation– Client Team to review Halsion’s design intent. Construction costs/programme impact to be assessed once design intent approved.

• EAI 127 Service Notch – Client Team to review DAA design intent. Further design co-ordination required with Façade/MEP/Structural sub-contractors following approval of design intent Construction costs/programme impact to be assessed once design intent approved.

• EAI 144 Service Yard Amendments – MCLH design team reviewing client brief. Construction costs/programme impact to be assessed once design intent approved.

8. Site Wide Issues / Matters Affecting Progress

• Twin Wall impact

• Wayleaves

• Water and power connected later than programmed

- 28.08.24

9. Quality and Environmental

• Environmental plan in place

• Section 61 approved

• CPDs carried out: Pudlo Waterproofing, quelfire (fire collars), CCL (post tensioning), Imperial Ductwork, British Gypsum and Wicona.

Progress Report 28 - 28.08.24

BREEAM (Tracker attached)

11. Utility Tracker

Progress Report 28 - 28.08.24

13 Civils & Structures Report

*No report issued

Progress Report 28 - 28.08.24

Progress Report 28 - 28.08.24

Progress Report 28 - 28.08.24

Progress Report 28 - 28.08.24

26(MW)

£71,465,514.00

£80,352,413.00

£89,386,835.00

£98,103,844.00

£106,028,997.00

£111,880,976.00

31(TV)

15.1 Valuation

- Valuation Nr 32 to be submitted on the 28th August 2024 - Next payment Cert. due on the 6th September 2024

15.2 Projected Final Account

£122,007,723

15.3 Provisional Sums

• Statutory Authorities £735,000

o £735,000 Omitted (under EAI 063)

o £461,993.51 Addition (under EAI 063)

• Bird Deterrent to Facades £50,000 – to be omitted

• Fibre Backbone Cabling for Wired Score £180,000 (instructed under EAI 132)

• Public Art Works £50,000 (design instructed under EAI 096 & EAI 125)

• Asbestos £5,000 (Omitted under EAI 063)

• Newts, bats & bat roosts, Japanese knotweed and hogweed. £5,000 (Omitted under EAI 063)

• UXO £5,000 (Omitted under EAI 063)

• Cycle Path Works including Green Wall to Carpark £295,000 – (instructed under EAI 031 and EAI 134)

15.4 Employer Instructions

• EAI 001 – BIM Level 2

• EAI 002 – Townhall design feasibility

• EAI 003 – Gym design feasibility

• EAI 004 – Drop kerb

• EAI 005 – S106

• EAI 006 – Townhall & Gym additional piles (only)

• EAI 007 – ASHRAE

• EAI 008 – Below ground drainage

• EAI 009 – CAT A Omission

• EAI 010 – Bridge Link Widening

• EAI 011 – Townhall & Gym

• EAI 012 – MER and SER Loading Design

• EAI 013 – S73 Façade and Plant Screen Amendment Rev1

• EAI 014 – MER and SER Loading Changes - 6th Floor Building B

• EAI 015 – Building B Column Sizes

• EAI 016 – Above Ground Drainage

• EAI 017 – Greywater and Rainwater Design

• EAI 018 – Additional Pile Mat

• EAI 019 – Change in RAL Colours

• EAI 020 – Gym Structural Changes

• EAI 021 – Building C Fees

• EAI 022 – Building A Ground Floor Amendments

• EAI 023 – Signage Design Costs

• EAI 024 – Rainwater Harvesting Tank (Supply Only)

• EAI 025 – CHW and LTHW Design

• EAI 026 – Ventilation Uplift Design

• EAI 027 – Splice Details

• EAI 028 – Green and White Brick Confirmation

• EAI 029 – GRC Alternative

• EAI 030 – Expenditure of FP McCann MSCP Structure

• EAI 031 – Green Wall Design

• EAI 032 – Town Hall Design Amendments

• EAI 033 – Building C Below Ground Obstruction

Progress Report 28 - 28.08.24

• EAI 034 – LV Design

• EAI 035 – Domestic Water

• EAI 036 – Structural Penetrations

• EAI 037 - Wicona

• EAI 038 – Rainwater Harvesting Tank

• EAI 039 – New Sewer Connection & Manhole

• EAI 040 – Internal Ramps

• EAI 041 – Townhall Amendments

• EAI 042 – Spandrel Panels

• EAI 043 – Terrace Doors

• EAI 044 – SMART Buildings Design

• EAI 045 – Building A – Slab Penetrations for Future MEP

• EAI 046 – Building B Slab Penetrations

• EAI 047 – MSCP Cast In Channels

• EAI 048 – WC Corridor RCPs

• EAI 049 – Secondary CAT A Omissions

• EAI 050 – CCTV and Access Control Omissions

• EAI 051 – Terrace Finishes

• EAI 052 – Building A and B Spandrels

• EAI 053 – Building C Ramp Ducts

• EAI 054 – Building A Column Sizes

• EAI 055 – Building A Soffit to Retail Entrance

• EAI 056 – Expenditure of Building C Lifts

• EAI 057 – Circleslide Doors

• EAI 058 – Generator Uplift TVR Construction Works

• EAI 059 – Domestic Water TVR Construction Works

• EAI 060 – Gym Floor Design

• EAI 061 – Building B Stair Glazed Screen/Fire Curtain Omission (Levels 1-10)

• EAI 062 – Expenditure of Utilities Prov Sum

• EAI 063 – Omission of Undefined Provisional Sums

• EAI 064 – Service Yard Door

• EAI 065 – Mullion Cover Strips

• EAI 066 – Ventilation TVR Construction Works

Progress Report 28 - 28.08.24

• EAI 067 – LV Panel Enhancement Construction Works

• EAI 068 – Modified CAT A

• EAI 069 – Maple & Halsion MSCP Construction Works

• EAI 070 – Gym Floor Dead Load Increase

• EAI 071 – Omission of Soap Dispensers

• EAI 072 – MSCP Additional Fire Alarm Protection

• EAI 073 – CHW & LTHW Uplift

• EAI 074 – RAL 9010

• EAI 075 – BOH Corridor Ceilings

• EAI 076 – Building A & B Shell and Core Sockets

• EAI 077 – Rainwater Above Ground

• EAI 078 – WC Hand Driers

• EAI 079 – Building B Opening

• EAI 080 – Corian Alternative

• EAI 081 – Building C Packages (Brick, Block, Roof)

• EAI 082 – Bridge Link Design

• EAI 083 – Building A Feature Stair Nosing

• EAI 084 – Omission of Toilet Roll Holders

• EAI 085 – CAT A Temporary Measures

• EAI 086 – Façade Lighting

• EAI 087 – Internal & External Doors (Design)

• EAI 088 – Building B Changing Places (Design)

• EAI 089 – External Louvres (Design)

• EAI 090 – Door Vision Panel Beads

• EAI 091 – Building A & B GF Screed and RAF Omission

• EAI 092 – Building C Planning Approval

• EAI 093 – BREEAM MAN02 Credit omission

• EAI 094 – Building C Fitout and Metalwork Packages

• EAI 095 – Town Hall Intumescent paint

• EAI 096 – Public Art Design

• EAI 097 – Feature Stair Curtains

• EAI 098 – MSCP Access Control/Park Mark/CCTV

• EAI 099 – Blind Box Design

Progress Report 28 - 28.08.24

• EAI 100 – Woodland Walk Widening Design

• EAI 101 – WC Frameless Grilles

• EAI 102 – Omission of Tea Point Fans & Ducts

• EAI 103 – Wiring Accessories

• EAI 104 – Blind Box Construction Rev3

• EAI 105 – Disabled Refuge Phone Recess

• EAI 106 – Public Art Schematic & Connection

• EAI 107 – RAF Omissions

• EAI 108 – Galv Brackets

• EAI 109 – Building A Baby Changing

• EAI 110 – Building C roof Landscaping

• EAI 111 – Building A Level 9 AHU Clash

• EAI 112 – Service Yard Door

• EAI 113 – Building A & B Manifestation

• EAI 114 – Building C Shower Shelf

• EAI 115 – SMART Network Infrastructure

• EAI 116 – BOH Door

• EAI 117 – Building B Changing Places Instruction

• EAI 118 – Access Control Hardware & CCTV Mounts

• EAI 119 – Brook Street Trees

• EAI 120 – Water Reduction

• EAI 121 – Floor Screed

• EAI 122 – Irrigation to Building C

• EAI 123 – RAF Levels

• EAI 124 – Terrazzo Benching (Building C)

• EAI 125 – Public Art Detailed Design

• EAI 126 – MSCP Expenditure (Ext. Doors, Louvres, Vinyl, Cycle Storage)

• EAI 127 – Service Notch

• EAI 128 - Soffit Lighting and Cable Tray Rev 1

• EAI 129 - External Lighting to Car Park Roof Terrace

• EAI 130 - S278 Setting Out

• EAI 132 - Fibre Backbone Cabling

• EAI 133 - Tobermore Paving

Progress Report 28 - 28.08.24

• EAI 134 - Cycle Works Temp Path

• EAI 135 - Water Testing

• EAI 136 - Building B Louvres Construction Rev1

• EAI 137 - Woodland Walk Lighting Ducting

• EAI 138 - Building A Louvres Construction

• EAI 139 - Woodland Walk Lighting R1

• EAI 140 - Ramps and External Works

• EAI 141 - Cancellation of EAI 131 Retention of Temp Services

• EAI 142 - Building C Packages (Firestopping, Channels and Roller Shutter)

• EAI 143 - MSCP Wayfinding Prov Sum (Wayfinding Signage)

• EAI 144 - Service Yard Bollards

• EAI 145 -

• EAI 146 - Cancellation of Building B Louvres

15.5 Project Cash Flow

• Cashflow issued on 1st December 22 in line with Townhall Instruction

• Cashflow Rev 1 issued on 8th August 23

• Cashflow Rev 2 issued on 6th February 24

• Cashflow Rev 3 issued on 6th March 24

16 Warranty / Sub-Contract / Appointment Tracker

• See attached

• Key Changes in the period

o Warranties – Francis Hunter have issued client version as a REV E Tracker

o Certified Sub-Contracts

▪ Sub-Sub-Contracts – clarity needed around certifying of these

▪ MCLH to issue any further redacted Sub-Contracts upon signing

▪ MCLH to issue Charter Global; currently being certified

17 Procurement schedule

Key Changes in the Period

• Building A & B - see attached

• Building C - see attached

18 Commercial and Contractual

• Early Access Protocol

Progress Report 28 - 28.08.24

o DRAFT issued to Francis Hunter

o Early Access Protocol meetings ongoing with Overbury & Mace

▪ MCLH awaiting Mace comments

o Point cloud Survey Parameters issued by MCLH

• Early Warnings

o EWN 001 – Brooke Street Closure; issued on 24/03/23

o EWN 002 – Thames Water; issued on 18/10/23

o EWN 003 – UKPN Wayleaves; issued on 19/03/24

o EWN 004 – G99 Application; issued on 02/04/24

o EWN 005 – Thames Water Permanent Connection; issued on 13/06/24

• Relevant Events

o RE 001 – Deferment – EOT 01 issued

o RE 002 – Deferment – EOT 01 issued

o RE 003 – Townhall Design – EOT 02 issued

o RE 004 – Townhall Construction – EOT 3 issued

o RE 005 – Smart Buildings – EOT 4 issued

o RE 006 – Thames Water Connection

o RE 007 – UKPN Wayleaves

Progress Report 28 - 28.08.24

Progress Photos

Report 28 - 28.08.24

Block B Toilet

Lift Lobby

Progress Report 28 - 28.08.24

Car Park

BREEAM tracker

Project Honey BREEAM Tracker - Design Stage

Please

Training,

Monitoring

principal contractor. The principal contractor analyses these items.

