Smart Wearables in Spine Surgery

Transforming Patient Care Through Digital Innovation

The convergence of consumer technology and medical practice is fundamentally transforming the landscape of spine surgery, heralding a new era of precision medicine and patient-centered care. Smart wearables, defined as sophisticated sensor-enabled devices capable of continuous physiological monitoring and real-time data transmission, have emerged as powerful tools in the armamentarium of spine surgeons.1 These devices range from consumer-grade fitness trackers to FDA-approved medical-grade sensors, each offering unique capabilities for objective functional assessment.2 Unlike traditional episodic clinical evaluations, wearables provide continuous, ecologically valid data streams that capture the nuances of patient movement, posture, and recovery in real-world environments.3 As spine surgery increasingly emphasizes value-based care models and quantifiable outcomes, smart wearables represent a paradigm shift in preoperative assessment, intraoperative monitoring, and postoperative rehabilitation. By addressing the limitations of patient-reported outcomes, these devices provide objective, longitudinal data that can detect subtle changes in functional status, predict complications, and personalize recovery trajectories.4 The integration of these devices into spine care protocols promises to enhance clinical decision-making, optimize surgical timing, and ultimately improve patient outcomes through data-driven insights that were previously unattainable.

Current Landscape of Wearable Technology in Spine Care

Consumer-Grade Devices

The adoption of consumer-grade wearables in spine care has been evolving, with devices such as smartphones, smartwatches, and activity trackers becoming integral components of clinical assessment protocols.5 Activity trackers, including popular devices like the Apple Watch, Fitbit, and Mi Band, have shown value in establishing baseline functional status through continuous monitoring of step counts, activity intensity, and movement patterns.1 These devices leverage built-in accelerometers and gyroscopes to provide objective measures of physical function that correlate with traditional clinical assessments while offering the advantage of continuous, real-world data collection.6 Smartwatches have advanced beyond basic tracking, now incorporating sophisticated algorithms for detecting gait abnormalities, monitoring heart rate variability during recovery, and even predicting postoperative complications through aberrant movement patterns.7 Posture-tracking devices represent another category of consumer wearables gaining traction in spine care, with smart fabrics and wearable sensors providing real-time feedback on spinal alignment and movement quality.8 Recent systematic reviews have identified more than 10 commercial posture-monitoring devices, though challenges remain regarding accuracy, comfort, and long-term adherence.9

Medical-Grade Wearables

Medical-grade wearables have emerged as sophisticated tools designed specifically for clinical applications in spine care, offering enhanced accuracy and reliability compared to consumer devices.10 FDA-approved devices for spine-specific applications include advanced sensor systems that combine multiple inertial measurement units (IMUs) to capture complex spinal kinematics with laboratory-grade precision.11 IMUs have become particularly valuable in spine care, offering detailed biomechanical data on spinal movement patterns, load distribution, and compensatory mechanisms that may not be apparent during traditional clinical examinations.12 Recent innovations include smart implants equipped with strain gauges and telemetry systems that monitor spinal fusion progression and detect early signs of implant failure, representing the next frontier in postoperative monitoring.13 The integration of these medical-grade devices with electronic health records and surgical planning software is creating comprehensive digital ecosystems that support evidence-based clinical decision-making throughout the continuum of spine care.14

Preoperative Applications

Smart wearables have transformed preoperative assessment in spine surgery by providing objective, continuous functional data that surpass traditional episodic clinical evaluations. These devices establish comprehensive baseline measurements through automated tracking of step counts, activity intensity, and movement patterns, offering insights into real-world functional capacity that correlate with surgical outcomes.1 Recent studies indicate that integrating ecological momentary assessments with wearable biometric data in mobile health evaluations enhances the accuracy of predicting lumbar surgery outcomes by 30%–34% over traditional assessment methods.15 Sleep quality metrics, captured through consumer-grade devices, reveal circadian disruptions and rest patterns that influence postoperative recovery trajectories, while continuous pain tracking identifies temporal fluctuations missed during clinic visits.15

Risk stratification has evolved substantially through wearable-enabled continuous monitoring. These systems are often integrated with preoperative planning software, allowing surgeons to visualize the impact of planned interventions based on patient-specific functional data. 3 Machine learning algorithms analyze multimodal wearable data streams to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from preoperative optimization or alternative treatment strategies.15 This approach enables precision timing of surgical intervention based on objective functional status rather than subjective reporting alone. Studies demonstrate that patients with higher preoperative activity levels measured through wearables experience improved postoperative outcomes and shorter hospital stays.16 Furthermore, continuous monitoring captures functional decline patterns that signal optimal surgical windows, which are particularly valuable in degenerative conditions where timing significantly impacts outcomes. Integration of these objective metrics into clinical decision-making algorithms represents a paradigm shift from static assessment to dynamic, data-driven surgical planning that accounts for individual patient variability and real-world functional capacity.

