November / December 2014
Vol. VIII No. 6
Serving Soil, Mulch, Compost & Wood Pellet Producers www.SoilandMulchProducerNews.com
Attention Readers !
NEWS
New England Leads Nation in Food Waste Recovery, Four States On Board
Are you looking for Products, Equipment or Services for your business? If so, please check out these leading companies advertised in this issue: Bagging / Wrapping Systems Amadas Industries – pg 20 Lachenmeier – pg 14 PremierTech Chronos – Insert
Blower Trucks & Trailers
By Todd Williams
Peterson – pg 7
Buildings & covers ClearSpan – pg 3 ComposTex – pg 6
Clutch Parts
Foley Engines – pg 19
Compost Equipment HCL Machine Works – pg 19
erosion Control JRM Chemical – pg 13
Mulch Coloring Equipment/ Colorants AgriCoatings – pg 8 CMC – pg 12 Colorbiotics – pg 11 Prism Corporation – pg 15
Shredders, Grinders, Chippers & Screening Systems Allu Group Inc – pg 17 CW Mill Equipment Co. – pg 21 Komptech USA – pg 24 Morbark Inc. – pg 2 Neuenhauser – pg 9 Peterson – pg 7 Premier Tech Chronos – Insert Rayco Mfg – pg 13 Rotochopper Inc. – pg 23 Sundance Grinders – pg 6 West Salem Machinery – pg 10
Trommel Brushes
Duff Brush LLC – pg 10 United Rotary Brush Corp – pg 19
P
rompted by rapidly shrinking landfill space combined with a growing national movement to recover food scraps, four New England states have passed stringent laws mandating separation of food waste from general trash. Connecticut, Massachusetts, Vermont and Rhode Island all have enacted legislation that, while slightly differing in each state, effectively bans the co-mingling of food waste with other recyclables and general trash. The laws in these states are the toughest in the nation, and make recycling mandatory Recognizing the food waste conundrum as a national issue, these four states have taken the problem head on, by enacting new regulations. And, according to the U.S. EPA, these rules are coming none too late. The EPA says more food reaches landfills than any other single material in municipal solid waste. In 2012 alone, more than 36 million tons of food waste was generated, with only five percent diverted from landfills and incinerators for composting. The EPA cites a number of reasons to divert food scrap from landfills including environmental benefits such as reducing landfill methane emissions, reducing resource use associated with food production, creating a valuable soil amendment, and improving public sanitation. Economic benefits include lower disposal costs, reduction of over-purchasing and labor costs, and receiving tax benefits by donating food.
According to K.C. Alexander, Organics Recycling Specialist with the Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection (DEEP), the state’s mandatory recycling legislation was first passed in 2011, with food scrap regulations added last year. The mandatory rules already target leaves and grass clippings. Thus food scraps became the next logical step in the recycling agenda. Alexander says the new recycling legislation was added, in part, because the rate of waste recycling and composting in the state has remained stuck at about 26 percent over the past decade. Connecticut still disposes of 2.4 million tons of trash annually, or an estimated 1,370 pounds of trash per person per year. Because the state has only a few landfills, most of Connecticut’s bulky trash is shipped out-of-state. The state’s goal is now a 60 percent recycling rate. The new food scrap law went into effect Jan. 1, 2014 calling for the recycling of commercially generated source-separated organic materials. The legislation, Alexander explains, addresses commercial food wholesalers or distributors, industrial food manufacturers or processors, supermarkets, and resorts or conference centers. It states that if these businesses are located no more than 20 miles from an authorized source-separated organic material composting facility and generate an average projected volume of not less than 104 tons per year of waste, they must separate the organic materials from other Continued on page 3