Your Austin: Beauty is for Everyone: A Framework Plan

YOUR AUSTIN

BEAUTY IS FOR EVERYONE: A FRAMEWORK PLAN Master of City Design + Territory Collaboration Urban Edge Studio (Fall 2024)

TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE............................................................................................................ 1 Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Plan Making Process. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

MCD and Territory Collaboration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Guiding Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3 4 5 7

AUSTIN FROM THEN NOW:............................................................................. 10 Existing Plan Review. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Context. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Key Takeaways. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 CO-DESIGNING AUSTIN ............................................................................... 72 CASE STUDIES................................................................................................. 84 Practical Applications for Austin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 FRAMEWORK PLAN........................................................................................ 94 Design Principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 Conceptualizing the Design Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 Focus Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 SPARKS OF BRILLIANCE................................................................................ 106 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 Focus Area 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 Focus Area 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 Focus Area 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137 WAVES OF TRANSFORMATION.................................................................... 151 Focus Area 1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153 Focus Area 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 Focus Area 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 IMPLEMENTATION ........................................................................................ 160

ii |

Overview

| iii

PREFACE

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

PLAN MAKING PROCESS

MASTER OF CITY DESIGN

AUGUST

Aesha Vinit Acharya Ashley McKnight Clare Colvin Disha Abhay Chande

1

SEPTEMBER

Existing Plan Review

George Perkins Anene John Lamberton Mack

2

Kshitij Sriperambuduru Zi Tang

Site Tours

3

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS CHICAGO Dr. April Jackson, Director, Master of City Design Program, Associate Professor, Urban Planning and Policy Vinayak Bharne, Adjunct Professor, Urban Planning and Policy

Engagement

4

5

Case Studies

Symphony Malveaux, Studio Manager

TERRITORY Dr. David Stewart, Director of Design Practice

OCTOBER

Territory Collaboration

6

Ashanti Leach, AmeriCorps VISTA in Community Development & Facilities Planning

Framework Plan

7

NOVEMBER

Focus Areas

8

DECEMBER

Design Concepts

9

Final Plan

3 | Preface

Preface

| 4

MCD & TERRITORY COLLABORATION

MCD & TERRITORY COLLABORATION TERRITORY PROJECT HIGHLIGHTS

“CREATING SPACE”

Territory’s work is rooted within the community itself. Guided by principles of equity and restorative design justice, each youth-led design project contributes to healing the community and enhancing the daily lives of its residents.

Territory recently opened “Creating Space,” a public art display in an empty lot across from the former Pink House. This display honors the Pink House, a cherished landmark in Austin that symbolized community pride and connection before being sold and repainted green.

WHO IS TERRITORY Territory is a youth-led local place-based urban design studio centered in Austin. Territory’s youth leaders in Austin have been developing solutions to reclaim vacant city-owned land using art and design to promote social wellness and economic development. Territory’s efforts are focused on urban design, community coownership, and cultural activation.

OUR PARTNERSHIP Our efforts have been in collaboration with Territory teens (ages 16-18) to better understand their perspectives of Austin as well as working with them to create and refine the focus areas, including Territory’s new location, and inform the overall framework plan. We are also collaborating to build on their vacant lot activations and short-term approaches to move towards long term projects leading to community change.

MCD students partnered with Territory’s TADs (Junior Associates)

KEY OBJECTIVES Our key objective of this partnership was to develop a comprehensive plan that supports cultural, social, and economic growth in the Austin neighborhood.

TERRITORY VALUES Youth Agency, Collaboration and Teamwork, Design Equity, Adventerousness, and Positive Impact.

TERRITORY AFFILIATIONS Austin Coming Together,Youth Empowerment Task Force, My Chi My Future, Steering Committee.

5 | Preface

Thie Creating Space project was developed in collaboration with the City of Chicago’s Together We Heal Creative Place Program, which highlights the vital role of the arts in fostering health, healing, and safety within communities.

Preface

| 6

GUIDING PRINCIPLES This process has four components that lay the foundation of our understanding of the Austin community and help shape our design recommendations. This includes completing an existing plan review, completing several site tours to both Austin and comparison communities, using several methods of community outreach, and collaborating with the community organization Territory.

Over the years, the Austin community has endured a persistent lack of investment, with developers overlooking the potential of this area. This disinvestment has left local residents facing deteriorating infrastructure, limited economic opportunities, and a lack of essential services. This plan encourages the community to build on it’s ongoing planning efforts in the Austin QOL Plan to support community co-ownership models for economic development. Recognizing the need for change, this community-driven approach empowers residents to address the challenges of the past from within while creating tangible improvements to build a resilient, sustainable future.

After the engagement focused components, the plan process entailed producing a framework plan, prioritizing specific focus areas to look at, developing short-term design concepts, and making recommendations to complete an action plan.

PLAN SUMMARY This Plan will be used as a living document to guide Austin forward towards the goals established by community members. The plan has been created with public input, nationwide best practices, and community analysis to ensure that it reflects the existing conditions of Austin and the desires of the residents.

Over the past months, the project team (MCD and Territory TADS) have identified a shared vision for improvements and opportunities for the neighborhood’s amenities and urban spaces. This process analyzes where Austin is now, where its residents want to be, and responds with how it can get there.

The resulting plan offers a framework of steps to take towards the overall vision. This is meant to be flexible to adapt to changing circumstances and will require significant additional implementation effort by community decision makers, leaders, and the public.

7 | Preface

By drawing on local knowledge, resources, and a deep commitment to the well-being of their neighbors, this plan provides a framework to support Austin residents creating change through community control. With this framework, Austin is not just waiting for change; they are creating it.

PRINCIPLES COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT TAKEWAYS

A GRASSROOTS MOVEMENT

community gathering areas

REDRESSING HARM

urban experiences

art and culture

STRENGTHENING IDENTITY

cleanliness and safety

educational opportunites

natural areas

SUPPORTING ECONOMIC VITALITY

food desert

DATA ANALYSIS TAKEWAYS

PLAN TIMELINE

vacant lots/abandoned buildings

equity

FOSTERING COMMUNITY RESILIENCE

economic development

green infrastructure disconnectivity and accessibility

ADVOCATING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE

Preface

| 8

AUSTIN: FROM THEN TO NOW

EXISTING PLAN REVIEW This Plan supports and works together with the important planning efforts that came before it including: We Will Chicago, Soul City Corridor, Invest Southwest, Central Avenue Technical Assessment Report, and Austin Forward Together.

Existing recommendations were documented for this plan to build upon the neighborhood’s previous planning efforts and bring remaining goals forward into the future. These plans were also reviewed to gain a better understanding of Austin.

Across all plans, several recurring topics were realized. These initiatives identified below will be brought forward and supported within this plan.

Recurring themes include: • Emphasizing Austin’s diversity; • creating equity and inclusion; • prioritizing sustainability and resiliency; • targeting economic revitalization; • integrating Austin’s culture; • and reframing the community’s narrative.

Figure 1: Existing Plans

11 | From Then To Now

From Then To Now

| 12

HISTORY 1970s: Struggle for Equity: Redlining, Unrest, and Division

By the 1970s, Austin faced the lasting impacts of systemic racism and economic inequities. Redlining denied Black families access to mortgages, segregating neighborhoods and limiting economic mobility. Urban renewal projects often displaced residents.

1865: Founding of Austin Henry W. Austin purchased 470 acres of marshland, anticipating growth driven by Chicago's expansion and the arrival of the railroad. This purchase marked the start of the area's development, originally known as "Austinville." Later, it was annexed into the City of Chicago, becoming one of its 77 neighborhoods.

1930s: The Great Migration Throughout the early 1900s, the Great Migration brought many middle-class Black families to Chicago, seeking better economic and educational opportunities, escaping the oppression of the Jim Crow South to improve their quality of life.

1900s: A Thriving Middle-Class Neighborhood In the early 1900s, the construction of Columbus Park, the town hall, and elegant mansions transformed Austin into a thriving, middle-class community. These developments attracted families and businesses, establishing Austin as a desirable neighborhood.

Figure 2: Austin Timeline 13 | From Then To Now

1940s: White Flight During the mid-20th century, Austin experienced significant demographic shifts as White residents left the area in large numbers, known as "White Flight."

This migration, driven by fears of racial integration, reshaped Austin's social and economic landscape.

The West Side Riots, following Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s assassination, left lasting scars, with widespread destruction leading to disinvestment and economic decline in Austin.

1980s: Economic Downturn As disinvestment continued, crime and poverty increased, leading to a deterioration of the neighborhood’s infrastructure. The economic decline deeply affected residents. Despite these challenges, local groups took action to promote equity and rebuild Austin’s community and opportunities.

2013: Chicago Public School Closures In 2013, the Chicago Board of Education voted to close nearly 50 public schools, citing low enrollment and budget constraints. This decision affected over 30,000 students, the majority of whom were African American.

In Austin, four schools Robert Emmet Elementary, Louis Armstrong Elementary, Leland Elementary, and Frances Scott Key Elementary were permanently closed. These closures further strained the community’s education system and contributed to ongoing disinvestment, leaving fewer resources and opportunities for families.

2008: The Great Recession The Great Recession led to increased home foreclosures in Austin, worsening the community’s financial hardships.

Many residents faced job loss and instability during this period.

2018 - Present: Neighborhood Reinvestment & Transformation In response to decades of challenges, local organizations and the City of Chicago have worked to reshape Austin's narrative through reinvestment and transformation.

Initiatives such as the Austin Quality of Life Plan, INVEST South/West, and the Soul City Corridor were launched to address key issues. These efforts aim to improve housing, education, economic development, public safety, and overall quality of life for Austin residents.

From Then To Now | 14

HISTORY REDLINING Figure 3 is derived from maps made by the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation (HOLC), a New Deal agency. Using data and evaluations gathered from local real estate professionals, HOLC created color-coded maps for more than 200 American cities. The maps used four colors to represent the “security,” or the determined relative riskiness of mortgage lending, for residential areas of each city.

In the 1930s, redlining marked Austin as a highrisk area for loans, largely because it became home to African American residents. This discriminatory practice meant fewer investment opportunities, limited access to affordable mortgages, and years of neglect. The effects of redlining still shape Austin today, contributing to issues like housing instability and economic struggles. Recognizing this history is crucial for creating equitable solutions moving forward.

Figure 3: HOLC Redline Map

• Green areas on the maps were called "A," "First Grade," or "Best" and were considered to be safest for loans. These areas were typically populated with wealthy, white residents that were born in the United States.

• Blue areas were called "B," "Second Grade," or "Still Desirable".

• Yellow areas were called "C," "Third Grade," or "Definitely Declining".

• Red areas were called "D," "Fourth Grade," or "Hazardous". HOLC recommended lenders "refuse to make loans in these areas [or] only on a conservative basis." These areas typically overlapped with Black and immigrant communities, which usually had lower incomes.

These grades were a tool for redlining: making it difficult or impossible for people in certain areas to access mortgage financing and thus become homeowners. Redlining directed both public and private capital to native-born white families and away from African American and immigrant families. As homeownership was arguably the most significant means of intergenerational wealth building in the United States in the twentieth century, these redlining practices from eight decades ago had longterm effects in creating wealth inequalities that we still see today.

15 | From Then To Now

From Then To Now

| 16

CONTEXT

7.1 Sq

17 | From Then To Now

iles

town Chic n a w

go

Do

uare M

From Then To Now

| 18

CONTEXT CONTEXT REGIONAL Austin’s location offers strong connectivity, just 20 minutes from downtown Chicago and positioned between O’Hare and Midway airports, enabling both regional and national access.

LOCAL The Austin neighborhood sits along Chicago’s western-most boundary. It is the largest of Chicago’s 77 neighborhoods, bounded by Humbolt Park to the east, Belmont Craigan to the north, Oak Park to the west and Berwyn to the south.

On a local scale, it is the largest of Chicago’s 77 neighborhoods measuring 2.85 miles in length and 1.77 miles in width.

Figure 5: Local Context

Austin also has good public transport connections with stations on both the CTA Blue and Green lines as well as METRA running along its northern boundary.

