SUBHEADING STUDIO TIMELINE
SUBHEADING
Introduction
goal #1 provide design services to an under-served community goal #2 explore the use of alternative building materials in an urban context
Research
Studio
MARCH 2011 IDEA FOR A STUDIO BEGINS
AUGUST 26, 2011 FIRST MEETING WITH YOUTHCARE
WINTER 2012
INDEPENDENT STUDIES TO PREPARE FOR STUDIO
APRIL 9, 2012
CLIENT WORKSHOP 1
APRIL 23, 2012
CLIENT WORKSHOP 2
MAY 4, 2012
MIDTERM REVIEW
MAY 11, 2012
DESIGN BUILD PROJECT AT ORION CENTER
JUNE 4, 2012
FINAL REVIEW AND CLIENT PRESENTATION
goal #3 work together to develop ideas as a collaborative, interdisciplinary group goal #4 complete the requirements of a comprehensive studio (study building systems) goal #5 have fun 1
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
2
Projects
INTRODUCTION SUBHEADING UW College of Built Environments The College of Built Environments at the University of Washington, Seattle devotes its resources to the tangible improvement of built and natural environments. The four departments at the College include architecture, landscape architecture, urban planning and construction management. Collaborative research efforts and courses are becoming more common, but this studio was unique as an interdisciplinary design studio arranged by students themselves.
Studio Team Adam Stoeckle, Master of Architecture student, 2-year Erin Feeney, Master of Architecture student, 3-year Jay Ranaweera, Master of Architecture student, 2-year Michael Gilbride, Master of Architecture student, 3-year Sam Kraft, Master of Architecture student, 3-year Virginia Werner, Master of Landscape Architecture and Master of Urban Planning student Brian Gerich served as faculty adviser, providing invaluable advice, structure, and motivation to the efforts of the studio.
YouthCare Seattle YouthCare is a nonprofit committed to engaging with homeless youth to stabilize their lives through social services and housing. This collaborative, interdisciplinary studio team worked directly with YouthCare to explore the vision for a new transitional housing facility that provides housing and services in a single facility, adding to their existing network of services.
PARTNERSHIPS SUBHEADING AWB The Seattle professional chapter of Architects Without Borders (AWB) provided support for the studio through the involvement of Brian Gerich and representation at design reviews. Architects Without Borders-Seattle provides ecologically sensitive and culturally appropriate design assistance to communities in need.
Introduction
Research
Studio VARIOUS RESIDENCES YOUTHCARE MAIN OFFICE
Projects
ORION CENTER NEW SITE 1 17th and YESLER
NEW SITE 2 - S. Alaska Street and MLK Studio team (L-R): Virginia Werner, Jay Ranaweera, Erin Feeney, Adam Stoeckle, Sam Kraft, and Michael Gilbride
3
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YOUTHCARE SERVICE NETWORK YouthCare
4
SUBHEADING
SUBHEADING
Introduction
Research
Studio
MARCH 2011 IDEA FOR A STUDIO BEGINS
5
AUGUST 26, 2011 FIRST MEETING WITH YOUTHCARE
WINTER 2012
INDEPENDENT STUDIES TO PREPARE FOR STUDIO
APRIL 9, 2012
CLIENT WORKSHOP 1
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
APRIL 23, 2012
CLIENT WORKSHOP 2
YouthCare
MAY 4, 2012
MIDTERM REVIEW
MAY 11, 2012
DESIGN BUILD PROJECT AT ORION CENTER
JUNE 4, 2012
FINAL REVIEW AND CLIENT PRESENTATION
6
Projects
YOUTH HOMELESSNESS The Youthcare studio felt it was necessary to research youth homelessness to better understand and serve our clients. We quickly found that youth homelessness is the result of many profoundly complex societal problems, the majority starting with the family but spanning to global economics.
Despite historical initiatives and legislature passed at the federal and state levels, youth homelessness remains a serious issue. With the onset of the 2008 recession, youth homelessness has increased dramatically. The primary cause for this increase is the inability of a financially struggling family to support their older children. In addition, neglect, abuse, residential instability, and family conflict are large contributors to youth homelessness. Furthermore, unemployment, crime, limited funding, and a lack of access to education, support, and resources continually perpetuates the homelessness of youth.
The services and organizations that do exist, like Youthcare, are always at capacity and working hard to take care of the day to day. However, many of these organizations are also looking to innovate their approaches to the larger patterns of youth homlessness. One innovation that we looked at is the “Foyer model”.
