

































INTERVIEW SETTELS SAVENIJE





BUDGET CUTS AT THE TU/E






ILLUMINATION OF WATCHES





















































































































































































































































































































INTERVIEW SETTELS SAVENIJE
BUDGET CUTS AT THE TU/E
ILLUMINATION OF WATCHES
Dear Reader,
Now that we are at the ending of the acadamic year, it is time for one more openME. We are happy to look back on another acadamic year with a lor of stories, lectures, studying, and memories
In this issue, we explore a variety of topics, including two internships, some information about the University council and the Department council. And some more information about the brand new department instagram.
Beyond education-focused content, we also have more topics, such as an article about a GPS works or the hubble space telescope.
In this edition we also look back on some activities like the Brascursion and the first edition PartEE with ME. If you do not know what to do this summer you can also read the summer guide for fun things to do in Eindhoven
So there are a lot of different topics and I wich you a lot of fun reading all the articles!
With kind regards,
Rixt Hofman Editor-in-Chief
March 2025, volume 56, issue 2
The ‘openME’ is a publication by the study Association for Mechanical Engineering Simon Stevin of the Eindhoven University of Technology
Editor-in-Chief
Rixt Hofman
Design
Maartje Borst, Rik Lubbers, Roelof Mestriner, Joel Peeters, Lex Verberne
Layout
Jens van Bavel, Stefan Geerts, Ben Gortemaker, Rixt Hofman, Vera Riemersma, Luca Prundus
Editorial committee
Max Dumoulin, Stefan Geerts, Anastasia Ghlighvashvili, Ben Gortemaker, Rixt Hofman, Luuk Jentink, Luca Prundus, Vera Riemersma, Carlijn Roggen, Aditya Shekhar
Illustrations and Pictures
Editorial committee, Photo committee, source stated otherwise
Printing office Drukkerij Snep
Circulation
600 pieces
Contact Eindhoven University of Technology Gemini-North -1.830
Den Dolech 2 5612AZ Eindhoven Post office box 513
E-mail: redactie@simonstevin.tue.nl
Homepage: simonstev.in
Settels Savenije group of companies is based at Strijp-T, Eindhoven. Founded in 1987 by John Settels and Jan van Amelsvoort, the company has grown into a leading provider of advanced engineering solutions. With a strong focus on technical excellence. We were invited to visit Settles Savenije’s inspiring work environment and have a talk with John Settels himself.
A beautiful piece of
on the wrist of a human being; a
Watches come in a wide variety of
es, colors and
but they have one thing in common, telling the time. One more fascinating thing they have is that their the
On the 7th of February, 2025, the most dazzling gala took place at the Ketelhuis on Strijp-S. This year, the theme of the gala was the Roaring 20s, an era known for its
and extravagant
On September 14, 2023, the president of the TU/e released a message describing that there must be a new future governance for the TU/e. The reason for this is that the TU/e needs a better and effective organisation to be able to deal with the growth of the university. This growth is mainly because of the internationalisation of the Brainport region, to keep up with the TU/e’s ambition in research and education, and to be able to satisfy the Beethoven project. Now, on the 30th of October 2024, this resulted into the advise to, amongst two other things, cut back from 9 departments to 4.
BY
Why do we need it?
Because of the growth of the TU/e itself and the pressure from the Brainport region, with the Beethoven project as the key driver, the university felt that the current organisation is not the best. It was felt among the members of the Executive Board and the deans that the current governance and organisational structure had several challenges that are currently blocking the effectiveness, with the large number of departments as one of them. For this rather important problem, a working group was established named the Future Governance TU/e. The working group has met with several leaders of four universities (TU Delft, KU Leuven, Technical University of Denmark, and University College London) to discuss the governance structure on their university. The structure the TU/e has is a rather unique structure: almost every study has its own department. The problem with this structure is that there is a significant difference in the working methods between various departments, which creates university-wide confusion about who is actually responsible for what. The large number of stakeholders, resulting from the many departments, also has a delaying effect on decision-making and implementation. So the new system would just make things go faster and more efficient.
The working groups has advised three things. The first being to change the top-level governance structure to three preparatory councils to be able to improve the decision making process, which I won’t bother you with. The second one is to narrow down to four service departments to improve the services and responsibilities. The last and most important change for us is the four department plan to better balance size and improve the strategic alignment.
As of now, the university has nine departments, which were installed to meet the needs of the regional industry. However, the current system creates an unbalance in terms of size. As yet, the largest department in terms of staff, which is Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences, is more than ten times the size of the smallest department, which is CE&C Chemical Engineering. This results in unequal representation in the decision-making process. For example, departments with fewer students may not recognise that other departments offer courses for hundreds of students, or vice versa. Decisions regarding education that are easy to implement in smaller classes can have a significant impact on larger courses, or the other way around.
In the 2000s, most universities in the Netherlands clustered their departments into large science and engineering departments. However, the TU/e didn’t. This was done to meet the specialised need for nearby industries. Now, with the ever-growing demand on impact of research from the Brainport, the forming of four departments needs to happen. The exact implementation of the plan is not sure yet and the names of the departments can also still change, since this whole plan is still an advise. But the working group has come up with a possible clustering (between brackets is the number of staff ).
FBS: Faculty of Basic Sciences (194)
• CE&C Chemistry and Materials (27)
• Applied Physics (63)
• Biomedical Engineering (44)
• Mathematics (60)
FAE: Faculty of Applied Engineering (181)
• Computer Sciences (71)
• Electrical Engineering (110)
FMT: Faculty of Manufacturing Technologies (137)
• CE&C Chemical Engineering (11)
• Mechanical Engineering (88)
• BE Engineering (41)
FDI: Faculty of Design and Innovation (179)
• IE&IS (122)
• Industrial Design (38)
• BE Design (19)
And what about the four service departments? Is this somethings important for me as a student? To be honest, not really. But it sure is worth to take a look at and it gives you a great insight. For example, when introducing digital testing in a course, multiple bodies need to be involved: General Affairs for policy, ESA for scheduling, planning, and logistics, the department for course organization, and IT for software support. While each service does its best to provide support, none of the bodies oversees the entire process, and no one is responsible for managing the full chain of activities. It’s like having a Study Association without a Board to oversee the full picture. Quite weird right?
To tackle this, a shift in governance and decision-making is necessary. In the past, services were organised in a decentralised manner, with each department having its own finance person, IT specialist, and so on. Over time, services were more and more centralised to improve efficiency, with only operational support staff remaining in the departments. This works great for a rather small university and it was beneficial for procedures that could be easily handled by the smaller departments. Ironically, this approach has in the end led to more customised solutions and higher costs. Now, the gap between central services and departments needs to be narrowed again. This means that the new organisational structure will require a balance between centralised and decentralised services, with a greater emphasis on decentralisation and more experts working directly within the departments. Here, one could say: “it used to be better in the old days.”
I won’t bother you with further details of who will work with whom, but it comes down to four different services departments, with each service department having a full-time director overseeing the process.
• Education Services: This service department is responsible for supporting the entire student journey, starting from the initial contact with TU/e, through enrolment in an educational program, and continuing throughout the education process until graduation or departure from TU/e. So most important for you as a student.
• Research and Valorisation Services: This service de partment is responsible for supporting the entire research process, from the initial idea and securing funding to executing the research, developing proof-of-concept, and, when applicable, commercialising the results.
• General Services: This service department is responsible for supporting university-wide processes and activities, such as compliance, accounting, and IT.
• Real Estate and Facilities: This service department is responsible for ensuring a safe and clean environment at TU/e. Its main tasks include maintaining the buildings and facilities.
The full implementation of the Future Governance plan is still a long way off. First, a so called Governance Process Organisation has to be set up. This organisation needs to make sure that the changes are actually implemented which first requires a thorough research on the consequences of the implementation of the ideas. Then, the restructure will begin slowly and from bottom-up. Finally, the change will be fully made once there is enough groundwork and support from everyone, and will be easier once the new top-level governance functions efficiently and is fully trusted. So, while it’s definitely on the horizon, it’s more of a marathon than a sprint: progress will come, just not overnight!
Forging, the ancient craft of shaping metal with heat and hammer, has been a cornerstone of human progress for thousands of years. What began with simple fire pits evolved into an art form that fueled technological advancements, shaped societies, and left an undeniable mark on human history. This is the story of forging with its origins, growth, and enduring legacy.
WRITTEN BY THOMAS POPPE
The story of forging begins in the Bronze Age, around 4000 BCE, when humans first learned to manipulate metals like copper and tin. Early blacksmiths discovered that heating these metals allowed them to be hammered into tools, weapons, and ornaments. These primitive forges, simple fires fueled by wood or charcoal, laid the foundation for one of humanity’s greatest crafts.
The bronze tools and weapons revolutionized daily life, while these creations symbolized power and spirituality. Metalworking was often viewed as a sacred art, with smiths revered as keepers of divine knowledge.
In Greek mythology, forging was elevated to a divine art under the watchful eye of Hephaestus, the god of fire, metalworking, and craftsmanship. Born to Zeus and Hera, Hephaestus was cast out of Olympus due to his deformity but found solace in his forge.
From his volcanic workshops, Hephaestus created magnificent artifacts, including Achilles’ impenetrable armor, the shield of Hercules, and even the thrones of the gods themselves. Despite his physical imperfections, Hephaestus symbolized the transformative power of forging, taking raw materials and shaping them into objects of unparalleled beauty and strength.
The myths of Hephaestus inspired blacksmiths throughout history. His story reminds us that forging is not only about strength but also about creativity and perseverance .
The advent of the Iron Age, around 1200 BCE, marked a turning point. Iron was more abundant and durable than bronze, but working it required higher temperatures. With the invention of bellows (see fig: bellow) to intensify heat, blacksmiths began forging iron tools, transforming agriculture, construction, and warfare.
Iron plows boosted farming efficiency, while forged swords and shields changed the dynamics of battle, empowering empires like the Romans. Smiths became central figures in society, and in myths like those of the Norse and Celts, they were celebrated as creators of magical and indestructible artifacts.
By the medieval period, forging had become a highly specialized and respected craft. Blacksmiths played an integral role in every village, crafting essential items such as horseshoes, nails, and plowshares. Their forges were hubs of activity, where the rhythmic clang of hammers echoed daily life.
Guilds began to regulate the trade, ensuring quality and passing down knowledge. Armorers focused on creating chainmail and plate armor for knights, while other smiths forged decorative yet functional iron gates, hinges, and tools. Forging wasn’t just practical, it became an art form, with high leveled designs reflecting the blacksmith’s skill and creativity.
The Industrial Revolution in the 18th and 19th centuries transformed forging forever. Steam-powered hammers and mechanical presses allowed for mass production, replacing much of the manual labor while increasing the scale and precision of forged products.
Steel emerged as the material of choice, combining strength and flexibility. Forging became critical to the expansion of railroads, shipbuilding, and industrial machinery. Axles, wheels, and anchors, all forged with precision, helped power the era of industrialization. Despite mechanization, skilled smiths remained indispensable, overseeing the operation of massive machines and ensuring quality.
Today, forging is a blend of ancient craftsmanship and modern innovation. Advanced machinery allows for the creation of complex, high-precision components used in industries like aerospace, automotive, and medicine.
Nowadays like mechanical engineers we see two main topics, precision forging and sustainability
Precision Forging: Computer-aided designs enable unparalleled accuracy, producing everything from turbine blades to surgical implants.
Sustainability: New techniques and materials are making forging more environmentally friendly, aligning this ancient craft with modern values.
From the bronze tools of ancient farmers to the steel skyscrapers of modern cities, forging has shaped the world as we know it. The forge, whether fueled by charcoal or electricity, remains a symbol of resilience, creativity, and mastery. Through the centuries, the blacksmith’s hammer has not only forged metal but also the story of human innovation. The flames of the forge continue to burn, linking us to a shared history of fire, strength, and determination.