Draft letter template under review with McL&H - please sign and send back

Early stage site activity: CLOCS and CCS accreditation being sought by McL&H certificate of compliance and 1st CCS repor issued, performance on track.

Draft letter template under review with

McL&H has registered the site with SMARTWaste - this is the confirmed method for monitoring and reporting energy and water consumption

PLEASE CONTINUE TO PROVIDE MONTHLY UPDATES AND AN UPDATED REPORT ON COMPLETION OF PROJECT

Draft

Transport impacts must be monitored. This information must be recorded in SMARTWaste (or similar) for credit to be targeted.

PLEASE ENSURE THIS IS MONITORED AND PROVIDE MONTHLY UPDATES AND AN UPDATED REPORT ON COMPLETION OF PROJECT

A copy of the architectural acoustic and BS reports confirm that the requirements are being targeted.

SQA has provided confirmation proposed design is expected to achieve indoor ambient noise levels that comply with the design ranges given in Section 7 of BS 8233:2014.

McLH - confirmation has been provided SQA is appointed to provide this post-completion review. McLH to provide written confirmation as per letter template.

Marked-up

McL&H

Proposed plan to be discussed:

Dedicated and safe cycle paths are provided from the site entrance to any cycle storage, and connect to offsite cycle paths where applicable.

Adequate external lighting in accordance with BS 5489-1:2013 Lighting of roads and public amenity areas.

2. Appropriate sized, designed and constructed. The following publications offer guidance on how to demonstrate this:

a. Local transport Note 2/08 Cycle infrastructure design, Department of Transport, 2008. b. Sustrans design guidance (www.sustrans.org.uk), specifically the Sustrans design manual handbookfor cyclefriendly design

Dedicated and safe footpaths are provided on and around the site providing suitable links for the following:

a The site entrance to the building entrance

b Car parks (where present) to the building entrance

c The building to outdoor space

d Connecting to off-site paths where applicable.

Pedestrian drop-off areas are designed off, or adjoining to, the access road and should provide direct access to other footpaths.

Where vehicle delivery access and drop-off areas form part of the assessed development, the following apply: Delivery areas are not accessed through general parking areas and do not cross or share the following: a pedestrian and cyclist paths b outside amenity areas accessible to building users and general public.

There is a dedicated parking or waiting area for goods vehicles with appropriate separation from the manoeuvring area and staff and visitor car parking.

Parking and turning areas are designed for simple manoeuvring according to the type of delivery vehicle likely to access the site, avoiding the need for repeated shunting.

Specifications

Watt AND All external light fittings are automatically controlled for prevention of operation during daylight hours and presence detection in areas of intermittent pedestrian traffic.

The above requirements include decorative & floodlighting.'

Emergency light fittings, including security lighting, that are also used for normal operation are assessed for this issue - please confirm if this will be the case.

External lighting drawings still to be provided confirming compliance with requirements.

Please obtain appropriate confrimation and spec and drawings from external lighting designer.

LZCT feasibility study has been

Specified local LZC technologies for the building have been shown in line with the feasibility study recommendation.

The reduced regulated carbon dioxide (CO ₂ -eq) emissions have been reported.

Copies of Part L received. energy specialist - Patel Jayesh, CIBSE reg.

3

2

1

Schenatics

Water

1.a

supply and the buildings under assessment.

2 The leak detection system is:

2.a A permanent automated water leak detection system that alerts the building occupants to the leak OR an inbuilt automated diagnostic procedure for detecting leaks

2.b Activated when the flow of water passing through the water meter or data logger is at

2.c

high or low level, over set time periods. Although high and low level leakage rates are not specified, the leak detection equipment installed must have the flexibility to distinguish between different flow rates to enable it to be programmed to suit the building type and owner's or occupier's usage patterns.

2.d Programmable to suit the owner's or occupier's water consumption criteria

2.e Where applicable, designed to avoid false alarms caused by normal operation of large water consuming plant such as chillers.

Where there is physically no space for a leak detection system between the utilities water meter and the building, alternative solutions can be used, provided that a major leak can still be detected.

Schematics have been provided confirming presence.

Leak detection - Page 334 clause M1-7 - Please provide additional specifications details: 1.a On the utilities water supply within the buildings, to detect any major leaks within the buildings AND

1.b Between the buildings and the utilities water supply, to detect any major leaks between the utilities

2 The leak detection system is:

2.a A permanent automated water leak detection system that alerts the building occupants to the leak OR an inbuilt automated diagnostic procedure for detecting leaks - PLEASE CONFIRM

2.b Activated when the flow of water passing through the water meter or data logger is at a flow rate above a pre ‐set maximum for a pre ‐set period of time. It does not necessarily require a system that directly detects water leakage along part or the whole length of the water supply system

2.c Able to identify different flow and therefore leakage rates, e.g. continuous, high or low level, over set time periods. Although high and low level leakage rates are not specified, the leak detection equipment installed must have the flexibility to distinguish between different flow rates to enable it to be programmed to suit the building type and owner's or occupier's usage patterns.

2.d Programmable to suit the owner's or occupier's water consumption criteria

2.e Where applicable, designed to avoid false alarms caused by normal operation of large water consuming plant such as chillers.

Template

Certs being

Calculation is underway.

DAA has

review and assessment additional narrative has been provided in addition to the drawings issued.

Confirmation design provides adequate protection for exposed parts of the building from material degradation.

Drawings and strategy confirm and demonstrate i) there is convenient access to the roof and façade for costeffective cleaning, replacement and repair in the building's design and ii) the roof and façade has been designed to prevent water damage, ingress and detrimental ponding

Progess is on-going. - report has been updated to include Technical Design Stage. consider methods that have been adopted that aim to optimise the use of materials to cover all of the following stages:

a. Preparation and Brief (e.g. re-use, adaption and expansion of existing building / services, need for flexibility and adaptability etc.)

b.

Please

This

of overheating

- Ene 01 approach, Maximise energy efficiency to tackle energy demand

- Ene 04 approach, passive design - Maximise opportunities to avoid unnecessary carbon emissions

- Mat 05 approach - durability and resilience - Avoid increased risks of deterioration and higher maintenance demands

- Pol 03 - Minimise the risks of increased flood risk and surface water run-off affecting the site or others Conduct

Ecological value of site

Site survey:

A Suitably Qualified Ecologist (SQE) carries out a survey and evaluation for the site early enough to influence site preparation works, layout and, where necessary, strategic planning decisions (typically Preparation and brief stage) .

The SQE’s survey and evaluation determines the site’s ecological baseline, including:

a Current and potential ecological value and condition of the site and related areas within the Zone of Influence.

b Direct and indirect risks to current ecological value from the project.

c Capacity and feasibility for enhancement of the site's ecological value and, where relevant, areas within the Zone of Influence.

Recommendations and data collected from the survey and evaluation are shared with appropriate project team members to influence decisions made for activities during site preparation, design and construction works, which can support ecological features.

Determining ecological outcomes:

The project team liaise and collaborate with representative stakeholders early enough to influence key planning decisions (typically Concept Design stage), to:

a Identify the optimal ecological outcomes for the site.

b Identify, appraise and select measures to meet the optimal ecological outcomes for the site, in line with the mitigation hierarchy of action, according to the route being used:

1. Avoidance

2. Protection

3. Reduction or limitation of negative impacts

4. On site compensation and 5. Enhancement, considering the capacity and feasibility within the site, or where viable, offsite. 2

LE 02's 'Survey and evaluation and Determining ecological outcomes’ criteria have been achieved.

1 credit: Further planning to avoid and manage negative ecological impacts on-site is carried out early enough to influence the concept design and design brief as well as site preparation planning (typically Concept Design stage). On-site measures for managing negative ecological impacts during site preparation and construction are implemented inpractice.

The above is based on input from the project team in collaboration with representative stakeholders and data collated as part of the ‘Determining ecological outcomes’ in LE 02 Ecological risks and opportunities

1 or 2 credits: Achieve 1st credit.

Negative impacts from site preparation and construction works are managed according to the mitigation hierarchy: No overall loss of ecological value has occurred (two credits).

OR The loss of ecological value has been minimised (Minimising Loss) (one credit)

where this is not feasible, b Off site within the Zone of Influence.

Data collated are analysed and where potentially valuable, provided to the local environmental records centres nearest to, or relevant for, the site 1 1 Feb-23

A copy of the ecology report has been provided and confirms site is of low ecological value.

Written confirmation required from Landscpae architect: - that the ecologist report was received at an early enough stage to help inform the landscaping and ecological enhancement strategy

- that the project team liaised and collaborated with representative stakeholders early enough to influence key planning decisions (typically Concept Design stage), to:

a Identify the optimal ecological outcomes for the site.

b Identify, appraise and select measures to meet the optimal ecological outcomes for the site, in line with the mitigation hierarchy of action:

1. Avoidance

2. Protection

3. Reduction or limitation of negative impacts

4. On site compensation and 5. Enhancement, considering the capacity and feasibility within the site, or where viable, offsite.

Ecologist has visited site and confirms compliance is being met.

McL&H to sign and return letter template, confirming below

One credit – Planning and measures on-site

Further planning is required to be carried out for activities during site clearance and construction. McLH to confirm mitigation strategy - requirement for On-site measures for managing negative ecological impacts during site preparation and construction are implemented in-practice (e.g. mitigation measures to protect existing ecological features), as per ecologist recommendations.

Two credits Managing negative impacts the following hierarchy must be followed when managing negative impacts of the site preparation and construction works:

– Avoidance of negative impacts on habitats and features of ecological value on the site.

– If it is not possible to avoid negative impacts completely; protect habitats and features of ecological value from damage during development works in accordance with best practice guidelines to minimise negative impacts.

- If it is not possible to achieve the above, fully reduce, limit or control negative impacts as far as possible

- Where it is not possible for avoidance, protection, limitation or control of the negative impacts on features of ecological value on site; compensation has taken place to ensure the existing ecological value is maintained during and after the project.

This builds on the measures agreed for delivering optimal ecological outcomes in LE 02 Ecological risks and opportunities.

Commit to ensuring measures are implemented that enhance ecological value, which are based on input from the project team and SQE in collaboration with representative stakeholders and data collated as part of the ‘Determining ecological outcomes’ in LE 02.

This issue intends to recognise enhancement measures that have been carried out in line with good practice recommended by an SQE, which build on mitigation measures taken in LE 03. enhancement measures must meaningfully enhance the site's ecological value - it would be benefical to discuss and agree this with input from the SQE.

McLH - please complete letter template - written confirmation compliance will be monitored against all relevant UK, EU or international legislation relating to the ecology of the site, as per SQE recommendation and that measures will be implemented as per SQE recommendations.

Landscape architect - please confirm final design. ecologist has deemed current proposals appropriate.

Three credits are to be targeted and will be awarded based on the change in ecological value occurring as a result of the project. This must be calculated in accordance with the process set out in GN36 - BREEAM, CEEQUAL and HQM Ecology Calculation Methodology – Route 2. Credits are awarded in line with the Reward Scale table in GN36 where there are no residual impacts on protected sites or irreplaceable habitats.

Biodiversity metric confirms significant net gain.

Pre-requisite

The client or contractor has confirmed that compliance is being monitored against all relevant UK, EU and international standards relating to the ecology of the site.

Comprehensive route (Route 2) - Criterion 8 in LE 03 has been achieved (Negative impacts from site preparation and construction works have been managed according to the mitigation hierarchy, in line with the SQE's recommendations) and at least one credit under LE04 for 'Change and Enhancement of Ecology' has been awarded.

Measures have been implemented to manage and maintain ecology throughout the project. These measures are based on input from the project team in collaboration with representative stakeholders and data collated as part of the ‘Determining ecological outcomes’ in LE 02 To ensure the optimal ecological outcomes agreed in LE 02 are met in-practice, these measures must monitor and review the effectiveness of the mitigation and enhancement measures in place for LE 03 & LE 04 to ensure they are implemented.

