IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE
WIT & WISDOM® © Great Minds PBC GREAT MINDS® WIT & WISDOM®
Implementation Guide
Implementation Guide A Guide for Educators
Great Minds® is the creator of Eureka Math® , Wit & Wisdom® , Alexandria Plan™, and PhD Science®
Published by Great Minds PBC greatminds.org
© 2023 Great Minds PBC. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means—graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying or information storage and retrieval systems— without written permission from the copyright holder. Where expressly indicated, teachers may copy pages solely for use by students in their classrooms.
Printed
ISBN 978-1-63898-141-1
in the
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 XXX 27 26 25 24 23
USA
WIT & WISDOM® Implementation Guide © Great Minds PBC
Module Design
Module Synopses
Content-Craft-Create Framework
| Content Stages and Content Framing Questions
| Craft Stages and Craft Questions
| Create: The Demonstration of Content and Craft Learning
| The Content-Craft-Create Framework in Action
Core Practices
Meeting Student Needs
| Student Engagement
| Productive Struggle
| Text Diversity
| Support for All Learners
| Supporting English Learners
Wit & Wisdom and Social-Emotional Learning
Lesson Design
Contents INTRODUCTION Comprehensive ELA Instruction ............................................................................................................................... ... 7 What Is Wit & Wisdom? ............................................................................................................................... .................... 8 Building Knowledge Through Complex Text Program Design Research in Action Wit & Wisdom in Sync™ Wit & Wisdom Core Curriculum Components 17 GETTING STARTED WITH WIT & WISDOM Overview 19 Terminology 20 Learning Design 21
© Great Minds PBC Implementation Guide iii WIT & WISDOM®
GOING DEEPER WITH WIT & WISDOM
iv
Assessment 57 The Wit & Wisdom Approach to Assessment Assessment in Action Achieving the Standards The Impact of Assessment The Wit & Wisdom Approach to the Standards ...................................................................................................... 60 Reading ............................................................................................................................... ............................................... 66 The Wit & Wisdom Approach to Teaching Reading Reading Instruction in Action Achieving the Standards The Impact of Reading Instruction Vocabulary 69 The Wit & Wisdom Approach to Teaching Vocabulary Vocabulary Instruction in Action Achieving the Standards The Impact of Vocabulary Instruction Foundational Skills ............................................................................................................................... .......................... 72 The Wit & Wisdom Approach to Foundational Skills Geodes®............................................................................................................................... ................................................ 73 The Wit & Wisdom Approach to Early Literacy Geodes Components Fluency 75 The Wit & Wisdom Approach to Teaching Fluency Fluency Instruction in Action Achieving the Standards The Impact of Fluency Instruction Visual Art 78 The Wit & Wisdom Approach to Teaching Visual Art Visual Art Instruction in Action The Impact of Visual Art Instruction Writing ............................................................................................................................... ............................................... 80 The Wit & Wisdom Approach to Teaching Writing Writing Instruction in Action Achieving the Standards The Impact of Writing Instruction © Great Minds PBC Implementation Guide WIT & WISDOM®
PLANNING FOR IMPLEMENTATION
Speaking and Listening 83 The Wit & Wisdom Approach to Teaching Speaking and Listening Speaking and Listening Instruction in Action Achieving the Standards The Impact of Speaking and Listening Instruction
Lesson Preparation 87 Wit & Wisdom Preparation Protocols 88 Mapping a Year of Wit & Wisdom 89 Using Time Between Modules Planning Pause Points Within Modules Sample Annual Calendar Setting Up a Wit & Wisdom Classroom ..................................................................................................................... 92 Student Journals Projection Device Student Access to Technology Materials for Collaborative and Individual Student Use Sample Daily Schedules 94 Sharing Wit & Wisdom with Families 97 LEADING AND SUPPORTING SCHOOL-WIDE IMPLEMENTATION Student Grading and Achievement ............................................................................................................................ 99 Teacher Observation and Integrity of Implementation .................................................................................... 100 Professional Development and Building Teacher Capacity ............................................................................. 102 RESOURCES Content Not Included in Wit & Wisdom in Sync 105 Volume of Reading Guidance 107 Socratic Seminar Guidance 107 Socratic Seminar Content Lesson Procedures Lesson Timing Supporting Student Participation in a Socratic Seminar Facilitating an Effective Socratic Seminar Sample Socratic Seminar Tracking Chart Instructional Routines ............................................................................................................................... .................. 114 © Great Minds PBC Implementation Guide v WIT & WISDOM®
What is an instructional routine?
What is the purpose of an instructional routine?
Frayer Model (Grades K–8)
Morpheme Matrix (Grades 3–8)
Outside-In (Grades K–8)
Relationship Mapping (Grades K–8)
Student-Generated Definitions (Grades 3–8)
Word Line (Grades K–8)
Informative/Explanatory Writing Models
| Grades K–1: TopIC
| Grades 2–3: I-TEE-C
| Grades 3–8: To-SEEC (To SEE Clearly)
Opinion/Argument Writing Models
| Grades K–1: OReO
| Grade 2: I-OREO
| Grades 3–5: OREEO or HI-OREE-CO
| Grades 6–8: CREEA-C or HI-CREEA-CC
Narrative Writing Models
| Grades K–2: CSPER
| Grades 3–8:
WORKS CITED CREDITS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
vi
Vocabulary
128
Instruction Examples
Sample Annotation Symbols
133 Writing Models 134
Chart
ESCAPE Writing Rubrics 141 Speaking and Listening Rubrics 168 Family Tip Sheets 183 Suggested Materials Lists for Modules 1 and 2 186 Background Reading 193
Foundational Sources
Articles and Reports
Books
© Great Minds PBC Implementation Guide WIT & WISDOM®
INTRODUCTION
COMPREHENSIVE ELA INSTRUCTION
Wit & Wisdom is a comprehensive Kindergarten through Grade 8 English Language Arts curriculum developed by and for teachers. Each Wit & Wisdom module centers on the study of rich and engaging texts, curated to build student knowledge of important ideas in the liberal arts and sciences. Wit & Wisdom provides the knowledge-building and standards-aligned integrated instruction essential to literacy success. The curriculum provides the complex texts students need to be strong in reading comprehension.
Wit & Wisdom should be paired with a foundational skill program to provide a comprehensive literacy solution for students in Kindergarten through Grade 3; together, they address states’ college- and career-readiness standards.
Geodes is a collection of accessible knowledge-building books for developing readers. Geodes Readables are a unique type of text in which specific decoding strategies are coupled with content and vocabulary. Geodes texts enable students to apply newly learned sound-spelling patterns and practice with phonemic awareness and phonics in readable texts. Each book in the collection is designed to cultivate a deep reading experience, enabling students to apply decoding skills while building knowledge in history, science, and the arts. While most early literacy books are quite basic, Geodes texts are rich with facts and ideas that spark students’ curiosity about the world around them.
For an overview of the alignment between Wit & Wisdom modules and Geodes, see the Resources section. For highlevel sample daily schedules, see the Setting Up a Wit & Wisdom Classroom section.
For more information on Geodes, see the Going Deeper with Wit & Wisdom section.
For information about Foundational Skills and Wit & Wisdom, see the Going Deeper with Wit & Wisdom section.
WHAT IS WIT & WISDOM?
Wit & Wisdom Kindergarten through Grade 8 centers on the study of compelling topics and engaging texts. Its framework of inquiry helps students build rich layers of knowledge. Wit & Wisdom’s integrated approach to learning enables students to activate and develop content and vocabulary knowledge while learning skills. In each module, students write about what they read, learn grammar, and then articulate the meaning of each text in formal and informal discussions with their peers.
The Wit & Wisdom approach helps teachers celebrate the joy of reading and writing with students, while also supporting all learners in meeting the rigor of the ELA standards. By reading engaging texts and participating meaningfully in their learning, students develop the knowledge and skills they need to be successful readers, critical thinkers, and effective communicators who love to learn and can succeed in college and careers.
© Great Minds PBC 7 Implementation Guide Introduction
Building Knowledge through Complex Text
The Wit & Wisdom curriculum is built on the foundational understanding that for students to become truly literate, they must develop a deep body of knowledge rather than simply master an isolated set of strategies. Research by cognitive scientists and literacy experts shows that students can learn more deeply and quickly when they have a foundation of knowledge in place.
Wit & Wisdom recognizes that, from the earliest grades, students must have access to complex grade-level text to build the background knowledge, vocabulary, and skills needed to be deep readers and literate citizens. Instead of basals, students read a wide range of full-length texts to build knowledge of the world and ideas. In approaching knowledge-building through the study of exemplary texts, Wit & Wisdom fully addresses the standards for text complexity. Wit & Wisdom texts merit close reading, lend themselves to the development of content knowledge and the mastery of skills, and, most importantly, engage students in productive—and joyful—struggle.
Wit & Wisdom includes a thoughtful balance of literary, informational, fine-art, and multimedia texts. Fictional and non-fictional texts include award winners, showcase diverse viewpoints, and represent varied genres: essays, speeches, articles, interviews, memoirs, and poetry. Texts are exceptional in both content and craft. Literary texts feature plot complexity, exemplary use of language and literary devices, and high-quality illustrations. Informational texts pique curiosity, build content knowledge, and introduce a range of perspectives and forms. With Wit & Wisdom, students learn to unlock the content and craft of texts to build a wide range of knowledge and apply their comprehension skills and background knowledge across academic disciplines.
In addition to literary and informational texts, Wit & Wisdom incorporates fine art, video, and audio recordings. Visual art texts include paintings, sculptures, architecture, and photographs that expand understanding of module topics and develop students’ visual and cultural literacy. Visual and multimedia texts support striving readers while engaging all students with rich content.
Each Wit & Wisdom year is comprised of four modules, or units of study, which focus on a topic essential for building knowledge, vocabulary, and writing skills. For example, students learn about the seasons, the American Revolution, civil rights, and space exploration. Essential topics reoccur, empowering students to deepen understanding of core knowledge across Kindergarten through Grade 8. The focus on knowledge building is supported by research, which shows that knowledge begets knowledge. Students with background knowledge are equipped to tackle increasingly complex texts and ideas and have the vocabulary to learn new information and discuss their findings.
Together, a module’s texts create the module’s Knowledge Puzzle: each piece contributes to key learning about a topic. Individually and collectively, the pieces of each Knowledge Puzzle empower students with the literary, historical, scientific, artistic, and cultural knowledge required for successful thinking and citizenship. In each module, students encounter quality texts that influence, extend, and often challenge their knowledge of the world and their knowledge of ideas.
Knowledge Puzzles build across grades to foster essential connections within and across disciplines. The following is one example of how Wit & Wisdom students explore domain-specific literary and informational texts to build rich knowledge and vocabulary about American history—within a grade and across grades.
Implementation Guide Introduction 8 © Great Minds PBC
Kindergarten Module 3: America, Then and Now
Essential Question: How has life in America changed over time?
Core Texts
Informational
p Communication Then and Now, Robin Nelson
p Home Then and Now, Robin Nelson
p Now & Ben: The Modern Inventions of Benjamin Franklin, Gene Barretta
p School Then and Now, Robin Nelson
p Transportation Then and Now, Robin Nelson
p When I Was Young in the Mountains, Cynthia Rylant
Literary
p The Little House, Virginia Lee Burton
Grade 2 Module 2: The American West
Essential Question: What was life like in the West for early Americans?
Core Texts
Informational
p The Buffalo Are Back, Jean Craighead George
p Journey of a Pioneer, Patricia J. Murphy
p Plains Indians, Andrew Santella
Literary
p Johnny Appleseed, Steven Kellogg
p John Henry: An American Legend, Ezra Jack Keats
p John Henry, Julius Lester
p The Legend of the Bluebonnet, Tomie dePaola
p The Story of Johnny Appleseed, Aliki
Implementation Guide Introduction © Great Minds PBC 9
Grade 2 Module 3: Civil Rights Heroes
Essential Question: How can people respond to injustice?
Core Texts
Informational
p I Have a Dream, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.; paintings, Kadir Nelson
p Martin Luther King, Jr. and the March on Washington, Frances E. Ruffin; illustrations, Stephen Marchesi
p Ruby Bridges Goes to School: My True Story, Ruby Bridges
p The Story of Ruby Bridges, Robert Coles; illustrations, George Ford
p Separate Is Never Equal: Sylvia Mendez and Her Family’s Fight for Desegregation, Duncan Tonatiuh
Grade 3 Module 3: A New Home
Essential Question: How do stories help us understand immigrants’ experiences?
Core Texts
Informational
p Coming to America: The Story of Immigration, Betsy Maestro
Literary
p Grandfather’s Journey, Allen Say
p Tea with Milk, Allen Say
p Family Pictures, Carmen Lomas Garza
p The Keeping Quilt, Patricia Polacco
Grade 4 Module 3: The Redcoats Are Coming!
Essential Question: Why is it important to understand all sides of a story?
Core Texts
Informational
p George vs. George: The American Revolution as Seen from Both Sides, Rosalyn Schanzer
Literary
p Woods Runner, Gary Paulsen
p The Scarlet Stockings Spy, Trinka Hakes Noble
p Colonial Voices: Hear Them Speak, Kay Winters
Implementation Guide Introduction 10 © Great Minds PBC
Grade 5 Module 3: A War Between Us
Essential Question: How did the Civil War impact people?
Core Texts
Informational
p The Boys’ War, Jim Murphy
Literary
p The River Between Us, Richard Peck
Grade 6 Module 1: Resilience in the Great Depression
Essential Question: How can enduring tremendous hardship contribute to personal transformation?
Core Texts
Literary
p Bud, Not Buddy, Christopher Paul Curtis
p Out of the Dust, Karen Hesse
Grade 7 Module 2: Americans All
Essential Question: How did World War II affect individuals?
Core Texts
Informational
p Farewell to Manzanar, Jeanne Wakatsuki Houston and James D. Houston
Literary
p Code Talker, Joseph Bruchac
Grade 8 Module 4: Teens as Change Agents
Essential Question: How do people effect social change?
Core Text
Informational
p Claudette Colvin: Twice Toward Justice, Phillip Hoose
Implementation Guide Introduction © Great Minds PBC 11
Program Design
Expert advisors devised the Wit & Wisdom learning design based on current high-quality academic research. Skilled teachers, literacy coaches, and school leaders then brought their years of experience about what does and does not work within a classroom to write lessons based on that learning design. These teacher-writers applied their knowledge of how to meet students at their level, keep them engaged and challenged, differentiate when necessary, and build a love of books to propel young students into a successful academic career.
Through a rigorous and careful module design, students gain content knowledge and an awareness of how to read texts, write, speak, and listen. Each of the four modules in each grade has a topical focus. For each module, students read—or, in the case of younger students, hear read aloud—a series of authentic texts on the topic and consider those texts critically and systematically. Frameworks of questioning, the Content Stages and Content Framing Questions, engage students in the content and in the process of reading complex texts. Content Framing Questions guide students’ daily work of encountering, understanding, and analyzing complex text. Students then distill each text’s deeper meaning and, finally, articulate how the texts, individually and collectively, build their knowledge of the topic.
Another line of daily questioning, Craft Questions, teaches students the elements of strong craft—writing, speaking, and listening—so that students become adept at applying these skills for a variety of purposes. This knowledge of craft, in turn, allows students to create their own responses to the texts they read.
By engaging with these lines of inquiry and repeatedly applying a series of strategies to multiple texts and curated fine art, students solidify their critical thinking skills so they can transfer them to any future setting.
Throughout each module, standards are addressed in an integrated manner. Instead of addressing and assessing standards one by one, in isolation, the curriculum teaches reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language in an integrated manner so that students learn all skills in the context of module content. This integrated approach enables students to activate and build on their developing background and vocabulary knowledge of the module topic while learning skills in other areas. With standards across strands integrated together in every lesson in the service of learning, Wit & Wisdom helps all students be more successful in building higher-level literacy skills.
Implementation Guide Introduction 12 © Great Minds PBC
Research in Action
Wit & Wisdom helps teachers put research-based best practices into action.
Research Says Students Need Wit & Wisdom Responds
“Performance on complex texts is the clearest differentiator in reading between students who are likely to be ready for college and those who are not” (ACT 16–17). But as college and career reading expectations have held steady or increased, the complexity of Grades K–12 texts has declined (Adams 4–5; NGA Center and CCSSO 3).
Students need to be able to unlock meaning from complex texts.
Instead of basals, Wit & Wisdom students read complex grade-level books they love, from classics such as The Story of Ferdinand and Animal Farm to new favorites such as Last Stop on Market Street and The Crossover to captivating nonfiction such as I Am Malala: The Girl Who Stood Up for Education and Was Shot by the Taliban and An American Plague: The True and Terrifying Story of the Yellow Fever Epidemic of 1793 Students use these texts at every turn to learn, and eventually master, essential reading, writing, speaking, listening, grammar, and vocabulary skills.
Students who usually struggle with reading can outperform those who usually score high—if they possess more knowledge of a text’s topic (Willingham).
Students acquire vocabulary much faster when reading numerous texts focused on one topic rather than a collection on scattered topics. In an effect known as bootstrapping, reading increasingly complex texts focused on a single topic allows students to access texts above their typical independent reading level by expanding relevant background knowledge and vocabulary (Adams 9–10).
Before students can flexibly apply a skill, such as determining main ideas or organizing an essay, they need multiple experiences working in meaningful contexts over extended periods of time (National Research Council 65–66).
Students need topic-focused vocabulary and background knowledge.
Students need knowledge-rich experiences to develop skills and transfer them to new contexts.
Each Wit & Wisdom module focuses on an important, high-interest topic in literature, history/social studies, science, or the arts. Through carefully chosen literary, informational, and visual art texts, students examine each central topic from diverse angles. Across Grades K–8, significant topics strategically reoccur, establishing a foundation of background knowledge.
Implementation Guide Introduction © Great Minds PBC 13
Research Says Students Need Wit & Wisdom Responds
To comprehend any text, readers coordinate and execute a huge number of complex thinking processes (Frey and Fisher 18).
Each text’s unique attributes inform the varied questions, tasks, and standards students explore and practice with that text (Shanahan 9–11).
Successful readers hold a “standard for coherence,” expecting to understand each aspect of a text, from striking word choice to byzantine structure to puzzling allusions (Pearson and Liben 1).
Repeatedly progressing through a sequence of purposeful, predictable close-reading stages (Adler and Van Doren 46–48; Liben 1–9) can establish and enable that standard for coherence.
Reading, writing, speaking, and listening are interrelated aspects of the same act: communicating ideas through language. When studied together, these strands reinforce one another (Graham and Perin 20–21; Hawkins et al. 14).
Content integration levels the playing field among students with different types of background knowledge by focusing on information gained through reading rather than through personal experience (Hawkins et al. 34–36).
Students need to develop the skills necessary to access any text they encounter.
Students need a process for reading, understanding, and analyzing complex texts.
Wit & Wisdom establishes a line of questioning to help students understand and discern the meaning of complex texts. Skill development follows a coherent sequence of English Language Arts standards while staying true to the demands of each individual text. Students employ many skills in service of understanding each text, while building mastery of a smaller number of focus standards that are particularly relevant to the specific texts within a module.
Students need an integrated approach to literacy and content to increase learning.
Wit & Wisdom takes an integrated approach to literacy, as the work students do with reading, thinking, speaking, listening, writing, vocabulary, and grammar all ties into the module’s topic or Essential Question. Teachers leverage the content knowledge students gain through the texts to support their abilities in other areas, such as having academic conversations or writing meaningfully and purposefully.
Implementation Guide Introduction 14 © Great Minds PBC
Wit & Wisdom in Sync
Wit & Wisdom in Sync™ offers a robust suite of digital resources to enhance and extend instruction in various learning environments. Classroom teachers collaborated with Great Minds teachers to deliver synchronous and/or asynchronous lessons. These resources provide the flexibility to maintain seamless learning in face-to-face, online, and hybrid instruction, building on best practices for remote and in-person learning. The Wit & Wisdom in Sync Help Center http://witeng.link/0983 provides additional information for implementation and ongoing support.
Wit & Wisdom in Sync includes these core Wit & Wisdom components:
Teacher Edition (print and digital)
Student Edition (print and digital)
Assessments (print and digital)
Two central components build on this foundation to provide flexibility in teaching and learning:
Learn Anywhere Plan (LAP)—The LAP is the backbone of Wit & Wisdom in Sync and the core planning resource for classroom teachers. Module LAPs provide overviews of each streamlined module. Daily LAPs show each day’s sequence of instruction and how the Great Minds teacher and classroom teacher share instruction.
Daily Videos—Great Minds teachers deliver key lesson content through Daily Videos, bringing their experiences of successfully teaching Wit & Wisdom to the virtual environment. Videos include closed captioning in English and audio in English and Spanish.
The following additional resources complete the digital suite:
Digital Student Edition—Classroom teachers can assign all Wit & Wisdom handouts through the Wit & Wisdom in Sync platform. Students may complete and submit handouts within the platform, download handouts to complete offline, or print handouts to complete with paper and pencil.
Affirm—All users have access to Affirm®, Great Minds’ online resource for major assessments. Classroom teachers assign assessments, and students complete and submit their work online. Teachers can auto score, rubric score, or provide written feedback and generate data reports. All assessments are printable.
Vocabulary Videos—Brief videos, presented in both Spanish and English, align with the start of each Focusing Question arc and preview highly portable content-area and academic words.
Geodes digital flipbooks Geodes early literacy texts unite phonics with the content of Wit & Wisdom modules so students build both foundational reading skills and knowledge. For Geodes customers, Wit & Wisdom in Sync includes 30 digital flipbooks and read-aloud videos for Kindergarten through Grade 2.
Projected slides Wit & Wisdom in Sync users have access to slide presentations that correspond to the original Wit & Wisdom lessons. Slide decks are available for all modules for Grades 3 through 8, and for Modules 2–4 for Kindergarten through Grade 2.
Coaching—To support teachers in implementing the Wit & Wisdom in Sync LAPs, Great Minds offers a one-and-a-half-hour coaching session, Learn Anywhere with Wit & Wisdom in Sync. This virtual session guides school and district leaders to support continuous learning using the LAPs and to toggle between in-person and virtual instruction.
Implementation Guide Introduction © Great Minds PBC 15
Wit & Wisdom in Sync consists of a streamlined set of resources developed to meet the unique needs of distance and hybrid learning models, which often require abbreviated timeframes. While the Daily Videos and LAPs correlate with the original Wit & Wisdom curriculum, these resources are not comprehensive on their own and should always be used in conjunction with the complete Wit & Wisdom Teacher Edition.
In the processing of streamlining Wit & Wisdom in Sync, the following elements of Wit & Wisdom have been modified in Wit & Wisdom in Sync in the Daily Videos and LAPs, with careful consideration to maintain alignment to Focus Standards and Learning Goals:
Texts—The Wit & Wisdom in Sync team carefully selected 93 of the original core texts to help students work with each module’s major assessments. See the Wit & Wisdom in Sync™ Core Text Library (http://witeng.link/0945) for the complete list.
Standards and Learning Goals—Some Learning Goals have been slightly modified to achieve the standards in an online format. Given the asynchronous nature of the Daily Videos, Speaking and Listening standards are not fully covered in the videos, but are included in the classroom teacher guidance.
Lessons—Some learning activities have been modified, combined, removed, or reordered for streamlining purposes or to meet the needs of the virtual environment.
Assessments—Some assessments have been slightly modified to correspond to revised lessons. In addition, some assessments are categorized as Additional Instruction in the LAPs. These assessments may be assigned at the classroom teacher’s discretion to all or select students.
Deep Dives—In general, Deep Dive lessons addressing style and conventions are categorized as Additional Instruction in the LAPs. These lessons may be taught at the classroom teacher’s discretion to all or select students.
Scaffolds and Extensions—Scaffolds and extensions included in the Daily Videos may be different from those included in the Wit & Wisdom Teacher Edition.
Wit & Wisdom in Sync supports online, hybrid, and in-person teaching and learning. Educators use this flexible resource in varied ways, including:
The digital resources that accompany Wit & Wisdom in Sync—including the Wit & Wisdom Projected lesson slides and the Vocabulary Videos—are helpful for in-person or distance learning contexts.
Teachers can use the Great Minds teacher videos for professional learning as models of Wit & Wisdom delivery.
Students who are absent can keep up with instruction through the Great Minds teacher videos.
Teachers and students can continue to use the assessment resources provided through Affirm. For more guidance on implementing Affirm, see the Great Minds Help Center http://witeng.link/0985.
Wit & Wisdom in Sync materials are not meant to be used as primary instructional materials. While the pacing constraints of distance learning necessitate streamlining lesson content, use of the complete Wit & Wisdom curriculum is necessary to address each module’s learning fully and to provide a more rigorous, equitable learning experience for teachers and students. The full curriculum’s integration of the vocabulary and language conventions in the Deep Dives supports students’ literacy development. Some content and scaffolds found in the Teacher Edition have been modified or eliminated in LAPs. Careful consideration was taken regarding any eliminated content to maintain alignment to the Focus Standards and Learning Goals. See the Resources section for a list of eliminated content by grade level.
Implementation Guide Introduction 16 © Great Minds PBC
WIT & WISDOM CORE CURRICULUM COMPONENTS
Wit & Wisdom is a comprehensive curriculum, offering the following materials and resources for teachers and students.
Component Audience Format Feature
Implementation Guide Teacher Downloadable PDF from Great Minds website
Purpose
Provide a user guide for the modules
Description
Explanation of the components, philosophy, and resources of the curriculum
Module Zero, Grades K–2, Grades 3–5, and Grades 6–8
Teacher and student
Downloadable PDF from Great Minds website
Introduce students to key components and features while building a community of readers and writers
Six abbreviated lessons that walk students through the Content Stages and Craft Stages, as well as the types of questions, practices, and instructional routines they encounter in Modules 1–4
Teacher Edition (TE) Print or Digital
Teacher Print books; interactive digital platform Module Overview Introduce the teacher to the module
Core lessons with Deep Dives
Appendices A–E
Summary, instructional goals, major assessments of the module, and map of the lessons
Provide instruction Approximately 30 to 38 lessons and Deep Dives
Supply additional teacher resources
Resources to build knowledge of text complexity, vocabulary teaching and learning, and assessments
Student Edition (SE) Student Print workbooks
Student handouts Support student engagement with lesson instruction
Volume of Reading Reflection Questions
Provide formative assessment questions
Graphic organizers and handouts
Questions to record knowledge gained from reading independently and widely on the module topic, and to measure accountable volume of reading
Core Texts Teacher and student
Previously published texts available in classroom library sets
Provide the foundation for instruction in every module at each grade level
Carefully sequenced literary and informational texts are utilized to develop students’ knowledge and skills in each module
Implementation Guide Introduction © Great Minds PBC 17
Component Audience Format Feature Purpose Description
Geodes Student Optional classroom library; Grades K–2 only
Knowledgebuilding early readers allow students to practice taught phonics skills in authentic text
Early readers align with Wit & Wisdom module topics
Assessment Packs Teacher and student
Wit & Wisdom in Sync Teacher and student
Print set of assessment materials; available at point-ofuse in digital Teacher Edition
in Sync digital platform
Supply class set (thirty) of the assessments for distribution
Provide digital resources to enhance and extend instruction in a variety of learning environments
Major assessment materials
A robust suite of teacherand student-facing digital resources to supplement instruction from Teacher Edition
Wit & Wisdom Affirm Teacher and student
Affirm digital platform
Formative and summative assessments
Provide digital assessments, scoring, and reporting
A robust suite of studentfacing digital assessments with teacher scoring and reporting
Family Tip Sheets Student and family
Downloadable PDFs from the Great Minds website and in the print Student Edition
Support family engagement with student learning in each module
Explanation of each module’s topic, text list, and questions, as well as ideas for questions and texts to explore at home
Implementation Guide Introduction 18 © Great Minds PBC
GETTING STARTED WITH WIT & WISDOM
OVERVIEW
Wit & Wisdom consists of modules of study designed to help students develop habits of mind common to strong readers and writers.
The Academic Year consists of an abbreviated introductory module, Module 0, and four comprehensive modules to be taught in order.
The Teacher Edition for each of the four modules consists of:
A Module Overview, which includes
p a summary of the module’s knowledge story, the contribution of core texts, and topics examined
p the Essential Question
p suggested Student Understandings
p a list of core and supplementary texts
p module learning goals for content, reading, writing, language, and speaking and listening
p explanations of how the module’s content and skill foci fit into the context of year-long learning
p the focus and continuing standards addressed in the module
p a description of the formative and summative assessments
p a Module Map that provides a lesson sequence, identifying lesson-level Content Framing and Craft Questions, Learning Goals, and placement of formal assessments
Thirty to thirty-eight core lessons and Deep Dives
Five appendices
p Appendix A: Text Complexity: quantitative and qualitative evaluations of module core texts’ complexity
p Appendix B: Vocabulary: a list of the vocabulary words taught and assessed in the module, as well as the Words to Know (selected words to use in a teacher-created student glossary)
p Appendix C: Answer keys, Rubrics, and Sample Student Responses: rubrics and tracking forms for student assessments and speaking and listening participation
p Appendix D: Volume of Reading: a select bibliography of additional texts related to the topics and genres presented in the core module texts
p Appendix E: Works Cited: a full bibliography of the sources used and referenced in the module
19 © Great Minds PBC Implementation Guide Getting Started
TERMINOLOGY
Wit & Wisdom uses precise terminology to describe key teaching and learning practices. The following table introduces key terms and their definitions.
Check for Understanding (CFU)
A lesson-level assessment included in each Wit & Wisdom lesson. CFUs take many forms, such as Exit Tickets, graphic organizers, or written responses. Aligned to specific skills acquisition, they focus on reading, writing, and/or speaking and listening. On average, one to three CFUs appear in each lesson. Every Deep Dive has its own CFU.
Content Framing Question
A lesson-level question representing the particular Content Stage in the reading of a complex text. Each of the five sequential Content Framing Questions articulates the lens through which students will explore the text in a given lesson. For more on this term, see the Content Stages and Content Framing Questions section.
Continuing Standards Standards addressed pervasively across modules and accordingly not listed as focus standards for any particular module.
Core Practices
Craft Question
Four key practices—questioning, annotating, summarizing, and collecting evidence—used throughout all modules to help students learn how to read a text and communicate their understanding of a text.
A lesson-level question representing the particular stage in the process of learning, practicing, and demonstrating specific writing or speaking skills. For more on this term, see the Craft Stages and Craft Questions section.
Deep Dive
A 15-minute lesson designed to teach a particular vocabulary, grammar, or style and conventions concept or skill that elaborates on the learning in the core lesson.
End-of-Module (EOM) Task The assessment at the end of a module through which students demonstrate both their understanding of the module’s content and their ability to use the craft skills taught in the module.
Essential Question
Exit Ticket
A thought-provoking, transferable question that guides students’ thinking, reading, writing, and discussion throughout a module, to be addressed in the EOM Task and investigated well after the module ends.
A strategy for quickly assessing student understanding in which, upon ending a lesson, students respond to a short-answer or multiple-choice question on an individual sheet of paper and submit it to the teacher.
Focus Standards Standards explicitly taught, practiced, and assessed multiple times during a specific module.
Focusing Question
A question directing students’ reading, thinking, discussion, and writing tasks throughout an arc of lessons that builds sequential knowledge of texts and the Essential Question and is addressed in the Focusing Question Task.
Focusing Question Task An assessment at the end of a Focusing Question arc of lessons through which students demonstrate both their understanding of the arc’s content and their ability to use the craft skills taught up to that point in the module.
Knowledge Journal A journal that students use to reflect on, synthesize, and extend the knowledge they have developed—as a group and individually—over a stretch of time, emphasizing transferable learning about topics and skills. For more on this term, see the Setting Up a Wit & Wisdom Classroom section.
Module Map Contained in the Module Overview for each module, the Module Map identifies the text(s), Content Framing Question, Craft Question, and learning goals for each lesson, providing teachers with an overview of lesson-level and sequential learning.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 20 © Great Minds PBC
New-Read Assessment
An assessment of students’ ability to transfer select reading and language skills they have learned to a new text or portion of a text that they have not previously read. For more on this term, see the Assessment section.
Response Journal
A frequently used journal in which students record their thinking during core lessons and Deep Dives, including lists of brainstormed ideas, responses to questions and prompts, and reflections on texts or classroom discussions.
Socratic Seminar
A student-led collaborative discussion centering on a thought-provoking question related to a module’s content. Students engage in inquiry, elaboration, and debate while expressing their own ideas clearly. For more on this term, see the Socratic Seminar Guidance section.
Supporting Standards
Text-Dependent Question (TDQ)
Vocabulary Journal
Volume of Reading
Standards practiced in a particular module due to their alignment with the study of a particular text but not explicitly taught or assessed.
Generally appearing as a series, TDQs develop a purposeful line of questioning that focuses on key aspects of a text and that students can answer only by referring to textual evidence.
A journal in which students engage in vocabulary-related work, such as making connections among words, applying their understanding of a word, or recording definitions of key words.
The reading students do independently. Research shows a correlation between the volume of high-quality texts students read and their development of reading skills and proficiency.
LEARNING DESIGN Module Design
Each of the four modules:
centers on one Essential Question;
develops around complex texts (literary and informational) and visual art related to the Essential Question;
typically consists of thirty to thirty-eight core lessons, 75 minutes in length, each followed by a 15-minute Deep Dive focused on vocabulary or style and conventions germane to the core lesson; and
concludes with an EOM Task.
Within each module, several Focusing Questions organize arcs of lessons that build sequential knowledge of texts and the Essential Question. Reading, writing, and discussion in each arc support student success on the EOM Task.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 21 © Great Minds PBC
Each Essential Question:
provides a compelling question for students to investigate during study and beyond;
establishes inquiry-based learning; and
guides students’ thinking as they read, think, discuss, and write throughout a module.
Examples:
Kindergarten Module 2: What makes a good story?
Grade 2 Module 3: How can people respond to injustice?
Grade 4 Module 1: What does it mean to have a great heart, literally and figuratively?
Grade 8 Module 3: What is love?
The Focusing Questions:
offer deeper investigations of different aspects of the Essential Question;
direct students’ reading, thinking, discussion, and written tasks throughout each arc of lessons in a module; and
culminate in a Focusing Question Task, an opportunity for students to demonstrate learning and teachers to assess progress.
Example:
Grade 5 Module 4 Essential Question: How can sports influence individuals and societies?
Focusing Questions:
How can sports affect the way we view others?
How can sports create opportunities for change?
How can people challenge or overcome barriers through sports?
Each of the Daily Lessons consists of a core lesson and a Deep Dive.
Core lessons (75 min.):
p focus students’ learning through lesson-level Content Framing Questions and Craft Questions that target specific content and craft learning;
p offer a purposeful sequence of activities centered on reading, discussing, and writing about module texts; and
p build students’ content knowledge and skills acquisition.
Deep Dives (15 min.) provide a deep study of pertinent vocabulary, grammar, or style and conventions connected to the core lesson.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 22 © Great Minds PBC
Module Synopses
Grade Module 1
K The Five Senses
Essential Question: How do our senses help us learn?
Module Summary: The five senses help humans experience, learn, and communicate about the world.
Knowledge Goals: Recognize and describe the five senses and related body parts.
Identify rhyme and repetition within texts.
Describe the use of color and shape in visual art.
EOM Writing Type: Informative
EOM Task: Students write a book describing how the five senses help both them and a character from a text learn about the world.
Module 2
Once Upon a Farm
Essential Question: What makes a good story?
Module Summary: Stories of farm life and animals lead to a discovery of the universal elements of well-crafted stories.
Knowledge Goals: Identify the differences among the seasons and how they affect life on the farm.
Describe key details about different farm animals, including how they help humans.
Retell classic folktales featuring farm animal characters, using various story elements as a guide.
Understand the elements that make up a narrative and how these elements work together to create a cohesive story.
EOM Writing Type: Narrative
EOM Task: Students write an original narrative, set on Maple Hill Farm, featuring one farm animal they learned about in the module.
Module 3
America, Then and Now
Essential Question: How has life in America changed over time?
Module Summary: While people’s basic needs may not change over time, the ways that people meet their needs do change, as new inventions and innovations take hold.
Knowledge Goals: Understand the difference between the past and the present.
Identify how aspects of life in America—specifically, home life, school life, transportation, and communication—have changed.
Describe key details about how the topics of home, school, transportation, and communication have changed over time.
Understand how a main topic or topic statement is supported by key details.
EOM Writing Type: Informative (Research)
EOM Task: Students create an informative poster to explain how one aspect of life in America has changed over time.
Module 4
The Continents
Essential Question: What makes the world fascinating?
Module Summary: The world’s splendor comes to life through an examination of the unique natural features, animals, and activities of Earth’s seven continents.
Knowledge Goals: Identify the seven continents. Describe the different natural features, things to do, and animals on each continent.
Demonstrate understanding of maps and their purpose.
Understand how illustrations, photographs, and words in a text communicate important information.
EOM Writing Type: Opinion
EOM Task: Students sort module texts into informational texts and stories. They then create a travel brochure for a chosen continent.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 23 © Great Minds PBC
1 A World of Books
Essential Question: How do books change lives around the world?
Module Summary: Books bring joy to children and transform their lives in different ways, often through the heroic efforts of those who dedicate their lives to sharing reading with everyone.
Knowledge Goals: Describe how books can change the lives of people around the world.
Identify and describe how people in different places get books.
Appreciate the people that dedicate their lives to helping others access books.
Identify and explain the elements of a story and how those elements contribute to the joy of reading.
EOM Writing Type: Narrative
EOM Task: Students write and illustrate a narrative about a character whose life has changed because of books.
Creature Features
Essential Question: What can we discover about animals’ unique features?
Module Summary: For as long as they have shared the planet, humans have been fascinated with observing, describing, and depicting animals and understanding their diverse bodies and behaviors.
Knowledge Goals: Communicate ways and reasons that people observe animals and discover new things about them.
Describe similarities and differences among diverse animal species, citing details about features of their bodies and behaviors.
Explain how animals defend themselves and how people should act around animals to keep themselves and the animals safe.
EOM Writing Type: Informative (Research)
EOM Task: Using evidence, students create a large trading card for an animal.
Powerful Forces
Essential Question: How do people respond to the powerful force of the wind?
Module Summary: Although no one can see the wind, it affects our physical and emotional world in powerful ways.
Knowledge Goals: Understand that wind force varies in intensity. Recognize that people can experience a range of feelings, including joy, anger, fear, jealousy, guilt, boredom, and sadness.
Explain how wind is a form of energy.
EOM Writing Type: Narrative
EOM Task: Students create an original story about a character who must respond to the powerful force of the wind to solve a problem.
Cinderella Stories
Essential Question: Why do people around the world admire Cinderella?
Module Summary: With their unique aspects and commonalities, diverse Cinderella stories show Cinderella’s ability to adapt as well as to endure.
Knowledge Goals: Recognize that countries all over the world share similar stories.
Identify common elements of Cinderella stories that are shared across different cultures (e.g., good vs. evil characters, magical elements, proof of identity).
Infer traits based on character actions.
Identify admirable traits such as being honest, hardworking, forgiving, and kind.
EOM Writing Type: Opinion
EOM Task: Students write an opinion paragraph telling which Cinderella character they most admire and why.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 24 © Great Minds PBC
Module 1 Module 2 Module 3 Module 4
Grade
2 A Season of Change
Essential Question: How does change impact people and nature?
Module Summary: Seasonal change shapes our yearly experience of nature, from our activities to our clothing choices, and launches an exploration of the concept of change as it relates to both nature and human experience.
Knowledge Goals: Define change as the process of becoming different than before.
Use key words first, then, and finally to identify the process of change.
Recognize that friends can help people manage change.
Identify the impact of weather on leaves in autumn.
Identify how changes in fall weather impact people, plants, and animals.
EOM Writing Type: Informative
EOM Task: Students contribute to a class informational text by writing a paragraph about how changes in weather impact plants or animals in fall.
3 The Sea
Essential Question: Why do people explore the sea?
Module Summary: The ocean is a complex ecosystem, made up of beautiful, mysterious, and important life forms that are a source of knowledge, beauty, and inspiration.
The American West
Essential Question: What was life like in the West for early Americans?
Module Summary: Westward expansion brought social and environmental changes to the lives of Native Americans and early settlers.
Knowledge Goals: Recognize change over time in the West.
Build understanding of the interrelationships between people and nature.
Identify characteristics of life and challenges faced by the pioneers and Native Americans in the West.
Recognize that stories can contain important life lessons.
EOM Writing Type: Informative
EOM Task: Students write a paragraph explaining how the life of either John Henry or Johnny Appleseed differed from the lives of real pioneers.
Civil Rights Heroes
Essential Question: How can people respond to injustice?
Module Summary: America is a nation founded on liberty and justice for all, and individuals fought for and defended these rights with actions that effected change in the United States.
Knowledge Goals: Recognize how people responded to injustices in the United States.
Understand the Civil Rights Movement in the United States and the changes that resulted from it.
Identify leaders who fought against segregation.
Recognize that speeches are an important type of literary text.
EOM Writing Type: Narrative
EOM Task: Students write an original narrative from the point of view of Ruby Bridges or Sylvia Mendez, describing a key moment from The Story of Ruby Bridges by Robert Coles or Separate Is Never Equal by Duncan Tonatiuh.
Good Eating
Essential Question: How does food nourish us?
Module Summary: Food nourishes our bodies both physically and emotionally and can build community.
Knowledge Goals: Understand the process of digestion and the specific function of some organs.
Conceptualize that food gives our body nutrients that we need to live.
Identify the steps in the process of growing food (on a small and large farm).
Recognize that communities come together around food.
EOM Writing Type: Opinion (Research)
EOM Task: Students write a paragraph stating their choice between two food plates, providing reasons and evidence from two module texts to support their choice.
Outer Space
Essential Question: How do people learn about space?
Module Summary: Long before Neil Armstrong’s “one small step” on the moon, outer space has fascinated humans and driven people to study, explore, and deepen their understanding of the universe.
A New Home
Essential Question: How do stories help us understand immigrants’ experiences?
Module Summary: The history, challenges, and rewards of immigration shape the United States, and stories show how traditions blend with new experiences to create a rich, vibrant culture.
Artists Make Art
Essential Question: What is an artist?
Module Summary: Considering what it means to be an artist involves an exploration of different artists’ creative processes and the successes and struggles involved in translating inspiration into movement, words, images, and sound.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 25 © Great Minds PBC Grade Module 1 Module 2 Module 3 Module 4
3 Knowledge Goals: Identify how artists and writers use domain-specific elements to express ideas.
Explain how scientists observe the ocean carefully to learn more about it.
Explain why squid and sharks are important to the sea’s ecosystem.
Explain how people develop technology to solve problems.
EOM Writing Type: Informative
EOM Task: Students write two paragraphs in which they explain why an author, artist, or scientist explored the sea.
Knowledge Goals: Explain how people learn about space through technology, art, and literature.
Explain how scientists adapt to the challenges of space.
Gain basic information about the moon and the stars.