After taking ‘only’ 5.5 years to finish my bachelor’s, I decided it was time to speed things up with my master’s. I completed my first year on schedule, leaving just the internship and master’s thesis. Initially, I considered going abroad for the experience, but when I came across an offer I couldn’t refuse, all those plans flew out the window. The internship was in Geleen, Limburg, and focused on ballistic testing of polymer fiber-based armor. As soon as I heard the word ballistics, I was hooked.
WRITTEN BY FERENC STERKENS Master Student Processing and Performance
My day would start at 6:30 AM with a shower and getting ready. By 7:30 AM, I’d be in my car, setting off from Eindhoven with some relaxing music. The 50-minute drive included a 10-minute stop at a gas station for coffee, a quick chat with the staff or other travelers, and—more often than not—a panini. (I probably ate more paninis in three months than I have in my entire life.)
By 8:30 AM, I’d arrive at work and start the day with tasks like data analysis, reviewing high-speed camera footage, or writing reports. Around lunchtime, I’d take a break to eat and chat with colleagues. At around 4–5 PM, I’d hit the gym before heading home. The schedule was intense, but the experience was well worth it. And thankfully, I didn’t have to wear any of the vests during ballistic tests!
Internship
My research focused on UHMWPE (Ultra-High-MolecularWeight Polyethylene) or HMPE (High-Modulus Polyethylene) fiber. This material is insanely strong and lightweight—about 15 times stronger than steel by specific strength—and has the highest impact resistance of any thermoplastic.
UHMWPE fibers are used in a variety of applications. When turned into ropes, they create ultra-strong yet lightweight lines
for sailing, parasailing, and even aerospace projects—like the 30 km-long space tether used in the Young Engineers’ Satellite 2. When made into fabric, UHMWPE is used in ultra-light camping gear, including tents, backpacks, and even bear-proof food bags.
My research focused on Dyneema® laminates, which are commonly used in body armor and ballistic vests. These laminates are created by layering fiber yarns in one direction, pressing them onto an adhesive, cutting them into squares, and then stacking them at 90° angles with additional adhesive layers. Each yarn contains 780 fi laments, and the final laminate is about 10–12 fi laments thick.
To evaluate the material’s impact resistance, we fired projectiles at a fixed distance and measured their speed before and after impact. High-speed cameras captured the impact, while microscope imaging helped analyze fiber behavior. By calculating the dissipated energy, we could determine how effectively the material absorbed the impact.
The goal of my research was to study how a steel cylinder impacts pressed Dyneema® panels (HB) and unpressed packs (SB). By analyzing high-speed footage, velocity data, and penetration depth, we compared the results to theory and simulations, gaining valuable insight into how Dyneema® composites absorb energy.
Although people love to joke about Limburg, it’s not all that different from where I’m from—except for the funny accents and some more hills, of course! But what was interesting were the research results and high-speed footage we gathered.
Below is a graph showing data from different soft ballistic panels. The Y-axis represents the dissipated energy per ply, while the X-axis shows impact velocity. The dotted lines represent the normalized kinetic energy of the projectile—physically, no data
points can go above these lines because that would mean more energy was dissipated than the projectile had in the first place (which is obviously impossible!).
The targets with more plys were actually more effective in stopping projectiles! Even when looking at normalized energy, therefore performance scales with more than increased the material amount!
Soft vs. Hard Ballistics – Which Works Better?
One of the most surprising discoveries was that soft ballistics are more effective at stopping projectiles than hard ballistics. This seemed counterintuitive at first, but after analyzing the highspeed footage, it made sense.
High-Speed Footage Breakdown
• HB Material (Hard Ballistics) – Below, you can see the 16-ply HB material at a velocity of about 450 m/s. On the left, the projectile is just before impact; on the right, it’s five frames later.
• SB Material (Soft Ballistics) – The same test was done with SB material. The left image shows the moment just before impact, while the right shows the projectile five frames later.
The key difference? The backface deformation in soft ballistics is much greater, meaning the material absorbed significantly more energy. This explains why soft ballistics dissipate impact energy more effectively than hard ballistics.
Conclusion
This research gave me a deep understanding of ballistic impact resistance and how UHMWPE composites behave under extreme conditions. If you’re curious to learn more, check out my full internship paper: “Characterization of Impact Ballistics: UHMWPE Fiber Composite”.
Thanks for reading—I hope at least some of this information penetrated your brain!
Last summer the Olympic games in Paris were in full swing and our very own Bas Jansdam was on the scene to report on the race against cheating in the Olympic games.
In Olympia, in the year 776 BCE, the first ever Olympic games took place in honour of the greatest chariot racer of the time, Pelops, who beat Oinomaos in a great race for what would now be called the Peloponnesus. A wonderful story of how those with immense talent and dedication can claim victory against any odds. At least, it would be if Pelops had not cheated and created an unfair advantage. Not only did he advantage himself by having immortal horses and a flying chariot, he also took the opportunity to have the chariot of his opponent sabotaged, which ended in Oinomaos’ death when the axle came loose. 1
While this was largely celebrated at the time, these tactics would be considered unfair and unsportsmanlike at later events, which is why the Olympics have tried to make the games as fair as possible ever since.
When we think of ways to keep sports fair these days we often envision camera technologies like Hawkeye™, but in the days of the Greeks these solutions were decidedly more low-tech. Besides, tennis wasn’t even invented yet and these first games in Olympia had only one event: the stade. 2
The stade was a massive event in Olympia, where up to 40.000 people could be seated on the banks beside the track 3 and where up to 40 competitors lined up to take home the olive crown and eternal fame.
WRITTEN BY BAS JANSDAM
There were however some problems that the Greeks had with the organisation of the stade: How do you make sure that everyone starts at the same time, and how do you prevent false starts? Both good questions with no easy answers. In fact, they seemed to have no answer at all. Cheating was rampant during the stade. Which makes you wonder what they did to stop this cheating, and how it is prevented today.
The modern 100m dash looks the most like the races in ancient Greece, so we will use that as our modern day equivalent. A quick recap on the 100m dash. We have a start line and an endline, with a distance between them of approximately 100 meters. Everyone lines up at the start, waits for the signal and tries to get over the endline as quickly as possible. Getting there quicker than the competition is of course easier if you don’t wait for the signal and leave before everyone else. This is considered cheating.
To make sure nobody cheats by leaving before they get the signal, the starting blocks are fitted with strain gauges which are used to measure the force of the athlete’s foot on the block. When there is no longer a force applied, that means the foot has left the block and if this happens before the signal has gone off you have made a false start and are immediately disqualified.4
The problem with this solution is that the starting signal is given using a starting pistol, and in a field where the difference between winning and losing often comes down to milliseconds the time it takes for sound to travel from the sideline to the furthest competitor is not insignificant.
To make sure everyone hears the pistol at the same time the starting blocks are fitted with speakers, which sound when the starting pistol is engaged.
These solutions do not quite work for the Greeks as they had not yet invented the starting block, which makes mounting strain gauges and speakers impossible. So in the first few hundred years of the games these problems were solved by having a lot of officials to look for false starts. Around the third century BCE however, a new invention was introduced, which is still in use at modern Olympic events: the starting gate.
Starting gates are used these days mostly in the winter Olympics as timing systems. When a skier sets off, they pass and trigger a gate, starting a timer. This ensures that all times are started at the same point. The ancient Olympics used a very similar system, the hysplex. (reference: Valavanis, 1999) (figure by Veronika Miketa).
The hysplex at Olympia consisted of a vertical bar with a horizontal bar on top of it that could pivot. This bar was held horizontally by a rope that was connected to the short overhang of the bar. All the ropes were led to the referee, who was located at a central point behind the runners. At the start of the race, the referee would let go of the ropes, causing the bars to fall down, allowing the Olympian to start running.
This way everyone got the signal at the same time and false starts were made impossible, making all running competitions finally fair after only a few hundred cheating filled games. (Footnote: except for the occasional tripping of opponents and the one time take over and fortification of the stadium by the Pisans and the Akkadians.)
While starting before your competitors is an obvious case, cheating has proved to be a notoriously difficult concept to define. A commonsense understanding of cheating as the ‘intentional violation of the rules to gain a competitive advantage’ is riddled with difficulties (reference: Russell, 2017). For example, if cheating is necessarily a type of rule violation, what of the violation of conventions and other norms not captured by the formal rules? What if these violations are not intentional? And even if there was cheating, can this be excused? The case of cyclist Lance Armstrong has provided a focal point for some of this debate (reference: Moore, 2017). Is cheating wrong if one’s competitors (or at least a significant proportion of one’s competitors) are also cheating? I’m just happy I don’t have to answer these questions.
It is also worth noting the related discussion of ‘gamesmanship’. This is a term used to denote conduct that falls short of cheating (as it does not violate the formal rules) but is morally dubious nonetheless and are often called unsportsmanlike behaviour. Such acts might include the intimidation of one’s opponent, the manipulation of officials, or the intentional disruption of an opponent’s preparations (e.g. coughing just as they are about to putt). And while such conduct is not formally proscribed, it speaks to a question that every athlete must ponder: what should I be prepared to do to win?
Because the competitions are so close, and the rewards so large, many people seek advantages anywhere. Most famously the Russian version of the NOC-NSF had set up a program for systematic doping for their athletes. In this program Russian athletes across all disciplines were encouraged to take EPO and steroids to improve their performance, while the Russian sports governing bodies would protect these athletes. Following the discovery of these practises by WADA (world anti-doping agency) Russia was banned from participating in all major international events for four years.
The reason these drugs were taken are simple, they improve performance. EPO encourages the production of red blood cells, making the athletes able to perform better for longer, while anabolic steroids are a modified version of testosterone that is even better at preventing muscle breakdown, allowing for more muscle buildup and more strength in the athlete.
While both of these substances are found in some form in the human body, the increased amounts offer unfair performance benefits. This is clearly cheating, because external methods are used, but it is undeniable that these chemicals appear in the human body naturally and that some people have higher levels than others. Which brings us to a very difficult question: can being naturally gifted be considered cheating?
Men have one huge advantage over women when it comes to sports: their testosterone levels. Because having more testosterone in your blood allows for more muscle growth, men will have an easier time getting stronger than women, which is considered an unfair advantage in many disciplines. Because of this there is a separation of gender in most sports, so that women who are immensely talented and dedicated have a chance to win in a battle with their peers. This is no different than having weight classes in boxing or age groups in football. We want to see people with talent and dedication have a fighting chance against their peers. Which is why, in 2018, World Athletics (formerly the International Association of Athletics Federations) decided to ban Caster Semenya from all short distance female track events.
Caster Semenya is a south-African woman who dominated track events through the late 2000’s and 2010’s. She is an amazing runner that naturally produces a lot of testosterone. She truly dominated. So much so, that after desperate cries for intervention from her peers World Athletics banned her from the track. If the most talented and dedicated athletes in the world are without a chance of winning we can not speak of fairness, they argued, and to keep the competition fair they instituted a limit to the amount of testosterone a woman could have in competitions were elevated levels were too large an advantage. As a result Semenya was forced to pivot to the 5000m race, where she failed to qualify for the Olympics.
Keeping the games fair is a hard job. Deciding on what is an unfair advantage is a job that is sure to lead to unhappy people whatever you decide. Are the Nike Vaporfly™ shoes cheating? (footnote: It was decided they were banned until the competition was able to catch up as to not disadvantage athletes sponsored by other brands.) Is using high altitude tents unfair? (footnote: Despite the advantage they give by increasing red blood cell production it is allowed, as all competitors can do it without risk to health and the same advantage can be achieved by living at high altitude.) And can you be too good to compete with your peers? All difficult decisions, but the result of these decisions is a competition where those who have impeccable talent and true dedication can show the world they can go faster, higher, and stronger than anyone else.
In February 2005, three former PayPal employees—Chad Hurley, Steve Chen, and Jawed Karim—launched a website that would forever change how people consume and share video content. What began as a simple platform for sharing home videos quickly grew into a global powerhouse of entertainment, education, and professional development. Now, 20 years later, YouTube is more than just a social media platform—it has become an indispensable resource for industries like mechanical engineering, where professionals and enthusiasts alike turn to it for learning, innovation, and collaboration.
When Me at the Zoo, the first-ever YouTube video, was uploaded in April 2005, the platform was still a novel experiment in online video sharing. In its early years, YouTube was primarily a hub for personal videos, viral clips, and home recordings. However, as the site gained traction, universities and educators saw an opportunity to share knowledge on a global scale.
During this period, MIT OpenCourseWare and other academic initiatives began uploading engineering lectures, allowing students worldwide to access high-level mechanical engineering content for free. Though valuable, these videos were often lengthy and lacked the visual engagement that would later define the platform’s most successful educational content.
By 2006, Google acquired YouTube for $1.65 billion, a move that signaled the platform’s immense potential. The introduction of the YouTube Partner Program in 2007 incentivized creators to produce high-quality content, and soon, early engineering educators began experimenting with new formats to explain complex mechanical concepts in a more accessible way.