Management and maintenance throughout the project

- Contractor nominates biodiversity champion - Contractor trains the site workforce on how to protect site ecology during the project - Contractor records actions taken to protect biodiversity and monitor their effectiveness A new ecologically valuable habitat appropriate to the local area is created

- Where flora and/or fauna habitats exist on-site, the contractor programmes site works to minimise disturbance to wildlife

A section on Ecology and Biodiversity has been included as part of the tenant or building owner information supplied, to inform the owner or occupant of local ecological features, value and biodiversity on or near the site. This should include detailed management and maintenance plans as required by landscape and asset managers as well as relevant parts of the handover information for occupiers written in a format that encourages understanding and supportive behaviours 1 1

Contractor to confirm compliance will be monitored against all relevant UK, EU and international standards relating to the ecology of the site.

McLH to please confirm measures will be implemented to manage and maintain ecology throughout the project - as per letter template.

For brownfield sites, drainage measures are specified so that the peak rate of run-off from the site to the watercourses (natural or municipal) shows a 30% improvement for the developed site compared with the predeveloped site. This should comply at the 1-year and 100-year return period events.

For Greenfield sites, drainage measures are specified so that the peak rate of run-off from the site to the watercourses (natural or municipal) is no greater for the developed site than it was for the pre-development site. This should comply at the 1-year and 100-year return period events.

Relevant

Surface water run-off rate calcs have been provided for 1-year and 100-year.

Calculations appear to demonstrate that a 40% allowance for climate change has been provided.

Written summary confirmation has been provided demonstrating compliance can be met: Confirmation that surface water run-off design solutions are bespoke, i.e. they take account of the specific site requirements and natural or man-made environment of and surrounding the site. Please confirm the priority levels detailed in BREEAM have been followed, with justification given where water is allowed to leave the site. For brownfield sites, drainage measures are specified so that the peak rate of run-off from the site to the watercourses (natural or municipal) shows a 30% improvement for the developed site compared with the predeveloped site. This should comply at the 1-year and 100-year return period events. OR For Greenfield sites, drainage measures are specified so that the peak rate of run-off from the site to the watercourses (natural or municipal) is no greater for the developed site than it was for the pre-development site. This should comply at the 1-year and 100-year return period events.

Please confirm calculations and reports are for both buildings, noted Building A and Building B on the submitted drawings.

Please confirm maintenance agreements for the ownership, long term operation and maintenance of all specified Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) are in place.

Calculations have been provided.

Calculations and reports are for both buildings, noted Building A and Building B on the submitted drawings.

Flooding of property will not occur in the event of local drainage system failure (caused either by extreme rainfall or a lack of maintenance); AND EITHER

Drainage design measures are specified so that the post-development run-off volume, over the development lifetime, is no greater than it would have been prior to the assessed site’s development. This must be for the 100year 6-hour event, including an allowance for climate change.

Any additional predicted volume of run-off for this event is prevented from leaving the site by using infiltration or other SuDS techniques.

OR (only where criteria above cannot be achieved):

Justification from the appropriate consultant indicating why the above criteria cannot be achieved, i.e. where infiltration or other SuDS techniques are not technically viable options.

Drainage design measures are specified so that the post-development peak rate of run-off is reduced to the limiting discharge. The limiting discharge is defined as the highest flow rate from the following options:

a.The pre-development one-year peak flow rate

b. The mean annual flow rate (Qbar)

c. 2L/s/ha.

For the one-year peak flow rate, the one-year return period event criterion applies.

For either option, above calculations must include an allowance for climate change; this should be made in accordance with current best practice planning guidance.

Please also confirm relevant maintenance agreements for the ownership, long term operation and maintenance of all specified SuDS are in place.

Aecom CMT report

To: FrancisHunter – Luke Nurser

CC: meeting distribution

Monthly Report : TA/CMT No 26: 28/08/24

Report up to 27/08/2024

1. Key Actions in Month

1.1 Follow up on responses on power on & HV/LV switchrooms comments

1.2 Site visit continues.

1.3 Commissioning report meetings

1.4 Benchmark inspections as part of Site Visit Report.

2. Status of Document Submittals

AECOM Sunley House 4 Bedford Park Croydon CR0 2AP, UK T +44(0)203 043 9200 aecom.com

Project name: Project Honey - Kingston Project ref: 60627560

By : D Emerson

Date: 28/08/24

2.1 Schedule of o/s comment received - Comments issued on submittals as per MCLH notes of review.

3. Any key issues / comments / quality issues related to site/Test activities

3.1 Site visit report issued following visit.

3.2 Comments raised on power on & HV/LV rooms – copy of relevant supporting documents awaited.

4. Key actions for next month

4.1 Review of o/s package comments to be submitted as per MCLH list

4.2 Continue schedule of visits.

4.3 Agreement on close out process

4.4 Comments on paperwork re HV/LV switchrooms

5. Key decisions required / variations

5.1 Commissioning / demo and completion programme.

6. Any CDM issues

6.1 n/a

MNP CMT report -tofollow

ORSA monthly CDM report

0.0 Document Verification

Job Number 2800

Job Eden Campus

Document Title Site Inspection File Reference SI1 ORSA_H&S Site Inspection February 2024.docx

Document Information

Revision Issue Date Filename 2800_Eden Campus_ORSA Site Inspection_FJMK300824

A 02/09/24 Description Site Inspection

Prepared By Checked By Approved By Name Francis J M Kenny Chris Bracewell Chris Bracewell

Signature Date 30/08/24 02/09/24 02/09/24

Revision Issue Date Filename 2800_Eden Campus_ORSA Site Inspection_FJMK300824_CMB040924

B 04/09/24 Description Addendum Report

Prepared By Checked By Approved By Name Chris Bracewell

Signature Date 04/09/24 dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy

Revision Issue Date Filename dd/mm/yy Description

Prepared By Checked By Approved By Name

Signature Date dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy dd/mm/yy

1.0 Key Project Details

Client Globe Kingston Ltd

Site Eden Campus, Eden Street, Kingston Upon Thames KT1 1ER.

Principal Contractor McLaughlin & Harvey Ltd

Inspected by Francis J M Kenny

Date 30 August 2024

Programme Completion due October 2024

2.0 Site Inspection

A site inspection of the Eden Campus Project was undertaken on the 30th August 2024 in the company of Connor Casey, Assistant Site Manager for Principal Contractor McLaughlin & Harvey Ltd.

The Project comprises the erection of 3 blocks. An 11-storey office block, a 9-storey office and retail block and a multi storey car park with 354 spaces.

The car park will contain ground floor changing area with showers and lockers. The office block will be occupied by Unilever when completed.

The purpose of the site inspection was to highlight any Health, Safety and Environmental observations and undertake a review of the on-site documentation in relation to the work activities that were being carried out.

This report dated 4th September is an addendum report revised from the initial report issued 2nd September 2024. See 5.0 Accidents, Incidents and Near Misses.

3.0 Work activities ongoing at time of inspection

▪ Landscaping

▪ Raised floor.

▪ Cleaning.

▪ Cladding.

▪ Painting.

▪ M&E

▪ Waste removal.

▪ Lifting operations.

▪ Traffic management

▪ Deliveries.

4.0 Site Attendance

The current average daily site attendance is approximately 100 including operatives and site management.

5.0 Accidents, Incidents & Near Misses

During the visit it was confirmed by Connor Casey that there have been no recorded accidents, incidents or near misses or Enforcing Authority visits since our last inspection.

On the 2nd of September having issued the August report, ORSA were advised that there had been a RIDDOR occurrence.

The incident occurred on the 6th of August. Hernando Enrique Paternina Se La Ossa was injured when a stillage containing glass panels became unstable and fell onto him. He sustained facial lacerations, upper leg bruising along with pains to wrist and chest.

M @ H have produced a comprehensive report following investigation of the incident with recommendations/action to reduce the risk of a similar incident. (copy attached)

6.0 Compliance Actions that the contractor needs to implement

Concluding this visit there was one issue or action raised, and all issues or actions raised last month have been addressed by McLaughlin & Harvey Ltd.

▪ Dust management

7.0 Comments

I conducted a detailed safety inspection of the project site to assess overall safety performance and ensure full compliance with health and safety standards.

The inspection focused on identifying both strengths and areas for potential improvement.

Findings showed that operatives consistently followed safety protocols under close supervision.

Site security is strengthened by biometric turnstiles, which allow entry only to authorised personnel.

The perimeter is well-secured with regularly maintained hoarding and fencing.

Health and safety noticeboards are strategically positioned, keeping workers informed about regulations and requirements.

Daily hazard and briefing boards effectively communicate safety updates, increasing awareness of potential risks and necessary precautions.

Operatives were observed wearing appropriate PPE, safeguarding them during various tasks.

Manual handling practices were commendable, supported by proper equipment and training.

Work areas, walkways, and routes were orderly and wellmaintained, although dust management needs improvement to maintain high safety standards.

The site is equipped with certified portable fire extinguishers and clearly marked fire exits, ensuring preparedness in emergencies.

Exclusion zones, marked by barriers and signage, help to minimise risks by limiting access to hazardous areas.

Method statements and risk assessments were adequate, effectively covering the health and safety risks related to the project.

First aid resources are readily accessible, with trained first aiders on-site to provide immediate medical assistance if needed.

The site offers sufficient facilities, including toilets, washing stations, drinking water, and a well-kept canteen.

Dedicated areas for changing and storing clothing and PPE further support operatives’ comfort and welfare, fostering a safe and productive environment.

Documents observed while on site included:

▪ Safety posters

▪ Safety notice and hazard boards.

8.0 Temporary Works Design & Coordination

McLaughlin & Harvey Ltd. has established a robust system to ensure that any temporary works installed on-site are appropriately designed and approved by competent engineers.

This measure is crucial to mitigate potential risks associated with temporary structures and ensure their stability throughout their intended use.

A comprehensive temporary works register is in place on the project. The register provides detailed information about all temporary works on-site, including their design specifications, installation dates, responsible personnel, and approval status, and the register is updated regularly to reflect any changes or new installations.

Andy Finnigan has been formally appointed as the responsible person for overseeing temporary works at the project site.

This appointment demonstrates a clear commitment to ensuring that temporary works are managed by a competent individual with the necessary expertise to assess and oversee their design, installation, and maintenance.

In line with best practices, McLaughlin & Harvey Ltd. has ensured that engineers responsible for designing and approving temporary works possess the required competencies and qualifications. This approach guarantees that temporary structures are designed and executed by individuals with the appropriate expertise.

9.0 Site Inspection Assessment Criteria below

The scoring criteria adopted for our site inspection is given as

10.0 Site Inspection Checklist & Actions

Observation

Project H&S Organisation

Project Arrangements

Project Risk Register

Project Methodology Statements

Inductions

Register/Notices/Forms

Permits to Work

Construction Phase Health & Safety Plan

Information

Communications/Consultation/Training

Site Establishment

Welfare-General

Canteen

Rest/Drying/Changing Room

First Aid

Sanitary/Washing Facilities

Walkways/safe routes

Fire escape routes

Access and Egress on site

Offices

Storage

Segregation of substances

Access / Egress

Site Boundary

Hoarding/Fence/Other

Security

Signage

Traffic Management

Status

Acceptable Contained within the CPP.

Acceptable Project risk register available.

Acceptable In place for live works.

Acceptable Inductions carried out and recorded.

Acceptable Displayed.

Acceptable Issued and controlled.

Acceptable In place.

Acceptable Displayed on notice boards.

Acceptable Briefings undertaken daily.

Acceptable Good standard, clean and tidy. -

Acceptable Good standard, clean and tidy.

