Health Financing Reform in Ukraine

Page 64

44

|

HEALTH FINANCING REFORM IN UKRAINE

reform, when the SNGs were paying for the bulk of health ­services funded through central health grants, they had traditionally ­supplemented central grants with a substantial portion of local revenue, nearly 25 percent of the total health budget, as shown in table 2.3. Within this local supplement, about one-third covered utility costs, and another one-third was invested in capital costs. After the reform, subnational financing of utility costs and capital expenditures became mandatory, but the SNGs were given discretion as to whether they wanted to continue to pay the rest of their traditional budget supplement. In essence, their expenditure responsibility was reduced by about UAH 10 billion as of 2020. While there was no matching reconsideration of the tax assignment responsibility between government tiers, the MoF reduced the size of one of the three core block grants available as delegated revenue for local budgets in 2020 by UAH 4 billion. In that year, the size of the local supplementary financing decreased by UAH 6.1 billion between 2019 and the pre-COVID-19 2020 plan. In other words, having been given the discretion to do so, and having a reduced delegated revenue base, the SNGs continued to voluntarily supplement around UAH 4 billion of the PMG running costs. Moreover, facing COVID-19 costs, the SNGs have significantly increased their contribution to health expenditures, which grew to nearly the level prior to the reform. • Local supplementation of the PMG running costs can lead to inefficiencies, but these can be addressed through a set of specific national policy tools. On the one hand, the practice of local supplementation of the PMG budget may lead to inefficiencies. Local politics in both centralized and decentralized systems tend to lead to advocacy to retain inefficient, low-occupancy, and low-quality facilities in small hospitals, usually in rural and small-town locations. It also

TABLE 2.3

Intergovernmental financing of health care, 2015–20 2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

HEALTH SPENDING

2020

2020

PLAN PRECOVID

PLAN POSTCOVID

Consolidated budget (UAH billions)

71.0

75.5

102.4

115.9

128.4

138.5

169.0

Central spending (state budget health expenditures, including health grants)

63.3

57.2

78.7

87.4

97.7

113.9

141.0

7.7

18.3

23.7

28.4

30.7

24.6

28.0

Consolidated budget (percent of GDP)

3.57

3.17

3.43

3.26

3.23

3.04

4.24

Central spending (state budget health expenditures, including health grants)

3.19

2.40

2.64

2.46

2.46

2.50

3.54

Local co-pay (local budget health spending, excluding health grants)

0.39

0.77

0.79

0.80

0.77

0.54

0.70

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

Central spending (state budget health expenditures, including health grants)

89.21

75.80

76.86

75.47

76.09

82.24

83.43

Local co-pay (local budget health spending, excluding health grants)

10.79

24.20

23.14

24.53

23.91

17.76

16.57

Local co-pay (local budget health ­spending, excluding health grants)

Consolidated budget (percent of total consolidated expenditures)

Source: State Treasury Service of Ukraine.


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook

Articles inside

Recommendations

2min
page 108

technology

5min
pages 106-107

Well-coordinated and constructive interagency relationships NHSU capacity: Structure, human resources, information

2min
page 105

constraint

2min
page 104

for decision-making

5min
pages 101-102

External accountability and oversight of the NHSU Effective systems of internal control within a firm and credible budget

2min
page 103

The autonomy of the NHSU Clear and transparent roles, methodologies, and processes

2min
page 100

References

2min
pages 97-99

Notes

5min
pages 95-96

3.8 Payment mix for PMG services in Q2–Q3 of 2020

10min
pages 91-94

3.2 Contracting requirements for the service packages under the NHSU

1min
page 74

3.7 Packages of specialized care in the PMG, 2020

7min
pages 88-90

3.3 E-Health development timeline

13min
pages 76-80

3.1 Graphic presentation of the PMG components—PMG service packages

5min
pages 72-73

Specialized care: Inpatient, outpatient, emergency, and hospital care

5min
pages 86-87

The AMP for outpatient care

4min
pages 81-82

What is covered by the Program of Medical Guarantees, and how is it purchased?

1min
page 71

projections to 2025

4min
pages 59-60

References

1min
page 70

2.13 Largest functions as a percentage of consolidated expenditures, 2007–20

4min
pages 62-63

Notes

2min
page 69

2.1 Central government spending, including transfers

1min
page 58

Recommendations

4min
pages 67-68

2.3 Intergovernmental financing of health care, 2015–20

7min
pages 64-66

Constraints and opportunities beyond 2021

5min
pages 52-53

Notes

3min
pages 41-42

oblast, 2019 and 2021

4min
pages 33-34

1.4 Service packages purchased under the PMG

7min
pages 30-32

What is the Program of Medical Guarantees?

4min
pages 43-44

and selected country groups, 2000–18

4min
pages 24-25

1.3 Health spending as a share of total spending and GDP, 2007–20

7min
pages 26-28

Governance arrangements for the PMG

8min
pages 38-40

of 2020

6min
pages 35-37
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.