The Patriot Pony Bonus Section
Monday, December 6, 2021
Subscribe for free
$0.00—online only
COVID Patient Given Ivermectin Multiple State Attorney Generals to present new standing to Supreme Court in election fraud At Edward Improving: Report Lisa Marie, Farver,Patch.com Staff EDITOR’S NOTE—This section is reserved as an editorial and may not necessarily reflect the policy of this publication.
Over the weekend, a group numbering hundreds of people staged a funeral march in Parma, Italy, in memory of those who died as a result of COVID-19 vaccination. Marchers held photos of the dead as they solemnly marched through central Parma, chanting the names of those killed because of experimental vaccines. On November 20, relatives of those who died from vaccination also held a march in South Korea, where they shaved their heads as a sign of remembrance for their lost loved ones and asked for answers from government officials. ***** Nevada on Thursday became the first U.S. state to impose a surcharge on workers who have not gotten a COVID-19 vaccine, though the penalty doesn’t take effect until the middle of next year. All but two members of the state’s Public Employees’ Benefit Program Board (PEBP) voted during a meeting to approve a surcharge of $55 a month on unvaccinated workers. The approved proposal also stipulates a surcharge of $175 a month for workers’ spouses, partners, and dependents 18 and older. That could be adjusted down the road. The surcharges will go into effect on July 1, 2022. ***** British Member of Parliament David Da-
(Continued on page 18)
NAPERVILLE, IL — A COVID-19 patient at Edward Hospital who was given ivermectin after a lawsuit is now breathing without assistance, Daily Herald reports his attorneys have said. Lawyers for the hospital contend that Sun Ng had been improving prior to the treatment. In early November, Judge Paul Fullerton had ordered the hospital to allow Dr. Alan Bain, who is not vaccinated against coronavirus, to come to the hospital to provide ivermectin treatments to Ng, 71, a resident of Hong Kong, who was hospitalized with coronavirus on Oct. 14. Ng was placed on a ventilator four days later. Ng's daughter, Dr. Man Kwan Ng, sued Edward-Elmhurst Health after the hospi-
tal denied her request to allow her father to receive ivermectin, according to a news release from Dr. Ng's lawyers. According to Daily Herald, lawyers for the family said Sun Ng was given ivermectin for five days. After the treatment, attorneys said Ng removed his breathing tube and was taken out of intensive care. Joseph Monahan, a lawyer who represents Edward Hospital, countered that Ng had shown improvement prior to being given ivermectin. "Monahan also said the hospital was unable to confirm the contents of the drug given because the doctor obtained it online from India," Daily Herald reports. Lawyers for Ng and Edward Hospital did not immediately respond to Patch's request for more information and comment Wednesday afternoon.
Wayne Allyn Root Predicts Dems Will Try to ‘Install’ Hillary Clinton as President The entertaining and sensational-leaning Conservative columnist and syndicated radio/TV host, Wayne Allyn Root, predicts that Hillary Clinton will soon be President of the United States. In an article for Townhall, Root shared his prediction while touting his “remarkably accurate” ability to foretell the future— noting that he has “the best record of anyone in the media.” What Root lacks in specifics, he compensates for in bravado— citing his “.990” record and boasting that “almost everything I’ve predicted has come true.” “[From a] stolen election based on mail-in
voting without voter ID; a Communist takeover of the USA based on lockdowns; COVID-19 ’public safety’ mandates and open borders; and President Joe Biden being a brain-dead puppet with dementia… it’s all on tape,” writes Root. “So I’m going to make another shocking prediction,” Root continued. “Democrats (i.e., the party of radical, insane and hateful Socialists, Marxists and Communists) are getting ready to install Hillary Clinton as President of the United States.” Root provides few
(Continued on page 18)
Attorney Kurt Olsen has laid out a case for state Attorney Generals as to why the November 2020 election shouldn’t stand. There are four significant differences from this complaint than the previous complaint filed by the State of Texas (joined by 18 other states) in December of 2020. This includes new defendants and claims against those defendants. Those include the United States, the officers of the United States including the President, Vice President, Speaker of the House, Attorney General, and President Pro Tem of the Senate. The attorney has filed claims under Article IV of the Constitution guarantee clause which state that the United States shall provide for a republican form of government.
of eight Justices. Four of them wanted to rule on Article II on the changes to election laws by nonlegislative actors such as courts and officers.
“The stolen election is not a republican form of government,” Olsen stated in a recent interview.
The other basis for standing is that each state has agreed to play by the same rules under the United States Constitution.
Olsen also has alleged violations of the Take Care Clause under Article II which state that those officers named have a duty to ensure that the laws of the United States are faithfully executed and states that this election shows that they were not. Olsen says that it is a fact that on October 2020, there were four Supreme Court Justices who wanted to take up a case involving Article II violations in Pennsylvania. But the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, by fiat, ruled that ballots could be counted after the statutory deadline of Nov. 3 at 8 pm. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court said that they could keep counting ballots even without postmarks and signatures through Nov. 6. At that time, the US Supreme Court consisted
The three remaining new issues include new arguments for standing whereas the Supreme Court dismissed the Texas case on that matter a year ago. Olsen says one of the two new arguments for standing couldn’t have been made before since the Georgia run-off election had not taken place a year ago. With the US Senate being split 50/50, Vice President Kamala Harris, who is alleged in the complaint to not have been legitimately elected, became the deciding vote. Because of her casting the deciding vote, it gives standing to all 50 states.
“Because accepting the facts in the complaint plat is true, which the court must, the electoral count would be below 270,” said Olsen. “As a consequence, every state has a right under the 12th Amendment to demand an election pursuant to the 12th Amendment, pursuant to that architecture for the President and Vice President.” The next distinction in this case is a plethora of new evidence and facts since December 2020. On Sept 24, 2021, the results of the Maricopa County, Arizona audit and in October 2021, the Racine County Sheriff referred felony criminal charges against the Wisconsin election stating that election laws were not just broken but were “shattered.” The Wisconsin Legislative Au-
dit Bureau issued a damning report finding tens of thousands of ballots that were irregular or illegal. In example, over 50,000 new registered voters whose identification didn’t match what was on file. This included obvious errors such as names that didn’t match. A new court decision by the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled (after the US Supreme Court dismissed the Texas case) that guidance given by the Wisconsin Election Commission on indefinitely confined, which involves potentially over 160,000 ineligible voters, was unlawful. In Michigan, a court ruled in March 2021 that the Secretary of State guidance which removed signature verification was unlawful. “So, you have a host of new facts, new developments, new findings – all that make this complaint materially different than the case that was filed in December 2020,” said Olsen. He states that the last thing that is materially different than the last case is the coverup of the election fraud. He says that evidence from the Maricopa audit showed that Maricopa Board of Elections supervisors destroyed election records and tried to feverishly block the audit. “They destroyed those election records, apparently, after the court in Arizona ruled that the audit must go forward,” said Olsen. “The evidence of that has been referred to Arizona Attorney General for further investigation and presumably and hopefully, and indictment.” Olsen also cites destruction of election records in Georgia.
(Continued on page 18)
