The League of Women Voters Voters' Guide by APG Media of Chesapeake

The League of Women Voters Voters’ Guide ®

Published by the Leagues of Women Voters of Kent County, the Mid-Shore (Caroline, Dorchester, and Talbot Counties) and Queen Anne’s County Presidential General Election

Tuesday, Nov 5, 2024

7 am to 8 pm

About this Voters’ Guide

This Voters’ Guide is published by the League of Women Voters Education Fund and covers all races for which voters in Caroline, Dorchester, Kent, Queen Anne’s and Talbot counties may vote. The League has a long tradition of publishing the verbatim responses of candidates to questions important to voters. During Presidential elections, the national League invites candidates for president to participate in the Voters’ Guide based on specified criteria (see President and Vice President of the United States section for details). Local Leagues invite all candidates for state or local office who filed with the State Board of Elections to submit information about their candidacy to our web-based VOTE411 system. All invited candidates are asked to provide their campaign contact information and their responses to a series of questions posed for each office; candidates for president are limited to 750 characters for each response while state and local candidates are limited to 500 characters. Responses shown are what candidates entered up to the stated limit. Those candidate responses appear as written in their own words and are included in VOTE411 in their entirety. Due to printing constraints, not all questions and responses are included in this Guide and only candidate website, if available, is included here for contact information. Go to VOTE411.org to see all questions and candidatesubmitted information.

The League offers this Voters’ Guide to assist citizens in their decision-making process as they prepare for participation in the 2024 general election.

The League does not support or oppose any political party or candidate. This Guide is for the benefit of individual voters and should not be marked by others for organizations or individual voters. Material from the Guide may not be reproduced in whole or in part without permission of the League of Women Voters.

The League assumes no liability for errors or omissions. The candidates’ answers in the Guide appear as submitted. Only formatting changes, if any, have been made for printing purposes. Only candidates whose names are on the 2024 general election ballot are included in this Guide

The League of Women Voters is a nonpartisan organization whose membership is open to all persons 16 years of age or older. Its mission is to encourage the informed participation of voters in the democratic process. The League promotes political responsibility through informed and active participation of citizens in their government.

The League of Women Voters is where hands-on work to safeguard democracy leads to civic improvement. Learn more at LWV.org and VOTE411.org.

Election Day: Tuesday, Nov 5, 2024

Early Voting: Thursday, Oct 24 – Oct 31, 2024

Voter Registration Deadline: Oct 15, 2024

You also may register to vote during early voting and on Election Day; contact your county Board of Elections office for details.

Three Ways to Vote

– Thursday, Oct 31

Read this Guide with your mail-in or sample ballot in hand, and mark your ballot accordingly. Take your sample ballot with you when you vote as you are not permitted to use electronic devices, such as smartphones, tablets, and computers, inside polling places.

Pay attention to the number of votes you can cast for each race; checking more than the maximum allowed will invalidate your vote for that race.

Check both sides of your ballot for additional races.

While we have listed local write-in candidates, if any, known at the time of our publication deadline, write-in candidates can file until Oct 17 to be included in the official vote count. We recommend you check the lists of certified write-in candidates listed in your sample ballot, at your local election board office, and posted at all voting locations to verify certified candidates.

Only candidate information available at the time of our publication deadline is included here; for more up-todate information on candidate responses, check VOTE411.org.

This printed Guide is just a start. Go online to VOTE411.org for all candidate-supplied information from all candidates on your ballot, including responses, photos, campaign contact information and other links to help with the voting process.

HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE

League of Women Voters 2024 General

VOTE BY MAIL-IN BALLOT

To vote by mail you must first request an application for a mail-in ballot, return your application, and then return your voted ballot.

Request an Application for a Mail-In Ballot

Call or visit your local Board of Elections (contact information is to the right) to request an application for a mail-in ballot. Or, if you have a Maryland driver’s license or an MVA-issued ID card, you can request a mail-in ballot online at https:// elections.maryland.gov/voting/absentee.html

Return Your Application to Your Local Board of Elections

You can return your application for a mail-in ballot by mail, fax, email (as a scanned document) or in person to your county Board of Elections (see address information to right). The deadline to return your application depends on how you want to receive your ballot: To receive your ballot:

• by mail or fax, deliver by Tuesday, Oct 29.

• via the internet, deliver by Friday, Nov 1.

• pick up in person, deliver by Tuesday, Nov 5.

All ballots must be mailed or hand delivered on or before Election Day, Nov 5. Return your ballot to:

• your county Board of Elections office,

• your county early voting location,

• your local polling location on Election Day, or

• deposit it in a county ballot drop-box

Ballots must be returned no later than 8 pm Nov 5

Ballot drop-off boxes are available now; see locations in the farright column.

VOTE IN PERSON DURING EARLY VOTING

Thursday, Oct 24– Thursday, Oct 31

7 am - 8 pm Daily

You can vote early in your county at the early voting locations listed in the far-right column.

VOTE IN PERSON ON ELECTION DAY

Tuesday, Nov 5, 7 am to 8 pm

Vote at your assigned polling place. Check your sample ballot for your polling place or visit https:voterservices.elections. maryland.gov/PollingPlaceSearch

For More Information

Contact your local office of the State Board of Elections for other information about registering to vote, polling locations, change of address, and any other questions you may have about the voting process.

COUNTY BOARDS OF ELECTIONS

Caroline County Board of Elections

Health and Public Services Building

403 S. 7th Street, Suite 247

Denton MD 21629-1335

410-479-8145, Fax: 410-479-5736

www.carolinemdelections.org

Email Address: election@carolinemd.org

Dorchester County Board of Elections

1000 Goodwill Avenue

P.O. Box 414 Cambridge MD 21613-0414

410-228-2560, Fax: 410-228-9635

www.docomdelections.org

Email Address: Gwendolyn.dales@maryland.gov

Kent County Board of Elections

135 Dixon Drive

Chestertown, MD 21620-1141

410-778-0038, Fax: 410-778-0265

www.kentcountyelections.org

Email Address: elections@kentgov.org

Queen Anne’s County Board of Elections

110 Vincit Street Suite 102 Centreville MD 21617

410-758-0832, Fax: 410-758-1119

www.qacelections.com

Email Address: Christine.Jones@maryland.gov

Talbot County Board of Elections

215 Bay Street #7 P.O. Box 353, Easton MD 21601-0353

410-770-8099, Fax: 410-770-8078

www.talbotcountymd.gov/Election_Board

Email Address: talbot.elections@maryland.gov

BALLOT DROP-BOX LOCATIONS

Caroline County (3 locations):

Caroline County Health & Public Services Building, 403 S. 7th St, Denton MD

Federalsburg Municipal Parking Lot, Morris Ave, Federalsburg MD (across from the Police Dept)

Goldsboro Vol Fire Dept Parking Lot, 700 Old Line Rd, Goldsboro MD.

Dorchester County (2 locations):

Dorchester County Board of Elections, 1000 Goodwill Ave, Cambridge MD

Veterans Memorial Park, 204 South Main St, Hurlock MD

Kent County (3 locations):

Galena Vol Fire Co, 90 E. Cross St, Galena MD

Kent County Public Library, 408 High St, Chestertown MD (at rear entrance on Calvert St)

Rock Hall Vol Fire Co, 21500 Rock Hall Ave, Rock Hall MD

Queen Anne’s County (3 locations):

Go Mart, 741 Main St, Church Hill MD

Kent Island Fire Dept, 1610 Main St, Chester MD

Queen Anne’s County Office Building, 110 Vincit St, Centreville MD

Talbot County (2 locations):

Easton Fire House Bingo Hall, 315 Aurora Park Dr / 315

Leonard Rieck Dr, Easton MD

Talbot County Board of Elections, 215 Bay St, Easton MD

EARLY VOTING LOCATIONS

Caroline County

Caroline County Health & Public Services Building, 1st floor, Suite 112, 403 S. 7th St, Denton MD

Dorchester County

Dorchester County Early Voting Center, 1000 Goodwill Avenue, Cambridge MD

Kent County

Kent County Public Library, 408 High Street, Chestertown MD

Queen Anne’s County (2 locations)

Kent Island Vol Fire Dept, 1610 Main St, Chester MD

Queen Anne’s County Office Building, 110 Vincit St, Centreville MD

Talbot County

Easton Fire House Bingo Hall, 315 Aurora Park Dr / 315 Leonard Rieck Dr, Easton MD (enter from Creamery Ln)

President and Vice President of the United States

DUTIES: The President is the head of state of the United States of America; the Chief Executive Officer; and the Commander in Chief of all military forces. The powers of the President are prescribed in the Constitution and federal law. The President appoints the members of the Cabinet, ambassadors to other nations and the United Nations, Supreme Court Justices, and federal judges, subject to Senate approval. The President, along with the Cabinet and its agencies, is responsible for carrying out and enforcing the laws of the United States. The President may also recommend legislation to the United States Congress.

TERM : Four years. Limit of two terms.

BASE SALARY : $400,000 per year.

CRITERIA FOR PARTICIPATION WWW.VOTE411.ORG:

All presidential candidates who will appear on the ballot in Maryland are listed below. All qualified presidential candidates were invited by the League of Women Voters Education Fund (LWVEF) to provide biographical information and responses to specific questions. Candidates were qualified if they met the following criteria during the general election season:

Candidates qualified for invitations from LWVEF to provide responses to specific questions if they met the following criteria:

• The candidate must have made a public announcement of her/his intention to run for President.

• The candidate must meet the Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act’s minimum contribution threshold requirements for qualifying for matching funds, based on the most recent data publicly available on the Federal Election Commission website by the date of publication;

• The candidate must qualify for the ballot in enough states to win a majority of electoral votes.

Questions

COST OF LIVING/WAGES: What steps should be taken to address the high cost of living and depressed wages in America, including for families, people with disabilities, and people that are economically disadvantaged?

ACCESS TO HEALTHCARE: What steps will you take to ensure all Americans have access to quality and affordable health care, including reproductive care and prescription drug coverage?

GUN VIOLENCE: What steps will you take to curb gun violence and build safe and healthy communities for communities disproportionally impacted by gun violence in the United States?

