Join Us in Newport Beach, California! NAFA 2016 Annual Convention
www.nafahq.org â–ª The source for expertise, education and standards in air filtration
National Air Filtration Association
Chair, Marketing & Membership Robert Martin, CAFS
Michelle Czosek, CAE NAFA Executive Director
Designer and Content Editor Terry Driscoll
Air Media magazine is published three times per year by the National Air Filtration Association. Annual dues are $520 for Active Membership and $945 for Associate Membership; dues include a paid subscription to Air Media. Air Media provides a forum for the free exchange of opinions and information. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of NAFA, its officers, directors, membership or staff. Your contributions help make this magazine an interesting and informative forum for exchanging ideas and recognizing the advancements in our industry. Neither NAFA nor Air Media is responsible for claims made in advertisements. Editorial and advertising closing dates are the 1st of the month prior to issue.
National Air Filtration Association (NAFA) Headquarters 22 N. Carroll Street, Suite 300 Madison, Wisconsin 53703 Phone: 608-310-7542 Fax: 608-310-7545 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Table of Contents Features In-situ residential HVAC filtration efficiency for fine and ultrafine particles
NAFA Guidelines: Recommended Practices for Filtration for Airborne Infections Containment Rooms in Health Care Facilities
NAFA member booths during AHR Expo
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
2016 Annual Convention
Departments Presidentâ€™s Message
Welcome to NAFA
2016 Board of Directors
Industry Calendar of Events
From the Executive Director
Surf’s up! by Jeron Downing, CAFS, Dave Downing & Associates
“Waves are not measured in feet and inches, they are measured in increments of fear” – Buzzy Trent
The 2016 NAFA annual conference in Newport Beach is quickly approaching. The focus on the annual meeting is geared more towards the broad business environment and not just technical filter information. It’s a way to spend more time with fellow members and discuss “industry chatter” over lunch versus sitting in the conference room with stale hotel coffee! This beautiful beach destination offers us the perfect setting to do so. The macro environment in 2016 has sent tidal waves through the industry. AAF surprised the industry by announcing the purchase of Flanders making AAF an industry giant, both in the USA and abroad. ASHRAE continues to fight off advances of ISO to replace the 52.2 test we know today. And, to top it off, political pressure during this Presidential race leaves businesses uncertain of changing regulation and taxation. What are we to do? Buzzy Trent, a famous big wave surfer said, “Waves are not measured in feet and inches, they are measured in increments of fear.” While big mergers make a big splash, do they affect your business? When you stop and think about your business today, are you being led by fear of the unknown, or do you plan for the changing environment. There is no way to predict everything around you, but you can bolster your business by building solid relationships with customers and living by the golden rule.
“Wiping out is an under-appreciated skill,” said Laird Hamilton, another big wave surfer. In a sense, everyone is going to have to overcome obstacles and failure, but how you pick yourself up and learn from it will separate you from your competition. Challenge yourself and your organization to regularly attend NAFA conferences to stay on the cutting edge and know what’s going on in the industry. After all, you can’t learn everything from your favorite search engine! Be on the lookout for the new NAFA e-newsletter, called “The Filter Advisor”. It includes details about what’s happening within NAFA, reminders about upcoming conferences such as the AHR Expo, and featured articles from our members. We are always looking for fresh content so please reach out to Michelle Czosek or Terry Driscoll if you are interested in providing content. Hope the sun is shining and the surfs up! See you in Newport Beach, California. ■
Jeron Downing NAFA President
NAFA Air Media
Welcome to NAFA!
2016 Board of Directors
Rich Scott, CAFS
National Trade Supply Greenwood, Indiana
Techniques, Inc. Roseau, Minnesota
Jeron Downing, CAFS
Dave Downing & Associates 130 North 39th Avenue Phoenix, AZ 85009 602-264-5100 Fax 602-241-7500 email@example.com www.davedowning.com
Timmy Lott, CAFS, NCT II
Associate Gary Chu
Gabo Filters, Inc. Upland, California
Pure Air Filter Sales & Service 204 Eastman Street Greenwood, MS 38935 662-453-0034 Fax: 662-453-8199 firstname.lastname@example.org www.pureairco.com
Jay Reese, CAFS
General Mike Garcia
TFM Consultants International, Ltd. Langley, British Columbia Canada
Arlene Jacobs Kelly Services Troy, Michigan
Professional Individual Michael Corbat, CAFS Custom Filter, LLC Aurora, Illinois
3M Purification, Inc. 400 Research Parkway Meriden, CT 06450 612-716-1001 email@example.com www.3MPurification.com
Trey Fly, CAFS, NCT II
Joe W. Fly Co., Inc. 4820 Memphis Street Dallas, TX 75207 214-634-2200 Fax: 214-634-7928 firstname.lastname@example.org www.joeflyco.com
Immediate Past President
Christopher A. Zaker, CAFS, NCT Glasfloss Industries, Inc. 2168 Commerce Street Lancaster, OH 43130 740-687-1100 x 116 Fax 740-687-1145 email@example.com www.glasfloss.com
Tom Justice, CAFS, NCT Zene 112 Point Shore Drive Goldsboro, NC 27534 919-740-6308 firstname.lastname@example.org
Patrick Rosenthal, CAFS
TEX-AIR Filters/Air Relief Technologies 2209-A Rutland Drive Austin, TX 78758 512-833-3330 Fax: 512-833-3335 email@example.com www.texairfilters.com
North Central Region
Robert Martin, CAFS
Kimberly Clark Corporation 1400 Holcomb Bridge Road Roswell, GA 30076 770-587-7383 Fax: 770-587-7241 firstname.lastname@example.org www.kcfiltration.com
South Central Region Ray Riopel, CAFS
B. C. Air Filter, Ltd. 2809 Norland Avenue Burnaby, BC V5B 3A9 Canada 604-435-4396 Fax: 604-291-2510 email@example.com www.bcairfilter.com
Nathan Wittman, CAFS, NCT Filter Technology Company, Inc. 9018-B Scranton Street Houston, TX 77075 713-910-1395 Fax: 713-910-0071 firstname.lastname@example.org www.filtertexas.com
Julie Engelstad, CAFS
Fiber Bond Corporation 110 Menke Road Michigan City, IN 46360 219-879-4541 Fax: 219-874-7502 email@example.com www.fiberbond.net
Ruben A. Cespedes, CAFS
RCA Ltd. Av. 11 de Setiembre 2214, Of. 149 Providencia, Santiago Chile 011 56 2 335-0418 Fax: 011 56 2 335-7733 firstname.lastname@example.org www.rcaltd.cl
In-situ residential HVAC filtration efficiency for fine and ultrafine particles by Torkan Fazli and Brent Stephens, Ph.D. Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL Built Environment Research Group | www.built-envi.com
Human exposure to airborne fine particles (i.e., PM2.5, or the mass concentration of particles smaller than 2.5 µm) and ultrafine particles (i.e., UFPs, or the number concentration of particles smaller than 0.1 µm) are consistently linked to a variety of adverse health effects including asthma exacerbation, cardiopulmonary mortality, lung cancer, and stroke.1–3 Although these associations are typically made using outdoor particle concentrations, much of human exposure to airborne particles actually occurs indoors, particularly in residences.4–6 This is because (i) people spend most of their time at home,7 (ii) particles of outdoor origin can infiltrate and persist in residences with varying efficiencies,8 and (iii) there are also many indoor sources of airborne particles of various sizes in residences, including smoking, cooking, burning incense and candles, operating office equipment, indoor oxidative chemistry, and resuspension from settled dust.6 The combination of all of these impacts makes particulate matter exposure inside residences likely the most important indoor pollutant for human health, according to one recent estimate.9
High-efficiency particle air filtration in central heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems is increasingly being used to reduce concentrations of particulate matter of both indoor and outdoor origin inside residences. However, questions remain about their effectiveness for reducing indoor particle concentrations in homes operating under realistic occupied conditions. For one, the predominant filter test standard in the U.S., ASHRAE Standard 52.2-2012 and its Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV) metric, only characterizes removal efficiency for particles 0.3-10 µm in size, although the vast majority of particles present in both indoor and outdoor environments (by number) are smaller than 0.3 µm.10–13 The same issues are true for other filter test standards such as AHRI 68014 as well as a variety of rating systems that have been developed by air filter manufacturers and retailers. For example, 3M uses a “Microparticle Performance Rating” (MPR) to characterize its products. The MPR measures the ability of an air filter to capture particles 0.3 to 1 μm in size. The retailer Home Depot uses
a “Filter Performance Rating” (FPR) to characterize its air filtration products. FPR ranges from 1 to 10 based on the weighted air filter performance of large particle removal (60%), small particle removal (30%), and weight gain/lifetime (10%).15 A comparison between the MERV rating system and MPR and FPR is shown in Table 1.16 A number of questions remain regarding how residential HVAC filters perform in real environments. First, it remains to be seen how filters rated by these test standards perform for removing finer (e.g., ultrafine) particles in addition to the typical 0.3 µm to 10 µm size ranges. Second, filters installed in central residential HVAC systems may be subject to different face velocities, particle concentrations, particle compositions, and environmental conditions that do not reflect test conditions in Standard 52.2.17 Third, filters may also experience substantial bypass airflow in poorly constructed filter housings in residential installations.18 Given these issues with existing air filtration test standards, we have been utilizing a simple in-situ test method to measure the size-resolved single-pass particle removal efficiency
Table 1. Comparison of common rating systems used for residential HVAC filters MERV
ASHRAE Minimum Initial Efficiency
0.3 – 1 µm
1 - 3 µm
3 – 10 µm
75 – 95%
Black 2200 Navy Blue 1900 Purple 1500
8 - 9 Purple
80 – 90%
65 – 79%
50 – 64%
Light Blue 600
70 – 85%
50 – 69%
35 – 49%
MERV 0 - 5
20 – 34%
NAFA Air Media
Figure 1. Section view, plan view, and photo of the experimental setup.