WRITTEN BY STEFAN GEERTS
As YouTube matured, it became clear that visual storytelling and engaging explanations were key to making engineering accessible. This era saw the rise of dedicated creators who transformed the way mechanical engineering was taught online.
Derek Muller, the mind behind Veritasium, was among the first to revolutionize science and engineering education on YouTube. His research-backed, interactive approach to explaining physics and mechanical principles made even the most abstract concepts feel tangible. Through high-speed cameras, realworld experiments, and hands-on demonstrations, Veritasium introduced millions to the deeper mechanics behind everyday phenomena.
During the same period, Tom Scott emerged as a master of exploring engineering marvels and scientific oddities. Rather than filming in a traditional studio, he took viewers to fascinating locations—from unique bridges to underground tunnels— explaining the hidden mechanics behind infrastructure and design in a clear and engaging manner. His ability to make complex systems understandable helped popularize engineering among broader audiences.
As educational content gained popularity, hands-on engineering channels also began to take off. This set the stage for a new wave of creators who focused not just on explaining engineering but also on building and demonstrating it.
By the mid-2010s, YouTube’s engineering content was no longer limited to explanations—it was becoming a showcase for realworld builds and hands-on mechanical applications. This shift led to the rise of creators who blurred the line between engineering education and entertainment.
One of the most unconventional yet influential figures in this space was Colin Furze. A former plumber turned inventor, Furze pushed engineering to its extremes, creating jet-powered bicycles, homemade hoverbikes, and retractable superhero claws. His over-the-top projects weren’t just about spectacle— they showcased the fundamentals of mechanical design, fabrication, and problem-solving in action. His work inspired a new generation of young engineers by proving that engineering could be exciting, creative, and sometimes even a little bit reckless.
At the same time, Mark Rober, a former NASA engineer, introduced a more refined, methodical approach to engineering entertainment. His viral projects—ranging from the world’s largest NERF gun to highly sophisticated squirrel-proof obstacle courses—demonstrated engineering principles in ways that were not only educational but also deeply engaging. By carefully explaining his design process and iterating through multiple prototypes, Rober highlighted the importance of trial and error in engineering.
As YouTube entered its second decade, its role in engineering education solidified. High-resolution 3D animations, in-depth CAD tutorials, and virtual prototyping made it easier than ever for students and professionals to learn complex mechanical engineering concepts.
Channels like Practical Engineering and Real Engineering set new standards for technical education on the platform, diving deep into infrastructure mechanics, engineering failures, and design principles. Their well-researched, visually engaging content turned YouTube into a legitimate alternative to traditional engineering education, complementing textbooks and classroom lectures with real-world examples.
By now, YouTube had become an essential tool for professional development. Many engineers relied on it for software training, finite element analysis guidance, and staying up-to-date with emerging industry trends. Companies and universities increasingly recognized YouTube as a valuable educational platform, integrating its content into formal training programs.
Engineering collaborations also became more common. Creators frequently worked together to tackle ambitious projects, merging expertise from different disciplines. This collaborative culture further reinforced YouTube’s role as a knowledge-sharing platform, helping engineers and enthusiasts alike learn from some of the brightest minds in the field.
As YouTube enters its third decade, its influence on mechanical engineering is expected to grow even further. Emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, augmented reality, and virtual reality could enable more interactive and immersive learning experiences.
Furthermore, as more universities, research institutions, and industry leaders recognize the power of YouTube, we may see greater integration between traditional engineering education and digital content. The ability to access high-quality, up-todate engineering knowledge at any time will continue to shape the next generation of engineers, making learning more flexible and globally accessible.
At 20 years old, YouTube has gone far beyond its original purpose of video sharing. It has become a global classroom, a professional development tool, and a critical component of the engineering community. As mechanical engineers continue to innovate and push boundaries, YouTube will undoubtedly remain a key platform for learning, sharing, and inspiring the next generation of problem-solvers and creators.
One of the oldest properties of the Association, Den Dis had seen better days. While some instability was inherent in its design, it had deteriorated to the point where it was no longer acceptable and needed attention. In this article, I’ll take you through the process of repairing Den Dis and highlight its unique (some might say cursed) features.
WRITTEN BY BEN GORTEMAKER
Around a year ago, the top of Den Dis became loose, rendering it impossible to lift. This is an issue if you’re trying to clean De Weeghconst. To investigate, the top had to be removed. This brought the first challenge: was the glue or beer that had seeped into the top holding it together? The top of Den Dis had a large split, causing beer to leak into the MDF plate below. The MDF material, unfortunately, proved suboptimal—absorbing moisture and weakening over time. Additionally, screws were pulling out of the MDF, loosening the connection. A quick fix with rings reattached the plate, but a more permanent solution was necessary.
Further complicating the issue, the screws in both the top and bottom of the plate were improperly positioned, causing them to bend under pressure. The unique design of Den Dis, resembling a spring nest, caused the screws to undergo excessive stress with any applied force.
Moreover, moving Den Dis, especially during rehousing and drink constitution, revealed that the large top made it cumbersome. The new design prioritizes making the top easier to remove and handle.
To strengthen Den Dis, we’ll replace the existing screws with M8 threaded bolts and inserts. These will better distribute the bending loads from the rods connecting the top to the base. The metal-to-metal connection is more durable and less likely to strip compared to wood, offering a stronger and longer-lasting solution. Assembly and disassembly will also be easier, as metalto-metal connections endure more wear than wood.
Next, the single MDF plate will be replaced with two multiplex plates. One will attach to the top of Den Dis, and the other will connect to the legs. M8 threaded connections between the two plates will allow for secure, durable disassembly and reassembly. Finally, the split in the top will be closed as much as possible, and any remaining gap will be filled with epoxy to restore the structure.
At this stage, attention turned to the rods of Den Dis, all of which had to be removed to install threaded inserts. The original connection to the base was weak, allowing the rods to be easily pulled off. Unfortunately, this also left behind screws that had been secured from the bottom of Den Dis, protruding upwards from the base. Since these screws couldn’t be removed from the top, they had to be unscrewed from below.
However, this task was easier said than done. Accessing these screws required a complete disassembly of the base, a process made even more challenging by several stripped threads. The only silver lining was that some screws had rusted so severely that they crumbled apart, simplifying their removal.
During the disassembly, a surprise awaited. The 50th Board of our Association had left a message from their repair efforts, likely dating back 18 years. But there was no time to dwell on this discovery, as the next layer of MDF awaited. Unlike other parts of the table, this MDF had been glued down rather than receiving the traditional De Weeghconst treatment, which allows parts to naturally settle together. Fortunately, the MDF was still in relatively good condition and reluctantly has been reused. Once it was removed, the screws securing the rods were finally accessible and could be taken out.
The first step was to remove the deteriorating MDF plate and replace it with a new multiplex plate. The gap, likely caused by wood expansion, had become a collection point for the remnants of spilt drinks. These drinks that had missed their desired location had seeped in, forming a hardened, black, crystal-like structure that made closing the gap significantly more difficult. Before any further work could continue, this stubborn residue had to be carefully removed.
Once the junk was cleared, efforts turned to closing the gap itself. This required patience, several failed attempts, and the use of straps to pull the tabletop back into place as much as possible. After achieving the best possible smallest gap, the multiplex plate was attached to keep it in place. To prevent future damage, the gap was filled with epoxy. This step was crucial in ensuring that no further liquid could seep into the table, avoiding the same destructive process that had weakened it in the first place.
Interestingly, the old MDF plate, now completely useless for structural support, still had one last role to play, Serving, as a template for marking the attachment points of the table legs. Once it had fulfilled this final duty, it was retired to a place where it would never be seen again.
With that hurdle cleared, the threaded inserts could now be installed in the base. However, positioning them precisely was tricky. As some inserts ended up slightly off-centre due to pre-existing holes left by the original screws. This misalignment required extra effort when reattaching the rods. A note for any future repairers: If Den Dis ever needs another restoration, consider removing the inserts, filling the holes with epoxy, and then reinstalling the inserts to ensure perfect alignment.
After a long process of installing the rods, it was finally time for reassembly. The connection plate was secured with countersunk hex bolts, and the top of Den Dis was reattached to the base using the same type of bolts. The new plates featured a keyed design, making it easier to align the top and bottom correctly.
Now, Den Dis is as structurally sound as possible. A fresh coat of stain and lacquer will restore its original appearance, bringing it back to pristine condition.
But one question remains: How long will this ancient piece of Association property endure?
Time will tell, but for now, Den Dis has been given a new lease on life, standing as a testament to the dedication of those who have worked to preserve it over the years.
AI models have been popping up around every major social media site over the last few years. While there have been attempts to respond to the ever-evolving landscape of artificial intelligence, DeepSeek has emerged as a groundbreaking yet highly controversial development. As an advanced AI model developed by a Chinese research team, DeepSeek has demonstrated remarkable capabilities in language processing, coding, and multimodal tasks. However, its release has raised some debates regarding data security, and the future of AI dominance.
WRITTEN BY ANASTASIA GHLIGHVASHVILI
DeepSeek has been able to match the performance of the reigning titan of the AI space, OpenAI. One of its key strengths is its ability to operate in multiple languages, including Mandarin and English, with high accuracy. This multilingual capability makes it a powerful tool, with earning potential even beyond the English-centric models dominating the market.
But why is DeepSeek so special? Its because of its reduced cost. While both OpenAI and DeepSeek are able to perform the tasks of text generation, problem-solving and programming, DeepSeek matches OpenAI’s performance at 95% less cost (Buntz, 2025). OpenAI’s operational scale highlights the significant financial gap between proprietary and open AI systems. As reported by Business Insider, the company incurred daily infrastructure costs of 700,000 in 2023, with annual expenses for training and inference expected to approach 7 billion in 2024. Training its GPT-3 model in 2020 cost 4.6 million, while its upcoming GPT 5 model reportedly demands 500 million every six months for training, according to The Wall Street Journal. In contrast, DeepSeek’s RL training budget for R1 was reportedly $12 million, putting into question if such heavy investments into AI models is really worth it.
DeepSeek’s success challenges the notion that substantial budgets and high-end chips are essential for AI advancements, raising questions about the future demand for high-performance hardware. The revelation of DeepSeek’s lower operational costs unsettled financial markets on January 27, triggering a broad sell-off in the tech sector. The Nasdaq dropped over 3%, impacting chip manufacturers and data centers globally (Ng, 2025). Nvidia, previously the most valuable company by market capitalization, saw its stock plummet 17% on Monday before beginning to recover the following day. Its market value declined from $3.5 trillion to $2.9 trillion, pushing it down to third place behind Apple and Microsoft, according to Forbes.
Venture capital investments in AI startups may also shift in response to DeepSeek’s capabilities. If investors perceive Chinese AI models as superior or more cost-effective, funding for Western AI firms may decrease, altering the financial landscape of AI development. Currently, DeepSeek is a privately held company and is not publicly traded, meaning investors cannot purchase shares on major stock exchanges.
Beyond economic impacts, another concern surrounding DeepSeek is data security. Critics argue that AI models developed in China may pose a risk to sensitive data, particularly if the technology is used outside its domestic market. Given the ongoing tensions between China and Western nations over cybersecurity, some governments and companies have expressed hesitation in integrating DeepSeek into their systems.
The AI’s ability to process vast amounts of information has also raised alarms about potential surveillance applications. Some fear that DeepSeek could be leveraged for state-sponsored monitoring or information control, further intensifying concerns about privacy. Australia has banned DeepSeek on government devices and systems, saying it poses a national security risk, while Italy blocked DeepSeek’s app on 30 January and ordered the company to stop processing the personal information of its citizens over data protection concerns.
Despite the controversy, DeepSeek remains a technological marvel with significant potential applications. Its capabilities could revolutionize multiple industries. However, addressing security concerns and ensuring ethical AI deployment will be crucial to its acceptance in global markets. As the AI landscape continues to evolve, and the Silicon Valley tech giants feel mounting pressure, the world will be watching closely to see how DeepSeek shapes the future of artificial intelligence.
A key hub for innovation and technology, Settels Savenije group of companies is based at Strijp-T, Eindhoven. Founded in 1987 by John Settels and Jan van Amelsvoort, the company has grown into a leading provider of advanced solutions, with a strong focus on technical excellence. We were invited to visit Settles Savenije’s inspiring work environment and have a talk with John Settels himself.
John Settels was born in Son en Breugel. Having completed his secondary education in Eindhoven, in 1980 he began studying industrial engineering and management science at the city’s Technical University, specializing in industrial psychology. Upon graduating in 1986, John worked for a small high tech engineering and manufacturing company in Veldhoven, which employed between 60 and 70 people.
