ENG_3.3.1._Pilloting Report_Lielvaiceni.pdf

Page 6

7. Please, could you give evaluation of the pilot seminar quality?

Evaluation of the quality of pilot seminar in "Laivaiceni" Very good

No.of answers

Good

Average

Poor

30 25 20 15 10 5 0

The selection

Performance

Organization

of the farm

of the teachers

of the pilot

WB 1

WB 2

WB 3

seminar

8. Other comments, suggestions, refrences · Make products produced in Latvia more attractive to foreign markets, · The similar seminars could be held more frequently. · Organizing other study tours. · Very responsive hosts. · To give demonstrations of production techniques and let students to try out themselves, · More practical approaches, allowing students to use practically the technologies. · More interesting to choose a larger enterprise. More detailed presentation of their equipment, machinery park would be more interesting. · Everything was good. · In my opinion, everything was good enough. · Everything, was fine. · Thanks for the interesting visit. · In the future I would like to go abroad and learn of the experience of foreign farmers. · More such events -they help to better learn about agriculture. · Should send students into practice and let them directly learn from the farmer. · The quality of the seminar and offered information on marketing would be appropriate for students or people who are not employed in the business.

Final conclusions:

Participants were satisfied with the visiting of good practice farm “Lielvaicēni” and obtained new information about the farmers’ marketing activities and strategies.


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.