THE HARROVIAN
Editors: Benjamin Wang (Y12, Churchill) Nicole Pullinger (Y11, Gellhorn)
Issue 9
Student Newspaper
Leadership for a better world
Resolve in an imperfect world by Zeli Wang (Y12, Churchill), Calvin Kean (Y13, Peel)
Photo credits: CDNIS Photography Team
A delegation of 21 Harrow Hong Kong students dressed in formal attire attended the second annual Model United Nations conference at Canadian International School of Hong Kong on 15th September. The early morning arrival (7:45 am) was rather painful for the students as the conference was held during a long weekend. However, after a few short opening speeches, they were all woken up and ready to debate. Each student was directed to their specific committee which would address a range of current issues, from the court case of Julian Assange to the growing threat of ISIS and the prevention of another Cuban missile crisis. Harrow Hong Kong delegates came well prepared, armed with draft resolutions and loaded with cogent arguments. Every committee, with their different formats and foci, brought about distinct experiences for each delegate. Committee sessions began with opening speeches, when delegates put forward their nation’s position on the questions, and identified allies and opponents through others’ speeches. Shortly after, the lobbying period saw the formation of blocs of nations with similar aims. Like-minded delegates discussed, combined, and fine-tuned their draft resolutions while lying on bean bags. After passing through the Approving Panel, the resolutions were debated one by one, with speeches made for or against it. Opponents often used Points of Information to their advantage to attack inconsistencies, while friendly delegates strengthened the resolution with amendments. This did not, of course, stop detractors from trying to strike all the clauses from the resolution. After a majority voting for the entire resolution as a whole, clapping was in order. Success in each committee can only happen after thorough research and a clear conception of the interests of the nation you represent. These are even more important in ‘special’ committees such as the Covert Conference for Intelligence Agencies (CCIA). Although generally delegates
October 2016
should be persuasive while being diplomatic, the one-on-one debate in CCIA often gets fiery and pointed. The committee, designed for experienced MUNers, requires extensive familiarity with the world’s intelligence agencies and current affairs. Directors of IAs could be put on trial for crimes against humanity and, if they lost the case, were sentenced to some forfeit. The Harrow Hong Kong delegation was thoroughly challenged by collisions of opinions in the General Assembly and trials in the CCIA. Ralph Summers (Y13, Churchill), Secretary General of the MUN executive committee, gained valuable experience as chair of the CCIA. Seven delegates received an award, a very impressive record given that there are only three awards in each committee. In particular, James Brammer (Y12, Peel), a first-time MUNer, earned “best delegate”. For students aiming to excel at The Hague International MUN in Singapore next month, this was the perfect training course. The executive committee looks forward to hosting HARMUN on the 21st and 22nd January. It welcomes all students with an interest in world issues and public speaking to join the club for future conferences, regardless of experience. Visit www.harmun.weebly.com for more information.
Freedom of Movement
Should all people have the right to live in any country they wish? by Kalina Milenova (Y12, Gellhorn)
In light of the current global refugee crisis, we asked Upper School students to send in their opinion about whether people should be legally free to live in any country in the world in this first instalment of Question of the Issue. We were unable to fit in all the responses but thank you for everyone who took the time to write in. Here are some of the responses: “From my point of view, everyone should be given the right to live in any country, as long as they commit to the responsibility of respecting the country’s religion and culture. This is because I believe nobody should be discriminated against for their individualism. However, if the person poses a potential threat to the society, for example, if they have committed murder before, they should not be allowed to live in any given country unless they can prove that they will not negatively affect the society.” (Chinat Yu, Y11, Churchill) “Before we think ‘should or should not’, we should consider ‘why’. Businesses may wish to increase labour mobility because it is easier for them to employ professional and skilled workers. Asylum seekers may wish to live in another country to avoid the chaos of war. Some might be benefit-seekers, who just want to live in another country to enjoy social welfare. From the people’s perspective, assuming the majority only