IMMIGRATION: What are the most important steps you will take to improve U.S. immigration policies, including creating an accessible path to citizenship?

CLIMATE CHANGE: What actions will you take to address the threats facing the United States due to climate change?

CANDIDATES

Vote for 1

Kamala D. Harris and Tim Walz Democratic Party Campaign Website: https://kamalaharris.com/

No response by print deadline; check Vote411.org

Donald J. Trump and JD Vance Republican Party Campaign Website https://www.donaldjtrump.com/

No response by print deadline; check Vote411.org

Chase Oliver and Mike ter Maat Libertarian Party Campaign Website: https://votechaseoliver.com/

This candidate did not meet the LWVEF criteria above for receiving questions.

Jill Ellen Stein and Rudolph Ware Green Party Campaign Website: https://jillstein2024.com/

COST OF LIVING / WAGES: We need an economy that works for working people, not just the wealthy and powerful. To reverse surging inequality and insecurity, we need an Economic Bill of Rights establishing the rights to a living-wage job, guaranteed livable income, housing, healthcare, childcare, lifelong education, secure retirement, utilities, healthy food and clean water, so that all of us are guaranteed the basic security for a good life that can reach our highest potential.

Healthcare is a human right. We need a universal healthcare system that is equitable, comprehensive, free at point of service, and accessible to every single person in the US.

ACCESS TO HEALTHCARE: A Jill Stein administration will immediately implement National Improved Medicare for All as a precursor to establishing a UK-style National Healthcare Service which will replace private hospital, private medical practice, and private medical insurance with a publicly-owned, democratically controlled healthcare service that will guarantee healthcare as a human right to everyone in the United States. We will take the pharmaceutical industry into public ownership to provide medicines as a public good.

We will also codify Roe v. Wade and advance reproductive rights.

GUN VIOLENCE: We need to end the epidemic of gun violence with common-sense gun safety laws.

A Jill Stein administration will ban the sale of assault rifles and establish a buyback program; establish mandatory waiting periods and background checks for firearm purchases; pass red flag laws for individuals who pose a danger to themselves and others; create standardized digital records of gun registrations and sales; close gun show loopholes; require firearm owners to own a high-quality gun safe to store their firearms; require firearm owners to purchase liability insurance of no less than $1,000,000; and hold adult firearm owners criminally liable for minor children accessing and using firearms in the commission

of any crime, accidental injury or death.

IMMIGRATION: Immigrants’ rights are human rights. It’s time to completely overhaul the broken and abusive immigration system, as well as the unjust policies driving people to leave their homes. We need a comprehensive immigration policy and properly funded institutions to ensure a timely, ethical, transparent, and dignified path to citizenship for immigrants, asylum seekers, and refugees. Border policy should move away from detention and enforcement response toward humane and effective asylum processing.

A Jill Stein administration will replace ICE with an Office of Citizenship, Refugees, and Immigration Services under the Department of Labor, grant amnesty to every undocumented person, and implement a path to citizenship with expediency.

CLIMATE CHANGE: We all have a human right to a livable planet with a stable climate, healthy food, clean air and water, and living soil. We need a real Green New Deal to transition rapidly from an economic system that is destroying our only home to a sustainable society built around human needs and protecting life on Earth.

Our Green New Deal will invest in renewable energy, a publiclyowned nationwide smart energy grid, clean transportation technology, energy efficiency and conservation to generate millions of good-paying jobs, rapidly phase out fossil fuels and achieve 100% clean renewable energy and zero-to-negative carbon emissions by no later than 2035.

We need to act now so that our children and future generations can not only survive, but thrive.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Nicole Shanahan Unaffiliated Campaign Website: https://www.Kennedy2024.com/

No response by print deadline; check Vote411.org

This candidate has suspended his campaign but remains on the ballot in Maryland.

U.S. Senator

DUTIES: U.S. Senators make laws along with the members of the U.S. House of Representatives. They also ratify treaties and conduct investigations on issues of national importance. The Senate confirms presidential appointments, including Supreme Court justices.

TERM: Six years. No term limit.

SALARY: $174,000.

HOW ELECTED: Elected statewide. In 2024, Maryland voters will elect one of our two Senators. About one-third of the 100 members of the Senate are elected every two years.

WEBSITE: senate.gov/

Questions

QUALIFICATIONS: How does your experience prepare you for the duties of United States Senator?

PROTECTING DEMOCRACY: What actions should the United States government take to protect voting rights and ensure the security of elections?

ENVIRONMENT: How would you address problems such as climate change and pollution?

IMMIGRATION: What changes would you propose in immigration policy?

FIREARMS: Please provide your position on national gun safety legislation.

CANDIDATES

Democrats may vote for 1

Angela Alsobrooks

Campaign Website: www.angelaalsobrooks.com

QUALIFICATIONS: I am proud to have spent my life in public service, first as an Assistant State’s Attorney focused on domestic violence cases, then as State’s Attorney, where under my tenure violent crime dropped by 50%, and most recently as Prince George’s County Executive. I know Marylanders deserve a Senator who both fights for them and shares their concerns. I am running for Senate to be a voice for families like the ones I grew up with and whom I have worked for throughout my life.

PROTECTING DEMOCRACY: I will fight to eliminate the filibuster and pass critical legislation like the John Lewis Voting Rights Act and Freedom to Vote Act. I’m proud to be endorsed by Congressman John Sarbanes and End Citizens United // Let America Vote, two leading voices for protecting voting rights, strengthening election laws and taking money out of politics.

ENVIRONMENT: Urgent action is needed to address the climate crisis. I will be a vocal advocate for the Green New Deal, as well as for expanding tax credits for clean energy and ensuring that all U.S. Government purchases, from buildings to vehicles, align with emission goals. As County Executive, I issued an Executive Order for Prince George’s County, setting ambitious targets to reduce the 2005 emission levels by half before 2030 and net zero by 2045. I believe the U.S. should adopt a similar timeline.

IMMIGRATION: I will be a strong advocate for comprehensive immigration reform to mend the broken immigration system, including creating a pathway to citizenship for those already living and working in the United States. I will support initiatives such as the American Dream and Promise Act, aimed at safeguarding the rights and future of DREAMers and TPS recipients. I firmly believe these individuals deserve certainty and security, regardless of who holds the office of the President.

FIREARMS: As a mother, I have been deeply affected by the tragic loss of too many children to gun violence and am frustrated by the lack of action from Washington. I am committed to fighting for essential gun safety legislation to protect children and communities from gun violence. I will work to implement universal background checks and red flag laws, close the gun show loophole, ban military-style weapons like AR-15s, and prohibit devices like bump stocks.

Larry Hogan Republican Party Campaign Website: www.LarryHogan.com

QUALIFICATIONS: Governor Hogan has a long record of solving hard problems and overcoming broken politics–including working with the state’s Democratic legislature to cut taxes, lower health care costs, and make generational investments in universal broadband and workforce development; leading the nation’s governors through the worst global pandemic in more than a century; and, as co-chair of No Labels, partnering with the Problem Solvers Caucus to advance a historic federal infrastructure bill.

PROTECTING DEMOCRACY: Free and fair elections are the foundation of American democracy and the most basic promise that those in power can pledge to citizens. Governor Hogan supports state and local efforts to ensure safe and secure elections by combating election interference and intimidation. He also looks forward to continuing to work with the League of Women Voters and other leading civic-minded organizations on initiatives to end partisan gerrymandering and restore fairness in the electoral system.

ENVIRONMENT: While Washington was failing to address climate change, Maryland was leading under Governor Hogan–enacting cleaner air standards stronger than 48 other states and far stronger than the Paris Agreement. In addition to supporting strong environmental stewardship and sustainability, he believes it is especially critical to bring both state and federal resources to bear in holding upstream polluters accountable and protecting regional Chesapeake Bay cleanup goals.

IMMIGRATION: The humanitarian and security crisis at our southern border underscores the need to fix our broken and badly outdated immigration system. One party alone didn’t cause these problems, and one party alone cannot solve them. Governor Hogan will work with any leader willing to set politics aside and work on real solutions–starting with securing the border and addressing the flow of migrants.

FIREARMS: Governor Hogan believes it is possible to respect the rights of law-abiding gun owners while making it harder for criminals and the mentally ill to obtain firearms. In addition to red flag legislation, the governor has long called for federal action to institute a federal universal background check system. He also strongly supports providing law enforcement with more tools and resources to protect our communities–including increasing penalties for those who commit a crime with a gun.

Mike Scott

Libertarian Party Campaign Website: www.lifeinallcaps.com

QUALIFICATIONS: I am a long range planner and strategist. I have almost 30 years of combined federal service in the defense, acquisitions, communications, and ethics communities. I’ve built and managed multibillion dollar budgets. I have trained and led people. I received a TOP SECRET clearance in 1994. I’ve forgotten more about federal service than my opponents will ever know. Most important point-I’m not a politician. I will do the work that needs to be done in Senate.

PROTECTING DEMOCRACY: Election Day should be a 2-3 day event. It should be done in person. Early voting should be left to military and absentee voters. We should move away from voting machines that can be hacked. But, the BIG thing: we need term limits and campaign finance reform. That takes away the impetus to cheat in elections. We need money out of politics and there are ways to do it.

ENVIRONMENT: When COVID hit, one of the unintended consequences

was the Earth got to BREATHE again. I suggest investment in viable, ATTRACTIVE public transportation. We have too many cars and trucks on the road. The use of Nuclear power (the reactors that re-use, not store waste) would also help. I’d encourage investment in Hemp plastics and construction materials. But, to fix pollution & the environment? PEOPLE have to CARE.

IMMIGRATION: The problem with immigration is America’s rampant welfare state, and our fractured domestic and foreign policy. We destabilized the middle east (GWOT & Israel policies), destabilized Latin America (Drug War), now we’re messing about in Africa (Sudan, Congo) and Europe (Ukraine). In other words, we have a LOT to fix to fix immigration. I’d like an Ellis Island style immigration system to quickly process immigrants. And, eliminate monetary incentives to come to America and NOT work.