Acceptable Good standard, clean and tidy.

Acceptable First aid equipment available on site.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable Access and egress sufficient and not obstructed.

Acceptable Weil controlled

Acceptable Clean and tidy.

Acceptable Stored in line with COSHH assessment.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable Good standard and well maintained

Acceptable No issues identified.

Acceptable Good signage in place.

Acceptable Managed well.

Observation Status

One Way System?

Site internal turning

Banks man supervision

Vehicle/Pedestrian Segregation

Wheel wash

Site Access-General

Operations - Safety Management – Planning

Risk Assessment-General

Method Statement-General

Roles and Responsibilities-General

Scaffold/Register

Plant/Register

False work

Temporary Works Design Brief

Temporary Works Appointments

Temporary Works Register

Operations - Safe Methods of Work

Compliance with method statement

Method Statement-General

Signature/Documentation

Risk Assessments

Permit system responsible person

Internal site safety tours

Documentation Acceptable

Considerate Constructors Registered

Water Management Plan

Emergency Fire evacuation Plan

Use of Scaff-inspection tags

Slips/`Trips /Falls

RPE - Face Fit testing

Acceptable Site has two gates, and a one-way system is used as required.

Acceptable Traffic marshals in place.

Acceptable In place.

Acceptable Good segregation is in place.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable RAMS are in place.

Acceptable Suitable and sufficient.

Acceptable In place and listed within CPP.

Acceptable Suitable and sufficient.

Acceptable Completed.

Acceptable. No issues raised.

Acceptable In place.

Acceptable In place for Andy Finnigan

Acceptable In place and up to date.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable Suitable and sufficient.

Acceptable In place within the site files.

Acceptable In place.

Acceptable In place and up to date.

Acceptable Regular tours undertaken.

Acceptable In place and relevant.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable In place.

Acceptable In place.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Observation

Asbestos Register and Awareness Training

Good Practice - Safe Working

Work areas tidy

Walkways/safe routes clear of obstruction

Tools & Equipment suitable for the task

Safe manual handling

Signage

Storage of materials

Compliance with method statement

Personnel Protective Equipment PPE

Operations - Activity Set Up

Resources

Operatives Certification

Plant Certification

PUWER Register

Hoist Register

Crane Register

Lifting Equipment Register

Induction Register

Tool box talks

Contractor's team briefings

Operations - Activities -Safe Working

Site tidiness-Housekeeping

Fire Precautions

Fire safety route

Fire Fighting Equipment [Site]

Fire Signage

Fire Escape route

Fire Assembly

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable In place and sufficient.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable Clear and un-obstructed.

Acceptable Suitable for current activities. -

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable Plant registers maintained

Acceptable Records in place and up to date.

Acceptable Records in place and up to date. - -

Acceptable Four cranes in place, and rescue team trained.

Acceptable In place.

Acceptable In place and signed by site operatives.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable In place and completed.

Acceptable Good standard

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable Clear and unobstructed.

Acceptable Suitable and sufficient.

Acceptable Displayed.

Acceptable Clear and unobstructed.

Acceptable In place.

Observation

Fire register [Site]

COSHH

Safe Storage

Hazardous Substance Register

MSDS Sheets Documented

Hand Tools/Plant/Transport

Hand Tools [PAT]

Plant

Transport Equipment

Excavation

Electricity

Status Comments

Acceptable In place.

Acceptable Assessments in place.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable In place and sufficient.

Acceptable Attached to assessments.

Acceptable No defects noted.

Acceptable PAT tested and in date.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable Good practice

Acceptable No issues raised.

Overhead Power Lines Not Applicable Not Applicable.

Underground Services

Acceptable No issues raised.

HV Electrical installation Not Applicable Not Applicable.

Working at Height

Ladders

Step Ladders

Mobile Scaffold Towers

Roof work

Mobile Elevated Working Platforms [MEWP]

Hoists

Mechanical Lifting

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable Clear and unobstructed.

Confined Space Not Applicable. Not Applicable.

Permit

Floor openings

Edge Protection

Signage

Safe working practices

Protective clothing /equipment

PPE-General

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable in place where required.

Acceptable Relevant safety signage is in place.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Acceptable 5 points of PPE as per site rules.

Acceptable No issues raised.

Observation

Manual handling

Environmental

Air Pollution

Water Pollution

Land Pollution

Noise Pollution

Dust Pollution

Status Comments

Acceptable No issues raised. - -

Acceptable No activities causing concern. - -

Acceptable No activities causing concern. - -

Acceptable No activities causing concern. - -

Acceptable No activities causing concern. - -

Acceptable No activities causing concern. - -

Improvement Needed Dust management throughout the project has improved, but will still need to be monitored carefully

Working over /adjacent to water Not Applicable. Not Applicable.

Roadwork's Not Applicable. Not Applicable.

Working over/adjacent to railways Not applicable Not Applicable.

McLaughlin & Harvey Ltd

Appendix 1 Photographs

DAA CMT report

Architectural Progress Report _ 28th August 2024

Project Project Honey, Kingston Created By Alexander Cook

Job No 19064

Date 27/08/2024

Revision 01

1.0 Project Overview

Date 27/08/2024

Approved By Alastair Roberts

Date 27/08/2024

 DAA continue to develop & coordinate the Stage 5 detailed design of buildings A + B + C with McLH in line with the construction programme.

 DAA have started Snagging process to ensure De-snag condition in line with Program - Refer to the McLH Snagging Tracker for further details.

 All remaining pre-commencement conditions have all been submitted. Cond 43 “Flood Resistance” & Condition 44 ‘Flood Maintenance’ have since been rejected & a detailed POA with McLH + RBG is required to rectify RBKT concerns. Refer to the McLH + FH Conditions Tracker for further details.

 DAA are developing the remaining TVRs & are actively developing all variations relating to External Works, CCTV, GF Service notch to Link + Ceiling Bulkheads.

2.0 Key Design Development/Deliverables

 DAA are attending project DTM’s with McLH & the design team as well as organising specific design workshops with Structures, M+E, Facades, Building Control, Fire & BREEAM when required

 A s lead design DAA continue the coordination of BIM models & have begun circulat ing our Revit models on a bi-weekly basis following all BIM protocol to ensure the design team is fully informed & coordinated

 DAA issued architectural information that targets all pre-above ground planning conditions & continue to work with both McLH + FH to unlock the conditions. The CMT team continue to chase the progress of Condition 3 & associated comments

 DAA are attending detailed design workshops on the proposed External Works, landscaping, Internal walls , waterproofing, roofing , external f acades to ensure further coordination between consultants, the occupier team & funders.

 DAA continue to manage & present E xternal + Internal finishes samples to both the Unilever design team & RBKT for formal sign off. The design team are continuing to develop the façade detailed proposals with Clarkes & McLH through dedicated façade workshops & a re actively responding to RFI’s to ensure the façades retains the original design intent + quality.

 DAA have attended site meetings + visits + snagging when required to review benchmark works on site, samples & detailed coordination issues.

3.0 Next Period / Key Decisions and Instructions Required

 Instruction required on all occupier variations + associated DAA fees on the following: - Signage planning application.

Any Additional Occupier Variations

 Full understanding of any other new UL variations which could potentially affect the S tage 5 design programme is critical for avoiding redundant work.

4.0 Issued Documentation + Information.

 DAA have issued design sketches + Updated Stage 5 Design Packs for the following :

 Building A and B CCTV coordination and Clarkes elevations review + comments

 Building C CCTV Strategy coordination

 RCP and Wall updates due to HAL request for builders work change

 Building Control outstanding items

 Reception link notch coordination

 Responding to various contractor’s queries

 Snagging according to schedule

 90 Series – External Works – Paving / Levels / Ramp set out

 MSCP Roller Shutter Proposals

 Entrance Link Notch Coordination

 External Lighting + CCTV TVR

 Builders Work changes to Building A Level 07 (HAL Change of Control)

 Additional ceiling access hatches (HAL Change Control Request 07)

 MSCP Wayfinding

 Blind Box design updates + coordination

 Fire Curtains + interface detailing – Bridge Link

 Revised Threshold details

 RCP’s + MEP coordination/Set out

 Service Yard elevations – External Lourves

 MSCP External Wall / Flood void / Blockwork / Brickwork

 Façade Coordination + Comments – A + B + C

 Building Control tracker coordination with other consultants and respond to Building Control Officer queries

Snagging + Benchmarks :

- Snagging completed according to MCLH schedule

 DAA have fully updated their Architectural folder on Viewpoint + associated TIDP which now contains all issued drawings / specifications / reports / design options / sketches

 DAA have continued to attend BIM clash detection workshops when required & have always ensured that design development of Revit models are frequently issued following coordination workshops & key design changes/variations.

 DAA have responded to all required RFI’s & provided comments via Viewpoint on all consultant drawings & design information.

Latest Stage 5 Car Park Architectural Information Issued within this period [Buildings C] :

 13000 – Floorbeds - A5

 21000 – External Walls + Façade Packages - A5

 22000 – Internal Walls – A5

 24000 – Stairs - A5

 25000 – Cores - A5

 2 7 000 – Roof Package - A5

 30000 – GA Drawings - A5

 34000 – Metalwork - A5

 35000 – RCPs - A5

 42000 – Wall Finishes - A5

 43000 – Floor Finishes - A5

 68000 – Fire Strategy - A5

 44000 – Skirtings - A5

 74000 – Sanitaryware Package - A5

 Outline Finishes Specification

 External Door Schedule - A5

 Internal Door Schedule - A5

 NBS Specifications - A5

 External Roller Shutter Proposal - A5

 Floor beds + Gullies Changing village - A5

Latest Stage 5 Architectural Information Issued within this period [Buildings A + B] :

 03000 – GA’s - A5 – CAT A Omissions

 04000 – Ground Floor Setting Out + Slab Edge Set Out + Builders Works Penetrations - A5

 13000 – Floorbeds - A5

 23000 - Thermal Zones - A5

 21000 – External Walls + Façade Packages - A5

 22000 – Internal Walls - A5

 23000 – Building Links – Reception + Bridge - A5

 24000 – Stairs + Feature Stair Building B - A5

 25000 – Core Package - A5

 27000 – Roof Package - A5

 31000 - External Door Schedule - A5

 32000 – Internal Door Schedule - A5

 33000 – RAF - A5

 34000 – Metalwork - A5

 35000 – RCP’s - A5 – CAT A Omissions

 42000 – Wall Finishes - A5 – CAT A Omissions

 43000 – Floor Finishes – A5 – CAT A Omissions

 44000 – Skirtings – A5 – CAT A Omissions

 68000 – Fire Strategy - A5

 74000 – Sanitaryware Package - A5

 80000 – Areas - A5

 90000 – External Works - A5

 External Door Schedule – A5

 Internal Door Schedule – A5

 NBS Specifications – A5

 External Shutter – A5

 Lift Finishes + Lobby - A5

 Fire Stop Details + Fire Curtains - A5

Latest Contractors Instruction Issued within this period:

 CI 014 - CIRCLESLIDE DOORS – Closed out

 CI 015 - BUILDING B FEATURE STAIR GLAZING INFILL – Closed out

 CI 028 - CAT A Temp Measures – Closed out

 CI 029 - Internal + External Doors – Closed out

 CI 030 - Changing Places – Closed out

 CI 031 - External Louvres – Closed out

 CI 032 - Facade Lighting – Closed out

 CI 033 - GF Screed and Omission of RAF – Closed out

 CI 034 - Blind Boxes – Closed out

 CI 035 - Car Park Additional Work – Closed out

 CI 036 - WC Grilles – Closed out

 CI 037 - RAF Omission – Closed out

 CI 038 - Building A Baby Change – Closed out

 CI 039 - Car Park - Shower shelf – Closed out

 CI 040 - Blind box – Closed out

 CI 041 – Doors ( CI 029 amendment s + CCTV ) Closed out

 CI 042 - Lift Floor

 EAI 71 - Omission of Soap Dispenser – Closed out

 CI 043 – Paving Specification – In progress

 CI 044 – Reception Link Notch – In progress

McLH procurement schedule

Contract:

Lautus progress report

Planning Report

Project Honey

Project Honey

This report is based on the construction programme Rev 16 rather than the contract programme.