When this company went bankrupt in September 1987, John and his colleague Jan van Amelsvoort were prompted to start a business of their own. Jan, who had been head of development at their former company, approached John with a proposition: “Let’s hire four mechanical engineers. I’ll handle the projects, and I need you to deal with everything else.”
Thus, their company was launched on September 1, 1987. Jan focused on the technical side whilst John took on all other responsibilities, from financial administration to insurances.
A year later, John had everything fine so fine-tuned that he was able to complete the work needed to run the business in one day a week, so he suggested the rest of his time be spent on management consultancy and company restructuring. This he did for 10 years.
By 1999 the engineering company had expanded to 25 employees. The staff expected Jan to be the manager, but he didn’t like the role and preferred to focus on technology and do engineering projects. Therefore he called John and told him he wanted him full time in the engineering company, as the manager.
John asked Jan if he was really sure about this, because they only had mechanical engineers in the firm, and they didnt take him seriously, because the technicians said his degree wasn’t a real profession. However Jan was totally convinced that John was the perfect man for the job. And John took on the role.
By 2001, the company had grown to 35 employees, but due to a challenging period in the high tech industry, they had to let go of 10 people in 2004. That same year, they moved their operations from Waalre to Eindhoven, and in 2006 Jan retired.
At that point, John had doubts about whether to continue with the company, because there was so little business available. However, instead of closing, he started sending his employees out to customers. His employees didn’t like this because it felt as if they were in a temporary work agency, not a real engineering firm.
John started to create a world that really worked for talented technical people. His philosophy was simple: if he could build a great workplace for engineers, and an open and transparant working culture which would inspire talented people, they would want to work for him, and the customers would follow.
Today, customers come to Settels Savenije because of their employees. John believes that nowadays 90% of their business is granted to them because the customers have confidence in the Settels teams; that they can achieve what the customers are looking for.
After a few years, projects started to come back to the company. In 2010, John was approached for a project at a machine factory, and the engineers returned with big smiles, inspired by the high level of craftsmanship. This experience led to an investment in that factory, and Settels Savenije developed a combination of three uniquely inspiring connected environments, namely Research and Development, Advanced Systems and Precision Parts.
build a great workplace for engineers, then talented people want to work for you and customers will follow
In 2011, John first visited a building that would eventually become the company’s new home. The building, previously used to purify water, consisted of large concrete compartments, tubes, and pump systems. Despite skepticism from others, John was able to see the potential in the structure and in its technical aspects. The building, 60% of which is underground, captured his imagination. And while many thought he was crazy for considering it, he was convinced it was the right place.
By 2014, John decided to move into the building. After working with an architect, they signed a deal with the building’s owner in
2015. Finally, in February 2017, the company officially moved into its new installations, marking a significant milestone in John’s vision for the company. The move not only reflected the company’s growth but also changed how they were perceived by others in the industry.
Since moving, the company has grown remarkably. The number of employees has increased from 50 in 2017 to 170 in 2024, with a turnover of 30 million euros. John’s dedication to fostering the right environment for his team has played a crucial role in this success.
John believes that creating the right environment for engineers is much easier in a small company. As the company grows, maintaining its core philosophy requires a different level of attention and effort. Preserving this philosophy is essential to John, since it is the foundation of the company’s success.
One of the key questions John asks himself is: How big should the company become? He firmly believes that if the company grows too large, it could compromise the culture that makes it so unique.
Currently, with a staff of 170, John estimates that the ideal maximum size is around 250 employees, a scale where it’s still possible to know everyone personally. This is important because one of the most important parts of the company’s success is its unique culture and how everyone works together. John is convinced that exceeding 250 employees could weaken the powerful company culture.
When broaching the type of environment that best suits technical professionals, John is very clear: a workplace with minimal politics, transparency and open communication.
For John, it is crucial that employees feel comfortable providing strong feedback to their colleagues when something isn’t done well. However, this feedback should always be given constructively, to inspire and to motivate people to improve.
On April 1, 1989, John was driving his car with Jos Berben sitting beside him. They were on their way to the first day of a new project, where they had to restructure a company. As they approached the company, John asked Jos what their plan was. Jos replied that he had no idea, but he was confident it was going to work.
Jos then shared a piece of advice that John took to heart and wants to pass on to all mechanical engieering students, which is: there is no such thing as a silly question. Even if you feel you probably should have known the answer, always ask anything you want, no matter how basic it may seem. Silly answers however, do exist. Especially when you are young, you should never hesitate to ask questions.
We express our thanks to John Settels for telling us about his experiences at Settels Savenije.
We hope that, as a reader, you’ve gained a better understanding of Settels Savenije and its founding story.
If you want to know more about Settels Savenije or to keep up to date with their news or job vacancies, make sure to visit www.sttls.nl
At the TU/e, students are educated to become excelling engineers in research or industry. The vision is to teach students how to become experts in their field of work, as well as broadly developed in order to work in interdisciplinary teams. The TU/e forms a diverse and international community, and also her education should teach students how to become inclusive leaders, being aware of cultural differences and diverse needs of students. Within ME, we go a step further to ensure that everybody feels welcome at the TU/e. The P&PD line we have should prepare bachelor’s students to become the next generation of leaders in their field of expertise
In April 2024, the first Social Safety training took place in the form of a theatre play for the freshmen as the start of the Social Safety P&PD line at ME and the TU/e. After this, three other trainings will be given for this generation student. These will be given as part of the courses Sustainable Fuels (2024, Y2Q2), Multidisciplinary CBL (2024, Y2Q4) and Computational mechanics (2025, Y3Q1). However, for the students after this generation, the trainings start earlier in the year to educate students early on the importance of social safety.
What are the trainings, and why are these important?
As stated above, the first part of the P&PD line, you will follow an interactive theatre session on social safety, discrimination, and transgressive behaviour. This theatre session will be held by Time Out Café. The goal of this interactive theatre session is to open the dialogue on social safety, to open your eyes on where discrimination and transgressive behaviour takes place and in what way we can search for the boundaries between what is okay, and what is not. And to stress that this happens in higher education. This training is part of the CBL Launching mechanism (Y1 Q2).
In collaboration with Stichting GELIJKSPEL, you will follow a workshop on social safety and transgressive behaviour. This workshop is a continuation on the theatre play Safe Space. You will learn how to check boundaries and state boundaries in their student life. Also, the role of bystander will be discussed. A focus point in the workshop is the ‘rules of the game’ when it comes to safe and enjoyable ways of sexual interaction. Student life
plays a large role in exploring sexuality, especially with students from all different backgrounds. By educating you on this matter, the TU/e helps facilitate a socially safe interaction within your student community and therefore keep the university a space where you can develop, academically and personally. This training will be given in Q4 of Y1 as a part of the CBL Energy storage and transport.
Once ground rules on social safety and interaction within student life are set, the focus will be on educating how to collaborate in an inclusive way. In this training session, inclusive and intercultural collaboration will be on the agenda. You will learn about cultural differences and personal differences in ways of communication, different cultural values and social preferences. Moreover, the training will pay attention to what intercultural and diverse groups can also bring to a group in terms of quality of the end product. The training will be part of Sustainable Fuels in Q2 of the second year.
In the last part of the P&PD line on social safety and Inclusive collaboration & leadership, inclusive leadership in general will be tackled. A recap will be held for what diversity means for the quality of the end product for the project. Moreover, you will learn how to become inclusive leaders. This means the workshop educates you on how to create an inclusive environment for working with others. How you can adapt to diverse needs, and how to get the most value out of each other. You will learn the importance of taking time, setting up a team and speaking out about each other’s expectations for a project. Moreover, the workshop will also pay attention to inclusive collaboration with non-peers (supervisors or other stakeholders). This final training will be given during Computational mechanics in Q1 of your third bachelor year.
With this P&PD line, Mechanical Engineering is a pioneer in the Netherlands in ensuring the wellbeing of students. This all to get the best out of your education to make sure that you excel in your career.
Have you every watched those car-pimping shows like Wheeler Dealers or Top Gear, and wished you could a fford to do something similar. Well, the Land Yachting Committee has great news for you. You can upgrade just about everything on your car without spending a dime! All you need is a sledgehammer, crowbar, and some beun in your blood. Welcome to the ultimate guide on how to pimp your ride, for absolutely free!
Lost your car keys, or fear ever losing them in the future? Simply remove the ignition cylinder, and hotwire the wires to a button on the custom dashboard. This way, you will never need your keys to start your car again! If you do this to someone else’s car, it is definitely considered theft, but doing it to your own is just innovation in our eyes.
Always wanted to be able to look up at the stars while driving at night? How about some nice sunshine on your head? Paying for a sunroof is not a small investment, so making it DIY is much cheaper. First, determine the size of the sunroof you want, and mark it on the roof of the car. This can best be done by scratching the markings in with the crowbar, as the markings will not be visible in the end anyway. Next, take your sledgehammer and hit the markings all the way around. This will weaken the material the perfect amount, so now you can chisel away at it with the crowbar. Pro tip: leave a bit of material on one side that works as a hinge, so you can always close the roof again when the rain comes.
Have you ever looked at your dashboard and thought: “Why are there so many buttons? I don’t even know what half of these do!” There is an easy way to simplify this. Simply take your sledgehammer, and hit every button that you do not understand or need anymore. This way, only the bare required will remain. Make sure you disconnect or remove the airbags before you do this, because otherwise you might get an unexpected surprise.
Getting bored with the simple and plain paintjob on your car? Let your imagination go wild. Take your crowbar and carve in whatever drawings, sketches, or other patterns you feel like. The more scratches, the more personalized and impressive the car will become. If you really feel like it, you can always take the sledgehammer and customize the shape of the panels as well!
Want that lifted-truck look but don’t want to spend money on an actual lift kit? Just take a sledgehammer and start whacking the wheel wells until the suspension gives up. Instant clearance upgrade! Beware: results may vary, usually in favour of catastrophic failure.
Why waste money on expensive subwoofers when you can create your own unique sound experience? Smash the exhaust pipe for a custom bass-heavy growl, or rip out the muffler entirely for a thrilling high-volume effect.
We at the ZWC are clearly fans of feeling some wind through your hair when driving. Having this in your car would also help keep your head cool, and feel much more powerful on the road. The procedure is simple, take a crowbar and chisel away at the edges of the windshield. After the edges are taken care of, simple peel away the entire windshield. For a real wind tunnel effect, it is best to also remove the rear windshield.
Ever been jealous of those Jeep drivers rolling around with no doors? Here’s your chance! Simply wedge a crowbar near the hinges and pry away until you achieve that open-air experience. Bonus points if you remove just one door for a bold asymmetrical look.
Ever noticed how clean racecars and high-performance vehicles minimize distractions? Eliminate pesky reflections and distortions by removing all windows! Not only will your view be perfectly unobstructed, but you’ll also enjoy a totally open driving experience—whether you like it or not.
Side mirrors only show you where you’ve been—not where you’re going. Remove them entirely for a sleek, futuristic design. Who needs to check blind spots when you can just rely on vibes?
Fuel economy is important, and excess weight is your enemy! Rip out anything unnecessary—passenger seats, panels, carpets, even the dashboard—to maximize mpg. Just remember: the lighter your car, the faster it disappears in strong winds.
After following these simple, budget-friendly car modification tips, you’ll be left with a truly one-of-a-kind vehicle. So, grab your sledgehammer, summon your inner artist, and get to work. And if you ever doubt your skills, just take a look at what the ZWC managed in 1 hour, with these exact tools.
Cherenkov radiation is a fascinating physical phenomenon that manifests as a blue glow when electrically charged particles move faster than the speed of light in a specific medium. This effect, named after the 1958 Physics Nobel Prize laureate Pavel Cherenkov, was first experimentally demonstrated and explained by Cherenkov himself.
According to Einstein’s theory of relativity, nothing can surpass the speed of light in a vacuum, which is approximately 299,792 kilometers per second . However, in different mediums like water, glass, or certain gases, light slows down significantly. For instance, in water, light travels at about 75% of its speed in a vacuum. Meanwhile, other particles, such as electrons, may maintain higher velocities than the sloweddown light, resulting in the emission of Cherenkov radiation.
This process is analogous to a sonic boom, which occurs when an object moves faster than the speed of sound in air. Similarly, Cherenkov radiation represents a “shock wave” of visible light produced when charged particles exceed the speed of light in a given medium.
When a high-speed charged particle moves through a medium like water, it disturbs the surrounding atoms, disrupting their energy balance. These atoms then release energy in the form of photons (light particles) as they return to equilibrium. The light emitted is predominantly in the blue, violet, and ultraviolet portions of the electromagnetic spectrum due to the high energy levels involved.
The color of visible light is determined by the wavelength and frequency of its photons. High-energy photons have short wavelengths and high frequencies, which correspond to blue and violet light. Although some Cherenkov radiation extends into the ultraviolet range, which is invisible to the human eye, specialized instruments can detect and measure this radiation.
