References

comparative perspective, not only to enrich in-country discussions but also to inform a more global understanding of the interface between devolution and service delivery. 4. In addition to a general review of devolution across the country, the study undertook deepdive case studies in five counties: Garissa, Kisumu, Makueni, Nairobi, and Nyandarua. The deep-dive counties were selected by the task force, and they offer several dimensions that represent other counties. It is important to point out that the national government took over some of the functions of Nairobi City County, and the study did not look into this issue, given that it happened at the time when background work for the study was concluded.

It is an important issue that future studies will have to look into.

REFERENCES

Boone, C. 2012. “Land Conflict and Distributive Politics in Kenya.” African Studies Review 55 (1): 75–03. Cheeseman, N., K. Kanyinga, G. Lynch, M. Ruteere, and J. Willis. 2019. “Kenya’s 2017 Elections:

Winner-Takes-All Politics as Usual?” Journal of Eastern African Studies 13 (2): 215–34. D’Arcy, M., and M. Nistotskaya. 2019. “Intensified Local Grievances, Enduring National Control:

The Politics of Land in the 2017 Kenyan Elections.” Journal of Eastern African Studies 13 (2): 294–312.

El Messnaoui, A., D. Omowole, L. Mrewa, and R. F. Silvosa. 2018. “A Political Economy Analysis of Devolution in Kenya.” Report, Institute of Economic Affairs, Nairobi. Kanyinga, K. 2016. “Devolution and the New Politics of Development in Kenya.” African Studies

Review 59 (3): 155–67. Mueller, S. D. 2008. “The Political Economy of Kenya’s Crisis.” Journal of Eastern African

Studies 2 (2): 185–210. World Bank. 2003. World Development Report 2004: Making Services Work for Poor People.

Washington, DC: World Bank. World Bank. 2012. “Devolution without Disruption: Pathways to a Successful New Kenya.”

Report No. 72297, World Bank, Washington, DC.