

Ammophila Vol.3: There Was Land Here Before
Writers:
Natalia Damigou Papoti, Emmanouela Kiriakopoulou, Anastasia Michopoulou, Christina Papoulia, Eleni Riga, Theophilos Tramboulis, Vicky Tsirou, EvitaT sokanta, Stefanos Yiannoulis, Costis Zouliatis.
Visual Artists: Alexis Fidetzis, Fotini Kalle, Dionisis Kavallieratos, Panagiotis Kefalas, Electra Maipa, Persephone Nikolakopoulou, Ilias Papailiakis, Poka-Yio, Dimitris Rentoumis, Nana Sachini, Nana Seferli, Eva Stefani, Sasha Streshna, Garden Thief, Kleopatra Tsali, Manos Tsichlis, VASKOS, Marina Velisioti, Christos Venetis, 3 137.

Curated by: Ammophila
© writings: The Writers: © artworks: The Visual Artists
© translations: Dimitris Vitiniotis
The production takes place within the framework of the 2022 program of «All Greece is one Culture» institution of the Ministry of Culture and Sports.


Detailed information and seat reservations at https://digitalculture.gov.gr/

With the financial support of the Ministry of Culture and Sports, the Region of Peloponnese, the Municipality of Elafonisos, the Greek National Tourism Organization,NEON Organization for Culture and Developmentand ZOE.




Acknowledgements
We want to sincerely thank the institutions that supported us so that ammophila Vol.3 There Was Land Here Before could be implemented.
First of all, we would like to express our sincere gratitude to the institutions that supported us. For the financial support of ammophila Vol.3 There was land here before, we would like to thank : «All Greece in one Culture» institution of the Ministry of Culture and Sports, Ministry of Culture and Sports, Region of Peloponnese, Municipality of Elafonisos, Greek National Tourism Organization, NEON Organization for Culture and Development and ZOE Lifestyle Brand.
We sincerely thank the Municipality of Elafonisos and especially Mrs. Efi Liarou, Mayor of Elafonisos for supporting and hosting the exhibition and for providing us with the school building.
For hosting the musical performance we also thank the Ephorate of Antiquities of Laconia and the Archaeological Museum of Neapolis Voion Laconia.
We could not have undertaken this journey without our fellow visual artists, writers and musicians who participated and, with their work and presence, gave life to the event.
Finally, we are also grateful to everyone who helped in any way to make the exhibition ammophila vol.3 There was Land Here Before and the musical performance «posttruth is another water game I play against my mouth» come to life.
The production takes place within the framework of the 2022 program of «All Greece is one Culture» institution of the Ministry of Culture and Sports.
Detailed information and seat reservations at https://digitalculture.gov.gr/
With the financial support of the Ministry of Culture and Sports, the Region of Peloponnese, the Municipality of Elafonisos, the Greek National Tourism Organization, NEON Organization for Culture and Development and ZOE.

Vol.3: There Was Land Here Before 18-28 August 2022
Elafonisos School, Elafonisos, Laconia Archaeological Museum of Neapolis Voion, Laconia
The exhibition Ammophila vol.3: There Was Land Here Before renegotiates our relationship to land, as well as the dominant narratives associated with it. We often think of land as our subsoil, a common ground for coexistence, and we create stories and histories to reinforce this relationship. The exhibition invites us to think of new interpretations and stories regarding real lands, as well as those constructed through our collective fantasies: fantasies of a non-existent land, a land that is different or inhabited differently, a land that can shake us off, a decaying land, a flourishing land, a trembling land, a land without borders. There Was Land Here Before creates narratives around our sense of place and time and how these form our different lives.
Elafonisos, once a peninsula connected to the mainland, was transformed into an island by an earthquake. On this trembling ground, how can we reexamine past narratives and narratives of the past, while replacing them with collective dreams and radical gestures?
Contemporary Art Exhibition
Visual Artists: Alexis Fidetzis, Fotini Kalle, Dionisis Kavallieratos, Panagiotis Kefalas, Electra Maipa, Persephone Nikolakopoulou, Ilias Papailiakis, Poka-Yio, Dimitris Rentoumis, Nana Sachini, Nana Seferli, Eva Stefani, Sasha Streshna, Garden Thief, Kleopatra Tsali, Manos Tsichlis, Vaskos, Marina Velisioti, Christos Venetis, 3 137.
Writers:
Natalia Damigou Papoti, Emmanouela Kiriakopoulou, Anastasia Michopoulou, Christina Papoulia, Eleni Riga, Theophilos Tramboulis, Vicky Tsirou, Evita Tsokanta, Stefanos Yiannoulis, Costis Zouliatis.
Guest performance by Sofia Kouloukouri
Location: Elafonisos School, Elafonisos, Laconia
Duration: 18-28 August 2022