One of the most common and well-known sources of Cherenkov radiation is the cooling water that surrounds the fuel in nuclear reactors. During nuclear reactions, high-energy charged particles are produced, and when they travel through water at speeds greater than the speed of light in that medium, the characteristic blue glow emerges.
t: Will the roads of tomorrow still be enjoyable?
“To fight climate change in this ever-changing world, it is a necessity to keep innovating towards a more sustainable future.” This may sound like the beginning of a USE Engineering Design presentation, but it’s also a reality our generation has to deal with. If it is up to the European Union, we must take the lead on multiple fronts regarding this mission, but what does this mean for the survival of iconic vehicles on the road?
WRITTEN BY JOEY VAN PETERSEN
Many mechanical engineers have an unconditional love for everything that contains a combustion engine. The expensive car your dad bought during his midlife crisis, an old two-stroke moped your granddad gave you as a present, or even a hard-tostart standalone single-cylinder, they all have their own charm, character and feeling. Even though they are loved by many, their survival has been under pressure for a long time.
As a contribution to global climate initiatives, the EU introduced its first European Emission Standard (EURO 1) in the early 1990s, containing the first vehicle emission regulations on the continent. It was implemented to mitigate the effects of deteriorating air quality on public health. The first standard had a lasting impact on vehicle design. Emission limits for carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides, directly led to the widespread use of unleaded gasoline, which we still use today. Additionally, this standard mandated the use of a three-way catalytic converter in the exhaust system of passenger cars for the first time. Every four to five years, the standard was revised with lower emission limits, the required adoption of new technologies and or newer testing methods. The equivalent standard for two-wheeled vehicles was later introduced in 1999.
Engineers are always challenged to innovate, especially when tightened regulations come into effect. This often leads to a game of cat-and-mouse being played between regulators and designers. The design goal of a vehicle is almost never the same as the goal of the regulations, but focusses more on creating an affordable and well-performing system. Volkswagen’s Dieselgate is perhaps the most wellknown example of such a difference.
Software in the onboard computers recognized when an emission test was being conducted and temporarily optimized the catalytic conversion by mixing more urea in the exhaust gases than during regular usage. This significantly reduced nitrogen oxide emissions, allowing Volkswagen to obtain the EURO 5 certification without developing expensive technologies or requiring the user to refill urea regularly. To prevent manufacturers from circumventing regulations in a similar manner again, the ‘Real Driving Emissions’ test was introduced with EURO 6. This test uses mobile equipment to measure emissions during normal driving conditions, which must stay under specific limits, in addition to the traditional roller bench tests.
This scandal revolved around everyday diesel cars, but creatively working around the rules is simply part of our nature as engineers, even if such approaches might backfire. For example, some motorcycle designers were unable to meet the EURO V standards, introduced in 2020, without compromising too much on sound and performance. Like a CBL group tackling a vaguely defined assignment, they came up with a clever solution. By using thin coating layers, non-heat-resistant materials and rapidly wearing filters, they developed catalytic systems that passed the emission tests, but afterwards wore out much faster than usual. Once the catalytic converter wears down, back pressure reduces, allowing for a bigger power output at high RPMs, greatly benefitting sport motorcycles in particular. Like a startled professor, still revising the project assignment well into the quartile, the EU also responded to this development trend. In this case, several years later, EURO V+ was introduced. While the limits remained the same, the tests now have to be conducted after 35,000 kilometres as well. In addition, sensors monitoring the catalytic converter’s performance became mandatory. If a significant loss in performance, compared to the initial level, was detected, the check engine light would be activated. This made it nearly impossible to design a system that only performed adequately under normal use for a limited period. Even after thousands of kilometres of intensive use, the standards must still be met.
The European regulations, along with those of the Environmental Protection Agency in the United States, have been world leaders in enforcing a cleaner transport sector, and with great success. According to the E.P.A. new vehicles are up to 99% cleaner compared to 1970. Dozens of countries worldwide also adopt the European and/or American standards, or older versions thereof, as their own. This means that nearly all manufacturers globally must comply with these standards. It is undoubtedly good for the environment, but every story has two sides. Over the years our roads have bid farewell to countless iconic cars, motorcycles and mopeds. Both the Mazda RX-7 and its successor, the RX8, were discontinued as a result of EURO 2 and EURO 5, respectively, after which the unique rotary engine would never return in passenger cars. The disappearance of the Nissan Silvia
and Mitsubishi Evo further marks the end of the ‘The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift’ era. In the motorcycle world, Yamaha also had to yield to Euro V regulations, ceasing production of the popular YZF-R6, while the YZF-R1 will no longer have a European variant due to EURO V+. Even two-stroke motorcycles and mopeds have long ceased to be produced for public roads due to these standards. Now only old ones are still out there, destined to gradually disappear from the streets entirely.
The future of exhilarating internal combustion engines does not look all too bright. For bigger car producers, it is often still viable to develop technologies like ‘EcoBoost’ or ‘BlueTEC’ to obtain their certifications, but to be honest, these cars are far from truly exciting. In contrast the lower production volumes and specific market demands of sport-oriented vehicles cannot be combined with the emission certifications in an affordable manner. Notably, the rising popularity of electric alternatives further reduces the available funds for new fuel and exhaust technology. And to make matters even worse, the Euro 7 standard, set to take effect in 2026, introduces limits on emissions from tire and brake wear. These new requirements will be specifically challenging for sporty vehicles, as these components endure more stress compared to those on regular vehicles. While it cannot be definitely stated that emission standards are the sole reason for halting production of many models, they are often a decisive factor for our beloved, nostalgic and iconic vehicles. With ambitious climate goals ahead, it is highly likely that this trend will continue in the near future. For enthusiasts, this may sound a bit disheartening, but fortunately, we are in the right place for a glimmer of hope! Mechanical engineers stand at the forefront of realizing the innovations needed to meet these climate goals, without sacrificing our passion on the roads. Whether you’re designing a more efficient exhaust system, modelling a wear-resistant brake disc or optimizing the controller in an ECU, every research group within our faculty can contribute to preserving enjoyable vehicles. Enthusiastic engineers are the key to keeping iconic cars, motorcycles and mopeds alive. By doing so, we might even save the internal combustion engine as a whole.
Almost everyone has one; a smartphone. Just take your phone out of your pocket, purse or jacket and the screen will light up and tell you the time. But there is another way of time telling, which is done by a beautiful piece of craftsmanship on the wrist of a human being; a watch. Watches come in a wide variety of sizes, colors and shapes, but they have one thing in common, telling the time. One more fascinating thing they have is that they have the ability to in a magical way ‘glow in the dark’. But why does humanity even need watches that glow?
WRITTEN BY MAX DUMOULIN
Maybe first introduce the importance of watch illumination, as this might not seem so obvious at first. For an every day user is enhances the readability in low light. For example at a movie theatre or driving at night, no external light source is needed to tell the time.
Lume is also essential for divers. They rely on it to check for example dive times underwater where the natural sun light is limited. A famous diving watch is the Rolex Deepsea Challenger, which can you up to a sea depth of 11000 meter . And for an watch admirer the glow of a watch is just aesthetically pleasing. This all made me wonder, how do watches glow in the dark? And what is the history behind this phenomenon?
Between 1910 and 1920, watch and clock companies employed women to paint dials and hands with luminous radium paint mixed with zinc sulfide. This cutting-edge technology, which became widespread around the time of the First World War
(1914-1918), allowed timepieces to glow in the dark. The potential of radium had a lot of pros, it was self-illuminating, bright and long lasting glow. It did enhance the readability of watches in the dark, which was particularly useful for military usage at that time. An extraordinary example of a watch that radium illumination is the highly collectable Rolex GMT Master 6542.
This watch had an original Bakelite bezel and is therefore considered quite rare. Despite the major pros, the danger of radium was initially underestimated, leading to devastating health consequences for workers. The workers who did this work are the socalled the Radium Girls. These women, who painted watch and clock dials with radium-laced paint, unknowingly ingested the toxic substance through a practice called “lip-pointing,” in which they shaped their brushes with their lips. Over time, they developed severe health issues, including necrosis of the jaw, bone fractures, anemia, and cancer. After more than 40 years, radium was banned in 1968 and replaced with safer alternatives. In the year 2020 a movie was made, which told the captivating story about these Radium Girls.
Promethium
In the same time promethium was used, which is also radioactive, but less then Radium. The major downside of the Promethium was that the lifespan was only 2.62 years, making it not a feasible option for the production of watches.
In the 1960 Tritium H-3 was used. This is a radioactive isotope of hydrogen with a respectable half-life of 12.3 years. The radioactivity of tritium was also way less then that of radium and promethium. The other major disadvantage of tritium was that it had a tendency to diffuse, seeping through the case and coming into contact with the wearer’s skin. Many watch brands, including Rolex, utilized tritium-based paints until they were banned in 1998 .
Since the banning of radioactive the most commonly used way of the ‘lighting’ of a watch is by the use of photoluminescent pigments. The biggest constraint between the different areas is the fact that the radioactive watches have the capability to glow without the need of a charge by a light source. While the LumiNova and Super LumiNova works more like a battery, It works by absorbing light or UV and the stored energy releases visible light, which causes it to ‘glow in the dark’.
LumiNova
LumiNova was invented 1993 in Japan, by Nemoto & Co, this type of luminance quickly became the standard for watches and is still mostly used today. LumiNova is, like has been said before, not a radioactive luminescent. It absorbs the energy and then emits it afterwards. LumiNova is based on strontium aluminate, an aluminate compound. This new material had to be combined with a chemical element called europium to glow.
The new LumiNova is about ten times brighter traditional luminescence and comes in variations of bright blue and bright green. The green hue glows the brightest, while the blue hue lasts the longest. Like a rechargeable battery, it must absorb light to glow in the dark, so the luminescent is not permanent. The brightness of the glow depends on factor like the intensity and the length of the light exposure. The glow gradually fades after 3-5 hours even under the most ideal conditions.
Super-LumiNova
Super-LumiNova is a Swiss development of LumiNova, it stands out for its higher performance and durability. Compared to LumiNova it remarkably brighter and the glow lasts longer compared to LumiNova. It does not degrade over time and can be recharged indefinitely, unlike tritium and radium. The C3 variant is the brightest and has largely replaced the earlier C1. As illustrated in the brightness chart, C3 delivers 100% brightness, followed by BG W9 (95%) and C5 (77%).Darker shades, such as dark green (29%), dark orange (27%), and dark red (18%), have the lowest brightness but provide unique aesthetic options.`
Chromalight
Rolex enhances luminescence by applying a bright white base beneath Chromalight, maximizing its glow. Introduced in 2008 and patented by Rolex, Chromalight ensures long-lasting readability, emitting a distinctive blue glow in darkness while appearing white in daylight.
Composed of aluminium, strontium, dysprosium, and europium, it absorbs ambient light and gradually releases it over time. The powdered material is heated to high temperatures, mixed with resin, and meticulously hand-applied to the hands and hour markers. Chromalight can last up to eight hours, which is more than double the duration of other luminescent materials
Electroluminescence occurs when an electric current passes through a phosphor, causing it to emit light. In watches, this effect is achieved by coating a glass or plastic panel with a phosphor and an electric conductor, then mounting it behind the dial. When activated—typically by pressing a button—the current flows through the panel, causing it to glow and illuminate the dial. This technology is most commonly found in digital watches, such as Timex analog models or G-SHOCK digital watches, making it a familiar feature for many watch enthusiasts.
Watch illumination has come a long way, moving from hazardous radioactive materials to safe and effective alternatives like LumiNova, Super-LumiNova, and Chromalight. These advancements have made watches brighter, longer-lasting, and completely safe to wear. Looking ahead, new materials and technologies could push things even further. Developments in nanotechnology or self-charging luminescence might one day allow watches to glow brighter and longer without needing an external light source. As watchmaking continues to evolve, so too will the ways in which we see time in the dark.
Formula 1 is often seen as the pinnacle of motorsport engineering, where every component of the car is optimized for maximum performance. Among these components, tyres play one of the most crucial roles. Unlike standard road car tyres, F1 tyres are designed for extreme speed, high temperatures, and rapid degradation to enhance racing strategy. In this article, we’ll dive into which tyres there are and how they influence the race outcomes.
WRITTEN BY RIXT HOFMAN
Italian manufacturer Pirelli has been the exclusive tyre supplier for Formula 1 since 2011, marking a return to the sport after previous stints in the 1950s, 1980s, and 1990s.
Pirelli was among the original tyre providers when the World Championship began in 1950, alongside several other brands that have come and gone over the decades. As F1 cars evolved, so too did tyre technology, keeping pace with the ever-increasing demands of the sport.
