END460 North Buffalo Rails Trail Equitable Community Engagement Framework

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The North Buffalo Rail Trail Equitable Community Engagement Framework is an important comprehensive step that will help to enhance our collective community space within University Heights.

Collaboration for the plan was performed by students at UB’s Environmental Design Program studio led by Darren Cotton, assisted with the support of volunteers and members of the University Heights Collaboartaive (UHC). The Tool library’s role was instrumental in the formation of this project.

INSTRUCTORS

UB STUDENTS

Darren Cotton Madison Rios

Richard Anderson Rasheed Aribidesi Julia Bertolini Caitlin Chan Reilly Dzielski Olivia Jiang Tanner Laramee Fanny Liang Ellison Mcmahon James Metzger Maegen O’ Hara Brittany Robinson Trevor Rubino Angus Sunday Serina Valletta Jacob Vollers Taylor Wallace Sage Welte Bobby Zhao

GUEST SPEAKERS/ ORGANIZATIONS Chris Kameckl (Local Artist & Activist) Jennifer McQuilkin (M&T) Jajean Rose (Western New York Land Conservancy) Ashley Smith (GOBike) Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority

SPONSERS Bert’s Reddy Bikeshare Bert’s Wegmans Food

UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS COLLABORATIVE BOARD MEMBERS Stephen Arlington Mike Cartwright Overton-Burns Dayna Linda Garwol Candy Hayes Raymond Reichert

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The role of an urban planner has changed dramatically to plan with a community, no longer for a community. Interactions and conversations are important, as isr engaging with a community and having the ability to engage by their ideal circumstances is equitable for the community. This report will examine the lessons, experiences and best practices of equitable engagement and its importance to its study area.

Located in Buffalo, New York, students of an Environmental Design studio from the University at Buffalo were presented with the nearby ‘Starin Nature Preserve’, an abandoned rail corridor now inhabited by wildlife. Adjacent is the Minnesota Linear Park and Buffalo Rails-to-Trails multi-use path, which are all sites located in the University Heights neighborhood. There is an apparent risk to transform the study area into a residential development, yet previous advocacy, civic involvement and determination preserved the nearby park and path from similar circumstances. Both a dependent and independent variable, practices and principles of equitable engagement was vital to this triumph. An opportunity has come to allow the Starin Nature Preserve a chance at preservation. Similar to the surrounding Linear Park and Rail-Trail, understanding how people visit and interact within the study area would not be possible without demonstrating equitable engagement actions.

Throughout the duration of the studio course, students were introduced to what equitable engagement is and its purpose in the profession today. Comprehensive assignments in review, exploration and synthesis broadened understanding of the principle while students’ skills in background research supplemented these efforts. Among frequent evaluations and assessments of their understanding of equitable engagement, students welcomed and absorbed additional context of their project by means of interviews, site visits and impromptu community service experiences. The accumulation of these assignments and experiences prompted students with the challenge to identify barriers in equitable engagement and provide solutions that could be implemented for future processes of the report’s project study area. At the beginning of the course, a subsequent task was also introduced for a future service event that the studio class was to plan for. A garbage clean-up event was scheduled near The Tool Library, a local community asset and non-profit organization, for the Minnesota Linear Park and Rails-to-Trail path; coincidentally, The Tool Library was founded and is directed by the studio course professor.

In the cumulative period consisting of classroom instruction, event planning and community involvement, the studio class piloted their solutions involving equitable engagement at the clean-up event and recorded observations for future reference and analysis. In summary, this report is the culmination of exposure, committed efforts, and evaluations of the studio class’ understanding in equitable engagement practices to recommend a viable plan for future planning frameworks.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

01

05

1.1 Public Engagement................................02

5.1 Barriers...............................................31

INTRODUCTION 1.2 Historical Inequities...............................02 1.3 Importance of Green Space...................03 1.4 Purpose & Value.....................................03 1.5 Existing Local Planning Context..........04

02

CASE STUDIES & BEST PRACTICES 2.1 Durham Belt Line....................................06 2.2 Southern Tier Trail..................................07 2.3 Riverline Equitable Framework.............08

03

SITE CONTEXT 3.1 Background.............................................10 3.2 Existing Conditions................................10 3.3 Native Flora & Fauna..............................13 3.4 Demographics Of Site & Surrounding Areas..............................14 3.5 Socioeconomic Statistics......................18 3.6 Land Use & Transportation....................20

04

FINDINGS & FIELD WORK 4.1 Project Catalyst.......................................24 4.2 Site Visits.................................................24 4.3 Service Events........................................26 4.4 Community Survey.................................28 4.5 Interviews................................................29

BARRIERS & PERSONA 5.2 Personas.............................................31 5.3 Awareness..........................................36 5.4 Accessibility.......................................36 5.5 Inclusivity............................................37

06

IMPLEMENTATIONS & SOLUTIONS 6.1 Barriers...............................................40 6.2 Personas.............................................40 6.3 Awareness..........................................41 6.4 Accessibility.......................................42 6.5 Inclusivity...........................................43

07

CONCLUSION 7.1 Every Ending Is The Beginning of Something New........................................49

APPENDIX Appendix A. Studiio User Personas......61 Appendix B. Event Day Survey...............65

01 INTRODUCTION

02 1.1 PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT In the 21st century, the process of city planning has evolved unprecedentedly. The rapid changes in connectivity and our environment have challenged us to plan urban environments more responsibly, and more consciously. In general, cities, towns and villages legislate land use, or what is appropriate to be built where, but the communities and natural resources in those areas are responsible for taking care of that land. Likewise, communities are the voices for its land and resources and are its advocates for what it should be, or to become. Recognizing this, modern practice of urban planning must question how to effectively engage.

Today, many planning organizations have transformed engagement processes to effectively interact with the locale. Realizing continual change in human behavior, modern events and technological innovations, these groups have faced scrutiny for their engagement methods and have been called upon to create fair, or equitable options to engage and communicate. Remarkably, these planning and development projects have seen success results increase by equitably engaging with neighborhoods, communities, and local stakeholders; in result, residents and communities of these neighborhoods gain influence and resources to improve their surroundings that address their immediate needs.

1.2 HISTORICAL INEQUITIES Traditionally, city or town officials will hold public meetings or hearings to allow their citizens to discuss and debate plans in action on public matters. However, given the scale of urban growth and its consequences, residents and groups have been repressed from voicing their concerns on land use or planning projects. This has resulted in building developers, local officials and even individuals to take advantage of communities and neighborhoods because of no one knowing where to voice their concerns, or of developments ingeneral. Observing the long-lasting effects of this previous engagement process of planning, com-

munities and neighborhoods have been physically separated, isolated and disconnected from those around them.

MAP 1. Historical Aerial

In the early 20th century, racial segregation rampantly divided communities and neighborhoods by actions of redlining, restrictive covenants, and even physical prevention. Redlining prevented demographic minorities from obtaining federally-backed mortgages because of both the house’s location and racial bias, which resulted in a national consequence of massive impoverished housing and segregated neighborhoods. Similarly, private homeowners had amended their property deeds using exclusionary conditions to restrict purchasing privilege.

Although these practices were deemed unconstitutional and outlawed in 1968 under the Fair Housing Act, their social consequences carry into now; minority neighborhoods verily experience immeasurable disinvestment and have become greatly overlooked in their local value. Massive roadway projects had also taken priority in

03 planning developments throughout the mid1950’s into the 1960’s. Continuing similar practices of geographic discrimination, urban expressways and national interstates had bisected minority areas which physically separated neighborhoods and communities even further. Even more, public transportation options and availability saw drastic reductions and suspensions, which continue assisting in isolating minority populations from their ability to live, interact and engage with their cities.

Equitable engagement recognizes these existing disparities have disempowered communities from advocating for their needs and priorities. Genuine efforts to extend empathy and understanding has informed planners and officials of their neighborhoods’ barriers to succeed.

By adjusting former and impractical engagement techniques to be inviting and effective, the foundation of practicing equitable engagement methods become more personal, more transparent, and more trustworthy to implement and revitalize communities.

1.3 IMPORTANCE OF GREEN SPACE Recent movement patterns show that living in urban or denser environments have become increasingly popular. In contrast, green spaces and public places have become scarcer in urban environments because of existing infrastructure, as well as natural changes in climate. Researchers who have studied the effect of accessible public places found health benefits and neighborhood involvement significantly increase with greater opportunities to use nearby parks and trails.1 Observing this relationship, new developments are seen to advertise their proximity to natural spaces and recreation trails for nearby residents, however these developments tend to be exclusionary to existing communities and inhabitants. This trend of “green gentrification” is harmful to existing

communities of nearby nature recreation areas, as they are intended to be enjoyed by newer, and typically wealthier residents.2 Understanding this context, activism among communities across the nation have empowered them to advocate and be more involved in improving and developing nearby green spaces.

Knowing that many will share this space is pivotal in providing equity and fairness to original neighborhood residents. Applying inclusionary practices for green space development have generally seen varied results, but local successes and continued involvement has proven effective and successful. Local examples are the dependent base and purpose of this report’s project, as the studio class is introduced to the nearby “Starin Nature Preserve” green space.

1.4 PURPOSE & VALUES The studio class of this Environmental Design workshop for the Starin Nature Preserve is introduced to the practice and importance of equitable engagement and how it differs from former public engagement methods. Facing an altered circumstance of green gentrification, the Starin Nature Preserve is primed to be developed into single-unit, residential housing which would raze the now naturalized abandoned rail corridor that exists now. Home to local wildlife, it encompases the nearby Buffalo Rail-Trail, which had formerly experienced similar lack of care. Now a vital community asset, the Rail-Trail is enjoyed by the local University Heights neighborhood and surrounding residents. To preserve the Starin Nature Preserve, utilizing equitable engagement practices is imperative to the study area’s success as harmful development patterns could afflict more exclusion and displacement. Elements of community development such as regenerative development, asset-based community development and placemaking will be key tenants in effectively applying equitable engagement methods. In broadening understanding of equitable engagement, acquired

1 The Case for Healthier Spaces. Project for Public Spaces. (2016). https://tinyurl.com/5szucpb2.

2 Inclusive Trail Planning Toolkit. J. Raskin. (2020). https://tinyurl.com/yckkwawj.

04 organizational skills will be applied at an on-site event to serve as the case study for the studio class’ comprehension of practicing equitable engagement.

Moving forward, the studio class has identified key values to reflect upon throughout the course of this project. These values are to remind the reasons for using equitable engagement methods, and how these values are received by community members when in action. Although the class suggested many values, those that guided this studio workshop included diversity, inclusion, equity, and accessibility. Throughout this report, these values are commonly apparent as the University Heights community defines and embraces these characteristics that serve as common ground for the studio class’ journey with equitable engagement.

1.5 EXISTING LOCAL PLANNING CONTEXT The North Buffalo Rail Trail has been specifically noted in many recent local plans. The study area of this studio project holds significant potential to be integrated into the region’s greenspace and bicycling network system. Of these plans including Bike Buffalo Niagara, One Region Forward, and the Empire State Trail, each report and their respective inclusions of the project study area repeated its value across all scopes. Reviewing the locally-focused Bike Buffalo Niagara and One Region Forward plans, each thoroughly evaluates existing site conditions and vocalizes key values of equitable engagement precepts that have helped their planning efforts. In interest of the Bike Buffalo Niagara report plan, the study area has been designated as a high-priority off-road path project because of its invaluable potential of connecting two distinct areas of Buffalo, along with completing a fragmented path of New York’s Empire State Trail. Both the Bike Buffalo Niagara and One Region Forward reports frequently recall and advocate for equitable practices that empower and connect underserved communities. In addition, dozens of figures between the two reports consisting of response inquiries, event photographs and infographics reaffirm benefits of equitable engagement practices including asset-based community development and inclusive discussions and decision-making. From all plan reports, significant recognition of the North Buffalo Rail Trail’s value can be attributed to repeated efforts and genuine investment of equitable engagement practices. Understanding the roles many organizations and stakeholders assumed, the studio project is humble to continue the study area’s current progressions by studying and refining the best equitable engagement strategies specifically for the University Heights neighborhood.

02 CASE STUDIES & BEST PRACTICES

06 2.1 DURHAM BELT LINE In August of 2018, Durham was directed to “create an engagement plan that will allow the City to create a racial equity plan regarding the Belt Line,” (2018, 2) in response to resident concerns regarding equity. Over ninety days, a blueprint was developed to reframe the city’s engagement process. The goal was to create a framework that could be used for community engagement procedures for future projects across the city. The city council recognized that it is crucial to be more inclusive with their decision-making process and prioritized finding strategies to engage with demographics that have been historically dismissed. The identified general themes include accessibility, accountability, power-sharing, inclusion, information, timeliness, and transparency.