Learn about Apollo 11, the first successful effort to put people on the moon.
EOM Writing Type: Opinion
EOM Task: Students write a four-paragraph essay in which they express their opinion about humankind’s most important attempt to learn more about space.
Knowledge Goals: Gain an overview of the history of immigration to the United States.
Understand some of the challenges that immigrants face in their new country.
Understand the diversity of traditions immigrants bring with them.
Gain basic information about the Statue of Liberty and its history.
Learn about the use of scale and perspective in art.
EOM Writing Type: Narrative
EOM Task: Students write a short narrative from the point of view of a main character from one of the module’s core texts.
Knowledge Goals: Demonstrate how artists use their imagination to present ideas in different media.
Explain how artists teach us to see the world in different ways.
Understand how the challenges that artists face can serve as an inspiration to us.
Explain how artists and their work help us gain insight into our society and culture.
Learn about the following artists:
Marian Anderson was a famous American singer who helped Americans recognize that all citizens have gifts to offer.
Alvin Ailey was an innovative American choreographer who used dance to express and share appreciation for his African American culture.
William Carlos Williams was an innovative American poet who used language to express the beauty of the ordinary.
Charles Demuth was an innovative American artist.
Jackson Pollock was a groundbreaking American artist who experimented with line and form to express movement through art.
EOM Writing Type: Informative (Research)
EOM Task: Students research the life and work of one of the artists in the module and then write an essay explaining why that artist is important.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 26 © Great Minds PBC Grade Module 1 Module 2 Module 3 Module 4
4 A Great Heart
Essential Question: What does it mean to have a great heart, literally and figuratively?
Module Summary: The heart is a literal muscle that sustains human life and a figurative center of human emotions.
Knowledge Goals: Explain why Clara Barton, Helen Keller, and Anne Frank could each be said to have had a great heart, figuratively. Explain what makes a human heart great, or healthy.
Identify people or characters who have a figurative great heart because they are generous, courageous, or heroic.
EOM Writing Type: Informative
EOM Task: Students write an essay explaining what it means to have a great heart, literally and figuratively. They develop their essays using evidence from the two core texts.
Extreme Settings
Essential Question: How does a challenging setting or physical environment change a person?
Module Summary: A journey through various extreme settings reveals the challenges harsh environments present to humans, what it takes to survive in them, and how people’s experiences in, and responses to, extreme settings can shape who they become.
Knowledge Goals: Identify elements of an extreme setting or environment.
Infer and describe the effect an extreme setting has on a character or speaker in a story or poem.
Infer and describe the characteristics that help a person overcome the challenges of an extreme setting.
Identify and describe different techniques used to survive in the wilderness.
EOM Writing Type: Narrative
EOM Task: Students write an original survival story in which they imagine they are lost on a mountain and must rely on their own survival skills.
The Redcoats Are Coming!
Essential Question: Why is it important to understand all sides of a story?
Module Summary: Multiple perspectives capture the conflict between the American colonies and the British empire to show how the American Revolution would forever change the United States’ identity.
Knowledge Goals: Explain how taxes, housing British soldiers, and the control of freedoms led to the American Revolution by the American colonists against the British government.
Understand that American colonists had three main stances: they supported King George, they opposed his rule, or they were neutral regarding the conflict.
Learn that the American colonists created secret organizations including the Sons of Liberty to spread news about the happenings in the colonies and to defend themselves against the British army.
Learn about how Americans declared independence from Great Britain and then fought many bloody battles over eight years to eventually win their freedom.
Myth Making
Essential Question: What can we learn from myths and stories?
Module Summary: A comparative study of myths from Greek and Native American cultures explores the relevance of mythology and the power of stories to impart important life lessons.
Knowledge Goals: Describe the characteristics of myths.
Explain how people from different cultures used myths and stories to understand unexplained aspects of the natural world and to teach morals.
Recognize how words in our English language originated from the characters and events in Greek and Roman mythology.
Explain similarities and differences in how myths from different cultures teach similar lessons.
EOM Writing Type: Informative
EOM Task: Students write an essay to explain two themes that myths and stories can teach.
Recognize that the war impacted everyone from soldiers to farmers to shopkeepers.
Learn that multiple perspectives on events related to the American Revolution existed and impact our understanding of the conflict.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 27 © Great Minds PBC Grade Module 1 Module 2 Module 3 Module 4
Develop an understanding of how American Patriots demonstrated an unwavering strength and spirit despite horrific conditions and terrible odds to defeat the most powerful army in the world.
EOM Writing Type: Opinion (Research)
EOM Task: Students write an essay to convince a friend as to whether American patriots were, or were not, justified in fighting for their independence from Britain.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 28 © Great Minds PBC Grade Module 1 Module 2 Module 3 Module 4
4
5 Cultures in Conflict
Essential Question: How do cultural beliefs and values guide people?
Module Summary: In the conflict between the Nez Perce and the United States government during the era of U.S. westward expansion, different cultural beliefs and values guided people’s actions, individually and collectively.
Knowledge Goals: Explain how U.S. westward expansion impacted Native American cultures in the West.
Identify the values and beliefs that are important to a group of people, specifically those of the Nez Perce, the U.S. government, and early white settlers.
Explain how values and beliefs of a culture, particularly those of the Nez Perce, the U.S. government, and early white settlers, motivate and influence actions, and how those actions can lead to conflict.
Explain how values and beliefs can differ within a culture and cause tension among that culture’s peoples.
EOM Writing Type: Informative
EOM Task: Students write an essay to explain how Chief Joseph’s “Lincoln Hall Speech” conveys two important beliefs and values of the Nez Perce people.
Word Play
Essential Question: How and why do writers play with words?
Module Summary: Norman Juster’s The Phantom Tollbooth anchors an exploration of the richness of the English language from a humorous angle to see how authors use wordplay to engage audiences, create humor and meaning, and express themes.
Knowledge Goals: Analyze how authors use wordplay meaningfully.
Explain the relationships between wordplay and humor and wordplay and meaning.
Recognize and explain examples of wordplay in various media.
Develop understanding of different ways that writers use wordplay to create humor, interest, and meaning.
EOM Writing Type: Narrative
EOM Task: Students write an exploded moment narrative.
A War Between Us
Essential Question: How did the Civil War impact people?
Module Summary: Experiences of the Civil War from various perspectives, including boy soldiers in the North and South, girls and women on the home front, and free people of color in New Orleans, show how the Civil War irrevocably changed lives of individuals and families.
Knowledge Goals: Explain the major factors in both the North and the South that led to the start of the Civil War.
Analyze the impact that the Civil War had on men and women, soldiers, civilians, and free people of color in New Orleans.
Compare and contrast the expectations and reality of war for boy soldiers in both the North and the South during the Civil War, and how their experiences shaped their perspectives on war.
EOM Writing Type: Opinion
EOM Task: Students write an essay to express their opinion about whether the Civil War has a mostly positive or mostly negative impact on the Pruitt family in The River Between Us
Breaking Barriers
Essential Question: How can sports influence individuals and societies?
Module Summary: Sports have the power to bring people together, challenge injustices, and provide hope for the future.
Knowledge Goals: Explain how the Negro Leagues created opportunities for African American baseball players and paved the way for the integration of Major League Baseball.
Explain how individual athletes, teams, and coaches throughout history have challenged barriers of race, gender, and culture, as well as physical barriers.
Develop an understanding of how sports can unify people, create opportunities, break down barriers in societies, inspire hope for youth, and strengthen individuals and communities.
EOM Writing Type: Informative (Research)
EOM Task: Students research one of three soccer organizations and write an essay that explains how the organization uses soccer to transform individuals and societies.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 29 © Great Minds PBC Grade Module 1 Module 2 Module 3 Module 4
6 Resilience in the Great Depression
Essential Question: How can enduring tremendous hardship contribute to personal transformation?
Module Summary: During the Great Depression, people faced hardships with resilience to find hope and even joy.
Knowledge Goals: Determine the contexts and causes of the Great Depression and the Dust Bowl.
Learn how individuals coped with hardships during the Great Depression.
Develop insight into the process of transformation as one that requires endurance and struggle.
EOM Writing Type: Informative
EOM Task: Students write a cause-and-effect essay to explain how one character’s responses to the hardships they face during the Great Depression contribute to their personal transformation.
A Hero’s Journey
Essential Question: What is the significance and power of the hero’s journey?
Module Summary: In contemporary versions of two ancient myths, the hero’s journey follows extraordinary but flawed individuals who endure hard-fought struggle, experience transformation, and change the world for the better.
Knowledge Goals: Learn about the monomyth’s persistence throughout cultures and time.
Develop an understanding of how the monomyth reveals the universal human struggle of overcoming one’s flaws.
Evaluate the influence of the monomyth on a contemporary story.
EOM Writing Type: Narrative
EOM Task: Students use their knowledge of the monomyth to create an original hero’s journey.
Narrating the Unknown
Essential Question: How did the social and environmental factors in the unknown world of Jamestown shape its development and decline?
Module Summary: Unlocking mysteries of long-ago events through science and historical fiction provides an exploration of the factors that shaped and led to the decline and near extinction of Jamestown.
Knowledge Goals: Learn about the challenges that Jamestown settlers faced, and the solutions they used in response, as they created a colony in the New World.
Develop an understanding of how science can help uncover new historical truths. Evaluate whether social or environmental factors had a stronger impact on Jamestown’s development and decline.
EOM Writing Type: Argument
EOM Task: Students evaluate the factors that had the most significant impact on the Jamestown colony’s development and decline and write an essay in which they argue whether the social or environmental factors were most significant to the settlement’s struggle to thrive.
Courage in Crisis
Essential Question: How can the challenges of a hostile environment inspire heroism?
Module Summary: Ernest Shackleton and Malala Yousafzai each acted heroically in the most hostile, challenging environments.
Knowledge Goals: Describe what constitutes heroic action, such as focusing on others more than oneself and taking risks on behalf of others.
Analyze how different types of hostile environments provoke and inspire individuals to respond with heroic action.
Examine how an individual’s or a group’s heroic actions can positively impact the experiences and lives of others.
EOM Writing Type: Informative (Research)
EOM Task: Students research and write an essay about an individual whose heroic action during a time of challenge or controversy affected others’ lives.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 30 © Great Minds PBC
Module 1 Module 2 Module 3 Module 4
Grade
7 Identity in the Middle Ages
Essential Question: How does society both support and limit the development of identity?
Module Summary: A literary expedition across medieval Europe reveals the rigid social hierarchy of medieval Europe and the ways that society can support and limit one’s identity.
Knowledge Goals: Identify factors that influence identity (what makes us who we are?).
Describe the varied groups that formed the medieval period’s social hierarchy and explain how one’s social class influenced daily life.
Identify characteristics that make The Canterbury Tales an enduring classic.
Understand narrative elements and techniques, analyzing their function in works of fiction and exploring them in the students’ own narrative writing.
EOM Writing Type: Narrative
EOM Task: Students write an exploded moment narrative expanding on a scene from one of the module literary texts to demonstrate how medieval society supports or limits a character’s identity.
Americans All
Essential Question: How did World War II affect individuals?
Module Summary: When Germany’s declaration of war and Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor shattered America’s isolationist mood and swept the country into World War II, Americans experienced the war and the opportunities and challenges it presented differently.
Knowledge Goals: Summarize the experiences of Japanese Americans and members of the Navajo tribe—before, during, and after World War II.
Identify the effects of cultural assimilation on Navajo individuals, as shown through the story of Code Talker’s protagonist.
Describe the role of the Navajo code talkers in the United States’ World War II victory and explain how the war affected Navajo individuals.
Explain the causes of the Japanese internment, daily life at the Manzanar camp, and the internment’s effects on Japanese American individuals.
Identify the basic facts of World War II, including Pearl Harbor’s role in escalating U.S. involvement and the major theaters of the war.
Language and Power
Essential Question: What is the power of language?
Module Summary: Poets strive to inspire, advertisers to persuade, and leaders to influence citizens, showing the power of language to inspire and manipulate.
Knowledge Goals: Name and describe ways that language and words inspire, persuade, and control.
Describe the structures and techniques used in poetry and political speeches, both in terms of their written expression and oral delivery.
Analyze, contextualize, and critique George Orwell’s Animal Farm to identify and evaluate its themes.
Define and classify elements and examples of propaganda, argument, and persuasion: isolate varied persuasive techniques; and recognize appeals to pathos, logos, and ethos.
Recognize Animal Farm as an allegory, connecting it to the Russian Revolution and the rise of Stalin.
EOM Writing Type: Argument
EOM Task: Students write an essay about whether language is more powerful when it is used to uplift and inspire or when it is used as a negative tool to manipulate.
Fever
Essential Question: How can times of crisis affect citizens and society?
Module Summary: In Philadelphia in 1793, the yellow fever epidemic presented a crisis that compelled the city’s citizens and leadership to respond— and survive—the unknown with behavior driven by fear, compassion, and a desire to understand.
Knowledge Goals: Describe aspects of late eighteenth-century Philadelphian life, including living conditions, political structures, and social norms.
Explain how the epidemic affected and was affected by these factors.
Explain how eighteenthcentury medical practices and lack of scientific understanding contributed to the epidemic’s spread and deleterious effects, as well as how the epidemic provided an opportunity to deepen scientific understanding.
Analyze the impact that individuals had on the development of the crisis and the reciprocal impact that the crisis had on these individuals.
Describe the roles of race, gender, and social class in early American society, and analyze how these factors influenced individuals’ experiences of the crisis.
Understand the purposes, benefits, and process of academic research.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 31 © Great Minds PBC Grade Module 1 Module 2 Module 3 Module 4
7
8 The Poetics and Power of Storytelling
The Poetics and Power of Storytelling
Essential Question: What is the power of storytelling?
Module Summary: Through stories and storytelling, people navigate complex social situations, develop empathy, and understand different views to make sense of themselves and their worlds.
Knowledge Goals: Identify and interpret the ways form, content, and expression contribute to the meaning of stories.
Explain the concept of sense of self and the factors that can shape a person’s sense of self.
Summarize a range of cultural, scientific, and literary explanations of the distinctive role of storytelling in people’s lives.
Articulate a well-formed understanding of the power of storytelling.
Delineate the purpose and effects of sensory, descriptive, and figurative language in storytelling.
EOM Writing Type: Informative
EOM Task: Students write an essay to explain the effects that World War II had on the lives and identity development of either Ned Begay in Code Talkers or Jeanne Wakatsuki Houston in Farewell to Manzanar
The Great War
Essential Question: How do literature and art illuminate the effects of World War I?
Module Summary: The modern warfare introduced by World War I had profound effects on individuals and society that provoked complex expression in literature and art.
Knowledge Goals: Identify how writers and artists depict attitudes toward World War I.
Explain how war can have a significant effect on individuals, and society at large.
Analyze how significant incidents from individual experiences of World War I can illuminate the physical and psychological effects of war.
EOM Writing Type: Informative
EOM Task: Students write an essay that explains how Paul’s experiences in All Quiet on the Western Front illuminate the effects of World War I on individuals and suggest larger reverberations in society at large.
EOM Writing Type: Informative (Research)
EOM Task: Students write an essay explaining two or three ways that members of a selected group of Philadelphians responded to the yellow fever crisis and evaluate whether these responses were helpful, harmful, or both.
What Is Love?
Essential Question: What is love?
Module Summary: William Shakespeare’s A Midsummer Night’s Dream anchors an investigation of the roles of individual choice, fate, social status, and science in the development of love.
Knowledge Goals: Identify how drama, fiction, and informational texts define love and its impact.
Understand why love is a complex idea and experience.
Analyze how love is affected by social norms, human agency, and matters beyond one’s control.
EOM Writing Type: Argument
EOM Task: Students choose a character from A Midsummer Night’s Dream and write an essay asserting whether the outcome of this character’s romantic relationship is a result of agency or an outcome directed by fate.
Teens as Change Agents
Essential Question: How do people effect social change?
Module Summary: The story of Claudette Colvin and her fight for social change during the Civil Rights Movement launches deeper exploration of the Civil Rights Movement and broader examination of how people, individually and collectively, can effect real, lasting change.
Knowledge Goals: Explain and re-evaluate the contributions different people made to the Civil Rights Movement, especially Claudette Colvin.
Analyze Claudette Colvin’s contributions to the Civil Rights Movement in relation to a broader range of historical events, actors, and ideas.
Define what it means to challenge injustice in the context of specific historical, social, and individual circumstances.
Identify diverse strategies to effect social change.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 32 © Great Minds PBC
Module 1 Module 2 Module 3
4
Grade
Module
Grade Module 1
8 Define narrative elements and poetic terms.
EOM Writing Type: Narrative
EOM Task: Students write a portfolio of three poems, each of a distinct poetic type, that together tell a story about a significant time in their lives.
Content-Craft-Create Framework
The Content-Craft-Create framework is the backbone of Wit & Wisdom’s learning design.
Apply an understanding of an individual’s motivations and strategies for creating social change to the development of an original research project focused on a teen change agent.
EOM Writing Type: Informative (Research)
EOM Task: Students write a research essay in which they explain how a teen (or teen group) has responded to an important social issue and then present their findings in a multimedia presentation.
Specifically, Wit & Wisdom lessons are designed so that students develop the following:
Content knowledge. Students learn how to comprehend complex literary, informational, visual, and multimedia texts.
Craft proficiency. Students learn to convey information and express ideas through explicit instruction in the crafts of writing, speaking, and presenting.
Opportunities to create. Through the merging of content and craft, students demonstrate their knowledge and express their ideas in formal written and oral assessments.
Each aspect of this framework is carefully organized to help students gain lifelong skills and habits of mind.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 33 © Great Minds PBC
Module 2 Module 3 Module 4
Content Stages and Content Framing Questions
Wit & Wisdom equips students with a flexible yet predictable process for deep reading of complex texts. Lessons are structured with a purposeful progression that enables students to access, understand, and analyze these texts. This progression consists of five Content Stages: Wonder, Organize, Reveal, Distill, and Know. Shaping each lesson is a Content Framing Question that guides students’ exploration of a text and represents where they land in the lesson’s learning.
The following chart identifies each Content Stage, a typical version of its associated Content Framing Question, and the type of thinking and reading in which students engage during each stage.
Content Stage Content Framing Question
Description of Student Thinking and Actions
Wonder What do I notice and wonder about this text? Students read the text with curiosity and attention and ask key questions about what they read. Students generate their own observations and questions, forming an initial impression of the text.
Organize What is happening in this text?
Students organize their thinking on what the text is about, demonstrating their literal comprehension of a text. Readers get the gist of the text by sorting out characters, settings, and plot for literary texts; or speaker, audience, main ideas, and purpose for informational texts. TDQs and tasks in this stage focus on specific and challenging areas (e.g., domain-specific vocabulary, syntax, and background information) that are crucial to understanding the text and set the stage for deeper interpretation and analysis.
Reveal What does a deeper exploration of [textspecific element] reveal in this text?
Students go deeper into the text, explore the author’s craft and word choices, analyze the text’s structure and its implicit meaning, and attend to other unique features of the text.
Distill What is the essential meaning of this text? Students synthesize their understanding of a text’s elements to discern the full impact of the elements they studied. They seek to understand the text as a sum of its parts, with the goal of achieving a profound understanding of the whole work. Students express the central ideas or themes of the text and determine how key aspects of the text support these ideas and themes.
Know How does this text build my knowledge of [specific topic]?
Students consider the text in the context of their own knowledge and learning. They examine the impact of the text on their world of knowledge and articulate how a text builds their knowledge and expands their knowledge by connecting the text to other texts and topics of study.
By engaging in this process with multiple texts, students internalize the stages and develop habits of mind that will enable them to approach and be successful with many different types and levels of texts.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 34 © Great Minds PBC
Craft Stages and Craft Questions
The crafts of writing, speaking, and presenting are also taught in a careful sequence that ultimately leads students to mastery and independence. Students begin by examining high-quality exemplars of the craft. Then they receive progressive direct instruction in the skills necessary to practice and master the craft. As it does with the Content Stages, Wit & Wisdom delineates each Craft Stage with a Craft Question.
The following chart identifies each Craft Stage, its associated Craft Question, and the type of thinking and reading in which students engage during each stage.
Craft Stage Craft Question
Examine Why is [specific skill] important?
Description of Student Thinking and Action
Students analyze an exemplar of a writing or speaking skill to recognize criteria for quality communication and, ultimately, to execute the skill on their own. The exemplar can come from authentic texts, class collaborative writing, or a module resource.
Experiment How does [specific skill] work?
Students practice and hone the target writing or speaking skill in a scaffolded task. Scaffolded tasks provide significant support by limiting the volume of writing, providing parts of a writing piece, or focusing on a relatively simple topic.
Execute How do I use [specific skill] in [specific task]? Students plan or draft a full writing piece, paying particular attention to applying the target strategy to support the purpose of the task.
Excel How do I improve my use of [specific skill]? Students revise, edit, and respond to feedback on the pieces they drafted in the Execute stage, focusing on the target strategy. They reflect on their use of the strategy to refine their thinking about its use in current and future writing.
With this carefully scaffolded instruction, students develop transferable skills in the crafts of speaking, writing, and presenting.
Create: The Demonstration of Content and Craft Learning
After building content knowledge through the Content Framing stages progression and developing their craft, students are ready to create a knowledge-based product. Students express their ideas and understanding of texts by completing these performance assessment tasks:
Focusing Question Tasks
End-of-Module Tasks
Focusing Question and EOM Tasks invite and inspire students to create and share great work. These tasks are specific to each module’s texts and topic. Modules are backward-designed from these questions, which drive student inquiry and focus assessments.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 35 © Great Minds PBC
The Content-Craft-Create Framework in Action
The following chart provides a snapshot of how the Content-Craft-Create framework plays out at the lesson level through examples from a Wit & Wisdom module.
Grade 3 Module 2: Outer Space
What do I notice and wonder about One Giant Leap?
Why is it important to support an opinion with reasons?
What is happening in One Giant Leap?
How do supporting reasons work in opinion writing?
What does a deeper exploration of figurative language reveal in One Giant Leap?
How do I use supporting reasons in an opinion paragraph?
What is the essential meaning of One Giant Leap?
How do I improve supporting reasons in opinion writing?
25
How do Moonshot and One Giant Leap build my knowledge of space and the astronauts who study space?
Create: Focusing Question Task
You are entering an opinion essay contest. The essays will be judged by NASA scientists who want to understand young people’s opinions about space travel. The question that you have to answer in your essay is:
Would you like to have been an astronaut on the Apollo 11 mission?
To answer this, write a four-paragraph opinion essay that includes the following:
an introduction paragraph
two supporting paragraphs
a conclusion paragraph
Support your opinion using evidence from the following texts:
Moonshot, Brian Floca
One Giant Leap, Robert Burleigh
Implementation Guide Getting Started 36 © Great Minds PBC
Lesson Content
Question
Question
Framing
Craft
19 Wonder
Examine
20
Organize
Experiment
21 Reveal
Execute
22 Distill
Excel
23 Know
Core Practices
Within and across modules, Wit & Wisdom features four key practices—questioning, annotating, summarizing, and collecting evidence—to help students learn how to read a complex text and communicate their understanding of texts.
Each practice is task-specific, easy to implement, and experienced in a progression of gradual release. Within each grade, teachers guide and support students with each practice, increasing complexity and independence and gradually transferring responsibility from the teacher to students. The gradual release of the Core Practices occurs within individual modules as well as across modules throughout the year.
Specific Core Practices often appear in conjunction with a particular Content Stage. For instance, students practice questioning during the Wonder stage, as they generate their own questions about a text. Summary occurs during the Organize stage, when students focus on demonstrating literal comprehension of a text. In addition, Core Practices can appear, with a range of complexity, in conjunction with several stages. For example, students use annotation to note observations and unknown words during the Wonder stage and also to highlight text evidence essential for a summary in the Organize stage. Students also employ annotation during the Reveal stage to indicate specific textual elements, such as types of figurative language, or shifts in point of view.
This chart provides descriptions of each Core Practice and its value.
Core Practice Description Progression of Practice Value
Questioning
Students monitor their understanding of the text by recording questions they have about it.
During their first encounter with a text, students record questions they have about it. When students return to the text, they continue to monitor their understanding, recording any additional questions that arise while also looking for answers to their initial questions. After the first stage of reading, students share and, when possible, answer these text-based questions, or problemsolve about how to answer the questions. For instance, students may return to the text, consult a reference source, or conduct research.
For Students
When readers ask themselves (or others) questions during the first few readings of a text, they can maintain engagement with and focus on the text while reading and monitor their comprehension of what they are reading.
For Teachers
Examining students’ questions serves as a valuable formative assessment tool as the questions students ask indicate their understanding of the text as well as learning from previous modules.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 37 © Great Minds PBC
Core Practice Description Progression of Practice Value
Annotating
While independently reading a text or section of text, students make notes with common annotation symbols and/or marginal notes.
For a sample Annotation Symbols chart, see the Resources section.
Annotation during the first read aims to develop the habit of monitoring understanding of a text as students read. In subsequent reads, annotation focuses readers on deeper understanding, such as distinguishing among purpose, claim, and conclusion; noticing authors’ crafting of literary elements or text features; and/or supporting learning goals relevant to the text (e.g., character analysis, influence of setting).
For Students
Annotation encourages active reading, inviting students to engage in a dialogue with the text while reading.
For Teachers
Annotations serve as indicators of students’ understanding of the text and learning from previous modules.
Summarizing
Students summarize texts, or sections of longer texts, and reflect as they summarize to determine the main topic/idea or central idea of what they are reading.
While many strategies encourage summarization, the use of visuals and manipulatives (objects that can be used in a hands-on manner) from Kindergarten through Grade 8 supports all learners, particularly visual and kinesthetic learners. Students may begin practice work with graphic organizers. The goal is for students to achieve independence, ultimately no longer needing the structured organizer to summarize text and distinguish main ideas/ themes/plot points from details.
For Students
Summarizing a text, or portion of text, after reading helps readers to think about texts more deeply, both at the word and sentence level and as whole texts; identify main and central ideas and key and supporting details; distinguish between more relevant and less relevant details; and check their comprehension of what they have read.
To summarize, a reader must make determinations about the following:
The main or central ideas (in informational texts) and plot points and/ or themes (in literary texts)
The key ideas versus details
Relevance
For Teachers
Student summaries are valuable assessment tools, providing insights into students’ understanding of texts, their ability to distinguish important versus unimportant details, and their comprehension of the central message or theme of a text.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 38 © Great Minds PBC
Core Practice Description
Collecting Evidence
The purposeful collecting of evidence serves as the bridge from reading to writing. Students collect evidence during reading when they question and annotate. The Core Practice formalizes the process, pinpointing the period when students collect evidence in response to a specific prompt, task, or question.
Meeting Student Needs
Progression of Practice Value
Students excavate the text (or multiple texts) to respond in depth to any question or purpose requiring a complex analysis and synthesis of multiple pieces of evidence (from the same text or multiple texts).
To gain practice, students collect evidence as a class, in small groups, or in pairs. Ultimately, students work individually with their own graphic organizers or their own notetaking or annotation systems to collect and record evidence prior to expressing their understandings through writing or speaking.
For Students
Collecting evidence, grounding written and oral responses with textual evidence, answering text-dependent questions, and writing to sources have all been an emphasis of ELA instruction. To meet the rigor of the Standards for ELA, students must identify, evaluate, and cite textual evidence.
For Teachers
Students’ purposeful and strategic selection of textual evidence provides insight into students’ understanding of a task and a text and their ability to synthesize and contextualize evidence in writing or speaking.
Wit & Wisdom reflects the Great Minds belief that all children deserve rich, engaging learning opportunities. Wit & Wisdom lessons engage all students and address individual needs such as those of striving readers and English learners.
Student Engagement
Wit & Wisdom lessons are designed to maximize student engagement in multiple ways. The lessons include the following features:
Engaging texts, topics, and tasks. The lessons engage students through challenging, high-quality texts; compelling topics in the humanities, history/social studies, science, and the arts; and tasks that encourage productive study and discussion.
A variety of instructional routines and approaches. Teachers use a variety of instructional routines through which students explore content with classmates in a variety of ways, including seminars, class discussions, pairs, and groups. For a list of and directions for these varied approaches, see Instructional Routines in the Resources section.
Content Framing Questions that begin and end each lesson. The recurring familiar structure of the Content Stages helps students internalize daily goals and develop transferable habits. It also ensures that students understand texts and build knowledge with a growing level of independence.
Sequences of Craft Stages focused on specific skills. Students practice writing and speaking, mastering tools with which to communicate content knowledge clearly.
High expectations. Learning goals are clear and measurable, and tracked through daily Checks for Understanding.
Scaffolds and extensions. These tools help teachers support all students in successfully accessing core grade-level content.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 39 © Great Minds PBC
Help for students to organize their thinking. Individual Student Editions and journals provide opportunities for written responses, vocabulary and word work, and reflection on knowledge.
Content presented through multiple modalities. These modalities include auditory, visual, kinesthetic, interpersonal, self-guided, and technological.
Student choice. Students have opportunities to choose the topic, process, and product, often with options of multiple texts as they pursue interests.
As a result, all students are motivated to participate in and engage with lesson content.
Productive Struggle
Wit & Wisdom’s rigorous curriculum ensures that thinking and analysis are done by students, not for students. In a Wit & Wisdom classroom, all students are given the opportunity to learn from a grade-level, complex curriculum, and correspondingly advanced texts. Instructional routines in the curriculum allow students to productively struggle with academic content—seeking to solve problems and find answers for themselves, so that they can master content and skills. Routines such as Chalk Talks and Socratic Seminars build students’ sense of self-efficacy and competence, building their confidence as learners. The curriculum prioritizes giving students ample processing time and purposeful instructional matrices, such as Content Framing Questions and Craft Questions, so that students have the tools and time to engage deeply in their own learning.
With Wit & Wisdom, all students, regardless of language acquisition or background, encounter and engage with the same complex texts. Instead of providing lower-level texts and lower learning expectations for some students, lessons support students who read below grade level. By engaging all students in shared learning with the same rigorous texts, Wit & Wisdom promotes equity. The program supports all students with instruction in content and vocabulary. Wit & Wisdom promotes different paths to the same shared learning goals.
Text Diversity
The Wit & Wisdom teacher–writers created Wit & Wisdom with the goal of presenting its content as both a mirror and a window. Students see themselves reflected in the curriculum’s texts, content, and ideas (the content acts as a mirror), and they gain insight into the viewpoints and experiences of others (the content acts as a window). For example, the Grade 6 core text I Am Malala will serve mostly as a window for students who have never faced the prospect of limited education or have no experience with violent, oppressive leadership. Other students and/or their families may have personal experience with similar cultural and political conditions; for them, the text serves as a mirror.
From Kindergarten through Grade 8, Wit & Wisdom students see in mirrors or through windows presented by the perspectives of authors such as Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, Toni Cade Bambara, Matt de la Peña, Rita Dove, Nikki Giovanni, Langston Hughes, Walter Dean Myers, Andrea Davis Pinkney, Allen Say, and Jeanne Wakatsuki Houston. Wit & Wisdom students read culturally diverse texts, such as Waiting for the Biblioburro by Monica Brown; Plains Indians by Andrew Santella; Ramayana: Divine Loophole by Sanjay Patel; Code Talker by Joseph Bruchac, and The Crossover by Kwame Alexander. Students read about important historical figures, including Alvin Ailey, Chief Joseph, Ruby Bridges, Martin Luther King, Jr., and Sylvia Mendez. In addition to these authors, texts, and historical figures, Wit & Wisdom features deep study of the works of a diverse group of artists, including Marian Anderson, Romare Bearden, Duke Ellington, Katsushika Hokusai, and Pablo Picasso.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 40 © Great Minds PBC
Support for All Learners
The Wit & Wisdom learning design, especially its use of Content Framing Questions to structure lesson-level learning, supports a range of students in numerous ways, including the following:
Deliberate sequencing. Students build knowledge of each module topic by reading texts in a purposeful sequence. Students complete each module study with knowledge and skills that they can use to access grade-level text.
Predictability of structures. The predictability of the recurring Content Stages helps students develop habits of mind and provides a scaffold for reading challenging texts. Students use the Content Framing Question as an entry point to difficult texts.
Reading scaffolds. Organizing ideas from informational and literary texts establishes student understanding of the main ideas and plot points prior to the consideration of deeper ideas.
Focus on vocabulary and syntax. Students learn to read closely and discuss important passages, with particular emphasis on:
p learning the meanings of essential content words and academic vocabulary
p studying roots and affixes to grow capacity to discern word meaning independently
p dissecting phrases to reveal how syntax conveys meaning
Exploration of content in multiple forms. Students explore print texts, visual art, videos, audio recordings, photographs, and maps to access module concepts and information.
Reliance on strong models. Students examine models of strong writing to understand how to craft effective sentences, paragraphs, and essays.
Frequent feedback. Students receive ongoing and explicit feedback from peers and teachers.
Scaffolds. At key moments, lessons include specific suggestions for how to scaffold instruction. These scaffolds empower teachers to seamlessly integrate remediation suggestions into instruction. For students who may be challenged by the lesson’s rigor, scaffolds provide another path to the learning goal, rather than minimizing or changing the learning goal.
Extensions and differentiation suggestions. Lessons often offer suggestions for how to vary learning tasks for those who already have well-developed skills, or to extend learning for students who seek an additional challenge.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 41 © Great Minds PBC
The chart below more specifically illustrates how Wit & Wisdom lessons support striving readers.
Module Element Strategies and Tasks That Help Striving Readers
Content Stage and Content Framing Question:
Wonder
What do I notice and wonder about this text?
Content Stage and Content Framing Question:
Organize
What is happening in this text?
Content Stage and Content Framing Question:
Reveal
What does a deeper exploration of ____ reveal in this text?
Content Stage and Content Framing Question
Distill
What is the essential meaning of this text?
Content Stage and Content Framing Question:
Know
How does this text build my knowledge of ____?
Deep Dives
Students build confidence as they articulate observations stemming from their curiosity and focus. Students engage in noticing and wondering at their current ability level, often activating prior knowledge, which fosters a feeling of success in striving readers.
Students learn to take note of information and details as they read. Students learn to articulate their confusion about a text.
Students learn to focus on the role of illustrations in building meaning, where applicable.
Building basic plot understanding before moving on to close reading exercises ensures that students will be able to succeed at more complex text analysis.
The focus on text organization (sequential, narrative, cause/effect, etc.) helps students generalize how to approach and comprehend different types of texts.
Tactile work through routines such as Boxes and Buttons and Story Stones engages and supports kinesthetic learners.
Careful and repetitive work with certain standards using shorter segments of text for close reading gradually leads to student success with analyzing and understanding complex texts.
Text-dependent questions and text-dependent tasks, such as Graphic Organizers or Chalk Talks, encourage students to reread the text several times to determine meaning.
Graphic Organizers and thoughtful instruction during this stage of reading and analysis lead students to a deeper understanding of a complex text.
Intentional building of content knowledge improves comprehension and increases both domain-specific and academic vocabulary.
Learning to apply understanding of roots and affixes helps students determine the meanings of unfamiliar words and access increasingly complex texts.
Writing Instruction Writing models give students visuals for organizing their expository, argumentative, and narrative writing. Evidence Organizers prime students for success in identifying and organizing their ideas before writing.
Sharing writing ideas orally prior to writing helps support students in understanding and expressing their ideas about texts.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 42 © Great Minds PBC
Module Element
Strategies and Tasks That Help Striving Readers
Volume of Reading Students benefit from frequent and increased exposure to a range of texts at a range of levels.
The more students read and are read to, the more knowledge they build and the more they develop their academic vocabulary.
Opportunities for choice in independent reading enhance student engagement.
Fluency Instruction
Repeated reading helps students work on the correct pronunciation of words, building confidence in their oral language.
Frequent reading of complex passages for fluency helps build comprehension.
Fluency performance with partners and small groups builds reading confidence, as students receive affirmation from teachers and peers.
Supporting English Learners
Wit & Wisdom supports English learners in two fundamental ways: content and instruction.
1 Wit & Wisdom content engages all students with complex texts, topics, and tasks.
2 Wit & Wisdom instruction empowers students with strategies to access complex language and ideas.
With Wit & Wisdom, all students—including English learners—learn the content they need to succeed in the classroom and beyond.
With Wit & Wisdom, students build content knowledge of:
challenging, high-quality texts
compelling topics in literature, science, history/social studies, and the arts
key academic and content-specific vocabulary
varied text genres (that students study and then produce in their own writing)
With Wit & Wisdom, students build skills with:
reading
writing
speaking and listening
collaborating
vocabulary acquisition
style and conventions
Implementation Guide Getting Started 43 © Great Minds PBC
The Wit & Wisdom approach of developing the same rigorous content and skills for all students—including English learners—is critical, as Lily Wong Fillmore and Charles J. Fillmore note:
One of the biggest roadblocks to learning is that [English learners and language-minority students] never get a chance to work with complex texts. Why would that be a problem? Simply put, the easy texts schools give to [English learners and language minority students]—given prophylactically as a safeguard against failure—actually prevent them from discovering how language works in academic discourse. (2)
Wit & Wisdom lessons maximize all students’ access to complex content and develop their skills. As Fillmore and Fillmore emphasize, “many students, but especially English learners, need instructional support from teachers to discover how to gain access to the ideas, concepts, and information that are encoded in the text” (6). The structures and routines of Wit & Wisdom that are particularly helpful for striving readers and English Learners include:
Deliberate sequencing. Texts and activities are purposefully sequenced to build students’:
p knowledge of module topics in literature, science, history/social studies, and the arts.
p skills with reading, writing, listening, speaking, and viewing.
Predictable structures. The recurring Content Stages (that scaffold close reading) and Craft Stages (that scaffold the writing process) help students develop transferable habits of mind.
Focus on vocabulary and syntax. In the 15-minute Deep Dives that follow each core lesson, students study vocabulary and grammar in the context of the module texts.
Content in multiple forms. Students explore print, visuals (art, photographs, maps, videos, and more), and audio to access module concepts and information.
Ongoing, sequential, explicit writing instruction. Students learn to write and write to learn every day in Wit & Wisdom.
Authentic opportunities for collaboration. Wit & Wisdom includes daily opportunities for collaboration and explicitly teaches speaking and listening skills.
Varied instructional routines and approaches. Teachers use varied instructional routines, such as visual graphic organizers or collaborative Think–Pair–Share activities or creative Readers’ Theater performances, to support students’ content and skill building.
Scaffolds, extensions, and suggestions for differentiation. Lessons include frequent suggestions for scaffolding, extending, and differentiating instruction.
Help for students to organize their thinking. Individual consumable Student Editions and journals are set up for written responses and reflection.
Student choice. Students choose topics, processes, and products in the core lessons, and the Volume of Reading text lists offer options of additional texts at varied reading levels for students to continue to explore topics of interest.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 44 © Great Minds PBC
The following chart illustrates how specific Wit & Wisdom lesson components support English learners.
Module Element Strategies and Tasks That Help English Learners
Content Stage and Content Framing Question:
Wonder
In this first close reading stage, students ask, What do I notice and wonder about this text?
Content Stage and Content Framing Question:
Organize
To ensure comprehension, students ask, What is happening in this text?
Annotating gives a structure for English learners to document their understanding.
Discussing unknown vocabulary and comprehension confusion supports English learners in the process of making meaning.
The focus on academic language and content vocabulary in context supports the development of such language in English learners.
Teacher Read-Alouds of text during this stage—sometimes optional for differentiation but often the norm— offer support for students who are not yet fluent in English.
Graphic organizers and other visual and tactile prompts support English learners in building comprehension. Instructional routines include the following:
Story Stones: Students use tactile symbols to represent plot elements.
Literary Dominoes: Students record key plot events onto dominoes that they can place in sequence and use to summarize.
Boxes and Buttons/Boxes and Bullets: Students record texts’ main ideas (boxes) and key details (buttons or bullets).
Content Stage and Content Framing Question:
Reveal
Students reread for deeper meaning: What does a deeper exploration of ____ reveal in this text?
Content Stage and Content Framing Question
Distill
What is the essential meaning of this text?
Content Stage and Content Framing Question:
Know
At the end of reading, students reflect: How does this text build my knowledge of ____?
Focused work on specific elements such as figurative language, point of view, and individual text features increases students’ ability to access complex texts.
Discussion in pairs and groups helps students determine the central ideas and themes of a text.
Graphic organizers offer a structure for students to analyze how key aspects of the text support these ideas and themes.
Thoughtful instruction leads students to a deeper understanding of complex texts.
The predictable routine of using the Knowledge Journal gives students an opportunity to reflect on and record their learning.
Connecting to prior knowledge, making connections with other texts, and reflecting on skill acquisition helps students solidify knowledge that will support future learning. Separate reflections on skill and content knowledge acquisition help students categorize and solidify what they are learning.
Students build a cache of knowledge around various topics, learning a greater amount of vocabulary than they could through simply thematic collections.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 45 © Great Minds PBC
Module Element Strategies and Tasks That Help English Learners
Deep Dives Explicit vocabulary instruction builds English learners’ bodies of known academic and content-specific words.
Morphology analysis and other word-learning strategies give English learners the tools they need to learn new words.
The study of syntax helps English learners understand a variety of sentence structures as they read them and use them in their own writing.
Grammar study helps students learn parts of speech and word functions in context.
Writing Modules and lessons feature learning-to-write activities and text-based writing-to-learn responses.
The Craft Stages offer a sequence of predictable routines: 1. Examine, 2. Experiment, 3. Execute, 4. Excel.
Writing models give students visuals for organizing their expository, argumentative, and narrative writing.
Evidence Organizers prime students for success in identifying and organizing their ideas before writing. Sharing writing ideas orally prior to writing helps support students in understanding and expressing their ideas about texts.
Sentence frames provide a structure and starting point for those who may struggle with language or syntax, and they model academic language students can internalize.
Speaking and Listening
Modules and lessons include opportunities for students to speak and listen in informal pair and group activities and in more formal, student-led discussions.
Defined speaking and listening goals for each module offer instruction and practice in the development of a specific skill.
Students have multiple opportunities to practice academic language: routines such as Think–Pair–Share give students a chance to practice ideas with a partner before sharing with the larger group.
Small-group discussions and tasks offer the opportunities for collaborative learning and to having low-risk academic discussions, as English speakers model language use for English learners.
Socratic Seminars provide models for participating in formal academic conversations.
Suggested sentence frames, such as: I agree with _______ because _______, or, I want to add to what _______ said, help students frame their thinking and develop a bank of phrases to use in academic conversations in English.
Vocabulary Journals and classroom charts are available to students as tools for ensuring precision of language in academic discussions.
Volume of Reading
Text choice fosters student engagement: students can choose additional texts based on their interests.
Sustained study of the module topic helps students build knowledge and vocabulary.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 46 © Great Minds PBC
Module Element
Strategies and Tasks That Help English Learners
Fluency Instruction Wit & Wisdom provides explicit instruction in the elements of fluency, followed by opportunities for practice. In lessons and homework, students repeatedly read short, well-chosen excerpts from module texts.
Fluency passages are often chosen to provide additional opportunities to engage with complex sections of text.