over a wide range of fine and ultrafine particle sizes (from 0.01 to 2.5 µm) of a wide range of commercially available filters for use in residential buildings.19 Here we briefly report on the test method and some preliminary results.
The measurements are relatively straightforward. Indoor particle concentrations are elevated inside a ~650 ft 2 unoccupied apartment unit on the campus of Illinois Institute of Technology, and size-resolved particle concentrations (from ~10 nm to ~10 µm) are measured upstream and downstream of the filter using a combination of a TSI NanoScan Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS) and a TSI Optical Particle Sizer (OPS). A 100% recirculating central air-handling unit is installed in the living room and connected to interior rigid sheet metal
ductwork. The system is not connected to a heating or cooling system, but it is designed to mimic a typical residential air handler and distribution system. The air-handling unit can accommodate 16” x 25” filters with depths ranging from 1” to 5” (or more). Particles are generated into a 3 ft × 1 ft × 2 ft chamber that is installed in front of the return plenum through a combination of burning incense and operating a TSI Model 8026 particle generator to aerosolize NaCl particles. Each test is conducted for approximately 1 hour. Upstream and downstream concentrations are measured through an automated electronically actuated sampling system connected to the aerosol instruments using conductive tubing. Each sampling period is set for 4 minutes, providing a total of 8 minutes per upstream/downstream combination, or
about 7 complete upstream/downstream cycles within 1 hour of testing. The size-resolved single-pass particle removal efficiency is then calculated in each particle size bin (approximately 20 bins total) for each 8-minute sampling period by subtracting the ratio of the average downstream concentration to the average upstream concentration from unity. The average size-resolved removal efficiency is then reported as the average removal efficiency across all 7 sampling periods for a given filter test. In both upstream and downstream sampling periods, the first minute of data are discarded to ensure that the sampling lines were cleared from the previous measurement. Size-resolved removal efficiencies for each test filter is reported as an average and standard deviation across the 7 combined upstream/ downstream sample periods. Figure
Figure 2. Mean and standard deviation of size-resolved in-situ particle removal efficiency measured for 9 filters labeled with MERV.
Figure 3. Mean and standard deviation of size-resolved in-situ particle removal efficiency measured for 3 filters labeled with MPR and 4 filters labeled with FPR.
1 shows drawings and a photo of the experimental setup. Realistically, given challenges in aerosolizing large particles in real environments, we are typically able to calculate removal efficiencies for particles from 10 nm to about 3 Âľm, which provides a dataset for both fine and ultrafine particles. For each filter test, airflow rates and filter pressure drop are also measured and recorded. Filter pressure drop is measured using an Energy Conservatory DG-700 differential pressure gauge connected to ambient indoor air on one end and to a pressure tap just a few inches downstream of the filter (in the return plenum) on the other end. The airflow rate is estimated for each test by measuring the pressure in the supply
plenum and relating back to TrueFlow plate measurements. Temperature and relative humidity in the room is measured throughout each test using an Onset HOBO U12. Air velocity measurements were also taken with a Fluke air velocity meter (Model #975) to confirm that isokinetic sampling is being achieved within a reasonable range (i.e., ~10%).
To date, we have successfully measured size-resolved fine and ultrafine particle removal efficiency of 16 commercially available residential filters. These filters are new and not previously loaded, and we have not taken steps to artificially load them at this point. We are providing all of the results in an electronic database
online for others to access for free: http:// built-envi.com/portfolio/filter-testing/. The summary data include particle removal efficiency measured across 21 particle size bins, filter pressure drop, airflow rate, and indoor temperature and relative humidity measured during the test. Here we provide just a few highlights from the first set of filter tests conducted using the setup. Figures 2 and 3 show the mean and standard deviation of size-resolved removal efficiency measured for 16 filters labeled with three different rating systems: MERV (n = 9), MPR (n = 3), and FPR (n = 4). Most filters had the lowest measured removal efficiency for particle sizes around 0.3 Âľm and the highest efficiency for particle sizes
NAFA Air Media
Figure 4. Correlation between measured filter pressure drop and air handler airflow rates. 1” filters are marked with circles, 2” filters are marked with diamonds, and 4” filters are marked with triangles.
Figure 5. Correlation between manufacturer-reported MERV (or MERV equivalent) and measured filter pressure drop
near 2.5 µm, consistent with fibrous media filtration theory and previous measurements. Removal efficiencies were also fairly constant across the 10-100 nm UFP size ranges for most filters. Removal efficiencies for particles greater than 0.3 µm largely scaled with rated removal efficiency, which is consistent with the various filtration test standards. However, removal efficiencies for UFPs did not necessarily scale with rated removal efficiency. For example, UFP removal efficiencies measured using two MERV 8 filters (WEB-ECO 1” and Airguard 4”), two MERV 11 filters (cULus 2” and Flanders 2”), and MERV 13 filters (Flanders 2” and Airguard 1”) differed by nearly a factor of two for many UFP sizes when comparing results within the
same rating. These differences are likely attributed to a combination of differences in media charge, pleating, and filter depth. The differences in UFP removal efficiencies were not as large for filters rated by MPR and FPR. Figure 4 shows the correlation between filter pressure drop and HVAC airflow rate for the 16 tested filters installed in the test system. The minimum airflow rate decrease (~2%) was measured with a 1” MERV 1-4 filter installed. The maximum airflow rate decrease (~16%) was measured with a 1” MERV 13 filter installed. Figure 4 also shows that filters with extended depths were able to maintain higher airflow rates than those with lesser depths.
Finally, Figure 5 demonstrates that there was only a weak correlation (R 2 = 0.13) between measured filter pressure drop and manufacturer reported efficiency rating (i.e., MERV or MERV equivalent when other efficiency rating systems are converted to MERV using Table 1) when analyzing the data across all filter depths. However, there was a strong correlation between measured filter pressure drop and reported efficiency rating when analyzing only 1” or 2” depth filters (R 2 = 0.78 and 0.74, respectively), but no correlation when comparing only 4-5” filters (R 2 = 0.10). These data suggest that extended depth filters can achieve low pressure drop and high fine and ultrafine particle removal efficiency, but that 1” and 2” filters cannot.
