


Fort Pierce City Attorney Tanya Earley is resigning while the City balks at its contractual obligation for the purchase agreement of Fisherman's Wharf.
In June 2020, the City began accepting proposals to redevelop the 3.2-acre city-owned waterfront property located north of the south causeway bridge. Shelli and Associates proposed Pierce 1 Marina, a mixed-use luxury waterfront destination complete with restaurants, residential and retail space, and a fully-automated innovative dry stack boat storage facility called, "The Boat House."
At a Fort Pierce Redevelopment Agency (FPRA) Board Meeting on March 22, 2021, Mayor Linda Hudson said the boat house technology is "absolutely fascinating" and a "game changer." The Mayor said the project was "another way to put Fort Pierce on the map" and will be a "really, really big attraction." At the meeting, FPRA board members voted unanimously to enter into contract negotiations
with Shelli and Associates.
In a press release following the vote Mayor Hudson stated, “The FPRA wanted a project that would act as a buffer between our thriving Downtown and the Port of Fort Pierce. Shelli Associates or Pierce 1 offers exactly that, with a state-of-the-art boat storage facility, restaurants and other amenities. Best of all, the approved project retains the public access to the waterfront. Our negotiations have resulted in an agreement that protects our city and its taxpayers. This project joins another promising redevelopment project, Kings Landing, to make the future look very bright for the Sunrise City."
On August 16, 2021, the City and FPRA entered into an Agreement for the Purchase and Development of Fisherman's Wharf with Pierce 1 Marina. Shelli and Associates agreed to pay $5 million for the property and pay to have the Black Pearl Boat Ramp relocated to a safer and more accessible location just north of

Fisherman’s Wharf at Harbor Pointe.
But nearly two years later the $75 million project remains at a standstill. The main obstacle is a title issue that dates back to 1954 when the state gave the City 1.5 acres within Fisherman's Wharf for public access.
So prior to closing the deal, The City of Fort Pierce has a contractual obligation to cure title objections, including a deed restriction with the State of Florida requiring state approval for any future development to ensure it is reserved for public uses.
The state has sent notice to the City that they will lift the deed restriction for $1.98 million, but the City is refusing to pay and the developer in fed up.
Mayor Linda Hudson originally supported the Pierce 1 Marina plan but is now pushing back. “I am having serious doubts, if this is going to be able to have all the moving parts, put in the right play to move forward,” the Mayor said at a Commission Meeting on March 6th.
Commissioner Arnold Gaines offered Mayor Hudson some advice during the meeting:

Commissioner Curtis Johnson warned, “If your title’s not clear you can't transfer nothing,” and Commissioner Gaines said “We haven’t done what we said we are going to do.”
After discussion at the March 6th meeting, Commissioners voted for a third extension to the purchase agreement and now have until September 2023 to clear title defects.
“It’s a hot mess,” Mayor Linda Hudson said.
Fort Pierce City Attorney Tanya Earley told City Commissioners and the Mayor, “The City has the obligation under the contract to exercise reasonable care in clearing those issues.”
Commissioner Arnold Gaines expressed his support of Earley, “I have faith in our City Attorney.”
But following the meeting Earley resigned as City Attorney and developer Chris Shelli questions,“Who is running the City of Fort Pierce?”
During the 2022 State of the City Address, Commissioner Jeremiah Johnson said, "We are all very excited about this project as the technology and uniqueness of the proposed boat house is yet another highlight that puts fort pierce on the map.”
The Pierce 1 Marina project remains in the approval phase.
A spokesperson for the Fort Pierce City Attorney’s Office confirmed with the Dish that Ms. Earley will leave her position in mid-July but would not comment on why.



St. Lucie Public Schools Board Member Jennifer Richardson is standing up to resistance from Superintendent John Prince and her fellow board members.
In November 2020, 77,000 St. Lucie County residents voted for change. They ousted six-term incumbent School Board Member Kathryn Hensley in favor of Richardson, a political newcomer.
But following the retirement of Superintendent Wayne Gent in February 2020, the School Board voted 4-1 to hire John Prince as his replacement, and Richardson was the lone dissenting vote.
Prince, who once entered into a diversion agreement with the State Attorney's Office to avoid jail for misusing his school's credit card has a history of bullying school employees.
So Prince began retaliating against Richardson by refusing to provide her information necessary to preform her duties and even told her he would charge her a fee for records she requested from his office.
Now Richardson is fighting back. At a School Board Workshop in April, Richardson said, “I’m not your house girl,” and soon after Prince agreed to meet with Richardson weekly to update her.



The St. Lucie County Tax Collector's Office hired former Fort Pierce City Commissioner Edward Becht as General Counsel without considering other candidates.
Becht was first elected to the Fort Pierce City Commission in 2004; in 2013, the Florida Commission on Ethics investigated him for misuse of his position to help in his private law practice.
After leaving public office, Becht accepted a job as General Counsel at the St. Lucie County Tax Collector's Office. He earned $92,153.86 in 2022.
Although the Federal Government declared an end COVID-19 Public Health Emergency, a sign remains visible on Becht’s downtown office, “In responses to the Coronavirus Pandemic and for the safety of our staff our office is closed to the public.”
Today, Becht draws a public salary to offer legal advice and accepts private clients that pay for his legal defense.
When the Tax Collector's Office hired Becht, they did not publicly advertise the position or solicit more qualified candidates to apply.
Becht is an at-will employee with the Tax Collector's Office and did not enter into or sign a contract with the government organization. As such, no safeguards are in place to prevent conflicts arising from Becht's personal practice and professional obligation. In fact, nothing stops Becht from seeing his private clients












