FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA
SERVING THE UC DAVIS CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY SINCE 1915
@THECALIFORNIAAGGIE
THE CALIFORNIA AGGIE
THEAGGIE.ORG
@CALIFORNIAAGGIE
@CALIFORNIAAGGIE
VOLUME 140, ISSUE 6 | THURSDAY, OCTOBER 28, 2021
YOLO COUNTY HOLDS FREE FLU SHOT CLINICS DURING OCTOBER AND NOVEMBER Flu vaccines will help prevent the possibility of a double pandemic BY SHRADDHA JHINGAN city@theaggie.org Yolo County announced that it will be holding free flu shot clinics during the month of October to help protect residents against the flu, according to a press release published on Oct. 8. More clinics will also be added to the list for November as well. “Yolo County strongly encourages residents to protect themselves and their loved ones from influenza (flu) this year by vaccinating,” the press release reads. The locations of upcoming flu shot clinics include the Yolo County HHSA Building on Oct. 26, in the River City Room and the Knights Landing Family Resource Center on Oct. 29. Additionally, another clinic was held at Davis Senior Center on Oct. 19 and the Yolo County Office of Education on Oct. 12. The hours of the respective clinics can be found in the press release. John Fout, the public information officer for Yolo County, explained the impact that the free flu shot clinics will have on residents in Yolo County. “The free clinics are spread around the county, including unincorporated areas like Esparto and Knight’s Landing,” Fout said via email. “The free flu shot removes the need to pay for a shot. This assists our residents with convenience and best of all, it comes at no cost.” Fout added that the free clinics also help “older residents who need the flu shots the most but live on a budget,” among others. “Our hope is that this availability and no cost increases the number of people getting a flu
shot,” Fout said via email. “The more people who get the flu shot, the less likely we will have flu hospitalizations, further stressing our healthcare system and our hard working, but exhausted healthcare workers.” The UC is now also mandating flu vaccines for employees and students. “The more shots we get out there, the better,” a UC Davis employee said in a video by ABC10. The CDC also published a video in Sept. 2020, discussing the importance of getting a flu shot. “The more people vaccinated, the more people protected,” the video narrator said. “Get your flu vaccine to protect yourself and your loved ones.” In addition to the flu shots, a certain number of first doses of the COVID-19 vaccine will also be provided at the locations of the flu shot clinics. The Yolo County press release also explains how the flu shot clinics operate, in terms of appointments. “All sites will be walk up sites, with some indoor locations,” the press release reads. “Appointments are not required but recommended and can be made by calling (530) 666-8552.” Fout explained that appointments are encouraged however. “We encourage appointments, but walk ups are always welcome,” Fout said via email. “The only exception was the Davis Senior Center, as they specifically requested appointments to better manage the traffic flow in a small space.”
In addition to the flu shot clinics, people can also get flu shots at pharmacies like Rite Aid and CVS, as well as on campus. The press release also shares common symptoms of the flu, such as a fever, as well as ways to help prevent it. Ultimately, Fout explained that the flu shots will not only help prevent the flu, but also the onset of a double pandemic.
“We avoided a double pandemic last year, as many people were taking every precaution to prevent COVID and flu and restrictions were in place,” Fout said via email. “This year, a double pandemic is a very real possibility, and we want to prevent the increased burden on our healthcare system, that is already struggling under the weight of the COVID pandemic.”
Flu Clinic Center at Davis Senior Citizens Center on A Street. (Quinn Spooner / Aggie)
CONTROVERSY ARISES OVER THE FUTURE OF THE G STREET CLOSURE City council planning on reviewing the closure while local business owners weigh in BY RACHEL SHEY city@theaggie.org
G Street (Quinn Spooner / Aggie) On Sept. 24, The Artery co-owner and artist Adele Shaw posted an open letter on the Davisite, expressing dismay over the continued closure on G Street. “A permanent closure of the street will likely cause the death of many of the non-restaurant businesses on G Street,” the letter reads. “The city issued TUP’s [Temporary Use Permits] during “emergency” times but they’ve created another emergency all together- an inequitable restaurant
takeover on G Street. It may look like a party when you’re picking up a pizza or having a beer, but it’s not an equitable, harmonious party.” In the letter, Shaw described the closure as “a hastily planned and poorly executed response to the Pandemic that only addresses outdoor food service: mainly to the benefit of a few chain-run businesses and to the detriment of the locallyowned majority of the businesses affected by the street closure.”