The first thing they did was adopt a set of values. The values that were identified were: right to be involved, contribution will be thoughtfully considered, recognize the needs of all, seek out involvement, participants design participation, adequate information, and known effect of participation. Their next step was to collect baseline data on who was currently involved with engagement and those who were underrepresented. The Community Engagement team then met with community members to understand more about why people aren’t more involved in engagement and different ways to engage with those residents.

After analyzing the data collected from both research and talking to residents, the city drafted the Steps to Build Equitable Community Engagement Plan. This is a five-step plan that focuses on the level of engagement that should be used, who should be engaged, how engagement should happen, how to measure successful engagement, and how to build for the long-term. This draft is not a one-size-fits-all; however, it outlines key components of how the engagement process should be delivered. This blueprint was applied to the Durham Belt Line Trail Equitable Engagement Plan and continues to help the city perform equitable engagement and build trust within the community.3

Equitable Community Engagement Blueprint Introduction The Neighborhood Improvement Services Department (NIS) works to preserve and improve quality of life conditions for Durham residents, and to encourage active participation in neighborhood redevelopment and public policy and decision making dialogue. The Community Engagement Team strives to inform, engage, partner and empower the Durham community.

The City has not executed a standardized process for conducting community engagement that is shared or adopted by all Departments. Furthermore, the City has not developed an equitable community engagement process that ensures that its outreach or information-gathering approaches include an intentional effort to engage a representation of the City’s diversity. The Community Engagement Team of NIS, to match the goal of encouraging active participation in neighborhood redevelopment and public policy and decision making dialogue, has created an Equitable Community Engagement Blueprint through conversation with other departments and community leaders.

Background The City of Durham strives to be a welcoming, diverse and innovative community. Equity and resident engagement are key components of the City’s FY2019-2021 Strategic Plan, includes Advance a More Inclusive and Equitable Durham, Shared Economic Prosperity, and the Language Access Plan.

“Many current inequities are sustained by historical legacies and structures and systems that repeat patterns of exclusion. Institutions and structures have continued to create and perpetuate inequities, despite the lack of explicit intention. Without intentional intervention, institutions and structures will continue to perpetuate racial inequities. Government has the ability to implement policy change at multiple levels and across multiple sectors to drive larger systemic change. Routine use of a racial equity tool explicitly integrates racial equity into governmental operations.”

(Government Alliance on Race & Equity, 2018)

In order to create strategies for equity to achieve the City’s vision of an excellent and sustainable quality of life for all residents, the City must engage the community in an equitable way.

3 Equitable Engagement (Equitable Community Engagement Blueprint. City of Durham NIS Community Engagement.

(2022). https://www.durhamcommunityengagement.org/equitable_engagement.

07 2.2 SOUTHERN TIER TRAIL Southern Tier Trail is a proposed trail connecting Erie and Cattaraugus Counties in Western New York, following the Buffalo-Pittsburgh rail corridor. This trail features on-road and off-road routes.

This trail spans 80.1 miles. It is recommended for pedestrians, bicyclists, equestrians and snowmobilers. This project was broken into twenty-three subsections. These focused on connection to existing trails, population density, right-of-way availability, public support, municipal support, access to amenities/destinations and maintenance support.

A large emphasis on trail connections drives the project. Positive impacts of this include health and well-being of the users. This helps with the likelihood of heart and respiratory diseases. Another positive impact is safety, allowing bicyclists and pedestrians a safe passageway without the interaction of vehicles. Transportation is also a positive impact, as this trail can be used to increase mobility and accessibility to those who don't have access to a vehicle or public transit. Lastly, the trail positively impacts the economy of the area, boosting tourism, property values, development of new businesses and outdoor recreation.

To get public input on the trail, various meetings were held with the stakeholders, homeowners, municipality leaders, nonprofits and trail users. These meetings were held to collect more specific feedback. GOBike also engaged in one-on-one outreach, calling to municipal and community groups or organization leaders to gather information, impressions, and local knowledge as inputs to draft planning documents. They also held public meetings, allowing the public to give their input online in maps. This helped gauge what the community actually wanted for the trail.4 This relates to our project through its importance of greenspace and trails. Trails impact communities positively, through health and wellness. These spaces can help create a more community driven area, and pride in nature.

SOUTHERN TIER TRAIL FEASIBILITY STUDY FEBRUARY 2021

4 Southern Tier Trail Feasibility Study. Southern Tier Trail. GObike. (2021). https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QHZY0ejqxbf2lAIzB0XcgdlJ4sEWujq_/view.

08 2.3 RIVERLINE EQUITABLE FRAMEWORK The Riverline5 is a one and a half mile long nature trail and greenway being developed on a former elevated rail corridor adjacent to downtown Buffalo and the Buffalo River. The Western New York Land Conservancy is developing The Riverline based on a vision created by the community through means of equitable community engagement. This multi-use nature trail and greenway has the potential to build on the heritage and vibrancy of three historic neighborhoods– the Old First Ward, Perry, and the Valley. The vision of this trail inspired an international design ideas competition with close to 100 design proposals– a professional jury and community members selected their favorites and winners were decided in various categories. The most recent update in the process was in July 2021 which announced the land conservancy and their award-winning partners’ concept designs.

The guiding principles for this project was to prevent cultural displacement while revitalizing the neighborhood, ensure that programming reflects and empowers the history and culture of the surrounding neighborhoods, and promote art and cultural opportunities for current residents. Key themes that were focused on were equity and accessibility, active recreation and healthy living, and strengthening connections between neighborhoods. While discussing the importance of equitable community engagement, these topics were determined to be relatable to the Rail Trail. Similar to the Riverline, the Rail Trail also has many cultural and historic aspects that are prioritized and respected.

JUNE 2020

EQUITABLE DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK

5 Equitable Development Framework for The Riverline. University at Buffalo Regional Institute, The State University of New York at Buffalo, School of Architecture and Planning, and Make Communities. (2020). https://brandcast-cdn.global. ssl.fastly.net/d8824b65-42d7-4e51-9cda-37b31642c352/08f61f06-aa94-49fb-9a72-fd404f857589/69a9c40dd995176eafbabb90dbd9238a/TheRiverline_EquitableDevelopmentFramework_June2020_SinglePages.pdf.

03 SITE CONTEXT

10 3.1 BACKGROUND Buffalo was first settled in 1789 in an area previously occupied by the Iroquois (Haudenosaunee) confederacy of six nations: Cayuga, Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Seneca, and Tuscarora. The city was founded in 1801 and incorporated in the early 1830s. Buffalo’s location at the convergence of the Niagara River with Lake Erie allowed for the city to establish itself as a transhipment hub for grains coming from the Midwest. During the Industrial Revolution, Buffalo was the eighth largest city in the United States and much of its success can be attributed to the Erie Canal, which was completed in 1825. Within the decade, the success of the canal was overshadowed by new railroad technologies as the steam locomotive emerged as the primary form of goods and livery transportation. 6 After World War II, the city of Buffalo was the second largest railroad hub in the U.S. and over 700 miles of track ran through the city.

The railroad industry was booming and provided ample job opportunities, but this later changed.

After the construction of the Interstate Highway System, automobiles became the preferred mode of transportation. Combined with outdated regulations and high taxes along with the exodus of downtown Buffalo residents, the railroad industry started to decline in the mid 1960s. Railroad corridors were abandoned and remained as unused spaces for decades until recent years. A movement started to transform the abandoned rail lines into public trails for recreational use. The Heath Street Block Club and Merrimac Street Block Club, along with other community members, were able to secure $1.7 million in federal funding to turn the Erie Lackawanna (EL) Railroad into a vibrant trail that people use for exercise, relaxation, and social activities. The shift from rail line to abandoned space to essential greenspace in the community exemplifies how we can transform forgotten spaces into dynamic multi-use spaces

throughout the city, and thus help build community relations, connect various neighborhoods, and improve the local economy.7

3.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS The site we will be discussing in this report is unofficially named the “Starin Nature Preserve.”

It is an area consisting of approximately 17 acres of undeveloped land, formerly occupied by rail lines, adjacent to Minnesota Linear Park. The Starin Nature Preserve is bounded by neighborhoods to the north on St. Lawrence Avenue and Brinton Street, neighborhoods to the south on Taunton Place, the University Heights District to the east, and to the west by Starin Avenue. The eastern portion of the property intersects with the recently added Minnesota Linear Park, providing a linkage between neighborhoods that were previously separated by infrastructural barriers. To the west, the newly created Rachel Vincent Way is the location of a new housing development and is built along another abandoned portion of the former rail lines.

MAP 2. Starin Nature Preserve

From Main Street, access to Starin Nature Preserve can be obtained by walking to the rear of the parking lot behind the LaSalle Metro Rail and

6 Early History of Buffalo (ca. 1790’s-1853). J. Walkowski. (2011). https://buffaloah.com/h/jw/bflo.html.

7 University Heights, Links to Buffalo Architecture and History Website. C. LaChiusa. (2016). https://buffaloah.com/h/u. html

11 following the rail trail along Minnesota Linear Park to the “crossroads.” Walking north, there is abundant greenery and wildlife surrounding the park. It is not uncommon to see various species of wildlife, such as birds, rabbits, or even deer during a visit. There are limited benches on the path for resting, but there is ample street lighting, making it safer for nighttime use. At the “crossroads,” the rail trail intersects where there are two large stone abutments on both sides of the path. Entry to the Starin Nature Preserve can be made via the top of the left abutment or through an at-grade entrance after turning left at the intersection and walking westward a short distance. The at-grade trail is a footpath into the undeveloped acreage, marked by a large concrete trapezoidal form. While walking through the Nature Preserve, privately-owned residential backyards on adjacent lots are viewable at higher elevations; future design recommendations may need to consider privacy concerns.

Currently overgrown with various plants, some of which are invasive plant species, the site is evidently not well tended to as there is much litter on the ground. Along the footpath, there is no lighting or seating, typical of a desire path, and there may be areas encroached on by tree branches and overgrowth. People generally use this space for exercising or walking their dog, but it appears to be less widely used compared to the paved rail trails within Minnesota Linear Park. On the other hand, Linear Park has more users, likely due to the presence of lighting, a few benches, and overall better maintenance and visibility of the area. Both the site and Minnesota Linear Park have issues with snow removal in the winter months, though less so for the latter. Workers plow the snow on the paved rail trail in Linear Park, though not necessarily in the areas surrounding it. This makes it difficult to access the park particularly for those with mobility issues. As for the site itself, snow is not cleared, and those who wish to utilize the space must essentially create their own path by trekking through the snow. The unmaintained path can also pose a safety concern during the spring season with wet ground and in the fall season with leaves and other organic debris.

When the site was used as a rail line, two lines converged and required an upper and lower track portion. The remnants of the abutment for the upper rail line remain at the eastern end of the property, and a raised mound exists along the northern length. The southern length elevation is significantly lower, and in some places there exists a sizable depression between the two extents. If the site were to be considered for a trail, there would need to be significant accommodations made to bridge the disconnect between the northern and southern elevations for ease of traversing the site. In considering equitable and accessible trails and greenspace, special attention will need to be directed to the safety and mobility concerns for people of all ages and abilities in their use of the property.

Starin Nature Preserve Site Vist

12 FIGURE 1. Starin Nature Preserve Timeline

01

02

03

13 3.3 NATIVE FLORA & FAUNA Buffalo consists of many native plants and trees that can be used for our final project.8 For instance, native tree species include Red Maple (Acer rubrum), River Birch (Betula nigra), and American Beech (Fagus grandifolia). Not only do all three of these trees provide bird habitation, but they also provide other uses and benefits including tolerating pollution, growing well in wet areas, and providing shade, respectively. These trees play a very important role in protecting Buffalo’s urban forest, which would be a great asset for the University Heights neighborhood. There are also vacant spaces around our site where trees could be planted along the streets and parks of the area.9 Native plant species of Buffalo also include plants such as Evening Primrose (Oenothera) and American dog violet (Viola Labradorica), which can be used to bring color into the natural landscape.

Some common birds in Western New York include the following: Blue Jay (Cyanocitta cristata), American Robin10 (Turdus migratorius), and Red-Winged Blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus). Encouraging these birds to inhabit the area and making it easier for them to do so would increase vegetation and balance the ecosystem of the site.

Native Plant Species of Buffalo, NY

8 Western New York Guide to Native Plants for your Garden. Buffalo Niagara Riverkeeper. (2014). https://drive.google. com/drive/folders/1bod2Z5WdPc3ONSmKAV81O6oqrY8N4K2h?eType=ActivityDefinitionInstance&eId=4c59e609-f24a44aa-a744-9263ccb4341d.

9 Native Plant Guide. Buffalo Niagara Waterkeeper. (2022). https://bnwaterkeeper.org/projects/nativeplantguide/.

10 American Robin. All About Birds. (2019). https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/American_Robin/id.