The Foyer model approaches youth homelessness by focusing on the assets and energy of the youth in order to support and facilitate a transition to independence. Foyers provide housing, education, and training in exchange for a commitment to support the community through their behavior and work. In many cases the buildings and the services they provide become a beacon and landmark in the “Foyers are integrated learning and accommodation area and help bring the youth out of the shadows centres providing safe and secure housing, support and and into society. training for young people aged 16 - 25.” www.foyer.net
Introduction
Research
Studio
Projects
www.goodshepherds.org
The Chelsea Foyer at the Christopher has small living spaces and generous communal spaces to encourage mixing.
http://blog.endhomelessness.org
7
www.goodshepherds.org
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
8
YOUTH HOMELESSNESS - TRANSITIONAL HOUSING SUBHEADING Housing strategies for homeless youth include: -Group Homes -”Housing First” or rapid re-housing: prioritized by King County -Permanent supportive housing -Employment-focused housing -Transitional housing: short term, typically 18-24 month. It is intended to bridge between living on the street or in emergency shelters to permanent, stable housing. The concept of transitional housing began in the early 1990s and it has expanded ever since. In 2004, over 7,000 transitional housing programs existed. Important to the success of any housing program are: -issues of scale -level of independence vs. support -community networks -fit within the fabric of the local community -safety and stability
This program was developed through research on existing transitional housing projects and based on conversations with YouthCare. The comprehensive studio requirements for the Architecture Department
PROJECT SUBHEADING PROGRAM recommend a 30,000 SF building, which was easily met with this program. Each project takes a unique perspective on program relationships, layout, and square footage based on the following.
transitional housing: 12,550 sq.ft
common spaces
“To be successful, housing must be enhanced with intensive case management services, school, meals, job training, and money management and other life skills training.” - City of Seattle
LIVE
Gaps in services: -funding for programs typically ends at age 24, making support and resources scarce for young adults who are unable to live independently -there is a bottleneck of facilities and staff that limits the number of youth able to enter -much of the transitional housing available requires sobriety
size
number
type a (180sq.ft) type b (150sq.ft) type c (125sq.ft) total
1800 sq.ft 3000 sq.ft 1250 sq.ft 6050 sq.ft
10 beds 20 beds 10 beds
conference kitchen exercise bike storage laundry total
1200 sq.ft 400 sq.ft 4200 sq.ft 400 sq.ft 300 sq.ft 6500 sq.ft
4 1 1 1 1
2700 sq.ft 1200 sq.ft 4000 sq.ft 1800 sq.ft
3 1 2 2
Research
Studio
education and employment: 9,700 sq.ft classrooms computer lab flex space/ lounge studio/workshop
LEARN SUPPORT
Projects
offices, staff lounge and conference room: 610 sq.ft service spaces: 11, 340 sq.ft mechanical electrical circulation bathrooms/storage
haitianconsortium.com
Local services: -King County receives $19 million in annual funding for its “Continuum of Care” through the McKinney Vento Homesless Assisstance Act -King County has a “10 Year Plan to End Homelessness” that proposes new dormitory style housing for youth and young adults -Housing providers in the Seattle area (focus area indicated): Archdiocesan Housing Authority (women), Cedar House (mental illness), Church Council of Greater Seattle’s Home Step (low-income stable), Dove House, Friends of Youth’s New Ground (transitional), Goodwill Development Association’s Aridell Mitchell Home (transitional), ROOTS (emergency shelter), United Indians of All Tribes, Urban League of Metropolitan Seattle’s Harder House (transitional group home), YMCA Young Adult Services (transitional and permanent), and YouthCare. UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter 9
3000 sq.ft 1500 sq.ft 3840 sq.ft 3000 sq.ft
SERVICE YouthCare
TOTAL : 34,200
Introduction
10
NEW HORIZON YOUTH CENTRE - London, United Kingdom - Adam Khan Architects Recommendations: - Example of “non-institutionalized space� in the form of creative expression space, privacy nooks, and conversation spots - Solid material palette for sense of permanence and durability
The New Horizon Youth Centre is an organization that assists youth in the transition to adulthood. The youth centre addition adds a series of spaces to an existing youth homeless shelter. Different configurations of seating and surfaces allow for different levels of privacy and sociability. Window nooks or group seating tables reiterate the available choice in experience. Several elements are made out of solid materials in order to express permanence and durability.
CASE STUDY Sources: The architects were focused on avoiding - http://www.adamkhan.co.uk/ institutional space by creating a sense of home - http://www.architecturetoday.co.uk/?p=9175 and flexibility. A space on the top floor acts as a place for intense expression or emotion. It is clad in slightly shifting wooden planes in order to express warmth and security.
Introduction
Research
Studio
Projects
Study area
11
Privacy nook
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
Exterior view
YouthCare
Creative Expression Space
12
OUTSIDE IN - Portland, Oregon - Clark Kjos Architects
CASE STUDY
Recommendations: - Similar program of housing and services in one facility - Aesthetic intent to make building approachable with enclosed outdoor spaces, dynamic massing, and “urban materials.”
The design for the main headquarters of Outside In was focused on making the building approachable. This goal was accomplished by breaking up the building in different sections and expressing each one differently. Other approachable elements include the exposed The headquarters for Outside In is a 31,000 square foot structure, the angled walls, and “urban materials.” building that contains counseling services, employment The mural and street art further ensures a noninstitutional building. services, a clinic, kitchen, dining space, and housing.