Unlike past eras that saw multiple manufacturers competing in intense “tyre wars,” Pirelli now serves as F1’s sole supplier, a role secured through an agreement extending until the end of the 2027 season.
As part of the major technical regulation changes in 2022, Formula 1 introduced all-new 18-inch tyres, replacing the previous 13-inch versions. Every aspect of these tyres, from profile and structure to the various compounds, was developed from scratch to suit the new generation of F1 cars.
Pirelli invested over 10,000 hours in indoor testing, 5,000 hours of simulation, and designed 70 virtual prototypes to refine the final product. In total, 30 different tyre specifications were tested across more than 20,000 kilometers before settling on the optimal design.
Continuous refinements followed, with further successful adjustments made throughout the 2023 and 2024 seasons to enhance performance and adaptability.
Pirelli has also prioritized research and development of sustainable tyre solutions in alignment with Formula 1’s goal of achieving Net Zero Carbon by 2030. The company became the first to produce a full range of Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)-certified tyres for motorsport, making F1 the first competition to adopt them.
Beyond their role in racing, Pirelli’s 18-inch tyres are more comparable to those used by everyday motorists. This alignment allows for a smoother transfer of technology from the track to the road, ensuring that the innovations driven by F1 continue to benefit the wider automotive industry.
Pirelli’s selection of 18-inch tyres for the 2025 season includes six slick compounds, ranging from hardest to softest: C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, and the newly introduced C6. Additionally, the range features intermediate tyres and full wet tyres designed for rainy conditions.
The C6, an ultra-soft compound, is tailored for specific street circuits. Drivers had the opportunity to test it during a special practice session at the 2024 Mexico City Grand Prix and the Abu Dhabi post-season test.
For each Grand Prix, Pirelli selects three compounds from the C1 to C6 range based on track characteristics and weather conditions. Tougher circuits typically see the hardest compounds in use, while less demanding tracks feature softer options.
Throughout the race weekend, the tyres are color-coded: the softest compound available is marked red and called the ‘soft’ tyre, the middle choice is marked yellow and referred to as the ‘medium,’ and the hardest compound is marked white and labeled as the ‘hard.’ Additionally, green is used for intermediate tyres, and blue denotes full wet tyres.
In theory, the soft compound provides the highest grip levels but wears out quickly, making it ideal for short, high-performance stints such as qualifying. On the other hand, the hard compound offers greater durability at the expense of grip, resulting in slower lap times but a longer lifespan.
During a race, teams typically favor the medium and hard compounds, as they provide a better balance between performance and longevity, allowing for more strategic flexibility across a Grand Prix.
On a normal Grand Prix weekend, each driver is given 13 sets of dry-weather tyres, along with four sets of intermediates and three sets of full wets to handle varying track conditions. Additionally, an extra set of soft tyres is allocated to those who reach Q3 in Qualifying. During the race, teams must use at least two different slick compounds, provided the track remains dry, adding a strategic element to pit stop planning.
For Sprint weekends, the tyre allocation is slightly adjusted. The total number of dry-weather sets is reduced to 12, distributed as two sets of hards, four sets of mediums, and six sets of softs. The wet-weather allocation remains seven sets, but with a revised breakdown of five intermediates and two full wets. These rules ensure teams carefully manage their tyres while adapting to different race formats throughout the season.
Modern F1 races are often decided by tyre strategy. Teams must choose the right compound based on factors like track temperature, asphalt roughness, and expected weather conditions.
Undercut Strategy: Pitting early for fresher tires to gain a speed advantage over competitors.
Overcut Strategy: Staying out longer on older tires, hoping to gain time while rivals pit.
One-Stop vs. Multi-Stop: Some teams aim to complete the race with fewer pit stops, while others prefer aggressive strategies with multiple tire changes.
Over the summer holiday, Simon Stevin launched a brand-new association website, bringing a modernized and more user-friendly digital experience to our members. This new platform, built on the Congressus software, offers numerous improvements over our previous system, enhancing both usability and functionality. Whether you’re a long-time member or a fresh face in the association, you’ll find navigating and interacting with the website easier than ever before.
WRITTEN BY STEFAN GEERTS
The previous website, while functional, was becoming outdated and lacked flexibility. Managing membership data, signing up for events, and handling payments required unnecessary manual work, both for members and the board. The move to Congressus brings several key improvements. The user experience has been significantly enhanced with a sleek and modern design, making it much easier to find information and sign up for events. Membership administration is now streamlined, eliminating the need for cumbersome spreadsheets and simplifying recordkeeping. Integrated payment options allow event registrations and membership fees to be handled directly through the website.
Additionally, members can now pay via auto-incasso or direct debit, which bundles all payments of a month together. This not only simplifies the payment process for members but also significantly reduces the administrative burden for the board, ensuring a smoother and more efficient financial workflow. The site is also fully responsive, ensuring a seamless experience on mobile devices. Security has been improved, incorporating modern authentication methods and data protection measures to keep member information safe.
For those who enjoy exploring technical possibilities, the Congressus platform offers a powerful API. This means the website is not just a static tool but can be extended and automated in innovative ways. Membership data can be synchronized with external tools such as mailing lists or internal dashboards, making communication and data management more efficient. Event processes can be automated, allowing for attendance lists to be generated and reminders to be sent out through various communication tools. The API also enables structured data extraction for statistical analysis, offering insights into member engagement and event popularity.
Alongside the new website, we are also introducing a brandnew Simon Stevin app. This mobile application is designed to seamlessly integrate with the website, offering a convenient way for members to stay connected. Through the app, users can easily view all upcoming activities and register for events with just a few taps. They can also respond to polls about special drinks or questions from the Board. One of the most exciting features is the ability to link photos to individual student profiles, allowing members to keep a personal archive of their association experiences. The app ensures that members never miss an update, providing real-time notifications and easy access to event details, making participation more engaging than ever before. With this app, the Simon Stevin experience is always at your fingertips.
The launch of our new website is just the beginning. With the powerful tools provided by Congressus, we will continue to refine and enhance the online experience for all our members. Whether you’re here for the convenience or the technical potential, this upgrade marks a significant step forward for Simon Stevin. If you have feedback or ideas for future improvements, let us know—we’d love to hear from you!
WRITTEN BY ANASTASIA GHLIGHVASHILI
The Energy Transition, Green Energy, and Low Carbon Footprint have become attention-catching buzzwords as humanity tries to take steps to reduce our carbon emissions and slow down the man-made effects of climate change. The most prevalent argument against the energy transition is renewable energy’s inability to meet the energy demand. However, this statement is shrouded in falsehood. Renewable energy is being expensively wasted. Balancing supply and demand with wind and solar farms is far more strenuous than traditional fossil fuels.
Variable changes such as fluctuating weather patterns have a great impact on when energy is produced, which does not align with energy demand. Between 2015 and 2021, the UK’s electricity system operator (ESO) curtailed, or discarded, over 13% of the total wind energy generated. In 2020 and 2021 curtailment was especially high, costing £806 million and wasting enough renewable electricity to power 800 000 homes (Energy, n.d.).
Furthermore, worldwide 66% of the primary energy used to create electricity is wasted by the time the electricity arrives at the customer (Shively, 2017). Nature bestows upon us enough energy to run our man-made machines, and it is our job to ensure an efficient energy transition through the utilization of energy storage.
This is no new discovery. A myriad of ideas, concepts, and inventions have been put into action to solve this problem. Batteries are not a foreign concept to anyone. Tesla’s Powerwall, a boxy, wall-mounted, lithium-ion battery, can power your home for about half a day (F. Service, 2023). But innovation is crucial, which is why researchers at MIT asked the question: what if your home was the battery?
What if it were possible to utilize two of humanity’s most ubiquitous historical materials, cement, and carbon black, to make way for a new age of energy storage (Chandler, 2023)? Researchers have come up with a new way to store electricity in cement, using cheap and abundant materials. If scaled up, the cement could hold enough energy in a home’s concrete foundation to fulfill its daily power needs. Scaled up further, electrified roadways could power electric cars as they drive.
The fundamental idea behind the discovery is the utilization of supercapacitors and one of the most-used materials in production, cement. Capacitors are fundamentally simple devices composed of two electrically conductive plates submerged in an electrolyte and separated by a membrane.
When a voltage is applied, positive ions from the electrolyte gather on the negatively charged plate, while negative ions accumulate on the positively charged plate. The membrane acts as a barrier, preventing ion migration and resulting in a charge separation that generates an electric field, effectively storing energy. These plates can retain their charge for extended periods and release it rapidly when required. Supercapacitors function similarly but can store significantly larger amounts of charge.
Global cement manufacturing is responsible for about 8% of the world’s total CO2 emissions (Purton, 2024). If it were to be utilized under an energy storage system, it may be able to offset its immense contributions to carbon pollution. A main concern in the utilization of concrete for the project is that cement, a primary ingredient in concrete, is typically a poor electrical conductor. The energy storage capacity of a capacitor is directly influenced by the surface area of its conductive plates. The innovation behind the new supercapacitors developed by researchers lies in a cement-based material engineered to have an exceptionally high internal surface area. This is achieved by integrating carbon black, a highly conductive substance, into a concrete mixture containing cement powder and water. As the mixture cures, the water creates a network of tiny channels within the structure, allowing the carbon to migrate and form intricate, wire-like conductive pathways. These pathways exhibit a fractal-like pattern, branching into increasingly smaller structures, which significantly expands the available surface area within a compact volume. To complete the process, the material is infused with an electrolyte, such as potassium chloride, which supplies charged particles that accumulate on the carbon structures.
An even more impressive advantage of the incorporation of carbon black into the structure is its price competitiveness. Previously, researchers had used highly conductive forms of carbon, such as graphene or carbon nanotubes, to achieve the same effect. However, while these materials improve conductivity, they are expensive
and hard to produce in large volumes. Thus, the cost-effectiveness of this material also makes it a promising alternative for energy storage in developing countries. “This puts us into a new space for energy storage at prices accessible anywhere in the world,” says Admir Masic, a chemist at MIT and co-author of the study. Currently, the cement-based energy storage devices are small, capable of powering only a few LED light bulbs. However, researchers are actively working on scaling up the technology. A 45-cubic-meter section of this electrified concrete, the typical volume used in a home’s foundation, could store approximately 10 kilowatt-hours of energy, sufficient to meet a household’s daily power needs. If implemented in infrastructure such as roads, parking lots, or driveways, this technology could store renewable energy and wirelessly transfer it to electric vehicles using inductive charging, much like smartphone wireless chargers. Similar systems are already being developed in Germany and the Netherlands.
However, in order to be able to make the technology viable at a larger scale, researchers need to address the challenge of maintaining electrical conductivity in larger supercapacitors. A potential solution is increasing the proportion of carbon black in the mix. This, unfortunately, comes with a tradeoff of lowering the material’s structural integrity. The team has determined that up to 10% carbon black can be added without significantly compromising the concrete’s strength (Chandler, 2023).
Alongside houses, the material can be weaved into other structures where cement does not play the main structural role. Concrete roadways could be a game-changer for powering electrical vehicles.
These supercapacitors have the capability to efficiently utilize the paramount of wasted renewable energy. The variability of solar, wind, and tidal power will no longer be a limitation, due to the ever-present supply of cement. The energy transition is reliant on innovation. This material is efficient and practical, making it a crucial factor for the implementation of renewables as humanity’s main energy source.
TU/e’s MyFuture platform is evolving to better support students in career preparation
With the introduction of the Career Desk for CV and LinkedIn checks, and the upcoming MyFuture Week packed with career-boosting events, now is the time to take the next step toward your professional future. Stay engaged and make the most of these opportunities!
WRITTEN BY STEFAN GEERTS
MyFuture Activities
You’ve probably heard about MyFuture Activities (MFA)—but do you know how they actually work? These career-related activities help you develop professional skills and gain valuable insights into the job market, all while earning MFA points. But not all activities are the same; they vary in depth and breadth, depending on their focus.
MFA activities are categorized into three levels:
Level 1: These include company workshops, and lectures, where you can gain useful insights but with a relatively focused scope.
Level 2: Activities like company visits and symposia provide deeper engagement, giving you firsthand exposure to industry environments.
Level 3: If you’re looking for an immersive career-oriented experience, activities such as international study trips and multi-day symposia provide the highest level of engagement and learning.
By participating in a mix of these activities, you not only earn MFA points but also take an active role in shaping your career path. Whether you’re just getting started or looking to deepen your industry connections, there’s an MFA activity suited for you. So, why not explore your options and make the most of what MyFuture has to offer?
The MyFuture Career Desk, launched in collaboration with Career Academy at the start of the academic year, serves as the central contact point for career orientation, employability, and skills development at TU/e. Located in Metaforum 1.370, next to the ESA desk, it provides students with support on MyFuture Activities (MFA), CV and LinkedIn feedback, cover letter reviews, career development opportunities, internships, and student jobs.