Visiting hours: 18:00-21:00 Curated by: Ammophila
Musical Performance
post-truth is another water game I play against my mouth (electro-acoustic Lamento for 4 performers / sound installation)
5000 years ago, there was a city — there, we can immerse ourselves in its own perspective with what is left to be true. Now beings live in the World of the Mouth (inter-verbal space)
but the gates of what remains, are outside their sight
Participating Artists:
Anna Papathanasiou: vox - performance / Stella N. Christou: vox - performance – digital electronics / Tasos Stamou: Improvised sound sources - analog electronics / Kostas Tzekos: Bass Clarinet - analog electronics.
Composition – Installation – Words: Stella N.Christou
Location: Archaeological Museum of Neapolis Voion, Laconia Start: 19:30 Duration: 40min Days: 23 & 24 August 2022

The production takes place within the framework of the 2022 program of «All Greece is one Culture» institution of the Ministry of Culture and Sports.
Detailed information and seat reservations at https://digitalculture.gov.gr/
With the financial support of the Ministry of Culture and Sports, the Region of Peloponnese, the Municipality of Elafonisos, the Greek National Tourism Organization, NEON Organization for Culture and Development and ZOE.

My dears Tasos, Kostas and Anna, I am in Cyprus recording in the valley of Solea, by the river Klarios (or Karkotis) and in Skouriotissa, one of the oldest mines in Cyprus1.
The sounds that I am collecting will compose the soundscape for our performance in Archaeological Museum of Neapolis Voion.
It will be our continuo, in the manner of Jani Christou, that will help us achieve the transitions of the themes / the cues / the broader «psychological» state of the live narration.
Here is a brief -emotional- score of the work. We will go into the details in the following days.
☼
1. The mine of Skouriotissa

PART A
“I wear stone glasses and I am called Petra”2
(And I became a stone - let there be no depth... / a “stone” visual lament for this lost dispute between the museum›s ancient exhibits taken from the bottom of Pavlopetri and the living active artistic beings / burning stones coming out of my mouth - mouth made of stone - eyes made of stone manoula mou…)
Line-up in the form of an early-80s Greek popular orchestra.
-Tasos: “bouzouki” — electronics
-Kostas: bass clarinet — “clarinet”
-Anna, Stella: “popular” singers
PART B “Christ, if I go crazy, it will be from a fish and from indolence”3
— the freshwater fish paradox — (Freshwater from lakes and rivers —0.1% of all surface water— is home to half the population of fish, while the sea and the seabed —99.6% of all surface water— is home to the other half. I wish today we would look after at least one river - how the contemporary Greek civilization remains inactive before the hunt for the “depths” of place and time)
-Tasos: fish - grains - clunks / the movement of elements in space
-Kostas: drones / 2 / from the dark bottom - to the sweet river
-Anna, Stella: bodies and voices move in a fragmented verbal state -Hydrophones
2. Miltos Sachtouris, “I wear stone glasses and I am called Peter”, PARALOGAIS, 1948
3. Katerina Zisaki, Without self (Χωρίς Εαυτό), 2022