14 3.4 DEMOGRAPHICS OF SITE & SURROUNDING AREA A. DEMOGRAPHICS

Census data can provide insight into the demographics and economic makeup of an area. Using Social Explorer and U.S. Census Bureau data, we gathered key demographic information for the census tracts that surround the Starin Nature Preserve in the University Heights district of North Buffalo. The site is contained within tract 45 of Erie County, NY and is bordered by tracts 80.02 and 80.03 to the north; tracts 46.01 and 47 to the east; and tracts 51 and 48 to the west. For consistency, all data was collected using the 2019 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates as the most recently available census data.

Although the data is recent, there have also been major economic shifts due to the ongoing global COVID-19 pandemic. Survey data provides a solid foundation on which to better understand a community through quantitative research, but it may not accurately depict the truest or most current representation of community values and demographics. Therefore, it is imperative that we actively and directly engage with the community to account for shifts in socio-economic status not represented by this data, and to reflect the principles of inclusive planning.

B. RACE/ ETHNICITY

The site is predominantly White and Black, with a small percentage of Asian, American Indian, Pacific Islander and other races. According to the U.S. Census Data, 87% of residents in tract 80.03 are White, while other races such as Asian, African American, and Native Hawaiian only collectively comprise 13% of the tract. 99% of the population in tract 80.02 are White residents.11 Almost all the data collected shows that the White population around the study area is significantly higher than all other races, excluding tract 47. That is because Tract 47 is located east of Main Street, which is where 85% of Black Buffalonians live. This is due to Buffalo’s history in housing segregation that still persists today.12 FIGURE 2. Race By Census Tract

11 Race, Census Tract 45, Erie, NY. ACS 2019 (5-Year Estimates). Social Explorer. (2019). https://www.socialexplorer.com/ a9676d974c/view.

12 A City Divided, A Brief History of Segregation in Buffalo. A. Blatto. (2018). https://ppgbuffalo.org/files/documents/data-demographics-history/a_city_divided__a_brief_history_of_segregation_in_the_city_of_buffalo.pdf.

15 MAP 3. Bufalo Census Tract Map

16 C. GENDER IDENTITY Nearly all of the census tracts we collected data from have more women than men, though the difference is not too significant. Overall, 51.8% of the population in the selected census tracts are women, while men comprise 48.2% of it. Of all the census tracts, tract 80.03 has the smallest gap between the number of men and women with a difference of only 80 more women. Meanwhile, tract 80.02 has the largest difference of 440 more women. It is interesting to note that the two census tracts are adjacent to each other; In addition, tract 46.01, which encompasses the western half of University Heights, is the only tract to have more men than women with 148 more men.

13

Most residents living around the study area received a high school degree, a bachelor’s degree, and a master’s degree. Based on tracts 45, 46.01, 48, more than half of the population obtained bachelor's and master’s degrees. Conversely, 64% of the population in tract 47 received some college education obtained or a high school degree.

Overall, the percentage of educational attainment of the selected census tracts appears to be similar.14 FIGURE 5. Education Levels

FIGURE 3. Sex By Census Tract

E. AGE

FIGURE 4. Overall Sex Breakdown

Since tract 46.01 is located within University Heights, it is likely the reason why it is the only tract to have an obvious majority of 18-to-24 year olds. Tract 47 also has university students living there, but there is a noticeable increase of young adults aged 25 to 34 as well as middle-aged adults aged 35 to 54. These residents are possibly local Buffalonians, and the increase is likely due to the greater distance away from UB South Campus.

Tracts 45, 48, 51, 80.02, and 80.03 have relatively similar age demographics, and there tends to be more young and middle-aged adults. Overall, 25to-34 year olds are the most common age demographic when looking at the data as a whole, and there are similar numbers of college age students as well as people in their 30s, 40s and 50s.15

D. EDUCATION LEVEL 13 Sex, Census Tract 45, Erie, NY. ACS 2019 (5-Year Estimates). Social Explorer. (2019). https://www.socialexplorer.com/ a9676d974c/view.

14 Education, Census Tract 45, Erie, NY. ACS 2019 (5-Year Estimates). Social Explorer. (2019). https://www.socialexplorer. com/a9676d974c/view.

15 Age, Census Tract 45, Erie, NY. ACS 2019 (5-Year Estimates). Social Explorer. (2019). https://www.socialexplorer.com/ a9676d974c/view.

17 FIGURE 6. Age Demographics By Tract

18 3.5 SOCIOECONOMIC STATISTICS A. MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME Median household income is a good indicator of wealth within a community. In 2019, the median household income for Erie County was $58,121, with the City of Buffalo reporting a median household income of $37,354. The average median household income for the 7-tract study area is $57,173, which is 1.65% lower than the county and 41.9% higher than the city. Within the study area, tracts 47 and 51 reported the lowest median household incomes with $39,440 and $44,163 respectively, and both were higher than the city median household income. Tract 47 likely houses many college students who may hold part-time jobs, have limited income to report, or living on loans.

Tract 51 has older established neighborhoods and includes the Holling Homes development, a property of the City of Buffalo Municipal Housing Authority.

This tract is also home to the newly developed Rachel Vincent Way with residential infill development that may not have been included in the 2019 estimates. The highest income reported was found in tract 48 with a median household income of $76,270. This tract covers a significant portion of the commercial district on Hertel Avenue that boasts a variety of locally owned businesses, restaurants, and retail shops.16

FIGURE 7. Median House Incomes

B. EMPLOYMENT It is important to know the employment rate of a community to better understand the condition of the operating economy and get insight on the city’s labor market. In all census tracts, at least 75% of employed

individuals are White. In most of the census tracts, the second highest reported racial demographic of employed people are Black or African American, but this population is significantly smaller compared to the number of White employees. The only exception is census tract 46.01, where the number of Asian employees is slightly greater than the number of Black or African American employees. There are no reported Native Americans or Hawaiian employees residing in areas around our site. When comparing the data sets of 2014, 2016, and 2019, the employment rate appears to steadily decrease. The only exception lies in census tract 46.01; While the number of employed workers is still less than it was in 2014, it is greater than that in 2016. When comparing employment by sex, the number of male and female employees are relatively similar. For instance, census tracts 45, 48, 51, and 80.02 have more male employees, but tracts 46.01, 47, and 80.03 have more female employees. Overall, the percentage of male and female employees are relatively equal with less than 10% difference for all census tracts, with the highest difference in tract 80.02 of 9%.17

C. COMMUNITY HEALTH Trails and greenspaces are essential for numerous reasons, with community health being a major one. Physical inactivity and chronic diseases are becoming more prevalent in the U.S. When COVID-19 caused everyone to quarantine at home, people had less opportunities to exercise and relax in nature. If people did go outside, it was difficult to maintain social distancing even in public parks sometimes due to the sheer number of people and the insufficient supply of greenspace.

Despite the world slowly returning to ormalcy, there

is still an increased demand for further expansion and investment in trails and greenspace. A few of the many benefits of trails include better access to the outdoors and increased physical activity, which can help combat conditions such as coronary heart disease and obesity.18 According to the Trust for Public Land (TPL), Buffalo is ranked 38 out of 100 ParkScore cities in

16 Median Household Income (Inflation Adjusted Dollars), Census Tract 45, Erie, NY. ACS 2019 (5-Year Estimates). Social Explorer. (2019). https://www.socialexplorer.com/a9676d974c/view.

17 Labor Force, Civilian, Employed, Census Tract 45, Erie, NY. ACS 2019 (5-Year Estimates). Social Explorer. (2019). https://www.socialexplorer.com/a9676d974c/view.

18 BRFSS 2019, 2018. ACS 2019 (5-Year Estimates). ACS 2018 (5-Year Estimates). Places, Local Data for Better Health.

(2022). https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/22c7182a162d45788dd52a2362f8ed65.

19 the U.S. It is based on five characteristics of an effective park system: access, investment, acreage, amenities, and equity. The city of Buffalo has partnered up with the TPL to create a master plan that will set the course of parks in Buffalo for now and future generations. The main goal of this plan is to have a park and/or public greenspace within a 10-minute walk (1⁄2 mile) for every resident in the city. As of right now, about 89% of Buffalo residents live within a 10-minute walk of a park, while the national average is at 55%. It is also important to note that there is a race and income disparity in regards to this statistic. Residents in neighborhoods of color have access to 8% less park space per person than the city median and 53% less than those in white neighborhoods. In addition, residents in low-income neighborhoods have access to 8% more park space per person than the city median and 15% less than those in high-income neighborhoods.

Our focus area in the University Heights neighborhood is vital in increasing our percentage of residents living within a 10-minute walk of a park, as there is very little to no space available anywhere else in the immediate area due to dense residential neighborhoods. Within our focus area, there is ample room for certain amenities that would increase our ParkScore. Such amenities include basketball courts, a dog park, playgrounds, and a splash pad/sprayground. If we can include these amenities in our area and transform the site into an active public park, it will decrease the high-priority focus area that was highlighted in a map provided by the TPL by almost half. This site needs to be protected in order to move our city up in the rankings, and make it a better place to live no matter what neighborhood you end up in.

Data suggests that coronary heart disease and obesity are concerns in the census tracts including and surrounding the site, particularly the latter. Estimated prevalence rates for coronary heart disease for adults aged 18 years and over range from 4.2% to 5.7%. However, the rates are much higher for obesity and physical inactivity. Tracts 46.01 and tract 48 have the lowest estimated prevalence rates of 26.9% and 27.9% for obesity, respectively. The highest two prevalence rates for obesity are 37.4% and 34.9% for tracts 47 and 51, respectively. As for physical inactivity, the lowest estimated prevalence rates come in at 18.9% and 19.8% for census tracts 48 and 45. Similar to the statistics for obesity, tracts 47 and 51 have the highest prevalence rates of 30.2% and 27.3%, respectively.

Not only do trails and greenspaces allow people to enjoy the natural environment on a micro level, but they can also improve community health on a larger scale by improving access to the outdoors. Therefore, preserving and developing the Starin Nature Preserve into a trail has immense benefits for community health in the surrounding neighborhoods, and it can connect to the existing Minnesota Linear Park and further connect existing trails.

D. HOME OWNERSHIP VS. HOUSEHOLDS

Considering the community that will benefit from the Starin Nature Preserve, it is important to know which neighbors are more likely to commit to its long-term maintenance and care versus those who may enjoy it only briefly. Understanding the relationship of owner-occupied and renter-occupied households may enable a more targeted engagement process to determine the design qualities and community values that each type of household is more likely to respond to. In 2019, owner-occupied households made up 64.58% of Erie County households and 40.72% of households in the city of Buffalo.

19

19 Housing, Renter Occupied, Census Tract 45, Erie, NY. ACS 2019 (5-Year Estimates). Social Explorer. (2019). https:// www.socialexplorer.com/a9676d974c/view.

20 The 7-tract study area surrounding the Starin Nature Preserve has an average of 61.27% for owner-occupied households, which is 5.3% lower than the county average but 40.3% higher than the city average. Tract 80.03 has the highest rate of owner-occupied households with 88.34%. On the otherhand, tract 47 has the lowest percentage of owner-occupied households of 29.64% due to the higher student population.

Renter-occupied households account for 38.73% of households, which is 8.9% higher than the average for Erie County and 41.9% lower than the average for the city of Buffalo. Tract 80.03 has the highest rate of owner-occupied households as well as the lowest percentage of renter-occupied households of 11.66%. The inverse is true for tract 47, which has the highest rate of renter-occupied households of 70.36%. Tract 46.01, which borders University at Buffalo’s South Campus, has the most even distribution of renter- and owner-occupied households with a near 50-50 split.

It is important to note that green gentrification and displacement are possible with our plans to preserve and develop the site. The addition of trails and greenspaces can lead to an increase in surrounding property values and rents. People looking to buy homes in the neighboring areas around the Starin Nature Preserve may find it difficult to afford it, and rental households may be particularly affected. Considering the site is in University Heights where a significant number of UB students rent housing, it may cause students to be unable to afford to live there in the future. It is our hope to avoid this issue by implementing equitable community engagement strategies.20

3.6 LAND USE & TRANSPORTATION The location of the site is significant in that it lies between University Heights and North Buffalo. This offers a unique opportunity to bridge historic physical and social barriers between these two communities. Combined with the state’s current initiatives on expanding trails and greenways, this is a particularly pertinent time for the site to be preserved.

A. LAND USE & ZONING Currently, the majority of the University Heights neighborhood is located in an N-3 zone, which is considered an urban neighborhood according to Buffalo’s Unified Development Ordinance (UDO).

This zoning code applies to neighborhoods that were originally designed when the streetcar was the primary form of transportation, so it has a classically dense feel to the neighborhood with a mix of both commercial and residential properties. The neighborhood also contains the following zones: D-IL, light industry that popped up around railroads; N-4, single family residential; D-E, educational campus; N-1, urban core; and D-OG, open space. The site itself is zoned D-OG, meaning there are more parks, civic green spaces, or publically accessible areas with trees and landscape framed by an element such as a building facade, trees, or a fence (Buffalo NY, Zoning Map).21

B. COMMUNITY ASSETS A community asset is a resource that improves a community, and it can include individuals, associations, institutions, physical space, exchange, and culture or history. In the case of our project, commu20 Housing, Owner Occupied, Census Tract 45, Erie, NY. ACS 2019 (5-Year Estimates). Social Explorer. (2019). https:// www.socialexplorer.com/a9676d974c/view.

