COT Course Evaluation Sample

Page 1

Online Faculty Course Evaluations

College of Technology Faculty Course Evaluation ** Click here to return to the class listing page (this will not submit your evaluation) **

Evaluation Information Course

Title

Professor

10016

CourseDescript (DE): CrseTopicDescr (Component)

Last, First M 10016

**This form is specifically intended to be used for the above listed course number and professor. Note: This form will not be saved in any way until you click submit. You must click submit. Once submitted, you will not be able to return to this form to change answers. Evaluation forms can not be reset under any circumstances.

Section 1

Student Information 1) Gender Male Female

2) Classification Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior Post Baccalaureate Graduate

3) Student Major (Undergraduate) ET - Mechanical Engineering Technology ET - Electrical Power Engineering Technology ET - Construction Management ET - Surveying ET - Computer Engineering Technology ET - Biotechnology ILT - Information System Technology ILT - Technology Leadership and Supervision ILT - Logistics and Supply Chain HDCS - Consumer Science and Merchandising

http://localhost:4019/CourseEvaluation.aspx[1/28/2010 10:48:34 AM]


Online Faculty Course Evaluations

HDCS - Human Resource Development

4) Student Major (Graduate) ILT - Technology Project Management ILT - Technology Project Management / Information Security ILT - Technology Project Management / Logistics ET - Construction Mangement Technology ET - Network Communications HDCS - Human Resource Development HDCS - Futures

5) This course meets my requirements for: Major requirement Core reqirement Elective Other

6) Course Delivery Lecture Blended/Hybrid Online

7) Expected Course Grade A AB+ B BC+ C CD F W I

8) Overall GPA <2.0 2.00 - 2.49 2.50 - 2.99 3.00 - 3.50 3.51 - 4.00

http://localhost:4019/CourseEvaluation.aspx[1/28/2010 10:48:34 AM]


Online Faculty Course Evaluations

Section 2

College Items Please respond to the following statements using the scale below E = Excellent, G = Good, A = Average, BA = Below Average, P = Poor Â

E

G

A

BA

P

O

AA

A

BA

P

9) Quality of text books

10) Contribution to my professional growth and development

11) Level to which this course met my learning expectations

12) Instructor presentation of material

13) Intructor response to student questions

14) Instructor organization

15) Instructional effectiveness

16) Fairness of grading

Section 3

Administration 17) I had a desire to take this course Yes No

18) The instructor remained in the room while I filled out this evaluation. Yes No

Section 4

Common University-Wide Items Please respond to the following statements using the scale below O = Outstanding, AA = Above Average, A = Average, BA = Below Average, P = Poor  19) The overall teching effectiveness of this instructor is

http://localhost:4019/CourseEvaluation.aspx[1/28/2010 10:48:34 AM]


Online Faculty Course Evaluations

20) The overall quality of this course is

21) This instructor's availability for individual assistance is

22) This instructor's demonstration of respect for students is

Section 5

Comments The previous sections may not have covered a basic strong or weak point of the course that you might want to relate. Thus you are encouraged to write comments related to the course. 23) What have you liked most about the course?

24) What have you liked least about the course?

25) Other comments

Section 6

Distance Education Please respond to the following statements using the scale below

SA = Strongly Agree, A = Agree, N = Neutral, D = Disagree, SD = Strongly Disagree, NA = Not Applicable  26) Course Objectives were clearly indicated in the syllabus or somewhere online

27) The quizzes/tests and/or assignments were related to the lectures and course material

28) Grading criteria for this course was clear

http://localhost:4019/CourseEvaluation.aspx[1/28/2010 10:48:34 AM]

SA

A

N

D

SD

NA


Online Faculty Course Evaluations 29) The instructor or TA provided timely feedback and was available to discuss my progress

30) The technology used to deliver this course was helpful [beneficial] to learning the material

31) Technical assistance was available when I needed it

32) Additional Comments

 Š 2009 The University of Houston. All rights reserved. 4800 Calhoun Road, Houston, Texas 77204 (713) 743-2255

http://localhost:4019/CourseEvaluation.aspx[1/28/2010 10:48:34 AM]


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.