BREXIT:
“WITHDRAWAL OF THE UNITED KINGDOM FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION” as quoted by Wikipedia……yes it’s even got its own Wiki page
You gotta love the quote, “withdrawal”; the U.K withdraws from Europe. It amazes me that the entire campaign, whether you are an “in” or “out” campaigner, actually centres on the principle of the prospect of the UK leaving the EU. The entertainment factor of Farage and Johnson (and let it be known that I’ve been a fan of both) prancing around, beating the “UK better out” drum, whilst in the same drum beat assuring us all that they will get a better deal with Europe is quite frankly, different class. In short, let’s leave this rather morbid party, of which we happen to be a pretty strong player in, only to then, once we are out and quite frankly piss everyone off, knock on their door and ask if we can play again. Best of all they think we will be in a position of strength in doing this - it’s genius! Yes there are deficiencies in Europe, a great many in fact, but to suggest that we would be better able to change them from outside than from within, is somewhat far-fetched. This referendum is neither about the UK leaving, or staying in the EU, it is in my view, about how it renegotiates its position and that of Europe's, in the longer term. The U.K. doesn't get to leave Europe and even if it tried to, it would still take years to implement, anything between 2 -10 years, as indicated by parliamentary committees, BoE and other such bodies - by which point its new terms / framework and structure, not to mention relationship, would still represent a membership with Europe anyway. Mind boggling or what! All we need now is “The Donald” weighing in and pledging his support to Boris
toward building a Wall across the channel - financed by Greece, project managed by Spain and constructed by the Italians. It’s in moments like these where hysteria, panic and lack of clear sensible judgment take centre stage. I actually have no issue in accepting that Farage, Johnson and Co are (in part) right in their assessments and their criticisms of Europe, but their solutions are insular, exclusive, nationalistic and protectionist, not to mention hugely lacking any plan or vision - all traits which have, in the past, resulted in disastrous consequences. Solutions are rarely in the form of black or white, but rather varying shades of grey. Some (including myself) may have been slightly irritated at the weighing in of POTUS. Airforce 1, Marine 1, the motorcade, tea at Pall Mall and meeting Prince George can be somewhat of a statement and an overwhelming force, care of the leader of the free world. Don’t you just love that special relationship? However, what is interesting about the American perspective and one which I do think worthy of mention, is their firm belief, that it’s actually the U.K, in Europe, that gets to drive the agenda and play a key role in the renegotiation of what I think we all accept is a failing Europe. Interestingly however, the impact of a Brexit, uncertain as it may be, will hardly render the UK defunct and although the prospect of being placed at “the back of the queue” so to speak is a real threat, the reality is that the U.K economy survives, renegotiates, moves on and in years to come will look back at the whole episode like a bad hangover after a night in, watching Eurovision…..yes that bad, but it will be over.