You Decide on CFS
An editorial response
J-Reyez’s story to fame
Intersectional identities
Benefits of Zumba fitness
News, page 2
Opinion, page 4
Arts, page 5
Features, page 8
Sports, page 11
Students call for Peterson’s dismissal The letter alleges that Peterson has broken the University’s Code of Behaviour on Academic Matters ALICIA BOATTO NEWS EDITOR
Over 100 university members have called for the University of Toronto to remove Jordan Peterson from the institution in an open letter addressed to the university’s vice president and vice president and provost Cheryl Regehr last week. The letter alleged that Peterson’s recent discourse is in violation with the University’s Code of Behavior, as Peterson stated intent to design a website that would highlight courses with “postmodern” and “neo-Marxist” content. The most recent letter by students and university members is a similar letter to the previous letter from U of T faculty of the Women and Gender Studies Institute, requesting that action be taken by the university against Peterson resulting in his dismissal. “The mere fact that such an aggressive and damaging initiative was proposed by a tenured University of Toronto professor is unacceptable. Prof. Peterson’s intended project would specifically target the academic integrity of and student enrolment
CARLOS OSORIO/THE STAR
The letter calls for the removal of Jordan Peterson from the University of Toronto. in Women and Gender Studies, ‘racial and ethnic groups studies,’ and the humanities in its broadest sense, contravening the University’s Code of Behaviour on Academic Matters, which states the University’s responsibility to ensure that ‘malevolent or even mischievous disruption’ is not permitted to threaten the educational process,” read the members’ letter.
Peterson has been a long-time advocate for free speech on university campuses and announced the launch of a website designed to highlight the ideologies of course instructors before enrolling in a class. “All these actions emphasize that such a database would constitute a serious threat to the mental and physical safety of students, faculty,
and staff at the University as well as to the broader academic and general communities. Prof. Peterson’s ongoing misconduct is damaging not only to the University’s educative function, but also to its civic role in the broader community,” the open letter also read. The letter claims that Peterson is “trying to disadvantage others”
through the use of his website and recent discourse against the humanities, alleging that those actions are against the interests of the university. Recently, the Women and Gender Studies Institute of U of T wrote to the vice-provost requesting a meeting regarding Peterson. WGSI alleged that Peterson’s intent to launch his website would jeopardize the safety of faculty and students within the department, and would allow individuals to target professors and courses through the use of the site. “Some members of our community have expressed concerns regarding Prof. Peterson’s recent statements. We are listening to these concerns, and considering them carefully,” stated Althea Blackburn-Evans, the director for U of T Media Relations, in an email to The Medium. The email also stated that the university had only become aware of the letter by students on November 29th. The university’s media team did not specify if the university has been in contact with Peterson regarding the announcement of his website or either of the open letters sent to Regehr. Letter continued on page 2
CUPE Unit 3 ratifies Tentative Agreement CUPE Unit 3 reached an agreement with U of T while Unit 1 continues to bargain with the university ALICIA BOATTO NEWS EDITOR A tentative agreement has been reached between CUPE 3902 Unit 3 and the University of Toronto bargaining team on Saturday, November 25. The two parties are currently undergoing ratification of the offer by Unit 3 members. CUPE 3902 released a brief statement on their social media pages the following day on Sunday, acknowledging that a tentative agreement had been reached after 24 hours of bargaining. According to an update on the U of T News page posted on November 28th, the tentative agreement was presented to employees during an ascension meeting that same day. CUPE 3902 posted on their website that 92.5 per cent of Unit 3 members voted in favour to send the tentative agreement to a bargaining-wide ratification vote during the ascension
MAHMOUD SAROUJI/THE MEDIUM
The collective agreement for CUPE 3902 Unit 1 is set to expire on December 31st. meeting. CUPE’s website also states that the results of the ascension meeting permitted a tri-campus referendum open to all Unit 3 members on whether to ratify the tentative agreement.
Polls remained open on all three campuses until December 1. The university and the bargaining team have been renegotiating contracts for sessional lecturers for several months. The university’s bar-
gaining team had offered Unit 3, which represents over 1,200 sessional lecturers, music instructors, and writing instructors at U of T, at least five different offers, according to CUPE’s fourth bargaining bulletin.
Kristin Cavoukin, a representative from the for CUPE 3902 Unit 3 bargaining team was unable to respond to The Medium’s request for comment, as of press time. A labour dispute had previously occurred in 2015 when U of T and CUPE 3902 Unit 1 failed to negotiate a tentative agreement. The strike, primarily concerned CUPE’s wish for increased wages, affected all teaching assistants across the U of T campuses and lasted four weeks. The 2015 strike came to an end after binding arbitration was decided in an emergency meeting. Unit 1 is currently still undergoing bargaining with the U of T administration with their contracts set to expire on December 31st. According to a November bulletin post, the Unit 1 bargaining team has met with the university’s administration five times in order to reach an agreement. CUPE continued on page 2