The pus – or, regarding the places that exist even if you don’t see them
Strange things happened to her that winter.
She has always had pimples. Not many, a couple of relatively large ones before her period and some smaller ones at unexpected moments. That winter, however, her body began a strange and incomprehensible production. Pimples were popping up in entirely new places, pimples which were different from the ones she had before : when she squeezed them they wouldn’t empty out, or rather they ended up only partially emptied and while she was sure to have exterminated them, the following day they reappeared larger than before and instead of having turned into a sore as she would have expected, they no longer had any visible exit point. They continued to grow bigger, trapped under her skin, turning little reddish lumps that she didn’t know how to deal with; she would temporarily forget about them but they reminded her of their existence every time she contracted her facial muscles to talk.
Ever since she cut her hair into a fringe, they had been popping up uncontrollably on her forehead; as soon as one was about to disappear, her skin would throb announcing an imminent inflammation just a centimetre away. It was as if they were deliberately trying to remain invisible to the eyes of others; only she knew of their existence or of the fact that under her fringe there was an entire constellation of swollen red bumps.
Just before the end, she got a pimple in a place she didn’t even know existed. She was about to wear a pair of earrings in front of the half-broken bathroom mirror of an unkempt rented room right across the island of Spinalonga. As she was sliding the hoop into her left ear she momentarily felt the mellow heat of pooled pus. She manically started searching for its source. She looked behind the ear, under the ear, around the ear, even inside it. No luck. All over, her skin was as expected; white and smooth. Until she suddenly saw it: one pimple had popped up right where the earlobe meets her face. She couldn’t comprehend how a pimple could have appeared in this non-place, she could hardly believe that there were sebum-secreting pores in that area! And yet. The soft slit that would normally be there was now swollen and warm, an accumulated morbidity that was festering and would have gone unnoticed having sprouted where it did, but she had accidentally uncovered it. She moved the earlobe to the side, examined the area thoroughly, located its exit point, found the optimal position to place her fingers, and squeezed it. It was so close
to her ear that for the first time in her life she could actually hear the pus coming out, that faint crunchy noise which she could never say with certainty whether it was a sound or a sensation, this time resembled a small explosion. The discharge poured out thick as cream. It was no longer possible to pretend that she hadn’t seen the slit at the edge of her face.
Natalia Damigou-PapotiPortrait of an unknown land
The image of a land that once existed and has currently taken on a new form inevitably brings to mind the concept of memory. Mankind has learned to persistently operate through visualizations, through reconstructions of previously experienced memories, and leaps of fantasy to a time and place that has not yet arrived (and usually never will). Memory comes along with terms such as mnemonic practices and documentation, as elements associated with something that once existed and is now lost. This, ultimately, leads to reflecting on what has not yet been experienced, at the level which is dominated by fantasy, utopia and vision.
Memory and utopia have always provided the ground for artistic creation. They are two sides of a complementary bipolarity, which is deeply rooted in our perceptions and every manifestation of it. Convention plays a very important role within this dense nexus. In Art and Illusion (1960) Ernst Gombrich had eloquently expressed the ways in which convention, in the sense of having knowledge of a particular visual vocabulary and reducing symbols from intellectual to real, is the basis on which artists create their works with a relative certainty that they can become legible. Convention, this “prior knowledge”, as a concept, essentially gives meaning to a memory to which we turn again and again in order to interpret the world around us. This clearly presupposes the existence of common places; however, nothing can give us the comforting or even suffocating certainty that we all interpret common symbols in common ways, perhaps with the exception of their first level. Visual symbols, like language, are more like mnemonic anchors. And ultimately, all communication systems, as well as the concept of narration at their core, leave plenty of room for the expectations of creators and of those who complement and consume their works. We only have to recall Akira Kurosawa in Rashōmon (1950) and his argument that human beings, willingly or not, are constantly completing aspects of their lives, their own personal stories and those they have picked up and become part of them.
In Portrait of a Lady on Fire (2019) by Céline Sciamma, a female artist is commissioned to create a portrait of a French woman of the gentry to be sent to her future husband in Italy before her arrival. This portrait, like so many others that were created and sent to prospective spouses who had never met the person they were about to marry, is, to my eyes, the embodiment of the imaginary and of insightful practice. Frans Hals’
The Laughing Cavalier (1624) has been considered, among other interpretations, as a work commissioned by the person portrayed in it to be sent to a prospective bride. If this is indeed true, we can picture a woman in 17th-century Holland examining closely the entire painting, closing her eyes, taking notes of the man’s features and creating his face in her mind, a face made of a material that is malleable, luminous, indistinct, freed from reality but inescapably profoundly anchored in it. In fact, it was Hals himself who, through brushstrokes that are more suggestive than descriptive, seems to achieve an intensely philosophical alignment between form and substance. As regards this imaginary woman who received the portrait created by Hals, the multiple interpretations from one medium to another, from one convention to the next, and from one system of expectations to a new one, resulted in creating a land that rises up to the surface for as long as the intermediate stage between complete ignorance of this person’s existence and the encounter lasts. So, through an intuitive sequence reminiscent of “Chinese whispers”, the Dutch woman holding the portrait of the Laughing Cavalier in her hands creates a certain expectation and, ultimately, oddly enough (but not quite), a memory of her future husband. The Laughing Cavalier, if indeed he did send this portrait to a prospective bride and if the marriage was indeed consummated, he saw himself confronting a memory of his own existence, which although it had nothing to do with reality at the same time it cannot be considered as fictional because someone (the Dutch woman) had dreamt of it. In Nagisa Ōshima’s Death by Hanging (Kōshikei) which was released in 1968, a convict who survives hanging but loses his memory is called by his executioners to take part in a play in which he is taught how to become himself again, that is, the man who must face execution for his evil deeds. The man does not remember anything, but those around him have a detailed “memory” of his crimes, his childhood and of his everyday life, and they constantly refer to events that are communicated for the first time both to himself as well as to the film’s audience. It is a land that pre-existed and a new one which is now emerging in the same place. This land of before is both an ally (as a precondition) and an enemy to the new one.