21 Zoning Map, City of Buffalo, Unified Development Ordinance. City of Buffalo. Mayor’s Office of Strategic Planning.

(2017). https://www.buffalony.gov/DocumentCenter/View/6105/Citywide_Zoning_Map_January2017?bidId=

21 MAP 4. Bufalo Zoning Map

22 nity assets include the University Heights Collaborative22 (UHC), the Tool Library, and the University at Buffalo (UB). The UHC is a community-based organization that fosters and promotes the well-being and cooperation of the neighborhood. It is composed of residents and other groups, such as local block clubs and neighborhood watch groups. The UHC consists of committees involved in beautification, business involvement, communication, neighborhood watch, and landlord outreach. It is a helpful resource because its board consists of residents in the neighborhood, so there is a direct line of communication with people in the community. Because the UHC also consists of block clubs, we can reach smaller organizations in the community as well as reach more residents that are not necessarilyaffiliated with these groups.

The Tool Library23 is a non-profit organization that lends tools for a small annual fee. Anyone in Buffalo or in nearby suburbs, both homeowners and renters alike, can sign up for a membership with the Tool Library. However, considering many households in University Heights consist of shortterm renters, particularly college students, it is especially helpful for University Heights residents to have a place where one can have access to tools that may not be needed for regular use. Rather than buying expensive tools that will only be used once or a few times, people can borrow tools as needed and save money. The Tool Library is home to numerous types of tools, and people can borrow tools needed for anything ranging from simple at-home DIY projects to larger scale events, such as neighborhood clean-ups and tree plantings.

UB is also a highly valued asset to the University Heights neighborhood, along with its faculty, students, and this studio. This studio aims to focus on equitable community engagement before developing design plans for the site, which is not always practiced in the field of environmental design. In addition, the students are also great assets because of their passion for helping the community. In fact, the April clean-up event had an incredibly high turnout, with a majority of the attendees being UB students.

With these community assets, we were able to network and reach community members that know the neighborhood and site well. For instance, we met with UHC board members and were able to get a better sense of the dynamic between longtime residents and student renters. In addition, we utilized tools from the Tool Library for the highly successful clean-up event. Despite the existence of these great community assets, there is a disconnect between longtime residents and student renters. It is not unheard of for older local residents to report negative interactions with college students, and it has contributed to strained relations over time. However, considering a majority of the clean-up event attendees were also UB students, this demonstrates their desire to connect with and help the community. We hope that this project can open a dialogue and improve communication between the two groups, as well as allow them to work together in deciding the fate of the Starin Nature Preserve.

C. TRANSPORTATION According to 2019 ACS census data, there is an obvious majority of people who drive a vehicle to commute to work. Census tract 80.02 has the highest estimated percentage of people who drive a vehicle to work with a rate of 93.9%, while tract 46.01 has the lowest rate of 71.2%. This discrepancy is possibly due to tract 46.01 being more likely to have more student renters, and college students are less likely to own a car compared to working adults. Of the people who drive a vehicle to work, a relatively small proportion of them carpool. For most census tracts, the rate of people carpooling ranges from roughly 22 About. University Heights Collaborative (UHC). (2022). http://ourheights.org/about/#mission.

23 About Us. The Tool Library. (2022). https://www.thetoollibrary.org/about/.

23 5% to 8%. Interestingly, this figure is significantly higher for tracts 47 and 80.03, with a rate of 20.9% and 13% of people, respectively. Tract 47 is also home to a considerable number of UB students, so it may be the increase in college students that causes such a difference in this census tract. However, it is unclear why tract 46.01 has a noticeably lower rate of 6.4%. Public transportation rates are also highly variable, with the lowest of 2.2% at tract 80.02. There is a moderate increase in public transit rates in tract 51 with a rate of 7.6%. Tracts 46.01 and 47 have the most people taking public transportation to work, with estimates of 17.6% and 10.6%, respectively. Figures for walking and biking are even lower, though the former is slightly more popular than the latter. Rates for walking range from 0% 7.4% while rates for biking range from 0% to 2%. Interestingly, census tract 45 is the only one to have rates of 0% for both walking and biking, and it is also the tract that contains the project site. If the site were to be preserved and developed into a trail, these figures may increase due to better connectivity. Though not as many people rely on public transportation compared to personal vehicles, this would likely change if Buffalo’s public transit system were to be improved. It is important to have an effective public transit system to serve those who rely on it, but it may not be sufficient enough for those who do need it. Nearly 56,700 households in Erie County do not own a car. Not only are 67% of these households low-income, but also 2,000 of them are not located in an area with easy access to transportation. There is also a large difference when it comes to race and who is using this public transport. For workers earning between $35,000 and $65,000, 21% of workers of color use public transport compared to 3% of white workers. When comparing workers earning between $15,000 and $35,000, 29% of workers of color use it while 7% of white workers use it. For workers who earn less than $15,000 per year, 51% of workers of color use public transportation while only 8% of white workers use it. As annual wages decrease, the gap between the number of workers of color versus white workers utilizing public transportation grows exponentially.

It is clear the city of Buffalo is largely dependent on single-occupancy vehicles, but there is still a sizeable portion of people who utilize non-motorized forms of transportation such as walking and biking. There is also a significant number of people who use more environmentally friendly motorized modes of transit such as public transportation and carpooling. Having more trails and greenspaces available may encourage people to use cars less, and perhaps more people would walk or bike to work.24

24 Commuting Characteristics By Sex, Census Tracts 45, 46.01, 47, 48, 51, 80.02, 80.03. ACS 2019 (5-Year Estimates). United States Census Bureau. (2019). https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?g=1400000US36029004500,36029004601,360290047 00,36029004800,36029005100,36029008002,36029008003&tid=ACSST5Y2019.S0801&moe=false.

04 FINDINGS & FIELDWORK

24 4.1 PROJECT CATALYST “The North Buffalo Rail Trail is located adjacent to a 17 acre site of undeveloped greenspace. In response to recent housing developments in the area, the desire among the community is to see this place preserved as greenspace in perpetuity and prevent any future development.”

-The University Heights Collaborative

4.2 SITE VISITS Starin Nature Preserve Our first visit to the Starin Nature Preserve took place on February 7th, 2022. This visit was used as an introduction to the site and for us as future planners to get a better understanding of the terrain and community we are working with. Upon first observations, the site was covered in snow, as there was a fresh snowfall a few days prior. There were a few people on the trail when we arrived, and there was evidence of residents walking their dogs in the preserve as well, which allowed us to see how the neighborhood interacts with the preserve. We noted that there were also some privacy concerns, as the site rises above property fences, allowing users to look directly into the homes bordering the preserve.

There were also some accessibility issues, as far as the abutments go. Overall, the site is in shape to redevelop these concerns.

25 Riverline Tour (Chris Kameck) Chris Kameck, a local artist and activist, provided us with a tour of the Riverline, which bleeds into the First Ward of Buffalo, NY. At this site, he provided plenty of stories and information about Red Jacket River Front Park and the surrounding areas. He told stories of how he interacted with the park and about how some of the residents in the First Ward also engaged with the space. The First Ward is next to Larkinville, an area that has seen significant private investment in recent years. The residents in the area are concerned of gentrification bleeding into their neighborhood.

To be specific, a high end apartment complex is being planned in an old factory next to Red Jacket River Front Park, which is receiving push back from the current residents in the neighborhood.

The current residents are worried about being displaced from their neighborhood, some of which have lived there their whole life. It helped that we were able to talk to some of the residents who were walking their dogs or riding their bikes, allowing the class to gain perspective on the community itself.

The Riverline project itself is a nature trail and greenway linking Buffalo to the Buffalo River.

This project has engaged with the community several ways. First, they held door-to-door surveying and canvassing the residents of the neighborhood. Another way they engaged with the community was painting a mural with children in the neighborhood. Lastly, they held live-meetings online with polls so the community could vote on designs for the project.

26 Tyler Street (Darren Cotton) To prepare for our community clean-up, we began to clean up the Tyler Street Community garden and prepare it for springtime use. This was a previous community engagement project and is used as a community garden in University Heights. This was a hands-on introduction into project planning, and implementation. We talked through what the garden needed first, assessing the area, and then borrowed tools from one of our community stakeholders, the Tool Library, to implement. We cleaned up the trash within the garden and the surrounding area. We also flipped the beds in the garden and did brush removal. This was just a small taste of what the Earth Day Clean-Up would look like and entail.

We also used this as an opportunity to determine what tools we may need to borrow from The Tool Library for our clean up event at the Starin Nature Preserve and to understand what we would need to consider when organizing activities for a large-scale community event.

4.3 SERVICE EVENTS Earth Day Cleanup The Earth Day Clean-Up is our community engagement event, in which we cleaned up the Starin Nature Preserve and asked the community what they wanted to see moving forward. This involved cleaning up the site of debris and litter, trimming and removing brush, and engaging with the community as far as what they would like to see done with the preserve.

EARTH DAY CLEAN UP EVENT APRIL

Join us for a community clean up event and participate in the contest for a chance to win a PRIZE!

23

rd

SATURDAY

Linear Park/Rail Trail Cleanup Meet at 10AM

The Tool Library (5 W. Northrup Place)

To register scan the barcode or visit the link below www.thetoollibrary.org/service Get in touch: info@thetoollibrary.org 716-510-1745 | @thetoollibrary

27

28 4.4 COMMUNITY SURVEY During the clean-up event, we surveyed the participants. We asked a series of questions, involving age, sex, race, mode of transportation, etc. This provided an opportunity to pilot an actual community engagement activity. We worked hard to make the proess inclusive by having a digital survey and a hard copy of the survey on site.

Of the 64% of surey respondents that claimed they do not utilize the space, the primary reason they cited for not using it was because they did not know it exsisted. This amounted to a whopping 57% of responses citing this reason. 26% of them claimed that a lack of accessible trasnit was the primary reason they dont use the space.

We found that most of the community would prefer being notified about events and future activities by email or social media. A very small minority of people would prefer in-person meetings as opposed to these methods. This, along with mailers, prooved to be the least popular form of engagement. Lying somewhere inbetween the line of popular and unpopular was texting as a form of engagement - coming in with a score of 13%.

From the collected survey results, we found that 50% of participants who arrived at the EarthDay Cleanup event drove to the location. This means that 21 out of the 42 responses indicated driving as a form of arrival. This signifies that driving to the rail trail may serve to be a popular method of transport in the future. Out of the 42 total responses, the second most popular form of transport to the site was biking which amounted to 13 of the 42 (31%) of participants. This was a pleasantly surprising figure - indicating to us that the rail trail seemed to be incentivizing this method of transport. Coming in next was public transit. This method, although ranking third in popularity, ended up showing a significant drop off in users as opposed to driving and biking, This method of transport ended up scoring 5 out of 42 users which amounts to a 12% popularity score. Finally, walking prooved to be the least popular method of arrival at our Earth Day event only coming in at 3 out of 42 users (7%).

Our survey suggests that residents like to use the rail trail primarily for enjoying nature and relaxing. This amounts to 40% of the 36% of respondents who do utilize the space. The second most popular reason for using this space was for exersize.

29 4.5 Interviews Jajean Rose-Burney (WNY Land Conservancy) Jajean Rose-Burney from the Western New York (WNY) Land Conservancy helped us develop ideas as far as their community engagement and processes from their work. First, they suggested meeting with the community you are trying to plan and impact before the media makes them aware. By starting with traditional in-person methods, the community gets a more personal engagement experience. Surveying residents is also an impactful way to get a sense of how the community feels about and wants from the space, especially from a data standpoint. To gain momentum on the project, it’s recommended to do direct community improvement events, much like our own community event.

Jennifer McQuilkin (Former Studio Professor) Jennifer McQuilkin gave beneficial insight into Human-Centered Design. Using this strategy, we conceived of the idea for user personas, which will be mentioned later in this report. Through developing user personas, we can begin to understand the needs of the community, define problems and barriers, ideate possible solutions, test solutions, and collect feedback. She was very helpful in fleshing out the different types of people who may be interacting with the community and the site, and how we can appeal and be inclusive towards them.

Meeting With the UHC Meeting with our main stakeholders, the University Heights Collaborative was a crucial part of getting involved in the community engagement process for our site. Our meeting with the UHC consisted of interacting with Stephen Arlington, Mike Cartright, Linda Garlow, Candy Hayes, Dayna Overton-Burns, and Raymond Reichert in order to gain a wider perspective of the study area at hand.

