Making Devolution Work for Service Delivery in Kenya

Page 23

1

Introduction and Analytical Framework

CONTEXT Devolution in Kenya is an integral part of a major constitutional reform, the aims of which are to redistribute political power, establish a more inclusive political system, and share resources more equitably. The centerpiece of this devolution reform was the new Constitution of Kenya of 2010, adopted after a national referendum. It is widely accepted that in the wake of the 2007–08 postelection violence, improving Kenya’s political settlement was the primary driver that led to the reintroduction of devolution after many previous attempts (World Bank 2012). Although improving service delivery may have been implicit in this process, it was not the primary driver or point of discussion. The institutional reforms enshrined in the new constitution were intended to address a range of long-standing grievances—stretching over decades—related to the highly centralized distribution of political power and persistent regional imbalances in development (Boone 2012; D’Arcy and Nistotskaya 2019; Kanyinga 2016; Mueller 2008). Devolution was a key element of the constitutional response to these grievances and, along with other measures, was intended to share the power and authority of central government and an “imperial” presidency—by establishing self-governing county governments—and to reduce regional disparities in development. A decade has now passed since the new constitution was enacted and kickstarted a dramatic transformation of the Kenyan state. Implementing devolution as part of the new constitutional reforms has been immensely challenging. Moving away from a centralized and unitary state to a highly devolved and ­quasi-federal state has been a multidimensional paradigm shift, requiring major institutional reforms, huge changes in the management of public finances and human resources, and transformations in mindsets and behavior. Guided by the provisions of the 2010 constitution, major political and institutional achievements and reforms have underpinned a radical restructuring of the Kenyan state, devolving significant powers and responsibilities from the national level to the counties.1 County governments in all 47 counties are now well established and have become an entrenched feature of Kenya’s 1


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

A.4 Service delivery oversight, management, and systems

4min
pages 180-181

A.1 Functions and responsibilities

5min
pages 170-172

A.3 County resource allocation and use

5min
pages 177-179

Major achievements and challenges

10min
pages 154-157

Delivering the future promise of devolution

2min
pages 167-169

The role of development partners

2min
page 166

Policy options to make devolution work for service delivery

18min
pages 158-165

Introduction

1min
page 153

References

2min
pages 151-152

Conclusions

2min
page 149

6.6 Project management committees

2min
page 148

MCA elections

3min
page 145

the civil service

2min
page 143

communication

2min
page 140

Makueni County

3min
page 144

6.1 Elements of social accountability systems

4min
pages 136-137

Citizen engagement and service delivery

2min
page 135

Introduction

2min
page 134

Key Messages

1min
page 133

5.1 Categories of staff on county payrolls in Kenya, FY2018/19

2min
page 127

5.1 Initiatives to improve HRM in Makueni County

2min
page 128

References

1min
page 132

Overarching HRM frameworks

2min
page 126

Capacity building

2min
page 129

Staff performance

2min
page 125

with equitable share funding per capita in FY2018/19

1min
page 118

as a share of FY2019/20 total, by county

1min
page 117

Key messages

1min
page 115

allocation and use of resources

2min
page 112

4.14 Budget execution rates, by county, FY2014/15–FY2018/19

6min
pages 108-110

4.6 Postdevolution asset and liability management remains incomplete

2min
page 106

4.5 Participatory planning in public financial management

2min
page 105

FY2019/20

1min
page 104

expenditure in Kenya, by county, FY2018/19

1min
page 102

4.4 Weaknesses in the structure of budgets at the county level

5min
pages 100-101

4.3 County budget cycle in Kenya after devolution

2min
page 98

4.1 Performance-based conditional grants

2min
page 92

4.2 County creditworthiness

2min
page 95

counties in Kenya, FY2017/18

1min
page 91

Allocation and use of resources at the county level

2min
page 96

spending

2min
page 97

Key messages

1min
page 83

by county, FY2017/18

2min
page 89

3.7 Deficiencies in ECDE information management

2min
page 75

3.8 Quality assurance in the ECDE sector

2min
page 76

Conclusions

2min
page 80

Intergovernmental relations

2min
page 77

under devolution

2min
page 73

3.9 Intergovernmental coordination in the agriculture sector

2min
page 78

County management of sector service delivery

2min
page 69

3.6 Information management in the devolved health sector

2min
page 74

perspectives B3.1.1 Institutional arrangements in the urban water and sanitation

3min
page 66

delivery, by sector

2min
page 59

Disparities in county expenditure on devolved services

2min
page 54

References

1min
pages 31-32

FY2017/18

1min
page 57

Devolution of functions

2min
page 64

2.9 Total county per capita spending, FY2013/14–FY2017/18

1min
page 44

Context

1min
page 23

Kenya

2min
page 65
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Making Devolution Work for Service Delivery in Kenya by World Bank Publications - Issuu