To illustrate its size, Austin’s 7-square-mile area could fit the neighborhoods of Lincoln Park, Lakeview, and Near North Side combined.

However, Austin’s population is significantly smaller—about three times less than those neighborhoods—which highlights ongoing challenges of disinvestment and the need for revitalization efforts.

Figure 4: Community Comparisons

103,050 pop.

70,492 pop.

105,481 pop.

19 | From Then To Now

From Then To Now

| 20

DEMOGRAPHICS POPULATION

AGE

Austin currently has 92,485 residents. The population has seen continual declines since its peak in the early 1900’s. It is anticipated to see a 23% decrease from 2000 to 2029. anticipated to see a 23% decrease from 2000 to 2029. At the same time, the population is getting older as it declines.

The majority of Austin residents in 2024 are between 25-34 (14%), younger than the marjoity in 2010 which was 45 - 54. However, the popplation is largely aging with an increase by 4 years from 2010 to 2024 (34 to 38, respectively).

This trend is anticipated to continue with the median age of 39.5 in 2029.

Figure 8: Demographics Snapshot

Vacant Homes 9%

Occupied Homes 91%

Home Occupancy

Figure 6: Population Trends

100,120 residents

117,527 98,514

96,557

92,584

89,949 Under 15 60+

10%

18% 15 - 30 17%

Work Commute Figure 7: Population Trends

30 - 45 32% 45 - 59

35,602 households

17%

Below Poverty 21%

Income (Last 12 Months)

At or Above Poverty 79%

2010 2024 2029

Source: US Census Bureau, Decennial Census and 2024 ACS 5 Year

21 | From Then To Now

37,281 workers Source: US Census Bureau, Decennial Census and 2024 ACS 5 Year

From Then To Now

| 22

2000 Renter Occupied

2000 Renter Occupied

DEMOGRAPHICS Figure 9: Renter Occupied Homes (2000-2024)

Figure 10: Owner Occupied Homes (2000-2024)

20

20

24

24 20

20

00

00 City of Chicago, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, USFWS

0.35 0.17

LEGEND Legend

2000 Renter Occupied

0

0.35

0.7

1.05

1.4

Miles

City of Chicago, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, USFWS

¯

LEGEND

0.35 0.17

2000 Owner Occupied

2000 Renter Occupied

179.1- 292.0

0.0 - 42.0 0.0 - 42.0

179.1 - 292.0

292.1 - 451.0

0.0 - 42.0 0.0 - 42.0

42.1 -79.0 42.1 - 179.0

292.1 - 451.0

451.1 - 773.0

42.1 - 179.0 42.1 -79.0 292.1 - 451.0

2000 Renter Occupied

451.1 - 773.0

0.35

0.7

1.05

179.1 - 292.0

1.4

Miles

179.1- 292.0 292.1 - 451.0 451.1 - 773.0

451.1 - 773.0

2024 Renter Occupied

2024 Owner Occupied

0.0 - 46.0

192.1 - 293.0

0.0 - 46.0

192.1 - 293.0

46.1 - 192.0

293.1 - 502.0

46.1 - 192.0

293.1 - 502.0

502.1 - 758.0

502.1 - 758.0 Source: ESRI Population Summary

23 | From Then To Now

0

Legend

Source: ESRI Population Summary

From Then To Now

| 24

¯

DEMOGRAPHICS HOUSING COST BURDEN Every census tract area in Austin suffers from high rental costs as a percentage of income.

This leaves less money for families to spend on other essentials such as food, medical expenses and recreation. This high cost burden is common with the outer suburbs of Chicago.

CR LA OS SE

CENTRA L

AUSTIN

NAGL E

N AR R AGAN S E T T

ARMI TA GE

OAK PAR K

HARLEM

Figure 11: Housing Cost Burden (2024)

GR

AN

Table 1: Race Comparisons (2024)

Austin Chicago

RACE Austin remains majority black, however, like the rest of Chicago, the neighborhood is witnessing a shift in demographics due to the increase in immigrants to the city overall. As a result, Black residents have decreased by 13% of the last 24 years while Hispanic residents have increased by 18%.

D

NO RT H

NO R TH

COMMUNITY COMPARISONS

White

6.0%

34.9%

Black

74.5%

28.8%

American Indian

0.8%

1.3%

Asian

0.4%

7.4%

Pacific Islander

0.0%

0.0%

Some Other Race

12.4%

16.4%

Two or More

5.9%

11.1%

Hispanic Origin (Any Race)

20.6%

30.8%

Figure 12: Race Make Up (2000-2024) Austin

CHICAG O

CICERO

AUSTIN L AR AMI E

CENTRA L

DIVISION

KINZIE

KINZIE

Chicago MADISO N

VA NB UREN

HARRISON

CE N T R AL

EISENHOWER

ROOSEVEL T

2000

2010

2024

LEGEND 100 0

25 | From Then To Now

Source: US Census Bureau, Decennial Census and 2024 ACS 5 Year

Source: US Census Bureau, Decennial Census and 2024 ACS 5 Year

From Then To Now

| 26

DEMOGRAPHICS SUMMARY COMPARISONS Compared to neighboring areas - Oak Park, Berwyn, Humboldt Park, and Belmont Cragin - Austin is more diverse, highly populated, disadvantaged and under-educated. In terms of demographics, it is most similar to Belmont Cragin and differs most from Oak Park. The median household income is significantly lower than surrounding areas, approximately $20,000 lower than the second lowest, has a much higher portion of black residents, and is less educated than the other areas.

“Austin Boulevard is like a Berlin Wall dividing Austin and Oak Park”

Figure 13: Neighborhood Demographic Comparisons

96,557 96,557 96,557

54,583 54,583 54,583 54,698 54,698 54,698

54,698

55,391 55,391 55,391 55,391

73,991 73,991 73,991 73,991

35,602 TOTAL HOUSEHOLDS 35,602 35,602 35,602 Total Households Total Households Total Households

23,345 23,345 19,904 19,904 19,904 23,345 19,904 23,345

18,763 18,763 18,763 18,763

23,068 23,068 23,068 23,068

Population POPULATION Population Population 96,557

2010 - 2020 ANNUAL -1.9% -1.9% -1.9% GROWTH – 2020 Annual 20102010 – 2020 2010 Annual – 2020 Annual 38.2 MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD

Growth Growth Growth 38.2 38.2 Average Age Average Age Average Age $43,109

INCOME

-1.9% 38.2

$43,109 $43,109 $43,109 Median Household Median Household Median Household 73.5% PERCENTAGE BLACK Income Income Income 73.5% Percentage Black 14.5% 73.5% 73.5% Percentage Percentage Black Black RESIDENTS WITH BACHELORS DEGREE AND ABOVE Residents Residents Residents Bachelors Degree and 14.5% chelorsBachelors Degree and Degree and14.5% 14.5%

Above Above Above

27 | From Then To Now

54,583

5.2% 39.9

5.2%

5.2%

39.9

39.9

$103,264

5.2% 39.9

1.6%

1.6%

37.5

37.5

1.6%

1.6%

37.5

37.5

$71,300

$103,264$103,264 $103,264 $71,300$71,300 $71,300 19.0% 8.8% 19.0% 19.0%71.8%

19.0%

71.8% 71.8%

71.8% 24.5% 24.5%

8.8%

8.8%

-3.8%

-3.8%

34.0

34.0

-3.8%

-3.8%

34.0

34.0

$97,550

$97,550$97,550 $97,550 36.0%

24.5% 8.8%

36.0% 36.0%

36.0% 16.1%

24.5%

16.1% 16.1%

16.1%

-.79%

-.79%

34.7

34.7

-.79%

-.79% 34.7

34.7

$62,476

$62,476$62,476 $62,476 4.5% 4.5%

4.5% 14.5%

14.5% 14.5%

14.5%

4.5%

Source: US Census Bureau, Decennial Census and 2024 ACS 5 Year

From Then To Now

| 28

DEMOGRAPHICS

ECONOMICS

EDUCATION COMPARISONS

ECONOMICS

Austin is less educated than other nearby communities. A majority of the population has a high school diploma and only 8% have a Bachelor’s degree.

Austin has continued to have high levels of residents living below poverty. As previously discussed, the median household income of Austin is significantly lower than adjacent communities.

2000 Renter Occupied

“We need more funding for our own books and better resources”

Specifically, there is a $28,654 difference between the median household income in Austin and Chicago.

Figure 15: Poverty (2010-2024)

Figure 14: Education Comparisons

20 24 10 20

City of Chicago, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTech

City of Chicago, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, EPA, NPS, Census Bureau, U METI/NASA, USGS, EPA, NPS, USUSGS, Census Bureau, USDA, US USFWS

Legend

Austin

Oak Park

Berwyn

Chicago

Source: US Census Bureau, Decennial Census and 2024 ACS 5 Year

29 | From Then To Now

LEGEND Poverty

0.35 0.17

Legend

0

0.35 0.17

0.35

0

0.7

1.05

0.35

1.4

2000 Renter Occupied 179.1- 292.0 Percent of Population whose income in the past 12 months is below poverty Percent of Population whose income in the past 12 months is below poverty level 0.0 - 42.0 292.1 - 451.0 24% >>24% 42.1 -79.0 451.1 - 773.0 <<1% 1% Source: US Census Bureau, Decennial Census and 2024 ACS 5 Year

From Then To Now

¯

0.7Miles 1.05

| 30

ECONOMICS HOUSEHOLD INCOME

COMMUTING

TOP INDUSTRIES

Compared to the household income makeup of other communities, more Austin residents make under $15,000 and only 13% make between $100,000 - $149,000, the average income of Chicago. The median household income of Austin is $43,109 which is significantly lower than adjacent communities. To be more specific, there is a $28,654 difference between the median household income in Austin and Chicago.

As Figure 17 shows, many residents work outside of Austin. The list on the following page shows the top locations where residents work.

A significant portion of residents in Austin work in the Service Industry (51%). This is followed by those in Retail Trade (19.5%) and Finance, Insurance, Real Estate and Finance (5.6%).

Figure 17: Commuter Locations Percent Employed Percent Employed

Top Commuter Location

Place of Employment Place of Employment

Top Locations

Figure 16: Income (2024)

$43,109 $103,264 $71,300

median income

median income

median income

$71,673

median income

Table 2: Top Industries (SIC Codes)

Service Services Summary Other Services

Health Services Automotive Services Education Institutions & Libraries Movies & Amusements Legal Services Hotels & Lodging Retail Trade Summary

31 | From Then To Now

Percent of Residents 51.4% 38.7% 4.2% 3.1% 3.1% 1.7% 0.5% 0.1% 19.5%

Eating & Drinking Places

6.6%

Miscellaneous Retail

3.3%

Food Stores

2.7%

Auto Dealers & Gas Stations

2.6%

Furniture & Home Furnishings

1.3%

General Merchandise Stores

1.1%

Apparel & Accessory Stores

1.0%

Home Improvement

1.0%

Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Summary

Source: US Census Bureau, Decennial Census and 2024 ACS 5 Year

Source: ESRI Business Profile

5.6%

Real Estate, Holding, Other Investment Offices

2.7%

Banks, Savings & Lending Institutions

1.5%

Insurance Carriers & Agents

1.0%

Securities Brokers

0.3% From Then To Now

| 32

ECONOMICS

TAX INCREMENT FINANCE

BUSINESSES

CR LA OS SE

CENTRA L

NAGL E

OAK PAR K

ARMI TA GE

AUSTIN

Figure 19: TIF Projects

N AR R AGAN S E T T

Figure 18: Active Business Licenses (2024)

HARLEM

There are 1,230 active business licenses in Austin with a majority of them being in tobacco businesses.

There are 17 tax increment finance (TIF) projects within Austin (Table 3). A majority of the TIF projects are being developed by the Chicago Public Schools in the southern portion of the neighborhood.