According to Shaw, the closure has eliminated parking spots, which creates parking issues in the surrounding area, and the barricades are unsightly to residents and merchants. Others, such as Davis Vanguard Executive Editor David Greenwald, hope that the G Street closure becomes permanent. “Indoor dining is back open, but, as someone who works on that block, I can tell you that the outdoor eating is filled most days,” Greenwald wrote for the Davis Vanguard. “You see people outside on the street in that area all of the time—and people are around and able to safely congregate in public outdoor spaces.” Greenwald believes that G Street has been improved by the closure and would now be “very dead” if it were not for the outdoor seating. “The way G Street was before was unkempt,” Greenwald wrote. “Homeless people and debris next to the parking lot. Homeless people and their belongings in the doorways of closed-off businesses.” Greenwald also said that G Street was “never a major road.” “In fact, I would argue that it was illsuited as arterial,” Greenwald wrote. “One of the major problems is that it narrowed at the parking garage, which created all sorts of traffic problems. There were always vehicles backing out of parking spots. At midday the delivery trucks would partially block the street.” City councilman Dan Carson assured that the public would be allowed to contribute their opinions on any decision. “In the past, meaning a couple of months ago, members of the City Bicycle Transportation
and Street Safety commission weighed in wanting us to make the changes at G Street permanent,” Carson said. “Our normal process is that once city staff has a recommendation for us, they’ll bring it to city council as an agendized matter, and we’ll let the public weigh in, including those with businesses as well as others in the community.” Carson explained that the council plans on reconsidering the closure again very soon. “We’d always planned to periodically review the arrangements we made when COVID-19 hit hard, to close or restrict certain streets to traffic, and we will be doing that again soon,” Carson said. “In particular, the city of Davis asked the Davis Downtown Business Association to talk to its membership, which includes retailers as well as restaurants, to see what they think should be done.” The city is also trying to solve the problems that people have complained about, according to Carson. “We are doing some things to address some of the underlying issues we heard about,” Carson said. “So for example, there was concern that downtown needed to be cleaned up, and we’ve actually been making considerable effort lately to power wash places and clean up trash. The city council adopted collectively a new set of goals for the next two year cycle. We’ve heard a lot about trash, not just in downtown, so we directed our city staff that we wanted to make it a priority to spruce up our downtown, to make it a more attractive place.”
ASUCD ENDS YEAR-AND-A-HALF LONG STATE OF EMERGENCY As national, state and local governments return to normal operations, ASUCD follows suit BY KATHLEEN QUINN campus@theaggie.org On Oct. 7, ASUCD ended its state of emergency which began in March 2020, the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. The original declaration of state of emergency included the cancellation of in-person meetings of 10 or more people and a transition to meeting via Zoom. It also closed several ASUCD units including the CoHo, KDVS, in-person events like Picnic Day and the Whole Earth Festival and the Pantry. The declaration was later revised as the pandemic progressed. Ryan Manriquez, the ASUCD president and a fourth-year double majoring in political science and communication, said that the decision to end the state of emergency came naturally as national, state and local state of emergencies were removed. Reimbursements for units, committees and commissions required approval by the controller and the business manager alone. The decision replaces pandemic procedures where the controller and business manager made most major decisions. This included reimbursement funds for units, committees and commissions which were not reimbursed without their approval. Kabir Sahni, the ASUCD senate president pro tempore and a fourth-year double majoring in communication and international relations, said that although pandemic procedures were intended to speed things up and streamline
decision-making, as the campus returns to inperson instruction, it has created a bottle-neck at the top, slowing down activity within the association. Though the state of emergency could have been ended by an act of the president in consultation with the cabinet and the senate pro tempore according to the ASUCD Bylaws, the senate made the decision to discontinue the state of emergency by a two-thirds majority. “I advised them to wait about a week or two because of the numbers coming from the [internal affairs commission],” Manriquez said. “The books close for ASUCD in late July but we don’t get the final numbers until mid to late October so I wanted to be able to wait to 100% confidently make that determination that we were going to be OK.” Sahni said he felt the decision not to move forward with the letter to discontinue the state of emergency was done without appropriate communication with the senate. “Suddenly he made the decision that he didn’t want to send out the letter to end it because he’s holding out for some numbers,” Sahni said. “I was not consulted, but the bylaws state that the only voice from senate members consulted is the pro tem.” Aidan Kato, an interim senator and a third-
Mee room located in ASUCD business office. (Quinn Spooner / AGGIE) year majoring in international relations, was the one member of the senate who voted against ending the state of emergency. He said he did so because he didn’t understand the consequences of voting yes until after the vote was taken. “As an interim senator, I was never briefed on or informed of the effects of the state of emergency—just that it was in existence,” Kato
said via email. Despite the particulars of how the vote and letter were sent out, the general consensus was that it was time for the state of emergency to end. “The argument that the campus is no longer in a state of emergency is really all the argument we need to no longer be in one,” Manriquez said.