SE P T E M B E R 2013
|
VO LU M E 13
|
ISSUE ONE
Community focussed
the UNIVERSITY OF LETHBRIDGE
Cooper eager to explore opportunities in dean’s role
Millman ready to build off of rookie success
Vasey explores the study of same-sex sexuality
Adamson looks to further engage alumni
The U of L Legend is published monthly during the academic year by the communications unit within University Advancement. Submissions, comments and story ideas are always welcome. The Legend reserves the right to refuse any submitted advertisement. The Legend can be found online at issuu.com/ulethbridge. A DV E R T I S I N G For ad rates or other information, contact: legend@uleth.ca CREDITS Editor: Trevor Kenney Designer: Stephenie Karsten CO N T R I B U TO R S: Amanda Berg, Bob Cooney, Jane Edmundson, Alesha Farfus-Shukaliak, Erica Lind, Jesse Malinsky, Suzanne McIntosh, Kali McKay, Leslie Ohene-Adjei, Stacy Seguin, Katherine Wasiak, Lori Weber and Jamie Woodford
University of Lethbridge 4401 University Drive Lethbridge, AB T1K 3M4 www.ulethbridge.ca
Dr. Judith Kulig and the Rural Wildfire Study Group offer key recommendations for community rebuilding after disaster.
R
ecently published research from University of Lethbridge Faculty of Health Sciences researcher Dr. Judith Kulig and the Rural Wildfire Study Group suggests that communities affected by significant traumatic events invest in recovery efforts that focus on the community as a whole, and not just those who experienced losses as a result of the event. Kulig has spent considerable time researching rural health issues and community resiliency, particularly in communities that have experienced wildfire events. In a paper just published in the Journal of Community Psychology, Kulig and co-authors Dr. Ivan Townshend (geography, University of Lethbridge), Dr. Dana Edge (nursing, Queen’s University), Dr. William Reimer (sociology, Concordia University) and Dr. Nancy Lightfoot (rural and northern health, Laurentian University) suggest that a community’s ability to recover from a wildfire event is impacted by many factors, but that it is imperative that all members of the community receive timely access to recovery services,
whether or not they were evacuated during the event or experienced a tangible loss. “While our study reflects the experiences of those in a wildfire event, the results are relatable to similar traumatic community events, such as the recent flooding in High River and the urban communities in Calgary,” says Kulig. The Rural Wildfire Study Group conducted a series of qualitative interviews with community members who experienced wildfire events in Barriere, B.C. (2003) and LaRonge, Sask. (1999) to answer the question, “Does the severity level of wildfires based on loss make a difference to the experience of individual and community impacts?” The results of those interviews suggest that residents in both communities, whether or not they experienced loss, were significantly impacted by the event. Further, in order to facilitate the social rebuilding of these communities, it was important that community resources be made available to all members of the community to mitigate lingering negative effects of the event.
“There is an expectation that those who were evacuated from the community or who experienced the loss of physical property as a result of the event are in need of and will receive community support and resources,” says Kulig. “But our research shows that there is often a long-term emotional impact felt throughout the community and that these resources must be available on a much wider scale to help the community heal.” In the end, tragic events have the capability of bringing communities together in a cohesive and supportive manner. Through continued gathering of information about the varying responses of community residents who have experienced traumatic community events, Kulig and her group hope to better understand the impact and duration of the effects and determine appropriate disaster recovery protocols. Additional information about Kulig’s research, and recommendations for community rebuilding after a disaster, can be found at the following website: www.ruralwildfire.ca
LEGEND RUN COMES TO AN END, FOCUS MOVES ONLINE This marks the 119th issue of the Legend newspaper. It also marks the last. From its debut on Oct. 4, 2001 to present day, the Legend has been the internal news and information vehicle for the University community. Its mandate has always been to engage and inform the campus community by celebrating faculty, staff and student success and by highlighting all that our campus has to offer. As we strive to meet the changing needs of our community, communication tools have evolved, and we are incorporating these tools into the way in which we tell our story. A digital signage network was
introduced to campus five years ago, social media has blossomed into one of the most utilized information networks on campus, and we have streamlined the presentation of many of our messages into our UWeekly newsletter, effectively eliminating the proliferation of e-mails that used to clutter up our inboxes. That evolution now continues as we move from a printed product to the delivery of all our messages, stories, event promotions and kudos to the digital world. Recently, a new Experts Database was unveiled, raising the profile of our esteemed researchers, and now a revamped and enhanced UNews product is ready to
be released. In the near future, a new Notice Board product will be revealed while campus research will get a further boost with the introduction of a new research-themed website that will celebrate the groundbreaking work that is being done throughout campus. All the features you’ve come to expect with the Legend will still exist, only they will be presented in a more timely and efficient manner through these new digital assets. As well, with new products come new possibilities, such as the ability to display many more video and audio clips. CONTINUED ON PG. 9