GRA

ND

NO RT H

NO R TH

CHICAG O

CICERO

AUSTIN L AR AMI E

CENTRA L

DIVISION

KINZIE

KINZIE

MADISO N

VA NB UREN

HARRISON

CE N T R AL

EISENHOWER

ROOSEVEL T

LEGEND

LEGEND

Current Business Licenses

Current TIF Projects

Source: Chicago Data Portal

33 | From Then To Now

Source: Chicago Data Portal

From Then To Now

| 34

ECONOMICS Table 3: TIF Projects Source: Chicago Data Portal

Project

Address

Developer

IGA - CBE - Rockne Stadium lighting

1117 S Central Av

Chicago Public Schools

BUILD Incorporated TIF RDA

5100 W Harrison St

BUILD Incorporated

IGA - CPD - Amundsen (Roald)

6200 W Bloomingdale Av Chicago Park District

Merlin Coke

1401 N Cicero Av

MLRP-Merlin, LLC

IGA - CPD - Clark (John) Pool Rehabilitation Loretto Hospital

4615 W Jackson Bv

Chicago Park District

645 S Central Av

Loretto Hospital

North Cicero

1600 N Cicero Av

North and Cicero LLC

McNair ES IGA with CPS BAS

4820 W Walton Dr

CPS

ASPIRE Center / West Side Health RDA

5500 W Madison St

Westside Health Authority

Laborer's Union

1841 N Monitor Av

Construction Laborers' District Council Training and Apprentice Fund

IGA - CPD - Amundsen Park

6200 W Bloomingdale Av

Chicago Park District

Spencer ES IGA with CPS

214 N Lavergne Av

CPS

Brach's - 401 N Cicero

401 N Cicero Av

MLRP 401 Cicero LLC

IGA-CBE-Spencer

214 N Lavergne Av

Chicago Public Schools

IGA - CBE - HS - Austin - II

231 N Pine Av

Chicago Public Schools

IGA - CPD - Austin Town Hall

5610 W Lake St

Chicago Park District

Batter and Berries

5924 W Chicago Av

Juan and Only, LLC

35 | From Then To Now

From Then To Now

| 36

CULTURAL ASSETS community centers. These spaces are vital hubs for learning, gathering, and celebrating the community’s heritage.

CR LA OS SE

CENTRA L

AUSTIN

NAGL E

N AR R AGAN S E T T

ARMI TA GE

OAK PAR K

HARLEM

Austin has numerous cultural assets and historical landmarks that reflect its rich history.

The majority are located in Austin’s south and central areas, including twelve city-recognized landmarks such as libraries, churches, and Figure 20: Cultural Assets

GRA

ND

NO RT H

NO R TH

Citizen’s Associations

Cultural Groups

CHICAG O

CICERO

AUSTIN L AR AMI E

CENTRA L

DIVISION

Local Organizations

KINZIE

KINZIE

MADISO N

VA NB UREN

HARRISON

CE N T R AL

EISENHOWER

ROOSEVEL T

LEGEND

Source: Chicago Data Portal and Austin Coming Together

37 | From Then To Now

From Then To Now

| 38

CULTURAL ASSETS HISTORIC LANDMARKS

the neighborhood’s architectural beauty but also its pivotal role in Chicago’s history.

Austin is rich in history and home to a variety of historic landmarks that reflect its cultural significance. These landmarks not only celebrate

Figure 22: Historic Landmarks

CR LA OS SE

CENTRA L

AUSTIN

NAGL E

N AR R AGAN S E T T

ARMI TA GE

OAK PAR K

HARLEM

Figure 21: Historic Landmark Locations

GRA

ND

NO RT H

NO R TH

CHICAG O

CICERO

AUSTIN L AR AMI E

CENTRA L

DIVISION

KINZIE

KINZIE

MADISO N

VA NB UREN

HARRISON

CE N T R AL

EISENHOWER

ROOSEVEL T

LEGEND

Source: Chicago Data Portal and Austin Coming Together

39 | From Then To Now

From Then To Now

| 40

MOBILITY TRANSPORTATION Austin faces heightened pollution levels due to industrial activity and major roadway intersections. These factors increase health and safety risks for residents, especially those who rely on public transit or non-motorized transportation.

There is a high number of pedestrian accidents on Central Avenue and Cicero Avenue. A high percentage of those that involve automobiles are also along Cicero Avenue and North Avenue (Figures 23 - 25).

“Pollution and accidents make Cicero and Central feel unsafe.”

Source: Chicago Transit Authority

41 | From Then To Now

From Then To Now

| 42

CENTRA L

CHICAGO

CHICAGO

CENTRA L

DIVISION

CICERO

KINZIE

KINZIE

MADISO N

AUSTIN

KINZIE

KINZIE

MADISO N

VA NB UREN

VA NB UREN

HARRISON

HARRISON

ROOSEVEL T

ROOSEVEL T

LEGEND

Source: Chicago Data Portal

43 | From Then To Now

EISENHOWER

CE N T R AL

CE N T R AL

EISENHOWER

LEGEND

AN D

CICERO

AUSTIN

DIVISION

AUSTIN

GR

NO RT H

NO R TH

L AR AMI E

CENTRA L

CR LA OS SE

L AR AMI E

NO RT H

NO R TH

NAGL E

AN D

N AR R AGAN S E T T

GR

ARMI TA GE

OAK PAR K

CR LA OS SE

CENTRA L

NAGL E

OAK PAR K

ARMI TA GE

HARLEM

Figure 24: Traffic Crashes Heat Map (2022-2024)

AUSTIN

Figure 23: Mobility Map

N AR R AGAN S E T T

MOBILITY

HARLEM

MOBILITY

Source: Chicago Data Portal

From Then To Now

| 44

CENTRA L

CHICAGO

CHICAGO

CENTRA L

DIVISION

CICERO

KINZIE

KINZIE

MADISO N

AUSTIN

KINZIE

KINZIE

MADISO N

VA NB UREN

VA NB UREN

HARRISON

HARRISON

ROOSEVEL T

ROOSEVEL T

LEGEND

Source: Chicago Data Portal

45 | From Then To Now

EISENHOWER

CE N T R AL

CE N T R AL

EISENHOWER

LEGEND

AN D

CICERO

AUSTIN

DIVISION

AUSTIN

GR

NO RT H

NO R TH

L AR AMI E

CENTRA L

CR LA OS SE

L AR AMI E

NO RT H

NO R TH

NAGL E

AN D

N AR R AGAN S E T T

GR

ARMI TA GE

OAK PAR K

CR LA OS SE

CENTRA L

NAGL E

OAK PAR K

ARMI TA GE

HARLEM

Figure 26: Car Crashes And Traffic Counts Map

AUSTIN

Figure 25: Pedestrian Crashes Map

N AR R AGAN S E T T

MOBILITY

HARLEM

MOBILITY

Source: Chicago Data Portal

From Then To Now

| 46

HEALTH

HEALTH

Figure 27: Violent Crime Summary Map 2024

CRIME Austin experiences elevated levels of violent crime throughout the entire community, including shootings and robberies. Despite

efforts to improve safety, residents continue to face daily struggles with public safety, making crime a major issue in the area.

CR LA OS GR SE AN D

CENTRA L

AUSTIN

NAGL E

N AR R AGAN S E T T

ARMI TA GE

OAK PAR K

HARLEM

Figure 28: Arrested Crime Heat Map 2024

NO RT H

NO R TH

CHICAG O

CICERO

AUSTIN L AR AMI E

CENTRA L

DIVISION

KINZIE

KINZIE

MADISO N

VA NB UREN

HARRISON

CE N T R AL

EISENHOWER

ROOSEVEL T

LEGEND Sparse Dense Source: Chicago Data Portal Source: Chicago Data Portal

47 | From Then To Now

From Then To Now

| 48

HEALTH Figure 29: Grocery Store Coverage

Almost half of the adults in Austin are obese, a portion that is significantly above Chicago.

There are also more deaths in Austin per 100,000 residents – 1.08% in Austin versus .78%.

There is 65% coverage by grocery stores (Figure 28), equating to 35% gaps in access. However, while there is coverage by grocery stores, Austin residents have expressed that there are not healthy, high quality food options in the area.

While there are farmers markets that attempt to address this, they cover only 25% of the area and are temporary opportunities to fresh food (Figure 29).

Image Source: Austin Garden CollectiveFacebook

“We don’t have grocery stores nearby with healthy, fresh options”

49 | From Then To Now

Figure 30: Farmers Market Coverage

Source: Chicago Data Portal

From Then To Now

| 50

SUSTAINABILITY Multiple factors were assessed to understand Austin’s overall sustainability and vulnerability.

FLOOD SUSCEPTIBILITY

efficiency, increasing access to renewable energy, and providing support for low-income families to help ease their financial load may all offer relief of energy burdens.

Figure 31: Vulnerability Assessment

Flood Susceptibility

Austin is dealing with a high flood risk, having experienced some historic flooding in recent years. As you can see in this map, a pattern clearly emerges where marginalized communities are disproportionately impacted by flooding. So again, with climate change only getting worse, there is a strong need for improved infrastructure in the area as well as flood relief efforts, because we have learned that has been very difficult for residents to get assistance from the city after flood events.

TREE CANOPY Austin has a relatively low tree canopy of 19 percent, especially when you compare it to Oak Park, which has a canopy of 31%. The canopy is not evenly distributed; some streets are lush with trees, while other major arterial roads like North and Cicero Ave are noticeably lacking greenery.

This uneven distribution emphasizes the need for focused efforts to boost tree coverage across the entire neighborhood.

Particulate Matter

PARTICULATE MATTER

HEAT ISLAND

Impervious Surfaces

Austin has several high-traffic roads that create high levels of diesel particulate matter, which has a serious impact on Austin residents. This air quality issue not only poses serious health risks, such as respiratory problems and cardiovascular diseases, but also disproportionately affects vulnerable communities.

In line with most of Chicago, Austin is a heat island. Notably, there can be a staggering 22-degree temperature difference between the North and Southwest sides on the same day.

This temperature disparity exacerbates health risks and energy demands.

IMPERVIOUS SURFACES A large portion of Austin is covered by impervious surfaces such as buildings, pavement, and other structures that prevent water from seeping into the ground. This contributes to issues like increased runoff, flooding, and heat islands.

ENERGY BURDEN A majority of residents in Austin are dealing with a high energy burden, which means they spend 6% or more of their income on energy bills. This puts a significant strain on residents’ budgets and makes it difficult to invest in other important things such as healthcare, education, and housing. Strategies that focus on energy

51 | From Then To Now

Energy Burden

VULNERABILITY All of this data combined makes clear that Austin has a high vulnerability ranking. This ranking takes into account things like flood risk, surface temperatures, and air toxins, providing a clear picture of how these issues overlap.

A step in the right direction towards addressing these environmental challenges and establishing a more resilient community is Austin’s community gardens. This plan aims to support these distinct elements and support development of more gardens.

Tree Canopy

Heat Island

Vulnerability

From Then To Now

| 52

SUSTAINABILITY Figure 32: Vulnerability Assessment

IMPERVIOUS SURFACES

COMMUNITY GARDENS FLOOD SUSCEPTIBILITY

HEAT ISLAND

CR LA OS GR SE AN D

CENTRA L

AUSTIN

NAGL E

N AR R AGAN S E T T

ARMI TA GE

OAK PAR K

HARLEM

Figure 33: Green Spaces

NO RT H

NO R TH

90-100

80-89%

80-83

77-79

84-86

80-83

90-100%

ENERGY BURDEN

71-73

DIVISION

VULNERABILITY RANK

TREE CANOPY

CHICAG O

AUSTIN CICERO

80-90

61-79%

Surface Temperature in Farenheit

L AR AMI E

40-60%

CENTRA L

0-80

KINZIE

KINZIE

MADISO N

VA NB UREN

HARRISON

CE N T R AL

EISENHOWER

0-50

Very high

Low

50-80

High

Very low

80-90

Medium

90-100 53 | From Then To Now

Tree Canopy

ROOSEVEL T

LEGEND Parks Community garden Garden in Neighborhood Land Trust

Source: Chicago Data Portal

Source: Council of Environmental Quality Data, City of Chicago, FEMA

From Then To Now

| 54

BUILT ENVIRONMENT

Figure 34: Land Use Map

Source: CMAP Data Hub

The land uses are largely reflective of the mix of zoning in the area which is largely residential.

Residential largely takes the form of single family detached, two flats, town houses and low density housing.