Repeated reading helps students develop correct pronunciation of words and build confidence in oral English language skills.
Feedback from peers, teachers, and others helps students focus on the specific skills they need to develop to read more fluently and with increasing automaticity.
Developing greater fluency builds comprehension.
Multilingual Vocabulary Glossaries
Available in Arabic, Chinese, French, English, Haitian Creole, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Tagalog, Urdu, and Vietnamese for every module.
A list of key content vocabulary supports students’ engagement with a module topic while building academic discourse.
Glossaries support students with literacy in another language to develop both their home language and English.
Teachers can use the glossaries to help students make connections to their home language and access important funds of knowledge.
Families can use the glossaries to deepen their understanding of the content being taught in school and to engage their children in rich conversations.
Wit & Wisdom and Social-Emotional Learning
Wit & Wisdom explicitly fosters students’ development of the five social-emotional competencies identified by the Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL):
Self-awareness: Students explore topics and texts that help them recognize their emotions, thoughts, and values; cultivate a growth mindset through rigorous work; and learn to evaluate their own academic performance.
Social awareness: Students examine topics and texts in which real and fictional people from diverse backgrounds and cultures respond to opportunities and challenges.
Self-management: Students learn to organize their reading, thinking, writing, and speaking; make responsible choices about their learning; and deepen their innate sense of curiosity as they explore compelling questions.
Relationship skills: Explicit instruction in speaking and listening, authentic opportunities to communicate with classmates, and collaborative learning structures help students work effectively with others to accomplish tasks.
Responsible decision-making: Students learn to make responsible choices in their learning, in Socratic Seminars, and as they explore topics and texts in which real or fictional characters face challenging decisions.
At each grade level, the curriculum is designed to cultivate a community of readers and writers. A brief opening unit—Module 0—enables teachers carefully introduce the curriculum, establish basic routines students will use all
Implementation Guide Getting Started 47 © Great Minds PBC
year, and foster students’ connections to each other and their learning. Students begin to feel safe enough to take the academic risks needed to learn. Each of the remaining four modules is organized around a compelling topic. All students read, discuss, and write about the same texts aligned with that topic; in the process, they develop a sense of community that deepens through a shared purpose and pursuit of knowledge. The curriculum is also designed to expand students’ social-emotional development from grade to grade. Wit & Wisdom’s collaborative structures and learning frameworks evolve in age-appropriate complexity across the Kindergarten through Grade 8 span.
The instructional routines and strategies in Wit & Wisdom require students to activate different ways of thinking in order to process a text, thereby building content knowledge, deepening understanding, and developing literacy skills. Instructional routines increase student engagement and provide practices to make students’ thinking and learning visible. At the lesson level, Grouping Designations describe the primary way students work in a lesson section—as individuals, in pairs or small groups, or as a whole group.
The following table outlines the key ways Wit & Wisdom’s approach fosters students’ social-emotional development and describes how each of these elements builds SEL core competencies and gives examples of how this integration of academics and social-emotional learning looks in action in the curriculum.
How Students Engage with Social-Emotional Learning in Wit & Wisdom
This Element Builds
How This SEL Integration Looks in Action
Build Knowledge of Themselves Wit & Wisdom’s curriculum is designed to develop in students a deep knowledge of important topics in the liberal arts and sciences in the context of ELA. As students learn about various events from history and science, they often explore real and fictional human conflicts and challenges and people’s reactions to them. As a result, students acquire a deeper understanding of the human experience, which supports their own development of self-awareness.
Students develop knowledge about these topics by reading curated sets of complex texts. In these texts, students frequently examine the thoughts, words, and actions of real and fictional people. Through this work, they identify, label, recognize, and analyze their emotions and how these emotions affect them and others. They develop a social-emotional vocabulary and build their ability to recognize their own emotions, thoughts, and values and how they influence their behavior, and essential aspects of self-awareness.
K–2 Grade Band:
In Grade 2 Module 3: Civil Rights Heroes, students explore questions of fairness and justice. They analyze a variety of texts, including picture books, photographs, poetry, videos, and informational articles, to closely examine the impact of three key civil rights heroes: Martin Luther King Jr., Ruby Bridges, and Sylvia Mendez. The rich texts give students the opportunity to learn how these important individuals were affected by, felt about, and responded to injustice and the lasting effects of their actions.
3–5 Grade Band:
Grade 5 Module 1: Cultures in Conflict gives students the chance to explore a complicated and compelling question: How do cultural beliefs and values guide people? Students read texts about the effect of westward expansion on native American tribes. Their two primary texts, the novel Thunder Rolling in the Mountains by Scott O’Dell and Elizabeth Hall and the “Lincoln Hall Speech,” which Nez Perce Chief Joseph delivered to Congress in 1879, allow students to wrestle with perspectives and the impact of human choices and actions.
6–8 Grade Band:
In Grade 6 Module 1: Resilience in the Great Depression, students analyze human experience and resilience in one of the most challenging eras of American history: the Great Depression. Students examine texts in which ordinary people—Bud in Christopher Paul Myers’s novel Bud, Not Buddy and Billie Jo in Karen Hesse’s novel Out of the Dust—find a way to endure this bleak time. Students examine what makes humans resilient as they build understanding through historical accounts, newspaper articles, music, photographs, poetry, and videos.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 48 © Great Minds PBC
How
SEL Core Competencies
How Students Engage with Social-Emotional Learning in Wit & Wisdom
Engage in Productive Struggle
How This Element Builds SEL Core Competencies
Wit & Wisdom’s rigorous approach requires that all students engage in productive struggle. Students tackle complex topics and texts through reading, writing, and discussion and are pushed to do so at a deep, analytical level. The curriculum provides numerous supports to help them succeed, such as doing the work within a strong learning community and through scaffolding. Over time, students come to realize the value of taking on challenging tasks and pushing through their challenges. As a result, students develop selfawareness, including an increased sense of self-efficacy and a growth mindset.
Other SEL competencies promoted: self-management
Evaluate their Academic Performance Students frequently evaluate their own learning, deepening their self-awareness and selfmanagement. For example, they regularly use checklists to compare their performance in areas such as speaking and listening or writing to established criteria for success. Using such checklists for selfevaluation teaches students the importance of taking incremental steps toward larger goals and helps students learn to accurately assess their strengths and identify areas for future growth. Over time, students internalize the skills of self-evaluation.
Other SEL competencies promoted: responsible decision-making
How
This SEL Integration Looks in Action
K–2 Grade Band:
After reading a variety of Cinderella stories from around the world (Grade 1 Module 4: Cinderella Stories), students read an excerpt from “900 Cinderellas,” an informational article describing key features of Cinderella tales. Students then analyze one Cinderella tale to determine which of the key features in “900 Cinderellas” appear in their selected tale. While such analysis is challenging for Grade 1 students, comparisons performed in earlier lessons have prepared them for it.
3–5 Grade Band:
At the end of Grade 4 Module 3: “The Redcoats are Coming!,” students write an essay in response to the following question: In your opinion, were the American patriots justified in fighting for their independence from Britain? While this is a complex question, students have been preparing throughout the module to synthesize and think critically about what they have learned from multiple texts in order to thoughtfully respond to it.
6–8 Grade Band:
As part of a larger study of the power of language, Grade 7 students analyze a sophisticated New York Times article about advertising. With multiple supports to guide them, students examine the negative effect of advertising techniques on children, why children are particularly vulnerable to advertising techniques, and how advertisers attempt to exploit those vulnerabilities.
K–2 Grade Band:
Students assess their performance on major assessments using a yes/not yet rating of various statements written in student-friendly language. For example, in Grade 2 Module 4: Good Eating, students evaluate their End-of-Module Task performance considering statements such as: I introduce the topic I am writing about, I wrote an opinion statement, and I write two or more reasons to support my opinion statement.
3–5 Grade Band:
As part of the fluency homework routine, students orally reread the same fluency passage several nights in a row and self-evaluate their progress in terms of accuracy, phrasing, expression, and rate.
6–8 Grade Band:
Students evaluate their performance in Socratic Seminars by using specified criteria. In Grade 6, for example, students consider whether they acknowledged and elaborated on comments from peers, brought the conversation back on topic when needed, and used appropriate formal, academic language.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 49 © Great Minds PBC
How Students Engage with Social-Emotional Learning in Wit & Wisdom
Develop Transferable Habits of Mind
How This Element Builds SEL Core Competencies
Wit & Wisdom’s learning design intentionally fosters students’ self-management skills. It guides them in developing habits of mind they can use to approach a given problem or situation and organize their reading, thinking, writing, and speaking as they do.
For example, students learn to analyze texts through a sequence of five Content Stages—beginning at the essential literal level and progressing to deeper levels of understanding as they read the text. Applying these stages to their reading across texts and over time, students learn how to independently approach new texts and effectively organize their reading.
The curriculum also offers students a variety of structures for organizing the evidence they gather from reading and for writing. Students learn useful structures to help them take that evidence and incorporate it into their writing in organized and effective ways.
Other SEL competencies promoted: self-awareness; responsible decision-making
How This SEL Integration Looks in Action
K–2 Grade Band:
In Kindergarten, students begin using the five Content Stages to guide their text analyses. For example, the questions at each stage of students’ exploration of Aliki’s book My Five Senses are as follows:
Wonder: What do I notice and wonder about My Five Senses?
Organize: What’s happening in My Five Senses?
Reveal: What does a deeper exploration of words and pictures reveal in My Five Senses?
Distill: What is the essential meaning of My Five Senses?
Know: How does My Five Senses build my knowledge of the senses?
3–5 Grade Band:
In Grade 4 Module 1: A Great Heart, Lesson 4, students use an evidence organizer so that in Lesson 5, they are prepared to write a paragraph about how someone shows great heart, figuratively. In columns, students record text evidence, its source, and an explanation of how it supports a focus statement.
6–8 Grade Band:
Students use the CREEA-C model to organize their writing of argument paragraphs:
C—Claim
R—Reason
E—Evidence
E—Elaboration
A—Alternate Claim(s)
C—Concluding Statement
Implementation Guide Getting Started 50 © Great Minds PBC
How Students Engage with Social-Emotional Learning in Wit & Wisdom
Value Inquiry
How This Element Builds SEL Core Competencies
Wit & Wisdom’s pervasive use of questioning to frame students’ thinking taps into their innate curiosity and builds selfmotivation, a key aspect of selfmanagement. Students are driven to answer important questions as they learn, not just to complete isolated tasks.
For example, each module centers on an Essential Question, an enduring question that guides their study throughout the module and can continue to captivate students well after a module ends. Students tackle that broad question through Focusing Questions that guide them to explore one key aspect of the Essential Question. Questions also frame students’ exploration of texts and the crafts of speaking and writing. The framing of learning through meaningful questions imbues students’ work with authenticity and purpose.
Other SEL competencies promoted: Responsible decision-making
How
This SEL Integration Looks in Action
Essential Question from Grade 1 Module 1: A World of Books: How do books change lives around the world?
Essential Question from Grade 5 Module 4: Breaking Barriers: How can sports influence individuals and societies?
Essential Question from Grade 8 Module 4: Teens as Change Agents: How do people effect social change?
Implementation Guide Getting Started 51 © Great Minds PBC
How Students Engage with Social-Emotional Learning in Wit & Wisdom
Build Knowledge of Others
How This Element Builds SEL Core Competencies
Many module topics help students understand the experiences and perspectives of people across cultures and periods and to examine the need for basic social and ethical norms in communities. Students investigate these topics in depth, reading a broad range of texts that address them. The text-based investigations of these topics help students develop social awareness.
Moreover, Wit & Wisdom purposefully chose texts that give students many opportunities to take different perspectives, empathize, appreciate diversity, and show respect for others.
Other SEL competencies promoted: self-awareness; responsible decision-making
How
This SEL Integration Looks in Action
K–2 Grade Band:
In Grade 1 Module 1: A World of Books, students consider how books change lives around the world. Students discover how access to books differs widely for children across cultures and communities and learn to see things from others’ perspectives. They learn the many ways that children access books, from waiting for librarians atop donkeys, packhorses, or camels to awaiting a library boat.
3–5 Grade Band:
In Grade 5 Module 4: Breaking Barriers, students learn how the power of sports has been harnessed, both throughout history and in our current day, to leave a positive, lasting impact in the world. They learn how South Africa’s rugby team helped unite and heal that nation’s wounds from decades of apartheid, and learn about the determination, spirit, and impact of players and coaches in America’s Negro Leagues.
6–8 Grade Band:
In Grade 8 Module 4: Teens as Change Agents, students explore Claudette Colvin’s role in the civil rights movement, and use Colvin’s story as an example of the possibilities for change agents in a variety of circumstances and how those agents might affect a variety of social issues.
Learn Through Collaboration
The curriculum’s collaborative approach to learning fosters students’ relationship skills. In every lesson, students work together to gather and analyze text evidence, communicate their ideas, and reflect on their learning. The curriculum uses a variety of instructional routines such as Think–Pair–Share, Jigsaw, Mix and Mingle, and Readers’ Theater to meaningfully structure this collaborative work so that it is productive and successful. Over time, through the careful use of these routines, students learn how to communicate and engage with others and work as a team, building relationships as they do so.
Other SEL competencies promoted: social awareness
K–2 Grade Band:
In Grade 1 Module 3: Powerful Forces, after writing sentences describing a scene from William Steig’s Brave Irene, students work in small groups to act out their scenes. Students learn to navigate various roles (narrator, actor) as they set up scenes.
3–5 Grade Band:
In Grade 3 Module 1: The Sea, Lesson 23, students identify which questions they generated about module texts in a previous module that have not yet been answered. Then they Mix and Mingle to share questions and discuss how they might go about answering the questions.
6–8 Grade Band:
Grade 7 students work together to explore the humor and meaning of “The Miller’s Tale” from The Canterbury Tales as they perform Readers’ Theater versions of it (Grade 7 Module 1: Identity in the Middle Ages, Lesson 11).
Implementation Guide Getting Started 52 © Great Minds PBC
How Students Engage with Social-Emotional Learning in Wit & Wisdom
Communicate Effectively
How This Element Builds SEL Core Competencies
The curriculum’s explicit teaching of speaking and listening promotes students’ relationship skills. Through carefully sequenced instruction, including teacher modeling and student role playing, students learn the skills they need to effectively communicate in both academic and social settings.
Moreover, the curriculum embeds numerous authentic ways for students to practice those skills (Think–Pair–Share, small group discussions, Socratic Seminars, and whole group conversations). Suggested sentence frames, such as: I agree with _____ because _____, or, I want to add to what _____ said, help students frame their thinking and develop a bank of phrases to use in academic and social conversations.
Other SEL competencies promoted: Responsible decision-making; selfmanagement; self-awareness; social awareness
How This SEL Integration Looks in Action
K–2 Grade Band:
In Grade 1 Module 2: Creature Features, students learn to notice pauses in conversations and use them to decide when to speak and when to listen. Students follow a set of steps to help them in conversation, such as: I hear you, and _____.
3–5 Grade Band:
In Grade 4 Module 4: Myth Making, Lesson 9, the teacher models and students practice giving each other feedback on writing. Lessons provide sentence frames for students to use to ensure that this feedback is helpful.
6–8 Grade Band:
In Grade 8 Module 3: What Is Love?, Lesson 11, students engage in a Fishbowl experience to learn about the importance of staying focused on the purpose of a discussion and of using logic in that discussion.
Value Evidence and Logical Reasoning
The curriculum’s focus on the necessity of evidence and sound reasoning in productive academic conversations fosters students’ responsible decision-making. Students learn that to make constructive choices as members of any community, they need to base their opinions and ideas on evidence and logical reasoning, not mere personal opinion. They learn how to gather facts and use logic to analyze situations and solve problems.
K–2 Grade Band:
In Kindergarten Module 1: The Five Senses, students learn that finding evidence in texts is like looking for clues in a detective story. The teacher models rereading a text to find evidence in response to a question. Students then practice finding evidence to answer questions they previously generated. Students begin to discuss and understand why evidence matters.
3–5 Grade Band:
Students begin to understand how to base their opinions on evidence by first learning to support a claim with evidence from one source and then learning to pull relevant evidence from multiple sources to support a thesis.
6–8 Grade Band:
Across this grade band, as part of argument writing, students learn to gather and analyze evidence first, before taking a position on an issue or question.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 53 © Great Minds PBC
How Students Engage with Social-Emotional Learning in Wit & Wisdom
Make Authentic Choices
How This Element Builds SEL Core Competencies
Lessons foster self-management skills, as they frequently give students opportunities to make meaningful choices about their learning. Students choose what to learn, how to learn, and how to show their knowledge. By having to choose among topics to read or write about or among several options for how to respond to a prompt, students are more selfmotivated and learn how to set learning goals and work toward them.
In addition, in each module, students engage in several Socratic Seminars, studentled collaborative discussions centering on a thought-provoking question related to a module’s content. These seminars also give students authentic and meaningful opportunities to practice responsible decision-making. As students independently engage in inquiry, elaboration, and debate, they have to listen to others, evaluate what others say, and make constructive choices about when and how to express their own ideas.
Other SEL competencies promoted: responsible decision-making
How This SEL Integration Looks in Action
K–2 Grade Band:
After studying all seven continents throughout Kindergarten Module 4: The Continents, students choose one continent and design a travel brochure to explain why someone should visit that continent.
3–5 Grade Band:
In certain tasks throughout the modules, students can choose which text, work of art, excerpt, or quotation they will analyze.
6–8 Grade Band:
In Grade 7 Module 4: Fever, students choose how they will show their understanding of the main events in a chapter by writing an imaginary newspaper interview with the main character about the chapter’s events, or by writing a letter home from the character about those events.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 54 © Great Minds PBC
Lesson Design
Each Wit & Wisdom lesson organizes student learning into sections using the following structure:
Lesson Section Typical Time Allocated Description
Welcome
Launch
5 min.
3 min.
Students independently engage in a task that prepares them for the lesson’s learning.
The teacher introduces the lesson’s Content Framing Question, and students interact with it in a meaningful way by unpacking terminology, or by making connections to the Focusing Question, Essential Question, and/or text. The teacher ensures student understanding of the lesson’s Learning Goals.
Learn
60 min.
Through a variety of instructional routines and tasks, teachers support students as they engage in productive struggle, both independently and with peers, and as they develop skills and knowledge needed to answer the lesson’s Content Framing Question.
Land
5 min.
The teacher facilitates student reflections on how they met lesson goals and answered the Content Framing Question.
The teacher directs closing activities, such as assigning homework. Deep Dive 15 min.
Wrap 2 min.
The teacher supports students’ learning of vocabulary, grammar, or style and conventions. The Deep Dive is also organized into Launch, Learn, and Land sections.
Total Lesson Time = 90 min.
In addition, two teacher-facing sections frame each lesson, providing guidance about the purpose of the lesson and modes of assessing its success.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 55 © Great Minds PBC
Every lesson begins with a Prepare section that:
lists the lesson’s guiding questions
conveys the lesson’s logical unity. This section explains:
p what students do in the lesson.
p the relationship between activities.
p how the lesson’s learning connects to at least one broader module goal.
Every lesson concludes with an Analyze section that:
explains a key assessment in the lesson, highlighting its purpose in relation to the lesson’s and the module’s learning goals.
offers guidance on evaluating student success on the assessment and actionable next steps for scaffolding learning when students struggle with particular tasks.
Implementation Guide Getting Started 56 © Great Minds PBC
GOING DEEPER WITH WIT & WISDOM ASSESSMENT
The Wit & Wisdom Approach to Assessment
A cornerstone of the curriculum’s backwards design, assessment in Wit & Wisdom provides ongoing evidence of how deeply students understand what they are learning. Frequent and varied, assessments are tied to module and lesson content and build toward the final, End-of-Module Task. Assessments occur in every lesson. The teacher-facing Analyze box at the end of each lesson provides ideas for how to analyze and act upon the results of that lesson’s assessments.
Wit & Wisdom grounds its assessments in four main principles:
Assessment can be a powerful tool to drive student learning.
Assessments should form a coherent narrative, reflecting the knowledge and skills students will build throughout a module.
The most powerful type of assessment is the content-based performance task. Tasks should consist of work worth doing, reflecting best instruction.
Self-assessment empowers students to understand and improve their learning.
Wit & Wisdom lessons include:
frequent, varied assessments and other tasks that provide evidence of how deeply students understand what they are learning.
frequent opportunities for self-assessment (often in the Land section of a lesson), using such tools as checklists, rubrics, goal-setting, and self-reflective journal prompts.
Analyze sections that provide educative information about assessing student learning—what teachers should look for in lesson assessments and how to act upon the results.
Rubrics for text-based writing, language, and speaking and listening with sample student responses.
The following graphic shows the five types of major Wit & Wisdom assessments, the frequency of each, and how the first four types are designed to build toward success on the EOM Task.
57 © Great Minds PBC Implementation Guide Going Deeper
Check for Understanding 1+ per lesson
Focusing Question Task 3–6 per module
Formative Lesson-level learning goal(s)
Formative or summative Module learning goals for knowledge, reading, writing, speaking, and/or language
New-Read Assessment 2–3 per module Formative or summative Transfer of reading and/or language module learning goals to a new text or a portion of text focused on a topic that has been introduced
Socratic Seminar 2–3 per module
Formative or summative Module learning goals for knowledge, speaking, and language
End-of-Module Task 1 per module
Assessment in Action
Summative Module learning goals for knowledge, reading, writing, speaking, and/or language
The following chart provides examples of the assessments at various grade levels.
Assessment Examples
Check for Understanding
Grade K Module 1 Lesson 19
Students listen closely to the text on that page spread and make drawings to reflect the text. Reread as needed. Give students five minutes to create their interpretation from the text on pages 9–10.
Grade 3 Module 3 Lesson 12
(This CFU occurs after students complete a graphic organizer about the following two texts.) Students use one color to highlight similarities between Grandfather’s Journey and Tea with Milk. Students use the other color to highlight differences between Grandfather’s Journey and Tea with Milk
Grade 6 Module 2 Lesson 22
Students complete a Quick Write in response to the following: Choose one of the illustrations analyzed in the Chalk Talk. Explain how analyzing Packer’s use of art elements helped you better understand Penelope’s character.
Focusing Question Task
Grade 2 Module 1, Focusing Question Task 4
Write an informative paragraph explaining the impact of fall weather on leaves.
Grade 7 Module 4, Focusing Task 2
Deliver a five-minute presentation explaining an effect of the (1793 yellow fever) crisis, using examples from one or both core texts.
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 58 © Great Minds PBC
Frequency Type
Assessment
What Does It Assess?
Assessment Examples
New-Read Assessment
Grade 5 Module 3, New-Read Assessment 1
Text: The Boys’ War: Confederate and Union Soldiers Talk About the Civil War, Jim Murphy
Part A
What point does the author make about drummer boys in this excerpt?
a) Drummer boys will always be an important part of war.
b) As war techniques changed, so did the need for drummer boys.
c) Soldiers needed drummer boys in order to hear commands.
d) Drummer boys caused too many problems during the Civil War, so armies stopped using them in later wars.
Part B
Which evidence from the text supports your answer to Part A? Select two
a) “The Civil War would be the last time drummer boys would be used in battle” (Murphy 41).
b) “The roar of big cannons and mortars, the rapid firing of thousands of rifles, and the shouts of tens of thousands of men made hearing a drumbeat difficult” (Murphy 41–43).
c) “Instead, smaller, fast-moving units and trench warfare, neither of which required drummers, became popular” (Murphy 43).
d) “Even as their role in the fighting was changing, Civil War drummers stayed at their positions signaling orders to the troops” (Murphy 43).
e) “Hundreds were killed and thousands more wounded” (Murphy 43).
Socratic Seminar
Grade 1 Module 3 Lesson 29
Is science or magic more important to William?
Grade 2 Module 3 Lesson 13
Why were Martin Luther King, Jr.’s words powerful?
Grade 4 Module 3 Lesson 15
Participate in a Town Meeting to share your opinion as a colonist in Colonial Voices about whether or not you support dumping the English tea in Boston Harbor as protest for the tax placed on the tea by King George and Parliament.
Grade 6 Module 3 Lesson 32
Did the Jamestown settlement fail? Why or why not?
Grade 8 Module 3 Lesson 32
Is love real?
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 59 © Great Minds PBC
Assessment Examples
End-of-Module Task Kindergarten Module 4
Part 1: Use knowledge of various text types to sort each module text into one of the following categories: informational text or storybook.
Part 2: Choosing from among one of the following continents—Asia, Africa, Antarctica, Europe, Australia, or South America—create a travel brochure to explain why someone should visit that continent.
Grade 8 Module 1
Write a portfolio of three poems that demonstrate an understanding of ideas of the power of stories, the effects of descriptive and sensory language, narrative arc, and the relationship between content and structure. Write a cover letter explaining the story, the relationship between form and content, and an understanding of the power of storytelling. Then perform the poetry portfolio for an audience, with attention to poetic expression.
Achieving the Standards
Lessons list aligned standards for each assessment. Major assessments (Focusing Question Tasks, New-Read Assessments, Socratic Seminars, and EOM Tasks) primarily assess module focus standards. Occasionally they also assess supporting standards. By the end of the module, students have at least one opportunity to demonstrate mastery of each focus standard on a major assessment. Major assessments may assess some standards multiple times so that teachers can assess growth.
The Impact of Assessment
Whether in college or a career, students will frequently be held accountable for what they know and what they can do. Forms of assessment that are typically limited to the classroom, like multiple choice, can be helpful in giving teachers quick feedback on student learning. However, the best assessments mirror the work students will do in college and in their careers, allowing them to perform their learning in authentic contexts. Wit & Wisdom’s Focusing Question Tasks, Socratic Seminars, and EOM Tasks are designed to elicit that kind of performance, giving students an opportunity to show what they can do by applying their learning to solving academic, intellectual, and real-world problems.
THE WIT & WISDOM APPROACH TO THE STANDARDS
The texts and tasks included in Wit & Wisdom present opportunities for students to practice and master state standards for English Language Arts. Wit & Wisdom’s learning design premise is that texts speak, and standards answer. Instead of addressing standards one by one, in isolation, the tasks and activities associated with each Wit & Wisdom text integrate multiple standards from the Reading, Writing, Speaking and Listening, and Vocabulary strands.
Wit & Wisdom explicitly addresses all expectations of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for English language arts, except the Foundational Skills standards. One (or more) module targets nearly all standards and sub-standards. The notable exceptions are W.9 and W.10, which are Supporting Standards in most modules to reflect the standards’ purpose; RL.10, RI.10, and L.6, which are Continuing Standards in all modules; and the Foundational Skills standards. See the Foundational Skills section in the Going Deeper section for details.
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 60 © Great Minds PBC
To further highlight the integrated nature in which standards are taught, Wit & Wisdom utilizes three Standard categories: Focus, Supporting, and Continuing. Each module designates applicable standards.
Focus Standards are taught explicitly in a given module through explanation, modeling, or gradual release of responsibility. Students practice the Focus standards in multiple lessons, and complete major assessments such as Focusing Question Tasks, New-Read Assessments, etc.
Supporting Standards are not taught explicitly or assessed formally in the module, but students practice them using one or more module texts. Many standards are designated as Focus Standards just once or twice but reappear in other modules as Supporting Standards. Throughout the year, students apply Supporting Standards to new texts with increasing independence.
Continuing Standards represent broad, end-of-year goals so assessment does not occur in a single task. Unlike Focus and Supporting Standards, Continuing Standards are taught and practiced pervasively across modules rather than individual lessons. Students practice and master these standards cumulatively. The Continuing Standards RL.10, RI.10, and L.6 are foundational to what students do daily and, therefore, appear in every grade module.
In each module, Focus Standards receive extensive instruction, practice, and assessment. Supporting Standards from across the strands provide multiple opportunities for students to practice and master grade-level literacy skills in context in module lessons. Woven into all lessons and modules, Continuing Standards represent broad goals foundations to students’ daily work.
Within the Teacher Edition for each grade-level module, the Module Overview provides standards alignment information in the following sections:
Module Learning Goals
Standards
Major Assessments
Module Map
Standards by Grade and Module
Through careful analysis of the texts and topics, each module aligns to the standards best suited to building students’ understanding and knowledge of module content. As they practice and apply these skills throughout the year, students become confident, engaged, college- and career-ready learners. When appropriate and logical, both module and lesson-level learning goals group multiple standards within and across strands.
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 61 © Great Minds PBC
The following chart shows the Focus and Continuing Standards for each module.
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 62 © Great Minds PBC
Grade Module 1 Module 2 Module 3 Module 4 K The Five Senses Once Upon a Farm America, Then and Now The Continents Reading RL.K.1, RL.K.6, RI.K.1, RI.K.4, RI.K.5 Reading RL.K.2, RL.K.3, RL.K.9 Reading RI.K.2, RI.K.3, RI.K.6 Reading RL.K.4, RL.K.5, RL.K.7, RI.K.7, RI.K.8, RI.K.9 Writing W.K.2, W.K.8 Writing W.K.3, W.K.6, W.K.8 Writing W.K.2, W.K.7, W.K.8 Writing W.K.1, W.K.5, W.K.8 Speaking and Listening SL.K.1.a, SL.K.1.b Speaking and Listening SL.K.6 Speaking and Listening SL.K.3, SL.K.5 Speaking and Listening SL.K.2, SL.K.4 Language L.K.1.d, L.K.2.c, L.K.2.d Language L.K.1.a, L.K.1.e, L.K.1.f, L.K.2.c, L.K.2.d, L.K.5.a, L.K.5.c Language L.K.1.b, L.K.1.c, L.K.2.a Language L.K.1.f, L.K.2.a, L.K.2.b, L.K.4.a, L.K.4.b, L.K.5.b, L.K.5.d Continuing RL.K.10, RI.K.10, W.K.10, L.K.6 Continuing RL.K.10, RI.K.10, W.K.10, L.K.6 Continuing RL.K.10, RI.K.10, W.K.10, L.K.6 Continuing RL.K.10, RI.K.10, W.K.10, L.K.6 1 A World of Books Creature Features Powerful Forces Cinderella Stories Reading RL.1.1, RL.1.2, RL.1.3, RI.1.1, RI.1.7 Reading RL.1.2, RI.1.2, RI.1.3, RI.1.5, RI.1.8 Reading RL.1.4, RL.1.5; RI.1.4, RI.1.6, RI.1.9 Reading RL.1.6, RL.1.7, RL.1.9 Writing W.1.3, W.1.5 Writing W.1.2, W.1.6, W.1.7, W.1.8 Writing W.1.3 Writing W.1.1, W.1.8 Speaking and Listening SL.1.1.a, SL.1.1.b Speaking and Listening SL.1.5, SL.1.6 Speaking and Listening SL.1.1.c, SL.1.3 Speaking and Listening SL.1.2, SL.1.4 Language L.1.1.b, L.1.1.f, L.1.1.j, L.1.2.b Language L.1.1.h, L.1.1.i, L.1.1.j, L.1.2.b, L.1.2.e, L.1.4.a, L.1.5.b, L.1.5.d Language L.1.1.c, L.1.1.e, L.1.1.f, L.1.4.b, L.1.4.c, L.1.5.c, L.1.5.d Language L.1.1.a, L.1.1.d, L.1.1.g, L.1.1.j, L.1.2.a, L.1.2.c, L.1.2.d, L.1.4.a, L.1.5.a Continuing RL.1.10, RI.1.10, W.1.10, L.1.6 Continuing RL.1.10, RI.1.10, W.1.10, L.1.6 Continuing RL.1.10, RI.1.10, W.1.10, L.1.6 Continuing RL.1.10, RI.1.10, W.1.10, L.1.6
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 63 © Great Minds PBC Grade Module 1 Module 2 Module 3 Module 4 2 A Season of Change The American West Civil Rights Heroes Good Eating Reading RL.2.1, RL.2.2, RL.2.5; RI.2.1, RI.2.2 Reading RL.2.2, RL.2.3, RL.2.9, RI.2.4 Reading RL.2.4, RL.2.6; RI.2.7, RI.2.9 Reading RL.2.7; RI.2.3, RI.2.5, RI.2.6, RI.2.8 Writing W.2.2, W.2.5, W.2.8 Writing W.2.2, W.2.5, W.2.6, W.2.8 Writing W.2.3, W.2.8 Writing W.2.1, W.2.7, W.2.8 Speaking and Listening SL.2.1.a, SL.2.1.b Speaking and Listening SL.2.5, SL.2.6 Speaking and Listening SL.2.1.c, SL.2.3 Speaking and Listening SL.2.2, SL.2.4 Language L.2.1.e, L.2.1.f, L.2.4.a, L.2.4.b, L.2.4.e, L.2.5.a, L.2.5.b Language L.2.1.a, L.2.1.b, L.2.2.a, L.2.4.a, L.2.4.b, L.2.4.c Language L.2.1.e, L.2.1.f, L.2.4.d, L.2.5.b Language L.2.1.c, L.2.2.b, L.2.2.c, L.2.2.d, L.2.2.e, L.2.3.a, L.2.4.e, L.2.5.a Continuing RL.2.10, RI.2.10, W.2.10, L.2.6 Continuing RL.2.10, RI.2.10, W.2.10, L.2.6 Continuing RL.2.10, RI.2.10, W.2.10, L.2.6 Continuing RL.2.10, RI.2.10, W.2.10, L.2.6 3 The Sea Outer Space A New Home Artists Make Art Reading RL.3.1, RL.3.2, RI.3.1, RI.3.2, RI.3.4, RI.3.5, RI.3.7 Reading RL.3.2, RI.3.3, RI.3.6, RI.3.9 Reading RL.3.1, RL.3.6, RL.3.9 Reading RL.3.4, RL.3.5, RL.3.7, RI.3.8 Writing W.3.2, W.3.4, W.3.8 Writing W.3.1, W.3.2, W.3.4, W.3.5, W.3.8 Writing W.3.3, W.3.4 Writing W.3.2, W.3.4, W.3.6, W.3.7, W.3.8 Speaking and Listening SL.3.1.b Speaking and Listening SL.3.1.d, SL.3.2, SL.3.4 Speaking and Listening SL.3.1.a, SL.3.1.c, SL.3.3 Speaking and Listening SL.3.4, SL.3.5, SL.3.6 Language L.3.1.a, L.3.1.e, L.3.1.i, L.3.2.a, L.3.2.e, L.3.4.a Language L.3.1.a, L.3.1.h, L.3.1.i, L.3.4.a, L.3.4.b, L.3.5.a, L.3.5.c Language L.3.1.b, L.3.1.c, L.3.1.d, L.3.1.e, L.3.1.f, L.3.2.b, L.3.2.c, L.3.2.d, L.3.4.c, L.3.5.b Language L.3.1.g, L.3.2.e, L.3.2.f, L.3.2.g, L.3.3.a, L.3.3.b, L.3.4.d Continuing RL.3.10, RI.3.10, W.3.10, L.3.6 Continuing RL.3.10, RI.3.10, W.3.10, L.3.6 Continuing RL.3.10, RI.3.10, W.3.10, L.3.6 Continuing RL.3.10, RI.3.10, W.3.10, L.3.6
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 64 © Great Minds PBC Grade Module 1 Module 2 Module 3 Module 4 4 A Great Heart Extreme Settings “The Redcoats Are Coming!” Myth Making Reading RL.4.2, RL.4.5, RI.4.2, RI.4.4, RI.4.7 Reading RL.4.1, RL.4.3, RL.4.7, RI.4.1, RI.4.5 Reading RL.4.2, RL.4.6, RI.4.3, RI.4.6, RI.4.8 Reading RL.4.4, RL.4.5, RL.4.7, RL.4.9, RI.4.9 Writing W.4.2, W.4.8 Writing W.4.2, W.4.3, W.4.4, W.4.5, W.4.8 Writing W.4.1, W.4.6, W.4.7 Writing W.4.2 Speaking and Listening None Speaking and Listening SL.4.4, SL.4.5, SL.4.6 Speaking and Listening SL.4.1.a, SL.4.1.b, SL.4.1.c, SL.4.3, SL.4.4 Speaking and Listening SL.4.1.d, SL.4.2, SL.4.4 Language L.4.1.d, L.4.2.a, L.4.2.b, L.4.2.c, L.4.5.a Language L.4.1.a, L.4.1.e, L.4.3.a, L.4.3.b, L.4.4.a, L.4.4.b, L.4.5.a Language L.4.1.a, L.4.1.b, L.4.1.f, L.4.2.c, L.4.3.c, L.4.4.c, L.4.5.c Language L.4.1.c, L.4.1.g, L.4.2.d, L.4.3.c, L.4.4.b, L.4.5.b Continuing RL.4.10, RI.4.10, W.4.10, L.4.6 Continuing RL.4.10, RI.4.10, W.4.10, L.4.6 Continuing RL.4.10, RI.4.10, W.4.10, L.4.6 Continuing RL.4.10, RI.4.10, W.4.10, L.4.6 5 Cultures in Conflict Word Play A War Between Us Breaking Barriers Reading RL.5.3, RL.5.9, RI.5.2, RI.5.3 Reading RL.5.1, RL.5.2, RL.5.4, RL.5.5, RL.5.7 Reading RL.5.6, RI.5.4, RI.5.6, RI.5.8 Reading RI.5.1, RI.5.5, RI.5.7, RI.5.9 Writing W.5.2, W.5.4 Writing W.5.3, W.5.4, W.5.5 Writing W.5.1, W.5.4, W.5.5 Writing W.5.2, W.5.4, W.5.6, W.5.7, W.5.8 Speaking and Listening SL.5.1.b Speaking and Listening SL.5.4, SL.5.6 Speaking and Listening SL.5.1.a, SL.5.1.c, SL.5.2, SL.5.3 Speaking and Listening SL.5.1.d, SL.5.4, SL.5.5 Language L.5.1.a, L.5.2.d, L.5.3.a, L.5.4.a, L.5.5.c Language L.5.1.a, L.5.2.b, L.5.2.c, L.5.3.a, L.5.4.a, L.5.4.c, L.5.5.b Language L.5.1.b, L.5.1.c, L.5.1.d, L.5.3.b, L.5.4.a, L.5.4.b, L.5.5.a Language L.5.1.a, L.5.1.e, L.5.2.a, L.5.2.e, L.5.3.a, L.5.4.b, L.5.5.c Continuing RL.5.10, RI.5.10, W.5.10, L.5.6 Continuing RL.5.10, RI.5.10, W.5.10, L.5.6 Continuing RL.5.10, RI.5.10, W.5.10, L.5.6 Continuing RL.5.10, RI.5.10, W.5.10, L.5.6
7 Identity in the Middle Ages Americans All Language and Power
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 65 © Great Minds PBC Grade Module 1 Module 2 Module 3 Module 4 6 Resilience in the Great Depression A Hero’s Journey Narrating the Unknown Courage in Crisis Reading RL.6.1, RL.6.2, RL.6.3, RL.6.4, RL.6.9, RI.6.1, RI.6.2, RI.6.9 Reading RL.6.3, RL.6.5, RL.6.7 Reading RL.6.3, RL.6.4, RL.6.6, RI.6.2, RI.6.3, RI.6.8, RI.6.9 Reading RI.6.4, RI.6.5, RI.6.6, RI.6.7 Writing W.6.2, W.6.4, W.6.5 Writing W.6.3, W.6.4, W.6.5, W.6.6 Writing W.6.1, W.6.4, W.6.5 Writing W.6.2, W.6.4, W.6.7, W.6.8 Speaking and Listening SL.6.1.b Speaking and Listening SL.6.1.d, SL.6.4, SL.6.5, SL.6.6 Speaking and Listening SL.6.2, SL.6.4 Speaking and Listening SL.6.1.a, SL.6.1.c, SL.6.3 Language L.6.1.e, L.6.3.a, L.6.4.a, L.6.5.a Language L.6.1.b, L.6.1.d, L.6.2.a, L.6.2.b, L.6.4.b, L.6.5.a, L.6.5.c Language L.6.1.a, L.6.1.c, L.6.3.a, L.6.4.c, L.6.4.d, L.6.5.c Language L.6.1.d, L.6.3.b Continuing RL.6.10, RI.6.10, W.6.10, L.6.6 Continuing RL.6.10, RI.6.10, W.6.10, L.6.6 Continuing RL.6.10, RI.6.10, W.6.10, L.6.6 Continuing RL.6.10, RI.6.10, W.6.10, L.6.6
Fever Reading RL.7.1, RL.7.2, RL.7.3, RL.7.4 Reading RL.7.2, RL.7.3, RI.7.1, RI.7.2, RI.7.3 Reading RL.7.4, RL.7.5, RL.7.6, RL.7.7, RI.7.7, RI.7.8 Reading RL.7.2, RL.7.3, RL.7.9, RI.7.4, RI.7.5, RI.7.6, RI.7.9 Writing W.7.3, W.7.4 Writing W.7.2, W.7.4, W.7.5 Writing W.7.1, W.7.4 Writing W.7.2, W.7.4, W.7.6, W.7.7, W.7.8 Speaking and Listening SL.7.1.b Speaking and Listening SL.7.4, SL.7.6 Speaking and Listening SL.7.1.a, SL.7.1.c, SL.7.3 Speaking and Listening SL.7.1.d, SL.7.2, SL.7.4, SL.7.5 Language L.7.1.b, L.7.3.a Language L.7.1.a, L.7.1.c, L.7.2.b, L.7.3.a, L.7.4.b, L.7.5.b Language L.7.1.b, L.7.3.a, L.7.4.a, L.7.4.b, L.7.5.a, L.7.5.c Language L.7.2.a, L.7.4.b, L.7.4.c, L.7.4.d, L.7.5.c Continuing RL.7.10, RI.7.10, W.7.10, L.7.6 Continuing RL.7.10, RI.7.10, W.7.10, L.7.6 Continuing RL.7.10, RI.7.10, W.7.10, L.7.6 Continuing RL.7.10, RI.7.10, W.7.10, L.7.6
READING
The Wit & Wisdom Approach to Teaching Reading
Wit & Wisdom’s rigorous and joyful text-based approach to reading instruction creates skilled readers who love to read. Through inquiry-based engagement, students build their comprehension and deepen their analysis of texts.
Wit & Wisdom reading instruction:
is precisely and deliberately crafted to ensure rigor, lead to authentic work arising from the texts, and create coherence across a module.
requires that learners do the cognitive work.
is structured within and across lessons to guide purposeful engagement during each Content Stage of a text, thus enabling deeper understanding of the text.
is sequenced across each module to cultivate content connections and skill development among multiple texts.
Each lesson begins and ends with a Content Framing Question that provides an umbrella for the text-dependent tasks and text-dependent questions in the lesson. Framing each lesson with familiar question stems helps students build the habits of mind they need to become independent close readers.
The discussions, text-dependent tasks, and TDQs within each Content Stage serve a distinct purpose, illuminating key close reading habits.
