FOLLOW OUR SOCIALS
@THECALIFORNIAAGGIE
SERVING THE UC DAVIS CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY SINCE 1915
THEAGGIE.ORG
@THECALIFORNIAGAGGIE
@THECALIFORNIAAGGIE
VOLUME 149, ISSUE 04 | THURSDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2025
UC Davis Law Student Association reinstated The graduate student government was initially suspended in March over BDS legislation BY RIVERS STOUT campus@theaggie.org !e UC Davis Law Student Association (LSA) has been reinstated, with the university lifting their March suspension of the student government over its passing of a constitutional amendment that would have enforced Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) rules on student groups requesting funding from the LSA. The amendment, which was never officially implemented, was found by university officials to have violated restrictions on student governments to make decisions on a “viewpointneutral basis.” While the LSA appealed the amendment on April 19, the university did not confirm that they would be reinstated until late summer. !e end of the suspension returns control of LSA funds to students and creates a noncommittal Ethical Spending Committee. The suspension of LSA, which represents over 660 students, upset many in the King Hall community and was the subject of several protests and criticism. !e LSA did not provide a comment on their reinstatement by the time of publication. In a statement addressing the matter, a university spokesperson told !e California Aggie that UC Davis respects student groups’ right to free speech, but it stands firm in enforcing its funding and boycott rules. “!e decision [to reinstate the LSA] followed the vote by LSA to repeal a measure that violated University of California policy,” the university spokesperson said
King Hall, home to the School of Law at UC Davis. (Aggie File)
via email. “[That policy] requires student governments to provide financial and other tangible support for student activities and organizations on a viewpoint-neutral basis. !is policy prohibits financial boycotts of entities associated with a particular country.” “Members of the campus community may peacefully exercise their constitutional right of free
expression,” the spokesperson said. “Yet the university cannot allow disregard or violation of state or federal law and university policy. UC Davis is committed to providing an environment free of discrimination, harassment, antisemitism and other forms of hate.” !e LSA’s new Ethical Spending Committee’s framework is still being
designed, but LSA Representative Shasun Sulur noted that the university’s actions have created an uneasy relationship between itself and the student government. “[!e LSA’s suspension] has been a reflection of how student rights more broadly have been treated for the past two years, as many UC student movements’ demands have
been ignored by the regents,” Sulur said to !e Aggie in July. “!e dissolution of the LSA is another part of that. It shows an increasingly drawn line between what the UC [administration] prioritised versus what students prioritise.” In July, then-UC President Michael Drake wrote a letter to system chancellors reinforcing university policy which forbids student governments from boycotts targeted at countries. \ !is came after multiple student governments across the UC system passed legislation supporting a boycott of companies connected to Israel, whom they levy as the perpetuator of the Gaza genocide. While the Associated Students of UC Davis (ASUCD) passed similar boycott legislation with Senate Bill #52 in 2024, it was never fully implemented as intended. The ASUCD Ethical Spending Committee created by the undergraduate student government is currently an advisory committee, a decision made by student leaders in consultation with university officials. Overall, it would appear the landmark achievements reached by the ASUCD and LSA with their legislation aimed at boycotting the genocidal Israeli state have had little permanent effect. !e results of both attempts at ethical spending legislation in recent years, and the university’s successes in nullifying these efforts, brings into question the ability of student governments and university-affiliated student groups to levy their own activism in the face of official UC policy.