Back to portraiture, Rubens’ Henry IV Receives the Portrait of Marie de’ Medici, is the perfect embodiment of the exalting, pragmatic, yet deeply imaginary nature of creating and sending portraits before the couple’s first encounter. Rubens’ work can be interpreted in an intensely self-referential way which leads to a web of multiple associations. First of all, it opens a window to the other side of the story, namely the one that has to do with the delivery of the portrait to the prospective spouse and the subsequent beginning of the construction of a memory. Marie de’ Medici had commissioned the painting and this fact links the incident to
the then established practice of women sending images of themselves. However, the picture was commissioned after the wedding; in fact it was commissioned after the death of the portrayed love-struck King Henry of France. At a first level, the context as regards the commissioning of this work was dictated by politics, as Marie de’ Medici was facing expulsion from the French capital, accused of having usurped the throne, and she was desperately looking for a way to legitimize her position. But ultimately, through a work of art aimed at restoring the prestige of its protagonist, Marie de’ Medici (or Rubens and on her behalf for that matter) ends up presenting a vision: she fantasizes a moment of the past -in a later timewhich she has never actually experienced, and this very moment concerns a man who has just started reflecting on it. While we focus on the work, Rubens puts us between two mirrors and we find ourselves, together with Rubens’ protagonist, trapped in a perpetual sequence of feedbacks between the past and the future, a moment that lasts forever without ever connecting to its present.
This strong association between memory and vision is reminiscent of a practice that was quite common in 15th-century Europe. Those who had travelled to the Holy Land used to write down their experiences and share them with Christian worshippers who, although they had never visited the Holy Land, they knew the paths of Jerusalem down to the tiniest detail. Whether studying at an academy or at home gazing out of an open window, with one finger holding the page they were reading, those devoted Christians would close their eyes and enter a world shaped by the narrations of the itinerant writers using a raw material that was fluid, but also full of personal and social conventions, prejudices, expectations and memories (which stemmed from the world of reality or their reasoning). I don’t know how many of them did actually make the journey or how the austere material place before them interacted with the one they had imagined; I am sure, however, that they never saw the visit to the Holy Land as a pending issue, because the pilgrimage and the vision of it had ended up fusing into one entity.
We constantly narrate stories about events we’ve experienced, but also about others we’ve chosen to associate ourselves with. Art has been one of the most favourite codes that we have made use of in order to organise the vast material of life, in an attempt to adequately satisfy our need for causality, but it has failed to distant itself from the self-referential aspect of time that opens up –simultaneously– to a recollection of the past and a reflection on the future. This intermediate state of an ever-expanding present takes place, this time, in a place which is old, submerged, and reborn. In a land that may be afraid to engage in a confrontation with
our memories, even for those of us who we have simply dreamed of it while holding a wedding portrait of it in our hands.
Emmanouela KiriakopoulouLocus,
loci:
An interdisciplinary approach to the ideal place
Place and space. Interrelated concepts that recur frequently in the history of human intellect, art, and literature. Place and space, sometimes as key drivers for the evolution of the myth and sometimes as the context within which the action takes place.
Place serves multiple functions and that is why it has been subjected to various categorisations. Michel Foucault (1926-1984), in his effort to retrace “a history of space”, argues that in the Middle Ages there was “a hierarchic ensemble of places”. Places were usually divided into two opposite poles; sacred or profane, protected or open, urban or rural, supercelestial as opposed to the celestial, and the celestial place was in its turn opposed to the terrestrial.1 As regards contemporary space, the philosopher opines that we may still not have reached the point of a “practical desanctification of space” because “the oppositions that we regard as simple givens […] are still nurtured by the hidden presence of the sacred”. For example the distinction between the space of leisure and that of work, private space and public space, etc.2 As regards this last dipole, Walter Siebel suggests that the public space differs from the private, in that the former is characterized by the “ritual anonymity of a pretentious behaviour that preserves distances” while the latter “is a space of intimacy, physicality and sentimentality”.3 On the other hand, Foucault talks about utopia, which, according to him, is “a site with no real place” distinct from heterotopia because the latter is “an effectively enacted utopia, […] a sort of place that is outside of all places” even though it may be possible to indicate its location in reality.4
In folktales, place plays an essential role in the evolution of the story and heroes’ mindset. In some cases it can be a place “unknown and magical” that “can be reached only after having worn out the soles of forty pairs
1. Michel Foucault, Άλλοι χώροι [Ετεροτοπίες] (Other places [Heterotopias]) in Ετεροτοπίες Και Άλλα Κείμενα [Heterotopias and Other Essays], translated by Tassos Betzelos, Athens, Πλέθρον editions, 2012, p. 256 (hereinafter referred to as “Foucault, 2012”).
2. Foucault, 2012, p. 258.
3. Walter Siebel, «Τα θεμελιώδη χαρακτηριστικά και το μέλλον της Ευρωπαϊκής πόλης» (The fundamental characteristics and the future of the European city) in Αύριο οι Πόλεις [The cities tomorrow], edited by: Pavlos Lefas, Athens, Πλέθρον editions, pp.87-93
4. Foucault, 2012, p. 260
of iron shoes”.5 In other cases, the supernatural beings of the tale inhabit a place of real, identifiable surroundings, such as a deserted location, a nearby hill or meadow “on the outskirts of the community” of the narrator, a cave or a house.6 A frequent motif used in folktales is that of the descent, in which the hero or heroine, using a forty-step staircase, is transported to a palace unlike any other building in the real world.7 If we adopt a psychoanalytic interpretation, this is most definitely a symbol, that of the process of coming of age, but also of the immersion in the subconscious.