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 66 © Great Minds PBC Grade Module 1 Module 2 Module 3 Module 4 8 The Poetics and Power of Storytelling The Great War What Is Love? Teens as Change Agents Reading RL.8.1, RL.8.2, RL.8.4, RL.8.5, RI.8.2 Reading RL.8.3, RL.8.7, RI.8.1, RI.8.3 Reading RL.8.2, RL.8.4, RL.8.6, RL.8.9, RI.8.4, RI.8.8 Reading RI.8.5, RI.8.6, RI.8.7, RI.8.9 Writing W.8.3, W.8.4, W.8.5 Writing W.8.2, W.8.4 Writing W.8.1, W.8.4, W.8.5 Writing W.8.2, W.8.4, W.8.6, W.8.7, W.8.8 Speaking and Listening SL.8.4, SL.8.5, SL.8.6 Speaking and Listening SL.8.1.b, SL.8.1.d Speaking and Listening SL.8.1.a, SL.8.1.c, SL.8.3 Speaking and Listening SL.8.2, SL.8.4, SL.8.5 Language L.8.1.c, L.8.2.a, L.8.5.a Language L.8.1.b, L.8.1.d, L.8.2.b, L.8.5.b, L.8.5.c Language L.8.1.c, L.8.1.d, L.8.2.a, L.8.2.c, L.8.4.b, L.8.4.c, L.8.4.d, L.8.5.a, L.8.5.c Language L.8.1.a, L.8.3.a, L.8.4.a, L.8.4.d, L.8.5.b Continuing RL.8.10, RI.8.10, W.8.10, L.8.6 Continuing RL.8.10, RI.8.10, W.8.10, L.8.6 Continuing RL.8.10, RI.8.10, W.8.10, L.8.6 Continuing RL.8.10, RI.8.10, W.8.10, L.8.6
Reading Instruction in Action
Wit & Wisdom lessons execute this learning approach through:
an average of 55 minutes or more of reading instruction per lesson.
carefully constructed TDQs and text-dependent tasks that require students to return to and reread texts for authentic and engaging purposes, ultimately leading to deeper understanding and analysis. The following two examples—the first from Lesson 2 of Grade 2 Module 1, and the second from Lesson 8 of Grade 8 Module 1— illustrate the power of this combination of joy and rigor:
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 67 © Great Minds PBC
multiple and varied opportunities to reflect on and discuss texts—individually, with a partner or small group, or in the whole group. This allows for increased engagement, giving the time to develop thinking and deepen understanding through the exchange of ideas, as in this lesson from Grade 2 Module 3:
a variety of ways to explore text meaning and demonstrate understanding of texts—such as Response Journal entries, writing in a variety of genres, Graffiti Walls, Tableaux, or Chalk Talks like the one in this lesson from Grade 4 Module 2:
frequent reading assessments, including daily CFUs, New-Read Assessments, Focusing Question Tasks, and EOM Tasks.
support for the important practice of Volume of Reading, students’ independent and self-selected reading of a volume and range of texts to build knowledge and vocabulary. For more on Wit & Wisdom’s support of this practice, see Volume of Reading Guidance.
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 68 © Great Minds PBC
Achieving the Standards
The chart below shows typical standards that the lessons address at each Content Stage.
Stage Typical Standards
Wonder R.1, R.4 (determine word meaning)
Organize R.2 (summarize key ideas and details), R.5
Reveal R.3, R.4 (analyze word choice), R.5, R.6, R.7, and/or R.8
Distill R.2 (interpret central ideas or themes)
Know R.9
The Impact of Reading Instruction
Through close reading of complex texts, students come to understand the elements of effective writing, recognizing that each element of a text contributes to its richness and cohesion. When students expect to understand a text deeply, they persevere through confusion, reading and rereading until they have unlocked the layers of meaning in the text (Boyles 4–7; Jones et al. 4–5). Practicing close reading in the classroom builds the mental muscles needed for deep comprehension during independent reading—which is the ultimate goal. These habits of mind will serve students well as they encounter challenging texts in Kindergarten through Grade 12 assessments, in college, at work, and throughout their daily adult lives (ACT 16–17; NGA Center and CCSSO 2–4; PARCC).
VOCABULARY
The Wit & Wisdom Approach to Teaching Vocabulary
Thorough knowledge of word meanings is key to understanding any complex text and to learning as a whole (Chall and Jacobs; Anderson and Freebody 77). Vocabulary instruction in Wit & Wisdom is accordingly designed to achieve three key student outcomes:
Better comprehension of complex texts
Broader and deeper knowledge of words and word parts (including affixes and roots)
Increased ability to determine the meanings of unknown words
As a text-based curriculum, Wit & Wisdom teaches vocabulary both implicitly and explicitly using words in the core and supplementary texts. Through repeated readings of complex, knowledge-building texts, students implicitly learn many new words (Feitelson, Kita, and Goldstein 340; Miller and Gildea 96; Nagy and Scott 273). Explicit vocabulary instruction focused on the three student outcomes emphasizes three categories of high-leverage vocabulary words and phrases.
Content-Specific Vocabulary: Relates to key ideas of a domain-specific topic.
Academic Vocabulary: Frequently occurs across disciplines and is often abstract, with multiple meanings.
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 69 © Great Minds PBC
Text-Critical Vocabulary: Essential to understanding a specific text.
Note that one word might fit into multiple categories.
Vocabulary Instruction in Action
Wit & Wisdom lessons execute the vocabulary learning design through:
explicit vocabulary instruction essential to understanding texts that students read, as shown through this example from Lesson 30 of Grade 3 Module 2:
encouraging students to use target vocabulary in their discussions and writing about texts, as in this excerpt from Lesson 9 of Kindergarten Module 1:
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 70 © Great Minds PBC
vocabulary-specific instructional strategies and routines in the core lessons. See the Resources section for a description of instructional routines and examples of how some of those routines might be used for vocabulary instruction.
Deep Dive vocabulary instruction and practice to develop student knowledge of high-value words and word-solving strategies, as in this example from Lesson 1 of Grade 7 Module 3:
focusing on elements of vocabulary, such as abstract or multiple meanings, connotation, relationships among words, and morphology.
quick, targeted assessments, as well as indirect assessments, such as use of new vocabulary in context.
Word Walls and Vocabulary Journals for students to record newly acquired words and vocabulary strategies.
Appendix B in each module, which supports teachers in customizing vocabulary instruction to the needs of their students.
Achieving the Standards
Wit & Wisdom’s systematic, text-based vocabulary instruction intentionally aligns with the many standards promoting deep word study. The modules optimize opportunities for students to acquire and deepen vocabulary knowledge in the context of complex texts. L.6 is a continuing standard in Wit & Wisdom, as it represents the cumulative achievement of using a range of vocabulary knowledge throughout modules. Deep Dives frequently address the specifics of L.4 and L.5, offering explicit instruction and practice.
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 71 © Great Minds PBC
The Impact of Vocabulary Instruction
Vocabulary knowledge correlates strongly with reading comprehension. Students with a broad vocabulary tend to understand more of what they read, while students who know fewer words understand less of what they read. Enormous disparities in students’ word knowledge begin early in life, then grow greater over time (Stanovich 373). Wit & Wisdom’s systematic, text-based vocabulary instruction addresses these critical needs, ensuring that Wit & Wisdom students develop the vocabulary knowledge and skills they need to succeed in school and beyond.
FOUNDATIONAL SKILLS
The Wit & Wisdom Approach to Foundational Skills
Before independently reading and writing about complex texts, students must master the building blocks of reading and writing. In Kindergarten through Grade 3, the core Wit & Wisdom curriculum should be implemented alongside a systematic, research based foundational skills program. In Kindergarten through Grade 3, the core Wit & Wisdom curriculum is implemented alongside a systematic, researched based foundational skills program. The core lessons in Wit & Wisdom do not explicitly teach foundational skills other than fluency, which is explicitly and comprehensively addressed. (See the Fluency section that follows.) Nonetheless, Wit & Wisdom lessons are specifically designed to reinforce the foundational skills instruction in through:
occasionally having students transfer previously learned foundational skills to a lesson’s reading or writing tasks about complex texts. For example, some writing lessons cue teachers to review previously taught sound-spelling patterns that students are frequently misspelling, then give students time to edit their text-based writing with a focus on those patterns.
Foundational Skills Connections activities in Modules 2–4. In these optional activities, students practice skills from the foundational skills curriculum with Wit & Wisdom module texts, as in the following example from Lesson 12 of Grade 1 Module 2. Teachers can implement the activity before, after, or in the middle of the lesson.
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 72 © Great Minds PBC
alignment of expectations for students’ independent reading and writing with developmentally accessible and rigorous foundational skill levels.
frequent Read-Alouds of complex texts in early grades in which students are building foundational skills.
task- and text-specific scaffolds for struggling readers and writers.
frequent fluency practice with carefully selected passages from Wit & Wisdom core texts. See the Fluency section below for details.
Teachers can and should customize lessons in other ways to provide other opportunities for applying previously taught foundational skills in Wit & Wisdom lessons. Foundational skills are necessary but not sufficient for students to navigate the complex reading and writing required in college and careers. By engaging all students with complex text, Wit & Wisdom allows students with varying proficiency in foundational skills to build grade-level knowledge of the world, ideas, vocabulary, and syntax. Thus, when striving students catch up in foundational skills, they are ready to tackle complex texts.
GEODES
The Wit & Wisdom Approach to Early Literacy
Providing a bridge between foundational skill instruction and the core ELA instruction provided in Wit & Wisdom, schools and districts can adopt the ancillary product, Geodes classroom libraries, for their Kindergarten through Grade 2 classrooms. Geodes are accessible, knowledge-building books created to engage emerging and developing readers. Geodes reinforce sequentially and explicitly taught phonics while building content knowledge about important ideas in science, history, and the arts. Each book in each grade-level collection is designed as an authentic reading experience, using a variety of text structures and features, sentence lengths, vocabulary, illustrations, and multiple layers of meaning. This approach empowers young students as they develop foundational reading skills, reading confidence, and intellectual curiosity.
Rooted in the belief that children are capable of reading to learn while learning to read, Geodes fill the gap between decodable texts and leveled readers. Unlike decodables, Geodes review explicitly taught phonetic patterns and contain a greater volume of content-related vocabulary. Geodes also build knowledge around particular topics by including a limited number of non-decodable words allowing for more knowledge-rich informational or narrative text. This differentiates Geodes from leveled texts which typically string together random topics and are not designed to build a depth of knowledge. By reading Geodes, students learn that the purpose of reading is not only to decode but also to seek meaning and gain understanding.
Designed to be at least 80 percent decodable, Geodes are a powerful educational resource that can be used in conjunction with any systematic, research-based phonics instruction program. Beautiful illustrations and photographs enrich and expand on the text. Designed for flexible instruction, with ample supports for educators’ instructional decision-making, Geodes help all students grow as readers as they access the same text, creating the foundation for shared learning and equity in the classroom.
Geodes are designed to allow teachers to tailor instruction to meet the range of student needs. Teachers may use Geodes in whole group or small group instruction or use them for student independent reading. The teacher resource, Inside Geodes, which accompanies every classroom library, provides educators with multiple options for using the texts to support all students, regardless of their current language acquisition or reading level. Activities which can either scaffold or extend instruction around fluency, phrasing, expression, reading rate, and comprehension are clearly outlined within the teacher resource.
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 73 © Great Minds PBC
Geodes Components
Each Level 1 and Level 2 Classroom Library Contains:
Item Description
Individual Titles
Books are organized into four modules per year, based on the Wit & Wisdom module topics
Each Module contains four sets of books
Each set has four titles
My Geodes
A bound collection of the four texts that make up one set. These texts, printed in greyscale, can be used for extra practice in school or at home. Each book in the set has its own icon paired with page numbers to help students navigate the collection.
Inside Geodes The educator resource guide for Geodes that includes a comprehensive guide to module design and Geodes’ components. Also provides suggestions for incorporating Geodes in literacy instruction.
Geode with display stand
Real geode rock and display stand
Each Level K Classroom Library Contains:
Item Description
Individual Titles Books are organized into four modules per year, based upon the Wit & Wisdom module topics.
Quantity
64 individual titles
6 full-color copies of each title
20 of each of the 16 sets making up a grade-level
1 Classroom Library
1 per classroom
My Geodes
A bound collection of the four texts that make up one set. These texts, printed in greyscale, can be used for extra practice in school or at home. Each book in the set has its own icon paired with page numbers to help students navigate the collection.
Quantity
Modules 1 and 2:
8 individual titles
2 Wordless Picture Books
6 Sound Search Books
12 full-color copies of each title
Modules 3 and 4:
16 individual titles
All Duet Books
6 full-color copies of each title
20 copies of My Geodes, organized by set
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 74 © Great Minds PBC
Item Description
Inside Geodes The educator resource guide for Geodes that includes a comprehensive guide to module design and Geodes’ components. Also provides suggestions for incorporating Geodes in literacy instruction.
Quantity
1 per Classroom Library
Geode with Display Stand Real Geode rock and display stand 1 per classroom
FLUENCY
The Wit & Wisdom Approach to Teaching Fluency
Reading fluency is the ability to read print words aloud accurately and effortlessly, with appropriate speed and meaningful expression and phrasing. Fluent readers make meaning from text as they read it aloud.
As young students learn to read, multiple knowledge systems develop concurrently. Students learn phonics, phonological awareness, decoding, spelling, and vocabulary. During these early learning stages, the teacher usually reads complex texts aloud to students. As they listen strategically and repeatedly to challenging texts, students develop the knowledge and language they need to read and think about complex text independently.
As readers grow into their elementary- and middle-school years, their knowledge systems progress, and fluency functions as a bridge to comprehension. For a variety of reasons, some readers may continue to require targeted and intentional fluency supports through the middle-school grades. As these supports help them improve their fluency, these striving readers can become independent readers of complex text, no longer dependent on audiobooks, teacher Read-Alouds, or other means of accessing the text.
Wit & Wisdom fluency instruction is designed to foster fluency development for all readers. It is grounded in the belief that the goal of fluent reading is rich comprehension, rather than a quantitative assessment of reading rate. Students learn to read grade-level complex text through repeatedly reading short, well-chosen text excerpts from module texts. Practicing these fluency excerpts builds students’ overall fluency skills while also scaffolding understanding of specific module texts. In lessons and homework, repeated oral readings of these excerpts help students to understand the texts and communicate more effectively about them.
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 75 © Great Minds PBC
Fluency Instruction in Action
Wit & Wisdom modules build fluency through
an explicit introduction to fluency in Module 1 (Grades 1 through 8), including Anchor Charts like this one from Lesson 2 of Grade 2 Module 1:
reflection on the importance of fluency and modeling of fluent reading as in Lesson 1 from Grade 6 Module 1:
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 76 © Great Minds PBC
routine fluency homework chosen strategically from complex texts (required for all students in Grades 1 through 5; optional, though encouraged, in Grades 6 through 8).
formal and informal reading fluency performances, such as Readers’ Theater, individual reading performances for the class, or partner readings of selected texts.
authentic fluency tasks integrated with students’ close reading and text-based writing, as in this example from Lesson 21 of Grade 7 Module 3:
Achieving the Standards
The primary standards connection for fluency work is Reading Foundational Skills Standard 4. This standard calls for students to read with sufficient accuracy and fluency to support comprehension. It is the Reading Foundational Skills Standard that the Wit & Wisdom curriculum addresses directly, because attention to fluency aids students’ comprehension of complex texts and scaffolds students’ mastery of and ability to read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently. Although RF.4 is Kindergarten through Grade 5 standard only, Wit & Wisdom includes fluency work in Grades 6 through 8 as well. Teachers in Grades 6 through 8 have the option of using fluency instruction and practice with all students or as an intervention for striving readers.
The Impact of Fluency Instruction
According to Dr. Timothy Rasinski, “oral reading performance has the potential to transform a self-conscious student into a star performer—especially when he or she is coached and given opportunities to practice” (The Fluent Reader 23). Fluency is the bridge to success with reading. As students become able to read a greater number of words per minute with increased understanding, they read more. The more they read, the more they build knowledge.
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 77 © Great Minds PBC
VISUAL ART
The Wit & Wisdom Approach to Teaching Visual Art
Wit & Wisdom teacher–writers recognize that as one of the earliest modes of human communication, visual art is a universal and essential form of expression and communication, accessible to even the youngest of learners. Each module provides multiple opportunities for students to engage with significant works of art as core and supplementary texts, including paintings, illustrations, prints, sculptures, architecture, and photographs. Rather than serving as illustrations of module content, each selection has been chosen to inspire students to grapple with broader concepts related to the module knowledge story.
The Wit & Wisdom Content Stages guide students to view these artworks with wonder, curiosity, and imagination, and then to build knowledge and appreciation of artistic elements, genres, styles, and media. Next, students explore how artists express important thoughts and ideas, identify the essential themes, and connect their learning to the greater Knowledge Puzzle of the module.
Visual Art Instruction in Action
Wit & Wisdom art lessons
guide students to apply the habits of mind they have developed as readers to the analysis of visual art, using the five Content Stages to structure their inquiry;
introduce and extend understanding of fundamental elements of visual art such as color, space, line, and form, as exemplified in a variety of media—as shown in this excerpt from Lesson 21 of Grade 3 Module 3:
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 78 © Great Minds PBC
establish discipline-specific vocabulary for naming, describing, and interpreting works of visual art, as shown by this example from Lesson 33 of Grade 5 Module 2:
teach students to base their analysis and interpretations on evidence from the artwork, as students are asked to do in Lesson 20 of Grade 8 Module 2:
offer diverse perspectives from a variety of culturally significant artists, artistic movements, and historical contexts;
provide occasional opportunities for students to create their own visual response to artwork;
relate understandings about works of art to the broader module Knowledge Puzzle; and
provide opportunities for all learners, regardless of prior knowledge and skills, to access themes and ideas expressed through visual art.
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 79 © Great Minds PBC
The Impact of Visual Art Instruction
In a world increasingly dependent on visual media to communicate meaning, it is essential to teach students visual literacy. Through intentional exposure to great works of art in the Wit & Wisdom curriculum, students build understanding, appreciation, and awareness of the ways in which the elements of visual language influence people and the world of ideas. Moreover, many of the selected works represent a wide cultural vocabulary, providing students with a common visual experience to carry throughout their lives as educated citizens.
WRITING
The Wit & Wisdom Approach to Teaching Writing
Wit & Wisdom students learn to write and write to learn about complex texts. Writing builds on a foundation of content knowledge developed through the close reading of texts about important topics. All writing is text-based or text-inspired. Through narrative, opinion/argument, and informative writing, students build and express understanding within and across texts.
Through explicit learning-to-write instruction, teachers gradually release responsibility for a specific writing strategy through a series of lessons. One or more Craft Stages shapes each lesson.
Supported gradual release of a strategy
Examine: Students analyze how an exemplar models one or more writing strategies. The exemplar can come from authentic texts, class collaborative writing, or a module resource.
Experiment: Students practice applying a target strategy. Scaffolded tasks provide significant support by limiting the volume of writing, providing parts of a writing piece, or focusing on a relatively simple topic.
Execute: Students plan or draft a full writing piece, paying particular attention to applying the target strategy to support the purpose of the task.
Excel: Students revise, edit, and respond to feedback on the pieces they drafted in the Execute stage, focusing on the target strategy. They reflect on their use of the strategy to refine their thinking about its use in current and future writing.
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 80 © Great Minds PBC
Independent
Writing Instruction in Action
Wit & Wisdom lessons include:
an average of twenty or more minutes of writing per lesson.
explicit learning-to-write instruction on transferable strategies for effective writing, as in this excerpt from Lesson 11 of Grade 2 Module 4, in which students begin to learn strategies for opinion writing:
routine writing-to-learn opportunities in which students write informally and formally to explore complex texts, as in Lesson 30 of Grade 5 Module 3:
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 81 © Great Minds PBC
a variety of writing performance tasks, each with a clear audience and purpose, such as this one from Lesson 31 of Grade 7 Module 3:
rubrics, checklists, and sample student responses to assess students’ writing.
Achieving the Standards
Wit & Wisdom organizes the skills of ELA writing standards and Language Standards 1–3 into five Craft Features, defined below. These features also align to the Craft Features for Speaking and Listening.
Structure: Focusing a writing piece on a unifying idea; organizing the parts of the piece to clearly communicate the idea and how details relate to it.
Development: Stating and elaborating on details using evidence or narrative devices.
Style: Strategically using language to convey meaning; includes writer’s voice, diction (word choice), syntax (sentence structure), and adaptation to task, audience, and purpose.
Conventions: Following rules of Standard English grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage.
Process: Planning, drafting, giving and responding to feedback, revising, editing, and presenting writing pieces; choosing a process appropriate for the task, purpose, and audience.
Students often begin study of a writing type with a focus on its structure and development and then deepen their understanding of how style can strengthen tasks using that writing type. Throughout the year, students apply their conventions and process knowledge with increasing depth and independence. Writing rubrics and checklists are used to assess students’ mastery of these Craft Features, while explicit instruction in each feature guides students to success.
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 82 © Great Minds PBC
The Impact of Writing Instruction
The ability to communicate effectively in writing and speech is essential for success in college and most careers. Wit & Wisdom learners build both deep knowledge and the tools to articulate that knowledge in writing and speaking. Through explicit instruction in all aspects of the writing process, repeated opportunities to practice writing for authentic purposes, and receiving and learning to apply meaningful feedback on their writing, these students will be well prepared for the writing challenges they will face in school and beyond.
SPEAKING AND LISTENING
The Wit & Wisdom Approach to Teaching Speaking and Listening
Wit & Wisdom builds students’ ability to communicate orally by maximizing the quality, quantity, and variety of their speaking and listening experiences.
Quality: Students learn speaking and listening just as they would any other discipline—through rich, rigorous, and joyful instruction. From explicit modeling to experimentation to independent expression, students build capacity in discrete speaking and listening skills that make their communications stronger. As with writing instruction, this speaking and listening instruction is always text-based or text-inspired.
Quantity: Daily lessons intentionally shift the balance of talking to students, engaging them in multiple, meaningful opportunities to speak and listen.
Variety: Students hone their skills and awareness of the many purposes for speaking and listening, and they learn how to tailor their speaking and listening for a specific purpose and audience. For example, students learn how to participate informally in daily academic conversations and also how to deliver a formal presentation.
Teachers use the Craft Stages of Examine, Experiment, Execute, and Excel to guide students through explicit speaking instruction while gradually releasing responsibility to students for these skills.
A key aspect of the Wit & Wisdom approach to Speaking and Listening is the Socratic Seminar. In a Socratic Seminar, students prepare for and participate in a structured, text-based, academic conversation. Each seminar is organized around a rigorous question that provokes new thinking. Students apply the crafts of speaking and listening to express and extend what they have learned from their reading and writing. For more information on Socratic Seminars, see Socratic Seminar Guidance.
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 83 © Great Minds PBC
Speaking and Listening Instruction in Action
Wit & Wisdom lessons execute this approach to teaching speaking and listening through:
explicit instruction in transferable strategies for speaking and listening, as in this example from Lesson 4 of Grade 8 Module 3:
frequent opportunities and ways for students to develop and practice speaking and listening. These include a variety of instructional routines and engaging activities designed to foster high-quality academic discussion, as in Lesson 32 of Kindergarten Module 4, in which students are actively engaged in learning the importance of incorporating details into verbal descriptions:
development of speaking and listening skills through students’ work with reading fluency and comprehension.
intentional connection between oral and written communication by having students orally rehearse what they will write by first talking about it with classmates.
assessment of oral language comprehension and skill, including Socratic Seminars and grade-level speaking and listening rubrics.
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 84 © Great Minds PBC
Achieving the Standards
Wit & Wisdom structures the skills of Speaking and Listening standards into four Craft Features, defined below, which align to the Craft Features for writing and language. Explicit speaking skill instruction focuses on a single feature for each module.
Process: Process goals help learners participate effectively in academic conversations.
Delivery: Delivery, or style and conventions for communicating orally, goals help learners follow conventions for public speaking and hone their speaking style to engage an audience.
Structure: Structure goals help learners organize ideas to communicate clearly.
Development: Development goals help learners speak logically and use evidence.
Students learn and apply one new speaking and one new listening goal in each module. These goals build incrementally over four modules to fully address the Speaking and Listening standards for each grade.
The Impact of Speaking and Listening Instruction
The ability to effectively communicate with others is crucial to success in college, careers, and civic life. Those who can speak in an articulate, organized, and thoughtful way and respectfully raise questions, concerns, and disagreements can engage in the collaborative work characteristic of most college and career settings. Similarly, the ability to listen deeply and for a purpose promotes both collegiality and learning. Through the speaking and listening instruction that Wit & Wisdom lessons provide, students expand their vocabularies, improve their reading fluency, readily make cognitive connections, collaborate effectively, and ultimately develop the capacity to engage in conversations with both peers and adults.
Implementation Guide Going Deeper 85 © Great Minds PBC
PLANNING FOR IMPLEMENTATION
LESSON PREPARATION
To successfully implement Wit & Wisdom, teachers take part in a familiar, four-part preparation process.
While each of these stages can be described separately, they overlap considerably in practice. For example, much assessment and analysis occurs during the teaching phase. Each stage involves the following teacher actions.
Prepare Teach Assess Analyze
Before teaching the module, reread the core texts, read the Module Overview, and make note of its key elements, such as the Essential Question, the EOM Task, and standards.
Before teaching each lesson, reread the texts;
look at the Lesson’s At a Glance page, noting the lesson’s learning goals; study the Prepare box, information to determine the lesson’s focus; read the lesson in depth, paying particular attention to the Content Framing Question and Learning Goals; and based on data and analysis, plan to adapt the lesson to students’ needs, using alternate activity ideas from the lesson or your own ideas
Teach lessons as written and intended, paying attention to recommended time suggestions for each section. Multiple reads of each complex text shaped by the Content Framing Questions lead to comprehension of the texts over multiple lessons and prepare students to speak and write about them. Student engagement and understanding increase with crisp, concise instruction.
When students demonstrate additional support is needed, provide opportunities for:
Read-Alouds
oral rehearsal before writing
use of sentence frames
graphic organizers included in the lessons
Assess student understanding and performance during and after the lesson. Among other actions, be sure to do the following:
Collect (or take anecdotal notes on) the lesson’s CFUs.
Collect other student work products from the lesson.
Pay attention to whole class conversations and circulate as students work in pairs or small groups to continually assess student understanding.
Observe students’ speaking and listening skills during lessons and assess how those are progressing.
Analyze students’ work and discussions to make future instructional decisions. Use information in the Analyze boxes to assess performance on the CFUs and plan next steps. Use rubrics or checklists to score written work and generate quantitative data.
Evaluate instruction: Revisit lesson preparation notes. Videotape the teaching, and then analyze the performance. Invite a colleague or administrator to observe the lesson and give feedback.
Implementation Guide Planning for Implementation 87 © Great Minds PBC
WIT & WISDOM PREPARATION PROTOCOLS
To make the most of Wit & Wisdom, teachers must internalize the curriculum before they implement it. Wit & Wisdom’s preparation protocols support this internalization, building a deep understanding of the curriculum’s what and why. This understanding helps teachers think through lesson materials and logistics, as well as pace and scaffold instruction.
Wit & Wisdom was created through backward design:
1 Content Topics and Grade-Level Outcomes: Great Minds started development by:
a mapping important topics and curating core text sets to build knowledge of each topic.
b identifying skill outcomes for each grade.
2 Texts: Wit & Wisdom teacher–writers closely read each core text and determined what made each worthy of deep study.
3 Learning Goals: Teacher–writers then analyzed the grade-level content and skill outcomes and carefully matched each with the appropriate texts to determine module and lesson Learning Goals.
4 Assessments: Next, teacher–writers designed the End-of-Module Task for each module, the summative assessment of student learning for that module, to assess the Learning Goals.
5 Questions: Teacher–writers structured each module around a series of questions. The module’s Essential Question leads students on a path of inquiry to the EOM Task performance. Lessons are organized as a series of learning arcs, each of which is directed by a Focusing Question and culminates in a formative assessment.
6 Lessons: Last, teacher–writers wrote the individual lessons.
The Wit & Wisdom protocols follow the module structure:
The Module Study Protocol guides educators in examining a module’s topic, texts, and skill focus and analyzing the knowledge and skills students are expected to develop.
The Focusing Question Arc Study Protocol guides educators in understanding what knowledge and skills an arc of lessons, addressing a particular Focusing Question, will develop and how that arc fits in with the module as a whole.
The Lesson Study Protocol supports educators in preparing to teach a lesson through understanding what happens in the lesson and why. This deep analysis helps educators pace instruction and make sound decisions, such as how long to discuss a question before moving on, as well as anticipate where students may struggle and plan how to support them with follow-up questions.
With the protocols, Wit & Wisdom teachers can follow this backward design, recognize how the pieces of each module fit together, and thus prepare for successful implementation. Teachers can complete the protocols individually or collaboratively. Teachers use these protocols when they are new to the curriculum or the grade level. After Year One, teachers can refer to the completed protocols, updating and supplementing as needed. Preparation protocols are available as downloadable PDFs from Great Minds’ website.
Implementation Guide Planning for Implementation 88 © Great Minds PBC
MAPPING A YEAR OF WIT & WISDOM
Wit & Wisdom Modules 0–4 include approximately 150 lessons, allowing schools to accommodate mandates such as school-wide events or standardized tests. A curriculum with approximately 145 days of instruction helps schools tailor the curriculum to specific opportunities, resources, and needs, leaving a measure of flexible time between or within modules.
For the best student experience, modules should be scheduled around longer vacation periods or extended stretches of intense assessment time that could interrupt the flow of module learning.
Using Time Between Modules
Wit & Wisdom learning can be supplemented through relevant, practical learning activities between modules to accommodate student interests and employ community resources. Activities to connect periods between modules might include the following:
Short studies of favorite texts related to module topics or other important topics
Research projects to apply skills and build knowledge
Field trips that connect to module topics and build community connections
Planning Pause Points Within Modules
In addition to time between modules, Wit & Wisdom can accommodate extra time within modules for teachers to respond to specific student needs. Teachers can consider building in strategic Pause Points, which are days for re-teaching, scaffolding, or extending lessons. Based on students’ strengths, needs, and interests, teachers might use Pause Points to do the following:
Complete lessons that require more time
Reteach or provide additional support for content or skills that students need to practice (See the Analyze Section at the end of each core lesson for ideas for additional support)
Connect content to current events or opportunities that arise in the community
Review vocabulary terms that are essential to understanding the module content
Boost fluency through Readers’ Theater performances, student-led declamations, or poetry slams
Provide more time and support for complex writing assignments
Increase the Volume of Reading on the topic of study by reading and discussing additional texts
Explore extension activities, texts, or videos suggested in the module
Complete student-led research projects that capitalize on students’ interests
Implementation Guide Planning for Implementation 89 © Great Minds PBC
Sample Annual Calendar
Quarter 1
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
Week 1 School and Class Culture Building
Week 2 Wit & Wisdom Module Zero Lessons
Week 3 Holiday Module 1 Lessons 1–8
Week 4 Pause Point
Week 5 Module 1 Lessons 9–13
Week 6 Pause Point Module 1 Lessons 14–19
Week 7 Pause Point Module 1 Lessons 20–21
Week 8 Holiday and Parent Conferences Module 1 Lessons 22–28
Week 9 Pause Point
Week 10 Module 1 Lessons 29–32
Quarter 2
Week 11
Publish EOM Tasks
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
Teacher Choice Text Study
Week 12 Module 2 Lessons 1–9
Week 13 Holiday
Week 14 Pause Point Module 2 Lessons 10–18
Week 15
Week 16 Pause Point Module 2 Lessons 19–24
Week 17 Holiday Party Winter Break
Week 18
Week 19 Module 2 Lessons 25–29
Week 20 Pause Point Module 2 Lessons 30–32 Publish EOM Tasks
Implementation Guide Planning for Implementation 90 © Great Minds PBC
Quarter 3
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
Week 21 Holiday Student-Led Research Projects
Week 22 Module 3 Lessons 1–6
Week 23 Pause Point Module 3 Lessons 7–13
Week 24 Pause Point
Week 25 Holiday Module 3 Lessons 14–21
Week 26 Pause Point
Week 27 Module 3 Lessons 22–28
Week 28 Overnight Field Trip Spring Break
Week 29
Week 30 Module 3 Lessons 29–35
Week 31 Publish EOM Tasks Assessment Review
Quarter 4
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
Week 32
Standardized Assessments
Week 33 Module 4 Lessons 1–3
Week 34 Pause Point Module 4 Lessons 4–9
Week 35 Pause Point Module 4 Lessons 10–16
Week 36
Week 37 Pause Point Module 4 Lessons 17–22
Week 38 Pause Point Module 4 Lessons 23–27
Week 39 Holiday Pause Point
Week 40 Module 4 Lessons 28–34
Week 41
Total: 180 instructional days
Publish EOM Tasks Parent Conferences/Celebration
Implementation Guide Planning for Implementation 91 © Great Minds PBC
SETTING UP A WIT & WISDOM CLASSROOM
Wit & Wisdom is designed to foster a classroom culture of knowledge-building and active student engagement.
Room setup can promote such a culture and engagement with, for example, desks arranged to accommodate flexible working arrangements (individuals, pairs, groups), a designated whole group meeting area in early grades, and strategic displays of anchor charts and student work.
Students and teachers also need easy access to key tools that support their work with Wit & Wisdom. In addition to the texts and student handouts, the following resources support success with Wit & Wisdom modules.
Student Journals
Students maintain a Response Journal, a Vocabulary Journal, and a Knowledge Journal. Teachers choose the format that works best for their classrooms: a three-part spiral notebook, an individual composition book for each journal, a binder with three tabs (one for each journal), or another option of the teacher’s design. Formats will vary; teachers create a format that distinguishes the three journals and optimizes usability for their students and themselves.
Response Journal: A frequently used resource, the Response Journal provides one place for students to document their thinking during core lessons and Deep Dives, including lists of brainstormed ideas, responses to questions and prompts, and reflections on texts or classroom discussions. In this journal, students write to learn and learn to write. Inclusive in nature, the Response Journal records the wide range and various stages of thinking instrumental to academic success.
Vocabulary Journal: A dedicated journal for students’ vocabulary-related work, the Vocabulary Journal reinforces the importance of vocabulary to knowledge- and skill-building. In this journal, students engage in activities such as making connections among words, applying their understanding of a word, or recording definitions of key words.
Knowledge Journal: Reserved for use in Know lessons, the Knowledge Journal invites students to reflect on, synthesize, and extend the knowledge they have developed—as a group and individually—over a stretch of time. Although it is used sparingly in each module (rather than daily), the Knowledge Journal captures students’ thinking at key intervals, requiring students to process and analyze what they have learned. Students apply, stretch, and connect ideas and themes throughout the whole year.
p For Kindergarten through Grade 2, the Knowledge Journal consists of two sections: Knowledge of the World (What I Know) and Knowledge of Skills (What I Can Do).
p For Grades 3 through 8, there are four sections: Knowledge of the World, Knowledge of Ideas, Knowledge of Skills, and Reflections.
z Knowledge of the World: Students articulate and synthesize knowledge about pertinent topics. As students realize they are building world knowledge, they apply this background knowledge to the reading of the next text and to wide reading in other academic situations.
z Knowledge of Ideas: Wit & Wisdom values inquiry-based learning about the big ideas that inform our experiences and understandings of culture, history, and identity. As students realize they are building idea knowledge, they notice how these big ideas (like justice or agency) surface and resurface and apply their knowledge to articulate differences and express an increasingly deeper understanding of the idea.
Implementation Guide Planning for Implementation 92 © Great Minds PBC
z Knowledge of Skills: Recording skill knowledge ensures that students are learning standards and applying that knowledge in subsequent modules. Skill review and application to a new text teaches students that we intend for them to use what we teach them for life, not just for one module.
z Reflections: This section allows for uncategorized thinking, encouraging students to explore connections and extend their thinking.
Knowledge Journal activities vary but share an emphasis on open-ended inquiry. Sample questions include the following:
p What are the three most important things you’ve learned from this text?
p What difference does it make that The Crossover is written as a novel-in-verse?
p If we were continuing our study of this module topic, what would you examine next? Why?
Knowledge Journal prompts are never part of an assessment. The goal of the Knowledge Journal is for students to use writing (and drawing) to process and learn, and come to understand what they know. They are designed so that students’ thinking is not inhibited by the prospect of an assessment.
Students often reference their Knowledge Journals in Wonder lessons. They apply—and extend—previous learning and begin to notice what they never noticed before.
With increasing independence, students reflect on important ideas they learned, world knowledge that is important as background knowledge, and skills that help them see new things in a text.
Projection Device
Lessons often call for teachers to display art, writing models, and other visuals. Ideally, classrooms will be equipped with a projector, interactive whiteboard, or other presentation tool.
Student Access to Technology
To meet the expectations of the standards, students must use technology and will need access to a computer lab or personal devices.
Materials for Collaborative and Individual Student Use
Each lesson uses specific materials particular to that lesson, which are identified in the Materials list on the At A Glance page of each lesson. Modules often require materials specific to their content and Knowledge Puzzles, like the following examples:
In Grade 1 Module 1: A World of Books, students use a large world map to track how other children around the world get books.
In Grade 4 Module 1: A Great Heart, students use modeling clay and straws to help connect what they have read about the human heart to what they observe about their own pulses.
For more specific information, see Suggested Materials Lists for Modules 1 and 2 in the Resources section.
Implementation Guide Planning for Implementation 93 © Great Minds PBC
SAMPLE DAILY SCHEDULES
Wit & Wisdom lessons dedicate ninety minutes of instruction in order to meet the goals of productive struggle with close reading of complex texts, integration of all ELA strands, and knowledge- building with a range of topics. Ninety-minute lessons allow for focused reading and writing instruction and whole, small group, paired, and independent work; these lessons do not include time dedicated to foundational literacy skills, Volume of Reading, differentiated small group literacy instruction, or strategic literacy intervention. Teachers in Kindergarten through Grade 2 will need to dedicate additional time for phonics and small group instruction, as shown in the following Sample Daily Schedules.
What follows are several sample schedules showing how schools might allocate time in the daily schedule so that teachers can implement Wit & Wisdom with integrity.
SAMPLE SCHEDULES A
Grades K–2
90 min. Wit & Wisdom English
30 min. Small-group literacy instruction with Geodes or Volume of Reading
30 min. Foundational literacy skills
60 min. Lunch and recess
75 min. Math
45 min. Science and history
60 min. Special subjects: Art, music, physical education, and media (alternating)
6 hrs., 30 min.
Grades 3–5
90 min. Wit & Wisdom English
40 min. Differentiated Volume of Reading and small-group literacy
60 min. Lunch and recess
90 min. Math
50 min. Science and history
60 min. Special subjects: Art, music, physical education, and media (alternating)
6 hrs., 30 min.
Implementation Guide Planning for Implementation 94 © Great Minds PBC
Grades 6–8
90 min. Wit & Wisdom English
60 min. Math
45 min. Lunch and recess
60 min. Science
60 min. History
60 min. Special subjects: Art, music, physical education, and media (alternating)
15 min.
6 hrs., 30 min.
Sample Schedules B
Grades K–2
75 min.
30–45 min.
30 min.
15 min.
Study hall (could be used for Volume of Reading)
Wit & Wisdom English (core lesson)
Small-group literacy instruction with Geodes or Volume of Reading
Foundational literacy skills
Wit & Wisdom English (Deep Dive)
60 min. Lunch and recess
60 min. Math
30 min.
60 min.
6 hrs.–6 hrs., 15 min.
Kindergarten: Play-based Knowledge Centers
Grades 1–2: Science and history (alternating)
Special subjects:
Art, music, physical education, science lab, and social studies media lab (alternating)
Implementation Guide Planning for Implementation 95 © Great Minds PBC
Grades 3–5
90 min. Wit & Wisdom English English (core lesson and Deep Dive)
45–60 min. Differentiated Volume of Reading and small-group literacy
60 min. Lunch and recess
60 min. Math
45 min. Science and history (alternating)
60 min. Special subjects: art, music, physical education, science lab, and social studies media lab (alternating)
6 hrs.–6 hrs., 15 min.
Grades 6–8
75 min. Wit & Wisdom (core lesson)
75 min. Math
45 min. Lunch and recess
45–50 min. Science
45–50 min. History
45–50 min. Special subjects: art, music, physical education, and media
30 min. Deep Dive and Volume of Reading
6 hrs.–6 hrs., 15 min.
Implementation Guide Planning for Implementation 96 © Great Minds PBC
SHARING WIT & WISDOM WITH FAMILIES
Research demonstrates that students are most successful when parents and caregivers are meaningfully engaged with their child’s school and curricula. Wit & Wisdom supports engagement with families by providing Family Tip Sheets for each module.
The Family Tip Sheets provide families with the following:
An overview of what students will learn in the module
The core texts students will read
The Essential Question and Focusing Questions guiding each module
A list of books families can read together at home
Questions families can discuss with students at home
Ideas for what families can do together to explore the module’s content at home
Family Tip Sheets for each module can be accessed as PDF downloads from a teacher’s dashboard on the Great Minds website. Family Tip Sheets are also available in the print Student Edition of each module.
In addition, Wit & Wisdom teachers can engage families by doing the following:
Sharing information about Wit & Wisdom with families at Back-to-School and Open House nights
Frequently displaying Wit & Wisdom student work
Sharing student work or anecdotes from Wit & Wisdom lessons through newsletters or on classroom websites and social media sites
Inviting family members to observe a Wit & Wisdom lesson in action
Implementation Guide Planning for Implementation 97 © Great Minds PBC
LEADING AND SUPPORTING SCHOOL-WIDE IMPLEMENTATION
Strong and supportive leadership is essential to successful school-wide implementation of Wit & Wisdom. While there are many ways to exercise such leadership, what matters most is having a thorough plan for the many aspects of implementation and a sturdy leadership structure to execute the plan. Key players in a successful implementation include the following:
Teachers, who work directly with students and provide instruction
Coaches, who support teachers in developing and executing high-quality instruction
School leaders, who determine the overall vision, expectations, and goals for implementation; create an environment that fosters accountability, ownership, and investment; and provide structures and resources that allow coaches and teachers to succeed
These three roles are united by a common goal: promoting student success.
STUDENT GRADING AND ACHIEVEMENT
By studying student work and using the qualitative and quantitative data it generates to scaffold instruction responsively, teachers and leaders can support student growth on any standards-aligned measure of achievement.
Because grading systems and policies differ vastly across schools and districts, Wit & Wisdom assigns no specific grading method, rule, or point value to most tasks. However, the modules were carefully designed to elicit a range of information about student performance that teachers can use to generate quantitative grades. (For more information, see the sections on assessment and rubrics.) As a result, Wit & Wisdom is compatible with any grading or reporting system.
Grade-level modules include tools teachers can easily use to generate numeric scores for assessment tasks: writing rubrics, speaking and listening rubrics, and text-based writing checklists. While numerical grades are a component of many grading systems, Wit & Wisdom places great emphasis on the value of studying student work and using written responses and other student artifacts to look for evidence of deep and enduring understanding. This evidence is one of the strongest indicators of a student’s success on future assessment tasks and performances.