We are beginning to build an online database of in-situ size-resolved particle removal efficiency measurements for a wide range of filters commonly used in residential buildings. With 16 filter tests completed to date, we have found that the removal efficiency for ultrafine particles generally ranged from ~35% to ~98% for MERV 8 filters and MERV 16 filters, respectively. For particle sizes between 0.3 and 1 µm, the removal efficiency of the filters ranged from a minimum of ~16% for MERV 1-4 filters to a maximum of ~99% for MERV 16 filters. Similarly, removal efficiencies for particle sizes 1 µm to 2.5 µm ranged from ~30% for MERV 1-4 to 100% for MERV 16. UFP removal efficiencies are more varied. These results are beginning to show that in order to achieve substantial removal of both fine and ultrafine particles by central HVAC filters in residential environments, higher efficiency filters than what is typically recommended in standards such as ASHRAE 62.2-2016 are required. We encourage you to ship us your clean (or dirty) filters if you want them tested and we will add your results to the online database!* ■
We are grateful for those of you who have already sent filters for us to test. This work is supported in part by an ASHRAE Graduate Student Grant-in-Aid Award to Torkan Fazli and in part by an ASHRAE New Investigator Award to Brent Stephens.
(1) Stölzel, M.; Breitner, S.; Cyrys, J.; Pitz, M.; Wölke, G.; Kreyling, W.; Heinrich, J.; Wichmann, H.E.; Peters, A. Daily mortality and particulate matter in different size classes in Erfurt, Germany. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2007, 17 (5), 458–467. (2) Pope, C. A.; Ezzati, M.; Dockery, D. W. Fineparticulate air pollution and life expectancy in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360 (4), 376–386. (3) Brook, R. D.; Rajagopalan, S.; Pope, C. A.; Brook, J. R.; Bhatnagar, A.; Diez-Roux, A. V.; Holguin, F.; Hong, Y.; Luepker, R. V.; Mittleman, M. A.; et al. Particulate matter air pollution and cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2010, 121 (21), 2331–2378. (4) Ji, W.; Zhao, B. Estimating Mortality Derived from Indoor Exposure to Particles of Outdoor Origin. PLoS ONE 2015, 10 (4), e0124238.
(5) Wallace, L.; Ott, W. Personal exposure to ultrafine particles. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2011, 21 (1), 20–30. (6) Morawska, L.; Afshari, A.; Bae, G. N.; Buonanno, G.; Chao, C. Y. H.; Hänninen, O.; Hofmann, W.; Isaxon, C.; Jayaratne, E. R.; Pasanen, P.; et al. Indoor aerosols: from personal exposure to risk assessment. Indoor Air 2013, 23 (6), 462–487. (7) Klepeis, N. E.; Nelson, W. C.; Ott, W. R.; Robinson, J. P.; Tsang, A. M.; Switzer, P.; Behar, J. V.; Hern, S. C.; Engelmann, W. H. The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 2001, 11 (3), 231–252. (8) Chen, C.; Zhao, B. Review of relationship between indoor and outdoor particles: I/O ratio, infiltration factor and penetration factor. Atmos. Environ. 2011, 45 (2), 275–288. (9) Logue, J. M.; Price, P. N.; Sherman, M. H.; Singer, B. C. A method to estimate the chronic health impact of air pollutants in U.S. residences. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120 (2), 216–222. (10) Wallace, L. Indoor sources of ultrafine and accumulation mode particles: size distributions, sizeresolved concentrations, and source strengths. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2006, 40 (5), 348–360. (11) Asmi, A.; Wiedensohler, A.; Laj, P.; Fjaeraa, A.-M.; Sellegri, K.; Birmili, W.; Weingartner, E.; Baltensperger, U.; Zdimal, V.; Zikova, N.; et al. Number size distributions and seasonality of submicron particles in Europe 2008–2009. Atmospheric Chem. Phys. 2011, 11 (11), 5505–5538. (12) Costabile, F.; Birmili, W.; Klose, S.; Tuch, T.; Wehner, B.; Wiedensohler, A.; Franck, U.; König, K.; Sonntag, A. Spatio-temporal variability and principal components of the particle number size distribution in an urban atmosphere. Atmospheric Chem. Phys. 2009, 9 (9), 3163–3195. (13) Hussein, T.; Puustinen, A.; Aalto, P. P.; Mäkelä, J. M.; Hämeri, K.; Kulmala, M. Urban aerosol number size distributions. Atmospheric Chem. Phys. 2004, 4 (2), 391–411. (14) ANSI/AHRI Standard 680 (I-P) Standard for Performance Rating of Residential Air Filter Equipment. Arlingt. VA 2009. (15) The Home Depot, Air Filters Buying Guide http:// www.homedepot.com/c/air_filters_HT_BG_HC. (16) NordicPure. What are MERV, MPR, FPR Ratings? Nordicpure.com AC & Furnace Filters. (17) Stephens, B.; Siegel, J. A. Comparison of test methods for determining the particle removal efficiency of filters in residential and lightcommercial central HVAC systems. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2012, 46 (5), 504–513. (18) VerShaw, J.; Siegel, J.; Chojnowski, D.; Nigro, P. Implications of filter bypass. ASHRAE Trans. 2009, 115 (1), 191–198. (19) Fazli, T.; Stephens, B. Characterizing the insitu size-resolved removal efficiency of residential HVAC filters for fine and ultrafine particles. In The Proceedings of the 2016 ASHRAE Winter Conference; Orlando, FL, 2016.
Dr. Brent Stephens is an Associate Professor in the Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering at Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT) in Chicago, IL. He also directs the Built Environment Research Group at IIT where he and his students continue to investigate problems and solutions related to energy efficiency, indoor air quality, and environmental exposures within the built environment. Dr. Stephens also serves as Secretary of the International Society for Indoor Air Quality and Climate (ISIAQ), Chair of the ISIAQ Scientific and Technical Committee (STC) 21 on Ventilation, and Member and Research Subcommittee Chair of ASHRAE Technical Committee 2.4 on Particulate Air Contaminants and Particulate Contaminant Removal Equipment. Torkan Fazli is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering at Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT) and a graduate research assistant in the Built Environment Research Group at IIT. She received her M.Sc. in Building Science in 2013 from Middle East Technical University. Her research interests include energy, sustainability, and environmental issues within the built environment. Her work has focused on developing methods of modeling and analyzing energy use and indoor air quality in buildings.
*We encourage you to ship us your new (or used) 16” x 25” filters for testing. Send to: Dr. Brent Stephens Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering Illinois Institute of Technology Alumni Hall Room 228 3201 S. Dearborn Street Chicago, IL 60616
NAFA Air Media
NAFA Guidelines: Recommended Practices for Filtration for Airborne Infections Containment Rooms in Health Care Facilities
All NAFA Guidelines are written and researched by dedicated volunteers of the Guidelines Committee and has undertaken the task of updating all current NAFA Guidelines and producing two new guidelines each year. The committee is currently working on: Hospitals – Critical and Patient Care Areas; Elder Care and a Residential Guideline. You can find the current published NAFA Guidelines at www.nafahq.org. The Recommended Best Practice for Filtration Infections Containment Rooms in Health Care Facilities was published May 2016. Authors, contributors and committee members:
Authors Bill Palmer, CAFS AeroMed, Inc.
Committee Members Michael Beier, CAFS Products Unlimited, Inc.
Larry Clark, CAFS Clark Air Systems, Inc.
Trey Fly, CAFS, NCT II Joe W. Fly Co., Inc.
Contributors Bill Cawley, CAFS
Roberta MacGillvray B.G.E. Service & Supply Ltd.
Kevin Delahunt, CAFS B.G.E. Service & Supply Ltd.
Steve Peege, CAFS Columbus Industries, Inc.
Paula Levasseur, CAFS Cameron Great Lakes, Inc.
This best practice guideline establishes criteria for using air filtration in the removal of airborne infectious pathogens from hospital containment rooms for the purpose of protecting staff, patients and visitors from nosocomial infections.
This guideline will address air filter selection, hardware requirements, filter installation and service recommendations.
The airborne spread of infectious diseases such as M. tuberculosis in health care facilities has been well documented. One of the primary control measures employed to reduce the risk for the spread of airborne infections is the use of negative pressure rooms and areas1. There are several areas within a hospital where this is applied. They include: •
Sputum induction rooms
Pentamidine administration areas
Jay Reese, CAFS 3M Purification, Inc.
Emergency room (ER) waiting areas
John Liberio, CAFS, NCT II CLARCOR Air Filtration Products
Patrick Rosenthal, CAFS TEX-AIR Filters
ER decontamination areas
Phil Maybee, CAFS, NCT The Filter Man, Ltd.
George Spottswood, CAFS Quality Filters, Inc.