FIREARMS: I’m unreasonably pro 2A. The Constitution was not meant to give citizen’s rights. It was designed to limit government’s power to deny rights. They banned fully automatic weapons, in part, because Blacks were protecting our neighborhoods with them. Weapons are not only necessary for self defense, they put a check on government power. With all the corruption and graft in government, I can’t IMAGINE what they’d do to us if we disarm. And, both parties (Mr Trump and VP Harris) want us disarmed.

Representative in Congress Congressional District 1

DUTIES: Representatives make laws along with the members of the Senate and may conduct investigations on issues of national importance. Laws that impose taxes always begin in the House of Representatives. Representatives can recommend that the Senate remove from office a public official accused of a crime.

TERM: Two years.

SALARY: $174,000.

HOW ELECTED: Elected by voters in each congressional district. Maryland has eight of the 435 Representatives, based on the state’s population in the 2020 Census.

WEBSITE: house.gov

Questions

QUALIFICATIONS: How does your experience prepare you for the duties of United States Representative?

PROTECTING DEMOCRACY: What actions should the United States government take to protect voting rights and ensure the security of elections?

ENVIRONMENT: How would you address problems such as climate change and pollution?

IMMIGRATION: What changes would you propose in immigration policy?

FIREARMS: Please provide your position on national gun safety legislation.

League of Women Voters 2024

CANDIDATES

Vote for 1

Blane H. Miller, III Democratic Party Campaign Website: miller4maryland.com

QUALIFICATIONS: I meet all the constitutional qualifications required. Being in Congress doesn’t require one to be a nuclear physicist or rocket engineer. As a son, father, small business owner, and veteran, I understand the challenges our country faces more than most. My experiences in running a business, defending our country, and loving my family have equipped me with the necessary skills to be the next congressman for Maryland’s First Congressional District.

PROTECTING DEMOCRACY: Requiring an ID and verifying citizenship is a fundamental measure that the United States government can implement to protect voting rights. It is not unreasonable to ask for an ID when it is already required for purchasing alcohol, firearms, tobacco, cashing checks, and even buying certain medications at Walmart. This measure is essential to preserving our democratic republic in our country. Those who oppose this requirement pose a greater threat to our democratic republic process than the measure itself.

ENVIRONMENT: The impact of these environmental challenges is farreaching, affecting our health, economies, and the natural world. . Reducing greenhouse gas emissions, transitioning to renewable energy sources, and implementing sustainable practices are essential steps in combating climate change. Additionally, addressing pollution through stricter regulations, promoting recycling, and reducing waste can significantly improve our environment. We all have a role to play in this effort.

IMMIGRATION: First, close the border! Economic growth relies on a dynamic workforce, and immigrants contribute significantly to innovation, entrepreneurship, and productivity. Second, border security ensures the safety of citizens and prevents illegal activities. Third, refugees and vulnerable populations seek protection, and a well-regulated immigration system allows the U.S. to fulfill its humanitarian obligations. Lastly, legal avenues for employers to access skilled workers are essential for sustained economic prosperity.

FIREARMS: As a constitutionalist, I believe in the Second Amendment. Freedom of speech was first, and the right to bear arms was second, indicating the importance our forefathers placed on these rights. I don’t think creating more gun laws will have the intended effect. I support laws that penalize individuals who fail to secure their guns, allowing them to fall into the hands of minors. I believe there is a significant issue with mental health, and it’s crucial to ensure that systems work together effectively, even within the constraints of HIPPA.

Andy Harris Republican Party Campaign Website: andyharris.com

QUALIFICATIONS: In addition to being a US Navy veteran, I was a practicing physician for over 30 years, and have been serving the First Congressional District in Congress since 2011. I sit on the Appropriations Committee, and Chair the Agriculture subcommittee, which is important to the economy of the district.

PROTECTING DEMOCRACY: We must ensure the integrity of our elections by requiring voter ID and signature verification of mail-in ballots. Electronic voting should not be allowed - only paper ballots which can be audited in a recount. We cannot allow illegal aliens to vote in any elections.

ENVIRONMENT: We have to invest in research to allow us to transition from fossil fuel energy to safe nuclear energy, hydrogen fuel cells, and eventually to fusion energy. Until then we should take advantage of our huge natural gas reserves, which are an environmentally-friendly way of producing energy.

IMMIGRATION: We have to deport the millions of illegal immigrants who were allowed to enter the US under the Biden administration. We also have to strengthen the H2B temporary foreign worker program that our district economy depends on.

FIREARMS: The Second amendment guarantees the right of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms. In the current environment of increasing violent crime and the restrictions placed on law enforcement to do their jobs, the need for self-defense is even more important than ever. Increasing violent crime by illegal aliens makes this problem even worse.

Joshua W. O’Brien Libertarian Party

Maryland Appellate Court Judges

DUTIES: Judges of the Appellate Court of Maryland review the actions and decisions of the Circuit Court and of the Orphans’ Court in cases brought before it. The Court, usually sitting in panels of three judges, decides if the trial judge followed the law and legal precedent. The Court is composed of 15 judges: eight at large and one each from seven appellate judicial districts.

NOTE: In 2022, voters approved an amendment to the Maryland constitution that changed the name of this court from “Court of Special Appeals” to “Appellate Court of Maryland.”

SALARY: $213,633 annual base.

TERM: Ten years, no term limit. Mandatory retirement age of 70 years.

HOW ELECTED: When there is a vacancy on the Appellate Court, a nominating commission reviews the qualifications of applicants for the judgeship and recommends several names to the Governor, who appoints a person from that list to fill the office, who must then be confirmed by the State Senate. Once appointed, the appellate judge holds the office until the first election that occurs at least one year after the vacancy happened. At that time, the judge runs for an uncontested election for a ten-year term on their record (yes or no for continuance in office). No one is permitted to file against them. If the incumbent judge is approved, the judge faces another “retention election” every ten years to continue in office. If the incumbent judge is rejected by the voters, the post becomes vacant, and the governor makes a new appointment.

Questions

CHALLENGES: What are the greatest challenges facing Maryland’s courts and how should they be addressed?

DISCRIMINATION: How can the courts prevent prejudices based on race, gender, age, or sexuality from affecting the fairness of court proceedings?

ACCESS TO JUSTICE: What actions would you support to provide individuals with more access to the judicial system and legal assistance?

Judge, Appellate Court At Large

CANDIDATES

Vote YES or NO for Continuance in Office

Anne K. Albright

Kevin F. Arthur

Andrea M. Leahy

The candidates above did not respond by our print deadline; check Vote411.org

Judge, Appellate Court Circuit 1

CANDIDATES

Vote YES or NO for Continuance in Office

Stephen H. Kehoe

No response by print deadline; check Vote411.org

State Ballot Question

Question 1

Constitutional Amendment (Ch. 245 of the 2023 Legislative Session) Declaration of Rights-Right to Reproductive Freedom

The proposed amendment confirms an individual’s fundamental right to reproductive freedom, including but not limited to the ability to make and effectuate decision to prevent, continue, or end the individual’s pregnancy, and provides the State may not, directly or indirectly, deny, burden, or abridge the right unless justified by a compelling State interest achieved by the least restrictive means.

(Adding Article 48 to the Maryland Declaration of Rights)

Vote FOR or AGAINST the Constitutional Amendment

Current Law: Maryland law says that the State cannot stop a woman from ending a pregnancy before the fetus can survive outside the womb. A pregnancy also may be ended at any time if needed to protect the woman’s life or health, or if the fetus has a serious medical problem. Doctors, nurse practitioners, midwives, and physician assistants can perform abortions. These providers are protected from being sued or charged if they perform an abortion in good faith. Health insurers and Maryland Medicaid must cover the cost of abortion services.

Proposed Change: The ballot question would not change existing law as stated above, but would add a new Article 48 in the Maryland Constitution: “That every person, as a central component of an individual’s rights to liberty and equality has the fundamental right to reproductive freedom, including but not limited to the ability to make and effectuate decisions to

prevent, continue, or end one’s own pregnancy. The State may not, directly or indirectly, deny, burden, or abridge the right unless justified by a compelling State interest achieved by the least restrictive means.”

The amendment is designed to protect the entire range of reproductive decisions including birth control, in vitro fertilization, fertility treatments and abortion.

Origin of the Ballot Question: This amendment was proposed by the Maryland General Assembly in Senate Bill 798 during the 2023 session. It was prompted by the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade. The Dobbs decision allows states to make their own abortion laws. Neighboring jurisdictions, like West Virginia, have banned abortion, while others, like the District of Columbia, protect the right to abortion.

Arguments FOR the amendment:

• Nearly 70% of Maryland residents disagree with the Dobbs decision, and almost 80% support a constitutional amendment to protect abortion rights in Maryland (Washington Post poll, September 2022).

• Because the Dobbs decision removed federal constitutional protection for reproductive freedom, a provision in the Maryland Constitution would be the strongest legal protection for this right in the state. Additionally, changing this constitutional provision would require approval by three-fifths of legislators and a majority of voters.

• Under this provision, abortions and other reproductive procedures would remain safe and legal in Maryland. In places where abortion is outlawed or restricted, the procedure will still take place but under potentially unsafe or deadly circumstances.

Arguments AGAINST the amendment:

• Maryland already allows abortion, so a constitutional amendment is not necessary. If passed, this amendment would restrict future legislators from making new abortion-related laws.

• The proposed amendment goes farther than existing law in that it would permit abortion at any time until birth without limitations.

• This amendment could lead to more abortions and could make Maryland a destination for out-of-state abortions.

A majority vote FOR Question 1 means the Maryland Constitution would affirm that everyone has the right to reproductive freedom, including the right to an abortion and that the state cannot limit this right unless justified by a compelling state interest achieved by the least restrictive means. Maryland’s existing law regarding the right to an abortion would remain in effect but could be changed by the legislature if the change were consistent with this constitutional amendment.

A majority vote AGAINST Question 1 means the Constitution would not be changed. Maryland’s current law about abortion would remain the same but could be changed by the legislature in the future.

Caroline County Offices

Caroline County Board of Education

DUTIES: Caroline County has a “hybrid” Board of Education with 2 members appointed by the Governor and 3 members elected from Caroline County. Terms are staggered. In 2024 two board member will be elected

from the County. The Board of Education sets policy and oversees Caroline County Public Schools.