Contract Dates

Running a Monte Carlo risk analysis the likely end date at present is the 21 November 24.

Progress

Building A - on site

Comment

Building A likely completion is 21/11/24. The critical path is shown running through cladding, M & E and commissioning.

Envelope

Envelope

Construction programme May24 Rev 12

A Utilised

RescheduledConstruction programme June24 Rev 14completion date

RescheduledConstruction programme August24Rev 16completion date +/June toAug

Utilised Cladding

Until the cladding panels are installed the tower crane can’t be removed. The revised date for removal of the tower crane is the 31st August. Along with the installation of the brick faced GRC and the removal of the mast climber these will all affect the external works.

Level 2, 3 & 4 is reported 100%

Level 596%

Level 693%

Level 776%

Level 879%

From the revised construction programme rev 16 utilised cladding is due to complete externally on 22 August (last month reported 2 September) and internal finishes to cladding completes 2 September (last month 12 September 24).

Equitone Cladding

These panels are still to be installed. Until this is complete the mast climbers can’t be removed.

Stick System

The curtain walling ground and first floor is projected -10W late (programme Rev 12) with completion 27 August 24. Last month the 12 August 24. With doors installed 2 September 24.

Roof

Roof Construction programme May24 Rev 12

RescheduledConstruction programme June 24Rev 14

RescheduledConstruction programme August24 Rev 16 +/June to July

Level 9 2/9/24 2/9/24 Complete 0

Level 8

Terrace 13/6/24 16/7/24 1/11/24 -15W3d

Level 6

Terrace 1/7/24 30/9/24 1/11/24 -5W

Similar to June report, roof terrace finishes still to be carried out. Level 8 and level 6 terrace are being used to store materials thereby delaying the roof insulation, roof finishes and handrails etc.

Finishes Blind Boxes

The instruction to install perimeter blind boxes has been included in the revised construction programme. These are complete on the 2nd, 3rd and 4th floor. 20% on first floor, 80% on 5th floor. These are on the critical path on the 5th floor. Curved grilles are being fixed to blind boxes. Confirmation required that they have all been ordered.

Lift installation

Lift 01 05, and 07 100% complete. L02 L03, L04 & L06 underway. Likely completion date end for all lifts is the 10 September 24. Last month projected completion was the end of August.

Lift L07 and L01 are being used as means of vertical transportation of materials and labour. The external hoist has been de commissioned.

Work to risers

Work to risers complete except for the smoke ventilation risers which has a projected completion of the 27 August 24.

Cores

Level 1 to 5 projected to complete by the 23 September.

Level 6 by the 4 October.

Level 7 & * complete by the 10 October.

Progress appears to have slowed probably due to lack of labour as this has been diverted to complete Building B.

Commissioning

Due to commence Finishes

Building B- on site

Envelope

Envelope Construction programme May24Rev 12 RescheduledConstruction programme June 24Rev 14

Brick faced GRC cladding

June completion projected 13 August, now projected completion 2 September.

Stick System

The curtain walling ground and first floor is projected-7W 2D. Last month delay was -4W1D.

Roof

Construction programme June 24Rev14

Level 11 and terrace at level 10 are nearly complete.

This area has been used for storage of materials.

Projected completion is now 2 September 24.

Finishes Finishes

programme May24Rev 12 RescheduledConstruction programme August24Rev 14 RescheduledConstruction programme July24Rev16 +/-

Finishes

Construction programme May24 Rev 12

RescheduledConstruction programme August24Rev 14

RescheduledConstruction programme July24 Rev16 +/-

Lift installation.

Lifts complete. Lifts to continue as BBU

Finishes to Stairs 01 and 02 now running together rather than one at a time. Stair 1 projected completion 6 September and Stair 2 3 September.

Commissioning

This is due to commence. It was reported that an early Cause and Effect operation was carried out. This is in advance of commissioning works to identify possible issues. A few issues were found and are now being addressed.

Building C- on site

Roof landscaping underway.

Work progressing with fit out on the ground floor, a critical area, which is now projected to complete 5 November 24. Last month the 28 October 24. To maintain this end date the fit out works on the ground floor have been split into three zones. This is now an area that is running on the critical path. There is a high risk that the reported completion date will not be met.

Commissioning

Not started. There has been a request to Halsion to look at reducing the timescale for these works.

External Works

The haulage road is now broken up. This will effect site logistics and an increase risk to site performance. External works is a complex in a restricted area. With a delay to the removal of the mast climber and Tower Crane this puts greater pressure on achieving the completion date. Projected completion 4 October 24.

Critical issues

◌ྕ The break out of the haulage road will adversely effect logistics. This is likely to effect site progress.

◌ྕ The brick faced GRC installation at the base of the building has now commenced. This delay will adversely affect the external works programme.

◌ྕ The delay in completing the cladding on building A will delay the removal of the tower crane and subsequently effect the completion of the external works.

◌ྕ Fit out of the ground floor in building C now on the critical path is an area that is likely to over run.

◌ྕ Labour diverted from Building A to Building B due to a general lack of labour. This has had affected on progress on Building A.

◌ྕ External works is a complex in a restricted area. The remaining time available puts greater pressure on achieving the completion date.

Buildzone tracker/report

TECHNICAL AUDIT REMEDIATION TRACKER

BuildzoneRef Number: BZ9084931 InspectionsRequired: 27 (Twentyseven)

Address: ProjectHoney InspectionNo: 18 of 27

Surveyor: Ahmet Ozcagli

•Provide images of works before visitincluding pile caps,foundations before concrete pour, floor slab before concrete pour,Core twin wall installations.

•Provide pile integritytests certificates.

•Provide pre-pour QAinspection records for foundations,slabs,columns and core wall installations.

Provide structural engineer’s solution or approval for the low concrete coverage for steel over precastslab at Block A ground floor.

Provide structural engineer’s solution or approval for the low concrete coverage for steel over precastslab at Block B ground floor.

Provide structural engineer’s solution or approval for the low concrete coverage for steel over precastslab at Block C ground floor.

For Block B,provide structural engineer’s written approval of fire door opening core wall cutting works.

Provide repair method statementand images of repairs at Block C precast elements.

Client is advised to provide repair methodologyand images of repair applications to floor concrete at Block C roof level.

Client is advised to provide repair methodologyand images of repair applications to floor concrete at Block C 1st level.

2.04 Full RIBA Stage 5 Structural Drawings and Calcs

2.05 Pile integritytest results

2.06 Cube testresults

2.07 Heat soak and impacttestglass specifications

2.08 Terrace and flat roof IBG

2.09 List of full cladding materials proposed

2.10 Windows & external door manufacture guarantees

2.11 Provide QA records for precast elements from manufacturer

3.00Othermattersarising(attimeofinspection)

3.01 Provide all statutoryand certification documentation at projectcompletion inline with technical reporting

Pre-pour inspection records from site engineer

Building Control site inspection reports

Fire consultant QA records

Basementwaterproofing QA records

Pile integritytest certs

Bolt checking QA records

Weld testcerts

Cube testcerts

Static load testcerts

Terrace and Flat roof IBG

BBA certification for anyrainscreen cladding or brick slips

Glazing / curtain walling heat soak and impacttesting certs

Building Control Completion Cert(s)

EPC

As built SAPS

Mechanical Ventilation certification

Chlorination certs

Gas/water/elec certs

Fire door compliance commissioning

Fire suppression,alarm commissioning

Sound tests

Air tests

Lift Commissioning

Drainage pressure testing (written confirmation from AI) & or CCTV

q

commissioning meeting notes

PROJECT HONEY

CLIENT COMMISSIONINGMEETING

Document No. Revision 5

Date/Time 20/08/24

Place Microsoft Teams / Project Office

Prepared / Chaired by Sam Jeffries

Date of Issue 21/08/24

Allen Nash MCLH (AN)

Ian Goodwin AACM (IG)

Giuseppe Vaccaro Unilever (GV)

Sam Jeffries AACM (SJ)

Andy Tichopad Knight Frank (AT)

Attendees

Joanna Swidzinska Mecserve (JS)

Adrian Lavendar

Talent Ncube

Piyush Patel Inhabit Group (PP)

Gary Gee Hoarelea(GG)

Jeremy Pollard Unilever (JP)

Andrew Finnegan (AF) MCLH

Joanna Harris (Sodexo)

Gavin Toman MCLH (GT)

Apologies

David Lunt Francis Hunter (DL)

Luke Nurser Francis Hunter (LN)

Feran Olanrewaju Mace (FO)

Phil Lewins AECOM (PL)

David Stephens Francis Hunter (DS)

Copies to All Attendees,

NOTE

Purpose of meeting is to align client and delivery teams expectations of commissioning and integration requirements, delivery strategies and confirm roles and responsibilities across all stakeholders

1.2 Documentation

Current Progress and tracker run through and appended with minutes

PROJECT HONEY

- PP comments addressed 10/07/24 via email response

o PP confirms that no items have been satisfactorily closed

o SJ confirms all commissioning data has been taken from the approved stage 5 design

o PP references client bible

o Rev 4 of schedule (issued with minutes) answered by Hoare lea, AECOM and halsion to be further reviewed

o Meeting required before this next meeting (1pm Tuesday 27th)

o Stage 5 approved design

- CTPs / trackers located within client commissioning folder

- Any further personnel needing access to folder, please send request to ian goodwin AACM

- Dashboard appended to minutes

1.3 Programme Key activities

BUILIDNG B

LTHW CHW (B)

- Flushing complete

- Commissioning / set up 90% progressed, riser balance to complete

o Discussed discrepancy of PICV to Riser Commissioning sets recording circa 20% lower on riser CS than summation of PICV FCUs

oCrane(PICVmanufacturer)currentlyreviewingall issuedtestresults

oPreliminaryadvisethatfunction/operationoffsetwill beappliedandincludedintestpacktoconfirm performancereadingsacrossthesystem

oNotewillbeaddedtoOMM

o Issue has persisted theremay be the need to introduce metering stations to each FCU to confirm system distribution and tally volumes against branch and riser valves

o MCLH AACM will confirm on review of halsion latest test results

Electrical Building (B)

- Submain testing complete

- ATS function testing on-going

PROJECT HONEY

- DB secondary distribution

o 100% Installed

o 96% Dead / Live Tested

o 31%documentedtoAACMremainingdocstobeissued WC19/08

- Emergency light testing complete 12/08

o Neon led to be rewired on some luminaires

o Client / sweco invited to witness, did not attend

o Will re demo a limited number of emergencies on BB IST

o Full test will not be done again

Ventilation systems (B)

- General ventilation 90% progressed / commissioning

- Toilet extract complete will be on next issue of WLAS

- FCU sec air circa 75% complete, generally perimeter FCUs to complete

- Smoke system complete to 1st floor Specialist contractor in 23/08/24 to complete system

Fire Alarm System (B)

- Device testing on-going (PMN 100% witnessed to AACM 14/08/24)

- Integration / interface testing to be completed WC19/08

- Internal C&E latter part WC19/08

- AACM C&E 23/08

- Client C&E 05/09

BMS (B)

- Static / point to point testing complete

- OnavailabilityofcommissionedsystemsS&Stoset /commission into auto control

- All to be complete for IST

Building A

- power available

- LTHW/CHW system flushing commenced on programme 17/07.