Radiology waiting rooms
Airborne infection isolation rooms (AIIR)
Thomas Riddell, CAFS, NCT II Air Filter Sales & Service
Rick Wells, CAFS Northeast Air Solutions, Inc.
AIIR patient toilet rooms
NAFA Air Media
Since these rooms all have very similar requirements, we will refer to them by group as Airborne Infection Containment Rooms (AICR). AICRs are maintained under negative pressure for the purpose of preventing potentially infectious airborne particles from leaving the space. Air removed from these spaces to create negative pressure is either exhausted directly to the outside or is filtered prior to exhaust so that airborne infectious contaminants are not spread to other areas of the facility. Current construction guidelines call for AICRs to have from 10-12 air changes per hour (ACH) depending on the classification of the room. (Existing rooms constructed prior to 1994 may have 6 ACH). Filtration of supply air is not covered by this document.
Circulation within ward or to other areas within the facility
Dedicated exhaust air from an AICR must be exhausted 25 feet or more from a potential air intake. If this cannot be achieved, the exhaust air should be passed through a properly installed, certified and maintained HEPA filtration system. Additional protection may be obtained for service personnel by using a Bag-in / Bagout (BiBo) containment system. All exhaust air from the AICR rooms, associated anterooms and associated toilet rooms shall not be combined with any other non-AICR exhaust system unless filtered through a properly installed, tested in place and maintained HEPA filtration system.
The primary contaminants of concern are sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and ozone. These contaminants are known to chemically attack artifacts, causing permanent, irreversible damage. The type of damage and severity depends upon the amount of contamination and the artifactsâ€™ materials of construction. There may be other molecular contaminants present that are specific to individual applications and/or geographic locations that are not currently thought to be detrimental in LAMs. For example, in new construction, there could be levels of formaldehyde that would require additional controls. Air may be recirculated within the AICR, within an isolation ward or back to the general use areas within the facility if proper high efficiency particulate respirator (HEPA) filters and test procedures are in place. The main benefits of recirculated air are lower energy costs and reduced installation costs. Recirculation of AICR air through a HEPA filter may be achieved with either a permanently mounted system or by using a portable self-contained unit.
AICR rooms are required to have 10-12 air changes per hour (ACH) of which two ACH must be outdoor air. The remaining ACH may be achieved as equivalent air changes by using make-up air recirculated within the room through a HEPA filter.
Air may be recirculated to other areas of the facility when exhaust to the outside is not feasible. When recirculating to other areas of the facility, all air must be passed through a HEPA filter that is properly installed, sealed and tested in place.
HEPA filters should always be in-place tested using a cold poly-dispersed challenge, such as Emory Oil or other suitable challenge, and scanned using a light-scattering photometer. Both NAFA and the Controlled Environment Testing Association (CETA) have personnel trained and certified in this discipline and should be utilized for such testing.
Bag-in/Bag-out containment systems
There is currently on-going debate regarding the validity of the continued practice of using Bag-in/Bag-out (BiBo) containment systems for hospital isolation rooms. BiBo systems have long been used to reduce the possibility of live microorganisms captured on high efficiency filters from becoming airborne during filter changes. The inherent risks associated with contaminated filters, mandates that service personnel who change filters in a BiBo system be properly gowned and safe-guarded with full-face respiratory protection (PPE). The process to change filters is a specific step-by-step procedure designed to ensure the proper installation of high efficiency filters and the protection of service personnel.
Protection for service personnel
Do microorganisms live on high efficiency filters? It may be argued that microorganisms such as TB that were previously thought to live on filters for days, are quickly rendered inactive. Should they no longer be considered hazardous? While it has been stated by researchers that the risk of acquiring TB infection from the process of changing HEPA filters is minimal, the potential harm could be significant. It is recommended that safety measures be taken to protect the technician when changing HEPA filters that service an AICR. One method is to remove HEPA filters from an air handler or air purifier directly into a bag while wearing appropriate PPE such as gloves and a respirator. Another method is to use BiBo filter housings which, when properly serviced, seal filters during the change-out procedure. If upstream and downstream isolation dampers are in place, a third method is to decontaminate or disinfect the filter in place using proven and accepted methods. To date, there is little evidence to support that one method provides a better health or safety outcome than the other in this setting. When planning for new construction or renovations, a health care facilityâ€™s Infection Control Risk Assessment (ICRA) committee should discuss and determine what safety measures they want to employ during the filter changeout process and plan their equipment purchases accordingly. For further guidance on employee health during the filter change-out process, contact your NAFA Certified Air Filter Specialist. At the minimum, 95% dust masks should be worn when changing high efficiency filters. When changing HEPA filters, technicians should always wear full-face respiratory protection (PPE).
Standard AIIR without ante-room: Stacked black boxes represent patientâ€™s bed. Long open box with cross-hatch represents supply air. Open boxes with single, diagonal slashes represent air exhaust registers. Arrows indicate direction of air flow. Illustration from Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Health-Care Facilities, Centers for Disease Control, 2003. Negative pressure is achieved by exhausting more air from the room than is supplied. This creates a flow of air into the room that is from clean to dirty (or from low risk of contamination to high risk of contamination). This directional airflow helps prevent potentially pathogenic airborne particles from leaving the space in an unsafe manner. An AICR may or may not include an anteroom and/or a patient bathroom. Please refer to Facility Guidelines Institute (FGI) 2014 construction guidelines for health care facilities for the correct pressure relationships between these and other spaces.
Filter efficiency and selection
Since the number of particles required to cause infection for pathogens such as M. tuberculosis may be as low as one2, it is imperative that filtration solutions employed be capable of removing all potentially infectious particulates. Choosing the wrong filtration solution,
the wrong hardware for filter installation or servicing the filters in an inappropriate manner may lead to dire consequences. HEPA filters have a removal efficiency >99.97% on particles both greater than and less than the 0.3um challenge agent particle size (see most-penetrating particle size information in NAFA Guide to Air Filtration3), making them ideal for removing particles in the respirable particle size range. When filters are properly installed, and in-place performance tested, users can be assured that there is no air by-pass around the filters and that removal efficiency is maintained. HEPA filters used for this application shall be individually certified to have an initial removal efficiency of 99.97% on particles 0.3 um in size, in accordance with industry standards (MIL Std 282, IEST-RPCC1.4). See NAFA Guide to Air Filtration for a complete list of industry standards4. HEPA filters used in AICR applications shall not be constructed with materials that support microbial growth (i.e., wood or particle board frames). In an effort to minimize the expense related to the use of HEPA filters, use of pre-filters upstream to remove larger particles will extend the life of the HEPA filter. When possible, adding a MERV 14 (>90% efficient) filter upstream of the HEPA filter may extend the life of the HEPA filter by as much as 900%5.
Every part of a HEPA filter system is equally important. Without an appropriate sealing mechanism and a properly contained housing which eliminates bypass, the integrity of the HEPA filter will be compromised. This means that: â€˘ The filter-mounting system must be leak free, rigid and capable of supporting the HEPA filter(s). â€˘ The sealing system that holds the HEPA filter in place must eliminate any possibility of leakage between the filter and the mounting system.
Sealing of HEPA filters
Typically, HEPA filter housings are made to accommodate one of two different types of HEPA sealing mechanisms, gasket seal or fluid seal.
Gaskets are supplied on the HEPA filters, this provides the advantage of having a new gasket every time the filter is changed. The HEPA filter housing provides a mechanism that will compress the HEPA gasket so that it provides an air-tight seal.
The fluid seal system is a filter with a channel in the face of the filter frame into which a non-Newtonian gel is loaded. When the filter is installed fully, the knife edge extends into the gel and provides a
NAFA Air Media
fluid seal. Fasteners are used to hold the filter in place inside the holding frame, but they do not require compression. Please refer to the NAFA Guide to Air Filtration for more detailed information on both gasket and fluid seal HEPA filters. A differential pressure monitoring device should be installed across each filter bank so that proper change out intervals can established.
Air that is exhausted from an AICR should be treated as contaminated air. HEPA filters should be installed as close to the point of exhaust as is possible. When designing or installing filter housings, it is imperative to ensure that there are no barriers to service access doors (electrical conduit, piping, duct work, etc.) and that ample room for filter maintenance, preferably the largest filter dimension + 12â€?, is available.