Intraoperative Integration

Intraoperative wearable technologies enhance both surgeon performance and patient safety through real-time monitoring and augmented visualization capabilities. Surgeon-focused wearables, particularly head-mounted displays integrated with navigation systems, have demonstrated significant improvements in accuracy while decreasing radiation exposure during spine procedures.17 These augmented reality systems overlay critical anatomical information directly onto the surgical field, reducing cognitive load and improving spatial orientation during complex procedures. In addition, ergonomic monitoring devices assess surgeon posture and movement patterns, identifying fatigue indicators linked to technical performance degradation, thereby optimizing surgical scheduling and preventing burnout-related complications.18

The emergence of consumer-grade augmented reality devices, such as the Apple Vision Pro, represents a potential paradigm shift in surgical visualization and workflow optimization. These lightweight, high-resolution displays enable surgeons to access patient imaging, vital signs, and navigation data without diverting attention from the operative field. Apple Vision Pro's advanced spatial computing capabilities allow for manipulation of three-dimensional spinal models through intuitive hand gestures, supporting real-time surgical planning adjustments. Integration of artificial intelligence into these platforms may further enhance efficiency by offering predictive analytics for instrument selection and procedural steps, potentially reducing operative time and improving efficiency. Furthermore, augmented reality systems facilitate remote collaboration via head-mounted devices such as Microsoft HoloLens, Vuzix smart glasses, and Google Glass, which offer video and audio feeds. This allows a remote surgeon to see the surgical field from the operating surgeon’s viewpoint and interact by adding virtual annotations or instruments to the shared view. This capability has been showcased in orthopedic and spinal surgeries, where remote experts provide guidance or mentorship to local surgeons, improving both safety and education. However, challenges remain regarding limited battery life during extended procedures, display latency in dynamic surgical environments, and the need for specialized training to optimize these technologies’ benefits while avoiding distraction-related complications.

Postoperative Revolution

The integration of smart wearables in postoperative spine care represents a shift from episodic clinical assessments to continuous, real-world monitoring of recovery. Remote patient monitoring through wearable devices enables objective tracking of early mobilization, a critical determinant that correlates with reduced complications and improved functional outcomes.16 Consumer-grade devices such as smartwatches and activity trackers generate continuous data on step counts, activity intensity, and movement patterns during the crucial early recovery period, offering insights unattainable through traditional follow-up alone.2

Wearable-based tracking of early mobilization offers superior compliance monitoring compared to self-reporting, with studies showing that objective activity data correlate more strongly with functional recovery than subjective assessments.1 These devices detect aberrant movement patterns that may signal developing complications, such as asymmetric gait suggesting nerve irritation or sudden decreases in activity suggesting pain exacerbation, enabling timely interventions before complications necessitate readmission.16 Therefore, wearable monitoring can enhance perioperative surveillance, enable earlier detection of complications, and support remote management, which may reduce unnecessary healthcare utilization, though specific quantitative reductions in clinic visits have not been established.

Rehabilitation optimization represents another cornerstone of the postoperative wearable revolution. Smart devices provide real-time biofeedback during physical therapy exercises, ensuring proper form and intensity while preventing overexertion that could compromise surgical outcomes. Gamification elements integrated into rehabilitation protocols through wearable applications could also improve patient engagement and improve adherence to home exercise programs by incorporating achievement badges and progress tracking. Furthermore, objective documentation of functional improvement through wearables provides insurers with quantifiable evidence of rehabilitation effectiveness, potentially streamlining authorization for continued therapy and reducing administrative burden on both patients and providers.