Ideal places occupy a prominent place in theatre, literature and painting. An archetypal example is found in William Shakespeare’s The Tempest in the form of the island where Prospero lives, after having fled from Milan. It is a place inspired by colonialism and by a shipwreck that occurred in 1609, and also by the writings of Thomas More (1478-1535) and Michel de Montaigne (1533-1592).8 In literature, Utopia has quite often been identified with Arcadia, as is the case of Philip Sidney’s (1554-1586) pastoral romance The Countess of Pembroke’s Arcadia (1593). In the art of painting, the most famous example of utopia is the Shepherds of Arcadia (16371638) by Nicolas Poussin (1594-1665). Ernst Gombrich’s interpretation of the painting is considered a classic: in an idyllic landscape, shepherds read an inscription on a marble tombstone: “Et in Arcadia Ego” (“I am in Arcadia too”). The subject of the sentence is Death who exists even in such an idyllic landscape.9
Another case of an ideal place, which is found in literature and inspired paintings and operas, is that of the magical island of witch Alcina, which is mentioned in Orlando Furioso (1516), the epic poem by Ludovico Ariosto (1474-1533). Like Aeaea and Ogygia, Alcina’s island is a mythical place, a heaven on earth of sensual pleasure and lovemaking, far removed from the burden of civilian duties in an organised society.10 Knight Ruggiero arrives 5 Marianthi Kaplanoglou, Παραμύθι
νέα εποχή [Folktale and Storytelling in Greece: An Old Art in a New Era], Athens, Patakis editions, 2014 (1st edition, by the author herself, 2002), (hereinafter referred to as “Kaplanoglou, 2014”), p. 218.
6. Kaplanoglou, 2014, pp. 218-219
7. Kaplanoglou, 2014, p. 298
8 Marios Ploritis, Ο πολιτικός Σαίξπηρ. Η τραγωδία της εξουσίας [Political Shakespeare. The Tragedy of Power], Athens, Kastaniotis editions, 2002, pp. 300, 305, 307-308
9. Ernst H. Gombrich, The Story of Art, New York, Phaidon, p. 294
10. Ita Mac Carthy, “Alcina’s Island: From Imitation to Innovation in the ‘Orlando furioso’”, Italica, vol. 81, issue 3 (Autumn, 2004), pp. 325-350 (hereinafter referred to as “Mac Carthy, 2004”)
at Alcina’s island after his fight against the giantess Erfilla.11 However, the island is enchanted and Alcina has transformed her ex-lovers into plants, animals and inanimate objects12. Ruggiero succumbs to Alcina’s charms.13 Later in the poem, the fairy Melissa, hands him the Ring of Reason and this helps him understand that he has been deluding himself.14 Ruggiero leaves for another place, that of Logistilla, in pursuit of intellect and reason.15
Thus, these two places, the palaces of Alcina and Logistilla, constitute two opposing and symbolic poles, that of the spiritual and that of the physical, it is the amor celeste versus the amor vulgare, the heavenly against the earthly in Neoplatonic terms. Of course, the poet does not condemn the impulses and sensuality of the body, instead, he presents it as something natural, given that the main location of the Alcina incident is the locus amoenus, 16 a place of pleasure17 which of course, at least in the case of Alcina’s garden or of Circe, the more appealing it appears at first, the more dangerous turns out to be afterwards.18 In Canto VI, the poet is wondering, “is this heaven or hell? Or this is where Love is born?... There is no trace of white-haired contemplation…[this place] could easily be utopia”. Later in the poem, when talking about the population of the island, he says “One would assume that these girls and boys are posing for a painting of Arcadian theme”. 19
Around 1550, painter Nicolò dell’Abate (ca. 1509/12-1571), inspired by Orlando Furioso, produced a series of eight frescoes in the Palazzo Torfanini, Bologna. One of them depicts the scene of Ruggiero’s arrival at Alcina’s palace. The witch and her entourage welcome the knight who can be seen on horseback on the left side of the fresco. In the middle and
11. Morten Steen Hansen, “Ariosto in the Hands of Sixteenth and Seventeenth-Century Artists” in Teaching the Italian Renaissance Romance Epic, edited by Jo Ann Cavallo, New York, The Modern Language Association of America, 2018, pp. 251-258 (hereinafter referred to as “Steen Hansen, 2018”)
12. Mac Carthy, 2004
13 Ludovico Ariosto, Orlando Furioso: A New Verse translation translated by David R. Slavitt, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2009, (hereinafter referred to as “Ariosto, 2009”) Canto VΙI, stanza 16, p. 111
14. Mac Carthy, 2004
15. Mac Carthy, 2004
16. Mac Carthy, 2004
17. Eduardo Saccone, “Wood, Garden, ‘locus amoenus’ in Ariosto’s ‘Orlando Furioso’”, MLN, vol. 112, issue 1, (January 1997), pp. 1-20 (here in after referred to as “Saccone, 1997”)
18. Saccone, 1997
19. Ariosto, 2009, Canto VI, stanzas 73-74, p. 105
in the background, we see the fight between Ruggiero and Erfilla.20 The lush vegetation, although its main function is to serve as the background that embraces the protagonists and separates the narrative present (arrival at the palace) from the narrative past (duel), at the same time it is suggestive of this place of pleasure and also could be a reminder of Alcina’s transformed ex-lovers. Despite the illusionism of the fresco, the illogical proportions of figures, buildings, and landscape across the painted space lend an air of the uncanny21 and the fairytale-like.
In the course of humanity, places, whether appearing as utopias or heterotopias, shape, activate, or conceal all aspects of the meaning. Each place is a “language” that expresses the very core of the signified, it is a writing that precedes narrative, literary conception, intellectual construction, and visual creation, while at the same time it embraces and espouses the entire content. Place enhances communication and the level of comprehension of viewers or readers.
It is for these reasons that utopia and ideal places, which portray space as an illusion and as something that lacks spatial conventions, and compare it with the real environment of human life and of structured societies, have become common motifs in artistic creation and popular tradition, while they are often the subject of in-depth study by philosophers.
Anastasia Michopoulou, Philologist
Postgraduate student of History of Art, University of Crete20. Steen Hansen, 2018
21. Steen Hansen, 2018
There Was Land Here Before – Will there be land here anymore?
Florence, November 4, 1966. The Arno river floods and the city centre sinks below the water level which covers everything but the domes and belfries of the city’s Renaissance monuments. At the same time, SUPERSTUDIO is born, an artistic movement that does not construct buildings but seeks to disrupt the architecture and design of the past. A past so insurmountable that ends up confining the present, leading to a dystopian future.
According to Tafuri, the utopian visions of the interwar avant-gardes are nothing more than an idealization of capitalism, a transformation of capitalist rationality into rationality of the form, of architectural design.1 What had been proposed as regards the reconstruction which took place during the post-war decades of the Golden Age, 2 led to the total elimination of the place through the universal domination of technique.