CRO LA SSE

CENTRA L

AUSTIN

NAGL E

OAK PAR K

ARMI TA GE

N AR R AGAN S E T T

open green spaces which is spread across the community.

HARLEM

Austin largely contains residential development, which is around 65% followed by commercial, institutional, mixed-use and industrial. The commercial corridors are distributed east to west with industrial scattered towards the outer edges of the community. Compared to the size of the neighborhood, it lacks the amount of

Residential

Commercial

Industrial

Mixed Use

65%

6%

GRA

ND

NO RT H

NO R TH

4%

CHICAG O

CICERO

AUSTIN L AR AMI E

CENTRA L

DIVISION

KINZIE

KINZIE

4%

MADISO N

Vacant (15%) VA NB UREN

Industrial (4%) Open Space (1%)

HARRISON

CE N T R AL

EISENHOWER

Institutional (3%)

Single Family Residential (32.7%)

Mixed Use (4%) Commercial (6%)

ROOSEVEL T

Institutional

3%

LEGEND Single Family

Commercial

Multi Family

Mixed Use

55 | From Then To Now

Institutional

Green Space

Industrial

Vacant

Utilities

Residental: Multi Family (32.3%)

From Then To Now

| 56

BUILT ENVIRONMENT

CRO LA SSE

CENTRA L

NAGL E

AUSTIN

Source: CMAP Data Hub

N AR R AGAN S E T T

ARMI TA GE OAK PAR K

HARLEM

Figure 35: Zoning Map

GRA

ND

NO RT H

NO R TH

Single Family

Multi Family

Mixed Use

Commercial

CHICAG O

CICERO

AUSTIN L AR AMI E

CENTRA L

DIVISION

KINZIE

KINZIE

MADISO N

VA NB UREN

HARRISON

CE N T R AL

EISENHOWER

ROOSEVEL T

LEGEND

Institutional

57 | From Then To Now

From Then To Now

| 58

BUILT ENVIRONMENT Figure 36: Imageability Map

Austin’s Imageability Map examines the five key elements of a city as defined by urban theorist Kevin Lynch: paths, edges, districts, nodes, and landmarks. Austin, one of Chicago’s 77 neighborhoods, spans over seven square miles, with its boundaries clearly defined. To the south, it is bordered by the Eisenhower Expressway (I-290), while the Green Line and Metra tracks traverse its center. The northern boundary is marked by additional Metra railroad tracks.

The neighborhood’s primary paths are its major east-west streets: North Avenue, Division Street, Chicago Avenue, and Madison Street.

These routes, identified by residents as key for navigation, also help delineate North Austin, Central Austin, and South Austin. Key nodes of concentrated activity, such as the intersection

of Chicago Avenue and Central Avenue, serve as important gathering spots and orientation points for the community.

Austin’s Midway Park District stands out as a prominent historic residential area, known for its Queen Anne and Prairie-style homes and its connection to notable political figures from Chicago’s past. The neighborhood also features several iconic landmarks, including Columbus Park, Austin Town Hall, and the historic Pink House, which, though no longer standing, remains a cherished symbol for longtime residents. These landmarks, paths, edges, nodes, and districts collectively shape Austin’s identity and structure.

LEGEND Districts

Nodes

Landmarks

Parks

Edges

Train Station

Paths Source: Chicago Data Portal

59 | From Then To Now

From Then To Now

| 60

BUILT ENVIRONMENT The street façades in Austin reflect the neighborhood’s mix of uses and its character.

Along major streets like North Avenue, Division Street, Chicago Avenue, and Madison Street, the buildings vary in style and purpose. These corridors feature a combination of small businesses, restaurants, retail stores, and apartments above shops, creating an active and urban environment.

Most commercial buildings are concentrated along these key streets, while residential areas are set back, consisting of single-family homes, two-flats, and low-density housing. Division

W CHICAGO AVENUE

Street and Chicago Avenue have a mix of local shops and institutions, giving them a more community-focused feel. North Avenue, on the other hand, has larger commercial properties and busier traffic, making it a more active hub.

W NORTH AVENUE

The condition of façades varies widely. Some areas are well-maintained and lively, while others show signs of wear and neglect. Poorly lit or less cared-for sections can make some streets feel uninviting, especially at night.

Overall, Austin’s street façades tell a story of a neighborhood with strong community potential but in need of better upkeep and investment to enhance its appearance and safety.

Figure 37: Block Face Analysis

W DIVISION

LEGEND

61 | From Then To Now

Commercial

Institutional

Residential

Mixed Use

Recreational

From Then To Now

| 62

BUILT ENVIRONMENT VIBE CHECK The graphic below highlights the “vibe” of community - what makes Austin, Austin and where the residents recreate and come together.

Vibrant

Resilient

Culture 63 | From Then To Now

From Then To Now

| 64

BUILT ENVIRONMENT abandoned buildings

vacant lots

NO RT H

NO R TH

AUSTIN

ARMI TA GE

NAGL E

ND

N AR R AGANS E T T

GRA

OAK PAR K

CENTRA L

CRO LA SSE

HARLEM

Figure 39: Vacant Lots

AUSTIN

NAGL E

N AR R AGANS E T T

ARMI TA GE

OAK PAR K

HARLEM

Figure 38: Abandoned Buildings

CRO LA SSE

CENTRA L

1,141

117

There are many lots and buildings throughout the neighborhood that are underutilized. Many lots sit vacant and buildings abandoned. There 1,141 vacant lots. Of those vacancies, 376 are publicly owned. There are also 117 abandoned buildings in the neighborhood.

GRA

ND

NO RT H

NO R TH

DIVISION

CHICAG O

AUSTIN CICERO

KINZIE

CHICAG O

L AR AMIE

KINZIE

CENTRA L

CICERO

AUSTIN L AR AMIE

CENTRA L

DIVISION

KINZIE

KINZIE

MADISO N MADISO N

VA NB UREN

HARRISON EISENHOWER

ROOSEVEL T

LEGEND

ROOSEVEL T

LEGEND

Abandoned Buildings

Public, available lots

Existing Buildings Source: Chicago Data Portal

65 | From Then To Now

VA NB UREN

CE N T R AL

CE N T R AL

HARRISON EISENHOWER

Vacant Lots

Source: Chicago Data Portal & ChiBlockBuilder

From Then To Now

| 66

BUILT ENVIRONMENT FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES Several developments are currently underway in Austin, including residential projects, transportation improvements, office and commercial spaces, and health and wellness

initiatives. Major development is taking place along Chicago Avenue and Madison Street, all aimed at addressing the community’s needs.

Figure 41: Future Development

CRO LA SSE

CENTRA L

AUSTIN

NAGL E

NAR R AGANS E T T

ARMI TA GE

OAK PAR K

HARLEM

Figure 40: Future Development Opportunities

GRA

ND

NO RT H

NO R TH

CHICAG O

CICERO

AUSTIN L AR AMIE

CENTRA L

DIVISION

KINZIE

KINZIE

MADISO N

VA NB UREN

CE N TR AL

HARRISON EISENHOWER

ROOSEVEL T

LEGEND New Development and Future Opportunities Source: Austin Cominig Together

67 | From Then To Now

From Then To Now

| 68

KEY TAKEAWAYS

S

STRENGTHS

W

O

T

WEAKNESSES

OPPORTUNITIES

THREATS

• Entrepreneurial Spirit

• Sustainability

• Greening

• Closed Schools

• Sense of Community

• Education

• Community Spaces

• Crime

• Historic Values

• Workforce

• Economic disparities

• Ongoing Efforts and Plans

• Generational Wealth

• Community Wealth Building

• Community based organizations

• Affordable Housing

• Transparency

• Vacancies

• Healthcare Access

• Wayfinding

• Community Mobility

• Deteriorating Infrastructure

• Identity

• Diversity • Cultural Heritage

• Safety

• Size • Vacant Lots • Abandoned Buildings

69 | From Then To Now

From Then To Now

| 70

KEY TAKEAWAYS

CO-DESIGNING AUSTIN

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

TERRITORY ENGAGEMENT

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

INTRODUCTION

This process included several tactics to engage the community. We heard from multiple residents and organizations in the area as well as several topic experts. These participants make up the public, private, and non-profit sectors, ensuring a comprehensive and holistic outlook. Together, both community and expert engagement offered insightful knowledge that was foundational both to understanding Austin as well as the possibilities for the community.

Community engagement played a crucial role in shaping this framework plan, particularly through our collaboration with Territory, a youthled, place-based design studio in Austin. Over three months, we worked closely with local youth (ages 16-18) in a series of workshops to explore priorities such as affordable housing,

local businesses, mental health programs, and walkable neighborhoods. Their insights revealed key hangout spots, potential locations for public art and green spaces, and ideas for vibrant, youth-friendly streetscapes, which have been integrated into the framework.

STAKEHOLDER & EXPERT ENGAGEMENT

73 | Co-designing Austin

Co-designing Austin

| 74

TERRITORY ENGAGEMENT WORKSHOP #1 In the first workshop, 13 participants shared their preferences for Austin, focusing on topics like affordable housing, local businesses, youth programs, and mental health initiatives. Through prioritization exercises and mental mapping, participants highlighted reliance on cars and

public transit along Cicero Avenue and North Avenue, identified key hangout spots, and flagged areas needing improvement. They also suggested potential sites for art installations, green spaces, and business development.

MENTAL MAPPING ACTIVITY This is a mental mapping activity where we asked them to draw a path from home to territory or school, so we could better understand the paths they take most frequently in the neighborhood.

We learned that many of the TADs got around primarily by car due to a lack of reliable public

transport options. There was also a perception that the green line stations were unsafe and that the high traffic and dangerous driving on Cicero and North Avenue makes it difficult for pedestrians.

PRIORITIZATION ACTIVITY For this prioritization activity we asked the TADS what they want to see in Austin. Most of them chose affordable housing. We learned that they also want to see more color and art

in the neighborhood, more black owned local businesses, more youth programs, and places for teens to hangout after school.

MAGNET MAP ACTIVITY For this Magnet map activity, the students were asked to place magnets showing activities like art murals, gateways, businesses and green spaces to help enhance the built environment on a map of Austin. This helped us to determine which locations in Austin might be suitable for various design development and program types.

75 | Co-designing Austin

Co-designing Austin

| 76

TERRITORY ENGAGEMENT

TERRITORY ENGAGEMENT

WORKSHOP #2

WORKSHOP #3

DESIGN YOUR STREET ACTIVITY

The final workshop allowed us to present our design proposals, gather feedback, and ensure that the vision aligned with the priorities of the youth. This collaboration has been instrumental in creating a framework that reflects the aspirations and insights of Austin’s young residents, paving the way for both short-term interventions and long-term community transformation.

The second workshop, with eight participants, built on these insights. We engaged in deeper prioritization, asking the youth what would improve their quality of life, such as locally owned businesses, public art, and hangout spaces for youth. They also designed their ideal street, envisioning a vibrant mix of businesses and public spaces. When discussing 15-minute walkable neighborhoods, the youth prioritized spaces like gyms, healthcare clinics, and community gathering spots. Feedback from three additional focus group discussions emphasized the importance of unity, safety, and preserving Austin’s history and identity.

LEGO DENSITY ACTIVITY We conducted two density and land use activities where we asked the youth to use lego blocks to activate vacant lots within our focus as to the kind of uses and massing that the youth would like to see and where. These blocks represented various uses and could be stacked to give us an indication as to the kind of uses and densities they desire.

CONNCEPT FEEDBACK ACTIVITY The second activity in workshop 3 was designed to allow Territory to give us feedback on our focus area concepts. The results were that all three Focus Areas were seen as good, but that Focus Area 3 around Territory’s new office space, was seen as the strongest focus area.

HAND ACTIVITY

For this hand activity, we asked the TADs to describe their future vision of Austin in one word.

77 | Co-designing Austin

15-MINUTE NEIGHBORHOOD ACTIVITY or this activity, the TADS were asked to design a 15-minute walkable block. They focused on youth spaces, gyms, healthcare clinics, art and greenspace and some community gathering spaces.

Co-designing Austin

| 78

TERRITORY & MCD PHOTOMAPPING

TERRITORY DESIGN CONCEPTS

TERRITORY PHOTOMAPPING

These are the concept drawings that Territory produced following the first two workshops.

