Making Devolution Work for Service Delivery in Kenya

Page 97

Finance, Resource Allocation, and Use

|

BOX 4.3

County fiscal responsibility principles (for resource allocation and spending) •

Recurrent expenditure shall not exceed total revenue.

Over the medium term, a minimum of 30 percent of the budget, and of actual expenditure, shall be allocated to the development expenditure.

Expenditure on wages and benefits for its public officers shall not exceed a percentage of the

county government’s total revenue as prescribed by the County Executive member for finance in regulations, and approved by the County Assembly, and this shall not exceed 35 percent. •

T he approved expenditure of a County Assembly shall exceed the lower of either 7 percent of total county revenues or twice its personnel emoluments.

Source: Public Finance Management Act (No. 18 of 2012), s. 107(2); Public Finance Management (County Government) ­Regulations, 2015, reg. 25(1).

Although the county executive prepares the various county plans and budget documents, the County Assembly approves those budgets and provides oversight of county spending (table 4.3). Counties have used much of their autonomy to good effect; they have increased allocations to education, health, and urban services by over 50 ­percent between FY2014/15 and FY2017/18 (figures 4.7 and 4.8). Even though some believe that counties spend considerable resources on road construction projects, their spending on works, infrastructure, and information and communication technology (ICT) make up only the third-­ranking sectoral share of county expenditures. This typically represents slightly more than 10 percent of county spending and expenditure and only a 10 percent increase in budget allocation during the same period. County health services, which is the largest county service delivery function, accounts for about 24 percent of county expenditure.

Issues with county budgets Although counties are more or less following prescribed planning and budgeting steps, there are clearly aspects of county-level resource allocation processes that could and should be improved to strengthen service delivery. Structural deficiencies

County budgets are not of sufficient quality to effectively show what should be and is achieved with the allocated funds and are thus not connecting spending to results as intended. A range of deficiencies compromise the utility of ­county-level program budgeting as currently practiced (box 4.4). For example, ­salaries are typically allocated to administrative or support services budgets rather than being tied to service delivery. Budgets also do not provide specific allocations to facilities and geographical areas within counties. This makes it hard to judge whether resources are well allocated or whether the desired

75


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

A.4 Service delivery oversight, management, and systems

4min
pages 180-181

A.1 Functions and responsibilities

5min
pages 170-172

A.3 County resource allocation and use

5min
pages 177-179

Major achievements and challenges

10min
pages 154-157

Delivering the future promise of devolution

2min
pages 167-169

The role of development partners

2min
page 166

Policy options to make devolution work for service delivery

18min
pages 158-165

Introduction

1min
page 153

References

2min
pages 151-152

Conclusions

2min
page 149

6.6 Project management committees

2min
page 148

MCA elections

3min
page 145

the civil service

2min
page 143

communication

2min
page 140

Makueni County

3min
page 144

6.1 Elements of social accountability systems

4min
pages 136-137

Citizen engagement and service delivery

2min
page 135

Introduction

2min
page 134

Key Messages

1min
page 133

5.1 Categories of staff on county payrolls in Kenya, FY2018/19

2min
page 127

5.1 Initiatives to improve HRM in Makueni County

2min
page 128

References

1min
page 132

Overarching HRM frameworks

2min
page 126

Capacity building

2min
page 129

Staff performance

2min
page 125

with equitable share funding per capita in FY2018/19

1min
page 118

as a share of FY2019/20 total, by county

1min
page 117

Key messages

1min
page 115

allocation and use of resources

2min
page 112

4.14 Budget execution rates, by county, FY2014/15–FY2018/19

6min
pages 108-110

4.6 Postdevolution asset and liability management remains incomplete

2min
page 106

4.5 Participatory planning in public financial management

2min
page 105

FY2019/20

1min
page 104

expenditure in Kenya, by county, FY2018/19

1min
page 102

4.4 Weaknesses in the structure of budgets at the county level

5min
pages 100-101

4.3 County budget cycle in Kenya after devolution

2min
page 98

4.1 Performance-based conditional grants

2min
page 92

4.2 County creditworthiness

2min
page 95

counties in Kenya, FY2017/18

1min
page 91

Allocation and use of resources at the county level

2min
page 96

spending

2min
page 97

Key messages

1min
page 83

by county, FY2017/18

2min
page 89

3.7 Deficiencies in ECDE information management

2min
page 75

3.8 Quality assurance in the ECDE sector

2min
page 76

Conclusions

2min
page 80

Intergovernmental relations

2min
page 77

under devolution

2min
page 73

3.9 Intergovernmental coordination in the agriculture sector

2min
page 78

County management of sector service delivery

2min
page 69

3.6 Information management in the devolved health sector

2min
page 74

perspectives B3.1.1 Institutional arrangements in the urban water and sanitation

3min
page 66

delivery, by sector

2min
page 59

Disparities in county expenditure on devolved services

2min
page 54

References

1min
pages 31-32

FY2017/18

1min
page 57

Devolution of functions

2min
page 64

2.9 Total county per capita spending, FY2013/14–FY2017/18

1min
page 44

Context

1min
page 23

Kenya

2min
page 65
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Making Devolution Work for Service Delivery in Kenya by World Bank Publications - Issuu