In a playful engagement with space, time and architecture, the Hyper-hypersurface, this everlasting and colourless surface of information and energy, promises to open up new possibilities of habitation based on the interplay between humans and technology. The concepts of space and time are renegotiated due to electronic plugs which connect and disconnect as they see fit. The internet allows for this kind of space-time transcendence. The boundaries between nature and dwelling are unclear and fluctuating, almost non-existent. The complete eradication of borders seems
1. Tafuri, M., 1969, “Per una critica dell’ideologia architettonica” [“Towards a Critique of Architectural Ideology”], Contropiano, 1, 31-79.
2. Hobsbawm, E., 2010 [1994], Η Εποχή των Άκρων. Ο σύντομος Εικοστός Αιώνας (1914-1991) [The Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century (1914-1991)], Athens: Θεμέλιο editions.
SUPERSTUDIO, Salvataggi dei centri storici italiani (Italia vostra), Firenze, 1972to provide the freedom that wanderers, migrants, nomads and travellers long for. There is no hierarchy on the canvas covering the ground; all its pieces appear equal to such an extent that the need to move between places hardly ever surfaces. Freed from property anxiety, the body itself turns into an architectural object a self-sufficient shell that inhabits and is inhabited at the same time.
SUPERSTUDIO, Supersuperficie, 1971-1972