Territory youth expressed their desire for a larger, newer home base for Territory with new design studio on the ground floor and affordable housing above. In their concept sketches - Territory offices will act as a key anchor along Cicero that will spur additional economic development activity with uses such as a wellness center, grocery store, and small business-like salons, barber shops, and cafes.

These are some of the images captured by the TADs during their photomapping of Focus Area Three, along Cicero Avenue between Chicago and Division Streets. Their observations highlighted significant issues, including an abundance of litter and a noticeable absence of garbage cans.

They also noted prevalent graffiti and a concentration of auto shops in the area.

MCD PHOTOMAPPING

MCD students conducted the photomapping for Focus Areas 1 and 2. Their observations revealed clear signs of disinvestment, such as abandoned buildings and vacant lots. However, they also noted positive community interventions, including public art, painted garbage cans, and historical banners that reflected local pride and efforts to revitalize the area.

79 | Co-designing Austin

Co-designing Austin

| 80

KEY TAKEAWAYS There is a strong sense of community pride that is not well-reflected through the public realm.

“I would love places to hangout with my friends”

There is a lack of stores, restaraunts, and entertainment in Austin for residents to live, work, and play.

“I want to be a part of making the decisions for Austin”

There is an absence of community spaces for residents to gather and recreate.

There are few opportunities for residents to connect with nature.

The public realm has seen years of disinvestment and is in need of aesthetic and economic improvements.

81 | Co-designing Austin

“We need more art and color” “I want to leave a lasting impact on making Austin a better place”

“I feel unsafe around the green line stop”

“I want people to see Austin as resilient and selfreilant” “We visit downtown because it is prettier than Austin, not just because there is more to do”

“I want to rewrite the narrative of Austin” Co-designing Austin

| 82

CASE STUDIES

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS FOR AUSTIN CASE STUDY OVERVIEW Given the challenges and opportunties analyzed within Austin, several case studies were reviewed as practical applications for Austin.

Incorporating planning case studies into this framework plan provides valuable real-world insights that can guide the development of effective strategies and solutions. By analyzing the successes and challenges faced in previous planning projects, case studies offer a deeper understanding of best practices, common pitfalls, and innovative approaches.

The case studies were vetted based on locations with similar contexts to Austin - rustbelt, historically black communities facing economic and development challenges.

The following topics were reviewed for practical applications for Austin: VACANT LOT ACTIVATION: Austin has over 1,000 vacant lots due to population decline, disinvestment, and economic challenges.

These lots can, and should, be repurposed for community benefits. This transformation can foster social cohesion, provide healthy food options, and improve the safety and aesthetics of the area. It also helps reduce the negative impacts of vacant properties, such as blight and illegal activity.

GREENWAYS: Austin, like many urban neighborhoods, can benefit from enhanced green corridors that improve connectivity, mobility, and access to green space. Greenways could connect Austin’s residential areas to parks, transit hubs, and commercial corridors, promoting sustainable transportation options like biking and walking.

Greenways in Austin can improve air quality, reduce heat island effects, and provide residents with much-needed outdoor spaces for recreation and health. They also serve as pedestrian and bike-friendly routes,

85 | Case Studies

encouraging less car-dependent travel and enhancing community connectivity.

STREETSCAPE AND PUBLIC REALM: Streetscapes and public spaces in the Austin neighborhood, especially along major corridors like Chicago Avenue or Cicero Avenue, are key for improving the pedestrian experience, local business accessibility, and overall neighborhood aesthetics. Investing in streetscape improvements can help transform Austin into a more pedestrian-friendly neighborhood, encourage local commerce, and create safer environments for walking and cycling. Enhancing streetscapes with trees, seating, public art, and well-lit areas can encourage social interaction, reduce crime, and make the neighborhood more inviting to residents and visitors.

ECODISTRICT: An ecodistrict approach in Austin would focus on creating a sustainable and self-sufficient neighborhood. Currently, the neighborhood is extremely vulnerable to natural disasters due to underinvestment and overburden of energy costs. Techniques such as implementing energy-saving technologies, water-efficient landscaping, and community-driven sustainability initiatives could help combat climate change impacts, reduce energy costs, and improve overall environmental health.

REPARATIVE JUSTICE: Reparative justice in the context of urban development aims to address historical and systemic injustices faced by marginalized communities. These strategies aim to right past wrongs by fostering equitable development, redistributing resources, and creating opportunities for communities that have been historically marginalized.

ADAPTIVE REUSE: Adaptive reuse repurposes existing buildings to ncontribute to sustainability, preserve cultural heritage, and revitalize neighborhoods without displacing residents.

This approach can be particularly valuable in

VACANT LOT ACTIVATION

communities like Austin, where there may be underutilized or deteriorating buildings with historical significance.

CADILLAC FARMS - DETROIT, MI The main intent of Cadillac Farms, a one-acre urban farm, is to provide a space for communities to come together to grow produce and promote food sovereignty. This also promotes place based intergenerational learning and empowerment opportunities including but not limited to activities, programs, employment, and services.

PARK INA TRUCK - PHILIDELPHIA, PA Park in truck transforms urban green spaces in Philadelphia with help of neighbourhood youth.

The park in a truck program uses green spaces to transform neighbourhoods with the help of young people. Using the park in a truck DIY toolkit, Austin can design, build and sustain own unique green space in community.

REGENERATING ROOTS - MIAMI, FL This project shifts the narrative of the community from vulnerable to the one with power and authenticity. The open-air market will not only pay homage to the Bahamian roots of this congregation but also activate a vacant parcel that currently contributes to neighborhood blight. Additionally, the project will serve as a venue to showcase The Set community’s cottage industries, such as food, entertainment, and beauty products.

SOUTHSIDE SANCTUARY - BRONZEVILLE, CHICAGO The South Side Sanctuary is a transformative, gathering space dedicated to uplifting and uniting multigenerational community members from all walks of life. Now open to the public, The South Side Sanctuary centers arts and culture, integrative wellness, sports and recreation and innovation and entrepreneurship.

Case Studies

| 86

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS FOR AUSTIN GREENWAYS

JOE LOUIS GREENWAY - DETROIT, MI

STREETSCAPE AND PUBLIC REALM

DESTINATION CRENSHAW - LA, CA

The Joe Louis Greenway is a transformative infrastructure project in Detroit, MI, designed to connect neighborhoods through a loop of pedestrian and bike networks. The greenway links parks, residential areas, and cultural landmarks while promoting recreation, accessibility, and community cohesion. The project prioritizes environmental sustainability, economic development, and community connectivity.

Destination Crenshaw is a 1.3-mile cultural corridor designed to celebrate Black culture and history while revitalizing the Crenshaw community’s infrastructure. The project aims to boost economic development, create jobs, and promote environmental healing. Featuring over 100 pieces of public art, green spaces, and gathering areas, it transforms the streetscape into a vibrant cultural destination.

606 Trail - Humboldt Park - Chicago, IL The 606 Trail in Humboldt Park, Chicago, is a 2.7-mile greenway designed to connect neighborhoods, enhance access to green spaces, and promote active transportation.

While it has improved green space access, it also underscores the challenges of gentrification in Black and Latino communities. Efforts are underway to protect affordable housing and support long-term residents.

4TH AVE - BIRMINGHAM, AL

Baltimore Greenway Trails Network - Baltimore, MD The Baltimore Greenway Trails Network is a planned 35-mile loop designed to enhance mobility and recreational access by connecting parks, waterfronts, and historically disconnected neighborhoods, particularly those with large Black populations. This initiative aims to address racial and environmental inequalities by providing improved access to green spaces, transportation, and recreational opportunities.

The revitalization of 4th Avenue in Birmingham focuses on preserving the historic district’s legacy as a hub for Black-owned businesses and civil rights activism. Streetscape improvements, including enhanced sidewalks, upgraded lighting, and thoughtful landscaping, create a welcoming and accessible environment.

The project honors the area’s rich cultural and historical significance while fostering community pride and driving economic revitalization.

BROADWAY STREETSCAPE - PORTLAND, OR The Broadway Streetscape project in Portland reimagines an urban corridor focusing on sustainability, accessibility, and community engagement. Enhancements like widened sidewalks, dedicated bike lanes, rain gardens, and public art installations prioritize pedestrianfriendly design and environmental stewardship.

This initiative creates a vibrant, inclusive, and resilient public space for residents and visitors alike.

U STREET - WASHINGTON DC U Street in Washington, DC, is a historic corridor celebrated as a vibrant hub of African American culture and heritage, often called “Black Broadway.” Once home to icons like Duke Ellington, the area has been revitalized with a dynamic blend of live music venues, art galleries, restaurants, and boutique shops.

Streetscape enhancements have improved walkability and accessibility while preserving the district’s cultural legacy.

87 | Case Studies

Case Studies

| 88

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS FOR AUSTIN ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS/ECO DISTRICT

REPARITIVE JUSTICE HOPE VILLAGE ECO DISTRICT - DETROIT, MI The Hope Village Eco-District in Detroit, MI, is a community-led initiative to create a sustainable, resilient, and equitable neighborhood. Centered on principles of environmental stewardship and social justice, the project integrates green infrastructure, renewable energy, and energyefficient housing to enhance the quality of life for residents.

AVALON VILLAGE - HIGHLAND PARK, MI Avalon Village in Highland Park, Michigan, is a grassroots initiative led by Shamayim “Mama Shu” Harris to transform abandoned properties into vibrant community spaces. The eco-village model promotes self-sufficiency and empowerment through resources like the Homework House. The Homework House serves as a tutoring center where children can complete homework, enjoy meals, and engage in enrichment activities before and after school. It embodies Avalon Village’s mission to uplift youth and support educational growth as a foundation for community revitalization.

ECO WORKS- DETROIT, MI EcoWorks is a nonprofit organization in Detroit dedicated to promoting sustainability and energy efficiency while empowering local communities. Through innovative programs and partnerships, EcoWorks provides tools, resources, and education to address climate resilience, reduce energy costs, and create sustainable job opportunities.

STONY ISLAND ARTS BANK - CHICAGO, IL Local artist Theaster Gates led the efforts to convert this derelict former bank in the southside of Chicago into an arts and archival centre to serve the surrounding community. The arts bank focuses on displaying art by black artists or which relates to the history and culture of the African American community in Chicago and in the United States.

COOPERATION JACKSON - JACKSON, MI Based in Jackson Mississippi, this project seeks to create an alternative to the current exploitative and destructive socio-economic system by developing a network of cooperative organisations. The project focuses primarily on black working-class neighbourhoods where the residents are not having their needs adequately addressed by conventional for-profit companies.

WOODLAWN CHICAGO, IL

SUSTAINABLE

SQUARE

MILE

The Woodlawn neighbourhood includes the Emmett and Mamie Till-Mobley House Museum as a focus for telling the story of the great migration and of African American civil rights martyrs such as Emmett Till. The Sustainable Square mile seeks to build on this heritage to foster black community development initiatives to address the challenges faced by the climate and economic crises.

ECO-DISTRICT - ENGLEWOOD, CHICAGO The Englewood Agro-Eco District, the first of its kind in the nation, aims to transform vacant lots into an urban agriculture zone and green space. Anchored by the Englewood Nature Trail project, this initiative focuses on environmental improvements and economic revitalization by attracting industry and entrepreneurs to this corridor situated between two railroads sites.

89 | Case Studies

-

Case Studies

| 90

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS FOR AUSTIN ADAPTIVE REUISE

WEBSTER ELEMENTARY PONTIAC - MI Webster Community Center is an adaptive reuse project of Webster Elementary. The intent is to transform this large 52,950-square-foot space into a mixed-use community center to further serve Pontiac residents through health and wellness, arts and culture, entrepreneurship, and youth activities.

MLK JR HIGHSCHOOL - CLEVELAND OH This project will reutilize Martin Luther King Jr. High School for 310 housing units and two divisible commercial spaces intended to offer a diverse range of housing options, catering to various income levels, thereby fostering a socially diverse and inclusive community. The development will feature a community park, farms, a pond, fountain and a walking path.