Installation and maintenance of AICR filtration systems
Proper installation, service and maintenance are imperative in order for these systems to perform at desired levels. HEPA filters may easily be damaged in shipment and when handled. To ensure proper performance of the filtration system the following points are considered best practices: Personnel performing this work should be completely trained by a National Air Filtration Association member to be NCT level I certified. All HEPA filters used in an AICR system shall be leak tested in place upon installation, and every 12 months thereafter (reference ISO 14644-1). We also recommend testing the HEPA filters when there is any change or variation in HEPA filtration system that could potentially cause an issue with the HEPA filters, seals or other hardware. Additional consideration may be given to selecting HEPA filters with a perforated grille to protect the filter face from damage from shipping or handling.
Personal protection for filter installation and maintenance
NAFA recommends that you follow the CDC recommendations below when installing, testing or servicing any HEPA filter: Laboratory studies indicate that reaerosolization of viable mycobacterium from filter material (HEPA filters and N95 disposable respirator filter media) is not probable under normal conditions. Although these studies indicate that M. tuberculosis becoming an airborne hazard is not probable after it is removed by a HEPA filter (or other high efficiency filter material), the risks associated with handling loaded HEPA filters in ventilation systems under field-use conditions have not been evaluated. Therefore, persons performing maintenance and replacing filters on any ventilation system that is probably contaminated with M. tuberculosis should wear a respirator in addition to eye protection and gloves6.
(1) CDC 2005 TB guidelines (2) Jacobs, A.L., Infective Dose in Pulmonary Tuberculosis, Tubercle 22(11):266-271, 1941. (3) NAFA Guide to Air Filtration 5th edition, chapter 5, page 5.5 4 NAFA Guide to Air Filtration, 5th edition, chapter 8, page 8.5 (4) Ibid (5) American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Industrial ventilation: a manual of recommended practice. 24 ed. Cincinnati, OH: American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists; 2001. (6) CDC 2005 TB Guidelines
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Industrial Ventilation: a manual of recommended practice. 24 ed., American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists; Cincinnati, OH: 2001. Infective Dose in Pulmonary Tuberculosis, Tubercle, Jacobs, A.L., 1941. NAFA Guide to Air Filtration, 5th edition, 2014 TB guidelines, CDC 2005
Disposal of filters and other potentially contaminated items used in the filter changeout process should be done according to all local, state and federal regulations.
This best practice guideline is provided to give direction for using air filtration for the removal of airborne infectious pathogens in hospital AICRs. This is not meant to be an in-depth guideline on AICR applications. For more detailed information on additional aspects of these applications, please refer to the FGI Guidelines for Design and Construction of Health Care Facilities (2014 edition) or the CDC Guidelines for Preventing the Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in HealthCare Settings (2005). â–
CAMERON GREAT LAKES, INC. Molecular Filtration Specialists
At CGL we carry the most complete line of commercial and industrial products for both air and liquid molecular filtration. We offer a full line of bulk media, complete system design and fabrication. We offer all the standard size filters and we are also fully equipped to custom build to your specific needs. Our experienced staff with over 75 years in the industry, is always ready to provide the technical support you need to ensure that the product we supply will meet all of the demands for every application.
MRM 18 Refillable Module
12â€? and 4â€? Vapor Trap Disposable V-Bank
Plastic Disposable 18 Module
Vapor Trap Disposable Panel Vapor Trap with Dusting Disposable Panel Filter
Building Healthy Environments Worldwide 2335 NW 29th Avenue, Portland OR 97210 Phone (800) 777-4044 Fax (503) 225-0137 Visit us on the web at CAMERONGREATLAKES.COM
With over 50 years experience, CLARCOR Air Filtration Products, is one of the world’s foremost manufacturers of air filtration products for the commercial, industrial, institutional and residential markets. We offer the broadest line of filtration products in the industry, and our products can be found improving the quality of air around the world in homes, hospitals, office buildings, industrial plants, laboratories, pharmaceutical facilities, schools, museums, sports arenas and many more facilities where clean air is critical. CLARCOR Air Filtration Products ® ™ sells its products under the brand names Airguard , Purolator and ATI.
For all your filter needs, visit www.clcair.com or call 1-866-247-4827 or 1-866-925-2247.
Visit NAFA member booths during AHR Expo
AHR Expo | January 30 - February 1, 2017 | Las Vegas, Nevada
NAFA Annual Convention September 14 – 16 Hyatt Regency Newport Beach Newport Beach, California AHR Expo Mexico September 20 - 22 Monterrey Mexico
AAF | Flanders
American Metal Filter Company
CLARCOR Air Filtration Products
Clean and Science Co., Ltd.
Columbus Industries, Inc.
Dynamic Air Quality Solutions
Hydrosil International Limited
National Air Filtration Association
Sanuvox Technologies, Inc.
Tri-Dim Filter Corporation
N = North Hall C = Central Hall
Volunteer at the NAFA booth Booth volunteers needed – NAFA 2017 ASHRAE/AHR Expo We need member volunteers to man the NAFA booth at the 2017 AHR Expo in Las Vegas, NV. (All volunteers will receive an “Exhibitor” badge.) NAFA Booth C5308. Volunteer here: http://www.nafahq.org/booth-volunteersneeded-nafa-2017-ashraeahr-expo/ or visit the NAFA website www.nafahq.org. ■
SMACNA 2016 Convention October 16 - 19 Phoenix, Arizona AMCA Annual Meeting 2016 October 18 - 23 Washington, D.C. AHRI Annual Meeting November 13 - 15 Scottsdale, Arizona 2016 HARDI Conference December 3 - 6 Colorado Springs, Colorado
2017 ASHRAE Winter Meeting January 28 - February 1 Las Vegas, Nevada 2017 AHR Expo January 30 - February 1 Las Vegas, Nevada IAQA 20th Annual Meeting January 30 - February 1 Las Vegas, Nevada NAFA 2017 Technical Seminar April 4 - 6 Louisville, Kentucky AHRI Spring Meeting May 1 - 3 Reston, Virginia 2017 ASHRAE Annual Conference June 24 - 28 Long Beach, California 2017 SMACNA Annual Convention October 22 - 25 Maui, Hawaii
NAFA Air Media
Need a room reservation for the AHR Expo? Need a room reservation? NAFA has booked rooms at the Mirage, 3400 S. Las Vegas Blvd., Las Vegas, NV 89109. Room Rate: $134 + tax + $25 resort fee for single/double. Copy this form to reserve your room. Show Dates: January 30 - February 1, 2017. Show Hours Monday, January 30: 10 am - 6 pm Tuesday, January 31: 10: am - 6 pm Wednesday, February 1: 10 am - 4 pm
AHR Expo 2017 January 30 â€“ February 1, 2017 Las Vegas, NV Credit Card Authorization I authorize NAFA to use the credit card listed below to guarantee hotel rooms at the Mirage, 3400 S. Las Vegas Blvd., Las Vegas, NV 89109 Room 1 Name(s):_______________________________________________________________________ Check in date: ____________________ Check out date: __________________ Room 2 Name(s): ______________________________________________________________________ Check in date: ____________________ Check out date: __________________
Room Rate: $134 + tax + $25 resort fee for single/double The hotel will charge a deposit of 1 night room and tax to the credit card used to guarantee this reservation. This deposit is refundable if your reservation is cancelled no later than 3PM local hotel time, 72 hours prior to arrival. Credit Card Number: __________________________________________________________________ Expiration Date (Must expire after January 2017): _______________________
Billing Address: ________________________________________________________________________ City, State Zip: ________________________________________________________________________ Phone Number: _______________________________________________________________________ Name on Card: ________________________________________________________________________
Authorized Signature: __________________________________________________________________
Fax or email this form to NAFA at 608.310.7545 / email@example.com
We can make any size filter you need.
VER-MAC Econo Frames!!! (Pad Holding Frames)
• Sturdy 24 Gauge Galvanized Steel • 16 Gauge 1x1 Galvanized Wire Backing • 9 Gauge Hourglass Gate (Optional) • Standard And Non-Standard Sizes
NEW LOWER PRICING!