The courtyard creates a private outdoor space for the youth while also allows the opportunity to be opened up to the public. For the interior of the building, a two-story lobby acts as the internal, central hub of the building.
Introduction
Sources: - http://www.ckarch.com/main.html
Research
Studio
Projects
Entrance
13
Dynamic massing of building facade
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
Entrance atrium
YouthCare
Entry outdoor space
14
SITE VISITS
SITE VISITS
Geographic Information System (GIS) Site Selection Criteria:
Other Site Selection Criteria:
Introduction
- Parcel of 30,000 square feet or more - Vacant Land - Appropriate Zoning - Non-steep slope sites
- Proximity to public transportation - Proximity to commercial areas/jobs - Proximity to other YouthCare facilities - Diverse site types (constrained vs. open)
Research
Studio
Early visit to Columbia City site
Early visit to Yesler site
Site visit in the Rainier Valley
15
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
Projects
YouthCare
16
MATERIALS
MATERIALS Polycarbonate roofing--a lightweight and low cost roofing solution that allows lighter structure and maximizes diffuse daylighting of interior spaces.
We felt like the architecture could be an opportunity for education and innovation. That was the theme of the program and the motive behind the creation of the studio.
Introduction
This led us to explore alternative materials. The materials themselves could provide learning opportunities about the trajectory of architecture and construction in a postpetroleum world.
Research
Studio SEDUM TILES
A section through a bioswale design
6� SOIL FILTER FABRIC DRAINAGE LAYER WATER RETENTION FABRIC ROOT BARRIER ROOF MEMBRANE ROOF DECK
Typical green roof section
http://www.modcell.com http://www.modcell.com
17
Straw Panels--These prefabricated timber with straw infill panels are the structure and insulation as one and are applicable for small and large scale projects
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
http://www.greenpublicart.com
http://www.nordicewp.com
Green Walls/Living Walls/Vertical Gardens--Blank walls become living, respirating works of art or ecologically performative components of the building systems.
Cross Laminated Timber--It is like plywood on steroids. These panels can span up to 50 feet and are able to speed up construction time much like precast panels or SIPS, but without the toxic substances or embodied energy.
18
Projects
SYSTEMS: SITE
SYSTEMS: SITE
Introduction
Research Natural Systems Hydrological cycle - water Sun - energy Wind - air Earth - site and water
Studio Built Systems Hydrological cycle - rain water harvesting, gray and black water Sun - daylighting, solar harvesting Wind - natural ventilation
Different systems work simultaneously and cyclically to create the experiences we have in and around buildings. Each system can be analyzed separately, but they work together to support the building and its inhabitants.
Social Systems Education/training Support Work Live 19
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
20
Projects
SYSTEMS: WATER
SYSTEMS: WATER
General Approach: • Conserve water use with efficient fixtures • Harvest rain water for supplementary uses • Create a system that cycles and treats gray water and black water if appropriate • Employ green roofs, green walls and constructed wetlands to hold and filter water appropriately • Minimize the waster stream exiting the building to the city infrastructure
Daily indoor per capita water use is 69.3 gallons.
Total indoor building usage: Does not include outdoor usage
Research
Gray water - any used water that is carrying a very low amount of organic material. This includes water from bathroom sinks, washing machines, and showers. Black water - water from kitchen sinks and toilets is considered black water because it likely carries a lot of organic solids and must be more extensively treated and or filtered. This is the most difficult to treat on-site.
~50,000 gal./year
GRAYWATER REUSE COMMUNITY GARDEN
~430,000 gal./year
~70,000 gal./year
~50,000 gal./year
Studio
EXTENSIVE GREEN ROOF BIOSWALE
Installing more efficient fixtures can lower daily per capita water usage to 45.2 gallons (saving 35%). 40 youth at 45.2 gallons per day: 10 staff at 10 gallons per day:
Introduction
Rain water- can be stored and used for irrigation. Can be filtered through green roofs and green walls and combined with gray water to be treated and re-used.