Conclusion

Smart wearables represent a paradigm shift in spine surgery, transforming every phase of patient care from preoperative assessment through long-term recovery monitoring. The convergence of consumer accessibility, clinical validation, and seamless integration with existing healthcare infrastructure positions these technologies as essential tools rather than optional adjuncts in modern spine practice. For spine surgeons, embracing evidence-based wearable technology adoption offers unprecedented opportunities to enhance surgical precision, optimize patient selection, and deliver truly personalized care through objective, continuous data streams. The future of digitally-enhanced spine surgery lies in artificial intelligence integration, promising predictive analytics that anticipate complications before clinical manifestation and powering adaptive recovery algorithms tailored to individual progress.19 As value-based care models increasingly emphasize measurable outcomes, wearable-derived objective metrics will become indispensable for demonstrating surgical efficacy and justifying interventions. The vision ahead encompasses a comprehensive digital ecosystem where preoperative baselines, intraoperative precision, and postoperative trajectories seamlessly inform clinical decision-making, ultimately elevating the standard of spine care through data-driven insights and patient-centered innovation.

References

1. Haddas R, Lawlor M, Moghadam E, Fields A, Wood A. Spine patient care with wearable medical technology: state-of-the-art, opportunities, and challenges: a systematic review. Spine J. 2023;23(7):929-944.

2. Lightsey HM, Yeung CM, Samartzis D, Makhni MC. The past, present, and future of remote patient monitoring in spine care: an overview. Eur Spine J. 2021;30(8):2102-2108.

3. Bi CL, Kurland DB, Ber R, et al. Digital biomarkers and the evolution of spine care outcomes measures: smartphones and wearables. Neurosurgery. 2023;93(4):745-754.

4. Lee SI, Campion A, Huang A, et al. Identifying predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis patients using smart-shoe technology. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017;14(1):77.

5. Greenberg JK, Javeed S, Zhang JK, et al. Current and future applications of mobile health technology for evaluating spine surgery patients: a review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2023;38(5):617-626.

6. Chakravorty A, Mobbs RJ, Anderson DB, et al. The role of wearable devices and objective gait analysis for the assessment and monitoring of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletl Disord. 2019;20(1):288.

7. Syversen A, Dosis A, Jayne D, Zhang Z. Wearable sensors as a preoperative assessment tool: a review. Sensors (Basel). 2024;24(2):482.

8. Papi E, Koh WS, McGregor AH. Wearable technology for spine movement assessment: a systematic review. J Biomech. 2017;64:186-197.

9. Yoong NKM, Perring J, Mobbs RJ. Commercial postural devices: a review. Sensors (Basel). 2019;19(23):5128.

10. Mattison G, Canfell O, Forrester D, et al. The influence of wearables on health care outcomes in chronic disease: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(7):e36690.

11. McClintock FA, Callaway AJ, Clark CJ, Williams JM. Validity and reliability of inertial measurement units used to measure motion of the lumbar spine: a systematic review of individuals with and without low back pain. Med Eng Phys. 2024;126:104146.

12. Aranda-Valera IC, Cuesta-Vargas A, Garrido-Castro JL, et al. Measuring spinal mobility using an inertial measurement unit system: a validation study in axial spondyloarthritis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10(6):426.

13. Kim SJ, Wang T, Pelletier MH, Walsh WR. ‘SMART’ implantable devices for spinal implants: a systematic review on current and future trends. J Spine Surg. 2022;8(1):117-131.

14. Simpson AK, Crawford AM, Striano BM, Kang JD, Schoenfeld AJ. The future of spine care innovation-software not hardware: how the digital transformation will change spine care delivery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023;48(1):73-78.

15. Greenberg JK, Frumkin M, Xu Z, et al. Preoperative mobile health data improve predictions of recovery from lumbar spine surgery. Neurosurgery. 2024;95(3):617-626.

16. Yakdan S, Zhang J, Benedict B, et al. Multidomain postoperative recovery trajectories after lumbar and thoracolumbar spine surgery. Spine J. Published online May 7, 2025. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.spinee.2025.05.017

17. McCloskey K, Turlip R, Ahmad HS, Ghenbot YG, Chauhan D, Yoon JW. Virtual and augmented reality in spine surgery: a systematic review. World Neurosurg. 2023;173:96-107.

18. Zulbaran-Rojas A, Rouzi MD, Zahiri M, et al. Objective assessment of postural ergonomics in neurosurgery: integrating wearable technology in the operating room. J Neurosurg Spine. 2024;41(1):135-145.

19. Knight SR, Ng N, Tsanas A, Mclean K, Pagliari C, Harrison EM. Mobile devices and wearable technology for measuring patient outcomes after surgery: a systematic review. NPJ Digit Med. 2021;4(1):157.

Contributors:

Luis M. Salazar, MD

Vincent P. Federico, MD

Arash Sayari, MD

From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at Rush University Surgery at Rush University Medical Center in Chicago, Illinois.