BASE SALARY: $3,000 annual salary.

TERM: Four years; no term limit.

HOW ELECTED: Board members are elected from districts.

Questions

QUALIFICATIONS: What has inspired you to become a candidate for this office? How does your background and knowledge prepare you for the duties of this office?

PARENTAL INPUT: How would you address concerns about specific books or instructional materials in the schools?

TEEN MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS: What programs and policies, if any, do you propose or support to help our schools address the ongoing concerns around student mental health?

OPPORTUNITY GAP: How would you ensure that all students have equitable access to resources, challenging courses, and effective teachers and administrators?

TEACHERS: What strategies would you support to attract and retain effective teachers and administrators?

Caroline County Board of Education District 1

CANDIDATES

Vote for 1

Chrissy Bartz

No response by print deadline; check Vote411.org

Caroline County Board of Education District 2

CANDIDATES

Vote for 1

Stefanie D. Johnson

No response by print deadline; check Vote411.org

Dorchester County Offices, Ballot Questions

Dorchester County Board of Education

DUTIES: The Board of Education is responsible for the supervision of the public schools, including the selection of a Superintendent, approval of

the annual budget, and establishing general policies governing the school system.

BASE SALARY: $3,200 annual salary.

TERM: Four years, limited to three consecutive terms.

HOW ELECTED: Board members are elected from councilmanic districts.

Questions

QUALIFICATIONS: What has inspired you to become a candidate for this office? How does your background and knowledge prepare you for the duties of this office?

PARENTAL INPUT: How would you address concerns about specific books or instructional materials in the schools?

TEEN MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS: What programs and policies, if any, do you propose or support to help our schools address the ongoing concerns around student mental health?

OPPORTUNITY GAP: How would you ensure that all students have equitable access to resources, challenging courses, and effective teachers and administrators?

TEACHERS: What strategies would you support to attract and retain effective teachers and administrators?

Dorchester County Board of Education District 1

CANDIDATES

Vote for 1

Brandy Dawson Cumberland

QUALIFICATIONS: I was approached about becoming a candidate due to numerous concerns including transparency. As a life-long resident of my district, and with four children of my own, I was passionate about saving our schools, especially our rural schools. I have studied and implemented quality initiative projects through my nursing doctoral studies. I am serious about safe, evidence-based, and data-driven solutions while remembering the uniqueness of our large school district and rural areas.

PARENTAL INPUT: I encourage parental input regarding instructional materials and resources. Parental involvement is critical to change within our school system. Books and materials should be age-appropriate, serve an educational purpose, and not seek to promote controversy.

TEEN MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS: I aim to establish and reform policies to promote a safe environment for students. As a mental health professional, I witness and treat adults daily who are chronically impacted by childhood trauma. Community involvement, funding for extracurricular activities, mental health awareness, and increased availability of counselors are all integral parts I would like to see increased.

OPPORTUNITY GAP: Creating a learning environment that attracts and retains quality teachers and administrators is the foundation of equitable access for all students. The staff and community must be empowered to express concern over barriers they see a student face. For instance, if a student desires to participate in a club or higher level of learning, and the teacher or a fellow parent is aware of a transportation barrier

that the child faces, we need anonymous outreach avenues and resources for the student.

TEACHERS: Aside from a competitive benefit package, we need safe schools for our teachers. This is a tremendous concern presently in our schools. Additionally, teachers and administrators must be supported by their superiors and board.

Dorchester County Board of Education District 3

CANDIDATES

Vote for 1

Christine LaMonica

QUALIFICATIONS: As a parent and a public servant in the community, I am motivated to address safety concerns in our schools as well as advocate for all students to have access to a quality education. As we continue to face challenges, I am compelled to serve on the board to enact positive change. With a commitment to public service and a desire to see our children and educators set up for success, I plan to use my professional experience to assist with solutions and decision making.

PARENTAL INPUT: I would use an approach that allows for diversity in educational materials while maintaining standards and values across the board. As a parent myself I would strive to listen to parental concerns without judgement. Review and research material and/or consult educators and librarians for clarity. Maintaining a fair, inclusive, and informed approach that allows prioritization of educational needs as well as the values and culture of our community.

TEEN MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS: This topic requires a multifaceted approach, student mental health is a concern in our community and can be a significant hinderance to learning and student health and safety. We must navigate this well. Mental health programs require a lot of collaboration with community partners and wraparound services. Some thoughts for the future: Peer groups, school-based support services and promoting mental health initiatives within our schools.

OPPORTUNITY GAP: All students deserve the resources and opportunities that are necessary for academic success. Curriculum and instruction should be fair and equitable to those who come from a marginalized background, and we must recognize that “marginalized” comes in many shapes and forms. I will work with stakeholders and educators to determine how these services could be expanded. Collaboration with HR operations to establish how we can better hire and retain quality educators is on the top of my concerns.

TEACHERS: As your candidate I will work with HR operations and collaborate with larger school systems to learn new and fresh ideas on how to better attract and retain effective educators and administrators. Recruitment initiatives and mentoring would bring ideal candidates to our schools, attracting those who are vested in change, growth, and exceeding expectations. As a candidate I would meet with the educators and administrators to better understand how this would look in each of our county schools.

Dorchester County Board of Education District 5

CANDIDATES

Vote for 1

Jerome J. Harris

No response by print deadline; check Vote411.org

Christopher M. Wheedleton

QUALIFICATIONS: Throughout my life, I have drawn inspiration from both family and educators who challenged me and guided me toward making positive contributions to my community. While working in several education-focused organizations around the country, my career has included opportunities to weave together education and workforce development. This work has equipped me with the skills, knowledge, and ability to bring what I have learned into our local school system. I try to help in every way that I can.

PARENTAL INPUT: In my current role on the Board, I have addressed concerns about specific books or instructional materials by ensuring that we consistently follow the transparent review process we have in place. This process involves a cross-section of qualified stakeholders in our community, including educators, parents, and students. It’s important we consider all perspectives through constructive dialogue and a review process that values high quality, age-appropriate content for all students.

TEEN MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS: I support integrating comprehensive mental health education programs into academic experiences. It’s essential to provide support services through a combination of on-site counseling with trusted adults invested in the students’ success and peer support initiatives to foster a positive school culture. Resources for fostering collaboration with community partners, and implementing policies ensuring accessibility and confidentiality are crucial for student mental health support and growth.

OPPORTUNITY GAP: Ensuring equitable access requires targeted resource allocation as well as the right balance of funding, technology, and community partners to help. Providing support for diverse learning needs is essential and takes every stakeholder in our communities to help young people find their individual path to success. Engaging with every student to learn where their interests lie and matching that to all the best resources available put us on the best path to equitable access for all students.

TEACHERS: I have been working to support competitive compensation packages, professional development opportunities, and mentorship programs to attract and retain effective teachers and administrators. A positive work environment with opportunities for career advancement and leadership roles further enhances retention. Prioritizing work-life balance and listening to needs and challenges are integral strategies to ensure long-term commitment and satisfaction among educators and administrators.

Dorchester County Ballot Questions

Question A Charter Amendment Administrative Review

To amend the Dorchester County Charter to specify that the review of administrative structure that is required at least every four years be conducted within the first fiscal year of each County Council term.

Vote FOR or AGAINST the Charter Amendment

Origin of the Ballot Question: The Dorchester Charter Review Commission was reactivated by the County Council in 2023. After a thorough review of the Charter, the Commission presented their recommendations to the Council on March 5, 2024. The Commission recommended that the requirement for the Council to review the administrative structure of the County Government be specified to occur during the beginning of each Council term. This would ensure the review would take place and provide a solid understanding of the current state of the Executive branch for the incoming Council, especially any new members. It would also give the Council an opportunity to rectify any shortcomings noted during the review making for a more efficient and effective administration. The Council accepted the recommendation, held public hearings, and subsequently approved Resolution 667 for placing a question on the 2024 general election ballot to amend Article 4, Section 409 of the Charter.

Current Law: Article 4, Section 409 of the Charter reads as follows:

“By the year 2006, and at least every four years thereafter, the Council shall have made an evaluation of the organizations, functions, powers, and duties of each department, agency, and office in the executive branch of the Government. The evaluation shall address the efficiency and effectiveness of programs, services, and administration.”

Proposed Change: Article 4, Section 409 would be revised to replace the phrase “have made” in the first sentence to be “conduct” and insert the phrase “be conducted within the first fiscal year of each Council term and” into the secondbetween “shall” and “address”. The proposed revisions would read as follows (additions to the text are indicated by BOLD CAPITALIZATION ) :

“By the year 2006, and at least every four years thereafter, the Council shall CONDUCT an evaluation of the organizations, functions, powers, and duties of each department, agency, and office in the executive branch of the Government. The evaluation shall BE CONDUCTED WITHIN THE FIRST FISCAL YEAR OF EACH COUNCIL TERM AND address the efficiency and effectiveness of programs, services, and administration.”

Arguments FOR the Charter Admendment: These changes offer a specific timeline for when to conduct the review, not

League of Women Voters 2024

only to make sure it happens, but to make it an opportunity for a fresh start for each Council term to be sure there is a regular look at the current state of the Executive branch. It would also serve as a good orientation for any new member of the Council.

Arguments AGAINST the Charter Admendment: The Council needs the flexibility to prioritize issues and schedule them accordingly.

A majority vote FOR the Charter amendment means the Council would need to undertake the administrative review within the first fiscal year of each Council term.

A majority vote AGANIST the Charter amendment means the Council could undertake the administrative review anytime within the four years of the Council term.

Question B

Charter Amendment County Budget Preparation and Adoption Dates

To amend the Dorchester County Charter to change the date by which the County Council shall prepare the annual budget from May 1 to May 15 each year, and to change the date by which the Council shall adopt the annual budget from May 31 to June 15 each year.

Vote FOR or AGAINST the Charter Amendment

Current Law: The proposed amendment would require changes to Article 5, Sections 504 (Preparation of the County Budget) and 507 (b) (Action of the Budget by the Council). The relevant part of Section 504 is as follows:

“Not later than May 1 of each year, the Council shall prepare a proposed Budget for the ensuing fiscal year.”

