Financing Solutions to Reduce Natural Gas Flaring and Methane Emissions

Page 112

92

| Financing Solutions to Reduce Natural Gas Flaring and Methane Emissions

2. Service fee model. In this scenario, Galileo installs its equipment and is remunerated with fees for the provision of turnkey services, from the treatment and liquefaction of associated gas to the transportation and delivery of LNG. The typical contract duration is 5–10 years. The fee structure consists of a fixed amount per month based on installed capacity plus a processing fee for the LNG produced. 3. LNG sale model. In this scenario, a special purpose vehicle is set up to run the entire process. The special purpose vehicle purchases associated gas from the oil producer and sells LNG or electricity—if Galileo also installs power generation units—to the oil producer and third parties. Depending on associated gas quality, some projects are also able to monetize liquids by selling them to third parties. Projects are equity-funded by Galileo and, case by case, by co-­ investors such as public or private utilities and other companies. This model, which is asset-light from the perspective of the oil operator and entails the provision of turnkey services by Galileo, is gaining traction among clients.

Takeaways Galileo attributes the success of its FMR solution to several factors: the modularity and movability of its technology, the ability to provide turnkey services to oil operators, the ability to shoulder the up-front investment instead of the oil operator, and swift project execution. In addition to reducing emissions from flaring, Galileo’s solutions also eliminate methane emissions from incomplete flares and leave no environmental footprint. Galileo’s equipment can be installed without permanent damage to the ground and, once removed, allows for the quick return of native flora and fauna.

THE NIGERIAN GAS FLARE COMMERCIALISATION PROGRAMME Background Despite successful efforts by the Nigerian government to curb flaring over the past 20 years, Nigeria was still responsible for 5 percent of gas flared globally in 2020. That year, the Nigerian oil industry flared 7 billion cubic meters of associated gas, a 70 percent reduction over the previous 20 years achieved primarily by tackling large flares through own consumption and large revenue-generating FMR projects. In 2019—before the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) crisis—according to Nigeria’s Department of Petroleum Resources (DPR), 178 sites in the country were flaring close to 900 mmscf/d, with some three-quarters of it being routine flaring (figure 4.4). Despite various legal and regulatory actions since the 1960s, Nigeria did not witness a structural reduction in flaring until the turn of the century, coinciding with the development of the LNG industry and other gas use schemes. The Petroleum Act of 1969 gave ownership of all associated gas to the federal government free of cost at the flare and without payment of royalty. The Petroleum (Drilling and Production) Regulation of 1969 required producers to include associated gas use plans in field development plans for approval. The Associated Gas Re-injection (Continued Flaring of Gas) Regulations of 1985 required producers to reinject associated gas when a use scheme was not feasible and introduced


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Risks of FMR investments and mitigating factors

6min
pages 127-130

A.1 Selected companies that offer flaring and methane reduction solutions

4min
pages 131-132

Financial attractiveness of flaring and methane reduction investments

4min
pages 125-126

References

1min
page 124

Galileo

5min
pages 110-111

4.4 Flared gas volume in Nigeria, 1992–2019

4min
pages 113-114

Notes

2min
page 123

phases

5min
pages 115-116

Crusoe Energy Systems

5min
pages 118-119

The Nigerian Gas Flare Commercialisation Programme

2min
page 112

4.1 Termo Mechero Morro

1min
page 109

Mechero Energy

2min
page 108

4.2 Aggreko’s installed capacity, by geography

6min
pages 102-104

4.3 Sacha Central flare-to-power business model

4min
pages 106-107

Hoerbiger

2min
page 105

Methodology and general assumptions

2min
page 71

Aggreko

2min
page 100

Highlights

1min
page 69

Summary takeaways

1min
page 99

Notes

2min
page 65

gas sector

3min
page 56

reduction financing

3min
page 64

Financing instruments

2min
page 58

2.1 Banking on Climate Change 2021’s bank policy scoring

2min
page 51

2.2 The European Union Green Bond Principles: Overview

5min
pages 60-61

2.3 Transition bond guidelines: Summary

2min
page 62

and Development, 2014–20

2min
page 57

Categories of investors

1min
page 47

reduction

4min
pages 32-33

1.2 Examples of countries’ regulatory approaches to gas flaring

2min
page 38

Contributions

3min
page 39

Regulatory developments

4min
pages 36-37

References

4min
pages 45-46

1.8 Emission reduction commitments and targets of selected companies

2min
page 43

Notes

2min
page 44

1.3 Reasons for routine flaring and venting (upstream

3min
page 27
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Financing Solutions to Reduce Natural Gas Flaring and Methane Emissions by World Bank Publications - Issuu