05 BARRIERS & PERSONAS

31 5.1 BARRIERS The idea of equitable community engagement is a recently created term in the realm of urban planning and design, but it is one that has gained a lot of traction since its inception, and it is rare to find a modern public plan of any kind that does not include this concept. We, as a society and especially as planners, have come a long way when it comes to approaching community engagement in a more inclusive way, and the results have been almost universally positive. Because this concept is so fresh, it is vital to gain an understanding of what works and what does not work in the planning process, which is why we need to focus our efforts on recognizing and understanding what type of barriers may exist in the process that ultimately exclude certain demographics of people. It is important to realize that just because we are open to the opinions of the public, this does not necessarily mean that the public knows how to become involved. For our project, we actively researched and hypothesized as many barriers in as many demographics as possible.Next, we created solutions to mitigate these barriers to equitable engagement. Here we will highlight the most common barriers in participation that community members could face using research from previous studios, engagement plans from various cities, as well as our own findings throughout the semester.

5.2 PERSONAS To gain a better understanding of possible barriers in community engagement, our class utilized user personas that were created by a previous studio class and also created our own user personas to help us gain perspective of possible users of our study area. Developing user personas is highly beneficial in comprehending various behavior patterns, goals, skills, attitudes, and background information of demographics that we otherwise knew very little about. Developing user personas is also a way to help designers build empathy in order to gain a perspective similar to the user. Creating user personas can help designers see beyond their own perspective and recognize that other people have unique needs and expectations. By thinking about the needs of a fictional, yet relevant, persona, designers may be better able to infer what a real person might need.

32

Emma Chang Introduction

21 year-old UB student; Recently moved into a house in the University Heights neighborhood that she is renting with some of her friends

Uses

Uses the site to travel to and from UB’s South Campus; uses the site as a place for exercise and likes to run there

Barriers

Hawk the American Robin Introduction

American Robin, which is a common bird throughout the continent that can be found in various outdoor environments and climates

Uses Using the site for nesting, as a place to forage for berries and worms, as a pick-up spot for attracting a mate, and as a place to show off his lyrical abilities

Desired Outcomes

Barriers

Lack of proper lighting

Increased interactions between her and her neighbors

Community lacks knowledge

The site lacks the proper space to take part in exercise activities that will not obstruct people using the trail

Additional programming that appeals to her age group/demographic

Wildlife lacks a voice

More attention for wildlife

Lack of positive interaction between site users and the wildlife

For the use of pesticides and herbicides at the site to be eliminated

Lacks a connection to her neighbors and the community due student status

More lighting to make space safer

Desired Outcomes

To maintain the environment and keep clean

33

Lt. Paveljack Introduction

Sunja Vang Introduction

73 year-old Navy veteran that currently lives at the VA hospital located on Bailey Ave

30 year-old mother of three kids and recent Laotian immigrant to Buffalo, Non-native English speaker

Uses

Uses

Uses the trail for strolls with his grandchildren and as a place to observe the wildlife present

Uses the trail for walks with her children and as a pass-through to get to nearby stores

Barriers

Barriers

Desired Outcomes

limited to handicap-accessible infrastructure

More programming available at the site for all age groups

Struggles to attend meetings that are in person but is not completely familiar with current technologies

More amenities at the site as well as those that are ADA accessible

immunocompromised due to his age

More variety in the platforms in which meetings are held

Speaks English but cannot read or write

Desired Outcomes

Access for strollers and restrooms

Works evenings and is unable to attend community meetings

A place to relax and enjoy family and friends

Does not understand how she can get involved with the community

Multilingual signage with visual icons

34

Julieta Madrigal Introduction

32 year-old wife and mother of three that recently moved to the University Heights neighborhood from Colombia

Uses

Diana Owens Introduction

50 year-old Caucasian woman with 6 year-old daughter who chose to give up previous job for daughter’s wellbeing

Uses

Has not yet visited the site and has only seen the site in passing because she and her family are new residents to the neighborhood

Lives in Minnesota Linear Park’s homeless settlement with her daughter

Barriers

Barriers

Desired Outcomes

Lack of motivation to participate in events

More information about the park

Is a non-native English speaker

Desired Outcomes

Multi-lingual engagement options

Busy family life afffects attendance

Opportunities to build connections

Too busy finding daily supplies for her daughter and herself

More signage of assistance for homeless individuals

Lack of community connection & knowlegdge of events and the site

Informing non-native English speakers about existing & upcoming resources

Lack of connections with other members of the community

Community activities that are geared towards her daughter’s age range

35

Kameron Rivers Introduction

10 year-old Public School student, enjoys video games, lives with his Mom and sister in University Heights

Uses Uses the site for sledding in Winter, meeting friends afterschool, and walking on family outings

Barriers

Lack of lighting at night

Desired Outcomes

Age-appropriate programs and groups

Mother worries about safety

Ability to play safely

Lack of youth programs and time constraints

Family programs

36 5.3 AWARENESS A. LACK OF UNDERSTANDING The most common barrier to equitable community engagement is a general lack of understanding of how to get involved in the planning process. This lack of awareness is most often caused by issues in communication between the planners and the public.

B. SIGNAGE Signs are invaluable for parks, trails, and greenways. They make spaces interactive, convey information, create safer environments, and help users find their way. There is currently limited signage in the park, and it can deter individuals from using this space and automatically excludes those who are not aware that the park exists.

C. LACK OF PLANNING Youth: There is little done to involve the youth in the engagement process; meetings can be boring for children, and community events, such as clean-ups and plantings, are difficult for children to do, especially without adult supervision.

Elderly: It is difficult to engage this demographic when events are announced via social media and/ or other forms of social media. There is also a barrier in the UHC meetings themselves in that they are done primarily online.

Flora and Fauna: There is a lack of education and awareness in regard to the plant and animal species both native and non-native that are found in the park.

Utilizing Public Dpace: This space is open to the public yet it is scarcely used for public events through community members, the University at Buffalo, and many other organizations in the area.

Lack of Service Events: Although there are various clean-up events throughout the year, there needs to be a great deal more– the community does not get much help from the NFTA or other city workers in regard to cleaning this space and removing large and/or potentially hazardous debris.

5.4 ACCESSIBILITY A. SAFETY Lighting: The park has two tiers; the only light posts are along the lower level’s east side path- this barrier prevents users from being able to use the space at night, a time when many people use the park as a shortcut to get to various destinations.

Limited Security: there are a couple cameras present on the property but they have limited view and the video feed is low quality.

Privacy Concerns: Asking for personal data could make residents fear that they could be a victim of discrimination or experience a threat to their livelihood, so it’s important to be transparent about why you want particular information and explain how it will be used.

37 B. ADA BARRIERS Steps, curbs, and lack of paved pathways/trails prevent access to people who use wheelchairs. Lack of handrails on any of the trails’ inclines is also problematic for ADA as well as disabled and elderly individuals.

C. SEATING & REST STATIONS The park has close to 2 miles of paths/walking space and only a handful of benches or areas to rest.

There are no benches on the top levels of trails which can be problematic for disabled and eldery individuals using the space.

D. LACK OF MAINTENANCE There are issues regarding overgrown trees, bushes and grass impeding the trails, as well as an accumulation of trash throughout the year, a lot of which is dangerous in nature (drug paraphernalia, sharp objects, rope and wires to trip on, etc.). During the winter months the snow removal is sparse or non-existent, making it difficult and sometimes impossible for park goers to utilize this space.

E. ENTRANCE DIFFICULTY Unlike the rest of the park, which has multiple access points, the western neighborhood has very few areas to enter the park due to houses and fence lines impeding the way.

F. WAYFINDING There is a lack of signage, both temporary and permanent throughout and surrounding the park– many people do not know that this park exists, and navigating the trails can be difficult to new users.

5.5 INCLUSIVITY A. TECHNOLOGY DISPARITIES People who spend less time online and have lower digital capability may not be able to participate in online community engagement and communications efforts effectively.

B. LACK OF TIME As much as community members would like to be involved, many of them just do not have the time to do so, especially when planning meetings and events are held during the day. People who are employed can also find it difficult to attend during work hours.

C. LACK OF CHILDCARE Parents and caregivers can find it difficult to participate in face-to-face engagement events, especially during the planning process, as it may be difficult to find child care and can be expensive to hire a sitter for those who are financially strained.

D. NAVIGATION Aside from the neighborhood to the west, there is a general difficulty in being able to access the park, especially during the winter when most of the access points are buried in snow. There are no maps posted on any of the current signage, there are very few signs that point in the direction of the park

38 rom the most commonly used streets (Main Street, Starin, Kenmore Avenue), and in the park, the lack of wayfinding signage is an issue in that the space is not perfectly straight and can get very confusing.

E. SHORT-TERM VS. LONG-TERM RESIDENTS Short Term: This demographic mainly refers to college students living in the area who may not feel the need to be involved in the engagement process because they will not be living here long, or that they do not have as much empathy for a space that they barely know. The student population may also face discrimination barriers due to the history of students in the area being disrespectful of the space (littering, vandalism, noise complaints, etc.)

Long Term: The effects of the short-term residents may also create a barrier for long-term residents because they may think it is not worth the trouble to create a space that may inevitably be abused or destroyed.

F. LANGUAGE BARRIER It’s important to understand the various languages that are spoken within a community and offer multilingual services so that people can interpret and engage with materials in their preferred language.

Matching the right language level for the audience is equally important.

G. INCOME BARRIER People may not be able to take off of work or do not have the discretionary income to participate regularly in community meetings as a volunteer.

H. LACK OF STUDENT CONNECTION The University at Buffalo has created events for the public but has historically only hosted them on UB property and have not utilized other public space, such as the rail trail park.

06 SOLUTIONS & IMPLEMENTATION

40 6.1 Building Public Interest Awareness Based on our survey responses, many people are not aware of the site itself or events which the community holds. An example of how awareness can impact a project is the t-shirt design created by the studio as a logo for the Earth Day clean up event. Creating a recognizable brand for the service event helped bring more attention and awareness to the event and introduced the site to the community as an identifiable asset, even without an official title.

6.2 Lack of Communication Creating a Project Brand Considering there is not an official name for this project or site, it can be challenging for people to identify and locate it. It is highly recommended that one of the first courses of action be naming the site. Allowing the location to be easily identifiable will bring more awareness to the site and the project.

Create a unified project and community brand. This will be beneficial to identify the community group and get people engaging with the members.

“I Love Public Parks” Earth Day Tree created by Julia Bertolini

Create Collateral Materials Collateral materials should be created explaining the “who, what, when, where, and why” of the project. This could be listed on flyers, postcards, or other print and digital materials. The next step would be to create a mailing list of the residents that would like to be involved in the project. This can be done by collecting emails and addresses at neighborhood events and meetings.

Continuous Communication The collected contact information can then be used to keep everyone notified of upcoming events, meetings, and plans for the site. A presence in news stories, web pages, and social media would also be beneficial in spreading information and attracting engagement with the community. It is important to be respectful of the community by allowing them to be the first to hear of, review, and vote on plans before it is shared by larger media outlets.

41 6.3 Signage and Wayfinding Wayfinding Signage, both on and off the site, is crucial for attracting people to engage with the site. Accessibility concerns can be addressed by providing easy-to-read signage to properly direct people to the site from major travel corridors, like Hertel Avenue, Main Street, Kenmore Avenue, and Starin Avenue. It would be beneficial to have the site added to local, regional, statewide, or national maps of trails.

Temporary Signage Temporary signs and posters would be a great way to test the efficacy of signage to determine if it would bring added awareness to the site. WalkYourCity.org has temporary signs which are easy to install and help users better understand the spaces around them. These could be placed along the major travel corridors mentioned above in addition to places along the Rail Trail. Temporary signage is a cheap and easy way to run a trial to determine the need for signage, appropriate placement locations, and improve messaging until there is long-term funding available for the site.

Wayfinding signage can go up to direct people to the site. There can be scannable QR codes which lead to maps, websites or additional information.

Educational & Informative Signage This can include directions to the location, information about the site, along with educational signage.

There can also be updated and newly created maps to inform users on the physical space, paths, additional information and park amenities. This can build upon the existing information that is exhibited along the Rail Trail. These could provide information regarding flora and fauna.

Community Bulletin Board Bulletin boards at the crossroads of Linear Park and the Rail Trail are also recommended. These could be used for groups involved with the site, like the UHC and Tool Library, to share their information and for the community to share their knowledge. For example, if someone wants to put up a business card or a flyer for a local event.

42 6.3 Lack of Programming Ecological Based Events Some examples that could be used are nature walks and Flora and Fauna events conducted by the Buffalo Audubon Society, where the community can get educated on the wildlife in the area. This can include information on the ecological research done for the site about native plants and the revitalization and preservation of the native ecology or the use of pesticides and herbicides.