The infinite supply of information and services appears to offer the muchsought variability of the “city” that has been freed from all kinds of structures but, in return, offers constant connectivity. The concept of the city is replaced by the impetus of the hub. Within such a new illusory sense of freedom of movement and choice, disconnection becomes the new challenge.
Land is replaced by a canvas, like the one placed by archaeologists on the ground before digging into its deep history, or the one used by architects before expanding ground surface towards the sky. SUPERSTUDIO’s canvas looks like a motionless sea of mirrors, almost like the present day meadows of photovoltaic panels which, accompanied by wind turbines, have come to defend the smooth relationship between man and the environment. In the same vein, cars are gradually becoming “eco-friendly” until

they cease to exist. Ultra-luxurious smart cities are here to solve housing problems caused by overpopulation and involuntary displacement.3 In the “sustainable” cities of the future, culture is replaced by tourism, entertainment by leisure, education by lifelong learning, medicine by biotechnology. Our digestive tract will gradually get used to the intake of new forms of bio food so that humanity will eventually help release as less methane as possible into the atmosphere.
Technological utopias, utterly dystopian. Religion is dead. Long live science!
The new moment is the image of the moment, the one that is automatically transmitted by the hub to the entire planet and beyond. Through the interplanetary highway human civilization expands into the universe.