The relevant part of Section 507 (b) is as follows: “The adoption of the Budget shall be by affirmative vote of not less than three members of the full Council in a law enacted no later than May 31 ….”

Proposed Changes: Section 504 would be changed to replace the date of May 1 with May 15 and Section 507 (b) would be changed to replace the date of May 31 with June 15.

Arguments FOR the Charter Admendment:

• The extra time in the budget cycle allows all data necessary for full comparison and vetting of all budget items, especially mandated school-funding requirements.

• It also allows time to compare Dorchester salaries with salary increases proposed by other counties, helping them be more competitive and able to retain more employees who leave the County for better paying positions.

Arguments Against the Charter Admendment: None

A majority vote FOR the Charter amendment means the Council would need to prepare a proposed Budget by no later than May 15 and approve it no later than June 15.

A majority vote AGANIST the Charter amendment means Article 5, Sections 504 and 507(b) of the Charter would not change, and the current schedule would remain in effect.

Question C

Charter Amendment County Manager Residency

To amend the Dorchester County Charter to remove the requirement that the County Manager be a resident of Dorchester County.

Vote FOR or AGAINST the Charter Amendment

Origin of the Ballot Question: The Dorchester Charter Review Commission was reactivated by the County Council in 2023. After a thorough review of the Charter, the Commission presented their recommendations to the Council on March 5, 2024. The Commission recommended that the requirement that the County Manager be a resident of Dorchester County be removed from the Charter; it is overly restrictive and it would be more appropriate to leave consideration of residency up to the discretion of the County Council. The Commission noted that it is important that the County Council hire the most qualified candidate for the position of County Manager. They saw no need for a County Manager to live within the County when they can live outside the County, a reasonable distance away, and still perform their duties efficiently. It should be up to the County Council to evaluate the potential impact of residency on job performance when determining who to hire. The Council accepted the recommendation, held public hearings, and subsequently approved Resolution 670 for placing a question on the 2024 general election ballot to amend Article 4, Section 406 to remove the residency requirement for the County Manager.

Current Law: Article 4, Section 406 reads as follows:

“406. Qualifications of County Manager.

The County Manager shall be a United States citizen and appointed on the basis of education and professional experience in business or government and executive and administrative affairs. The County Manager need not be a resident of the County at the time of appointment, but shall become a resident within six months after appointment. The County Manager shall retain residency in the County for as long as the person is employed as the County Manager.”

Proposed Change: Only the first sentence of Section 406

would be retained; the last two sentences of Section 406 would be deleted from the Charter thereby eliminating residency as a qualification of the County Manager.

Arguments FOR the Charter Admendment:

• Removing the residency requirement from the Charter would not prevent the County Council from considering where job candidates live when hiring a County Manager, but it would allow them more flexibility in terms of who they could hire. The advances in communications technology since the Charter was adopted in 2002 make it easier for the County Manager to have access to staff and data at essentially anytime regardless of where they happen to be.

• The current employment market on the Eastern Shore is extremely competitive for local talent and makes it challenging to find, hire and retain qualified candidates for the position of County Manager. It is even more challenging when one of the qualifications is where the successful candidate may reside. By restricting residency to Dorchester County, the pool of otherwise qualified candidates is further reduced, especially when viewed in light of a limited real-estate market available to nonresident candidates. Removing the residency restriction:

• would allow the County Council more flexibility in terms of who to hire.

• would increase the pool of qualified candidates from which to hire.

• could make the job offer more desirable.

• could make the job offer more competitive.

Arguments AGAINST the Charter Admendment: Employees living within the County

• would have more opportunity to understand the local conditions and could help them be more responsive to local needs.

• would have a vested interest in improving the efficiency and effectiveness of County operations. Could have an advantage in getting up to speed on the job.

A majority vote FOR the Charter amendment means the County Manager would not need to reside within Dorchester County to remain employed as County Manager.

A majority vote AGANIST the Charter amendment means the County Manager would need to be a resident of the County within six months of being so appointed and to retain that residency for as long as they remained County Manager.

Question D

Charter Amendment County Manager Responsibilities

To amend the Dorchester County Charter to clarify certain responsibilities of the County Manager, including the day-to-day operation of the County government, and establish procedures for certain vacancies.

Vote FOR or AGAINST the Charter Amendment

League of Women Voters 2024 General Election

The Commission recommended that the Charter be amended to clarify the role of the County Manager to prevent any confusion between the roles and responsibilities of the County Council and the County Manager, especially in terms of the management of County employees. The County Council acts as a governing body, and the County Manager acts as their agent to carry out the decisions and policies of the Council. To further emphasize the importance of the County Manager to the proper functioning of the County government, the Commission recommended adding three new subsections to Section 405: the appointment of an assistant County Manager, restricting Council members from giving orders to any subordinate employee, and handling vacancies in the County Manager position. The Council accepted the recommendation, held public hearings, and subsequently approved Resolution 671 for placing a question on the 2024 general election ballot to amend Article 4, Section 405 of the Charter.

Current Law: Article 4, Section 405 (County Manager) currently is composed of 12 subsections under subsection (a) and enumerates the duties and responsibilities of the County Manager. The relevant sections for which changes are requested are (a)(2), (a)(4), (a)(10), (a)(11), (a)(12) and read as follows.

(a)(2) Except as may otherwise be provided in the Charter, hire, suspend, and remove all heads of departments, agencies, and offices of the Government, subject to approval by the Council;

(a)(4) Be entitled to attend all Council meetings, except those concerning the salary or future employment of the County Manager, but the County Manager may not vote;

(a)(10) Under direction of the Council make, or cause to be made, studies or investigations that are in the best interests of the County, including but not limited to investigations of the affairs, functions, acts, methods, personnel or efficiency of any department, agency, office or officer;

(a)(11) Recommend legislative measures to the Council whenever appropriate; and

(a)(12) Perform other duties as may be prescribed by law, this Charter, or the Council.

Proposed Changes: Article 4, Section 405 would be amended to update subsections (a)(2), (a)(4), (a)(10), (a)(11); to add a new subsection (a)(12); renumber the existing subsection (a)(12) to be (a)(13); and add new subsections (b) and (c). The proposed revisions would read as follows (additions to the text are indicated by BOLD CAPITALIZATION ):

(a)(2) Except as may otherwise be provided in the Charter, hire, suspend, and remove all heads of departments, agencies, and offices of the Government, subject to approval by the Council. DURING A VACANCY IN ANY SUCH POSITION, THE COUNTY MANAGER MAY FILL THE VACANCY WITH AN INTERIM APPOINTEE UNTIL COUNCIL APPROVAL;

(a)(4) A ttend all Council meetings, except those concerning the salary or future employment of the County Manager, but the County Manager may not vote;

(a)(10) WHENEVER APPROPRIATE , OR U nder direction of the Council make, or cause to be made, studies or investigations that are in the best interests of the County, including but not limited to investigations of the affairs, functions, acts, methods, personnel or efficiency of any department, agency, office or officer;

(a)(11) recommend legislative, POLICY AND REGULATORY measures to the council whenever appropriate;

(a)( 12 ) APPOINT AN ASSISTANT COUNTY MANAGER, SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION AND COUNCIL APPROVAL, WHO SHALL FUNCITON AS INTERIM COUNTY MANAGER WHEN THE COUNTY MANAGER IS TEMPORARILY UNAVAILABLE DUE TO DISABILITY, EXTENDED ABSENCE OR OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES, OR WHEN THE POSITION IS VACANT; AND

(a)( 13 ) perform other duties as may be prescribed by law, this charter, or the council.

(b) THE COUNTY MANGER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DAY-TO-DAY OPERATION OF THE GOVERNMENT. NO INDIVIDUAL MEMBER OF THE COUNCIL SHALL GIVE ORDERS TO ANY SUBORDINATE EMPLOYEE, EITHER PUBLICLY OR PRIVATELY.

(c) WHEN THE COUNTY MANAGER POSITION BECOMES VACANT, THE COUNCIL SHALL CONDUCT A SEARCH AND APPOINT AN INTERIM COUNTY MANAGER WITHIN SIX MONTHS. NO MEMBER OF THE COUNCIL MAY BE APPOINTED INTERIM COUNTY MANAGER.

Arguments FOR the Charter Admendment: By clearly specifying responsibilities and contingencies for vacancies or extended absence of the County Manager, the recommended changes to the Charter should mark firm boundaries between the Council and its members and the County Manager, reducing overstepping of boundaries and leading to less confusion for employees and less friction and turnover in the position.

Arguments AGAINST the Charter Admendment: None

A majority vote FOR the Charter amendment means the Charter would be revised to make clear the full responsibilities of the County Manager and to specify how vacancies in County government positions should be handled.

A majority vote AGANIST the Charter amendment means Article 4, Section 405 of the Charter would not be changed.

Question E

Charter Amendment Director of Finance Residency

To amend the Dorchester County Charter to remove the requirement that the Director of Finance be a resident of Dorchester County.

Vote FOR or AGAINST the Charter Amendment

Origin of the Ballot Question: The Dorchester Charter Review Commission was reactivated by the County Council in 2023. After a thorough review of the Charter, the Commission presented their recommendations to the Council on March 5, 2024. The Commission recommended that the requirement that the County Director of Finance be a resident of Dorchester County be removed from the Charter; it is overly restrictive and it would be more appropriate to leave consideration of residency to the discretion of the County Council. The Commission noted that they saw no need to require a County Director of Finance to live inside the County when they can live outside the County, a reasonable distance away, and still perform their duties efficiently. It should be up to the County Council to evaluate the potential impact of residency on job performance when determining who to hire. The Council accepted the recommendation, held public hearings, and subsequently approved Resolution 672 for placing a question on the 2024 general election ballot to amend Article 5, Section 501 to remove the residency requirement for the Director of Finance.

Current Law: Article 5 (Budget and Finance), Section 501 (Establishment of Position of Director of Finance.) reads as follows:

“The County Manager shall, with the approval of the Council, appoint one person, knowledgeable and experienced in financial matters, to serve as the Director of Finance of the County. The Director of Finance must take up and continue residence in the County within six months of appointment.”