Community Events Public and community outreach events hosted at the space may include: public art exhibits, created and shown by local artists; pet parades that could be charitable events to aid with local not-for-profits, and in partnership with the VA Hospital; and rummage sales or farmer’s markets, also in partnership with charitable organizations or to provide maintenance funding for the site.

A final suggestion is to host annual clean-up and service events at this location to build on the momentum of the recent Earth Day Clean-Up event. To appeal to all ages, it is recommended to include youth programming that could include tactile projects such as building bird baths or boxes; and senior programming to promote health, wellness, and social networking. Each program also provides an opportunity to solicit additional feedback on the prospective design and implementation of the project site.

‘Pup Parade’ is a great way to celebrate veterans and have a fun event of dog walking which not only includes veterans and their service dogs, but other pets as well which will help celebrate and raise money for those who served our country.

Lack of Time Many people in the community might not have time to attend meetings or events and it is important to understand as well as include them in the process. Canvassing and door-to-door surveys are a great way to get out information to the community without making it mandatory for them to meet at a certain time and location. Sending mailers out to all households in the neighborhood is also an option to inform the community on events and needed to know information. Community meetings can be recorded whether they are in person or virtual. That way, people who might be unavailable to attend are still able to get the information provided at the meeting.

6.4 Accessibility Accessibility for the site is a key component for engaging with the community and attracting visitors. This entails that the area is a safe, ADA compliant, and easily accessible space.

Lack of Maintainance The site is currently lacking year-round maintenance. To keep activity levels on the site throughout the winter months, it is recommended to contact the City of Buffalo Department of Public Works in regards to keeping the paths clear from barriers during this time.

43 6.5 Inclusivity Inclusivity is the most important aspect of equitable engagement. Ensuring all community members’ voices are heard is crucial to better understand and meet the needs of all.

Technology Disparities Some members of the community might not be familiar or comfortable using technology such as online platforms. The Covid-19 pandemic has created a new need for online platforms and communication. It will be important to provide opportunities for both online and in-person meetings. There are also Zoom tutorials on their website such as their ‘show me videos’ and live tutorials.

Language Barriers Not all people living in the community are fluent in English. It is important to recognize and make accommodations to ensure they have the opportunity to engage with the community and the spaces available. Educating the community on currently existing resources such as Buffalo Public Schools Adult Education Program, New York State for New Americans, Bow Valley College English Literacy Readers, and many more. It is important to make engagement materials available in multiple languages and could be beneficial to employ a translator to attend meetings.

Short-term and Long-term Residents There is room to improve the current relationship between short-term and long-term residents. Many of the short-term residents in the area are students attending UB. Engaging UB students in community initiatives and events can help bring a new bond between these residents. One example of an event which will bring UB students to the site is a spin off UB on the Green which could be called UB on the trail. There is also the option of promoting volunteer opportunities to UB students to engage and care for a space in the community which will further improve the relationship between long-term residents and short-term residents. There is also the opportunity that short-term residents could become longterm residents and develop a vested interest in the community.

‘UB on the Trail’ can be a great way to invite students to the space and engage with the members of the community.

UB Connections Reaching out to UB students can be beneficial to create more connections within the University Heights neighborhood. This includes those students living within the area as there is an additional opportunity to build mutually beneficial relationships with temporary residents. Opportunities for continuing studio courses can also help bring student engagement to the site and its community members. In addition to the UB School of Architecture and Planning, other programs, such as the School of Public Health and School of Social Work can also be included in future research and service events.

44

ACCESSIBILITY Group Rides

Fall 2022 - Organize a group bike ride along the rail trail to take place on a Saturday.

Participants could stop at different destinations and point sof interest along the trail. For those without access to a bike, a partnership with Reddy Bikeshare might allow free or discounted bike rentals.

Partnerships • UHC, GOBike, Reddy Bikeshare, Slow Roll • UB Cost • • • • •

Organization Flyers, Advertisement Media Food Prizes

• Reddy Bikeshare membership

ACCESSIBILITY Community Snow Shoveling Event Winter 2022 - After a heavy snowfall, community members could organize a “shovel mob” to ensure pathways along trails are clear and accessible. Shovels could be borrowed from The Tool Library and warm refreshments could be donated by area businesses.

Partnerships • UHC • City of Buffalo Department of Public Works • Tool Library Cost • • • • •

Organization Flyers, Advertisement Media Food Prizes

• Tools/material

AWARENESS Wayfinding Signage Spring 2023 - Temporary signage is installed along major travel corridors like Main Street, Kenmore Avenue, and Hertel Avenenue to direct people to the rail trail. QR Codes on the signs can be linked to a website with additional information or a project survey.

Partnerships • UHC • Tool Library • UB students Cost • • • •

Organization Installation Printing Maintenance/Removal

45

AWARENESS Pup Parade Fall 2022 - An event to celebrate veterans and their service animals as well as fundraise to support veteranoriented causes. Neighbors with pets can also register to walk in the parade with their favorite pooch!

Partnerships • UHC • VA Hospital Cost • • • • • •

Organization Volunteers Food and Drinks Prizes Media Printing

INCLUSIVITY UB on the Trail Summer 2023 - Shift one or more performances of “UB on the Green” to along the North Buffalo Rail Trail.

Potential to use the stone abutments at the crossroads as a natural sound shell. The event could also encourage residents and students to walk or bike down to the site.

Partnerships • UHC • UB Cost • • • • • • • •

Organization Installation Printing Food Volunteers Media Musical artists Permits

INCLUSIVITY Monthly Zoom Workshops Fall 2022 - Partnering with the community center, free monthly workshops could be held in the computer lab for those who may be unfamiliar with video call technology.

Flyers, postcards, and word of mouth advertisement would be necessary to reach the intended audience.

Partnerships • Gloria J. Parks Community Center • UHC • UB (students) Cost • • • •

Organization Teachers Advertisements Printing

Source: https://www.buffalo.edu/community/events/ub-on-thegreen.html

46

POTENTIAL PROJECT COSTS ITEM

COST

Flyers, postcards, various print material for 2000 flyers

$160

Social media and email service costs

$20/month

Staff/Consultant Time

$30-75/hour

Bulletin Board

$800-$1,000

Signage (Temporary)

$20 per sign

Signage (Permanent)

$100-$600 per sign

Event Permits

$35/day

Postage

$800 per 2000 postcards

Childcare

$20/hr

Translation services

$30/hr

Maintenance & Clean Up

Volunteer hour or $39+/hr

Programming Costs (service events, paying vendors, advertisement, food)

Varied

47

POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES Ralph C. Wilson Jr. Foundation Legacy Funds Grant Size: $10,000-$50,000 Application Dates: November to December Goal: “To serve to support localized projects across the WNY region, for which a smaller grant can make all the difference.”

Funding our Solutions: All proposed solutions could be funded by this. https://www.cfgb.org/nonprofits/grants/ralph-wilson-legacy/

Rails to Trails Conservancy - Trails Grant Program Grant Size: $1,000-$25,000 Application Dates: Rolling Deadline Goal: Individual to network projects.

“These investments represent RTC’s commitment to working directly with community organizations to create meaningful walking and bicycling connections that can positively impact economic and health outcomes in their communities.”

Funding our Solutions: Snow removal and new trail maintenance, temporary signage for the site. https://www.railstotrails.org/our-work/grants/

Community Forest Conservation Grant Program Grant Size: $50,000-$300,000 Application Dates: January 24, 2022 to April 13, 2022 Goal: “This grant program funds municipal land acquisition for community forests, which are vital for wildlife habitat, flood mitigation, recreational opportunities, mental health, air quality, water quality, and to meet the obligations outlined in New York's Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act. Community forests build local ownership of forests and local participation in forest management.”

Funding our Solutions: Nature walk and bird watch. https://www.dec.ny.gov/lands/124345.html

AARP Community Challenge Grant Grant Size: $10,000-$50,000 Application Dates: January 25, 2022 to March 22, 2022 Goal: “AARP Community Challenge grants can be used to support: permanent physical improvements in the community, temporary demonstrations that lead to long-term change, new, innovative programming or services.”

Funding our Solutions: Implementation and establishment of the site, and access to site (ADA compliance). https://www.aarp.org/livable-communities/community-challenge/

07 CONCLUSION

49 7.1 EVERY ENDING IS THE BEGINNING OF SOMETHING NEW...

As the studio class had gathered information, experience, and knowledge of equitable engagement, the entire project would not have been successful without this class’ passion to understand its importance in many different aspects. Recalling frequent discussions and visits with guest speakers, the priority tasked onto the studio class was to dedicate ourselves not only now, but forever, to learn and create relationships with the people we plan with. This core tenet of equitable engagement is what will allow planners to answer, “How will the community benefit from this method of involvement and planning?”

Without the time-invested commitments and dedication of the study area’s existing community, this studio project would be challenged with breaking the initial barriers of equitable community engagement. Building on existing practices and events of equitable engagement within the University Heights neighborhood, the studio class was able to identify and engage with existing neighborhood resources, local institutions and small businesses that also wish to continue improving the study area and its community. Among numerous in-class assignments, site visits and the class’ execution of the Earth Day Clean Up service event, it was apparent of the study population’s positive reception to the class’ efforts.

By evaluating in-class equitable engagement exercises and comparing them with former studio assignments, this studio class was able to identify and categorize barriers the study population would face from equitable engagement with the study site. Incorporating the lessons and experiences gained from the main service event, the studio class ideated solutions of all scales that could be implemented in future engagement efforts. Understanding that external factors could introduce possible barriers, utilizing gained engagement experiences had allowed the studio class to conceive of solutions to the possible barriers for future equitable engagement. Along with identifying potential dependencies such as costs, labor and other resources that could be obstacles, presenting these factors and their needs can better prepare future plans and events for equitable engagement practices.

In summary, the studio class diverted from typical planning and engagement processes to learn and interact with its study population in finding the best ways of interacting with the community.

With guidance and support from in-practice professionals, community members and former studio outcomes, this studio class identified and challenged obstacles of practicing equitable engagement.

By evaluating responses and recommendations from the study population, the class’ solutions were adapted and organized to present a localized best practice for equitable engagement efforts for the studio project. The cumulative effort executed by the studio class has added a foundational perception of equitable engagement within the University Heights neighborhood that will empower its community members to engage further with other planners and developers.

50

Meet the Team Richard Anderson: Contribution to The Studio: Surveys, Script Development/ Presenter Future Plans: Working at Frank Lloyd Wright’s Darwin D. Martin House

"Love working with the community and making

an impact."

Rasheed Aribidesi Contribution to The Studio: Painting, General Cleanup, & Report Layout Future Plans: Working in Construction or Landscape Architecture

"I like the contrast betweem that mural and the

graffiti bring to our space."

Julia Bertolini Contribution to The Studio: Food Stand, General Supervisor, & Script Development/ Presenter Future Plans: Working for Americorp for a year then getting her Masters for Landscape Architecture

"I like the hands-on aspect of this class."

Caitlin Chan Contribution to The Studio: Survey & Reference List Future Plans: Attending Cuny Hunter College for Masters of Urban Planning

"I appreciate the guest speakers and love

listening to them."

Reilly Dzielski Contribution to The Studio: Photos, General Content, & Development Future Plans: Returning to the University at Buffalo for the Masters of Urban Planning

"I like participating in the cleanup events with

the community."

Olivia Jiang Contribution to The Studio: Socal Media, Script Development/ Presenter, & Slide Deck Design Future Plans: Attending Cornell University for Masters of Regional Planning

"I like all my classmates and the energy they

bring."

Tanner Laramee Contribution to The Studio: Brush Removal, Maps & Tables, & Photos Future Plans: Plans on attending the State University of New York College of Environmental

Science and Forestry for his Masters of Landscape Architecture

"I love the cleanup events."

Fanny Liang Contribution to The Studio: Survey, General Content Development Future Plans: Joining the tech field

"I love the chance I got to experience working

with greenspace."

51 Ellison Mcmahon Contribution to The Studio: General Cleanup & Script Development/ Presenter Future Plans: Attending Syracuse University for Masters of Urban Planning

"I like it when the whole classwork like a team."

James Metzger Contribution to The Studio: Brush Removal, Maps & Tables, & Photos Future Plans: Returning to the University at Buffalo for the Masters of Architecture and

Master of Urban Planning

"I like the folks I met during the semester."

Maegen O’ Hara Contribution to The Studio: Painting concrete slab, General Content Development, & Slide Deck Design Future Plans: Returning to the University at Buffalo for the Masters of Urban Planning

"Love the hands-on experience."

Brittany Robinson Contribution to The Studio: General Cleanup, General Content Development, & Slide Deck Design Future Plans: Working in the field

"I like the level of excitement to having public

greenspace."

Trevor Rubino Contribution to The Studio: Contest* Cover Page Design Future Plans: Returning to University at Buffalo for Masters of Architecture

"I love the hands-on approach and interactive

engagement with the community" Angus Sunday Contribution to The Studio: Contest, General Cleanup, & Meet the Team Content Future Plans: Returning to the University at Buffalo for the Masters of Architecture

"I like working alongside my classmates and

professors."