For More Information Call 800-671-1046 Ext. 222 or 225
FAPFC Accessory Clip FASC Spring Clip available in 12"
FAAC Spring Clip
FAPC P-type available in 1⁄2" to 12"
u J ..
a F r
FACC Corner Clip
available in 6" and 12"
. .. ■
available in 2" and 4"
. .. ■
. .. ■
s r e
’S T A ■
o D e
Very Low Prices
Same Day Shipping
726 Route 202 South ■ Suite 320-152 ■ Bridgewater, NJ 08807 www.filterfasteners.com ■ firstname.lastname@example.org
Servicing: Commercial/Industrial Air Filter Manufacturers Commercial/Industrial Air Filter Distributors HVAC Contractors Simply the Highest Quality Air Filter Holding Frame Clips and High Efficiency PreFilter Clips Available. Low Cost, Manufacturer-Direct Pricing.
PCA 1”- 2” P-clip
PCA 3”- 4” P-clip
PCA 5”- 6” P-clip
PCA 12” P-clip
F - 12 A, 12” Spring with Clip
F - 12, 12” Spring NO Clip
HFFC - 23 ss Corner Bracket
C - 86 ss 2” Wire Forms C - 89 h 4” Wire Forms
Bag Filter Frame Clips
PFC 2” - 4” PreFilter Clips
MADE IN THE USA
Versa - M 2” - 4” PreFilter Clips for 13/16” Metal Flanged Filters
See our website for pricing and complete part descriptions.
Versa - P 2” - 4” PreFilter Clips for Plastic V-Bank Filters
311 Shaker Road - Po Box 505 • East Longmeadow, MA 01028 • (Toll-Free) 800.637.3033 (Phone) 413.525.6837 • (Fax) 413.525.6895 • (Web) www.springfieldspring.com
The Carbon Filter Specialists® . . . Since 1970
Odor and Pollution Control Filters made with CarbonWeb®
PANELS PADS PLEATS INSERTS RING PANELS/LINKS ROLLS/BLANKETS RIGID CELLS TRAYS BULK CARBON APPLIANCE FILTERS AIR CLEANER FILTERS
NEW 500 gm sq./ft. [1” tk.]
Please visit our website to review our Learning Center 25712 D’Hondt Court ● Chesterfield, MI 48051-2600 www.dmarkinc.com ● email@example.com 800.343.3610 ● 586.949.3610 ● fax 586.949.4181
Industry News Dynamic Air Quality Solutions announces Partnership with COPD Foundation Dynamic Air Quality Solutions, a manufacturer and distributor of highperformance indoor air quality products, announced today that it is partnering with the COPD Foundation to help increase awareness about Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and to improve the lives of an estimated 30 million people living with COPD in North America. COPD is the 3rd leading cause of death in North America. More people die annually of COPD than breast cancer and diabetes combined and furthermore, there are an estimated 14 million people living with COPD who have never been diagnosed. Indoor Air Quality is obviously a major focus for the HVAC industry for all the right reasons. Over the years, home comfort systems have evolved dramatically to improve the air people breathe. But until recently, IAQ has not been as important as it is today, which has contributed to health issues for millions. Dynamic Air Quality Solutions plans to react to this epidemic by educating friends and clients about COPD and encouraging people to be screened and tested when appropriate. If diagnosed early enough and treated, people can live long and productive lives even with COPD. As a partner of the COPD Foundation, Dynamic is committed to helping to put COPD on the map and rallying support for people living with COPD. With over 30 million people in North America living with COPD, it is likely that each one of us knows someone with COPD, and probably someone that could have the disease who has never been screened or tested. Dynamic Air Quality Solutions is proud to have adopted the mission of the COPD Foundation as part of our corporate identity and culture. You’ll see important information about COPD on our websites, in our newsletters and as a part of our messaging during training events, industry gatherings and tradeshows. According to Rob Goodfellow, Vice President of Marketing for Dynamic Air Quality Solutions, “We are proud to take this proactive stance to help the COPD Foundation provide help and hope to families living with COPD. Together we can take action today so more people will be able to breathe better tomorrow. Dynamic continues to provide air cleaning solutions to industry clients who pride themselves on their ability to offer the right solutions to meet air quality challenges of today and tomorrow.” ■
Jeannie Frank promoted to VP of Finance
New Glasfloss Industries Vice President of Finance Jeannie Frank
Don Kingston, CEO, today announced the promotion of Jeannie Frank to the position of Vice President of Finance. Mrs. Frank has been with Glasfloss Industries for 18 years and previously served as Accounting Supervisor and Controller. “Jeannie has done an exceptional job in her positions for the last 18 years and we are very proud to have her fill this position,” said Don Kingston. Mrs. Frank received her B.S. in accounting from DeVry Institute and held several accounting positions with other companies before joining Glasfloss in 1998. Glasfloss Industries is a leading manufacturer of HVAC air filtration products for commercial, industrial and residential applications with five manufacturing plants across the United States. For more information about Glasfloss or our products, please visit: www.glasfloss.com. ■
• 2” and 4” filter constructed with the same 500 to 600 grams per square meter weight of high activity 85% CTC carbon media used in traditional 12” models • High impact durable plastic frame • Compact design • Lightweight • Saves shipping and storage • Easy installation to existing equipment with little or no modification
NEW HEGA® COMPACT SERIES 2” & 4” High Efficiency Gas Adsorber filtrationgroup.com - 877.344.8326
• Available in four different carbon medias for specific odor removal applications such as... • VOC’s - Volatile Organic Compounds • Diesel Exhaust • Acid Gases • Ammonia and Amines
Finally... A Cost-Effective & Efficient Solution to PreFilter Medium & High Efficiency V-Bank & Metal-Flanged Filters ( Introducing The VERSA CLIP™ )
VERSA - P™ (2” & 4”) Designed to PreFilter Plastic V-Bank Filters with a 2” or 4” Pleated Filter
VERSA - M™ (2” & 4”) Designed to PreFilter 13/16” Metal-Flanged Metal Header Filters with a 2” or 4” Pleated Filter
Servicing: Commercial/Industrial Air Filter Manufacturers Commercial/Industrial Air Filter Distributors HVAC Contractors Simply the Highest Quality Air Filter Holding Frame Clips and High Efficiency PreFilter Clips Available. Low Cost, Manufacturer-Direct Pricing. (Toll-Free) 800.637.3033 • (Fax) 413.525.6895 • (Web) www.springfieldspring.com
SO ENERGY EFFICIENT, THEY COULD BE FREE! Discover long-term savings when you use CI filters What if you could lower costs and reduce energy consumption with a single product? With performance engineered filtration products from Columbus Industries, you can. CI filters are ideal for these applications: commercial and industrial facilities; government and educational facilities; paint booth/finishing; hospitals, research labs and pharmaceuticals; airports; electrical manufacturing; and power generators. Lower operating costs can be achieved by using filters that combine lower initial pressure and higher dust holding capacity. The long-term energy savings will more than cover the cost of the filter. To request a free energy calculator, visit www.colind.com, click on CONTACT US and type your request in the filtration needs comment section.