Proposed Change: The amendment proposes to delete the last sentence of Section 501.

Arguments FOR The Charter Admendment:

• Removing the residency requirement from the Charter would not prevent the County Council from considering where job candidates live as part of their decision making when hiring a Director of Finance, but it would allow them more flexibility in terms of who they could hire. The advances in communications technology since the Charter was adopted in 2002 make it easier for the Director of Finance to have access to staff and data at essentially anytime regardless of where they happen to be.

• The current employment market on the Eastern Shore is extremely competitive for local talent and makes it challenging to find, hire and retain qualified candidates for the position of Director of Finance. It is even more challenging when one of the qualifications is where the successful candidate may reside. By restricting residency to Dorchester County, the pool of otherwise qualified candidates is further reduced, especially when viewed in light of a limited real-estate market available to nonresident candidates. Removing the residency restriction:

• would allow the County Council more flexibility in terms of who to hire.

• would increase the pool of qualified candidates from which to hire.

• could make the job offer more desirable.

• could make the job offer more competitive.

Arguments AGAINST the Charter Admendment: Employees living within the County

• would have more opportunity to understand the local conditions and could help them be more responsive to local needs.

• would have a vested interest in the financial health of the County.

• could have an advantage in getting up to speed on the job.

A majority vote FOR the Charter amendment means the Director of Finance would not need to reside within Dorchester County to remain employed as Director of Finance.

A majority vote AGANIST the Charter amendment means the Director of Finance would need to be a resident of the County within six months of being so appointed and to retain that residency for as long as they remained the Director of Finance.

Question F

Charter Amendment Governmental Transparency

To amend the Dorchester County Charter to ensure transparency of governmental functions, access to open meetings (in person or remotely) and access to public records.

Vote FOR or AGAINST the Charter Amendment

Origin of the Ballot Question: As part of their 2023 review of the County Charter, the Charter Review Commission emphasized the importance of the Council continuing to make public meetings and information more accessible to its citizens. They therefore recommended adding a new section to the Charter under Article 6 (Miscellaneous Provisions) that would enshrine these policies as fundamental to good governance. The Council accepted the recommendation, held public hearings, and subsequently approved Resolution 673 for placing a question on the 2024 general election ballot to amend Article 6 by adding a new Section 606 to the Charter.

Current Law: The Charter currently lacks any consideration of governmental transparency or public access to Council information.

Proposed Change: Add new section 606, entitled “Governmental Transparency and Public Access”, to Article 6 (Miscellaneous Provisions) as follows ( BOLD CAPITALIZED text indicates new text):

606. GOVERNMENTAL TRANSPARENCY AND PUBLIC ACCESS.

A THE COUNCIL SHALL ENSURE THE ABILITY OF THE PUBLIC, ITS REPRESENTATIVES, AND THE MEDIA TO ATTEND, IN PERSON OR REMOTELY, OBSERVE, REPORT ON, AND BROADCAST MEETINGS OF THE GOVERNMENT AND TO WITNESS THE PHASES OF DELIBERATION, POLICY FORMATION,

AND DECISION MAKING BY THE GOVERNMENT’S PUBLIC BODIES.

B THE COUNCIL SHALL ENABLE THE PUBLIC, ITS REPRESENTATIVES AND THE MEDIA TO HAVE ACCESS TO GOVERNMENT RECORDS WITHOUT UNNECESSARY COST OR DELAY. UNLESS EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE, THE CUSTODIAN OF THE GOVERNMENT’S RECORDS SHALL PROVIDE SUCH ACCESS TO REQUESTED RECORDS.

C THE COUNCIL SHALL ENSURE THAT MEETING MINUTES OF THE GOVERNMENT’S PUBLIC BODIES, UPON APPROVAL, ARE PROMPTLY POSTED AND OTHERWISE MADE ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC, ITS REPRESENTATIVES AND THE MEDIA.

Arguments FOR The Charter Admendment: Codifying the actions of the current Council regarding transparency would ensure that these processes continue, thus helping citizens to become more informed and involved in governmental affairs.

Arguments AGAINST The Charter Admendment: Costs for providing these services would continue to rise.

A majority vote FOR the Charter amendment means the Charter would be updated to include requirements for the Council to provide open and accessible access of its citizens to meetings and information used by the Council in the performance of its public duties.

A majority vote AGANIST the Charter amendment means the Charter would not be changed and future Councils would be free to reduce or recind easy access to the government’s business.

Kent County Offices

Kent County Board of Education

DUTIES : The 5 members of the board establish and oversee the educational policies for the public school system of the county, decide when and where schools should be built or consolidated, establish annual budgets for the school system, and hire the Chief Executive Officer (superintendent) to implement public school policies and programs.

TERM: 4 years; no term limits

SALARY: $2,000

HOW ELECTED/QUALIFICATIONS: In 2024, there are 2 open positions and 4 candidates. The 2 receiving the most votes in the General Election will occupy these offices. Candidates must be registered voters in Kent County.

Questions

QUALIFICATIONS: Please write a brief biography, emphasizing

educational level, prior work experience and current position.

CHALLENGES: What do you think is the number one challenge facing Kent County Public Schools at this time and how would you address this issue?

BENEFITS OF THE “BLUEPRINT”: What do you believe are the benefits for Kent County schools of the “Blueprint for Maryland’s Future”? Discuss one of the 5 pillars that you personally would want to promote in the community.

CANDIDATES

Vote for up to 2

Piers Heriz-Smith

QUALIFICATIONS: I was born in the UK, moving to the US as a child. I grew up rural, working with horses and a two-man landscaping/fencing outfit prior to joining the USAF. A humanitarian deployment was the catalyst for me becoming a naturalized US citizen. I served 23 years in the Medical Service, in war and humanitarian crises across the globe, rising to command Program Manager and Career Field Manager.

CHALLENGES: KCPS suffers from a combination of the County historically failing to adequately fund the schools and a consequential migration of students with means out public school, leaving KCPS with a more resource dependent student body. I would address the funding issue by developing a relationship between the BOE and County defined by accountability and transparency, so that the people of Kent understand what KCPS requires and what KCPS is given...then we can hold government accountable.

BENEFITS OF THE “BLUEPRINT”: The Blueprint will make KCPS more competitive with other districts, and will begin to address decades of neglect. The Blueprint will also make additional State resources available, and address funding disparities. The Pillar I want to promote in the community is “Governance and Accountability”. A free and appropriate public education is the foundation upon which the ideal of Equality is built. Our government owes us and our children that, at the very least

QUALIFICATIONS:

I’ve been a citizen of Kent County for the past 24 years. I graduated from Washington College (’00) and The Johns Hopkins University School of Education (’11). I am a case manager at the Benedictine School with 10 years of experience in special education. I am also a licensed mental health therapist at Discovering Serenity Counseling Services in Chestertown.

CHALLENGES: Students in Kent County, as in many public schools across the nation, are still recovering from the regression that occurred academically, socially and emotionally, during COVID. Connecting students, families and staff with the resources they need to confidently prepare for a productive future that is meaningful for the student and relevant to the needs of our society is a priority.

BENEFITS OF THE “BLUEPRINT”: The Blueprint is designed to ensure academic excellence and work readiness for all students in ways that better serve the needs of working families. Elevating career readiness along with college readiness is a more person-centered approach that I believe will greatly benefit students in Kent County, as they explore their post-secondary options and consider their role in our global economy.

Laura McKenzie

League of Women Voters 2024

John Queen Campaign Website: jmqueencommunity.com

QUALIFICATIONS: With years of experience as a youth and community organizer at Bayside H.O.Y.A.S. in Kent County, I have a proven track record of implementing effective, community-based solutions to address the socioeconomic issues that impact our community, including poverty, racism, and education. I also have two daughters currently enrolled in the Kent County Public School system.

CHALLENGES: I think the number one issue facing Kent County Public Schools is the need to strengthen career and technical education for students. Students must be given the chance to succeed— not just in the classroom, but in life. Students need resources and access to more career-readiness educational programs that boost professionalism, develop students’ work ethic and prepare them for the next stage—whether it is college, a trade or a professional career.

BENEFITS OF THE “BLUEPRINT”: During my term, I will focus on the “college and career readiness” pillar of the new Blueprint for Maryland’s Future by working closely with the new Superintendent and administration to develop new initiatives designed to support students as they embark on careers, trades or the next stage of their academic path. This also enables our school system to give students access to several college and career pathways at no cost to them. This pillar is vital to Blueprint and the future of Kent County.

Francoise Sullivan Campaign Website: voteforsullivan.org

QUALIFICATIONS: I am currently serving the final year of my first term on the KCPS Board of Education. I am proud of the work that our board has been able to accomplish but there is always more to do.

CHALLENGES: Teacher shortages. We need to encourage more students to go into the teaching profession. The Teaching Academy pathway at KCHS is a great introduction to the profession. We need to make sure students know that KCPS teachers are respected and valued. We need to attract more teachers to Kent County and KCPS be casting a wider net and making sure we reach out to more HBCUs.

BENEFITS OF THE “BLUEPRINT”: CCR - College and Career Readiness. When I was in high school we used the term VoTech for our Career programs - the term used now is CTE - Career and Technical Education. Currently KCHS offers 9 pathways - Construction Trades, Teacher Academy, Pre-Engineering (Project Lead The Way), Broadcasting (WKHS), Culinary, Health Professions, Automotive, Agriculture and Fire and Rescue. We are planning to add a Computer Science pathway.

for determining the mission and vision for the school system and adopting goals to help achieve that vision. The board shall adopt policies consistent with these goals and shall regularly review such policies and the progress towards attainment of these goals. The board shall also advocate for adequate funding for the school system and shall direct the expenditure of resources to best fulfill the goals.

TERM: Four years with no term limits

SALARY: $3500/year (Board president $4,000)

Questions

QUALIFICATIONS: How does your experience prepare you for the duties of this office, and what qualifies you to make decisions about curriculum?

VOCATIONAL EDUCATION: How can the schools prepare students for employment?

SCHOOL SAFETY: How will you address school safety issues?