- Dead testing progressing throughout the building.

Building C

- power available

PROJECT HONEY

- Static testing underway in line with programme

Witnessing

Inhabit confirmed they would witness complete systems as per previously issued mail. Completed CTPE’s to be issued prior to witnessing.

- Confirmation ofcompleted andvalidatedsystems will be offered to client teams

- Aim to issue WLA with completed systems WC 26/08

- Outlook invites to be sent on confirmation

- All tests will be notified via Witness Look Ahead (WLA)

Reporting

AACM maintain both equipment and documentation trackers which will form part of the bi-weekly commissioning report

Meetings / Workshops

- Client meeting agreed to go weekly predominantly will be held over teams

- IST workshop date TBC.

o Discussed in last two meetings

o Document issued no comment to date

o Building B primary isolation only as no generator

- IST document run through Note, Generator will not be available for Building B.

IST

- Draft document run through

- Document written as all power supplies available though generator will not be available for building B

- Noted buildings are design stand alone with sprinkler and life safety supplies fed from C

- Document within client commissioning folder

- Following client review IST workshop to be set up to run through and agree test procedure

- SJ will email when updated intro re generator

Client Training

- GVstatesthat client trainingwillbebettercarriedoutlaterinthe programme circa mid-oct

o To be agreed and formally communicated

PROJECT HONEY

o It was noted that when teams are identified they can be on witness notifications for familiarisation of systems / site

o Note these will be demonstrations not training opportunities

- Schedule received from DS

- Noted some dates are slightly premature

- Dates / programme will become clear through the next weeks progress of Integration and close out testing

- Personnel to be invited to demonstrations of systems which could be recorded as familiarisation

- Confirmed T&F required before PC though as above could be reduced sessions

- Francis Hunter to share client training document to Adrian Lavender

- Francis Hunter (DS) MCLH (AN) AACM SJ IG) to meet 21/08/24 to confirm requirements / action

- PMN meeting held AA to confirm T&F day to familiarise FM teams in advance full client training as detailed in previously issued CT Training document

AOB

Section to be included for upcoming witnessing to client.

- Piyush Query schedule – stated as majority of items closed DS to close on V4P

- As above separate meeting to be arranged

-Assetregisterstage4only–stage5updaterequired/beissued ANlastreceivedaugust2023DSANresolvedoutsideofmeeting

-AllinformationissuedtoFH

- Listofsuppliersonregistertobeincluded

NEXT MEETING 27/08/24

Plowman Craven latest measure

AREA MEASUREMENT REPORT (RICS Code of Measuring Practice)

EDEN CAMPUS

(Buildings A & B)

St James's Road

KINGSTON-UPON- THAMES KT1

Project Number

45323-005 Contents

Report Issue Status

Survey Report

Summary of Areas

Reference Plans

EDEN CAMPUS

(Buildings A & B) St James's Road

KINGSTON-UPON- THAMES KT1

Report Issue Status

ACC1 06 June 2024 FOR REVIEW ISSUED FOR COMMENTS

ACC2 12 June 2024 FOR REVIEW 4TH, 3RD & 2ND FLOOR AREAS AMENDED

ACC3 10 July 2024 FOR REVIEW BUILING A 2ND & BUILDING B 1ST,5TH, 6TH ADDED

ACC4 22 July 2024 FOR REVIEW BUILDING B AREAS AMENDED

ACC5 22 August 2024 FOR REVIEW BUILDING A 3RD , 4TH , 5TH & BUILDING A 10th -7th & 1stG ADDED & 2nd FLOOR AMENDED

ACC6 28 August 2024 FOR REVIEW CLIENT AMENDMENTS TO ALL FLOORS

ACC7 29 August 2024 FOR REVIEW CLIENT AMENDMENTS TO ALL FLOORS

Survey Report

Introduction

This Area Measurement Survey was undertaken by Plowman Craven between June and August 2024, in accordance with the guidelines as described in the Sixth Edition (September 2007) of the Code of Measuring Practice and the Globally applicable 6th Edition (May 2015), published by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS).

The measurement was undertaken by Plowman Craven’s representative at the date of survey, under site conditions at that time and in line with Plowman Craven's standard conditions of contract.

Scope of Work

In preparing this measurement report, Plowman Craven has relied upon supplied information. The areas to be measured were defined by the instructing client through floor or lease plans with appropriate areas outlined, and/or as instructed on site by the client or client’s representative.

Any undefined areas were measured as found on site in accordance with the Sixth Edition (September 2007) of the Code of Measuring Practice and the Globally applicable 6th Edition (May 2015).

Site Survey

Measurements were taken to the internal face of perimeter walls and to the face of walls enclosing toilets, stairs and other core areas.

Areas and wall lines with limited access at the time of survey are denoted on drawings by dashed lines. Any areas that were not accessible, due to either building construction, tenant imposed restrictions or wall lines obscured by fixtures and fittings, have required professional estimations based upon similar layouts on adjacent floors and on information derived from supplied drawings.

A 3D Laser scanner was used to observe the geometrical framework of the area surveyed. The point cloud data was downloaded and stored onto a laptop, and later downloaded directly to office servers. Dimensions were taken of overall distances and, where necessary, diagonals and check measurements, using a “Leica Disto” laser device. These were recorded on to a laptop running relevant software.

Area Calculation

Site survey work and corresponding accuracy levels are constrained by the methods adopted to capture relevant site data given the nature of access afforded and the time allocated to complete the work. The accuracy of the area figures reported is commensurate with the measurement methodology applied.

All site observations and dimensions were checked and any discrepancies exceeding the required tolerance were, if necessary, verified on site.

Computer-Aided Design (CAD) software has been used to construct accurate area drawings from the information collected. The area values derived have been calculated using commands and routines built into the CAD software.

The drawings have been retained as digital CAD files comprising accurate data of area extents and configurations and have been produced in compliance with the measurement reporting standard of the RICS Code of Measuring Practice. All areas have been calculated in square metres and converted into square feet using a conversion factor of 1 sq. m = 10.7639 sq. ft. Caution should be used when working with hard copy paper prints generated from digital data files. These drawings have been produced for area referencing purposes and must not be used for any architectural or construction/engineering purposes or for any other purpose other than that for which they were originally intended.

The drawings contained within the report reflect the site configuration at the time of survey. As such Plowman Craven cannot be held responsible for any changes made to the site, that may affect the area, after the date of the original survey.

Report Production

This report includes copies of:

- Property Photographs - illustrating the condition of site at the time of survey

- A Summary of Areas

- Area Plans - showing the extent of the area measured, identifying specific areas of inclusion/exclusion and quoting area values in square metres and square feet.

Should this report be distributed to other parties it should be done so in it’s entirety. The “Summary of Areas” and the “Area Plans” should be read in conjunction with each other and should not be separated from this report.

Quality Control

All figures and drawings are checked as part of our standard works procedures in accordance with the company's certification to BS EN ISO 9001:2015.

Property Photographs

BROOKSTREET

ThisdrawingcomplieswiththeRICSCodeofMeasuringPractice,6thedition(September2007)andtheGloballyapplicable6thEdition(May2015).Itindicatestheextentoftheareasquoted,producedtoan accuracycommensuratewithstandardpresentationscales.ItisheldinascaleddigitalCADformat. LossofAreaispre-agreedandhavenotbeenmeasuredonsite.Thisareahasbeenreportedunderclientinstruction. ThebackgrounddatashowningreyhasbeenproducedbyaThird-Partyandisshownforreferencepurposesonly.Thisdatamaynotcoincidewiththeextentsoftheon-sitemeasurements.

BROOKSTREET

ThisdrawingcomplieswiththeRICSCodeofMeasuringPractice,6thedition(September2007)andtheGloballyapplicable6thEdition(May2015).Itindicatestheextentoftheareasquoted,producedtoan accuracycommensuratewithstandardpresentationscales.ItisheldinascaleddigitalCADformat. LossofAreaispre-agreedandhavenotbeenmeasuredonsite.Thisareahasbeenreportedunderclientinstruction. ThebackgrounddatashowningreyhasbeenproducedbyaThird-Partyandisshownforreferencepurposesonly.Thisdatamaynotcoincidewiththeextentsoftheon-sitemeasurements.

BROOKSTREET

ThisdrawingcomplieswiththeRICSCodeofMeasuringPractice,6thedition(September2007)andtheGloballyapplicable6thEdition(May2015).Itindicatestheextentoftheareasquoted,producedtoan accuracycommensuratewithstandardpresentationscales.ItisheldinascaleddigitalCADformat.

LossofAreaispre-agreedandhavenotbeenmeasuredonsite.Thisareahasbeenreportedunderclientinstruction. ThebackgrounddatashowningreyhasbeenproducedbyaThird-Partyandisshownforreferencepurposesonly.Thisdatamaynotcoincidewiththeextentsoftheon-sitemeasurements.

BROOKSTREET

ThisdrawingcomplieswiththeRICSCodeofMeasuringPractice,6thedition(September2007)andtheGloballyapplicable6thEdition(May2015).Itindicatestheextentoftheareasquoted,producedtoan accuracycommensuratewithstandardpresentationscales.ItisheldinascaleddigitalCADformat. LossofAreaispre-agreedandhavenotbeenmeasuredonsite.Thisareahasbeenreportedunderclientinstruction. ThebackgrounddatashowningreyhasbeenproducedbyaThird-Partyandisshownforreferencepurposesonly.Thisdatamaynotcoincidewiththeextentsoftheon-sitemeasurements.

EDEN CAMPUS, St James's Road, KINGSTON-UPON- THAMES, KT1

BROOKSTREET

LossofAreatobeincludedinNIAinlinewithDOV

ThisdrawingcomplieswiththeRICSCodeofMeasuringPractice,6thedition(September2007)andtheGloballyapplicable6thEdition(May2015).Itindicatestheextentoftheareasquoted,producedtoan accuracycommensuratewithstandardpresentationscales.ItisheldinascaleddigitalCADformat. LossofAreasarepre-agreedwithUnileverandhavenotbeenmeasuredonsite.Theseareashavebeenderivedformsupplieddrawingsunderclientinstruction. Finishedfloornotinsituatthetimeofsurveyandithasbeenassumedthiswillbeinstalledlevelwiththebottomtransom,thereforefullheightglazingisincluded. ThebackgrounddatashowningreyhasbeenproducedbyaThird-Partyandisshownforreferencepurposesonly.Thisdatamaynotcoincidewiththeextentsoftheon-sitemeasurements.

BROOKSTREET

ThisdrawingcomplieswiththeRICSCodeofMeasuringPractice,6thedition(September2007)andtheGloballyapplicable6thEdition(May2015).Itindicatestheextentoftheareasquoted,producedtoan accuracycommensuratewithstandardpresentationscales.ItisheldinascaleddigitalCADformat.

LossofAreasarepre-agreedwithUnileverandhavenotbeenmeasuredonsite.Theseareashavebeenderivedformsupplieddrawingsunderclientinstruction. Dashedlinedenotesassumedwalllineinaccessibleatthetimeofsurvey.

ThebackgrounddatashowningreyhasbeenproducedbyaThird-Partyandisshownforreferencepurposesonly.Thisdatamaynotcoincidewiththeextentsoftheon-sitemeasurements.

BROOKSTREET

ThisdrawingcomplieswiththeRICSCodeofMeasuringPractice,6thedition(September2007)andtheGloballyapplicable6thEdition(May2015).Itindicatestheextentoftheareasquoted,producedtoan accuracycommensuratewithstandardpresentationscales.ItisheldinascaleddigitalCADformat.

LossofAreasarepre-agreedwithUnileverandhavenotbeenmeasuredonsite.Theseareashavebeenderivedformsupplieddrawingsunderclientinstruction. Dashedlinedenotesassumedwalllineinaccessibleatthetimeofsurvey.