Implementation Guide Leading and Supporting School-Wide Implementation 99 © Great Minds PBC
TEACHER OBSERVATION AND INTEGRITY OF IMPLEMENTATION
Effective teacher observation and coaching are key elements of successful implementation. As with grading systems, the methods for observation and coaching will differ greatly across districts and states. However, effective observation and coaching systems share the following characteristics:
A collaborative commitment to evaluating the actions teachers take to create a classroom experience that promotes optimal learning
A focus on the quality of student products, performances, and tasks
Strong communication between observer and teacher, including descriptive feedback
Supportive coaching
When observing teachers, school leaders should keep in mind that Wit & Wisdom is not a scripted program, and Wit & Wisdom instruction will vary from classroom to classroom. While the lessons can be implemented as written, teachers will study the modules and come to know them as deeply as the educators who wrote them. Teachers should use their knowledge of the modules and of their students to customize lessons when needed.
Within this context, school leaders need to ensure that teachers teach the program with integrity. In practice, tension often exists between the desire to teach with fidelity to the lesson as written and the necessity of being flexible to meet students’ needs. The graphic below captures that tension.
Optimal learning occurs when teachers strike a balance between flexibility and fidelity, landing in the integrity portion of the spectrum. Implementing with integrity means:
honoring the essential components of a module—its major questions (Essential, Focusing, and Content Framing), learning goals, and summative assessments.
internalizing a lesson’s goals and plans, then customizing the lesson as needed during lesson preparation.
ensuring students receive a rigorous and successful learning experience by maintaining the expectations of the task, lesson, and module.
providing scaffolds and differentiation to meet students where they are and ensure that their efforts are productive.
attempting different approaches to engage students with content.
solving problems and making decisions based on evidence and data, especially from student work.
To ensure integrity in implementation, instructional leaders can empower teachers to customize while setting expectations for key habits, strategies, and methods that embody Wit & Wisdom’s learning design.
To focus and guide their classroom observations, observers can consider whether teachers and students are engaging in the following behaviors.
Implementation Guide Leading and Supporting School-Wide Implementation 100 © Great Minds PBC
Teachers should
support student mastery of specific, transferable, learning goals.
ensure that students closely read complex texts, completing multiple reads.
use the Content Framing Questions to set a clear purpose for each read of a text.
ensure that students respond to the text-dependent questions and text-dependent tasks that require them to gather evidence from each text and examine its unique language and features.
check students’ understanding through multiple assessments (including daily Checks for Understanding) arranged in a deliberate progression that builds the skills and knowledge students need to perform successfully on the End-of-Module Task.
strategically scaffold instruction to support all students.
Students should
build knowledge by reading and connecting Wit & Wisdom texts.
engage in explicit writing instruction and frequent, diverse writing opportunities, which enable them to articulate their understanding of texts.
actively speak and listen, demonstrating and reinforcing their learning in reading, writing, and oral language.
study vocabulary to improve comprehension of complex texts, increase knowledge of words and word parts, and determine the meanings of unknown words.
regularly practice fluency, reading with accuracy at an appropriate rate and with appropriate phrasing and expression to deepen comprehension.
analyze visual art as a text, examining evidence within the four corners of the frame.
actively engage with texts and tasks, navigating productive struggle.
In addition to observations, instructional coaches can help teachers deepen their understanding of and enhance their skill in implementing Wit & Wisdom in many other ways, including the following:
Conducting demonstration lessons or co-teaching lessons
Capturing lessons on video for teachers to later reflect upon the implementation
Working with teachers to assess student work
Collaborating with teachers to analyze evidence of student learning to make instructional decisions and plans for future lessons
Implementation Guide Leading and Supporting School-Wide Implementation 101 © Great Minds PBC
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND BUILDING TEACHER CAPACITY
To reach the full potential of Wit & Wisdom, schools should adopt an embedded process of building teachers’ capacity. In addition to participation in Great Minds’ curriculum specific professional development sessions and implementation success services, the modules, module texts, and Wit & Wisdom-specific resources can serve as resources to deepen and enhance teachers’ understanding of literacy instruction. These resources include:
Wit & Wisdom Implementation Guide
Wit & Wisdom Preparation Protocols
The Art of Wit & Wisdom
Instructional leaders can help teachers make the most of these resources by creating time and space for teachers to study, discuss, and practice with these materials with their colleagues and with guidance from coaches and mentors. One way to achieve these ends is by establishing a curriculum team, or Professional Learning Community (PLC), in which teachers from the same grade level share collaborative planning time.
Some actionable processes that can help build teacher capacity include the following:
Reading core texts and discussing them in a book club with grade-level colleagues (For more ideas, see texts from the Background Reading section)
Preparing to teach a module by reading the core texts and Module Overview and doing a test drive of the EOM Task
Engaging in a learning experience from the student’s perspective. A coach or lead teacher teaches a Wit & Wisdom lesson while other teachers participate as learners. Then coaches and teachers discuss and reflect on the experience and its implications for instruction.
Review sections of the Implementation Guide and discussing implications for practice at curriculum team or PLC meetings. Sections of particular relevance to teachers include (but are not limited to) the following:
p Learning Design
p Core Practices
p Assessment
p Vocabulary
p Socratic Seminar Guidance
p Volume of Reading Guidance
p Instructional Routines
p Assessment and Rubrics
Planning how to deliver and assess lessons, Focusing Question arcs, and modules with a curriculum team utilizing the Wit & Wisdom Preparation Protocols. Team teachers then map the lessons and major assessments onto a school calendar, note places to build in time to differentiate, and create a plan to collect and analyze data from formative assessments.
Implementation Guide Leading and Supporting School-Wide Implementation 102 © Great Minds PBC
Successful Wit & Wisdom professional development honors these key elements of the curriculum design:
Keeping content at the core to emphasize illuminating study of texts, modules, and student work
Building teachers’ knowledge of content, as well as their instructional practice
Empowering teachers to play a key role in extracting meaning from and making connections to the curriculum
Honoring teachers’ experience, insight, and knowledge of their students
Great Minds offers a comprehensive suite of Wit & Wisdom-specific professional development options and implementation success services to support teachers, schools, and districts in implementation. For more information, please visit https://greatminds.org/english/PD.
Implementation Guide Leading and Supporting School-Wide Implementation 103 © Great Minds PBC
RESOURCES
CONTENT NOT INCLUDED IN WIT & WISDOM IN SYNC
The following chart indicates the content removed in Wit & Wisdom in Sync, with careful consideration to maintain alignment to the Focus Standards and Learning Goals.
Content Not Included in Wit & Wisdom in Sync*
Grade K
Module 2
The Little Red Hen, Jerry Pinkney
New-Read Assessment 1
Focusing Question Task 5
Grade 1
Module 2
Module 3
Lesson 26
Feelings, Aliki
Lessons 11–12
Focusing Question arc 2
Focusing Question Task 2
Module 4
The Korean Cinderella, Shirley Climo
Grade 2
Module 1
“Weather,” Eve Merriam
Focusing Question arc 1
Module 2
The Story of Johnny Appleseed, Aliki
Johnny Appleseed, Steven Kellogg
Focusing Question arc 5
New-Read Assessment 2
Focusing Question Task 5
Module 4
The Digestive System, Jennifer Prior
Grade 3
Module 1
Module 2
Ocean Sunlight: How Tiny Plants Feed the Seas, Molly Bang and Penny Chisholm
Zathura, Chris Van Allsburg
Lessons 28–29
Implementation Guide Resources 105 © Great Minds PBC
Module 1
Module 2
Lessons 6, 22
Lessons 6, 31–34
Focusing Question Task 3
Grade 4
Module 3
The Scarlet Stockings Spy, Trinka Hakes Noble
Focusing Question arc 3
Focusing Question Task 3
Lessons 16–20
Grade 5
Module 1
Lessons 9–12
Focusing Question arc 3
New-Read Assessment 1
Socratic Seminar 1
Focusing Question Task 3
Module 4
Lessons 31–35
Focusing Question arc 4
End-of-Module Task
Grade 8
Module 1
Lessons 18–22, 28
Focusing Question arc 3
Socratic Seminar 2
New-Read Assessment 2
Focusing Question Task 3
Focusing Question arc 4
Socratic Seminar 3
Focusing Question Task 4
Implementation Guide Resources 106 © Great Minds PBC
*No major content was removed from Grades 6 through 7 for Wit & Wisdom in Sync.
VOLUME OF READING GUIDANCE
In addition to close reading of core and supplementary texts, the Wit & Wisdom learning design emphasizes the need for students to read a volume and range of texts for four key purposes:
1 To systematically build knowledge and vocabulary through sustained study of a topic
2 To address the need for students to both stretch their reading abilities and experience the satisfaction and pleasure of easy, fluent reading within them by offering a range of texts at different levels of complexity
3 To engage and motivate students with opportunities to choose additional texts based on interest
4 To provide students with opportunities to use mental habits developed in the Content Stages
In each module, Appendix D contains a curated Volume of Reading text list, which includes quality texts that add to the module Knowledge Puzzle and offer students choices at varying levels of complexity. As teachers get to know the range of student needs and interests within a topic of study, they can add favorite titles to this list—leveraging classroom, school, and community libraries to maximize choices.
Based on the Content Framing Questions, a set of Volume of Reading Reflection Questions appears in the Student Edition of each module, giving students guidance and structure to apply the Content Framing Questions independently to books of their choice.
Time for Volume of Reading is not included within the ninety-minute module lessons, but it should be a high priority. Independent work time and Pause Points could be used for such reading, or it could be connected to students’ work in other disciplines. (For scheduling ideas, see the Sample Daily Schedules section)
SOCRATIC SEMINAR GUIDANCE
In a Socratic Seminar, students prepare for and participate in a structured, text-based, academic conversation. Students apply the crafts of speaking and listening to express what they have learned from their reading and writing.
In Wit & Wisdom, each Socratic Seminar relates to the Content-Craft-Create framework in two explicit ways:
1 Socratic Seminars connect to Content by engaging students in text-driven inquiry.
2 Socratic Seminars connect to Craft by providing an authentic and comprehensive vehicle through which students can apply (Execute) and hone (Excel) their oral communication goals.
Socratic Seminar Content
In Wit & Wisdom, questioning is foundational to student success. Each module’s Essential Question, Focusing Questions, and lesson-level Content Framing Questions and Craft Questions play key—and different—roles in focusing student learning and knowledge development.
Socratic Seminars also feature the importance of questioning. Each seminar is organized around a rigorous question that pushes students’ thinking. While synthesizing learning is a goal of many of Wit & Wisdom’s summative tasks, in Socratic Seminars the goal is for students to synthesize and extend their learning by exploring and debating intriguing questions that provoke new thinking. Students’ conversation should go beyond summarizing learning they have done in previous lessons.
Implementation Guide Resources 107 © Great Minds PBC
To help students accomplish this goal, establish time for a prewriting activity in which students:
Respond to a question that stimulates or organizes their thinking
Collect textual evidence
Jot down initial responses to the opening Socratic Seminar question
Compare and connect evidence from different texts in relation to a topic or question germane to the seminar
Share responses with a peer and develop a question about their peer’s writing
To help students discern how the Socratic Seminar extended their learning, dedicate time to a content-focused post-writing activity in which students:
Explain the transformative power of strategic speaking and keen listening by responding to the question: How has my previous thinking been transformed by my talking and listening?
Focus not on telling what they did (e.g., I spoke five times), but show what they learned through this form of collaborative, inquiry-based learning
Lesson Procedures
1 Preparation: Students complete a close rereading of the text(s) prior to the seminar.
2 Formation: Students sit in a circle. In larger classes, students may sit in two concentric circles for participants and observers or conduct simultaneous seminars.
3 Expectations and goals: The teacher and students work collaboratively to set group and individual expectations and goals (e.g., I will speak at least once; or, We need to improve on taking turns.). Consider establishing guidelines for expectations of what to do and what to avoid in a seminar. Things to do might include taking turns, citing the text, and building upon what others have stated. Things to avoid might include interrupting and telling elaborate, disconnected stories.
4 Opening question: The teacher poses the opening question. (As students gain confidence, they might pose the opening question.)
5 Sustained dialogue: Students engage in collaborative speaking and listening, employing text evidence.
6 Debrief: Students reflect on their participation.
Student actions include the following:
Responding to peers, posing new questions, and offering new lines of inquiry
Practicing and developing skills such as citing evidence; asking questions; speaking, listening, and responding to one another; making connections; paraphrasing; summarizing; and building ideas based on the opening question
Implementation Guide Resources 108 © Great Minds PBC
Teacher actions include the following:
Asking follow-up questions to elicit greater understanding of the text, bring out viewpoints, etc. (See sample questions below.)
Remaining neutral by not affirming or challenging ideas, verbally or nonverbally, because the goal is for students to think for themselves, not just agree should the teacher affirm something
Taking notes for reflective practice and improvement (See sample tracking chart below.)
Debriefing as a class after the seminar with questions such as the following:
p How well did we meet our goals?
p What worked?
p What didn’t work?
Lesson Timing
Time dedicated to Socratic Seminars will vary based on grade level, students’ needs, the text, and the topic. Sample outlines appear below and can serve as models for allocating lesson time.
Grade 1 (30 min.)
What new knowledge did you gain?
How did your thinking change?
What went well?
What needs improvement?
Implementation Guide Resources 109 © Great Minds PBC
Seminar Component Minutes Description Preparation Before seminar Students complete close reading and annotation in previous lessons. Formation 2 Students form dialogue circle(s) and bring their texts. Expectations and Goals 3 The class as a whole reviews expectations, speaking goals, etc. Opening Question 2 The teacher asks the opening question, and students Think–Pair–Share in response. Sustained Dialogue 20 Students engage in collaborative speaking and listening, employing text evidence. Debrief 3 Students reflect by answering questions
such as the following:
Grade 5 (50 min.)
Seminar Component Minutes Description
Preparation
Before seminar Students complete close reading and annotation in previous lessons.
Prewriting 10 Students engage in prewriting in the Socratic Seminar lesson to stimulate and organize thinking.
Formation 2 Students form dialogue circle(s) and bring their texts.
Opening Question 3 The teacher asks the opening question. (Optional: Students Think–Pair–Share)
Sustained Dialogue 25 Students engage in collaborative speaking and listening, employing text evidence.
Post-Writing 5 Students answer questions such as the following:
What new knowledge did you gain?
How did your thinking change?
Debrief 5 Students reflect (e.g., using an Exit Ticket) by answering questions such as the following:
What went well?
What needs improvement?
Grade 8 (60–65 min.)
Seminar Component Minutes Description
Preparation Before seminar Students complete close reading and annotation in previous lessons.
Prewriting 10–15 Students engage in prewriting in the Socratic Seminar lesson to stimulate and organize thinking.
Formation 2 Students form dialogue circle(s) and bring their texts.
Opening Question 2 The teacher asks the opening question.
Sustained Dialogue 40 Students engage in collaborative speaking and listening, employing text evidence.
Post-Writing 10 Students answer question such as the following:
What new knowledge did you gain?
How did your thinking change?
Debrief 5 Students reflect (e.g., using an Exit Ticket) by answering questions such as the following:
What went well?
What needs improvement?
Implementation Guide Resources 110 © Great Minds PBC
Supporting Student Participation in a Socratic Seminar
Teachers share or distribute questions like the following for students to ask of their peers.
Clarification
What do you mean by ?
Can you say more about that?
Could you summarize that in your own words?
What is your main point?
Could you explain your reasons for saying that?
What do you think caused that?
What difference does that make?
Where in the text did that come from?
Reasoning
How did you come to that conclusion?
What is our point of view? Should we look at this differently?
If what you said is true, then how do you explain _____ ?
What would be an alternative to ?
Text Evidence
Can you find that passage and read it for us?
What happened in the story that makes you say that?
Where did you see that in the painting?
Could you give us an example from the text?
Implementation Guide Resources 111 © Great Minds PBC
Facilitating an Effective Socratic Seminar
Facilitators listen attentively, sharing questions and observations only as needed. Teachers ask the opening question and then sit back and observe. If the initial question doesn’t spark discussion, teachers encourage students to draw from their notes and prewriting. If significant wait time has passed, teachers may consider asking a new question.
The teacher’s three early roles include the following:
Questioner. Ask an open-ended, thought-provoking opening question.
Clarifier. Ask follow-up questions designed to elicit clarification and specificity.
Process Coach. Coach students to go deeper, work together better, build cohesion and rapport, etc.
General facilitator actions include the following:
Insist that answers be clear, directing students to rephrase as necessary.
Insist on citations, text evidence, and strong reasoning.
Put a student on hold (i.e., pause them from speaking) to balance contributions.
Invite additional viewpoints or opinions.
Suggest a Think–Pair–Share.
Track, tally, or map participation.
The teacher may consider posing questions such as the following at opportune times to enhance collaboration:
Do you agree with ? Disagree with ?
Did change your mind, or are you sticking with your original answer?
Have you heard an answer that is different from your own?
Does anyone see this another way?
How are these two ideas alike? Different?
Can you summarize what just said?
Does anyone have a different understanding of the problem?
Implementation Guide Resources 112 © Great Minds PBC
Sample Socratic Seminar Tracking Chart
Implementation Guide Resources 113 © Great Minds PBC
Listening Reading Speaking Name Builds on Previous Speaker Faces Speaker Cites Text Speaks Once or More Uses Complete Sentences Relevant Initiates Idea Elaborates Insightful Respectful 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22, 23. 24.
INSTRUCTIONAL ROUTINES
What is an instructional routine?
An instructional routine is a classroom procedure that supports the development of content knowledge and literacy skills. An instructional routine provides students with a structured approach to thinking about a topic, question, or idea.
What is the purpose of an instructional routine?
The routines in Wit & Wisdom require students to activate different ways of thinking to process a text, thereby building content knowledge, deepening understanding, and developing literacy skills. Instructional routines increase student engagement and provide practices to make students’ thinking and learning visible. The following table outlines the purpose, grouping, and instructions for the routines that occur frequently in Wit & Wisdom.
Routine Purpose Grouping How It Works
Anchor Chart
An Anchor Chart captures information, strategies, or procedures foundational to student learning. Posted in the classroom, it is often created collaboratively and is used—and frequently developed—across multiple lessons.
Whole group
1 Write the title for the Anchor Chart on a large sheet of chart paper.
2 Add information, strategies, or procedures as taught or discussed, with student input if appropriate.
3 Post, refer, and encourage students to refer to the chart during any applicable lessons or activities.
Boxes and Buttons (Variation: Boxes, Bags, and Bullets)
Boxes and Buttons helps students practice summarizing and recording the main ideas and key details in informational texts.
Individuals or pairs 1 Tell students that the box represents the main idea, and the buttons represent the key details.
2 Students label the box with the main idea and add buttons (or bullets) as they state each key detail, rereading the text as needed. Depending on the text and learning goal, students start with either the key details or the main idea.
3 As students progress, they can add bags, which represent the main ideas of subsections of text, to their boxes. Each bag can hold its own details (buttons).
Categorization
Categorization supports students in thinking critically about groups of words.
Small groups or pairs
1 Provide a set of index cards with a vocabulary word written on each card.
2 Students sort the index cards into different categories of words. The categories can be assigned, or students can create them according to specified guidelines.
Implementation Guide Resources 114 © Great Minds PBC
Routine Purpose
Chalk Talk
A Chalk Talk is a silent conversation that helps students organize their thinking and fosters universal participation. It can serve as pre-work for Socratic Seminars.
Choral Reading A Choral Reading supports fluency and comprehension of a challenging text. Choral Reading is appropriate for early elementary grades.
Grouping How It Works
Whole group, small groups, or pairs
1 Write questions on the board or pieces of chart paper.
2 Students respond to the questions, as well as to others’ follow-up questions and responses, by writing directly under each question on the board or paper.
Whole group 1 Provide copies of the text or display a large copy.
2 Read aloud a passage to model fluent reading and ask students to use their eyes or an index card to follow along with the text.
3 Reread the passage aloud, and have all students concurrently read the text aloud in unison.
Echo Reading
Use an Echo Reading during an early read to support students in being able to read challenging words and phrasing.
Whole group 1 Provide copies of the text or display a large copy.
2 Read aloud a challenging selection in doable phrases from the text, modeling fluent reading.
3 Students echo the same phrases back, echoing voice, inflection, and the modeled pauses.
4 Repeat this process for the remainder of the text or excerpt.
Fishbowl Use a Fishbowl to model or experiment with behaviors such as asking thoughtful questions, listening attentively, and sharing ideas.
Whole group 1 Establish a purpose for the Fishbowl, directing students to focus their observations and learning on something specific.
2 Divide students into two groups—inside or outside the fishbowl. Outside students sit in a ring around Inside students. Typically, more students are situated outside the fishbowl than within it.
3 Provide additional information or directions to those in the fishbowl as needed.
4 Students inside the fishbowl engage in a collaborative task or discussion, while students outside observe.
5 Students debrief through discussion and/or writing.
Implementation Guide Resources 115 © Great Minds PBC
Routine Purpose Grouping How It Works
Gallery Walk A Gallery Walk deepens engagement and understanding by allowing students to share their work with peers in a gallery setting.
Small groups, pairs, or individuals
1 Post work around the room. The work can include individual writing pieces, small groups’ Graffiti Walls, a variety of module texts, etc.
2 Students circulate, closely viewing the work. They can discuss with peers or record written observations. (Optional: Some students stand by their work to present it to viewers.)
3 Students debrief through discussion and/or writing.
Give One-Get One-Move On A Give One-Get One-Move On activity engages all students in identifying and sharing key learning.
Pairs
1 Students record key ideas on index cards or sticky notes.
2 Students circulate and locate a partner with whom to share their key ideas.
3 Announce: Give One to indicate that students should swap ideas and Get One from another student.
4 Announce: Move On to indicate that students should circulate again to find a new partner and repeat the process, explaining the new idea to the new partner.
Graffiti Wall A Graffiti Wall helps students organize and deepen their thinking as they collaboratively explore key concepts. This routine supports visual learners and promotes collective learning.
Grammar Safari A Grammar Safari allows students to hunt, or locate, grammar concepts using inductive reasoning and authentic texts from the module.
Small groups
1 Give small groups a large piece of chart paper.
2 After investigating, reading, and/or discussing a task, students record their ideas and learning on the paper through symbols, illustrations, words or phrases, and quotations. The routine can be scaffolded by giving a minimum or maximum number of symbols or phrases to be included on the wall.
Small groups, pairs, or individuals
1 Present examples of the grammar concept from the text, without naming the concept.
2 Ask students to describe what the examples have in common.
3 Name the targeted concept and ask students to generate a definition or rule(s) for the concept.
4 Students look for other examples in the texts and further refine the rules and/or definitions of the concept.
5 Students write their own sentences or paragraphs, highlighting their use of the grammar concept.
Implementation Guide Resources 116 © Great Minds PBC
Routine Purpose Grouping How It Works
Graphic Organizer (Variations: Boxes and Bullets, Frayer Model, Morpheme Matrix, Relationship Maps)
A graphic organizer allows students to visually gather, organize, and express ideas, preparing students to effectively communicate ideas in writing or discussion.
Small groups, pairs, or individuals
1 Distribute handouts featuring spaces to record ideas and evidence from the text. As students progress, they can create their own graphic organizers.
2 Students record responses and then debrief through writing or discussion.
Variations:
Boxes and Bullets: Students record the text’s main ideas and supporting details.
Frayer Model: Select a vocabulary word for further study. Students record the definition, characteristics of the word, examples of the word, and non-examples. (As an Extension activity, students sketch their examples and non-examples.)
Morpheme Matrix: Students explore new roots and affixes.
Relationship Map: Select a graphic organizer such as a Venn diagram, word web, or spoke wheel. Students record information to convey the relationships between the words or concepts.
Jigsaw (Variation: One Stay, Three Stray)
Use a Jigsaw for students to study one section of a text (or task) and then share with students who studied other sections. This gives all students access to the ideas from the full text without requiring them to read the full text closely. It also encourages collaborative learning.
Small groups
1 Divide a text (or task) into multiple pieces.
2 Divide students into home groups. Assign each student in a home group a specific piece of the text (or task).
3 Students regroup according to their assignment from step 2, meeting in expert groups with others who share the same assignment.
4 Students work collaboratively in their assignment-based groups to become experts on their assigned text (or task).
5 Students then return to their home groups. Each group member shares their expertise.
Variation:
One Stay, Three Stray: Students from one Jigsaw group visit other groups and then report back to the Jigsaw group.
Implementation Guide Resources 117 © Great Minds PBC
Routine Purpose Grouping How It Works
Link Up Link Up helps students understand the connection between two identified words.
Pairs
1 Give each student an index card with a vocabulary word.
2 Specify which relationships among words students should consider, such as meaning, part of speech, or usage in a particular text.
3 Students circulate and discuss with each person they meet whether their cards are related in the way specified.
4 Once students identify someone with a related word, they link up with that person.
5 As a whole group, students debrief; for example, by sharing the relationship among their words.
Literary Dominoes Literary Dominoes helps students review, comprehend, and analyze the plot of a story by ordering and connecting the events.
Small groups, pairs, or individuals
1 Students record important events or plot points from the text on separate slips of paper and tape them onto dominoes.
2 Students order the dominoes so that each plot point is placed next to the event it causes. If more than one plot point arises from a single event, students include branches from that plot point. Alternatively, students can organize the dominoes to show different types of relationships between plot points.
3 Students may also consider What if? questions about the events.
4 Each group writes a summary of one of the events, describing the consequences.
Mix and Mingle
(Note that other resources might call this routine Standing Think–Pair–Share, Freeze–Mix–Pair, or Backto-Back and Face-to-Face.)
Mix and Mingle offers an active way for students to orally share ideas about the text.
Whole group, small groups, pairs
1 Develop a question or set of questions about the text.
2 Each student circulates, sharing their question with a peer. (Optional: On a cue—e.g., stop music, chant, call out directions—students stop, stand back-to-back with a partner, and listen to the question.)
3 Students think about and then discuss the question or questions.
Outside-In Use Outside-In to determine word meaning from context and morphology, such as roots and prefixes.
Whole group, small groups, pairs, or individuals
1 Select a vocabulary word from the text.
2 Ask students to discuss what the context reveals about the word’s possible meaning.
3 Ask students to discuss clues to meaning within the word, such as roots and prefixes.
4 Have students draft possible definitions and then verify them using reference materials.
Implementation Guide Resources 118 © Great Minds PBC
Routine Purpose Grouping How It Works
Partner Reading Partner Reading is a cooperative activity that encourages peerto-peer learning. It is a routine for fluency practice only when students have previously read the text.
Pairs
Option 1:
Partner A reads the assigned passage while the other listens and comments on a specified aspect of the reading (e.g., accuracy or fluency). Then, Partner B reads the same passage while the other listens and comments.
Option 2:
Partner A reads a few paragraphs or pages. Then, Partner B reads the next few paragraphs or pages. Partners can share feedback after hearing the other read.
Praise, Question, Suggestion Praise, Question, Suggestion is a routine for authentic peer-topeer feedback.
Small groups or pairs
1 Each student shares work with a partner or the group.
2 The partner or group members give(s) specific positive feedback, ask(s) a question, and offer(s) a suggestion. (Optional: Establish a focus for peer feedback, e.g., one (or more) criterion from the writing checklist.)
3 Each student summarizes their plan for revision based on the feedback.
Question Corners (Variation: Four Corners)
Question Corners provide a way for students to express and support their opinions.
Small groups and then whole group
1 Present a controversial statement or question.
2 In each corner of the classroom, post a response or opinion. Students move to the corner that best represents their opinion.
3 Students discuss the reasons why they chose their corner.
4 After listening to one another’s reasoning, students have the option of moving to another corner, but they must explain the rationale for the move.
Quick Write A Quick Write is a brief written response that helps students reflect on a topic and teachers to assess comprehension. It can be used at the beginning of a lesson as a warm-up, during the middle of the lesson in response to an idea or section of text, or at the end of the lesson to summarize key ideas.
Individuals
1 Provide a question or open-ended prompt.
2 Allot 2–10 minutes for students to write.
Implementation Guide Resources 119 © Great Minds PBC
Routine Purpose Grouping How It Works
Quiz-Quiz-Trade Quiz-Quiz-Trade helps students review and assess their understanding of a concept or topic by posing questions to a peer and then checking the peer’s response.
Pairs
1 Prepare review cards with questions on one side and answers on the other side.
2 Distribute one card to each student.
3 Students circulate around the room and locate a partner.
4 Partners quiz one another by asking the written question, then checking peer responses against the written answers.
5 Partners switch cards and repeat the process with new partners.
Readers’ Theater
A Readers’ Theater allows students to practice fluency as they read from scripts, adding their own dramatic elements, such as expression and gestures, to their performances.
Whole group, small groups, or pairs
1 Using a prepared script (including sections of a module text), assign parts to students, considering their varied abilities.
2 Students read their parts silently, annotating for challenging vocabulary, questions about basic understanding, and ideas for fluent expression and dramatic interpretation.
3 Students read aloud with a partner to rehearse the language, phrasing, and expression of the text.
4 When using the same script with multiple performance teams, group students who have the same part together for practice and peer coaching.
5 Allow students time to rehearse and coalesce their roles into a unified scene.
6 Have students perform the Readers’ Theater, giving time for feedback after each group finishes.
Variation:
Identify one or more important scenes or excerpts for students to perform in groups. Students create their own scripts by using highlighters to identify each character’s and narrator’s parts or by rewriting the excerpt in the form of a script.
Implementation Guide Resources 120 © Great Minds PBC
Routine Purpose
Response Techniques (Variations: Equity Sticks, Response Cards, Nonverbal Signals, Whiteboards)
Response techniques encourage whole class engagement while enabling teachers to conduct quick, formative assessments of student understanding.
Grouping How It Works
Whole group Pose a question and then use a technique to elicit quick responses from a variety of students
Variations:
1 Equity Sticks: Call on students by randomly selecting names from a container that holds all students’ names on slips of paper or craft sticks.
Recommended for open-ended questions
2 Response Cards: Students select a response from a set of pre-printed response cards, and then hold up their card for the class to see.
Recommended for questions with a closed set of possible responses
3 Nonverbal Signal: Students respond with a general signal (e.g., the American Sign Language [ASL] sign for yes or no) or a situation-specific signal (e.g., the ASL letter P when they hear details about a story’s problem). To encourage independent thinking, suggest that students make the signals close to their chests.
Recommended for questions with a closed set of possible responses
4 Whiteboards: Students write responses on individual whiteboards or other erasable boards and then hold up their responses for the class to see.
Recommended for open-ended or closed questions with short written responses
See–Think–Wonder (Also called: Observe–Infer–Wonder)
See-Think-Wonder encourages students to think carefully about a new text and stimulates their curiosity. It can focus students’ exploration of a new module topic or text.
Whole group, small groups, pairs, or individuals
1 Display a short, interesting text, such as a piece of visual art, an illustration, or a quotation.
2 Students briefly consider the new text independently.
3 Students discuss what they observe in the text, recording observations in individual or class notes.
4 Next, students discuss what they think or infer about the text, justifying their inferences with evidence and recording them in individual or class notes.
5 Finally, students discuss what they wonder about the text, recording questions in individual or class notes.
Implementation Guide Resources 121 © Great Minds PBC
Routine Purpose Grouping How It Works
Shared or Collaborative Writing
Shared or Collaborative Writing enables students to build their understanding of exemplary writing through developing a piece of writing as a class.
Whole group
1 Students read the writing prompt. Explain any criteria for the first sentence or section of the writing piece.
2 Students draft the first sentence or section through Stop and Jot or Think–Pair–Share, writing on erasable boards, etc.
3 Choose a strong student response or combine and rephrase several students’ ideas. In Shared Writing, the teacher writes the piece. In Collaborative Writing, students share the pen, manually writing or typing some components of the piece.
4 Display the chosen sentence or section. Ask students to read it. Explain and discuss how the chosen piece of writing meets the target criteria.
5 Repeat the procedure for the rest of the sentences or sections of the writing piece.
6 Students read the entire piece and then debrief about what they learned about writing.
Sky Writing (Variations: Arm Writing, Floor Writing)
Sky Writing helps students practice writing letter(s) or word(s) in the air before committing them to paper. Note: Sky Writing is appropriate for early elementary grades.
Pairs or individuals
Students identify and annotate or record unknown words in a text, prioritizing those that are critical to student understanding.
7 Save students’ collaborative text as an exemplar. Throughout the year, students can refer back to it for support during writing Signal Unknown Words Signal Unknown Words allows students to build vocabulary and improve comprehension.
Individuals
1 Present a question or task that can be answered with simple letters or words (e.g., multiple-choice questions, questions with one-word answers).
2 Students stand, hold one arm straight out, and point a finger.
3 Students trace the letter(s) or word(s) in the air.
Variations:
Arm Writing: Students stay seated and use a finger to write on their arms.
Floor Writing: Students stay seated and write on the floor with one finger.
Implementation Guide Resources 122 © Great Minds PBC
Routine Purpose
Stop and Jot (Variation: Stop and Draw)
Stop and Jot allows individual written responses to texts or learning. This procedure provides ongoing assessment data for teachers and helps students track their thinking.
Grouping How It Works
Individuals and then pairs or whole group
1 During a task, prompt students, using either a verbal cue or a visual symbol (e.g., stop sign, response box), to pause and respond to a question.
2 Students write a brief response.
3 Students briefly discuss their responses with a partner and/or the whole class.
4 Students can reference their Stop and Jots when completing formative assessments.
Variation:
Stop and Draw: Rather than writing, younger students draw a quick sketch to represent responses.
Story Stones
Story Stones provide students visual and tactile prompts for retelling stories or identifying story elements.
Whole group, small groups, pairs, or individuals
1 Create story stones by painting stones with symbols representing basic story elements (beginning, middle, and end) or more sophisticated literary terms (character, setting, problem, and resolution). Lessons give suggestions for specific symbols.
Options for using the stones:
a. Identify a specific stone, and ask students to give details from the text corresponding to the stone.
b. Students draw a stone from a pile and provide information from the text about that element.
c. Students touch the stones as they orally retell or recount the story, using the stones as reminders to include each major element. Alternatively, students place stones in the correct element spot when the corresponding element appears in the text.
Tableau (Variation: Moving Tableau)
A Tableau encourages students to visually and kinesthetically express understanding of an idea or text excerpt.
Small groups or pairs
1 Students use their bodies and facial expressions to create a scene that represents a specific idea or re-creates a scene from the text.
2 The students in each tableau do not speak.
3 A student outside of each tableau may narrate the scene for the viewers.
Variation:
Moving Tableau: As appropriate, motion can be included in a tableau to meet the needs of kinesthetic learners and represent elements of the text.
Implementation Guide Resources 123 © Great Minds PBC
Routine Purpose Grouping How It Works
T-chart (Variation: Notice and Wonder T-Chart)
A T-chart allows students to visually gather and organize evidence or ideas about two aspects of an assigned or chosen topic, preparing them to effectively communicate ideas in writing or discussion.
Whole group, small groups, pairs, or individuals
1 Students to make a table in the shape of a lowercase t, with a vertical line down the center and a horizontal line at the top.
2 Students label each column of the chart above the horizontal line.
3 Students record evidence or ideas on the chart below the horizontal line.
4 Students debrief through writing and/or discussion.
Variation:
Notice and Wonder T-Chart: Students create T-charts, recording observations about a text on the left-hand side and questions about it on the right-hand side.
Think–Pair–Share
(Variations: Think–Pair, Think–Pair–Square, Jot–Pair–Share)
A Think-Pair-Share allows individual students to consider their thoughts about a question and then collaboratively discuss the question with peers.
Individuals, then pairs, then small groups or whole group
1 Pose a thought-provoking question.
2 Give students time to think.
3 Students share their responses with a partner.
4 Then, pairs share their responses with small groups or the whole group. Not all students need to share their responses in the larger group.
Variations:
Think–Pair: Complete the same procedure without the small or whole group sharing.
Think–Pair–Square: Students conduct a Think-Pair and then join a second pair, sharing in groups of four.
Jot–Pair–Share: Students quickly jot down their thinking prior to sharing with a partner.
Implementation Guide Resources 124 © Great Minds PBC
Routine Purpose
Think-Puzzle-Explore Think-Puzzle-Explore encourages inquiry about a new topic by activating prior knowledge and questions about the topic, and then identifying ideas and strategies for further inquiry.
Grouping How It Works
Whole group, small groups, pairs, or individuals
1 Students briefly consider the new topic independently.
2 Students discuss what they think they know about the topic, recording thoughts in individual or class notes.
3 Students discuss what puzzles them about the topic, recording questions in individual or class notes.
4 Students discuss how they can explore the topic, recording ideas in individual or class notes.
5 Display a class record of students’ thoughts, questions, and exploration ideas, including any misconceptions. As students learn more about the topic, return to the class record to allow students to correct misconceptions.
3-2-1 Response A 3-2-1 Response encourages students to reflect on their reading or new learning and provides formative assessment data for teachers.
Individuals
1 Display a 3–2–1 prompt.
2 Students write in their Response Journals and then discuss, or they submit 3–2–1 Exit Tickets.
Below are examples of 3–2–1 Response prompts.
Example A
3 most important ideas
2 supporting details
1 question
Example B
3 things you learned
2 questions you still have
1 text-to-text connection
Value Line-Up
(Note that other resources might call this routine Take a Stand.)
A Value Line-Up encourages students to organize and deepen their thinking about essential concepts, as they demonstrate agreement or disagreement with a posed statement or point of view, while also expanding understanding by listening to classmates’ beliefs.
Whole group, then pairs
1 Read aloud a statement related to a module idea or concept.
2 Students line up based on their level of agreement or disagreement with the statement.
3 The single line then folds in half, pairing students such that students who most disagree are partnered with those who most agree.
4 Partners discuss their individual positions.
Implementation Guide Resources 125 © Great Minds PBC
Routine Purpose
Whip Around A Whip Around serves as a quick check for understanding of each student’s thinking or a culminating reflection on learning.
Grouping How It Works
Whole group
1 Pose an open-ended question.
2 Individual students jot down or think about their answers.
3 Students share their responses one after another until all students have shared their answers.
4 If students wrote their answers, each student can strike out their answer if someone else says it first.
Wonder Chart (Variation: Notice and Wonder T-Chart)
A Wonder Chart encourages students to think about a new, complex text by writing questions about their areas of curiosity and confusion, then investigating the answers to those questions. Students’ questions provide formative assessment data and set the stage for further discussion.
Whole group, small groups, pairs, or individuals
1 Display a chart with three columns: Questions, Answers in Progress, and Complete Answers.
2 After the first read of a text, students write text-based questions on large sticky notes, and then place the notes in the Questions column.
3 Select questions to investigate, and/or group similar questions together.
4 During later reads of the text, students identify the questions they can now answer with text evidence. They write responses on large sticky notes, and then attach the notes to the relevant question notes.
5 As appropriate, move each question-andanswer pair to the Answers in Progress or Complete Answers column.
Variation:
Notice and Wonder T-Chart: Students create T-charts, recording observations on the lefthand side and questions on the right-hand side.
Implementation Guide Resources 126 © Great Minds PBC
Routine Purpose
Wonder Wheel (Variation: Question Cube) A Wonder Wheel encourages students to ask a variety of questions using pre-identified question stems.
Grouping How It Works
Whole group, small groups, pairs, or individuals
1 On chart paper, create a wagon-wheel shape with I Wonder in the middle of the wheel.
2 Generate a list of question stems that radiate like spokes from the middle of the wheel. Questions stems can be the question words who, where, when, what, why, and how, or more text-specific stems.
3 Students choose stems to ask questions about the text.
Alternatively, students choose a question stem from the wheel and ask as many text-based questions as they can using the chosen stem.
Variation:
Question Cube: Students roll a cube with a different question stem on each side, generating a new text-based question(s) with each stem they roll.
Word Line A Word Line encourages students to order words on a continuum to explore the relative intensity or shades of meaning of a word or concept.
Small groups, pairs, or individuals
1 Select a group of vocabulary words from a text.
2 Students write the words in order of intensity. For example, students might rank words from most extreme to least extreme. Consider writing the words on index cards to aid kinesthetic learners.
3 Students debrief through discussion.
Word Wall A Word Wall supports students in tracking, using, and deepening understanding of vocabulary.
Whole group, small groups, pairs, or individuals
1 Designate a space on the classroom wall.
2 When students encounter key vocabulary, have them use sticky notes to add words, definitions, illustrations, and examples to the space.
3 Have students refer to the Word Wall to incorporate vocabulary into discussion and writing.
Implementation Guide Resources 127 © Great Minds PBC
VOCABULARY INSTRUCTION EXAMPLES
This section provides examples of how some common strategies and instructional routines can be used for vocabulary instruction in Wit & Wisdom
Frayer Model (Kindergarten through Grade 8)
The Frayer Model is a graphic organizer that students can use to represent their understanding of a word by providing its definition, characteristics, examples, and non-examples. This is a time-intensive strategy and should be used sparingly (focusing on no more than one word in a given day) with words that represent major knowledge-building concepts or crucial text-based understandings. It is also a good way to summarize a concept that has already received some attention.
The strategy works well in small groups of two to four. Several groups can work on the same word and compare their results.
When introducing the Frayer Model, the teacher can place a word in the middle of the organizer, and work with students to fill out the four quadrants. Over time and with practice, students can take more ownership of the process and fill out the organizer with increasing independence.
The following is an example of a Frayer Model for the word metropolis.
Definition: A very large city.
Examples: Chicago, New York, Los Angeles, Tokyo, London
Characteristics: Huge populations, tall buildings, busy streets, lots of businesses, noise, energy, motion
metropolis
Non-examples: Small city, town, rural area, village, farm
Implementation Guide Resources 128 © Great Minds PBC
Morpheme Matrix (Grades 3 through 8)
This strategy exposes students to new roots and affixes. It can be used to introduce a new term or to build upon a known root.
Steps for explicit instruction include the following:
1 Teacher introduces a term and encourages students to break apart the term to its root(s) and affix(es).
Example: reconstruct can be broken into re-, con-, and struct.
2 Teacher explicitly teaches the meaning of the root.
Example: struc(t) means to build.
3 Teacher encourages students to brainstorm additional words that have the struct root.
Example: instruction, structure, construction
4 Students complete a Morpheme Matrix around the root. This can be done individually, or in pairs or groups. The main goal is to see how the root can grow.
For other examples of morpheme matrices, see the Mini-Matrix Maker (http://witeng.link/0617).
5 Teacher selects terms that students generated as the basis for a root discussion.
Example: What does build have to do with instruction?
6 Students add any newly learned words to their Vocabulary Journals.
Implementation Guide Resources 129 © Great Minds PBC
re de con struct “build” s ed ing ion or in de in od sub super infra ive ly ity ness ure es ed ing al ly ism ist
Outside-In (Kindergarten through Grade 8)
Students use this strategy to determine the meanings of unknown words as they read. The strategy will work only for words with recognizable roots and affixes, and for the minority of words (about 25 percent) that have meanings readers can infer from context. Students will be more likely to derive meaning from the inside if root words or affixes are present but only if they know the meaning of the root or affix.