Since its opening on September 10, the Career Desk has seen a strong student response, with many seeking advice on topics such as finding relevant side jobs, connecting with future employers, preparing for job interviews, and salary negotiation. It offers a more structured and professional approach to career guidance, moving away from the previous informal CV check sessions. Students can now speak face-to-face with trained peers, allowing for personalized advice and immediate answers to their career-related questions.
Operating Monday through Thursday from 12:30 PM to 1:30 PM, the desk continues to grow in visibility, supported by promotional efforts and on-campus events. With positive feedback from students, the Career Desk is solidifying itself as a valuable resource for those looking to navigate their professional future with confidence.
MyFuture Week offers a valuable opportunity for students to actively engage in career development through a range of networking events, workshops, company presentations, and skill-building sessions. Whether you’re seeking to connect with industry professionals, explore potential career paths, or earn MyFuture Activity (MFA) points, this week provides the perfect platform to take meaningful steps toward your future.
F U T U . U E N
With a diverse lineup of events, students can gain practical insights, develop essential professional skills, and expand their network in an interactive setting. No matter where you are in your career journey, MyFuture Week is designed to help you make informed decisions and prepare for the next steps in your professional life.
WRITTEN BY WILLEMIJN VAN ROOIJ
Let’s look back to the Roaring 20s Gala!
On the 7th of February, 2025, the most dazzling gala took place at the Ketelhuis on Strijp-S. This year, the theme of the gala was the Roaring 20s, an era known for its jazz, glamour, and extravagant parties. Like in The Great Gatsby, we threw a celebration so grand that even Leonardo DiCaprio would have raised a toast in approval.
The evening began with a bang as Eddih took the stage, setting the perfect tone for the night. The Swifter Band then transported us straight to the jazz-filled speakeasies of the 1920s, bringing the smooth, swinging sounds of the era to life. In true Gatsby fashion, the dancefloor quickly filled with guests who had taken part in the pre-gala dance lessons. The lively jive, a popular dance of the time, perfectly matched the band’s upbeat rhythms, making everyone feel like they had stepped straight into a Charleston-filled soirée of the past.
Did you know that jazz was considered scandalous in the 1920s? It was seen as wild and rebellious, much like the flappers who embraced short dresses, bobbed hair, and a new sense of independence. At our gala, we fully embraced that same carefree spirit!
As the evening progressed, the Swifter Band made way for DJ Kazz and Kordaat, who brought the energy to a whole new level. While the 1920s may have been all about jazz, it was also the decade of secret speakeasies and underground parties where anything was possible. Our gala captured that same thrill as the beats intensified and the dancefloor pulsed with energy. And just when we thought the night couldn’t get any better, Mystery Beats delivered an electrifying closing set that ensured no one wanted to leave.
Of course, no Gatsby-inspired party would be complete without a well-stocked bar! The open bar kept the spirits flowing—some might say a little too well! It was a nod to the Prohibition era, when alcohol was banned, yet secret bars known as speakeasies flourished. Unlike those hidden spots of the past, we had no need to whisper passwords to bartenders—drinks were in abundance, and the guests sparkled all night.
To immortalize the magic of the evening, a photobooth captured every moment of laughter, friendship, and pure joy. Whether it was a group of friends striking a dramatic Gatsby pose or a candid shot of guests mid-dance, these snapshots will serve as cherished mementos of an unforgettable night.
As F. Scott Fitzgerald once wrote, “A little party never killed nobody.” And this gala? It was nothing short of legendary. A night of glamour, music, and endless celebration—one that will be remembered for years to come!
In today’s digital landscape, ransomware attacks have become a formidable threat to large corporations. These cyber-attacks involve malicious actors encrypting a company’s data and demanding payment for its release. This predicament leaves organizations grappling with a critical question: to pay or not to pay the ransom?
WRITTEN BY VIDE PAPAC
A ransomware attack can have devastating consequences for companies. Operational disruptions are the first thing we think of. The shutdown of Critical Services and loss of Data Access can result in the shutdown of production lines. Employees may be locked out of crucial files and systems, delaying work, and without backups, some companies never fully recover. On top of the standstill, the attack can also induce financial, reputational, and legal damage. Some companies lose millions in revenue from halted operations and sometimes pay even more as ransom money.
The repercussions of a cyberattack on a company can be catastrophic. Beyond the immediate financial losses and operational halts, such incidents can push organizations toward bankruptcy. While it’s easy to dismiss the plight of large corporations losing millions, assuming their vast reserves can absorb the blow, the reality is more complex. These attacks don’t solely impact the wealthy; they ripple down to affect lower-earning employees as well. In extreme cases, especially with cyberattacks on hospitals, lives are at stake. Disruptions in digital systems can delay critical procedures and obscure essential medical records, leading to fatal outcomes.
It is the 27th of May 2023 when the first attack is executed on the company MOVEit, a renowned managed file transfer software, entrusted with the world’s most sensitive data. Unbeknownst to its users, MOVEit had become the latest target of the notorious Cl0p ransomware syndicate.
For years, Cl0p had been honing their craft, meticulously planning an assault that would exploit a critical SQL injection vulnerability within MOVEit—a flaw they had been eyeing since 2021. This vulnerability allowed them to infiltrate the system without detection, planting malicious web shells that granted them unrestricted access to extensive amounts of confidential information.
Unlike typical ransomware attacks, which encrypt data and demand payment for decryption, Cl0p employed a more insidious tactic. They exfiltrated the data, threatening to publish it on their dark web platform, “Cl0p^_-Leaks”. This method left organizations with a harrowing dilemma: pay the ransom or risk exposing sensitive information to the world. And then, of course, there’s no guarantee that Cl0p will actually follow through on its promise.
The aftermath was catastrophic. Thousands of organizations found themselves compromised, and the personal data of nearly 100 million individuals hung in the balance. The ripple effects were felt across industries, from finance to healthcare, as companies scrambled to assess the damage and protect their stakeholders.
Whether Cl0p actually received their ransom money or not is unclear but if they did, an estimate for the amount would be 75 to 100 million dollars.
In the early hours of May 7, 2021, as dawn’s first light touched the Eastern Seaboard, an unseen threat infiltrated the heart of America’s energy infrastructure. Colonial Pipeline, a critical artery supplying approximately 45% of the East Coast’s fuel, had fallen prey to a ransomware attack. The culprits: a collective known as DarkSide.
The breach was traced back to a single compromised password linked to an outdated VPN account that did not have 2FA enabled. This seemingly minor lapse became the gateway for DarkSide to inject their malicious code, seizing control of Colonial’s digital operations. In a preemptive move to contain the threat, the company initiated a complete shutdown of its pipeline system, a decision with far-reaching consequences.
On May 9, U.S. President Joe Biden declared a state of emergency. DarkSide released a statement that did not directly mention the attack, but claimed that “our goal is to make money, and not creating problems for society.”
On May 10, Georgia Governor Brian Kemp declared a state of emergency.
On May 11, 71% of filling stations in the Areas from northern South Carolina to southern Virginia are running out of fuel.
On May 12, Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and U.S. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm both cautioned against gasoline hoarding. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission advised people to “not fill plastic bags with gasoline” or to use any containers not meant for fuel. Biden signed Executive Order 14028, increasing software security standards for sales to the government, tightening detection and security on existing systems, improving information sharing and training, establishing a Cyber Safety Review Board, and improving incident response.
Under mounting pressure, Colonial Pipeline made the contentious decision to pay a ransom of approximately $4.4 million in Bitcoin(overseen by the FBI). Upon payment, DarkSide provided a decryption tool, but its sluggish performance compelled the company to rely on its own backups to restore operations. Joseph
Blount said why he ultimately decided to pay a $4.4 million ransom; “It was the right thing to do for the country.” He also said, “I know that’s a highly controversial decision”. Gebruiken als infographic?
On May 12, 5 p.m., The restart of pipeline operations began. Marking the beginning of the end of one of the most significant cyberattacks on U.S. critical infrastructure to date.
On May 15, All Colonial Pipeline systems and operations had returned to normal.
On May 18, Around 10,600 gas stations were still without gas.
In the aftermath, the U.S. Department of Justice announced the recovery of 63.7 Bitcoins, approximately $2.3 million, from the ransom payment. This partial reclamation offered a glimmer of hope.
Determining whether to pay a ransom following a cyberattack is a complex decision. While immediate financial losses and operational disruptions can be severe, and even higher than the amount demanded by the criminals, paying the ransom does not guarantee data recovery and may inadvertently fund and encourage further criminal activities.
Authorities like the National Cyber Security Centre generally advise against paying ransoms. Emphasizes that payments may not be lawful and do not ensure the return of data.
In light of these considerations, organizations are encouraged to focus on preventive measures and incident response planning. However while authorities generally advise against paying ransoms due to legal and ethical concerns, organizations may consider payment under certain circumstances. For example In sectors like healthcare, where prolonged downtime can jeopardize patient care, paying the ransom might be viewed as the quickest way to restore essential services.
Ultimately, the decision to pay or not to pay a ransom is complex and should be made carefully, under the supervision of law enforcement and relevant authorities.
You might have heard it on the news already, but there are severe budget cuts for the higher education in the Netherlands. This is what the new cabinet’s outline agreement included. The most famous and also most controversial budget cut was the long study fine. Luckily, this one is already cancelled. But still, there are hundreds of millions of euros that need to be cut from the higher education in the Netherlands. This article will dive deeper in what that means for the TU/e, and what the current financial state is of the university.
WRITTEN BY LUCAS HASELHOFF
After several years of running surpluses, including a profit of 21.6 million euros in 2022, the TU/e reported a loss of 1.5 million euros in 2023. This loss was actually significantly lower than expected, as the 2023 budget had predicted a deficit of 27.3 million euros. This is not a good sign, and it will only get worse if nothing is done. For the year 2025, the deficit is predicted to be around the same as the two years before. 27.1 million euros to be exact. The rising costs are mainly driven by high inflation over the past two years, which has increased prices on everything. Additionally, the large salary increases agreed upon in the collective labour agreement also contribute to this. The big problem is, revenues can’t keep up with these growing expenses. To set an example, the TU/e’s total salary costs were 320 million euros in 2022, increasing by 12 percent to 359 million euros in 2023. For 2024, This rose with another 9 percent to 392 million. Finally, for the year 2025 expected salary costs are again 6 percent higher, rising to 416 million euros. These higher costs are only partially compensated by a rising government contribution and tuition fees.
This doesn’t directly mean that the university is in big financial problems, because there’s quite some money in the bank. At the end of 2023, these ‘liquid assets’ amounted to 150.8 million euros. With this amount of money in the bank, the big deficits should be relatively fine. But a lot of money is also needed for investments, including the construction and renovation of buildings on campus, which quickly makes the money disappear. The ‘Campus Strategy 2030’ states that the TU/e should have more student housing. In terms of money, this means that there is a significant increase in so-called ‘tangible fixed assets’, this entails land, buildings, machines, technical installations etc. At the end of 2023, the university had 392 million euros worth of these tangible fixed assets. In the year 2028, this should increase to an amount of 800 million euros.
So, cuts will have to be made. These cuts will be made in hiring 1st tier external staff. Also, there is an expected decline in the number of Postdoctorals and EngDs, because the cuts hit the start-ups and research the most. All of the departments and services have been told to make cuts of about 2 percent for four consecutive years. What this exactly will be, is not known yet, since the plans of the government have not been finalised.
What does this mean for the future? Well, to make things a bit more prosperous, the prognosis made in the multiannual budget 2025-2029 (MAB) from the university is that from 2027 onwards, the budget should be balanced again. This is mainly because of investments from ASML. ASML will invest a total of 80 million euro in collective research to train more PhD candidates and a contribution to a new cleanroom building. Also, the MAB states that 50 million euros will be left of the 150 million at the end of 2028.
Finally, the TU/e will borrow money. And this is no child’s play. The long-term debt will skyrocket from 93 million euros to 468 million euros by 2028. The growing debt puts massive pressure on the university’s financial health. The solvency ratio, which is the ratio between borrowed capital (loan) and equity, was 43 percent at the end of 2023. Due to the increasing loans, this ratio will drop to 20 percent in 2028. That’s way below the standard of 32 percent that is considered safe.
The big question is whether these cuts will stop here. After all, the new cabinet wants to structurally save over a billion euros in higher education. The universities are, of course, resisting these plans. But if they go ahead, the cuts will run even deeper.