LANTERN - Detroit, MI The former bakery and warehouse will be converted into a mixed-use art, education and community space. It includes artist studios, galleries, creative retail and an outdoor courtyard that will serve as an accessible community space. The approach takes advantage of the building’s current state of disrepair, transforming turning it into unique architecture.

78TH STREET STUDIOS - CLEVELAND, OH The original home of Baker Electric Motor Vehicle Company has been transformed into art galleries, artist studios, performance spaces, and music recording studios. The space hosts community events every month and includes promotions and specials for the surrounding businesses.

91 | Case Studies

REREADING AUSTIN FRAMEWORK PLAN

DESIGN PRINCIPLES PLAN PRINCIPLES Through community engagement and data analysis, five key principles became evident.

Together, the five principles below provide a holistic framework for the revitalization of the Austin neighborhood, ensuring it thrives socially, economically, environmentally, and culturally while being inclusive and just for all residents.

2. Strengthening Identity: Strengthening the identity of the Austin neighborhood involves celebrating its rich cultural heritage and history. This principle encourages growth of the existing community pride by amplifying local culture, traditions, and arts. It also involves creating spaces where residents feel a deep sense of belonging and connection to the neighborhood.

4. Fostering Community Resiliience: This principle addresses the current vulnerability of Austin. It will support Austin’s ability to withstand challenges and adapt to future uncertainties, such as economic downturns, climate change, and public health crises.

1. Redressing Harm: This principle aims to address the historical and ongoing challenges in Austin resulting from systemic inequality, disinvestment, and racial injustice. By providing targeted support and reparative measures, the community can heal from past trauma. Redressing harm also includes creating paths for healing and reconciliation, ensuring that residents feel empowered to participate in decisions about their future and are compensated for the losses they have experienced.

3. Supporting Economic Vitality: This principle focuses on promoting sustainable growth and fostering a thriving local economy that benefits all residents through providing locally driven jobs, goods, and entertainment. This principles serves to ensure that economic opportunities are accessible, equitable, and locally driven, empowering residents to build wealth and improve their quality of life.

95 | Framework Plan

5. Advocating for Environmental Justice: Advocating for environmental justice in Austin addresses the disproportionate environmental burdens faced by historically marginalized communities. This principle calls for policies that mitigate environmental hazards, promote sustainable urban development, and prioritize the health and well-being of the community.

Framework Plan

| 96

CONCEPTUALIZING THE DESIGN FRAMEWORK OVERVIEW The overarching concept for the Framework Plan envisions Austin as a quilt. The quilt reflects the rich, complex, and diverse nature of the community, composed of many different backgrounds, cultures, and histories that together form a unique and vibrant whole.

Like a quilt, Austin is made up of different pieces, each representing various aspects of the people who live there, their stories, and their contributions. In this quilt of Austin, no one patch or story stands alone. The neighborhood’s strength lies in the way these different patches interweave, creating a vibrant, multifaceted community. Though there may be challenges such as economic disparities or violence, there is also a deep sense of pride and solidarity.

The people of Austin, like the threads in a quilt, are interwoven, and the neighborhood continues to evolve, with each generation adding new layers to its collective story.

The patches of the quilt are made up of halfmile grids, representing the micro-communities within Austin. Each patch reflects the diversity of Austin—whether it is an area with a predominantly African American population, a growing Latino community, or a space with a concentration of local shops and services.

These patches are distinct from one another but still part of the larger whole and contributing to the broader mosaic of the neighborhood.

The street grid, as the seams of the quilt, represents the connections and flows between the patches. Roads like Austin Boulevard, Cicero Avenue, and Madison Street serve as the boundaries between the half-mile patches, but they also allow for movement and interaction between these areas. They symbolize the ongoing interaction and movement of people, ideas, and resources, while maintaining the distinctiveness of each patch.

QUILT

PATCHES

SEAMS

Austin community

Blocks and vacant lots

Street grid

Cultural Assets

0.06 0.03

0

0.06

0.12

0.18

0.24

Miles

¯

Esri Community Maps Contributors, City of Chicago, © OpenStreetMap,

97 | Framework Plan

Framework Plan

| 98

FOCUS AREAS IDENTIFYING FOCUS AREAS

FOCUS AREA 1: GREEN CORRIDOR

CULTURAL ASSET ANALYSIS

A vulnerability analysis was completed by assessing areas with significant gaps in community assets such as parks, schools, and gardens. This analysis also reviewed blocks with vacant lots and abandoned buildings, two elements that can negatively impact a community, but also provide an opportunity for future development. Three distinct priority areas were realized through this assessment. Each area focuses on a unique set of goals, specifically in creating a green corridor, a community center grid, and a cultural grid.

Due to the sheer size of Austin, this plan focuses specifically on three priority areas. However, the intention is for these frameworks to eventually be brought into the entire neighborhood once their benefits are conceived.

Cultural Assets

FOCUS AREA 2: AUSTIN TOWN CENTER

Key Map

Step 1: Identification of cultural assets

Step 2: Quarter mile grid buffer highlighting areas with little to no community assets

Step 3: Vulnerability analysis of blocks based on presence of parks and assets. Red blocks equate to high vulnerability, orange equate to medium, and yellow reflect low vulnerability

Step 4: Narrowed down areas based on vulnerability, engagement, and presence of vacant lots and abandoned buildings

3

2

1

FOCUS AREA 3: ARTS COLLECTIVE HUB

City of Chicago, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, USFWS

0.35 0.17

99 | Framework Plan

0

0.35

0.7

1.05

1.4

Miles

¯

Framework Plan

| 100

Cultural Assets

Cultural Assets

FOCUS AREA 1: GREEN CORRIDOR

FOCUS AREA 2: AUSTIN TOWN CENTER

Cultural Assets

Cultural Assets

Key Map

Key Map

0.15 0.07

0

0.15

City of Chicago, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, USFWS

0.35 0.17

0

0.35

0.7

1.05

1.4

Miles

¯

Esri Community Maps Contributors,

0.3

0.45

0.6

Miles

¯

Focus Area number one is located along and Streets near the Green Line station, an City Kinzie of Chicago, Esri, Lake TomTom, area that repeatedly came up during engagement with Territory as a place where the youth does not feel safe. Currently, there is a large cluster of vacant lots and abandoned buildings. This focus area is proposed as a Green Corridor to enhance sustainability, tackle food insecurity, boost economic growth in the neighborhood, and overall create a safe, welcoming area for residents.

101 | Framework Plan

0.1 0.05

City of Chicago, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, USFWS

0.35 0.17

0

0.35

0.7

1.05

1.4

Miles

¯

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

¯

Miles

Esri Community Maps Contributors,

The second focus area is located in the City neighborhood center of Austin, primarily based on Kenzie of Chicago, Esri, TomTom, Street and bounded by Madison Avenue to the south, Central Avenue on the west, and Laramie street to the east.

This focus area aims to create an environment of “live, work and play”, an idea that was derived from the existing conditions of significant commuters, few spaces to gather, and a lack of diverse housing types.

Framework Plan

| 102

Cultural Assets

FOCUS AREA 3: ARTS COLLECTIVE HUB

Cultural Assets

Key Map

0.06 0.03 City of Chicago, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, USFWS

0

0.06

0.12

0.18

0.24

Miles

¯

Esri Community Maps Contributors, The third focus area is a block¯ bounded

by Chicago, Laramie, Division and Cicero. This block is City of Chicago, © OpenStreetMap, where the new Territory office will be. These projects will serve as the foundation for a dynamic cultural district with community co-ownership spaces (e.g., artist collectives, maker spaces, and incubators for small businesses), paving the way for the eventual growth of long-term businesses in the area. As such, the proposed cultural node will support a welcoming atmosphere that strengthens the neighborhood identity and community pride.

0.35 0.17

0

0.35

103 | Framework Plan

0.7

1.05

1.4

Miles

Framework Plan

| 104

SPARKS OF BRILLIANCE

SPARKS OF BRILLIANCE OVERVIEW This chapter reflects the proposed projects, designed to bring about transformative change in both the short and mid-term. Through implementation, they lay the groundwork for a future with lasting impact. This section will begin with case studies to showcase successful models of similar urban transformations, followed by intersections and photomontages to visualizre what these proposals could look like once implemented. This section touches on sparks of brilliance within each of the three focus areas identified below to address the community’s needs, with the aim of creating a safer, more vibrant, and sustainable Austin.

Finally, Focus Area 3, in collaboration with Territory, proposes the transformation of vacant lots into thriving community spaces through short-term projects. These projects include a makers market for local artisans, murals created by neighborhood artists to reflect Austin’s unique culture, and temporary workshop spaces that offer creative opportunities for all ages. These projects will serve as the foundation for a dynamic cultural district, paving the way for the growth of long-term businesses, artist collectives, and small business incubators, fostering community co-ownership and economic development.

Focus Area 1 proposes the creation of a Green Corridor along Kinzie and Lake Streets, designed to not only beautify the area but also to promote sustainability and combat food insecurity. This vision includes three key initiatives: urban agriculture, which will provide fresh produce to address food access challenges; greenways, which will enhance environmental sustainability while offering spaces for relaxation and recreation; and a farmers market, which will serve as a hub for local produce and economic growth. Together, these efforts will foster a stronger, more resilient community that benefits from improved health, safety, and environmental outcomes.

Focus Area 2 centers on revitalizing the heart of Austin, particularly along Kinzie Street, where cultural landmarks like Austin Town Hall and the local library define the area’s character. The vision for this area includes transforming Kinzie Street into a pedestrian-friendly High Street, complete with bike lanes to promote active transportation. The creation of welcoming third spaces for youth and a historic trail will celebrate Austin’s rich cultural heritage and encourage community interaction. These initiatives are designed to honor the neighborhood’s history while enhancing connectivity and fostering a vibrant, inclusive environment for all.

107 | Sparks of Brillliance

Sparks of Brillliance

| 108

FOCUS AREA 1: CASE STUDIES This plan highlights case studies, including a detailed look at a zoomed-in area within Focus Area 1, as well as examples from comparable cities and neighborhoods. These case studies demonstrate potential short-term projects that could activate vacant lots and improve infrastructure. For instance, Chicago’s 606 serves as a model for the proposed greenway

109 | Sparks of Brillliance

along Kinzie Street, which would connect several existing parks through a continuous corridor featuring active travel infrastructure and parklets. Similarly, Cadillac Urban Farms in Detroit showcases how urban agriculture can enhance food security for underserved communities.

Sparks of Brillliance

| 110

FOCUS AREA 1: INTERSECTION INTERSECTION DETAIL

The Green Corridor intersection graphic illustrates how a series of interconnected short-term projects around the Kinzie Street greenway can begin to link together, resulting in a dynamic space. These projects primarily address sustainability issues. The rain garden would help mitigate flooding impacts, while urban agriculture would improve food security.

Building on the work of Forty Acres, the farmers’ market will provide opportunities for accessible, local food.

A

KEY MAP- AUSTIN

C B

KEY PLAN

111 | Sparks of Brillliance

Sparks of Brillliance

| 112

FOCUS AREA 1: STREET SECTION This section highlights as the extension of green corridor in our first focus area’s proposal on Kinzie street. It shows that pedestrianising this part of the street on weekends and festivals can help activating it. This area can be turned into a TOD eventually with the proposed street infrastructure and street markets or pedestrian drives.

BEFORE

Figure 42: Pedestrian Street Section Project: Austin Town Center Location: Kinzie Street

AFTER

AFTER

113 | Sparks of Brillliance

Sparks of Brillliance

| 114

FOCUS AREA 1: SHORT-TERM INTERVENTIONS This photomontage highlights potential enhancements to the street’s public realm. The image in the top right shows an existing section of Kinzie Street, which currently lacks pedestrian access. The photomontage demonstrates how small-scale improvements such as planting, bike lanes, and public art could redesign the street while still accommodating vehicular access.

Figure 43: Green Corridor Photomontage Project: Green Corridor Location: Lake Street

BEFORE 115 | Sparks of Brillliance

A

AFTER Sparks of Brillliance

| 116

FOCUS AREA 1: SHORT-TERM INTERVENTIONS This photomontage highlights a farmers’ market concept. The graphic envisions a weekly farmers’ market on a vacant lot (image on the top right), where local businesses, artisans, and restaurants could sell their goods to support economic development. Such markets would also serve as social events, bringing the community together and providing opportunities for local artists and musicians to perform.

