B1
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 2016
Opinion
Adelle Chua, Editor mst.daydesk@gmail.com
EDITORIAL
POP GOES THE WORLD JENNY ORTUOSTE
THE CROCHETED HILLARY BLANKET: FIBER ARTS AS WOMEN’S ACTIVISM
WHAT WAS HE THINKING?
T
ONE of the more amazing artifacts to come out of the recent United States general election was a gigantic PeptoBismol pink blanket depicting Hillary Clinton’s face, entirely hand-crocheted and draped across a billboard on a New Jersey highway. The portrait of the erstwhile US presidential candidate was stitched in black and white, and the accompanying text read: “#I’mWithHer.” The artwork consisting of 94,880 stitches was created by PolishAmerican artist Olek with the help of 38 volunteers as a show of support for Clinton. There are other fiber artworks on the internet that have similar purposes and sentiments: cross-stitched Hillary campaign logos (the blue H with a red arrow as the bar), an embroidered “A woman’s place is in the White House,” and depictions of a blonde woman in a blue pantsuit created entirely in thread. (Fiber artworks about Donald Trump are, in general, rather more negative.) For a millenia, textile crafts— spinning and weaving, embroidery, knitting and crochet—were performed by women and thus identified as women’s work. The purpose was at first functional—to make clothes and house linen such as sheets—then decorative—to decorate the clothes and sheets made. In her book “Woman’s Work, The First 20,000 Years: Women, Cloth, and Society in Early Times” (1994) Elizabeth Wayland Barber refers to Judith Brown’s theory on why these skills became the near-exclusive province of women—it was linked to child-bearing. Because only females can breastfeed, they could not perform chores that took them away from the house for long periods. In order to be productive while caring for children, they had to occupy themselves with work. To avoid risking the safety of the children, the work had to be the kind that was simple, repetitive and not likely to require much concentration, easily interruptible and just as easily resumed—among them sewing, spinning, and cooking. As society developed social hierarchies, in some cultures the women of the upper classes, who had servants to do the common housework, spent their considerable leisure time doing fancy needlework. They created not only embellished clothing and linen, but also wall hangings that depicted scenes real and imaginary, with the most famous being the Bayeux Tapestry—artworks, in other words. Female servants or needle workers did the plain sewing. Sewing and other fiber crafts became strongly identified with women. But because these domestic activities did not generate profit, men undervalued and marginalized them. With changing tastes and technologies in modern times, women no longer need to make their own clothes. This development, as well as the rise of feminism, have encouraged women to deliberately reclaim and practice the traditional arts to express their personal, ideological, and political views. In fact, as in the case of Olek’s Hillary blanket, fiber arts has long been used to support a cause or candidate or advocate an action, an
he Philippine National Police is not exactly in the best of places now.
Controversy has hounded the police organization for a long time. In recent memory, there was Mamasapano. Allegations that some members of the PNP are involved in criminal syndicates or are not screened properly for any sign of mental imbalance. And with the entry of the Duterte administration, supposed extra-legal operations where suspected drug users or drug pushers are arrested because of planted evidence, or alleged resistance to arrest. Just last week, we were dumbstruck at how a detained drug suspect, Albuera, Leyte Mayor Rolando Espinosa, was shot dead in his cell at the sub-provincial police station. That police officers were called to the Senate to give their own account of the fantastic incident did not help allay our fears that we were not necessarily safer with this present batch of cops. And while all the attention was in Leyte, in the mysterious death of the mayor who may have known too much, the head of the PNP was nowhere near here. Director General Ronald dela Rosa was instead in the United States, providing moral support to boxing icon—incidentally, also senator—Emmanuel Pacquiao from his front-row seat to the event. Dela Rosa came home a few days later, as part of the Pacquiao entourage.
At the airport he appeared uneasy, as though he were trying to make himself inconspicuous. It was impossible he did not realize the gravity of what just happened in Leyte, especially in relation to the government’s war against drugs but also the questions on human rights violations. But he chose to stay and enjoy the match—and some other perks from the pugilist-senator. Dela Rosa has admitted Pacquiao took care of his and his family’s airfare, accommodations, even some allowance. Now he is home to take the heat, and rightly so. It is inconceivable that Dela Rosa, for his position, would be blissfully ignorant of anti-graft laws. He has no excuse whatsoever, and he has to answer painful questions. Ombudsman Conchita CarpioMorales will look into whether Dela Rosa could be liable for graft for accepting Pacquiao’s treat. The PNP already has a lot on its plate, and it has yet to show the people it is their protector above anything else. What on earth was the chief thinking — if he ever did so, at all?
Scan this icon to view the PDF
Turn to B2
A MESSAGE TO GIRLS LONG STORY SHORT ADELLE CHUA
MANY thought former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would become the first female president of the United States. Despite having her own set of controversies, the former first lady was seen as the superior choice over her rival, billionaire businessman Donald Trump. The debates held in the weeks leading to the November 8 polls
showed that she had the intellect, the diligence and the disposition to lead the most powerful nation in the world. Surprise, surprise. She lost. In her concession speech, Clinton graciously exhorted her followers to keep an open mind and give Trump the chance to lead. She acknowledged that
the campaign had been “vast, diverse, creative, unruly and energized,” thanked everyone who had helped, and expressed pride and gratitude nonetheless. She told the youth that over the course of their lives they would experience success and heartbreaking setbacks, but that they should never stop fighting.
Most importantly, she talked about that highest and hardest glass ceiling which nobody has yet shattered.“Someday, someone will,” she said wistfully. To little girls, Clinton said: “Never doubt that you are valuable and powerful and deserving of every chance and opportunity Turn to B2
Rolando G. Estabillo Publisher can be accessed at: thestandard.com.ph
Benjamin Philip G. Romualdez Former Chief Justice Reynato S. Puno
Philippine Press Institute The National Association of Philippine Newspapers
Anita F. Grefal Baldwin R. Felipe Edgar M. Valmorida
ManilaStandard
Published Monday to Sunday by Philippine Manila Standard Publishing Inc. at 6/F Universal Re Building, 106 Paseo de Roxas, corner Perea St., Legaspi Village, Makati City. Telephone numbers 832-5554, 832-5556, 832-5558 (connecting all departments), (Editorial) 832-5554, (Advertising) 832-5550. P.O. Box 2933, Manila Central Post Office, Manila. Website: www.thestandard. com.ph; e-mail: contact@thestandard.com.ph
ONLINE MEMBER
PPI
Chairman Board Member & Chief Legal Adviser Treasury Manager OIC-Ad Solutions Circulation Manager
Ramonchito L. Tomeldan Chin Wong/Ray S. Eñano Francis Lagniton Joyce Pangco Pañares
Managing Editor Associate Editors News Editor City Editor
Emil P. Jurado
Adelle Chua Honor Blanco Cabie Romel J. Mendez Roberto Cabrera
Chairman Emeritus, Editorial Board
Opinion Editor Night Editor Art Director Chief Photographer