PARTNERSHIPS: How can the schools partner with businesses and community organizations to improve education?

COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: How will you involve the community in supporting education, especially with regard to diversity, equity, and inclusion?

OTHER PRIORITIES: What other issues are priorities for you?

Queen Anne’s County Board of Education District 2

CANDIDATES

Vote for 1

Mathew Drayer

QUALIFICATIONS: My educational background entails a bachelor’s degree in business and a master’s degree in accounting. I worked on several government contracts preparing the budget and the allotment of funds for various contract tasks. I developed curriculum for multiple courses, that I taught to government employees and our nations military.

VOCATIONAL EDUCATION: The QACPS already has a solid CTE program. The schools may further expound on this program by gaining a better understanding where the economy and work force needs are shifting. With this understanding, the schools can tailor future CTE programs to those shifts. The students also must be informed of the CTE programs, so they can better understand and participate in them.

Queen Anne’s County Board of Education

ABOUT THE OFFICE: The board consists of five members (one representative from each of the four commissioner districts and one member at large). The board is responsible

SCHOOL SAFETY: School safety is a concern for both the students and the faculty. This doesn’t only include the safety from outside threats, but also from incidents happening within. There is a need to expound on the current anti-bullying and anti-harassment programs while holding those individuals accountable.

PARTNERSHIPS: Community involvement is one of the foundations to educating our youth. Combining local businesses with the QACPS CTE and other school programs, allows

students to gain knowledge from individuals directly working in these key fields of the work force.

COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: Education, opportunity, and extracurricular activities are for everyone, and QACPS should support this in every facet of operation.

OTHER PRIORITIES: In an education system, transparency and communication should be a priority to the parents and individuals paying taxes, while holding all the school faculty and administration accountable

Richard “Dick” Smith

QUALIFICATIONS: In answer to your questions, I would say look at my record. If anyone would have questions, please contact me. 410-490-1900

Queen Anne’s County Board of Education District 3

CANDIDATES

Vote for 1

Carrie Sutherland

QUALIFICATIONS: I attended Caroline County public schools and graduated from North Caroline HS while also attending classes at Chesapeake College. I have a BS in Geography with a minor in Spanish from SSU. Our son graduated from KIHS in 2011 and we currently have 2 students in QACPS. I’ve held various leadership positions and have started and worked in businesses in a variety of sectors. I was a board member of Chesapeake Moms club, coach Rec sports, and am an active member of St. Christopher’s.

VOCATIONAL EDUCATION: After sitting with our freshman daughter to look at her choices for Pathways at QAC high schools, I was very impressed with the choices in the programs. I’m sure there are ways to improve programs by interfacing more with local businesses; our communities within the county need to work to build a viable workforce through our educational system. Apprenticeships and employment opportunities sourced

SCHOOL SAFETY: QACPS should continue to work with professionals such as the QAC Sheriff’s Department to make schools safe. One aspect of addressing school safety is by focusing on improving the overall school climate, as a positive environment promotes respectful, trusting, and caring relationships among all members of the school community. Safety is addressing bullying and having disciplinary actions.

PARTNERSHIPS: QACPS has done a great job in partnering with businesses and organizations. Continuing with programs such as life after high school and job fairs for summer employment and tying in what skills and qualifications those employers look for in employees would help the entire community. At lower grade levels, continue to seek help from outside schools for programs and local field trips.

COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT: Letting the public know about opportunities to be involved is key. Parents, families, and household members are the ones we need to encourage to be

involved in all aspects of education; not just sporting events. Schools are already governed by state and federal regulations concerning diversity, equity, and inclusion. Creating an atmosphere of inclusion starts in the home.

OTHER PRIORITIES: My priority is simply addressing the issues brought before the board and myself as a board member to make sure our county is doing the best we can to give our students The Best Education we can. Public schools face many challenges. I believe educators, parents, communities and school boards must work together to find solutions – to prepare students to be great citizens and live successful lives.

Queen Anne’s County Board of Education District 4

CANDIDATES

Vote for 1

L. Eichler

No response by print deadline; check Vote411.org

Talbot County Board of Education

DUTIES: The Board establishes specific policies that govern school system operations and has authority over fiscal year budgets, curriculum materials, textbooks, personnel appointments, capital improvements, land acquisitions, grant applications, and other policy decisions. In addition to selecting and appointing the Superintendent of Schools, the Board also employs legal counsel and external auditors.

BASE SALARY: $3,200

TERM: Four years.

HOW ELECTED : This is a non-partisan position. Registered voters may vote for one candidate for their district of residence.

Questions

QUALIFICATIONS: What has inspired you to become a candidate for this office? How does your background and knowledge prepare you for the duties of this office?

PARENTAL INPUT: How would you address concerns about specific books or instructional materials in the schools?

TEEN MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS: What programs and policies, if any, do you propose or support to help our schools address the ongoing concerns around student mental health?

OPPORTUNITY GAP: How would you ensure that all students have equitable access to resources, challenging courses, and effective teachers and administrators?

TEACHERS: What strategies would you support to attract and retain effective teachers and administrators?

Talbot County Board of Education District 2

CANDIDATES

Vote for 1

Candace N. Henry

Campaign Website: www.candacefortalbot.com

QUALIFICATIONS: As a devoted Talbot County Public Schools (TCPS) alumna and mother of two TCPS students, I proudly serve on the Board of Education, with a passion for education inspired by my grandmother’s 30+ years as a TCPS educator. I am currently the Director of the Disability Resource Center at Salisbury University (SU), overseeing operations and strategic initiatives. I also co-developed and teach in SU’s first Disability Studies minor. With 20+ years of advocacy, I’m committed to education on the Shore.

PARENTAL INPUT: A comprehensive approach is needed to ensure that all viewpoints are considered, while prioritizing the highest educational standards. I’m proud of the collaborative process that TCPS already employs, and our commitment to understanding that content evaluation, community/parental input, curriculum alignment, and diverse viewpoints are crucial and ensure accuracy, relevance, and age appropriateness. We strive for continuous improvement to sustain intellectual growth and respect all perspectives.

TEEN MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS: Advocacy for student mental health is a personal passion and a high priority of the county. Current programming, such as the Yellow Ribbon Suicide Prevention Program is vital to addressing mental health challenges. I am a champion for ongoing/accessible school-based services, peer support programs, and wellness initiatives that address the interconnectedness of physical and mental health. I am an advocate for policies that prioritize mental health funding, educator training, and access to care.

OPPORTUNITY GAP: Equitable and inclusive access is crucial for promoting educational excellence and addressing disparities. I am committed to advancing TCPS efforts that address equitable resource allocation, targeted support for underserved communities, access to challenging courses for all students, professional development for educators, data-informed decision-making, community engagement, recruitment/retention of diverse educators, and policies that promote educational equity.

TEACHERS: To attract and retain effective teachers and administrators, a multifaceted approach is necessary. We must incorporate strategies aimed at creating an appealing/supportive work environment, competitive compensation, professional development opportunities, ongoing support for new teachers and administrators, advancement and leadership opportunities, prioritizing work-life balance, and recognizing/appreciating the value of educators and leaders.

Ann C. O’Connor

QUALIFICATIONS: I’ve always been interested in what our schools are teaching, how they are teaching, the retention of good teachers, and good quality education. Our six children have gone through/ are currently going through Talbot County Public Schools. 3 are in college, 2 in high school and one in middle school. I am a former

Spanish teacher, having taught in private and public high schools and community college.

PARENTAL INPUT: My main concern about books and instructional materials for our schools is that they offer our students the best in math, reading, writing, science and social studies. I’m a firm believer in the classics and history. If our students don’t know from where we came, how will they know where we are going? I’m for “back to basics” , keeping education of math, reading, writing, and the arts in the classroom, and leaving anything not having to do with those subjects to discretion of their parents.

TEEN MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS: First, students need to feel safe in their environment. There needs to be clear guidelines on what behavior is and is not tolerated. There needs to be follow through and back up/ support for teachers by administrators. School should be a place where students have a routine, they know what is expected of them. When outside of the rule, there needs to be consequences. In addition, perhaps more trained counselors could be on site to help with and identify certain students and situations.

OPPORTUNITY GAP: There is a need for rigor in our Talbot County Public School System. There is a lot of emphasis on special Ed and bringing children up to where they need to be. There’s a definite need to bridge the gap. Our scores indicate as such. Offering ESOL classes/ and more special Ed, as well as advanced classes for those who need starting in middle school, and definitely by 9th grade. We need to set the bar high with our expectations and students will rise to it. Discipline is first and foremost.

TEACHERS: Ask the teachers! The teachers are in the classroom and know firsthand what is needed to succeed. They know what is working and what isn’t as far as subject matter and discipline, Utilizing the talents of our teachers in placing them in certain positions/grades would have to be researched and developed. Offering support in the classroom with aides, ample planning time, reduced class sizes, and of course, compensation are all things that would be on the top of my list.

Talbot County Board of Education District 5

CANDIDATES

QUALIFICATIONS: As a mother and educator, I believe our public school system is the key to our community’s continued success. I am knowledgeable about the Blueprint for Maryland’s Future and how it will impact our school system. This position’s duties require knowledge of the policies that govern the board and an understanding of how that can impact our community, our schools, and our stakeholders. In addition, I have experience in teaching, human resources, curriculum implementation, and grant management.

PARENTAL INPUT: As a board member, it is our duty to ensure that we follow our policies and procedures as it relates to adopting and implementing curricula for all subject areas. The process ensures all stakeholders have a voice as well as a chance to review materials before adoption. As far as current books or materials, a process can be implemented which would allow resources to be reviewed to determine the appropriateness of materials at each level (elementary, middle, and high school).

Kendra

Anna Howie

League of Women Voters 2024

TEEN MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS: Student mental health is a growing concern not only for our county, but our nation. TCPS currently provides programs to ensure that our students have access to mental health care. We must continue to partner with local mental health agencies, maximize our current resources, and if needed expand our tier 1 supports such as counselors, social workers, and teacher training to provide immediate informed support and the ability to refer parents and students for more intensive support as needed.