Figure 44: Farmers Market Photomontage Project: Farmers Market Location: 4850 W Race Ave

BEFORE 117 | Sparks of Brillliance

B

AFTER AFTER Sparks of Brillliance

| 118

FOCUS AREA 1: SHORT-TERM INTERVENTIONS This photomontage highlights an urban farm concept. Urban agriculture is central to Focus Area 1, featuring a community garden aimed at mitigating food insecurity. Urban agriculture provides numerous benefits, including the production of healthy, nutritious food for the local community, opportunities to support garden-to-table initiatives, access to green spaces that promote improved mental health, and the chance to learn new skills through various gardening training programs.

Figure 45: Urban Market Photomontage Project: Urban Market Location: 4825 - 4865 W Race Ave

BEFORE 119 | Sparks of Brillliance

C

AFTER Sparks of Brillliance

| 120

FOCUS AREA 2: CASE STUDIES The Sears Sunken Garden in North Lawndale provides inspiration for how landscaping improvements could be implemented at Levin Park in Focus Group 2. The 4th Avenue in Birmingham, Alabama, serves as an example of

121 | Sparks of Brillliance

how a historic African American main street can be revitalized. This approach could inform our concept of transforming Central Avenue into a new High Street for Austin, featuring a green corridor and historic trail.

Sparks of Brillliance

| 122

FOCUS AREA 2: INTERSECTION INTERSECTION DETAIL

The Austin Town Center intersection graphic illustrates an area around Austin Town Hall, which is the focus of Focus Area 2. Here, Central Avenue intersects with the CTA Green Line station, which would be upgraded to create a safe and attractive gateway into Austin.

Third spaces would be established in this central and accessible location to serve as a community hub for Austin. The new High Street along Central Avenue could occasionally be closed to car traffic to accommodate street festivals and community events.

A

KEY MAP- AUSTIN

B

C

123 | Sparks of Brillliance

KEY PLAN

Sparks of Brillliance

| 124

FOCUS AREA 2: STREET SECTION This section depicts Central Avenue activated as the historic trail with minimum physical interventions, like recognising the existing bus stop unique to Austin, adding information hoardings about the historic locations like Town Hall and Library. Adding a bike lane and making the existing walkways permeable is a proposal throughout the neighborhood streets for improving street infrastructure and to mitigate the heat island.

BEFORE

Figure 46: Historic Trail Section Location: Central Avenue

AFTER

125 | Sparks of Brillliance

Sparks of Brillliance

| 126

FOCUS AREA 2: SHORT-TERM INTERVENTIONS This photomontage highlights a heritage trail.

The trail would link together key buildings and events in Austin’s history, providing residents with a greater understanding of their neighborhood’s past while also serving as an attraction for visitors from other areas.

Figure 47: Historic Trail Photomontage Project: Historic Trail Location: Start/end Austin town hall

BEFORE 127 | Sparks of Brillliance

A

AFTER Sparks of Brillliance

| 128

FOCUS AREA 2: SHORT-TERM INTERVENTIONS At night, the trail transforms into a lively and illuminated path, with colorful lights and glowing installations creating a safe and festive atmosphere. This dynamic design not only deepens residents’ connection to their community but also invites visitors to explore and celebrate Austin’s rich history.

Figure 48: Historic Trail Photomontage Project: Historic Trail Night Location: Start/end Austin town hall

BEFORE 129 | Sparks of Brillliance

A

AFTER Sparks of Brillliance

| 130

FOCUS AREA 2: SHORT-TERM INTERVENTIONS This photomontage highlights pedestrian streets on weekends. This artwork illustrates how closing the roadway to traffic on weekends could create new spaces for community and cultural events.

Figure 49: Pedestrian Street Photomontage Project: Pedestrian Street Location: Central Avenue

BEFORE 131 | Sparks of Brillliance

B

AFTER AFTER Sparks of Brillliance

| 132

FOCUS AREA 2: SHORT-TERM INTERVENTIONS During community festival, the space transforms into a hub of activity where families, friends, and neighbors come together to enjoy a safe and welcoming environment. Colorful murals, accessible pathways, and greenery enhance the atmosphere, while the addition of gathering spaces, performances, and recreational activities highlight the street as a place for connection and celebration. This reimagined street serves as a vibrant symbol of community pride and shared experiences.

Figure 50: Pedestrian Street Photomontage Project: Pedestrian Street Festival Location: Central Avenue

BEFORE 133 | Sparks of Brillliance

B

AFTER AFTER Sparks of Brillliance

| 134

FOCUS AREA 2: SHORT-TERM INTERVENTIONS This photomontage highlights POP! Unity. Third spaces can take many forms but simply provide a place outside of home or work where people can come together, socialize, and have fun, ideally with no or low cost of entry. This graphic envisions transforming a vacant lot into a vibrant space featuring a mix of activities, including seating, pop-up vendors, performances, and public art, to bring the community together.

Figure 51: Pop! Unity Photomontage Project: Pop! Unity Location: 129 N Pine

BEFORE 135 | Sparks of Brillliance

C

AFTER AFTER Sparks of Brillliance

| 136

FOCUS AREA 3: CASE STUDIES This plan highlights case studies demonstrating how culture and the arts can serve as catalysts for regeneration, particularly within Black communities. Southside Sanctuary in Chicago is an example of a space designed to promote arts, culture, innovation, and entrepreneurship.

Similarly, Destination Crenshaw in Los Angeles showcases how art can transform a declining commercial corridor.

Regenerating Roots, Miami, FL A vacant parcel transformed into a venue showcasing the community’s food, entertainment, and beauty products.

78th Street Studios, Celevland, OH Southside Sanctuary, Chicago, IL Gathering space that centers arts and culture, integrative wellness, sports and recreation and innovation and entrepreneurship.

A historic building that has been renewed into art galleries, artist studios, performance spaces, and music recording studios.

hic

a

C

go

e

Av

u en

Destination Crenshaw, Los Angeles California

A thriving commercial corridor linked by community spaces and pocket parks, newly planted trees, and over 100 works of art.

137 | Sparks of Brillliance

Sparks of Brillliance

| 138

FOCUS AREA 3: INTERSECTION The intersection of Chicago and Leclaire features large vacant sites that could be utilized for various short-term projects. This plan illustrates how public artwork, events, and public realm improvements can transform the intersection into a creative and economic hub.

INTERSECTION DETAIL

A

KEY MAP- AUSTIN

KEY PLAN

B

139 | Sparks of Brillliance

Sparks of Brillliance

| 140

FOCUS AREA 3: SHORT-TERM INTERVENTIONS This photomontage highlights murals. A blank gable wall adjacent to a vacant lot allows outdoor movie screenings and interactive murals. Such a space would attract visitors, while local vendors could use the area to sell their products, such as food or crafts.

Figure 52: Murals Photomontage Project: Murals Location: 899 N Leclaire Ave

BEFORE 141 | Sparks of Brillliance

1A

AFTER AFTER Sparks of Brillliance

| 142

FOCUS AREA 3: SHORT-TERM INTERVENTIONS In the evenings, the space could host community movie nights, food markets, live performances, and engaging activities, creating a lively atmosphere that brings people together.

Figure 53: Outdoor Movies Photomontage Project: Outdoor Movies Location: 899 N Leclaire Ave

BEFORE 143 | Sparks of Brillliance

2A

AFTER AFTER AFTER Sparks of Brillliance

| 144

FOCUS AREA 3: SHORT-TERM INTERVENTIONS In the winter, the space could host seasonal activities such as ice skating or holiday markets, further engaging the community.

Figure 54: Winter Murals Photomontage Project: Winter Murals Location: 899 N Leclaire Ave

BEFORE 145 | Sparks of Brillliance

3A

AFTER Sparks of Brillliance

| 146

FOCUS AREA 3: SHORT-TERM INTERVENTIONS This photomontage highlights temporary workshop space. This artwork illustrates how flexible spaces, such as artist workshops/ studios, small business spaces, or maker spaces, could be created using shipping containers.

These containers can be placed on vacant lots to provide adaptable workspaces and easily removed when the lot is ready for permanent development.

Figure 55: Workshop Photomontage Project: Workshop Montage Location: 899 N Leclaire Ave

BEFORE 147 | Sparks of Brillliance

B

AFTER AFTER Sparks of Brillliance

| 148

FOCUS AREA 3: SHORT-TERM INTERVENTIONS This photomontage highlights makers’ space.

A more permanent development might include makers’ spaces on the ground floor with residential units above. This building would support the local creative community by providing residents with a space to develop their craft and turn it into a profit-generating business.

Figure 56: Makers Space Photomontage Project: Makers Space Location: 5135 W August Blvd

BEFORE 149 | Sparks of Brillliance

C

AFTER Sparks of Brillliance

| 150

WAVES OF TRANSFORMATION

FOCUS AREA 1: LONG-TERM PLAN Focus 1: Promoting Sustainability and Food Access The first long-term axis emphasizes emphasizes a forward-thinking approach to sustainability, food equity, and active transportation. The plan introduces green corridors, bike infrastructure, and rain gardens to build environmental resilience and promote alternative mobility. Urban agriculture, food pop-ups, and farmers markets address critical food access challenges and foster healthier and more self-sufficient communities. Mixed-use buildings and pocket parks activate spaces for daily life, while solar farms and green roofs integrate renewable energy solutions. Together, these strategies create a future-ready neighborhood that prioritizes ecological balance and community well-being.

Neighborhood Key Map

Plan Key Map

153 | Waves of Transformation

Waves of Transformation

| 154

FOCUS AREA 2: LONG-TERM PLAN Focus 2: Improving Community Connectivity and Social Infrastructure The second massing axis emphasizes creating a connected, inclusive, and vibrant community.

Proposed actions prioritize enhancing existing public spaces and promoting opportunities for social and economic interaction. Key strategies include improving parks, adding affordable housing, and integrating community gathering spaces. Shared workspaces, small local businesses, and mixed-use buildings further support a vibrant and dynamic urban environment. Streetscape improvements and after-school spaces address both mobility and youth engagement, ensuring that the neighborhood becomes a safe, thriving, and accessible place for all.

Neighborhood Key Map

Plan Key Map

155 | Waves of Transformation

Waves of Transformation

| 156

FOCUS AREA 3: LONG-TERM PLAN Focus 3: Celebrating Culture, Creativity, and Innovation The third Massing Axon explores the integration of arts, culture, and economic opportunity into the urban fabric. This vision focuses on transforming underutilized spaces into vibrant hubs of activity through adaptive reuse, business incubators, and studio space. Public art, including murals and open art installations, enriches the neighborhood’s identity while encouraging creative expression. Maker’s markets and green paving initiatives further emphasize sustainability and community-driven growth.

By weaving together culture and entrepreneurship, the design strengthens the neighborhood’s sense of place and drives long-term innovation.

Neighborhood Key Map

Plan Key Map

157 | Waves of Transformation

Waves of Transformation

| 158

IMPLEMENTATION

IMPLEMENTATION

LONG-TERM URBAN DESIGN STRATEGIES

OVERVIEW

BEAUTIUFL AUSTIN YEAR 5

The transformation Austin will unfold over several decades, ultimately creating a vibrant, connected, and inclusive neighborhood. In the early stages, development will focus on pilot projects that spark short-term improvements, such as the creation of community spaces, enhancements to streetscapes, and the support of local businesses. These initial successes will serve to attract further investment to the area.

We now move out of the Focus Areas and start to look at how this development framework might be applied to Austin as a whole – creating Your Austin – where beauty is for everyone.

Within a five-year time frame our three focus areas have been developed and now there is an explosion of short-term projects which are beginning to link together leading to more permanent smaller-scale development projects and investment is being attracted into the area.

As the transformation progresses, various portions of Austin will see the successes of these projects and begin to implement even more, strengthening their unique identities centered around sustainability, cultural heritage, and the arts, while major streets are improved to better connect these evolving neighborhoods.

