Wednesday February 18, 2015
Kaieteur News
Page 25
Neesa Gopaul murder trial…
Grandfather warned daughter of lover’s behaviour Mohamed Kayum, the Grandfather of murdered Queen’s College student, Neesa Gopaul told the court yesterday, that he was present when a police officer identified the headless remains of a female to be that of his granddaughter. Kayum is the fifth civilian witness to take the stand in murder trial of Jarvis Small and Bibi Shareema Gopaul. The two persons are on trial before Justice Navindra Singh and a mixed twelve -member jury at the High Court in Georgetown for the murder, which allegedly took place sometime between September 24 and October 2, 2010. Small is being represented by a team of lawyers including Glenn Hanoman, Bernard De Santos SC, Lyndon Amsterdam and Zanna Frank, while Gopaul is being represented by Attorney-at-Law, George Thomas. State Prosecutors Diana Kaulesar, Mercedes Thompson and Stacy Gooding are presenting the case On October 2, 2010, the headless remains of a female was discovered at a location along the Soesdkye/Linden Highway, tucked inside a suitcase that was partially submerged in a creek. A rope was wrapped around the suitcase and dumbbells were attached at one end, apparently in an effort to keep the body under water. In addition to the body, a passport bearing the name Neesa Lalita Gopaul was also found. The teenager was reported missing just days before the discovery was made. Following the discovery, the teen’s mother, Bibi and her then lover, Small were arrested and charged for the murder. Yesterday, 73-year- old Kayum took the stand and identified the number two accused as his daughter Bibi Shareema Gopaul. Kayum then told the court he also knew number one accused, “Barry Small,” because his daughter had introduced them to each other before. He explained that they were introduced one morning after he had visited her home at Leonora, West Coast Demerara (WCD). The elderly man told the court that he is a resident of Anna Catherina, WCD, but that he would visit his daughter and her children, who were living a few villages away, from time to time. Kayum said that on October 2, 2010, Assistant Superintendent of Police (ASP), Terrance Paul contacted him at the Leonora Police Station and related to him that the police had found the body of his granddaughter, Neesa Gopaul, and that the body
was at Lyken’s Funeral Home. The man said that he later went to the funeral home accompanied by Officer Paul, who pointed out the body to be that of his granddaughter, Neesa Gopaul. “When I get there he tell me this is Neesa Gopaul,” the witness said, noting that the body was clad in a flowered multi-coloured top and black tights. Prosecutor Kaulesar then asked the witness whether there was anything about the body which looked familiar. The man replied in the affirmative, noting that he had seen his granddaughter in the multi-coloured flowered top on at least one occasion before. Kayum said that the teen was wearing the top when she visited his home in Anna Catherina on September 17, 2010. The witness explained that it was the day after her birthday that she visited his home; she was wearing the multi-coloured flowered top and blue jeans.” I kill a duck, cook and treat them,” the witness said noting that, that was the last time he saw his granddaughter alive. Kayum was also shown a photograph in which he identified the clothing to be that which he had seen on the body at the funeral home. He said that on October 6, 2010, he went to the mortuary of the Georgetown Public Hospital Corporation, (GPHC) to witness a post mortem examination conducted on the said body. Kayum recalled however, that the body was headless, thus he could not definitively say whether it belonged to his granddaughter Neesa Gopaul. Further question about his granddaughters, Kayum said that they - Neesa Gopaul and her younger sister, Miriam - were placed in his care by the Child Care and Protection Agency, (CPA). Gopaul said that after four weeks his daughter, (Bibi Shareema) came for her two children and he sent them with their mother. He explained that he had spoken to Ann Greene of the CPA, and she told him that she had given the mother permission to collect her children. The witness expressed his love for both his granddaughters Kayum further stated that ever since the incident; the younger granddaughter was left in his care. “That is me job now to look after Miriam. Meh does make sure she go to school, come home and everything.. Meh does look after she!” the witness said emphatically. This brought tears to the eyes of the number two accused Gopaul, who hid her
Murdered: Neesa Gopaul face in her hands as she sat listening to her father’s testimony. The elderly man also noted that he was left with the keys to his daughter’s home following her arrest. Under cross examination from Senior Counsel Bernard De Santos, the witness explained that Officers Paul and Jessemy took him to see the body at the funeral home. Kayum said that after the officer told him that the body belonged to his granddaughter, he asked them how they knew. The witness said Officer Paul responded by stating that a passport and bank card bearing the name, Neesa Gopaul, was found with the body. Kayum noted however, that he never saw any of the said documents. In response to questions by the attorney, the witness maintained that the multicoloured flowered top was the only thing he recognized on the body. He noted that he did not identify the body, but he was told it was Neesa Gopaul. Kayum also accepted that he was reluctant to give a statement, but he subsequently did so at the insistence of the police. The witness also noted that his other granddaughter submitted a statement to police officers at their Headquarters in Eve Leary. Further questioned about the evidence he had given in the Magistrates’ Court regarding the identity of the corpse, Kayum acknowledged that the only reason he accepted that Neesa Gopaul was dead was because the police told him so. “I tell the magistrate that I don’t know if it was Neesa Gopaul, because she was headless.” The defence attorney went on to ask the witness whether he knew that his granddaughter had a boyfriend, and whether the boyfriend was allowed to visit the home from time to time. “No no no, nah me house” the witness blurted in response, causing an outburst of laughter in the courtroom. Under cross examination by Defence Attorney George Thomas, Kayum disclosed