OPPORTUNITY GAP: By reviewing instructional data, we can identify where the gaps are and then align the appropriate resources to ensure that all students have equitable access to the curriculum. The Blueprint has produced three pathways to allow students access to Advanced Placement courses, Career and Technical Education programs, and Dual Enrollment courses at Chesapeake College. Through professional development and the evaluation process, our teachers and administrators work to enhance student learning.

TEACHERS: Retention of quality and effective teachers and administrators is essential to our students’ success. We should continue to expand public-private partnerships to assist with housing, relocation, grow your own programs, and more robust development of our own initiatives to retain staff. A review of our pay and benefit structures must also occur to ensure we remain competitive with surrounding school systems.

Karla Wieland-Cherry

QUALIFICATIONS: I have watched and listened to parents talk about the quality of our local education system being degraded from issues that are non-educational in matter. I want to make education important again. I want to see more emphasis on CTE programs. And more importance of supporting the arts in schools as well, not just sports. I have been involved with the schools since the time my children started in Talbot County and found that I had to be their advocate in order to help them succeed.

PARENTAL INPUT: Age appropriateness is best for books and instructional material. Banning books does not stop curiosity but only makes for more desire to read what is forbidden. Being able to use every moment as a teachable moment, especially for those without good parental support is important. Not putting our personal ideology into the schools is important and should remain personal and private; that applies to all teaching and educational staff as well.

TEEN MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS: Mental health services need to be more available both inside and outside of the schools. Mental health availability has been an ongoing issue for many years and needs to remain a priority to enhance a positive learning experience and environment. Having mental health services also requires that services be administered by qualified licensed personnel.

OPPORTUNITY GAP: In Talbot county, there was a recent mass exodus of teaching staff. Trying to understand the reason behind that is important to determine what needs to be done to recruit & retain qualified teachers & staff. Being a teacher has also become dangerous in some school areas; that was not an issue until recent years. Supporting teacher safety & a safe work environment & hence children’s safety is vital also. Great teachers can make great students by giving them the challenges they need and want.

TEACHERS: Money is always the easy answer. A safe work

environment is also important. Supportive leadership that listens, acts, and follows through helps teachers know they are truly an integral part of a successful learning environment.

Talbot County Board of Education District 6

CANDIDATES Vote for 1

Kerry Gunshenan

No response by print deadline; check Vote411.org

Cynthia Marrah Jurrius Campaign Website: www.cynthiafortalbot.com

QUALIFICATIONS: By working together, we can create a positive, safe, effective and inclusive learning environment where all students can reach their highest potential. With a mediation and legal background, I am a collaborative problem solver committed to hearing and valuing all perspectives. I have the skills necessary to navigate complex community challenges and have experience implementing innovative school-based community partnerships that maximize limited resources for student success.

PARENTAL INPUT: I welcome parental input and value our educators’ expertise. Communication and transparency are key. I support a transparent review process for new curriculum, similar to the current TCPS system, which involves teachers, administrators, and opportunity for community feedback. This ensures materials are evaluated fairly, respecting diverse perspectives while maintaining a curriculum that fosters learning, critical thinking, and strong reading skills.

TEEN MENTAL HEALTH CRISIS: Teens face unprecedented mental health challenges. While working to understand the complex national and community-specific causes, I will support integrating mental health services into schools and fostering partnerships with local organizations to provide comprehensive care for students and families. Additionally, I would advocate for policies that enhance mental health education, promote positive peer interactions, address bullying, and equip educators with trauma-informed strategies.

OPPORTUNITY GAP: To ensure equal access for all students, I will evaluate resource allocation, expand access to advanced courses, provide needed targeted support, and prioritize recruiting, retaining, and supporting a diverse team of highly effective teachers. Community school hubs can connect students and families with essential services. By fostering a supportive and inclusive environment and actively engaging families and our community, we can create schools with opportunities for all to succeed.

TEACHERS: To recruit and retain effective teachers and administrators, I will advocate for prioritizing a positive school climate, competitive compensation, strong mentoring, and high quality professional development. Effective communication between administrators and teachers, along with positive family and community engagement, fosters a collaborative school environment where educators are valued and supported, enabling them to focus on helping students succeed and thrive.

Talbot County Ballot Question

Question A

Allowing Extension of Temporary Increase of One Cent per One Hundred Dollars of Assessed Value for an Additional Seven Fiscal Years

Section 614 of the Talbot County Charter establishes a cap on the amount of revenue the County can derive from taxes levied on real estate. The cap on revenue is two percent (2%) compared to the previous year, or Consumer Price Index-Urban (CPI-U), whichever is less. Talbot County’s revenue cap is one of the most restrictive in the State of Maryland, making it extremely difficult for the County to raise sufficient revenue to fund certain initiatives, including key public safety projects. At the November 3, 2020, general election, the voters approved an amendment to § 614 giving the County Council authority to increase revenues above the revenue cap, with a limit of up to one cent (1¢) per one hundred dollars ($100.00) of assessed value for five (5) fiscal years, beginning July 1, 2021, and ending June 30, 2026. The Charter Amendment would extend the County Council’s authority to raise revenues above the revenue cap as aforesaid for an additional seven (7) fiscal years, beginning July 1, 2026, and ending June 30, 2033.

Vote FOR or AGAINST the Charter Amendment

Origin of the Ballot Question: Talbot County has a balanced budget requirement and operates under revenue restrictions which make it very challenging for the County to fund all its operational and capital needs. County budgets starting with fiscal year (FY) 2022 have used an additional one cent of property tax revenue to support public safety needs. All of the money raised by the additional penny has gone toward boosting public safety wages and benefits (in the form of retirement packages for Sheriff’s Deputies, Paramedics, and soon Correctional Officers at Talbot’s Detention Center) to be competitive in recruiting and retaining public safety staff, as well as increased support to volunteer fire companies. To continue to have sufficient funds to maintain these initiatives and to remain flexible in meeting rising costs projected beyond the FY26 Budget, the County Council introduced Resolution 359 during the March 28, 2024 Council meeting proposing to extend the penny revenue-cap exception for an additonal 5 years, ending on June 30, 2031. During the public hearing held on June 25, 2024 Resolution 359 was amended to propose an extension of 7 years instead of 5 to have the authorization expire during a presidential election year. That would allow any future request for extension to be placed on a less crowded ballot. Resolution 359 (as amended) was approved by unanimous vote of the Council to place the proposed question on the ballot for the November 2024 general election.

Current Law: The Charter currently states ”… from and after July 1, 2021, revenues derived from taxes on properties included in the Constant Yield Tax Rate Certification prepared by the Maryland State Department of Assessments and Taxation shall not increase, compared with the previous year, by more than two percent, except that revenues derived from such taxes may increase above the revenue cap limit by up to one cent per one hundred dollars of assessed value in each of the five fiscal years beginning July 1, 2021. Any increase above the revenue cap limit authorized in this Section shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, any increases above such limit authorized by State law.”

Proposed Change: The proposed change would replace the word “five” for the number of fiscal years covered by the proposed amendment with the word “twelve.”

Arguments FOR the Charter Admendment:

• The addition of at one cent to the property tax rate is optional and at the discretion of the County Council. The extension of this option is a means of adjusting to changing circumstances.

• The County Council is projecting that the costs of funding public safety, particularly public safety wages and benefits, may continue to exceed the 2% cap. By extending the option now to raise additional funds when needed, the County will be able to remain competitive in recruiting and retaining public safety staff. Without that flexibility, the County could be faced with having to cut public safety positions or not keeping wages and benefits competitive with neighboring jurisdictions.

• Talbot County has strong financial ratings from Moody’s Investors Service (Aa1) and Fitch Ratings (AAA) due in part to its conservative budgeting approach, healthy reserves, and its strong ability to adjust revenues in light of the historically volatile nature of their revenues. The current temporary funding authorization is an important component of Talbot’s financial resilience and provides the County Council with the flexibility it needs to continue to meet the goals of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan and beyond.

Arguments AGAINST the Charter Admendment: The County Council has added a penny to property tax rates every fiscal year since this option went into effect on December 3, 2020, resulting in property taxes that are higher than 2% over each previous year. If this amendment is passed, it is likely that the property tax rate would exceed the 2% cap every year until June 30, 2033.

A majority vote FOR the Charter amendment means the Talbot County Charter would be changed to extend the length of time the County Council can exercise the option of adding a penny to the property tax rate for an additional seven fiscal years up through June 30, 2033.

A majority vote AGAINST the Charter amendment means the Charter would not be changed and the revenue cap would revert to 2% after the FY 2026 budget ends on June 30, 2026.

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS® OF MARYLAND EDUCATION FUND

LEAGUE MEMBERSHIP

Membership is open to all persons at least 16 years of age. As a member of one of the local Leagues of Women Voters, you will automatically be a member of the League of Women Voters of the United States and receive publications and other benefits from both the US and Maryland Leagues. Please contact your Local League (listed below) to become a member.

Caroline, Dorchester, and Talbot Counties: League of Women Voters of the Mid-Shore P.O. Box 1724 Easton, MD 21601 443-646-3338 LWVMS.MD@gmail.com lwvmidshore.org

Visit us on Facebook

YOUR LOCAL LEAGUE

Kent County: League of Women Voters of Kent County P.O. Box 374 Chestertown, MD 21620 kent-lwvmaryland.nationbuilder. com Visit us on Facebook

Queen Anne’s County: League of Women Voters of Queen Anne’s County P.O. Box 341 Centreville, MD 21617 LWVQAC@gmail.com lwvqac.org/ Visit us on Facebook

YOUR DONATION IS IMPORTANT!

Help the League of Women Voters keep government power in the hands of the people by assisting citizens to become educated, active, and engaged in public policy decisions. If you believe this is important and want us to continue to provide candidate forums and debates, Voters’ Guides, and the website VOTE411.org, please make a tax-deductible contribution to the LWV Maryland Education Fund. We depend on your donations for our work! The Eastern Shore Leagues will be grateful for your check made out to “LWVMD Education Fund” and sent to us at

LWV Mid-Shore PO Box 1724 Easton, MD 21601

(Please write your county name on the memo line of your

Or donate to us online at our websites

The League of Women Voters Voters' Guide