To not make you too scared about the future of the university, there is also good news. This is called ‘The Beethoven project’, or you can also call it ‘The Big Bag of Money project’. For this plan, the previous cabinet has made 2.51 billion euros available for investments in education, knowledge and spatial infrastructure. With this project, the government want to strengthen the Dutch microchip sector and support further growth of activi-
ties in Brainport Eindhoven. The regions Brainport (Eindhoven), Delft, Twente and Groningen have to increase their outflow of master students to the semicon sector. For the TU/e this means that there needs to be a growth in the master’s programs at Applied Physics, Electrical Engineering, Mathematics & Computer Science and Mechanical Engineering of around 1900 master students in 2030. To put this into perspective, in 2023, the TU/e counted 5000 master students in total. So in 7 years time, the amount of master students need to grow with 38%. For Mechanical Engineering, this means that we have to double our outflow of master students. This is one of the most difficult challenge the university is facing today.
In terms of money, this means that the region Eindhoven will receive around 450 million euros for the growth of the semicon sector. The TU/e will receive a total of well above 90 million euros to be spend on education, new labs, better student recruitment, and more professional and scientific staff. The TU/e is the university that receives the most amount of money from this project, since we are in the heart of the semicon sector. In the coming two years, the TU/e will receive about 11 million to spend on this. What comes with this rise in students, is of course a rise in income for tuition fee. This is already budgeted 12.8 million higher than last year, which is a 31 percent increase.
In short, this all means that the TU/e needs to grow whilst being hit with significant budget cuts. Luckily, thanks to Project Beethoven, the TU/e is probably the university who gets away with it the best. However, Project Beethoven is not a solution to our current financial deficit.
Sense and nonsense in Technology
People require salary and need breaks. However, robots don’t. Robots do exactly what you want them to do. So why not replace whatever jobs you can with robots?
Carlo Ratti developed the Makr Shakr Robot together with MIT, Coca-Cola and Bacardi Rum. After further development of an earlier prototype, the robot bar is now ready to serve the masses. The bar is built-in in a standard sea container, which makes it easily transportable. The only requirements for installing the bar are a power supply and an internet connection.
The robot is completely autonomous and visitors can order their drinks via a smartphone app. Through this app customers can even compose their
own drinks. The possibilities are almost endless, since there are more than forty ingredients.
When an order is entered, the robot starts moving to fill the cocktail shaker. Afterwards, the robot can shake, stir or sift the cocktail. The cocktails that are being prepared are shown real-time on two screens. Customers can rate the cocktails, leave their comments and share cocktail recipes.
Want to see how this cocktail robot works?
Scan the QR-code for a link to the video.
Robbert Louwers
Who says that robots always have to be useful? Well, Simone Giertz, a Swedish inventor, has a YouTube channel where she posts videos of self-made robots that are all completely useless.
She has gotten quite popular and is now known by “the queen of shitty robots”. She builds robots that are mechanically correct, but they show us that it will take some time before every part of our lives can be automated. The robots she makes are very diverse. For example, she made a tooth brushing machine which basically is just a helmet on your head with a motor that moves the toothbrush for you. She also made a robot that can help you with arguing on the internet. This robot is a face that is being rolled over a keyboard.
According to her, the reason that she builds these robots is because it is the only way for her to get the ideas out of her head. Scan the QR code to take a look at her channel and get some inspiration to spend your next SEB-time (Study Evading Behaviour) on!
Elon Musk’s Space X has not been idle after its recent developments with the re-usable Falcon 9 rocket. The company now wants to create a world-wide internet network by launching thousands of satellites. The first goal is to launch 800 satellites to create better and faster internet in the USA. Later, they want to increase the amount to 4425 satellites for world-wide internet coverage. This satellite network would be a first step towards internet accessibility on other planets, since Space X’s long term goal is to send people to Mars.
Letting this many satellites orbit around the earth is a challenge itself, since currently only about 1400 operating satellites orbit the earth. Thus the amount Space X wants to launch would quadruple this amount, making it very packed in space.
To be able to create fast connections, Space X wants the satellites to orbit closer
to the earth than common satellites, at a distance of only 1200 km from earth. The establishment of such a satellite internet network would cost 10 billion dollars according to Space X themselves. It is not yet known when Space X is planning to launch the first satellites or who is going to fund this project.
Almost everyone knows Transformers from the several successful movies. Now you wouldn’t think it is possible that such robot cars would ever exist, but the opposite is true.
A Turkish company, Letvision, converted a BMW M3 to a real Transformer, called the Letron. With one press on the button, the car transforms into a standing robot. In its car form, the car is still fully functional and can be used to drive around. In its
robot form, the Letron is a bit stiff but it can turn its head and move its arms.
For now, the Letron is the only working Transformer and it still is a prototype, but the company is working on building more Transformers based on BMWs. With the following prototypes, they are also hoping to give the robot more uses than only being able to turn its head and move its arms. A release date and price tag is still unknown.
Battlebots was aired on TV for five seasons in 2000 until 2002. In the series, robots fight each other in a death match. Competitors had to build their own robot which they could control from the side of the arena. In the arena where the robots battled there were some traps hidden to destroy the battlebots, for example using flamethrowers and crushers. The robots that battled in the arena could use any kind of weapons to destroy their enemies. Spinning blades, robots that used spiked hammers or spinning robots, they were all present.
Many fans wanted the series to be back on television and after thirteen years the show aired again in 2015, to see how it would be received by the public.
Because the reactions on this were positive, a new series started in June
Professor Maarten Steinbuch, from the TU/e is going to invest half a million euros in the development of a robot that can remove bone cancer from a patient by itself. Professor Steinbuch has received the Simon Stevin Mastership in November 2016, with which comes the prize of half a million euros which he can invest in research.
The robot will be much more precise than any human could ever be. When this operation is performed by a surgeon he has to be very careful with drilling and milling because he could hit nerves which would paralyze the patient.
The robot works by using X-ray images and the research focuses on developing a robot that can do the whole operation by itself, without the need of human intervention.
2016 and episodes are now also being streamed online on abc.com.
Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, is one of Germany’s most remarkable examples of industrial transformation. Located in the Ruhr region, this former ironworks site has been transformed into a multifunctional public park that seamlessly integrates industrial heritage, recreational spaces, and ecological restoration. Spanning approximately 180 hectares, This article explores the history, transformation, attractions, and significance of Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord.
WRITTEN BY RIXT HOFMAN
Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord is situated on the site of the former Thyssen Ironworks, which operated from 1901 until its closure in 1985. The ironworks played a crucial role in Germany’s industrial expansion, contributing to the production of steel and iron that fueled the nation’s economic growth. However, with the decline of heavy industry in the late 20th century, the facility was decommissioned, leaving behind an extensive industrial wasteland.
Rather than demolishing the site, local authorities and planners saw an opportunity to repurpose it into an innovative public space. In 1991, landscape architect Peter Latz was commissioned to design a park that would preserve the site’s industrial heritage while promoting environmental and recreational uses. His visionary approach integrated the existing structures into the landscape, creating a park that is both an open-air museum and a thriving ecological habitat.
Before its transformation into a public park the Thyssen Ironworks operated a fully integrated steel production facility that played a crucial role in Germany’s heavy industry. The site housed multiple blast furnaces, coke ovens, casting halls, and rail transport systems, all designed to support large-scale iron and steel manufacturing.
The core industrial process began with the smelting of iron ore in the blast furnaces, which reached temperatures exceeding 1,500°C. The furnaces were continuously supplied with iron ore, coke, and limestone, leading to the extraction of molten iron, which was then transported to casting halls for further processing. Large-scale gasometers stored byproducts such as blast furnace gas, which were used to power other industrial operations on-site. Railway networks and conveyor systems facilitated the seamless movement of raw materials and finished products, enabling the Thyssen Ironworks to supply the automotive, construction, and machinery sectors with high-quality steel.
The transformation of Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord is a testament to adaptive reuse and sustainable urban design. Unlike conventional parks that rely on manicured gardens and artificial landscaping, Landschaftspark embraces the raw, industrial aesthetic of the former ironworks. The park’s design incorporates rusting blast furnaces, towering chimneys, and abandoned railway tracks, turning them into unique attractions rather than demolishing them.
One of the most remarkable aspects of the park’s design is its integration of nature. Over the years, vegetation has gradually reclaimed parts of the industrial complex, creating a striking juxtaposition between man-made structures and natural growth. This approach not only preserves the site’s historical identity but also fosters biodiversity, making it a haven for plants, birds, and insects.
One of the park’s most iconic attractions is the opportunity to climb Blast Furnace . A series of staircases and platforms allow visitors to ascend to the top, offering panoramic views of the Ruhr region. The ascent provides a unique perspective on the industrial landscape and showcases the site’s engineering marvels.
At night, Landschaftspark is transformed into a mesmerizing spectacle with a lighting installation designed by British artist Jonathan Park. The illumination highlights the industrial structures with al sorts of colors, creating an almost surreal atmosphere. This nighttime display has made the park very popular.
Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord has had a profound impact on urban planning and landscape architecture, influencing similar projects worldwide. Its success has demonstrated that industrial heritage sites can be revitalized without erasing their past, offering a unique blend of history, nature, and recreation.
Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord is a remarkable example of industrial transformation done right. By preserving its historical structures, promoting ecological restoration, and offering diverse recreational opportunities, the park has become a symbol of innovation and sustainability. Whether you love history, or you are a nature lover, or an adventure seeker, Landschaftspark offers an unforgettable experience that celebrates the coexistence of industry and nature. As cities around the world grapple with post-industrial landscapes, Landschaftspark serves as an inspiring blueprint for sustainable urban redevelopment.
Futoshiki is a board-based puzzle game, also known under the name Unequal. The purpose of the game is to discover the digits hidden inside the board’s cells; each cell is filled with a digit between 1 and 6. The arrows indicate if a number is greater or smaller in the cell next to it. On each row and column each digit appears exactly once. Good luck!
Toroidal Sudoku follows standard Sudoku rules: fill a 9×9 grid so that each row, column, and special region contains the numbers 1-9 exactly once. Unlike regular Sudoku, the 3×3 regions are irregularly shaped and can wrap around the grid edges, forming a toroidal (donut-like) pattern. This means some regions are disconnected but still follow the rule of uniqueness, making the puzzle more challenging. Enjoy playing!
Odd-Even Sudoku follows standard Sudoku rules: fill a 9×9 grid so that each row, column, and 3×3 box contains the numbers 1-9 exactly once. Additionally, some cells are shaded to indicate that they must contain only even numbers (2, 4, 6, 8), while unshaded cells can contain only odd numbers. This extra constraint adds a unique logical challenge to the puzzle. Have fun!
Submit your answer and win a SONY WH-CH720N!
The first hint provides 8 different combinations that multiply to 36.
Next, using the second hint, you calculate the sum of each combination. Although the exact sum is unknown, you notice that all but two sums are unique. Since the Board knew the number of bottles in the storeroom, a unique sum would have revealed the code. However, they asked for more hints, meaning the hallway number must match the only sum that appears more than once.
This leaves two possible combinations: 1, 6, 6 and 2, 2, 9.
The final hint states that the smallest number must be unique, which is only true for 1, 6, 6.
To verify, the last hint mentions that when the combination is reas backwards it should be prime. Since 661 is a prime number, the answer is confirmed.
The correct answer was 1, 6, 6
e ProBoKoCo has kidnapped one of the members from the Beer Brewing committee hoping to learn where they keep their special recipe for one of their beers.
But you, as one of the members of the BACo also want to have this recipe. So the CoBA sends you to spy on them. e member of the Beer Brewing committee is also one of your friends and because of that you can tell if he is lying or not. e ProBoKoCo holds the member of the beer brewing committee prison in In Vivo, you are in De Weeghconst. From your spot in De Weeghconst, you can see the member of the beer brewing committee, but you cannot hear him. You can only hear the person from the ProBoKoCo because they are just close enough to be heard.
e ProBoKoCo member says that they already know that the recipe is in one of the lockers between 13 and 1300. ey ask the member of the Beer Brewing committee if the number is less than 500.
You can’t hear what the answer is but you can see that the member of the Beer Brewing committee is lying. e member of the ProBoKoCo on the contrary believes him.
en he asks if the number is a perfect square (e.g. 4x4). You again cannot hear the answer but you can see that the member of the Beer brewing committee is lying. And the member of the ProBoKoCo again falls for his answer.
en the question is if the number is a perfect cube (e.g. 4x4x4). When he answers you see that he nods yeas and that he is telling the truth. e last question is whether the second digit of the number is a 1, but while he is asking the question he stands up, you now cannot see the member of the beer brewing committee anymore. A er this the member of the ProBoKoCo leaves In Vivo and you hear him scream that he has got the answer.
You then know that they have the wrong number but can you gure out the right one and retrieve the recipe yourself?
Submit your answer via an e-mail to redactie@simonstevin. tue.nl with your name and the solution. The prize will be raffled from the correct submissions and the correct answer will be published in the next winning contest.
Make sure to submit your answer before the 30th of April 2025! The winner will be notified and announced via the social media channels of Simon Stevin.