Wednesday, September 12, 2018 • Vol. 47, No. 1 • HCCEgalitarian.com
In Today’s Issue
Ruling on DACA Judge Andrew Hanen rules in favor of President Obama’s DACA program, shielding thousands of students.
see News, Page 3
Helping fight hunger The Houston Food Bank received helped from student and staff sorting food for needy families.
see On Campus, Page 4
Fresh Ink, Still Wet New maps, weapons, and badges are just a few of the updates to this eddition of the franchise.
see Culture, Page 7
Floodplain Changes
Will this help or hinder Houston homeowners?
Sarah Al-Shaikh
sal-shaikh@hccegalitarian.com
“A Costly and Unequal Burden” is what Austin-based advocacy group, Texas Housers, is calling Houston’s newly revised Floodplain Management Ordinance. Only eleven days have passed since Houston’s revised floodplain took effect, and already questions are arising on whether these new regulations are truly benefiting all Houstonians or are actually hurting low-income communities in our city. Seven months after Hurricane Harvey left Houston in complete disarray, this past April Houston’s City Council passed Mayor Sylvester Turner’s proposed refined floodplain regulations. Before September 1st, homeowners in the 100year floodplain were required to have flood insurance and build new homes 1 foot above the floodplain. However, as of now, Turner’s proposal increases elevation to 2 feet and expands the regulations to homes in the 500-year floodplain. A 500-year floodplain is an area with a 0.2 percent risk of flooding from a bayou, creek, or
other waterways. Meaning any architecture located in a 500-year floodplain have a minimum of a 0.2 percent chance of flooding in any given year. This is a big change from the previous 100year floodplain which pertained to land predicted to flood during a 100-year storm; which has a 1 percent chance of occurring in any given year. This revised ordinance for those in the 100year and 500-year floodplain pertains to new construction and already existing homes expanded by 33 percent or more. The push for these regulation changes come from homes in the 500-year floodplain flooding for three consecutive years. Harvey damaged a third of homes in the 500-year floodplain area, and a recent study showed 84 percent of buildings impacted by Harvey could have avoided damage with the suggested regulations. Now that these new regulations are in place, thousands of Houstonians are receiving notices that their homes must be elevated to meet new floodplain regulations. However, several families do not have the means to front the bill now asked of them. While this new ordinance
did pass, it was not unanimous. Houston Council member against this change, Jack Christie, disclosed his concerns about how expanding regulations to the 500-year floodplain forces homeowners to elevate their homes regardless of having flood history or not. Christie was not standing alone when not voting for these floodplain changes. Fellow council member Greg Travis also did not support these new regulations. He believes they are acting too fast because they are still waiting on updated floodplain maps. Travis expresses, “We’ve only looked at 5,000 houses in the 500-year floodplain. There’s not enough data. Nobody here is saying, ‘Don’t do anything,’ we’re saying, ‘Do the right thing.’” Along with Christie and Travis’ concerns, a new report by Austin’s Texas Housers asserts this new floodplain ordinance negatively affects low-income communities. In the 17-page report analyzing the revisions to Houston’s floodplain code, Texas Housers express their concerns about the unintended consequences on low-to-moderate income households and communities
The official student newspaper of the Houston Community College System
of color as a result of these changes. As it stands, not every Houstonian is equally protected from potential floods. Texas Housers mention how affluent neighborhoods are better protected with certain flood protections, while lower-income neighborhoods are left with only basic open ditch drainage. Along with these present divisions in flood protection, this proposed
regulation could: -place an enormous cost on low-and moderate-income households -shift the focus from public infrastructure projects to private-funded home elevations; which places the financial burden and responsibility on the homeowner -further divide the flood protection gap; where some homeowners have the means to comply with new flood regulations and are thus more protected from flood risks. Whereas some cannot afford the cost and remain in danger of potential flood damage In addition to these potential negative effects, Texas Housers share their own suggestion for see Floodplain, Page 2