Debating with utopia seems inevitable. According to Koolhaas, without reference to utopia the work of the architect cannot have any real value, yet intertwined with utopia it will be found complicit in the commission of lesser or greater crimes. 4
Is there a measure on earth?
There is none. Because what we signify when we say “on earth” exists only insofar as man dwells on earth and, in dwelling, he lets the earth be as earth.5
3. https://www.neom.com/en-us/about
4. Koolhaas, R., 2003, Content. Köln: Taschen, 393.
5.Heidegger, M. 1971 [1951], “…Poetically man dwells…”, in Martin Heidegger, Poetry, Language, Thought, (translated by Hofstadter). New York,: Harper & Row, 227
SUPERSTUDIO, L’ architettura interplanetaria, Autostrada Terra-Luna, 1970-1971 Christina PapouliaHydrophilic and ammophile
1904, Elafonisos
In 1904, the geologist Fokion Negris was the first to observe the architectural remains of the submerged settlement of Pavlopetri in Elafonisos. The settlement dates from 2,800 BC. The hydrophilic Fokionas had found his own Atlantis. His observations were confirmed only after a visit by the oceanographer Nicholas Flemming to the area years later. In 1967, Flemming, in an attempt to study sea level changes in the Aegean, rediscovered the ruins of the prehistoric settlement. In collaboration with Angelos Delivorias from Sparta’s Archaeological Authority, he mapped perhaps the oldest sunken city.
1996, Elafonisos
That summer was different from the others. Amongst the others but also apart from them. I spent two and a half hours in the back seat tangled between floral skirts. I do not remember if I was dizzy in the spiral streets or if the ferry was shaking. But I remember the little, round, green watermelon when we got out of the big, white house. It was so small I could hold it in my arms. Next to it was another: disemboweled, glittering, red with black seeds.
I put on my swimsuit and pulled my curly hair into a bun in the hope that it would not get tangled and my grandmother would not pull it as tight as my mom’s braids. Since then, she said, she had a permanent headache, and I was afraid that maybe the same thing would happen to me. If the wind didn’t tangle them, the water would anyway. I had to rule out all possibilities.
Immediately after, we went down to the beach and I fell onto the sand to make little angels like they did in the movies in the snow. The sand made me golden and salty, almost crunchy, after a while under the sun. For the first time I had a sense of self-enjoyment. Since then, I have become a sand lover, an “ammophile”. I caressed the dunes that swung slowly with the wind and they in turn tenderly caressed me back.
1928, Fokionos Negri
Fokionos Negri was built on the Levidi stream that started from Turk-
ovounia. The stream separated the houses creating a “rive gauche - rive droite” situation that ended in a wooden bridge in Patission. The street was designed by the architect Vassilis Tsagris with poplars and fountains. At the beginning of the 20th century, the Great Fountain in Kypseli was a meeting point for the “neroulades”, the water sellers during the frequent periods of drought that afflicted Athens. In 1928, the name Fokionos Negri was given to the hydrophilic road.
2022, Fokionos Negri
Noon, fifth floor, large glass panel. To cool off, in the face of the water, I went down to the fountain with the swimmer entitled “Daughter in Ecstasy” by the sculptor Michalis Tombros. The bather is located between ivy and plane trees, surrendered to the eyes of passers-by.
For the first time I felt at home in Athens thanks to this fountain. After all, whenever we talk, we end up at my first fountain. Every fountain I come across refers to that.
My mom used to say it had goldfish when she was little. That’s why they said they went to “psarakia”: to the fish and not to the fountain. I didn’t see them, but I liked to watch the water jumping happily and continuously. This perpetual renewal of water was for me a pleasure, an Other pleasure, a hydrophilic one.
When I returned, the moving boxes were still there. Somewhere inside me I hoped they were gone. They would be tired of waiting for me to open them, to tame my fears, to settle my anger, to cool off from the heat. They would just be gone.
I started with the oldest box. The wounds had become friendly ghosts. In the polaroid of 1996, you are in the water and I am sitting on the dune, still trying to make perfect little angels. You are hydrophilic, I am ammophile. You were tall and handsome. She was left out of the plan. She had a big birthmark on her cheek. A mother who wanted something and did not get it. A sign of an Other desire. I tried to talk to you on the phone, I was on 53rd, just before 5th Avenue and a wall fountain appeared in front of me. You did not answer anymore and I felt my eyes wet, hydrophilic.
2022, Elafonisos