that his granddaughter had complained to him about Small being in their home, but noted that Neesa never complained about her mother. The elderly man recalled that on one occasion he had repaired a door at his daughter’s residence. “She tell me that Barry Small kick down the door,” the witness recounted. Asked whether his daughter made any attempts to get Small out of her home, the witness said “me tell Shareema Gopaul, meh ask she wha ya do with this man? This man looks like a killer, all he eye red red… but she seh she try fuh put he out, but he nah does tek leff”. Near the end of his evidence, the elderly man broke down on the stand. In tears, the man expressed gratitude that he was able to tell his part of the story to the court before he died. He noted that he took care of his granddaughters whole-heartedly. Following the cross examination, a member of the jury sought clarification into the statements made by the witness with regard to the CPA. However, this question was not allowed based on objections by the defence. Senior Counsel Bernard De Santos noted that such questions would lead to hearsay and prejudicial evidence. Ashram Tiwari also testified yesterday. He told the court that he became ac-
Murdered Accused: Jarvis Barry Small
Murder Accused: Bibi Shareema Gopaul
quainted with Small about a year prior to the incident. He told the court that he would visit Small at his home, where they would hang out. The man noted that during the period he had known the accused, he lived at two houses; with his wife and at Nari’s, whom he identified to be Bibi Shareema Gopaul. The witness recounted that while visiting the home he noticed gym equipment, dumbbells included. Tiwari told the court that in October 2010, he was also arrested in relation with the incident. He noted that he submitted a statement to the police after he was shown a pair of dumbbells which he recognized to be the ones he had seen at the home of the accused.
The witness was subsequently shown the pair of dumbbells which were admitted into the evidence earlier in the trial. He identified them to be the weights he had seen at the Police Station and at the home of the accused. Police Corporal Lancelot Whittington also took the stand. The policeman told the court that he had taken photographic exposures of the body of Neesa Gopaul, during a post mortem exercise which was conducted by Government Pathologist, Dr Nehaul Singh. The witness identified 10 photographs as those he had taken of the body in October 2010. The images were thereafter admitted into evidence and shown to members of the jury.
Health Ministry denies transparency concern over AIDS funding The Ministry of Health yesterday said that there is no specific recommendation on transparency with which Guyana has to comply with in order to benefit from U$9 million in funding from the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. The Ministry was referring to statements by UNAIDS Country Director Dr Roberto Campos, that disbursement of the funds hinges on transparency and other benchmarks. Programme Director of the National AIDS Programme Secretariat (NAPS), Dr Shanti Singh, said that all principal recipients of the Global Fund are guided by clear benchmarks for transparency that have been established. “During the process of applying for a country grant, countries are required to satisfy the Global Fund on issue of transparency and accountability as part of the eligibility criteria for a concept note for which Guyana complied. “If a country does not pass this first phase a grant is not approved,” the Health Ministry stated. In a statement issued at the NAPS, the Ministry of Health said “there is no specific recommenda-
tion on transparency that Guyana has to comply with for the remainder of the funds to be released. The HIV programme has always been transparent in its actions.” In an interview, Dr Campos said that Guyana programmes under the Global Fund had to re-organised to meet a new global funding model. He had said the Global Fund is “really worried” about the process of procurement of supplies in general and ARVs (Anti-Retroviral Drugs) drugs in particular. According to Campos, there needed to be clear guidelines developed by the government for the procurement and supply of drugs. He particularly mentioned the needs for a procurement manual. In relation to the procurement of Anti-retroviral drugs for HIV patients, Dr Singh said the Ministry of Health is a signatory to the Global Fund’s Voluntary Pooled Procurement (VPP), a strategy established by Global Fund to support countries. “Through this mechanism, procurement of ARVs for the Guyana programme is therefore not done by Guyana,
Rather the country receives the ARVs procured by the Global Fund through VPP,” the Ministry of Health said. In relation to the availability of ARVs, the National Programme conducts regular quantification based on sound methodology with consideration of critical information such as stock on hand, ARV regimen use and others, the Ministry stated. It added that this has resulted in a high level of accuracy in quantifying the country’s needs for ARVs and has therefore ensured consistent and uninterrupted supply of ARVs. Dr Singh said that in the last five years, only on one occasion was supplies requested on an emergency basis. In the interview, Dr Campos had said that Guyana pays much more for drugs than other countries and one of the reasons is that drugs are purchased on an emergency basis. “If you start the process one year before, you know you will need ‘X’ amount of drugs, and so you purchase those drugs in a lower prices; if you delay the purchase you need to buy in emergency way so the price will go up,” Dr Campos had stated.