As time goes on, vacant lots will be developed and abandoned buildings repurposed, breathing new life into underutilized spaces.

Over the years, the neighborhood will become more connected, with safe, green streets and accessible transit improving mobility and making it easier for residents and visitors to navigate through and around Austin. With each stageof implementation, Austin will gradually attract new residents and businesses, leading to the revitalization of key corridors with mixed-use, highdensity developments that provide affordable and diverse housing, retail, and services.

Ultimately, Austin will evolve with a strong sense of community and cultural identity.

The long-term improvements will not only transform Austin itself but will also generate positive change in neighboring areas, creating a ripple effect of growth and opportunity throughout the wider community.

161 | Implementation

Implementation

| 162

LONG-TERM URBAN DESIGN STRATEGIES BEAUTIUFL AUSTIN YEAR 10 By year ten, other ‘patches’ are beginning to follow the initial pilots in focus areas 1, 2, and 3 and are slowly developing their own distinctive characteristics around greening, cultural heritage, and arts and culture curation. In addition, the ‘seams’ or major streets that create a ½-mile square grid are starting to develop as part of a concurrent municipal initiative.

This interconnected network of public realm

163 | Implementation

improvements links the various patches together.

Infill development is now being undertaken throughout Austin on remaining vacant lots and abandoned buildings are being adaptively reused.

BEAUTIUFL AUSTIN YEAR 15 By year 15 the ‘quilt’ is beginning to be seen.

Redevelopment efforts being undertaken in every patch and the seams are now fully connected allowing residents to traverse the whole of Austin via green, and safe streets by a range of accessible multimodal transportation options that have resulted from a concurrent municipal effort.

Implementation

| 164

LONG-TERM URBAN DESIGN STRATEGIES BEAUTIUFL AUSTIN YEAR 20 In year 20, the quilt has now fully matured, with the city’s once fragmented zones now fully interconnected with green streets, pedestrian-friendly pathways, and an expanded multimodal transportation network.

By year 20, this transformation is evident in everyday life: people of all ages and backgrounds are reaping the benefits of these interventions through a range of transportation

165 | Implementation

methods, improved environmental and economic development, and an overall increased quality of life.

BEAUTIUFL AUSTIN YEAR 25 In year 25, the momentum is now so significant that Austin’s population decline has been reversed. The Austin community is attracting new residents and businesses to the point that key corridors are being densified via new highdensity mixed-use development.

Implementation

| 166

LONG-TERM URBAN DESIGN STRATEGIES BEAUTIUFL AUSTIN YEAR 30+ At 30 years plus, Austin has become one of the most dynamic and attractive neighborhoods in Chicago, while retaining the community and cultural identity that made it special to begin with. The improvements made within Austin are starting to branch out into neighboring areas.

This page has been intentionally left blank

167 | Implementation

Implementation

| 168

FOCUS AREA 1: IMPLEMENTATION The process of implementing these complex projects can be challenging without proper funding or support. To address this, the project team has developed an implementation matrix for twenty-three potential projects, ranging from

short- to long-term, outlining key sites, partners, and funding sources. This matrix will help Territory and other organizations streamline initiatives to achieve the goals.

The projects are divided into three timelines: short-term (1–5 years), mid-term (5–10 years), and long-term (10+ years). This helps the team focus resources and achieve goals step by step.

PROJECT

DESCRIPTION

LOCATION

TIMEFRAME

PRINCIPLES

PARTNERS

FUNDING SOURCES

Urban Agriculture

Identify strategic vacant parcels of land to be used for community farms and allotments.

4852 - 4856 W Race Ave

Short

Advocating for Environmental Justice, Strenghtening Community Identity, Supporting Economic Vitality, Fostering Community Reslience

DPD, Austin Coming Together, Alderman Office, Territory, Neighborspace, Forty Acres Fresh Market, Community Garden Organizations

Sweetwater Foundation, EPA, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, MacArthur Foundation Service/ Planning Grant

Improve Existing Parks

Upgrade existing parks Levin Park, Austin Park through enhanced landscaping and improved sports and recreation facilities.

Short

Advocating for Environmental Justice

Chicago Park District, DPD

Chicago Park District

Rain Gardens

Identify strategic vacant land to be used for Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS).

4936 W Hubbard St

Short

Advocating for Environmental Justice

MWRD. City of Chicago, Neighborspace, Green Corps Chicago, CNT

USEPA, IL EPA, MWRD Green Infrastructure Partnership Program

Green Roofs

Identify flat-roof buildings suitable for green roofs.

5351 W Lake St

Short

Advocating for Environmental Justice

MWRD. DPD, Delta Institute

ComEd's Energy Efficiency Program, USEPA Grants for Green Infrastructure, Illinois Clean Energy Community Foundation

Greenways

Connect existing parks and Kinzie corridor community gardens through a network of green streets.

Medium

Advocating for Environmental Justice

DPD, Alderman Office, Chicago Park District, The Morton Arboretum

City of Chicago, MWRD Green Infrastructure Partnership Program, Openlands

Farmers' Market

Identify a site for a recurring farmers' market.

Short

Advocating for Environmental Justice, Supporting Economic Vitality, Fostering Community Reslience

Alderman Office, Austin Coming Together, DCASE, Neighborspace

City of Chicago, Sweetwater Foundation, USDA Farmers Market Promotion Program, DCASE, DCEO

Community Energy

Identify opportunities for 339 N Parkside Ave community-owned renewable energy generation, including solar photovoltaic panels and district heating.

Short

Advocating for Environmental Justice, Supporting Economic Vitality, Fostering Community Reslience

ComEd, Chicago Department of Environment and Sustainability, DPD, Austin Coming Together

ComEd Energy Efficiency Program, Illinois Solar for All, Federal Solar Investment Tax Credit, MacArthur Foundation

Community Pocket Park

Identify opportunities for small, 521-525 N Laramie Ave active green spaces within existing neighborhoods.

Short

Advocating for Environmental Justice and Fostering Community Reslience

Neighborspace, Local Land Banks, Alderman Office

Openlands, Chicago Park District

Fresh Grocery Store

Identify a site for a new community-owned grocery store to sell locally grown produce.

5333 Lake St - Sprout Lofts

Medium

Advocating for Environmental Justice, Supporting Economic Vitality

Forty Acres

Sweetwater Foundation, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, MacArthur Foundation Service/ Planning Grant

Cycling Infrastructure

Create a segregated bike lane network.

W Lake St, Central Ave

Medium

Advocating for Environmental Justice

CDOT

CDOT, Safe Routes to School

169 | Implementation

4850 W Race Ave

Implementation

| 170

FOCUS AREA 2: IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT

DESCRIPTION

LOCATION

TIMEFRAME

PRINCIPLES

PARTNERS

FUNDING SOURCES

Austin Historic Trail

Utilize signage to draw attention to important historic buildings and people.

Start/end Austin town hall

Short

Strenghtening Community Identity, Redressing Harm

SSA#72, City of Chicago (DCASE and DPD), Austin Chamber of Commerce

Mellon Foundation, Knight Foundation, National Trust for Historic Preservation, Illinois Transprotation Enhancements Program (ITEP), Cook County Communuity Development Block Grant (CDBG) Public Service/Planning Grant, National endowment for the humanities, Chicago Park District, NEH

Affordable Housing

Develop and build affordable 148 N Lotus Ave housing typologies based on contemporary reimaginings of popular local housing styles.

Medium

Supporting Economic Vitality, Fostering Community Reslience, Redressing Harm

llinois Housing Development Authority (IHDA), Austin Coming Together

LIHTC Funds, LISC, DPD, Austin Chamber of Commerce

Austin Gateways

Upgrade the Central Green Line station through landscaping, safety features, and artwork to create a gateway to Austin town center.

Central Green Line Station

Short

Strenghtening Community Identity, Redressing Harm

SSA, DPD, Chicago Park District,Choose Chicago, Austin Chamber of Commerce, Austin African American Business Networking Association

Alderman Office Funds, Choose Chicago, IL Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity (DCEO) Office of Tourism, LISC, CMAP

Third Spaces

Identify locations for low- or no-cost third spaces such as cafes, shared workspaces, etc.

Lots: 155 N Pine Ave, 424 N Lockwood Ave

Short

Strenghtening Community Identity, Fostering Community Reslience

DPD, Austin Coming Together, Territory, Alderman Office (29, 37,24), Chicago Architecture Center

DCASE, Chicago Community Trust, U for Urban Impact,National Endowment for the Arts, National Endowment for the Arts Our Town Creative Placemaking Grants, Project for Public Spaces Community Placemaking Grants

129 N Pine

Short

Fostering Community Reslience

Territory, Austin Coming Together, Front Porch Arts Center, Root2Fruit, local schools

Chicago Public Schools

Medium

Strenghtening Community Identity, Supporting Economic Vitality

CDOT, DPD, CTA, SSA#72, Austin Chamber of Commerce

CDOT Make Way for People Program, USDOT Safe Streets for All (SS4A) Grant Funding, Alderman Office Funds, Choose Chicago

After-School Spaces Create safe after-school recreation spaces for children and teenagers.

Austin High Street

Implement street Central Ave improvements, including wider footways, enhanced hard surfacing, and street furniture.

171 | Implementation

Implementation

| 172

FOCUS AREA 3: IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT

DESCRIPTION

LOCATION

TIMEFRAME

PRINCIPLES

PARTNERS

FUNDING SOURCES

Makers Spaces

Create small studio and workshop spaces where makers, craftspeople, and artists can develop their skills.

4857 W Iowa St (bldg)

Short

Supporting Economic Vitality

DPD, Austin Coming Together, Austin Chamber of Commerce, Territory, Austin African American Business Networking Association

City of Chicago, Lohengrin Foundation, Ford Foundation, Project for Public Spaces, Ford Foundation, Tax Increment Finance funds, Community Placemaking Grants

Business Incubators

Provide small, low-rent office 1020-1024 N Cicero and workshop spaces for local Avenue businesses and entrepreneurs.

Short

Supporting Economic Vitality

Austin Chamber of Commerce, Austin African American Business Networking Association

Ford Foundation, The Kresge Foundation, Small Business Improvement Funds, LISC

Murals

Commission local artists to create murals on blank walls and abandoned buildings.

Gable of 5058 W Chicago Ave

Short

Strenghtening Community Identity

SSA#72, Territory, Front Porch Arts Center

Graham Foundation, Driehaus Foundation, DCASE, IL Arts Council, SSA, Kresge Foundation

Community Arts and Heritage Center

Build a local arts venue in the north of Austin for hosting music, performances, and exhibitions, with rehearsal space included.

5058 W Chicago Ave

Medium

Strenghtening Community Identity, Redressing Harm

DPD, Austin Coming Together, Alderman Office (29, 37,24), Territory, Austin African American Business Networking Association, Front Porch Arts Center

Graham Foundation, Driehaus Foundation, DCASE, Lohengrin Foundation, Ford Foundation,LISC, Kresge Foundation

Makers Market

Build a local arts venue in the north of Austin for hosting music, performances, and exhibitions, with rehearsal space included.

1020-1024 N Cicero Avenue

Short

Supporting Economic Vitality

Austin Chamber of Commerce, Austin African American Business Networking Association

Ford Foundation, Small Business Improvement Funds, LISC, Kresge Foundation

Adaptive Reuse

Identify abandoned industrial buildings that could be brought back into use, either temporarily or permanently.

1124 Cicero Avenue - Cafe/ Long Coffee shop

Supporting Economic Vitality, Redressing Harm

Austin Coming Together, Austin Chamber of Commerce, Austin African American Business Networking Association

LISC

Green Paving

Replace hard bituminous surfaces with permeable and/ or green paving.

1020-1024 N Cicero Avenue

Advocating for Environmental Justice

CDOT, MWRD, Austin Coming Together, NeighborSpace

Illinois Green Infrastructure Grants, ComEd Green Region Program, LISC

173 | Implementation

Short

Implementation

| 174

UNITED AUSTIN THRIVING AUSTIN GROWING AUSTIN VIBRANT AUSTIN COLORFUL AUSTIN RESILIENT AUSTIN BEAUTIFUL AUSTIN YOUR AUSTIN