GREEN WALLS (drip irrigated)
SITE WATER 170,000 gal./year
650,000 gallons per year 25,000 gallons per year
GRAYWATER PRE-TREATMENT
BELOW-GRADE RAINWATER CISTERN
GRAYWATER TREATMENT PLANTERS
340,000 gal./year
675,000 gallons per year
Projects
N BELOW-GRADE GRAYWATER CISTERN
Rain water - As a rule of thumb, each inch of rainwater will provide .55 gallons of water per sq.ft. of roof 1” rain = .55gallons/sq.ft. of roof
Columbia City water systems diagram: This is a schematic diagram of a possible configuration
Seattle average annual rainfall: 38” Columbia City green wall diagram: This is a schematic diagram of a possible configuration
Yesler Site 12,980 sq ft x 38“ rain/year x .55 = 271,282 gal/ year 21
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
22
SYSTEMS: AIR + LIGHT
SYSTEMS: AIR + LIGHT
General Approach: • Use building orientation and shape to maximize natural ventilation and sunlight • Operable windows allow for individual control of ventilation and comfort and are therefore ideal for living spaces and offices • Ventilate with a dedicated outside air system to insure fresh air for all spaces • Use the envelope to mitigate glare and maximize use of daylight
Introduction
Passive Systems
SOLAR SCREEN (on south facade)
Research
ALTERNATIVE ENERGY OPPORTUNITY HOUSING ORIENTED FOR PASSIVE COOLING
Studio
Projects
Other Considerations • Consider heat recovery ventilations system (HRV) that recovers heat from exhaust air providing energy savings. • Double skin facade systems offer energy savings and better control of shading, ventilation and acoustics, but have higher upfront costs and maintenance must be carefully considered
TRANSLUSCENT DAYLIT CORE OPERABLE PANELS FOR VENTILATION NARROW FLOOR PLATE WITH WINDOWS
N
23
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
24
SYSTEMS: ENERGY
SYSTEMS: ENERGY
General Approach: • Use tight and well insulated envelope to maintain thermal comfort with minimal energy • Employ heat recovery system to save energy • Adjust heating system to the different occupancies and intensities of the residential, learning, and office spaces • Consider geothermal ground source heat pump and solar thermal water as potential sources of heat • Radiant heat is efficient and effective and may be appropriate
Introduction
Active Systems AIR INTAKE FLAT PLATE SOLAR HOT WATER
Research
RADIANT BASEBOARD HEATERS PER ROOM
Studio
Other Considerations
Projects
HYDRONIC RADIANT FLOOR AT FLEX
EXHAUST AIR
SUPPLEMENTARY HEAT SOURCE (boiler) HEAT RECOVERY
N
25
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
26
SUBHEADING
SUBHEADING
Introduction
Research
Studio
MARCH 2011 IDEA FOR A STUDIO BEGINS
27
AUGUST 26, 2011 FIRST MEETING WITH YOUTHCARE
WINTER 2012
INDEPENDENT STUDIES TO PREPARE FOR STUDIO
APRIL 9, 2012
CLIENT WORKSHOP 1
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
APRIL 23, 2012
CLIENT WORKSHOP 2
YouthCare
MAY 4, 2012
MIDTERM REVIEW
MAY 11, 2012
DESIGN BUILD PROJECT AT ORION CENTER
JUNE 4, 2012
FINAL REVIEW AND CLIENT PRESENTATION
28
Projects
RELATIONAL MODELS SUBHEADING Description This introductory exercise emphasized relationships. Without a site or a fully established program, the construction of physical models focused on materials, connections, and spatial strategies as a means to explore essential relationships in the project. During the studio discussion of the models, a variety of relationships between the youth and staff, client and public, building and site, were shared and common themes were established.
29
SUBHEADING Essential relationships expressed: -haven or shelter function of housing -terrain as undulating or unstable -need for individual expression -ambiguity of entrance -projections and voids -consistency of materials vs. form -diverse opportunities for stillness -evidence of hand-made/natural vs. machine-made -enclosure vs. spilling out -built meeting living culture -folding, spiraling, continuity -assembly vs. reduction -embedded in context vs. safe oasis -privacy, security, comfort -flexibility -progression, hope -iconography -precarious/unexpected moments -navigating landscape -constructed/intentional vs. constructable/changeable -connection to landscape -prospect and refuge -responsibility and structure vs. playfulness
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
30
Introduction
Research
Studio
Projects
WORKSHOPS Workshop Goals As part of our research, we conducted two sets of workshops with the managers and staff of YouthCare, and the youth at the Orion Center. These workshops consisted of collaborative exercises to get ideas and feedback from the youth and staff regarding how they view their current space, and what they would want in a
WORKSHOPS new space. Another goal was to understand the relationships between staff and youth at the different levels of housing, and see how those relationships affect the physical space they occupy. This feedback was very valuable for us as we developed our projects.
Workshop 1: What works, what doesn’t? focused primarily on identifying the current benefits, drawbacks, strengths, and weaknesses of the YouthCare homes and centers.
Who We Are COLLEGE OF BUILT ENVIRONMENTS
We also discussed design/build ideas for our studio, as well as opportunities for future work with YouthCare. Virginia
Jay
Erin
Adam
Sam
Introduction
Workshop 2: Ideas for the future featured a dot exercise to identify priorities and a board game to stimulate conversation about function proximities and relationships.
Research
Michael
Our Process
Studio testing
LIVING
+
LEARNING
drawing
listening
Projects
designing
UW students get organized 3/30
UW students meet with YouthCare staff
4/9
Workshop 1: What works, what doesn’t?
4/23
Workshop 2: Ideas for the future
Build Days! UW students work on new building design
UW students share final project with YouthCare
31
Managers and Staff at Workshop 1
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
June
5/11 5/12
Workshop 1 Introduction Board
YouthCare
Managers and Staff at Workshop 1
May
UW students plan design/build project and work on new building design
April March
Studio Timeline
Virginia and Erin running Workshop 1
32
WORKSHOPS
WORKSHOPS
Workshop Findings
Where do the youth like to spend most of the their time inside? Why? The different residential settings facilitate different kinds of hanging out. Some managers said the youth prefer the living room and dining rooms, and smoking areas, while others said the youth prefer spending time in their bedrooms, and hang out in the laundry room. Some managers noted that this was because they simply just did not have a good gathering space. When it is nice outside, the youth like to be on the front porches. The youth at the Orion Center liked spending time playing video games on the couches.
