Making Devolution Work for Service Delivery in Kenya

Page 104

82

|

Making Devolution Work for Service Delivery in Kenya

FIGURE 4.11

Average health sector budget allocations in counties in Kenya, FY2019/20 Construction and rehabilitation facilities, 1.2%

Other programs, 2.2%

Maternal and child health, 6.4%

Preventive and promotive services, 32.7%

Curative services, 57.5%

Source: Office of the Controller of Budget, “Annual County Governments Budget Implementation Review Report for FY2019/20.”

services and investments in each sector are different and need to be allocated and prioritized in different and sector-specific ways to enable effective service delivery. In the absence of such guidance, counties are left to their own devices, without a grounded framework or set of principles for allocating resources within sectors. In addition, the participatory planning processes required by legislation are only working effectively in a few counties. These processes are subject to capture and multiple parallel processes, leading to contested outcomes (box 4.5), and they are often driven by investment project prioritization rather than service delivery priorities. One cause of this may be that planning and budget documents are not always made readily available to the public. The challenge ahead is to move beyond the establishment of formal processes and toward improving their quality to ensure that they deliver on their underlying intent—which is to ensure that counties deliver quality services in a responsive manner to their residents. This lack of sector guidance and weaknesses in participatory processes mean that county expenditure allocations across and within sectors and geographical areas vary significantly and appear to be influenced heavily by political and institutional considerations. In the absence of mature political and administrative processes at the county level, as well as sectoral norms and standards to ensure that resources are put to their best use, it is unlikely that county spending decisions will systematically prioritize public resources between and within sectors to put them to their highest use. Weaknesses in asset and liability management

As part of the county planning process, it is important that asset management forms an integral part, but counties have typically not managed their assets well, and the transfer of assets and liabilities remains incomplete. County governments need to strategically plan to create or acquire, develop, operate, maintain, refurbish, and dispose of assets.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

A.4 Service delivery oversight, management, and systems

4min
pages 180-181

A.1 Functions and responsibilities

5min
pages 170-172

A.3 County resource allocation and use

5min
pages 177-179

Major achievements and challenges

10min
pages 154-157

Delivering the future promise of devolution

2min
pages 167-169

The role of development partners

2min
page 166

Policy options to make devolution work for service delivery

18min
pages 158-165

Introduction

1min
page 153

References

2min
pages 151-152

Conclusions

2min
page 149

6.6 Project management committees

2min
page 148

MCA elections

3min
page 145

the civil service

2min
page 143

communication

2min
page 140

Makueni County

3min
page 144

6.1 Elements of social accountability systems

4min
pages 136-137

Citizen engagement and service delivery

2min
page 135

Introduction

2min
page 134

Key Messages

1min
page 133

5.1 Categories of staff on county payrolls in Kenya, FY2018/19

2min
page 127

5.1 Initiatives to improve HRM in Makueni County

2min
page 128

References

1min
page 132

Overarching HRM frameworks

2min
page 126

Capacity building

2min
page 129

Staff performance

2min
page 125

with equitable share funding per capita in FY2018/19

1min
page 118

as a share of FY2019/20 total, by county

1min
page 117

Key messages

1min
page 115

allocation and use of resources

2min
page 112

4.14 Budget execution rates, by county, FY2014/15–FY2018/19

6min
pages 108-110

4.6 Postdevolution asset and liability management remains incomplete

2min
page 106

4.5 Participatory planning in public financial management

2min
page 105

FY2019/20

1min
page 104

expenditure in Kenya, by county, FY2018/19

1min
page 102

4.4 Weaknesses in the structure of budgets at the county level

5min
pages 100-101

4.3 County budget cycle in Kenya after devolution

2min
page 98

4.1 Performance-based conditional grants

2min
page 92

4.2 County creditworthiness

2min
page 95

counties in Kenya, FY2017/18

1min
page 91

Allocation and use of resources at the county level

2min
page 96

spending

2min
page 97

Key messages

1min
page 83

by county, FY2017/18

2min
page 89

3.7 Deficiencies in ECDE information management

2min
page 75

3.8 Quality assurance in the ECDE sector

2min
page 76

Conclusions

2min
page 80

Intergovernmental relations

2min
page 77

under devolution

2min
page 73

3.9 Intergovernmental coordination in the agriculture sector

2min
page 78

County management of sector service delivery

2min
page 69

3.6 Information management in the devolved health sector

2min
page 74

perspectives B3.1.1 Institutional arrangements in the urban water and sanitation

3min
page 66

delivery, by sector

2min
page 59

Disparities in county expenditure on devolved services

2min
page 54

References

1min
pages 31-32

FY2017/18

1min
page 57

Devolution of functions

2min
page 64

2.9 Total county per capita spending, FY2013/14–FY2017/18

1min
page 44

Context

1min
page 23

Kenya

2min
page 65
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Making Devolution Work for Service Delivery in Kenya by World Bank Publications - Issuu