To introduce the strategy, write the words Outside and Inside on the board. Invite students to brainstorm by asking: What kind of evidence can be found outside, or around, a word that might help you know what it means (e.g., context clues in neighboring words and sentences and/or illustrations)? Then ask: What kind of evidence can be found inside a word that might help you know what it means (e.g., word parts/roots/affixes)?
Model for students how to use the strategy.
Example:
The director made a unilateral decision. He canceled the annual company picnic without discussing it with his managers, which made them angry.
Share with students how you can look outside of the word for clues.
Say: The word describes a kind of decision or action. The boss made this kind of decision. It must be a bad decision because it made the managers angry.
Model how you can look inside the word for clues.
Say: The prefix uni- means one. I know that prefix from other words like unicycle (a bicycle with just one wheel) or unicorn (an animal with one horn). So, I think that unilateral means one something. Then I can look outside again. If the boss made a one-something decision, what could it have been? He did not tell the managers about it. He just did it on his own. Maybe unilateral means one-way or one-sided. That seems to work in the sentence: The director made a one-sided decision.
Example taken from: Ebbers, Susan M., and Carolyn A. Denton. “A Root Awakening: Vocabulary Instruction for Older Students with Reading Difficulties.” Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, volume 23, issue 2, 2008, pp. 90–102.
Notes:
While it is possible to break down some word parts into even smaller roots, be mindful of the ways in which most people realistically understand words. Atomizing a word into the smallest possible parts, at least at first, may add unnecessary complications.
When appropriate, prompt students to apply their knowledge of a new morpheme or root to understanding a concept on a deeper level. For instance, after breaking down democracy into demo (people) + crat (ruler), ask students how understanding the word parts helps them understand the concept of democracy as compared to other forms of rule (e.g., plutocracy, aristocracy).
Implementation Guide Resources 130 © Great Minds PBC
Relationship Mapping (Kindergarten through Grade 8)
When studying multiple words that have a significant relationship to each other, the teacher (in lower grades) or students (in upper grades) can select several terms from the text or module (e.g., We have learned about several words this week. How might community, prosper, settler, and origin be connected?). Students then determine a connection between the terms.
With more complex groups of words, students can create a graphic organizer to represent how the words relate. The shape will vary depending on the word relationships (e.g., Venn diagram, spoke wheel).
Example:
Words from ““Chicago,” Carl Sandburg:
The people of Chicago
Occupations
Tool Maker
Hog Butcher
Stacker of Wheat
Physical Actions
Words and thoughts
Shoveling
Wrecking
Laughing
Bragging
Singing
Planning
Implementation Guide Resources 131 © Great Minds PBC
Student-Generated Definitions (Grades 3 through 8)
This activity is a follow-up to the Signal Unknown Words routine. It works best after a first or second reading.
1 Before the lesson, the teacher determines a list of text-critical and content words that are likely to be unfamiliar to students. Teachers can use the Module Word List provided in Appendix B of each module as a resource for building the list.
2 Students individually signal unknown words.
3 The class shares the words aloud with the teacher, who collects them on the board. To avoid spending time on too many low-priority words, the teacher can ask how many students circled the same word. If only two to three students raise their hands for a particular word that is not on the teacher’s predetermined list, the word can be set aside for the time being.
4 The teacher adds to the board any words from the Module Word List that students did not.
5 The teacher goes through the list. For words that are not from the Module Word List, the teacher asks for a volunteer to supply the meaning. If no one can, the teacher provides a brief definition, and the class moves on. (It is helpful for students to know why certain words are worth spending more time on.)
6 The teacher allocates remaining words evenly among small groups of students.
7 Each small group attempts to define its words using word-solving strategies, in the following order:
a. Asks whether any group members know the word already
b. Looks for clues and/or resources in the text—such as context, appositives, footnotes, or a glossary—that i may clearly define the word (This will likely be the case only 20 to 50% of the time.)
ii determines whether meaning can be derived from roots and/or affixes
iii verifies meaning in a dictionary, ideally one with student-friendly definitions
c. Returns to the text to confirm that the meaning makes sense in context
8 The class reconvenes, and each group shares definitions with the whole class.
9 Students record definitions in their Vocabulary Journals (only for words they signaled as unknown).
Word Line (Kindergarten through Grade 8)
When analyzing words that have strong connotations (or a group of words that are close in meaning), students can place the words on a word line to rate the relative intensity of the words. This helps students understand the subtle shades of meaning that differentiate words that are ostensibly synonymous. This strategy works well in small groups; several groups can work on the same word and compare their results.
Example:
Word line for words related to angry:
annoyed exasperated mad angry furious incensed irate apoplectic Younger students (Kindergarten through Grade 1) will need more support.
Implementation Guide Resources 132 © Great Minds PBC
SAMPLE ANNOTATION SYMBOLS CHART
Response Annotation Symbol
Questions and confusions ?
Observations
Connections
To other text: T
Within the text:
To the world:
Unknown words WORD
Figurative language (e.g., similes, metaphors, personification, alliteration, onomatopoeia, hyperbole, idioms)
[He ran like the wind]
Transition words (e.g., first, then, next) First
Key passages to quote or cite later
Standard-specific element (e.g., alliteration, point of view, humor, suspense)
Implementation Guide Resources 133 © Great Minds PBC
W
<>
POV
WRITING MODELS
Informative/Explanatory Writing Models
Kindergarten through Grade 1: TopIC
Make a TopIC sandwich:
Top Topic State the topic.
I Information Supply facts and details about the topic
C Conclusion Reinforce your topic
Grades 2 through 3: I-TEE-C
Describe your knowledge to a TEE:
I Introduction Introduce your reader to the topic
T Topic Statement State your essential idea about the topic
E Evidence Supply evidence that develops your topic
E Elaboration Explain how the evidence develops your topic
Evidence Supply more evidence that develops your topic
Elaboration Explain how the evidence develops your topic
C Conclusion Reinforce your essential idea
Grades 3 through 8: To-SEEC (To SEE Clearly)
Write a To-SEEC paragraph:
To S Topic Statement State your essential idea about a topic
E Evidence Cite evidence that develops your topic, including necessary context
E Elaboration Explain how the evidence develops your topic
C Concluding Statement Reinforce your essential idea
Implementation Guide Resources 134 © Great Minds PBC
Write a To-SEEC essay:
H Hook Catch your audience’s attention
I Introduce Introduce your audience to the topic
T Thesis State your essential idea about the topic and preview your supporting points
To S Topic Statement State a point that supports your thesis
E Evidence Cite evidence for your point, including necessary context
E Elaboration Explain how the evidence relates to the point
C
Concluding statement Close the paragraph
Topic Statement
Evidence
Transition from your last point and state another point that supports your thesis
Cite evidence for your point, including necessary context
Elaboration Explain how the evidence relates to the point
Concluding Statement Close the paragraph
C Conclusion
Reinforce your thesis, reflecting on its significance
Implementation Guide Resources 135 © Great Minds PBC
Opinion/Argument Writing Models
Kindergarten through Grade 1: OReO
Make an opinion sandwich:
O Opinion Grade K: State an opinion about the topic
Grade 1: Introduce the topic and state an opinion about it
Re Reasons Supply reason(s) that support the opinion
O Opinion Reinforce your opinion
Grade 2: I-OREO
I Introduction Introduce your reader to the topic
O
Opinion Statement State your opinion on the topic
R Reason Supply a reason that supports your opinion
E Evidence Cite evidence for the reason
Reason Supply another reason that supports your opinion
Evidence Cite evidence for the reason
O
Opinion Conclusion Reinforce your opinion in a conclusion
Grades 3 through 5: OREEO or HI-OREE-CO
Write an opinion paragraph:
O Opinion Statement State your opinion on a topic
R Reason Supply a reason that supports your opinion
E Evidence Cite evidence for the reason, including necessary context
E Elaboration Explain how the evidence relates to the reason
O
Write an opinion essay:
Opinion Reinforce your opinion in a conclusion
H Hook Catch your audience’s attention
I Introduce Introduce your audience to the topic
O
Opinion Statement State your opinion on the topic and preview your supporting reasons
Implementation Guide Resources 136 © Great Minds PBC
R Reason State a reason that supports your opinion
E Evidence Cite evidence for the reason, including necessary context
E Elaboration
Explain how the evidence relates to the reason
C Concluding Statement Close the paragraph
Reason
Transition from your last reason and state another reason that supports your opinion
Evidence Cite evidence for the reason, including necessary context
Elaboration Explain how the evidence relates to the reason
Concluding Statement Close the paragraph
O Opinion
Reinforce your opinion, reflecting on its significance
Grades 6 through 8: CREEA-C or HI-CREEA-CC
Write an argument paragraph:
C Claim
R Reason
State your claim(s) about a topic
State a reason that supports your claim
E Evidence Cite evidence for the reason, including necessary context
E Elaboration
Explain how the evidence relates to the reason
A Alternate Claim(s)* Grade 6: Remove this section
Grade 7: Acknowledge alternate or opposing claim(s)
Grade 8: Acknowledge and distinguish from alternate or opposing claim(s)
C Concluding Statement Reinforce your argument
Write an argument essay:
H Hook
I Introduce
C Claim
Catch your audience’s attention
Introduce your audience to the topic
State your claim(s) about the topic and preview your supporting reasons
Implementation Guide Resources 137 © Great Minds PBC
R Reason State a reason that supports your claim
E Evidence Cite evidence for the reason, including necessary context
E Elaboration Explain how the evidence relates to the reason
C Concluding Statement Close the paragraph
R Reason Transition from your last reason and state another reason that supports your claim
E Evidence Cite evidence for the reason, including necessary context
E Elaboration Explain how the evidence relates to the reason
C Concluding Statement Close the paragraph
A Alternate Claim(s)* Grade 6: Remove this section
Grade 7: Acknowledge alternate or opposing claim(s)
Grade 8: Acknowledge and distinguish from alternate or opposing claim(s)
C Conclusion Reinforce your argument, reflecting on its significance.
*Acknowledgment of alternate or opposing claim(s) does not occur in a fixed order; it can happen anywhere in the paragraph or essay.
Implementation Guide Resources 138 © Great Minds PBC
Narrative Writing Models
Kindergarten through Grade 2: CSPER
C Characters
Who the story is about
S Setting
When and where the story takes place
P Problem
E Events
The main character’s challenge
What happens
R Resolution
End of the problem
Implementation Guide Resources 139 © Great Minds PBC
Grades 3 through 8: ESCAPE
ESCAPE into a story:
E Establish
Grades 3–5: Orient your reader to a situation
Grade 6: Engage and orient your reader by establishing a context
Grades 7–8: Engage and orient your reader by establishing a context and point of view
S Setting
When and where the story takes place
C Characters
Who the story is about and what they want
A Action
Grades 3–5: What events happen and how characters respond
Grades 6–8: What events happen and how characters experience the events
P Problem
E Ending
What prevents the main character(s) from getting what they want
Resolution to the problem
Note: As appropriate in Grades 3 through 8, emphasize that students can change the sequence of the story elements for effect.
Implementation Guide Resources 140 © Great Minds PBC
Writing
Kindergarten: Informative/Explanatory
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Using a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing:
Does not respond to prompt; off-topic.
Does not supply information about topic; topic is unclear.
WRITING RUBRICS
Using a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing:
Responds to some elements of prompt.
Information about topic is supplied; topic is apparent but not explicitly stated.
With guidance and support such as collaborative planning:
With guidance and support such as collaborative planning:
Does not supply evidence.
Supplies general evidence that may not come from text or may not be factually accurate.
Evidence may not consistently relate to topic.
The following only applies when using students’ own writing:
The following only applies when using students’ own writing:
Does not show command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning and writing is difficult to follow.
Shows partial command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; errors interfere with meaning and some main points are not intelligible to reader.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Using a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing:
Responds to all elements of prompt.
Names general topic.
Supplies one additional piece of information about the topic after naming the topic.
With guidance and support such as collaborative planning:
Supplies one piece of evidence from text.
Evidence provided relates to topic.
The following only applies when using students’ own writing:
Shows general command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; some errors interfere with meaning.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Using a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing:
Structure
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Names specific topic.
Supplies two additional pieces of information about the topic after naming the topic.
With guidance and support such as collaborative planning:
Development
Supplies two pieces of evidence from text(s).
Evidence provided develops topic.
The following only applies when using students’ own writing:
Conventions
Shows consistent command of end-of-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; occasional errors may interfere with meaning but main points are intelligible to reader.
The Kindergarten writing and language standards do not require strategic application of grammar and vocabulary knowledge in students’ writing, so the Kindergarten rubrics do not include the Style feature.
Implementation Guide Resources 141 © Great Minds PBC
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Using a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing:
Does not respond to prompt; off-topic.
Does not name topic or book
Does not state an opinion or preference.
With guidance and support such as collaborative planning:
Does not support or explain opinion.
The following only applies when using students’ own writing:
Does not show command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
Using a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing:
Responds to some elements of prompt.
Attempts to name topic or book but does so in an unclear or inaccurate way.
States an unclear opinion or preference.
With guidance and support such as collaborative planning:
Attempts to explain or support, but support may not relate to the opinion.
The following only applies when using students’ own writing:
Shows partial command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; errors interfere with meaning, and some main points are not intelligible to reader.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Using a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing:
Responds to all elements of prompt.
Names topic or book.
States an opinion or preference.
With guidance and support such as collaborative planning:
Supports or explains the opinion with information from text(s).
The following only applies when using students’ own writing:
Shows general command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; some errors interfere with meaning.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Using a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing:
Structure
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Names topic or book with further information about topic or book.
States opinion or preference clearly.
With guidance and support such as collaborative planning:
Development
Supports the opinion with a fact or piece of evidence from text(s).
The following only applies when using students’ own writing:
Conventions
Shows consistent command of end-of-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; occasional errors may interfere with meaning, but main points are intelligible to reader.
Implementation Guide Resources 142 © Great Minds PBC
Opinion Writing
Kindergarten:
Kindergarten:
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Using a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing:
Does not respond to prompt; off-topic.
Does not narrate an event.
Does not provide a reaction to what happened or an ending.
The following only applies when using students’ own writing:
Does not show command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
Using a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing:
Responds to some elements of prompt.
Attempts to narrate an event, but action or situation is unclear.
Events are not told in order in which they occurred.
Attempts to provide a reaction; reaction may be unrelated to what happened.
The following only applies when using students’ own writing:
Shows partial command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; errors interfere with meaning, and some main points are not intelligible to reader.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Using a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing:
Responds to all elements of prompt.
Narrates a single event or several loosely linked events.
Tells events in the order in which they occurred.
Provides a reaction to what happened.
The following only applies when using students’ own writing:
Shows general command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; some errors interfere with meaning.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Using a combination of drawing, dictating, and writing:
Structure
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Narrates several linked events.
Tells events in the order in which they occurred.
Provides a reaction to what happened that provides a brief sense of closure.
The following only applies when using students’ own writing:
Conventions
Shows consistent command of end-of-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; occasional errors may interfere with meaning, but main points are intelligible to reader.
Implementation Guide Resources 143 © Great Minds PBC
Narrative
Writing
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not respond to prompt; off-topic.
Responds to some elements of prompt.
Does not name or refer to topic.
Refers to topic indirectly without clearly naming or identifying it.
Does not provide additional information.
Does not provide closure.
Provides one piece of information about the topic in middle.
Attempts to provide closure but does so unclearly.
With guidance and support such as collaborative planning:
With guidance and support such as collaborative planning:
Does not supply evidence.
Supplies general evidence that may not come from text or may not be factually accurate.
Evidence may not consistently relate to topic.
Does not use conjunctions.
Uses limited vocabulary inappropriate to the content.
Attempts to use conjunctions but does so incorrectly or with inappropriate words.
Uses 1–2 words and phrases related to the topic.
Does not show command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
Shows partial command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; errors interfere with meaning, and some main points are not intelligible to reader.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Responds to all elements of prompt.
Names topic.
Provides two additional pieces of information about the topic in middle.
Provides some sense of closure.
With guidance and support such as collaborative planning:
Supplies evidence from text(s), including facts when appropriate.
Evidence provided relates to topic.
Uses conjunctions to signal simple relationships.
Uses several words and phrases relevant to the text and topic.
Shows general command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; some errors interfere with meaning.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Names topic with further introductory or contextual information.
Provides three or more additional pieces of information about the topic in middle.
Provides a strong sense of closure.
With guidance and support such as collaborative planning:
Supplies a variety of evidence from text(s), including facts when appropriate.
Evidence provided develops topic.
Uses conjunctions to signal simple relationships and create compound sentences.
Uses several words and phrases specific to the text and topic.
Shows consistent command of end-of-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; occasional errors may interfere with meaning, but main points are intelligible to reader.
Structure
Development
Style
Conventions
Implementation Guide Resources 144 © Great Minds PBC
Informative/Explanatory
Grade 1:
Writing
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not respond to prompt; off-topic.
Responds to some elements of prompt.
Does not name or refer to topic or book.
Refers to topic or book indirectly without clearly introducing or naming it.
Does not state an opinion.
Does not provide additional information.
Does not provide closure.
With guidance and support such as collaborative planning:
Does not supply a reason.
Does not use conjunctions.
Uses limited vocabulary inappropriate to the content.
Does not show command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
States an unclear opinion.
Provides additional information about the topic before introducing topic or after closure.
Attempts to provide closure but does so unclearly.
With guidance and support such as collaborative planning:
Supplies a reason that does not relate to the opinion.
Attempts to use conjunctions but does so incorrectly or with inappropriate words.
Uses 1–2 words and phrases related to the topic.
Shows partial command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; errors interfere with meaning, and some main points are not intelligible to reader.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Responds to all elements of prompt.
Introduces topic or names book.
States an opinion.
Provides one additional piece of information about the topic in middle.
Provides some sense of closure.
With guidance and support such as collaborative planning:
Supplies at least one reason that relates to the opinion.
Uses conjunctions to signal simple relationships.
Uses several words and phrases relevant to the text and topic.
Shows general command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; some errors interfere with meaning.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Structure
Introduces topic or names book with further introductory or contextual information.
States opinion clearly.
Provides two or more additional pieces of information about the topic in middle.
Provides a strong sense of closure.
With guidance and support such as collaborative planning:
Development
Supplies two or more reasons that support opinion well.
Uses conjunctions to signal simple relationships and create compound sentences.
Uses several words and phrases specific to the text and topic.
Shows consistent command of end-of-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; occasional errors may interfere with meaning, but main points are intelligible to reader.
Style
Conventions
Implementation Guide Resources 145 © Great Minds PBC
1: Opinion Writing
Grade
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not respond to prompt; off-topic.
Responds to some elements of prompt.
Does not recount any events.
Does not provide closure.
Recounts only one event or recounts two or more events in a confusing or unclear sequence.
Does not use temporal words.
Attempts to provide a sense of closure, but ending is unclear.
Inconsistently or incorrectly uses temporal words to signal event order.
With guidance and support such as collaborative planning:
With guidance and support such as collaborative planning:
Does not include details to describe what happened.
Does not use adjectives.
Uses limited vocabulary inappropriate to the content.
Does not show command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
Includes one or two general details.
Attempts to use adjectives but may be improperly used.
Uses 1–2 words and phrases related to the topic.
Shows partial command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; errors interfere with meaning, and some main points are not intelligible to reader.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Responds to all elements of prompt.
Recounts two or more appropriately sequenced events.
Provides a sense of closure.
Uses temporal words to signal event order.
With guidance and support such as collaborative planning:
Includes two or more details to describe what happened.
Uses frequently occurring adjectives.
Uses several words and phrases relevant to the text and topic.
Shows general command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; some errors interfere with meaning.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Structure
Recounts three or more appropriately sequenced events.
Provides a more thorough sense of closure.
Uses a variety of temporal words to signal event order.
With guidance and support such as collaborative planning:
Development
Includes several precise or wellchosen details to describe what happened.
Uses a variety of adjectives effectively.
Style
Uses several words and phrases specific to the text and topic.
Shows consistent command of end-of-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; occasional errors may interfere with meaning, but main points are intelligible to reader.
Conventions
Implementation Guide Resources 146 © Great Minds PBC
Grade 1: Narrative Writing
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not respond to prompt; off-topic.
Responds to some elements of prompt.
Does not introduce or reference topic.
References topic but does not clearly introduce it.
Does not provide additional information.
Provides one piece of information about the topic in middle.
Does not provide closure.
Provides a brief or unclear sense of closure.
Does not provide evidence.
Develops topic with general evidence that may not come from text or may not be factually accurate.
Evidence may not consistently relate to topic.
Does not use compound sentences.
Attempts to use one or two compound sentences but may be improperly used.
Uses limited vocabulary inappropriate to the content.
Does not show command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
Uses 1–2 words and phrases related to the topic.
Shows partial command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; errors interfere with meaning, and some main points are not intelligible to reader.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Responds to all elements of prompt.
Introduces topic.
Provides two additional pieces of information about the topic in middle.
Provides a concluding statement or section.
Develops topic with evidence from text(s).
Evidence provided relates to topic and develops points.
Uses simple and compound sentences.
Uses several words and phrases relevant to the text and topic.
Shows general command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; some errors interfere with meaning.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Structure
Introduces topic thoroughly.
Provides three or more additional pieces of information about the topic in middle.
Provides a strong concluding statement or section.
Develops topic with a variety of evidence from text(s).
Development
Evidence provided strongly and clearly develops points.
Uses a variety of appropriately chosen simple and compound sentences.
Style
Uses several words and phrases specific to the text and topic.
Shows consistent command of end-of-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; occasional errors may interfere with meaning, but main points are intelligible to reader.
Conventions
Implementation Guide Resources 147 © Great Minds PBC
Grade 2: Informative/Explanatory Writing
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not respond to prompt; off-topic.
Responds to some elements of prompt.
Does not introduce or reference topic or book.
References topic but does not clearly introduce it.
Does not state an opinion.
Does not supply a reason.
Does not provide closure.
Does not use linking words.
Does not supply a reason.
Does not use compound sentences.
Uses limited vocabulary inappropriate to the content.
Does not show command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
States an unclear opinion.
Supplies reasons before introducing topic or after conclusion.
Provides a brief or unclear sense of closure.
Inconsistently or incorrectly uses linking words to connect opinion and reasons.
Supplies one reason.
Reason may not clearly support the opinion.
Attempts to use one or two compound sentences but may be improperly used.
Uses 1–2 words and phrases related to the topic.
Shows partial command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; errors interfere with meaning, and some main points are not intelligible to reader.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Responds to all elements of prompt.
Introduces topic or book.
States an opinion.
Supplies reasons in the middle.
Provides a concluding statement or section.
Uses linking words to connect opinion and reasons.
Supplies two or more reasons.
Reasons support the opinion.
Uses simple and compound sentences.
Uses several words and phrases relevant to the text and topic.
Shows general command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; some errors interfere with meaning.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Structure
Introduces topic or book thoroughly.
States opinion clearly.
Supplies reasons in the middle that are listed or organized in a logical way.
Provides a strong concluding statement or section.
Uses a variety of well-chosen linking words to connect opinion and reasons.
Supplies two or more reasons that show insightful understanding of text.
Development
Reasons clearly and convincingly support opinion.
Uses a variety of appropriately chosen simple and compound sentences.
Style
Uses several words and phrases specific to the text and topic.
Shows consistent command of end-of-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; occasional errors may interfere with meaning, but main points are intelligible to reader.
Conventions
Implementation Guide Resources 148 © Great Minds PBC
2: Opinion Writing
Grade
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not respond to prompt; off-topic.
Responds to some elements of prompt.
Does not recount any events.
Recounts events in a confusing or unclear sequence.
Does not provide a sense of closure.
Does not use temporal words.
Attempts to provide a sense of closure, but ending is unclear.
Inconsistently or incorrectly uses temporal words to signal event order.
Does not include details to describe actions, thoughts, and feelings.
Does not use compound sentences.
Does not use adjectives and adverbs to describe things.
Does not show command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
Includes one or two general details.
Attempts to use one or two compound sentences but may be improperly used.
Uses one or two adjectives and adverbs to describe things.
Shows partial command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; errors interfere with meaning, and some main points are not intelligible to reader.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Responds to all elements of prompt.
Recounts a well-elaborated event or short sequence of events.
Provides a sense of closure.
Uses temporal words to signal event order.
Includes some details to describe actions, thoughts, and feelings.
Uses simple and compound sentences.
Uses several adjectives and adverbs to describe things.
Shows general command of endof-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; some errors interfere with meaning.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Structure
Recounts a well-elaborated event or short sequence of events that flows well.
Provides a more thorough sense of closure.
Uses a variety of temporal words to signal event order.
Includes several precise or wellchosen details to describe actions, thoughts, and feelings.
Development
Uses a variety of appropriately chosen simple and compound sentences.
Style
Uses several precise or wellchosen adjectives and adverbs to describe things.
Shows consistent command of end-of-grade-level language standards for conventional written English, including mechanics, usage, and spelling; occasional errors may interfere with meaning, but main points are intelligible to reader.
Conventions
Implementation Guide Resources 149 © Great Minds PBC
2: Narrative
Grade
Writing
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not respond to prompt; off-topic.
Responds to some elements of prompt.
Piece lacks focus on topic.
Does not introduce topic.
Often departs from focus on topic.
Information is randomly organized and not grouped.
Attempts to introduce topic but does so in a general, incomplete, or inaccurate way.
Does not provide a concluding statement or section.
Does not use linking words or phrases.
Related information about the topic is partially or inconsistently grouped together.
Provides a brief concluding idea that does not clearly refer to topic.
Inconsistently or incorrectly uses linking words and phrases to connect ideas.
Does not provide evidence.
Does not examine or analyze the topic.
Develops topic with general evidence that may not come from text or may be factually inaccurate.
Partially or briefly examines or analyzes the topic.
Does not use compound or complex sentences.
Attempts to use one or two compound or complex sentences but may be improperly used.
Uses limited vocabulary inappropriate to the content.
Uses a few general academic words.
Does not show command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
Shows inconsistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors interfere with meaning.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Responds to all elements of prompt.
Maintains focus on topic throughout piece with occasional departures.
Introduces topic.
Groups related information about the topic together.
Provides a concluding statement or section that refers to topic.
Uses linking words and phrases to connect ideas.
Develops topic with evidence from text(s).
Examines or analyzes the topic.
Uses simple, compound, and complex sentences.
Uses general academic language.
Shows general command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; some errors may interfere with meaning.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Structure
Maintains focus on topic throughout piece.
Introduces topic thoroughly.
Groups related information about the topic together into clear categories or paragraphs.
Provides a concluding statement or section that refers to topic and adds insight.
Uses a variety of well-chosen linking words and phrases to connect ideas.
Develops topic with a variety of evidence from text(s).
Development
Examines or analyzes the topic with additional insight or thoroughness.
Uses a variety of appropriately chosen simple, compound, and complex sentences.
Style
Uses precise general academic language appropriate to the task.
Shows consistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; occasional errors do not significantly interfere with meaning.
Conventions
Implementation Guide Resources 150 © Great Minds PBC
3: Informative/Explanatory Writing
Grade
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not respond to prompt; off-topic.
Responds to some elements of prompt.
Lacks focus on opinion/point of view.
Does not introduce topic or text.
Does not state an opinion.
Reasons are not organized.
Does not provide a concluding statement or section.
Does not use linking words or phrases.
Does not support opinion with reasons.
Does not use compound or complex sentences.
Uses limited vocabulary inappropriate to the content.
Does not show command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
Often departs from focus on opinion/point of view.
Attempts to introduce topic or text but does so in a general, incomplete, or inaccurate way.
States an unclear opinion.
Reasons are not clearly listed or organized.
Provides a brief concluding idea that does not clearly refer to opinion.
Inconsistently or incorrectly uses linking words and phrases to connect opinion and reasons.
Provides reasons that may not clearly support opinion.
Attempts to use one or two compound or complex sentences but may be improperly used.
Uses a few general academic words.
Shows inconsistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors interfere with meaning.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Responds to all elements of prompt.
Maintains focus on opinion/ point of view with occasional departures.
Introduces topic or text.
States an opinion.
Lists or organizes reasons.
Provides a concluding statement or section that refers to opinion.
Uses linking words and phrases to connect opinion and reasons.
Supports opinion with reasons.
Uses simple, compound, and complex sentences.
Uses general academic language.
Shows general command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; some errors may interfere with meaning.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Structure
Maintains focus on opinion/point of view.
Introduces topic or text clearly.
States opinion clearly.
Lists or organizes reasons into clear categories or paragraphs.
Provides a concluding statement or section that refers to opinion and adds insight.
Uses a variety of well-chosen linking words and phrases to connect opinion and reasons.
Supports opinion with reasons and supporting evidence or details.
Development
Uses a variety of appropriately chosen simple, compound, and complex sentences.
Style
Uses precise general academic language appropriate to the task.
Shows consistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; occasional errors do not significantly interfere with meaning.
Conventions
Implementation Guide Resources 151 © Great Minds PBC Grade 3: Opinion Writing
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not respond to prompt; off-topic.
Responds to some elements of prompt.
Does not establish a situation for the reader; narrator and/ or characters are lacking or undefined.
Partially or unclearly establishes a situation and introduces a narrator and/or characters.
Events unfold in a random or confusing manner so that reader cannot follow a sequence.
Organizes an event sequence that may be occasionally confusing or have logical gaps.
Does not provide a sense of closure.
Attempts to provide a sense of closure, but ending is unclear.
Does not use temporal words and phrases.
Inconsistently or incorrectly uses temporal words and phrases to signal event order.
Does not use dialogue or description to develop events and characters.
Uses occasional or brief dialogue and description to develop events and characters.
Does not use compound or complex sentences.
Attempts to use one or two compound or complex sentences but may be improperly used.
Uses limited vocabulary inappropriate to the content.
Does not use adjectives and adverbs to describe things.
Uses one or two adjectives and adverbs to describe things.
Does not show command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
Shows inconsistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors interfere with meaning.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Responds to all elements of prompt.
Establishes a situation and introduces a narrator and/or characters.
Organizes an event sequence that unfolds naturally.
Provides a sense of closure.
Uses temporal words and phrases to signal event order.
Uses dialogue and description to effectively develop events and characters.
Uses simple, compound, and complex sentences.
Uses several adjectives and adverbs to describe things.
Shows general command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; some errors may interfere with meaning.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Structure
Skillfully establishes a situation and introduces a narrator and/or characters.
Organizes a clear event sequence that unfolds naturally.
Provides complete closure.
Uses a variety of well-chosen temporal words and phrases to signal event order.
Uses dialogue and description to develop events and characters effectively and thoroughly.
Development
Uses a variety of appropriately chosen simple, compound, and complex sentences.
Uses several precise or wellchosen adjectives and adverbs to describe things with greater specificity.
Shows consistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; occasional errors do not significantly interfere with meaning.
Style
Conventions
Implementation Guide Resources 152 © Great Minds PBC
Grade 3: Narrative Writing
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not respond to prompt; off-topic.
Responds to some elements of prompt.
Piece lacks focus on topic.
Does not introduce topic.
Often departs from focus on topic.
Ideas are unrelated and disorganized.
Introduces topic in an incomplete or unclear way.
Does not provide a conclusion.
Does not use transitions to link ideas.
Ideas are somewhat organized but may be unrelated or lumped together.
Provides a conclusion that is incomplete or may not relate to the explanation
Inconsistently or inappropriately uses transitions to link ideas.
Does not use evidence from text(s).
Develops topic with evidence from text(s).
Does not elaborate upon evidence.
Elaborates upon evidence vaguely or superficially.
Sentence patterns are basic and repetitive.
Uses limited vocabulary inappropriate to the content.
Writing is inappropriate to audience.
Does not show command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
Varies sentence patterns occasionally.
Uses general vocabulary with a few domain-specific words.
Writing is appropriate to audience.
Shows inconsistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; some errors interfere with meaning.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Responds to all elements of prompt.
Maintains focus throughout piece, with occasional departures.
Introduces topic clearly.
Organizes related information into paragraphs and sections.
Provides a conclusion that relates to the explanation.
Uses transitions to link ideas within categories.
Develops topic with evidence from text(s) that is related to the topic.
Elaborates upon evidence with explanation or analysis.
Varies sentence patterns.
Uses domain-specific vocabulary.
Writing is appropriate to audience.
Shows consistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; occasional errors do not significantly interfere with meaning.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Structure
Maintains focus throughout piece.
Introduces topic clearly and thoroughly.
Organizes related information effectively into paragraphs and sections.
Provides a strong conclusion that relates to and expands on the explanation.
Skillfully uses transitions to link ideas within categories.
Develops topic with a variety of evidence from text(s) that is closely related to the topic.
Development
Elaborates upon evidence thoroughly with accurate analysis.
Uses precise language and domain-specific vocabulary.
Style
Writing shows exceptional awareness and skill in addressing audience’s needs.
Shows strong command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors are few.
Conventions
Implementation Guide Resources 153 © Great Minds PBC
4: Informative/Explanatory
Grade
Writing
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not respond to prompt; off-topic.
Responds to some elements of prompt.
Piece lacks focus on opinion/ point of view.
Often departs from focus on opinion/point of view.
Does not introduce topic or text(s).
Does not state an opinion.
Ideas are unrelated and disorganized.
Does not provide a conclusion.
Does not use transitions to link opinion and reasons.
Does not support opinion with reasons or evidence from text(s).
Does not elaborate upon evidence.
Sentence patterns are basic and repetitive.
Uses limited vocabulary inappropriate to the content.
Writing is inappropriate to audience.
Does not show command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
Introduces topic or text(s) in an incomplete or unclear way.
States an unclear opinion.
Ideas are somewhat organized but may be unrelated or lumped together.
Provides a conclusion that is incomplete or may not relate to the opinion.
Inconsistently or inappropriately uses transitions to link opinion and reasons.
Provides reasons that may not clearly support opinion or are not well-supported by evidence from text(s).
Elaborates upon evidence vaguely or superficially.
Varies sentence patterns occasionally.
Uses general vocabulary with a few domain-specific words.
Writing is appropriate to audience.
Shows inconsistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; some errors interfere with meaning.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Responds to all elements of prompt.
Maintains focus on opinion/point of view throughout piece, with occasional departures.
Introduces topic or text(s) clearly.
States an opinion.
Organizes related ideas to support opinion.
Provides a conclusion that relates to the opinion.
Uses transitions to link opinion and reasons.
Supports opinion with reasons that are supported by evidence from text(s).
Elaborates upon evidence.
Varies sentence patterns.
Uses domain-specific vocabulary.
Writing is appropriate to audience.
Shows consistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; occasional errors do not significantly interfere with meaning.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Structure
Maintains focus on opinion/point of view throughout piece.
Introduces topic or text(s) clearly and thoroughly.
States opinion clearly.
Organizes related ideas to support opinion.
Provides a strong conclusion that relates to and expands on the opinion.
Skillfully uses transitions to link opinion and reasons.
Supports opinion with reasons that are supported by a variety of evidence from text(s).
Development
Elaborates upon evidence thoroughly.
Uses precise language and domain-specific vocabulary.
Style
Writing shows exceptional awareness and skill in addressing audience’s needs.
Shows strong command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors are few.
Conventions
Implementation Guide Resources 154 © Great Minds PBC Grade 4: Opinion Writing
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not respond to prompt; off-topic.
Responds to some elements of prompt.
Does not establish a situation for the reader; narrator and/ or characters are lacking or undefined.
Partially orients the reader by establishing a situation and introducing a narrator and/or characters in an unclear way.
Events unfold in a random or confusing manner so that reader cannot follow a sequence.
Organizes an event sequence that may be occasionally confusing or have logical gaps.
Does not provide a conclusion.
Does not use transitions to sequence events.
Provides a conclusion that is incomplete or does not follow from the narrated experiences or events.
Inconsistently or inappropriately uses transitions to manage sequence of events.
Does not use dialogue or description to develop events and characters.
Uses occasional or brief dialogue and description to develop events and characters.
Includes few or no sensory details.
Uses some sensory details to convey events.
Sentence patterns are basic and repetitive.
Includes few or no concrete words and phrases.
Writing is inappropriate to audience.
Does not show command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
Varies sentence patterns occasionally
Uses some concrete words and phrases to convey events
Writing is somewhat appropriate to audience
Shows inconsistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; some errors interfere with meaning.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Responds to all elements of prompt.
Orients the reader by establishing a situation and introducing a narrator and/or characters.
Organizes an event sequence that unfolds naturally.
Provides a conclusion that follows from the narrated experiences or events.
Uses a variety of transitions to manage sequence of events.
Uses dialogue and description to effectively develop events and characters.
Uses sensory details to convey events precisely.
Varies sentence patterns
Uses concrete words and phrases to convey events precisely
Writing is appropriate to audience
Shows consistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; occasional errors do not significantly interfere with meaning.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Structure
Orients the reader skillfully by establishing a situation and introducing a narrator and/or characters.
Organizes a clear event sequence that unfolds naturally.
Provides a conclusion that follows from and brings resolution to the narration.
Skillfully uses a variety of transitions to manage sequence of events.
Uses dialogue and description to develop events and characters effectively and thoroughly.
Development
Uses sensory details to convey events precisely and vividly.
Uses concrete words and phrases to convey events precisely and vividly
Writing shows exceptional awareness and skill in addressing audience’s needs
Shows strong command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors are few.
Style
Conventions
Implementation Guide Resources 155 © Great Minds PBC
4: Narrative
Grade
Writing
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not respond to prompt; off-topic.
Responds to some elements of prompt.
Piece lacks focus on topic.
Does not introduce topic.
Often departs from focus on topic.
Ideas are unrelated and disorganized.
Introduces topic in an incomplete or unclear way.
Does not provide a conclusion.
Does not use transitions to link ideas.
Ideas are somewhat organized but may be unrelated or lumped together.
Provides a conclusion that is incomplete or may not relate to the explanation.
Inconsistently or inappropriately uses transitions to link ideas.
Does not use evidence from text(s).
Develops topic with evidence from text(s).
Does not elaborate upon evidence.
Elaborates upon evidence vaguely or superficially.
Sentence patterns are basic and repetitive.
Uses limited vocabulary inappropriate to the content.
Writing is inappropriate to audience.
Does not show command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
Varies sentence patterns occasionally.
Uses general vocabulary with a few domain-specific words.
Writing is appropriate to audience.
Shows inconsistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; some errors interfere with meaning.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Responds to all elements of prompt.
Provides a focus for topic and maintains focus throughout piece, with occasional departures.
Introduces topic clearly.
Organizes related information into paragraphs and sections.
Provides a conclusion that relates to the explanation.
Uses transitions to link ideas within categories.
Develops topic with evidence from text(s) that is related to the topic
Elaborates upon evidence with explanation or analysis.
Varies sentence patterns.
Uses domain-specific vocabulary.
Writing is appropriate to audience.
Shows consistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; occasional errors do not significantly interfere with meaning.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Structure
Provides a focus for topic and maintains focus throughout piece.
Introduces topic clearly and thoroughly.
Organizes related information logically and effectively into paragraphs and sections.
Provides a strong conclusion that relates to and expands on the explanation.
Skillfully uses transitions to link ideas within and across categories.
Develops topic with a variety of evidence from text(s) that is closely related to the topic.
Development
Elaborates upon evidence thoroughly with accurate analysis.
Varies sentence patterns for clarity, interest, style.
Uses precise language and domain-specific vocabulary.
Writing shows exceptional awareness and skill in addressing audience’s needs.
Shows strong command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors are few.
Style
Conventions
Implementation Guide Resources 156 © Great Minds PBC Grade 5: Informative/Explanatory Writing
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not respond to prompt; offtopic.
Piece lacks focus on opinion/point of view.
Does not introduce topic or text(s).
Does not state an opinion.
Ideas are unrelated and disorganized.
Does not provide a conclusion.
Does not use transitions to link opinion and reasons.
Does not support opinion with reasons or evidence from text(s).
Does not elaborate upon evidence.
Sentence patterns are basic and repetitive.
Uses limited vocabulary inappropriate to the content.
Writing is inappropriate to audience.
Does not show command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
Responds to some elements of prompt.
Often departs from focus on opinion/point of view.
Introduces topic or text(s) in an incomplete or unclear way.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Responds to all elements of prompt.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Maintains focus on opinion/point of view throughout piece, with occasional departures.
Introduces topic or text(s) clearly.
States an unclear opinion.
Ideas are somewhat organized but may be unrelated or lumped together.
Provides a conclusion that is incomplete or may not relate to the opinion.
Inconsistently or inappropriately uses transitions to link opinion and reasons.
Provides reasons that may not clearly support opinion or are not well-supported by evidence from text(s).
Elaborates upon evidence vaguely or superficially.
Varies sentence patterns occasionally.
Uses general vocabulary with a few domain-specific words.
Writing is appropriate to audience.
Shows inconsistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; some errors interfere with meaning.
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Structure
Maintains focus on opinion/point of view throughout piece.
Introduces topic or text(s) clearly and thoroughly.
States an opinion.
Organizes related ideas to support opinion.
Provides a conclusion that relates to the opinion.
Uses transitions to link opinion and reasons.
Supports opinion with reasons that are supported by evidence from text(s).
Elaborates upon evidence.
Varies sentence patterns.
Uses domain-specific vocabulary.
Writing is appropriate to audience.
Shows consistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; occasional errors do not significantly interfere with meaning.
States opinion clearly.
Organizes related ideas logically to support opinion.
Provides a strong conclusion that relates to and expands on the opinion.
Skillfully uses transitions to link opinion and reasons.
Supports opinion with logically ordered reasons that are supported by a variety of evidence from text(s).
Development
Elaborates upon evidence thoroughly.
Varies sentence patterns for clarity, interest, style.
Uses precise language and domainspecific vocabulary.
Style
Writing shows exceptional awareness and skill in addressing audience’s needs.
Shows strong command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors are few.
Conventions
Implementation Guide Resources 157 © Great Minds PBC
5: Opinion Writing
Grade
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not respond to prompt; off-topic.
Responds to some elements of prompt.
Does not establish a situation for the reader; narrator and/ or characters are lacking or undefined.
Partially orients the reader by establishing a situation and introducing a narrator and/or characters in an unclear way.
Events unfold in a random or confusing manner so that reader cannot follow a sequence.
Organizes an event sequence that may be occasionally confusing or have logical gaps.
Does not provide a conclusion.
Does not use transitions to sequence events.
Provides a conclusion that is incomplete or does not follow from the narrated experiences or events.
Inconsistently or inappropriately uses transitions to manage sequence of events.
Does not use dialogue or description to develop events and characters.
Uses occasional or brief dialogue and description to develop events and characters.
Includes few or no sensory details.
Uses some sensory details to convey events.
Sentence patterns are basic and repetitive.
Includes few or no concrete words and phrases.
Writing is inappropriate to audience.
Does not show command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
Varies sentence patterns occasionally.
Uses some concrete words and phrases to convey events.
Writing is somewhat appropriate to audience.
Shows inconsistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; some errors interfere with meaning.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Responds to all elements of prompt.