The following questions and answers represent the cumulative knowledge of the managers, staff, and youth.
Introduction
Research
Studio
Where do the staff like to spend time inside, or would like to spend time, and why? The staff also like to hang out in the kitchen, and at the administrative offices. They voiced opinions that they need to have a space that is dedicated to a gathering space, because being in the offices is disruptive to those working.
33
Managers and Staff Dot Exercise at Workshop 2
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
What is your favorite thing about the building you work in? Least favorite? Favorite things included: the old houses have character, outside patios, individual rooms for residents, front porch, built-in benches, commercial kitchen at Orion Center, flexible spaces can have many uses. Least favorite things included: old houses need a lot of maintenance, lack of studio apartments, lack of office space, lack of game room/common space, shared office space, no place to eat/lack of common space for staff, no “decompression� space for staff, and not enough small meeting rooms. YouthCare
Projects
Managers and Staff playing Board Game at Workshop 2
34
WORKSHOPS
WORKSHOPS
What spaces are best, or would be best, for interacting with the youth in a professional capacity? The offices and small meeting rooms - but many are shared and do not allow for the needed privacy. Outdoor spaces are also good. What spaces are best, or would be best, for interacting with the youth socially? Similarly, outdoor spaces are good for social interaction, as are the kitchens, and it’s also really good to have offices on public corridors - it facilitates interactions. Social living spaces, such as living rooms, would be good. Small individual counseling spaces are also good for social interactions. Orion Center Youth Board Games at Workshop 2
What is the outdoor space like at your place of work? Does it work well or poorly? What would your ideal outdoor space be like for a new YouthCare facility that combined housing, counseling, offices, education, and training programs? In general, the managers agreed that having programmed outdoor space, a green buffer space, and more parking were needed for a new facility. The housing element needs to be screened from view from nosy neighbors, especially in the residences where transgender youth live (this has been a problem in the past). The managers also expressed that the outdoor spaces for sunbathing, playing volleyball, and barbecuing are popular, and those should be incorporated into the semi-public spaces in the project. Gardens and p-patchs were also desired.
Introduction
Research
Studio
Projects
What issues do you have at your facility related to security and visibility? What are ways to mitigate that? Need to have offices or staff areas that look onto common space for the youth, like the Orion Center has windows that look into the main room from the upstairs offices, creating a visual connection. Stairwells and hallways, and bathrooms, are often places that are unmonitored where bullying occurs, so making those spaces more open and visible would help prevent some of the intimidation among the youth and make them feel more safe and secure. While they need privacy from the neighbors, they also need to be friends with the neighbors - the idea that the more eyes on the street, the more secure it will be.
Managers and Staff playing Board Game at Workshop 2
35
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
36
SITES - Yesler
SITES - Yesler
One site selected for the project was chosen as an urban a public park. The closest transit routes for the site include the typology with easy access to downtown. Downtown was following bus lines: 14, 27, 984, 987. viewed as both an asset and a potential detriment to the wellbeing of the youth. This corner site is located on the corner of 17th Avenue and East Yesler Way. It is approximately 15,500 square feet and zoned for Neighborhood Commercial and a 40 foot height limit. Currently, the site is a vacated auto shop.
Introduction
Research
Also, this site is adjacent to the Langston Hughes Performing Arts Center, a small commercial area, a vocational school, and
Studio
Projects
East Yesler Way 17th Avenue
37
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
38
SITES - Columbia City
SITES - Columbia City
This site was selected for the project for the purposes of exploring a large site in South Seattle. This corner site is located at the intersection of South Alaska Street and Martin Luther King Jr. Way South. It is approximately 30,000 square feet and zoned for Neighborhood Commercial and a 40 foot height limit. The site is in a small mixed-use area surrounded by the Rainier Vista affordable housing development and single family homes.
ongoing remediation of the site’s soil. The closest transit options include the Columbia City light rail station across the street and the 8, 9, and 42 bus lines.
Introduction
Research
Previously, the site included a gas station, resulting in the
Ma
Studio
rtin er K
h Lut ing
Projects
S ay Jr. W
39
Str e
et
h
ka
out
S. A las
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
40
SUBHEADING CONTEXT MAPPING
COLUMBIA SUBHEADING CITY
“Make a map, not a tracing... What distinguishes the map from the tracing is that it is entirely oriented toward an experiment in contact with the real. The map does no reproduce an unconscious closed in upon itself, it constructs the unconscious. It fosters connections between fields...” -A Thousand Plateaus, Gilles Deleuze & Felix Guattari
Introduction
This mapping exercise to enhance understanding of the two selected sites was focused on four areas of documentation: • temporal spatial systems • sociocultural systems • ecological systems • infrastructural systems
Research
R AVE
RAINIE S
S GENESEE ST
S T
S ALASKA ST
S ALASKA ST
Single Family
Rainier Ave. South
Neighborhood/Commercial
Miles 0.2
Lake Washington Blvd.