Serina Valletta Contribution to The Studio: Event Manager & General Content Development Future Plans: Attending NC State for Masters of Architecture

"Love the class cleanup event."

Jacob Vollers Contribution to The Studio: Media Press & Report Layout Future Plans: Returning to University at Buffalo for Masters of Urban Planning

"Cool class exploration of the lower South

Ward."

Taylor Wallace Contribution to The Studio: Photos & Script Development/ Presenter Future Plans: Attending UC Berkeley for Masters of Landscape Architecture

"Was an experience picking up heavy garbage

at the cleanup event."

52 Sage Welte Contribution to The Studio: Contest, General Supervision, Script Development/ Presenter, Executive Summary Future Plans: To contiune domestic and international travel

"This is the only class I have had field trips in."

Bobby Zhao Contribution to The Studio: Social Media, Cover Design, & Layout Report Future Plans: Returning to University at Buffalo for Masters of Architecture

"Glad I got to experience a wonderful first

and last in-person studio."

53

GLOSSARY OF TERMS Asset-Based Community Development - Asset-Based Community Development’s core idea is that

communities can drive the development process themselves by identifying and mobilizing existing, but often unrecognized assets. This requires a strong commitment to community driven efforts through active citizenship and participatory democratic methods.

Equitable Community Engagement - For engagement to be equitable, it must aim for participation

from a group representative of a community’s geography, race/ethnicity, age, gender, and other demographic characteristics. It must place specific emphasis on those who will be most adversely impacted by the project and those who are most often marginalized in these conversations.

Green Gentrification - The process of adding additional green space results in higher property value

and rent.

Participatory Budgeting - Community members identify spending ideas in meetings and online, then

select budget delegates to represent their neighborhoods. With help from experts, the delegates transform the initial ideas into concrete project proposals. Community members vote on which projects to fund and the City implements the top projects.

Placemaking - A community centered place to create an inclusive space for all, regardless of money,

continuously promotes the neighborhood for years to come.

Rail Trail - A former rail line turned into a trail/walking path.

Redlining - The federal government created color coded maps of every metropolitan area in the

country to indicate where it was safe to insure mortgages. Anywhere where Black people lived or lived nearby were colored red to indicate to appraisers that these neighborhoods were too risky to insure mortgages. Redlining restricted the flow of capital in and out of Black neighborhoods as restrictive covenants and other forms of housing discrimination kept minorities from moving into white neighborhoods.

Regenerative Development - An economy based on extracting from a finite system faster than the ca-

pacity of the system to regenerate will eventually come to an end—either through collapse or through our intentional re-organization.

User Persona - A person created with specific demographic information and personality, usually for

the purpose of including underrepresented groups.

54

BIBLIOGRAPHY All About Birds. (2019). American Robin. The Cornell Lab. Retrieved from https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/American_Robin/id.

Alta Planning + Design, & GBNRTC Bicycle Subcommittee. (2020). (rep.). (Greater Buffalo Niagara Regional Transportation Council, Ed.) Bike Buffalo Niagara: Regional Bicycle Master Plan.

Retrieved from https://www.gbnrtc.org/regional-bike-buffalo-niagara-master-plan.

Ann, Tiffani. (2022). Reddy Bikeshare. Retrieved from https://www.tiffaniann.com/reddy-bikeshare.

American Planning Association. (2017). Great Urban Parks Campaign Case Studies, Engage ment. Retrieved from https://planning-org-uploaded-media.s3.amazonaws.com/docu ment/ GUP-Case-Study-Engagement.pdf.

Ananat, Elizabeth O. (2005). The Wrong Side(s) of the Tracks, Estimating the Causal Effects of Racial Segregation on City Outcomes. MIT. Retrieved from https://www.economics.uci.edu/files/ docs/colloqpapers/w06/Ananat.pdf.

Arnstein, Sherry R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Planning Association,35:4, 216-224. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225.

Arellano, Megan. (2017). Another car nearly landed on the Cherry Creek bike path after a crash.

Denverite. Retrieved from https://denverite.com/2017/05/16/less-6-months-two-cars-in-ornear-cherry-creek-trail/.

Avgustinovich, Yulia. (2019). Floral Mural at the Cherry Creek Trail. Retrieved from https://yulia-art. com/project/floral-mural-cherry-creek-trail-denver/.

Beekers, Evy. (2020). INJUV empowers 28,250 millennials to discuss sustainable development ideas for Chile. Citizenlab. Retrieved from https://www.citizenlab.co/blog/case-study/case-study-in juv-empowers-millennials-sustainable-development-chile/.

Blatto, Anna. (2018). A City Divided, A Brief History of Segregation in Buffalo. Partnership for the Public Good. Retrieved from https://ppgbuffalo.org/files/documents/data-demographicshistory/a_city_divided__a_brief_history_of_segregation_in_the_city_of_buffalo.pdf.

Bruce, Kenzie. (2019). Cherry Creek Trail Art Guide. Westword. Retrieved from https://www.west word.com/slideshow/photos-cherry-creek-trail-art-guide-11296026/11296051.

Buffalo Niagara Waterkeeper. (2022). Native Plant Guide. Retrieved from https://bnwaterkeeper.org/ projects/nativeplantguide/.

Buffalo Niagara Riverkeeper. (2014). Western New York Guide to Native Plants for your Garden.

Niagara River Greenway. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1bod2Z5WdP c3ONSmKAV81O6oqrY8N4K2h?eType=ActivityDefinitionInstance&eId=4c59e609-f24a-44aa -a744-9263ccb4341d.

55 Buffalo State, Geography and Planning. (2018). Buffalo State Experts: Buffalo, A Walkable City-In Some Neighborhoods. https://geography.buffalostate.edu/news/buffalo-state-expertsbuffalo-walkable-city%E2%80%94-some-neighborhoods.

Census Profile, Census Tract 45, Erie, NY. Census Reporter. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://censusre porter.org/profiles/14000US36029004500-census-tract-45-erie-ny/.

Cherry Creek Greenway. (2018). Cherry Creek Area Implementation Plan (CCAIP). Retrieved from https://cherrycreekgreenway.com/.

Cichon, Steve. (2020). From 1880 to Today, The Erie County Almshouse. The Buffalo News. Retrieved from https://buffalonews.com/news/local/history/from-1880-to-today-the-erie-county-alms house/article_000dd103-c23d-57db-bb6f-444ca5a16c6d.html.

CitiStat Buffalo. (2022). Bureau of Forestry. Pendata Buffalo. Retrieved from https://data.buffalony.gov/ stories/s/CitiStat-Buffalo-Bureau-of-Forestry/x22c-fjeg/.

City of Buffalo. (2022). Welcome to Buffalo, NY, Mayor Byron W. Brown. https://www.buffalony.gov/.

City of Durham NIS Community Engagement. (2022). Equitable Engagement (Equitable Community Engagement Blueprint. Retrieved from https://www.durhamcommunityengagement.org/equi table_engagement.

City of Raleigh. (2020). Equitable Transit-Oriented Development Guidebook. Retrieved from https:// cityofraleigh0drupal.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/drupal-prod/COR22/EDATGuidebook.pdf.

City Parks Alliance. (2022). Cities Connecting Children To Nature, Case Study, Equity. Retrieved from https://cityparksalliance.org/resource/cities-connecting-children-nature/.

Cotton, Darren. (2021). Grant Adds Momentum to Historic Preservation Efforts in University Heights. Buffalo Rising. Retrieved from https://www.buffalorising.com/2021/09/pre serve-ny-grant-adds-momentum-to-historic-preservation-efforts-in-university-heights/.

Ehlenz, Meagan M. (2015). Anchoring Communities: The Impact of University Interventions on Neighborhood Revitalization. Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 1050. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2860&context=edissertations.

Erie County Parks, Recreation & Forestry. (2022). Grover Cleveland Golf Course. Retrieved from https://www3.erie.gov/parks/grover-cleveland-golf-course.

Esmonde, Donn. (2009). University Heights needs UB to step up. The Buffalo News. Retrieved from https://buffalonews.com/news/university-heights-needs-ub-to-step-up/article_3ccff64b-c96b5cf3-b976-538a03b6306f.html.

Gaffney, Loretta. (2022). Teenagers And Community Engagement: The Developmental Picture -Knowledge Quest. Knowledgequest.Aasl.Org. Retrieved from https://knowledgequest.aasl.org/ teenagers-community-engagement-developmental-picture/.

56 GObike. (2021). Southern Tier Trail Feasibility Study. Southern Tier Trail. Retrieved from https:// drive.google.com/file/d/1QHZY0ejqxbf2lAIzB0XcgdlJ4sEWujq_/view.

Goingpublic.de. (2021). https://www.goingpublic.de/going-public-und-being-public/greensillcapital-angeblich-pleite-das-koennte-auch-deutsche-sparer-treffen/.

Google. (2022). https://earth.google.com/web/.

Greater Buffalo Niagara Regional Transportation Council; University at Buffalo Regional Institute, The State University of New York at Buffalo, School of Architecture and Planning; Cambridge Systematics; TyLin International. (2018). Moving Forward 2050, A Regional Transportation Plan for Buffalo Niagara. Retrieved from https://www.gbnrtc.org/movingforward2050.

Guildford Borough. (2011). Pirbright Conservation Area Appraisal. Guildford Borough Council.

Retrieved from https://www.guildford.gov.uk/media/7818/Pirbright-Conservation-AreaAppraisal/pdf/Pirbright_Conservation_Area_Appraisal_book_low_res1.pd f?m=636074703404000000.

Holley, Kip. (2016). The Principles for Equitable and Inclusive Civic Engagement: A Guide to Transformative Change. The Ohio State University, Kirwan Institute. Retrieved from http://kir waninstitute.osu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/ki-civic-engagement.pdf.

Homeless Alliance of Western New York. (2020). Retrieved from https://wnyhomeless.org/ Kenney, Andrew. (2019). Head-on bike collision on Denver’s Cherry Creek Trail renews talk about speed and safety. The Denver Post. Retrieved from https://www.thedenverchannel.com/ news/local-news/head-on-bike-collision-on-denvers-cherry-creek-trail-renews-talk-aboutspeed-and-safety.

Keppel, Angela. (2013). Begin the Development of University Heights, Get A Street Named After You. Discovering Buffalo, One Street At A Time. Retrieved from https://buffalostreets. com/2013/07/27/begin-the-development-of-university-heights-get-a-street-named-after-you/.

Krolikowski, A. and Magavern, S. (2017). Working Toward Equality, Updated: Race, Employment, and Public Transportation in Erie County. Partnership for the Public Good. Retrieved from https:// ppgbuffalo.org/files/documents/working_toward_equalityfinal.pdf.

LaChiusa, Chuck. (2016). University Heights, Links to Buffalo Architecture and History Website.

Buffalo as an Architectural Museum. Retrieved from https://buffaloah.com/h/u.html.

Liu, E. and Hanauer, N. (2011). The Garden of Democracy: A New American Story of Citizenship, the Economy, and the Role of Government. Sasquatch Books.

Mayor’s Office of Strategic Planning. (2017). Zoning Map, City of Buffalo, Unified Development Ordinance. City of Buffalo. Retrieved from https://www.buffalony.gov/DocumentCenter/ View/6105/Citywide_Zoning_Map_January2017?bidId=.

57 Mighty Texas Dog Walk. (2021). Service Dogs, Inc. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.servicedogs. org/events/dogwalk202.

Moovit. (n.d.). (2022). Line route 8, NFTA, Bus Schedules. Moovit. Retrieved from https://moovitapp. com/buffalo_ny-1402/lines/8/241248/979031/en?customerId=4908&ref=2&poiType=line.

Movement Generation Justice and Ecology Project. (2016). From Banks and Tanks to Cooperation ...

-Movement Generation. Retrieved from https://movementgeneration.org/wp-content/up loads/2016/11/JT_booklet_English_SPREADs_web.pdf.

Mungo News. (2021). Benefits of Living In a College Town. Mungo Homes. Retrieved from https:// www.mungo.com/mungo-news/benefits-of-living-in-a-college-town.

Nelson Nygaard. (2022). Principles For Equitable Public Outreach & Engagement During Covid-19 and Beyond. Retrieved from https://nelsonnygaard.com/principles-for-equitable-public-out reach-engagement-during-covid-19-and-beyond/.

New York State Department of Financial Services. (2021). Report on Inquiry into Redlining in Buffalo, New York. Retrieved from https://www.dfs.ny.gov/system/files/documents/2021/02/ report_redlining_buffalo_ny_20210204_1.pdf.

New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. (2021) Final Statewide Greenway Trails Plan & Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement. Retrieved from https://parks.ny.gov/documents/inside-our-agency/FinalStatewideGreenwayTrailsPlan2020.pdf.