Orients the reader by establishing a situation and introducing a narrator and/or characters.
Organizes an event sequence that unfolds naturally.
Provides a conclusion that follows from the narrated experiences or events.
Uses a variety of transitions to manage sequence of events.
Uses dialogue and description to effectively develop events and characters.
Uses sensory details to convey events precisely.
Varies sentence patterns.
Uses concrete words and phrases to convey events precisely.
Writing is appropriate to audience.
Shows consistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; occasional errors do not significantly interfere with meaning.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Structure
Orients the reader skillfully by establishing a situation and introducing a narrator and/or characters.
Organizes a clear event sequence that unfolds naturally.
Provides a conclusion that follows from and brings resolution to the narration.
Skillfully uses a variety of transitions to manage sequence of events.
Uses dialogue, description, and pacing to effectively and thoroughly develop events and characters.
Development
Uses sensory details to convey events precisely and vividly.
Varies sentence patterns for clarity, interest, style.
Style
Uses concrete words and phrases to convey events precisely and vividly.
Writing shows exceptional awareness and skill in addressing audience’s needs.
Shows strong command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors are few.
Conventions
Implementation Guide Resources 158 © Great Minds PBC
5: Narrative
Grade
Writing
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not respond to prompt; offtopic.
Responds to some elements of prompt.
Piece lacks focus on topic.
Often departs from focus on topic.
Does not introduce topic.
Introduces topic in an incomplete or unclear way.
Ideas are disorganized.
Does not provide a conclusion.
Organizes ideas inconsistently.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Responds to all elements of prompt.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Maintains focus on topic throughout piece, with occasional minor departures.
Introduces topic.
Does not use transitions to connect ideas.
Provides a conclusion that is incomplete or may not follow from the focus.
Organizes ideas clearly and effectively.
Inconsistently uses transitions to connect ideas.
Provides a conclusion that follows from the focus.
Uses appropriate transitions to clarify relationships.
Does not use relevant evidence from text(s).
Develops topic with insufficient relevant evidence from text(s).
Develops topic with sufficient, relevant evidence from text(s).
Does not elaborate upon evidence.
Elaborates upon evidence vaguely or superficially.
Elaborates upon evidence with accurate analysis.
Sentence patterns are basic and repetitive.
Varies sentence patterns occasionally for clarity or interest.
Varies sentence patterns for clarity and interest.
Uses limited vocabulary inappropriate to the content.
Uses general vocabulary with a few domain-specific words.
Uses domain-specific vocabulary.
Mostly expresses ideas precisely.
Language is imprecise and lacks concision, often wordy or redundant.
Language is occasionally precise and may be unnecessarily wordy.
Establishes a formal style, with occasional minor lapses.
Uses an inappropriately informal style.
Attempts to use a formal style but with many lapses.
Writing is appropriate to audience.
Writing is inappropriate to audience.
Writing is somewhat appropriate to audience.
Does not show command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
Shows inconsistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; some errors interfere with meaning.
Shows consistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; occasional errors do not significantly interfere with meaning.
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Structure
Maintains focus on topic throughout piece.
Introduces topic.
Organizes ideas clearly and effectively.
Provides a strong conclusion that follows from and expands on the focus.
Uses appropriate transitions to clarify relationships.
Develops topic with relevant, sufficient evidence from text(s).
Development
Elaborates upon evidence thoroughly with accurate, insightful analysis.
Varies sentence patterns for clarity, interest, emphasis, and style.
Uses precise language and domainspecific vocabulary.
Style
Consistently expresses ideas precisely.
Establishes and maintains a consistent, formal, and engaging style.
Writing shows exceptional awareness and skill in addressing audience’s needs.
Shows strong command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors are minor and few.
Conventions
Implementation Guide Resources 159 © Great Minds PBC
Grade
6: Informative/Explanatory Writing
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not respond to prompt; offtopic.
Piece lacks focus on claim or argues in support of alternate/opposing claims.
Does not introduce claim.
Reasons and evidence are disorganized.
Does not provide a conclusion.
Does not use transitions to connect ideas.
Does not support claim with reasons; lacks relevant, accurate evidence from text(s).
Does not elaborate upon evidence.
Sentence patterns are basic and repetitive.
Uses limited vocabulary inappropriate to the content.
Language is imprecise and lacks concision, often wordy or redundant.
Uses an inappropriately informal style.
Writing is inappropriate to audience.
Does not show command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
Responds to some elements of prompt.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Often departs from focus on claim; may at times argue in support of alternate/opposing claims.
Introduces claim in an incomplete or unclear way.
Organizes reasons and evidence inconsistently.
Provides a conclusion that is incomplete or may not follow from the focus.
Inconsistently uses transitions to connect ideas.
Supports claim with unclear reasons and evidence from text(s) that is occasionally irrelevant or inaccurate.
Elaborates upon evidence vaguely or superficially.
Varies sentence patterns occasionally for clarity or interest.
Uses general vocabulary with a few domain-specific words.
Language is occasionally precise and may be unnecessarily wordy.
Attempts to use a formal style but with many lapses.
Writing is somewhat appropriate to audience.
Shows inconsistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; some errors interfere with meaning.
Responds to all elements of prompt.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Maintains focus by arguing in support of claim throughout piece, with occasional minor departures.
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Maintains focus by arguing in support of claim throughout piece.
Structure
Introduces claim clearly.
Organizes reasons and evidence clearly.
Provides a conclusion that follows from the focus.
Uses appropriate transitions to clarify relationships.
Supports claim with clear reasons and relevant, accurate evidence from text(s).
Elaborates upon evidence.
Varies sentence patterns for clarity and interest.
Uses domain-specific vocabulary.
Mostly expresses ideas precisely.
Establishes a formal style, with occasional minor lapses.
Writing is appropriate to audience.
Shows consistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; occasional errors do not significantly interfere with meaning.
Introduces claim clearly and thoroughly.
Organizes reasons and evidence clearly.
Provides a strong conclusion that follows from and expands on the focus.
Uses appropriate transitions to clarify relationships.
Supports claim with clear reasons and well-chosen, relevant, and accurate evidence from text(s).
Development
Elaborates upon evidence thoroughly and insightfully.
Varies sentence patterns for clarity, emphasis, interest, and style.
Uses precise language and domainspecific vocabulary.
Style
Consistently expresses ideas precisely.
Establishes and maintains a consistent, formal, and engaging style.
Writing shows exceptional awareness and skill in addressing audience’s needs.
Shows strong command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors are minor and few.
Conventions
Implementation Guide Resources 160 © Great Minds PBC Grade 6: Argument Writing
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not respond to prompt; offtopic.
Does not establish a context for the reader; narrator and/or characters are lacking or undefined.
Events unfold in a random or confusing manner so that reader cannot follow a sequence.
Does not provide a conclusion.
Does not use transitions to convey sequence; shifts in chronology and setting are confusing.
Does not use narrative techniques to develop events and characters.
Includes few or no descriptive details and sensory language.
Sentence patterns are basic and repetitive.
Includes few or no precise words and phrases.
Writing is inappropriate to audience.
Does not show command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
Responds to some elements of prompt.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Orients the reader by partially establishing a context and briefly or unclearly introducing a narrator and/ or characters.
Organizes an event sequence that may be occasionally confusing or have logical gaps.
Provides a conclusion that is incomplete or may not follow from the narrated events.
Inconsistently uses transitions to convey sequence; shifts in chronology and setting may be confusing.
Uses a few narrative techniques to develop events and characters.
Uses some descriptive details or sensory language to convey events.
Varies sentence patterns occasionally for clarity or interest.
Uses some precise words and phrases to convey events.
Writing is somewhat appropriate to audience.
Shows inconsistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; some errors interfere with meaning.
Responds to all elements of prompt.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Engages and orients the reader by establishing a context and introducing a narrator and/or characters.
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Engages and orients the reader by establishing a context and introducing a narrator and/or characters.
Structure
Organizes an event sequence that unfolds naturally and logically.
Provides a conclusion that follows from the narrated events.
Organizes a well-structured event sequence that unfolds naturally and logically.
Uses a variety of transitions to convey sequence and signal shifts in chronology and setting.
Provides a strong conclusion that follows from the narrated events.
Skillfully uses a variety of transitions to convey sequence, signal shifts in chronology and setting.
Uses narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, and description, to effectively develop events and characters.
Uses narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, and description, to effectively and thoroughly develop events and characters.
Development
Uses relevant descriptive details and sensory language to convey events.
Uses relevant descriptive details and sensory language to vividly convey events.
Varies sentence patterns for clarity and interest.
Uses precise words and phrases to convey events.
Writing is appropriate to audience.
Shows consistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; occasional errors do not significantly interfere with meaning.
Varies sentence patterns for clarity, interest, emphasis, and style.
Uses precise words and phrases to vividly convey events.
Style
Writing shows exceptional awareness and skill in addressing audience’s needs.
Shows strong command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors are minor and few.
Conventions
Implementation Guide Resources 161 © Great Minds PBC
Grade 6: Narrative Writing
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not respond to prompt; offtopic.
Piece lacks focus on topic.
Does not introduce topic.
Ideas are disorganized.
Does not provide a conclusion.
Does not use transitions to connect ideas.
Does not use relevant evidence from text(s)
Does not elaborate upon evidence
Sentence patterns are basic and repetitive.
Uses limited vocabulary inappropriate to the content.
Language is imprecise and lacks concision, often wordy or redundant.
Uses an inappropriately informal style.
Writing is inappropriate to audience.
Does not show command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
Responds to some elements of prompt.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Often departs from focus on topic.
Introduces topic in an incomplete or unclear way.
Organizes ideas inconsistently.
Provides a conclusion that is incomplete or may not follow from the focus.
Inconsistently uses transitions to connect ideas.
Develops topic with insufficient relevant evidence from text(s)
Elaborates upon evidence vaguely or superficially
Varies sentence patterns occasionally for clarity or interest.
Uses general vocabulary with a few domain-specific words.
Language is occasionally precise and may be unnecessarily wordy.
Attempts to use a formal style but with many lapses.
Writing is somewhat appropriate to audience.
Shows inconsistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; some errors interfere with meaning.
Responds to all elements of prompt.
Maintains focus on topic throughout piece, with occasional minor departures.
Introduces topic clearly, previewing what is to follow.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Maintains focus on topic throughout piece.
Structure
Organizes ideas clearly and effectively.
Introduces topic clearly and thoroughly, previewing what is to follow.
Provides a conclusion that follows from and supports the focus.
Organizes ideas clearly and effectively.
Uses appropriate transitions to create cohesion and clarify relationships.
Provides a strong conclusion that follows from, supports, and expands on the focus.
Uses appropriate transitions to create cohesion and clarify relationships.
Develops topic with sufficient, relevant evidence from text(s).
Elaborates upon evidence with accurate analysis.
Varies sentence patterns for clarity and interest.
Uses domain-specific vocabulary.
Mostly expresses ideas precisely and concisely.
Establishes a formal style, with occasional minor lapses.
Writing is appropriate to audience.
Shows consistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; occasional errors do not significantly interfere with meaning.
Develops topic with relevant and sufficient evidence from text(s).
Development
Elaborates upon evidence thoroughly with accurate, insightful analysis.
Varies sentence patterns for clarity, interest, emphasis, and style.
Uses precise language and domainspecific vocabulary.
Style
Consistently expresses ideas precisely and concisely.
Establishes and maintains a consistent, formal, and engaging style.
Writing shows exceptional awareness and skill in addressing audience’s needs.
Shows strong command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors are minor and few.
Conventions
Implementation Guide Resources 162 © Great Minds PBC
7: Informative/Explanatory Writing
Grade
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not respond to prompt; offtopic.
Piece lacks focus on claim or argues in support of alternate/opposing claims.
Does not introduce claim.
Reasons and evidence are disorganized.
Does not provide a conclusion.
Does not use transitions to connect ideas.
Does not support claim with reasons; lacks relevant, accurate evidence from text(s).
Does not elaborate upon evidence.
Sentence patterns are basic and repetitive.
Uses limited vocabulary inappropriate to the content.
Language is imprecise and lacks concision, often wordy or redundant.
Uses an inappropriately informal style.
Writing is inappropriate to audience.
Does not show command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
Responds to some elements of prompt.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Often departs from focus on claim; may at times argue in support of alternate/opposing claims.
Introduces claim in an incomplete or unclear way.
Organizes reasons and evidence inconsistently.
Provides a conclusion that is incomplete or may not follow from the focus.
Inconsistently uses transitions to connect ideas.
Supports claim with unclear reasons and evidence from text(s) that is occasionally irrelevant or inaccurate.
Elaborates upon evidence vaguely or superficially.
Varies sentence patterns occasionally for clarity or interest.
Uses general vocabulary with a few domain-specific words.
Language is occasionally precise and may be unnecessarily wordy.
Attempts to use a formal style but with many lapses.
Writing is somewhat appropriate to audience.
Shows inconsistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; some errors interfere with meaning.
Responds to all elements of prompt.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Maintains focus by arguing in support of claim throughout piece, with occasional minor departures.
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Maintains focus by arguing in support of claim throughout piece.
Structure
Introduces claim clearly, acknowledging counterclaim(s)
Organizes reasons and evidence clearly and mostly logically.
Provides a conclusion that follows from and supports the focus.
Uses appropriate transitions to create cohesion and clarify relationships.
Supports claim with clear, logical reasons and relevant, accurate evidence from text(s).
Elaborates upon evidence.
Varies sentence patterns for clarity and interest.
Uses domain-specific vocabulary.
Mostly expresses ideas precisely and concisely.
Establishes a formal style, with occasional minor lapses.
Writing is appropriate to audience.
Shows consistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; occasional errors do not significantly interfere with meaning.
Introduces claim clearly and thoroughly, acknowledging counterclaim(s).
Organizes reasons and evidence clearly and logically.
Provides a strong conclusion that follows from, supports, and expands on the focus.
Uses appropriate transitions to create cohesion and clarify relationships.
Supports claim with clear, logical reasons and well-chosen, relevant, and accurate evidence from text(s).
Development
Elaborates upon evidence thoroughly and insightfully.
Varies sentence patterns for clarity, emphasis, interest, and style.
Uses precise language and domainspecific vocabulary.
Style
Consistently expresses ideas precisely and concisely.
Establishes and maintains a consistent, formal, and engaging style.
Writing shows exceptional awareness and skill in addressing audience’s needs.
Shows strong command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors are minor and few.
Conventions
Implementation Guide Resources 163 © Great Minds PBC Grade 7: Argument Writing
Grade 7: Narrative Writing
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not respond to prompt; offtopic.
Does not establish a context for the reader; narrator and/or characters are lacking or undefined.
Events unfold in a random or confusing manner so that reader cannot follow a sequence.
Does not provide a conclusion.
Does not use transitions to convey sequence; shifts in chronology and setting are confusing.
Does not use narrative techniques to develop events and characters
Includes few or no descriptive details and sensory language.
Sentence patterns are basic and repetitive.
Includes few or no precise words and phrases.
Writing is inappropriate to audience.
Does not show command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
Responds to some elements of prompt.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Orients the reader by partially establishing a context and briefly or unclearly introducing a narrator and/ or characters.
Organizes an event sequence that may be occasionally confusing or have logical gaps.
Provides a conclusion that is incomplete or may not follow from the narrated events.
Inconsistently uses transitions to convey sequence; shifts in chronology and setting may be confusing.
Uses a few narrative techniques to develop events and characters.
Uses some descriptive details or sensory language to convey events.
Varies sentence patterns occasionally for clarity or interest.
Uses some precise words and phrases to convey events.
Writing is somewhat appropriate to audience.
Shows inconsistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; some errors interfere with meaning.
Responds to all elements of prompt.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Engages and orients the reader by establishing a context and point of view and introducing a narrator and/ or characters.
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Structure
Engages and orients the reader by establishing a context and
Organizes an event sequence that unfolds naturally and logically.
consistently controlled point of view and introducing a narrator and/or characters.
Provides a conclusion that follows from the narrated events.
Organizes a well-structured event sequence that unfolds naturally and logically.
Uses a variety of transitions to convey sequence and signal shifts in chronology and setting.
Provides a strong conclusion that follows from and reflects on the narrated events.
Skillfully uses a variety of transitions to convey sequence and signal shifts in chronology and setting.
Uses narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, and description, to effectively develop events and characters.
Uses narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, description to
Development
effectively and thoroughly develop events and characters.
Uses relevant descriptive details and sensory language to convey events.
Uses relevant descriptive details and sensory language to capture action and vividly convey events.
Varies sentence patterns for clarity and interest.
Uses precise words and phrases to convey events.
Writing is appropriate to audience.
Shows consistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; occasional errors do not significantly interfere with meaning.
Varies sentence patterns for clarity, interest, emphasis, and style.
Uses precise words and phrases to vividly convey events.
Style
Writing shows exceptional awareness and skill in addressing audience’s needs.
Shows strong command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors are minor and few.
Conventions
Implementation Guide Resources 164 © Great Minds PBC
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not respond to prompt; offtopic.
Piece lacks focus on topic.
Does not introduce topic.
Ideas are disorganized.
Does not provide a conclusion.
Does not use transitions to connect ideas.
Does not use relevant evidence from text(s)
Does not elaborate upon evidence
Sentence patterns are basic and repetitive.
Uses limited vocabulary inappropriate to the content.
Language is imprecise and lacks concision, often wordy or redundant.
Uses an inappropriately informal style.
Writing is inappropriate to audience.
Does not show command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
Responds to some elements of prompt.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Often departs from focus on topic.
Introduces topic in an incomplete or unclear way.
Organizes ideas inconsistently.
Provides a conclusion that is incomplete or may not follow from the focus.
Inconsistently uses transitions to connect ideas.
Does not use relevant evidence from text(s)
Does not elaborate upon evidence
Varies sentence patterns occasionally for clarity or interest.
Uses general vocabulary with a few domain-specific words.
Language is occasionally precise and may be unnecessarily wordy.
Attempts to use a formal style but with many lapses.
Writing is somewhat appropriate to audience.
Shows inconsistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; some errors interfere with meaning.
Responds to all elements of prompt.
Maintains focus on topic throughout piece with occasional minor departures.
Introduces topic clearly, previewing what is to follow.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Maintains focus on topic throughout piece.
Structure
Organizes ideas clearly and effectively.
Introduces topic clearly and thoroughly, previewing what is to follow.
Provides a conclusion that follows from and supports the focus.
Organizes ideas clearly and effectively into broader categories.
Uses appropriate transitions to create cohesion and clarify relationships.
Provides a strong conclusion that follows from, supports, and expands on the focus.
Uses appropriate and varied transitions to create cohesion and clarify relationships.
Develops topic with sufficient, relevant evidence from text(s).
Develops topic with relevant, sufficient, well-chosen evidence from text(s).
Development
Elaborates upon evidence with accurate analysis.
Elaborates upon evidence thoroughly with accurate, insightful analysis.
Varies sentence patterns for clarity and interest.
Uses domain-specific vocabulary.
Mostly expresses ideas precisely and concisely.
Establishes a formal style, with occasional minor lapses.
Writing is appropriate to audience.
Shows consistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; occasional errors do not significantly interfere with meaning.
Varies sentence patterns for clarity, interest, emphasis, and style.
Uses precise language and domainspecific vocabulary.
Style
Consistently expresses ideas precisely and concisely.
Establishes and maintains a consistent, formal, and engaging style.
Writing shows exceptional awareness and skill in addressing audience’s needs.
Shows strong command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors are minor and few.
Conventions
Implementation Guide Resources 165 © Great Minds PBC
8: Informative/Explanatory Writing
Grade
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not respond to prompt; offtopic.
Piece lacks focus on claim or argues in support of alternate/opposing claims.
Does not introduce claim.
Reasons and evidence are disorganized.
Does not provide a conclusion.
Does not use transitions to connect ideas.
Does not support claim with reasons; lacks relevant, accurate evidence from text(s).
Does not elaborate upon evidence.
Sentence patterns are basic and repetitive.
Uses limited vocabulary inappropriate to the content.
Language is imprecise and lacks concision, often wordy or redundant.
Uses an inappropriately informal style.
Writing is inappropriate to audience.
Does not show command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
Responds to some elements of prompt.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Often departs from focus on claim; may at times argue in support of alternate/opposing claims.
Introduces claim in an incomplete or unclear way.
Organizes reasons and evidence inconsistently.
Provides a conclusion that is incomplete or may not follow from the focus.
Inconsistently uses transitions to connect ideas.
Supports claim with unclear reasons and evidence from text(s) that is occasionally irrelevant or inaccurate.
Elaborates upon evidence vaguely or superficially.
Varies sentence patterns occasionally for clarity or interest.
Uses general vocabulary with a few domain-specific words.
Language is occasionally precise and may be unnecessarily wordy.
Attempts to use a formal style but with many lapses.
Writing is somewhat appropriate to audience.
Shows inconsistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; some errors interfere with meaning.
Responds to all elements of prompt.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Maintains focus by arguing in support of claim throughout piece with occasional minor departures.
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Maintains focus by arguing in support of claim throughout piece.
Structure
Introduces claim clearly, acknowledging counterclaim(s).
Organizes reasons and evidence clearly and mostly logically.
Provides a conclusion that follows from and supports the focus.
Uses appropriate transitions to create cohesion and clarify relationships.
Supports claim with clear, logical reasons and relevant, accurate evidence from text(s).
Elaborates upon evidence.
Varies sentence patterns for clarity and interest.
Uses domain-specific vocabulary.
Mostly expresses ideas precisely and concisely.
Establishes a formal style, with occasional minor lapses.
Writing is appropriate to audience.
Shows consistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; occasional errors do not significantly interfere with meaning.
Introduces claim clearly and thoroughly, acknowledging and distinguishing counterclaim(s).
Organizes reasons and evidence clearly and logically.
Provides a strong conclusion that follows from, supports, and expands on the focus.
Uses appropriate and varied transitions to create cohesion and clarify relationships.
Supports claim with clear, logical reasons and well-chosen, relevant, and accurate evidence from text(s).
Development
Elaborates upon evidence thoroughly and insightfully.
Varies sentence patterns for clarity, emphasis, interest, and style.
Uses precise language and domainspecific vocabulary.
Style
Consistently expresses ideas precisely and concisely.
Establishes and maintains a consistent, formal, and engaging style.
Writing shows exceptional awareness and skill in addressing audience’s needs.
Shows strong command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors are minor and few.
Conventions
Implementation Guide Resources 166 © Great Minds PBC Grade 8: Argument Writing
Grade 8: Narrative Writing
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not respond to prompt; offtopic.
Does not establish a context for the reader; narrator and/or characters are lacking or undefined.
Events unfold in a random or confusing manner so that reader cannot follow a sequence.
Does not provide a conclusion.
Does not use transitions to convey sequence; shifts in chronology and setting are confusing.
Does not use narrative techniques to develop events and characters.
Includes few or no descriptive details and sensory language.
Sentence patterns are basic and repetitive.
Includes few or no precise words and phrases.
Writing is inappropriate to audience.
Does not show command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors significantly interfere with overall meaning, and writing is difficult to follow.
Responds to some elements of prompt.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Orients the reader by partially establishing a context and briefly or unclearly introducing a narrator and/ or characters.
Organizes an event sequence that may be occasionally confusing or have logical gaps.
Provides a conclusion that is incomplete or may not follow from the narrated events.
Inconsistently uses transitions to convey sequence; shifts in chronology and setting may be confusing.
Uses a few narrative techniques to develop events and characters.
Uses some descriptive details or sensory language to convey events.
Varies sentence patterns occasionally for clarity or interest.
Uses some precise words and phrases to convey events.
Writing is somewhat appropriate to audience.
Shows inconsistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; some errors interfere with meaning.
Responds to all elements of prompt.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Engages and orients the reader by establishing a context and point of view and introducing a narrator and/ or characters.
Responds thoroughly to all elements of prompt.
Structure
Engages and orients the reader by establishing a context and
Organizes an event sequence that unfolds naturally and logically.
consistently controlled point of view and introducing a narrator and/or characters.
Provides a conclusion that follows from the narrated events.
Organizes a well-structured event sequence that unfolds naturally and logically.
Uses a variety of transitions to convey sequence and signal shifts in chronology and setting.
Provides a strong conclusion that follows from and reflects on the narrated events.
Skillfully uses a variety of transitions to convey sequence, signal shifts in chronology and setting, and show relationships among events.
Uses narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, and description, to effectively develop events and characters.
Uses narrative techniques, such as dialogue, pacing, description, and reflection, to effectively and thoroughly develop events and characters.
Development
Uses relevant descriptive details and sensory language to convey events.
Uses relevant descriptive details and sensory language to capture action and vividly convey events.
Varies sentence patterns for clarity and interest.
Uses precise words and phrases to convey events.
Writing is appropriate to audience.
Shows consistent command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; occasional errors do not significantly interfere with meaning.
Varies sentence patterns for clarity, interest, emphasis, and style.
Uses precise words and phrases to vividly convey events.
Style
Writing shows exceptional awareness and skill in addressing audience’s needs.
Shows strong command of grammar, mechanics, spelling, and usage; errors are minor and few.
Conventions
Implementation Guide Resources 167 © Great Minds PBC
Kindergarten: Speaking and Listening
SPEAKING AND LISTENING RUBRICS
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not ask questions.
Does not answer questions.
Does not yet talk about familiar people, places, things, and events.
Does not respond to requests.
Does not use drawings.
Does not yet speak audibly and clearly.
Does not speak in conversations.
Follows few, if any, agreed-upon rules for conversations.
Rarely, if ever, tracks speakers.
Doesn’t remember what is heard.
Asks questions sometimes.
Answers questions sometimes.
Names familiar people, places, things, and events.
Says more when requested.
Uses drawings when speaking.
Speaks audibly or clearly.
Speaks in conversations.
Follows some agreed-upon rules for conversations.
Sometimes tracks speakers.
Can recognize what is heard.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Asks clarifying questions.
Answers clarifying questions.
Describes familiar people, places, things, and events.
Provides examples when requested.
Uses drawings to add detail to spoken descriptions.
Speaks audibly and clearly.
Speaks in conversations through multiple exchanges.
Follows most agreed-upon rules for conversations.
Tracks speakers with eyes.
Can repeat back what is heard.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Asks clarifying questions.
Structure
Answers clarifying questions.
Describes familiar people, places, things, and events in detail.
Development
Provides examples when speaking.
Uses drawings to strengthen spoken descriptions.
Style
Expresses clearly with effective volume.
Conventions
Alternates speaking and listening in conversations through multiple exchanges.
Follows all agreed-upon rules for conversations.
Eye contact and body language demonstrate attention.
Can repeat back what is heard in sequence from memory.
Process
Listening
Implementation Guide Resources 168 © Great Minds PBC
1: Speaking and Listening
Grade
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not ask questions.
Does not answer questions.
Does not request more information.
Does not yet describe familiar people, places, things, and events using details.
Does not respond to requests.
Does not use drawings.
Does not express ideas and feelings.
Does not yet speak audibly and clearly.
Does not yet speak in complete sentences.
Does not speak in conversations.
Follows few, if any, agreed-upon rules for conversations.
Rarely, if ever, responds to what others say.
Sometimes tracks speakers.
Doesn’t remember what is heard.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Asks questions. Answers questions.
Asks questions about key details.
Sometimes requests more information.
Answers questions about key details.
Requests more information to clear up confusion.
Describes familiar people, places, things, and events with some details.
Describes familiar people, places, things, and events using relevant details.
Says more when requested.
Uses drawings when speaking.
Expresses ideas and feelings.
Speaks audibly or clearly.
Sometimes speaks in complete sentences.
Speaks in conversations.
Follows some agreed-upon rules for conversations.
Sometimes responds to what others say.
Tracks speakers.
Can repeat back what is heard.
Provides examples when requested.
Uses drawings to add detail to spoken descriptions.
Expresses ideas and feelings clearly.
Speaks audibly and clearly.
Speaks in complete sentences.
Speaks in conversations through multiple exchanges.
Follows most agreed-upon rules for conversations.
Responds to what others say.
Eye contact and body language demonstrate attention.
Can repeat back what is heard in sequence.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Asks clarifying and probing questions about key details.
Structure
Answers clarifying and probing questions about key details.
Requests elaboration to further understanding.
Richly describes familiar people, places, things, and events using many relevant details.
Development
Provides examples when speaking.
Uses drawings to strengthen spoken descriptions,
Style
Expresses ideas and feelings with clarity and expression.
Expresses clearly with effective volume.
Conventions
Speaks in complete and complex sentences.
Alternates speaking and listening in conversations through multiple exchanges.
Follows all agreed-upon rules for conversations.
Responds directly to what others say.
Eye contact and body language demonstrate interest.
Can repeat back what is heard in sequence from memory.
Process
Listening
Implementation Guide Resources 169 © Great Minds PBC
2: Speaking and Listening
Grade
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not ask questions.
Does not answer questions.
Does not request more information.
Speaks off topic.
Does not yet report on topics and texts using details.
Does not recount stories and experiences.
Does not respond to requests.
Does not use drawings.
Does not express ideas and feelings.
Does not yet use inflection.
Does not yet speak audibly and clearly.
Does not yet consistently speak in complete sentences.
Does not yet speak in conversations.
Follows few, if any, agreed-upon rules for conversations.
Rarely, if ever, links comments to comments of others.
Does not yet use kind words.
Sometimes tracks speakers.
Doesn’t yet remember what is heard.
Does not yet cue the speaker.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Asks questions. Answers questions.
Asks questions about key details.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Answers questions about key details.
Asks clarifying and probing questions about key details.
Structure
Sometimes requests more information. Speaks about related ideas.
Requests more information to clear up confusion.
Speaks on topic.
Reports on topics and texts using details.
Reports on topics and texts using relevant and descriptive details.
Recounts stories and experiences with some facts and details.
Recounts stories and experiences with appropriate facts and relevant details.
Says more when requested.
Provides clarification when requested.
Uses drawings when speaking.
Expresses ideas and feelings.
Uses drawings to add detail to spoken descriptions.
Uses inflection to indicate questions or statements.
Expresses ideas and feelings clearly.
Varies inflection to express meaning.
Speaks audibly or clearly.
Speaks in complete sentences.
Speaks in conversations.
Follows some agreed-upon rules for conversations.
Sometimes links comments to comments of others.
Sometimes uses kind words.
Tracks speakers. Can repeat back what is heard.
Sometimes gives the speaker cues.
Speaks audibly and clearly.
Speaks in coherent sentences.
Speaks in conversations through multiple exchanges.
Follows most agreed-upon rules for conversations.
Links comments to comments of others.
Uses kind words.
Eye contact and body language demonstrate attention.
Can repeat back what is heard in sequence.
Cues the speaker with gestures and/or facial expressions.
Answers clarifying and probing questions about key details.
Requests elaboration to further understanding.
Speaks on topic and prompts others to do the same.
Reports thoroughly on topics and texts using relevant and descriptive details.
Development
Recounts stories and experiences with appropriate facts and relevant details.
Anticipates and provides clarification when speaking.
Uses drawings to strengthen spoken descriptions.
Style
Expresses ideas and feelings with clarity and expression.
Varies inflection to express meaning and engage audience.
Expresses clearly with effective volume.
Conventions
Speaks in coherent and complex sentences.
Alternates speaking and listening in conversations through multiple exchanges.
Follows all agreed-upon rules for conversations.
Links comments to comments of others effectively.
Process
Uses kind words and tone.
Eye contact and body language demonstrate interest.
Can repeat back what is heard in sequence from memory.
Listening
Listens actively and cues the speaker with gestures and facial expressions.
Implementation Guide Resources 170 © Great Minds PBC
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not yet ask questions about key details.
Asks questions about key details.
Does not yet answer questions about key details.
Answers questions about key details.
Does not request more information.
Sometimes requests more information.
Speaks about related ideas.
Speaks off topic.
Does not yet report on topics and texts using details.
Reports on topics and texts using details.
Does not recount stories and experiences.
Recounts stories and experiences with some facts and details.
Does not respond to requests.
Does not prepare for discussions.
Does not use drawings.
Does not express ideas and feelings.
Does not yet use inflection.
Says more when requested.
Reads text for discussions.
Uses drawings when speaking.
Expresses ideas and feelings.
Uses inflection to indicate questions or statements.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Asks questions about main ideas and key details.
Answers questions about main ideas and key details.
Requests more information to clear up confusion.
Speaks on topic.
Reports on topics and texts using relevant and descriptive details.
Recounts stories and experiences with appropriate facts and relevant details.
Provides clarification when requested.
Prepares in advance for discussions.
Uses drawings to add detail to spoken descriptions.
Expresses ideas and feelings clearly.
Varies inflection to express meaning.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Asks clarifying and probing questions about main ideas and key details.
Answers clarifying and probing questions about main ideas and key details.
Requests elaboration to further understanding.
Speaks on topic and prompts others to do the same.
Reports thoroughly on topics and texts using relevant and descriptive details.
Recounts stories and experiences with appropriate facts and relevant details.
Anticipates and provides clarification when speaking.
Prepares thoroughly in advance for discussions and draws extensively on that preparation.
Uses drawings to strengthen spoken descriptions.
Expresses ideas and feelings with clarity and expression.
Varies inflection to express meaning and engage audience.
Structure
Development
Style
Implementation Guide Resources 171 © Great Minds PBC
Grade 3: Speaking and Listening
3: Speaking and Listening
Grade
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not yet speak audibly or clearly.
Does not yet speak in complete sentences.
Speaks too fast or too slow.
Does not yet speak in conversations.
Follows few, if any, agreed-upon rules for conversations.
Rarely, if ever, links comments to comments of others.
Does not yet indicate agreement or disagreement.
Contributions do not yet indicate compliance.
Does not yet create audio recordings of stories or poems.*
Sometimes track speakers.
Does not yet repeat back what is heard.
Does not yet give the speaker cues.
Speaks audibly or clearly.
Speaks in complete sentences.
Sometimes speaks at an understandable pace.
Speaks in conversations.
Follows some agreed-upon rules for conversations.
Sometimes links comments to comments of others.
Indicates agreement and/or disagreement.
Contributions indicate compliance.
Creates audio recordings of stories or poems.*
Tracks speakers.
Can repeat back what is heard.
Sometimes gives the speaker cues.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Speaks audibly and clearly.
Speaks in coherent sentences.
Speaks at an understandable pace.
Speaks in conversations through multiple exchanges.
Follows most agreed-upon rules for conversations.
Links comments to comments of others.
Agrees and disagrees respectfully.
Contributions indicate engagement.
Creates engaging audio recordings of fluently read stories or poems.*
Eye contact and body language demonstrate attention.
Can repeat back what is heard in sequence.
Cues the speaker with gestures and/or facial expressions.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Expresses clearly with effective volume.
Conventions
Speaks in coherent and complex sentences.
Paces speech dynamically for meaning.
Alternates speaking and listening in conversations through multiple exchanges.
Follows all agreed-upon rules for conversations.
Links comments to comments of others effectively.
Agrees and disagrees respectfully and strategically.
Contributions indicate curiosity.
Creates expressive and engaging audio recordings of fluently read stories or poems.*
Facial expressions and body language demonstrate curiosity.
Can repeat back what is heard in sequence from memory.
Listens actively and cues the speaker with gestures and facial expressions.
Process
Listening
Implementation Guide Resources 172 © Great Minds PBC
4: Speaking and Listening
Grade
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not yet pose questions about key details.
Poses questions about key details.
Does not yet respond to questions about key details.
Responds to questions about key details.
Does not request more information.
Sometimes requests more information.
Does not connect information.
Does not yet report on topics and texts using details.
Does not recount stories and experiences.
Does not yet respond to points in conversations.
Does not yet paraphrase what is read or heard.
Does not prepare for discussions.
Does not use drawings.
Does not express ideas and feelings.
Does not yet use inflection.
Does not yet speak formally.
Sometimes connects information.
Reports on topics and texts using details.
Recounts stories and experiences with some facts and details.
Responds to points in conversations.
Tries to paraphrase what is read or heard.
Reads text for discussions.
Uses drawings when speaking.
Expresses ideas and feelings.
Uses inflection to indicate questions or statements.
Occasionally speaks formally.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Poses clarifying questions about main ideas and key details
Responds to clarifying questions about main ideas and key details.
Requests more information to clear up confusion.
Organizes relevant and related information.
Reports on topics and texts using relevant and descriptive details.
Recounts stories and experiences with appropriate facts and relevant details.
Responds to points and reasons in conversations.
Paraphrases what is read or heard.
Prepares in advance for discussions.
Uses drawings to add detail to spoken descriptions.
Expresses ideas and feelings clearly.
Varies inflection to express meaning.
Speaks formally in academic conversations.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Poses clarifying and probing questions about main ideas and key details.
Structure
Responds to clarifying and probing questions about main ideas and key details.
Requests elaboration to further understanding.
Organizes relevant and related information to strong effect.
Reports thoroughly on topics and texts using relevant and descriptive details.
Development
Recounts stories and experiences with appropriate facts and relevant details.
Responds to and provides points and reasons in conversations.
Precisely paraphrases what is read or heard.
Prepares thoroughly in advance for discussions and draws extensively on that preparation.
Uses drawings to strengthen spoken descriptions.
Style
Expresses ideas and feelings with clarity and expression.
Varies inflection to express meaning and engage audience
Varies formality of speech to context.
Implementation Guide Resources 173 © Great Minds PBC
4: Speaking and Listening
Grade
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not yet speak audibly or clearly.
Does not yet speak in complete sentences.
Speaks too fast or too slow.
Does not yet speak in conversations.
Follows few, if any, agreed-upon rules for conversations.
Rarely, if ever, links comments to comments of others.
Does not yet indicate agreement or disagreement.
Contributions do not yet indicate compliance.
Does not yet create audio recordings of stories or poems.*
Sometimes track speakers.
Attentive in a structured conversation for less than 20 minutes.
Does not yet give the speaker cues.
Speaks audibly or clearly.
Speaks in complete sentences.
Sometimes speaks at an understandable pace.
Speaks in conversations.
Follows agreed-upon rules for conversations or carries out roles.
Sometimes links comments to comments of others.
Indicates agreement and/or disagreement.
Contributions indicate compliance.
Creates audio recordings of stories or poems.*
Tracks speakers. Attentive in a structured conversation for at least 20 minutes.
Sometimes gives the speaker cues.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Speaks audibly and clearly.
Speaks in coherent sentences.
Speaks at an understandable pace.
Comments contribute to discussion.
Follows norms for conversations and carries out roles.
Links comments to comments of others.
Agrees and disagrees respectfully.
Contributions indicate engagement.
Creates engaging audio recordings of fluently read stories or poems.*
Eye contact and body language demonstrate attention.
Attentive in a structured conversation for at least 30 minutes.
Cues the speaker with gestures and/or facial expressions.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Expresses clearly with effective volume.
Conventions
Speaks in coherent and complex sentences.
Paces speech dynamically for meaning.
Comments contribute significantly to discussion.
Upholds norms for conversations for self and others and carries out roles.
Links comments to comments of others effectively.
Agrees and disagrees respectfully and strategically.
Contributions indicate curiosity.
Creates expressive and engaging audio recordings of fluently read stories or poems.*
Facial expressions and body language demonstrate curiosity.
Attentive in a structured conversation for as long as needed.
Listens actively and cues the speaker with gestures and facial expressions.
Process
Listening
Implementation Guide Resources 174 © Great Minds PBC
5: Speaking and Listening
Grade
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not yet pose questions.
Does not yet respond to questions.
Does not request more information.
Does not connect information.
Does not yet summarize what is read or heard.
Does not yet report on topics and texts using details.
Does not recount stories and experiences.
Does not yet respond to points in conversations.
Does not prepare for discussions.
Does not yet use logic.
Does not use multimedia components.
Word choice doesn’t yet enhance expression.
Does not yet use inflection.
Does not yet speak formally.
Does not yet adapt inflection, tone, or non-verbal expression to audience or purpose.
Poses clarifying questions.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Responds to clarifying questions.
Sometimes requests more information.
Sometimes connects information.
Tries to summarize what is read or heard.
Reports on topics and texts using details.
Recounts stories and experiences with some facts and details.
Responds to points in conversations.
Reads text for discussions.
Responds with some attention to logic.
Uses multimedia components when speaking.
Chooses words to express ideas and feelings.
Adapts inflection, tone, or non-verbal expression to audience or purpose.
Speaks formally in academic conversations.
Poses clarifying questions that contribute to the discussion.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Poses clarifying and probing questions that contribute to the discussion.
Structure
Responds to clarifying questions that contribute to the discussion.
Responds to clarifying and probing questions that contribute to the discussion.
Requests more information to clear up confusion.
Organizes relevant and related information.
Summarizes what is read or heard aloud.
Reports on topics and texts using relevant and descriptive details.
Recounts stories and experiences with appropriate facts and relevant details.
Responds to points and reasons in conversations.
Prepares in advance for discussions.
Logically orders contributions.
Uses multimedia components to add detail to spoken descriptions.
Chooses strong words to express ideas and feelings clearly.
Adapts inflection, tone, and nonverbal expression to audience and purpose.
Varies formality of speech to context.
Requests elaboration to further understanding.
Organizes relevant and related information to strong effect.
Precisely summarizes what is read or heard aloud.
Reports thoroughly on topics and texts using relevant and descriptive details.
Development
Recounts stories and experiences with appropriate facts and relevant details.
Responds to and provides points and reasons in conversations.
Prepares thoroughly in advance for discussions and draws extensively on that preparation.
Logically and strategically orders contributions.
Uses multimedia components to strengthen spoken descriptions.
Style
Chooses precise and meaningful words to express ideas and feelings clearly.
Optimally adapts inflection, tone, and non-verbal expression to audience and purpose.
Effectively varies formality of speech to context.
Implementation Guide Resources 175 © Great Minds PBC
5: Speaking and Listening
Grade
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not yet speak audibly or clearly.
Does not yet speak in complete sentences.
Speaks too fast or too slow.
Does not yet speak in conversations.
Follows few, if any, agreed-upon rules for conversations.
Does not yet link comments to comments of others.
Does not yet indicate agreement or disagreement.
Speaks audibly or clearly.
Speaks in complete sentences.
Sometimes speaks at an understandable pace.
Speaks in conversations.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Follows agreed-upon rules for conversations or carries out roles.
Links comments to comments of others.
Speaks audibly and clearly.
Speaks in coherent sentences.
Speaks at an understandable pace.
Comments contribute to discussion.
Follows norms for conversations and carries out roles.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Expresses clearly with effective volume.
Conventions
Speaks in coherent and complex sentences.
Builds and elaborates on others’ comments.
Indicates agreement and/or disagreement.
Agrees and disagrees respectfully.
Contributions do not yet indicate compliance.
Contributions indicate compliance.
Contributions indicate engagement.
Sometimes track speakers.
Attends to structured conversation for less than 20 minutes.
Does not yet give the speaker cues.
Paces speech dynamically for meaning.
Comments contribute significantly to discussion.
Upholds norms for conversations for self and others and carries out roles.
Builds and elaborates on others’ comments and contributes positively to a collaborative group process.