0.1
50th Ave. South
0.05
Martin Luther King Jr. Way S. + Link Light Rail
Multi-Family 0
Beaocn Ave.
Major Institutions
15th Ave. South
S Alaska Street
Highway I-5
S AY RW
T
GJ
AS
KIN
SK
AS
SITE
ML
LA
SK
S AY RW GJ
LA
KIN
ay Jr W
SA
ML
ng
SA
Projects
S GENESEE ST
R AVE
Ki her Lut
RAINIE
rtin Ma
38TH AVE S
38TH AVE S
Studio
Major Institutions Multi-Family 0
0.05
0.1
Miles 0.2
Topography in Columbia City
41
Neighborhood/Commercial Single Family
Spatial Edges / Regions
Land use in Columbia City
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
1000 ft
0
1/4 mile
Spatial Edges and Regions of Columbia City
YouthCare
42
SUBHEADING CONTEXT MAPPING
COLUMBIA SUBHEADING CITY
Introduction
Neighborhood House education and technology
Columbia City Public Library
Rainier Community Center
Research
Diverse cultural services
Refugee Women’s Alliance
0.15 mi
Politics at Columbia City site
0.15 mi
Gathering at Columbia City site
Studio Consejo substance abuse counseling
Boys & Girls Club
Projects
Royal Esquire’s Club (Black social club)
0.15 mi
Rainier Beach Family Center + Proposed Rainier Beach Community Center
Transportation at Columbia City site
0.15 mi
Density at Columbia City site
Columbia City Bakery
Southeast Youth & Family Services
Full Tilt Ice Cream
Community Art
Rainier Valley Cultural Center + JazzEd program
Rainier Valley Historical Society
Filipino Community Center
COLUMBIA CITY FOOD
SE Effective Development (housing and economics)
Cultural and social resources in Columbia City Local food culture in Columbia City
43
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
44
SUBHEADING CONTEXT MAPPING
SUBHEADING YESLER
Introduction
TRANSITIONAL HOUSING
Research HOME OF HOPE
Studio
Projects Coyote Central
ORION
Seattle University
Garfield High School
YESLER Boys and Girls Club
Yesler Terrace Communtiy Center
Douglass Truth Library
Youthcare on Yesler Langston Hughes Performing Arts Center
Pratt Fine Arts Center
Seattle Vocational Institute
Washington Middle School r ile lf m ha
ad iu s: 10 mi nw alk
Wood Construction Center
YOUTHBUILD
YouthCare network and Yesler site
45
Food Access within .5 mile 1” = 500’
Half-mile radius from Yesler site
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
46
SUBHEADING CONTEXT MAPPING
SUBHEADING YESLER 1
4
Visual Evidence
Introduction
Japanese culture near the Yesler Site 1 Keiro Nursing Home
Research
2 Seattle Dojo 3 Japanese Congregational Church 4 Keiro Nursing Home 2
5
5 Seattle Royasan Buddhist Temple
Studio
6 Japanese Congregational Church
Projects
3
6
Japanese Ownership or Service 1” = 200’ Japanese culture around Yesler site
47
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
48
ORION CENTER FURNITURE DESIGN/BUILD When the UW Architects Without Borders - YouthCare Studio was first organized with the intent of serving the non-profit organization YouthCare, we set out to provide them with both a short-term design/build solution as well as a longterm architectural visioning study to help them expand their services and capabilities as an organization serving the homeless youth in Seattle.
To achieve our short-term design/build solution, the YouthCare studio discussed the needs of the organization with both the staff and the youth served by YouthCare, and were given the opportunity to design a much-needed storage solution for the YouthCare’s Orion Center located in Downtown Seattle.
The concept for the storage system consisted of four main aspirations: repurposing of materials, replicability and ease of construction, modularity and low-cost. While touring the Orion Center, the team was inspired by the reusing of empty milk-crates as storage boxes. Using this concept of designing with repurposed materials, the design team was able to propose a relatively low-cost storage solution using empty milk crates.
Introduction
Research
Studio
REPURPOSING OF MATERIALS
EASE OF CONSTRUCTION
Projects
DESIGN GOALS FOR YOUTHCARE STORAGE DESIGN
MODULARITY
49
LOW-COST
http://blog.endhomelessness.org
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
Milk Crates - Repurposing of Materials
YouthCare
Modularity of Shelving Units
50
ORION CENTER FURNITURE DESIGN/BUILD However, since the storage boxes needed to be easily changes on a table saw to cut the individual components of removable, the milk crates could not be directly attached to the framework. one another. Instead, they had to be nested within an easy-toconstruct framework of plywood. Another key feature of the design was its ability to be constructed with simple tools found in any woodshop or The construction process of the plywood framework was construction site. With access to a table saw, electric drill, carefully designed to minimize material waste and to be able and wood screws along with a few hardware pieces such as to replicate with as little effort as possible. Careful attention metal caster and metal angle brackets (both easily available to detail allowed for a design that achieved great structural at hardware stores) a team of two could easily assemble one stability as well as required a minimum number of fence modular furniture unit.