Two major UC unions City of Davis and UC Davis gear up for 19th Annual Davis continue contract negotiations this year Neighbors’ Night Out UPTE and AFSCME 3299 allege unfair
Davis commission emphasizes community input as it begins new year of work
labor practices, with one union having authorized a strike vote
UC Davis workers on strike in February 2025. (Aggie File) Streets of Davis without activity. The recent Annual Davis Neighbors’ Night Out event was held through various community gatherings. (Aggie File) BY ALMA CULVERWELL city@theaggie.org !e city of Davis, UC Davis and the Associated Students of UC Davis (ASUCD) invited community members to come together for the 19th Annual Davis Neighbors’ Night Out (DNNO) on Sunday, Oct. 5, 2025. !e event, which has become a Davis tradition, aimed to strengthen connections among residents, students and local organizations through neighborhood gatherings across the city, according to the city of Davis’ website. First launched to build stronger community ties, DNNO encourages neighbors, students and city leaders to meet in a casual setting. !e event is held each October to include new and returning UC Davis students in neighborhood festivities, fostering relationships between long-term residents and the campus community. Last year, more than 100 neighborhood events took place, ranging from potlucks and picnics to block parties. !is year, hosts were again encouraged to organize small gatherings in their neighborhoods, apartment complexes or community associations. !ose who registered to host were entered into a lottery for special guest visits from Davis City Council members, UC Davis mascots and Davis Police and Firefighters. Registration for this year’s event opened on Aug. 19. Residents were provided with a city event map to see the planned events in their areas. One of the organizations who brought DNNO to life this year was
KDRT 95.7 FM, Davis’ community radio station. Autumn Labbe-Renault, the executive director of KDRT media access, explained the group’s involvement and role in the event. “KDRT is a project of [the] community media center Davis Media Access (DMA),” Labbe-Renault said. “DMA frequently partners with the city, other non-profits and community organizations to help amplify events and causes.” Labbe-Renault further explained the collaboration involved for this event. “Working with the city’s Promotions Director Carrie Dyer, we produced a two-and-a-half-hour live show, aired on KDRT 95.7 FM and streamed at KDRT.org that included party music and live giveaways of gift cards provided by the city,” LabbeRenault said. Leading up to the event, KDRT also helped spread the word. LabbeRenault shared the outreach strategies they used to inform community members. “We promoted by newsletter, onair [public service announcements] PSAs, website and social media,” Labbe-Renault said. “Carrie and two neighborhood hosts also guested on KDRT’s show ‘Listening Lyrics.’” For KDRT, the partnership re#ects the station’s mission to connect people through local media. “DMA uses media tools and technology to build community,” Labbe-Renault said. “We’ve partnered with the city on this event for several years. It helps amplify the events, provide parties with a lively soundtrack
“I know in our neighborhood it’s been an important way to welcome students and build community.”
Autumn Labbe-Renault Executive Director of KDRT Media
and it’s fun.” She added that DNNO plays an important role in bringing residents together. “I know in our neighborhood it’s been an important way to welcome students and build community,” Labbe-Renault said. “(I) loved that some of the callers were longtime KDRT listeners and supporters, and that another caller was happy because he’d never won anything [before]!” Over the years, KDRT’s involvement in DNNO has evolved alongside the event itself. “We’ve gotten video some years, done live radio others,” Labbe-Renault said. “I think most people feel safer and happier when they’re known — not just ‘the folks who live down the block,’ but Bill, Carol and their dog Scout. Neighborhoods are critical building blocks in a community, and Davis takes that seriously.”
BY KHADEEJAH KHAN campus@theaggie.org As the school year begins, three major labor unions in the University of California (UC) system are still navigating contracts and negotiations. During the 2024-25 school year, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 3299 and University Professional and Technical Employees (UPTE) Communications Workers of America (CWA) 9119 went on a series of four strikes alleging unfair labor practices. In late summer, a third union, the Research and Public Service Professionals – United Auto Workers (RPSP-UAW), formed to represent research and public service professionals. !e California Aggie talked to UC leaders from these three unions to gain an understanding about the state of negotiations and labor actions moving forward. UPTE-CWA 9119 !e UPTE represents over 19,000 medical, technical and research workers throughout the UC system. The union’s top priority is addressing the “real staffing crisis at the university,” according to Amy Fletcher, a chair of UPTE’s UC Davis chapter and state union treasurer. UPTE has engaged in a series of conversations with the UC since their last strike in May. !e UC has sent its Last, Best and Final Offer (LBFO) that addresses benefits, wages and healthcare, according to Heather Hansen, a spokesperson for the UC Office of the President. However, Fletcher maintains that the offer failed to address union demands and that the UC is bargaining
in “bad-faith.” !e union has authorized a strike, following a vote that took place from Sept. 22 through Oct. 2, but has yet to announce strike dates. “Even though we don’t want to necessarily go on strike, we don’t want to walk away from our research, our patients — we will call a strike, if necessary, and our members are willing to strike if needed,” Fletcher said. Other union priorities include compensation, turnover and career progression for workers. Fletcher adds that union priorities are also student priorities, with students experiencing the impact of staff shortages. “Our students are already feeling these impacts,” Fletcher said. “We certainly don’t want to strike, but we are striking because our students are feeling the impacts of the staffing crisis.” AFSCME 3299 The AFSCME 3299 represents more than 37,000 service, patient care and skilled craft workers. Like UPTE, their most recent strike was held on May 1 of this year, and they aimed to address issues regarding affordability, unfair labor practices and job security. “We are the university’s lowest-paid workers,” Dara Streit, a communications associate at AFSCME 3299, said. “We’re living paycheck to paycheck, and the university’s current offer will keep us there. UC refuses to address the harm of rampant in#ation on our wages. It wants to get rid of our caps on healthcare increases it can implement on us, a benefit we’ve fought hard for. !ey don’t care if we’re forced to do the work of two people, and they won’t pay us like it either.” UNIONUPDATE on 7