NYS Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation. (2017). Empire State Trail. Retrieved from https://empiretrail.ny.gov/.

NFTA-Metro. History of Metro. Retrieved from https://metro.nfta.com/about/history-of-metro.

NFTA. (n.d.). (2022). Weekday. Buffalo Metro Rail. Retrieved from https://metro.nfta.com/legacy/ metro/pdfs/145.pdf.

Niche. (2022). University Heights, Buffalo. Retrieved from https://www.niche.com/places-to-live/n/ university-heights-buffalo-ny/residents/.

OpenSpacePGH. (2013). Pittsburgh’s Comprehensive Plan. Pittsburgh City Planning. Retrieved from https://apps.pittsburghpa.gov/dcp/OpenSpacePGH%20lo%20res.pdf.

Pantic, Vanja. (2021). Stirling’s centralised community engagement promotes safe and impactful participation. citizenlab. Retrieved from https://www.citizenlab.co/blog/planning-publicspaces/centralised-community-engagement-leads-to-safe-and-impactful-participation-instirling/.

Pawsitive for Heroes. WNY Heroes. (2022). Retrieved from https://wnyheroes.org/grants-programs/ pawsitive-for-heroes/.

58 Places, Local Data for Better Health. (2022). BRFSS 2019, 2018. ACS 2019 (5-Year Estimates).

ACS 2018 (5-Year Estimates). Retrieved from https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/22c718 2a162d45788dd52a2362f8ed65.

Project for Public Spaces, Inc. (2016). The Case for Healthy Places, Improving Health Outcomes Through Placemaking. Retrieved from https://www.pps.org/product/the-case-for-healthy- places#:~:text=The%20Case%20for%20Healthy%20Places%20is%20a%20free%20report%20 of,community%20organizations%2C%20and%20other%20partners.

Raskin, Julia. (2019). Inclusionary Trail Planning Toolkit. Pennsylvania Environmental Council (PEC).

Retrieved from https://pecpa.org/wp-content/uploads/Inclusive-Trail-Report.pdf.

Reddigari, Manasa. (2022). 12 Good Reasons to Move to a College Town. bobvila. Retrieved from https://www.bobvila.com/slideshow/12-good-reasons-to-move-to-a-college-town-53087.

Reddy Bikeshare. (n.d.). (2020). Season 5 Impact Report. Retrieved from https://reddybikeshare.social bicycles.com/.

Reiter, J., Boyer, L., and Kuchta, M. (2017). Community Engagement Systems in Three Cities: A comparative analysis focused on achieving effective equitable engagement. City of Port land. Retrieved from https://macgrove.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/EngagementCities-Report-April-2017.pdf.

Restoration Society, Inc. (2022). Retrieved from https://rsiwny.org/.

Sachs, David. (2020). Some things haven’t changed. Drivers are still crashing cars onto the Cherry Creek Trail, for example. Denverite. Retrieved from https://denverite.com/2020/04/02/somethings-havent-changed-drivers-are-still-crashing-cars-onto-the-cherry-creek-trail-for -example/.

Social Explorer. (2019). Housing, Renter Occupied, Census Tract 45, Erie, NY. ACS 2019 (5-Year Estimates). Retrieved from https://www.socialexplorer.com/a9676d974c/view.

Social Explorer. (2019). Housing, Owner Occupied, Census Tract 45, Erie, NY. ACS 2019 (5-Year Estimates). Retrieved from https://www.socialexplorer.com/a9676d974c/view.

Social Explorer. (2019). Median Household Income (Inflation Adjusted Dollars), Census Tract 45, Erie, NY. ACS 2019 (5-Year Estimates). Retrieved from https://www.socialexplorer.com/ a9676d974c/view.

Social Explorer. (2019). Labor Force, Civilian, Employed, Census Tract 45, Erie, NY. ACS 2019 (5-Year Estimates). Retrieved from https://www.socialexplorer.com/a9676d974c/view.

Social Explorer. (2019). Age, Census Tract 45, Erie, NY. ACS 2019 (5-Year Estimates). Retrieved from https://www.socialexplorer.com/a9676d974c/view.

Social Explorer. (2019). Sex, Census Tract 45, Erie, NY. ACS 2019 (5-Year Estimates). Retrieved from https://www.socialexplorer.com/a9676d974c/view.

59 Social Explorer. (2019). Race, Census Tract 45, Erie, NY. ACS 2019 (5-Year Estimates). Retrieved from https://www.socialexplorer.com/a9676d974c/view.

Social Explorer. (2019). Education, Census Tract 45, Erie, NY. ACS 2019 (5-Year Estimates). Retrieved from https://www.socialexplorer.com/a9676d974c/view.

Staeger, Steve. (2016). No fix to Cherry Creek Trail problems, but progress. 9News. Retrieved from https://www.9news.com/article/news/local/next/no-fix-to-cherry-creek-trail-problems-butprogress/73-292355931.

Stream Landscape Architecture. (2022). Cherry Creek Greenway, Rehabilitation of Cherry Creek and Cherry Creek Trail. Retrieved from https://streamla.com/work/cherry-creek-greenway/.

The Goldlaw Firm. (2019). Watch Out Bicyclists, Denver’s Cherry Creek Trail is Dangerous. Retrieved from https://www.thegoldlawfirm.net/watch-bicyclists-denvers-cherry-creek-trail-dangerous/.

The Tool Library. (2022). About Us. Retrieved from https://www.thetoollibrary.org/about/ The Trust for Public Land. (2022). ParkServe. Retrieved from https://parkserve.tpl.org/map ping/index.html?CityID=5363000#reportTop. The Salvation Army, USA Central Territory. (n.d.). Mother and Baby Turn to Salvation Army to Avoid Homelessness. Retrieved from https://centralusa.salvationarmy.org/usc/news/mother-and-ba by-turn-to-salvation-army-to-avoid-homelessness/.

The Wilderness Society. (2021). It’s time to own up to the racism and violence embedded in the names of parks and public lands. Retrieved from https://www.wilderness.org/articles/blog/its-timeown-racism-and-violence-embedded-names-parks-and-public-lands.

University at Buffalo Regional Institute, The State University of New York at Buffalo School of Architecture and Planning. (2014). One Region Forward, A New Way to Plan for Buffalo Niagara. Retrieved from https://regional-institute.buffalo.edu/work/one-region-forward/.

University at Buffalo Regional Institute, The State University of New York at Buffalo, School of Architecture and Planning, and Make Communities. (2020). Equitable Development Framework for The Riverline. Retrieved from https://brandcast-cdn.global.ssl.fastly.net /d8824b65-42d7-4e51-9cda-37b31642c352/08f61f06-aa94-49fb-9a72-fd404f857589/69a9c40d d995176eafbabb90dbd9238a/TheRiverline_EquitableDevelopmentFramework_June2020_ SinglePages.pdf.

University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, The Baldy Center for Law and Social Policy.

(2022). Indigenous Land Acknowledgement. Retrieved from https://www.buffalo.edu/baldy center/about/land-acknowledgement.html.

University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, University at Buffalo Libraries. (2022). Erie County Almshouse and County Hospital Complex. Retrieved from https://library.buffalo.edu/ archives/campuses/detail.html?ID=3.

60 University at Buffalo, The State University of New York at Buffalo. (2021). UB on the Green. Office of Government and Community Relations. Retrieved from https://www.buffalo.edu/community/ events/ub-on-the-green.html.

University District Community Development Association Inc (UDCDA). University Heights, Summit Park, Berkshire Terrace Historic District. Retrieved from http://udcda.org/historicdistrict/.

University Heights Collaborative (UHC). (2022). About. Retrieved from http://ourheights.org/ about/#mission.

University Heights Collaborative (UHC). (2022). Historical Significance. Retrieved from http://www. ourheights.org/significance.html.

United States Census Bureau. (2019). Commuting Characteristics By Sex, Census Tracts 45, 46.01, 47, 48, 51, 80.02, 80.03. ACS 2019 (5-Year Estimates). Retrieved from https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?g=1400000US36029004500,36029004601,36029004700,36 029004800,36029005100,36029008002,36029008003&tid=ACSST5Y2019.S0801&moe=false.

Urban Roots, Cooperative Garden Market. (2022). Natives. Retrieved from https://urbanroots.org/ natives/.

Veterans Race- Buffalo, NY. Veterans Race - Buffalo, NY. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://runsignup.com/ Race/NY/Buffalo/VeteransRace.

Veitch, J., Ball, K., Rivera, E., Loh, V., Deforche, B., and Timperio, A. (2022). Understanding Children’s Preference For Park Features That Encourage Physical Activity: An Adaptive Choice Based Conjoint Analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

Retrieved from https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-021-01203-x.

Visit Philadelphia. (2022). Neighborhood, University City, Home to major universities and directly adjacent to Center City. Retrieved from https://www.visitphilly.com/areas/philadelphianeighborhoods/university-city/?cpage=2.

Walkowski, Jennifer. (2011). Early History of Buffalo (ca. 1790s-1853), Elmwood Historic District (West). National Register of Historic Places Nomination, section 8, pp. 4-8. Retrieved from https://buffaloah.com/h/jw/bflo.html.

Webster Museum and Historical Society. (2022). Birds of Western New York. Museum Kids. Retrieved from https://webstermuseum.org/birds.php.

Zornick, Daniel. (2002). The Belt Line Railroad, Its Influence on the Development of Buffalo’s Neighborhoods. History of Buffalo. Retrieved from https://buffaloah.com/h/belt/.

61

APPENDIX A STUDIO USER PERSONAS 01- Arthur Johnson 65 years old, retired, African American, Male.

Lack of technology skills.

Has disability: needs walking cane and hearing aid.

Use the rail trail as a commuting tool and a place for meetings.

02 - Sarah Robinson

25 year old, Female, Single.

Part-time barista at Spot Coffee and part-time cook at Lloyd Taco Factory.

Jogs around the neighborhood & to restaurants and bars with friends on weekends.

Finds it hard to have free time with two par-time jobs.

03 - Thomas Hernandez

17 year old Latino, Male.

A place to hang out and play sports with his friends.

Needs parental permission to attend events.

Hard to attended events/ meetings due to classes.

04 - Diana Owens 50 year old Caucasian Woman with a 6 year old daughter.

Chose to give up her previous job to take care of her daughter.

Lack of motivation & find it too busy to find time with daily expenditures her daughter.

62 05 - Katelyn Jones 22 years old, Female, UB graduate student/ neighborhood residents.

Takes daily walks with her dog.

Experiences fear when walking alone and during dark.

Feels in the way of bikers.

06 - Jordan Everett 21 years old, African America Male, UB undergraduate student/ surrounding residents.

Commutes on the Rail-Trail path to school everyday Enjoys taking photos of the trail and all it has to offer Sick and tired of snow not being plowed frequently on the path.

07 - Stark 2 year old shih tzu.

Takes daily walks with Katelyn.

Experiences fear when bikers pass too close to him.

Too short to walk in the snow when the trail isn’t plowed.

Lack of doggie stations

08 - Gwenyth Rivers

39 year old, single mother.

Has two children (ages 6 and 10) for two years now.

She works 60 hours a week and loves her kids.

Use rail trail for easy access to public transportation.

Lack of personal transportation & support networks.

63 09 - Kameron Rivers Kameron River's 10 year old son.

Needs adult supervision.

Lack of kid inclusive programs.

Limited access after dark.

10 - Lt. Paveljack

73 year old, Veteran.

NearbyVA hospital.

Wheelchair bound, limited to handicaped accessible infrastructure.

Struggles to attend in-person meetings.

11 - Julieta Madrigal

A 32 year old woman who recently moved Non-native English speakers and have struggled with language.

Lack of connections in the community as a new resident.

Glimpse the site when passing.

12- Emma Chang

24 year old. Graduate Student,. Female.

Use the site to exerciise and commute.

Wants fitness-centered programs to meett people.

Would like more lighting at night to feel safer.

Excercise space without disturbing others.

64 13 - Benjamin Davis 10 year old boy.

Bikes through the rail trail wih his friends & family Climbs trees and searches for animals/ plants Need adult supervision, no daycare Lack of child focused programs.

14 - Hawk An American Robin.

Need food sources during winter.

Lost of natural habitat & climate change.

Need more open green spaces.

15 - Freddie Jibbs 14 year old boy.

Use the rail trail for natural walk and entertainments.

Wants more lighting and fences.

Feels there are a lack of seats and benches.

Don't see a lot of animals..

16 - Sunya Vang 30 year old. Lao immigrant. Mother of 3.

Use the trail as natura walk with her kids & for faster commute.

Language barrier, overall lack of understanding of how to get involved.

17 - Tristant Terrance 32 year old. Male. Visually impared.

Use the rail trail for natural walk and daily commute.

Wants better infrastrucutre for people with disabilities.

Finds it hard to talk to other people.

65

APPENDIX B EVENT DAY SURVEY