Agrees and disagrees respectfully and strategically.
Process
Contributions indicate curiosity.
Tracks speakers.
Attends to structured conversation for at least 20 minutes.
Sometimes gives the speaker cues.
Eye contact and body language demonstrate attention.
Facial expressions and body language demonstrate curiosity.
Attends to structured conversation for at least 30 minutes.
Attends to structured conversation for as long as needed.
Listening
Cues the speaker with gestures and/or facial expressions.
Listens actively and cues the speaker with gestures and facial expressions.
Implementation Guide Resources 176 © Great Minds PBC
6: Speaking and Listening
Grade
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not yet pose questions.
Does not yet respond to questions.
Does not request more information.
Does not connect information.
Does not yet present information connected to the topic of study.
Does not yet present claims.
Does not recount stories and experiences.
Does not yet respond to points in conversations.
Does not prepare for discussions.
Does not yet use logic.
Does not use multimedia components.
Word choice doesn’t yet enhance expression.
Does not yet use inflection.
Does not yet speak formally.
Does not yet adapt inflection, tone, or non-verbal expression to audience or purpose.
Poses clarifying questions.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Responds to clarifying questions.
Sometimes requests more information.
Sometimes connects information.
Presents information connected to the topic of study.
Presents claims and some details.
Responds to points in conversations.
Prepares in advance for discussions.
Responds with some attention to logic.
Uses multimedia components when speaking.
Chooses words to express ideas and feelings.
Adapts inflection, tone, or non-verbal expression to audience or purpose.
Speaks formally in academic conversations.
Poses clarifying questions that contribute to the discussion.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Poses clarifying and probing questions that contribute to the discussion.
Structure
Responds to clarifying questions that contribute to the discussion.
Responds to clarifying and probing questions that contribute to the discussion.
Requests more information to clear up confusion.
Organizes relevant and related information.
Interprets information and connects it to the topic of discussion.
Presents claims and findings using pertinent descriptions, facts, and details.
Responds to points and reasons in conversations.
Prepares in advance for discussions and draws on evidence from that preparation.
Logically orders contributions.
Uses multimedia components to add detail to spoken descriptions.
Chooses strong words to express ideas and feelings clearly.
Adapts inflection, tone, and nonverbal expression to audience and purpose.
Varies formality of speech to context.
Requests elaboration to further understanding.
Organizes relevant and related information to strong effect.
Effectively interprets information and connects it to the topic of discussion.
Presents strong claims and findings using pertinent descriptions, facts, and details.
Development
Responds to and provides points and reasons in conversations.
Prepares thoroughly in advance for discussions and draws extensively on evidence from that preparation.
Logically and strategically orders contributions.
Uses multimedia components to strengthen spoken descriptions.
Style
Chooses precise and meaningful words to express ideas and feelings clearly.
Optimally adapts inflection, tone, and non-verbal expression to audience and purpose.
Effectively varies formality of speech to context.
Implementation Guide Resources 177 © Great Minds PBC
Speaking and Listening
Grade
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
Does not yet speak audibly or clearly.
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not yet speak in complete sentences.
Speaks too fast or too slow.
Does not yet make eye contact.
Rarely, if ever, pronounces words clearly.
Does not yet contribute both questions and statements in conversations.
Follows few, if any, agreed-upon rules for conversations.
Does not yet set goals or deadlines.
Does not yet link comments to comments of others.
Does not yet indicate agreement or disagreement.
Contributions do not yet indicate compliance.
Sometimes track speakers.
Attends to structured conversation for less than 20 minutes.
Does not yet give the speaker cues.
Does not yet reflect or paraphrase to consider multiple perspectives.
Speaks audibly or clearly.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Speaks in complete sentences.
Sometimes speaks at an understandable pace.
Occasionally makes eye contact.
Occasionally pronounces words clearly.
Contributes both questions and statements in conversations.
Follows rules for collegial discussions or defines individual roles.
Sets goals or deadlines.
Links comments to comments of others.
Agrees and disagrees respectfully.
Contributions indicate compliance.
Tracks speakers.
Attends to structured conversation for at least 20 minutes.
Sometimes gives the speaker cues.
Reflects or paraphrases to consider multiple perspectives.
Speaks audibly and clearly.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Speaks in coherent sentences.
Speaks at an understandable pace.
Uses appropriate eye contact.
Pronounces words clearly.
Comments balance questions and statements that contribute to discussion.
Follows rules for collegial discussions and defines individual roles.
Sets goals and deadlines.
Builds and elaborates on other’s comments.
Agrees and disagrees respectfully and strategically.
Contributions indicate engagement.
Eye contact and body language demonstrate attention.
Expresses clearly with effective volume.
Conventions
Speaks in coherent and complex sentences.
Paces speech dynamically for meaning.
Uses effective eye contact.
Pronounces words clearly and accurately.
Comments effectively balance questions and statements that contribute significantly to discussion.
Upholds rules for collegial discussions for self and others and carries out defined individual roles.
Sets specific and effective goals and deadlines.
Builds and elaborates on other’s comments and contributes positively to a collaborative group process.
Agrees and disagrees respectfully and strategically, using knowledge of common categories of disagreements.
Process
Contributions indicate curiosity.
Facial expressions and body language demonstrate curiosity.
Attends to structured conversation for at least 30 minutes.
Attends to structured conversation for as long as needed.
Cues the speaker with gestures and/or facial expressions.
Listens actively and cues the speaker with gestures and facial expressions.
Listening
Reflects and paraphrases to consider multiple perspectives.
Reflects and paraphrases strategically to consider multiple perspectives.
Implementation Guide Resources 178 © Great Minds PBC
6:
Speaking and Listening
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not yet pose questions.
Does not yet respond to questions.
Does not request more information.
Does not connect information.
Does not yet present information connected to the topic of study.
Does not yet present claims.
Does not prepare for discussions.
Does not yet use logic.
Does not yet respond to other’s reasoning.
Does not yet acknowledge new ideas.
Does not use multimedia components.
Word choice doesn’t yet enhance expression.
Does not yet use inflection.
Does not yet speak formally.
Does not yet adapt inflection, tone, or non-verbal expression to audience or purpose.
Poses clarifying questions.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Responds to clarifying questions.
Sometimes requests more information.
Sometimes connects information.
Interprets information and connects it to the topic of study.
Presents claims and findings using pertinent descriptions, facts, and details.
Prepares in advance for discussions.
Responds with some attention to logic.
Responds to others’ reasoning.
Acknowledges new ideas.
Uses multimedia components when speaking.
Chooses words to express ideas and feelings.
Adapts inflection, tone, or non-verbal expression to audience or purpose.
Speaks formally in academic conversations.
Poses questions that elicit elaboration.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Responds to questions with relevant observations.
Poses probing questions that elicit elaboration.
Structure
Requests more information to clear up confusion.
Responds to questions with relevant and coherent observations and ideas.
Organizes relevant and related information.
Requests elaboration to further understanding.
Analyzes information and connects it to the topic of discussion.
Organizes relevant and related information to strong effect.
Effectively analyzes information and connects it to the topic of discussion.
Coherently presents claims and findings emphasizing salient points.
Prepares in advance for discussions and draws on evidence from that preparation.
Coherently and effectively presents claims and findings emphasizing salient points.
Development
Logically orders contributions.
Prepares thoroughly in advance for discussions and draws extensively on evidence from that preparation.
Evaluates the soundness of others’ reasoning.
Modifies own views in response to new, stronger ideas.
Uses multimedia components to add detail to spoken descriptions.
Chooses strong words to express ideas and feelings clearly.
Adapts inflection, tone, and nonverbal expression to audience and purpose.
Varies formality of speech to context.
Logically and strategically orders contributions.
Effectively and strategically evaluates the soundness of others’ reasoning.
Effectively reflects on and modifies own views in response to new, stronger ideas.
Uses multimedia components to strengthen spoken descriptions.
Style
Chooses precise and meaningful words to express ideas and feelings clearly.
Optimally adapts inflection, tone, and non-verbal expression to audience and purpose.
Effectively varies formality of speech to context.
Implementation Guide Resources 179 © Great Minds PBC
7:
Grade
Speaking and Listening
Grade
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
Does not yet speak audibly or clearly.
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not yet speak in complete sentences.
Speaks too fast or too slow.
Does not yet make eye contact.
Rarely, if ever, pronounces words clearly.
Does not yet contribute both questions and statements in conversations.
Follows few, if any, agreed-upon rules for conversations.
Does not yet set goals or deadlines.
Does not yet link comments to comments of others.
Does not yet indicate agreement or disagreement.
Contributions do not yet indicate compliance.
Does not yet acknowledge when the discussion is off topic.
Sometimes track speakers.
Attends to structured conversation for less than 20 minutes.
Does not yet give the speaker cues.
Does not yet reflect or paraphrase to consider multiple perspectives.
Speaks audibly or clearly.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Speaks in complete sentences.
Sometimes speaks at an understandable pace.
Occasionally makes eye contact.
Occasionally pronounces words clearly.
Contributes both questions and statements in conversations.
Follows rules for collegial discussions or defines individual roles.
Sets goals or deadlines.
Links comments to comments of others.
Agrees and disagrees respectfully.
Contributions indicate compliance.
Acknowledges when the discussion is off topic.
Tracks speakers.
Attends to structured conversation for at least 20 minutes.
Sometimes gives the speaker cues.
Reflects or paraphrases to consider multiple perspectives.
Speaks audibly and clearly.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Speaks in coherent sentences.
Speaks at an understandable pace.
Uses appropriate eye contact.
Pronounces words clearly.
Comments balance questions and statements that contribute to discussion.
Follows rules for collegial discussions and defines individual roles.
Sets goals and deadlines.
Builds and elaborates on other’s comments.
Agrees and disagrees respectfully and strategically.
Contributions indicate engagement.
Brings the discussion back on topic.
Eye contact and body language demonstrate attention.
Attends to structured conversation for at least 30 minutes.
Cues the speaker with gestures and/or facial expressions.
Reflects and paraphrases to consider multiple perspectives.
Expresses clearly with effective volume.
Conventions
Speaks in coherent and complex sentences.
Paces speech dynamically for meaning.
Uses effective eye contact.
Pronounces words clearly and accurately.
Comments effectively balance questions and statements that contribute significantly to discussion.
Upholds rules for collegial discussions for self and others and carries out defined individual roles.
Sets specific and effective goals and deadlines.
Builds and elaborates on others’ comments and contributes positively to a collaborative group process.
Agrees and disagrees respectfully and strategically, using knowledge of common categories of disagreements.
Process
Contributions indicate curiosity.
Routinely and adeptly brings the discussion back on topic.
Facial expressions and body language demonstrate curiosity.
Attends to structured conversation for as long as needed.
Listens actively and cues the speaker with gestures and facial expressions.
Reflects and paraphrases strategically to consider multiple perspectives.
Listening
Implementation Guide Resources 180 © Great Minds PBC
7:
Speaking and Listening
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not yet pose questions.
Does not yet respond to questions.
Does not connect relevant information.
Does not yet analyze information connected to the topic of study.
Does not yet present claims.
Does not prepare for discussions.
Does not yet use logic.
Does not yet respond to other’s reasoning.
Does not yet acknowledge new ideas.
Does not yet acknowledge the motives behind presentations.
Does not use multimedia components.
Word choice doesn’t yet enhance expression.
Does not yet use inflection.
Does not yet speak formally.
Does not yet adapt inflection, tone, or non-verbal expression to audience or purpose.
Poses questions.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Responds to questions with relevant observations.
Poses questions that connect the ideas of several speakers.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Responds to questions and comments with relevant evidence.
Sometimes connects relevant information.
Analyzes information and connects it to the topic of study.
Organizes relevant and related wellchosen details.
Analyzes the purpose of information presented.
Presents claims and findings using pertinent descriptions, facts, and details.
Coherently presents claims and findings emphasizing salient points.
Prepares in advance for discussions.
Responds with some attention to logic.
Prepares in advance for discussions and draws on evidence from that preparation.
Responds to others’ reasoning.
Acknowledges new ideas.
Acknowledges the motives behind presentations.
Uses multimedia components when speaking. Chooses words to express ideas and feelings.
Adapts inflection, tone, or non-verbal expression to audience or purpose.
Speaks formally in academic conversations.
Logically orders contributions.
Evaluates the soundness and validity of others’ reasoning.
Modifies own views in response to new, stronger ideas.
Analyzes the motives behind presentations.
Uses multimedia components to add detail and interest to spoken descriptions.
Chooses strong words to express ideas and feelings clearly.
Adapts inflection, tone, and nonverbal expression to audience and purpose.
Varies formality of speech to context.
Poses probing questions that connect the ideas of several speakers.
Structure
Adeptly responds to questions and comments with relevant evidence.
Organizes relevant and related wellchosen details to strong effect.
Effectively analyzes the purpose of information presented.
Coherently and effectively presents claims and findings emphasizing salient points.
Development
Prepares thoroughly in advance for discussions and draws extensively on evidence from that preparation.
Logically and strategically orders contributions.
Effectively and strategically evaluates the soundness and validity of others’ reasoning.
Effectively reflects on and modifies own views in response to new, stronger ideas.
Effectively analyzes the motives behind presentations.
Uses multimedia components to strengthen and add interest to spoken descriptions.
Style
Chooses precise and meaningful words to express ideas and feelings clearly.
Optimally adapts inflection, tone, and non-verbal expression to audience and purpose.
Effectively varies formality of speech to context.
Implementation Guide Resources 181 © Great Minds PBC
8:
Grade
Grade 8: Speaking and Listening
1 (Does Not Yet Meet Expectations)
Does not yet speak audibly or clearly.
2 (Partially Meets Expectations)
Does not yet speak in complete sentences.
Speaks too fast or too slow.
Does not yet make eye contact.
Rarely, if ever, pronounces words clearly.
Does not yet contribute both questions and statements in conversations.
Follows few, if any, agreed-upon rules for conversations.
Does not yet set goals or deadlines.
Does not yet link comments to comments of others.
Does not yet indicate agreement or disagreement.
Does not yet acknowledge when the discussion is off topic.
Sometimes track speakers.
Attends to structured conversation for less than 20 minutes.
Does not yet give the speaker cues.
Does not yet reflect or paraphrase to consider multiple perspectives.
Speaks audibly or clearly.
3 (Meets Expectations)
Speaks in complete sentences.
Sometimes speaks at an understandable pace.
Occasionally makes eye contact.
Occasionally pronounces words clearly.
Contributes both questions and statements in conversations.
Follows rules for collegial discussions or defines individual roles.
Sets goals or deadlines.
Links comments to comments of others.
Agrees and disagrees respectfully.
Acknowledges when the discussion is off topic.
Tracks speakers.
Attends to structured conversation for at least 20 minutes.
Sometimes gives the speaker cues.
Reflects or paraphrases to consider multiple perspectives.
Speaks audibly and clearly.
4 (Exceeds Expectations)
Speaks in coherent sentences.
Speaks at an understandable pace.
Uses appropriate eye contact.
Pronounces words clearly.
Comments balance questions and statements that contribute to discussion.
Follows rules for collegial discussions and defines individual roles.
Sets goals and deadlines.
Builds and elaborates on other’s comments.
Agrees and disagrees respectfully and strategically.
Identifies and refocuses irrelevant and off-topic discussion.
Eye contact and body language demonstrate attention.
Attends to structured conversation for at least 30 minutes.
Cues the speaker with gestures and/or facial expressions.
Reflects and paraphrases to consider multiple perspectives.
Expresses clearly with effective volume.
Conventions
Speaks in coherent and complex sentences.
Paces speech dynamically for meaning.
Uses effective eye contact.
Pronounces words clearly and accurately.
Comments effectively balance questions and statements that contribute significantly to discussion.
Upholds rules for collegial discussions for self and others and carries out defined individual roles.
Sets specific and effective goals and deadlines.
Builds and elaborates on other’s comments and contributes positively to a collaborative group process.
Agrees and disagrees respectfully and strategically, using knowledge of common categories of disagreements.
Process
Routinely and adeptly identifies and refocuses irrelevant and off-topic discussion.
Facial expressions and body language demonstrate curiosity.
Attends to structured conversation for as long as needed.
Listens actively and cues the speaker with gestures and facial expressions.
Reflects and paraphrases strategically to consider multiple perspectives.
Listening
Implementation Guide Resources 182 © Great Minds PBC
FAMILY TIP SHEETS
This section contains an example of a Family Tip Sheet. Family Tips Sheets for each module can be accessed through the Great Minds website or in the print Student Edition of each module.
For more information about Family Tip Sheets, see the Sharing Wit & Wisdom with Families section.
WIT & WISDOM FAMILY TIP SHEET
WHAT IS MY GRADE 1 STUDENT LEARNING IN MODULE 1?
Wit & Wisdom is our English curriculum. It builds knowledge of key topics in history, science, and literature through the study of excellent texts. By reading and responding to stories and nonfiction texts, we will build knowledge of the following topics:
Module 1: A World of Books
Module 2: Creature Features
Module 3: Powerful Forces
Module 4: Cinderella Stories
In this first module, A World of Books, we will study the power of books and libraries around the world. Some people have climbed mountains just to find books. Others have trekked to libraries on boats or even on elephants. In this module, we will ask the question: How do books—and the knowledge they bring—change lives around the world?
OUR CLASS WILL READ THESE BOOKS:
Picture Books (Informational)
Museum ABC, The Metropolitan Museum of Art
My Librarian Is a Camel, Margriet Ruurs
Picture Books (Literary)
Tomás and the Library Lady, Pat Mora and Raul Colon
Waiting for the Biblioburro, Monica Brown and John Parra
That Book Woman, Heather Henson and David Small
Green Eggs and Ham, Dr. Seuss
Implementation Guide Resources 183 © Great Minds PBC
OUR CLASS WILL WATCH THESE VIDEOS:
“Biblioburro: The Donkey Library,” Ebonne Ruffins, CNN
“Pack Horse Librarians,” SLIS Storytelling
OUR CLASS WILL EXAMINE THIS PAINTING:
The Midnight Ride of Paul Revere, Grant Wood
OUR CLASS WILL ASK THESE QUESTIONS:
How do library books change life for Tomás?
How does the Biblioburro change life for Ana?
How do people around the world get books?
How does the packhorse librarian change life for Cal?
How do books change my life?
QUESTIONS TO ASK AT HOME:
As you read with your Grade 1 student, ask:
What do you notice and wonder?
BOOKS TO READ AT HOME:
Poppleton, Cynthia Rylant
Rain School, James Rumford
Library Lion, Michelle Knudsen
Abe Lincoln: The Boy Who Loved Books, Kay Winters
Thank You, Mr. Falker, Patricia Polacco
Wild about Books, Judy Sierra
The Library, Sarah Stewart
Implementation Guide Resources 184 © Great Minds PBC
PLACES YOU CAN VISIT TO TALK ABOUT BOOKS:
Visit the local library together. Ask the librarian:
What is the history of the library?
When was the library built?
Who built the library?
How many people visit the library each year?
What programs does the library offer?
Implementation Guide Resources 185 © Great Minds PBC
SUGGESTED MATERIALS LISTS FOR MODULES 1 AND 2
This is a suggested purchase list of materials for the first two modules based on what is listed in the module lessons. There may be some items that need to be purchased for later modules that are not listed here.
There are some items (e.g., a magician’s hat, bouncy balls, cups) that may be in the materials list in a specific lesson but are not listed here as classroom supplies.
Kindergarten Materials
Description/Use Suggested per Classroom or Student
Chart paper Used for teachers to create charts for specific lessons and to display around the classroom as reference for students
Sticky notes An assortment of colors and sizes needed
In some lessons, different colors used to indicate different items
4 pads
4 pads per student
Sentence strips
Scissors
Glue sticks
Construction paper
World map
Index cards
Small (3” x 5”) and large (at least 4” x 6”) sizes needed
Used to make flash cards and for writing/drawing responses (larger size for younger students)
Journal/notebook Blank primary journals that include open space for drawing and large lines for writing
Used for Response Journals
Map of the United States
Talking chips Little tokens that students give back when they speak in a Socratic Seminar
Could be a commonly used math manipulative
White computer paper Used for drawing
Markers
Crayons
String
Variety of colors
Sticky flags Used to mark sentences, words, or pictures in books
Whiteboards
3 packs
1 per student
3 per student
3 packs, multicolored
1 map
2 packs per student
4 per student
1 map
1 set
2 packs
1 box per student
1 box per student
1 roll
2 packs
1 per student
Implementation Guide Resources 186 © Great Minds PBC
Kindergarten Materials
Dry-erase markers 5 boxes
Audio recording device (e.g., cell phone, voice recorder)
1 per classroom Grade 1 Materials
Used to record students speaking so teachers and students can listen to recordings
Chart paper Used for teachers to create charts for specific lessons and to display around the classroom as reference for students
Sticky notes An assortment of colors and sizes needed
In some lessons, different colors used to indicate different items
Sticky flags Used to mark sentences, words, or pictures in books
Journals/notebooks*** Use either composition books, or binders with dividers
For this grade, two separate journals needed
Story Stones Teachers label stones with different story elements so students can put the stones in order and retell a story in the correct order.
4 pads
3 pads per student
2 packs
Composition Books: 8 per student or Binder with dividers: 1 per student
5 stones per student
Implementation Guide Resources 187 © Great Minds PBC
Description/Use Suggested
per Classroom or Student
Description/Use Suggested
per Classroom or Student
Sentence strips 3 packs Colored pencils 1 pack per student Crayons 1 pack per student Whiteboards 1 per student Dry-erase markers 5 boxes Index cards Small (3” x 5”) and large (at least 4” x 6”) sizes needed 1 pack per student
World map 1 map
Grade 2 Materials
Chart paper Used for teachers to create charts for specific lessons and to display around the classroom as reference for students
Sticky notes
An assortment of colors and sizes needed
In some lessons, different colors used to indicate different items
4 pads per student
Crayons
Journals/notebooks***
Use either composition books, or binders with dividers
For this grade, two separate journals needed
1 box of 12 per student
Composition books: 8 per student or Binder with dividers: 1 per student
Story Stones
Index cards
Teachers label stones with different story elements so students can put the stones in order and retell a story in the correct order.
Variety of colors needed
Small (3” x 5”) and large (at least 4” x 6”) sizes needed
2 packs per student
Colored
Implementation Guide Resources 188 © Great Minds PBC
per Classroom or
Description/Use Suggested
Student
4 pads
box
Markers Variety of colors 1
per student
Sentence strips 3 packs
Highlighters Variety of colors needed 2 per student
5 stones per student
pencils
student
per student Sticky flags 2 packs Map of the United States 1 map Plastic sheet protectors 2 packs Scissors 1 pair per student Tape 1 roll
1 set per
Whiteboards 1
Grade 3 Materials
Description/Use
Chart paper Used for teachers to create charts for specific lessons and to display around the classroom as reference for students
Index cards
Highlighters
Dictionary
Sentence strips
Markers
Crayons
Colored pencils
Small (3” x 5”) and large (at least 4” x 6”) sizes needed
Variety of colors needed
Suggested per Classroom or Student
4 pads
2 packs per student
2 per student
Online or print 1 per student
3 packs
Variety of colors
Sticky notes An assortment of colors and sizes needed
In some lessons, different colors used to indicate different items
1 box per student
1 box per student
1 box per student
4 pads per student
White computer paper
Journals/notebooks***
Use either composition books, or binders with dividers
For this grade, three separate journals needed
2 packs
Composition books: 12 per student or Binder with dividers: 1 per student
Implementation Guide Resources 189 © Great Minds PBC
Colored paper 1 pack Glue sticks 1 per student
Grade 4 Materials
Chart paper Used for teachers to create charts for specific lessons and to display around the classroom as reference for students 4 pads
Large pocket chart 1 per classroom
Index cards
Small (3” x 5”) and large (at least 4” x 6”) sizes needed 3 packs per student
colors
Highlighters
Variety of colors needed
Sticky flags An assortment of colors and sizes needed
In some lessons, different colors used to indicate different items
2
Journals/notebooks*** Use either composition books, or binders with dividers
For this grade, three separate journals needed
Composition books: 12 per student or Binder with dividers: 1 per student
Implementation Guide Resources 190 © Great Minds PBC
Classroom
Description/Use Suggested per
or Student
Computer paper 2 packs Markers
Variety of
1 box per student
2 per student
Colored pencils 1 pack per student
Sticky notes 4 packs per student
Glue sticks 2 per student
packs Construction paper 2 packs
Sentence strips 2 packs Clipboard 2 per classroom
1
student
tape 1
Ruler 1 per student Glue sticks
per
Masking
roll
Chart paper Used for teachers to create charts for specific lessons and to display around the classroom as reference for students
Online or print
An assortment of colors and sizes needed
In some lessons, different colors used to indicate different items
Journals/notebooks*** Use either composition books, or binders with dividers
For this grade, three separate journals needed
Chart paper Used for teachers to create charts for specific lessons and to display around the classroom as reference for students
Composition books: 12 per student or Binder with dividers: 1 per student
Journals/notebooks*** Use either composition books, or binders with dividers
For this grade, three separate journals needed
Composition books: 12 per student or Binder with dividers: 1 per student
Implementation Guide Resources 191 © Great Minds PBC Grade 5 Materials Description/Use Suggested per Classroom or Student
4 pads Dictionary
1
per student
1 pack
2 per student Index cards 3 packs
student Red pencils or pens 2 per student
notes
Colored pencils
per student Highlighters Variety of colors needed
per
Sticky
6 pads per student
stickers 1 pack Glue sticks 1 per student
Dot
flags
Whiteboards 1 per student Dry-erase markers 5 boxes Grade 6 Materials Description/Use Suggested per Classroom or Student
4 pads Markers Variety of colors 1 box per student Highlighters Variety of colors 1 pack per student Colored pencils 1 pack per student
cards 2 packs per student
Sticky
2 packs
Index
Grade 7 Materials
Chart paper Used for teachers to create charts for specific lessons and to display around the classroom as reference for students 4 pads
Journals/notebooks***
Use either composition books, or binders with dividers
For this grade, three separate journals needed
Sticky notes An assortment of colors and sizes needed
In some lessons, different colors used to indicate different items
Composition books: 12 per student or Binder with dividers: 1 per student
2 packs per student
Chart paper Used for teachers to create charts for specific lessons and to display around the classroom as reference for students 4 pads
Journals/notebooks***
Use either composition books, or binders with dividers
For this grade, three separate journals needed
Composition books: 12 per student or Binder with dividers: 1 per student Markers
Sticky notes
An assortment of colors and sizes needed
4
packs per student
Varies depending on chosen recording option Yard stick 1
Students will record themselves reciting a poem and will need to be able to play it back on some sort of electronic device
per classroom
Implementation Guide Resources 192 © Great Minds PBC
Description/Use Suggested per Classroom or Student
Index cards
4 packs per student Dictionary Online or print 1 per student
Thesaurus Online or print 1 per student
Grade 8 Materials Description/Use Suggested per Classroom or Student
Variety
of colors 1 box per student
Index cards Variety of colors
packs
student
pencils 1 pack
student
Variety of colors
In some lessons, different colors used to indicate different items per student
3
per
Colored
per
Highlighters
2
Multimedia recording equipment
Masking tape 1 roll
***Schools have some choices with student journals. They might use separate composition books for each journal, or a three-ring binder with dividers to hold all the journal types. If they use composition books, students will likely go through multiple Response Journals in the year—an estimate of one composition book per module.
BACKGROUND READING
Foundational Sources
Adler, Mortimer Jerome, and Charles Lincoln Van Doren. How to Read a Book. Touchstone, 1972.
The Vermont Writing Collaborative. Writing for Understanding: Using Backward Design to Help All Students Write Effectively. Authentic Education, 2008.
Articles and Reports
Adams, Marilyn Jager. “Advancing Our Students’ Language and Literacy: The Challenge of Complex Texts.” American Educator, vol. 34, no. 4, 2010, pp. 3–53. American Federation of Teachers, http://witeng.link/0135.
Cain, Katie, and Jane Oakhill. “Matthew effects in young readers: reading comprehension and reading experience aid vocabulary development.” Journal of Learning Disabilities, vol. 44, no. 5, 2011, pp. 431–443, http://witeng.link/0618
Cunningham, Anne E., and Keith E. Stanovich. “What reading does for the mind.” American Educator, 1998, pp. 1–8. American Federation of Teachers, http://witeng.link/0136. PDF.
Fisher, Douglas, and Nancy Frey. “Close Reading in Elementary Schools.” The Reading Teacher, vol. 66, no. 3, 2012, pp. 179–188. American Reading Company, http://witeng.link/0137. PDF.
Graham, Steve, and Dolores Perin. “Writing Next: Effective Strategies to Improve Writing of Adolescents in Middle and High Schools—A Report to Carnegie Corporation of New York.” Alliance for Excellent Education, Carnegie Corporation of New York, 2007, http://witeng.link/0138. PDF.
Griffith, Lorraine. “Great Content, Good Questions, and Sufficient Time Spark Curiosity.” ASCD Express, vol. 11, no. 17: Encouraging Curious Minds, 12 May 2016. ASCD, http://witeng.link/0139.
Griffith, Lorraine Wiebe, and Timothy V. Rasinski. “A Focus on Fluency: How One Teacher Incorporated Fluency with Her Reading Curriculum.” The Reading Teacher, vol. 58, no. 2, 2004, pp. 126–137, http://witeng.link/0982 PDF.
Hirsch, E. D. Jr. “Building Knowledge: The Case for Bringing Content into the Language Arts Block and for a Knowledge-Rich Curriculum Core for All Children.” American Educator, vol. 30, no. 2, 2006. American Federation of Teachers, http://witeng.link/0132
Hochman, Judith. “Academic Writing Isn’t a Throwback to the 1950s.” The Atlantic, Atlantic Media Company, 26 Sept. 2012, http://witeng.link/0140.
Liben, David. “Vocabulary and the Common Core.” Achieve the Core, Student Achievement Partners, 18 July 2014, http://witeng.link/0141.
Implementation Guide Resources 193 © Great Minds PBC
Pearson, P. David, and David Liben. “The Progression of Reading Comprehension.” Achieve the Core, Student Achievement Partners, 13 Aug. 2013, http://witeng.link/0134.
Shanahan, Timothy. “Letting the Text Take Center Stage: How the Common Core State Standards Will Transform English Language Arts Instruction.” American Educator, vol. 37, no. 3, 2013, pp. 4–11. American Federation of Teachers, http://witeng.link/0142. PDF.
Stanovich, Keith E. “Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of Literacy.” Reading Research Quarterly, vol. 21, no. 4. 1986, pp. 360–407, http://witeng.link/0143. PDF.
Tyre, Peg. “The Writing Revolution.” The Atlantic, Atlantic Media Company, Oct. 2012, http://witeng.link/0144.
Vermont Writing Collaborative, Student Achievement Partners, and CCSSO. “In Common: Effective Writing for All Students—Collection of All Informative/Explanatory Samples, K–12.” Achieve the Core, Student Achievement Partners, http://witeng.link/0145. PDF.
Books
Adams, Marilyn Jager. Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print. MIT Press, 1990.
Adler, Mortimer Jerome. How to Speak, How to Listen. Simon & Schuster, 1997.
Beck, Isabel L., and Margaret G. McKeown. Improving Comprehension with Questioning the Author: A Fresh and Expanded View of a Powerful Approach. Scholastic, 2006.
Beck, Isabel L., et al. Bringing Words to Life: Robust Vocabulary Instruction. 2nd ed, Guilford, 2013.
Beers, G. Kylene, and Robert E. Probst. Notice & Note: Strategies for Close Reading. Heinemann, 2013.
Benjamin, Amy, and Joan Berger. Teaching Grammar: What Really Works. Eye on Education, 2010.
Delpit, Lisa. Other People’s Children: Cultural Conflict in the Classroom. The New Press, 2006.
Ebbers, Susan M. Vocabulary through Morphemes. 2nd ed, Cambium Learning Sopris, 2011.
Fish, Stanley Eugene. How to Write a Sentence: And How to Read One. Harper, 2011.
Frey, Nancy, and Douglas Fisher. Checking for Understanding: Formative Assessment Techniques for Your Classroom. 2nd ed, ASCD, 2014.
Frey, Nancy, and Douglas Fisher. Rigorous Reading: 5 Access Points for Comprehending Complex Texts. Corwin, 2013.
Frey, Nancy, and Douglas Fisher. The Formative Assessment Action Plan: Practical Steps to More Successful Teaching and Learning. ASCD, 2011.
Implementation Guide Resources 194 © Great Minds PBC
Gallagher, Kelly. Deeper Reading: Comprehending Challenging Texts, 4–12. Stenhouse, 2004.
Gallagher, Kelly. Write Like This: Teaching Real-World Writing through Modeling & Mentor Texts. Portland: Stenhouse, 2011.
Hattie, John. Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning. Routledge, 2012.
Harris, Karen R., et al. Powerful Writing Strategies for All Students. Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company, 2008.
Henry, Marcia Kierland. Unlocking Literacy: Effective Decoding & Spelling Instruction. 2nd ed, Paul H. Brookes Publishing Company, 2010.
Jago, Carol. With Rigor for All: Meeting Common Core Standards for Reading Literature. 2nd ed, Heinemann, 2011.
Wiggins, Grant P., and Jay McTighe. Understanding by Design. 2nd ed, ASCD, 2005.
Willingham, Daniel T. Why Don’t Students Like School? A Cognitive Scientist Answers Questions about How the Mind Works and What It Means for Your Classroom. Jossey-Bass, 2010.
Implementation Guide Resources 195 © Great Minds PBC
WORKS CITED
ACT. Reading Between the Lines: What the ACT Reveals about College Readiness in Reading. ACT, 2006, Web. PDF.
Adams, Marilyn Jager. “Advancing Our Students’ Language and Literacy: The Challenge of Complex Texts.” American Educator, vol. 34, no. 4, 2011, pp. 3-11.
Adler, Mortimer J., and Charles Van Doren. How to Read a Book: The Classic Guide to Intelligent Reading Touchstone, 1972.
Anderson, Richard, and Peter Freebody. “Vocabulary Knowledge.” Comprehension and Teaching: Research Reviews. Edited by John T. Guthrie, International Reading Association, 1981, pp. 77-117.
Boyles, Nancy. “Closing in on Close Reading.” Educational Leadership, vol. 70, no. 4, 2012–2013, pp. 36-41.
Chall, Jeanne S., and Vicki A. Jacobs. “The Classic Study on Poor Children’s Fourth-Grade Slump.” American Educator, vol. 27, no. 1, 2003, Web.
Ebbers, Susan M., and Carolyn A. Denton. “A Root Awakening: Vocabulary Instruction for Older Students with Reading Difficulties.” Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, vol. 23, no. 2, 2008, pp. 90-102.
Feitelson, Dina, et al. “Effects of Listening to Series Stories on First Graders’ Comprehension and Use of Language.” Research in the Teaching of English, vol. 20, no. 4, 1986, pp. 339-356.
Fillmore, Lily Wong, and Charles J. Fillmore. “What Does Text Complexity Mean for English Learners and Language Minority Students?” Understanding Language: Language, Literacy, and Learning in the Content Areas, Stanford Graduate School of Education, January 2012, http://witeng.link/0840.
Frey, Nancy, and Douglas B. Fisher. Rigorous Reading: 5 Access Points for Comprehending Complex Texts. Corwin, 2013.
Graham, Steve, and Dolores Perin. Writing Next: Effective Strategies to Improve Writing of Adolescents in Middle and High Schools: A Report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Alliance for Excellent Education, Carnegie Corporation of New York, 2007, http://witeng.link/0138. PDF.
Hawkins, Joey, et al. Writing for Understanding: Using Backward Design to Help All Students Write Effectively. Authentic Education, 2008.
Jones, Barbara, et al. Supporting Students in Close Reading. The Regents of the University of California, Feb. 2015, Web. PDF.
Implementation Guide Works Cited 196 © Great Minds PBC
Liben, David. “Framework for Preparing, Implementing and Assessing Close Reading Lessons.” Achieve the Core, Student Achievement Partners, 20 May 2015. Web. 1 Aug. 2016.
Miller, George A., and Patricia M. Gildea. “How Children Learn Words.” Scientific American, vol. 257, no. 3, 1987, pp. 94-99.
Nagy, William E., and Judith A. Scott. “Vocabulary Processes.” Handbook of Reading Research, Volume III. Edited by Michael L. Kamil, et al, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000, pp. 269-284.
National Governors Association for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers. “Appendix A: Research Supporting Key Elements of the Standards, Glossary of Key Terms.” Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects, NGA Center and CCSSO, 2010, Web.
National Governors Association for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers. Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects, NGA Center and CCSSO, 2010, Web.
National Research Council. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. The National Academies Press, 2000.
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers. “Structure of the Model Content Frameworks for ELA/Literacy.” PARCC, Web.
Pearson, P. David, and David Liben. “The Progression of Reading Comprehension.” Achieve the Core, Student Achievement Partners, 13 Aug. 2013, Web.
Rasinski, Timothy. The Fluent Reader. Scholastic, 2003.
Ramsden, Neil. “Mini Matrix-Maker.” Word Building and Spelling Experiments in English Morphology, 10 Jan. 2013, http://witeng.link/0617.
Shanahan, Timothy. “Letting the Text Take Center Stage: How the Common Core State Standards Will Transform English Language Arts Instruction.” American Educator, vol. 37, no. 3, 201, pp. 4-11.
Stanovich, Keith E. “Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy.” Reading Research Quarterly, vol. 21, no. 4, 1986, pp. 360-407.
Willingham, Daniel T. “How Knowledge Helps: It Speeds and Strengthens Reading Comprehension, Learning and Thinking.” American Educator, vol. 30, no. 1, 2006, Web.
Implementation Guide Works Cited 197 © Great Minds PBC
CREDITS
Great Minds has made every effort to obtain permission for the reprinting of all copyrighted material. If any owner of copyrighted material is not acknowledged herein, please contact Great Minds PBC for proper acknowledgment in all future editions and reprints.
All images are used under license from Shutterstock.com unless otherwise noted.
For updated credit information, please visit http://witeng.link/credits.
Implementation Guide WIT & WISDOM® © Great Minds PBC
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Great Minds® Staff
The following writers, editors, reviewers, and support staff contributed to the development of this curriculum.
Ann Brigham, Lauren Chapalee, Sara Clarke, Emily Climer, Laurie Delgatto-Whitten, Reba Frederics, Lorraine Griffith, Emily Gula, Sarah Henchey, Trish Huerster, Stephanie Kane-Mainier, Lior Klirs, Karen Lempert, Whitney Lyle, Liz Manolis, Brian Methe, Andrea Minich, Lynne Munson, Marya Myers, Rachel Rooney, Aaron Schifrin, Danielle Shylit, Rachel Stack, Sarah Turnage, Michelle Warner, Amy Wierzbicki, Margaret Wilson, and Sarah Woodard.
Colleagues and Contributors
We are grateful for the many educators, writers, and subject-matter experts who made this program possible.
David Abel, Robin Agurkis, Elizabeth Bailey, Julianne Barto, Amy Benjamin, Andrew Biemiller, Charlotte Boucher, Sheila Byrd-Carmichael, Jessica Carloni, Eric Carey, Janine Cody, Rebecca Cohen, Elaine Collins, Tequila Cornelious, Beverly Davis, Matt Davis, Thomas Easterling, Jeanette Edelstein, Kristy Ellis, Moira Clarkin Evans, Charles Fischer, Marty Gephart, Kath Gibbs, Natalie Goldstein, Christina Gonzalez, Mamie Goodson, Nora Graham, Lindsay Griffith, Brenna Haffner, Joanna Hawkins, Elizabeth Haydel, Steve Hettleman, Cara Hoppe, Ashley Hymel, Carol Jago, Jennifer Johnson, Mason Judy, Gail Kearns, Shelly Knupp, Sarah Kushner, Shannon Last, Suzanne Lauchaire, Diana Leddy, David Liben, Farren Liben, Jennifer Marin, Susannah Maynard, Cathy McGath, Emily McKean, Jane Miller, Rebecca Moore, Cathy Newton, Turi Nilsson, Julie Norris, Galemarie Ola, Michelle Palmieri, Meredith Phillips, Shilpa Raman, Tonya Romayne, Emmet Rosenfeld, Jennifer Ruppel, Mike Russoniello, Deborah Samley, Casey Schultz, Renee Simpson, Rebecca Sklepovich, Amelia Swabb, Kim Taylor, Vicki Taylor, Melissa Thomson, Lindsay Tomlinson, Melissa Vail, Keenan Walsh, Julia Wasson, Lynn Welch, Yvonne Guerrero Welch, Emily Whyte, Lynn Woods, and Rachel Zindler.
Early Adopters
The following early adopters provided invaluable insight and guidance for Wit & Wisdom:
Bourbonnais School District 53 • Bourbonnais, IL
Coney Island Prep Middle School • Brooklyn, NY
Gate City Charter School for the Arts • Merrimack, NH
Hebrew Academy for Special Children • Brooklyn, NY
Paris Independent Schools • Paris, KY
Saydel Community School District • Saydel, IA
Strive Collegiate Academy • Nashville, TN
Valiente College Preparatory Charter School • South Gate, CA
Voyageur Academy • Detroit, MI
Design Direction provided by Alton Creative, Inc.
Project management support, production design, and copyediting services provided by ScribeConcepts
Copyediting services provided by Fine Lines Editing
Product management support provided by Sandhill Consulting
© Great Minds PBC Implementation Guide WIT & WISDOM®
MORE MEANINGFUL ENGLISH
Wit & Wisdom ® is a comprehensive English language arts curriculum that builds students’ knowledge of key topics in history, science, and literature. Students engage with award-winning texts of the highest quality to master essential reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language skills. By studying enjoyable, informative books, students build knowledge and develop tools to articulate what they know.
GREAT MINDS
The uncompromising curricula from Great Minds assume that every child is capable of greatness. We bring teachers and scholars together to craft exemplary instructional materials that inspire joy in teaching and learning. Our curricula—Wit & Wisdom, Eureka Math ® , and PhD Science ®—give schoolteachers what they need to take students beyond rote learning to provide a deeper, more complete understanding of the humanities, mathematics, and the sciences.
USING THIS GUIDE
Great Minds’ high-quality, knowledge-rich curricula provide tools worthy of your craft. This resource will help you plan for instruction, hone your practice, and strive for continuous improvement. Use this guide to build on in-person professional development, develop a foundation for ongoing lesson preparation, understand the coherence within and across grades, and deepen your understanding of instructional goals. It is designed to assist you through a cycle of preparation, teaching, assessing, and analyzing. Learn
ON THE COVER
Earth from Space, 2000
This image shows North and South America as they would appear from space 22,000 miles above the Earth.
Credit: Reto Stöckli, Nazmi El Saleous, and Marit Jentoft-Nilsen, NASA GSFC
Wit & Wisdom students study this image to build knowledge in Grade 3 Module 2: Outer Space.
ISBN 978-1-63898-141-1
USA $50.00
more at GreatMinds.org
9 7 8 1 6 3 8 9 8 1 4 1 1