NOTES ON SOME SUFFOLK MOTHS, 2000
83
COMMENTS AND NOTES ON SOME SUFFOLK MOTHS IN 2000 A. W. PRICHARD At the start or the end of the millennium (depending on your point of view) moth recording in the county seems to be in a fairly healthy state with more recorders sending in records each year, providing us with more information to add to our knowledge of the moths of the county. Most recorders are operating moth traps in their back garden or a local site and this regular trapping at a site is helping provide useful information on the declines and rises in the populations of the moths of the county. The Suffolk Moth Group and Suffolk Branch of Butterfly Conservation continue to carry out surveys of moths at various sites around the county through the moth nights that they hold each year. The use of ultra-violet lamps to attract moths is certainly a comparatively effective way of recording those species that are attracted to light and are flying in the area while the lights are operated. They do not, however, attract all species of moths and give no definite indication as to which moths are actually resident at a particular site. To record these species usually involves different recording methods and searching for different stages of the lifecycle and it is to be hoped that these methods do not fall into neglect with the popularity of light-trapping. The year 2000 continued the pattern of recent years with most recorders reporting generally lower than usual moth numbers with some species faring less well than others while a smaller number of species conversely appeared in larger numbers than usual. This year will not be looked back on as one of the great years for moth recording in the county. Rafe Eley at Nowton reports that moth numbers were well down this year, with species such as; Chloroclysta truncata (Hufnagel), Common Marbled Carpet, Thera britannica (Turner), Spruce Carpet, Xanthorhoe ferrugata (Clerck), Dark-barred Twin-spot Carpet, Hydriomena furcata (Thunberg), July Highflyer, Chiasmia clathrata (L.), Latticed Heath and the various ‘Thorns’ faring particularly badly. Fewer species were recorded in increased numbers at Nowton including Acasis viretata (Hubner), Yellow-barred Brindle, Hypena proboscidalis (L.), Snout and two of the footman moths; Eilema complana (L.), Scarce Footman and Eilema lurideola (Zincken), Common Footman. Stan Dumican at nearby Sicklesmere reports a slightly different picture for the year that may indicate that some of these population changes may be localised. SD reports Agrotis puta (Hubner), Shuttle-shaped Dart, Discestra trifolii (Hufnagel), Nutmeg, Orthosia cruda (D. & S.), Small Quaker and the Hawk-moths were recorded in significantly lower numbers, whereas, Idaea biselata (Hufnagel), Small Fan-footed Wave, Idaea dimidiata (Hufnagel), Single-dotted Wave, Colostygia pectinataria (Knoch), Green Carpet, Pasiphila rectangulata (L.), Green Pug, Peribatodes rhomboidaria (D. & S.), Willow Beauty and Hypena proboscidalis (L.), Snout were amongst those species which did rather better during the year. Following the recent trend the year started with some rather mild spells that again enabled the hardier recorders to venture into the field early in the year. Of the early spring species Apocheima hispidaria (D. & S.), Small
Trans. Suffolk Nat. Soc. 37 (2001)