Making Devolution Work for Service Delivery in Kenya

Page 153

7

Conclusions and Recommendations

INTRODUCTION Kenya adopted a new constitution and began the process of devolution in 2010. The new constitution was the institutional response to longstanding grievances related to the overcentralization of state powers and public sector resources, regional disparities, and top-down service delivery. This radical restructuring of the Kenyan state has three main objectives: decentralizing political power, public sector functions, and public finances; ensuring a more equitable distribution of resources between regions; and promoting more accountable, participatory, and responsive government at all levels. The first elections under the new constitution were held in 2013. Alongside the national government, 47 county governments were established. A new bicameral parliament was also elected, in which the National Assembly plays an oversight role with respect to the national executive, while the Senate protects and promotes the interests of the county governments. Each county government is made up of a County Executive, headed by an elected Governor, and works under the oversight of an elected County Assembly. County governments fulfill their constitutionally mandated responsibilities, financed by equitable shares of national revenues, conditional grants, and own-source revenues (OSR). Devolution has led to the establishment of institutions and systems for delivery of devolved services. Stability of these institutions and systems will be critical for the reform to be assessed as a success. The basic institutional framework stipulated in the 2010 constitution has largely been put into place. County governments are now well established. National and county-level elections were held in 2013 and 2017, resulting in a successful transition of political power. Kenyans appreciate devolution as a major gain from the new constitution; however, the next phase will require stable, enabled, and effective institutions and systems to deliver more and better services to citizens and to further reduce regional disparities. The constitution laid out a strong foundation for sharing responsibilities and resources between the national and county governments, with counties being assigned significant frontline service delivery functions and with the national government assuming a typical central mandate around policy, 131


Articles inside

A.4 Service delivery oversight, management, and systems

4min
pages 180-181

A.1 Functions and responsibilities

5min
pages 170-172

A.3 County resource allocation and use

5min
pages 177-179

Major achievements and challenges

10min
pages 154-157

Delivering the future promise of devolution

2min
pages 167-169

The role of development partners

2min
page 166

Policy options to make devolution work for service delivery

18min
pages 158-165

Introduction

1min
page 153

References

2min
pages 151-152

Conclusions

2min
page 149

6.6 Project management committees

2min
page 148

MCA elections

3min
page 145

the civil service

2min
page 143

communication

2min
page 140

Makueni County

3min
page 144

6.1 Elements of social accountability systems

4min
pages 136-137

Citizen engagement and service delivery

2min
page 135

Introduction

2min
page 134

Key Messages

1min
page 133

5.1 Categories of staff on county payrolls in Kenya, FY2018/19

2min
page 127

5.1 Initiatives to improve HRM in Makueni County

2min
page 128

References

1min
page 132

Overarching HRM frameworks

2min
page 126

Capacity building

2min
page 129

Staff performance

2min
page 125

with equitable share funding per capita in FY2018/19

1min
page 118

as a share of FY2019/20 total, by county

1min
page 117

Key messages

1min
page 115

allocation and use of resources

2min
page 112

4.14 Budget execution rates, by county, FY2014/15–FY2018/19

6min
pages 108-110

4.6 Postdevolution asset and liability management remains incomplete

2min
page 106

4.5 Participatory planning in public financial management

2min
page 105

FY2019/20

1min
page 104

expenditure in Kenya, by county, FY2018/19

1min
page 102

4.4 Weaknesses in the structure of budgets at the county level

5min
pages 100-101

4.3 County budget cycle in Kenya after devolution

2min
page 98

4.1 Performance-based conditional grants

2min
page 92

4.2 County creditworthiness

2min
page 95

counties in Kenya, FY2017/18

1min
page 91

Allocation and use of resources at the county level

2min
page 96

spending

2min
page 97

Key messages

1min
page 83

by county, FY2017/18

2min
page 89

3.7 Deficiencies in ECDE information management

2min
page 75

3.8 Quality assurance in the ECDE sector

2min
page 76

Conclusions

2min
page 80

Intergovernmental relations

2min
page 77

under devolution

2min
page 73

3.9 Intergovernmental coordination in the agriculture sector

2min
page 78

County management of sector service delivery

2min
page 69

3.6 Information management in the devolved health sector

2min
page 74

perspectives B3.1.1 Institutional arrangements in the urban water and sanitation

3min
page 66

delivery, by sector

2min
page 59

Disparities in county expenditure on devolved services

2min
page 54

References

1min
pages 31-32

FY2017/18

1min
page 57

Devolution of functions

2min
page 64

2.9 Total county per capita spending, FY2013/14–FY2017/18

1min
page 44

Context

1min
page 23

Kenya

2min
page 65
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.