Introduction
Research
Studio
+
+
+
+ Projects Materials and Tools Required
51
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
52
ORION CENTER FURNITURE DESIGN/BUILD Through a series of collaborative design charrettes and by carefully listening to the needs of the client, YouthCare design studio was able to achieve its design goals while engaging both the YouthCare staff and the youth served by them.
Introduction
Thank you to our Design Build volunteers Natalia Chetvernina, Ali Mohammed, and Zeke Jones!
Research
Studio
Projects
53
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
54
SUBHEADING
SUBHEADING
Introduction
Research
Studio
MARCH 2011 IDEA FOR A STUDIO BEGINS
55
AUGUST 26, 2011 FIRST MEETING WITH YOUTHCARE
WINTER 2012
INDEPENDENT STUDIES TO PREPARE FOR STUDIO
APRIL 9, 2012
CLIENT WORKSHOP 1
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
APRIL 23, 2012
CLIENT WORKSHOP 2
YouthCare
MAY 4, 2012
MIDTERM REVIEW
MAY 11, 2012
DESIGN BUILD PROJECT AT ORION CENTER
JUNE 4, 2012
FINAL REVIEW AND CLIENT PRESENTATION
56
Projects Projects
Youthcare Final Project: Yesler Site
Sam Kraft | Michael Gilbride
YESLER LIVING/LEARNING CENTER
YESLER LIVING/LEARNING CENTER black water grey water
constructed wetlands clean water cistern
dedicated outdoor air system ground source heat pump high efficiency boiler raised floor small local radiators
Introduction
Iterations of building form 1/2 mile map of resources around Yesler Site
Research
Final form and programmatic relationships TRANSITIONAL HOUSING
HOME OF HOPE
Studio Water system diagram
ORION
YESLER
YOUTHBUILD
YouthCare and Seattle
Projects
We found two contrasting sites in Seattle that showed potential to develop a living/learning building for Youthcare. This is the Yesler site. It is the smaller of the two sites and closer to downtown. Yesler Way is a major east-west arterial that spans through many neighborhoods. This particular spot is at the top of a hill and home to a performing arts center, a fine arts school, a small commercial pocket, and a park. This place already has momentum, diversity, and an attitude that would welcome a motivated homeless youth population as a source of energy and not as a drain on property values.
Looking East up Yesler Way
Diagrams of program and systems relationships
59
HVAC diagram
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
60
YESLER LIVING/LEARNING CENTER
YESLER LIVING/LEARNING CENTER
Introduction
Research Plaza Level Plan
Basement Floor Plan
The extensive program and small site led us to start with the buildable envelope. We experimented with strategically eroding the building based on solar access and a simple building parti. After many iterations, a lower plinth supporting an “L” above became the basic massing. The plinth houses the learning program, the “L” contains housing.
Section looking North
61
First Floor Plan
Fourth Floor Plan
From here we developed a diagram that organized the relationships inside the building, the movement of people and the systems that support the people. The initial diagram is about activated edges. In a natural system, edges are the most active and diverse areas. In buildings, edges are often closed, sealed, or detailed to reduce activity and movement. By pulling apart the edges where two things meet, a space forms. We filled these spaces with circulation, daylight, active HVAC and water systems. This proved to be a powerful and practical idea.
Studio
Projects
looking out on the Plaza
Section looking East
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
Third Floor Plan
YouthCare
62
Columbia City Transitional Housing Study Jay Ranaweera | Virginia Werner
COLUMBIA CITY TRANSITIONAL HOUSING STUDY
COLUMBIA CITY TRANSITIONAL HOUSING STUDY The conceptual basis behind the Columbia City Transitional Housing study was creating a contemplative and protected space surrounded by the housing units. Each room in the building would look into the courtyard which is carefully designed to provide a feeling of intimacy and privacy.
Introduction
Research
Studio
Projects
Inward Looking Courtyard
65
Mechanical
Semi-Public Space
Common Space
Mechanical Living Units
Semi-Public Space Community Connections
Common Space Studio
Living Units Administrative Office
Community Connections Vertical Circulation
Studio
Administrative Office
Optimizing the Courtyard
Vertical Circulation
Maximizing Natural Illumination
Program Concept Program Concept UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
View of Central Courtyard
66
COLUMBIA CITY TRANSITIONAL HOUSING STUDY
COLUMBIA CITY TRANSITIONAL HOUSING STUDY Special attention was paid to the hydrological processes on the site as it received a large quantity of rainwater runoff by being located at the bottom of a valley. In addition, the natural infiltration of water into the site is required to continue the soil remediation process completed recently.