yS g r e n E
2938 State Route 752 • P.O. Box 257 • Ashville, Ohio 43103-0257 Phone: 740.983.2552 • Fax: 740.983.4622 www.colind.com • Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Technology Corner Powered by Permatron Corporation
Small Package Convenience Needs Big Package Efficiency Fast paced lifestyles and eating on the go has created a rocketing demand for portable, single serving food and beverage offerings. Along with the food must come the packaging in the form of cups, bowls, tubs with lids and various other containers and resealable bottles. Industrial manufacturer Logoplaste, operating 67 factories and 450 machines in 17 countries, has created some of the most recognizable containers for beverages, condiments, personal care and household products for over 40 years. Logoplaste excels at meeting challenges such as speed to market, product differentiation, cost efficiency and sustainability. Their Kansas City Missouri plant, opened in 2013, houses up-to-date technologies and uses streamlined processes in injection molding, stretch-blow molding and extrusion molding. Their molding production processes include high heat chambers and hot sidewalls to melt plastic raw materials, followed by extrusion into cooling molds that create the finished containers. Knowing the critical demands needed to keep the facility operating at peak efficiency, the plant’s HVAC packaged system uses 130 Ton Trane chiller units which are designed and engineered to meet the most demanding cooling schedules for this high capacity plastics manufacturer. Cottonwood Trees in Abundance Environmental elements are a challenge for any outdoor cooling system. This facility is surrounded by a river and dense woods on one side, and a major highway and heavy industrial on the other sides. Cottonwood trees are abundant in the woods. Their white fluffy seeds fly through the air, and head right for the Trane unit’s outside air cooled condenser coils that have aluminum fins mechanically bonded to seamless copper tubing. Seeds, as well as airborne highway and industrial dirt are continually drawn into the chiller air intakes, clogging critical air flow. Brett
©2016 Permatron Corporation PATENT PENDING
Wagner, facility maintenance supervisor for Logoplaste, found that the dirty chiller units took 4 hours to clean each time, and resulted in costly manpower and system downtime. Sonja Hyder, their local air filtration expert with RamAir, recommended PreVent® air intake screens as a fast and convenient solution. Bonus Savings – Secure without Screws PreVent® air intake screens are custom sized and made of black polypropylene media, finished with vinyl edging and grommets for easy installation on all equipment types. Installation has been made even easier and faster with Permatron’s recent introduction of MagnaMount™. A neodymium magnetic mounting option that eliminates the need to drill into equipment, this plastic mount clip with a powerfully strong earth magnet sticks to the surface of metal enclosure cabinets, allowing them to be repositioned as needed. The quick mount reduces installation time to minutes and requires no tools. RamAir’s service team initially estimated the PreVent screen installation at 6 hours with standard mount clips with screws. Using MagnaMount allowed RamAir to complete the installation in under 1 hour. The UV protected PreVent screens are reusable and quickly brushed clean with a rubber broom supplied by Permatron. According to Wagner, the PreVent screens have been a huge timesaver in keeping the Trane air intakes protected against airborne environmental debris, allowing the systems to run clean and efficiently. Keeping the fins and coils clean now takes 15 minutes. Logoplaste continues to produce convenient packaging solutions distinct to the market, while PreVent air intake screens and the convenience of the new MagnaMount installation option helps to maintain their facility efficiencies.
NEW MagnaMount ™ available - No Tools Required! www.permatron.com
Helps Prevent Cottonwood Seed and Other Airborne Debris From Bringing Your Customerʼs Condenser Coils, Cooling Towers and Other HVAC Systems to a Grinding Halt! FEATURES • Specifically Engineered For Use On High Volume / High Velocity Airflow Systems. • Amazingly Low Impact on Static Pressure. • Non-electrostatic – Wonʼt Hold Debris during Cleaning and Wonʼt Load Up Too Quickly. • Compatible with All HVAC & Cooling Tower Equipment. • Light, Medium and Heavy Duty Filters with Choice of Quick Release Fastening Systems and Operating Options. • Up to 15 yr. Service Life.
BENEFITS • Stops Fouling of Condenser Coils, Cooling Tower Sumps, Strainers, Blow-Down Valves and Heat Exchangers. • Protect Internal HVAC Filters. • Helps Reduce Energy Cost, Repair Cost, Water Treatment Chemical Cost. • Simplifies HVAC & Cooling Tower Maintenance. • Helps Protect Against Equipment Failure, Downtime and Lost Productivity. • BEST OF ALL – Opens New Filtration Markets and Sales Opportunities for You!
Chiller Coil Intake Filters
Rooftop Unit Intake Filters
Dry Cooler Intake Filters
Air Cooled Condenser Intake Filter
Cooling Tower Intake Filters
Air Handling Unit Intake Filters
Louver Intake Filters
In-ground Intake Grate Filter
Reduces Cleaning To A Few Quick Swipes with a Broom, Brush, Shop Vacuum or, Simply Rinse with a Garden Hose. Filters Never Need To Be Removed For Cleaning. It Just Doesnʼt Get Any Easier Than This!
For Information on Becoming an Air Intake Filter Distributor, Contact:
Tel. 513-860-9784 or 248-676-9418 Visit our Website @ www.airsolutioncompany.com Air Intake Filters Are Manufactured By: Air Solution and Newway Companies, Commerce Twp, MI 48382 United States and Foreign Patents Granted - This product is protected under one or more of the following U.S. and foreign patents: 5,370,722 _ 5,529,593 _ 6,197,077 B1 _ 2170244 _ 95904185.6-2113, Other Patents Pending
Cottonwood Air Intake Filter Screens
The Cottonwood Air Intake Filter ®
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) By Stephen W. Nicholas, CAFS, NCT II, CPMM, Air Industries, Inc.
NAFA entered into an arrangement with the Association for Facilities Engineering (AFE) back in 2010 and recently with American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) in 2014. The idea of having a MOU with other organizations is to encourage a “synergy” with these other non-profit professional trade associations. The National Air Filtration Association (NAFA) is made up of various types of membership categories. Typically Independent HVAC air filter distributors, wholesalers, fabricators, and media-metal component manufacturers as well as professional members, i.e. consultants to the industry, etc. The HVAC air filter testing standards are currently developed by (ASHRAE), ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 52.2-2015. ASHRAE also publishes the Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) Standard for both commercial and residential applications, ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1 (commercial) Standard 62.2 (residential). The other MOU that NAFA has reached an agreement with is the Association of Facility Engineers (AFE) which was formerly (AIPE) the American Institute of Plant Engineers. The name change back in the mid 1990’s was done to reflect the all-encompassing discipline of facility engineering not just plant/ manufacturing facilities. Today AFE members work in operating Airports, Bio-Pharm, Shopping Malls, Colleges, K-12 Schools, LEED Certified Buildings, and Convention Centers. Many AFE members may have to comply with several ANSI/ASHRAE Code Intended Standards, (CIS). These Standards that
may be adopted by any Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ), i.e. State Building Codes, The International Mechanical Code and the Southern Building Code, etc. All three (3) organizations (NAFAASHRAE-AFE) have developed Certification Programs. The benefit here regarding the MOU is to have NAFA Distinguished Lecturers (DL) speak and to provide technical presentations to the ASHRAE & AFE Chapters located throughout the country. These Chapter meetings are typically held once a month on a certain day and time. These meetings provide a tremendous opportunity to network with your peers and to develop professional business relationships by promoting each other’s professional development programs. Having NAFA, ASHRAE and AFE DL’s speak at Chapter meetings is the very best way to communicate the ever changing Standards, Codes, and Best Practices. NAFA can also invite AFE & ASHRAE speakers to our Technical Meetings and at our Annual Conference. In closing may I suggest that you become a NAFA DL and effectively utilize the MOU with ASHRAE & AFE? This will distinguish you as a true professional in the industry today. This can be accomplished by successfully passing an examination; signing a code of ethics and renewing your wellearned credentials based on the required Continuing Education Units (CEUs’). By providing information regarding HVAC air filtration for various application requirements; i.e. LEED, JCHAO, EPA, FDA, and OSHA etc. you will become
known as the leading expert in your field of discipline. This will allow you more opportunities to communicate the necessary information for building operators, [AFE members] maintenance engineers [ASHRAE members] and managers alike. Utilizing the MOU with AFE & ASHRAE will provide more peer-networking experiences, business opportunities and speaking engagements than ever before. ■
Stephen W. Nicholas, CAFS, NCT II is President of Air Industries, Inc. and Past President of NAFA. He has been involved in the field of air filtration since 1984. Mr. Nicholas serves on several industry committees and the NAFA Education Committee as well as past Chairman of the Technical Committee. Steve contributed to the NAFA Installation Operation & Maintenance (IOM) Manual and in 20002001 to the 3rd Edition of the NAFA Guide to Air Filtration. He has also contributed to the Committee responsible for writing and publishing the NAFA User’s Guide for ASHRAE Standard 52.2-1999.
Synergy is working together to achieve what cannot be accomplished separately
NAFA 2016 Annual Convention Hyatt Regency, Newport Beach, California September 14 - 16, 2016 Join us in beautiful Newport Beach, California, a coastal fantasy land where leisure and style come together in ten distinct neighborhoods, each with its own unique charm — Airport District, Balboa Island and surrounding seven islands, Balboa Peninsula, Balboa Village, Cannery Village, Corona del Mar, Fashion Island, Mariner’s Mile/Westcliff, Newport Coast/ Crystal Cove, and the Back Bay. With the largest recreational harbor on the west coast, Newport Beach activities are abundant. Visitors can choose aquatic adventures from sunset cruises to stand-up paddle boarding. Art walks, wine tastings, tours, live entertainment and cultural venues will fill your itinerary. Create lasting memories on idyllic California beaches, breathtaking seaside cliffs, harborfront promenades and leave with the desire to return.