ThebackgrounddatashowningreyhasbeenproducedbyaThird-Partyandisshownforreferencepurposesonly.Thisdatamaynotcoincidewiththeextentsoftheon-sitemeasurements.

BROOKSTREET

ThisdrawingcomplieswiththeRICSCodeofMeasuringPractice,6thedition(September2007)andtheGloballyapplicable6thEdition(May2015).Itindicatestheextentoftheareasquoted,producedtoan accuracycommensuratewithstandardpresentationscales.ItisheldinascaleddigitalCADformat.

LossofAreasarepre-agreedwithUnileverandhavenotbeenmeasuredonsite.Theseareashavebeenderivedformsupplieddrawingsunderclientinstruction. Dashedlinedenotesassumedwalllineinaccessibleatthetimeofsurvey.

ThebackgrounddatashowningreyhasbeenproducedbyaThird-Partyandisshownforreferencepurposesonly.Thisdatamaynotcoincidewiththeextentsoftheon-sitemeasurements.

BROOKSTREET

ThisdrawingcomplieswiththeRICSCodeofMeasuringPractice,6thedition(September2007)andtheGloballyapplicable6thEdition(May2015).Itindicatestheextentoftheareasquoted,producedtoan accuracycommensuratewithstandardpresentationscales.ItisheldinascaleddigitalCADformat.

LossofAreasarepre-agreedwithUnileverandhavenotbeenmeasuredonsite.Theseareashavebeenderivedformsupplieddrawingsunderclientinstruction. Dashedlinedenotesassumedwalllineinaccessibleatthetimeofsurvey.

ThebackgrounddatashowningreyhasbeenproducedbyaThird-Partyandisshownforreferencepurposesonly.Thisdatamaynotcoincidewiththeextentsoftheon-sitemeasurements.

BROOKSTREET

ThisdrawingcomplieswiththeRICSCodeofMeasuringPractice,6thedition(September2007)andtheGloballyapplicable6thEdition(May2015).Itindicatestheextentoftheareasquoted,producedtoan accuracycommensuratewithstandardpresentationscales.ItisheldinascaleddigitalCADformat.

LossofAreasarepre-agreedwithUnileverandhavenotbeenmeasuredonsite.Theseareashavebeenderivedformsupplieddrawingsunderclientinstruction. Dashedlinedenotesassumedwalllineinaccessibleatthetimeofsurvey.

ThebackgrounddatashowningreyhasbeenproducedbyaThird-Partyandisshownforreferencepurposesonly.Thisdatamaynotcoincidewiththeextentsoftheon-sitemeasurements.

BROOKSTREET

ThisdrawingcomplieswiththeRICSCodeofMeasuringPractice,6thedition(September2007)andtheGloballyapplicable6thEdition(May2015).Itindicatestheextentoftheareasquoted,producedtoan accuracycommensuratewithstandardpresentationscales.ItisheldinascaleddigitalCADformat.

LossofAreasarepre-agreedwithUnileverandhavenotbeenmeasuredonsite.Theseareashavebeenderivedformsupplieddrawingsunderclientinstruction. Dashedlinedenotesassumedwalllineinaccessibleatthetimeofsurvey.

ThebackgrounddatashowningreyhasbeenproducedbyaThird-Partyandisshownforreferencepurposesonly.Thisdatamaynotcoincidewiththeextentsoftheon-sitemeasurements.

BROOKSTREET

ThisdrawingcomplieswiththeRICSCodeofMeasuringPractice,6thedition(September2007)andtheGloballyapplicable6thEdition(May2015).Itindicatestheextentoftheareasquoted,producedtoan accuracycommensuratewithstandardpresentationscales.ItisheldinascaleddigitalCADformat.

LossofAreasarepre-agreedwithUnileverandhavenotbeenmeasuredonsite.Theseareashavebeenderivedformsupplieddrawingsunderclientinstruction. Dashedlinedenotesassumedwalllineinaccessibleatthetimeofsurvey.

ThebackgrounddatashowningreyhasbeenproducedbyaThird-Partyandisshownforreferencepurposesonly.Thisdatamaynotcoincidewiththeextentsoftheon-sitemeasurements.

BROOKSTREET

ThisdrawingcomplieswiththeRICSCodeofMeasuringPractice,6thedition(September2007)andtheGloballyapplicable6thEdition(May2015).Itindicatestheextentoftheareasquoted,producedtoan accuracycommensuratewithstandardpresentationscales.ItisheldinascaleddigitalCADformat.

LossofAreasarepre-agreedwithUnileverandhavenotbeenmeasuredonsite.Theseareashavebeenderivedformsupplieddrawingsunderclientinstruction. Dashedlinedenotesassumedwalllineinaccessibleatthetimeofsurvey.

ThebackgrounddatashowningreyhasbeenproducedbyaThird-Partyandisshownforreferencepurposesonly.Thisdatamaynotcoincidewiththeextentsoftheon-sitemeasurements.

BROOKSTREET

ThisdrawingcomplieswiththeRICSCodeofMeasuringPractice,6thedition(September2007)andtheGloballyapplicable6thEdition(May2015).Itindicatestheextentoftheareasquoted,producedtoan accuracycommensuratewithstandardpresentationscales.ItisheldinascaleddigitalCADformat.

LossofAreasarepre-agreedwithUnileverandhavenotbeenmeasuredonsite.Theseareashavebeenderivedformsupplieddrawingsunderclientinstruction. Dashedlinedenotesassumedwalllineinaccessibleatthetimeofsurvey.

ThebackgrounddatashowningreyhasbeenproducedbyaThird-Partyandisshownforreferencepurposesonly.Thisdatamaynotcoincidewiththeextentsoftheon-sitemeasurements.

BROOKSTREET

ThisdrawingcomplieswiththeRICSCodeofMeasuringPractice,6thedition(September2007)andtheGloballyapplicable6thEdition(May2015).Itindicatestheextentoftheareasquoted,producedtoan accuracycommensuratewithstandardpresentationscales.ItisheldinascaleddigitalCADformat.

LossofAreasarepre-agreedwithUnileverandhavenotbeenmeasuredonsite.Theseareashavebeenderivedformsupplieddrawingsunderclientinstruction. Dashedlinedenotesassumedwalllinenotinsituatthetimeofsurvey.

ThebackgrounddatashowningreyhasbeenproducedbyaThird-Partyandisshownforreferencepurposesonly.Thisdatamaynotcoincidewiththeextentsoftheon-sitemeasurements.

NOTICEOFRELEVANTEVENT/MATTER

Project:ProjectHoney NoticeRef:006

ProjectRef:5412 Date:27/08/2024

RelevantEventReference:

ThisisanoticeprovidedinaccordancewithClause2.24oftheJCTDesignandBuildContract2016(“theContract”),thatithasbecome apparentthattheprogressoftheWorksislikelytobedelayedduetotheoccurrenceofaRelevantEventlistedinClause2.26ofthe Contract.

To:

DavidLunt

7ACCourt,HighStreet, Thames Ditton, Surrey, England, KT7 0SR

Particulars:

Copiesto:

Employer

Employer’s Agent

ThisdelayhasbeencausedbythelateconnectionofthePermanentWater,byThamesWater.

Following on from Early Warning 005, issued on the 12/06/2024, and the ongoing emails and correspondence that followed, the deferment of the Permanent Thames Water Connection, until the 1st July 2024, due to reasons unknown to Thames Water, has critically impactedMCLH’s ability tocompleteourContractWorks.This has impacted,more specifically,flushingactivities and has cause delays to theassociatedcommissioningworks.

ThisissueiscriticallydelayingtheoverallprogressoftheConstructionWorksandwillaffecttheoverallcompletionoftheWorksandthis isdemonstratedbelow.

Section1–10weeks

Section2–4weeks

RelevantEventclausepertainingtoabovecircumstances:2.26.6,2.26.7,2.26.13

ExpecteddelaytoDateforCompletion

Asnotedabove,weanticipatethattherewillbea10-WeekdelaytoSection1(BuildingB)anda4-WeekdelaytoSection2(BuildingA,C &Externals).TheparticularsofthesedelayswillbeissuedinthecomingdaysbutthecompletiondatesfortherelevantSectionsare notedbelow-

Section1–18th November2024

Section2–18th November2024

IsthisEventalsoaRelevantMatter:

IfYes,underwhichRelevantMatterclause:4.21.5

Signedby: MichaelMcCann Date:27/08/24

CommercialManager

AgreedandClosedby: AndrewDoherty Date:27/08/24

OperationsManager:

NOTICEOFRELEVANTEVENT/MATTER

Project:ProjectHoney NoticeRef:007

ProjectRef:5412

RelevantEventReference:

Date:27/08/2024

ThisisanoticeprovidedinaccordancewithClause2.24oftheJCTDesignandBuildContract2016(“theContract”),thatithasbecome apparentthattheprogressoftheWorksislikelytobedelayedduetotheoccurrenceofaRelevantEventlistedinClause2.26ofthe Contract.

To:

DavidLunt

7ACCourt,HighStreet, Thames Ditton, Surrey, England, KT7 0SR

Particulars:

Copiesto:

Employer

Employer’s Agent

ThisdelayhasbeencausedbythelatecompletionoftheWayleaveAgreementsbetweenUKPNandourClient.

Following on from Early Warning 003, issued on the 19/03/2024, and the ongoing emails and correspondence that followed, the deferment of the Wayleave Agreements until the 20th May 2024, due to reasons unknown, has critically impacted MCLH’s ability to completeourContractWorks.

This issue is critically delaying the overall progress of the Construction Works and will affect the overall completion of the Works and this isdemonstratedbelow.

Section1–10weeks

Section2–4weeks

RelevantEventclausepertainingtoabovecircumstances:2.26.6,2.26.7,2.26.13

ExpecteddelaytoDateforCompletion

Asnotedabove,weanticipatethattherewillbea10-WeekdelaytoSection1(BuildingB)anda4-WeekdelaytoSection2(BuildingA,C &Externals).TheparticularsofthesedelayswillbeissuedinthecomingdaysbutthecompletiondatesfortherelevantSectionsare notedbelow-

Section1–18thNovember2024

Section2–18thNovember2024

IsthisEventalsoaRelevantMatter:

IfYes,underwhichRelevantMatterclause:4.21.5

Signedby: MichaelMcCann Date:27/08/24

CommercialManager

AgreedandClosedby: AndrewDoherty Date:27/08/24

OperationsManager:

Process Objective: To establish, implement, control and maintain the processes needed to meet requirements for the provision of products and services.

Process Owner: Group SHEQ Director

Investigation Report

Project:

Project Title: Project Honey

Incident Location: Ground floor of Building A

Date of incident: 6th August 2024

Type of Incident: Impact / struck by: falling object

Project No:

Time of incident: 09.30am approx.

Injury Details: RIDDOR (over 7 days) – facial lacerations, upper leg bruising, chest / wrist pain.

Executive Summary:

The I.P. (Hernando Enrique Paternina Se La Ossa) was injured when a stillage containing panes of glass became unstable and fell onto him. The stillage was in the process of being moved to another location using a pallet truck. This stillage struck the I.P. and trapped him against a trolley to the rear of him.

The I.P. was one of two operatives from Clarke Facades (Clarkes) in the process of moving the stillage. The pallet truck operator (Oscar Fabran) had asked the I.P. to stand at the opposite end and steady the stillage whilst moving it. When the I.P. saw it beginning to fall he took it upon himself to try and stop it, putting himself between it and the trolley.

Root Cause: Inadequate risk assessment

Clarkes management failed to adequately plan / risk assess these works and provide suitable work equipment. The RAMS failed to identify a safe system of work for transporting glass stillages in Building A. They also do not address the risk of transporting stillages with uneven weight distributions. This method of transporting glass stillages had become the norm on the project and was unsafe as it was not in accordance with the glass manufacturer’s safety instructions. This was not identified or addressed by Clarkes supervision or management.