Introduction
The design proposes two Bioswale areas that filter rain water and grey water expelled from building uses, in order to foster environmental stewardship.
Research
Studio
Projects
Rainwater Collection Rainwater Collection
Rainwater Collection Rainwater Collection
Hydrological Processes on Site Greywater Filtration Grey-water Treatment on Site
67
Hydrological Processes
Ground Floor Plan
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
Bioswale Within Courtyard
68
COLUMBIA CITY TRANSITIONAL HOUSING STUDY
COLUMBIA CITY TRANSITIONAL HOUSING STUDY The building surfaces facing the interior courtyard consist of a series of sun shades depending on incident solar radiation. If additional privacy is needed, the facade contains wooden shutters that can be closed to cover the apartments while also creating an ever changing envelope in the courtyard.
Introduction
Each living unit also feature operable windows that can be opened into the courtyard, allowing natural ventilation in the summer.
Research
Studio
Projects Active Heating in Winter
Passive Cooling in Summer
69
North Elevation Typical Apartment Unit and Faรงade Components
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
Third Floor Plan
Ground Floor Plan
70
COLUMBIA CITY TRANSITIONAL HOUSING STUDY
COLUMBIA CITY TRANSITIONAL HOUSING STUDY The design of the landscape elements focused especially on the interactive nature of plants with the occupants. Plants were chosen not only for their suitability to the regional climate, but also based on how they can interact with the human senses of touch, smell, sight and sound.
Introduction
For example, the paper birch trees in the court yard invite occupants of the space to touch the peeling bark of the tree trunk, while the rustling sound of the grasses can create a sense of calm and assurance.
Research
Evergreen Huckleberry
Paper Birch
Grasses
Red Osier Dogwood
Pacific Dogwood
Vines
Trees
Quaking Aspen
Shrubs
Studio
Projects
Star Jasmine
WINTER
Orange Sedge
71
Golden Fountain Sedge
Tufted Hairgrass
Plants Used in the Landscape Design
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
SPRING
SUMMER
FALL
Seasonal Considerations in Plant Selection
72
COLUMBIA CITY
YouthCare Living and Learning Center Adam Stoeckle | Erin Feeney
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
YOUTHCARE LIVING AND LEARNING CENTER
Thus, the program and conceptual framework for the project reflect the basic massing of the project. The massing is based on a programmatic block of living, another of learning, and then a space in between that acts as a place of transition. This place transitions the youth programmatically from living to learning spaces and experientially from the more public experience of the street to the more private experience of the residences.
Housing
Supportive Housing
Support
This project began with the team placing priority on the role of this new living and learning building in the context of YouthCare’s existing facilities. The role imagined for the new building was that it would act as a gathering place at the scale of the city, the valley, and Columbia City. At each scale, homeless youth are using the living and learning program as a common point of transition to and from other YouthCare facilities and different levels of independence.
Support
Concept
Private Housing
Transitional Housing
Transitional Space Learning
Learning
COLUMBIA CITY
Introduction
Research
Studio
Projects
VARIOUS RESIDENCES YOUTHCARE OFFICE
ORION CENTER
NEW TRANSITIONAL HOUSING
YOUTHCARE
City FACILITIES
HOUSING SERVICES
Valley
HOUSING
RESIDENT
HOUSING
SERVICES
NON-RESIDENT
SERVICES
Columbia City
CITY-WIDE NETWORK
75
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
76
YOUTHCARE LIVING AND LEARNING CENTER
COLUMBIA CITY The living block is broken down into four levels of housing. Each level, the layout changes to reflect an increasing sense of independence. The ground floor includes dormitory-style rooms that use the common kitchen and shared bathrooms. The floor above houses units with a shared kitchen and bath in a group of four individual rooms. The upper two floors are studio apartments, each with their own kitchen and bath.
The final form of the building strongly reflects the conceptual intent. Classrooms, a community partnership space, a YouthBuild workshop, and conference room comprise the ground floor of the learning block, with staff office space above. A commercial teaching kitchen and community garden anchor the southern tip of the living block, functioning as a learning space, while a dining space above the kitchen functions as a related living space for the residents.
Introduction
Research
Studio Ground Floor Plan
Second Floor Plan
Third & Fourth Floor Plan
Projects
Section Looking North
N
Section Looking West
77
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
78
SUBHEADINGLIVING AND LEARNING CENTER YOUTHCARE
COLUMBIA SUBHEADING CITY
A major aesthetic component of the project are the vegetated walls that reflect a new iconography inspired by the painted green wall of the Orion Center. Functionally, this wall is linked to the rainwater collection system and the adjacent community garden.
Window nooks throughout the building provide varying experiences of privacy while visually tying together the building masses of living and learning. One example is a coffee service window at the corner facing the Link Lightrail stop, connecting the barista training program with the surrounding community.
Introduction
Research
Studio
Projects
Perspective of the community garden and green wall
79
Perspective of the entry showing the coffee service window
UW Architects Without Borders - Student Chapter
YouthCare
Perspective of the entry showing the coffee service window
80