Go to www.nafahq.org
You will find the 2016 Annual Convention program, spouse program, exam schedule and much more. In lieu of the Annual Golf Tournament, NAFA will be holding a prize drawing, when you register for the convention; don’t forget to purchase your tickets!
Our keynote speaker, New York Times bestselling author Sam Gwynne, kicks off the Annual Convention with his presentation, Stonewall Jackson: The First Great Hero of the Civil War. “Jackson is one of the greatest military heroes of all time and his strategic innovations shattered the conventional wisdom of how war was waged; he was so far ahead of his time that his techniques would be studied generations into the future.” You won’t want to miss the scheduled presenters, they are sure to educate! • A Panel Discussion on the Impacts of Consolidation on the Industry moderated by Trey Fly, CAFS, NCT II. Participants are: »» Dave Reaman, CAFS, Vice President of Sales, Marketing Services Inc. »» Dave Heritage, CAFS, Vice President of HVAC Filter Sales, Filtration Group
»» »» »»
Todd Poythress, Columbus Industries, Inc. Joe W. Fly, Jr., CAFS, CEO, Joe W. Fly Co. Jerry Festian, CAFS, NCT II, President, Aero Filter Inc.
• Comparing the New ISO 16890 Standard to the Current ASHRAE 52.2 Anja Coenen, Freudenberg Filtration Technologies Inc. • Relax and Conquer: The Ultimate Plan for High Achievers Brad Davidson, FDN-P, Author & Performance Coach • Benefits and Challenges of Particle Filtration and Air Cleaning Jeffrey Siegel, Ph.D., University of Toronto • The Last Business Plan You’ll Ever Write Jim Maher, CEO/Founder, Archford Capital Strategies • Stop Today’s Hackers - Empowering NAFA Members to be IT Security Savvy - Because Your Customers are Counting on You! Mike Foster, CEO & Founder, The Foster Institute, Inc. • Principles of Dust Collection 101 Kevin Scruggs, CLARCOR Industrial Air See you in Newport Beach, California! ■
While in Newport Beach, California, it’s okay to feel spoiled with pristine beaches, luxury shopping, fine dining, and water sports.
NAFA Air Media
Joining Hands to Better Serve You Your Source for Complete Air Filtration Solutions
Certified Personnel NCT
Omid Abolghasemi, NCT
Sarah T. Davis, NCT
Patricio Sandoval Barrientos, NCT
Joaquin Galleguillos Diaz, NCT
Hardeep Bolla, NCT
Hector Fernandez, NCT
Carlos Emilio Briso, NCT
Francisco Sebastian Gabilan, NCT
Jonathon Cardiff, NCT
Carlos Garcia, NCT
Ricardo Carrasco, NCT
Patricio Sutter Garcia, NCT
Hector Contreras Cisternas, NCT
Yohan Fibre Garrido, NCT
Patricio Pedraza Contreras, NCT
Moises Gere, NCT
TFM Consultants International, Ltd. Langley, British Columbia Canada Ingenieria Y Servicios, Ltda. Maipu, Santiago Chili
TFM Consultants International, Ltd. Langley, British Columbia Canada Malbec y Cia. LTDA Santiago Chili Air Filter Plus, Inc. Eudora, Kansas
Malbec y Cia. LTDA Santiago Chili Siclima S. A. Santiago Chili
Masterclima Service S. A. Santiago Chili
The Filter Shop Omaha, Nebraska
Masterclima Service S. A. San Miguel, Santiago Chili
Ingenieria y Servicio Ltda. Quinta Normal, Santiago Chili Hospital Naval de Talcahuano Talcahuano, Base-Naval-VIII Region Chili MPT S.A. Santiago Chili
Masterclima Service S. A. San Bernardo, Santiago Chili Sodexo Providencia, Santiago Chili Sodexo Providencia, Santiago Chili
NAFA Air Media
Greg Harris, NCT
Gustavo Rodriguez, NCT
Jaiden Hearn, NCT
Williams Mauricio Rojas, NCT
Mauricio Gallardo Hernandez, NCT
Raul Sanchez, NCT
Maritza Adasme Malschojsky, NCT
Donald Strange, NCT
Edson Mitchell Herrera, NCT
Peter Yufer Sulzer, NCT
Alex Albornoz Martinez, NCT
Hugo Navarro Valderrama, NCT
Jeremy Moore, NCT
Jason Wilsher, NCT
James Podraza, NCT
Jarvis Windrow, NCT
Air Filter Plus, Inc. Eudora, Kansas The Filter Shop Omaha, Nebraska
CLIMACOR, Ltda. Santiago Chili
Fresh Filter, Ltda. La Florida, Santiago Chili
Sodexo Providencia, Santiago Chili CLIMACOR, Ltda. Santiago Chili
Air Filter Systems, Inc. Maumelle, Arkansas
Argonne National Laboratory Lemont, Illinois
Bonded Filter Co. Miami, Florida MPT S.A. Santiago Chili
Ing. Termica Ingeterm Ltda. Osorno Chili Air Filter Plus, Inc. Eudora, Kansas
Rojo Y Azul Y Proy S.pA Jose Miguel, Claro Chili
Diaterm, Ltda. La Florida, Santiago Chili
TFM Consultants International, Ltd. Langley, British Columbia Canada Pure Air Filter Sales & Service Franklin, Tennessee
Michael True, NCT
B. C. Air Filter, Ltd. Burnaby, British Columbia Canada
Stephen W. Nicholas, CAFS, NCT II
CLEAN AIR FOR BETTER LIVING 800-558-5494 • email@example.com
Manufacturing Custom Filters
to Meet Your Needs Since 1941
Products: • Permanent Metal Filters • Filter Media & Retainers • Dry Type Air Filter • Compact Silencer/ • Cylindrical Air Filter Acoustical Management
• Grease Filter • Moisture Eliminators • Filter Accessories
Industries Served: • Power Generation • Oil & Gas
• Power Engineering • Transportation
• Maritime • HVAC
www.airsan.com • 4554 W Woolworth Avenue • Milwaukee, WI 53218
THE WORLDâ€™S LARGEST HVACR MARKETPLACE
LAS VEGAS JAN 30-FEB 1 2017 REGISTER NOW
FREE FOR A LIMITED TIME
From the Executive Director The power of NAFA by Michelle Czosek, CAE
I’ve worked in the association industry for longer than I’m going to mention in this column, and I’m constantly amazed at the “Power of A” – the term used by ASAE to show the reach and impact that associations have on people, the economy, legislation and more.
It’s hard to believe that almost a year has passed since the NAFA transition to AMPED. We’re just weeks away from the annual convention and I know it’s going to be a huge success. As I write this column, I’m sitting in a Starbucks in Salt Lake City, having just attended the opening day of the American Society of Association Executives (ASAE) 2016 Annual Meeting. This is the one time a year where 5,000 of my association peers and our industry partners descend on a city to exchange ideas and share best practices, all in an effort to help associations and individuals grow and thrive. It’s an experience that rejuvenates me and reminds me how lucky I am to have stumbled (like most association management professionals) into a career that I love.
As a member of NAFA, it’s important that you know what impact associations have and the importance of groups like ours. Below are just some of my favorite statistics from the ASAE website: • The IRS recognized 66,985 trade and professional associations in 2013. • During the 2013 fiscal year, there were 1,524 new applications for 501(c) (6) status. • Membership organizations of all types employed more than 1.3 million in 2013. • Membership organizations generated payroll of nearly $51 billion in 2013. • Associations represent a major piece of the meetings and conventions industry in the U.S. and that industry supports nearly 1.8 million jobs and accounts for $280 billion in direct spending by attendees.
Those are some pretty impressive numbers! What’s even more impressive is the power associations have to connect people like us to others that are engaged in a common business or career, share a mutual interest or are brought together for the good of a mission-driven organization. There’s incredible power in creating a community where we’re supportive of each other and share our knowledge so that everyone has a better chance for success. I’m excited about what lies ahead for NAFA and look forward to sharing what I’ve learned with Terry, so that we can make this association an even stronger and more connected community than it already is. I’d love to hear any ideas you have, too, so please feel free to contact me. I look forward to seeing you soon! ■ Warm regards,
The Power of A 36
NAFA Air Media
The publication for the air filtration industry