Secondary Cause: Poor or wrong equipment

The pallet truck was not suitable for the task of transporting these glass stillages.

Other contributing causes: Inadequate training / instruction – Due to insufficient risk assessment and supervision the I.P. or pallet truck operator did not receive sufficient information / instruction / training on what risks to be aware of and how this task was to be carried out safely. The I.P. was working on the project for less than 2 weeks.

Corrective actions / recommendations:

Action

Clarkes were immediately stood down and all their operatives re-briefed on their RAMS. Works involving the transport of glass stillages placed on hold.

Clarkes RAMS to undergo a general review to ensure they are relevant / specific to the current works and stage of the project.

Clarkes RAMS to be updated for distribution of glass stillages to detail a changed methodology. A mini glass lifting buoy is planned to move the panes of glass to a location where the tower crane can remove them from the building and store them externally. They will then be installed by the tower crane.

Meeting held with Clarkes / McLH Senior management to discuss the accident, other safety concerns and improvement measures. A required increase in safety standards was reiterated. A SOR is to be issued to Clarkes Contracts Manager for failing to ensure works were adequately planned / risk assessed and RAMS updated.

Clarkes have committed to their Safety department being on site daily and focusing on enhancing Black Hat Supervisor standards for the remainder of their contract works.

McLH project management to ensure RAMS are reviewed / updated as work activities change.

3 Clarkes supervisor’s will be booked onto the Black Hat Academy and Clarkes are releasing a safety bulletin internally within their company on the accident learnings.

McLH will distribute an internal Safety Alert with the learning outcomes from this accident.

By Whom

Matthew Garey (Clarkes Head of Health and Safety)

Matthew Garey / Junho Sung (McLH Façade Manager)

Matthew Garey / Jordan Anderson (Clarkes Contracts Manager)

Sam Peach (McLH Senior PM)

Matthew Garey

Sam Peach / McLH Project team

Matthew Garey

Sam Sufferin

McLaughlin & Harvey

Background Information:

Clarkes are contracted to install the building façade at Project Honey The majority of façade panels come prefabricated and ready to install. However, in the first and ground floor of Building A, the installation is ‘stick curtain wall’. This requires panes of glass and façade components to be delivered to site in a ‘flat-pack’ configuration and then assembled on site. The glass panes are delivered to site banded to a stillage. Stillages can have multiple glass panes on them.

The glass was being stored on the ground floor of Block A at the south elevation. The stillage was being moved to an alternative location so that the operatives could install fire barrier on the Block A South Elevation.

The I.P. (Hernando Enrique Paternina Se La Ossa) is employed by ES Facades, who are a sub-contractor of Clarkes. ES Facades operatives are signed onto Clarkes RAMS.

The I.P / pallet truck operator are both trained to CSCS labourer (green card) standard The I.P was inducted to the project on 22nd July 2024. The pallet truck operator on 15th April 2024.

Investigation Findings:

The I.P. was injured when a stillage containing panes of glass became unstable and fell onto him. The stillage was in the process of being moved to another location using a pallet truck. This stillage struck the I.P. and trapped him against a trolley to the rear of him.

The I.P. was one of two operatives in the process of moving the stillage. The pallet truck operator (Oscar Fabran) had asked the I.P. to stand at the opposite end and steady the stillage whilst moving it. When the I.P. saw it beginning to fall he took it upon himself to try and stop it, putting himself between it and the trolley.

The stillage was loaded with 3 panes of glass weighing circa 1075kg. These were ratchet strapped to secure them in place on the stillage One large pane of glass was stored on one side of the stillage weighing 446.40kg and two smaller panes of 298.80kg and 330.60kg (totalling 629.40kg) on the other. This heavier side (by approx. 183kg) was the side that tilted and fell onto the I.P.

The trolley to the rear of the I.P. also toppled onto a pallet of frame components behind it (see below left picture). This took some of the weight of the stillage and trolley, and stopped the full weight of the stillage coming down on top of him on the ground. The I.P was however left stuck between the stillage and trolley.

Other operatives in the area then assisted with removing the stillage off the I.P. An ambulance was called and the I.P. was described as being in a state of shock. Paramedics arrived approximately 10 minutes later and the I.P was taken to hospital where he was treated for wrist pain, an upper leg muscle injury, chest pain, and lacerations to the face. He was discharged on the day of the accident at approximately 17.30pm and has a sick note signing him off work until 27th August.

His rear left leg sustained bruising around the knee and hamstring area – see the photo below No update has been provided from the I.P. on the initial wrist and chest pain reported.

Work equipment - the pallet truck was being used in the narrow end of the stillage to lift and transport it (as per the below left photo), rather than the prefabricated central fork points on the wider side (as per the below right photo) AGC Interpane Architectural Glass is the company that supplies the panes of glass / stillages. Their user manual details that the ‘Tilt protection slots’ must always be used (as per the photo below right) and that only a forklift or crane should lift the stillage using these points. These are prefabricated on the stillage for this purpose.

McLaughlin & Harvey

Process Objective: To establish, implement, control and maintain the processes needed to meet requirements for the provision of products and services.

Process Owner: Group SHEQ Director

The stillage should not have been transported with this pallet truck. It should not have been transported by entering the narrow end of the stillage due to the uneven weight distribution on either side and height of the stillage leaving the centre of gravity difficult to determine. The pallet truck provided by Clarkes could not physically have fitted in the prefabricated fork points. The pallet truck provided was therefore not suitable for this task.

The way the pallet truck was utilised had a high likelihood not to be sufficiently aligned along the length of the stillage base to lift it. It can be assumed that at the time of the accident it was not sufficiently aligned, and that this along with the difference in weight on each side caused it to tilt and topple over.

Storage – the panes of glass on the stillage were not the panes of glass originally delivered on the stillage. Some of the panes had been removed and other panes transferred onto it from other stillages, in order to access the panes of glass needed. This is likely to have resulted in the weight difference on each of the stillage of approx. 183kg. The glass manufacturer safety instructions detail that ‘the centre of gravity of the racks should always be centred on the rack’ and that if not, a warning sign to highlight a risk of tipping should be displayed. No warning signage of this nature was in place. All images in the instructions also depict even loads on each side of the stillage.

Due to other materials in the area it would have been difficult to transport the stillage using the tilt protection slots and this could be an attributing reason as to why the stillage was being moved this way (side-on).

Clarkes have detailed that the stillages were brought internally to be installed as there was a lack of safe storage externally. Installing them internally would also be quicker, as they would require the use of the Tower Crane for installation externally in most areas. However, due to the building being substantially enclosed and with the internal partitioning nearing completion, this meant that a forklift could not be utilised to transport stillages.

Risk assessment / method statement (RAMS) - Clarkes safe system of work for the movement of glass stillages is the Offloading and Distribution RAMS EDC-MCF-XX-XX-MS-X-0002. The pallet truck operator was briefed on this during his induction on 15/04/2024. The I.P. is employed as an on-site labourer and his day to day task consists of assisting in moving and distributing materials. He was briefed on manual handling RAMS MCFXX-XX-MS-X-0012 on 22nd July.

The Offloading and Distribution RAMS were last reviewed / amended by Clarke’s in October 2023, and McLH reviewed these in November 2023.

The I.P. was not signed onto the ‘Offloading and Distribution’ RAMS, and these RAMS failed to address a safe system of work for transporting glass stillages within Building A Pallet trucks are referenced for transporting stillages, which is not in accordance with the glass manufacturer’s instructions i.e. that a forklift or crane should be utilised, using the designated tilt protection slots. They also did not address the risk of transporting stillages with uneven weight distributions.

McLaughlin & Harvey

Approx. location of the I.P

Pallet truck entered the narrow end of the stillage.

Trolley that the I.P. was trapped against

Arrows depicting the only lifting points to be used for transport.

Materials the trolley toppled over onto.

The manual handling RAMS which the I.P. was signed onto state that a forklift should be used to transport stillages on the ground floor to reduce manual handling. This is not aligned with the details within the offloading and distribution RAMS. A forklift could not physically access this area at this stage of the project due to the building being substantially enclosed and the internal partitioning, and so the RAMS are not accurate and required updating.

Supervision – the pallet truck operator details that he was instructed by the Supervisor of ES Facades (Besmir Beluli) to move the stillages and to get help to do so The supervisor however has detailed that this was not the case, and that the pallet truck operator decided to move the stillages himself.

This method of distributing the glass stillages however appears to have become the norm based on discussions with Clarkes senior management and this equipment was the only equipment provided and available to do so. This was not addressed by Clarkes supervision or management at any point

There is no information on Clarkes morning briefing regarding the transport of glass stillages.

Conclusions:

Root Cause: Inadequate risk assessment

Clarkes management failed to adequately plan / risk assess these works and provide suitable work equipment. The RAMS failed to identify a safe system of work for transporting glass stillages in Building A. They also did not address the risk of transporting stillages with uneven weight distributions. This method of transporting glass stillages had become the norm on the project and was unsafe as it was not in accordance with the glass manufacturer’s safety instructions This was not identified or addressed by Clarkes supervision or management.

Secondary Cause: Poor or wrong equipment

The pallet truck was not suitable for the task of transporting these glass stillages

Other contributing causes:

Inadequate training / instruction – Due to insufficient risk assessment and supervision the I.P. or pallet truck operator did not receive sufficient information / instruction / training on what risks to be aware of and how this task was to be carried out safely. The I.P. was working on the project for less than 2 weeks.

Actions / Recommendations:

Clarkes were immediately stood down and all their operatives re-briefed on their RAMS. Works involving the transport of glass stillages placed on hold.

Clarkes RAMS to undergo a general review to ensure they are relevant / specific to the current works and stage of the project.

Clarkes RAMS to be updated for distribution of glass stillages to detail a changed methodology. A mini glass lifting buoy is proposed to move the panes of glass to a location where the tower crane can remove them from the building and store them externally. They will then be installed by the tower crane.

Matthew Garey (Clarkes Head of Health and Safety)

Matthew Garey / Junho Sung (McLH Façade Manager) 13/08/2024 Awaiting confirmation of completion

Matthew Garey / Jordan Anderson (Clarkes Contracts Manager) 13/08/2024 Awaiting confirmation of completion

McLaughlin & Harvey

Process Objective: To establish, implement, control and maintain the processes needed to meet requirements for the provision of products and services.

Process Owner: Group SHEQ Director

Meeting held with Clarkes / McLH Senior management to discuss the accident, other safety concerns and improvement measures. A required increase in safety standards was reiterated A SOR is to be issued to Clarkes Contracts Manager for failing to ensure works were adequately planned / risk assessed and RAMS updated.

Clarkes have committed to their Safety department being on site daily and focusing on enhancing Black Hat Supervisor standards for the remainder of their contract works.

McLH project management to ensure RAMS are reviewed / updated as work activities change.

3 Clarkes supervisor’s will be booked onto the Black Hat Academy and Clarkes are releasing a safety bulletin internally within their company on the accident learnings.

McLH will distribute an internal Safety Alert with the learning outcomes from this accident.

Investigator:

SHEQ Advisor: (PRINT)

Sam Sufferin

Completion Date: 13/08/2024

Sam Peach (McLH Senior PM) 13/08/2024 Awaiting confirmation of completion

Matthew Garey Ongoing Ongoing action required

Sam Peach / McLH Project team Ongoing Ongoing action required

Matthew Garey 16/08/2024

Awaiting confirmation of completion

Sam Sufferin 16/08/2024 To be complete

SHEQ Advisor Name: (SIGNATURE)

Sam Sufferin

McLaughlin & Harvey